The present disclosure relates generally to mechanical projectile launching apparatuses, and more particularly, to projectile launching apparatuses operated by gas compressed by electrical motor driven linear motion converters.
Developments have been seen in the field of projectile launching apparatuses, such as air rifles, pneumatic guns, pellet rifles, paintball guns and the like. Paintball guns have been around for many years and have seen numerous evolutionary changes over the years. The most common mechanisms for launching projectiles, such as pellets, BB bullets and paintballs use energy of a compressed gas or a spring. However, there are variety of mechanisms described in the prior art for launching these projectiles. Such mechanisms include use of a stored compressed gas in a form of carbon dioxide cylinders or other high pressure storage tanks, use of a powerful spring to push a piston which compresses air to push a projectile, use of a hand pump to pressurize the air for subsequent release, and use of a direct acting means such as a solenoid plunger or a centrifugal force to push the projectile out of a barrel. The above-mentioned mechanisms generally suffer from a number of disadvantages as explained below.
The mechanism of using stored compressed gas, such as carbon dioxide, requires a storage means, such as a tank, a gas chamber, or a canister. The use of the storage means involves a cumbersome method of filling a gas in the storage means and transporting of the storage means-based projectile launching apparatus. Additionally, the use of such storage means requires additional equipment such as regulators, evaporation chambers, and other controls to reduce the pressure of the stored compressed gas for a safe launching of the projectiles. The necessity for such additional equipment increases the cost and the complexity of a projectile launching apparatus. In a typical projectile launching apparatus with such storage means, velocity of the projectile varies significantly depending on the temperature of the storage means. For example, a pressure of the carbon dioxide gas depends upon the temperature of the canister, containing the carbon dioxide gas. Furthermore, the storage means that is carrying a large amount of compressed gas may present a safety hazard if there is a sudden release of compressed gas due to a fault in the storage means.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,516,791, 6,474,326, 5,727,538 and 6,532,949 describe various ways of porting and controlling of high-pressure gas supply to improve the reliability of projectile launching apparatuses, specifically, guns. The control of the high-pressure gas supply is achieved by differentiating air streams, such as an air stream which is delivered to a bolt to facilitate the chambering of the projectile in a barrel and, an air stream which pushes the projectile out of the barrel. However, all the above-listed US Patents suffer from major inconvenience and potential safety hazard of storing a large volume of a highly compressed gas within the guns. Additionally, these guns combine an electronic control coupled with the propulsion method driving mechanism of stored compressed gas, which tend to increase the inherent complexity of the mechanism used in the gun, as well as the cost and reliability issues.
The another mechanism which has been used for quite a few years in many different types of pellet, “BB bullets” or air guns, has a basic principle of storing energy in a spring, which spring is subsequently released to rapidly compress gas, such as air present in the atmosphere. The highly compressed gas is generated by the spring acting on a piston to push the projectile out of the barrel at a high velocity. Problems with such mechanism include the need to “cock” the spring between successive shots, which limits such guns to be a single shot device or a gun with a low rate of firing. Further, unwinding of the spring results in a double recoil effect. The first recoil is from the initial forward movement of the spring and the second recoil when the spring slams the piston into an end of a cylinder (i.e. forward recoil).
A typical gun including the spring requires a significant amount of maintenance and, if dry-fired (without projectile), the mechanism is easily damaged. Finally, the effort required for such “cocking” is often substantial and can be difficult for many individuals. References to these guns are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,128,753, 3,212,490, 3,523,538, and 1,830,763. Additional variation on the above mechanism has been attempted through the years including using an electric motor to cock the spring that drives the piston. This variation is introduced in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,899,717 and 5,129,383. While this variation solves the problem of cocking effort, the resulting air gun still suffers from a complicated mechanism, the double recoil effect and the maintenance issues associated with such a spring piston system. A further mechanism which uses a motor to wind the spring is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,261,384 and 6,564,788, issued to Hu.
Hu's patents disclose a motor for compressing a spring, where the motor is connected to a piston. The spring is quickly released such that the spring drives the piston to compress the air, which pushes the projectile out the barrel. This implementation still suffers from similar limitations inherent in the spring piston systems. Hu describes the use of the motor to wind the spring in the above listed patents. Specifically, the spring must quickly compress the air against the projectile to force the projectile out of the barrel at a high velocity. This requires a strong spring to rapidly compress the air when the piston releases. Springs in such systems are highly stressed mechanical elements which are prone to breakage and also increase the weight of the air gun. A further disadvantage of Hu's patents is that the spring is released from a rack pinion under full load, causing tips of gear teeth to undergo severe tip loading. This causes high stress and wear on the mechanism—especially on the gear teeth. This is a frequent complaint for those guns in the commercial market and is a major reliability issue with this mechanism.
A further disadvantage of this type of mechanism is that for launching a larger projectile or a projectile requiring a high velocity of launch, there occurs much increased wear and forward recoil, resulting from the piston impacting the front end of the cylinder. In the case of a dry fire, the mechanism can be damaged as the piston slams against the face of the cylinder. Hu describes use of a breech shutoff that is common in virtually all toy guns since the air must be directed down the barrel and the flow into a projectile inlet port must be minimized. Further, Hu specifically does not incorporate an air compression valve in the above listed patents, which is a restrictive valve against which the piston compresses the air for subsequent releases. Thus, forward recoil, high wear and low power are drawbacks in this type of mechanism. A similar reference can be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 1,447,458, which shows a spring winding and then delivery to a piston to compress air and propel a projectile. In this case, the device is for non-portable operation.
Another additional mechanism, which uses hand pumps to pressurize the air, is often used in low end devices. The use of such mechanism suffers from a need to pump the air from anywhere between 2 to 10 times to build up enough air supply for a sufficient projectile launch velocity. This again limits the gun, such as the paintball gun, to slow rates of fire. Additionally, because of the delay between when the air is compressed and when the compressed air is released to the projectile, variations in the projectile launch velocity result.
Further, U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,568,432 and 2,834,332 describe a mechanism to use a solenoid to directly move the piston, which compresses the air and launches the projectile out of the barrel. While this mechanism solves the problem of manually pumping a chamber up in order to fire a gun, devices incorporating this mechanism suffer from the inability to store sufficient energy in the compressed air. Such a solenoid is an inefficient device and only capable of converting a very limited amount of energy in the compressed air due to its operation. Furthermore, since the compressed air is applied directly to the projectile in this mechanism similar to the spring piston mechanism, the projectile begins to move as the air starts being compressed. This limits the ability of the solenoid to store energy in the compressed air to a very short time period, and therefore these devices cater to low energy guns.
In order to improve the design, the piston must actuate in an extremely fast time frame in order to prevent significant projectile movement during a compression stroke. This results in a piston mass similar to the spring piston designs, which results in the undesirable double recoil effect as the piston mass must come to a halt. Additionally, when this mechanism undergoes a dry-fire, the air is communicated to the atmosphere through the barrel, causing damage to the mechanism. Another variant of this approach is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 1,375,653, which uses an internal combustion engine instead of the solenoid to act against the piston. Although this solves the issue of sufficient power, the use of the internal combustion engine is no longer considered as an air rifle as it becomes a combustion driven gun. Moreover, the use the internal combustion engine suffers from aforementioned disadvantages including complexity and difficulty in controlling the firing sequence.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,137,893 and 2,398,813 issued to Swisher disclose an air gun using an air compressor coupled to a storage tank, which tank and compressor are then coupled to the air gun. Although this solves the issue of double recoil effect, the arrangement still is effectively not portable system due to inefficiencies of compressing the air and the requirement of a large tank volume. This type of air gun is quite similar to an existing paintball gun in which the air is supplied via the air tank and not compressed on demand. Using air in this fashion is inefficient since much of compressed air energy is lost to the environment through the air tank via cooling. Forty percent or more (depending on the compression ratio) of the compressed air energy is stored as heat and is lost to do work when the air is allowed to cool. Furthermore, additional complexity and expenses are required to regulate the air pressure from the air tank so that the projectile launch velocity is controlled. A variation of the above-described mechanism is use of a direct air compressor as described in U.S. Pat. No. 1,743,576. Again, due to the large volume of air between compression means and the projectile, much of the compressed air energy especially, a heat of compression, is lost leading to inefficient operation. Additionally, the US '576 Patent teaches a continuously operating device, which suffers from a significant lock time (time between a trigger pull in order to initiate the launch and the projectile leaving the barrel) as well as the inability to run in a semiautomatic or single shot mode. Further disadvantages of this mechanism include the pulsating characteristics of the compressed air, which are caused by the release and reseating of a check valve during normal operation.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,343,127 and 2,550,887 disclose a mechanism that uses a direct mechanical action on the projectile. Limitations of this approach include difficulty in achieving high projectile velocity since the transfer of energy must be done extreme rapidly between an impacting hammer and the projectile. Further limitations of this mechanism include a need to absorb a significant impact as a solenoid plunger must stop and return for the next projectile. This causes double-recoil or forward recoil. Since the solenoid plunger represents a significant fraction of the moving mass (i.e. solenoid plunger often exceeds the projectile weight), this type of apparatus is very inefficient and limited to low velocity, such as required in low energy air guns for the purpose of toys and the like. Variations of this approach include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,694,815 in which the impact hammer is driven by a spring that contacts the projectile. The spring is “cocked” via an electric motor, but again, this does not overcome the prior mentioned limitations.
All of the currently available projectile launching apparatuses suffer from one or more of the following disadvantages. These disadvantages include, but are limited to, a manual operation by cocking a spring or pumping up an air chamber, difficulty to selectively perform single fire, semiautomatic mechanism, burst or automatic modes in these projectile launching apparatuses. Further, inconvenience, safety and consistency issues associated with refilling, transport and the use of high-pressure gas or carbon dioxide cylinders being the safety hazard. Furthermore, disadvantages include non-portability and low efficiency of these projectile launching apparatuses, which are associated with compressed air supplied from a typical air compressor. The forward recoil effects, high wear, and dry fire damage associated with a spring piston such as an electrically actuated spring piston designs. Complicated mechanisms associated with electrical winding and releasing of the spring piston design result in expensive mechanisms with reliability issues. Inefficient use and/or coupling of the compressed air to the projectile also restrict their capability to launch the projectile with high velocity.
Accordingly, there exists a need for a projectile launching apparatus which includes all the advantages of the prior art and overcomes the drawbacks inherent therein.
In view of foregoing disadvantage inherent in the prior art, the general purpose of the present disclosure is to provide a projectile launching apparatus, to include all the advantages of the prior art, and overcome the drawbacks inherent therein.
In light of the above objects, in one aspect of the present disclosure, a projectile launching apparatus is provided. The projectile launching apparatus includes a power source, a motor, a control circuit, a cylinder, a piston, a gear box, a first barrel cam, a gas spring and a breech assembly. The motor is electrically connected to the power source. The control circuit is configured to control a power supply to the motor from the power source. The first barrel cam is driven by the motor. The first barrel cam is operatively coupled to a piston and is configured to cause the piston to reciprocally move within the cylinder, energizing the gas spring. When the gas spring is fully energized, the first barrel cam releases the piston, generating pressure inside of the cylinder. The piston reciprocally moves within the cylinder to define a gas chamber within the cylinder to accommodate gas therein.
The breech assembly includes a barrel, at least one projectile inlet port and a bolt. The projectile inlet port is configured on the barrel and is adapted to receive a projectile into the barrel. The bolt includes a front portion and a rear portion. The bolt is operatively coupled to an additional barrel cam and is capable of reciprocating between a first position and a second position. In the first position the bolt is configured to be partially received within the barrel such that the front portion of the bolt shuts off the projectile inlet port, and in the second position the bolt is configured to enable the projectile to enter the barrel from the projectile inlet port. The gas received within the gas chamber is compressed by the piston as the first barrel cam arrangement rotates (and in a preferred embodiment, the operational cycle comprises two rotations of the first barrel cam arrangement. The compressed gas is released from the gas chamber into the barrel, causing compressed gas to expand in the barrel and accordingly, the projectile is launched from the barrel with two rotations of the barrel cam arrangement.
In an embodiment, the apparatus comprises a velocity control means for adjusting the velocity of the projectile that is launched from the apparatus. In an embodiment, the velocity control means comprises a bleed valve that is operatively coupled to the gas chamber. The bleed valve may allow gas to release from the gas chamber, thereby reducing the pressure within the gas chamber and accordingly adjusting the velocity of a projectile to be launched by the apparatus.
The breech assembly includes a barrel, a projectile inlet port and a bolt. The projectile inlet port is configured on the barrel and adapted to receive a projectile. The bolt includes a front portion and a rear portion. The bolt is operatively coupled to the linear motion converter (such as the bolt barrel cam mentioned above) and is capable of reciprocating between a first position and a second position. In the first position the bolt is configured to be partially received within the barrel such that the front portion of the bolt shuts off the projectile inlet port and in the second position the bolt is configured to enable the projectile to enter the barrel from the projectile inlet port. A compression valve arrangement is operatively disposed between the cylinder and the barrel.
These together with other aspects of the present disclosure, along with the various features of novelty that characterize the present disclosure, are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and form a part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the present disclosure, its operating advantages, and the specific objects attained by its uses, reference should be made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter in which there are illustrated exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.
The advantages and features of the present disclosure will become better understood with reference to the following detailed description and claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like elements are identified with like symbols, and in which:
Like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the description of several views of the drawings.
The exemplary embodiments described herein detail for illustrative purposes are subject to many variations in structure and design. It should be emphasized, however, that the present disclosure is not limited to a particular projectile launching apparatus, as shown and described. It is understood that various omissions and substitutions of equivalents are contemplated as circumstances may suggest or render expedient, but these are intended to cover the application or implementation without departing from the spirit or scope of the claims of the present disclosure.
The terms “first,” “second,” and the like, herein do not denote any order, quantity, or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another, and the terms “a” and “an” herein do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
The present disclosure provides a projectile launching apparatus for launching a projectile, such as a pellet, a BB bullet, an arrow, a dart, a paintball and the like. The projectile launching apparatus may be an arrangement of a linear motion converter driven by a motor, a piston coupled to the linear motion converter and reciprocally movable within a cylinder, a gas spring and a breech assembly. The piston, when actuated by the linear motion converter, may compress a gas within the cylinder, which compressed gas may be communicated to a barrel of the breech assembly. The compressed gas may expand in the barrel of the breech assembly for launching a projectile that has been chambered in the barrel, with a high velocity (or an adjusted velocity as elsewhere described herein).
The operation cycle of the projectile launching apparatus 1000 may start by pressing ON on the start switch of the apparatus. The power source is configured to supply power to the motor 101 through the control circuit 114. Specifically, the motor 101 may be electrically connected to the power source through the control circuit 114. The control circuit 114 may be any electronic-based apparatus that is capable of connecting power to the motor 101 for the purpose of initiating an operation cycle of the projectile launching apparatus 1000. The control circuit 114 is further capable of disconnecting the power to the motor 101 after an operation cycle of the projectile launching device 1000 is completed. Herein, the operation cycle of the projectile launching apparatus 1000 may comprise an operation involved in launching the projectile from the barrel 104 of the projectile launching apparatus 1000 upon once manipulating the start switch to an ON position. The motor 101 generates a rotational movement when the motor 101 is powered ON, and rotational movement of the motor 101 may be transferred to move the linear motion converter 110 through the gear reduction mechanism 102.
In the exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure as shown in
Although herein the linear motion converter 110 is represented in an exemplary embodiment as a barrel cam (and hereinafter referred to as “barrel cam 110”), it will be apparent to a person skilled in art that the linear motion converter 110 may be any suitable mechanism that converts the rotational movement of the motor 101 into a linear reciprocal movement of any element. For example, the linear motion converter may include other arrangements such as a rack and pinion arrangement, a lead screw arrangement and a crankshaft and connecting rod arrangement.
The barrel cam arrangement includes a barrel cam 110 (shown in
The barrel cam 110 is further coupled to the piston 109 (shown in
The barrel cam 110 and the piston 109 are further coupled to the gas spring 100, as shown in
Referring now to
Referring to
In the preferred embodiment of the disclosure, an exemplary full cycle is depicted in
The operational cycle can be stopped at any point during the sequence described above. However, the preferred stopping and starting point of the cycle is depicted in
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, the apparatus comprises a plurality of cam followers that are capable of engaging a barrel cam 110 with a single barrel cam track. This is depicted in
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, the plurality of cam followers comprises three cam followers 130, two being stationary cam followers 130a and 130b that are on the same side of the cam and one retractable cam follower 132 that is 180 degrees opposite the stationary followers 130a and 130b with respect to the cam. This embodiment is shown in an exemplary configuration in
The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present disclosure have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the disclosure and its practical application, and to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the disclosure and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is understood that various omissions and substitutions of equivalents are contemplated as circumstances may suggest or render expedient, but such are intended to cover the application or implementation without departing from the spirit or scope of the claims of the present disclosure.
The present application is a non-provisional application of and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 on U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/308,220, filed on Feb. 9, 2022, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6564788 | Hu | May 2003 | B1 |
6807959 | Murdock | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7730881 | Pedicini | Jun 2010 | B1 |
11243045 | Witzigreuter | Feb 2022 | B2 |
20050000505 | Pedicini | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050183709 | Marsac | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20090056693 | Pedicini | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090235911 | Klarborg | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110192387 | Hu | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20150377582 | Kang | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170176130 | Kang | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170176132 | Kang | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170276451 | Kang | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180045483 | Iwasawa | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20190093977 | Kim | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20200141672 | Silva | May 2020 | A1 |
20210055074 | Witzigreuter | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210381798 | Witzigreuter | Dec 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230251056 A1 | Aug 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63308220 | Feb 2022 | US |