Embodiments pertain to a projectile that includes wrap-around tail fins, and more particularly to a projectile that includes as needed pressure-relieving wrap-around tail fins.
The tail fin configuration in projectiles is an important aspect in determining projectile performance. One known tail fin configuration includes fins that cause the projectile to spin during flight. One of the drawbacks with projectiles that include this type of fin configuration is that the projectiles have limited maneuverability rendering them inadequate from many applications.
Another known tail fin configuration for projectiles is a scissors-type tail fin that allows the projectile to perform well but can be quite costly. The cost associated with scissors-type tail fins has lead to the development of projectiles that include wrap-around tail fins.
There are some inherent design constraints that are associated with configuring projectiles to include wrap-around tail fins. These design constraints are even more problematic than the usual design constraints because projectiles with wrap-around tail fins have not previously been used in conjunction with muzzle brakes, and many of the cannons that are used to launch projectiles are now using some form of muzzle brake.
Muzzle brakes are now typically included in cannons that are used to launch projectiles because muzzle brakes reduce recoil within a cannon by capturing and deflecting gas which is generated during projectile launch from the cannon. When a cannon with a muzzle brake is used to launch a projectile that includes wrap-around tail fins, the wrap-around tail fins must delay opening until the tail fins have exited the cannon. The wrap-around tail fins are usually configured to open as soon as possible after exiting the cannon.
One of the drawbacks that is associated with using a wrap-around tail fin configuration on projectiles that are launched from cannons which include muzzle brakes is that the wrap-around tail fins undesirably trap gas as the projectile is launched from the cannon. This gas trapping within the wrap-around tail fins can cause unwanted damage to the projectile and/or the cannon that launches the projectile. In addition, the unwanted trapping of gases by the wrap-around tail fins during launch of the projectile may adversely affect the initial operation of the projectile.
The drawbacks that are associated with gas trapping can be overcome by including openings in the wrap-around tails fins. The openings allow gas that is expelled by the projectile during launch to pass through the openings in order to relieve pressure. However, the addition of such openings in the fins causes unwanted drag on the fins once the fins are deployed during flight.
The following description and the drawings sufficiently illustrate specific embodiments to enable those skilled in the art to practice them. Other embodiments may incorporate structural, logical, electrical, process, and other changes. Portions and features of some embodiments may be included in, or substituted for, those of other embodiments. Embodiments set forth in the claims encompass all available equivalents of those claims.
As used herein, fins are meant to include any surface that generates aerodynamic forces and/or moments. Some example terms for such surfaces include tail, fin, wing, strake or canard (among others).
As used herein, projectile refers to missiles, guided projectiles, unguided projectiles and sub-munitions.
Each of fins 14 includes a first foil 15 that has a first set of openings 16 and a second foil 17 that includes a second set of openings 18. The first sets of openings 16 in the first foils 15 are aligned with the second sets of openings 18 in the second foils 17 when each of the fins 14 is in the stowed position. The first sets of openings 16 in the first foils 15 are not aligned with the second sets of openings 18 in the second foils 17 when each of the fins 14 is in the deployed position.
Since the first sets of openings 16 in the first foils 15 are aligned with the second sets of openings 18 in the second foils 17 when each of the fins 14 is in the stowed position, the fins 14 allow gas that is expelled from the projectile 10 during launch to flow through the first sets of openings 16 and the second sets of openings 18. As the gas flows through the first sets of openings 16 and the second sets of openings 18 pressure is relieved within a muzzle brake of a cannon that launches the projectile 10. In addition, since the first sets of openings 16 in the first foils 15 are not aligned with the second sets of openings 18 in the second foils 17 when each of the fins 14 is in the deployed position, the air resistance that is typically generated on the fins 14 during flight of the projectile 10 is significantly reduced.
As shown in
In the illustrated example embodiments, the first foil 15 in each fin 14 is rotatably connected to the baffle 20 and the second foil 17 in each fin 14 is rotatably connected to the baffle 20. However, it should be noted that the fins 14, including the first and second foils 15, 17, may be connected to the baffle 20 (or casing 12) in any manner that allows the first and second foils 15, 17 to move relative to one another.
Embodiments are also contemplated where the first and second foils 15, 17 are movably attached to one another. In addition, the projectile 10 may include any type of mechanism (not shown) that locks the first and second foils 15, 17 into place once the fins 14 move into the deployed position.
As shown most clearly in
In the illustrated example embodiments, the first foil 15 in each fin 14 is arcuate-shaped and the second foil 17 in each fin 14 is arcuate-shaped. However, it should be noted that the first and second foils 15, 17 may be any shape as long as (i) the first sets of openings 16 in the first foils 15 are aligned with the second sets of openings 18 in the second foils 17 when each of the fins 14 is in the stowed position; and (ii) the first sets of openings 16 in the first foils 15 are not aligned with the second sets of openings 18 in the second foils 17 when each of the fins 14 is in the deployed position.
In addition, the first foil 15 in each fin 14 may be the same size and shape as the second foil 17 in each fin 14. Although embodiments are contemplated where the first and second foils 15, 17 are different sizes and/or shapes.
As shown most clearly in
In addition, although the FIGS. only illustrate each opening 16 in the first sets of openings 16 as being a circular opening and each opening 18 in the second sets of openings 18 as being a circular opening, other embodiments are contemplated where the openings 16, 18 in the first and second sets of openings 16, 18 have different shapes. The size, shape and alignment of the first and second sets of openings 16, 18 will depend in part on the type of fin 14 that is utilized on the projectile 10 as well as the application where the projectile 10 is to be used.
In some embodiments, the first and second foils 15, 17 in each fin 14 rotate 90 degrees as each fin 14 moves from the stowed position (see
The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. Section 1.72(b) requiring an abstract that will allow the reader to ascertain the nature and gist of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to limit or interpret the scope or meaning of the claims. The following claims are hereby incorporated into the detailed description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4796835 | Galvin | Jan 1989 | A |
6325325 | Bonnet et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6682014 | Hickey | Jan 2004 | B1 |
7800032 | Facciano et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
20100102161 | Geswender et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120199691 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |