Environments in which objects are managed may be complex and fluid. For example, a retail environment may include objects such as products for purchase, a distribution environment may include objects such as parcels or pallets, a manufacturing environment may include objects such as components or assemblies, a healthcare environment may include objects such as medications or medical devices. A given environment may contain a wide variety of objects with different attributes (size, shape, price and the like). Further, the placement and quantity of the objects in the environment may change frequently. Still further, imaging conditions such as lighting may vary either over time or at different locations in the environment. These factors may reduce the accuracy with which information concerning the objects may be collected within the environment.
The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.
The apparatus and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
Environments such as warehouses, distribution centers, fulfilment and sortation centers, cross-docking facilities, manufacturing plants, assembly lines, retail locations (e.g. grocery stores, general merchandise stores, department stores, convenience stores, restaurants), health care facilities and the like typically contain a wide variety of products. Each such product may have certain associated characteristics, such as size, dimension, color, serial number, or weight. Certain environments may associate one or more products into a stock keeping unit (SKU) with similar features, for instance multiple shirts with an identical fashion but available in sizes of small, medium, large, or extra-large may have the same SKU. Certain environments may assign attributes to products or to SKUs to better manage the products, such as a cost, price, batch, date code, expiration date, components and/or ingredients, packaging, tracking number, order number, shipping number, storage requirements, or the like. Within the environment, products may be arranged in stocking areas: products may be supported on shelves for selection and purchase by customers or for picking by employees, vendors, or contractors; products may be placed in a particular floor zone; set on a pallet; or collected in a bin. Shelves may be arranged in a shelving module with a single module base, but multiple shelf sections, often with a module back. A shelving module may have a door, particularly if the products are refrigerated. Sometimes shelving modules are placed side to side so that individual shelf sections align, creating a longer shelf, other times a shelf is only a single shelf section. Sometimes shelving modules are placed face to face with an aisle between them to facilitate shopping by customers, picking by employees, or stocking by vendors.
The set of products within a stocking area varies over time, as products are stocked, removed and, in some cases replaced by, customers or employees. Products that have been partially or fully depleted typically require restocking, and products that have been incorrectly replaced (referred to as “plugs”) typically require relocation to the correct stocking area. More specifically, “spreads” are classified as a single product distributed across adjacent shelf locations where a different product (SKU) is supposed to be located. In addition, products may be present on shelves but incorrectly oriented, or pushed back from a shelf edge further than a predefined target distance. Of course, objects other than products may be placed in a stocking area or on a shelf as well, such as bags, packing materials, mobile computers, scanners, merchandising materials, cleaning supplies, kiosks, signage, etc.
Further, products in such environments are often associated with labels placed on a shelf edge, a peg, racking, displays or the products themselves. The labels generally indicate a price of the associated product or SKU, and may include other information, such as the name, a manufacturer, SKU, color, dimensions, size, EAN, license information, price, promotional message, nutritional information, storage requirements, safety information, date information, and the like. The information may be in text, color, graphics, digital or analog watermarking, or barcoded, and may also be associated with data stored in circuitry within the label, such as an electronic shelf label or RFID label. The labels are subject to physical disturbance (e.g. being knocked off a shelf edge), and may also be misplaced in the environment (e.g. adjacent to the incorrect products or SKUs). Further, the label price displayed on a label may not reflect a reference price associated with the relevant product in a price book employed by point-of-sale systems.
Detecting product status issues, such as restocking or plug/spread issues, product orientation issues, or labeling issues are conventionally performed by human employees, via visual assessment of the stock areas and shelves, manual barcode scanning (e.g. to compare prices displayed on labels to reference prices), and the like. This form of detection is labor-intensive and therefore costly, as well as error-prone.
Attempts to automate the detection of product status issues are complicated by the layout and dynamic nature of the environment in which an autonomous data capture system is required to operate. Areas of several thousand square feet or more, subdivided into a number of individual aisles, may need to be inspected for issues. Digital images of the shelves vary in quality depending on the available lighting, the presence of visual obstructions, and the like. The breadth of products present on the shelves and the variations in their positioning on the shelves reduces the accuracy of machine-generated status detection.
Examples disclosed herein are directed to a product status detection system comprising: a mobile automation apparatus having sensors configured to capture data representing a shelf supporting products, responsive to data capture instructions received at the mobile automation apparatus; a server in communication with the mobile automation apparatus via a network, including: a mobile apparatus controller configured to generate data capture instructions and transmit the data capture instructions to the mobile automation apparatus; a repository configured to store captured data received via the network from the mobile automation apparatus; a primary object generator configured to retrieve the captured data and generate a plurality of primary data objects from the captured data, each of the primary data objects including a location in a common frame of reference; a secondary object generator configured to generate a set of secondary data objects based on the primary data objects, and to store the secondary data objects in the repository; a detector configured to compare the secondary data objects with reference data obtained from the repository or other data sources, and to generate mismatch records identifying mismatches between the reference data and the secondary data objects; and an alert generator configured to select a subset of the mismatch records, generate a status alert corresponding to the subset of mismatch records, and transmit the status alert via the network; and a client computing device configured to receive the status alert via the network and display the status alert.
The client computing device 105 is illustrated in
The system 100 is deployed, in the illustrated example, in a retail environment including a plurality of shelf modules 110-1, 110-2, 110-3 and so on (collectively referred to as shelves 110, and generically referred to as a shelf 110—this nomenclature is also employed for other elements discussed herein). Each shelf module 110 supports a plurality of products 112. Each shelf module 110 includes a shelf back 116-1, 116-2, 116-3 and a support surface (e.g. support surface 118-3 as illustrated in
The server 101 includes a special purpose imaging controller, such as a processor 120, specifically designed to control the mobile automation apparatus 103 to capture data, obtain the captured data via a communications interface 124 and store the captured data in a repository 132 in a memory 122. The server 101 is further configured to perform various post-processing operations on the captured data and to detect the status of the products 112 on the shelves 110. When certain status indicators are detected by the processor 120, the server 101 is also configured to transmit status notifications (e.g. notifications indicating that products are out-of-stock, low stock or misplaced) to the mobile device 105. The post-processing of captured data and the detection of status and generation of notifications by the server 101 will be discussed below in greater detail.
The processor 120 is interconnected with a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as the above-mentioned memory 122, having stored thereon computer readable instructions for executing control of the apparatus 103 to capture data, as well as the above-mentioned post-processing functionality, as discussed in further detail below. The memory 122 includes a combination of volatile (e.g. Random Access Memory or RAM) and non-volatile memory (e.g. read only memory or ROM, Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory or EEPROM, flash memory). The processor 120 and the memory 122 each comprise one or more integrated circuits. In an embodiment, the processor 120, further includes one or more central processing units (CPUs) and/or graphics processing units (GPUs). In an embodiment, a specially designed integrated circuit, such as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), is designed to perform the object status detection discussed herein, either alternatively or in addition to the imaging controller/processor 120 and memory 122. As those of skill in the art will realize, the mobile automation apparatus 103 also includes one or more controllers or processors and/or FPGAs, in communication with the controller 120, specifically configured to control navigational and/or data capture aspects of the apparatus 103. The client device 100 also includes one or more controllers or processors and/or FPGAs, in communication with the controller 120, specifically configured to process (e.g. to display) notifications received from the server 101.
The server 101 also includes the above-mentioned communications interface 124 interconnected with the processor 120. The communications interface 124 includes suitable hardware (e.g. transmitters, receivers, network interface controllers and the like) allowing the server 101 to communicate with other computing devices—particularly the apparatus 103, the client device 105 and the dock 108—via the links 107 and 109. The links 107 and 109 may be direct links, or links that traverse one or more networks, including both local and wide-area networks. The specific components of the communications interface 124 are selected based on the type of network or other links that the server 101 is required to communicate over. In the present example, as noted earlier, a wireless local and wide area networks are implemented within the retail environment via the deployment of one or more wireless access points and/or wide area network communication interfaces. The links 107 therefore include either or both wireless links between the apparatus 103 and the mobile device 105 and the above-mentioned access points, and a wired link (e.g. an Ethernet-based link) between the server 101 and the access point.
The memory 122 stores a plurality of applications, each including a plurality of computer readable instructions executable by the processor 120. The execution of the above-mentioned instructions by the processor 120 configures the server 101 to perform various actions discussed herein. The applications stored in the memory 122 include a control application 128, which may also be implemented as a suite of logically distinct applications. In general, via execution of the control application 128 or subcomponents thereof, the processor 120 is configured to implement various functionalities. The processor 120, as configured via the execution of the control application 128, is also referred to herein as the controller 120. As will now be apparent, some or all of the functionality implemented by the controller 120 described below may also be performed by preconfigured hardware elements (e.g. one or more Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs)) rather than by execution of the control application 128 by the processor 120.
In the present example, in particular, the server 101 is configured via the execution of the control application 128 by the processor 120, to control the apparatus 103 to capture shelf data, to obtain the captured shelf data and process the data to detect status information for the products 112, and to generate status notifications.
Turning now to
The apparatus 103 further includes a sensor mast 204 supported on the chassis 200 and, in the present example, extending upwards from the chassis 200. The mast 204 supports the sensors 104 mentioned earlier. In particular, the sensors 104 include at least one imaging sensor 208, such as a digital camera, as well as at least one depth-sensing sensor 212, such as a 3D digital camera. The apparatus 103 also includes additional depth sensors, such as LIDAR sensors 216, in the present example. The sensors 208, 212, 216 are oriented on the mast 204 such that the fields of view of each sensor face a shelf along which the apparatus 103 is travelling. In other examples, the apparatus 103 includes additional sensors, such as one or more RFID readers, temperature sensors, structured light imaging sensors, and the like.
Turning now to
The control application 128 includes a mobile apparatus controller 300 configured to generate data capture instructions for the apparatus 103, deliver the data capture instructions to the apparatus 103, and obtain data captured by the apparatus 103 for storage in the repository 132. The control application 128 also includes a primary object generator 304 and a secondary object generator 308 configured to generate primary data objects and secondary data objects, respectively, as will be discussed below in greater detail. Further, the control application 128 includes a detector 312 configured to detect and classify mismatches between the secondary data objects provided by the generator 308 and reference data stored in the repository 132. The control application 128 also includes a notifier 316 configured to generate status notifications—for example, for transmission to the client device 105—based on the mismatches identified by the detector 312.
The functionality of the control application 128 will now be described in greater detail, with reference to the components illustrated in
At block 405, the controller 120, and particularly the mobile apparatus controller 300 of the control application 128, is configured to detect a data capture initiation event. The data capture initiation event, in some examples, is a preconfigured event stored in the repository 132. For example, the repository 132 can contain a schedule of data capture operations, and the apparatus controller 300 is therefore configured, based on a system time maintained by the controller 120, to determine whether the current time matches a scheduled data capture operation. In other examples, the data capture initiation is received at the server 101 (and specifically at the apparatus controller 300) as a request from the client device 105. In some examples, the client device 105 is configured to present on a display a layout of the retail environment and receive a selection of one or more areas of the retail environment (e.g. a selection of the shelves 110) in which to initiate a data capture operation. The client device 105 is configured, responsive to such a selection, to transmit a request to the server 101 via a link 107. The detection at block 405 in such examples is therefore the receipt, at the apparatus controller 300, of the request from the client device 105.
At block 410, having detected a data capture initiation event, the apparatus controller 300 is configured to generate data capture instructions and transmit the data capture instructions to the apparatus 103 for execution. The data capture instructions identify a region within the retail environment to be traversed by the apparatus 103 during the data capture operation. The region is identified in a common frame of reference, such as a predefined coordinate system for the retail environment. In one embodiment, the apparatus 103 is provisioned with a map of the retail environment, and is configured to navigate, with or without additional control data from the server 101, to and within the target region identified by the data capture instructions. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, various navigational techniques are available for use by the apparatus 103, including the above-mentioned map, as well as path planning operations, odometry and the like. For instance, in one embodiment, as an alternative or in addition to using a predetermined map of the retail environment, the apparatus 103 surveys the 3D map structure of the retail environment using 3D point data generated by one or more of its sensors and uses the surveyed 3D point data for navigation.
The data capture instructions may also specify other parameters for the data capture operation. Such parameters can include a travel speed for the apparatus 103, a frame rate for image capture, a target distance to maintain between the shelves 110 and the sensors 104 (e.g. the cameras 208). In other examples, such parameters are omitted and the apparatus 103 is instead configured to execute the data capture instructions according to an internally programmed set of parameters. In the present example, the apparatus 103 is configured to perform data capture operations travelling at speeds of about 0.3 m/s and with a frame capture rate of between 3 and 5 frames per second. Further, the apparatus 103 in the present example is configured to maintain a distance of about 60 cm between the mast 204 and the shelf 110 being captured. Thus, each image captured depicts a section of a shelf 110 with a width of about 31 cm, and a frame is captured every 6-10 cm of horizontal travel (dependent on the speed of travel). As a result, each position on the shelf 110 is imaged between three and five times during a data capture operation.
In some environments, the apparatus controller 300 is configured to perform additional functions at block 410 in association with the generation and transmission of data capture instructions. Referring to
At block 505, the apparatus controller 300 is configured to determine whether the requested (or otherwise initiated) data capture operation exceeds one or more operational capacities (e.g. range, on-board data storage) of the selected apparatus 103. The required travel distance of the data capture operation is determined based on the region of the retail environment to be traversed for the data capture operation, as mentioned above. If the determination at block 505 is affirmative, the apparatus controller 300 is configured, at block 510, to decompose the data capture operation by generating a package of sub-operations. Each sub-operation can, for example, include an instruction to return to the dock 108 for data transfer, recharging, or both. For example, if the requested data capture operation identifies the shelves 110-1 and 110-2, at block 510 the apparatus controller 300 can be configured to generate a package containing a first sub-operation identifying the shelf 110-1, and a second sub-operation identifying the shelf 110-2.
At block 515, the apparatus controller 300 is configured to transmit the sub-operation package, or the single operation as applicable (e.g. in the event of a negative determination at block 505) to the selected apparatus 103 via the link 107. The apparatus 103 is configured to execute the received data capture operation or sub-operations. In particular, the apparatus 103 is configured to traverse the identified region, capturing image data and depth measurements. The captured data is typically stored in on-board memory of the apparatus 103, for transfer to the server 101 after data capture is complete (e.g. via the dock 108). In other examples, however, the data is transferred to the server 101 wirelessly (e.g. over the link 107) during the data capture operation.
At block 520, the apparatus controller 300 is configured to determine whether any errors have been detected in connection with the data capture instructions sent at block 515. The apparatus 103 is configured to transmit error messages over the link 107 to the server 101 upon detecting any of a variety of operational errors during the execution of data capture instructions. Examples of such operational errors include a low battery, a sensor failure (e.g. the failure of one or more cameras 208), a path planning failure (e.g. resulting in the apparatus 103 becoming stuck) and the like. If the determination at block 520 is affirmative, the apparatus controller 300 is configured to return to block 500 to re-assign the failed data capture operation. In other examples, the apparatus controller 300 is configured to reassign the data capture operation only for certain types of errors. For other errors, the apparatus controller 300 is configured, prior to aborting and reassigning a data capture operation, to provide the apparatus 103 with intermediary instructions, such as returning to the dock 108 for charging, maintenance of the like, before returning to the data capture operation.
Returning to
The apparatus 103 is configured, in some examples, to perform certain pre-processing operations on the captured data prior to transferring the captured data to the server 101 (e.g. via the dock 108). For example, the apparatus 103 can be configured to downsample the captured images, or portions thereof. More specifically, the apparatus 103 can be configured to perform a barcode-detection operation on the images, and to downsample the regions of each image that do not depict a barcode, while maintaining the original resolution of regions in the images depicting barcodes. In other examples, however, such pre-processing is omitted.
At block 420, the primary object generator 304 is configured to generate a plurality of primary objects based on the captured data received at block 415. The primary object generator 304 may include a number of sub-components (not shown) each configured to detect a given type of primary object in the captured data. The objects detected in the captured data, for which primary data objects are generated at block 420, include gaps between products 112 (e.g. generated by a gap detection sub-component), and product indicators corresponding to the products 112 themselves (e.g. generated by a product/item recognition engine). The primary data objects can also include shelf edges (e.g. generated by a shelf structure detection subcomponent), labels (e.g. generated by a label detection subcomponent), and the like.
Each primary data object generated at block 420 includes a location, which may be indicated by a bounding box overlaid on the relevant image, as well as one or more object attributes. In other examples, the bounding box is stored (e.g. as coordinates) separately from the image, or in image metadata. The object attributes include an object type, defining the type of the primary data object. Additional attributes may also be included, such as a confidence value indicating the level of confidence of the relevant sub-component that the primary data object correctly identifies a corresponding object depicted in the image data. Further attributes may also be included in primary data objects dependent on the type of the object.
Turning to
Returning to
As will be apparent from
In other examples, the secondary object generator 308 is configured to generate the secondary data object by averaging or weighting the subset of primary data objects. In further examples, the secondary data object is generated with a location (e.g. a bounding box) consisting of the common portion of the primary data object locations (that is, the area that is shared by all primary data objects in the subset).
Turning to
The set of secondary data objects generated at block 425 is stored in conjunction with the image data in the repository 132. The storage image data and secondary data objects may also be referred to as a “realogram”, representing the current (as of the data capture operation) state of the retail environment. In other examples, the secondary data objects are stored in a data structure associated with the image data (instead of the overlay shown in
Following the generation and storage of the secondary data objects, the primary data objects are discarded in the present example. In other examples, however, the primary data objects are maintained in the repository 132.
Referring again to
At block 430, the detector 312 is configured to identify mismatches between the reference data and the secondary data objects, and to generate mismatch records corresponding to any detected mismatches. The identification of mismatches is performed by the detector 312 by comparing the reference indicators to the secondary data objects having locations coinciding with the reference indicators. The detector 312 is also configured, in examples in which the secondary data objects are stored in a tree structure such as that shown in
Each mismatch record generated at block 430 identifies a product, label, shelf structure or the like corresponding to the reference indicator that does not match the secondary data objects. The mismatch record also includes a mismatch type and a location of the mismatch (i.e. the location of the reference indicator). The mismatch type indicates, for example, whether a product is missing (i.e. out of stock), partially depleted (i.e. low stock), incorrectly located on the shelf 110 (i.e. a “plug” and/or “spread”), and the like. Other examples of mismatch status indicators include missing labels, incorrect price text on labels, improperly arranged products on the shelves 110 (e.g. a product that is improperly angled relative to the shelf edge). Additional examples of mismatch status will occur to those skilled in the art. Table 1 below illustrates example mismatch records generated at block 430 from the current and reference data shown in
At block 435, the notifier 316 is configured whether to generate notifications for one or more of the mismatch records generated by the detector 312 at block 430. The determination at block 435 includes, for example, a determination of whether a previous notification has been generated for a mismatch record having the same type and location within a configurable time period (e.g. up to two hours ago). The determination at block 435 can also be based on the type of each mismatch record. For example, the notifier 316 can be configured to generate notifications only for certain types of mismatches (e.g. out of stock mismatches). In further examples, the notifier 316 is configured to generate notifications only for certain locations in the retail environment at different times of day.
When the determination at block 435 is negative, the performance of the method 400 returns to block 405 for further data capture. When the determination is affirmative, however, the notifier 316, in block 440, is configured to select a subset of the mismatch records for which to generate one or more notifications, and to generate and transmit one or more status notifications to the client device 105. Each status notification indicates, for one or more mismatch records, the relevant label, product or the like (corresponding to the reference identifier in the mismatch record), the mismatch type, and the location of the mismatch. Each status notification also contains, in some examples, an identifier of a client application executing on the client device 105. The application identifier corresponds to one of a plurality of applications executing on the client device 105, and instructs the client device 105 to handle the status notification via that one of the applications. The client device 105 can therefore executed a number of applications, each directed to receiving and resolving different types of status notifications.
The notifier 316 is also configured, in some examples, to select a subset of client devices 105, when a plurality of client devices 105 are deployed in the system 100, to receive status notifications. Such a selection may be based, for example, on the location of the client devices 105 within the retail environment. The selection can also be based on roles assigned to the client devices 105 and stored in the repository (e.g. a stocking role, a label maintenance role, and the like).
Responsive to transmitting the status notifications, the notifier 316 is also configured to track the status notifications. In particular, the notifier 316 stores a record of any status notifications transmitted, and an indication of whether each status notification has been resolved (e.g. via the receipt of a message at the server 101 identifying a status notification and indicating that the corresponding mismatch has been resolved).
Variations to the above are contemplated. For example, the system 100 can also include an intermediate server (not shown) in communication with the server 101. Rather than sending and receiving data (e.g. data capture requests, status notifications and the like) directly to and from the client device 105, the server 101 is configured in such examples to exchange the above-mentioned data with the intermediate server, which is then configured to exchange the data with the client device 105.
Referring to
Embodiments of the above method of generating electronic notifications involve a multiple layered solution that addresses each of the problems outlined above so that the entire shelf management problem can be solved. An embodiment of this solution consists of the following layers:
Problem Detection layer;
Solution Generation layer;
Actor Selection layer; and
Action tracking layer;
As described above, the problem detection layer generates a list of problems from a scan of the shelf contents. Each problem will be time and location tagged. An embodiment of the solution generation layer involves specific programming of a rules based or machine learning engines (such as a Drools rules engine and/or neural networks or the like) to select the best action based upon the various inputs and desired behaviors. In an embodiment, there are interfaces to data bases that store:
Problems just discovered;
Problem priority (e.g. revenue impact of the problem);
Previously discovered problems (including copies of recently discovered problems);
Actions performed on previously discovered problems;
There may also be interfaces to computer systems that contain:
Product inventory;
Location of product;
Current and pending orders;
Product price;
Desired product location and quantity;
An embodiment of the specially configured rules operate on the combined set of problems and other sources of data to select the proper action. It should be noted that other techniques besides rules may be used to select correct action. One could utilize a neural network/AI (artificial intelligence) framework that would be “trained” to select the proper action. As those of ordinary skill in the art will realize, such a framework would be more flexible than a rules based engine but may take more time to create.
The foregoing description, including
The Actor selection layer will select the proper person, role, or autonomous system to perform each action. It will use a specially configured rules engine (or neural network) that will operate on the following data items in order to select the proper person, role, or system for the action:
The specific action;
Whether an autonomous system exists that can perform the action;
If there is not a suitable system, then:
The skills of each staff member;
The work schedule of each staff member;
The number of assigned action to each staff member;
In an embodiment, the rules engine will assign the action to the autonomous system or staff member best suited for the particular action. It may be that both a system and multiple staff are able to perform the action and so the system may assign the action to both a system as well as one or more personnel. If no system is available, then the action may be assigned to one or more personnel. Actions may also be assigned to “roles” (such as store manager) rather than to individual people. This may apply when several people are assigned to the position rather than just one.
An embodiment of the action tracking layer will notify each staff member of the actions assigned to them and monitor how long it takes them to accomplish it. It may also schedule an autonomous system to do the action. Each staff member will have a to do list that contains a prioritized list of actions to be taken and a means to indicate the action has been completed. It will also contain a means for a staff member to indicate that an action could not be completed along with a reason (e.g., via a mobile device with various modalities, such as voice, data, visual user interface, heads up display, and the like).
The results of the action tracking layer will be analyzed to determine the performance of each staff member as well as to determine the expected time to complete each type of action based upon the experiences of similar actions. If an action cannot be completed, the problem and action will be resubmitted to the solution generation layer in order to devise a new action. The action tracking system will also monitor the performance of autonomous systems, including one or more mobile automation apparatuses described above, to see how well they perform the assigned tasks, including tracking the time of task completion, which may be used for notification and/or task flow adjustments.
In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described.
However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.
The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.
Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has”, “having,” “includes”, “including,” “contains”, “containing” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a”, “has . . . a”, “includes . . . a”, “contains . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially”, “essentially”, “approximately”, “about” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1% and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.
It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be comprised of one or more generic or specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.
Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/492,670, filed May 1, 2017, by Perrella et al., entitled “Product Status Detection System,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2018/030419 | 5/1/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/204342 | 11/8/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5209712 | Ferri | May 1993 | A |
5214615 | Bauer | May 1993 | A |
5408322 | Hsu et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414268 | McGee | May 1995 | A |
5534762 | Kim | Jul 1996 | A |
5566280 | Fukui et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5953055 | Huang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5988862 | Kacyra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026376 | Kenney | Feb 2000 | A |
6034379 | Bunte et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6075905 | Herman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6115114 | Berg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141293 | Amorai-Moriya et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6304855 | Burke | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6442507 | Skidmore et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6549825 | Kurata | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6580441 | Schileru-Key | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6711293 | Lowe | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721723 | Gibson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721769 | Rappaport et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6836567 | Silver et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6995762 | Pavlidis et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7090135 | Patel | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7137207 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7245558 | Willins et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248754 | Cato | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7277187 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7373722 | Cooper et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7474389 | Greenberg et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487595 | Armstrong et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493336 | Noonan | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7508794 | Feather et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7527205 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7605817 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7647752 | Magnell | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7693757 | Zimmerman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751928 | Antony et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7783383 | Eliuk et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7839531 | Sugiyama | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845560 | Emanuel et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7885865 | Benson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7925114 | Mai et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7957998 | Riley et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7996179 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009864 | Linaker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8049621 | Egan | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8091782 | Cato et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094902 | Crandall et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094937 | Teoh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132728 | Dwinell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134717 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8189855 | Opalach et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8199977 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8207964 | Meadow et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8233055 | Matsunaga et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8260742 | Cognigni | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8265895 | Willins et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277396 | Scott et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8284988 | Sones et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8346783 | Bai | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8423431 | Rouaix et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429004 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8463079 | Ackley et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8479996 | Barkan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8520067 | Ersue | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8542252 | Perez et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8571314 | Tao et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8599303 | Stettner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8630924 | Groenevelt et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8660338 | Ma et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8743176 | Stettner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757479 | Clark et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8812226 | Zeng | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8923893 | Austin et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8939369 | Olmstead et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8954188 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8958911 | Wong et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971637 | Rivard | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8989342 | Liesenfelt et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9007601 | Steffey et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9037287 | Grauberger et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9064394 | Trundle | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9070285 | Ramu et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9120622 | Elazary | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9129277 | Macintosh | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9135491 | Morandi et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9159047 | Winkel | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9171442 | Clements | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9247211 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9329269 | Zeng | May 2016 | B2 |
9349076 | Liu et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9367831 | Besehanic | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9380222 | Clayton et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396554 | Williams et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9400170 | Steffey | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9424482 | Patel et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9517767 | Kentley et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9542746 | Wu et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9549125 | Goyal et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9562971 | Shenkar et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9565400 | Curlander et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9589353 | Mueller-Fischer et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600731 | Yasunaga et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600892 | Patel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9612123 | Levinson et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9639935 | Douady-Pleven et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9697429 | Patel et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9766074 | Roumeliotis et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9778388 | Connor | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9779205 | Namir | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9791862 | Connor | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9805240 | Zheng et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9811754 | Schwartz | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827683 | Hance et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9880009 | Bell | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9928708 | Lin et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9953420 | Wolski et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9980009 | Jiang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9994339 | Colson et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
9996818 | Ren et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10019803 | Venable et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10111646 | Nycz et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10121072 | Kekatpure | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10127438 | Fisher et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10197400 | Jesudason et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10210603 | Venable et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10229386 | Thomas | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10248653 | Blassin et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10262294 | Hahn | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10265871 | Hance et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10289990 | Rizzolo et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10336543 | Sills et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10349031 | DeLuca | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10352689 | Brown et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10373116 | Medina et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10394244 | Song et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
20010031069 | Kondo et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041948 | Ross et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020006231 | Jayant et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020059202 | Hadzikadic | May 2002 | A1 |
20020097439 | Braica | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020146170 | Rom | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158453 | Levine | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164236 | Fukuhara et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003925 | Suzuki | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030094494 | Blanford et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030174891 | Wenzel et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040021313 | Gardner et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040084527 | Bong | May 2004 | A1 |
20040131278 | imagawa et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040240754 | Smith et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016004 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050114059 | Chang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050174351 | Chang | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050213082 | DiBernardo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213109 | Schell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060032915 | Schwartz | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045325 | Zavadsky et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106742 | Bochicchio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060285486 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070036398 | Chen | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070074410 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070272732 | Hindmon | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080002866 | Fujiwara | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025565 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027591 | Lenser et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077511 | Zimmerman | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080159634 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164310 | Dupuy et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175513 | Lai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181529 | Michel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183730 | Enga | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080238919 | Pack | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294487 | Nasser | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090009123 | Skaff | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024353 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090057411 | Madej et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090059270 | Opalach et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090060349 | Linaker et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063306 | Fano | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063307 | Groenovelt | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074303 | Filimonova et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088975 | Sato et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103773 | Wheeler et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125350 | Lessing et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125535 | Basso et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090152391 | McWhirk | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160975 | Kwan | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090192921 | Hicks | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090206161 | Olmstead | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090236155 | Skaff | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252437 | Li et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287587 | Bloebaum et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090323121 | Valkenburg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017407 | Beniyama et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026804 | Tanizaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070365 | Siotia et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082194 | Yabushita et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091094 | Sekowski | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118116 | Tomasz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131234 | Stewart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141806 | Uemura et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161569 | Schreter | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171826 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208039 | Setettner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214873 | Somasundaram et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235033 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241289 | Sandberg | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257149 | Cognigni | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100295850 | Katz et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100315412 | Sinha et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326939 | Clark et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110047636 | Stachon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052043 | Hyung et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093306 | Nielsen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110137527 | Simon et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168774 | Magal | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172875 | Gibbs | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110216063 | Hayes | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242286 | Pace et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246503 | Bender | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254840 | Halstead | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110286007 | Pangrazio et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288816 | Thierman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310088 | Adabala et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017028 | Tsirkin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019393 | Wolinsky et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022913 | VolKmann et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120051730 | Cote et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120069051 | Hagbi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075342 | Choubassi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120133639 | Kopf et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120307108 | Forutanpour | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169530 | Padmanabhan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179621 | Moir et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185112 | Sung et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194644 | Newcombe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197464 | Wang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201466 | Funayama et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209553 | Doytchinov et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236119 | Rhee et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249802 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120250978 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269383 | Bobbitt et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287249 | Choo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120323620 | Hofman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130030700 | Miller et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130090881 | Janardhanan et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130119138 | Winkel | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132913 | Fu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130134178 | Lu | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138246 | Gutmann et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130142421 | Silver et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144565 | Miller et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130154802 | O'Haire et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130156292 | Chang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130162806 | Ding et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130176398 | Bonner et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178227 | Vartanian et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130182114 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130226344 | Wong et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228620 | Ahem et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130232039 | Jackson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235165 | Gharib et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235206 | Smith | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130236089 | Litvak et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130278631 | Border et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130299306 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130299313 | Baek, IV et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300729 | Grimaud | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130303193 | Dharwada et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130321418 | Kirk | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329013 | Metois et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341400 | Lancaster-Larocque | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002597 | Taguchi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003655 | Gopalkrishnan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003727 | Lortz et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006229 | Birch | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140016832 | Kong et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019311 | Tanaka | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025201 | Ryu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028837 | Gao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140047342 | Breternitz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049616 | Stettner | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052555 | MacIntosh | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140082316 | Erdmann | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086483 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098094 | Neumann et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100813 | Shaowering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129027 | Schnittman | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156133 | Cullinane et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140161359 | Magri et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192050 | Qiu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195374 | Bassemir et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214547 | Signorelli et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214600 | Argue et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140267614 | Ding et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267688 | Aich et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277691 | Jacobus et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277692 | Buzan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279294 | Field-Darragh | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140300637 | Fan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316875 | Tkachenko | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330835 | Boyer | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344401 | Varney et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351073 | Murphy et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140369607 | Patel et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150015602 | Beaudoin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019391 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150029339 | Kobres et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039458 | Reid | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150088618 | Basir et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088701 | Desmarais | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088703 | Yan | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150092066 | Geiss et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106403 | Haverinen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150117788 | Patel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150139010 | Jeong et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154467 | Feng et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150161793 | Takahashi | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170256 | Pettyjohn | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150181198 | Baele et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150212521 | Pack et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150235157 | Avegliano | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245358 | Schmidt | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150262116 | Katircioglu | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150279035 | Wolski et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150298317 | Wang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310601 | Rodriguez | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150332368 | Vartiainen | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150352721 | Wicks et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363625 | Wu et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363758 | Wu et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150365660 | Wu | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379704 | Chandrasekar et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160026253 | Bradski et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160044862 | Kocer | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160061591 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160070981 | Sasaki et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092943 | Vigier et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160012588 | Taguchi et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160104041 | bowers et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160107690 | Oyama et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112628 | Super et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160114488 | Mascorro Medina et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160129592 | Saboo et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160132815 | Itoko et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150217 | Popov | May 2016 | A1 |
20160156898 | Ren et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160163067 | Williams et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171336 | Schwartz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171429 | Schwartz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171707 | Schwartz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160185347 | Lefevre et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191759 | Somanath et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160224927 | Pettersson | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160253735 | Scudillo | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160253844 | Petrovskaya et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160260054 | High | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160271795 | Vicenti | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160313133 | Zeng et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160328618 | Patel et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160328767 | Bonner | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160353099 | Thomson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160364634 | Davis et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170004649 | Collet Romea et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170011281 | Dijkman et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170011308 | Sun et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032311 | Rizzolo | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170041553 | Cao et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170054965 | Raab et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170066459 | Singh | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170074659 | Giurgiu et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170109940 | Guo et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170147966 | Aversa | May 2017 | A1 |
20170150129 | Pangrazio | May 2017 | A1 |
20170178060 | Schwartz | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170193434 | Shah | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170219338 | Brown et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170219353 | Alesiani | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170227645 | Swope et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170227647 | Baik | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170228885 | Baumgartner | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170261993 | Venable | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262724 | Wu et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170280125 | Brown et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170286773 | Skaff et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170286901 | Skaff | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170323253 | Enssle et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170323376 | Glaser et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170337508 | Bogolea et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180001481 | Shah et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180005035 | Bogolea et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180005176 | Williams et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180020145 | Kotfis et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180046655 | Ward | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180051991 | Hong | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180053091 | Savvides et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180053305 | Gu et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180075403 | Mascorro Medina | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180089613 | Chen | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180101813 | Paat et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180108134 | Venable | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114183 | Howell | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180130011 | Jacobsson | May 2018 | A1 |
20180143003 | Clayton et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180174325 | Fu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180201423 | Drzewiecki et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204111 | Zadeh et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180251253 | Taira et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180276596 | Murthy | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180281191 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180293442 | Fridental et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180306958 | Goss | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180313956 | Rzeszutek et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180314260 | Jen et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180314908 | Lam | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315007 | Kingsford et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315065 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315173 | Phan et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315865 | Haist et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180370727 | Hance et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190057588 | Savvides et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190065861 | Savvides et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190073554 | Rzeszutek | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190073559 | Rzeszutek et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190073627 | Nakdimon | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190077015 | Shibasaki et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190087663 | Yamazaki et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190094876 | Moore et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190108606 | Komiyama | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190180150 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190197728 | Yamao | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190236530 | Cantrell et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190304132 | Yoda et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190392212 | Sawhney et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2835830 | Nov 2012 | CA |
3028156 | Jan 2018 | CA |
104200086 | Dec 2014 | CN |
107067382 | Aug 2017 | CN |
766098 | Apr 1997 | EP |
1311993 | May 2007 | EP |
2309378 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2439487 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2472475 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2562688 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2662831 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2693362 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2323238 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2330265 | Apr 1999 | GB |
2014170431 | Sep 2014 | JP |
101234798 | Jan 2009 | KR |
1020190031431 | Mar 2019 | KR |
WO 9923600 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 2003002935 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003025805 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2006136958 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007042251 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2008057504 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008154611 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2012103199 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012103202 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012154801 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO 2013165674 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO 2014066422 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014092552 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO 2014181323 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO 2015127503 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO 2016020038 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO 2018018007 | Jan 2018 | WO |
WO 2018204308 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO 2018204342 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO 2019023249 | Jan 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/030419 dated Aug. 31, 2018. |
“Fair Billing with Automatic Dimensioning” pp. 1-4, undated, Copyright Mettler-Toledo International Inc. |
“Plane Detection in Point Cloud Data” dated Jan. 25, 2010 by Michael Ying Yang and Wolfgang Forstner, Technical Report 1, 2010, University of Bonn. |
“Swift Dimension” Trademark Omniplanar, Copyright 2014. |
Ajmal S. Mian et al., “Three-Dimensional Model Based Object Recognition and Segmentation in Cluttered Scenes”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, No. 10, Oct. 2006. |
Batalin et al., “Mobile robot navigation using a sensor network,” IEEE, International Conference on robotics and automation, Apr. 26, May 1, 2004, pp. 636-641. |
Bazazian et al., “Fast and Robust Edge Extraction in Unorganized Point clouds,” IEEE, 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applicatoins (DICTA), Nov. 23-25, 2015, pp. 1-8. |
Biswas et al. “Depth Camera Based Indoor Mobile Robot Localization and Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2012. |
Bohm, Multi-Image Fusion for Occlusion-Free Façade Texturing, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, pp. 867-872 (Jan. 2004). |
Bristow et al., “A Survey of Iterative Learning Control”, IEEE Control Systems, Jun. 2006, pp. 96-114. |
Buenaposada et al. “Realtime tracking and estimation of plane pose” Proceedings of the ICPR (Aug. 2002) vol. II, IEEE pp. 697-700. |
Carreira et al., “Enhanced PCA-based localization using depth maps with missing data,” IEEE, pp. 1-8, Apr. 24, 2013. |
Chen et al. “Improving Octree-Based Occupancy Maps Using Environment Sparsity with Application to Aerial Robot Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017 IEEE. |
Cleveland Jonas et al: “Automated System for Semantic Object Labeling with Soft-Object Recognition and Dynamic Programming Segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY (Apr. 1, 2017). |
Cook et al., “Distributed Ray Tracing ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics”, vol. 18, No. 3, ACM pp. 137-145, 1984. |
Datta, A., et al. “Accurate camera calibration using iterative refinement of control points,” in Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009. |
Deschaud, et al., “A Fast and Accurate Place Detection algoritm for large noisy point clouds using filtered normals and voxel growing,” 3DPVT, May 2010, Paris, France. [hal-01097361]. |
Douillard, Bertrand, et al. “On the segmentation of 3D LIDAR point clouds.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2011. |
Dubois, M., et al., A comparison of geometric and energy-based point cloud semantic segmentation methods, European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), p. 88-93, Sep. 25-27, 2013. |
Duda, et al., “Use of the Hough Transformation to Detect Lines and Curves in Pictures”, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California, Graphics and Image Processing, Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, No. 1 (Jan. 1972). |
F.C.A. Groen et al., “The smallest box around a package,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 14, No. 1-6, Jan. 1, 1981, pp. 173-176, XP055237156, GB, ISSN: 0031-3203, DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(81(90059-5 p. 176-p. 178. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,103 dated Apr. 5, 2017. |
Olson, Clark F., etal. “Wide-Baseline Stereo Vision for terrain Mapping” in Machine Vision and Applications, Aug. 2010. |
Oriolo et al., “An iterative learning controller for nonholonomic mobile Robots”, the international Journal of Robotics Research, Aug. 1997, pp. 954-970. |
Ostafew et al., “Visual Teach and Repeat, Repeat, Repeat: Iterative learning control to improve mobile robot path tracking in challenging outdoor environment”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent robots and Systems, Nov. 2013, pp. 176. |
Park et al., “Autonomous mobile robot navigation using passive rfid in indoor environment,” IEEE, Transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 56, issue 7, pp. 2366-2373 (Jul. 2009). |
Perveen et al. (An overview of template matching methodologies and its application, International Journal of Research in Computer and Communication Technology, v2n10, Oct. 2013) (Year: 2013). |
Pivtoraiko et al., “Differentially constrained mobile robot motion planning in state lattices”, journal of field robotics, vol. 26, No. 3, 2009, pp. 308-333. |
Pratt W K Ed: “Digital Image processing, 10-image enhancement, 17-image segmentation”, Jan. 1, 2001, Digital Image Processing: PIKS Inside, New York: John Wily & Sons, US, pp. 243-258, 551. |
Puwein, J., et al.“Robust Multi-view camera calibration for wide-baseline camera networks,” in IEEE Workshop on Applications of computer vision (WACV), Jan. 2011. |
Rusu, et al. “How to incrementally register pairs of clouds,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 22, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/pairwise_incremental_registration.php. |
Rusu, et al. “Spatial Change detection on unorganized point cloud data,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 19, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/octree_change.php]. |
Schnabel et al. “Efficient RANSAC for Point-Cloud Shape Detection”, vol. 0, No. 0, pp. 1-12 (1981). |
Senthilkumaran, et al., “Edge Detection Techniques for Image Segmentation—A Survey of Soft Computing Approaches”, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, vol. 1, No. 2 (May 2009). |
Szeliski, “Modified Hough Transform”, Computer Vision. Copyright 2011, pp. 251-254. Retrieved on Aug. 17, 2017 [http://szeliski.org/book/drafts/SzeliskiBook_20100903_draft.pdf]. |
Tahir, Rabbani, et al., “Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint,” International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36.5 (Sep. 2006): 248-253. |
Trevor et al., “Tables, Counters, and Shelves: Semantic Mapping of Surfaces in 3D,” Retrieved from Internet Jul. 3, 2018 @ http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.703.5365&rep=rep1&type=p. |
Tseng, et al., “A Cloud Removal Approach for Aerial Image Visualization”, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information & Control, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 2421-2440 (Jun. 2013). |
Uchiyama, et al., “Removal of Moving Objects from a Street-View Image by Fusing Multiple Image Sequences”, Pattern Recognition, 2010, 20th International Conference On, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ pp. 3456-3459 (Aug. 23, 2010). |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, “Combined Search and Examination Report” for GB Patent Application No. 1813580.6 dated Feb. 21, 2019. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 22, 2016 for GB Patent Application No. 1417218.3. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 22, 2016 for GB Patent Application No. 1521272.3. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Mar. 11, 2015 for GB Patent Application No. 1417218.3. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated May 13, 2020 for GB Patent Application No. 1917864.9. |
Varol Gul et al: “Product placement detection based on image processing”, 2014 22nd Signal Processing and Communication Applications Conference (SIU), IEEE, Apr. 23, 2014. |
Varol Gul et al: “Toward Retail product recognition on Grocery shelves”, Visual Communications and image processing; Jan. 20, 2004; San Jose, (Mar. 4, 2015). |
Weber et al., “Methods for Feature Detection in Point clouds,” visualization of large and unstructured data sets—IRTG Workshop, pp. 90-99 (2010). |
Zhao Zhou et al.: “An Image contrast Enhancement Algorithm Using PLIP-based histogram Modification”, 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCON), IEEE, (Jun. 21, 2017). |
Ziang Xie et al., “Multimodal Blending for High-Accuracy Instance Recognition”, 2013 IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p. 2214-2221. |
Fan Zhang et al., “Parallax-tolerant Image Stitching”, 2014 Computer Vision Foundation, pp. 4321-4328. |
Kaimo Lin et al., “SEAGULL: Seam-guided Local Alignment for Parallax-tolerant Image Stitching”, Retrieved on Nov. 16, 2020 [http://publish.illinois.edu/visual-modeling-and-analytics/files/2016/08/Seagull.pdf]. |
Julio Zaragoza et al., “As-Projective-as-Possible Image Stitching with Moving DLT”, 2013 Computer Vision Foundation, pp. 2339-2346. |
Federico Tombari et al. “Multimodal cue integration through Hypotheses Verification for RGB-D object recognition and 6DOF pose estimation”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Jan. 2013. |
Flores, et al., “Removing Pedestrians from Google Street View Images”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference On, IEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 53-58 (Jun. 13, 2010). |
Glassner, “Space Subdivision for Fast Ray Tracing.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 4.10, pp. 15-24, 1984. |
Golovinskiy, Aleksey, et al. “Min-Cut based segmentation of point clouds.” Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on. IEEE, 2009. |
Hackel et al., “Contour Detection in unstructured 3D point clouds,” IEEE, 2016 Conference on Computer vision and Pattern recognition (CVPR), Jun. 27-30, 2016, pp. 1-9. |
Hao et al., “Structure-based object detection from scene point clouds,” Science Direct, v191, pp. 148-160 (2016). |
Hu et al., “An improved method of discrete point cloud filtering based on complex environment,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, v48, i18 (2013). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/064110 dated Mar. 20, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/024847 dated Jul. 7, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/025859 dated Jul. 3, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030345 dated Sep. 17, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030360 dated Jul. 9, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030363 dated Jul. 9, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/025849 dated Jul. 9, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/064020 dated Feb. 19, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/053212 dated Dec. 1, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/070996 dated Apr. 2, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/028133 dated Jul. 24, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/029134 dated Jul. 27, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/028183 dated Jul. 24, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/035285 dated Aug. 27, 2020. |
Jadhav et al. “Survey on Spatial Domain dynamic template matching technique for scanning linear barcode,” International Journal of science and research v 5 n 3, Mar. 2016)(Year: 2016). |
Jian Fan et al: “Shelf detection via vanishing point and radial projection”, 2014 IEEE International Conference on image processing (ICIP), IEEE, (Oct. 27, 2014), pp. 1575-1578. |
Kang et al., “Kinematic Path-Tracking of Mobile Robot Using Iterative learning Control”, Journal of Robotic Systems, 2005, pp. 111-121. |
Kay et al. “Ray Tracing Complex Scenes.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 20, No. 4, ACM, pp. 269-278, 1986. |
Kelly et al., “Reactive Nonholonomic Trajectory Generation via Parametric Optimal Control”, International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 22, No. 7-8, pp. 583-601 (Jul. 30, 2013). |
Lari, Z., et al., “An adaptive approach for segmentation of 3D laser point cloud.” International Archives of the Photogrammertry, Remote sensing and spatial information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-5/W12, 2011, ISPRS Calgary 2011 Workshop, Aug. 29-31, 2011, Calgary, Canada. |
Lecking et al: “Localization in a wide range of industrial environments using relative 3D ceiling features”, IEEE, pp. 333-337 (Sep. 15, 2008). |
Lee et al. “Statistically Optimized Sampling for Distributed Ray Tracing.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 19, No. 3, ACM, pp. 61-67, 1985. |
Li et al., “An improved RANSAC for 3D Point cloud plane segmentation based on normal distribution transformation cells,” Remote sensing, V9: 433, pp. 1-16 (2017). |
Likhachev, Maxim, and Dave Ferguson. “Planning Long dynamically feasible maneuvers for autonomous vehicles.” The international journal of Robotics Reasearch 28.8 (2009): 933-945. (Year:2009). |
Marder-Eppstein et al., “The Office Marathon: robust navigation in an indoor office environment,” IEEE, 2010 International conference on robotics and automation, May 3-7, 2010, pp. 300-307. |
McNaughton, Matthew, et al. “Motion planning for autonomous driving with a conformal spatiotemporal lattice.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011. (Year: 2011). |
Mitra et al., “Estimating surface normals in noisy point cloud data,” International Journal of Computational geometry & applications, Jun. 8-10, 2003, pp. 322-328. |
N.D.F. Campbell et al. “Automatic 3D Object Segmentation in Multiple Views using Volumetric Graph-Cuts”, Journal of Image and Vision Computing, vol. 28, Issue 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 14-25. |
Ni et al., “Edge Detection and Feature Line Tracing in 3D-Point Clouds by Analyzing Geometric Properties of Neighborhoods,” Remote Sensing, V8 I9, pp. 1-20 (2016). |
Norriof et al., “Experimental comparison of some classical iterative learning control algorithms”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Jun. 2002, pp. 636-641. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,175 dated Sep. 23, 2014. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/693,503 dated Mar. 11, 2016. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,495 dated Apr. 25, 2016. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/518,091 dated Apr. 12, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200118064 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62492670 | May 2017 | US |