The invention relates generally to a projectile which is to be propelled through air, and more particularly to such a projectile specially constructed for lateral expansion upon impact.
Light ammunition used by police and other civil authorities, and by citizens for self-protection, are intended to stop a possible attacker in a face to face engagement, producing as much stopping power and as little injury as possible. Killing or seriously wounding the attacker is a side effect of the attempt to stop and is not normally the intended objective.
Less than lethal alternatives to conventional light firearm ammunition include the so-called rubber/baton bullets and conducted electrical weapons like those marketed under the Taser® brand. Neither of these alternatives fully address the requirements of a typical law enforcement officer firefight scenario of near total darkness, 3 seconds warning or less, an engagement range of 3 to 20 feet, ability to penetrate an automobile windshield without significant loss of stopping power, and a broad requirement to take the targeted individual authoritatively out of the fight on the first shot with the lowest possible likelihood of fatality.
Maximum stopping power against soft targets such as humans is achieved through the creation of a large, disablingly painful, but shallow skin wound that is unlikely to be fatal, and which results from the efficient transfer of the projectile's (i.e., bullet's) kinetic energy to the attacker with maximum surface wound area and minimal penetration.
Despite the known advantages of energy transfer and limited penetration, the use of expanding and/or fragmenting designs in conventional light ammunition has not been widely adopted in law enforcement. One reason is that, at times, a projectile will be needed to penetrate an intermediate obstruction such as automotive glass, plastic, and metal in order to stop a would-be attacker, for example, in cases where an attacker is inside a motor vehicle. A traditional expanding/fragmenting projectile is not desirable in these situations, because most of all of the projectile energy would be dissipated on the obstruction; the projectile would not pass through to stop the driver.
The prior art has exhibited a long-felt desire to construct a projectile capable of adaptive expansion characteristics, but the dream remains elusive. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,136,616 to Schirneker discloses a projectile that can be manually configured prior to firing so that the front end of the projectile spreads out so that its diameter is increased for when it strikes against a soft material such as a human body. If, on the other hand, the projectile is expected to first strike a harder object, for example a sheet metal wall, the projectile can be manually configured prior firing so that it will not spread and instead pass through the metal. A primary disadvantage of U.S. Pat. No. 4,136,616 is that it is totally ill-suited for use in law enforcement scenarios where the peace officer would be required to make the adjustment in near total darkness, with 3 seconds warning or less, in order to strike an assailant 3 to 20 feet away, and with at best imperfect information about the target details. Under life-or-death conditions, it is unrealistic to expect the operator to adjust the projectile before firing.
Another example may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 1,134,797 to Wood. This patent describes an expanding bullet which, on striking the skin of the game or other object, due to the resistance encountered, the head of the bullet will be suddenly checked in its velocity, and the momentum of the body will cause the same to be driven forward on the conical body of the expanding core to thereby force the same forwardly. As the bullet proceeds through the soft tissues, its head will be expanded in proportion to the resistance offered and will consequently result in the further and proportional expansion of the body. This design maximizes rather than minimizes internal tissue damage, and neither maximizes shallow wounds nor selectively penetrates auto windshields or other hard targets.
A still further example is depicted in US Publication No. 2015/0308800 to Schnabel. This patent document offers a highly schematic/superficial description of a multi-part expanding projectile.
Despite these numerous attempts to perfect the concept of an expanding projectile, none as yet have been successful to satisfy the needs of the law enforcement community nor of self-defense interest groups, both of whom are mindful that most confrontational situations that would provoke them to unholster a firearm and aim at threatening human being will arise in near total darkness, with 3 seconds warning or less, and the assailant will be located 3 to 20 feet away.
According to one aspect of this invention, a projectile is provided of the type to be propelled through air. The projectile is specially constructed for lateral expansion only upon impact with a sufficiently soft target. The projectile comprises an annular submunitions array comprised of a plurality of discrete submunition elements. Each submunition element has an interior wedge surface defined by a portion of an interior funnel shape. A spreader is operatively disposed within the submunitions array. The spreader has a flared ramp that is adapted to engage the interior wedge surfaces of the submunitions. A ballistic penetrator is operatively disposed over the spreader. A pressure-sensitive link is disposed between the ballistic penetrator and the spreader. The pressure-sensitive link is responsive to a predetermined threshold impact force so as to disable the spreader when the impact force on the ballistic penetrator is above the predetermined threshold and thereby inhibit lateral expansion of the submunitions array.
The pressure-sensitive link facilitates the long-desired attribute of a projectile that capable of elective expansion characteristics. In particulate, the pressure-sensitive link does not disable the spreader when sufficiently soft targets are impacted, thus allowing the spreader to deploy the submunition elements. However, when the projectile strikes a hard object, such as an obstacle located in front of an assailant, the pressure-sensitive link reacts by disabling the spreader. As a direct result, the submunition elements are not deployed, allowing the projectile to maintain an essentially unitary or monolithic character with mass and penetrating power to pass through the obstruction along its continued trajectory toward the assailant.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become more readily appreciated when considered in connection with the following detailed description and appended drawings, wherein:
Referring to the figures, wherein like numerals indicate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views, a projectile according to one embodiment of the present invention is generally shown at 10. The projectile 10 is intended for small arms fire, also known as light firearm ammunition. In
In these broader contexts, it is intended that the projectile 10 of this invention be understood to comprise any bullet-like or pellet-like element for use in firearms to be propelled by any means through the air at a target. And more particularly, as will be explained in detail, the projectile 10 is specially constructed for rapid and substantial lateral expansion upon impact with a sufficiently soft target (like a human body) but to resist expansion upon impact with a sufficiently hard intermediate obstruction (like glass or sheet metal). By rapidly expanding upon impact with a sufficiently soft target like a human body, the depth of penetration will be minimized and the transfer of energy to a wide, shallow area of the target will be maximized. In contrast, by resisting expansion upon impact with a sufficiently hard intermediate obstruction like a vehicular windshield, penetration will be maximized and the transfer of energy to the target will be minimized thus facilitating pass-through to an ultimate target further along the trajectory.
Turning now to
A submunitions array is disposed upon the platform 22 of the base 16, encircling the guide 18. The submunitions array is comprised of a plurality of discrete submunition elements 26 arranged like sectors of a circle or wedge slices of a tangerine fruit around the base 16. The number of submunitions elements 26 within the array is variable. The illustrated examples variously show seven, eight and/or nine discrete submunition elements 26. However, the projectile 10 may be designed with as few as two submunitions elements 26 or as many as desired. To facilitate emergency care, it may be desirable to configure the array with a logical number of submunition elements 26, for example eight pieces. Submunitions arrays comprised of four-to-twelve discrete submunition elements 26 are generally considered adequate for most foreseeable applications. The submunition elements 26 may be made from any suitable material, including but not limited to alloys of tungsten, copper, steel and other materials both metallic and non-metallic.
Each submunition element 26 has a foot 28 disposed in direct surface contact with the platform 22. The foot 28 may be optimally shaped with a rounded outer corner matched, or generally matched, to the curvature of the annular fillet 24 so as to loosely form a pivoting joint. That is to say, the annular fillet 24 may be designed to function something like a pad or knuckle in pressing contact with the foot 28 of each submunition element 26 to encourage each submunition element 26 to individually pivot when forced to fan out like flower petals as depicted in
Returning to the cross-sectional view of
Each submunition element 26 has a back surface 36 that extends upwardly from the rounded outer corner of the foot 28. As perhaps best seen in
Returning once again to
The interlock portion 38 is designed to have a predetermined positive geometric shape. The predetermined positive geometric shape can take many different forms, the details of which are largely subject to designer's choice. In the illustrated examples, the positive geometric shape of the interlock portion 38 is depicted as a simple convex curvature. When all of the submunition elements 26 are arranged in the array, the combined interlock portions 38 form a semi-spherical shape. As said, however, in practice a great many geometric variations are possible. For example, in another contemplated embodiment (not shown), the positive geometric shape of the interlock portion 38 takes the form of a terraced or stair-stepped configuration. In yet another contemplated example (also not shown), the positive geometric shape of the interlock portion 38 takes the form of one or more grooves and/or ridges. Indeed, many geometric shaped are possible provided there is at least one outwardly-facing surface against which pressure can be applied to resist the submunition element 26 from being allowed to fan out like flower petals.
As perhaps best seen by alternately comparing
A spreader 44 is positioned centrally within, or otherwise poised to engage, the submunitions array. The lower end of the spreader 44 may be configured as a shaft 46 that is received inside the socket of the guide 18 with sufficient running clearance to enable smooth axial sliding movement therebetween. In other words, the shaft 46 of the spreader 44 fits inside the socket 20 of the guide 18 with sufficient clearance/tolerance so that the spreader 44 is constrained laterally but is free to move axially. The upper locator surfaces 32 of the submunition elements 26 are configured to rest against the shaft 46, as shown in
Optionally, the projectile 10 may be designed to include a vent 50 to allow the escape of air or other gas or filler medium from the socket 20 when the shaft 46 of the spreader 44 descends. The vent 50 is shown in
The nose of the projectile 10 comprises a ballistic penetrator 52. The ballistic penetrator 52 is operatively disposed over the spreader 44, as shown in
For convenience, the underside of the ballistic penetrator 52, i.e., opposite the leading face, may be designated the sheltered face 54. At least a portion of the sheltered face 54 will have a predetermined negative geometric shape that compliments the positive geometric shape of the interlock portions 38. Or said another way, a mating or nested or somewhat puzzle-piece like fit is established between the sheltered face 54 and the interlock portions 38 of the submunitions array, especially adjacent the outside edge of the ballistic penetrator 52. In the illustrated examples where the interlock portions 38 are convexly curved, the negative geometric shape of the sheltered face 54 will be defined by a concave curvature so that the parts have the ability to matingly engage. In the other mentioned examples of positive geometric shapes for the interlock portions 38 in the forms of terraces, stair-steps, grooves and ridges, the sheltered face 54 will take an adaptive configuration so that when (if) the ballistic penetrator 52 is brought into direct contact with the submunitions array, a tight nesting fit will be established. And more preferably still, the nesting fit may actually apply a radially inward force on the submunition elements 52 so that they are more tightly compressed together by the impact forces.
The sheltered face 54 of the ballistic penetrator 52 may be fitted with a centrally located ram 56. The ram 56 directly opposes the anvil 48 of the spreader 44. And, like the anvil 48, the ram 56 may also be configured like a plateau having a generally circular shape. In other contemplated embodiments, one or both of the anvil 48 and ram 56 are formed as depressions.
The adaptive qualities of the projectile 10 are enabled by at least one pressure-sensitive link 58 operatively disposed between the ballistic penetrator 52 and the spreader 44. In the illustrated examples, a single pressure-sensitive link 58 extends between the ram 56 and the anvil 48 like a cylindrical bridge or column that physically couples the ballistic penetrator 52 to the spreader 44 so that impact forces visited upon the ballistic penetrator 52 are directly transmitted to the spreader 44. As stated previously, one or both of the anvil 48 and ram 56 may alternatively be formed as depressions that offer self-centering benefits for the pressure-sensitive link 58.
In other contemplated embodiments the pressure-sensitive link 58 can take the form of one or more shear pins or springs or other frangible elements. Regardless of the specific design implementation, it is expected that impact forces up to a predetermined threshold will result in concerted movement of the ballistic penetrator 52 and spreader 44 as a unitary structure. That is to say, impact forces below the predetermined threshold will cause in the spreader 44 to move (axially) with the ballistic penetrator 52 in a 1:1 ratio.
The predetermined threshold can be controlled at the time of design by varying the compositional and/or dimensional attributes of the pressure-sensitive link 58. However, in most contemplated applications the predetermined threshold will be chosen to correspond to the average impact force generated through the deceleration of the projectile 10 in flesh or ballistic gelatin, possibly with a layer of material resembling common outer garments such as a jacket or sweater, for a given diameter, mass and velocity of the projectile 10. And, the predetermined threshold must be high enough to survive the anticipated G-forces at firing. As an example, assuming a projectile 10 configured to be fired from a standard 9 mm handgun (i.e., a 9×19P round), with a weight in the range of about 115-124 grains, traveling at a velocity in the neighborhood of ˜900-1300 ft/sec, the deceleration to be expected upon impact with flesh or ballistic gelatin may be about 30,000 Gs. The Gs experienced upon firing in this example, can be estimated about 50,000 Gs.
The predetermined threshold impact force for an adaptive projectile 10 configured for this application must therefore be reliably greater than 50,000 Gs (i.e., the greater of firing acceleration and soft impact deceleration) so there is little-to-no risk of exceeding the predetermined threshold when impacting a soft target. It may, in this circumstance, be desirable to design the pressure-sensitive link 58 so that its predetermined threshold impact force is reached at deceleration rates in the range of about 60,000-90,000 Gs (i.e., 2-3 times the actual expected deceleration rate in flesh). This safety factor will account for thick clothing or outer garments worn by the target attacker.
A generally cylindrical jacket 60 encloses the submunitions array and the spreader 44 to retain all of the components of the projectile 10 together in a tight pack. The jacket 60 is preferably friction-fit or crimped about the circular periphery of the base 16 and also friction-fit or crimped about the outer edge of the ballistic penetrator 52. In some contemplated designs, the jacket is seated on a ledge formed about the outer periphery of the base 16 to provide better structural integrity. The jacket 60 is preferably fabricated from a malleable metallic material, such as copper, to readily interact with the rifling in the barrel of a firearm from which it may be fired. An uppermost edge of the jacket 60, adjacent the ballistic penetrator 52, is preferably rounded or chamfered to eliminate a bur and facilitate transit through the firearm barrel. As shown in
Naturally, the design and composition of the pressure-sensitive link 58 is critical to proper operation of the projectile 10. As one example, the pressure-sensitive link 58 is fashioned in the form of a cylindrical column and fabricated from a material having a shatter strength of the order of 350,000 psi. More generally, the pressure-sensitive link 58 may be designed to achieve fracturing parameters between 320,000 psi and 400,000 psi, where the parameter is driven by the dimensions of the pressure-sensitive link. Certain spinel crystal structures have been found to satisfy these design criteria, including but not limited to Aluminum Oxynitride [ALON] spinels marketed by Surmet Corporation, which have compressive strengths of 2.68 GPa [≈389,000 psi].
Materials other than crystallographic spinels may also be found suitable for the pressure-sensitive link 58, provided they exhibit a shattering behavior and dimensional compatibility with the applicable bullet geometries and force magnitudes. Such alternatives may include synthetic spinel, sapphire, corundum, the multiple carbide and nitride families, as well as some exotic materials. Use of a non-metallic material for the pressure-sensitive link 58 may be considered preferable to ensure near-instantaneous decoupling of the ballistic penetrator 52 from the spreader 44, so that the submunition elements 26 might have zero radial force transmitted to them.
As stated, the anvil 48 and ram 56 could easily be configured so that the interconnecting pressure-sensitive link 58 operates in shear mode rather than compression. Shear pins are well-known for use to prevent a mechanical device from operating before the criteria for operation are met. Shear pins are typically cheap, easy to produce, maintenance-free and can remain ready for operation for years with little to no decrease in reliability.
In order to encourage ready adoption by relevant law enforcement and self-defense communities, it is desirable that the projectile 10 be designed to exhibit aerodynamics, moment of inertia, total mass, and center of gravity closely matching those of the common commercial rounds to be replaced. For handgun applications, these will naturally include the 9 mm, 38 Special/.357 Magnum, 40 cal. and 45 cal. Close matching of specifications for comparable commercial rounds will enable range practice with regular commercial loads. Use of ammunition fitted with the projectile 10 can be limited to on-the-job use in cases of actual assailant situations.
The premise behind the efficacy of the projectile 10 is that in some situations stopping an assailant can be accomplished by producing a large (˜1 ft2.) surface wound using multiple submunition elements 26 originally constituted as a unitary bullet. Upon impact with a soft target 62, the submunitions 62 fly away from one another at as close to a 90-degree angle to the initial trajectory as possible. Preferably, but not necessarily, the submunitions 62 projectiles are dense, non-toxic, non-fragmenting, easy to see with X-rays during medical treatment, not excessively sharp (to protect medical personnel) and occur in a logical number, for example eight pieces, to facilitate emergency care. The wounds they produce should be as painful as possible, in order to stop a would-be attacker with a single shot, if possible, but should not penetrate deeply enough to damage bone, internal organs, nerves, or critical blood vessels.
Stopping an assailant situated behind an obstruction is a different matter altogether. These types of situations require that the projectile 10 remain intact as it passes through the obstruction and continue its trajectory to reach the assailant. For example, the assailant may be in the act of piloting a motor vehicle in a threatening manner, and the obstruction could be the glass windshield or door glass 64, sheet metal and/or plastic door of the vehicle or its roof, etc. Such shots through obstructions may necessarily and unfortunately result in lethal impact to the assailant.
To summarize the foregoing, the invention is a projectile 10 that is specially constructed for lateral expansion upon impact with soft targets such as humans 62. But the projectile 10 is adaptive in that the lateral expansion depends on the hardness of the target in a way that is nominally the reverse of the simple behavior of common experience, in which the fractionation behavior of a projectile increases as impact force increases, rather than decreases. When impacting a relatively hard object, like a windshield 64 or sheet metal, the projectile 10 along with its submunition elements 26 retain a unitary geometry for maximum penetration. Penetration against hard objects is achieved through the use of a pressure sensitive-link 58 that structurally fails upon hard object impact, along with a ballistic penetrator nose cone 52 that slides backward as a part of the behavior of the pressure-sensitive link 58 and thereby retain the submunition elements 26 in a unitary bundle behind said nose cone. The result is a conventional ballistic penetrator that behaves in a conventional manner against a windshield 64 or other similar hard obstruction. In such cases, no lethality protection is afforded to a human target, and the projectile 10 responds to that human target in a conventional manner.
The adaptive projectile 10 includes a flat base 16 with a small, hollow cylinder (guide 18) attached to its top at its center. The role of the guide 18 is to stabilize a spreader 44, by allowing the spreader 44 to slide within the socket 20 of the guide 18. Surrounding the guide 18 are the plurality of rigid, preformed submunition elements 26. To envision their shape, it could be useful to imagine a soft, foam rubber children's football. The football is cut in half across its midsection, and a hole is drilled into it from both the top and the bottom, meeting in the middle. The bottom hole is cylindrical and sized to accommodate the outer cylinder part of the guide 18, and the top hole is smaller, but expands near the top, so that the hole itself resembles a golf tee or a small kitchen funnel in cross section. The resulting shape is sliced into identical (or regular alternating) pieces, from top to bottom, not unlike the identical pieces of a tangerine. Each piece is referred to as a submunition element 26. In one embodiment, the submunition elements 26 are made of tungsten, an extremely hard, tough, dense, x-ray opaque, nontoxic metal with specific gravity of 19.3.
Inserted into the upper hole between the centers of the submunition elements 26 is the spreader 44. The spreader 44 may be said to somewhat resemble a golf tee in cross section. Thus, its shape resembles the void in the submunitions array into which it is inserted.
Atop the entire assembly is the armor piercing penetrator 52, shaped somewhat like a bell or an umbrella in cross section, although the exact geometry of its upper surface could vary, depending on specific armor piercing requirements that might evolve. The interior diameter of the ballistic penetrator 52 is large enough to allow it to slip over the common tops (i.e., interlock portions 38) of the submunition elements 26.
The ballistic penetrator 52 is attached to the spreader 44 with a narrow pressure-sensitive link 58, made of a brittle material strong enough not to break during the forces encountered during firing and impact with a soft target, such as body tissue or clothing, but that would shatter during impact with a hard obstruction such as automotive glass.
The entire assembly is enclosed by a jacket 60 made of soft metal, for example, brass, allowing the assembly to conform to barrel rifling, and also holding it together until impact in the face of aerodynamic and centrifugal forces. The jacket 60 may or may not be scored to assist in fractionation or tearing as described below.
The projectile 10 is considered adaptive because it has two reactive modes of operation: soft target and hard obstacle. The projectile 10 is designed to react to hard obstacles differently than to soft targets. These terms are relative, where the term “soft target” refers to the human body, with or without normal layers of clothing, and where the term hard obstruction/obstacle refers to hard mechanical items such as automotive window glass, sheet metal, and possibly harder plastics.
In reacting to a soft target impact, the ballistic penetrator 52, the pressure-sensitive link 58, and the spreader 44 are pushed downward as a single unit, moving into the void inside the socket 20 on the base 16, which stabilizes the downward motion of the spreader 44 and prevents it from any motion other than straight downward. After traversing the optional void, which may be of zero volume or, if of non-zero volume may be filled with air or with either a lubricating material or other material with other useful properties, the lower surface of the spreader 44 contacts the wedge surface 40 of the plurality of single submunition elements 26. This contact occurs essentially simultaneously for all single submunition elements 26.
The impact of the spreader 44 causes the submunition elements 26 to individually rotate outward about their outside bottom corners (feet 28), constrained by the annular fillet 24. The jacket 60, which is very thin, deforms outward or begins to tear apart, potentially assisted by scoring. Further downward motion of the rigid combination of the ballistic penetrator 52, the pressure-sensitive link 58 and the spreader 44 may optionally cause the edge of bell-like ballistic penetrator 52 to further force the submunition elements 26 to individually rotate outward. The submunition elements 26 continue to rotate outward until the spreader 44 touches the bottom of the socket 20. At this time the submunition elements 26 have a mostly outward radial trajectory, having absorbed a significant portion of the total kinetic energy of the submunition element 26 as impact began. This causes them to fly sideways, potentially inducing significant, painful skin damage, but very little or no internal damage, since their trajectory at this time is largely radial.
The combination of the ballistic penetrator 52, the pressure-sensitive link 58, the spreader 44, the base 16 and the jacket 60 continue forward, but the expansion of the jacket 60 along with the loss of mass from the radial deployment of the submunition elements 26, greatly slows down this combination, resulting in very little kinetic energy being deposited into the body, very limited penetration, and very low likelihood of significant internal injuries. The non-toxic composition of the components, along with the extremely hard, tough materials used and the absence of sharp edges, as well as the x-ray opacity, causes the components to remain intact for simpler medical treatment.
In situations where the projectile 10 first encounters a hard obstacle, the ballistic penetrator 52 strikes with sufficient energy so as to cause the pressure-sensitive link 58, made of a brittle material with an appropriately chosen fracturing strength, a shear pin assembly, or other similar mechanism, to shatter without transferring appreciable kinetic energy to the spreader 44. The ballistic penetrator 52 descends onto the tops of the plurality of submunition elements 26 nearly simultaneously, causing the lower edge of the ballistic penetrator 52 to encircle the tops of the submunition elements 264, constraining them to remain together. The jacket 60 stays largely intact, since there exists no significant outward force to cause it to fracture. The now essentially unitary/monolithic projectile 10 continues, behaving as a hard, armor piercing bullet that will penetrate items of interest to police officers, including glass 64, modest thicknesses of metal, and most plastics.
The foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards, thus the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art and fall within the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority to Provisional Patent Application No. 62/680,807 filed Jun. 5, 2018, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and relied upon.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2019/035579 | 6/5/2019 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/236704 | 12/12/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
451088 | Tunnigliff | Apr 1891 | A |
854923 | Broad | May 1907 | A |
949028 | Ross | Feb 1910 | A |
1023469 | Haslett | Apr 1912 | A |
1134797 | Wood | Apr 1915 | A |
1322662 | Watson | Nov 1919 | A |
1512026 | Holden | Oct 1924 | A |
1556160 | Riggs | Oct 1925 | A |
3427976 | Lucy | Feb 1969 | A |
3941059 | Cobb | Mar 1976 | A |
4044685 | Avcin | Aug 1977 | A |
4136616 | Schirneker | Jan 1979 | A |
4175492 | Brede et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4245557 | Knappworst et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4655140 | Schirneker | Apr 1987 | A |
4665827 | Ellis, II | May 1987 | A |
4685397 | Schirneker | Aug 1987 | A |
5160805 | Winter | Nov 1992 | A |
5198616 | Anderson | Mar 1993 | A |
5454325 | LeBlanc | Oct 1995 | A |
6024021 | Schultz | Feb 2000 | A |
6148731 | Winter | Nov 2000 | A |
6655295 | Baumgartner et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6971315 | Knappworst et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7299750 | Schikora et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7360491 | Sanborn | Apr 2008 | B2 |
8171852 | Rebar | May 2012 | B1 |
8186277 | King | May 2012 | B1 |
8438767 | Rebar | May 2013 | B2 |
9255775 | Rubin | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9631910 | Fricke | Apr 2017 | B2 |
10443990 | Yadon | Oct 2019 | B2 |
20060124022 | Eberhart et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070131131 | Stock et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080223246 | Dindl | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080314280 | Martini Filho | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100224093 | Wilhelm et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20150308800 | Schnabel | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160202031 | Rumfitt et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160223307 | Bray | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170299358 | Miller et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4403725 | Aug 1994 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210223014 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62680807 | Jun 2018 | US |