The invention generally relates to products and processes for providing haptic feedback.
Tactile cues and feedback enhance the human-machine interface. Providing tactile feedback increases the amount of information available to a user in the operation of a device. Some devices utilize structural tactile methods. One such example is to provide a raised surface on an input surface, e.g., keypad, of the device. Such methods, however, are inherently static, and thus, cannot offer a wide array of, or effective, tactile feedback. Whereas before, one had to rely solely on aural, visual cues, and/or structural tactile cues, active methods of tactile feedback, i.e., haptics, increasingly provide greater and more effective physical cues to users of various devices.
Enhancing the functionality of a device with haptics, however, generally requires additional processor memory and speed. Moreover, enhancing a device with haptics may further complicate design considerations by placing demands on space constraints, especially where manufacturers of such devices, to satisfy consumer demands, strive to reduce the physical size of devices while increasing device functionality.
In a one-dimensional environment, one may select an item from a set of items, e.g., a list of names, by using a “detent” effect, where each item in the item set can be rendered or mapped to a single detent in a one-dimensional device. In a two-dimensional environment, one may select an item in horizontal or vertical directions. Therefore, one may speak of two-dimensional detents, also referred to as matrix-detents.
To create a haptic effect with a single effect located at different locations on a workspace, or interface area (such as for example, a keypad), it is known to create all those haptic effects in the device, and play them each cycle. A shortcoming of this known approach is that to create a two-dimensional detent, more than one effect has to be created. This, in turn, demands more on the communications bandwidth, as well as more memory and computational time on an embedded system, i.e., a system disposed on or within a device or system. Some applications are not well-suited for communicating an amount of traffic demanded by the known approach.
The invention provides products and processes for providing haptic feedback in a user interface device. In one exemplary embodiment, a single effect can be repeated at several locations in a matrix. One process according to the present invention comprises defining a first cell comprising a first parameter representing a first haptic effect, mapping a first location of a matrix with the defined first cell, and mapping a second location of the matrix with the defined first cell.
In another embodiment, a process comprises providing a cell comprising an arc and first and second edges. The cell forms a wedge of a switch. The process also comprises providing a plurality of force vectors within the cell and delimiting a corner of the wedge. The force vectors are directed radially toward the first and second edges. The corner is formed by the first and second edges.
In another exemplary embodiment, an apparatus comprises a first primary channel disposed about a first axis, a second primary channel disposed about a second axis, a first secondary channel disposed proximate to the first primary channel, and a second secondary channel disposed proximate to the second primary channel.
These exemplary embodiments are mentioned not to limit the invention, but to provide an example of an embodiment of the invention to aid understanding. Exemplary embodiments are discussed in the Detailed Description, and further description of the invention is provided there. Advantages offered by the various embodiments of the present invention may be understood by examining this specification.
The accompanying drawings, which constitute part of this specification, help to illustrate embodiments of the invention. In the drawings, like numerals are used to indicate like elements throughout.
Embodiments of the present invention include products and processes for providing haptic feedback in a user interface device. In some interface devices, cutaneous feedback (such as, without limitation, vibration, texture, and heat), is also provided to the user, in addition to kinesthetic feedback (such as, without limitation, forces or resistances sensed by muscles, tendons, and/or joints) both subsumed under the phrase, and more generally known collectively as, “haptic feedback.” The present invention may be embodied in hand-held devices, such as mobile phones, personal digital assistants (“PDAs”), camcorders, and other devices, such as control knobs and computer mice and joysticks.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, the detent 14 is a haptic effect, including, but not limited to, a kinesthetic force profile directing a user toward the location 16. Alternatively, the force profile of the detent 14 directs a user away from the location 16. Various haptic effects can be used for the force profiles of the detent 14. Examples of various haptic effects are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,169,540 and 6,285,351, assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated in their entirety herein by reference.
In general, the location 16 represents a physical area of the cell 10 where a haptic effect is disposed. In one embodiment, the dead-band 18 comprises a physical area of the cell 10 in which no forces are present. The dead-band 18 represents a stable position in the cell 10. As shown in
Referring now to
Preferably, the matrix 20 comprises cells similar to that described above with reference to the cell 10. That is, the cells 21 each comprise parameters including a detent 24, a location 26, and a dead-band 28. However, unlike the cell 10, each of the cells 21 do not have a wall. Rather, a wall 22 defines a perimeter of the matrix 20, rather than defining each cell 21. Alternatively, other suitable cells, arrangements of cells, and cell parameters can be used.
Referring now to
The numerals of the keypad 30 correspond substantially to location 26 of the matrix 20 shown in
Referring now to
The parameters of the cell 40 are similar to that described above with reference to the cell 10. Thus, the location 46 comprises a haptic effect, the detent 48 comprises a force profile, and the matrix and angular dead-bands 43,44 lack any discernable force profile.
Referring now to
Each cell 51 comprises a matrix dead-band 53, a first radial force 52, a second radial force 54, a first tangential force 55, a second tangential force 57, and a stable location 56. A wall (not shown) can be disposed surrounding the cell 51. Alternatively, other suitable cells, arrangements of cells, and cell parameters can be used. The matrix 50 can be used in suitable interface devices (not shown), such as a mobile phone, PDA, or GUI.
The first and second radial forces 52,54 are disposed radially within each cell 51. The first and second radial forces 52,54 are equal and opposite to one another. The intersection of the first and second radial forces 52,54 create a stable position along a radius.
The first and second tangential forces 55,57 are disposed tangentially within each cell 51. The first and second tangential forces 55,57 are equal and opposite to one another. The intersection of the first and second tangential forces 55,57 create a stable position along an arc. The intersection of the first and second radial forces 52,54 and the first and second tangential forces 55,57 creates a stable location 56. There is no force profile at stable location 56. The combination of first and second radial forces 52,54, first and second tangential forces 55,57, and matrix dead-band 53 can be used to guide a user toward a particular location of the matrix 50, and thus, the device.
Referring now to
The host processor 62 can be a computer or any other suitable processor, such as for example, digital logic processors capable of processing input, excuting algorithms, and generating output as needed. Such processors can include a microprocessor, an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), and state machines. Such processors include, or can be in communication with media, for example computer readable media, which stores instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the steps described herein as carried out, or assisted, by a processor.
One embodiment of a suitable computer-readable medium includes an electronic optical, magnetic, or other storage or transmission device capable of providing a processor, such as the processor in a web server, with computer-readable instructions. Other examples of suitable media include, but are not limited to, a floppy disk, CD-ROM, magnetic disk, memory chip, ROM, RAM, ASIC, configured processor, all optical media, all magnetic tape or other magnetic media, or any other medium from which a computer processor can read.
The host controller 62 is in communication with the effect library 63. The effect library 63 stores instructions for a variety of haptic effects. Preferably, the host controller 62 controls the effect library 63. In one embodiment, the host controller 62 communicates instructions to the effect library 63 to communicate a particular haptic effect to the device 65. As described above, the instructions for a particular haptic effect are communicated from the host 61 to the device 65 through the communications channel 64.
The device 65 comprises a local (or second) processor 66, a sensor 67, and an actuator 68. Preferably, the local processor 66 is embedded in (i.e., disposed within) the device 65. Alternatively, the local processor 66 is located in any other suitable location. The local processor 66 is operable to receive and executions received from the host processor 62. Generally, the local processor 66 is also operable to execute instructions autonomously of the host processor 62. Where the local processor 66 is embedded in the device 65, the local processor 66 generally is more limited in size, and thus computational power, than the host processor 62. Notwithstanding the limitations in size and computational power, the local processor 66 is preferably similar to that described above with reference to the host processor 62.
The local processor 66 is in communication with a sensor 67. The sensor 67 can be a single sensor or a plurality of sensors. The sensor 67 is operable to detect a wide variety of conditions, such as, but not limited to, position, pressure, motion, direction, displacement, and changes or deviations in such conditions. The information detected by the sensor 67 is communicated to the local processor 66, which then processes this information and/or communicates the information received from the sensor 67 to the host controller 62 via the communication channel 64.
The local processor 66 is also in communication with an actuator 68. The actuator 68 can be a single actuator or a plurality of actuators. The actuator 68 is operable to receive instructions (i.e., an actuation signal) from the local processor 66 and to output haptic feedback to the device 65. The local processor 66 can vary at least one of frequency, waveform, and magnitude of the actuation signal.
Suitable structures that can provide haptic feedback and that can produce a plurality of distinct haptic sensations, include, but are not limited to, a voice coil and a permanent magnet, rotating masses, a piezo material, such as quartz, Rochelle Salt, and synthetic polycrystalline ceramics, piezoelectric ceramics, piezoelectric films, and electroactive polymers. Alternatively, other suitable actuators can be used.
While system 60 is shown with first and second processors 62,66, an alternate embodiment comprises a single processor (not shown). For example, a stand-alone device can perform the tasks of both first and second processors 62,66. Thus, in this alternate embodiment, the communication channel 64 would be implemented in software rather than hardware as described in the embodiment above with reference to
Referring now to
As indicated by block 72, the method 70 comprises defining a first cell. In one embodiment, the first cell is defined by the first processor. The first cell comprises first parameter representing a first haptic effect. As described above, various haptic effects can be used. In one embodiment, the first cell comprises a first detent.
In one embodiment, the method 70 comprises communicating the defined first cell from a first processor to a second processor. In another embodiment, the defined first cell is communicated from the first processor to the second processor via a communication channel. In one embodiment, the communication channel is a wireless interface.
As described above, the first processor can be a host processor and the second processor can be a local processor embedded in a device. In one embodiment, the second processor is disposed remotely from the first processor.
As indicated by block 74, the method 70 comprises mapping a first location of a matrix with the defined first cell. In one embodiment, the second processor maps the first location with the defined first cell. In one embodiment, the matrix comprises a square shape, such as, for example, the 3×3 matrix described above and with reference to
As indicated by block 76, the method 70 comprises mapping a second location of the matrix with the defined first cell. In one embodiment, the second processor maps the second location with the defined first cell. In another embodiment, the method 70 further comprises defining a second cell. Preferably, the second cell is defined by the first processor. The second cell comprises a second haptic effect. Preferably, the second haptic effect is different than the first haptic effect. Alternatively, the first and second haptic effects can be the same. In one embodiment, the second cell comprises a second detent.
In another embodiment, the method 70 further comprises communicating the defined second cell from the first processor to the second processor. In one embodiment, the defined second cell is communicated from the first processor to the second processor via the communication channel. In one embodiment, the method 70 further comprises mapping a third location of the matrix with the defined second cell by the second processor. In another embodiment, the second cell is an inactive cell, whereas the first cell is an active cell.
In one embodiment, the third location is disposed between the first and second locations. Alternatively, the first and second cells can be disposed in other desired arrangements or configurations. The second processor is operable to arrange the first and second cells in suitable arrangements without instructions from the first processor, thus reducing the amount of communication between the first and second processors, and therefore bandwidth of the communication channel. Thus, multiple effects can be displayed in a two-dimensional device by specifying a limited number of parameters and a desired number of cells in the matrix.
In another embodiment, the method 70 further comprises providing an actuator in communication with the first, second and third locations. The actuator can be similar to that described above. In one embodiment, the actuator comprises a plurality of actuators. Preferably, the actuator is operated to provide a computer-modulated force to the first, second, and third locations. The actuator preferably receives an actuating signal from the second processor. Alternatively, the actuator receives instructions from the first processor.
Referring now to
In the force profile of the prior art switch shown in
Referring now to
Each cell 104 comprises a centerline 103, a corner 105, a first edge 106, and a second edge 107. As shown in
Each cell 104 also comprises a force profile (indicated by the vectors). The force profile of each cell 104 is directed outwardly from the centerline 103 toward the first and second edges 106,107 and the corner 105. Thus, the force profile of the switch guides a user toward the dead-bands 108 and the location 109.
Referring now to
As indicated by block 112, the method 110 comprises providing a cell comprising an arc and first and second edges. A plurality of cells form the switch. In one embodiment, the switch comprises a circular shape. In another embodiment, the switch comprises an eight-way switch. The eight-way switch is operable to select a channel about a first axis.
As indicated by block 114, the method 110 comprises providing a plurality of force vectors within the cell. The force vectors are directed radially toward the first and second edges. The force vectors direct a user toward the outside of the cell, i.e., toward a dead-band. As indicated by block 116, the method 110 comprises delimiting a corner of the cell. The corner is delimited by forming an arc joining the first and second edges. Thus, the force profile does not extend completely to a center of the switch. Preferably, the force vectors within the corner are directed toward the center of the switch.
In one embodiment, the method 110 comprises providing a biasing element proximate to the center of the switch. In another embodiment, the method 110 comprises providing a detent proximate to a radius of the switch. Other suitable configurations of switches can be used.
Referring now to
The switch 120 shows 12 different channels 128. Each channel is labeled with a letter beginning with the letter “A” and ending with the letter “L.” Thus, a user can select up to 12 options (i.e., any letter from A-L) with the switch 120.
Such a switch is referred to as an N-way switch, where “N” refers to the number of channels that can be selected or activated. As the number of choices increases, the more difficult N-way switches become for one to navigate. It is generally easier to select the four cardinal directions than to select channels that are located at angles, especially when the angles are close together. Of course, reducing the size of the switch to accommodate smaller-sized devices adds to the difficulty in navigating the switch.
Referring now to
For example, each channel of the switch 130 is labeled with the letters “A” through “L.” The letters A, D, G, and J are labeled along the “M” dimension, while the “N” dimensions are labeled with the letters B, C, E, F, H, I, K, and L. Thus, a 4×3 switch will offer the same number of options as a 12-way switch. However, the 4×3 switch only requires one to select along the cardinal directions making the task of selecting a channel easier for the user.
For example, to spell the word “ace” using the prior art switch of
Referring again to
The switch 130 also comprises a first secondary channel 133a,133b disposed proximate to the first primary channel 133 and a second secondary channel 134a,134b disposed proximate to the second primary channel 134. In one embodiment, the first secondary channel 133a,133b is in communication with the first primary channel 133 and the second secondary channel 134a,134b is in communication with the second primary channel 134.
In one embodiment, the first and second primary channels 133,134 and the first and second secondary channels 133a,133b,134a,134b are activated by one's touch, i.e., by a digit or device, such as a stylus. Alternatively, the first and second primary channels 133,134 and the first and second secondary channels 133a,133b,134a,134b are activated by depressing the switch 130 causing the switch to pivot about the first and/or second axes 131,132.
In the embodiment shown in
In one embodiment, the switch 130 further comprises a third primary channel 135 disposed substantially co-axial with the first primary channel 133 and a fourth primary channel 136 disposed substantially co-axial with the second primary channel 134. In another embodiment, the switch 130 further comprises a third secondary channel 135a,135b disposed proximate to the third primary channel 135 and a fourth secondary channel 136a,136b disposed proximate to the fourth primary channel 136. In one embodiment, the third secondary channel 135a,135b is in communication with the third primary channel 135 and the fourth secondary channel 136a,136b is in communication with the fourth primary channel 136.
In one embodiment, the third and fourth primary channels 135,136 and the third and fourth secondary channels 135a,135b,136a,136b are activated by one's touch. Alternatively, the third and fourth primary channels 135,136 and the third and fourth secondary channels 135a,135b,136a,136b are activated by depressing the switch 130 causing the switch 130 to pivot about the first and/or second axes 131,132.
In the embodiment shown in
Referring now to
While the present invention has been disclosed with reference to certain embodiments, numerous modifications, alterations, and changes to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the present invention, as defined by the appended claims. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but that it has the full scope defined by the language of the following claims, and equivalents thereof.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/419,024, filed Oct. 15, 2002, the priority benefit of which is claimed by this application and which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2524782 | Ferrar et al. | Oct 1950 | A |
2972140 | Hirsch | Feb 1961 | A |
3157853 | Hirsch | Nov 1964 | A |
3220121 | Cutler | Nov 1965 | A |
3490059 | Paulsen et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3497668 | Hirsch | Feb 1970 | A |
3517446 | Corlyon et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3623046 | Scourtes | Nov 1971 | A |
3623064 | Kagan | Nov 1971 | A |
3875488 | Crocker et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3902687 | Hightower | Sep 1975 | A |
3903614 | Diamond et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3911416 | Feder | Oct 1975 | A |
4050265 | Drennen et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4103155 | Clark | Jul 1978 | A |
4125800 | Jones | Nov 1978 | A |
4127752 | Lowthorp | Nov 1978 | A |
4148014 | Burson | Apr 1979 | A |
4160508 | Salsbury | Jul 1979 | A |
4236325 | Hall et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4262549 | Schwellenbach | Apr 1981 | A |
4311980 | Prusenziati | Jan 1982 | A |
4333070 | Barnes | Jun 1982 | A |
4385836 | Schmitt | May 1983 | A |
4391282 | Ando et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4400790 | Chambers et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4443952 | Schulien et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4464117 | Forest | Aug 1984 | A |
4484191 | Vavra | Nov 1984 | A |
4513235 | Acklam et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4546347 | Kirsch | Oct 1985 | A |
4581491 | Boothroyd | Apr 1986 | A |
4599070 | Hladky et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4637264 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4639884 | Sagues | Jan 1987 | A |
4676115 | Morscheck et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4678908 | LaPlante | Jul 1987 | A |
4680466 | Kuwahara et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4692726 | Green et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4695266 | Hui | Sep 1987 | A |
4699043 | Violante De Dionigi | Oct 1987 | A |
4708656 | De Vries et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4712101 | Culver | Dec 1987 | A |
4713007 | Alban | Dec 1987 | A |
4724715 | Culver | Feb 1988 | A |
4728954 | Phelan et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4734685 | Watanabe | Mar 1988 | A |
4758165 | Tieman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4772205 | Chlumsky et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4776701 | Pettigrew | Oct 1988 | A |
4794384 | Jackson | Dec 1988 | A |
4794392 | Selinko | Dec 1988 | A |
4795907 | Maekawa | Jan 1989 | A |
4799055 | Nestler et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4803413 | Kendig et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4811608 | Hilton | Mar 1989 | A |
4815006 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4819195 | Bell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4823106 | Lovell | Apr 1989 | A |
4825157 | Mikan | Apr 1989 | A |
4840634 | Muller et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4851771 | Ikeda et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4860051 | Taniguchi et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4885565 | Embach | Dec 1989 | A |
4891764 | McIntosh | Jan 1990 | A |
4891889 | Tomelleri | Jan 1990 | A |
4906843 | Jones et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4914976 | Wyllie | Apr 1990 | A |
4926879 | Sevrain et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930770 | Baker | Jun 1990 | A |
4934694 | McIntosh | Jun 1990 | A |
4935725 | Turnau | Jun 1990 | A |
4935728 | Kley | Jun 1990 | A |
4937685 | Barker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4940234 | Ishida et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4949119 | Moncrief et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962448 | DeMaio et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4964837 | Collier | Oct 1990 | A |
4965446 | Vyse | Oct 1990 | A |
4982504 | Soderberg et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5006703 | Shikunami et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5019761 | Kraft | May 1991 | A |
5022384 | Freels | Jun 1991 | A |
5022407 | Horch et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5024626 | Robbins et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035242 | Franklin | Jul 1991 | A |
5038089 | Szakaly | Aug 1991 | A |
5053975 | Tsuchihashi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062830 | Dunlap | Nov 1991 | A |
5065145 | Purcell | Nov 1991 | A |
5068529 | Ohno et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5078152 | Bond | Jan 1992 | A |
5079845 | Childers | Jan 1992 | A |
5086197 | Liou | Feb 1992 | A |
5095303 | Clark et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5107080 | Rosen | Apr 1992 | A |
5113179 | Scott-Jackson et al. | May 1992 | A |
5116051 | Moncrief et al. | May 1992 | A |
5121091 | Fujiyama | Jun 1992 | A |
5125281 | Mottate | Jun 1992 | A |
5132927 | Lenoski et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5138154 | Hotelling | Aug 1992 | A |
5139261 | Openiano | Aug 1992 | A |
5148377 | McDonald | Sep 1992 | A |
5155423 | Karlen et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5165897 | Johnson | Nov 1992 | A |
5168268 | Levy | Dec 1992 | A |
5175459 | Danial et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5182557 | Lang | Jan 1993 | A |
5186695 | Mangseth et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195179 | Tokunaga | Mar 1993 | A |
5195920 | Collier | Mar 1993 | A |
5202961 | Mills et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5204600 | Kahkoska | Apr 1993 | A |
5209131 | Baxter | May 1993 | A |
5212473 | Louis | May 1993 | A |
5216337 | Orton et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5223658 | Suzuki | Jun 1993 | A |
5229836 | Nagano | Jul 1993 | A |
5230623 | Guthrie et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5235868 | Culver | Aug 1993 | A |
5239249 | Ono | Aug 1993 | A |
5240417 | Smithson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5246316 | Smith | Sep 1993 | A |
5247648 | Watkins et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5254919 | Bridges et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5271290 | Fischer | Dec 1993 | A |
5275174 | Cook | Jan 1994 | A |
5275565 | Moncrief | Jan 1994 | A |
5280276 | Kwok | Jan 1994 | A |
5283970 | Aigner | Feb 1994 | A |
5284330 | Carlson et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5289273 | Lang | Feb 1994 | A |
5296846 | Ledley | Mar 1994 | A |
5299810 | Pierce | Apr 1994 | A |
5302132 | Corder | Apr 1994 | A |
5309140 | Everett, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313229 | Gilligan et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313230 | Venolia et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317336 | Hall | May 1994 | A |
5329289 | Sakamoto et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5334027 | Wherlock | Aug 1994 | A |
5341459 | Backes | Aug 1994 | A |
5351692 | Dow et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359193 | Nyui et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5374942 | Gilligan et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5379663 | Hara | Jan 1995 | A |
5384460 | Tseng | Jan 1995 | A |
5389849 | Asano et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390128 | Ryan et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390296 | Crandall et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396267 | Bouton | Mar 1995 | A |
5397323 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5398044 | Hill | Mar 1995 | A |
5402499 | Robison et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402582 | Raab | Apr 1995 | A |
5402680 | Korenaga | Apr 1995 | A |
5414337 | Schuler | May 1995 | A |
5417696 | Kashuba et al. | May 1995 | A |
5428746 | Dalrymple | Jun 1995 | A |
5436542 | Petelin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436622 | Gutman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436640 | Reeves | Jul 1995 | A |
5437607 | Taylor | Aug 1995 | A |
5452615 | Hilton | Sep 1995 | A |
5457479 | Cheng | Oct 1995 | A |
5457793 | Elko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461711 | Wang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466213 | Hogan | Nov 1995 | A |
5467763 | McMahon et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473344 | Bacon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474082 | Junker | Dec 1995 | A |
5481914 | Ward | Jan 1996 | A |
5491477 | Clark et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5512919 | Araki | Apr 1996 | A |
5514150 | Rostoker | May 1996 | A |
5524195 | Clanton, III et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526022 | Donahue et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530455 | Gillick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5543821 | Marchis et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547382 | Yamasaki | Aug 1996 | A |
5547383 | Yamaguchi | Aug 1996 | A |
5550562 | Aoki et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550583 | Matheny et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5565840 | Thorner et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570111 | Barrett et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575761 | Hajianpour | Nov 1996 | A |
5576727 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583407 | Yamaguchi | Dec 1996 | A |
5591924 | Hilton | Jan 1997 | A |
5592401 | Kramer | Jan 1997 | A |
5600777 | Wang et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604345 | Matsuura | Feb 1997 | A |
5611731 | Bouton et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623582 | Rosenberg | Apr 1997 | A |
5623642 | Katz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627531 | Posso et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628686 | Svancarek et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635897 | Kuo | Jun 1997 | A |
5638060 | Kataoka et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638421 | Serrano et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5652603 | Abrams | Jul 1997 | A |
5666138 | Culver | Sep 1997 | A |
5680141 | Didomenico et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690582 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691747 | Amano | Nov 1997 | A |
5691898 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694153 | Aoyagi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5719561 | Gonzales | Feb 1998 | A |
5722071 | Berg et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724106 | Autry et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724264 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734108 | Walker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736978 | Hasser et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5740083 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745057 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749577 | Couch et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755620 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1998 | A |
5763874 | Luciano et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766016 | Sinclair | Jun 1998 | A |
5767836 | Scheffer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771037 | Jackson | Jun 1998 | A |
5785630 | Bobick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795228 | Trumbull et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5808568 | Wu | Sep 1998 | A |
5808603 | Chen | Sep 1998 | A |
5818426 | Tierney et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825305 | Biferno | Oct 1998 | A |
5828295 | Mittel et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831593 | Rutledge | Nov 1998 | A |
5841133 | Omi | Nov 1998 | A |
5841423 | Carroll, Jr. et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841428 | Jaeger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844673 | Ivers | Dec 1998 | A |
5877748 | Redlich | Mar 1999 | A |
5879327 | Moreau DeFarges et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887995 | Holehan | Mar 1999 | A |
5889506 | Lopresti et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5912661 | Siddiqui | Jun 1999 | A |
5917486 | Rylander | Jun 1999 | A |
5917906 | Thronton | Jun 1999 | A |
5919159 | Lilley et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929607 | Rosenburg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936613 | Jaeger et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954689 | Poulsen | Sep 1999 | A |
5963196 | Nishiumi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977867 | Blouin | Nov 1999 | A |
5986638 | Cheng | Nov 1999 | A |
6008800 | Pryor | Dec 1999 | A |
6017273 | Pelkey | Jan 2000 | A |
6031222 | Carapelli | Feb 2000 | A |
6067077 | Martin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067081 | Hahlganss et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078311 | Pelkey | Jun 2000 | A |
6078876 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081536 | Gorsuch et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084587 | Tarr et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097499 | Casey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097964 | Nuovo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104379 | Petrich et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111577 | Zilles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118435 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6140987 | Stein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151332 | Gorsuch et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154201 | Levin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160489 | Perry et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169540 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183364 | Trovato | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192432 | Slivka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198206 | Saarmaa et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215778 | Lomp et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218966 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219034 | Elbing et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236647 | Amalfitano | May 2001 | B1 |
6241574 | Helbing | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243080 | Molne | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256011 | Culver | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259433 | Meyers | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262717 | Donohue et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280327 | Leifer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285351 | Chang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293798 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295608 | Parkes et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300038 | Shimazu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307465 | Kayma et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324928 | Hughes | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6326901 | Gonzales | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337678 | Fish | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349301 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6373463 | Beeks | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388655 | Leung | May 2002 | B1 |
6388999 | Gorsuch et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6414674 | Kamper et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418329 | Furuya | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422941 | Thorner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429846 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6445284 | Cruz-Hernandez et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469695 | White | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487421 | Hess et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6509892 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518958 | Miyajima et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535201 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546390 | Pollack et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563487 | Martin et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6590568 | Astala et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613000 | Reinkensmeyer et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628195 | Coudon | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633224 | Hishida et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636202 | Ishmael, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6637281 | Yamamoto | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6639582 | Shrader | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647145 | Gay | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6760751 | Hachiya et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6819312 | Fish | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6904823 | Levin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6954899 | Anderson | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7038667 | Vassallo et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7081883 | Chen | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7104152 | Levin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7650810 | Levin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20010018354 | Pigni | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010035854 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010045978 | McConnell et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020020236 | Onodera | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021282 | Masudaya | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020033795 | Shahoian et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020072674 | Criton et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020142701 | Rosenberg | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149561 | Fukumoto et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149570 | Knowles et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156807 | Dieberger | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030006892 | Church | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016211 | Woolley | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022701 | Gupta | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025679 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030030628 | Sato et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038776 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043206 | Duarte | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030048260 | Matusis | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058265 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067449 | Yoshikawa et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071795 | Baldauf et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090460 | Schena et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095105 | Vaananen | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112269 | Lentz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128191 | Strasser et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030128192 | van Os | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151597 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172757 | Yone | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174121 | Poupyrev et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179190 | Franzen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188594 | Levin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040076444 | Badovinac et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040193393 | Keane | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050109145 | Levin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050187747 | Paxson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
41 40 780 | Sep 1992 | DE |
196 36 779 | Mar 1998 | DE |
0 085 518 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0349086 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0 265 086 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0 470 257 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0 358 989 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0556999 | May 1998 | EP |
1182851 | Feb 2002 | EP |
0 875 819 | Oct 2002 | EP |
569136 | May 1945 | GB |
1 291 271 | Oct 1972 | GB |
1 372 412 | Oct 1974 | GB |
2 237 160 | Apr 1991 | GB |
2 347 199 | Aug 2000 | GB |
01-003664 | Jul 1990 | JP |
02-109714 | Jan 1992 | JP |
04-007371 | Aug 1993 | JP |
5-231509 | Sep 1993 | JP |
05-193862 | Jan 1995 | JP |
11-078576 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2001-350592 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-02944 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-09756 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-259059 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003-260948 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-511739 | Apr 2004 | JP |
WO 9616397 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9624398 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9632679 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9718546 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 0026891 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0077689 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0100630 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0167297 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0212991 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0227645 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0231807 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 0233290 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 03000319 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03085481 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report dated Jan. 12, 2004. |
Lindemann, R.W. and Templemann, J.N., Vibrotactile Feedback for Handling Virtual Contact in Immersive Virtual Environments, in Usability Evaluation and Interlace Design: Cognitive Engineering, Intelligent Agents and Virtual Reality, Smith, M.J., Salvendy, G., Harris, D., and Koubek, R.J. (Eds.) 2001, pp. 21-25. |
Lindemann, R.W., Templemann, J.N., Sibert, J.L. and Cutler, J.R., Handling of Virtual Contact in Immersive Virtual Environments: Beyond Visuals, Virtual Reality (2002) 6:130-139. |
Partial PCT International Search Report dated Sep. 2, 2004. |
Lake, “Cyberman From Logitech,” GameBytes, 1994. |
Noll, .“Man-Machine Tactile,” SID Journal, Jul./Aug. 1972 Issue. |
Rosenberg, Virtual Fixtures: Perceptual Overlays Enhance Operator Performance in Telepresence Tasks, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Jun. 1994. |
Yamakita et al., “Tele-Virtual Reality of Dynamic Mechanical Model,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Raleigh, NC, Jul. 7-10, 1992. |
Patent Office of Peoples Republic of China, First Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 03807822, dated Feb. 2, 2007. |
Shobayashi International Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-582601, mailed Dec. 10, 2008. |
Japanese Patent Office, Decision of Dismissal of Amendment, Japanese Application No. 2003-582601, dated Jan. 15, 2008. |
Shobayashi International Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Reasons of Rejection, Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-582601, dated Apr. 21, 2009. |
Patent Office of Peoples Republic of China, Second Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 03807822, dated Apr. 28, 2009. |
Shobayashi International Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Reasons of Rejection, Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-582601, dated Feb. 27, 2007. |
Shobayashi International Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Reasons of Rejection, Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-582601, dated May 30, 2006. |
KIPOS Notice of Preliminary Rejection, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2004-7015606, dated Jun. 4, 2010. |
KIPOS Notice of Preliminary Rejection, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2004-7015606, dated Jul. 10, 2009. |
Adelstein, “A Virtual Environment System for the Study of Human Arm Tremor,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Jun. 1989. |
Adelstein, “Design and Implementation of a Force Reflecting Manipulandum for Manual Control research,” DSC-vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, Edited by H. Kazerooni, pp. 1-12, 1992. |
Aukstakalnis et al., “Silicon Mirage: The Art and Science of Virtual Reality,” ISBN 0-938151-82-7, pp. 129-180, 1992. |
Baigrie, “Electric Control Loading—A Low Cost, High Performance Alternative,” Proceedings, pp. 247-254, Nov. 6-8, 1990. |
Bejczy et al., “Kinesthetic Coupling Between Operator and Remote Manipulator,” International Computer Technology Conference, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 12-15, 1980. |
Bejczy, “Sensors, Controls, and Man-Machine Interface for Advanced Teleoperation,” Science, vol. 208, No. 4450, pp. 1327-1335, 1980. |
Bejczy, “Generalization of Bilateral Force-Reflecting Control of Manipulators,” Proceedings of Fourth CISM-IFToMM, Sep. 8-12, 1981. |
Bejczy, et al., “Universal Computer Control System (UCCS) for Space Telerobots,” CH2413-3/87/0000/0318501.00 1987 IEEE, 1987. |
Bejczy et al., “A Laboratory Breadboard System for Dual-Arm Teleoperation,” SOAR '89 Workshop, JSC, Houston, TX, Jul. 25-27, 1989. |
Bliss, “Optical-to-Tactile Image Conversion for the Blind,” IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, vol. MMS-11, No. 1, Mar. 1970. |
Brooks et al., “Hand Controllers for Teleoperation—A State-of-the-Art Technology Survey and Evaluation,” JPL Publication 85-11; NASA-CR-175890; N85-28559, pp. 1-84, Mar. 1, 1985. |
Burdea et al., “Distributed Virtual Force Feedback, Lecture Notes for Workshop on Force Display in Virtual Environments and its Application to Robotic Teleoperation,” 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 25-44, May 2, 1993. |
Cadler, “Design of a Force-Feedback Touch-Introducing Actuator for Teleoperator Robot Control,” Bachelor of Science Thesis, MIT, Jun. 23, 1983. |
Caldwell et al., “Enhanced Tactile Feedback (Tele-Taction) Using a Multi-Functional Sensory System,” 1050-4729/93, pp. 955-960, 1993. |
“Cyberman Technical Specification,” Logitech Cyberman SWIFT Supplement, Apr. 5, 1994. |
Eberhardt et al., “OMAR—A Haptic display for speech perception by deaf and deaf-blind individuals,” IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Seattle, WA, Sep. 18-22, 1993. |
Eberhardt et al., “Including Dynamic Haptic Perception by the Hand: System Description and Some Results,” DSC-vol. 55-1, Dynamic Systems and Control: vol. 1, ASME 1994. |
Fokumoto, “Active Click: Tactile Feedback for Touch Panels,” ACM CHI2001 Extended Abstracts, pp. 121-122, Apr. 2001. |
Force Feedback Touch Panel, Represented by CSC Division, Sales Department., SIXIK Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, www.smk.co.jp. |
Gobel et al., “Tactile Feedback Applied to Computer Mice,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1-24, 1995. |
Gotow et al., “Controlled Impedance Test Apparatus for Studying Human Interpretation of Kinesthetic Feedback,” WA11-11:00, pp. 332-337, 1989. |
Howe, “A Force-Reflecting Teleoperated Hand System for the Study of Tactile Sensing in Precision Manipulation,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France, May 1992. |
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “Mouse Ball-Actuating Device With Force and Tactile Feedback,” vol. 32, No. 9B, Feb. 1990. |
Iwata, “Pen-based Haptic Virtual Environment,” 0-7803-1363-1/93 IEEE, pp. 287-292, 1993. |
Jacobsen et al., “High Performance, Dextrous Telerobotic Manipulator With Force Reflection,” Intervention/ROV '91 Conference & Exposition, Hollywood, Florida, May 21-23, 1991. |
Johnson, “Shape-Memory Alloy Tactile Feedback Actuator,” Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, AAMRL-TR-90-039, Aug. 1990. |
Jones et al., “A perceptual analysis of stiffness,” ISSN 0014-4819 Springer International (Springer-Verlag); Experimental Brain Research, vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 150-156, 1990. |
Kaczmarek et al., “Tactile Displays,” Virtual Environment Technologies, 1995. |
Kontarinis et al., “Display of High-Frequency Tactile Information to Teleoperators,” Telemanipulator Technology and Space Telerobotics, Won S. Kim, Editor, Proc. SPIE vol. 2057, pp. 40-50, Sep. 7-9, 1993. |
Kontarinis et al., “Tactile Display of Vibratory Information in Teleoperation and Virtual Environments,” PRESENCE, 4(4):387-402, 1995. |
Marcus, “Touch Feedback in Surgery,” Proceedings of Virtual Reality and Medicine the Cutting Edge, Sep. 8-11, 1994. |
McAffee, “Teleoperator Subsystem/Telerobot Demonstrator: Force Reflecting Hand Controller Equipment Manual,” JPL D-5172, pp. 1-50, A1-A36, B1-B5, C1-C36, Jan. 1988. |
Minsky, “Computational Haptics: The Sandpaper System for Synthesizing Texture for a Force-Feedback Display,” Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Jun. 1995. |
Ouh-Young, “Force Display in Molecular Docking,” Order No. 9034744, p. 1-369, 1990. |
Ouh-Young, “A Low-Cost Force Feedback Joystick and its Use in PC Video Games,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 41, No. 3, Aug. 1995. |
Ouhyoung et al., “The Development of a Low-Cost Force Feedback Joystick and its Use in the Virtual Reality Environment,” Proceedings of the Third Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, Pacific Graphics '95, Seoul, Korea, Aug. 21-24, 1995. |
Patrick et al., “Design and Testing of a Non-reactive, Fingertip, Tactile Display for Interaction with Remote Environments,” Cooperative Intelligent Robotics in Space, Rui J. deFigueiredo et al., Editor, Proc. SPIE vol. 1387, pp. 215-222, 1990. |
Patrick, “Design, Construction, and Testing of a Fingertip Tactile Display for Interaction with Virtual and Remote Environments,” Master of Science Thesis, MIT, Nov. 8, 1990. |
Pimentel et al., “Virtual Reality: through the new looking glass,” 2nd Edition; McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-050167-X, pp. 41-202, 1994. |
Rabinowitz et al., “Multidimensional tactile displays: Identification of vibratory intensity, frequency, and contactor area,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 82, No. 4, Oct. 1987. |
Russo, “The Design and Implementation of a Three Degree of Freedom Force Output Joystick,” MIT Libraries Archives Aug. 14, 1990, pp. 1-131, May 1990. |
Russo, “Controlling Dissipative Magnetic Particle Brakes in Force Reflective Devices,” DSC-vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, pp. 63-70, ASME 1992. |
Safe Flight Instruments Corporation, “Coaxial Control Shaker,” Part No. C-25502, Jul. 1, 1967. |
Scannell, “Taking a Joystick Ride,” Computer Currents, Boston Edition, vol. 9, No. 11, Nov. 1994. |
Shimoga, “Finger Force and Touch Feedback Issues in Dexterous Telemanipulation,” Proceedings of Fourth Annual Conference on Intelligent Robotic Systems for Space Exploration, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Sep. 30-Oct. 1, 1992. |
SMK Corporation, “Multi-Functional Touch Panel, Force-Feedback Type, Developed: A Touch Panel Providing a Clicking Feeling,” http://www.smk.co.jp/whatsnew—e/628csc—e.html, Sep. 30, 2002. |
SMK Corporation, “Force Feedback Type Optical Touch Panel Developed,” SMK Corporation Website, Oct. 30, 2002. |
Snow et al., “Model-X Force-Reflecting-Hand-Controller,” NT Control No. MPO-17851; JPL Case No. 5348, pp. 1-4, Jun. 15, 1989. |
Stanley et al., “Computer Simulation of Interacting Dynamic Mechanical Systems Using Distributed Memory Parallel Processors,” DSC-vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, pp. 55-61, ASME 1992. |
Tadros, “Control System Design for a Three Degree of Freedom Virtual Environment Simulator Using Motor/Brake Pair Actuators”, MIT Archive © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 1-88, Feb. 1990. |
Terry et al., “Tactile Feedback in a Computer Mouse,” Proceedings of Fourteenth Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, University of New Hampshire, Mar. 10-11, 1988. |
Wiker, “Teletouch Display Development: Phase 1 Report,” Technical Report 1230, Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego, Apr. 17, 1989. |
Adelstein, B., A Virtual Environment System for the Study of Human Arm Tremor, Submitted to the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 1989, pp. 1-253. |
Adelstein, B. et al., Design and Implementation of a Force Reflecting Manipulandum for Manual Control Research, DSC-vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, ASME 1992, pp. 1-12. |
Akamatsu et al., Multimodal Mouse: A Mouse-Type Device with Tactile and Force Display, Presence, vol. 3, No. 1 pp. 73-80, 1994. |
ATIP9B.059: Virtual Reality (VR) Development at SERI (Korea), Asian Technology Information Program (ATIP) Jul. 20, 1996, pp. 1-9. |
Aukstakalnis, S. et al., The Art and Science of Virtual Reality Silicon Mirage, 1992, Peachpit Press, Inc., Berkeley, CA, pp. 129-180. |
Baigrie, S. et al., Electric Control Loading-A Low Cost, High Performance Alternative, Proceedings, Nov. 6-8, 1990, pp. 247-254. |
Bejczy, A., Sensors, Controls, and Man-Machine Interface for Advanced Teleoperation, Science, vol. 208, No. 4450, 1980, pp. 1327-1335. |
Bejczy, A. et al., Kinesthetic Coupling Between Operator and Remote Manipulator, International Computer Technology Conference, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, San Francisco, CA, Aug. 12-15, 1980, pp. 1-9. |
Bejczy, A. et al., A Laboratory Breadboard System for Dual-Arm Teleoperation, SOAR '89 Workshop, JSC, Houston, Jul. 25-27, 1989. |
Bejczy, A. et al., Universal Computer Control System (UCCS) for Space Telerobots, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, pp. 317-324, 1987. |
Bjork, S. et al., An Alternative to Scroll Bars on Small Screens, Play: Applied Research on Art and Technology, Viktoria Institute, Box 620, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 1-2, 1999. |
Bouguila, L. et al., Effect of Coupling Haptics and Stereopsis on Depth Perception in Virtual Environment, Precision and Intelligence Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta cho Midori ku Yokohama shi 226-8503-Japan, 2000. |
Brooks. T. et al., Hand Controllers for Teleoperation: A State-of-the-Art Technology Survey and Evaluation, 1985, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. |
Burdea, G. et al., Distributed Virtual Force Feedback, IEEE Workshop on “Force Display in Virtual Environments and its Application to Robotic Teleoperation,” May 2, 1993, Atlanta, GA. |
Calder, B. et al., Design of a Force-Feedback Touch-Inducing Actuator for Teleoperator Robot Control, Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering in partial Fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelors of Science in Mechanical Engineering and Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 1983. |
Caldwell, D. et al., Enhanced Tactile Feedback (Tele-Taction) using a Multi-Functional Sensory System, Dept. of Electronic Eng., University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK, 1993. |
Cyberman Technical Specification, Logitech Cyberman SWIFT Supplement, Revision 1.0, Apr. 5, 1994, pp. 1-29. |
Eberhardt, S. et al., OMAR-A Haptic Display for Speech Perception by Deaf and Deaf-Blind Individuals, IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, Sep. 18-22, 1993, Seattle Washington. |
Eberhardt, S. et al., Inducing Dynamic Haptic Perception by the Hand: System Description and Some Results, Dynamic Systems and Control, 1994, vol. 1, presented at 1994 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago Illinois, Nov. 6-11, 1994. |
Fukumoto. M. et al., Active Click Tactile Feedback for Touch Panels, NTT DoCoMo Multimedia Labs, Japan, 2001. |
Gobel, M. et al., Tactile Feedback Applied to Computer Mice, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, No, 1, pp. 1-24, 1995. |
Gotow, J. et al., Controlled Impedance Test Apparatus for Studying Human Interpretation of Kinesthetic Feedback, the Robotics Institute and Deptartmetn of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, pp. 332-337, 1989. |
Hansen, W., Enhancing Docuemtns with Embedded Programs: How Ness extends Insets in the Andrew Toolkit, 1990. Information Technology Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. |
Hasser, C. et al., Tactile Feedback with Adaptive Controller for a Force-Reflecting Haptic Display Part 1: Design, 1996, Armstrong Laboratory, Human Systems Center, Air Force Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433. |
Hasser. C. et al., Tactile Feedback for a Force-Reflecting Haptic Display, Thesis Submitted to the School of Engineering of the University of Daytona, Dayton OH, Dec. 1995. |
Hasser, C., Force-Reflecting Anthropomorphic Hend Masters, Crew Systems Directorate Biodynamics and Biocommunications Division, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-7901, Jul. 1995, Interim Report for the Period Jun. 1991-Jul. 1995. |
Hinckley, K. et al., Haptic Issues for Virtual Manipulation, a Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy (Computer Science), Dec. 1996. |
Howe, R., A Force-Reflecting Teleoperated Hand System for the Study of Tactile Sensing in Precision Manipulation, Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE Conference in Robotics and Automation, Nice, France-May 1992. |
Iwata, H., Pen-Based Haptic Virtual Environment, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, University of Tsukuba, Japan, 1993. |
Jacobsen, S. et al., High Performance, Dextrous Telerobotic Manipulator with Force Reflection. Intervention/ROV '91, Conference & Exposition, May 21-23, 1991, Hollywood, FL. |
Johnson, A., Shape-Memory Alloy Tactical Feedback Actuator, Phase I-Final Report, Air Force SABIR Contract F33-88-C-0541, Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Human Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433, 1990. |
Jones, L. et al., A Perceptual Analysis of Stiffness, Experimental Brain Research, 1990, vol. 79, pp. 150-156. |
Kaczmarek, K. et al., Tactile Displays, Virtual Environment Technologies, pp. 349-414, 1995. |
Kelley, A. et al., MagicMouse: Tactile and Kinesthetic Feedback in the Human-Computer Interface using an Electromagnetically Actuated Input/Output Device, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Canada, Oct. 19, 1993. |
Lake, S.L., Cyberman from Logitech, web site at http://www.ibiblio.org/GameBytes/issue21/greviews/cyberman/html, as available via the Internet and printed May 29, 2002. |
MacLean, K., Designing with Haptic Feedback, Interval Research Corporation, 1801 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, 2000. |
Mine, M., Isaac, A Virtual Environment Tool for the Interactive Construction of Virtual Worlds, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 1995. |
Picinbono, G. et al., Extrapolation: A Solution for Force Feedback, Virtual Reality and Prototyping, Jun. 1999, Laval, France. |
Wloka, M., Interacting with Virtual Reality, Science and Technology Center for Computer Graphics and Scientific Visualization, Brown University Site. Department of Computer Science, 1995. |
eRENA, Pushing Mixed Reality Boundaries, Deliverable 7b.1, Final, Version 1.0, 1999. |
Real Time Graphics, the Newsletter of Virtual Environment Technologies and Markets, Aug. 1998, vol. 7, No. 2. |
1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 16-20, 1998, Lueven, Belgium. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,237 mailed Jun. 30, 2003. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/116,237. mailed Dec. 2, 2003. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/445,522, mailed Feb. 2, 2007. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/445,522, mailed May 2, 2007. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/445,522, mailed Oct. 10, 2007. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/10173, mailed Nov. 17, 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040145600 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60419024 | Oct 2002 | US |