This disclosure relates to progressive control of fade and balance in audio systems that may be used in environments with multiple listening zones.
There are two main rationales for implementing balance and fade behavior in a multi-loudspeaker audio system. The first is to re-position the audio image within the listening space to accommodate particular user preferences. The second is to re-locate the audio to avoid disturbing listeners within certain regions of the listening space. Existing audio system implementations address either one or the other of these divergent goals but not both, leading to a non-ideal solution in each case.
Re-positioning the audio implies that the user wants to tailor the acoustic sound field to an individual preference, but still desires overall sound quality for all listeners. In this case it is essential that multiple loudspeakers remain active (albeit with different gains) so that an even timbre and proper acoustic summation is maintained throughout the listening environment. For example, if the user chooses to fade the audio to the front, it is desirable that the rear speakers continue to play at least a portion of their low-frequency content to avoid producing unintended acoustic dips within the space.
In contrast, re-locating the audio implies that the user wants to isolate or focus the audio to certain areas of the listening environment to not disturb certain listeners. In this case, the user is willing to sacrifice some total sound quality to achieve this goal. Therefore, the loudspeakers located near the undesirable listening zones may be completely muted to reduce the acoustic output experienced by those listeners to the extent possible. In some cases it is also desirable to filter the audio to remove low-frequency content due to the nature of its omni-directional propagation. This muting and filtering provides for a non-ideal listening experience to those listeners in the active zone.
In various types of audio systems, the user can adjust the left/right balance and front/rear fade from a default or detent setting within a certain range. The detent positions may be designed to provide for optimum audio output across the main listening area of an intended listening environment. Progressively changing the balance control or input progressively moves the audio output to the left or right of the listening environment by adjusting the signal processing of one or more loudspeakers relative to one another. Fade control operates in a similar fashion to progressively move the audio output toward the front or rear of the listening environment.
A simple prior-art implementation achieves this by progressively adjusting the gain on the loudspeakers in response to each adjustment of the control away from the detent or default position. When a control is at the end of its range, the affected loudspeakers will be muted. However, this may result in compromising sound quality as perceived by users in one or more listening zones. This may be particularly noticeable in applications where multiple loudspeakers may be arranged around the listening environment, and may have different frequency responses such as those associated with a woofer, mid-range, or tweeter, for example, to provide a desired spatial sound image or distribution.
One solution that maintains audio quality across the range of balance/fade settings is to modify the output of the loudspeakers by simultaneously adjusting gain, filtering, and/or other signal processing parameters in tandem with the balance and fade controls. For these applications, all of the loudspeakers may still be producing some acoustic output even when a balance and/or fade control is adjusted to a maximum or minimum setting at the end of its range. However, this effect may be inconsistent with listener expectations and result in complaints or warranty claims. For example, listeners may expect certain speakers to have zero perceptible audio output based on balance and/or fade being adjusted to their maximum or minimum positions.
A system or method for controlling speaker acoustic output in a multi-speaker audio system having multiple listening zones include substantially simultaneously adjusting gain and at least one additional parameter, such as filtering and/or other signal processing parameters of at least a first speaker relative to at least a second speaker in response to a change in balance and/or fade settings of the audio system across a range of balance and fade settings except for a maximum or minimum setting, and muting at least one speaker in response to the maximum or minimum balance or fade setting.
In one embodiment, the system and method may also include adjusting the non-zero gain of a low frequency speaker, such as a subwoofer, to provide reduced non-directional acoustic output in response to the maximum or minimum balance or fade setting.
In one embodiment, balance and fade control is performed upstream of a spectral manager configured to generate speaker signals to provide a desired summation of speaker acoustic outputs within a particular listening zone.
In various embodiments, the system or method for balance and fade control is implemented within a head unit or control unit of an audio system in a vehicle having multiple speakers positioned within a vehicle cabin.
Systems and methods for controlling balance and fade according to the present disclosure may include one or more control regions or ranges surrounding the detent or default position of the balance and fade control interface. In one embodiment, a first range of balance and fade settings results in adjusting or modifying at least a first parameter, such as gain, associated with corresponding speakers within the listening environment. A second range of balance and fade settings results in adjusting or modifying at least a second parameter, such as the channel mixing, for example. The control may be implemented such that the second range adjusts both the first and second parameters, or various combinations of the second parameter and other parameters, such as frequency filtering, for example. Multiple control ranges may be provided with each range having progressive adjustments to one or more associated parameters to alter the sound field within the listening environment. In various embodiments, the multiple control ranges include a range that results in muting at least one speaker when the balance or fade is set to the last available position.
Embodiments according to the present disclosure provide various advantages. For example, the balance and fade control according to the present disclosure offers a hybrid approach that operates as expected by listeners and may reduce unnecessary complaints or warranty claims. The systems and methods of the present disclosure maintain a desired sound quality across a range of balance and fade settings except for the maximum and minimum settings, where one or more speakers are muted. In addition, the present disclosure provides a single implementation that achieves both rationales for balance and fade control without modification to existing controls that may vary based on the particular implementation of the human-machine interface (HMI). Muting of one or more speakers can be provided without an additional control, button, knob, switch, etc. The user can fine-tune the soundstage to individual preference by re-positioning the audio within the listening environment over a range of balance and fade settings using all but the maximum/minimum settings, and can also choose to reduce the audio output in certain zones of the listening environment by moving the balance and/or fade controls to the end of their range.
Operation of the balance and fade controls and the resulting audio system performance according to various embodiments of the disclosure is intuitive and can be transparent to meet user expectations. For example, many users expect some output from each of the loudspeakers with the balance and fade controls near their detent or default positions, and also assume that at least some loudspeakers will have no output as the controls reach a minimum/maximum setting at the end of their range.
The above advantages and other advantages and features associated with the present disclosure will be readily apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
As required, detailed embodiments are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary and may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ embodiments according to the disclosure.
Referring now to
In the representative embodiment illustrated in
The adjusted multi-channel output from balance and fade control 26 is provided to spectral manager 28. Spectral manager 28 receives the multi-channel audio input signal from balance and fade control 26 and processes audio content to separate the audio content into a low-frequency portion and a mid-range and/or high-frequency portion based on one or more predetermined tunable crossover frequencies. The separated frequency portions are routed to various speakers within the audio system to provide a tunable audio field within the listening environment. In a representative vehicle environment, speakers may include left and right front speakers, one or more center speakers, left and right side speakers, left and right back speakers, and a subwoofer, for example. Front speakers may include a left front woofer, a left front mid-range, a right front woofer, and a right front mid-range. Similarly, rear speakers may include a left rear woofer, a left rear mid-range, a right rear woofer, and a right rear mid-range. The center speaker is generally implemented using a mid-range speaker. Various speakers may be optimized for producing predetermined frequency ranges. For example, a subwoofer may be optimized for producing frequencies between 20 Hz-100 Hz, whereas a woofer may be optimized for producing frequencies between 100 Hz-1 kHz, and a mid-range may be optimized for frequencies between 300 Hz-5 kHz, for example. Additional details of a representative spectral manager 28 are described in commonly owned published patent application US 2010/0278346 titled “Spectral Management System”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Various other operational details of a representative system that may incorporate balance and fade control are described in commonly owned published patent application US 2011/0081024 titled “System For Spatial Extraction Of Audio Signals”, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
As illustrated by the representative block diagram of
As generally illustrated in the block diagram of
Similarly,
For example, as previously described, the first row corresponds to the detent or default/center position with no gain/attenuation applied to any of the speakers. The second row corresponds to relative gain/attenuation applied to each speaker to move or shift the sound to the front zone of the listening area. This would be indicated by adjusting the fade control to a maximum (or minimum position) while the balance control remains in a detent position. As such, in this example, a relative gain of −72 dB would be applied to the subwoofer effectively muting the subwoofer. No relative gain adjustments (0 dB) are applied to the front speakers, which include the left front woofer, right front woofer, left front mid, and right front mid. Relative gain values of −72 dB are applied to the left rear mid and right rear mid speakers, and no relative gain (0 dB) is applied to the center mid speaker. In a similar fashion, the last row of
As illustrated in
As generally illustrated by the relative gain values applied to speakers in a multi-speaker audio system having multiple listening zones, a system or method for controlling speaker acoustic output according to the present disclosure substantially simultaneously adjust gain and at least one additional parameter, such as filtering and/or other signal processing parameters of at least a first speaker relative to at least a second speaker in response to a change in balance and/or fade settings of the audio system across a range of balance and fade settings except for a maximum or minimum setting, and mute at least one speaker in response to the maximum or minimum balance or fade setting. By adjusting at least one additional parameter, such as filtering and/or other signal processing parameters of at least a first speaker relative to at least a second speaker, the systems and methods of the present disclosure maintain a desired sound quality across a range of balance and fade settings except for the maximum and minimum settings, where one or more speakers are muted to meet user expectations in response to a balance or fade setting at a minimum/maximum setting.
In the representative embodiment illustrated, a first control region is designated by reference numeral 1 and represents balance and fade settings surrounding a detent, default, or middle position. As illustrated in
As also shown in
In region 4, the balance control has progressed outside of region 1 settings but is not yet in region 5. In this region the parameters, such as gain, filtering, and/or mixing, are controlled to progressively fade to the left or right. This is accomplished with channel gains and also the left or right channels will mix to the right or left, respectively. The center channel will also mix to the left or right in tandem with the left and right channels.
In the third control zone represented by region 5, the balance and fade controls are at a maximum or last available setting. One or more parameters are adjusted such that the audio is completely faded and at least one speaker is muted by corresponding adjustment of the channel gains. For example, the relative gains in addition to filtering and/or additional acoustic parameters may be adjusted substantially simultaneously by the signal processor to progressively shift or fade the acoustic field. The at least one muted or effectively muted (no perceptible audio output) speaker corresponds the particular listening region or zone associated with the minimum/maximum balance/fade settings. For example, a fade to the front as shown in region 5 at the top of
As generally described above and illustrated in
As those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate, balance and fade control according to various embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented in various types of listening environments and may use a digital signal processor having software and hardware to perform various functions, such as substantially simultaneously adjusting relative gains, filtering, channel mixing, and the like between or among speakers positioned within various regions or zones of the listening environment. In various embodiments, the system or method for balance and fade control is implemented within a head unit or control unit of an audio system in a vehicle having multiple speakers positioned within a vehicle cabin.
Balance and fade control according to embodiments of the present disclosure offers a hybrid approach that operates as expected by listeners and may reduce unnecessary complaints or warranty claims by muting or effectively muting one or more speakers associated with a particular listening region or zone. The systems and methods of the present disclosure maintain a desired sound quality across a range of balance and fade settings except for the maximum and minimum settings, where one or more speakers are muted. In addition, the present disclosure provides a single implementation that achieves both rationales for balance and fade control without modification to existing controls that may vary based on the particular implementation of the human-machine interface (HMI). Muting of one or more speakers can be provided without an additional control, button, knob, switch, etc. The user can fine-tune the soundstage to individual preference by re-positioning the audio within the listening environment over a range of balance and fade settings using all but the maximum/minimum settings, and can also choose to reduce the audio output in certain zones of the listening environment by moving the balance and/or fade controls to the end of their range.
As previously described, operation of the balance and fade controls and the resulting audio system performance according to various embodiments of the disclosure is intuitive and can be transparent to meet user expectations. For example, many users expect some output from each of the loudspeakers with the balance and fade controls near their detent or default positions, and also assume that at least some loudspeakers will have no output as the controls reach a minimum/maximum setting at the end of their range.
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the claimed subject matter. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments that are not explicitly shown or described. While various embodiments may have been described as providing advantages or being preferred over other embodiments or prior art implementations with respect to one or more desired characteristics, as one of ordinary skill in the art is aware, one or more features or characteristics may be compromised to achieve desired overall system attributes, which depend on the specific application and implementation. These attributes include, but are not limited to: cost, strength, durability, life cycle cost, marketability, appearance, packaging, size, serviceability, weight, manufacturability, ease of assembly, etc. Embodiments described as less desirable than other embodiments or prior art implementations with respect to one or more characteristics are not outside the scope of the disclosure and may be desirable for particular applications.
This application is the U.S. national phase of PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/059708 filed on Sep. 13, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/700,881 filed on Sep. 13, 2012 and 61/706,121 filed on Sep. 26, 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/059708 | 9/13/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/043501 | 3/20/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5073944 | Hirasa | Dec 1991 | A |
5661811 | Huemann | Aug 1997 | A |
5901231 | Parrella | May 1999 | A |
6009178 | Abel | Dec 1999 | A |
6778073 | Lutter | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7039196 | Becker | May 2006 | B1 |
7190799 | Bray | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200239 | Yabe | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7305097 | Rosen | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7440578 | Arai | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447321 | Furge | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7526093 | Devantier | Apr 2009 | B2 |
8031880 | Holmi | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8073169 | Rosen | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8090116 | Holmi | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8654995 | Silber | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20020076066 | Yabe et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20050100174 | Howard | May 2005 | A1 |
20050213786 | Kerneis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20090190787 | Pieklik | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100278346 | Hogue et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110081024 | Soulodre | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120057725 | Nakamura | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130279706 | Marti | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150098590 | Oswell | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150256934 | Brockmole | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1642363 | Jul 2005 | CN |
1770928 | May 2006 | CN |
101027939 | Aug 2007 | CN |
102385888 | Mar 2012 | CN |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/059708, Completed by the European Patent Office on Nov. 29, 2013, 3 Pages. |
Office Action from corresponding European Application No. 13 767 207.7, dated Mar. 14, 2016, 4 pages. |
Office Action from corresponding Chinese Application No. 201380047727.9, dated May 18, 2016, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150256934 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61700881 | Sep 2012 | US | |
61706121 | Sep 2012 | US |