Patent Application
20200215183
The present invention relates to the production of recombinant influenza virus surface proteins in the fungus Myceliophthora thermophila. The recombinant proteins are for use in influenza vaccine compositions.
Influenza virus is a lipid-enveloped virus with a negative-sense, single-stranded, segmented RNA genome. The envelope of the virion contains two types of surface glycoproteins, hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, which play essential roles in viral infection. The hemagglutinin (HA) mediates attachment of the virus to its host cells and viral entry by membrane fusion. The neuraminidase (NA) is an enzyme which plays important roles in the release of new progenies and the prevention of their aggregation. Influenza viruses are classified into types A, B and C based on differences in their nucleoproteins and matrix proteins. Each type is further classified into subtypes according to combinations of HA and NA present on their surface. For influenza A viruses, 16 subtypes of HA and 9 subtypes of NA have been identified, of which three HA subtypes (H1, H2 and H3) and two NA subtypes (N1 and N2) are commonly found in humans. For influenza B viruses, only one subtype of HA and one subtype of NA are recognized.
The World Health Organization guidelines for the nomenclature of influenza virus strains are as follows: first, the type of virus is designated (A, B, or C), then the host (if non-human), place of isolation, isolation number, and year of isolation, separated by slashes. For influenza A, the HA and NA subtypes are noted in parentheses. For example, a strain often included in influenza vaccines is: A/New Caledonia/20/1999 (H1N1).
Vaccination of high-risk persons each year before the influenza season is the most effective measure for reducing the impact of influenza. The most common influenza vaccine is composed of inactivated virus particles produced using fertilized chicken eggs. Prior to each influenza season, a special committee selects three virus strains which are thought to represent the most likely viruses to strike in the coming flu season. Samples of the selected viruses are provided to manufacturers as seed virus stocks which possess the desired antigenic characteristics. The seed viruses are injected into fertilized chicken eggs. These eggs are incubated while the influenza viruses multiply. After a suitable period of time the eggs are opened and the egg white is harvested. This sample contains the viruses. The viruses are purified from the egg material and inactivated. Individual virus stocks are then combined to create the common trivalent influenza vaccine.
The production of the vaccine in eggs is associated with a number of drawbacks. First, a huge number of eggs is required, as high as 1-2 eggs/dose. In addition, the production is time consuming, expensive and lacks flexibility, for example if changes in the vaccine composition are needed during the flu season. Also, production in eggs results in varying viral yields and is also associated with allergic reactions to egg protein.
To avoid the use of eggs, alternative methods for producing influenza viruses have been proposed. These include production of virus particles by propagating the virus in mammalian cell cultures, for example in MDCK cells (Novartis) or PERC.6 cells (Crucell). In addition, production of recombinant hemagglutinin and/or neuraminidase proteins has been suggested, for example in insect cells using a baculovirus expression vector (Flublok®, Protein Sciences Corp.), in plant cells (Medicago Inc.), in bacterial systems (VaxInnate) and in fungi such as Neurospora crassa (Intrexon/Neugenesis) and Pichia pastoris (see for example, Murugan et al., 2013, Journal of Virological Methods, 187:20-25). However, hitherto described methods are relatively expensive and/or their yield is relatively low.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,163,533 discloses methods and compositions for rapidly producing multivalent recombinant vaccines using filamentous fungal heterokaryons. Filamentous fungal heterokaryons are generated from combinations of two or more parent strains into which recombinant DNA molecules encoding variants of antigens derived from pathogenic organisms have been introduced. The resulting vaccines are multivalent.
WO 2014/151488 discloses methods of improving the stability and maintaining the potency of recombinant hemagglutinin formulations, in particular, recombinant influenza hemagglutinin (rHA). In particular, it was shown that the stability of rHA formulations may be significantly improved by mutating cysteine residues or by formulating with a reducing agent and sodium citrate.
Myceliophthora thermophila strain C1, previously named Chrysosporium lucknowense strain C1, is a filamentous thermophilic fungus discovered in the early 1990's. The wild type C1 naturally produces high levels of cellulases, which made it attractive for production of these enzymes on a commercial scale. Over the years expression systems and several improved strains of C1 have been developed for producing additional enzymes and other industrial proteins in C1. For example, improved C1 strains characterized by cellulase production at higher levels compared to the wild type C1 isolate have been developed, denoted “High Cellulase” or “HC”. In addition, C1 strains which produce low levels of cellulases have also been developed, denoted “Low Cellulase” or “LC”, enabling the commercial production of purer enzymes.
Wild type C1 was deposited in accordance with the Budapest Treaty with the number VKM F-3500 D, deposit date Aug. 29, 1996. HC and LC strains have also been deposited, for example: strain UV13-6, deposit no. VKM F-3632 D, strain NG7C-19, deposit no. VKM F-3633 D, strain UV18-25, deposit no. VKM F-3631 D. Additional improved C1 strains that have been deposited include (i) HC strain UV18-100f (Δalp1Δpyr5)—deposit no. CBS141147; (ii) HC strain UV18-100f (Δalp1Δpep4Δalp2Δpyr5,Δprt1) deposit no. CBS141143; (iii) LC strain W1L#100I (Δchi1Δalp1Δalp2Δpyr5)—deposit no. CBS141153; and (iv) LC strain W1L#100I (Δchi1Δalp1ΔApyr5)—deposit no. CBS141149.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,268,585 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,871,493 disclose a transformation system in the field of filamentous fungal hosts for expressing and secreting heterologous proteins or polypeptides. Also disclosed is a process for producing large amounts of polypeptide or protein in an economical manner. The system comprises a transformed or transfected fungal strain of the genus Chrysosporium, more particularly of Chrysosporium lucknowense and mutants or derivatives thereof. Also disclosed are transformants containingChrysosporium coding sequences, as well expression-regulating sequences of Chrysosporium genes.
U.S. Pat. No. 9,175,296 discloses a fungal host strain of Chrysosporium lucknowense. Also disclosed is a method for homologous and/or heterologous production of a pure protein with a purity of higher than 75%, a method for production of artificial protein mixes and a method for simplified screening of strains functionally expressing a desired enzyme. U.S. Pat. No. 9,175,296 further discloses an isolated promoter sequence suitable for the transcriptional control of gene expression in Chrysosporium lucknowense and a method for isolating a fungal host strain of Chrysosporium lucknowense wherein the protease secretion is less than 20% of the protease secretion of Chrysosporium lucknowense strain UV 18-25.
There is a need for improved methods for producing influenza vaccine compositions, which are cost effective and which provide high yields of effective immunogenic proteins in a time-constrained manner that meets the production requirements of a seasonal influenza vaccine.
The present invention provides according to some aspects Myceliophthora thermophila strain C1 genetically modified to produce the influenza virus surface proteins hemagglutinin and neuraminidase.
As disclosed herein, the influenza virus surface proteins are produced as full length membrane-bound proteins, containing both their ectodomain and transmembrane domain It was surprisingly found that the full-length membrane-bound form produced by C1 is functional and immunogenic, while modified secreted forms are inactive. The membrane-bound form was particularly effective and elicited an immune response at relatively low concentrations, as exemplified in a mouse model. Advantageously, C1 could produce the membrane-bound form at high yields, suitable for commercial-scale production.
The present invention therefore provides an efficient system for producing effective immunogenic influenza virus proteins at high yields, for use in influenza vaccine compositions.
According to one aspect, the present invention provides a Myceliophthora thermophila C1 genetically-modified to produce an influenza virus surface protein, comprising an expression construct comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding the influenza virus surface protein operably linked to at least one C1 regulatory sequence, wherein the influenza virus surface protein comprises its ectodomain and transmembrane domain and is expressed in the C1 as a membrane-bound protein.
In some embodiments, the influenza virus surface protein is hemagglutinin (HA). According to these embodiments, the expression construct further comprises a nucleic acid sequence encoding a C1 signal peptide linked in-frame to the nucleic acid sequence encoding the HA.
In some embodiments, the HA subtype is selected from the group consisting of influenza A-H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H15 and H16; and influenza B subtype.
In some particular embodiments, the HA subtype is a subtype infecting humans selected from influenza A subtypes H1, H2 and H3; and influenza B subtype. Each possibility represents a separate embodiment of the present invention.
In some embodiments, the HA is from an influenza virus strain selected from the group consisting of A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1), A/California/04/2009 (H1N1), A/Uruguay/716/07 (H3N2) (A/Brisbane/10/07-like), B/Florida/04/2006: B Yamagata lineage, A/Puerto Rico/08/1934 (H1N1), and A/Texas/50/2012 (H3N2).
In some embodiments, the at least one C1 regulatory sequence comprises a C1 promoter. In some embodiments, the C1 promoter is selected from the group consisting of: hex1 (Woronin body), cbh1 (cellobiohydrolase 1) and chi1 (chitinase 1) promoters. Each possibility represents a separate embodiment of the present invention. In some particular embodiments, the C1 promoter is hex1 promoter.
In some embodiments, the C1 signal peptide is a signal peptide derived from a protein selected from the group consisting of Cbh1 (Cellobiohydrolase 1, C1), Gla1 (Glucoamylase 1, C1) and GlaA (Glucoamylase A, Aspergillus). Each possibility represents a separate embodiment of the present invention. In some particular embodiments, the C1 signal peptide is derived from Cbh1.
In some embodiments, the expression construct comprises: hex1 promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid sequence encoding a Cbh1 signal peptide fused to HA. According to these embodiments, the HA is from an influenza virus strain selected from the group consisting of A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1), A/California/04/2009 (H1N1), B/Florida/04/2006: B Yamagata lineage, A/Puerto Rico/08/1934 (H1N1), and A/Texas/50/2012 (H3N2).
In some embodiments, the influenza virus surface protein is a neuraminidase (NA).
In some embodiments, the NA subtype is selected from the group consisting of influenza A-N1, N2, N3, N4, N5, N6, N7, N8 and N9; and influenza B subtype.
In some particular embodiments, the NA subtype is a subtype infecting humans selected from influenza A subtypes N1 and N2; and influenza B subtype. Each possibility represents a separate embodiment of the present invention.
In some embodiments, the expression construct comprises: hex1 promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid sequence encoding NA. According to these embodiments, the NA is from the influenza virus strain A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1).
In some embodiments, the C1 strain is selected from the group consisting of: W1L#100I (prt-Δalp1Δchi1Δalp2Δpyr5) deposit no. CBS141153, UV18-100f (prt-Δalp1,Δpyr5) deposit no. CBS141147, W1L#100I (prt-Δalp1Δchi1Δpyr5) deposit no. CBS141149, and UV18-100f (prt-Δalp1Δpep4Δalp2,Δprt1Δpyr5) deposit no. CBS141143. In some particular embodiments, the C1 strain is W1L#100I (prt-Δalp1Δchi1Δalp2Δpyr5) deposit no. CBS141153. In additional particular embodiments, the C1 strain is UV18-100f (prt-Δalp1, Δpyr5) deposit no. CBS141147.
In some embodiments, the C1 strain is a strain mutated to delete one or more genes encoding an endogenous protease. In some embodiments, the C1 strain is a strain mutated to delete a gene encoding an endogenous chitinase.
According to a further aspect, the present invention provides a method for producing an influenza virus surface protein, the method comprising culturing the genetically-modified Myceliophthora thrmophila C1 of the present invention under conditions suitable for expressing the influenza virus surface protein; and recovering the influenza virus surface protein.
In some embodiments, recovering the influenza virus surface protein comprises extraction from mycelia.
In some embodiments, the yield of the recovered protein is at least 80%. According to certain exemplary embodiments, the yield is 80%.
According to another aspect, there is provided herein an expression construct for expressing a membrane bound influenza virus surface protein in Myceliophthora thermophila C1, the expression construct comprising at least one C1 regulatory sequence operably linked to a nucleic acid sequence encoding an influenza virus surface protein, wherein the influenza virus surface protein comprises its ectodomain and transmembrane domain
According to yet another aspect, there is provided herein a substantially pure, recombinant influenza virus surface protein produced by the modified Myceliophthora thermophila C1 of the present invention, wherein the influenza virus surface protein is purified to 95% purity or greater and is active and immunogenic, and induces a protective immune response when used as a vaccine.
Further provided herein is an influenza vaccine composition comprising an influenza virus surface protein produced the modified Myceliophthora thermophila C1 of the present invention.
These and further aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description, examples and claims which follow.
The present invention is directed to recombinant expression of influenza virus surface proteins in the fungus Myceliophthora thermophila, particularly in the strain C1.
The present invention provides according to some embodiments genetically modified C1 cells expressing influenza virus surface proteins, and methods for producing an influenza vaccine composition using the same.
It is now disclosed that influenza antigens produced in C1 generate an equal, or even better, immune response in mice than the industry standard antigens.
As used herein “C1” or “Myceliophthora thermophila C1” refers to Myceliophthora thermophila strain C1, previously named Chrysosporium lucknowense strain C1 deposited in accordance with the Budapest Treaty with the number VKM F-3500 D, deposit date Aug. 29, 1996. The terms also encompass genetically modified sub-strains thereof which have been mutated, for example, to delete one or more endogenous genes. For example, the C1 strain (sub-strain) may be a strain mutated to delete one or more genes encoding an endogenous protease and/or one or more genes encoding an endogenous chitinase. For example, C1 strains which are encompassed by the present invention include W1L#100I (prt-Δalp1Δchi1Δalp2Δpyr5) deposit no. CBS141153, UV18-100f (prt-Δalp1, Δpyr5) deposit no. CBS141147, W1L#100I (prt-Δalp1Δchi1Δpyr5) deposit no. CBS141149, and UV18-100f (prt-Δalp1Δpep4Δalp2,Δprt1Δpyr5) deposit no. CBS141143.
It is noted that a recent paper (Marin-Felix et al., 2015, Mycologica, 3:619-63) proposed the splitting of the Myceliophthora genus based on several criteria such as temperature growth, sexual morph in culture and conidia properties. According to the proposed criteria C1 belongs to the genus Thermothelomyces species heterothallical thermophila. Thus, according to the Marin-Felix paper, C1 updated name is Thermothelomyces thermophila strain C1.
The terms “expression construct”, “DNA construct” or “expression cassette” are used herein interchangeably and refer to an artificially assembled or isolated nucleic acid molecule which includes a nucleic acid sequence encoding a protein of interest and which is assembled such that the protein of interest is expressed in a target host cell. An expression construct typically comprises appropriate regulatory sequences operably linked to the nucleic acid sequence encoding the protein of interest. An expression construct may further include a nucleic acid sequence encoding a selection marker.
The terms “nucleic acid sequence”, “nucleotide sequence” and “polynucleotide” are used herein to refer to polymers of deoxyribonucleotides (DNA), ribonucleotides (RNA), and modified forms thereof in the form of a separate fragment or as a component of a larger construct. A nucleic acid sequence may be a coding sequence, i.e., a sequence that encodes for an end product in the cell, such as a protein. A nucleic acid sequence may also be a regulatory sequence, such as, for example, a promoter.
The terms “peptide”, “polypeptide” and “protein” are used herein to refer to a polymer of amino acid residues. The term “peptide” typically indicates an amino acid sequence consisting of 2 to 50 amino acids, while “protein” indicates an amino acid sequence consisting of more than 50 amino acid residues.
A sequence (such as, nucleic acid sequence and amino acid sequence) that is “homologous” to a reference sequence refers herein to percent identity between the sequences, where the percent identity is at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or at least 99%. Each possibility represents a separate embodiment of the present invention. Homologous nucleic acid sequences include variations related to codon usage and degeneration of the genetic code.
Sequence identity may be determined using a nucleotide/amino acid sequence comparison algorithms, as known in the art.
The term “regulatory sequences” refer to DNA sequences which control the expression (transcription) of coding sequences, such as promoters and terminators.
The term “promoter” is directed to a regulatory DNA sequence which controls or directs the transcription of another DNA sequence in vivo or in vitro. Usually, the promoter is located in the 5′ region (that is, precedes, located upstream) of the transcribed sequence. Promoters may be derived in their entirety from a native source, or be composed of different elements derived from different promoters found in nature, or even comprise synthetic nucleotide segments. Promoters can be constitutive (i.e. promoter activation is not regulated by an inducing agent and hence rate of transcription is constant), or inducible (i.e., promoter activation is regulated by an inducing agent). In most cases the exact boundaries of regulatory sequences have not been completely defined, and in some cases cannot be completely defined, and thus DNA sequences of some variation may have identical promoter activity.
The term “terminator” is directed to another regulatory DNA sequence which regulates transcription termination. A terminator sequence is operably linked to the 3′ terminus of the nucleic acid sequence to be transcribed.
The terms “C1 promoter” and “C1 terminator” indicate promoter and terminator sequences suitable for use in C1, i.e., capable of directing gene expression in C1. According to some embodiments, the C1 promoter/terminator is derived from an endogenous gene of Myceliophthora thermophila C1. For example, in some embodiments, the C1 promoter is hex1 (Woronin body) promoter. An exemplary hex1 promoter sequence is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 1. In additional embodiments, the C1 promoter is chi1 (chitinase 1) promoter. An exemplary chi1 promoter sequence is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 2.
According to some embodiments the C1 promoter/terminator is derived from a gene exogenous to Myceliophthora thermophila C1. For example, bg1 promoter may be used.
The term “operably linked” means that a selected nucleic acid sequence is in proximity with a regulatory element (promoter or terminator) to allow the regulatory element to regulate expression of the selected nucleic acid sequence.
The term “signal peptide” or “signal sequence” are used herein interchangeably and refer to a short peptide (usually 5-30 amino acids long) typically present at the N-terminus of a newly synthesized polypeptide chain that directs the protein to the secretory pathway in the host cell. The signal peptide is typically subsequently removed. A “C1 signal peptide” indicates a signal peptide suitable for use with C1, i.e., capable of directing proteins expressed in C1 into the secretory pathway of C1. According to some embodiments, the C1 signal peptide is derived from an endogenous gene of Myceliophthora thermophila C1. For example, in some embodiments, the C1 signal peptide is a signal peptide derived from Gla1 (Glucoamylase 1, C1). An exemplary sequence encoding Gla1 signal peptide is set forth in positions 1-20 of SEQ ID NO: 23. In additional embodiments, the C1 signal peptide is a signal peptide derived from Cbh1 (Cellobiohydrolase 1, C1). An exemplary sequence encoding Cbh1 signal peptide is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 3.
According to some embodiments the C1 signal peptide is derived from a gene exogenous to Myceliophthora thermophila C1. For example, in some embodiments, the C1 signal peptide is derived from GlaA (Glucoamylase A, Aspergillus). An exemplary sequence encoding GlaA signal peptide is set forth in positions 1-18 of SEQ ID NO: 24.
As used herein, the term “in frame”, when referring to one or more nucleic acid sequences, indicates that these sequences are linked such that their correct reading frame is preserved.
Expression constructs according to some embodiments of the present invention comprise a C1 promoter sequence and a C1 terminator sequence operably linked to a nucleic acid sequence encoding a C1 signal peptide and an influenza virus surface protein fused in-frame.
In some embodiments, the expression construct does not contain a nucleic acid sequence encoding a carrier protein fused to the influenza virus surface protein and facilitating secretion thereof.
A particular expression construct may be assembled by a variety of different methods, including conventional molecular biological methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), restriction endonuclease digestion, in vitro and in vivo assembly methods, as well as gene synthesis methods, or a combination thereof.
Hemagglutinin, abbreviated “HA”, is a type I membrane glycoprotein that mediates attachment of the virus to its host cells via sialic acid-containing receptors on the host cells. The HA molecule is present in the virus as a homotrimer. Each monomer generally comprises two domains, termed HA1 and HA2, where the HA2 domain comprises a transmembrane region, which connects the HA protein to the viral membrane, and a small cytoplasmic tail. The monomer is synthesized as a 75 kDa precursor protein, termed HA0, which assembles at the virus's surface into a trimeric protein. A signal peptide directs the HA0 into the host cell's secretory pathway and is not present in the mature protein. In order to be active, the HA0 precursor must be cleaved by cellular proteases of the host. After cleavage, two subunits corresponding to the HA1 and HA2 domains are generated, linked by a disulfide bond (and anchored to the virus's surface).
Unless defined otherwise, the term “hemagglutinin” or “HA” as used herein refers to influenza virus hemagglutinin, particularly to the full-length protein containing the ectodomain that extends outside the virus particle, the transmembrane domain and the cytoplasmic tail. The term encompasses the HAO uncleaved form as well as the mature HA1+HA2 form.
The subtype of the HA of the present invention may be influenza A subtype H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H15 or H16. The HA subtype may also be influenza B subtype. In particular embodiments, the HA subtype is a subtype infecting humans. In some embodiments, the HA subtype is selected from influenza A subtypes H1, H2 and H3. In additional particular embodiments, the HA subtype is influenza B subtype.
Neuraminidase, abbreviated “NA”, is a type II membrane-bound enzyme that mediates the release of new viral progenies from a host cell. It is present on the viral surface as a tetramer of four identical monomers, each generally comprising a cytoplasmic domain, a transmembrane domain, a stalk domain, and a globular head domain that carries the enzymatically active site. Unless defined otherwise, the term “neuraminidase” or “NA” as used herein refers to the full length protein.
The subtype of the NA of the present invention may be influenza A subtype N1, N2, N3, N4, N5, N6, N7, N8 or N9, or influenza B subtype. In particular embodiments, the NA subtype is a subtype infecting humans In some embodiments, the NA subtype is selected from influenza A subtypes N1 and N2. In additional particular embodiments, the NA subtype is influenza B subtype.
Nucleotide and protein sequences of HA and NA from various influenza virus strains are publicly available, for example, at the database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Exemplary sequences for HA and NA genes/proteins include those from influenza strains A/New Caledonia /20/99 (H1N1), A/California/04/2009 (H1 N1), A/Uruguay/716/07 (H3N2) (A/Brisbane/10/07-like), B/Florida/04/2006: B Yamagata lineage, A/Puerto Rico/08/1934 (H1N1), and A/Texas/50/2012 (H3N2). Each possibility represents a separate embodiment of the present invention.
Genetically-modified variants of HA and NA may also be engineered into C1 according to the present invention, such as variants denoted “universal” HA and NA. Universal HA and NA are cross-reactive antigens that stimulate protection against multiple influenza strains, as described, for example, in Carter et al. (2016) Design and Characterization of a Computationally Optimized Broadly Reactive Hemagglutinin Vaccine for H1N1 Influenza Viruses., J Virol. 90(9). 4720-34.
The influenza virus surface proteins are cloned and expressed according to the present invention as membrane-bound proteins comprising their ectodomain and transmembrane domain The cloned HA/NA genes of the present invention are typically modified by replacement of the natural signal peptide with a C1 signal peptide.
In some embodiments, the HA is from the influenza virus strain A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) (“HA New Caledonia”). The amino acid sequence of HA New Caledonia with its transmembrane domain, without the natural signal peptide, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 4. A nucleotide sequence encoding the HA New Caledonia with its transmembrane domain, without the natural signal peptide, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 5.
In some embodiments, the HA is from the influenza virus strain A/Texas/50/2012 (H3N2) (“HA Texas”). The amino acid sequence of HA Texas with its transmembrane domain, without the natural signal peptide, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 6. A nucleotide sequence encoding the HA Texas with its transmembrane domain, without the natural signal peptide, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 7.
In some embodiments, the HA is from the influenza virus strain A/Puerto Rico/08/1934 (H1N1) (“HA Puerto Rico”). The amino acid sequence of HA Puerto Rico with its transmembrane domain, without the natural signal peptide, is set forth as SEQ ID
NO: 8. A nucleotide sequence encoding the HA Puerto Rico with its transmembrane domain, without the natural signal peptide, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 9.
In some embodiments, the HA is from the influenza virus strain B/Florida/04/2006: B Yamagata lineage (“HA Florida”). The amino acid sequence of HA Florida with its transmembrane domain, without the natural signal peptide, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 10. A nucleotide sequence encoding the HA Florida with its transmembrane domain, without the natural signal peptide, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 11.
In some embodiments, the HA is from the influenza virus strain A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) (“HA California”). The amino acid sequence of HA California with its transmembrane domain, without the natural signal peptide, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 12. A nucleotide sequence encoding the HA California with its transmembrane domain, without the natural signal peptide, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 13.
In some embodiments, the NA is from the influenza virus strain A/New Caledonia /20/99 (H1N1) (“NA New Caledonia”). The amino acid sequence of NA New Caledonia, full length, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 14. A nucleotide sequence encoding the NA New Caledonia, full length, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 15.
For expression in C1, the cloned HA/NA genes are preferably codon optimized for C1 expression, meaning that the cloned genes are designed based on the amino acid sequence of an influenza virus surface protein of interest, employing the codon usage of C1.
According to certain exemplary embodiments, the genes are cloned under a C1 promoter and a C1 terminator.
An exemplary expression construct encoding HA New Caledonia with its transmembrane domain under hex1 promoter and cbh1 terminator, with a Cbh signal sequence, is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 16. The sequence encoding the HA corresponds to positions 2920-4563 of SEQ ID NO: 16. This segment may be replaced by a nucleotide sequence encoding a different HA protein or an NA protein, to obtain an expression construct encoding a different HA protein or an NA protein.
An exemplary expression vector comprising the expression construct set forth as SEQ ID NO: 16 is set forth as SEQ ID NO: 17 and illustrated in
C1 cells genetically engineered to produce influenza virus surface proteins according to the present invention are generated by introducing into C1 cells, particularly into the nucleus of C1 cells, an expression construct comprising a nucleic acid encoding an influenza virus surface protein, as described above. In particular, the genetic modification according to the present invention means incorporation of the expression construct to the host genome.
In some embodiments, C1 is genetically-engineered to produce a single influenza virus protein. In other embodiments, C1 is genetically-engineered to produce a plurality of different influenza virus proteins. A “plurality” indicates at least two.
Introduction of an expression construct into C1 cells, i.e., transformation of C1, can be performed by methods known in the art for transforming filamentous fungi. For example, transformation can be performed using the protoplast transformation method as known in the art and also described in the Examples section below.
To facilitate easy selection of transformed cells, a selection marker may be transformed into the C1 cells. A “selection marker” indicates a polynucleotide encoding a gene product conferring a specific type of phenotype that is not present in non-transformed cells, such as an antibiotic resistance (resistance markers), ability to utilize a certain resource (utilization/auxotrophic markers) or expression of a reporter protein that can be detected, e.g. by spectral measurements. Auxotrophic markers are typically preferred as a means of selection in the food or pharmaceutical industry. The selection marker can be on a separate polynucleotide co-transformed with the expression construct, or on the same polynucleotide of the expression construct.
Following transformation, positive transformants are selected by culturing the C1 cells on e.g., selective media according to the chosen selection marker.
Expression of the protein of interest can be detected using standard methods. The detection may be performed by detecting the protein itself, e.g., by various types of staining or by an immunological method, or by detecting its activity, e.g., by a hemagglutination assay. Prior to detection, the protein may be separated using a variety of techniques, such as SDS-PAGE. Exemplary procedures are described in the Examples section below.
Best producers are selected and applied in fermentations to produce high amount of the desired gene product.
To produce the protein, the genetically modified C1 cells are cultured under conditions that permit the expression of the nucleic acid encoding the influenza virus surface protein. Exemplary culturing conditions for shake-flask and stirred-tank fermentations are detailed in the Examples section below.
A vaccine or an immunogenic composition according to the present invention comprises an influenza virus surface protein produced as described above and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
The term “immunogenicity” or “immunogenic” relates to the ability of a substance to stimulate or elicit an immune response. Immunogenicity is measured, for example, by determining the presence of antibodies specific for the substance after challenging an immunologically competent organism with the substance. The presence of antibodies specific to the substance and their quantity is detected by methods known in the art, for example using an ELISA assay.
In some embodiments, the vaccine is formulated in an immunizing dosage form including purified HA proteins derived from three strains of influenza virus recommended by the FDA for a particular influenza season. Functional immunity can be measured using assays that quantify antibodies that bind to influenza hemagglutinin, that block the ability of influenza virus to agglutinate red blood cells, or that neutralize the influenza virus. Protective immune responses with recombinant HA vaccines can also be measured in animals that are susceptible to influenza infection or in human challenge studies.
The vaccines of the present invention comprise recombinant HA and/or NA proteins, and optionally, an adjuvant. As exemplified hereinbelow, it was surprisingly found that a recombinant HA protein produced in C1 according to the present invention elicited a humoral response in mice even when administered without an adjuvant.
The vaccine can be formulated for administration in one of many different modes, including via intramuscular, intranasal, intradermal, oral, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous or transdermal mode of administration
In some embodiments, the vaccine is formulated for parenteral administration. In some particular embodiments, the vaccine is formulated for intramuscular administration. In other particular embodiments, the vaccine is formulated for intradermal administration.
In additional particular embodiments, the vaccine is formulated for mucosal delivery, in particular intranasal delivery.
The vaccine composition can contain a variety of excipients, including stabilizers, buffers, or preservatives.
According to some embodiments, the vaccine compositions according to the present invention do not contain an adjuvant.
In some applications a pharmaceutically acceptable adjuvant may be included in the vaccine formulation. The choice of the adjuvant is determined in part by the mode of administration of the vaccine.
Non-limiting examples of intranasal adjuvants include chitosan powder, PLA and PLG microspheres, QS-21, calcium phosphate nanoparticles (CAP) and mCTA/LTB (mutant cholera toxin E112K with pentameric B subunit of heat labile enterotoxin).
Examples of adjuvants for other modes of administration include inorganic adjuvants in gel form (aluminium hydroxide/aluminium phosphate), calcium phosphate, bacterial adjuvants such as monophosphoryl lipid A and muramyl peptides, particulate adjuvants such as ISCOMS (“immunostimulatory complexes”), liposomes and biodegradable microspheres, adjuvants based on oil emulsions and emulsifiers such as IFA (“Incomplete Freund's adjuvant”), SAF (“Syntex Adjuvant Formulation”), saponins (such as QS-21), squalene/squalane, synthetic adjuvants such as non-ionic block copolymers, muramyl peptide analogs, synthetic lipid A, synthetic polynucleotides and polycationic adjuvants.
Adjuvants are utilized in an adjuvant amount, which can vary with the adjuvant, host animal and immunogen. Typical amounts can vary from about 1 microgram to about 1 mg per immunization. Those skilled in the art know that appropriate concentrations or amounts can be readily determined.
The following examples are presented in order to more fully illustrate certain embodiments of the invention. They should in no way, however, be construed as limiting the broad scope of the invention. One skilled in the art can readily devise many variations and modifications of the principles disclosed herein without departing from the scope of the invention.
Several series of expression constructs were designed for expression of recombinant HA proteins of various influenza virus strains in C1. A list of HA proteins tested in the study is detailed in Table 1 below. The expression constructs are detailed in
Initially, HAs were expressed under cbh1 (cellobiohydrolase 1) or chi1 (chitinase 1) promoter, fused to the well-secreted A. niger glucoamylase A (GlaA) as a carrier to facilitate secretion of the HAs into the extracellular medium. The HA genes were fused to the part of the glaA gene that encodes the catalytic domain of GlaA. A KEX2 cleavage site (VISKR) was designed in between the glaA and HA gene to obtain a separate HA protein after cleavage of the site in the Golgi apparatus. The constructs further included a C-terminal FLAG tag for detection and purification purposes. In this initial series of expression constructs, the HAs were expressed without their transmembrane domain (TMD) and cytoplasmic tail.
In a modified version of the expression constructs, the hex1 (hexagonal peroxisome, Woronin body) promoter was tested, which is considered an early constitutive promoter, induced earlier compared to the other two promoters.
For HA New Caledonia, additional construct variants were made, as follows:
C1 host strains for expressing the constructs were selected based on a proteolytic stability assay. Briefly, HAs produced with a baculovirus expression system (Protein Sciences Corporation, Meriden USA) were tested for proteolytic stability in end-of-fermentation (EOF) culture medium of several candidate C1 host strains (see Table 2 below). Less HA degradation was observed in the presence of the culture filtrates of the strains D240 (a high-cellulase (HC) strain) and D389 (a low-cellulase (LC) strain) compared to the other strains that were tested. D240 and D389 were therefore selected as host strains for producing the recombinant HAs. In later experiments, D382 was also tested for recombinant expression of HA.
Transformation was carried out as described below under “Material and Methods”. Following transformation, transformants were collected and cultivated in 96-well plates. The medium was screened for expression of glucoamylase (if applicable) and hemagglutinin. Positive transformants were further cultivated in shake flasks and expression of HA was evaluated using blotting techniques and an HA activity assay. The results are summarized in
Analysis of the obtained transformants revealed that recombinant HA_NC was better expressed in C1 when the FLAG-tag sequence was omitted. Without this tag high molecular weight species containing HA (130-160 kDa) were detected in the extracellular medium of shake flask cultivations, as shown on Western blot with a monoclonal antibody against HA_NC. Based on the signal strength this represents approximately 30 mg/L in the culture medium if extrapolated to a large-scale fermentation, reaching a total extracellular protein level of 10 g/L. The expression level of HA_NC was higher in the LC strain than in the HC strain. In addition, high levels of HA were found intracellularly and/or cell-wall-associated, which is estimated to represent at least as much as what is found in the medium.
Highest expression was obtained with transformants containing a construct with the hex1 promoter.
A second series of expression constructs were designed, in which the presence of the native transmembrane domain (TMD) of HA or a recombinant C-terminal trimerization domain from T4 bacteriophage fibritin (T4 foldon domain) was tested. The T4 foldon domain was added to facilitate stability of the HA upon extracellular secretion.
A linker of eight Gly residues (“8×G”) was cloned between the HA and T4 foldon domain The TMD was added to test its effect on expression levels and activity of the obtained HA (an HA construct containing the TMD was not expected to be secreted, but rather found intracellularly or cell-wall associated). In addition, a modified KEX2 proteolytic site containing a stretch of five Gly residues (“5×G”) between HA and GlaA carrier was tested in order to test whether such modified linker would result in obtaining higher levels of separate HA protein. The promoter used for this series was hex1, based on the stronger expression obtained using this promoter in the previous series. The various constructs in the series are detailed in
As seen with the first series, better expression was achieved without the carrier GlaA. When the carrier was present, only Gla-HA fusion proteins were visible, even when the modified proteolytic site between the two moieties was used. The presence of a C-terminal T4-foldon domain had a positive effect on the levels of HA detected extracellularly, however the resulting HA seemed to be inactive (negative results in the hemagglutination assay). To further evaluate the activity of HA fused to a T4 foldon domain, HA expressed from the construct Phex1-ssCbh-NC-8×G-T4 foldon-Tcbh1 was purified and tested in an immunogenicity assay in mice (see Example 2 below). No functional immunogenicity was observed.
The natural transmembrane domain of HA had a positive effect on expression levels (intracellular or cell wall-associated). In addition, the resulting protein was highly active in the HA activity assay. To further evaluate the activity of HA with its TMD, HA expressed from the construct Phex1-ssCbh-NC-TMD-Tcbh1 was purified and tested in an immunogenicity assay in mice (see Example 2 below). Functional immunogenicity was observed, which was particularly effective, as will be described in more detail below.
A third series of expression constructs were designed, in which HAs of different types, including types that were not tested until now, were expressed under the hex1 promoter with cbh signal sequence, no carrier, and with T4 foldon domain or TMD at the C-terminus. In this series the T4 foldon domain was cloned without the Gly linker or with modified linkers between the HA and the T4 foldon domain In addition, two variants of neuraminidase (NA) were also tested. The various constructs in the series are detailed in
C1 was able to produce HAs of different types. It was demonstrated that between 50-100 mg of proteins per liter of each of the HA type could be produced by C1 strains. In one or more cases expression levels of ˜300 mg per liter were achieved.
As seen with the second series, the presence of a C-terminal T4-foldon domain had a positive effect on the levels of HA detected extracellularly, however the resulting HA seemed to be inactive (negative results in the hemagglutination assay), even with no linker or with modified linkers between the HA and T4 foldon. The natural transmembrane domain of HA again showed a positive effect on expression levels (intracellular or cell wall-associated). In addition, the resulting proteins were highly active in the HA activity assay. Both type A and type B influenza proteins were successfully expressed and found to be biologically active.
With respect to NA, it was found that it is well expressed in C1 and can be detected both extra- and intra-cellularly.
HA protein standards were obtained from Protein Sciences Corporation (Meriden, USA). These proteins were produced in insect cells using the baculovirus expression vector system and purified to >90% purity under conditions that preserve the biological activity and tertiary structure. The protein standards were stored at 4° C. as recommended by the manufacturer. In addition, a batch of egg-derived HA from A/H1N1 A/New Caledonia/20/99 (NC) was ordered from the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC). This sample was aliquoted and stored at −20° C. as recommended by the manufacturer.
C1 strains
Candidate C1 production hosts tested in the study are indicated in Table 2. HC refers to a C1 High-Cellulase strain and LC to a C1 Low-Cellulase strain. Prt- refers to protease deficient, Δalp1 refers to gene disruption of the major secreted protease, Δalp2 refers to gene disruption of a highly expressed vacuolar protease and Δchi1 refers to gene disruption of the highly expressed extracellular C1 chitinase in C1 . All strains are Δpyr5
The expression vector used herein for heterologous protein production in C1, pP-ssglaA-glaA-HA-FLAG-tag, is shown in
For HC transformation experiments the following basic cloning vector was used:
pVJ1 (Pcbh1_glaA_kex2_GeneX_TcbhI) digested with EcoRV-EcoRI.
EcoRV is located in the kex2-site and EcoRI is located immediately after the stop codon of GeneX.
This vector was used to ligate the following synthetic gene fragments, codon-optimized for C1 based on 43 well expressed genes, secreted into to the culture medium (all synthetic fragments were sub-cloned by GeneArt® in a pMK or pMS shuttle vector):
For LC transformation experiments the following basic cloning vector was used:
pVJ6 (Pchi1_glaA_kex2_Gene-of interest_Tcbh1) digested with EcoRV-EcoRI.
EcoRV is located in the kex2 site and EcoRI is located immediately after the stop codon of the gene of interest.
This vector was used to ligate the following synthetic gene fragments: (all synthetic fragments were sub-cloned by GeneArt® in a pMK or pMS shuttle vector).
For HA New Caledonia, additional construct variants were made, as follows:
* Vector with cbh1 promoter or chi1 promoter, without GlaA carrier protein, but with cbh1 signal sequence for targeting to the ER. This vector was generated as follows:
Cloning vector pCBHProm was digested with SacI-BspHI and the 1819 bp fragment, containing the cbh1 promoter, was isolated.
Cloning vector pVJ1 was digested with SacI-EcoRI and the 3896 bp fragment, containing the cbh1 terminator and pUC backbone, was isolated.
These two fragments were ligated in a three way ligation with the synthetic fragment digested with PciI-EcoRI (1617 bp) containing the sscbh1-HA_NC_FLAG-tag.
Cloning vector pPchi1-linker-Tcbh1 was digested with NcoI—BspHI and the 5758 bp fragment, containing the cbh1 promoter—cbh1 terminator and pUC backbone, was isolated. The vector was used in a ligation with the synthetic fragment digested with PciI-EcoRI (1617 bp) containing the sscbh1-HA_NC_FLAG-tag.
* Vector with chi1 promoter and Gla1 (C1 homologue) as a carrier protein, generated as follows:
Cloning vector pPch1/-Gla1-XynB was digested with BsrGI-EcoRI and the 6609 bp fragment, containing the chi1 promoter, part of the Gla1 carrier protein, and cbh1 terminator, was isolated.
Cloning vector pPch1/-Gla1-XynB was digested with BsrGI-MabI and the 783 bp fragment, containing part of the Gla1 carrier protein, was isolated.
These two fragments were ligated in a three way ligation with the synthetic fragment digested with MabI-EcoRI (1723 bp) containing the part of Gla1, a KEX2 site, and HA_NC_FLAG-tag.
* Vector with EG2 as a carrier protein, generated as follows:
Cloning vector pPcbh1_EG2_Tcbh1 was digested with SacI-PciI and the 303 lbp fragment, containing the cbh1 promoter and part of the EG2 carrier protein, was isolated.
Cloning vector pVJ1 was digested with SacI-EcoRI and the 3896 bp fragment, containing the cbh1 terminator and pUC backbone, was isolated.
These two fragments were ligated in a three way ligation with the synthetic fragment digested with PciI-EcoRI (1669 bp) containing the part of EG2, a KEX2 site, and HA_NC_FLAG-tag.
* Vector with ‘early constitutive’ promoter hex1, GlaA carrier protein and HA_NC without FLAG-tag, generated as follows:
Cloning vector pTcV1011 digested with SacI-EcoRV and the 1643 bp fragment, containing the hex1 promoter, GlaA carrier protein, and part of the KEX2 site, was isolated.
Cloning vector pVJ1 was digested with SacI-EcoRI and the 3896 bp fragment, containing the cbh1 terminator and pUC backbone, was isolated.
These two fragments were ligated in a three way ligation with the synthetic fragment digested with EcoRV-EcoRI (1553 bp) containing the sscbhI-HA_NC.
All vectors were generated in XL1-blue (Stratagene). From all vectors cloning junctions were verified by sequence analysis.
The HA or NA expression cassettes were excised from their vectors using NotI. The pyr5 selection marker was excised from its vector (DNL35) using BgIII. Both fragments were separated from plasmid backbone and purified from gel using the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean up System (Promega). C1 hosts D389 and D382 were co-transformed with a single HA or NA expression cassette and the pyr5 marker.
The expression vectors were digested with NotI to generate a foreign-DNA free expression cassette. These expression cassettes were co-transformed with the pyr5 marker in pyr5-deficient C1 strains.
Purification streaks of 96 transformants of each strain were made on minimal medium plates containing sucrose and incubated for 4 days at 35° C. Pure colonies were transferred to a 96-well plate containing Caylase medium (mother plate) and incubated at 35° C. After 3 days 3 μl of culture per well was transferred to new 96 well plates (daughter plates) containing production medium ((NH4)2SO4, 35 mM, NaCl, 7 mM, KH2PO4, 55 mM, Glucose, 0.5%, MgSO4, 2 mM, trace element solution, casamino acids, 0.1%, biotin, 4 μg/L, penicillin 20 g/L, streptomycin 50 g/L, 10 mM. pH set to 5.5 with 10 M KOH) and plates were incubated for 72-96 hours. Supernatants were subsequently assayed for the required target expression or enzyme activity. For some constructs, the daughter plate medium used was either production medium or adapted inoculum medium (aIM), the growth temperatures were 35°, 30° C. or a combination of 35° C. followed by 30° C., and daughter plates were incubated for 48 and 72 (aIM) hrs.
In case of TMD-containing antigens, 100 μl of each culture (well) was transferred from the daughter plate wells to the wells of a 96-wells PCR plate. This was centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4000 rpm. The culture liquid was removed and 100 μl of extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1% SDS, 0.2% CHAPS) was added per well. This was mixed well and incubated for 5 minutes at 96° C. The plate was subsequently centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4000 rpm and the supernatants transferred to a new 96-wells plate. Twenty μL of this supernatant was used to spot onto PVDF membranes. Spot blots were subsequently blocked with BSA and screened using appropriate antibody. HRP conjugated secondary antibody substrate SuperSignal™ West Dura extended Duration Substrate (34075; ThermoFisher Scientific) was used to visualize bound antibody. Images were made using the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc. Selected transformant culture samples, either microtiter plate or shake flask derived, were further studied using SDS-PAGE and western blotting analyses according to standard techniques. The western blots were screened using the same antibody in a similar way as conducted for the spot blots.
Shake flask cultivation experiments were carried out in 300 ml flasks containing 50 ml medium. LC and HC were standard cultivated in production medium as described above, containing ammonium as nitrogen source and 0.5% glucose. Both strains were also tested in minimal medium (MM) and complete medium (CM)) containing besides 1% glucose, nitrate as nitrogen source, 0.1% casamino acids (in case of CM), 0.5% YE (in case of CM) (and vitamins). Cultivation was carried out at 250 rpm (1 inch/orbit) and 35° C.
Most of the transformants obtained were screened by spotblot analysis. After microtitre plate culture, plates were harvested by centrifugation and supernatants were transferred to new 96-well plates. For LC strains 25 μl of supernatant was used and for HC strains 12.5 μl was used. Samples were denatured at 96° C. for 5 min. cooled on ice and transferred to PVDF membrane. Spotblots were stained with mAb αGlaA or mAb αHA_NC (AbCam ab66189).
SDS-PAGE and Western analysis
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting was carried out according to standard procedures. Development of Western blots with alkaline phosphatase was carried out with NBT and BCIP as substrates. Development of Western blots with Horse radish peroxidase was carried out with ECL detection reagents according to supplier (Invitrogen: Novex®ECL #WP20005). The following protocol was used for stripping of the developed Western blots (Mild stripping procedure according to AbCam):
Fresh stripping buffer was prepared (1 L: 15 g glycine, 1 g SDS, 10 ml Tween20, adjust pH to 2.2) and the membrane incubated in the stripping buffer for 10 min at RT (shaking). The buffer was discarded and the procedure repeated with fresh stripping buffer. Next, the membrane was washed twice with PBS and twice with TBS-Tween20.
Prior to 2D SDS-PAGE, samples were 10-20× concentrated using Amicon Ultra 0.5 ml 10K centrifugal filters, subsequently samples were desalted using BioRad micro Biospin 6 chromatography columns, and protein concentration was determined using BCA assay (Pierce). Protein samples were purified using BioRad ReadyPrep 2D cleanup kit according to supplier. After purification, protein pellets (˜200 μg) were rehydrated in 200 μl 2-D rehydratation buffer 1 (BioRad) containing: 7M Urea, 2M Thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 50 mM DTT, 0.2% Bio-Lyte 3/10 ampholyte (20%), and 0.002% Bromophenol Blue. Rehydrated protein samples were loaded on BioRad Ready Strip IPG strips (11 cm pH 4-7) and incubated O/N at RT. After complete rehydratation of IPG strips, the strips were focused according to the supplier (BioRad). The second dimension was run on SDS-PAGE Criterion TGX 4-15% gradients gels (BioRad). Gels were either used for Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining or protein was transferred to PVDF.
Normally, influenza virus particles have HA on their surface that binds to sialic acid receptors on cells. The virus binds to erythrocytes (red blood cells), causing the formation of a lattice. This property is called hemagglutination. If functional HA is present in a sample containing red blood cells, the lattice is formed which is visible as “staying in solution” instead of precipitation of the red blood cells to the bottom of the vessel.
For rapid detection of HA secretion into the culture medium, cultures were tested for hemagglutinin activity by adding (filtered) fungal culture supernatant, serial diluted [in 1×PBS (without Ca2+ and Mg2+,) 50 μl final amount] in V bottom 96-well plates, to an equal amount (50 μl) of washed 0.5% chicken red blood cells in 1× PBS (without Ca2+ and Mg2+). Plates were then incubated at RT for 1 h. Samples were compared to a known amount of a purified HA standard (Protein Sciences Corp. or NIBSC).
EG2 activity was measured by an azo-CMCase assay (MegaZyme), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
BCA assay
The protein content was quantified by a BCA assay (Pierce), according to according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Following shake flask culture the fermentation broth was centrifuged and the supernatant collected. A 35 ml sample of the supernatant was concentrated using Millipore Amicon Ultra filter (with a cut off of 10 kDa) to a total volume of 300 μl (>100×concentrated). Prior to loading on a column, the sample was cleared by centrifugation (1 min at 14000 rpm). Gel filtration was performed in PBS and a 100 μl sample was loaded onto a 24-ml Superdex 200 column. Sample was processed with flow rate of 1 ml/min, and fractions of 0.5 ml were collected (AKTA Explorer system 1). Fractions were analyzed on Western blot with a monoclonal antibody against HA_NC.
TMD-containing HAs were extracted from mycelium fragments using an extraction buffer and subsequently purified using AEX-Capto Q ImpRes. See
Both extracellular and intracellular fractions were used in deglycosylation experiments. EndoH (Endo-β-Nacetylglucosaminidase; Roche 11 088 726 001) deglycosylation was performed under conditions as recommended by the supplier. Therefore, reactions were performed O/N at 37° C. in a buffer containing: 20 mM Na0Ac pH 5.5, 0.5 mM PMSF (phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride), 0.1 M β-mercaptoethanol and 0.02% SDS. Prior to adding 10 mU EndoH the protein samples were denatured for 10 min at 96° C. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting and stained with the mAb against HA_NC (AbCam ab66189). PNGaseF (Peptide N-glycosidase F from Elizabethkingia miricola; Sigma-Aldrich G5166) deglycosylation was performed under similar conditions as EndoH deglycosylation with the only difference that Triton X-100 is added to a final concentration of 0.1%. After denaturation of protein samples 5 U of PNGaseF was added and samples were incubated O/N at 37° C. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting and stained with the mAb against HA_NC (AbCam ab66189).
In vitro KEX2 Processing
Both extracellular and intracellular fractions were used in a KEX2 processing experiments. Samples were tested both in native- and denatured form. KEX2 protease protein derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, produced in High-5 insect cells (AbCam; ab96554). KEX2 protein cleavage was performed under the following conditions: Fractions were incubated in 50 mM Tris/HCl pH=7.5, 5 mM CaCl2 0.5 mM PMSF and 0.1% Triton X-100. Protein samples were either incubated in native or denatured form with 80 mU KEX2 for 4 hrs at 37° C. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting and stained with the mAb against HA_NC (AbCam ab66189) and the monoclonal against GlaA.
Partial trypsin digestions were performed at RT in 50 mM NaOAc pH=5.5 buffer. Extracellular sample was mixed with assay buffer and trypsin [TPCK trypsin (Pierce); stock solution is 50 mg/ml (aliquots are stored at −70° C.). Working solution is 50 ng/μl]. Samples were taken at t=0, t=2′, t=5′, t=10′, t=15′, t=20′, t=30′, t=45′, and t=60′. Digests were stopped by adding 6× SDS-PAGE loading buffer and denatured at 96° C. for 5 min Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting and stained with the mAb against HA_NC (AbCam ab66189) and the monoclonal against GlaA.
The fractionation study used to distinguish between HA localized intracellularly or cell-wall attached was carried out as schematically shown in
C1 LC cultures were grown for 2 days in Complete medium as described above. Protoplasts were generated and purified. An extra wash step was performed to reduce the risk of cell wall fragments contaminating the protoplasts.
Animal tests were carried out to test immunogenicity of a full length recombinant hemagglutinin protein from the A/NewCaledonia/20/99 (H1N1) influenza strain possessing the transmembrane domain (rHA-TMD) produced in C1. Biochemical evaluation of rHA-TMD is shown in
A preceding immunogenicity study was conducted with a secreted form of rHA from the same viral strain produced in C1. The transmembrane domain of this rHA is truncated and it contains additional domains not found in a native HA (an 8-Gly domain and a T4 foldon domain). The rHA-8Gly-T4 construct did not induce functional antibody responses. It was then proposed that a construct with the transmembrane domain (rHA-TMD) could induce a better immunogenicity.
To this end, eight groups of 8 Balb/C ByJ mice received two intramuscular (IM) injections, given four weeks apart, of 3-fold escalating dosages—ranging from 1 to 30 μg - of rHA-TMD produced in C1. As negative control, 5 mice were immunized with PBS according to the same immunization schedule. Blood samples were collected on Day 27 and Day 49 for antibody response analysis by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay.
As will be described in more detail below, the results showed that as early as following a single injection in mice of full length rHA prepared in C1, specific functional antibody responses were induced that were further enhanced following the second injection.
Table 3 lists the compositions that were tested in the study. Protein contents quantified by Bradford technique was used for injection dose preparation. All compositions were stored at +5° C.±3° C. until use.
Animal species: mice
Status: SPF
Strain: Balb/c ByJ mouse
Supplier: Charles River
Age: 9 weeks on DO
Sex: Female
Weight: 20-22 g
Individual identification by coloration
Care and maintenance: daily
Location: 4 animals/cage for all groups/cage in an air-conditioned building complying with L2 biosafety requirements.
Nb of animals/cage: 4
Diet: granulated food (M20, SDS, DIETEX France, St Gratien, France)
Water: Tap water, ad libitum, via an automatic watering system
Quarantine: N/A
Acclimation: Mice assigned for the study were acclimated to their designed housing for 5 days before immunization.
The group definition is summarized in the Table 4.
The study schedule is detailed in the Table 5.
Animals were observed daily on working days (from Monday to Friday) following the immunizations and weighted on days −1 and 27.
Blood samples were taken under isoflurane anesthesia from the retro-orbital sinus (ROS) or submandibular vein at D27 and after exsanguination by carotid section at D49 from all the animals At D49, the anesthesia was performed by Imalgene (1.6 mg of Ketamine) and Rompun (0.32 mg of Xylazine) administrated under a volume of 2004, by intraperitoneal route.
For humoral response assays, at D27, 200 μL of blood were collected in vials containing clot activator and serum separator (BD Microtainer SST ref 365951). After two hours at +37° C., the blood was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes and sera were stored at −20° C. until analysis.
At D49: 1 mL of blood was collected in vials containing clot activator and serum separator (BD Vacutainer SST II Advance ref 367957). After 2 days at +5° C., the blood was centrifuged at 2000 g during 20 minutes and serum was stored at −20° C. until analysis.
The assay is based on the ability of influenza virus to agglutinate red blood cells. A serum containing functional antibodies against HA inhibits the hemagglutination activity. In the assay, sera from influenza-immunized animals are titrated with influenza virus in order to characterize the concentration of functional anti-HA antibodies.
The titration is performed as follows: Serial dilutions (2 fold) of the virus were performed in PBS in order to calibrate the viral suspension and obtain a concentration of 4 HAU/50 μL. Calibrated virus (50 μL) was then added to a V-shaped 96 well plate on 50 μL of serum serial dilutions (2 fold) in PBS starting from 1/10, and incubated one hour at room temperature. Chicken red blood cells (0.5% in PBS) (50 μL) were then added to each well and inhibition of hemagglutination (red point) or hemagglutination (pink network) was visually read after one hour at room temperature.
In order to eliminate serum non-specific inhibitors directed against the HA, each serum was treated prior to the HI assay with a receptor-destroying enzyme (RDE), chicken red blood cells and TPCK trypsin. Briefly, 10 mU/mL of RDE was added to each serum (5 volume of RDE for 1 volume of serum). The mix was then incubated 18 h at +37° C., followed by lh inactivation at +56° C. To cool, the mixture “serum-RDE” was placed between 30 min to 4 hours at +4° C. The “serum-RDE” mixture was then absorbed on 10% cRBCs in PBS for 30 min (5 volumes of cRBCs for 1 volume of serum), at room temperature, and then centrifuged at +5° C., 10 min at 700 g. The supernatant was collected and the tryp sin treatment was carried out by mixing 10 volumes of RDE-RBC—heat inactivated serum (dilution serum 1:10) with 1 volume of 0.4% trypsin (w/v in saline) at +56° C. for 30 min The HI was then performed and the final serum dilution still considered at 1:10.
Serial dilutions (2 fold) of the virus were performed in PBS in order to calibrate the viral suspension and obtain a concentration of 4 HAU/50 μL. Calibrated virus (50 μL) was then added to a V-shaped 96 well plate on 50 μL of serum serial dilutions (2 fold) in PBS starting from 1/10, and incubated one hour at room temperature. Chicken red blood cells (0.5% in PBS) (50 μL) were then added to each well and inhibition of hemagglutination (red point) or hemagglutination (pink network) was visually read after one hour at room temperature.
The HI titer value is the inverse of the last dilution of serum that completely inhibited hemagglutination. A value of 5, corresponding to half of the initial dilution ( 1/10), was arbitrary given to all sera determined negative in order to perform statistical analysis.
The absence of non-specific agglutinins was controlled for each serum (4 serial dilutions of each serum and cRBCs without virus). A control of the cRBCs (only cRBCs and PBS) and a control of the presence of 4 HAU of the working dilution of virus were performed on each plate.
At D28, the day after blood sampling from the submandibular vein, a mouse from group A was found sick likely because it did not recover from this intervention and was thus euthanized.
An increase of mean body weight was observed in all groups from D1 to D27.
Humoral Response The antibody responses elicited against A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) were measured in individual sera collected from all animals at D27 and D49 by HI assay. The results are presented in
After the first injection of rHA, no or low HI responses were induced at the two lowest doses of C1-rHA, precluding statistical analysis. Still, the results strongly suggested that C1-rHA indeed induced antibody responses.
Following the booster injection, the responses were further enhanced. Significant dose-dependent HI effects were induced by C1-rHA with mean HI titers ranging from 108 to 830 for 1 and 30 μg dosages, respectively.
It is noted that the full length recombinant HA produced in C1 did not induce any negative clinical signs in the mice.
C1 can easily produce levels of 1 g/L of HAs and other antigens in 5 days fermentation therefore:
In seasonal influenza vaccine−total doses distributed=146 M/year
Each 0.5 mL dose is formulated to contain: 15 μg of HA for each strain.
Thus, 3×1000 L scale fermentation runs will be able to supply the annual global HA/strain needs against Influenza of 2,175 g.
Experiments were carried out to measure production levels of the rHA-TMD described above on a larger scale, in a stirred-tank fermenter with batch and fed-batch technologies. To this end, Minifors™ 3L bioreactors were used to culture C1 strain D389 expressing the rHA-TMD.
Table 6 summarizes the fermentations conditions of an initial set of experiments, carried out for 50 hrs. “Batch”—concentration of the indicated carbohydrate at the beginning of fermentation. “Fed-batch”—concentration of the carbohydrate in the feed. Fermentations were carried out at pH 7.5 with starting volume 1.5 liters.
Following fermentation, mycelia were collected and HA was extracted.
To evaluate mycelia concentration, the mycelial dry weight was measured. In brief, a certain amount of the fermentation broth was collected and washed a few times to remove media and media components, such as fermentation intermediates and secreted proteins. The resulting material was than dried for 24 h at 90° C. and weighted. All fermentation samples were found to contain about the same mycelium concentration.
Quantification of HA was carried out by comparing Western blot signals obtained for the extracted HA in comparison to HA standards of known amounts (
The production level of the best batch was calculated to be approximately 375 mg/l which is 170 mg/l/day
Table 7 summarizes the fermentations conditions and resulting HA production levels of a second set of experiments, carried out for 98-137 hrs. The table shows end-of-fermentation (EOF) results.
The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the invention that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without undue experimentation and without departing from the generic concept, and therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. The means, materials, and steps for carrying out various disclosed chemical structures and functions may take a variety of alternative forms without departing from the invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IB2018/056003 | 8/9/2018 | WO | 00 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62547885 | Aug 2017 | US |
