1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the challenge of programming a projectile during passage through the barrel or the like. In addition, provision is also made for implementing the transmission of energy to the projectile during passage through the barrel, etc.
2. Description of the Background Art
For programmable ammunition, information must be communicated to the projectile—which is to say programmed into it—concerning its detonation time and/or flight path. In systems in which the detonation time is calculated from the measured muzzle velocity V0, the information can be relayed no earlier than at the muzzle and/or in flight. If the programming takes place prior to exit from the gun barrel, as a general rule the projectile flies past a programming unit at the muzzle velocity V0 and thus is in motion relative to the programming unit.
A known programming unit is described in CH 691 143 A5. With the aid of a transmitting coil, the information is transmitted inductively via a matching coil in/on the projectile. Aside from the heavy construction of the programming unit, an unshielded transmitting coil can result in unwanted radiation, since the coil also acts as an antenna. The radiated signal can be detected, and conclusions concerning the location of the gun can be drawn therefrom.
A method is known from WO 2009/085064 A2 in which the programming is undertaken by the transmission of light beams. To this end, the projectile has optical sensors on its circumference.
DE 10 2009 024 508.1, which corresponds to U.S.20100308152, concerns a method for correcting the trajectory of a round of terminal phase-guided ammunition, specifically with the projectile imprinting of such projectiles or ammunition in the medium caliber range. It is proposed therein to separately communicate with each individual projectile after a firing burst (continuous fire, rapid individual fire) and in doing so to transmit additional information regarding the direction of the earth's magnetic field for the individual projectile. The projectile imprinting takes place using the principle of beam-riding guidance of projectiles. In this process, each projectile reads only the guide beam intended for that projectile, and can determine its absolute roll attitude in space using additional information, in order to thus achieve the correct triggering of the correction pulse.
Alternative transmission possibilities, for example by means of microwave transmitters, are known to those skilled in the art from EP 1 726 911 A1, which corresponds to U.S. 20070074625.
While programming during flight is indeed technically possible as a result, it nevertheless is also subject to simple interference.
For programmable ammunition, energy must be provided to the projectile for the electronics integrated therein and for starting of the detonating train. For this purpose, various rounds of ammunition have small batteries that supply the requisite energy. Others are programmed and supplied with energy before firing. If the energy quantity is available continuously, for example during storage or the process of loading in the weapon, undesired explosion of the projectile may occur in the event of a malfunction in the electronics. For this reason, the use of simple energy storage devices such as a battery is not always appropriate.
It is thus recommended for safety reasons to provide the energy to the projectile in close temporal proximity to firing, for example after the ignition of a propellant charge and before leaving the muzzle opening of a gun barrel. This ensures that the round of ammunition cannot detonate itself before firing, as it has no energy.
The battery from DE 31 50 172 A, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 4,495,851, is not activated until after the projectile has left the gun barrel, which is accomplished by means that include a mechanical timer. The battery in DE 199 41 301 A, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 6,598,533, also is first activated by high accelerations during firing.
According to DE 488 866, a capacitor of the detonator is charged via external contacts in the firing position. According to the teaching in DE 10 2007 007 404 A, an ignition capacitor is charged as early as following the end of muzzle safety, which is to say approximately two seconds before the end of the flight time. The ignition capacitor according to DE 26 53 241 A, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 4,116,133, is charged inductively via magnet coils before firing.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,144,815 A describes a type of energy transmission device in which the gun barrel serves as a microwave guide, so that the energy and the data are transmitted prior to firing. A receiving antenna on the detonator receives the radiated signal and directs it through a changeover switch to either a rectifier device or a filter acting as a demodulator that filters the data out of the incoming signal. The rectifier device in this design serves to produce a supply voltage, which is then stored, from the incoming signal.
Also known are devices that obtain the energy from the kinetic energy of the projectile. Here, a mechanism is built into the projectile that converts the required energy from the acceleration following ignition of the propellant charge into electromagnetic energy, and in so doing charges a storage device located in the projectile.
CH 586 384 A, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 4,044,682, describes a method in Which a soft iron ring and a ring-shaped permanent magnet are displaced in the direction of the projectile axis relative to an induction coil as a result of the linear projectile acceleration, by which means a voltage that charges a capacitor is generated in the coil. For the sake of safety, this unit is then provided in CH 586 889 A, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 4,005,658, with a transport safety device that is destroyed only by the, or a, high acceleration during firing.
It can be a disadvantage here that the acceleration of the projectile in the gun barrel is used, since this cannot be controlled with exact precision. This causes the energy charging to vary, so that the projectile is given too much or even too little energy in its travel. Too little energy then has the disadvantage that functionality is not guaranteed. A further disadvantage is the complex and thus space-consuming conversion mechanism for converting mechanical energy into electromagnetic energy. Moreover, with the extreme environmental influences (shocks during firing, transverse accelerations and spin) on the projectile during firing, this mechanism can be destroyed. In order to preclude this, design measures are necessary that not only make the round of ammunition costlier, but also require additional space in the projectile and make it heavier.
Generators in the projectile head are proposed in DE 25 18 266 A, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,228, and DE 103 41 713 A. An alternative to these is the use of piezo crystals, as proposed and implemented in DE 77 02 073 A (which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 4,138,946), DE 25 39 541 A or DE 28 47 548 A (which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 4,280,410).
In this context, the latter proposals already take the route of replacing prior art energy conversion mechanisms with an energy transmission system that for its part impresses the necessary energy on the projectile no later than during passage through the muzzle opening.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a projectile that allows for optimal programming and/or optimal energy transmission with simple construction.
In an embodiment of the invention, the programming and energy transmission is performed inductively and/or capacitively. To this end, the projectile contains a sensor that receives the programming signal, as well as a processor that is electrically connected to this sensor and that performs the programming and thereby initiates detonation of the projectile at a predetermined point in time. An electrical storage device serves to supply power to the electronics of the processor. In the preferred embodiment, this storage device receives its energy during passage through a gun barrel and/or a muzzle brake.
In an embodiment, the part that is used as a waveguide—the gun barrel, muzzle brake, or additional part between gun barrel and muzzle brake, and a part that can be attached to the muzzle brake—is operated below the cutoff frequency. From DE 10 2006 058 375 A, which corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 7,825,850, and which are incorporated herein by reference, such a method with device is already known for measuring the muzzle velocity of a projectile or the like. This document proposes using the gun barrel or launcher tube and/or parts of the muzzle brake as a waveguide (a tube with a characteristic cross-sectional shape that has a wall with very good electrical conductivity is considered a waveguide. Primarily square and round waveguides are widely used as a technology), which, however, is operated below the cutoff frequency of the applicable waveguide mode. WO 2009/141055 A, which corresponds to U.S. 20090289619, and which are incorporated herein by reference, carries this idea further and combines two methods of measuring V0.
Further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus, are not limitive of the present invention, and wherein:
In the exemplary embodiment, the energy transmission can be tuned to the signal of the programming. In this design in
In accordance with the exemplary embodiment in
In another embodiment from
The projectile or round of ammunition or shell 1 flies into the waveguide, which is not shown in detail. The energy transmission to the projectile 1 within the waveguide HL1 takes place in a first step. Either the bandpass filters 3, 4 are used for this purpose, or the control unit 8 in accordance with the exemplary embodiment in
If only one frequency (f2=f3) is used for the programming as well as the energy transmission, the electrical paths in the projectile 1 must be alternately opened and closed. In the simplest embodiment, this is accomplished by the switch 8 in the round of ammunition. Here, too, multiple waveguides may be present that are passed through sequentially (corresponding to N>1: yes) before the projectile 1 exits the waveguide.
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 006 530 | Feb 2010 | DE | national |
This nonprovisional application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/EP2011/000389, which was filed on Jan. 28, 2011, and which claims priority to German Patent Application No. DE 10 2010 006 530.7, which was filed in Germany on Feb. 1, 2010, and which are both herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2691761 | Smith, Jr. | Oct 1954 | A |
2824284 | Johnson | Feb 1958 | A |
3994228 | Hürlimann | Nov 1976 | A |
4005658 | Karayannis | Feb 1977 | A |
4030097 | Gedeon | Jun 1977 | A |
4044682 | Karayannis | Aug 1977 | A |
4116133 | Beuchat | Sep 1978 | A |
4138946 | Postler et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4142442 | Tuten | Mar 1979 | A |
4144815 | Cumming et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4280410 | Weidner | Jul 1981 | A |
4283989 | Toulios et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4495851 | Koerner et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4649796 | Schmidt | Mar 1987 | A |
4862785 | Ettel et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4928523 | Muhrer et al. | May 1990 | A |
5787785 | Muenzel et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5894102 | Oberlin et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6598533 | Kölbli | Jul 2003 | B1 |
7506586 | Pereira et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7825850 | Frick | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8305071 | Frick | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8746119 | Frick | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20070074625 | Seidensticker et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080211710 | Frick | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090289619 | Frick | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100308152 | Seidensticker | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
586 384 | Mar 1977 | CH |
586 889 | Apr 1977 | CH |
691 143 | Apr 2001 | CH |
488 866 | Dec 1929 | DE |
25 18 266 | Nov 1975 | DE |
25 39 541 | Mar 1977 | DE |
26 53 241 | Jun 1977 | DE |
77 02 073 | Apr 1978 | DE |
28 47 548 | May 1980 | DE |
31 50 172 | Jun 1983 | DE |
199 41 301 | Dec 2000 | DE |
698 11 187 | Jul 2003 | DE |
103 41 713 | Jun 2005 | DE |
197 56 357 | Jun 2007 | DE |
10 2006 058 375 | Jun 2008 | DE |
10 2007 007 404 | Aug 2008 | DE |
10 2009 024 508 | Jul 2011 | DE |
0 300 255 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0 769 673 | Mar 2002 | EP |
0 919 783 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1 726 911 | Nov 2006 | EP |
WO 2008067876 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2009085064 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2009141055 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140007759 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2011/000389 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13563165 | US |