The content of the electronically submitted sequence listing in ASCII text file (Name MWRD_205858_ST25.txt; Size: 742 bytes; and Date of Creation: Apr. 19, 2021) filed with the application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The Tables in APPENDICES A through H, filed herewith in the files:
Currently used wastewater treatment processes require the utilization of carbon sources. Many available carbon sources, however, are problematic because of insufficient availability, high cost, logistics of transport, need for infrastructure modification, potential for odors, energy input needed, non-sustainable nature, environmentally unfriendly nature, uncertainty over quality, uncertainty over consistency, uncertainty over long-term availability, and/or other undesirable characteristics.
Thus, there remains a need to develop methods of producing carbon-based compounds in the form of volatile fatty acids (VFAs)—such as but not limited to for use in wastewater treatment—in a manner that addresses current shortcomings in available carbon sources.
Provide for herein is a method of producing a volatile fatty acid that comprises fermenting a cellulosic feedstock present in a fermentation solution, wherein the fermentation solution comprises cellulolytic microorganisms and the cellulosic feedstock. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass, leaves, phragmites, cattails, guar gum, or a combination thereof. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass or guar gum. In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic microorganisms are supplied to the fermentation solution in an inoculum comprising the cellulolytic microorganisms. In certain embodiments, the composition of identities of and/or the metabolic pathways utilized by the cellulolytic microorganisms supplied to the fermentation solution have been previous adapted to the type of cellulosic feedstock and/or fermentation conditions to be used. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented under aerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented under anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is aerobic; optionally wherein the grass is not switchgrass. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Table 26A. In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of grass under aerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is aerobic; optionally wherein the grass is not switchgrass. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 27A. In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of grass under aerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is anaerobic; optionally wherein the grass is not switchgrass. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Table 28A. In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of grass under anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is anaerobic; optionally wherein the grass is not switchgrass. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 29A. In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of grass under anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is aerobic. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 30A. In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of guar gum under aerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is aerobic. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 31A. In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of guar gum under aerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is anaerobic. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 32A. In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of guar gum under anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is anaerobic. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 33A. In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of guar gum under anaerobic conditions.
In certain of any of the above embodiments, the cellulolytic microorganisms in the inoculum are derived from a seed source reservoir. And, in certain embodiments, the seed source reservoir is an anaerobic mesophilic digester draw from a municipal sewage treatment operation. Further, certain embodiments provide for deriving cellulolytic microorganisms from a seed source reservoir for use in the fermentation of the cellulosic feedstock. In certain embodiments, the composition of the identities of and/or the metabolic pathways utilized by the cellulolytic microorganisms is adapted to the type of cellulosic feedstock and/or fermentation conditions to be used. Certain embodiments further comprise cultivating and maintaining the derived cellulolytic microorganisms composition for use as the inoculum.
Further provided for in this disclosure is a carbon dependent nutrient removal and/or recovery process comprising the use of a volatile fatty acid produced as described elsewhere herein.
Further provided for is an industrial process comprising the use of a volatile fatty acid produced as described elsewhere herein as its raw or intermediate material
The terms defined immediately below are more fully defined by reference to the specification in its entirety. To the extent necessary to provide descriptive support, the subject matter and/or text of the appended claims is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
It will be understood by all readers of this disclosure that the exemplary aspects and embodiments described and claimed herein can be suitably practiced in the absence of any recited feature, element or step that is, or is not, specifically disclosed herein.
It is to be noted that the term “a” or “an” entity refers to one or more of that entity; for example, “a volatile fatty acid,” is understood to represent one or more volatile fatty acids. As such, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more,” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein.
Furthermore, “and/or” where used herein is to be taken as specific disclosure of each of the specified features or components with or without the other. Thus, the term and/or” as used in a phrase such as “A and/or B” herein is intended to include “A and B,” “A or B,” “A” (alone), and “B” (alone). Likewise, the term “and/or” as used in a phrase such as “A, B, and/or C” is intended to encompass each of the following embodiments: A, B, and C; A, B, or C; A or C; A or B; B or C; A and C; A and B; B and C; A (alone); B (alone); and C (alone).
It is understood that wherever aspects are described herein with the language “comprising,” otherwise analogous aspects described in terms of “consisting of” and/or “consisting essentially of” are also provided.
Unless defined otherwise, technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure is related.
Numeric ranges are inclusive of the numbers defining the range. Even when not explicitly identified by “and any range in between,” or the like, where a list of values is recited, i.e., 1, 2, 3, or 4, the disclosure specifically includes any range in between the values, i.e., 1 to 3, 1 to 4, 2 to 4, etc.
The headings provided herein are solely for ease of reference and are not limitations of the various aspects or aspects of the disclosure, which can be had by reference to the specification as a whole.
As used herein, a “cellulosic feedstock” is a material comprising the polysaccharide cellulose (C6H10O5), (where n can be 100s to 1000s) with β(1-4) linked D-glucose units and/or guar gum (guaran) C10H14N5Na2O12P3.
Provided herein are methods of producing carbon-based compounds from the fermentation of cellulosic feedstocks. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock and/or source of the cellulosic feedstock is grass, guar gum, leaves, cattails, and/or phragmites. Advantages of such methods include environmentally sustainable carbon generation, sequestration of carbon from air and affixing in soil, filtering of water runoff and flood control, cooler urban environments, contributes to oxygen production, and providing a great environment for recreational activities. Additional advantages include better landscape and curb appeal resulting in enhanced aesthetic and property values, potential of no wastewater plant operations and compliance issues, reduction/elimination of odors, control of costs. In addition, in the context of municipal waste water management, there is the opportunity for increased public-private partnership, better public image and perception due to environment-friendly technology, chemical cost savings for carbon need, sustainable outlet for recycling nutrients via composting/P-recovery, a free substitute to wood chips in compost processing, production of biogas as a by-product furthering efforts to achieve energy neutrality, and reduced emission of green-house gases by avoiding carbon chemical manufacturing, transportation, etc.
Cellulolytic organisms (e.g., bacteria, archaea, and fungi) exist in anaerobically digested sludge in a very low density, feeding on cellulose-type sources (e.g., toilet paper and other cellulosic products) for their cellular carbon needs. In certain embodiments, these organisms are derived, cultivated, concentrated, and redirected to derive their cellular-carbon need from cellulosic feedstocks such as grass, guar gum, leaves, phragmites, and cattails. These cellulolytic organisms can quickly adapt and degrade, for example, grass and guar gum (both of which contain cellulose or cellulose-like complex carbohydrates in abundant quantities), for their carbon needs.
Cellulose and guar gum contain polysaccharides comprised of linked sugar monomers. Celluloytic organisms break down the linkages between monomers to convert them back into monomers, such as D-glucose. Once glucose becomes available, its aerobic or anaerobic degradation/fermentation produces VFAs as intermediate products which can then be converted to biogas. Thus, carbon-based compounds of this disclosure include VFAs and biogas. In certain embodiments, the principle components of VFA production include: liquefication; hydrolysis; solubilization; and fermentation, resulting in the production of organic acids, VFAs, H2, CO2, NH3, and alcohols. Representative examples of VFAs produced by the methods of this disclosure include formic acid (HCOOH), acetic acid (CH3COOH), propionic acid (C2H5COOH), and butyric acid (C3H7CHOOH). Additional representative examples of VFAs include those listed elsewhere herein. In certain embodiments, fermentation of cellulosic feedstocks produces acetic, propionic, iso-butyric and/or n-butyric acids. Theoretical acetic acid production (being the predominant component of VFAs) from 1 g of cellulose can be anywhere from 1.1 to 1.3 g, depending upon the metabolic pathways that they undergo (
Without being bound by theory, it is believed that up to a point, the reaction rate of cellulosic feedstock fermentation increases with an increase in temperature due to increased metabolic activity of cellulolytic organisms. In certain embodiments, fermentation of any of the cellulosic feedstocks disclosed herein under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions, and with or without mixing/agitation, and at any pH disclosed herein, can be performed at a temperature of any of between about 15° C., 20° C., 25° C., 30° C., or 35° C. and any of about 20° C., 25° C., 30° C., 35° C., or 40° C. In certain embodiments, such fermentation can be performed at a temperature of between about 30° C. and 35° C. In certain embodiments, such fermentation can be performed at a temperature of about 25° C., 26° C., 27° C., 28° C., 29° C., 30° C., 31° C., 32° C., 33° C., 34° C., 35° C., 36° C., or 37° C.
For purpose of this disclosure, “loading rate” can be defined by the weight (e.g., dry weight, either determined or estimated) of feedstock per unit liquid feed volume (of sludge draw, nutrient solution, and/or plant effluent) fed to the reactor. Feedstock in grams can be viewed as loading per every 100 mL liquid feed after multiplying by 10. For example, 0.5 g guar gum per 100 mL liquid feed represents a loading rate of 5 g/L.
In certain embodiments of a fermentation process disclosed anywhere herein, any of the feedstocks disclosed herein can be loaded (i.e., have a loading rate) at between any of about 1 g/L, 2 g/L, 3 g/L, 4 g/L, 5 g/L, 6 g/L, 7 g/L, 8 g/L, 9 g/L, 10 g/L, 15 g/L 20 g/L, 25 g/L, 30 g/L, 35 g/L, 40 g/L, 45 g/L, 50 g/L, 55 g/L, 60 g/L, 65 g/L, 70 g/L, 75 g/L, 80 g/L, 85 g/L, 90 g/L, or 95 g/L to any of about 2 g/L, 3 g/L, 4 g/L, 5 g/L, 6 g/L, 7 g/L, 8 g/L, 9 g/L, 10 g/L, 15 g/L, 20 g/L, 25 g/L, 30 g/L, 35 g/L, 40 g/L, 45 g/L, 50 g/L, 55 g/L, 60 g/L, 65 g/L, 70 g/L, 75 g/L, 80 g/L, 85 g/L, 90 g/L, 95 g/L, or 100 g/L under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, any of the feedstocks disclosed herein is loaded at about 1 g/L, 2 g/L, 3 g/L, 4 g/L, 5 g/L, 6 g/L, 7 g/L, 8 g/L, 9 g/L, 10 g/L, 15 g/L 20 g/L, 25 g/L, 30 g/L, 35 g/L, 40 g/L, 45 g/L, 50 g/L, 55 g/L, 60 g/L, 65 g/L, 70 g/L, 75 g/L, 80 g/L, 85 g/L, 90 g/L, 95 g/L, or 100 g/L under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments of a fermentation process disclosed anywhere herein, grass feedstock can be loaded (i.e., have a loading rate) at between any of about 5 g/L, 10 g/L, 20 g/L, 30 g/L, 40 g/L, 50 g/L, or 60 g/L to any of about 10 g/L, 20 g/L, 30 g/L, 40 g/L, 50 g/L, 60 g/L, or 75 g/L under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, grass feedstock is loaded at about 30 g/L, 31 g/L, 32 g/L, 33 g/L, 34 g/L, 35 g/L, 36 g/L, 37 g/L, 38 g/L, 39 g/L, 40 g/L, 41 g/L, 42 g/L, 43 g/L, 44 g/L, 45 g/L, 46 g/L, 47 g/L, 48 g/L, 49 g/L, or 50 g/L under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, the grass feedstock can be loaded at about 40 g/L and in certain embodiments, such loading results in an average VFA production yield of at least about 106.8 mg/g per unit feedstock of grass under aerobic conditions (
In certain embodiments of a fermentation process disclosed anywhere herein, guar gum feedstock can be loaded at between any of about 1 g/L, 2 g/L, 3 g/L 4 g/L, 5 g/L, 10 g/L, 20 g/L, 30 g/L, 40 g/L, 45 g/L, or 50 g/L to any of about 2 g/L, 3 g/L 4 g/L, 5 g/L, 10 g/L, 20 g/L, 30 g/L, 40 g/L, 50 g/L, or 60 g/L under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, guar gum feedstock is loaded at about 1 g/L, 2 g/L, 3 g/L, 4 g/L, 5 g/L, 6 g/L, 7 g/L, 8 g/L, 9 g/L, 10 g/L, 11 g/L, 12 g/L, 13 g/L, 14 g/L, 15 g/L, 16 g/L, 17 g/L, 18 g/L, 19 g/L, or 20 g/L under either aerobic or anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments of a fermentation process disclosed anywhere herein, guar gum feedstock can be loaded at between any of about 5 g/L, 6 g/L, 7 g/L, 8 g/L, 9 g/L, 10 g/L, 11 g/L, 12 g/L, 13 g/L, or 14 g/L to any of about 6 g/L, 7 g/L 8 g/L, 9 g/L, 10 g/L, 11 g/L, 12 g/L, 13 g/L, 14 g/L, or 15 g/L under aerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, guar gum feedstock is loaded at about 5 g/L, 6 g/L, 7 g/L, 8 g/L, 9 g/L, 10 g/L, 11 g/L, 12 g/L, 13 g/L, 14 g/L, or 15 g/L under aerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, the guar gum feedstock can be loaded at 10 g/L and in certain embodiments, such loading results in an average VFA production yield of at least about 243.9 mg/g per unit feedstock of guar gum under aerobic conditions (
pH
The optimum enzymatic activity of acidogens (acid formers) occurs within the pH range of about 5.0 to 6.2, whereas that of methanogens occurs within the pH range of about 6.8 to 7.2. Additionally, alkalinity addition through nutrient solution introduction may be omitted/minimized to keep the pH values suppressed to inhibit methanogens. The VFAs or volatile acids/alkalinity ratios within 0.5 to slightly higher than 0.8 range can be used to keep the methanogens suppressed; this state of operation is known as “sour operation” due to accumulation of VFAs, which tends to drop the pH.
Provided in this disclosure are two sets of pH parameters: (i) in the stock cultures from where inoculum is derived and (ii) inside the fermenting reactor. In certain embodiments, the pH values during stock culture maintenance and/or in fermenters during production can be in the range of between any of about pH 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, or 6.4 to any of about pH 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, or 6.5. In certain embodiments, the pH values during stock culture maintenance and/or in fermenters during production is about pH 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, or 6.5. In certain embodiments, the pH values during stock culture maintenance and/or in fermenters during production can be in the range of between any of about pH 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, or 5.9 to any of about pH 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, or 6.0. In certain embodiments, the pH values during stock culture maintenance and/or in fermenters during production is about pH 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9. or 6.0. In certain embodiments, the pH values during stock culture maintenance and/or in fermenters during production does not exceed about pH 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, or 6.3. In certain embodiments, the pH values during stock culture maintenance and/or in fermenters during production does not exceed about pH 6.2. In certain embodiments, the pH values during stock culture maintenance and/or in fermenters during production does not exceed about pH 6.0. Without being bound by theory, the maintenance of pH according to the above helps to cultivate, promote, and maintain a maximum population of cellulolytic organisms while controlling methanogenic populations in check. VFAs are intermediate products of fermentation and are converted to biogas by methanogenic populations. Methanogens are very sensitive to acidic pH and enzymatic activity at or below 6.2 is greatly reduced or eliminated. Controlling the pH allows retention and harnessing of most of the VFAs produced, rather than being converted into biogas.
On the other hand, in certain embodiments, a pH value above 6.2, such as in the range of about pH 6.5 to 7.2 is useful for biogas production. In certain embodiments, a pH range of between any of about pH 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.5, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, or 7.4 and any of about pH 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, or 7.5 is used for biogas production. In certain embodiments, a pH range of between any of about pH 6.5, 6.5, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7.0, or 7.1 and any of about pH 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7.0, 7.1, or 7.2 is used for biogas production. In certain embodiments, a pH of about 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, or 7.5 is used for biogas production. In certain embodiments, a pH of about 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7.0, 7.1, or 7.2 is used for biogas production.
In certain embodiments it has been determined that methanogens consume VFAs if hydraulic retention time is greater than 120 hours. Thus, in certain embodiments, VFA harness occurs prior to 120 hours. In certain embodiments, VFA harness occurs after 48 hours or after 72 hours, for example, to allow ample time for VFA formation. In certain embodiments, VFA harness occurs between any of about 36 hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours, 84 hours, 96 hours, or 108 hours to any of about 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours, 84 hours, 96 hours, 108 hours, or 120 hours. In certain embodiments, VFA harness occurs after about 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours, 84 hours, 96 hours, or 108 hours, but prior to 120 hours.
Grass is a versatile plant that can be grown without maintenance and little water input. It is generally neglected in urban areas as it presents few beneficial uses upon mowing. It is mainly grown for beautification of site and increasing property values. Biodegradation of grass can occur aerobically and anaerobically. Without being bound by theory, every mole of cellulose can theoretically produce 3.00 to 3.50 moles of VFAs, depending upon the dominant degradation metabolic pathway.
Thus, certain embodiments of this disclosure are drawn to the use of grass as a cellulosic feedstock and/or source of a cellulosic feedstock. Grasses belong to the Poaceae family, which is one of the most abundant families of plants on earth (world wide web at wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_grass_made_of). While there are more than 10,000 varieties of plants in the Poaceae family (approximately 1,400 species of grasses exist in the United States), different types of grasses have some similarities. Grasses can be classified as either C3 or C4 plants. These terms refer to different pathways that plants use to capture carbon dioxide during photosynthesis. All species have the more primitive C3 pathway, but the additional C4 pathway evolved in species in the wet and dry tropics. All grasses produce seeds and are monocotyledonous. Additionally, most grasses are herbaceous, so they don't produce woody stems, and they die back to the ground at the end of the growing season. All grasses comprise water (generally about 70 to 80% by weight; turfgrass is about 75 to 80% water by weight) and lignin (world wide web at pennington.com/all-products/grass-seed/resources/10-surprising-facts-about-grass).
In certain embodiments, the grass used is a mixture of different grass families. In certain embodiments, the grass is from the genus “Poa” with comprising one or more of the subfamilies: Anomochlooideae; Aristidoideae; Arundinoideae; Bambusoideae; Chloridoideae; Danthonioideae; Ehrhartoideae; Micrairoideae; Paniocideae; Pharoideae; Pooideae; Puelioideae, of which there are several species in each subfamily. In certain embodiments, the grass contains one or more of Kentucky Bluegrass, Perennial Rye, Fescue (e.g., red fescue, hard fescue, sheep fescue, and tall fescue), Zoysia, Creeping Bent Grass, and/or one or more of the grasses listed in
In certain embodiments, grass is used as a cellulosic feedstock and/or source of a cellulosic feedstock for fermentation under aerobic conditions and in in certain embodiments, grass is used as a cellulosic feedstock and/or source of a cellulosic feedstock for fermentation under anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, the VFA yield from grass under anaerobic conditions is better than the yield from primary sludge (from a typical municipal wastewater treatment plant) fermentation and high strength organic wastes (from industrial sources—brewery, fats, oil and grease processor, and chemical operations sludge with high organic content) co-fermentation with anaerobic digester sludge that receives a mixture of primary and secondary sludge.
In certain embodiments, the grass is dried or dried and pulverized. In certain embodiments, wet grass is reduced to its smallest practical size to minimize handling and operational problems (e.g., pumping and clogging). Additionally, wet or dry grass size reduction was for increasing surface area of substrate to cellulotytic organisms; increased surface area thus tends to achieve higher process efficiency. In certain embodiments, fermentation of grass was conducted at 35° C. In certain embodiments, the fermentation reaction is mixed or occasionally and/or intermittently mixed, for example at 120 RPM. In certain embodiments, the fermentation reaction is subjected to a detention time of about 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours, 108 hours, or up to 120 hours, or any specific time or time range in-between.
In certain embodiments, one gram of grass produces at least about 20 mg, 25 mg, 30 mg, 35 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, or 750 mg of VFAs when fermented under certain aerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of grass produces at least about 30 mg, 35 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, or 100 mg of VFAs when fermented under certain aerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of grass produces between any of about 20 mg, 25 mg, 30 mg, 35 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, or 500 mg to any of about 25 mg, 30 mg, 35 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, or 750 mg of VFAs when fermented certain under aerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of grass produces between any of about 35 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, or 100 mg to any of about 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 110 mg, or 125 mg of VFAs when fermented under certain aerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, one gram of grass produces at least about 20 mg, 25 mg, 30 mg, 35 mg, 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, or 800 mg of VFAs when fermented under certain anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of grass produces at least about 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, or 200 mg of VFAs when fermented under certain anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of grass produces between any of about 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, or 500 mg to any of about 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, or 800 mg of VFAs when fermented under certain anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of grass produces between any of about 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, or 200 mg to any of about 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, or 250 mg of VFAs when fermented under certain anaerobic conditions.
Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of guar gum (also known as guaran) as a cellulosic feedstock and/or source of a cellulosic feedstock. Guar gum (e.g., CAS Number: 9000-30-0), is a substance made from guar beans which has thickening and stabilizing properties useful in various industries; e.g., traditionally the food industry and, increasingly, the hydraulic fracturing industry. Guar seeds are dehusked, milled and screened to obtain the guar gum in powder form. Chemically, guar gum is a polysaccharide composed of the sugars galactose and mannose (classified as a galactomannan). It is typically produced as a free-flowing, off-white powder. In water, it is nonionic and hydrocolloidal. Guar gum is also sometimes referred to in this disclosure as plant extract (PE).
In certain embodiments, guar gum is used as a cellulosic feedstock and/or source of a cellulosic feedstock for fermentation under aerobic conditions and in in certain embodiments, guar gum is used as a cellulosic feedstock and/or source of a cellulosic feedstock for fermentation under aerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, fermentation of guar gum was conducted at 35° C. In certain embodiments, the fermentation reaction is mixed or occasionally and/or intermittently mixed, for example at 120 RPM. In certain embodiments, the fermentation reaction is subjected to a detention time of about 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours, 108 hours, or up to 120 hours, or any specific time or time range in-between.
In certain embodiments, one gram of guar gum produces at least about 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg, 900 mg, or 1000 mg of VFAs when fermented under aerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of guar gum produces at least about 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, or 300 mg of VFAs when fermented under aerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of guar gum produces between any of about 40 mg, 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg, or 900 mg to any of about 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg, 900 mg, or 1000 mg of VFAs when fermented under aerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of guar gum produces between any of about 50 mg, 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, or 250 mg to any of about 60 mg, 70 mg, 80 mg, 90 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, or 300 mg of VFAs when fermented under aerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, one gram of guar gum produces at least about 50 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg, 900 mg, or 1000 mg of VFAs when fermented under anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of guar gum produces at least about 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 350 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, or 750 mg of VFAs when fermented under anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of guar gum produces between any of about 100 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg, or 900 mg to any of about 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg, 900 mg, or 1000 mg of VFAs when fermented under anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, one gram of guar gum produces between any of about 175 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 350 mg, 400 mg, 450 mg, or 500 mg to any of about 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 350 mg, 400 mg, 450 mg, 500 mg, or 600 mg of VFAs when fermented under anaerobic conditions.
Cattails are an aquatic plant common to ponds, marshes, lakes, and swamps, and are very easy to identify. They are distinguished by the unique seed heads on top of the stalks, which go from a hot dog or cigar-looking shape to a fluffy mass that looks somewhat like a cat's tail.
Cattails emerge from the muck in a long, round stalk that stands up to six feet or higher above the water. Leaves are mostly flat, narrow, and lance-shaped, emerging from the stalk in an alternating pattern. The only real lookalikes are different varieties of the Iris plant, and it's only the leaves that look similar. Iris and cattail are easy to differentiate, from the distinctive seed heads (or any remnant of them, if they're out of season); with true cattails, the seed head is always left behind.
In certain embodiments, cattails are used as a cellulosic feedstock and/or source of a cellulosic feedstock for fermentation under aerobic conditions as described for grass and/or guar gum anywhere else in this disclosure and in certain embodiments, cattails are used as a cellulosic feedstock and/or source of a cellulosic feedstock for fermentation under aerobic conditions as described for grass and/or guar gum anywhere else in this disclosure. In certain embodiments, the cattail used is one or more species of cattail listed in Table 1, or a mixture thereof. In certain embodiments, a cattail used is the cattail known as common cattail or broadleaf cattail, i.e., Typha Latifolia.
Phragmites australis, or common reed, is also known by many synonyms including: Phragmites; Arundo altissima; Arundo australis; Arundo graeca; Arundo isiaca; Arundo maxima; Arundo occidentalis; Arundo palustris; Arundo phragmites; Arundo vulgaris; Cynodon phragmites; Oxyanthe phragmites; Phragmites latissimus; Phragmites capensis; Phragmites caudatus; Phragmites chilensis; Phragmites dioicus; Phragmites fissifolius; Phragmites hispanicus; Phragmites isiacus; Phragmites martinicensis; Phragmites mauritianus; Phragmites maximus; Phragmites occidentalis; Phragmites; Phragmites vulgaris; Reimaria diffusa; Trichoon phragmites; Phragmites australis ssp. Maximus; Phragmites communis ssp. Maximus; Phragmites vulgaris ssp. Maximus; Phragmites communis var. flavescens; Phragmites communis var. genuinus; Phragmites communis var. hispanicus; Phragmites communis var. isiacus; Phragmites communis var. mauritianus; Phragmites communis var. variegatus; Phragmites maximus var. variegatus; Phragmites vulgaris var. mauritianus.
In certain embodiments, phragmites are used as a cellulosic feedstock and/or source of a cellulosic feedstock for fermentation under anaerobic conditions as described for grass and/or guar gum anywhere else in this disclosure and in certain embodiments, phragmites are used as a cellulosic feedstock and/or source of a cellulosic feedstock for fermentation under anaerobic conditions as described for grass and/or guar gum anywhere else in this disclosure.
Fermentation is a microbial process that relies on the presence of many different types of microbes to work as a consortium in harmony as complimentary supplementary relationships. The microbial community that makes up a specific fermenter's microbiome (the combination of all types of microbes in the fermenter) will be influenced by operational and design conditions, such as substrate type (feedstocks), biomass, hydraulic retention time, mixing, operating temperature, pH, and chemical addition (buffer solution or nutrient solution or foam prevention solution). The microbial community in turn will affect fermenter outcomes such as COD (chemical oxygen demand, a measure of carbon strength of the feed) removal and VFAs and biogas production.
Provided herein are the identities of certain bacterial and non-bacterial species responsible for cellulosic biomass degradation. Samples from grass aerobic, grass anaerobic, guar gum aerobic, and guar gum anaerobic stock cultures were analyzed by 16S amplicon sequencing technique and by metagenomics shotgun technique. The 16S amplicon sequencing data analysis was used to examine the celluloytic microbial community (bacterial species only) in four stock culture samples. This method provides taxonomic annotation and evidence of the presence of the functional gene; however, this technique can't identify organisms down to species level. It may be possible to infer functional genes from the 16S. It is not possible to detect any fungi or other types of organisms from the sample, as the 16S gene is only present in bacteria. It is theoretically possible to detect archaea using the 16S primers; however, the typical primers are more specific to bacteria and the bacterial sequence data would likely overshadow or obscure any archaeal sequences that are present. Identification of organisms is generally according to the nomenclature rules and are identified in the order, such as Super Kingdom, Kingdom, Phylum, Division or Class, Order, Family, Tribe, Genus, and Species.
A shotgun metagenomics approach can provide taxonomic alignments/annotations and detect the actual functional genes that are present in the samples as well as organisms from all domains of life, e.g. bacteria, archaea, eukaryotes, fungi, yeast, and viruses etc. There are taxonomic summaries for kingdom through species level. This technique is less sensitive with respect to 16S amplicon sequencing. Although shotgun metagenomic methods are not always as sensitive as 16S amplicon sequencing they can make up for this deficiency in the breadth of organisms and genes that can be detected
As determined in the non-limiting Examples below, certain results indicated that four sample conditions are quite similar to each other, particularly in terms of the functional gene annotation level. By taxonomic annotation, samples from aerobic conditions with grass as the feedstock and anaerobic conditions with grass as a feedstock are more similar to each other while samples from aerobic conditions with guar gum as a feedstock and anaerobic conditions with guar gum as a feedstock are more similar to each other. Nonetheless, all sample outcomes were similar at about an 80% level.
Known cellulolytic bacterial species (including both aerobic and anaerobic species) include: Micrococcus spp., Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Xanthomonas spp., Acetobacter Xylinum, and Brucella spp. Known cellulolytic fungal strains (including both aerobic and anaerobic strains) include: Chaetomium, Fusarium Myrothecium, Trichoderma. Penicillium, Aspergillus, and so forth, are some of the fungal species responsible for cellulosic biomass hydrolyzation. Other bacterial species include Trichonympha, Clostridium, Actinomycetes, Bacteroides succinogenes, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Ruminococcus albus, and Methanobrevibacter ruminantium.
In certain embodiments, cellulolytic organisms were identified with 16S amplicon DNA technology. Organisms were identified for the degradation of grass and guar gum under both aerobic and anaerobic fermentation conditions. It was observed that the samples were highly diverse at the “species” level with roughly 500 taxa observed per sample. One of the most abundant bacterial organisms identified in all four reactors as a taxon was:
Under guar gum anaerobic conditions, another highly abundant bacterial organism was:
Anaerobic operations are catabolic/destructive processes that occur in the absence of free molecular oxygen while aerobic processes occur in the presence of free and molecular oxygen. If the inoculum is not adequately controlled for methanogens, then VFAs (the intermediate products of fermentation) are converted into an end product herein referred to as “biogas.” In certain embodiments, biogas is an end product of fermentation of celluloytic biomass, such as grass, guar gum, under aerobic and anaerobic operating conditions, and leaves, phargmites, and cattails under anaerobic operating conditions and is a biological conversion of such biomass into gaseous forms, predominantly comprising of methane and carbon dioxide. The percentage proportions and percentage proportions of trace organic and inorganic gases vary from feedstock to feedstock and operating conditions of fermenters. In certain embodiments, other trace gases can be carbon monoxide, carbon disulfide, hydrogen, nitrogen, nitrous oxide (N2O), ammonia (NH3), hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and other odorous gases such as mercaptans (if sulfur is contained in feedstocks or comes with them as an impurity). Aerobic operations will predominantly produce carbon dioxide and water.
In certain embodiments, a nutrient solution can be added to culture reactors to aid in maintaining cellulolytic culture for VFAs and biogas production. A non-limiting, representative nutrient solution formulation is shown in Table 9.
In certain embodiments, a nutrient solution is not added if only VFAs production is desired, because such nutrient solutions contain buffering chemicals and that promote or harbor methanogens. The addition of a nutrient solution in stock culture reactors provides trace elements and vital vitamins and can help maintain all cellulolytic organisms in an equal functional state. Derivation of inoculum from stock cultures can result in less variability and more reproducibility due to consistency of the strength of organisms.
In certain embodiments, the addition of a nutrient solution is used to increase the rate of initial VFA production in very early period of the fermentation process. Such increased production rate can cut down the size of fermenting reactor volume. In certain embodiments, the addition of a nutrient solution is used to speed recovery of the mass of cellulolytic organisms after the process upsets, for example due to toxic substances.
Carbon-based compounds such as VFAs of the present disclosure can be used in wastewater treatment operations and other industrial settings where soluble carbon is needed for their operations.
The methods of producing carbon-based compounds of this disclosure are well-suited, for example, for wastewater treatment operations, where at least one or more of the following conditions prevail: i) the raw sewage has limited carbon in combined sewerage system due to inclusion of storm water; ii) limited carbon in the raw sewage is diluted with rainfall runoff and other drainage ending up in the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan (TARP) flows; iii) phosphorous is biologically removed but has an unattractive ratio of carbon to P; iv) the limited carbon is available to achieve multiple goals, such as biogas production and other carbon dependent liquid stream and resource recovery operations like enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR), dentrification, and waste activated sludge stripping to recover internal phosphate (WASSRIP®); and v) external carbon is purchased to sustain the above mentioned process performance.
Disclosed herein are methods of producing a volatile fatty acid by fermenting a cellulosic feedstock present in a fermentation solution. Descriptions of various feedstocks are provided in detail elsewhere herein. In certain embodiments, the fermentation solution comprises cellulolytic microorganisms and the cellulosic feedstock. Descriptions of cellulotytic microorganisms are provided in detail elsewhere herein. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is grass, leaves, phragmites, cattails, guar gum, or a combination of thereof. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is grass or guar gum.
In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic microorganisms are supplied to the fermentation solution in an inoculum comprising the cellulolytic microorganisms. In certain embodiments, the inoculum can come from a seed source reservoir which can, for example, be a digester draw from anaerobic mesophilic digester in a municipal sewage treatment plant, such as disclosed in Example 6 of the non-limiting examples below. In certain embodiments, the fermentation solution comprises nutrients to support the viability of the cellulolytic microorganisms. In certain embodiments, the nutrients are supplied to the fermentation solution in a nutrient solution, a representative example of which is shown in Table 9.
In certain embodiments, the composition of identities of and/or the metabolic pathways utilized by the cellulolytic microorganisms supplied to the fermentation solution have been previously adapted or derived to the type of cellulosic feedstock and/or fermentation conditions to be used. “Adapted,” “adapting,” “adaptation,” and the like involves making the cellulolytic microorganisms use a certain feedstock and/or fermentation condition to steer their identities and metabolic pathways to meet their carbon and cellular energy needs such that the cellulolytic microorganisms are trained and adapted to derive their carbon and energy needs from the feedstock and/or fermentation condition. As used herein, reference to “derived,” “deriving,” and the like is used interchangeably for the same process and/or phase of the methods disclosed herein.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented under aerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented under anaerobic conditions. In certain embodiments, the fermentation solution is agitated, either continually, periodically, intermittently, or the like, during fermentation. In certain embodiments, the agitation is achieved by stirring the fermentation solution within a fermentation vessel. In certain embodiments, the agitation occurs at 120 RPM.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented at a temperature of between any of about 15° C., 16° C., 17° C., 18° C., 19° C., 20° C., 21° C., 22° C., 23° C., 24° C., 25° C., 26° C., 27° C., 28° C., 29° C., 30° C., 31° C., 32° C., 33° C., 34° C., or 35° C. to any of about 20° C., 21° C., 22° C., 23° C., 24° C., 25° C., 26° C., 27° C., 28° C., 29° C., 30° C., 31° C., 32° C., 33° C., 34° C., 35° C., 36° C., 37° C., 38° C., 39° C., or 40° C. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented at a temperature of between about 20° C. to 35° C.
The loading rate of the cellulosic feedstock is described in detail elsewhere herein. For example, in certain embodiments, the loading rate of the cellulosic feedstock is: between about 30 g/L to 50 g/L in the fermentation solution, wherein the feedstock is grass fermented under aerobic or anaerobic conditions; between about 5 g/L and 15 g/L in the fermentation solution, wherein the feedstock is guar gum fermented under aerobic conditions; or between about 1 g/L and 10 g/L in the fermentation solution, wherein the feed stock is guar gum fermented under anaerobic conditions.
The pH at which the cellulosic feedstock can be fermented is described in detail elsewhere herein. For example, in certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented at a pH of less than about pH 6.2 or between about pH 5.0 and 6.0 if VFA production is desired. For example, in certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented at a pH of above about pH 6.3 or between about pH 6.5 and pH 7.2 if biogas production is desired.
In certain embodiments, at least one VFA produced is selected from the group consisting of acetic acid, propionic acid, iso-butyric acid, and N-butyric acid. In certain embodiments, at least two, at least three, or at least four VFAs produced are selected from the group consisting of acetic acid, propionic acid, iso-butyric acid, and N-butyric acid. In certain embodiments, the fermentation of the cellulosic feedstock proceeds to further generate a biogas as described in detail elsewhere herein. For example, in certain embodiments, the biogas produced is methane and/or carbon dioxide.
In certain embodiments disclosed anywhere herein, the cellulosic feedstock is grass which has been dried and pulverized before incorporation into the fermentation solution. And, in certain embodiments, the grass is not switchgrass.
In certain embodiments, cellulase is added to the fermentation solution. While cellulase is not necessary, and may not necessarily improve overall yield, it can be used to increase the initial reaction rate.
A fatty acid is a carboxylic acid with a long aliphatic chain, which can be saturated or unsaturated. Most naturally occurring fatty acids have an unbranched chain of an even number of carbon atoms, from 4 to 28. Fatty acids differ by length, often categorized as short to very long. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) are generally considered fatty acids with aliphatic tails of five or fewer carbons (e.g. butyric acid). Medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) are generally considered fatty acids with aliphatic tails of 6 to 12 carbons, which can form medium-chain triglycerides. Long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) are generally considered fatty acids with aliphatic tails of 13 to 21 carbons. And, very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) are generally considered fatty acids with aliphatic tails of 22 or more carbons. Provided herein are some of the most common forms of low-molecular-weight VFAs of importance with additional acids names in the table below.
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Some common forms of short chain free VFAs include: Formic acid; Acetic acid; Propionic acid; Isobutyric acid; Butyric acid; Isovaleric acid; and Valeric acid.
Medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs). Some common forms of medium chain VFAs include: Caproric acid (n-Hexanoic Acid); Enanthoic Acid (n-Heptanoic acid); Caprylic acid (n-Octanoic Acid); alpha-Ethylcaproic Acid (2-Ethylhexanoic Acid); Valproic Acid (2-Propylpentanoic Acid); Pelargonic Acid (n-Nonanoic Acid); Capric acid (n-Decanoic Acid); Undecylic acid (systematically named undecanoic acid); and Dodecylic acid (systematically named Dodecanoic acid; Lauric acid and Fulvic acid are common).
Long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs). LCFAS are found in most fats and oils, including olive oil, soybean oil, fish, nuts, avocado and meat. Some common forms include: Tridecylic acid; Tetradecanoic acid (Myristic acid); Pentadecylic acid; Hexadecanoic acid (Palmitic acid); Heptadecanoic acid (Margaric acid and Heptadecylic acid); Octadecanoic acid (Stearic acid); (9Z)-octadec-9-enoic acid (Oleic acid); (9Z,12Z)-octadeca-9,12-dienoic acid (Linoleic acid (with two double bonds); Linoleic acid (with three double bonds)); Nonadecylic acid; Eicosanoic acid (Arachidic acid; Arachic acid; Arachidonic acid; Mead's acid); and Heneicosanoic acid.
Very Long chain free volatile fatty acids (VLCFA). Some common forms include: Docosanoic acid (Behenic acid; DHA Cervonic acid); Tricosanoic acid (Tricosylic acid); Tetracosanoic acid (Lignoceric acid); Pentacosanoic acid (Pentacosylic acid); and Hexacosanoic acid (Cerotic acid).
Table 40 is list of carboxylic acids ordered by the number of carbon atoms in the carboxylic acid.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is aerobic. In certain embodiments, the grass is not switchgrass. Appendix A (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms was adapted to grass feedstock fermented under aerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Appendix A. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms disclosed in Appendix A. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix A. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix A. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix A. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Table 26A (Tables 26A and 26B are derived from Appendix A). In certain embodiments, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 26A. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Table 26B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other, (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_SB-1; Other; Other; Other; Other, (iii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_vadinHA17; Other; Other; Other; Other, (iv) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Firmicutes; D_2_Clostridia; D_3_Clostridiales; D_4_Family XI; D_5_Sedimentibacter; Other, and (v) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_Bacteroidia; D_3_Bacteroidales; D_4_Rikenellaceae; D_5_vadinBC27 wastewater-sludge group; Other. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, or all 3 of the top 3 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other, (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_SB-1; Other; Other; Other; Other, and (iii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_vadinHA17; Other; Other; Other; Other. In certain embodiments, at least 1 or both of the top 2 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other, and (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_SB-1; Other; Other; Other; Other. In any of the above, the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of grass under aerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms can be used for fermentation of grass under anaerobic conditions, fermentation of guar gum under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than grass, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is aerobic. In certain embodiments, the grass is not switchgrass. Appendix B (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of all cellulolytic microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic microorganisms was adapted to grass feedstock fermented under aerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Appendix B, whether bacterial or non-bacterial. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic microorganisms disclosed in Appendix B. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 27A (Table 27A, Table 27B, and Table 27C are derived from Appendix B). In certain embodiments, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 27A. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or all 15 of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 27B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 27C. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Proteobacteria; Other; Other; Other; Other; Other, (ii) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Firmicutes; c_Bacilli; o_Bacillales; f_Planococcaceae; g_Sporosarcina; s_Sporosarcina psychrophila, (iii) sk_Archaea; k_Archaea incertaesedis; p_Euryarchaeota; c_Methanomicrobia; o_Methanosarcinales; f_Methanosaetaceae; g_Methanothrix; s_Methanothrix soehngenii, (iv) sk_Eukaryota; k_Metazoa; p_Chordata; c_Mammalia; o_Primates; f_Hominidae; g_Homo; s_Homo sapiens, and (v) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Actinobacteria; c_Actinobacteria; Other; Other; Other; Other. In any of the above, the cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of grass under aerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic microorganisms can be used for fermentation of grass under anaerobic conditions, fermentation of guar gum under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than grass, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is aerobic. In certain embodiments, the grass is not switchgrass. Appendix B (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of all cellulolytic microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic microorganisms was adapted to grass feedstock fermented under aerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms disclosed in Appendix B. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or all 15 of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix B. In any of the above, the cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of grass under aerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms can be used for fermentation of grass under anaerobic conditions, fermentation of guar gum under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than grass, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is anaerobic. In certain embodiments, the grass is not switchgrass. Appendix C (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms was adapted to grass feedstock fermented under anaerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Appendix C. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms disclosed in Appendix C. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix C. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix C. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix C. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Table 28A (Table 28A and Table 28B are derived from Appendix C). In certain embodiments, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 28A. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Table 28B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other, (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_SB-1; Other; Other; Other; Other, (iii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_Bacteroidia; D_3_Bacteroidales; D_4_Rikenellaceae; D_5_vadinBC27 wastewater-sludge group; Other, (iv) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_vadinHA17; Other; Other; Other; Other, and (v) D_0_Bacteria; D_1 Synergistetes; D_2 Synergistia; D_3 Synergistales; D_4 Synergistaceae; D_5 Thermovirga; Other. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, or all 3 of the top 3 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other, (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_SB-1; Other; Other; Other; Other, and (iii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_Bacteroidia; D_3_Bacteroidales; D_4_Rikenellaceae; D_5_vadinBC27 wastewater-sludge group; Other. In certain embodiments, at least 1 or both of the top 2 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other, and (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_SB-1; Other; Other; Other; Other. In any of the above, the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of grass under anaerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms can be used for fermentation of grass under aerobic conditions, fermentation of guar gum under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than grass, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is anaerobic. In certain embodiments, the grass is not switchgrass. Appendix D (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of all cellulolytic microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic microorganisms was adapted to grass feedstock fermented under anaerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Appendix D, whether bacterial or non-bacterial. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic microorganisms disclosed in Appendix D. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 29A (Table 29A, Table 29B, and Table 29C are derived from Appendix D). In certain embodiment, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 29A. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or all 15 of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 29B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 29C. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) sk_Archaea; k_Archaea incertaesedis; p_Euryarchaeota; c_Methanomicrobia; o_Methanosarcinales; f_Methanosaetaceae; g_Methanothrix; s_Methanothrix soehngenii, (ii) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Actinobacteria; c_Actinobacteria; Other; Other; Other; Other, (iii) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertae sedis; p_Proteobacteria; Other; Other; Other; Other; Other, (iv) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertae sedis; p_Candidatus Cloacimonetes; c_Candidatus Cloacimonetes incertae sedis; o_Candidatus Cloacimonetes incertae sedis; f_Candidatus Cloacimonetes incertae sedis; g_Candidatus Cloacimonas; s_Candidatus Cloacimonas acidaminovorans, and (v) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Actinobacteria; c_Actinobacteria; o_Streptomycetales; f_Streptomycetaceae; g_Streptomyces; Other. In any of the above, the cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of grass under anaerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic microorganisms can be used for fermentation of grass under aerobic conditions, fermentation of guar gum under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than grass, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is anaerobic. In certain embodiments, the grass is not switchgrass. Appendix D (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of all cellulolytic microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic microorganisms was adapted to grass feedstock fermented under anaerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in Appendix D. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms disclosed in Appendix D. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In certain embodiment, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or all 15 of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix D. In any of the above, the cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of grass under anaerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms can be used for fermentation of grass under aerobic conditions, fermentation of guar gum under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than grass, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is aerobic. Appendix E (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms was adapted to guar gum feedstock fermented under aerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Appendix E. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms disclosed in Appendix E. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix E. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix E. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix E. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Table 30A (Table 30A and Table 30B are derived from Appendix E). In certain embodiments, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 30A. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Table 30B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_vadinHA17; Other; Other; Other; Other, (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other, (iii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_Sphingobacteriia; D_3_Sphingobacteriales; D_4_W CHB1-69; Other; Other, (iv) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_SB-1; Other; Other; Other; Other, and (v) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; Other; Other; Other; Other; Other. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, or all 3 of the top 3 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_vadinHA17; Other; Other; Other; Other, (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other, and (iii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_Sphingobacteriia; D_3_Sphingobacteriales; D_4_W CHB1-69; Other; Other. In certain embodiments, at least 1 or both of the top 2 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_vadinHA17; Other; Other; Other; Other, and (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other. In any of the above, the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of guar gum under aerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms can be used for fermentation of guar gum under anaerobic conditions, fermentation of grass under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than guar gum, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is aerobic. Appendix F (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of all cellulolytic microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic microorganisms was adapted to guar gum feedstock fermented under aerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Appendix F, whether bacterial or non-bacterial. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic microorganisms disclosed in Appendix F. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 31A (Table 31A, Table 31B, and Table 31C are derived from Appendix F). In certain embodiment, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 31A. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or all 15 of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 31B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 31C. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Proteobacteria; Other; Other; Other; Other; Other, (ii) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Actinobacteria; c_Actinobacteria; Other; Other; Other; Other, (iii) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Proteobacteria; c_Betaproteobacteria; o_Burkholderiales; f_Burkholderiaceae; g_Burkholderia; Other, (iv) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Actinobacteria; c_Actinobacteria; o_Streptomycetales; f_Streptomycetaceae; g_Streptomyces; Other, and (v) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Proteobacteria; c_Gammaproteobacteria; o_Pseudomonadales; f_Pseudomonadaceae; g_Pseudomonas; Other. In any of the above, the cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of guar gum under aerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic microorganisms can be used for fermentation of guar gum under anaerobic conditions, fermentation of grass under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than guar gum, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is aerobic. Appendix F (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of all cellulolytic microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic microorganisms was adapted to guar gum feedstock fermented under aerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in Appendix F. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms disclosed in Appendix F. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In certain embodiment, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or all 15 of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix F. In any of the above, the cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of guar gum under aerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms can be used for fermentation of guar gum under anaerobic conditions, fermentation of grass under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than guar gum, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is anaerobic. Appendix G (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms was adapted to guar gum feedstock fermented under anaerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Appendix G. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms disclosed in Appendix G. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix G. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix G. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix G. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Table 32A (Table 32A and Table 32B are derived from Appendix G). In certain embodiments, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 32A. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in Table 32B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_Bacteroidia; D_3_Bacteroidales; D_4 Bacteroidaceae; D_5 Bacteroides; Other 4C_PE Reactor, (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_vadinHA17; Other; Other; Other; Other, (iii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other, (iv) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Proteobacteria; D_2_Epsilonproteobacteria; D_3_Campylobacterales; D_4_Helicobacteraceae; D_5_Sulfurovum; Other, and (v) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_Sphingobacteriia; D_3_Sphingobacteriales; D_4_W CHB1-69; Other; Other. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, or all 3 of the top 3 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_Bacteroidia; D_3_Bacteroidales; D_4 Bacteroidaceae; D_5 Bacteroides; Other 4C_PE Reactor, (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_vadinHA17; Other; Other; Other; Other, and (iii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Chloroflexi; D_2_Anaerolineae; D_3_Anaerolineales; D_4_Anaerolineaceae; Other; Other. In certain embodiments, at least 1 or both of the top 2 most abundant types of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_Bacteroidia; D_3_Bacteroidales; D_4 Bacteroidaceae; D_5 Bacteroides; Other 4C_PE Reactor, and (ii) D_0_Bacteria; D_1_Bacteroidetes; D_2_vadinHA17; Other; Other; Other; Other. In any of the above, the cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of guar gum under anaerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic bacterial microorganisms can be used for fermentation of guar gum under aerobic conditions, fermentation of grass under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than guar gum, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is anaerobic. Appendix H (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of all cellulolytic microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic microorganisms was adapted to guar gum feedstock fermented under anaerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Appendix H, whether bacterial or non-bacterial. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic microorganisms disclosed in Appendix H. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 33A (Table 33A, Table 33B, and Table 33C are derived from Appendix H). In certain embodiment, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 33A. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or all 15 of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 33B. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the cellulolytic microorganisms in Table 33C. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of: (i) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertae sedis; p_Proteobacteria; Other; Other; Other; Other; Other, (ii) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Actinobacteria; c_Actinobacteria; Other; Other; Other; Other, (iii) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Proteobacteria; c_Betaproteobacteria; o_Burkholderiales; f_Burkholderiaceae; g_Burkholderia; Other, (iv) sk_Archaea; k_Archaea incertaesedis; p_Euryarchaeota; c_Methanomicrobia; o_Methanosarcinales; f_Methanosaetaceae; g_Methanothrix; s_Methanothrix soehngenii, and (v) sk_Bacteria; k_Bacteria incertaesedis; p_Actinobacteria; c_Actinobacteria; o_Streptomycetales; f_Streptomycetaceae; g_Streptomyces; Other. In any of the above, the cellulolytic microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of guar gum under anaerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic microorganisms can be used for fermentation of guar gum under aerobic conditions, fermentation of grass under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than guar gum, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is anaerobic. Appendix H (which is incorporated herein by reference), is a list of all cellulolytic microorganisms ordered by their abundance as detected when the population of cellulolytic microorganisms was adapted to guar gum feedstock fermented under anaerobic conditions. Certain embodiments are drawn to the use of one or more of the cellulolytic no-bacterial microorganisms in Appendix H. In certain embodiments, the most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganism and/or most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms correlate to or approximate the most abundant cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms disclosed in Appendix H. For example, while it would be prohibitive to list every potential combination which are understood to be disclosed herein, in certain embodiments, at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, or more of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 100 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In certain embodiments, at least 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or more of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 75 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In certain embodiments, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, or more of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 50 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In certain embodiment, the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum consist of the top 25 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or all 15 of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 15 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or all 10 of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 10 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In certain embodiments, at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or all 5 of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum are selected from the group consisting of the top 5 most abundant types of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms shown in Appendix H. In any of the above, the cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms in the fermentation solution and/or in the inoculum have been adapted to fermentation of guar gum under anaerobic conditions. Further, in certain embodiments, any of the above compositions of cellulolytic non-bacterial microorganisms can be used for fermentation of guar gum under aerobic conditions, fermentation of grass under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, or fermentation of a feedstock other than guar gum, such as but not limited leaves, phragmites, or cattails, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions.
In certain embodiments, the cellulolytic microorganisms in the inoculum are adapted or derived from a seed source reservoir. In certain such embodiments, the seed source reservoir is a digester draw from a municipal sewage treatment operation. In certain embodiments, a method disclosed herein comprises deriving cellulolytic microorganisms from a seed source reservoir for use in the fermentation of the cellulosic feedstock, for example, as shown in the Examples. In certain embodiments, during such derivation, the composition of the cellulolytic microorganisms is adapted to the type of cellulosic feedstock and fermentation conditions to be used.
In certain embodiments, derivation phase comprises fermentation of the cellulolytic microorganisms from a seed source reservoir for at least 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, 6 day, 7 days, at least 8 days, at least 10 days, at least 14 days, at least 21 days, at least 28 days, or at least 30 days, during which time the fermentation reaction can be “re-fed” one, twice, or three times per week by removing a portion of the reaction and replacing with feedstock (e.g., fresh feedstock), nutrient solution, and/or digester sludge. In certain embodiments, about 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, or 5%, e.g., 3%-5% of the volume is removed. It is understood that more can be removed, e.g., more than 5%, 5% to 10%, or more than 10% can be removed but doing so will delay the amount of time needed to the population of cellulolytic microorganisms to regain their mass. In certain embodiments, the method further comprising cultivating and maintaining the derived cellulolytic microorganisms' composition for use as the inoculum.
In certain embodiments disclosed anywhere herein, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented for about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or more days. In certain embodiments, after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 days, a portion of the fermentation solution is removed and replaced with a solution comprising unfermented cellulosic feedstock. In certain embodiments, additional inoculum and/or nutrient solution is also added. In certain embodiments, the amount of fermentation solution removed and replaced is about 50%, 60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95% of its volume. During the phase of generating VFAs and/or biogas, in a continuously operated batch system, any volume removal up to 80% of total solid and liquid volume or almost all liquid volume removal (i.e., leaving 20% of the total volume in the form of solids) is permissible, so long as there is sufficient active mass of solids left behind in the reactor that contains cellulolytic organisms to ferment a new incoming unfermented feedstock. In certain embodiments, the removal and replacement of a portion of the fermentation solution is repeated at least once after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 days. For purposes of determining the fermentation time in a continuously operated batch system, the time is considered reset to day 0 after each volume removal and replacement. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented from about 1 to 4 days to produce VFAs. In certain embodiments, the cellulosic feedstock is fermented 5 or more days to produce biogas.
Useful loading rates for cellulosic feedstock fermentation are described in detail elsewhere herein. For example, in certain embodiments: (i) the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass, the fermentation is aerobic, and the feedstock has a loading rate of between about 30 g/L and 50 g/L; (ii) the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass, the fermentation is anaerobic, and the feedstock has a loading rate of between about 30 g/L and 50 g/L; (iii) the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum, the fermentation is aerobic, and the feedstock has a loading rate of between 5 g/L and 15 g/L; or (iv) the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum, the fermentation is anaerobic, and the feedstock has a loading rate of between 1 g/L and 10 g/L.
Obtainable volatile fatty acid yields are described in detail elsewhere herein. For example, in certain embodiments the yield of VFAs is: (i) between about 35 mg/g and 125 mg/g per unit feedstock when the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is aerobic; (ii) between about 70 mg/g and 175 mg/g per unit feedstock when the cellulosic feedstock comprises grass and the fermentation is anaerobic; (iii) between about 150 mg/g and 300 mg/g per unit feedstock when the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is aerobic; or (iv) between about 400 mg/g and 600 mg/g per unit feedstock when the cellulosic feedstock comprises guar gum and the fermentation is anaerobic.
Certain embodiments are drawn to combining an inoculum comprising the cellulolytic microorganisms and the cellulosic feedstock to produce the fermentation solution. In certain embodiments, a nutrient solution is further added to the fermentation solution. Certain embodiments provide for a nutrient solution, a representative example of which is shown in Table 9.
In certain embodiments, the fermentation of the cellulosic feedstock occurs in a fermentation vessel.
Also provide herein is a carbon dependent nutrient removal and/or recovery process comprising the use of a volatile fatty acid produced by any of the fermentation of cellulosic feedstocks disclosed herein.
The following examples demonstrate the concept of VFA generation from grass and guar gum. Provided are representative variables useful for VFA production; e.g., aerobic/anaerobic conditions, cellulase, temperature, and pH and determinations of VFA yield.
Initial samples were collected on 9/14 from three sources and submitted for background analysis. These samples were: municipal tap water; water reclamation plant effluent (Stickney Water Reclamation Plant (SWRP) operated by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Chicago); and digester draw (SWRP operated by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Chicago). Freshly mowed grass was collected on 9/18 in two 40-gallon garbage bags. Five reactors were set up with 1,500 mL liquid volumes (9/18) as shown below and then on 9/20, additional 500 mL liquid volumes were added to the first four reactors to accomplish the following configurations (Table 2).
First set of samples were collected on 9/21 at about 3 pm and submitted on 9/25 due to Ortho-P 48 analysis hours holding time. On 9/26, additional samples were collected from each of the five reactors and submitted solely for VFA analysis. A comparison was also done using HACH's Volatile Acids test kit (TNT plus 872, Method 10240).
The five reactors were subsequently cleaned on 9/26 upon collecting samples. The reactor configuration was redesigned and four were filled on 9/28 (12 pm) and sample collected (Table 3 and Table 4):
1Results for VFA and sCOD for these samples (reactor three) to be multiplied by two to account for the dilution that was performed with the exception of sample for the VFA parameter (no dilution was performed).
2Results for VFA and sCOD for these samples (reactor four) to be multiplied by five to account for the dilution that was performed.
The four reactors were subsequently emptied of all liquid (10/6; 3 pm), leaving only solid material in each reactor. New SWRP effluent and digester draw source samples were collected at 3 pm on 10/11 (from the same locations as described above), as additional material was needed to fill the reactors.
The reactor configuration was redesigned and four were filled on 10/12 (9:45 am) and samples collected (Table 5 and Table 6).
1Results for VFA and sCOD for these samples (reactor three) to be multiplied by two to account for the dilution that was performed.
2Results for VFA and sCOD for these samples (reactor four) to be multiplied by five to account for the dilution that was performed.
On 10/17 at 12:45 pm, the squeezed grass mass VFA were measured using only HACH method.
WASSTRIP® Evaluation: On 10/18, approximately 10 gallons of mixed liquor sample was collected from the end of tank four of Battery D at the SWRP. A portion was submitted for laboratory analysis. The remaining mixed liquor sample was then allowed to settle for a period of 70 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. A portion of the thickened sludge sample was then submitted for laboratory analysis. At 8:35 am the following day, 3,600 mL of thickened sludge was combined with 1,090 mL of liquid from Reactor 3 and 260 mL of liquid from Reactor 2. Samples were taken at regular intervals (Table 7).
A total of 35 samples were taken from reactors one through four between 9/28 and 10/6. These samples were analyzed for VFA concentrations using both HACH's TNTplus 872 reagents (method 10240) and the services of the Calumet Analytical Laboratory. These concentrations were plotted (
Predicted values, using the above formulas in
Both the power and linear predictive formulas return a strong correlation to the Calumet Analytical Laboratory's VFA concentration (R2 values of 0.9087 and 0.9331, respectively). These formulas were then corrected so that the resulting formula slope equals 1 (e.g. the predicted value of 600 mg/L, using the HACH method results, corresponds to the Calumet Analytical Laboratory values of 600 mg/L). The corrected predicted formula, and associated plots are shown in
When samples were taken from reactors 3 and 4, these samples were diluted so that they could be prepared for VFA and soluble COD analysis, which require filtering through a 0.45 micron filter. The predictive analysis, described above, uses the raw values obtained before multiplying the sample by the appropriate dilution factor. The graphs of these multiplied results are illustrated in
The predictive formula can be adjusted in order to correct the resulting trendline slope to 1 (
The seed source reservoir of microorganisms was municipal anaerobic digesters (municipal wastewater treatment plant operated at a temperature of 95 degrees Fahrenheit and hydraulic/sludge retention time ranging from about 20 to 30 days). Other sources may be cow and buffalo dung and soil.
A. Derivation of Cellulolytic Organisms:
On 10/12, two aerobic reactors (grass and guar gum) with lids having vent line were established and operated as shown below in order to allow the organisms within these reactors to adapt to the fed substrates and mature for over a month (11/17).
Oxygen: Not aerated but exposed to atmosphere (aerobic).
Mixing: Only before sampling; occasional mixing unobjectionable.
Temperature: 25 to 30±1 C. pH: 7 to 7.5±0.3 pH units.
The first (Reactor 3), consisted of 1,500 mL digester draw, 1,500 mL of SWRP effluent, 100 g of dried shredded grass, and 3 g cellulase (1 g/l L).
The second (Reactor 4) consisted of 1,500 mL digester draw, 1,500 mL of SWRP effluent, 25 g of plant extract (PE; guar gum), and 3 g cellulase (i.e. 1 g/l L).
B. Process for Cultivation and Concentration of Cellulolytic Organisms.
In order to further cultivate and concentrate derived cellulolytic organisms in aerobic and anaerobic conditions, two stock fermenters for each substrate were set up using the liquid portion from the two reactors mentioned in the previous step (those two reactors were labeled as Reactors 3 and 4 in derivation step) as shown below. To accommodate large feed stock volume, 11 L volume was split into two 5.5 L reactors (3A and 3B and likewise 4A and 4B).
Aerobic Grass Fermenter 3A: Placed 250 mL of old Reactor 3 liquid and mixed with 2,625 mL of digester draw and 2,625 mL of effluent. Total volume of 5.5 L.
Aerobic Grass Fermenter 3B: Setup same as 3A, above. Total volume of 5.5 L.
Anaerobic Grass Fermenter 3C: Placed 500 mL of old Reactor 3 liquid into fermenter and mixed with 5,250 mL of digester draw and 5,250 mL of effluent. Total volume of 11 L.
Aerobic Guar Gum Fermenter 4A: Placed 250 mL of old Reactor 4 liquid and mixed with 2,625 mL of digester draw and 2,625 mL of effluent. Total volume of 5.5 L.
Aerobic Guar Gum Fermenter 4B: Setup same as 4A, above.
Anaerobic Guar Gum Fermenter 4C: Placed 500 mL of old Reactor 4 liquid into fermenter and mixed with 5,250 mL of digester draw and 5,250 mL of effluent. Total volume of 11 L.
C. Cultivation, Concentration and Maintenance of Cellulolytic Organisms.
A portion of fermenter content was removed and replenished with equal portion of salt-vitamin solution with grass in fermenters 3A, 3B, and 3C and equal portion of salt-vitamin solution with guar gum in fermenters 4A, 4B, and 4C, approximately twice per week as shown in Table 8 below. Occasionally, left over biomass from serum bottles were also fed back into reactors to conserve the mass of organisms. However, such left over additions are not needed.
One deterministic factor for servicing the fermenters is the length of time for which stock cultures of the vibrant cellulolytic organisms need to be maintained. The cellulolytic organisms in lab fermenters have been observed to survive without servicing the fermenters as well but servicing the fermenters can be performed.
On all of the dates listed above, the fermenters were fed using the following materials:
Fermenters 3A/3B: 11 g each of grass (2 g/L substrate feed rate)
Fermenter 3C: 22 g of grass at a rate of 2 g per liter (2 g/L substrate feed rate)
Fermenters 4A/4B: 0.55 g plant extract (0.1 g/L substrate feed rate)
Fermenter 4C: 1.1 g plant extract at a rate of 0.1 g per liter (0.1 g/L substrate feed rate)
Additionally, the fermenters were restocked with a volume of salt-vitamin solution equivalent to what was extracted, except when noted otherwise. A representative recipe for the salt-vitamin solution is included as shown in Table 9.
D. Monitoring of Fermenters for Healthy Cellulolytic Organisms.
Fermenters were monitored for proper operating conditions to ensure healthy growth and maintenance of a consortium of cellulolytic organisms' population. The following parameters were monitored with frequencies as follows: (i) measured pH and temp twice a week, Tuesdays and Fridays (measured twice per week) and (ii) four drawn samples from fermenters were composited (over two weeks) and analyzed for chemical oxygen demand (COD), total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), volatile fatty acids (VFA). pH and VFAs were used as indicators for “sour” reactors. The preceding procedure can be used for the grass and guar gum degradation process start-up.
Cellulase was added at 1 g per liter dose to all four reactors in a side-by-side testing to evaluate the impact of cellulase on VFA concentrations after a reaction time of about 2 to 4 days.
Means of populations of VFA concentrations of all four grass reactors with and without cellulase had no statistically significant difference. However, relating these concentrations with reaction time revealed a significantly different outcome, i.e., addition of cellulase reduced time to achieve the same concentration compared to omission of cellulase, indicating that cellulase did not affect final VFA production quantity, but it increased the reaction rate. Benefits of cellulase, despite its cost, include: (i) good for rapid stock culture growth; (ii) good for quicker VFA production on an emergency basis; and (iii) regain the strength of cellulolytic organisms from a toxic upset in the reactor.
A reduction in initial derivation time can be claimed due to cellulase use; cellulase enzyme promotes the outgrowth of cellulolytic organisms and thereby expedites the initial derivation time. Another claim can be the increased reaction rate with cellulase use, which reduces maximum VFA production time in the VFA production reactor, while end quantity of VFA is not impacted.
The purpose of maintaining and monitoring for certain operating conditions is to promote the growth of grass and guar gum feeding cellulolytic organisms to produce stock cultures and maintain young and dynamic biomass in the reactor for experiments in laboratory or to run field-scale grass and/or guar gum degradation fermenter systems.
Aerobic Grass Fermenter 3A/3B.
Oxygen: Not aerated but exposed to atmosphere (aerobic)
Mixing: Only before sampling
Temp.: 25 to 30±1 C
pH: 7 to 7.5±0.3 pH units
Anaerobic Grass Fermenter 3C.
Oxygen: No oxygen (anaerobic)
Mixing: Only before sampling
Temp.: 25 to 30±1 C
pH: 7 to 7.5±0.3 pH units
Aerobic Guar Gum Fermenter 4A/4B:
Oxygen: Not aerated but exposed to atmosphere
Mixing: Only before sampling
Temp.: 25 to 30±1 C
pH: 7 to 7.5±0.3 pH units
Anaerobic Guar Gum (#437) Fermenter 4C:
Oxygen: No oxygen (anaerobic)
Mixing: Only before sampling
Temp.: 25 to 30±1 C
pH: 7 to 7.5±0.3 pH units
Grass was dried at room temperature from 68% down to 5 to 10% moisture content and then pulverized to millimeter size particles before feeding to the reactors.
Guar gum in powder form was dissolved in lukewarm water before feeding to avoid undissolved lumps seating unutilized in the reactors.
A. 3A/3B at 35° C. and 120 RPM (12/18).
Consisted of 17 serum bottles (Table 10)—triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL dextrose (0.065 g/L); triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (1 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (2 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (6 g). The 425 mL inoculum extracted from each fermenter was replaced by 50% salt-vitamin solution, 25% digester draw, and 25% SWRP effluent.
B. 3C at 35° C. and 120 RPM (1/2).
Consisted of 17 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL dextrose (0.065 g/L); triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (1 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (2 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (6 g). The 850 mL inoculum extracted from the fermenter was replaced by 50% salt-vitamin solution, 25% digester draw, and 25% SWRP effluent. The setup configuration was the same as described in Table 10, but using fluid from Fermenter 3C, instead.
C. 4A/4B at 35° C. and 120 RPM (1/9).
Consisted of 17 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL dextrose (0.065 g/L); triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and plant extract (1 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and plant extract (2 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and plant extract (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and plant extract (0.5 g). The 425 mL inoculum extracted from each fermenter was replaced by 50% salt-vitamin solution, 25% digester draw, and 25% SWRP effluent. The setup configuration was the same as described in Table 11, but using fluid from Fermenter 4A/4B, instead.
D. 4C at 35° C. and 120 RPM. (1/16).
Consisted of 17 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL dextrose (0.065 g/L); triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and plant extract (1 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and plant extract (2 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and plant extract (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and plant extract (0.5 g). The setup configuration was the same as described in Table 11, but using fluid from Fermenter 4C, instead.
i. Serum Bottle Temperature Variable Experiment Setup:
A. 3C at 20° C. and 0 RPM (1/24).
Consisted of 15 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL dextrose (0.065 g/L); triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (2 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (6 g). The 750 mL inoculum extracted from the fermenter was replaced by 50% salt-vitamin solution, 25% digester draw, and 25% SWRP effluent.
B. 3C at 35° C. and 0 RPM (1/24).
Consisted of 15 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL dextrose (0.065 g/L); triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (2 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (6 g). The 750 mL inoculum extracted from the fermenter was replaced by 50% salt-vitamin solution, 25% digester draw, and 25% SWRP effluent. The setup configuration was the same as described in Table 12.
C. 3C at 25° C. and 0 RPM (1/31).
Consisted of 15 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL dextrose (0.065 g/L); triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (2 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (6 g). The setup configuration was the same as described in Table 12; however, the 750 mL inoculum extracted from the fermenter was replaced by the discarded solution from the serum bottle experiment set up on 1/24.
D. 3C at 30° C. and 0 RPM (1/31).
Consisted of 15 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL dextrose (0.065 g/L); triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (2 g); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (6 g). The setup configuration was the same as described in Table 12; however, the 750 mL inoculum extracted from the fermenter was replaced by the discarded solution from the serum bottle experiment set up on 1/24.
ii. Serum Bottle Mixing Speed Variable Experiment Setup.
A. 3C at 35° C. and 40 RPM (2/5).
Consisted of 10 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (6 g). The 500 mL inoculum extracted from the fermenter was replaced by the discarded solution from the serum bottle experiment set up on 1/31.
B. 3C at 35° C. and 80 RPM (2/5).
Consisted of 10 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (6 g). The 500 mL inoculum extracted from the fermenter was replaced by the discarded solution from the serum bottle experiment set up on 1/31. The setup configuration was the same as described in Table 13.
C. 3C at 35° C. and 0 RPM (2/7).
Consisted of 10 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (6 g). The setup configuration was the same as described in Table 13; however, the 500 mL inoculum extracted from the fermenter was replaced by the discarded solution from the serum bottle experiment set up on 2/5.
D. 3C at 35° C. and 120 RPM (2/7).
Consisted of 10 serum bottles-triplicate blank bottles with 50 mL inoculum and 50 mL salt-vitamin solution; triplicate control bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 30 mL salt-vitamin solution, and 20 mL sodium acetate (1 g/L); duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (4 g); and duplicate test bottles with 50 mL inoculum, 50 mL salt-vitamin solution, and grass (6 g). The setup configuration was the same as described in Table 13; however, the 500 mL inoculum extracted from the fermenter was replaced by the discarded solution from the serum bottle experiment set up on 2/5.
VFAs were measured following HACH procedures by the HACH Company (e.g., Volatile Acids. DOC316.53.01259. Esterification Method. Method 10240. 50 to 2500 mg/L CH3COOH (Acetic Acid). TNTPLUS™ 872. Scope and application: For digested sludges, activated sludges, process water and food products. 1 Adapted from The Analyst, 87, 949 (1962)). Additionally, many samples that were analyzed by HACH method were also analyzed by District's Analytical Laboratory Division (ALD) labs using GC-FID method.
District's ALD method was used to determine only four out of 16 components of VFAs, namely: acetic acid; propionic acid; iso-butyric acid; and N-butyric acid.
The gas produced in each treatment described above was extracted from serum bottles with graduated glass syringe and collected in separate Tedlar bags by treatment. Total gas production over a defined time period was recorded and used for the determination of total gas production and gas production rate per unit time.
For a bigger scale (6-L scale-up from serum bottle volume), the gas production was measured by Ritter milli gas counter, a volumetric gas flow meter (world wide web at www.ritter.de) and recorded with Rigamo (v. 3.1) software. The in-built feature was used to determine total gas production and gas flow rates.
Two major ingredients (CH4 and CO2) were measured in the gas samples using Gas Chromatographer SRI 8610C. The instrument was calibrated using known concentrations of both reference gas standards; the reference gas with known concentrations were diluted to different concentrations for calibration purpose. The gas was injected into an instrument for analysis upon calibration.
Average CH4 and CO2 were 37.79 and 41.77%, respectively.
On 1/30, 150 mL content was removed from each fermenter 3C and 4C (and 75 mL from each fermenter 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B) to submit for microbial identification. The 16S amplicon sequencing data analysis techniques was used to identify and examine the celluloytic microbial community in 4 samples from all four treatments. This technique provides taxonomic annotation and evidence of the presence of the functional gene; however, it can't identify organisms down to species level. It may be possible to infer functional genes from the 16S.
The 16S amplicon technique identified that all samples are highly diverse at the “species” level with roughly 500 taxa observed per sample, i.e., at least 500 dominant organisms in each of the 4 reactors.
The method using 16S amplicon sequence data is only able to detect bacterial functional genes. It is not possible to detect fungi or non-bacterial functional genes from the sample, as the 16S gene is only present in bacteria. It is theoretically possible to detect archaea using the 16S primers, however the typical primers are more specific to bacteria and the bacterial sequence data would likely overshadow or obscure any archaeal sequences that are present.
A shotgun metagenomics approach may be used to identify broader functional genes of cellulolytic organisms. It will detect the actual functional genes that are present in the samples as well as organisms from all domains of life, i.e. bacteria, archaea, eukaryotes, and viruses. However, it is less sensitive with respect to 16S amplicon sequencing.
As stated above, the samples were analyzed to identify predominant cellulolytic organisms by their taxon names.
12. Procedure for Boosting Efficiency of VFA Production from the Grass and Guar Gum Feed Stocks.
VFA concentrations and gas productions measured at different times were plotted against respective times. The time taken to reach a highest peak (i.e., highest VFA concentration or gas production) was noted as the required time for maximizing VFA and gas productions. An inflection point determined if both graphs were superimposed on one chart, may also be used as maximum allowable time for VFA production, as VFA are used as precursors to gas production by methanogens.
For maximizing gas production, pH adjustment may be needed using sodium bicarbonate or sodium or potassium hydroxide if the reactor pH drops falls below 6.5. Conversely, a pH drop below 6.5 would suppress methane producing organisms and allow VFA concentrations to accumulate in the reactor.
For each treatment, total VFA mass was calculated by multiplying highest concentration with total liquid volume in the reactor. The total gas production measured for each treatment was recorded. Total mass of VFAs was divided by the original amount of substrate added to the reactor at the start of experiments. Likewise, total volumetric gas production was divided by the original amount of substrate added at the start of the experiments. This method will determine VFA and gas production per unit weight of feedstock.
WASSTRIP® Evaluation (10/18; 2:12 pm). Approximately 10 gallons of mixed liquor sample was collected from the end of tank four of Battery D at the SWRP. A portion was submitted for laboratory analysis under LIMS number 8074350 for baseline TS, TVS, and Ortho-P. The remaining mixed liquor sample was then allowed to settle for a period of 70 minutes (settling criterion was developed during previous unrelated testing) and the supernatant was discarded. A portion of the thickened sludge sample was then submitted for laboratory analysis under LIMS number 8074351 for baseline TS, TVS, and Ortho-P. At 8:35 am the following day, 3,600 mL of thickened sludge was combined with 1,090 mL of liquid from Reactor 3 (grass derived VFA) and 260 mL of liquid from Reactor 2 (guar gum derived VFA) and a portion was analyzed for TP and Ortho-P. Samples were taken at regular intervals for Ortho-P analysis, as shown in Table 14.
With respect to initial TP of the mixture of WAS and VFA additions, the percent ortho-P were calculated at above hours since initial setup. The ortho-P concentrations of WAS, thickened WAS upon 70 minutes of settling, and the mixture of WAS and VFA additions were used as reference or background concentrations in the percent ortho-P calculations. 16. Applications of gas (derived from grass and guar gum feed stocks) in wastewater treatment operations.
It is contemplated that digester gas may be separated into two major gas streams if desired; CH4 and CO2 before its use.
Methane, preferably but not necessarily upon separation, may be used in boiler for heat energy production, or in CHP systems to produce heat and electricity, or to supply to natural gas lines while carbon dioxide may be sparged in digester draw to reduce its pH for reducing struvite formation and improving biosolids dewatering performance, or producing a food grade quality gas for carbonation for soft drinks.
Before or after gas separation, it may be used for the production of heat energy upon burning methane portion in the boilers, which in turn, can be used for the following:
a. Production of hot water;
b. Production of steam;
c. Heating and cooling buildings;
d. Raising temperature of digester feed; and
e. Maintaining digester's operating temperature.
This Example provides a summary of the basic bioinformatic analysis included with the amplicon sequencing services provided by the UIC Research Resources Center (RRC). The end result of these bioinformatics services is to provide investigators basic information concerning the abundance of taxa present in the samples. The basic bioinformatic analysis includes basic processing of raw sequence data using QIIME; including read merging, adapter & quality trimming, and chimeric checking; to generate a table of operational taxonomic units (OTU) with abundance data and associated taxonomic annotations (J. G. Caporaso, et al. Qiime allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature methods, 7(5):335-336, May 2010). Sequencing was performed by the DNA Services (DNAS) core of the RRC.
Forward and reverse reads were merged using PEAR (Jiajie Zhang, et al. Pear: a fast and accurate illumina paired-end read merger. Bioinformatics, 30(5):614-620, Mar. 12014). Percentages displayed are calculated based on the number of sequences per sample at the start of merging (Table 15 and
The DNAS core utilizes a set of filters and trim steps to generate a sequence dataset containing high quality data. Percentages displayed are calculated based on the number of sequences per sample at the start of trimming.
1. Ambiguous nucleotides (N) are trimmed from the ends and reads with internal ambiguous nucleotides are discarded.
2. Primer sequences are trimmed from the reads and any that lack either primer are discarded.
3. Reads are trimmed using a quality threshold of p=0:01.
4. Reads, after trimming, that are less than 300 bp in length are discarded.
Chimeric sequences are artifacts of the PCR process and occur when portions of two separate amplicons fuse during the amplification process. The RRC analysis pipeline uses a standard chimera checking program to identify chimeric sequences and remove from the dataset. Briefly, chimeric sequences were identified using the UCHIME algorithm as compared with the Greengenes_13_8_97database (Robert C. Edgar. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than blast. Bioinformatics, 26(19):2460-2461, 2010). Percentages displayed are calculated based on the number of sequences per sample prior to chimera filtering (Table 18 and
The QIIME v1.8 pipeline was used to perform the following processing steps: (1) Prepared sequence files (FASTA format) were combined using sample information; (2) Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clusters were generated denovo manner using the UCLUST method; (3) Representative sequences for each OTU were generated; (4) Taxonomic annotations were assigned to each OTU using the representative sequence data using UCLUST and the silva 119 16S.97 reference database (Daniel McDonald, et al. An improved greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. The ISME Journal, 6(3):610-618, March 2012); (5) Taxonomic and OTU abundance data were merged into a single OTU table and summaries of absolute abundances of taxa were generated for all phyla, classes, orders, families, genera, and species present in the dataset. (J. G. Caporaso, et al. Qiime allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature methods, 7(5):335-336, May 2010).
Scaled-up test runs were performed with grass, dried leaves, phragmites, and cattails under anaerobic conditions at 35° C. and 120 RPM mixing conditions to verify if yield was affected by the scaling-up process. These scaled-up runs used about 60 to 80 times higher liquid volume than previous serum bottle experiments (e.g., serum bottle experiments used a total liquid volume of 100 mL whereas the upscale experiments conducted in a fermenter used a total liquid volume of 6,000 to 8,000 mL.
Stock culture pH values observed with the use of alkalinity buffer solution were slightly above 7.0, while for anaerobic guar gum reactor, just below 7.50 as shown
pH values observed at larger fermenter scale for different feedstocks under anaerobic condition at 35 C, 120 RPM are shown in Table 20A and Table 20B, which indicates suppressed pH values compared to smaller scale samples (noticeably for grass).
The online pH drop monitored during larger scale runs is shown in
A representative example of a cellulose feedstock specific cultivation procedure is described below for cultivating and populating cellulolytic organisms' culture. In this procedure, grass is used as a cellulose feedstock but grass may be replaced by any other desirable feedstock.
a. Collect a sufficient amount (2 L) of digester draw.
b. Prepare the reactor (either a 5-L fermenter or a 5-L container with airtight lid) consisting of 1,500 mL digester draw, 1,500 mL of secondary treatment effluent, 100 g of dried shredded grass in powder form (just to make the solubilization step of fermentation process easier and increasing surface ratio of substrate to bugs; also to prevent feed and draw tubing clogged) and 3 g cellulase (can be used in initial set-up stage though not necessarily required; its use can shorten cultivation time).
c. Close the lid, shake and mix the contents well and leave undisturbed to allow for the organisms within the reactor to mature for about one month. The reactor lid can contain a thin tubing pierced through the lid for the biogas to vent out as a safety measure. If the reactor is a fermenter, then the gas venting with one way check valve mechanism should be used.
d. After about at least one-month time period, open the container and decant stratified liquid to discard.
e. Recover sludge portion (almost no separable grass is expected at this stage), and transfer 1 L content to each of the two separate fermenters; one aerobic and another anaerobic (see below Aerobic Fermenter and Anaerobic Fermenter).
f. At a frequency of every third day, a draw of 500 mL of content from both types of reactors is taken and replenished with 500 mL of a nutrient solution and 22 g of grass (or at a rate of 2 g per liter of fermenter liquid volume).
g. In case of guar gum, substance addition will be 1.1 g, or at a rate of 0.1 g per liter of fermenter liquid volume.
h. The draw from every third day can be sampled and analyzed for total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total phosphorus (TP), ortho-phosphates (Ortho-P), alkalinity, VFA, total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), and ammonia nitrogen (NH3) whereas inside content can be monitored for temperature and pH. As long as temperature is within the intended range, it should work like a controlled system. Too high of TKN is broken down into NH3, which in turn can potentially induce ammonia toxicity to the bugs. Relatively stable TS, VS, and COD values will indicate that the system is in steady state and is ready for the use.
i. Continue this feed/draw cycle for at least one to two months until the system has reached steady state. The culture is expected to be ready for the use. The total draw in each instance should not be more than 1.5 L per week to prevent a washout of community of organisms. Continue the routine like described above as long as you need the stock culture it for experimentation.
Place 1 L of old content into Fermenter without much exposure to atmosphere and mix with 5 L of digester draw and 5 L of secondary treated plant effluent. Total volume is 11 L. Remove air by flushing nitrogen gas and close the lid airtight. Intermittently mix the container by auto or manual operation at 120 RPM. Fermenter temperature is maintained between 30° C. and 35° C.
Place 1 L of old content into Fermenter and mix with 5 L of digester draw and 5 L of secondary treated plant effluent. Total volume is 11 L. Shake well and mix thoroughly. Leave the lid half open for allowing air to exchange. Although there seemed to be no need for mechanical mixing and/or aeration; intermittent mixing and aeration may be helpful. Occasional shaking can be helpful. Maintain fermenter temperature between 30° C. and 35° C.
Representative data of characteristics of stock reactors are shown in
Average VFA yield for grass ranged from 38.7 to 106.8 mg per gram in aerobic and from 74.8 to 129.3 mg per gram in anaerobic condition with a maximum VFA yield of 202.1 mg/g in 4 g grass treatment (
1Yields are based on 5.18% moisture in grass or 94.82% dry basis.
2Yields are based on 5.21% moisture in guar gum or 94.79% dry basis.
1Yields were based on 5.18% moisture on 100.00% dry basis.
The guar gum powder used in the experiment was a powder product, 200 mesh 35-40 cPs (centi-poise; a unit for viscosity). The analysis results presented below was conducted and provided by Rama Industries of India.
The first four, under the “Blended Grass” grouping, were taken from the blended stock of grass that are sitting in a 5-gallon pail on the benchtop. This stock had previously been dried in the hood prior to blending. The blended grass was then placed into the drying oven (104 degrees C. for 24 hours) and the resulting percent moisture between the hood dried grass and the oven dried grass is 5.2%.
The next four samples used fresh cut grass. The first two were placed into the drying oven (104 degrees C. for 24 hours) and the resulting percent moisture of 68.1%. The last two were first placed into the hood to dry (66.9% moisture), then into the oven drying oven (104 degrees C. for 24 hours) with a final percent moisture of 68.3% compared to the original fresh cut grass. The difference between hood dried and oven dried is only around 1.4% (68.3-66.9), versus the 5.2% in the first experiment using the blended grass. However, the difference is likely due to the blended grass holding some moisture from the air while sitting in the 5-gallon pail.
0.5 gal tap wtr+dry cut grass in 1 gal jar on 5/20 at 9:30 am; sampled 5/31 and 7/7,
Guar Gum 2.4 g+500 mL Distilled Water
The breadth and scope of the present disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
This is a U.S. Non-Provisional Application that claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/965,592, filed Jan. 24, 2020, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62965592 | Jan 2020 | US |