1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a projectile fuze in which the time of flight (T) can be programmed, having a timer/counter which counts up to the programmed time of flight (T)—minus a defined time value (Δt)—and then charges an electrical firing circuit. A mechanical safety and arming unit switches the firing circuit, which has an electrical detonator, a firing needle, a piercing detonator and a booster charge, to an armed position after a specific time interval. The projectile fuze, for example, may be used as a mortar fuze.
2. Discussion of the Prior Art
Projectile fuzes are known which possess a so-called overflight safety. Such an overflight safety has been introduced in the form of an electrical solution, for example, for a fuze with the type designation ANNZ DM 74. This known overflight safety is used to make the projectile fuze resistant to jamming attempts and/or to spoofing attempts by an enemy, and against rarely occurring influences, both external and internal, over a relatively long section of the projectile trajectory. The so-called trajectory decomposition rate for known projectile fuzes such as these is less than 10−6. This means that a projectile fitted with a projectile fuze such as this can now even be used over one's own troops. This applies, for example, to exercises using projectiles which are equipped with projectile fuzes such as these.
Electrical overflight safety such as described is achieved by programming, that is to say feeding the time of flight of the projectile into the fuze electronics by means of an external programmer. Once the projectile has been fired, a timer/counter is started, which counts up to the programmed time of flight—minus a defined time value—and then charges an electrical firing circuit for the fuze electronics. The time required to charge the firing circuit in this manner is in the region of milliseconds, so that the projectile fuze is ready to fire in good time at the predetermined target.
However, in the case of the known projectile fazes of the type mentioned above, the safety and arming unit is designed such that, even after a time interval which is very short in comparison to the overall trajectory, the mechanical interruption in the firing chain is removed, that is to say the so-called safe separation distance is comparatively short.
Accordingly, in view of the foregoing, the invention is based on the object of providing a projectile fuze of the type mentioned initially, which has a programmable electrical and mechanical overflight safety and a comparatively long safe separation distance.
According to the invention, this object is achieved in that the fuze is provided with a pyrotechnic force element, which is interconnected with the fuze electronics and mechanically blocks a safety and arming unit until there is reached the time of flight (T) minus the predetermined time value (Δt), after which the firing circuit is charged and the safety and arming unit is unlocked to the armed position by initiation of a force element.
Preferred refinements and developments of the projectile fuze according to the invention are set forth in the dependent claims.
In the case of the projectile fuze according to the invention, the safety and arming unit is blocked by a pyrotechnic force element, that is, in effect, it is held firmly in the safe position, until the time of flight which has been programmed, or else if necessary, has been set manually—minus a defined time value (overflight safety)—is reached. Once the selected time of flight minus the defined time value has been reached, then the firing circuit for the force element is charged, and the safety and arming unit is unlocked by initiation of the force element. The safety and arming unit then moves to the armed position, that is, the interruption is removed from the firing chain, and the firing chain is then in-line. The actual firing circuit of the projectile fuze according to the invention is now charged, so that the fuze is ready to fire in good time at the intended target.
Further details, features and advantages will become evident from the following description of two exemplary embodiments, which are illustrated in the drawings, of the projectile fuze according to the invention; and wherein:
In an illustration similar to
The safety and arming unit 16 has a rotor 18 with a fuze needle 20 and with a piercing detonator 22. The fuze needle 20 and the piercing detonator 22 are axially aligned with one another, and are at a distance from one another.
The projectile fuze 12 has an electrical detonator 24 which is interconnected with the fuze electronics.
The projectile fuze 12 also has a booster charge 26, which is associated with the electrical detonator 24. The rotor 18 is provided between the electrical detonator 24 and the booster charge 26.
While in the safe position as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 046 811 | Oct 2006 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3451340 | Batou | Jun 1969 | A |
4145971 | Graham et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4334475 | Turchi | Jun 1982 | A |
5063847 | Halssig et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5693906 | Van Sloun | Dec 1997 | A |
6463855 | Zehnder et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6883434 | Kienzler et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20010017090 | Zehnder et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20040144278 | Kienzler et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144279 | Glatthaar et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060260499 | Westphal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070051266 | Zinell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200 23 637 | Sep 2000 | DE |
101 33 832 | Jul 2001 | DE |
1 225 418 | Jul 2002 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080078299 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |