Patent Grant
12061382
The invention relates to a progressive ophthalmic lens adapted to a wearer in given wearing conditions having an addition greater than or equal to 1 D and smaller than or equal to 4 D, fulfilling an acuity performance criterion. The invention further relates to a method implemented by computer means for determining if a progressive ophthalmic lens fulfills an acuity criterion and a method implemented by computer means of determining a progressive ophthalmic lens.
The invention also relates to a computer program product comprising one or more stored sequence of instruction that is accessible to a processor.
Usually, progressive ophthalmic lenses have a far distance vision region particularly adapted for far distance vision and a near distance vision region particularly adapted for near distance vision. The far distance vision region provides to the wearer a first refractive power and the near distance vision region provides to the wearer a second refractive power. The far and near distance vision regions are usually linked by a progressive region along which the refractive power progresses continuously.
Such progressive ophthalmic lenses are well adapted to provide a wearer a clear vision at near distance and far distance and the progressive region provides the wearer with a progressive refractive power so as to see at intermediate distances.
Although the progressive region may be used by the wearer to seek an intermediate distance, the visual comfort of the wearer may be reduced when using the progressive region of the progressive ophthalmic lens. In particular, the progressive region is usually narrow.
The use of intermediate distance vision increases, in particular since wearers spend more and more time reading on screens such as computer screens.
Existing ophthalmic lenses provide extended intermediate distance vision region. Usually such extension is done at the expense of the comfort of the wearer in far distance and near distance vision.
Therefore, there is a need for a progressive ophthalmic lens that would provide high degree of visual comfort to the wearer when seeking at far, near and intermediate distances. In particular, a progressive ophthalmic lens that would provide a balanced visual comfort for the wearer between the vision distances.
An aim of the present invention is to propose such a progressive ophthalmic lens.
To this end, the invention proposes a progressive ophthalmic lens adapted to a wearer in given wearing conditions having an addition greater than or equal to 1 D and smaller than or equal to 4 D, fulfilling an acuity performance criterion,
wherein said acuity performance criterion being determined by:
the acuity performance criterion being fulfilled if for each vision distance of the set of at least three vision distances, the area of gaze directions for which the acuity loss is below the associated acuity loss threshold value is greater than or equal to the acuity area threshold value corresponding to said distance with the acuity area threshold value being:
The inventors have observed that an ophthalmic lens fulfilling the defined acuity performance criterion provides an increased optical comfort to the wearer, in particular a balanced optical comfort in terms of vision distance for the wearer when using the progressive ophthalmic lens.
Compared to prior art progressive ophthalmic lenses the visual comfort in intermediate vision in particular is significantly increased.
According to further embodiments which can be considered alone or in combination:
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
The invention also relates to a method implemented by computer means for determining if a progressive ophthalmic lens fulfills an acuity criterion, said progressive ophthalmic lens being delimited by a contour, adapted for a wearer with a given prescription and given wearing conditions and having an addition greater than or equal to 1D and smaller than or equal to 4D, the method comprising the steps of:
Advantageously, the method of the invention may be used to determine if a progressive ophthalmic lens fulfills the acuity criterion prior to manufacturing such progressive ophthalmic lens. In particular, the method of the invention may be used during a design process to determine a progressive ophthalmic lens that may offer an increase optical comfort to the wearer.
According to further embodiments which can be considered alone or in combination:
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
and/or
The invention also relates to a method implemented by computer means of determining a progressive ophthalmic lens delimited by a contour, adapted for a wearer with a given prescription and given wearing conditions, said method comprising a step of determining if the determined progressive ophthalmic lens fulfills an acuity criterion according to the method of the invention.
The invention further relates to a computer program product comprising one or more stored sequences of instructions that are accessible to a processor and which, when executed by the processor, causes the processor to carry out the steps of the methods according to the invention.
The invention also relates to a computer readable medium carrying out one or more sequences of instructions of the computer program product of the invention.
The invention further relates to a computer-readable storage medium having a program recorded thereon; where the program makes the computer execute the method of the invention.
The invention also relates to a device comprising a processor adapted to store one or more sequence of instructions and to carry out at least one of the steps of the method according to the invention.
Non-limiting embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawing wherein:
Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figure may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve the understanding of the embodiments of the present invention.
The following definitions are provided so as to define the wordings used within the frame of the present invention.
The wordings “wearer's prescription”, also called “prescription data”, are known in the art. Prescription data refers to one or more data obtained for the wearer and indicating for at least an eye, preferably for each eye, a prescribed sphere SPHP, and/or a prescribed astigmatism value CYLP and a prescribed axis AXISP suitable for correcting the ametropia of each eye of the wearer and, if suitable, a prescribed addition ADDP suitable for correcting the presbyopia of each of his eyes at a given distance.
“Progressive ophthalmic lenses” are known in the art. They are corrective lenses that provide comfortable vision for a presbyopic wearer at all distances.
The wearer's prescription for progressive ophthalmic lens comprises prescribed sphere SPHP, and/or a prescribed astigmatism value CYLP and a prescribed axis AXISP suitable for correcting the ametropia of each eye of the wearer at far vision distance and, a prescribed addition ADDP.
Advantageously for the purpose of the invention, the prescribed sphere is greater or equal to −20D and smaller or equal to 13D, preferably greater or equal to −6D and smaller or equal to 4D. Advantageously, the prescribed astigmatism value is greater or equal to −4D and smaller or equal to 0D, preferably greater or equal to −2D and smaller or equal to 0D.
The prescription for far vision distance is determined at a given vision distance corresponding to a given proximity ProxFVp, in most cases ProxFVp=0, and the prescription for near vision distance or the corresponding prescribed addition ADD is determined at a different vision distance corresponding to a given proximity ProxNVp, in most cases ProxNVp=2.5 D.
The term can also refer to said ophthalmic lenses which could present at least one added value such as, for example, tint, photochromism, polarization filtering, electrochromism, antireflective properties, antiscratch properties. The lens may be also a lens for information glasses, wherein the lens comprises means for displaying information in front of the eye . . . .
All progressive ophthalmic lenses of the invention may be paired so as to form a pair of progressive ophthalmic lenses (left eye LE, right eye RE).
A “gaze direction” is identified by a couple of angle values (α,β), wherein said angles values are measured with regard to reference axes centered on the center of rotation of the eye, commonly named as “CRE”. More precisely,
A value of radius q′ of 25.5 mm corresponds to a usual value and provides satisfying results when wearing the lenses. Other value of radius q′ may be chosen. A given gaze direction, represented by a solid line on
The angle α is the angle formed between the axis CRE-J and the projection of the straight line CRE-J on the horizontal plane comprising the axis CRE-F; this angle appears on the scheme on
In a given gaze direction, the image of a point M in the object space, located at a given object distance, is formed between two points S and T corresponding to minimum and maximum distances JS and JT, which would be the sagittal and tangential local focal lengths. The image of a point in the object space at infinity is formed, at the point F.
The distance D corresponds to the rear frontal plane of the lens. I is the point of the ray that intercepts the front face (opposite to the eye) of the lens on the path to the image of the point M in the object space. Further images of points M′ and M″ in the object space can be considered, located at different object distances.
For each gaze direction (α,β), a mean refractive power PPO(α,β), a module of astigmatism AST(α,β) and an axis AXE(α,β) of this astigmatism, and a module of resulting (also called residual or unwanted) astigmatism ASR(α,β) are defined.
“Astigmatism” refers to astigmatism generated by the lens, or to residual astigmatism (resulting astigmatism) which corresponds to the difference between the prescribed astigmatism (wearer astigmatism) and the lens-generated astigmatism; in each case, with regards to amplitude or both amplitude and axis.
“Ergorama” is a function associating to each gaze direction a distance of an object point.
Usual ergorama may be defined so that in far vision following the primary gaze direction, the object point is at infinity. In near vision, following a gaze direction essentially corresponding to an angle α of the order of 35 deg and to an angle β of the order of 5 deg in absolute value towards the nasal side, the object distance is of the order of 30 to 50 cm. For more details concerning a possible definition of an ergorama, U.S. Pat. No. 6,318,859 may be considered. This document describes an ergorama, its definition and its modeling method.
Using these elements, it is possible to define a wearer optical power and astigmatism, in each gaze direction. An object point M at an object distance given by the ergorama is considered for a gaze direction (α,β).
An object proximity ProxO is defined for the point M on the corresponding light ray in the object space as the inverse of the distance MJ between point M and point J of the vertex sphere:
ProxO=1/MJ
This enables to calculate the object proximity within a thin lens approximation for all points of the vertex sphere. For a real lens, the object proximity can be considered as the inverse of the distance between the object point and the front surface of the lens, on the corresponding light ray.
For the same gaze direction (α,β), the image of a point M having a given object proximity is formed between two points S and T which correspond respectively to minimal and maximal focal distances (which would be sagittal and tangential focal distances). The quantity Proxl is called image proximity of the point M:
By analogy with the case of a thin lens, it can therefore be defined, for a given gaze direction and for a given object proximity, i.e. for a point of the object space on the corresponding light ray, an optical power PPO as the sum of the image proximity and the object proximity.
PPO=ProxO+Proxl
The optical power is also called refractive power.
With the same notations, an astigmatism AST is defined for every gaze direction and for a given object proximity as:
The resulting astigmatism ASR is defined for every gaze direction through the lens as the difference between the actual astigmatism value AST for this gaze direction and the prescribed astigmatism for the same lens. The residual astigmatism (resulting astigmatism) ASR more precisely corresponds to module of the vectorial difference between actual (AST, AXE) and prescription data (CYLp, AXISp).
When the characterization of the lens is of optical kind, it refers to the ergorama-eye-lens system described above. For simplicity, the term lens' is used in the description but it has to be understood as the ‘ergorama-eye-lens system’. The values in optic terms can be expressed for gaze directions. Conditions suitable to determine of the ergorama-eye-lens system are called in the frame present invention “as-worn conditions”.
In the remainder of the description, terms like «up», «bottom», «horizontal», «vertical», «above», «below», or other words indicating relative position may be used. These terms are to be understood in the wearing conditions of the lens.
Notably, the “upper” part of the lens corresponds to a negative lowering angle α<0 deg and the “lower” part of the lens corresponds to a positive lowering angle α>0 deg.
A “far-vision gaze direction”, referred as FVGD, is defined for a lens, as the vision gaze direction corresponding to the far vision distant reference point and thus (αFV, βFV), where the mean refractive power is substantially equal to the mean prescribed power in far vision, the mean prescribed power being equal to SPHp+(CYLp/2). Within the present disclosure, far-vision is also referred to as distant-vision.
A “near-vision gaze direction”, referred as NVGD, is defined for a lens, as the vision gaze direction corresponding to the near vision (reading) reference point, and thus (αNV,βNV) where the refractive power is substantially equal to the prescribed power in far vision plus the prescribed addition, ADDP.
A “fitting-cross gaze direction”, referred as FCGD, is defined for a lens, as the vision gaze direction corresponding to the fitting cross reference point and thus (αFC, βFC).
The “meridian line”, referred as ML(α,β), of a progressive lens is a line defined from top to bottom of the lens and usually passing through the fitting cross where one can see clearly an object point. Said meridian line is defined on the basis of the repartition of module of resulting astigmatism, ASR, over the (α,β) domain and substantially correspond to the center of the two central iso-module of resulting astigmatism values which value is equal to 0.25 Diopter.
A “mean refractive power error”, referred as PE_P, is defined as the mean refractive power difference between the actual addition brought by the lens and the proximity, at a given point of the object space (α,β,ProxO), according to following equation:
PE_P(α,β,ProxO)=PPO(α,β,ProxO)−(PPO(FV)−ProxFVp)−ProxO
where PPO(FV) is the mean refractive power of the prescription of the wearer according to the far-vision gaze direction, for an object located at a distance corresponding to ProxFVp.
A “relative acuity”, referred as AC %_P, is defined as the result of a function of the mean refractive power error, PE_P, and of the resulting astigmatism, ASR, according to an acuity model, at a given point of the object space (α, β, ProxO); an example of an embodiment of calculation of relative acuity is provided here below.
An “acuity loss”, referred as ACU_P, is defined as a function of the relative acuity at a given point of the object space (α, β, ProxO), according to following equation:
ACU_P(α,β,ProxO)=−log(AC%_P(α,β,ProxO)/100)
where “log” is the logarithm in base 10.
The invention relates to a progressive ophthalmic lens adapted to a wearer in given wearing conditions having an addition greater than or equal to 1 D and smaller than or equal to 4 D, fulfilling an acuity performance criterion.
The progressive ophthalmic lens may be defined by its geometry, in particular the shape of the front and rear surfaces, their relative position and the refractive index of the material of the progressive ophthalmic lens.
The progressive ophthalmic lens being adapted to a wearer, the wearer's prescription is to be considered to define said progressive ophthalmic lens.
The wearing conditions are to be understood as the position of the progressive ophthalmic lens with relation to the eye of a wearer, for example defined by a pantoscopic angle, a Cornea to lens distance, a Pupil-cornea distance, a centre of rotation of the eye (CRE) to pupil distance, a CRE to lens distance and a wrap angle.
The Cornea to lens distance is the distance along the visual axis of the eye in the primary position (usually taken to be the horizontal) between the cornea and the back surface of the lens; for example equal to 12 mm.
The Pupil-cornea distance is the distance along the visual axis of the eye between its pupil and cornea; usually equal to 2 mm.
The CRE to pupil distance is the distance along the visual axis of the eye between its center of rotation (CRE) and cornea; for example equal to 11.5 mm.
The CRE to lens distance is the distance along the visual axis of the eye in the primary position (usually taken to be the horizontal) between the CRE of the eye and the back surface of the lens, for example equal to 25.5 mm.
The pantoscopic angle is the angle in the vertical plane, at the intersection between the back surface of the lens and the visual axis of the eye in the primary position (usually taken to be the horizontal), between the normal to the back surface of the lens and the visual axis of the eye in the primary position; for example equal to −8 deg.
The wrap angle is the angle in the horizontal plane, at the intersection between the back surface of the lens and the visual axis of the eye in the primary position (usually taken to be the horizontal), between the normal to the back surface of the lens and the visual axis of the eye in the primary position, for example equal to 5 deg.
The wearing condition may be customized for a given wearer or may be standard wearing conditions.
An example of standard wearing condition may be defined by a pantoscopic angle of −8 deg, a Cornea to lens distance of 12 mm, a Pupil-cornea distance of 2 mm, a CRE to pupil distance of 11.5 mm, a CRE to lens distance of 25.5 mm and a wrap angle of 5 deg.
The progressive ophthalmic lens according to the invention may have an addition greater than or equal to 1.5 D, for example greater than or equal to 2 D, and smaller than or equal to 2.5 D.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the progressive addition lens may have an addition of 2D.
The progressive ophthalmic lens according to the invention fulfills an acuity performance criterion.
The acuity performance criterion is determined by method of the invention comprising as illustrated on
During the set of distances defining step S1, a set of vision distances comprising at least three different vision distances: at least a first vision distance greater than or equal to 4 m, a second vision distance greater than or equal to 0.6 m and smaller than or equal to 2 m, for example equal to 1 m and a third vision distance smaller than or equal to 0.5 m.
The set of vision distances may comprise further vision distances, for example a vision distance at 2 m and/or a vision distance at 0.6 m.
Each vision distance of the set of vision distances is associated with an acuity loss threshold value.
The acuity loss threshold value corresponds to the maximum value of acuity loss acceptable for a given distance.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the acuity loss threshold value is identical for each distance of the set of vision distances.
Typically, the acuity loss threshold value may correspond to a visual acuity of 0.63 if the best visual acuity was 1.
During the acuity model providing step S2, an acuity model is provided. The acuity model defines acuity loss as a function of lens power and resulting astigmatism.
For each vision distance of the set of vision distances, one needs to determine the acuity loss within a predetermined domain of gaze directions.
The predefined domain of gaze directions may be defined as circle of radius 35 deg centered on α=5 deg and β=0 deg. The predefined domain may be defined by a given frame contour, for example, the predefined domain may be defined as the contour of the intersection between a given spectacle frame contour and said above-mentioned predefined domain of gaze directions.
Preferably the predetermined domain of gaze directions is the same for each vision distance of the set of vision distances.
For each vision distance, the predetermined domain of gaze directions may be spatially sampled, for example with a step of 1 deg in (α, β), the result being a mesh of gaze directions (αi,k, βi,l).
Preferably the sampling is identical for each vision distance of the set of vision distances.
For each gaze direction within the mesh of gaze directions one may trace the ray originating from the CRE in the given direction.
According to the previously indicated definition, one determines for each vision distance of the set of vision distances or the corresponding proximity ProxO and for each gaze direction (α, β) of the mesh of gaze direction, the following features:
if PE_P(α, β, ProxO)<0; and
RPE_P(α,β,ProxO)=PE_P(α,β,ProxO), if PE_P(α,β,ProxO)≥0
During the area determining step, for each vision distance of the set of visions distances an area of gaze directions (expressed in deg2) for which the acuity loss is below the associated acuity loss threshold value, for example 0.15 LogMAR, is determined.
The acuity performance criterion is fulfilled if for each vision distance of the set of at least three vision distances, the area of gaze directions determined during the area determining step is greater than or equal to the acuity area threshold value corresponding to said distance.
Each vision distance may have a different acuity area threshold value defined in term of area of gaze directions.
For example, the acuity area threshold values may be:
According to a preferred embodiment, the acuity area threshold value for each vision distance is determined based on the addition of the progressive ophthalmic lens by interpolation between the values:
According to an embodiment of the invention, the acuity area threshold value of the first vision distance may be defined by interpolation between the values:
According to an embodiment of the invention, the acuity area threshold value of the second vision distance defined by interpolation between the values:
According to an embodiment of the invention, the acuity area threshold value of the third vision distance defined by interpolation between the values:
According to an embodiment of the invention, the set of vision distances further comprises a vision distance at 2 m and the acuity area threshold value of the said vision distance is defined by interpolation between the values:
According to an embodiment of the invention, the acuity area threshold value of the 2 m vision distance is defined by interpolation between the values:
According to an embodiment of the invention, the set of vision distances further comprises a vision distance at 60 cm and the acuity area threshold of the said vision distance being defined by interpolation between the values:
According to an embodiment of the invention, the acuity area threshold value of the 60 cm vision distance is defined by interpolation between the values:
The invention further relates to a method, for example implemented by computer means, for determining if a progressive ophthalmic lens fulfills an acuity criterion, said progressive ophthalmic lens being delimited by a contour, adapted for a wearer with a given prescription and given wearing conditions and having an addition greater than or equal to 1D and smaller than or equal to 4D.
The method comprises the steps of:
The acuity model and calculations implemented for the method of the invention are as described previously.
The invention further relates to a method, for example implemented by computer means, of determining a progressive ophthalmic lens delimited by a contour, adapted for a wearer with a given prescription and given wearing conditions, said method comprising a step of determining if the determined progressive ophthalmic lens fulfills an acuity criterion according to the method of the invention.
Determining a progressive ophthalmic lens according to said method may comprise selecting in a predefined list of progressive ophthalmic lens, a progressive ophthalmic lens delimited by a contour, adapted for a wearer with a given prescription and given wearing conditions that fulfills the acuity criterion.
Determining a progressive ophthalmic lens according to said method may comprise calculating a progressive ophthalmic lens delimited by a contour, adapted for a wearer with a given prescription and given wearing conditions so as to fulfill the acuity criterion.
Calculating a progressive ophthalmic lens typically comprises an optimization step implementing a plurality of targets, said targets comprising at least the prescription of the wearer and the acuity criterion.
The optimization step can be performed by using optimization algorithms.
These methods are known by the one skilled in the art, for example in the publication “Application of optimization in computer-aided ophthalmic lens design” (P. Allione, F. Ahsbahs and G. Le Saux, in SPI E Vol. 3737, EUROPTO Conference on Design and Engineering of Optical Systems, Berlin, May 1999), which is incorporated by reference in the present document.
The inventors have compared a progressive ophthalmic lens according to the invention with a prior art progressive ophthalmic lens. Both progressive ophthalmic lenses fulfill following prescribed features:
Both progressive ophthalmic lenses have been determined over a contour that delimits the gaze direction field and said contour is defined as a circle of radius 35 deg centered on α=5 deg and β=0 deg.
Both progressive ophthalmic lenses are considered in the following wearing conditions:
Calculations are performed in the monocular eye referential as here above explained when discussing
Both progressive ophthalmic lenses have a thickness at the prism reference point as defined in ISO 89-80-22004, of 1.4 mm and a prism at the said prism reference point of ⅔ of the addition and oriented base down.
The progressive ophthalmic lens of the invention has a front base of 2.75 D at the far vision control point based on a reference refractive index of 1.53.
The progressive ophthalmic lens of the prior art has a front base of 3.75 D at the far vision control point based on a reference refractive index of 1.53.
Both progressive ophthalmic lenses have a refractive index of 1.665.
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power curve on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The mean refractive power repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The module of resulting astigmatism repartition on
The areas of gaze direction for which the acuity loss is below 0.15 LogMAR have been determined for five different vision distances for the prior ophthalmic lens illustrated on
The areas of gaze directions represented on
The areas of gaze directions represented on
The areas of gaze directions represented on
The areas of gaze directions represented on
The areas of gaze directions represented on
As illustrated on
Furthermore, the progressive ophthalmic lens according to the invention provides a more balanced distribution of acuity between the far vision distance, i.e. greater than or equal to 4 m, intermediate vision distances, i.e. greater than or equal to 0.6 m and smaller than or greater than 2 m and near vision distances, i.e. smaller than or equal to 0.5 m than the prior art progressive ophthalmic lenses.
The invention has been described above with the aid of embodiments without limitation of the general inventive concept.
Many further modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon making reference to the foregoing illustrative embodiments, which are given by way of example only and which are not intended to limit the scope of the invention, that being determined solely by the appended claims.
In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. The mere fact that different features are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these features cannot be advantageously used. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18306787 | Dec 2018 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2019/086346 | 12/19/2019 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2020/127763 | 6/25/2020 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5719658 | Ahsbahs et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5861935 | Morris et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5949519 | Le Saux et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6074062 | Morris et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 20130050637 | Roffman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20150355480 | Contet et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20170108710 | Guilloux et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170108712 | Guilloux | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20180307059 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180307060 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 103748505 | Apr 2014 | CN |
| 104995549 | Oct 2015 | CN |
| 2 733 328 | Oct 1996 | FR |
| WO 2015173379 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015173381 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued on Mar. 10, 2020 in PCT/EP2019/086346 filed on Dec. 19, 2019. |
| Combined Chinese Office Action and Search Report issued Sep. 21, 2022 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201980075589.2 (with unedited computer generated English Translation), 18 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220004027 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
