Patent Grant
9139505
The invention generally relates to the preparation of terephthalic acid di-esters from terephthalic acid.
Terephthalic acid di-esters, such as di-(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (also known as dioctyl terephthalate or DOTP), can be used as plasticizers in a variety of polymeric materials such as polyvinyl chloride.
DOTP is typically prepared by the titanate-catalyzed transesterification of dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) with 2-ethylhexanol (EH). This method, however, is not the most direct route to making DOTP. It requires the conversion of terephthalic acid (TPA) to DMT.
The most direct route to DOTP involves esterification of TPA with EH. Organo-titanates, such as tetraisopropoxy titanate, are among the best catalysts for this direct route. The reaction rate with these catalysts, however, is still significantly slower than the transesterification route.
Therefore, there is a need in the art for faster methods for forming DOTP directly from TPA.
The present invention addresses this need as well as others, which will become apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
The invention is as set forth in the appended claims.
Briefly, the present invention provides a process for preparing a terephthalic acid di-ester. The process comprises contacting terephthalic acid with a C6-C10 alcohol in the presence of an organo-titanium catalyst and an alcohol-amine promoter under conditions effective to form a corresponding terephthalic acid di-ester. The promoter is selected from 2-(methylamino)ethanol and 2-(ethylamino)ethanol.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a process for preparing di-(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate. The process comprises contacting terephthalic acid with 2-ethylhexanol in the presence of an organo-titanium catalyst and an alcohol-amine promoter at a temperature of 140 to 230° C. to form di-(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate. The promoter is selected from 2-(methylamino)ethanol and 2-(ethylamino)ethanol. The contacting step is carried out in a reactor fitted with a fractionation column comprising three to six high-efficiency theoretical stages for removing water from the reactor.
The FIGURE shows a reactor and column useful with the process according to the present invention.
It has been surprisingly discovered that certain alcohol-amines can significantly improve the reaction rate of organo-titanium catalyzed esterification of terephthalic acid with a C6-C10 alcohol to make the corresponding di-ester.
The present invention provides a process for preparing a terephthalic acid di-ester. The process comprises contacting terephthalic acid with a C6-C10 alcohol in the presence of an organo-titanium catalyst and an alcohol-amine promoter under conditions effective to form a corresponding terephthalic acid di-ester.
Examples of C6-C10 alcohols include hexanol, cyclohexanol, heptanol, 2-ethylhexanol (EH or 2-EH), cyclohexanemethanol, isomers of methylcyclohexanemethanol, octanol, nonanol, benzyl alcohol, 2-phenyl ethanol, and decanol.
Examples of the type of terephthalic acid di-esters that can be produced include dihexyl terephthalate, diheptyl terephthalate, di-(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate, dibenzyl terephthalate, dinonyl terephthalate, and didecyl terephthalate.
Examples of suitable organo-titanium catalysts include titanium tetraalkoxides having the formula Ti(OR)4 where R is an alkyl group having 1 to 8 carbon atoms. A preferred organo-titanium catalyst includes tetraisopropoxy titanate. The catalyst may be used in amounts ranging from 1000 to 2000 ppm, 1200 ppm to 1600 ppm, and 1300 ppm to 1500 ppm, based on the total reactant charge.
The preferred alcohol-amine promoters include 2-(methylamino)ethanol and 2-(ethylamino)ethanol. 2-(Ethylamino)ethanol is particularly preferred. The promoter may be used in amounts ranging from 500 ppm to 1500 ppm, 750 ppm to 1250 ppm, and 1100 ppm to 1200 ppm, based on the total reactant charge.
The process according to the invention may be carried out in a batch or continuous reactor under esterification conditions. The reactor can be a simple, stirred unit fitted with a fractionation column for water removal or can contain multiple ports for reactant introduction and product removal.
In one embodiment, the reactor is fitted with a fractionation column and access ports for charging TPA, alcohol, promoter, and catalyst. The fractionating column can both increase the reaction rate and minimize the occurrence of foaming as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,799,942 (the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference).
In another embodiment, the fractionation column has three to six high-efficiency theoretical stages (HETS). To minimize foaming, the fractionation column can have four to five HETS.
Typical esterification conditions include atmospheric pressure and elevated temperature. The temperature for reaction is typically set based on the lowest boiling point of the reactants, which is usually the alcohol. Generally, the temperature for reaction can range, for example, from 140 to 230° C., or from 180 to 225° C.
The esterification can be carried out with an excess amount of the alcohol. The mole ratio of alcohol to acid employed can range from 3:1 to 6:1, or 5:1 to facilitate conversion to the diester. Unreacted alcohol can be readily recycled to the process.
The process according to the invention may be practiced in a continuous mode by adding the TPA to a suitable reactor by means of a screw feeder and the alcohol/catalyst as a pump-fed mixture to a stirred-reactor equipped with a fractionating column/decanter combination such that the water of reaction can be removed and the unreacted alcohol returned to the reactor. The effluent from this reactor can be passed to a chain of one or more finishing reactors where the conversion to di-ester and removal of water are continued. The product of this reaction can be further processed and refined as described herein, if desired.
In one particular embodiment, the reactor is charged with terephthalic acid, excess 2-ethylhexanol, and a catalytic amount of tetraisopropoxy titanate (which is commonly abbreviated as TIPT), and the organic rate promoter. Heating and stirring the mixture to reflux results in efficient removal of water and esterification of the TPA to DOTP. The volatile components are mainly composed of the water of reaction and the unreacted 2-ethylhexanol. The water can be separated via a decanter, and the 2-ethylhexanol is allowed to reflux throughout the column. Conversion to DOTP is essentially complete in less than two hours, and the product can be filtered to remove traces of unreacted TPA for recycle. The crude product (filtrate) is then neutralized with dilute NaOH, washed with water, and filtered. Excess 2-ethylhexanol is stripped off at reduced pressure. An activated carbon treatment can be used to reduce color in the final product.
As used herein, the indefinite articles “a” and “an” mean one or more, unless the context clearly suggests otherwise. Similarly, the singular form of nouns includes their plural form, and vice versa, unless the context clearly suggests otherwise.
While attempts have been made to be precise, the numerical values and ranges described herein should be considered to be approximations. These values and ranges may vary from their stated numbers depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention as well as the variations resulting from the standard deviation found in the measuring techniques. Moreover, the ranges described herein are intended and specifically contemplated to include all sub-ranges and values within the stated ranges. For example, a range of 50 to 100 is intended to include all values within the range including sub-ranges such as 60 to 90 and 70 to 80.
This invention can be further illustrated by the following examples of preferred embodiments thereof, although it will be understood that these examples are included merely for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
This example used the reactor system and associated distillation column 30 shown in the FIGURE. The equipment included a one-liter base 31 fitted with a heating mantel 32, a magnetic stirrer bar 33, a temperature sensor 37, and a distillation column 34. The column 34 contained 10 inches of Penn State packing (which is equivalent to approximately 5 HETS). The top of the column 34 was fitted with a head 35 to allow the water/2-ethylhexanol azeotrope to condense via a condenser 39 and collect in a decanter 36. The top 2-ethylhexanol layer in the decanter 36 was returned to the column 34 via an overflow tube 38, and the water layer was collected in a collection device 40 and cooled in cooler 41 for weighing.
The reactor column base 31 was charged with 343.48 g (2.637 moles, 25 mole % excess, MW=130.23) of 2-ethylhexanol, 1.054 mole (175 g, MW=166.13) of purified terephthalic acid (PTA), 3000 ppm of promoter candidate (1.55 g) listed in Table 1, and 3000 ppm (1.55 g) of tetraisopropoxy titanate (TIPT). In the case of promoter candidate DEA Titanate, 6000 ppm was used since it is thought to be a roughly 1:1 complex of organo-titanium and diethanol amine.
The decanter was charged with 36.6 g of 2-ethylhexanol to make up for the removal of the 25 mole % excess from the system.
Heat-up was started, and the reaction progress was monitored by the production of water. The total water removed was typically 40-42 g. A 98.5% recovery of materials was typically achieved. Table 1 shows the promoter candidates tested and the total reaction time to achieve completion for each candidate.
A designed experiment was conducted to determine the optimum levels of reactants (TPA and EH), promoter (EAE), and catalyst (TIPT) for the conversion of TPA to DOTP. The parameters of the experiment are shown in Table 2.
0.5 moles of TPA were used.
The reaction was conducted as described in Example 1 above. The overall reaction time (defined as accumulation of the theoretical water of reaction) was the sole response. The run number was chosen randomly. The results of the designed experiment are summarized in Table 3 below.
The “*” next to the reaction time for Centerpoint 2 in Table 3 indicates the reproducibility of a particular experiment and is used by statisticians to establish the standard deviation for “identical conditions.”
The results in Table 3 were analyzed and a statistical model developed. The model indicated that the optimum level of 2-EH was 2.5:0.5 (5:1 mole ratio), the optimum level of promoter EAE was 1144 ppm, and the optimum TIPT amount was 1412 ppm. This set of calculated conditions would result in a reaction time of about 1.75 hours, which is within the experimental error of the values listed in Table 3.
Example 2 was compared with an optimized dimethyl terephthalate run using the same reaction equipment. The following were charged to the flask: 364.6 g of 2-ethylhexanol (2.8 moles, 40 mole % excess, MW=130.23); 194.2 g of DMT (1 mole; MW=194.18); and 0.055 g of TIPT (98 ppm).
A total of 1.4 hours reaction time resulted in removing 255 mL of methanol to completion of the reaction. Thus, the best reaction time achievable with terephthalic acid of 1.75 hours compares favorably with the 1.4 hours reaction time obtained with dimethyl terephthalate.
This example was conducted using the same reaction conditions and equipment as Run 12 of Example 2, but at twice the scale and with no promoter.
The reactor column base was charged with 651.2 g (5 moles, 150 mole % excess, MW=130.23) of 2-ethylhexanol, 1.00 mole (166.1 g, MW=166.13) of purified terephthalic acid, and 1000 ppm (0.818 g) of tetraisopropoxy titanate. The decanter was charged with 36.6 g of 2-ethylhexanol to make up for the removal of the 25 mole % excess from the system. Heat-up was started, and the reaction progress was monitored by the production of water. The total water removed was 36.2 g. The total reaction time to complete reaction was 3.75 hours.
Run 12 of Example 2 (with EAE as promoter) gave a reaction time of 2.0 hours. The promoter reduced the total reaction time by 47%.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2569440 | Agnew et al. | Oct 1951 | A |
| 3886199 | Suter et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 3896159 | Kratzer et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
| 4150214 | Kelley | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4216337 | Baba et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4241216 | Bergman et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4619987 | Saiki et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4681975 | Hasegawa et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4952663 | Cleary et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5102979 | Miki et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5296587 | Sumner, Jr. et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5349075 | van den Berg et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5428126 | Kashima et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5502240 | Pugach et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5741882 | Fujii et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5886133 | Hilbert et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5922828 | Schiraldi | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6303738 | Putzig et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6310233 | Maurer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6559271 | Schaaf et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6664413 | Cockrem | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6916950 | Gubisch et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6982295 | Godwin et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7271282 | Kawahara et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7276621 | Cook et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7323586 | Wiese et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7326764 | Di et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7368522 | Jernigan et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7696300 | Ohta et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7799942 | Osborne et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7842361 | Ohta et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 8034970 | Hassan et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8207289 | Jernigan | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8263728 | Kono et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 20060160986 | Hazen | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070038001 | Cook et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20120202928 | Loos et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 55-164220 | Dec 1980 | JP |
| 60-004151 | Jan 1985 | JP |
| 63-317523 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| 20130008344 | Jan 2013 | KR |
| 9529888 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO 2008140177 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Y. Mansoori et al., “Esterification of carboxylic acids by tributyl borate under solvent- and catalyst-free conditions,” Green Chem., vol. 7, pp. 870-873 (2005). |
| P. Jiang, “Synthesis of DOTP Plasticizer by Esterification,” Huaxue Shijie, vol. 35, pp. 411-415 (1994) (Abstract Only). |
| Y.K. Yang et al., “New Titanium-Based Catalysts for the Synthesis of Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate),” Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., vol. 33, pp. 3445-3447 (2012). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2014/063880, pp. 1-12 (Jan. 30, 2015). |
| English Abstract of KR 2013-0008344 A (2013). |
| English Machine Translation of KR 2013-0008344 A (2013). |
| English Abstract of JP 55-164220 (1980). |
| English Abstract of JP 60-004151 (1985). |
| English Abstract of JP 63-317523 (1988). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150133683 A1 | May 2015 | US |
