The invention relates to security systems and methods for protecting merchandise from theft, and in particular, to a security system and method including a programmable key that is programmed with a security code from a programming station and is subsequently used to program and/or operate an alarm module attached to an item of merchandise.
Retail stores use numerous types of theft deterrent security devices and security systems to discourage shoplifters. Many of these security systems use an alarm module or other security device that is attached to an item of merchandise to be protected. When the integrity of the security system or the item of merchandise protected thereby is compromised in any manner, such as by cutting a cable that attaches the item of merchandise to the alarm module, by removing the merchandise from the alarm module, by removing the alarm module from a fixture or support, or by interrupting a sense loop monitoring one or more sensors, the alarm module causes an audible alarm to be sounded to alert store personnel of a potential theft. The alarm module, as well as the item of merchandise protected thereby, may also contain various electronic article surveillance (EAS) devices that sound an alarm upon passing through a security gate.
These alarm modules or other security devices that are attached to the item of merchandise usually have some type of key, either mechanical, electrical or magnetic, which is used to arm and disarm the alarm associated with the alarm module, and in certain instances, to unlock or remove the item of merchandise from the alarm module to allow the merchandise to be taken to a cashier for purchase or to be taken from the checkout counter after purchase. A known problem with such security systems is that the keys may be stolen from the retail store and used at the same store or at another store using the same type of alarm module or other security device, to enable a shoplifter to disarm the alarm module or to unlock the security device from the merchandise. Keys may also be stolen by a dishonest employee and used by the employee in an unauthorized manner or passed to a shoplifter for use at the same store or at another store having the same type of alarm module or security device controlled by the key. It is extremely difficult to prevent the theft of security system keys by shoplifters or dishonest employees within a retail store due to the large number of keys that must be made available to store personnel in various departments of the store to facilitate use of the numerous alarm modules and other security devices needed to protect the valuable items of merchandise on display in the retail store.
Thus, the need exists for an improved security system and method including an alarm module or other security device for protecting an item of merchandise attached to the alarm module or other security device for display in a retail store. There exists a further and more particular need for a security system and method including a programmable key that is configured to prevent a shoplifter or dishonest store employee from using a key stolen from a retail store to disarm or unlock an alarm module or other security device at the same store or at another store that utilizes the same type of alarm module or other security device.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a security system and method for protecting an item of merchandise including a programmable key for arming and disarming an alarm module or other security device attached to the item of merchandise. The key is programmable with a unique security code, referred to herein as a Security Disarm Code (SDC), which code is provided to the key by a programming station. The SDC is unique to a particular retail store, thereby preventing a key from being used at a different retail store than the one from which the key is stolen.
Another aspect of the present invention is to use the SDC programmed into the key by the programming station to program each alarm module or other security device used in that retail store with the same SDC when the alarm module or other security device is first activated. In a preferred embodiment, the SDC then remains with the alarm module throughout its use in that retail store.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide such a security system and method including a programmable key provided with an internal timer that after a predetermined (i.e. factory set) or preset (i.e. at the retail store) period of time, for example 96 hours, automatically invalidates or inactivates the SDC in the key, thereby preventing its unauthorized use even in the retail store in which the programming station is located and the SDC was initially programmed into the key.
A feature of the present invention is to require the programmable key to be reprogrammed with the SDC by the programming station within a predetermined or preset period of time. In a preferred embodiment, the act of reprogramming the key may be performed only by authorized store personnel, thereby ensuring that the key will only be used by authorized persons and only in the retail store having the programming station and unique SDC for the alarm modules or other security devices in that store.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide the programmable key with an internal counter that counts the number of activations of an alarm module or other security device performed by the key, for example the initial activation (i.e. arming) of alarm modules or other security devices as well as each time the key is used to disarm or re-arm the alarm module or other security device. In a preferred embodiment, upon a predetermined maximum number of activations occurring the key will become permanently inactivated, thereby ensuring that a useable key always has a sufficient amount of internal power to receive the SDC from the programming station and to subsequently communicate (i.e. transmit and receive data) with the alarm module or other security device to arm and disarm the alarm module or other security device, as required. Furthermore, the internal counter may cause a logic control circuit to activate an indicating signal a predetermined time before the logic control circuit of the key is permanently deactivated upon the predetermined maximum number of activations occurring.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide various forms of data communication between the various elements of the security system, namely the programming station, programmable key, and the alarm modules or other security devices activated and deactivated by the key. In one preferred embodiment, data (e.g. the SDC) is communicated between the various components of the security system by wireless communication, such as infrared (IR), radio frequency (RF) or similar wireless communication system. In another preferred embodiment, data is communicated between the various components of the security system through electrical contacts. In yet another preferred embodiment, data is communicated between the various components of the security system by induction, for example electromagnetic induction, magnetic induction, electrostatic induction, etc.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide such a security system and method including a programmable key and an alarm module or other security device configured to actuate an alarm if a key programmed with a different SDC than the alarm module or other security device is used to attempt to disarm the alarm module or other security device.
Another feature of the present invention is that the security system may be configured to retain the SDC in the programming station within a non-volatile memory, thereby enabling the SDC to survive a power interruption.
Another feature of the present invention is that the security system may be configured to enable the programming station to immediately “time-out” the key, thereby preventing subsequent use of the key, upon the programming station reading a SDC stored in the key that does not match the SDC of the programming station.
Another feature of the present invention is that the programming station may be provided with a plurality of visual indicators that are illuminated and/or pulsed to indicate the operational status of the programming station.
Another feature of the present invention is that the a logic control circuit of the alarm module or other security device may include an operational lifetime timer that is preset for a predetermined lifetime to ensure that an internal battery maintains sufficient power for operating the alarm module or other security device, and further, that the alarm module or other security device includes a timer that records the amount of time an alarm is activated by the alarm module or other security device and the logic control circuit automatically reduces the lifetime of the operational lifetime timer. In a preferred embodiment, the logic control circuit automatically disables the alarm module or other security device at the end of the lifetime of the operational lifetime timer.
Another feature the present invention is that the operational lifetime timer of the alarm module or other security device may be configured to activate a near end-of-life signal a predetermined time before the logic control circuit completely disables the alarm module or other security device, thereby enabling store personnel to substitute an alarm module or other security device having a sufficiently charged internal battery.
Another feature of the present invention is that the alarm module or other security device may be provided with a plurality of connection ports for attaching one or more attachment cables extending between the alarm module or other security device and items of merchandise. Each such attachment cable may contain a sense loop that will activate an alarm in the event that the integrity of the sense loop is compromised.
Another feature of the present invention is that the logic control circuit of the programming station may be configured to permanently inactivate the SDC in a programmable key if the SDC programmed in the key does not match the SDC of the programming station when a logic control circuit of the programmable key is in communication with a logic control circuit of the programming station.
Another feature of the present invention is that the programming station may be provided with a plurality of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) that indicate various status displays depending upon the condition and state of operation of the programming station.
Another feature of the present invention is that the programming station may be provided with mechanical attachment means for securing it to a supporting structure in a secure location in which the programming station is connected to an external power source, thereby ensuring that power is available to the programming station and avoiding the use of an internal battery.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide such a security system and method including a programming station for programming a programmable key and an alarm module or other security device each having a light pipe to facilitate the transfer of infrared (IR) wireless communication between the key and the alarm module or other security device. In a preferred embodiment, at least a portion of a housing of the programming station is formed of a material suitable to facilitate the transmission of infrared (IR) waves between the wireless communication systems of the programming station and the key.
Another feature of the present invention is that sense loops extending between the alarm module or other security device and the item of merchandise may be formed of an electrical conductor or fiber optic conductor located within an outer mechanical attachment cable.
The above aspects and features are provided by a security system for protecting an item of merchandise according to the present invention, the general nature of which may be stated as including a programmable key, a programming station for generating a security code in the key and a security device, such as an alarm module, for attachment to an item of merchandise wherein the security device receives the security code from the key to initially activate the security device and to subsequently disarm and re-arm the security device.
The above aspects and features are further provided by a method for protecting an item of merchandise according to the present invention, the general nature of which may be stated as including the steps of attaching a security device, such as an alarm module, to the item of merchandise, programming a programmable key with a security code, programming the security code from the key into the security device, disarming the security device upon verifying that the security code in the alarm module with the security code in the key, and invalidating the security code in the key after a predetermined or preset period of time to prevent subsequent disarming of the security device unless the security code is refreshed in the key within the predetermined or preset period of time.
One or more exemplary and preferred embodiments of the invention illustrating the best mode presently contemplated for applying its principles is set forth in the following detailed description, is shown in the accompanying drawings and is particularly and distinctly pointed out and set forth in the appended claims.
Similar reference numbers and characters refer to like or similar parts throughout the various drawings.
An exemplary and preferred embodiment of a security system according to the present invention is shown in
Programming station 3 preferably is of the type shown and described in greater detail in related U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,844, filed on Dec. 14, 2006, and entitled PROGRAMMING STATION FOR A SECURITY SYSTEM FOR PROTECTING MERCHANDISE, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Programming station 3 is further shown in
Logic control circuit 18 includes a main controller 19, which preferably is a microprocessor, a communication circuit 20 and a security code memory 21 communicating with controller 19. The security code memory 21 stores a security code, also referred to herein as a Security Disarm Code or SDC. A status display 22 consisting of three LEDs 24 (
A key-actuated tumbler switch 31 is mounted in housing 15 and is controlled by a mechanical activation key 33 for activating the logic control circuit 18 within programming station 3 for programming a programmable key 5 with the SDC as discussed further below. The particular circuitry of logic control circuit 18 is shown in further detail in the U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,844 referenced above, but could be other types of circuitry than that shown therein that are readily known to those skilled in the art for obtaining the features and results of the programming station 3, as discussed further below.
Programming station 3 preferably is powered by an external power supply such as a usual 120 volt electrical outlet readily found in a typical retail store. Preferably, programming station 3 will be secured to support 26 in a secure location, such as inside the store manager's office or similar location with restricted access. Likewise, activation key 33 will be kept in the possession of the store manager or other authorized person to prevent the unauthorized use of programming station 3.
Alarm module 7, shown particularly in
An internal battery 44 is mounted in the interior of housing 35 and provides a source of power to a logic control circuit, shown diagrammatically in
One or more connection jacks 63 (
A key receiving port 65 is formed through top cover plate 36 and top housing member 37 of housing 35 adjacent a light pipe 67 to enhance the transmission of wireless communication signals, such as infrared (IR) signals, when a programmable key 5 is placed in key receiving port 65 and aligned with the transmitter and receiver, or transceiver 69 mounted on printed circuit board 48 below the port 65, as shown in
A programmable key 5 for use with security system 1 is shown in detail in
A light pipe 89 preferably is mounted in upper housing member 72 in alignment with an LED 90 mounted on printed circuit board 76. LED 90 provides a visual indication to a user of the status and activation of programmable key 5, as discussed further hereinafter. An optically transparent lens 91 is mounted in an opening 92 of a transfer end 93 of housing 71. Lens 91 preferably is a visible light filter to enhance the transmission and reception of infrared (IR) waves when the key 5 interacts with programming station 3 and alarm module 7, as will be described hereinafter. The circuitry and components of a logic control circuit 77 of one type of programmable key 5 suitable for use with a security system 1 according to the present invention are shown and described in greater detail in related U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,845 filed on Dec. 14, 2006, and entitled PROGRAMMABLE KEY FOR A SECURITY SYSTEM FOR PROTECTING MERCHANDISE, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. However, it will be readily understood by those skilled in the art that other circuitry and components can be utilized to achieve the objectives and features of programmable key 5 than shown and discussed therein without affecting the broad concept and intended scope of the invention.
In accordance with one of the objectives and features of the present invention, the SDC initially provided by programming station 3 is randomly generated and is unique to that programming station and always remains with that programming station for subsequent use. Thus, the SDC initially generated always stays with the programming station 3 and is subsequently programmed into one or more programmable keys 5. Once programmed with the SDC, key 5 is taken to one or more alarm modules 7 (or other security devices) and key end 93 is inserted into key receiving port 65, as shown in
In accordance with another of the objective and features of the present invention, when the SDC is stored in SDC memory 81, controller 80 of key 5 actuates a timer 82 for a predetermined time period, for example 96 hours. At the end of this time period, controller 80 automatically invalidates use of the SDC in SDC memory 81 by logic control circuit 77 to thereby render the key inoperative for use with alarm module 7. For example, controller 80 of logic control circuit 77 may prevent communication circuit 79 from transmitting the SDC from SDC memory 81. Alternatively, the SDC may be erased from SDC memory 81 so that it is no longer available for use with alarm module 7. Regardless, in this manner a programmable key 5 stolen by a thief or dishonest employee cannot be used after passage of the predetermined time period to disarm an alarm module 7 in the same store from which the key was stolen. Furthermore, since the SDC in the programmable key 5 is unique to the particular programming station 3 of the retail store that was used to program the key with the SDC, that key cannot be taken to another retail store having the same type of alarm module 7 and used during the predetermined time period to disarm that alarm module. The programmable key 5 will not function with the alarm module 7 in the other retail store since that alarm module will have been programmed with a different SDC randomly generated by a different programming station 3. Thus, programmable key 5 overcomes one of the primary disadvantages of current merchandise security systems that use various types of keys since those keys can always be used at other retail stores having similar types of security devices, whether the key is a mechanically, electronically or magnetically actuated type of key.
A programmable key 5 according to present invention can only be used for a relatively short predetermined period of time by a thief or a dishonest employee, and only in the same retail store from which the key was stolen. The predetermined time period can be preset during manufacture, or alternatively, adjusted after manufacture to any desired time period, for example 24 hours, 36 hours, etc. without affecting the broad concept and intended scope of the invention. The 96 hour time period of the preferred embodiment shown and described herein has been found to be a time period that provides sufficient security without the SDC in the programmable key 5 having to be reprogrammed, or as also used herein “refreshed,” often. However, security concerns in a particular retail store may require the programmable key 5 to time-out and have to be refreshed after each shift of a store employee, for example after only 8 hours. Again, the transmission of the SDC between programming station 3 and programmable key 5, and subsequently between the key and alarm module 7, is by wireless communication in the preferred embodiment of the security system 1 and associated method shown and described in
Counter 83 of the logic control circuit 77 of programmable key 5 counts each time that activation switch 85 is actuated whether when being programmed (or refreshed) with the SDC from programming station 3 or when arming or disarming an alarm module 7. After a predetermined maximum number of activations of activation switch 85, counter 83 will cause logic control circuit 77 to invalidate use of the SDC in SDC memory 81, thereby rendering key 5 inoperative for further use with alarm module 7. For example, controller 80 of logic control circuit 77 may prevent communication circuit 79 from transmitting the SDC from SDC memory 81. Alternatively, the SDC may be erased from SDC memory 81 so that it is no longer available for use with alarm module 7. Regardless, invalidating use of the SDC ensures that the internal battery 75 always has a sufficient charge remaining for transmission of the SDC between the programmable key 5 and the programming station 3, or alternatively, between the key and the alarm module 7.
In order to disarm alarm module 7, a programmable key 5 programmed with a valid SDC that is still within the active predetermined time period is placed into the key receiving port 65 of the alarm module, as shown in
As best shown in
A near end-of-life (NEOF) feature is also provided in logic control circuit 46 that will again provide a visual signal, such as a predetermined flashing pattern of LED 61 and/or a non-alarming sound from alarm 51, when the EOL time period is approaching, for example five days before the EOL timer 97 completely inactivates operation of the alarm module 7.
Further details of the operation of logic control circuit 77 of programmable key 5 are shown in flow chart form in
In summary, a security system and method according to the present invention can be configured for use in, for example, retail stores. The security system and method utilizes a programmable key as a primary component that even if stolen, cannot be used in the same retail store from which it was stolen after a predetermined time period to disarm an alarm module or other security device. Furthermore, the programmable key cannot be used in another retail store having the same type of security system to disarm an alarm module or other security device since it is programmed with a randomly generated SDC unique to that particular retail store, and the SDC is initially randomly generated by a programming station used only by that particular retail store. The programmable key includes an internal timer that will deactivate a key with a valid SDC after a predetermined time period, thereby rendering the key inoperative after the time period even in the same retail store in which the key was programmed. The programmable key must be returned to the same programming station, which can be maintained in a secure location, to enable an authorized person to reprogram or refresh the SDC into the key for subsequent use with the alarm modules or other security devices within the retail store that have been programmed from a programmable key that was previously programmed by the programming station with the unique SDC for that retail store. The programming station, programmable key and alarm module or other security device may each have various types of visual indicators and/or alarms for advising an authorized person of the status of these components and that will alert store personnel if an item of merchandise and/or the alarm module are tampered with. Furthermore, the programming station will deactivate a SDC stored in the SDC memory of a key if an incorrect SDC is encountered when the programming station is attempting to reprogram or refresh the key. Also, the alarm module or other security device will sound an alarm if a programmable key containing an incorrect SDC is attempted to be used with the alarm module. In addition to these features, each of the individual components may have various timing circuits, control circuits and visual indicating circuits all of which are part of the internal logic control circuits contained in the components, as shown and described in further detail in the aforementioned United States Patents, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Another feature that may be incorporated into the present invention is the use of a “master” key and “employee” key(s) in order to provide an additional layer of security to the security system of a particular retail store. In this dual key system, the random number generator contained in the logic control circuit of the programming station will only generate the security code (i.e. SDC) when the master key is presented to the station and a limited access switch is activated. The master key can then be used to program the SDC into the desired alarm modules and other security devices in addition to the employee key(s) that are subsequently programmed with the SDC by the programming station after the SDC is generated using the master key.
Use of the master key enables an authorized person to change the SDC of the programming station that is subsequently used by the employee key(s) to arm and disarm the alarm modules and other security devices throughout the retail store for any reason, including for example, if the original SDC is compromised. Should a new SDC be generated by the master key and then reprogrammed into the employee key(s), the logic control circuit of the alarm module or other security device will be provided with a means of recognizing both the old and the new SDC of a key when there is communication therebetween. In this manner, the alarm module or other security device is able to accept the new SDC to disarm the alarm module or other security device without activating the alarm, which would occur as described above when the logic control circuit identifies the use of a key programmed with an incorrect SDC.
The dual key system would increase the complexity of the logic control circuits in the programming station, programmable key(s) and alarm modules or other security devices, but would provide an additional layer of security should a retail store desire the increased level of security afforded by the ability to change the SDC. However, any of the embodiments of the security system and method described herein are believed to provide adequate security for protecting items of merchandise using only the programmable key.
Although the above description refers to the security code being a Security Disarm Code (SDC), it will be readily understood, appreciated and apparent to those skilled in the art that the security code can also be used to activate and control other functions and features of a security device, including for example without limitation, arming the security device (as mentioned above), unlocking the merchandise from the security device, shutting-off an alarm, providing other or additional commands to the security device, or transferring other or additional data to the security device, without departing from the broad concept and intended scope of the invention. Likewise, the components of the logic control circuits depicted in the block diagrams and flow charts of the accompanying drawings can easily be modified by one skilled in the art to achieve the same objectives, features or results. Also, the security code can be preset in the programming station at the factory or determined by an authorized person at the retail store, and if desired, can be changed thereafter by the authorized person without affecting the broad concept and intended scope of the invention.
The programming station 203 of the security system 200 is operable for programming the programmable electronic key 205 with a security code or Security Disarm Code (SDC), as previously described. The optional charging station 208 is operable for initially charging and/or subsequently recharging an internal power source disposed within the programmable electronic key 205. For example, key 205 and merchandise security device 207 may each be programmed with the same SDC into a respective permanent SDC memory. The programmable electronic key 205 may be provisioned with a single-use (i.e. non-rechargeable) power source, such as a conventional or extended-life internal battery. Preferably, however, the key 205 is provisioned with a multiple-use (i.e. rechargeable) power source, such as a conventional capacitor or rechargeable internal battery. In either instance, the internal power source may be permanent, semi-permanent (i.e. replaceable), or rechargeable, as desired. In the latter instance, charging station 208 is provided to initially charge and/or to subsequently recharge the power source provided within the programmable electronic key 205. Furthermore, the key 205 and/or the merchandise security device 207 may be provided with only a transient memory, such that the SDC must be programmed (or reprogrammed) at predetermined time intervals. In this instance, programming station 203 is provided to initially program and/or to subsequently reprogram the SDC into key 205. As previously described with respect to programmable key 5, the key 205 is operable to initially program and/or to subsequently reprogram the merchandise security device 207 with the SDC. The key 205 is further operable to operate the merchandise security device 207 by transferring power, by transferring data or, as described herein, by transferring both data and power to the merchandise security device.
As illustrated in
As best shown in
The logic control circuit of the programming station 203 performs an exchange of data with a similar logic control circuit of the key 205, referred to herein as a “handshake,” to determine whether the key has not previously been programmed with a SDC (i.e. a “new” key), or is an authorized key that is being presented to the programming station a subsequent time to refresh the SDC. In the event that the “handshake” fails for any reason, the programming station 203 will not provide the SDC to the device attempting to obtain the SDC, for example an infrared (IR) reader on a counterfeit key or other illegitimate device. When a proper “handshake” is completed, the programming station 203 permits the SDC generated by the logic control circuit and/or stored in the memory to be transmitted by the optical transceiver to the corresponding optical transceiver disposed within the programmable electronic key 205. As will be readily apparent and understood by those skilled in the art, alternatively the SDC may be transmitted from the programming station 203 to the programmable electronic key 205 by any suitable means, including without limitation, electrical contacts or electromechanical, electromagnetic or magnetic conductors, as desired.
Once programmed with the SDC, the programmable electronic key 205 is then available to operatively engage the merchandise security device 207. In the embodiment shown and described herein, the merchandise security device 207 is a conventional cabinet lock that has been modified to be operated by the programmable electronic key 205. Preferably, merchandise security device 207 is a passive device. As used herein, the term “passive” is intended to mean that the merchandise security device 207 does not have an internal power source to lock and unlock a physical lock mechanism disposed therein. Significant cost savings can be obtained by a retail store when the merchandise security device 207 is a passive device since the expense of an internal power source is confined to the programmable electronic key 205, and only one such key is required to operate multiple merchandise security devices. If desired, the merchandise security device 207 may also be provided with a temporary power source (e.g., capacitor or limited-life battery) having sufficient power to activate an alarm, for example a piezoelectric audible alarm, that is actuated by a security sensor in response to a security breach. The temporary power source may also be sufficient to transfer data, for example a SDC, from the merchandise security device 207 to the programmable electronic key 205 to authenticate the security device and thereby authorize the key to provide power to the merchandise security device. In contrast, the lock mechanism of existing merchandise security devices are operated mechanically, for example by a conventional key and tumbler, or magnetically, for example by a magnetic key of the type shown and described in United States Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0168811 entitled MAGNETIC KEY FOR USE WITH A SECURITY DEVICE, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In the security system 200 of the present invention however, the lock mechanism of the merchandise security device 207 is operated by electrical power that is transferred from the programmable electronic key 205 to the merchandise security device, as will be described.
The merchandise security device 207 further comprises a logic control circuit similar to the logic control circuit disposed within the programming station 203 and the programmable electronic key 205 that performs a “handshake” with the logic control circuit of the key in essentially the same manner as the “handshake” performed between the programming station and the key. In particular, the logic control circuit of the key 205 determines whether the merchandise security device 207 is an authorized “new” security device not having a SDC, or is an authorized security device already having the SDC. In the event that the “handshake” fails for any reason, the programmable electronic key 205 will not provide the SDC to the merchandise security device 207 (i.e. will not initially program a new merchandise security device with the SDC). When the merchandise security device 207 is an authorized “new” device and a proper “handshake” is completed, the key 205 permits the SDC stored in the SDC memory of the key to be transmitted by the optical transceiver disposed within the key to a corresponding optical transceiver disposed within the security device 207 to be stored in a SDC memory of the device. As will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, the SDC may be transmitted from the programmable electronic key 205 to the merchandise security device 207 by any suitable means, including without limitation, one or more electrical contacts or electromechanical, electromagnetic or magnetic conductors, as desired.
On the other hand, when the merchandise security device 207 is an authorized device already having the SDC and a proper “handshake” is completed, the logic control circuit of the key 205 causes the internal power source of the key to transfer electrical power to the lock mechanism of the merchandise security device. More particularly, electrical contacts on the programmable electronic key 205 electrically coupled to corresponding electrical contacts on the merchandise security device 207 are energized to transfer power from the internal battery of the key to the merchandise security device to perform a mechanical operation, such as to lock or unlock the lock mechanism. In the embodiment shown and described herein, the merchandise security device 207 is a cabinet lock that is affixed to one of a pair of adjacent sliding doors 201 of a conventional cabinet 202 of the type suitable for use in a retail store. The cabinet 202 typically contains relatively expensive items of merchandise 209, such as mobile phones, digital cameras, Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) devices, and the like. The doors 201 overlap at the center of the cabinet 202 and the cabinet lock 207 is secured on a lock arm 211 extending from a lock bracket 213 affixed to the innermost door 201 behind the outermost door 201. In this embodiment, the programmable electronic key 205 transfers power to an electric motor, DC stepper motor, solenoid, or the like that unlocks the lock mechanism of the cabinet lock 207 so that the cabinet lock can be removed from the lock arm 211 of lock bracket 213 and the doors 201 moved (i.e. slid) relative to one another to access the items of merchandise 209 stored within the cabinet 202. As best shown in
The cabinet lock 207 comprises a housing 235 sized and shaped to contain the logic control circuit disposed therein and a conventional internal lock mechanism (not shown). A key receiving port 265 formed in the housing 235 is sized and shaped to receive a transfer end 293 of the programmable electronic key 205, as will be described. At least one, and preferably, a plurality of magnets 266 are disposed within the key receiving port 265 for securely positioning and retaining the transfer end 293 of the key 205 in electrical contact with the logic control circuit of the cabinet lock 207 for providing power to the internal lock mechanism. In the particular embodiment shown and described herein, data is transferred from the programmable electronic key 205 to the cabinet lock 207 by wireless communication, such as infrared (IR) optical transmission, as previously described herein with respect to alarm module 7. Power is transferred from the programmable electronic key 205 to the cabinet lock 207 by electrical contacts disposed within the key receiving port 265 and disposed on the transfer end 293 of the key. For example, the key receiving port 265 may comprise a metallic outer ring 268 that forms one electrical contact, while the magnet(s) 266 form another electrical contact to complete an electrical circuit with the electrical contacts disposed on the transfer end 293 the programmable electronic key 205. Regardless, electrical contacts transfer power from the key 205 to the lock mechanism disposed within the housing 235 of the cabinet lock 207. As previously described, the power transferred from the key 205 may be used to unlock the lock mechanism, for example utilizing an electric motor, DC stepper motor, solenoid, or the like, so that the cabinet lock 207 can be removed from the lock arm 211 of the lock bracket 213.
It will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the cabinet lock 207 shown and described herein is but one of numerous types of a “passive” merchandise security device that can be configured to be operated by a programmable electronic key 205 according to the present invention. By way of example and without limitation, the merchandise security device may be a locking base for securing a merchandise display hook to a display support, such as pegboard, slatwall, bar stock or wire grid, or may be a locking end assembly for preventing the rapid removal of merchandise from the merchandise display hook. Alternatively, the merchandise security device may be a merchandise security alarm module or display stand comprising a lock mechanism for securing the alarm module or display stand to a display support, such as a table, countertop, desk, wall, or other fixed structure and/or a lock mechanism for securing an item of merchandise on the alarm module or display stand. Alternatively, the merchandise security device may be incorporated into security packaging for one or more items of merchandise including a lock mechanism for separating the packaging from the merchandise, or alternatively, for removing the merchandise from the packaging. Still further, the merchandise security device may be a conventional door or window security lock for preventing access to an enclosure, such as a room or closet. In any of these or other embodiments, the merchandise security device may further comprise an electronic lock mechanism in the form of a sensor, such as a conventional proximity, limit or contact switch, and an associated electronic monitoring circuit that activates an alarm in response to the sensor being actuated or the integrity of the sensor or monitoring circuit being compromised. Regardless, the merchandise security device preferably includes a logic control circuit, or the equivalent, including a SDC memory for storing a SDC, and a communication circuit for initially receiving the SDC from the programmable electronic key 205, and for subsequently facilitating data communication, including the SDC, between the programmable electronic key and the merchandise security device.
As shown in
As previously mentioned, the charging station 208 recharges the rechargeable internal battery of the programmable electronic key 205, and in some instances deactivates the data transfer and/or power transfer capability of the key until the key is reprogrammed with the SDC by the programming station 203. As best shown in
As best shown in
The logic control circuit of the programmable electronic key 205 may include a time-out feature as previously described with respect to programmable key 5. More particularly, the ability of the key 205 to communicate data and transfer power to the merchandise security device 207 may be deactivated or invalidated after a predetermined time period. By way of example, the logic control circuit of the programmable electronic key 205 may be deactivated after about 6 hours to about 12 hours from the time the key was programmed or last refreshed by the programming station 203. In this manner, an authorized person typically must reprogram or refresh the programmable electronic key 205 assigned to him at the start of each work shift. Furthermore, the charging station 208 may be configured to deactivate the logic control circuit of the programmable electronic key 205 when the key is positioned within a charging port 208A. In this manner, the charging station 208 can be made available to an authorized person in an unsecured location without concern that a charged key 205 could be removed from the charging station and used maliciously to disarm and/or unlock a merchandise security device 207. After charging, the programmable electronic key 205 would then have to be reprogrammed or refreshed by the programming station 203, which is typically monitored or maintained at a secure location, to reactivate the logic control circuit of the key. The logic control circuit of the programmable electronic key 205 may also be configured to include the internal counter feature previously described with respect to the programmable key 5 that counts the number of activations of the activation switch 285 and inactivates the logic control circuit after a predetermined number of activations so that the internal battery 275 maintains sufficient power to communicate with the programming station 203, the merchandise security device 207 or the charging station 208, as required, before the lifetime of the battery is exceeded.
In a specific example, a merchandise display security system and method according to the present invention utilizes the programmable electronic key 305 with inductive transfer and a programming station, merchandise security device and charging station similar to the components shown and described above with respect to
When the merchandise security device 207 is a purely mechanical security device, or alternatively, is an authorized security device already having the SDC and a proper “handshake” is completed, a logic control circuit of the programmable electronic 305 causes the internal battery of the key to transfer electrical power to the lock mechanism of the merchandise security device. More particularly, an inductive transceiver disposed within the programmable electronic key 305 operatively couples to a corresponding inductive transceiver disposed within the merchandise security device and transfers power from the internal battery of the key to the lock mechanism of the security device, for example to lock or unlock the security device. By way of example and without limitation, the programmable electronic key 305 transfers power to an electric motor, DC stepper motor, solenoid, or the like that unlocks the lock mechanism of the cabinet lock 207 so that the cabinet lock can be removed from the lock arm 211 of the lock bracket 213 and the sliding doors 201 moved (i.e. slid) relative to one another to access the items of merchandise 209 stored within the cabinet 202. It will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the cabinet lock 207 illustrated and described herein is but one of numerous types of a “passive” merchandise security device that can be configured to be operated by a programmable electronic key 305 according to the present invention. By way of example and without limitation, the merchandise security device may be a locking base for securing a merchandise display hook to a display support, such as pegboard, slatwall, bar stock or wire grid, or may be a locking end assembly for preventing the rapid removal of merchandise from the merchandise display hook. Alternatively, the merchandise security device may be a merchandise security alarm module or display stand comprising a lock mechanism for securing the display stand to a display support, such as a table, counter, desk, wall, or other fixed structure, and/or a lock mechanism for securing an item of merchandise on the alarm module or display stand. Alternatively, the merchandise security device may be incorporated into packaging for one or more items of merchandise comprising a lock mechanism for separating the packaging from the merchandise and/or for removing the merchandise from the packaging. Still further, the merchandise security device may be a conventional door or window lock for preventing access to an enclosure, such as a room, booth or closet. In any of these or other embodiments, the merchandise security device may further comprise an electronic lock mechanism in the form of a sensor, such as a conventional proximity, limit or contact switch, and an associated electronic monitoring circuit that activates an alarm in response to the sensor being actuated or the integrity of the sensor or monitoring circuit being compromised. Regardless, the merchandise security device preferably includes a logic control circuit, or the equivalent, including a SDC memory for storing a SDC, and a communication circuit for initially receiving the SDC from the programmable electronic key 205, and for subsequently facilitating data communication, including the SDC, between the programmable electronic key and the merchandise security device.
As previously mentioned, the programmable electronic key 305 preferably is configured to transfer both data and power to a merchandise security device that comprises an electronic lock mechanism and a physical lock mechanism. Accordingly, the programmable electronic key 305 must be an “active” device in the sense that it has an internal power source sufficient to operate the physical lock mechanism of the merchandise security device. As a result, the programmable electronic key 305 may be configured to transfer data from an internal source, such as a logic control circuit disposed within the key, and to transfer power from an internal power source, such as a conventional, extended-life or rechargeable battery disposed within the key. The exemplary embodiment of the programmable electronic key 305 depicted in
As best shown in
The programmable electronic key 305 further includes an inductive coil having high magnetic permeability that is adapted (sized and shaped) to be disposed within the housing 371 adjacent the transfer end 393. As shown, the inductive coil comprises a highly magnetically permeable ferrite core 396A surrounded by a plurality of inductive core windings 396B. The inductive core windings 396B consist of a length of a conductive wire that is wrapped around the ferrite core 396A. As will be readily understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art, passing an alternating current through a conductive wire generates (induces) a magnetic field around an inductive core. An alternating current may be passed through the conductive wire of the inductive core windings 396B by connecting one lead of the conductive wire to the logic control circuit and connecting the other lead of the conductive wire to the internal battery 375 of the programmable electronic key 305. A similar inductive coil having high magnetic permeability is adapted (sized and shaped) to be disposed within the housing of the merchandise security device, such as within housing 235 of the cabinet lock 207 previously described and shown in
As previously mentioned with regard to
As shown in
An available feature of a merchandise security system and method according to the present invention is that the logic control circuit of the programmable electronic key 305 may include a time-out function. More particularly, the ability of the key 305 to transfer data and power to the merchandise security device is deactivated or invalidated after a predetermined time period. By way of example, the logic control circuit may be deactivated after about 6 to about 12 hours from the time the key was programmed or last refreshed by the programming station. In this manner, an authorized person typically must program, reprogram or refresh the key 305 assigned to him at the start of each work shift. Furthermore, the charging station 308 may be configured to deactivate or invalidate the logic control circuit of the key 305 when the key is positioned within a charging port 308A. In this manner, the charging station 308 can be made available to an authorized person in an unsecured location, while the programming station remains in a secured location without concern that a programmable electronic key 305 could be removed from the charging station 308 and maliciously used to disarm and/or unlock a merchandise security device. After charging, the programmable electronic key 305 would then be reprogrammed or refreshed by the programming station, which as previously mentioned is monitored or maintained at a secure location, in order to reactivate the logic control circuit of the key. The logic control circuit of the programmable electronic key 305 may also be configured to include the internal counter feature previously described with respect to the programmable key 5 that counts the number of activations of the activation switch 385 and inactivates the logic control circuit after a predetermined number of activations so that the internal battery 375 maintains sufficient power to communicate with the programming station, the merchandise security device or the charging station 308, as required, before the lifetime of the battery is exceeded.
In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clarity and/or simplification. No unnecessary limitations are to be implied therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be construed broadly with respect to the concept and intended scope of the present invention. Moreover, the description and illustration of exemplary and preferred embodiments of the present invention is not intended to be limited to the exact details shown or described herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/554,074, filed on Aug. 28, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/107,537, filed on Aug. 21, 2018, and now U.S. Pat. No. 10,403,122, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/954,143, filed on Apr. 16, 2018, and now U.S. Pat. No. 10,062,266, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/586,939, filed on May 4, 2017, and now U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,867, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/397,362, filed on Jan. 3, 2017, and now U.S. Pat. No. 9,659,472, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/241,708 filed on Aug. 19, 2016, and now U.S. Pat. No. 9,576,452, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/047,218 filed on Feb. 18, 2016, and now U.S. Pat. No. 9,478,110, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/825,436 filed on Aug. 13, 2015, and now U.S. Pat. No. 9,269,247, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/529,516, filed on Oct. 31, 2014, and now U.S. Pat. No. 9,135,800, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/254,244, filed on Apr. 16, 2014, and now U.S. Pat. No. 8,884,762, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/169,968, filed on Jun. 27, 2011, and now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/770,321, filed on Apr. 29, 2010, and now U.S. Pat. No. 7,969,305, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/639,102, filed on Dec. 14, 2006, and now U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,846, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/753,908, filed on Dec. 23, 2005, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
883335 | O'Connor | Mar 1908 | A |
3444547 | Surek | May 1969 | A |
3493955 | Minasy | Feb 1970 | A |
3582981 | Dalyai | Jun 1971 | A |
3641498 | Hedin | Feb 1972 | A |
3685037 | Bennett | Aug 1972 | A |
3780909 | Callahan et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3848229 | Perron et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3953769 | Sopko | Apr 1976 | A |
4117465 | Timblin | Sep 1978 | A |
4250533 | Nelson | Feb 1981 | A |
4286305 | Pilat et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4353064 | Stamm | Oct 1982 | A |
4354189 | Lemelson | Oct 1982 | A |
4354613 | Desai et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4391204 | Mitchell et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4486861 | Harmel | Dec 1984 | A |
4509093 | Stellberger | Apr 1985 | A |
4573042 | Boyd et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4611205 | Eglise | Sep 1986 | A |
4660027 | Davis | Apr 1987 | A |
4686513 | Farrar et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4709202 | Koenck et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4720700 | Seibold et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4729056 | Edwards et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4742426 | Lavelle | May 1988 | A |
4766746 | Henderson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4791280 | O'Connell et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800369 | Gomi | Jan 1989 | A |
4811012 | Rollins | Mar 1989 | A |
4829296 | Clark et al. | May 1989 | A |
4845484 | Ellsberg | Jul 1989 | A |
4851815 | Enkelmann | Jul 1989 | A |
4853692 | Wolk | Aug 1989 | A |
4887292 | Barrett | Dec 1989 | A |
4926665 | Stapley et al. | May 1990 | A |
4926996 | Eglise et al. | May 1990 | A |
4952864 | Pless et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4967305 | Murrer et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4980671 | McCurdy | Dec 1990 | A |
5005125 | Farrar et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5014049 | Bosley | May 1991 | A |
5021776 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5065356 | Puckette | Nov 1991 | A |
RE33873 | Romano | Apr 1992 | E |
5109530 | Stengel | Apr 1992 | A |
5113182 | Suman et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117097 | Kimura et al. | May 1992 | A |
5140317 | Hyatt et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151684 | Johnsen | Sep 1992 | A |
5170431 | Dawson | Dec 1992 | A |
5182543 | Siegel et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5184855 | Waltz et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5245317 | Chidley | Sep 1993 | A |
5272475 | Eaton et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5278547 | Suman et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5280518 | Danler et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5347419 | Caron et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349345 | Vanderschel | Sep 1994 | A |
5367289 | Baro et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5473236 | Frolov | Dec 1995 | A |
5477041 | Miron et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479799 | Kilman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506575 | Ormos | Apr 1996 | A |
5508691 | Castleman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5543782 | Rothbaum et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559505 | McNair | Sep 1996 | A |
5570080 | Inoue | Oct 1996 | A |
5575515 | Iwamoto et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589819 | Takeda | Dec 1996 | A |
5602536 | Henderson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5610587 | Fujiuchi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5625349 | Disbrow et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5640144 | Russo et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5650774 | Drori | Jul 1997 | A |
5656998 | Fujiuchi et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5673034 | Saliga | Sep 1997 | A |
5701828 | Benore et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710540 | Clement et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5745044 | Hyatt et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748083 | Rietkerk | May 1998 | A |
5764147 | Sasagawa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767773 | Fujiuchi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767792 | Urbas et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771722 | DiVito et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774053 | Porter | Jun 1998 | A |
5774058 | Henry et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5793290 | Eagleson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5808548 | Sasagawa et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836002 | Morstein et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838234 | Roulleaux-Robin | Nov 1998 | A |
5864290 | Toyomi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5905446 | Benore et al. | May 1999 | A |
5942978 | Shafer | Aug 1999 | A |
5942985 | Chin | Aug 1999 | A |
5955951 | Wischerop et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964877 | Victor et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982283 | Matsudaira et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005487 | Hyatt et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6020819 | Fujiuchi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037879 | Tuttle | Mar 2000 | A |
6040771 | Kim | Mar 2000 | A |
6043744 | Matsudaira | Mar 2000 | A |
6104285 | Stobbe | Aug 2000 | A |
6118367 | Ishii | Sep 2000 | A |
6122704 | Hass et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130602 | O'Toole et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137414 | Federman | Oct 2000 | A |
6144299 | Cole | Nov 2000 | A |
6204764 | Maloney | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6211747 | Trichet et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219700 | Chang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6255951 | De La Huerga | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269342 | Brick et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275141 | Walter | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6300873 | Kucharczyk et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304181 | Matsudaira | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308928 | Galant | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323782 | Stephens et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331812 | Dawalibi | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342830 | Want et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346886 | De La Huerga | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362726 | Chapman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6380855 | Ott | Apr 2002 | B1 |
D457051 | Davis | May 2002 | S |
6384709 | Mellen et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6384711 | Cregger et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401059 | Shen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420971 | Leck et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433689 | Hovind et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437740 | De Champlain et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441719 | Tsui | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6472973 | Harold et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474117 | Okuno | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6474122 | Davis | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483424 | Bianco | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6512457 | Irizarry | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6525644 | Stillwagon | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531961 | Matsudaira | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535130 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6552650 | Gokcebay et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564600 | Davivs | May 2003 | B1 |
6578148 | Beuchat et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584309 | Whigham | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6604394 | Davis | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615625 | Davis | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6677852 | Landt | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6693512 | Frecska et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6717517 | Przygoda, Jr. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6718806 | Davis | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6819252 | Johnston et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6867685 | Stillwagon | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6882282 | Lie-Nielsen et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6895792 | Davis | May 2005 | B2 |
6961000 | Chung | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975202 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7002467 | Deconinck et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7053774 | Sedon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7102509 | Anders et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7317387 | Cova et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7385522 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D579318 | Davis | Oct 2008 | S |
7482907 | Denison et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7629895 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7698916 | Davis | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7737843 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737844 | Scott et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737845 | Fawcett et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737846 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7821395 | Dension et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7969305 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8884762 | Fawcett et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8890691 | Fawcett et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8896447 | Fawcett et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9135800 | Fawcett et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9171441 | Fawcett et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9269247 | Fawcett et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9396631 | Fawcett et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9478110 | Fawcett et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9501913 | Fawcett et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9576452 | Fawcett | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9659472 | Fawcett et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9858778 | Fawcett et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10013867 | Fawcett et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10062266 | Fawcett et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10269202 | Denison | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10297139 | Fawcett et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
20010000430 | Smith et al. | Apr 2001 | A1 |
20020024420 | Ayala et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024440 | Okuno | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020063157 | Hara | May 2002 | A1 |
20020085343 | Wu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089434 | Ghazarian | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020109580 | Shreve et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133716 | Harif | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020185397 | Sedon et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030058083 | Birchfield | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030120922 | Sun et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030179606 | Nakajima et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030206106 | Deconinck et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040003150 | Deguchi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003257 | Mitchell | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025039 | Kuenzi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039919 | Takayama et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046027 | Leone | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040046664 | Labit et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040051626 | Pautler | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040160305 | Remenih et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040174264 | Reisman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201449 | Denison et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040207509 | Mlynarczyk et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050017906 | Man et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050073413 | Sedon et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050077995 | Paulsen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050165806 | Roatis et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050231365 | Tester et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050242962 | Lind et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060038654 | Khalil | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047692 | Rosenblum et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070131005 | Clare | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144224 | Scott et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146134 | Belden et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159328 | Belden et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070194918 | Rabinowitz | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080074235 | Wong et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080224655 | Tilley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080252415 | Larson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090012372 | Burnett et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090096413 | Partovi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112739 | Barassi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100207575 | Pijnenburg et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100238031 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110084799 | Ficko | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110254661 | Fawcett et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120047972 | Grant et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20150137976 | Fawcett et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160358431 | Fawcett et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170069184 | Fawcett et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170236401 | Fawcett et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180102031 | Fawcett et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180233024 | Fawcett et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190051082 | Denison | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190385437 | Fawcett et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2465692 | Nov 2004 | CA |
201297072 | Aug 2009 | CN |
1405693 | Aug 1995 | DE |
0160093 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0193537 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0745747 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0663497 | Sep 1999 | EP |
2519058 | Jul 1983 | FR |
2801334 | May 2001 | FR |
2353622 | Feb 2001 | GB |
H1-192970 | Aug 1989 | JP |
8279082 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2606317 | Apr 1997 | JP |
1997-259368 | Oct 1997 | JP |
2001-0075799 | Aug 2001 | KR |
2002-0001294 | Jan 2002 | KR |
9009648 | Aug 1990 | WO |
199623122 | Aug 1996 | WO |
97031347 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9923332 | May 1999 | WO |
1999047774 | Sep 1999 | WO |
2001042598 | Jun 2001 | WO |
2002043021 | May 2002 | WO |
2004023417 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004093017 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Final Written Decision from IPR of U.S. Pat. No. 9,659,472, dated Dec. 5, 2019, 55 pages (IPR2018-01138). |
Decision Denying Institution from IPR of U.S. Pat. No. 10,062,266, dated Mar. 6, 2020, 30 pages (IPR2019-01553). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,896,447, May 22, 2015, 62 pages (IPR 2015-01263). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,843, Mar. 20, 2014, 64 pages (IPR 2014-00457). |
Supplementary European Search Report for related European Patent Application No. EP 06 845 868.6 filed Dec. 20, 2006; date of completion of the search May 7, 2010; 7 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for related European Patent Application No. EP 06 847 982.3 filed Dec. 20, 2006; date of completion of the search May 7, 2010; 3 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for related European Patent Application No. EP 06 845 865.2 filed Dec. 20, 2006; date of completion of the search May 12, 2010; 4 pages. |
Ligong Li, The First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 2012102534555 dated Dec. 16, 2013, Chinese Patent Office, Beijing, China. |
Ziwen Li, The Sixth Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 2006800481876, dated Feb. 17, 2014, 7 pages, Chinese Patent Office. |
C. Naveen Andrew, First Office Action for Indian Patent Application No. 3187/CHENP/2008, dated Jan. 27, 2015, 2 pages, Indian Patent Office, India. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,135,800, Apr. 14, 2016, 66 pages (IPR2016-00895). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,135,800, Apr. 14, 2016, 64 pages (IPR2016-00896). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,884,762, Apr. 14, 2016, 63 pages (IPR2016-00892). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,269,247, Apr. 14, 2016, 65 pages (IPR2016-00899). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,269,247, Apr. 14, 2016, 65 pages (IPR2016-00898). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,846, Jun. 21, 2016, 73 pages (IPR2016-01241). |
Extended European search report for Application No. 15198379.8, dated Apr. 13, 2016, 7 pages, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,396,631, Nov. 29, 2016, 65 pages (IPR2017-00344). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,396,631, Nov. 29, 2016, 63 pages (IPR2017-00345). |
Schneier, Bruce, Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C, 1994, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, Table of Contents and Excerpts, 14 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,844, Sep. 30, 2016, 76 pages (IPR2016-01915). |
Examination Report from related European Application No. 15198379.8, dated Jan. 23, 2017 (7 pages). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,576,452 dated Jan. 12, 2018, 73 pages (IPR2018-00481). |
Daher, John K., et al., “Test Concept and Experimental Validation of the Use of Built-in-Test to Simplify Conducted Susceptibility Testing of Advanced Technology Integrated Circuits and Printed Circuit Boards”, 1990, Georgia Tech Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia (5 pages). |
New Webster's Dictionary and Thesaurus of the English Language, 1992, Lexicon Publications, Inc., Santa Barbara, California, Excerpt, p. 747. |
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, Sixth Edition, 2003, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New fork, New York, Excerpts, pp. 689-690, 1672. |
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, Sixth Edition, 2003, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York, New York, Excerpts, pp. 689-690, 1231. |
Petition for Post-Grant Review of Claims 1-45 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,659,472, dated Oct. 17, 2017, 93 pages, (PGR2018-00004). |
Final Written Decision for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,884,762, dated Sep. 28, 2017, 71 pages (IPR2016-00892). |
Final Written Decision for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,269,247, dated Sep. 28, 2017, 78 pages (IPR2016-00898 and IPR2016-00899). |
Final Written Decision for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,135,800, dated Oct. 12, 2017, 82 pages (IPR2016-00895 and IPR2016-00896). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,478,110, Jul. 31, 2017, 68 pages (IPR2017-01900). |
Clements, Alan. Computer Organization and Architecture: Themes and Variations, 2014. Cengage Learning, Stamford, CT, Excerpts, 4 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,478,110, Jul. 31, 2017, 71 pages (IPR2017-01901). |
Final Written Decision for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,844, dated Mar. 28, 2018, 51 pages (IPR2016-01915). |
Final Written Decision for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,737,846, dated Dec. 19, 2017, 34 pages (IPR2016-01241). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,659,472, May 22, 2018, 71 pages (IPR2018-01138). |
Final Written Decision for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,396,631, May 24, 2018, 94 pages (IPR2017-00344 and IPR2017-00345). |
Final Written Decision from Inter Partes Review Nos. IPR2017-01900 and IPR-2017-01901 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,478,110, dated Feb. 12, 2019 (71 pages). |
Final Written Decision from Inter Partes Review No. IPR2018-00481 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,576,452, dated Jul. 16, 2019 (55 pages). |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 10,062,266, Aug. 28, 2019, 75 pages (IPR2019-01553). |
Newton, Harry. Excerpts from Newton's Telecom Dictionary, 16th edition, dated Jul. 2000 (4 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200219379 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60753908 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16554074 | Aug 2019 | US |
Child | 16825353 | US | |
Parent | 16107537 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 16554074 | US | |
Parent | 15954143 | Apr 2018 | US |
Child | 16107537 | US | |
Parent | 15586939 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 15954143 | US | |
Parent | 15397362 | Jan 2017 | US |
Child | 15586939 | US | |
Parent | 15241708 | Aug 2016 | US |
Child | 15397362 | US | |
Parent | 15047218 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15241708 | US | |
Parent | 14825436 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 15047218 | US | |
Parent | 14529516 | Oct 2014 | US |
Child | 14825436 | US | |
Parent | 14254244 | Apr 2014 | US |
Child | 14529516 | US | |
Parent | 13169968 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 14254244 | US | |
Parent | 11639102 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 12770321 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12770321 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13169968 | US |