1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the field of electronic circuits, and in particular, to an efficient, low noise fractional charge pump.
2. Related Art
Most portable electronic devices contain digital and analog circuits operating at 2.5 Volts or below. However, the battery power used in such devices generally provides a supply voltage that is above the operating voltage of these devices (typically around 3.6 V). For example, a modern rechargeable lithium ion or lithium polymer battery is typically rated to have a nominal output voltage of 3.7 V, but may actually provide a voltage in the range of 2.7 to 4.2 V, depending on the charge state of the battery.
This variability in battery supply voltage necessitates circuitry to step down the supply voltage to the acceptable level. One of the common schemes is to use a charge pump with multiple capacitors. A charge pump can have 2 capacitors equally dividing the battery voltage.
An implementation of such type of charge pump is known as a “1/2×” charge pump.
Charge pump 100 operates by switching between the two phases of operation shown in
Then, in a discharging phase shown in
Because capacitors C110 and C120 are inverted and connected in parallel after input terminal 101, the output voltage V_OUT1 provided during the discharging phase shown in
Therefore, the output voltage range of 1/2× charge pump 100 is between 1.35 V and 2.1 V when provided with a lithium ion battery voltage (i.e., 2.7 V to 4.2 V) as in input voltage.
As portable devices become increasingly advanced while at the same time shrinking in size, power efficiencies must continually be improved. While 1/2× charge pump 100 can provide a reduced supply voltage of half the battery voltage, the battery voltage can vary significantly, thereby resulting in significant variation in the reduced supply voltage. For example, the output voltage range of 1/2× charge pump 100 is between 1.35 V and 2.1 V when provided with a nominal 3.7 Volt lithium ion battery having a voltage range of 2.7 V to 4.2 V as an input voltage. In this case, the desired nominal output voltage is about 1.85 V. Thus, the output voltage provided by 1/2× charge pump 100 may be significantly below the desired nominal output voltage. In this case, the available battery charge is small and the efficiency is also small. For this reason, 1/2× charge pump 100 is not ideally suited for use in all applications.
It would therefore be desirable to have a charge pump capable of applying a multiplication factor greater than 1/2× and less than 1× to an input voltage. It would also be desirable to have a system and method for stepping down a supply voltage that maximizes power efficiency while minimizing die area requirements.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a charge pump that applies a 2/3× voltage scaling factor, rather than the conventional 1/1× or 1/2× scaling factors. As a result, an optimum output voltage can be achieved for a given input voltage, which can beneficially improve power efficiency in situations where conventional charge pumps provide excessive or insufficient voltage multiplication.
In one embodiment, a 2/3× charge pump can include first, second, and third capacitors, with the third capacitor connected between the output terminal of the charge pump and ground. The first and second capacitors are connected in three different connections to the input terminal of the charge pump during three different phases of operation to provide the 2/3× multiplier function.
In a charging phase, the first and second capacitors are connected in series between the input terminal and ground, so that the output terminal is driven by the charge stored on the third capacitor. In a first discharging phase, the output terminal is connected to the common node of the first and second capacitors connected in series, so that the voltage provided at the output terminal is the difference of the input voltage and the voltage across the first capacitor.
Finally, in a second discharging phase, the first and second capacitors are connected between the input terminal and the output terminal, with the first capacitor inverted relative to the input terminal, and the second capacitor having the same orientation as during the charging phase, but connected between the first capacitor and the output terminal. Therefore, the output voltage provided during the second discharging phase is equal to the sum of the input voltage and the voltage potential across the first capacitor, minus the voltage potential across the second capacitor.
By operating the charge pump in this manner, the average voltages on the first and second charge pumps will be one third and two thirds, respectively, of the input voltage, thereby causing the average output voltage provided by the charge pump to be equal to 0.66 times the input voltage.
In accordance with another embodiment, a 3/4× charge pump may be implemented by configuring two capacitors to have three different configurations in three operating phases. A 7/10× charge pump may also be implemented by configuring three capacitors in four operating phases. In addition, a 7/6× charge pump may be implemented by configuring three capacitors to have four different configurations in four operating phases. This 7/6× charge pump is helpful for the case where the battery voltage drops below the necessary output voltage and a 3/2 mode does not provide high enough efficiency. A methodology for identifying charge pumps with other multiplication factors is also provided, wherein N capacitors are configured in (N+1) different configurations in (N+1) corresponding operating phases. In accordance with another embodiment, a programmable charge pump is provided, wherein the multiplication factor can be selected to have different values by controlling the switching of capacitors of the charge pump.
The invention will be more fully understood in view of the following description and drawings.
Conventional charge pumps can generate output voltages that are higher or lower than necessary for many applications. Excess voltage gain must then be attenuated, which results in wasted power (and reduced battery life for devices incorporating conventional charge pumps). Insufficient voltage gain results in low operating efficiency. By providing a charge pump that applies a 2/3× voltage scaling factor, rather than the conventional 1/1 or 1/2 scaling factors, an optimum output voltage can be achieved for a given input voltage, which can beneficially improve power efficiency in situations where conventional charge pumps provide either excessive or insufficient voltage.
Charge pump 200 operates by switching between the three phases of operation shown in
During the charging phase, capacitors C210 and C220 are charged by input voltage V_IN2 to voltages V21 and V22, while a voltage V23 stored on capacitor C230 is provided as output voltage V_OUT2 for driving load D240. Note that because capacitors C210, C220, and C230 are always either charging or discharging, voltages V21, V22, and V23 are actually average voltages. However, so long as the different operational phases are short enough, the actual changes in voltages V21, V22, and V23 during each phase will be relatively small. Therefore, for descriptive and analytical purposes, voltages V21, V22, and V23 can be considered to be essentially constant.
In the first discharging phase shown in
Then, in the second discharging phase shown in
Note that unlike conventional charge pumps (e.g., 1/2× charge pump 100 of
To calculate the nominal values for voltages V21 and V22, Kirchoff's Second Law (conservation of voltage) can be used to generate voltage equations for the three phases of operation. Those equations can then be solved for voltages V21 and V22 to determine the relationship between those two voltages. For the charging phase (
V_IN2=V21+V22 [Eqn. 1]
For the first discharging phase (
V_OUT2=V_IN2−V21 [Eqn.2]
As described above with respect to
Finally, for the second discharging phase (
V_OUT2=V_IN2+V21−V22 [Eqn. 3]
As described above with respect to
Substituting Equation 2 into Equation 3 yields:
V_IN2−V21=V_IN2+V22 [Eqn. 4]
which reduces to the following:
V22=2*V21 [Eqn. 5]
Thus, the voltage potential across capacitor C220 (i.e., voltage V22) is twice the magnitude of the voltage potential across capacitor C210 (i.e., voltage V21). Substituting Equation 5 into Equation 1 then yields:
V21=(1/3*V_IN2 [Eqn. 6]
Finally, substituting Equation 6 into Equation 2 yields the following for output voltage V_OUT2:
V_OUT2=(2/3*V_IN2 [Eqn. 7]
Note that the same result can be derived by substituting Equations 5 and 6 into Equation 3. In either case, charge pump 200 provides a voltage multiplication factor of 2/3.
Thus, during the charging phase, switches S205(1), S205(5), and S205(7) are closed, while the remainder of switches S205 are open, thereby allowing charging of capacitors C210 and C220 as shown in
Note further that various other switching configurations can be used to provide additional voltage multiplication factors. For example, by changing the second discharge phase to connect the positive plate of capacitor C220 directly to input terminal 201 and the negative plate of capacitor C220 to output terminal 202, a 1/2× multiplication factor is obtained. In this case, capacitor C220 obtains the same charge and voltage as capacitor C210 during the first discharge phase. Thus, during the first discharge phase, V_OUT2 is equal to V_IN2 minus V21; and during the second discharge phase, V_OUT2 is equal to V_IN2 minus V22. It therefore follows that V21 is equal to V22, which is equal to V_IN2/2.
Note that due to switch resistance within charge pump 200, output voltage V_OUT2 may not precisely reach 2/3 of input voltage V_IN2. For example, if the combined switch resistance (open loop) across charge pump 200 is 1 ohm during each operational phase, a 100 mA load (D240) and an input voltage V_IN2 equal to 3 V will result in an output voltage V_OUT2 equal to 2.5 V (i.e., 2.5 V=(2/3*3.9 V)−(1Ω*0.1 A)), rather than the ideal output voltage value of 2.6 V (i.e., 2.6 V=2/3*3.9 V). Therefore, reducing the switch resistance within charge pump 200 can allow output voltage V_OUT2 to more closely approach the ideal 2/3 multiple of input voltage V_IN2. Note that this does not change the fact that charge pump 200 is a 2/3× charge pump, since the rating of a charge pump is based on operation under ideal conditions (i.e., no losses due to switch resistance, no load, and steady state operation). In general, any circuit incorporating charge pump 200 will operate properly so long as output voltage V_OUT2 provided by charge pump 200 is substantially equal to 2/3 times input voltage V_IN2 (e.g., voltage V_OUT2 is within 5% of 2/3 times voltage V_IN2).
By providing a 2/3× voltage multiplication factor, charge pump 200 can beneficially provide enhanced power efficiency over conventional 1/2× charge pumps (i.e., charge pump 100 shown in
In alternate embodiments of the present invention, a 2/3 voltage multiplication factor can also be achieved by modifying the first discharging phase of
In accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention, the charging phase of
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the above described fractional charge pumps can be generalized to any number of capacitors. The number of capacitors used in a fractional charge pump of the present invention can be defined by the positive integer, N. In the examples described above, N is equal to two. However, any number of capacitors can be used in other embodiments. The capacitors may then be defined by the labels C1 to CN. Assuming there are three or more capacitors, if the input voltage to the fractional charge pump is defined as Vin, and the output voltage provided by the fractional charge pump is defined as Vout, then each series combination of the N capacitors can be described by the following equation.
Si*Vin=So*Vout+S1*V1+S2*V2+. . . SN*VN [Eqn. 8]
wherein V1, V2 . . . VN represent the voltages across capacitors C1, C2 . . . CN, respectively, and the parameters Si, So, S1, S2 . . . SN are each selected to have one of the values {1, 0, −1}. Under steady state conditions, the voltages V1, V2 . . . VN, Vin and Vout have constant values.
If a parameter S1, S2, . . . or SN has a value of “1”, this means that the associated capacitor Cl, C2, . . . or CN is connected and has the “+” terminal oriented towards the input terminal and the “−” terminal towards the output terminal.
If a parameter S1, S2, . . . or SN has a value of “−1”, this means that the associated capacitor C1, C2, . . . or CN is connected and has the “−” terminal oriented towards the input terminal and the “+” terminal towards the output terminal.
Finally, if a parameter S1, S2, . . . or SN has a value of “0”, this means that the associated capacitor C1, C2, . . . or CN is bypassed (i.e., the capacitor is not connected in the same series path as capacitors having associated parameters equal to ‘1’ or ‘−1’).
The coefficients Si and So associated with the input voltage Vin and the output voltage Vout can have a value of +1, which signifies input and output are connected to the series of capacitors. The coefficients Si and So can alternately have a value of 0 (zero) which means input and output are respectively disconnected and their respective pin is grounded. In the described examples, the coefficients Si and SO cannot have a value “−1”, as this value has no useful physical meaning.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, the number of operating phases implemented by a charge pump having N capacitors is selected to be equal to N+1. Thus, a charge pump having two capacitors will have three phases, and a charge pump having three capacitors will have four phases.
Each operating phase of the charge pump can be described by a corresponding equation of the form defined above in equation (8). For example, the N+1 operating phases associated with a charge pump having N capacitors may be represented by the following equation set.
Si1*Vin=So1*Vout+S11*V1+S12*V2+ . . . S1N*VN
Si2*Vin=So2*Vout+S21*V1+S22*V2+ . . . S2N*VN
Si3*Vin=So3*Vout+S31*V1+S32*V2+ . . . S3N*VN
. . .
Si(N+1)*Vin=So(N+1)*Vout+S(N+1)1*V1+S(N+1)2*V2+ . . . S(N+1)N*VN [Eqn. 9]
Because the input voltage Vin is a known constant voltage, equation set [9] represents a linear system with (N+1) unknown values represented by (N+1) equations. This linear system can be solved using (N+1)×(N+1) matrices derived from equation set [9]. The matrix equations used to solve for the voltages Vout, V1, V2 and VN are provided below.
Several examples will now be provided. The three operating phases of the two capacitor charge pump 200, as represented by
(1)*V_IN2=(0)*V_OUT2+(1)*V21+(1)*V22 [Eqn. 14]
(1)*V_IN2=(1)*V_OUT2+(1)*V21+(0)*V22 [Eqn. 15]
(1)*V_IN2=(1)*V_OUT2+(−1)*V21+(1)*V22 [Eqn. 16]
Substituting the coefficients of equations (14)-(16) into equation (10) results in the following.
Substituting the coefficients of equations (14)-(16) into equation (11) results in the following.
Substituting the coefficients of equations (14)-(16) into equation (12) results in the following.
Note that the results provided by equations (17)-(19) concur with the results provided by equations (5)-(7).
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, equations (9)-(13) can be used to identify new charge pump configurations, by substituting coefficients until a desired voltage relationship is obtained. For example, a two capacitor, three stage charge pump having a multiplication factor of 0.75 can be implemented using the following coefficients.
(1)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(1)*V1+(0)*V2 [Eqn. 20]
(0)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(−1)*V1+(−1)*V2 [Eqn. 21]
(1)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(−1)*V1+(1)*V2 [Eqn. 22]
Substituting the coefficients of equations (20)-(22) into equation (10) results in the following.
Thus, equation 23 confirms that the charge pump defined by equations (20)-(22) has a multiplication factor of 0.75×. Substituting the coefficients of equations (20)-(22) into equation (11) results in the following.
Thus, equation 24 indicates that the voltage across the first capacitor C710 has a voltage equal to 0.25 * Vin.
Substituting the coefficients of equations (20)-(22) into equation (12) results in the following.
Thus, equation (25) indicates that the voltage across the second capacitor C720 has a voltage equal to 0.5*Vin. If the input voltage Vin is selected to have a value of 3 Volts, then the output voltage would be about 2.25 Volts, the voltage V1 would be about 0.75 Volts, and the voltage V2 would be about 1.5 Volts.
In a similar manner, a two capacitor, three stage charge pump having a multiplication factor of 1.33 can be implemented by equations using the following coefficients.
(1)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(−1)*V1+(0)*V2 [Eqn. 26]
(1)*Vin=(0)*Vout+(1)*V1+(1)*V2 [Eqn. 27]
(1)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(1)*V1+(−1)*V2 [Eqn. 28]
In accordance with another embodiment, a three capacitor, four stage charge pump having a multiplication factor of 0.7 can be implemented using the following coefficients.
(0)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(1)*V1+(1)*V2+(−1)*V3 [Eqn. 29]
(1)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(1)*V1+(0)*V2+(1)*V3 [Eqn. 30]
(1)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(−1)*V1+(1)*V2+(1)*V3 [Eqn. 31]
(1)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(−1)*V1+(−1)*V2+(0)*V3 [Eqn. 32]
Substituting the coefficients of equations (29)-(32) into equation (10) results in the following.
Thus, equation 33 confirms that the charge pump defined by equations 29-32 has a multiplication factor of 0.7×.
Substituting the coefficients of equations (29)-(32) into equation (11) results in the following.
Thus, equation 34 indicates that the voltage across the first capacitor C810 has a voltage equal to −0.10* Vin.
Substituting the coefficients of equations (29)-(32) into equation (12) results in the following.
Thus, equation (35) indicates that the voltage across the second capacitor C820 has a voltage equal to −0.20*Vin.
Substituting the coefficients of equations (29)-(32) into equation (13) results in the following.
Thus, equation (36) indicates that the voltage across the third capacitor C830 has a voltage equal to 0.40*Vin. If the input voltage Vin is selected to have a value of 3 Volts, then the output voltage would be about 2.1 Volts, the voltage V1 would be about −0.3 Volts, the voltage V2 would be about −0.6 Volts and the voltage V3 would be about 1.2 Volts. Note that the negative voltages V1 and V2 indicate that the polarity of these voltages is reversed (i.e., the capacitor terminals marked with a triangle are negative rather than positive).
In accordance with yet another embodiment, a three capacitor, four stage charge pump having a multiplication factor of 7/6 can be implemented using the following coefficients.
(1)*Vin=(0)*Vout+(1)*V1+(1)*V2+(1)*V3 [Eqn. 37]
(1)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(0)*V1+(0)*V2+(−1)*V3 [Eqn. 38]
(1)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(0)*V1+(−1)*V2+(1)*V3 [Eqn. 39]
(1)*Vin=(1)*Vout+(−1)*V1+(1)*V2+(0)*V3 [Eqn. 40]
Substituting the coefficients of equations (37)-(40) into equation (10) results in the following.
Thus, equation (41) confirms that the charge pump defined by equations 37-40 has a multiplication factor of 7/6×.
Substituting the coefficients of equations (37)-(40) into equation (11) results in the following.
Thus, equation (42) indicates that the voltage across the first capacitor C910 has a voltage equal to 1/2*Vin.
Substituting the coefficients of equations (37)-(40) into equation (12) results in the following.
Thus, equation (43) indicates that the voltage across the second capacitor C920 has a voltage equal to 1/3*Vin.
Substituting the coefficients of equations (37)-(40) into equation (13) results in the following.
Thus, equation (44) indicates that the voltage across the third capacitor C930 has a voltage equal to 1/6*Vin. If the input voltage Vin is selected to have a value of 3 Volts, then the output voltage would be about 3.5 Volts, the voltage V1 would be about 1.5 Volts, the voltage V2 would be about 1.0 Volts and the voltage V3 would be about 0.5 Volts.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, switches are provided to enable a predetermined set of capacitors to be connected in different manners to implement different charge pump circuits. That is, the capacitors can be switched to implement different charge pumps, effectively providing a charge pump with a programmable output voltage.
Programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Thus, programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be programmed to implement the two capacitor, three phase 2/3× charge pumps described in
In addition, programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Thus, programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the two capacitor, three phase 34 charge pump described in
In addition, programmable charge pump circuit 900 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 900 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 900 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 900 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Thus, programmable charge pump circuit 900 can be configured to implement the three capacitor, four phase 0.7× charge pump described in
In addition, programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the circuit of
Thus, programmable charge pump circuit 1000 can be configured to implement the three capacitor, four phase 7/6× charge pump described in
Although
Although the present invention has been described in connection with several embodiments, it is understood that this invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of various modifications that would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, charge pump 200 could include control logic to allow configuration and operation of capacitors C210 and C220 to provide different voltage multiplication factors. Furthermore, the operation of the charge pump 200 can include more phases, for example, a discharge phase from capacitor C220 alone connected to output node 202 and/or a discharge phase with capacitor C210 alone connected between input node 201 and output node 202. Thus, the invention is limited only by the following claims.
This is a continuation-in-part of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/678,048 filed Feb. 22, 2007, and entitled “Fractional Charge Pump For Step Down DC-DC Converter”, by Sorin S. Georgescu, Anthony G. Russell and Chris Bartholomeusz, which is a continuation-in-part of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/264,884 filed Nov. 1, 2005, and entitled, “LED Bias Current Control Using Adaptive Fractional Charge Pump” by Sorin S. Georgescu, Anthony G. Russell and Chris Bartholomeusz.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5870295 | Watanabe | Feb 1999 | A |
6198645 | Kotowski et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6556064 | Yatabe | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563235 | McIntyre et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6762639 | Ito et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
20020130705 | Meng et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050110537 | Wurzer | May 2005 | A1 |
20070018745 | Knotts et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070222501 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11678048 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 11746588 | US | |
Parent | 11264884 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11678048 | US |