The present invention relates generally to the field of computer software, and, more particularly, to a programming interface that supports the enforcement of electronic licenses.
Commercially-produced software has traditionally been made available under a license that defines the permissible terms of the software's use. When the practice of software licensing first began, the license generally took the form of a legal document that defined the user's rights with respect to the software. Such a document relied upon the legal system for enforcement. It has since become desirable for licenses to be enforced electronically—i.e., it is desirable that a computer program contain code that actively discourages or prevents use of the software in a manner that is contrary to the license.
Most software that provides for electronic license enforcement provides its own infrastructure to manage the licensing of the software and the use of the licenses. Thus, a typical commercial software product may include not only the code to perform the product's core function, but may also carry with it the code to obtain, evaluate, protect, and manage licenses for the software. For each software vendor to develop and incorporate this infrastructure into its software is often a wasteful duplication of effort. It is therefore desirable to provide a system that performs the basic functions related to software licensing, where the system can be used by a broad variety of software applications in a uniform and defined way.
In view of the foregoing, there is a need for a mechanism that overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art.
The present invention provides a software licensing Application Programming Interface (API) or callable interface that provides certain licensing functions for use by software products. A license service or licensing component performs functions relating to the use of licenses, and exposes these functions to software products through the API. The service performs functions such as obtaining licenses, storing and managing licenses, protecting licenses from tampering, evaluating a license's validity, and evaluating whether a license is correctly bound to the machine and/or software product on which it is used. The software is able to make use of this functionality by calling the methods of the API.
In a typical use of the API, a software product calls an “open” API method or handle-opening component in order to obtain a unique handle that is used by the license service to identify the application. The software product then calls a “consume right” API method or right-consumption component. “Consume,” in this context, means the exercise of a specified right. The call to the “consume right” method is parameterized by the software product's handle, and by the name of the right to be consumed. The license service then attempts to locate one or more valid, correctly bound licenses that contains the named right. If no such license exists, then the software product is notified of the failure. If such licenses exist, then the right is bound to one of the licenses, and the calling software product is notified of the binding. In such a case, the software product knows that the right exists, and can perform whatever functions are associated with this right.
In a preferred embodiment, the license service does not define what the software can or cannot do under the right, or enforce substantive constraints on the use of the software. Rather, the license service manages the licenses in such a way that a software product can determine by calling the API whether a right does, or does not, exist, so that the software can behave accordingly. For example, a right may be called “run,” indicating that the user has the right to run the software product. The software product can use the API to determine whether there is a valid (and correctly bound, and non-expired) right to run the software. However, if the API call returns with an indication that there is no right to run the software, it is up to the software to cease operation or take some other action based on the non-existence of this right.
A right may be associated with information, which becomes available after a successful call to the “consume right” method. For example, a given software product may have individual rules about when it is permissible to edit, print, save, etc., and these rules can be stored in the license that contains the right. The API provides a “get information” method or information-retrieval component that allows this information to be retrieved from the license.
Other features of the invention are described below.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings exemplary constructions of the invention; however, the invention is not limited to the specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed. In the drawings:
Overview
The use of commercial software is typically governed by a license, and it has become increasingly common for this license to be embodied in an electronic form that can be enforced by the software itself. One challenge in creating an electronic licensing system is that an infrastructure is needed to manage the use of the licenses. Replicating this infrastructure for every software product is cumbersome and wasteful. The present invention provides an API that allows different software products to use a common infrastructure that performs various licensing functions.
Exemplary Computing Arrangement
The invention is operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with the invention include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, embedded systems, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
The invention may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Various terms, including component, method, service, interface, module, routine, and program, are used interchangeably to refer to a group of computer-executable instructions stored in a computer-readable medium. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network or other data transmission medium. In a distributed computing environment, program modules and other data may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
With reference to
Computer 110 typically includes a variety of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by computer 110 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes both volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removeable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CDROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can accessed by computer 110. Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer readable media.
The system memory 130 includes computer storage media in the form of volatile and/or nonvolatile memory such as read only memory (ROM) 131 and random access memory (RAM) 132. A basic input/output system 133 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 110, such as during start-up, is typically stored in ROM 131. RAM 132 typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by processing unit 120. By way of example, and not limitation,
The computer 110 may also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. By way of example only,
The drives and their associated computer storage media discussed above and illustrated in
The computer 110 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 180. The remote computer 180 may be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to the computer 110, although only a memory storage device 181 has been illustrated in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 110 is connected to the LAN 171 through a network interface or adapter 170. When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 110 typically includes a modem 172 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 173, such as the Internet. The modem 172, which may be internal or external, may be connected to the system bus 121 via the user input interface 160, or other appropriate mechanism. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 110, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. By way of example, and not limitation,
Software Licensing Service
Software licensing service 202 manages license store 204 and trust store 206, and also performs various functions relating to the licensing of software. For example, software licensing service 202 may contain modules that parse license files, modules that enforce the binding of a license to a particular machine and/or to a particular instance of a software product, and a secure timer/counter (that uses trust store 206 in the manner described above).
Software licensing service 202 exposes an application programming interface (API) 208 that allows application software (such as application 135) to use software licensing service 202. Application 135 may invoke the features of software licensing service 208 by making local procedure call (LPC) to the methods of API 208. An example set of API methods that may be exposed by software licensing service 202 is described below.
The manner in which API 208 is used by an application is described with reference to
Example Software Licensing API
The following is an example set of API methods that may be exposed by a software licensing service:
SLOpen
The SLOpen function opens a SL client context handle that must be used for all subsequent SL API calls. (Throughout the example API descriptions, “SL” shall refer to the software licensing service. Thus, the SL client context handle is the handle used by a client in communicating with the software licensing service.)
Parameters
pguidApp
[in] Pointer to application GUID that uniquely identifies an application. If this argument is NULL, an E_INVALIDARG error is returned.
phSLC
[out] SL client context Handle or INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE if failed.
Remarks
Use the SLClose function to close an context handle returned by SLOpen.
Application GUID: Unique ID of application. For the WINDOWS version of the MICROSOFT OFFICE application suite, WinWord has an Application GUID which is different from Excel's Application GUID. For Windows, Windows itself is an application, although it is a composite of many programs.
In Office case, A user can install both Office Suite and WinWord standalone products on the machine. From SL point of view, the WinWord in both products has same Application GUID. WinWord's Application GUID associated to two Product GUID. In other words, WinWord can use either Office Suite's product license or WinWord's product license.
When SLOpen succeeds:
A RPC (remote procedure call) binding has been established.
A context memory is created on SL service. The context is used to keep the status information for the caller of the client.
The SLC handle is like a file handle. A process can open multiple SL context handles but handles are valid within the caller process.
Returns
Success or failure
SLClose
The SLClose function closes an opened SL client context handle. Any information in the context is released automatically.
Parameters
hSLC
[in] Handle to current SL client context handle
Remarks
When SLClose is done, the RPC binding is released, and the context is destroyed.
Returns
Success or failure.
SLInstall
The SLInstall function installs applications'licenses and registers applications'information.
Parameters
hSLC
[in] Handle to current SL client context handle
pAppPrdKey
[in] Application product key structure. The product key can be Microsoft product key format or Application's product key format.
The eProdKeyType can be one of following values:
If the Product Key type is non-MS Product Key (i.e. eProdKeyType=SL_PRODKEY_CUSTOM), the caller has to fill in its custom product key information. If the product uses MS Product Key, then CustomPrdKeyInfo can be ignored.
Current version number of SL_PRODKEY is 1. The caller can use SL_CURRENT_PRODKEY_VERSION in dwVersion field.
dwNumOfApps
[in] The number of application GUID in pguidApps.
pguidApps
[in] A list of application of GUID. The application GUID represents the application that the license is being installed for. For example, Office Setup program can call this function to install the license(s) for Word, Excel by specifying each application GUID in pguidApps. pguidApp cannot be NULL here.
dwNumOfApps
[in] The number of license files.
ppszLicFile
[in] File names in array of strings.
Returns
Success or failure
SLUninstall
The SLUninstall function uninstalls a product's license from an application.
Parameters
hSLC
[in] Handle to current SL client context handle
pAppPrdKey
[in] See above definition in connection with SLInstall.
Remarks
An application could have more than one product licenses. For example, when the user uninstalls Office suite, the association between Office Suite license and WinWord should be removed, but the license from WinWord Standalone product should not be removed.
When SLUninstall succeeds:
The information associated with this Product Key is removed. (see SLInstall, above, for the associated information)
The product keys associated with the Application GUID is removed.
The license files associated with the product GUID are preferably still kept.
Returns
Success or failure
SLConsumeRight
The SLConsumeRight function lets an application to examine or exercise the rights on a locally-stored license. Calling this function binds a license to the right mentioned in pszRightName. If this right cannot be exercised by the current caller, then the application fails. If the function succeeds, the action associated with the right can be executed (like decreasing usage count, decreasing time quota, or nothing)
Parameters
hSLC
[in] Handle to current SL client context handle
pszRightName
[in] The name of right needs to be evaluated. In current design, the right name is defined by applications. SL opens the license and evaluates the condition based on the right name.
pAsyncContext
[in/out] IfpAsyncContext is NULL, this function works in synchronous mode, otherwise, the function works in asynchronous mode. SL_ASYNC_CONTEXT is opaque to caller and managed by SLC.
Remarks
All licenses associated with the application GUID (specified in SLOpen) will be conceptually combined in one logic license.
If their are multiple consumable grants of the right, then the license with higher priority will be consumed first.
Returns
Success or failure
SLInitializeAsyncContext
The SLInitializeAsyncContext function or asynchronous-context-initiator component initializes the asynchronous context for SLC functions to make asynchronous call.
Parameters
pAsyncContext
[in/out] pointer to asynchronous context that contains asynchronous call information.
hEvent
[in] The event object used for synchronization.
pvReserved
[in] reserved for extension.
Returns
Success or failure.
SLCancelAsyncCall
The SLCancelAsyncCall fiuction is used to cancel an asynchronous call.
Parameters
pAsyncContext
[in] asynchronous context for SL asynchronous call.
fAbortCall
[in] If TRUE, the call is cancelled immediately. If FALSE, wait for the SL to complete the call.
Remarks
There are two ways for the caller to request cancellation of an asynchronous call-abortive and nonabortive. In an abortive cancel (fAbortCall is TRUE), the SLCancelAsyncCall function sends a cancel notification to the SLC and the asynchronous call is canceled immediately, without waiting for a response from the SLC. In a nonabortive cancel (fAbortCall is FALSE) the SLCancelAsyncCall function notifies SLC of the cancel and the caller waits for SLC to complete the call.
Returns
Success or failure.
SLCompleteAsyncCall
The SLCompleteAsyncCall function is used to complete an SLC asynchronous call.
Parameters
pAsyncContext
[in] asynchronous context for SL asynchronous call.
phrAsyncCall
[out] the error code of the submitted asynchronous call.
Remarks
If the caller calls this function before the reply has arrived, the call returns E_SLC_ASYNC_CALL_PENDING. The buffer must be valid and it must be big enough to receive the return value. If the call does not return E_SLC_ASYNC_CALL_PENDING, this SLCompleteAsyncCall invocation is final for the asynchronous call. After this function call, regardless of success or failure, all resources allocated for this asynchronous call are freed. (Subsequent calls to the SLCompleteAsyncCall or SLCancelAsyncCall functions have undefined results until a new call on the SL_ASYNC_CONTEXT structure is initiated).
Returns
SLGetInformation
The SLGetLicenseInfo function is used to get a variety of information.
Parameters
hSLC
[in] Handle to current SL client context handle
dwCategory
[in] The category of information.
pszKeyName
[in] the name of the key. E.g. BuildNumber
pdwType
[out] type of data
pcbValue
[out] Size of the buffer allocated (in bytes).
ppbValue
[out] If successful, the data is returned in the buffer allocated by SLC. The caller has to call SLFreeMemory to free the memory.
Returns
Success or failure
SLAcquireLicense
The SLAcquireLicense function is used to acquire on-line license for the user. SLC enumerates the product keys associated with the Application and picks up the product key with highest product priority (see SLInstall, registration information). Then SL gets the clearing house URL from out-of-box license and connects to clearing house to get a license.
SLAcquireLicense could be a lengthy process. Applications can call this function in asynchronous mode by specifying pAsyncContext (NULL means synchronous mode).
Parameters
hSLC
[in] Handle to current SL client context handle
pszProdKeyHash
[in] string of product key hash. The product key hash is created when SLInstall is called and is maintained by the licensing service.
pszPublishingLicense
[in] string of publishing license.
pAsyncContext
[in] asynchronous context for SL asynchronous call.
Remarks
The acquired license will be stored in license store accordingly and the license information will be registered, too. (see SLInstall)
Applications might need to add more client information to license. The application can put the information to pbAppData in the call and this data will be sent to clearing house.
When this function succeeds:
It sent necessary binding information to the specified license server.
It receives the license from license server.
It stored the license in license store. See description of SLInstall, above, for how the license file is stored.
Returns
Success or failure.
SLGenerateTextChallenge
Generates and installation challenge text to be routed to a license issuer in an out of band fashion (telephone, email, file share, etc).
Parameters
hSLC
[in] Handle to current SL client context handle
pszProdKeyHash
[in] String of product key hash. The product key hash is created when SLInstall is called and maintained by the licensing service.
bSingleSession
[in] Specifies whether or not the corresponding text response from the license issue will be valid only for the lifetime of this SLC session handle.
ppszChallenge
[out] If successful, the text challenge is returned in the buffer allocated by SLC. The caller needs to call SLFreeMemory to free the allocated memory.
Returns
Success or failure.
SLDepositTextResponse
Deposits the response to an installation challenge text in the licensing system. Used to activate a license with a conditional access code. Only valid if there is an outstanding text challenge which has been issued for a license. If the original license specified that the challenge was only valid for a single session, this API must be called with the response before the SLC handle is closed or depositing the response will fail.
Parameters
hSLC
[in] Handle to current SL client context handle
pszProdKeyHash
string of the product key hash
pszChallenge
[in] Response text
Returns
Success or failure.
SLEnumLicense
The SLEnumLicensefunction is used to enumerate installed licenses and get information from the license.
Parameters
hSLC
[in] Handle to current SL client context handle
pguidApp
[in] See SLInstall. IfpguidApp is not NULL, then licenses associated with this GUID are enumerated. If the GUID is NULL, then all licenses are enumerated.
dwindex
[in] The index number of the license to be retrieved. This value should be zero for the first call to the SLEnumLicense function and then incremented for subsequent calls.
The function may return licenses in any order.
Returns
E_SL_NO_MORE_DATA—No license at the specified index.
Remarks
If SLEnumLicenses succeeded, the selected license information can be accessed by calling SLGetInformation and the category is SL_CAT_ENUMLICINFO
Sample:
SLFreeMemory
The SLFreeMemory function is used to free the memory allocated by SLC.
Parameters
pvMemBlock
[in] Previously allocated memory block to be freed
Returns
None
Use of Software Licensing API to Control Use of Software
A software product uses the API of the present invention for various purposes related to licensing, including the consumption of rights in a license, and the retrieval of data from the license. As noted above, the API allows the software to determine what rights are present in the license, but, preferably, it is up to the software to determine what to do with that information—e.g., grant or deny access to a feature, cease operation altogether, etc. The following description of
If the license and/or right are found to be correctly bound and valid (408), then the license is bound to the right requested in the API call (412). (It should be noted that “binding” a license to a machine, environment, and a product key means that the license specifies which machine(s) and product key it can be used with; “binding” a license to a right means that the consume function has been successful, and the right is being consumed from a particular license. Throughout this description, it will be clear from context which meaning of “binding” applies.) The API call then returns to the calling application and indicates that the call was successful (414). If the license and/or right has been found to be invalid, or not correctly bound to the machine, environment, or product ID, then the SLConsumeRight call returns to the calling application and indicates that the operation failed (410).
If the SLConsumeRight call returns with a failure, then the right specified in the call cannot be consumed from a license, and no information about that right will be available to the calling application. However, if the right is successfully consumed, then the application can use the binding of the right to the license to get information from the license about the right. For example, a license may contain a general right called “run,” which indicates that the application may be run. However, for the “run” right, the license may contain more specific parameters about the usage of the application—e.g., the license may specify whether particular features of an application (e.g., print, edit, save, etc.) should be turned on or off, and may give specific parameters for the use of these features (e.g., the document can be saved only on machines that are running in a particular domain, or the print feature can only be used for thirty days, etc.). The SL API does not require any particular type of information to be associated with a right, but rather provides a mechanism whereby an application vendor can associate any type of information with a right, which can then be retrieved and interpreted by the application.
Assuming that a right has been successfully consumed as described in
First, the application calls the SLGetInformation method on the bound right (502). The various types of information that can be retrieved are described above in connection with the description of the SLGetInformation method. The licensing service then receives the call (504). The service retrieves the requested information from the license file that contains the bound right (506). The licensing service then places this information in a buffer (508), and returns to the calling application (510). The calling application then reads the contents of the buffer, and performs whatever actions it deems necessary based on the retrieved information.
It should be noted that the licensing service may not be aware of the meaning of the information that it is handling as part of an SLGetInformation call. As discussed above, the licensing framework provides a mechanism whereby a software vendor can create rights, and can associate information with the rights. The invention is not limited either to any particular type of information that can be associated with the right. When the information is retrieved from the license, it is simply passed by the licensing service to the application in a buffer. The application then interprets the retrieved information, decides what actions to be taken based on that information, and uses its own security features to enforce the application's decision. (E.g., if, based on the retrieved information, the application decides to disable the print feature, the application contains the code that actually disables this features and, possibly, code that prevents a hacker from tampering with the disabling of the print feature.)
It is noted that the foregoing examples have been provided merely for the purpose of explanation and are in no way to be construed as limiting of the present invention. While the invention has been described with reference to various embodiments, it is understood that the words which have been used herein are words of description and illustration, rather than words of limitations. Further, although the invention has been described herein with reference to particular means, materials and embodiments, the invention is not intended to be limited to the particulars disclosed herein; rather, the invention extends to all functionally equivalent structures, methods and uses, such as are within the scope of the appended claims. Those skilled in the art, having the benefit of the teachings of this specification, may effect numerous modifications thereto and changes may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention in its aspects.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5023907 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5155806 | Hoeber et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5204897 | Wyman | Apr 1993 | A |
5375206 | Hunter et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377354 | Scannell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5500936 | Allen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5519606 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | May 1996 | A |
5559944 | Ono | Sep 1996 | A |
5563946 | Cooper et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570109 | Jenson | Oct 1996 | A |
5588107 | Bowden et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596694 | Capps | Jan 1997 | A |
5625783 | Ezekiel et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629980 | Stefik et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634100 | Capps | May 1997 | A |
5634128 | Messina | May 1997 | A |
5638504 | Scott et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638513 | Ananda | Jun 1997 | A |
5659693 | Hansen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664127 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664208 | Pavley et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671412 | Christiano | Sep 1997 | A |
5721847 | Johnson | Feb 1998 | A |
5734915 | Roewer | Mar 1998 | A |
5760768 | Gram | Jun 1998 | A |
5760773 | Berman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761646 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778402 | Gipson | Jul 1998 | A |
5778404 | Capps et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5805167 | van Cruyningen | Sep 1998 | A |
5812132 | Goldstein | Sep 1998 | A |
5821936 | Shaffer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828376 | Solimene et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838321 | Wolf | Nov 1998 | A |
5842009 | Borovoy et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844558 | Kumar et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5844572 | Schott | Dec 1998 | A |
5855006 | Huemoeller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5885006 | Sheedy | Mar 1999 | A |
5893125 | Shostak | Apr 1999 | A |
5898436 | Stewart et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899979 | Miller et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905863 | Knowles et al. | May 1999 | A |
5926806 | Marshall et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936625 | Kahl et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940078 | Nagarajayya et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940847 | Fein et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943051 | Onda et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960406 | Rasansky et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970466 | Detjen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5999731 | Yellin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999938 | Bliss et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008806 | Nakajima et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012075 | Fein et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018343 | Wang et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034683 | Mansour et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047242 | Benson | Apr 2000 | A |
6067087 | Krauss et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072492 | Schagen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085206 | Domini et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101480 | Conmy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115777 | Zahir et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133915 | Arcuri et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6166738 | Robertson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175363 | Williams et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188403 | Sacerdoti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189146 | Misra et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192381 | Stiegemeier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211879 | Soohoo | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216122 | Elson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219670 | Mocek et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222540 | Sacerdoti | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226747 | Larsson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232971 | Haynes | May 2001 | B1 |
6236396 | Jenson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256628 | Dobson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260141 | Park | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278450 | Arcuri et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289317 | Peterson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289502 | Garland et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289505 | Goebel | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301704 | Chow et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305012 | Beadle et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307544 | Harding | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308317 | Wilkinson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308322 | Serocki et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323883 | Minoura et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324686 | Komatsu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327665 | Osanai | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353451 | Teibel et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359634 | Cragun et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373507 | Camara et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384849 | Morcos et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385596 | Wiser et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405216 | Minnaert et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424829 | Kraft | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429882 | Abdelnur et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433801 | Moon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456304 | Angiulo et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459441 | Perroux et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466236 | Pivowar et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469722 | Kinoe et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480865 | Lee et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493006 | Gourdol et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493731 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6546417 | Baker | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570596 | Frederiksen | May 2003 | B2 |
6578192 | Boehme et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583798 | Hoek et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587881 | Agarwal | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6618732 | White et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621504 | Nadas et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6621508 | Shiraishi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635089 | Burkett et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6664983 | Ludolph | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6680749 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686938 | Jobs et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691281 | Sorge et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697948 | Rabin et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6708205 | Sheldon et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6727919 | Reder et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732330 | Claussen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6734880 | Chang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750890 | Sugimoto | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785868 | Raff | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6825859 | Severenuk et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826729 | Giesen et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6850255 | Muschetto | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871195 | Ryan et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882354 | Nielsen | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6904449 | Quinones | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6906717 | Couckuyt et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915492 | Kurtenbach et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924797 | MacPhail | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6964025 | Angiulo et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983889 | Alles | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988241 | Guttman et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990637 | Anthony et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7027463 | Mathew et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032210 | Alloing et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039596 | Lu | May 2006 | B1 |
7046848 | Olcott | May 2006 | B1 |
7107544 | Luke | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7110936 | Hiew et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111238 | Kuppusamy et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7152207 | Underwood et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7188073 | Tam et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7212208 | Khozai | May 2007 | B2 |
7216301 | Moehrle | May 2007 | B2 |
7249325 | Donaldson | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7325204 | Rogers | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328409 | Awada et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337185 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346705 | Hullot et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346769 | Forlenza et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360174 | Grossman et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7386535 | Kalucha et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7392249 | Harris et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7461249 | Pearson et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7469385 | Harper et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484213 | Mathew et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7505954 | Heidloff et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7530029 | Satterfield et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7567964 | Brice et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7627561 | Pell et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7739259 | Hartwell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8027925 | Garst et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
20020007380 | Bauchot et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020037754 | Hama et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052721 | Ruff et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070977 | Morcos et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075330 | Rosenzweig et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078143 | De boor et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091739 | Ferlitsch et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122071 | Camara et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133557 | Winarski | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135621 | Angiulo et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140731 | Subramaniam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020140740 | Chen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149623 | West et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149629 | Craycroft et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154178 | Barnett et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161718 | Coley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163538 | Shteyn | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175955 | Gourdol et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196293 | Suppan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030011638 | Chung | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030011639 | Webb | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014490 | Bates et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022700 | Wang | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035917 | Hyman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038832 | Sobol | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043211 | Kremer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066025 | Garner et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070143 | Maslov | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076957 | Asokan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084286 | Bader | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088516 | Remer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093490 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097361 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030098891 | Molander | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110191 | Handsaker et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030112278 | Driskell | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140009 | Namba et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163455 | Dettinger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167310 | Moody et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030169284 | Dettinger et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195937 | Kircher et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206646 | Brackett | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218611 | Ben-tovim et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226106 | Mckellar et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030227487 | Hugh | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233419 | Beringer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003351 | Sommerer et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012633 | Helt | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040056894 | Zaika et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040090315 | Mackjust et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100504 | Sommer | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100505 | Cazier | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107197 | Shen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109025 | Hullot et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109033 | Vienneau et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117451 | Chung | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119760 | Grossman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128275 | Moehrle | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133854 | Black | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142720 | Smethers | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040164983 | Khozai | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168153 | Marvin | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186775 | Margiloff et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040189694 | Kurtz et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040221234 | Imai | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230508 | Minnis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230906 | Pik et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239700 | Baschy | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243938 | Weise et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268231 | Tunning | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004990 | Durazo et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005249 | Hill et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010871 | Ruthfield et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021504 | Atchison | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022116 | Bowman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050039142 | Jalon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043015 | Muramatsu | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044500 | Orimoto et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050315 | Burkhardt | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057584 | Gruen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086135 | Lu | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050117179 | Ito et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138576 | Baumert et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144241 | Stata et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172262 | Lalwani | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183008 | Crider et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216863 | Schumacher et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223329 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256867 | Walther et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278656 | Goldthwaite et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289156 | Maryka et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020962 | Stark et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036580 | Stata et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036945 | Radtke et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036965 | Harris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041545 | Heidloff et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047644 | Bocking et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080303 | Sargent et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095865 | Rostom | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101051 | Carr et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101350 | Scott | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111931 | Johnson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117249 | Hu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129937 | Shafron | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173824 | Bensky et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060218500 | Sauve et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060242557 | Nortis, III | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242575 | Winser | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060294452 | Matsumoto | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070050401 | Young et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061306 | Pell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061307 | Hartwell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061308 | Hartwell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106951 | Mccormack et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143671 | Paterson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070185826 | Brice et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070240057 | Satterfield et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260996 | Jakobson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279417 | Garg et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070300168 | Bosma et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080034304 | Feuerbacher et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040682 | Sorenson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052670 | Espinosa et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077571 | Harris et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080178110 | Hill et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090007003 | Dukhon et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090083656 | Dukhon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100009 | Karp | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090217192 | Dean et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222763 | Dukhon et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1207530 | Feb 1999 | CN |
0910007 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1223503 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 243 998 | Sep 2002 | EP |
0 715 247 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1376337 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1526427 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1672518 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1835434 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2391148 | Jan 2004 | GB |
5274275 | Oct 1993 | JP |
2002-358136 | Dec 2002 | JP |
WO 9220021 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 9220022 | Nov 1992 | WO |
9517732 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9904353 | Jan 1999 | WO |
9927495 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0177795 | Oct 2001 | WO |
02091162 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03098500 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
MSDN—License Service Application Programming Interface, API Specification v1.02, Microsoft, Jan. 28, 1993. |
Agha, G.A. et al., “Modular Heterogeneous System Development: A Critical Analysis of Java”, Heterogeneous Computing Workshop, 1998, 144-155, XP 010274892. |
Technical Standard, Systems Management: Software License Use Management (XSLM), The Open Group, Mar. 1999, 1-23, 41-70, XP-002326441. |
Aura, T. et al., “Software License Management with Smart Cards”, Proceedings of the USENIX Workshop on Smartcard Technology, 1999, 75-85. |
Grantham, I., “Centralize Software Monitoring with LicenseTrack 3.4”, UNIX Review, 1996, 14(7), 45-46, 48. |
Robert J. Oberg, Petr Thorsteinsson, Dan L.Wyatt: “Application Development Usin Visual Basic and .Net” [Online] Jun. 24, 2002 (Jun. 24, 2002), Prentice Hall Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com> [retrieved on Jun. 27, 2007] Part.4 : Fundamentals of the .Net framework Chapter 10 :.NET framework Classes Asynchronous Programming. |
Craig Tunstall, Gwyn Cole: “Developing WMI Solutions: A Guide to Windows Management Instrumentation” Nov. 12, 2002 (Nov. 12, 2002), Addison Wesley Professional Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com> [retrieved on Jun. 27, 2007] Chapter 7. Developing Management Applications Making Asynchronous calls. |
Norwegian Patent Application No. 20044099: Norwegian Search Report, dated Jan. 29, 2011, 2 pages. |
Taiwan Invention Patent Application No. 093126908: Taiwan Search Report, dated Jan. 5, 2011, 1 page. |
Office Action Received for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,482,182, dated Jun. 27, 2014, 4 Pages. |
India Patent Application No. 1921/DEL/2004; Hearing Notice; dated Apr. 18, 2017; 2 pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Brazilian Patent Application No. PI0404376-6”, dated Mar. 6, 2017, 7 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2004-70500”, dated May 31, 2012, 2 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/136,800”, dated Jul. 9, 2008, 21 Pages. |
Boyce, Jim, “Microsoft Outlook Inside Out”, Published by Microsoft Press, Jan. 2001, pp. 133, 134, 721-728. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/151,686”, dated Jul. 24, 2008, 17 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/151,686”, dated Oct. 28, 2008, 17 Pages. |
Bos, Bert, “Re: A proposal for addition to HTML 3.0: Frames”, Retrieved from http://www.nyct.net/aray/htmlwg/95q3/1141.html, Sep. 21, 1995, 5 Pages. |
Billo, E. Joseph, “Creating Charts: An Introduction”, In Book of Excel for Chemists: A Comprehensive Guide, Second Edition, 2001, 9 Pages. |
“Non- Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/151,686”, dated Sep. 26, 2007, 15 Pages. |
Berliner, et al., “Microsoft Office 2003”, Binom-Express Publishing House, Feb. 24, 2004, pp. 173-178. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/154,278”, dated Nov. 25, 2008, 23 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/154,278”, dated Nov. 13, 2009, 32 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,470”, dated Sep. 23, 2009, 14 Pages. |
“Non- Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/401,470”, dated Mar. 18, 2009, 14 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,416”, dated Jun. 27, 2008, 29 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,561”, dated Aug. 17, 2009, 17 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,561”, dated Jan. 9, 2009, 16 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562”, dated Nov. 13, 2008, 32 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562”, dated Jun. 19, 2009, 38 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562”, dated Jan. 7, 2010, 38 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/430,562”, dated May 30, 2008, 30 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/445,393”, dated Nov. 24, 2009, 8 Pages. |
Berliner, et al., “Microsoft Office 2003”, Binom-Express Publishing House, Feb. 24, 2004, pp. 39-40, 120-124, 175-177, 233-234. |
Becker, et al., “Virtual Folders: Database Support for Electronic Messages Classification”, In Book CODAS, Dec. 1996, pp. 163-170. |
Ando, et al., “Visualization-enabled Multi-document Summarization by Iterative Residual Rescaling”, In Natural Language Engineering, vol. 11, Issue 1, Mar. 2005, pp. 67-86. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/782,059”, dated Aug. 18, 2009, 28 Pages. |
Agarwal, Vikash K., “Creating a Visually Arresting User-Interface: A3D Tab Control Example”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20080513093733/http://microsoft.apress.com/asptodayarchive/71723/creating-a-visually-arresting-user-interface-a-3d-tab-control-example, Jan. 3, 2008, 12 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,797”, dated Apr. 28, 2009, 30 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Phillipines Patent Application No. 1-2004-000416”, dated Mar. 31, 2010., 2 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Phillipines Patent Application No. 1-2004-000416”, dated Sep. 4, 2008, 2 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Phillipines Patent Application No. 1-2004-000416”, dated Mar. 16, 2005, 1 Page. |
“Examiner's Action Issued in Philippines Patent Application No. 1-2005-000405”, dated Aug. 19, 2008, 1 Page. |
“Examiner's Action Issued in Philippines Patent Application No. 1-2005-000405”, dated Apr. 21, 2008, 1 Page. |
“Examiner's Action Issued in Philippines Patent Application No. 1-2005-000406”, dated Apr. 21, 2008, 1 Page. |
“Examiner's Action Issued in Philippines Patent Application No. 1-2005-000495”, dated Jul. 31, 2008, 1 Page. |
“Examiner's Action Issued in Philippines Application No. 1-2005-00406”, dated Sep. 12, 2008, 1 Page. |
“Office Action Issued in Israel Patent Application No. 164074”, dated Mar. 10, 2009, 9 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Israel Patent Application No. 169716”, dated Sep. 6, 2009, 2 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Israel Patent Application No. 169718”, dated Sep. 7, 2009, 2 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Israel Patent Application No. 170668”, dated Oct. 12, 2009, 2 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 1768-2005”, dated Nov. 27, 2008, 10 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 1768-2005”, dated Dec. 4, 2009, 12 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 1769-2005”, dated Nov. 27, 2008, 11 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 1769-2005”, dated Jan. 29, 2010, 14 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 1770-05”, dated Mar. 28, 2008, 5 Pages. (W/o English Translation). |
“Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 1770-2005”, dated Sep. 23, 2008, 10 pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 1770-2005”, dated Nov. 4, 2009, 14 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Indian Patent Application No. 1921/DEL/2004”, dated Apr. 18, 2017, 2 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in India Patent Application No. 1921/DEL/2004”, dated Sep. 12, 2014, 2 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,482,182”, dated Jan. 4, 2017, 1 Page. (W/o English Translation). |
“Office Action Issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,482,182”, dated Feb. 26, 2016, 8 Pages. |
“Communication Issued in European Patent Application No. 09006972.5”, dated Sep. 28, 2009, 6 Pages. |
“Search Report Issued in European Patent Application No. 09006972.5”, dated Sep. 7, 2009, 5 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Taiwan Patent Application No. 93126908”, dated Aug. 25, 2014, 4 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Taiwan Patent Application No. 093126908”, dated Nov. 22, 2012, 10 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Taiwan Patent Application No. 093126908”dated May 6, 2013, 9 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2005/007073”, dated Jun. 19, 2009, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2004/009395”, dated Nov. 11, 2009, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Indonesian Patent Application No. P00200400478”, dated Apr. 3, 2008, 5 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,407”, dated Jan. 23, 2007, 22 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/741,407”, dated Jul. 26, 2006, 22 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/800,056”, dated Oct. 19, 2006, 11 Pages. |
Olsen, Stefanie, “Yahoo to Test Desktop Search”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20070211093209/http://news.com.com/Yahoo+to+test+desktop+search/2100-1032_3-5486381.html, Dec. 9, 2004, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/800,056”, dated Apr. 27, 2006, 8 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/800,056”, dated Jul. 13, 2007, 11 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/836,154”, dated Jan. 28, 2008, 26 Pages. |
Kurtenbach, et al., “The Hotbox: Efficient Access to a Large Number of Menu-items”, In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 15, 1999, 7 Pages. |
Kundaje, Kunal, “Windows Desktop Search”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20051026105719/http://kunal.kundaje.net/reviews/wds.html, Jul. 10, 2005, 7 Pages. |
Wagner, Jim, “Microsoft Enters Desktop Search Fray”, Retrieved from: http:www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3447331, Dec. 13, 2004, 5 Pages. |
Slovak, Ken, “Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Office Outlook 2003”, Que Publisher, 2003, pp. 237-241. |
Halvorson, et al., “Microsoft Office XP Inside Out”, In Book—Microsoft Office XP Inside Out, 2001, pp. 1005-1009,1015,1023-1028,1036-1039,1093. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,506”, dated Apr. 12, 2007, 20 Pages. |
Habraken, Joe, “Microsoft Office XP 8 in 1”, Retrieved from http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/0789725096/, Jun. 5, 2001, 12 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,928”, dated Jan. 8, 2008, 34 Pages. |
Group, Omni, “Omni Web Help”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20071118203423/http://www.omnigroup.com/documentation/OmniWeb/browser/tabs.html, Retrieved on: Dec. 5, 2008, 2 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,940”, dated Apr. 7, 2009, 16 Pages. |
Goldberg, et al., “Using Collaborative Filtering to Weave an Information Tapestry”, In Communications of the ACM—Special Issue on Information Filtering, vol. 35, Issue 12, Dec. 1992, pp. 61-70. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,940”, dated Jul. 17, 2008, 18 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,940”, dated Jun. 4, 2007, 20 Pages. |
Dyszel, Bill, “Microsoft Outlook 2000 for Windows for Dummies”, The Wiley Publication, 1999, 12 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,941”, dated Apr. 29, 2008, 22 Pages. |
Dwelly, Andrew, “Functions and Dynamic User Interfaces”, In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Functional Programming Languages and Computer Architecture, Sep. 11, 1989, 11 Pages. |
“Non- Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,941”, dated Jul. 11, 2007, 15 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S Appl. No. 10/955,942”, dated Aug. 4, 2009, 19 Pages. |
Chen, et al., “NiagaraCQ: A Scalable Continuous Query System for Internet Databases”, In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, vol. 29, Issue 2, Mar. 2000, pp. 379-390. |
Camarda, Bill, “Using Microsoft Word 97”, Published by QUE Corporation, Jan. 1997, pp. 412, 869. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,942”, dated Jul. 11, 2007, 23 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,942”, dated Apr. 15, 2008, 25 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,967”, dated Aug. 4, 2009, 21 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,967”, dated Apr. 16, 2008, 18 Pages. |
Burns, Simon, “Microsoft Reinvents its Own Wheel”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20070514034824/http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=20214, Dec. 14, 2004, 5 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,967”, dated Jul. 11, 2007, 19 Pages. |
Budinsky, et al., “WebSphere Studio Overview”, In IBM Systems Journal, vol. 43, Issue 2, May 6, 2004, 25 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,073”, dated Jun. 8, 2009, 11 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,073”, dated May 28, 2008, 10 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,073”, dated Oct. 9, 2007, 10 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/982,073”, dated Dec. 11, 2008, 12 Pages. |
Boyce, Jim, “Microsoft Outlook Inside Out Version”, In Book Microsoft Outlook Version 2002 Inside Out, 2001, pp. 67, 68, 109, 110, 230, 231, 310, 316-318, 798. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2004-70500”, dated Jan. 5, 2013, 8 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2004-70500”, dated Jan. 7, 2011, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2004-70500”, dated Sep. 22, 2011, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,482,182”, dated May 7, 2012, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,482,182”, dated Jan. 22, 2013, 4 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,482,182”, dated Feb. 20, 2015, 8 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200410088294.4”, dated Aug. 10, 2007, 12 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200410088294.4”, dated Feb. 1, 2008, 29 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200410088294.4”, dated Jul. 4, 2008, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2004131031”, dated Nov. 14, 2008, 7 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2004216596”, dated Feb. 24, 2010, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2004216596”, dated Oct. 20, 2009, 2 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2004-302186”, dated Oct. 18, 2011, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2004-302186”, dated Dec. 10, 2010, 7 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2004-302186”, dated Jun. 10, 2011, 4 Pages. |
“Search Report Issued in Singapore Patent Application No. 200504474-8”, dated Jan. 16, 2007, 8 Pages. |
“Search Report Issued in Singapore Patent Application No. 200504475-5”, dated Sep. 19, 2006, 15 Pages. |
“Search Report Issued in Singapore Patent Application No. 200504508-3”, dated Sep. 18, 2006, 6 Pages. |
“Written Opinion Issued in Singapore Patent Application No. 200504508-3”, dated Sep. 18, 2006, 9 Pages. |
“Search Report Issued in Singapore Patent Application No. 200505257-6”, dated Feb. 12, 2007, 6 Pages. |
“First Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510089514.X”, dated May 23, 2008, 16 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510089514.X”, dated Apr. 3, 2009, 12 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510089514.X”, dated Nov. 21, 2008, 14 Pages. |
“First Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510092139.4”, dated Mar. 21, 2008, 25 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510092139.4”, dated Oct. 17, 2008, 19 Pages. |
“Third Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510092139.4”, dated Jun. 19, 2009, 7 Pages. |
“First Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510092141.1”, dated Apr. 11, 2008, 22 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510092141.1”, dated Oct. 10, 2008, 22 Pages. |
“First Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510092142.6”, dated Apr. 18, 2008, 22 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510092142.6”, dated Oct. 16, 2009, 9 Pages. |
“First Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200510092146.4”, dated Mar. 21, 2008, 21 Pages. |
“Russian Office Action Issued in Application No. 2005120363/09”, dated Oct. 26, 2009, 12 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2005120363/28”, dated Jun. 24, 2009, 8 Pages. |
Office Action received for Russian Patent Application No. 2005125831/09, dated Jul. 30, 2009, 17 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2005125837/09”, dated Jul. 21, 2009, 10 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2005125839/09”, dated Sep. 10, 2009, 16 Pages. |
“First Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200680018095.3”, dated Jul. 3, 2009, 14 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chilean Patent Application No. 2512-2005”, dated Mar. 4, 2009, 12 Pages. |
“Examination Report Issued in New Zealand Patent Application No. 541299”, dated Jul. 25, 2005, 2 Pages. |
“Examination Report Issued in New Zealand Patent Application No. 541300”, dated Jul. 25, 2005, 2 Pages. |
“Examination Report Issued in New Zealand Patent Application No. 541301”, dated Jul. 25, 2005, 2 Pages. |
Schumaker, Dennis, “User Interface Standards”, Retrieved from: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa217660(office.11.d=printer).aspx, Sep. 2001, 5 Pages. |
“About Google Desktop Search”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20041015131838/http://desktop.google.com/about.html, Oct. 15, 2004, 8 Pages. |
Riggsby, et al., “Mastering Lotus Notes and Domino 6”, In the Complete Guide to Using and Developing for Lotus Notes and Domino 6, 2003, pp. 18, 22, 33-35, 47, 122, 123, 215-241, 378. |
“Convert to Word 2007”, Retrieved from: http://www.regencytraining.com/word-2007-conversion.html, Retrieved on: Apr. 21, 2008, 2 Pages. |
“Customer Story: SourceXtreme”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20071028070032/http://trolltech.com/customers/casestories/stories/sourcextreme/, Apr. 22, 2008, 2 Pages. |
“Find Any File or Email on Your PC as Fast as You can Type”, Retrieved from: http://www.x1.com, Jan. 1, 2003, 1 Page. |
“Inter-Widget Communication”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20071204004440/http://web.mit.edu/6.115/www/miscfiles/amulet/amulet-help/IWC.htm, Retrieved on: Apr. 22, 2008, 6 Pages. |
“Lookout”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20040402233643/http://www.lookoutsoft.com/, Apr. 22, 2005, 20 Pages. |
“Managing the Code Editor and View”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20090714151035/http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/z01zks9a(VS.71).aspx, Jan. 2008, 3 Pages. |
Riggsby, et al., “Mastering Lotus Notes and Domino 6”, In The Complete Guide to Using and Developing for Lotus Notes and Domino 6, 2003, pp. 135-139. |
Riggsby, et al., “Mastering Lotus Notes and Domino 6”, In The Complete Guide to Using and Developing for Lotus Notes and Domino 6, 2003, pp. 135-138, 607-612. |
Rich, et al., “Adding a Collaborative Agent to Graphical User Interfaces”, In Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Jan. 1996, 10 Pages. |
Pogue, David, “Windows XP Home Edition: The Missing Manual”, In Publication of O'Reilly, 1st Edition, May 1, 2002, pp. 37, 38 and 41. |
Piperoglou, Stephanos, “What's Hot in Internet Services?”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/19990508222358/http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/3.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 Pages. |
Piperoglou, Stephanos, “The Style Element & CSS Selectors”, Retrieved from: http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/4.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 Pages. |
Piperoglou, Stephanos, “The Style Attribute and CSS Declarations”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20150922213836/http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/2.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 Pages. |
Piperoglou, Stephanos, “Separate Structure and Presentation”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20161012144134/http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/1.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 4 Pages. |
“Microsoft Outlook 2000: Introduction to Calendar”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20041102044718/http://www.uakron.edu/its/learning/training/docs/Calendar032502.pdf, Mar. 25, 2002, pp. 1-52. |
“Microsoft Publisher 11 Beta Layperson's Specification”, Microsoft Corporation, 2002, 13 Pages. |
Piperoglou, Stephanos, “ID & Class Selectors, Pseudoclasses”, Retrieved from: http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/6.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 Pages. |
Piperoglou, Stephanos, “External Style Sheets”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20150923022741/http://www.webreference.com/html/tutorial5/10.html, Aug. 20, 1998, 3 Pages. |
“MSN Desktop Search (beta)”, Retrieved From: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1771841,00.asp, Mar. 2, 2005, 2 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Malaysian Patent Application No. PI20043832”, dated Dec. 31, 2009, 3 Pages. |
“Primary Windows”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20070716034907/http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/navigator/guidelines/primary.html, Retrieved on: Feb. 23, 2007, 23 Pages. |
“Rainy's Rainlendar”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20040812092939/www.ipi.fi/rainy/index.php?on=projects&project=rainlendar, Retrieved on: Aug. 12, 2004, 18 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Brazilian Patent Application No. PI0404376-6”, dated Jul. 15, 2016, 4 Pages. |
Venolia, et al., “Understanding Sequence and Reply Relationships within Email Conversations: A Mixed-Model Visualization”, In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, vol. 5, Issue 1, Apr. 5, 2003, pp. 361-368. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Malaysia Patent Application No. PI 20043832”, dated Nov. 14, 2014, 2 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/046344”, dated Dec. 29, 2009, 11 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/046341”, dated Nov. 30, 2009, 11 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2007/012573”, dated Nov. 27, 2007, 9 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/035467”, dated Feb. 6, 2007, 10 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/034993”, dated Feb. 26, 2007, 11 Pages. |
“Software License Use Management (XSLM)”, Retrieved From: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9691999399/toc.pdf, Mar. 1999, 286 Pages. |
“TeeChart for NET Charting Control”, Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20030127080821/http://www.teechart.net:80/, Retrieved on: Jan. 27, 2003, 4 Pages. |
“The Technology in Document and Check Security”, Retrieved from: http://www.securedoc.in/thetechnology.htm, Retrieved on: Apr. 21, 2008, 7 Pages. |
“To-do List—Effective Task Management Software”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20070521185648/http://www.programurl.com:80/to-do-list.htm, Retrieved on: Jan. 2, 2007, 6 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2006/012724”, dated Oct. 17, 2007, 11 Pages. |
Padwick, Gordon, “Using Microsoft Outlook 2000”, In Book—Using Microsoft Outlook 2000, Que Publishers, Special Edition, May 1999, pp. 530-533. |
“Office Action Issued in Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2005/008351”, dated Mar. 3, 2009, 4 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Thailand Patent Application No. 0401003526”, dated Mar. 7, 2018, 1 Page. |
“Office Action Issued in Thailand Patent Application No. 0401003526”, dated Aug. 31, 2016, 2 Pages. |
“Search Report Issued in European Patent Application No. 04021618.6”, dated May 24, 2005, 5 Pages. |
“Search Report Issued in European Patent Application No. 04021618.6”, dated Jul. 11, 2005, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. 04-094.972”, dated Aug. 21, 2007, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. 04-094.972”, dated Oct. 17, 2008, 9 Pages. |
“Communicated Action Received for European Patent Office Application No. 04102463.02211”, dated Oct. 20, 2005, 4 Pages. |
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings Received for European Patent Application No. 04102463.9”, Mailed Date: Jun. 23, 2008, 76 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2005/008349”, dated Feb. 5, 2009, 10 Pages. |
“European Communication cited in Application No. 07795391.7”, dated Sep. 14, 2009, 5 Pages. |
“Office Action Received in Canada Patent Application No. 2482182”, dated Nov. 26, 2013, Filed Date: Sep. 20, 2004, 6 Pages. |
“Refusal Letter in Indian Patent Application No. 1921/DEL/2004”, dated Jun. 19, 2019, 3 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050091168 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |