The present invention relates to a mediating server and more specifically relates to a mediating server that is aware of device profiles of user devices served by the mediating server.
As a result of the proliferation of user devices having access to the Internet and the varying capabilities of these user devices, the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has promulgated a Composite Capability/Preference Profile (CC/PP) standard enabling customization of web content based on the capabilities and user preferences of a user device. More specifically, according to the CC/PP standard, a profile identifying the capabilities and user preferences of a user device is created. The profile may be provided to web content providers and used to customize the web content provided to the user device. For example, the profile of a user device may indicate that the display of the user device is 320×200 pixels. As a result, the web content provider may reduce the size of, for example, an image such that the image fits the display of the user device.
Messages, including the device profiles, from the user devices pass through a number of intermediary network devices on their way to the web content providers. Since the device profiles contain valuable information relating to the device capabilities of the user devices, there is a need for an intermediary network node that obtains the device profiles and provides value-added services based on the device profiles.
The present invention provides a profile aware mediating server. In general, the mediating server operates to interconnect a number of user devices to desired network servers. In order to receive customized content from the network servers, the user devices provide device profiles to the network servers via the mediating server within or in addition to requests for content. As the device profiles pass through the mediating server, the mediating server obtains the device profiles and stores the device profiles in a device profiles database. The mediating server may then classify the user devices based on the user profiles using a classification algorithm, which may include one or more classification rules for each of a number of classes. Thereafter, the mediating server may provide one or more services based on the device profiles, the classification of the user devices, or a combination thereof.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present invention and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention and illustrate the best mode of practicing the invention. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the invention and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
The mediating server 12 may generally be any network node between the user devices 14-1 through 14-N and the web server 16. As will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon reading this disclosure, one or more network nodes may interconnect the mediating server 12 to the user devices 14-1 through 14-N. Likewise, one or more network nodes may interconnect the mediating server 12 to the web server 16. The device profiles database 18 and the device classifications database 20 may be included within or associated with the mediating server 12. Further, while illustrated as being stored in the databases 18 and 20, the device profiles and device classifications may be stored in any fashion in one or more digital storage devices included within or associated with the mediating server 12.
The user devices 14-1 through 14-N may be, for example, mobile telephones, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), notebook computers, desktop computers, or the like. In this embodiment, the user devices 14-1 though 14-N include web browsers 22-1 through 22-N. As will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, the web browsers 22-1 through 22-N operate to request content from network servers, such as the web server 16 hosting a web site 24, via the mediating server 12. Since the user devices 14-1 through 14-N may have varying capabilities, the user devices 14-1 through 14-N provide device profiles to the web server 16 as part of or in addition to the requests for content. Based on the device profiles, the web server 16 customizes the content returned to the user devices 14-1 through 14-N. For example, the device profiles may indicate that the user devices 14-1 through 14-N have varying display sizes. As such, the web server 16 may customize the content, which in this case is content from the web site 24, to fit the displays of the user devices 14-1 through 14-N.
The device profiles generally include information identifying the capabilities of the user devices 14-1 through 14-N and optionally user preferences of the users of the user devices 14-1 through 14-N. The capabilities of the user devices 14-1 through 14-N may include hardware and software capabilities. More specifically, each device profile may include, for example, information regarding a Central Processing Unit (CPU) of the associated user device 14-1, 14-N; information regarding the amount of memory in the user device 14-1, 14-N; information identifying whether the user device 14-1, 14-N includes a keypad, microphone, and speakers; information regarding the wireless capabilities of the user device 14-1, 14-N; information identifying whether the user device 14-1, 14-N includes a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver; information identifying an operating system of the user device 14-1, 14-N; information identifying the web browser 22-1, 22-N of the user device 14-1, 14-N; and the like. For example, the device profiles may be Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PPs) as described in Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PP) Structure and Vocabularies 1.0, which was published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-CCPP-struct-vocab-20040115. An exemplary profile generated according to the CC/PP regulation is illustrated in
Once the user profiles are obtained, the mediating server 12 may then classify the user devices 14-1 through 14-N based on the device profiles according to a classification algorithm (step 104). The user profiles may be classified as they are obtained or in a batch process. The classification algorithm may be hard-coded or configurable. Further, the classification algorithm may be defined by a third-party service provider. For example, the classification algorithm may be a plug-in provided by a third-party service provider. Still further, the mediating server 12 may classify the user devices 14-1 through 14-N using multiple classification algorithms each associated with a particular service. As such, the user devices 14-1 through 14-N may be classified differently depending on the particular service.
In general, a classification algorithm includes a number of classes, each defined by one or more rules. The mediating server 12 identifies the ones of the user devices 14-1 through 14-N satisfying the rules for each class, thereby classifying the user devices 14-1 through 14-N. For example, the classification algorithm may include three classes: “mobile telephone,” “PDA,” and “personal computer.” By examining the user profiles of the user devices 14-1 through 14-N, the mediating server 12 may be able to conclusively determine or at least obtain an inference of the proper class for each of the user devices 14-1 through 14-N. More specifically, the “mobile telephone” class may be defined by one or more rules as devices manufactured by, for example, Nokia, Motorola, or LG Electronics and having both a speaker and a microphone. As for the “PDA” class, the class may be defined by one or more rules as devices manufactured by Nokia, Motorola, or LG Electronics and including a speaker and a display having a display size greater than or equal to 320×200 pixels and less than 640×480 pixels. The “personal computer” class may be defined by one or more rules as devices having some version of Microsoft Windows, Linux Red Hat, or Apple's MAC OS as their operating system and a display size of greater than or equal to 640×480 pixels. Alternatively, the device profiles may expressly indicate whether the user device is a mobile terminal, PDA, personal computer, or the like. Note that the exemplary rules above are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize numerous variations in the types of classes that may be created, the criteria used for the rules, and the complexity of the rules.
Once the user devices 14-1 through 14-N are classified, the mediating server 12 may provide a service based on the classification (step 106). While
In operation, when the mediating server 12 receives a request from one of the user devices 14-1, 14-N, the mediating server 12 determines the classification of the user device 14-1, 14-N and routes the request to a corresponding one of the caching servers 28-32. More specifically, assume that the user device 14-1 is classified as being within Class A. As such, the mediating server 12 routes requests from the user device 14-1 to the caching server 28. If the content requested is stored in the cache 34, the caching server 28 serves the request from the cache 34 and provides the requested content to the mediating server 12, which then sends the requested content to the user device 14-1. If the content requested is not stored in the cache 34, the caching server 28 forwards the request to the web server 16. The requested content is then provided to the user device 14-1 from the web server 16 via the caching server 28 and the mediating server 12.
When a request from one of the user devices 14-1 through 14-N is received by the mediating server 12, the mediating server 12 determines the classification of the user device 14-1, 14-N. If the user device 14-1, 14-N is classified as a Class A user device, the mediating server 12 serves as a caching server for the request. More specifically, the mediating server 12 determines whether the requested content is stored in the cache 44. If so, the requested content is obtained from the cache 44 and returned to the user device 14-1, 14-N. If not, the mediating server 12 forwards the request to the web server 16, which provides the requested content to the user device 14-1, 14-N via the mediating server 12. In a similar fashion, if the user device 14-1, 14-N is classified as a Class B user device, the mediating server 12 routes the request to the caching server 40, which serves the request as described above with respect to
For example, the service 52 may be a service of a mobile telephone service provider and may query the mediating server 12 for user devices in a “mobile telephone” class. In response, the mediating server 12 may provide e-mail addresses for telephone numbers for the user devices in the “mobile telephone” class. The mediating server 12 may then send an e-mail message or a SMS message to the identified user devices including, for example, an advertisement for a new mobile telephone or a new calling plan. As another example, the service 52 may query the mediating server 12 for user devices running Windows CE v. 5.0. The mediating server 12 may maintain a class for user devices running Windows CE v. 5.0 or identify the user devices running Windows CE v. 5.0 directly from the device profiles. The service 52 may then send an e-mail or SMS message to the identified user devices regarding an update for Windows CE v. 5.0.
The services discussed above with respect to
As another example, the mediating server 12 may be a coordinator of a peer-to-peer (P2P) topology wherein the user devices 14-1 through 14-N are peers. P2P connections may be made between the user devices 14-1 through 14-N based, at least in part, on the device classifications of the user devices 14-1 through 14-N. The mediating server 12 may be a director that instructs the user devices 14-1 through 14-N regarding the P2P connections that are to be made. Alternatively, the mediating server 12 may be a broker, wherein the user devices 14-1 through 14-N query the mediating server 12 in order to assist the user devices 14-1 through 14-N in deciding what P2P connections to make.
As yet another example, the mediating server 12 may be part of a P2P topology in order to provide a P2P cache that is distributed among the peers, which are the user devices 14-1 through 14-N. The user devices 14-1 through 14-N may each maintain a local cache. When making a request, the user device 14-1 may query the mediating server 12 to identify other user devices within the same class as the user device 14-1. The user devices within the same class may be used to provide a P2P cache for the user devices in that class. Thus, when one of the user devices 14-1, 14-N in the class makes a request, the request may be provided to the other user devices in the class, which collaboratively operate as a caching server.
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present invention. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6470332 | Weschler | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6721282 | Motley | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6871236 | Fishman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6987985 | Purkayastha et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7016668 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7130872 | de Bonet | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7739658 | Watson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7801945 | Geddes et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 20020010759 | Hitson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020013812 | Krueger et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020054578 | Zhang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020061029 | Dillon | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104099 | Novak | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107934 | Lowery et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129367 | Devara | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144267 | Gutta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156842 | Signes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030046270 | Leung et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050055 | Ting et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081580 | Vaidyanathan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110234 | Egli et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030152096 | Chapman | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030161268 | Larsson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006615 | Jackson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030798 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042421 | Mahany | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088369 | Yeager et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117824 | Karaoguz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040248615 | Purkayastha et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040264372 | Huang | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050008017 | Datta et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050034001 | Pontarelli | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108769 | Arnold et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050120091 | Casais et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050120127 | Bradley et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169632 | Song et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050183120 | Jain et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192987 | Marsh | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050201340 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216942 | Barton | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239497 | Bahl et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050286438 | Rajkotia | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060048185 | Alterman | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060048186 | Alterman | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053452 | Lee et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060056349 | Nakatugawa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060085830 | Bruck et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129672 | Mayer | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206933 | Molen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277271 | Morse et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070002742 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061488 | Alagappan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061580 | Venkatesan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070214237 | Stibel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282847 | Gwozdz | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20110087750 | Gwozdz | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 306 869 | Nov 1995 | GB |