1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a container having ribs designed to improve product evacuation from the container.
2. Description of the Related Art
When certain products are stored in plastic containers, these products become oxygen scavengers. This scavenging induces a vacuum that can cause the side surface of the container to collapse or buckle. Peanut butter and mayonnaise are examples of such products. One solution is to add more weight or thickening ribs to prevent collapse to improve the vacuum performance. Other approaches include a circumferential thickness of material, which creates an internally protruding rib. However, these solutions undesirably increase the container weight.
Another solution may be to provide ribs having about the same thickness to provide a structure to prevent buckling. However, these sort of ribs, by convention, have a symmetrical top to bottom profile. Further, to provide adequate hoop strength to prevent collapse, these ribs have tight corners leading into and out of the profile. While these ribs are used to resist internal pressures on the bottle, they have some drawbacks. In particular, products such as peanut butter, mayonnaise, and other food products are scooped or spatulated from their packaging for final use. The profile and blends (radii) make it difficult to evacuate product, especially products with higher viscosity. That is, it creates a profile below the rib, which makes it difficult to remove all of the product from the package using typical utensils.
Therefore, there is a need for an improved container that provides a structure for good vacuum resistance and product evacuation performance without undue increases in container weight.
According one aspect of this invention, a rib is provided by indenting the profile of the container to provide a structure that is resistant to deformation. While the top portion of the rib structure is somewhat shallow in depth, and the bottom of the rib has a large tangent radius flowing out of the rib at depth, back to the primary bottle surface.
According to another aspect, a container for storing a food product is provided. The container comprises a top opening for receiving a material; a side portion extending between the top opening and a bottom of the container; and an inward projecting rib disposed on the side portion having an upper portion having a radius of curvature smaller than a bottom portion of the rib.
According to another aspect, the thickness of the side portion of the container is substantially the same as a thickness of rib portion.
According to another aspect, the inward projecting rib has a transition portion between the upper portion and the bottom portion, the transition portion having a radius of curvature less than the upper portion.
According to another aspect, the radius of curvature of the upper portion ranges from 0.04 to 0.12 inches, the radius of curvature of the transition portion ranges from 0.02 to 0.10 inches and the radius of curvature of the bottom portion ranges from 0.50 to 1.0 inches.
The above and other features and aspects of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail non-limiting, exemplary embodiments thereof with reference to the attached drawings in which:
The container according to the present invention according to the non-limiting, exemplary embodiments of the present invention is described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As illustrated in
Continuous with the lead in portion 51 is a transition portion 52, which functions to turn the sidewall back toward the bottom and ultimately toward the outer circumference of the sidewall 40. The transition portion 52 turns the sidewall back toward the bottom 30 of the container 10 and slightly toward the outer sidewall. The radius of the transition portion 52 is within the range of 0.02 to 0.10 inches.
The transition portion 52 ends at the lead out portion 53, which forms a surface having less curvature than either of the lead in portion 51 or the transition portion 52. The radius of the lead out portion 53 is greater than the other rib portions to facilitate content removal. The radius of the lead out portion 53 is shown in the figures is 0.68 inches, but this radius may range from 0.50 to 1.0 inches. Most preferably, this radius is within the range of 0.68 to 0.75 inches.
Accordingly, as shown in more detail in
As a result of this configuration, the structure of the lead in portion 51 and the transition portion 52 provide for added hoop strength, whereas the lead out portion 53 provides a curved concave surface. As shown in
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, the above description should be considered in as illustrations of the exemplary embodiments only and are not for purposes of limitation. Therefore, the scope of the invention is defined not by the detailed description of the invention but by the appended claims, and all differences within the scope will be construed as being included in the present invention. Additionally, the features described in the various embodiments are not exclusive in that a feature of one embodiment may be incorporated into another embodiment.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/601,279 filed Feb. 21, 2013 in the U.S. Patent Trademark Office, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1835252 | West | Dec 1931 | A |
3117873 | Bartels et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
D235184 | Achenbach | May 1975 | S |
4921116 | Troughton et al. | May 1990 | A |
4936482 | Gallagher et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5137171 | Goeppner | Aug 1992 | A |
5303834 | Krishnakumar et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5337909 | Vailliencourt | Aug 1994 | A |
D381259 | Hayes | Jul 1997 | S |
5730315 | Richoux | Mar 1998 | A |
5803290 | Bongiorno | Sep 1998 | A |
D399129 | Ramsey | Oct 1998 | S |
D401860 | Mentasti Granelli | Dec 1998 | S |
5908128 | Krishnakumar et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6273282 | Ogg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6695162 | Boukobza et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6932230 | Pedmo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
D525129 | Hutter | Jul 2006 | S |
D538658 | Horne et al. | Mar 2007 | S |
7374055 | Hatcher et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
D596955 | Diss | Jul 2009 | S |
D596957 | Diss | Jul 2009 | S |
7748552 | Livingston et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7757874 | Ross | Jul 2010 | B2 |
D630515 | Bretz et al. | Jan 2011 | S |
D632189 | Diss | Feb 2011 | S |
D638311 | Diss | May 2011 | S |
D646169 | Bretz et al. | Oct 2011 | S |
D650703 | Westphal | Dec 2011 | S |
8070003 | True et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
D653125 | Murphy | Jan 2012 | S |
D657677 | Berzosa Sanchez | Apr 2012 | S |
D661203 | Murphy | Jun 2012 | S |
D661205 | Myers | Jun 2012 | S |
8496130 | Lane et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8505758 | Oshino | Aug 2013 | B2 |
D721586 | Sharpe et al. | Jan 2015 | S |
20040200799 | Yourist et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050121408 | Deemer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060283832 | De Cleir et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070199916 | Denner et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20110266293 | Kelley et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120074151 | Gill et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140091101 | Chiorazzi et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130213984 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61601279 | Feb 2012 | US |