The present invention relates to underwater projectiles.
Underwater gun systems are being developed for naval warfare. These systems often use an energetic propellant to launch a projectile from a launch tube. A challenge to the development of effective underwater guns is that a projectile traveling through water experiences a resistance or drag that is approximately one thousand times greater than the resistance experienced by the projectile traveling through air. As a consequence of this high level of drag, conventional underwater projectiles are limited to speeds of no more than about 80 kilometers/hour (km/h).
The high resistance presented by the water medium can be addressed via a phenomenon known as “supercavitation.” This phenomenon can occur when a projectile having a blunt nose travels at sufficiently high speeds under water. The blunt nose pushes aside water as the projectile advances. When the hydrodynamic pressure of water that is pushed aside overcomes the ambient static pressure, water vaporizes. The vaporized water forms air bubbles, which coalesce to form a “cavity” in the water. If enough bubbles are formed, the cavity will be large enough to completely engulf the projectile, with the exception of the blunt tip of the nose. This characterizes the supercavitating mode of operation, which is also referred to as “cavity-running” operation).
Within the vaporous cavity, the projectile is effectively traveling through air rather than water. The projectile, therefore, experiences greatly reduced drag. As a consequence, the projectile is capable of attaining a velocity far in excess of what is possible when traveling through water proper.
Supercavitating projectiles often collide with the walls of the enveloping cavity, which increases drag. This can be addressed by equipping the projectile with fins. When a fin contacts the cavity wall, a torque develops that steers the projectile toward the center of the cavity into a region of lower drag.
The fins are usually located in the aft section of the projectile body and project radially outward therefrom. The radially-extending fins prevent the projectile from being tightly packaged within a launch tube. This drawback is addressed by coupling the projectile to a sabot, which is a carrier that centers the projectile within the launch tube and falls off after launch. Use of a sabot disadvantageously increases the amount of energetic propellant required for launch and also requires an increase in launcher size. A need therefore exists for an improved supercavitating projectile that retains the in-cavity stability of known fin designs but does not require a sabot for launch.
Some embodiments of the present invention provide an improved design for an underwater projectile that is capable of operating in a supercavitating mode.
In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, a fin is pivotally coupled to the cylindrical body of the projectile. This pivotal coupling enables the fin to either (1) stow itself within a recess at the surface of the projectile or (2) deploy to a radially-extended position.
When stowed, substantially no portion of the fin protrudes beyond the circumference of the body of the projectile. In this stowed state, the projectile can be packaged inside of a launch tube or barrel without the use of a sabot. Furthermore, the fin is disposed forward of the aft end of the projectile of the booster base of the projectile. This enables multiple such projectiles to be “stacked” nose to tail within a barrel, such as in a stacked launcher configuration disclosed in U.S. Published Patent Application 2008/0022879, which is incorporated by reference herein. In this fashion, the projectile can be launched using an energetic propellant disposed within the launch tube (as per the referenced published patent application) or within the projectile.
Upon launch, the projectile enters the water and travels through it until a vaporous cavity is formed. In some embodiments, the water drag experienced by the projectile immediately following launch causes the fins to pivot to the deployed position. In some other embodiments, deployment via water drag is supplemented by a spring-biasing element that is used to initiate pivoting of the fins.
Once deployed, the fins operate in substantially the same manner as fixed-fin designs known in the prior art. In particular, the fins function as a control surface, interacting with the wall of the cavity in which the projectile travels. Contact with the cavity wall imparts sufficient torque to urge the projectile back toward the center of the cavity.
The following terms are defined for use in the description and the appended claims as follows:
Blunt forward end 104 of nose 102 is used to create the vaporous cavity that encompasses projectile 100 during supercavitating operation, in known fashion. For that reason, in the context of a supercavitating projectile, the forward end of the nose is typically referred to as a “cavitator.” In the illustrative embodiment, cavitator 104 is flat; however, in other embodiments, other structural arrangements for the cavitator may suitably be used. See, for example, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/102,784 and 12/102,781, incorporated by reference herein.
In the illustrative embodiment, nose 102 has “stepped” profile 106. The stepped profile results from configuring at least the forward portion of nose 102 as a plurality of substantially right-circular cylindrical shells or segments that increase in diameter progressively moving aft. The stepped profile of the nose can provide certain advantages as a function of the projectile's yaw angle. Other structural arrangements for the nose may suitably be used. See, for example, U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/102,784 and 12/102,781.
Body 108 is substantially cylindrical in shape. In some embodiments, body 108 houses a propellant bay (not depicted). The propellant bay contains a chemical propellant, typically (e.g., ammonium perchlorate, etc.) that is ignited to generate the energy for launch. The aft end of body 108 includes plural recesses 110 for accommodating a plurality of fins 112. In the illustrative embodiment, projectile 100 has three fins 112.
In
Body portion 313 of the fin 112 has two major surfaces; front surface 314 and rear surface 316. In the embodiment depicted in
Body portion 313 is characterized by tip T, root R, span S, and width W. The distance characterized as “width W” would properly be termed the “chord” of fin 112 if the fin were oriented in the manner of a typical fin, wherein the edges E1 and E2 were accurately characterized as the leading edge and trailing edge of the fin. But as depicted in
Portion 315 of front surface 314 near tip T is tapered wherein the thickness of body portion 313 decreases to a minimum at tip T. In some embodiments, a portion of rear surface 316 near tip T is tapered as well (see, e.g.,
Shoulders 318A and 318B depend from root R of body portion 313. The shoulders are separated by space 320. Extending away from root R of body portion 313, shoulders 318A and 318B enlarge to accommodate respective pivot-pin receiving holes 322A and 322B.
Edge 319 of shoulders 318A and 318B is a contoured surface that defines a cam, as discussed later in this specification in conjunction with
Fin-receiving region 430 is physically adapted to receive fin assembly 444. Specifically, fin-receiving region 430 includes recess 110, channels 432A and 432B, and access hollow 442.
Recess 110 is dimensioned and arranged to accommodate fin 112 in the stowed state. The recess is sufficiently deep so that when fin 112 is stowed, rear surface 316 of fin body 313 aligns with the surface of body 108. In the illustrative embodiment, the curvature of rear surface 316 matches that of body 108 to provide a smooth, essentially continuous surface when fin 112 is stowed.
Channels 432A and 432B, which align directionally with longitudinal axis A-A of projectile 100 (see,
Fin 112 is pivotally coupled to projectile 100 as follows. Shoulders 318A and 318B are received by respective channels 432A and 432B. Fin 112 and fin-receiving region 430 are dimensioned and arranged so that when the fin's shoulders are received by channels 432A and 432B, pivot-pin receiving holes 422A and 422B in the shoulders and pivot-pin receiving holes 434A, 434B, and 438 in fin-receiving area 430 are axially aligned with one another along axis B-B to collectively receive pivot pin 446. In this fashion, fin 112 is pivotally coupled to projectile 100. Access hollow 442, which in the illustrative embodiment is proximal to hole 434B, provides access to the pivot-pin receiving holes to insert pivot pin 446.
With continued reference to
In the illustrative embodiment, fin 112 rotates about 135 degrees from the stowed state to the deployed state. At some point during rotation of fin 112, surface 319 of shoulder 318B engages leaf spring 450. As the fin continues to rotate, leaf spring 450 flexes downwardly (toward base 560), with maximum flexure occurring as region 324 of cam surface or edge 319 (see also,
Once cam surface 328 and leaf spring 450 engage, as depicted in
In embodiments in which spring-biasing element 662 is not used, gap G, as depicted in
The following provides an example of a supercavitating projectile in accordance with the illustrative embodiment.
Diameter of body 108: 40.0 mm (1.57 in)
Diameter of cavitator 104: 7.62 mm (0.3 in)
Length of projectile 100: 483 mm (19.0 in)
Center of Gravity: 279 mm (11.0 in) from cavitator
Fin span: 57.2 mm (2.25 in)
Propellant bay: 230 grams (8 ounces)
Mass of projectile 100 1.93 kg (4.25 lbs)
Material of Construction:
The positioning of fins 112 forward of the aft end of projectile 100 (see, e.g.,
Launcher 770 accommodates multiple projectiles that arranged nose-to-tail within barrel 772. In the illustrative embodiment depicted in
Within barrel 772 is a plurality of propellant bays 774-1, 774-2, 774-3 (collectively or generally, “propellant bay(s) 774”). In the illustrative embodiment, each propellant bay is configured as a ring-shaped cavity within barrel 772 that is filled with propellant. Gas ports (not depicted) lead from the propellant bay to the bore of barrel 772.
Projectiles 100 are separated from one another in barrel 772 by “pusher plugs” 776. That is, pusher plug 776-1 is aft of projectile 100-1 and forward of projectile 100-2. Pusher plug 776-2 is aft of projectile 100-2 and forward of projectile 100-3, etc.
There is one propellant bay 774 for each projectile position, such that each propellant bay contains the propellant responsible for launching an associated projectile. For example, propellant bay 774-1 contains the propellant that is used to launch projectile 100-1 in Position 1. Launcher 770 is designed so propellant bay that is associated with a particular projectile is located just aft of the pusher plug for that projectile.
As previously noted, it is the positioning of fins 112 forward of the aft end of projectile 100 (see, e.g.,
Furthermore, in some embodiments, projectile 100 contains a booster that is ignited once the projectile leaves barrel 772. In those embodiments, fins 112 are disposed circumferential of a propellant bay disposed proximal to the aft end of the projectile. A benefit of fins 112 disclosed herein is that when deployed, the exhaust gas from the ignited booster never impinges on fins 112 since the fins are forward of the exhaust nozzle of the projectile.
It is to be understood that the disclosure teaches just one example of the illustrative embodiment and that many variations of the invention can easily be devised by those skilled in the art after reading this disclosure. For example, after reading this specification, those skilled in the art will know how to design alternative embodiments of the present invention in which projectile 100 is a torpedo or a projectile that is fired in air and then penetrates the water, in which the fins are located other than at the tail of projectile 100, etc. As a consequence, the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the following claims.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract #N00014-07-C-1103, and the Government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2460289 | Hickman | Feb 1949 | A |
| 3162163 | Silverman | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3627233 | Jacobson et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3677179 | Potteiger et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
| 4869442 | Miller | Sep 1989 | A |
| 5082203 | Baubry | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5235930 | Pendleton | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5584448 | Epstein et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5834684 | Taylor | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5929370 | Brown et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5955698 | Harkins et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5988071 | Taylor | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6021716 | Taylor | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6073879 | Sokolovsky et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6073880 | Voigt et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6168111 | Kayser et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| H1938 | Harkins et al. | Feb 2001 | H |
| 6314886 | Kuhnle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6739266 | Castano et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 7347146 | Gieseke | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 20010039898 | Bar et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20070002475 | Fowler et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Max R. Popenker, “RPG-28 antitank disposable grenade launcher / rocket-propelled grenade”, “http://world.guns.ru/grenade/gl42-e.htm”, 1999-2008. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110308418 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |