This document concerns an invention relating generally to shields for protection from projectiles, and more specifically to shields which tend to rebound/ricochet incoming projectiles.
Shootings at workplaces, schools, and other sites are of concern owing to increased instances of such shootings in recent years. Many sites have developed contingency plans for active shooters, typically calling for rapid evacuation and/or hiding in place until emergency personnel arrive. Hiding in place provides limited safety, as shooters may roam the area for targets and shoot any whom they may encounter. Protocols for hiding in place typically call for closing and barricading doors, or otherwise situating as many obstacles between the shooter and the target(s) as possible. However, these measures can signal to a shooter where potential targets may be present, and they merely offer a passive defense to projectiles (and a weak one at that, as doors and other commonly available obstacles are typically insufficient to stop projectiles, particularly from large-caliber and common semiautomatic weapons). Ideally, an obstacle should deter the shooter from firing at the obstacle as well as defending against projectiles.
The invention, which is defined by the claims set forth at the end of this document, is directed to a ballistic shield which may be rapidly deployed in doorways, windows, hallways, or elsewhere, and which rebounds incoming projectiles to deter further shooting. A basic understanding of some of the features of preferred versions of the invention can be attained from a review of the following brief summary of the invention, with more details being provided elsewhere in this document. To assist in the reader's understanding, the following review makes reference to the accompanying drawings of an exemplary version of the invention (these drawings being briefly reviewed in the “Brief Description of the Drawings” section following this Summary section of this document).
Preferably, the elastic layer 104 includes two or more adjoining cellular sublayers 112 wherein each sublayer 112 includes arrayed cells 108. In at least the cellular sublayer 112 closest to the ballistic textile layer 102, the cells 108 are most preferably arrayed in adjoining fashion such that the cells 108 continuously extend across the surface of the cellular sublayer 112 facing the ballistic textile layer 102. Tessellated cells 108, such as the hexagonal arrays of
The optional damping layer 106 can be affixed between the ballistic textile layer 102 and the elastic layer 104 if there is a desire to decrease the energy (speed) of the rebounding projectile. The depicted damping layer 106 is shown as a tessellated array of cells 114 filled with dilatant (shear-thickening fluid), whereby rapid deflection of a cell 114 (as from the impact of a projectile on the adjacent ballistic textile layer 102) causes the dilatant therein to thicken/harden. As depicted in
An exemplary installation for the ballistic shield 100 of
Further potential advantages, features, and objectives of the invention will be apparent from the remainder of this document in conjunction with the associated drawings.
The outer ballistic textile layer 102 is intended to halt the passage of projectiles, and is formed of ballistic textile, a flexible textile resistant to breakage/penetration from high-velocity flying objects such as projectiles and shrapnel. Ballistic textiles are typically formed of fibers or yarns of ballistic material arrayed into a sheet-like form (whether as a layer of fibers/yarns aligned in parallel; as multiple such layers with each layer's fibers/yarns oriented at an angle to the fibers/yarns of one or more adjacent layers; as a woven or knitted array; or otherwise). A “ballistic material” can be regarded as any material having antiballistic properties equal to or greater than nylon, with exemplary preferred ballistic materials being aramid (e.g., KEVLAR) and UHMWPE (Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene) (e.g., DYNEEMA from Avient Corporation). A preferred ballistic textile is GOLDFLEX (from Honeywell International, Inc.), a nonwoven aramid fabric. The ballistic textile layer 102 may be formed of one or more sublayers of ballistic textile, with the sublayers being sewn, adhered, or otherwise joined. Use of a single (or few) sublayer(s) of ballistic textiles is preferred, as fewer sublayers better maintain the elasticity of the ballistic shield 100. Greater numbers of sublayers may be used where the ballistic textiles have higher elasticity, as where fibers/yarns of ballistic material are held within a matrix of elastic/fibers/yarns). Use of fewer sublayers may allow a projectile to at least partially penetrate the ballistic textile layer 102, but the projectile will typically not penetrate the underlying elastic layer 104 (here assuming a projectile having the speed, mass, and/or surface area/configuration conventionally encountered with civilian firearms).
The optional damping layer 106 may be incorporated in the ballistic shield 100 if it is desired to reduce the energy (speed) of projectiles rebounded from the ballistic shield 100. Experimental versions of the ballistic shield 100 have resulted in projectiles rebounding from the ballistic shield 100 at as much as approximately 70% of their incoming velocity, which is sufficient to incapacitate a shooter in the rebounded projectile's path. Such a high-energy rebound is useful in hide-in-place scenarios, where the shooter may be the only person vulnerable to a rebounded projectile (as the potential targets will be behind the ballistic shield 100, or will otherwise be sheltered). However, in some situations—e.g., when shooting begins within a crowd, and the ballistic shield 100 is deployed in response—it may be desirable to slow the rebounded projectiles such that they are no longer potentially harmful to bystanders.
The depicted damping layer 106 is formed of a pair of flexible polymer sheets (e.g., polyvinyl chloride, neoprene, thermoplastic polyurethane, or nylon sheet/fabric) joined face-to-face to provide a tessellated array of cells 114 therebetween. These cells 114 contain dilatant, that is, a non-Newtonian shear-thickening fluid whose viscosity increases as it experiences greater shear. Thus, when the ballistic textile layer 102 is struck by a projectile and the impact forces are transmitted to the adjacent cell 114 of the damping layer 106, the dilatant therein becomes thicker, and the impact forces are better transmitted over the entire area of the cell 114 onto the adjacent elastic layer 104. While any dilatant may be used, it is preferably one which exhibits a high increase in viscosity as shear rate increases. A common dilatant suitable for use in the invention is PEG-400 (i.e., polyethylene glycol). A dilatant-containing damping layer 106 need not be cellular, though the cells 114 are useful to prevent dilatant from draining from the top of the damping layer 106 to collect at the bottom of the damping layer 106.
The damping layer 106 could take forms other than those depicted, and could be formed of any matter which absorbs or redirects energy, and which is sufficiently flexible that the ballistic shield 100 may convert between undeployed/collapsed and deployed/inflated states. As an example, the damping layer 106 could be formed of an array of soft or frangible metal, plastic, or ceramic plates affixed to the rear face of the ballistic textile layer 102, with the plates preferably being spaced such that a projectile cannot fit between adjacent plates, but such that the ballistic textile layer 102 at least substantially retains its flexibility. Breakage or deformation of such plates will absorb impact energy, thereby reducing the potential energy captured by flexure of the ballistic shield 100 (and thus reducing the kinetic energy of the projectile resulting from the release of such potential energy).
The elastic layer 104 may take any form that allows the ballistic shield 100 to at least substantially return to its pre-strike shape after being struck by a projectile. Stated differently, after a projectile strikes (but does not penetrate) the ballistic textile layer 102, the face of the elastic layer 104 closest the ballistic textile layer 102, at a location situated along a vector defining the path of the projectile, deviates from its pre-strike location by no more than 5% of the thickness of the elastic layer 104. As an example, the elastic layer 104 could simply take the form of one or more (sub) layers of elastane, neoprene, or other highly elastic textiles or sheets. The preferred form of the elastic layer 104 has opposing faces which are elastically biased apart. In the depicted elastic layer 104, two structures of this nature are provided as sublayers 112, with each sublayer 112 being configured of elastic material (e.g., polyvinyl chloride, neoprene, thermoplastic polyurethane, or nylon sheet/fabric) formed to contain a compressible fluid, somewhat like an inflatable mattress. Each sublayer 112 has cells 108 formed therein, with passages between the cells 108 (such passages not being depicted in the drawings) allowing all cells 108 to be inflated from a filling point (here valves 120). These passages between cells 108 are preferably provided with valves which limit deflation of all cells 108 in the event one cell is punctured. Such valves could take any suitable form, e.g., the form of check valves used for inflation of inflatable balls (e.g., basketballs). A particularly preferred valve for use between cells 108 is a flap check valve, also known as a flap gate. In such a valve, a fluid-receiving cell includes a flap on its cell wall which covers the aperture leading to the fluid-supplying cell, such that fluid may flow through the aperture from the fluid-supplying cell (the flap yielding during such flow), whereas counterflow from the fluid-receiving cell to the fluid-supplying cell presses the flap against the aperture to close it (halting the counterflow).
The cells 108 are preferably arrayed such that they extend across the entire surface of the elastic layer 104 facing the ballistic textile layer 102, such that the entirety of this surface provides an elastic response when struck. While the cells 108 can have any suitable shape and size (and might be provided in a variety of cell shapes and/or sizes), the cells 108 are preferably similarly configured so that all cells 108 have approximately the same elastic response. In the depicted cellular sublayers 112 of the elastic layer 104, the cells 108 are provided with hexagonal shapes which are tessellated across the planes of the sublayers 112. Alternative tessellated cell shapes might be used, e.g., square or triangular cells 108.
Where the elastic layer 104 is formed of two or more cellular sublayers 112, the cells 108 of each cellular sublayer 112 are preferably offset from the cells 108 of the adjacent cellular sublayer 112 (s), that is, the centerpoints and borders of the cells 108 in one sublayer 112 are (at least in major part) not aligned with the centerpoints and borders of the cells 108 in the adjacent sublayer 112 (s). Such an arrangement promotes a more uniform elastic response across the elastic layer 104. Additionally, it is preferred that the sublayer 112 situated closest to the ballistic textile layer 102 be at a lower pressure than the succeeding sublayer 112 (and that any successive sublayers 112 have increasing pressures), allowing the ballistic textile layer 102 to better elastically deflect when struck by a projectile.
The various layers 102, 104/112, and 106 may be affixed together by sewing, adhesive, thermal bonding, or any other suitable joinder methods. Additional layers may be incorporated on or within the ballistic shield 100 so long as they do not interfere with the aforementioned objectives of the ballistic shield 100. As an example, an additional ballistic textile layer 102 could be provided behind the clastic layer 104, or between any sublayers 112 in the elastic layer 104, as a safeguard against projectile penetration.
The filling means 116 for filling the cells 108 with fluid is preferably provided in the form of a container filled with compressed gas, such as air, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide. The filling means 116 could instead be provided by an air compressor, or even simply by the atmosphere if the cell walls 110 are formed with sufficient resilience that the ballistic shield 100, when relieved of a compressing force, springs from a flattened or folded state into a deployed state, with the expansion of the previously-collapsed cells 108 pulling in atmospheric air. The filling means 116 supplies the cellular sublayers 112 with compressible fluid through respective supply lines 118, each leading to respective valves 120 on the sublayers 112 which are suitable to fill the cells 108 of each sublayer 112 to the desired pressure, e.g., via limit valves having the desired shutoff pressures. A deployment valve 122 is also provided to activate supply of the compressible fluid from the filling means 116 to the elastic layer 104, with the deployment valve 122 preferably being an on-off valve which can be rapidly switched between fully open and fully closed states. A preferred arrangement is to use a remotely-controllable valve, i.e., a valve that can be electronically actuated from a closed state to an open state from a distance of ten or more feet from the valve. This allows the ballistic shield 100 to be rapidly deployed via a wired or wireless signal from a central office (which might monitor the vicinity of the ballistic shield 100 via video), via a “panic button” at a desk nearby the ballistic shield 100, or via a wireless remote control carried by selected personnel. The deployment valve 122 could also or alternatively be deployed automatically, as by gunfire/threat detection technologies. Technologies of this nature are available from, e.g., Shotspotter, Inc. of Newark, California; Shooter Detection Systems, LLC of Newburyport, Massachusetts; and Zeroeyes LLC of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
The ballistic shield 100 may then be situated for deployment in or adjacent to a portal 126 (i.e., any passage usable for ingress or egress, e.g., a doorway or window), in a hallway, or at any other area where the ballistic shield 100 might usefully be deployed as a protective curtain.
The ballistic shield 100 may have components in addition to those described above, and/or may be configured differently from the exemplary version depicted in the accompanying drawings. As an example, the ballistic shield 100 might be provided in a curved or angled form rather than in the planar version depicted, for instance, by configuring the ballistic shield 100 as walls which encircle a shielded space wherein personnel might shelter.
The versions of the invention described above are merely exemplary, and the invention is not intended to be limited to these versions. Rather, the scope of rights to the invention is limited only by the claims set out below, and the invention encompasses all different versions that fall literally or equivalently within the scope of these claims. In these claims, no element therein should be interpreted as a “means-plus-function” element or a “step-plus-function” element pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 112 (f) unless the words “means for” or “step for” are explicitly used in the particular element in question.
This application claims priority under 35 USC § 119 (e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 63/355,499 filed Jun. 24, 2022, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2723214 | Meyer | Nov 1955 | A |
3640831 | Gardner | Feb 1972 | A |
4404889 | Miguel | Sep 1983 | A |
5082289 | Paranto | Jan 1992 | A |
5093931 | LaBerge | Mar 1992 | A |
5349893 | Dunn | Sep 1994 | A |
5738925 | Chaput | Apr 1998 | A |
5824940 | Chediak | Oct 1998 | A |
5885912 | Bumbarger | Mar 1999 | A |
6500507 | Fisher | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6997218 | Garcia | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7571493 | Purvis | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7770233 | Haskell | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8037804 | Wahlquist | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8201488 | Daniels | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8291808 | Howland | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8375839 | Landi | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8863634 | Lou | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8904915 | Howland | Dec 2014 | B2 |
10591257 | Barr | Mar 2020 | B1 |
10866067 | Raber | Dec 2020 | B2 |
11226178 | Goepfert | Jan 2022 | B1 |
11353294 | Hall | Jun 2022 | B2 |
20060212985 | Lolis | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070099526 | Heerden | May 2007 | A1 |
20080264244 | Ravid | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090266226 | Beach | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100186134 | Hunter | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110192274 | Fingerhut | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120137865 | Citterio | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20140359912 | Sutton | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20200018574 | Nash | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20210108894 | Wang | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210270574 | Bopp | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20220167690 | Blecher | Jun 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63355499 | Jun 2022 | US |