Applicant claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 of German Application No. 20 2004 018 094.4 filed Nov. 22, 2004. Applicant also claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §365 of PCT/EP2005/011056 filed Oct. 14, 2005. The international application under PCT article 21(2) was not published in English.
The innovation relates to a profiled rail system for covering joints between floor and/or wall coverings, in order to obtain smooth transitions even when adjacent floor coverings have different heights. Joint bridges of this type are known from the prior art. Although such arrangements are already capable of being adapted to predetermined height tolerances, it is nevertheless desirable to extend the adaptability even further, so that even large joint depths or pronounced depth variations can be dealt with by means of a single product design. Such a requirement is demanded, in particular, by the trade, so that there is no need to keep in stock too many different types. Another requirement in this context is that the connection should have a good hold and be adaptable to all situations. For example, EP 1 403 444 discloses a profiled rail system, in which a profiled shank with a holding head, onto which the covering rail is placed, is plugged in the base rail. The plug connection of a shank in a longitudinal groove has lateral instability, particularly when the connection is held pivotably with respect to the covering rail put in place.
The object of the innovation is, therefore, to provide a profiled rail system for covering joints, in which a firm, secured connection between the base rail and covering rail is made, which can be used both for small and for very large joint heights.
The object is achieved, according to the innovation, by means of the features of claim 1. Due to the upstanding fixed holding head on the web of the base rail, the interposed holding part has a good hold in spite of the rotational moveable retention. The selected rotational moveability can readily have a generous angular deflection if the clamping and holding effect is sufficiently taut. The design of the interposed holding part in the form of a U-rail is particularly advantageous, because the holding elements can be accommodated protectively and in a space-saving way inside the U-rail, the entire width of the U-rail can be utilized for the pivoting region and the covering rail put in place can be retained with its two webs on the outer walls of the U-rail with a sufficient clamping effect. Here, too, the height position can be adapted and readjusted in a known way. Thus, a U-rail is compact and stable and easily withstands any tensile and compressive forces.
So that the holding part can be supported rotationally moveably on the base rail, the holding head of the web of the base rail has a cross section of circular design. This rounded end extends over the entire length of the web. Such a shape can be produced preeminently and cost-effectively by the extrusion method. Through the slender web and the large rounded closing-off head, the holding part put in place can be pivoted on both sides over at least 100. It is also intended to provide the surface of the circular head with a structure or with a longitudinally running flute, in order to give the retention part a better hold and to find the central orientation for the covering rail. It need not be mentioned that the holding part should have a corresponding elevation.
In order to secure the holding part on the holding head favorably to the base rail, there are several possibilities. The features of claim 1 have proved highly advantageous. The spring element is a part which is produced from an elastic and resilient material and which projects from the upper transverse wall into the inner space of the U-rail and is supported with its outwardly bent-up ends on the sidewalls of the U-rail.
The special shaping and mounting give the spring head a good and firm hold on the holding head of the web, the tension of which remains stable due to the lateral support of the bent-up ends. The strip material claimed refers merely to the fact that the spring element is thin-walled. It could, for example, be manufactured in one piece with the U-rail if both are produced from the same material.
A holding part with a spring element would also be highly advantageous if it were equipped with the features of claim 2. The spring element is admittedly preferably produced from sheet steel. A plastic part would, however, also be conceivable, because there are also types of plastic which have good spring properties. In this version according to claim 2, the spring element is a loose part which is pressed into the inner space of the U-rail and clamped. The free, outwardly directed ends engage into the structure of the inner sidewalls with such firmness that there is no fear of any independent release. The desired bracing is brought about by the pressure of the spring heads against the upper transverse wall. The manufacture of the rail system becomes more versatile due to the individual production of the springs. Above all, the spring elements can also be used individually at intervals, depending on the length of the U-rail or of the covering rail.
It has also proved to be highly advantageous to equip the holding part to be interposed with the features of claim 3. This manufacture may take place both in plastic and in metal. In the case of plastic, corresponding molds would have to be produced. Where metal is concerned, the walls of the U-rail would be partially indented and bent into their spring shape. It would also be possible, however, to manufacture the spring element separately and to hold it at intervals by means of thin webs, whereupon the U-rail is then cast and the web are at the same time encased, so that the spring element are interposed between the U-rail portions. In this version, too, the spring head covering more than 180° affords a sufficient hold for a rotationally moveable connection on the holding head of the base rail. The free ends of the spring are secured to the lower edge of the U-rail, so that the spring possesses sufficient tension. The shorter the portions of the spring elements and of the U-rail portions are, the more this profiled rail system can be produced in a more versatile and more cost-saving way.
A further and advantageous securing of the interposed holding part is possible if the features of claim 4 are utilized. The integrally formed webs preferably consist of plastic in the same way as the U-rail itself. For the snapping onto the holding head of the base rail, three webs distributed in the rounding are the most beneficial. Their elasticity makes it possible that they can receive the holding head securely between them as a rotary bearing and that the U-rail can be angled in the required region. High angular freedom is achieved when two webs are arranged on one side at a short interval and the third web is arranged opposite the two. However, even more webs for support are possible. This U-rail with the integrally formed webs can be produced highly cost-effectively by the extrusion method.
There is no difficulty in allowing the webs to extend over the length of the U-rail, particularly when the rail is produced by the extrusion method. This ensures that the holding part, over its entire length, retains the base rail.
It is highly advantageous, furthermore, if the features of claim 6 are utilized. It goes without saying that the covering rail must extend over the entire length of the joint. By contrast, it is entirely sufficient if this covering rail is secured at intervals only to the base rail. This saves a large amount of material and is cost-effective, as demanded by the trade.
When the holding pieces are used at intervals, it is necessary, as an alternative, that the features of claim 7 are adopted. In this version, there is high variability, since the U-rail, which serves as a holding part for the covering rail, may consist both of plastic and of metal. The same applies to the spring segment which is required for securing to the base rail. And because the two individual parts are first assembled to form a unit, only the shaping is important in the case of the individual parts so as to ensure that they are effectively connected to one another. The material is in this case unimportant. It is necessary merely to have the required properties of strength and elasticity. Since the parts are beneficially produced as mass production parts, the entire profiled rail system is highly cost-effective.
As regards the use of portions, another variant is also possible, for which the features of claim 8 are utilized. If the portion consists of metal, the U-rail is indented vertically in the sidewalls and a part region of the wall is shaped into a spring. The portions can even more beneficially be produced from plastic in a mold. Both the spring element and the rail segment immediately having the desired shape by which they can fulfill their tasks. These parts, too, are mass production parts which can be produced beneficially by permanent mold casting.
It has provided favorable, in practice, if the features of claim 9 are utilized. Plastic parts are not subject to corrosion, and because both the base rail and the interposed holding part are always covered completely, the visual appearance of these parts is entirely unimportant. Plastic possesses the required mechanical properties of strength, elasticity, breaking strength and resistance, and therefore its use affords nothing but advantages. Moreover, it can be processed beneficially by the injection molding or extrusion method.
Finally, it is particularly advantageous for the profiled rail system if the features of claim 10 are used. Owing to the profiling, which may be graining, fluting or a row of sawteeth, the overengaging webs have a good hold, above all when they themselves are also provided with a corresponding structure. Owing to a very slight angling of the webs, the have a prestress when they engage over the outer walls of the U-rail, and the clamping grip is a secure hold.
Exemplary embodiments of the innovation are described in more detail below with reference to the drawings in which:
The profiled rail system 1 illustrated in
So that the individual parts can be seen more clearly in terms of their configuration and functioning, the rail system 1 is illustrated in
Located above the base rail 2 is the holding part 4 which is designed as a downwardly open U-rail 14. In the inner space 15 of the U-rail 14, holding elements in the form of webs 16 are provided, which are integrally formed on the inner sidewalls 17 of the U-rail 14. In the present case, two webs 16, which are directed toward the center of the inner space 15, are provided at an interval on each sidewall 17. These webs 16 extend into the inner space 15 to an extent such that they firmly grip between them with their free ends the holding head 13 of the base rail 2, although said holding head remains rotationally moveable. Since the webs 16 are directed into the center only from the sidewalls, the necessary space remains from below in order to press the holding head 13 between the free ends of the webs 16 which have the required elasticity for this purpose. Preferably, the U-rail 14 together with the integrally formed webs 16 is manufactured from plastic having a Shore hardness of 74° to 76°. With this material strength, the holding head 13 is surrounded from outside to an extent such that it cannot automatically jump out of the mounting. The webs 16 extend over the entire length of the U-rail 14. They consequently have a firm, but rotationally moveable grip on the holding head 13.
The holding part 4 used for securing the covering rail 3 to the base rail 2 may even be equipped only with three webs 16 in the inner space 15 of the U-rail, as may be gathered from
In the case of a further holding part, which is designed as a U-rail 14, another holder holding element is provided, as shown in
Finally,
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2004 018 094 U | Nov 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/011056 | 10/14/2005 | WO | 00 | 11/14/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/056275 | 6/1/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2996751 | Roby et al. | Aug 1961 | A |
3254361 | Craven et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3473278 | Gossen | Oct 1969 | A |
3696461 | Kelly | Oct 1972 | A |
4067155 | Ruff et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4156300 | Jarjavail et al. | May 1979 | A |
4189880 | Ballin | Feb 1980 | A |
4385850 | Bobath | May 1983 | A |
5155952 | Herwegh et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5657598 | Wilbs et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5939670 | Shteynberg et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6340264 | Nelson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345480 | Kemper et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357192 | Schluter | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6550205 | Neuhofer, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6588165 | Wright | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6647680 | Daly et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6729092 | Grosjean | May 2004 | B2 |
7392627 | Sondermann | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20020000072 | McGrath et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030051426 | Kornfalt | Mar 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
296 19 983 | Jan 1997 | DE |
200 15 244 | Feb 2001 | DE |
20 2004 000706 | May 2004 | DE |
0 711 886 | May 1996 | EP |
1 403 444 | Mar 2004 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070199275 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |