The technical field of the invention relates to projectiles including a rotating band and a rear cup that is intended to be released on a trajectory.
One known projectile 1 of this type is shown in
A rotating band 3 of the projectile is there to provide sealing against gases between the projectile and the gun during firing of the projectile.
In order to protect the contents of the cup 5 from the corrosive effects of the firing gases, it is known to use a collar 4 that is centered by an annular part 4a on the projectile. The cup 5 comprises a wall 5b that extends from the bottom of the cup to below the collar 4.
An O-ring 8 is centered on the body 2 of the projectile 1 and pinches the edge of the wall 5b against the inside of the collar 4.
In this way, the firing gases cannot penetrate the cup 5 at the edge 5c of the wall 5b.
Upon leaving the gun, the shell 5 is separated from the rest of the projectile by means known by the person skilled in the art and as disclosed in patent EP 1,297,292, for example.
The rotating band 3 is in turn dislocated due to the rotation of the projectile, which improves the overall aerodynamics of the projectile by reducing the surface opposing the forward motion.
However, it remains an aerodynamic brake formed by a bulge of the projectile 1 body 2. This bulge forms a shoulder oriented toward the front of the projectile to serve as support for the annular part 4a of the collar 4.
It forms a first obstacle to the flow of air. The bulge includes a groove 7 that receives the O-ring 8, this groove causes a discontinuity in the flow of air (
Patent EP 1,297,292 describes one such type of known projectile.
The invention aims to improve the range of the projectile by reducing the sources of aerodynamic braking.
Thus, the invention relates to a projectile including an ejectable cup intended to protect, during firing, a base of the projectile with respect to propulsion gases, the cup including a bottom located at a rear of the projectile and a wall surrounding the base and extending longitudinally to a position where an edge of the wall is pinched between a seal surrounding a body of the projectile and a collar also surrounding the projectile, the collar comprising an annular part centered on a first cylindrical seat of the body of the projectile, the first cylindrical seat having a first diameter, the collar being located behind a rotating band of the projectile that is centered on a second cylindrical seat of the body of the projectile, the second cylindrical seat having a second diameter, wherein the first cylindrical seat is separated from the second cylindrical seat by a shoulder, a face of which is oriented toward the rear of the projectile, a gripping means pressing the seal against the annular part of the collar, which causes the radial expansion of the seal, which is thus pressed against the edge of the cup, which is in turn pressed against an inside of the collar.
Advantageously, the gripping means includes a nut screwed on a thread centered on the projectile body, the thread having an outer diameter that is less than or equal to the first diameter, the nut being able to be fragmented by the action of centrifugal forces developed during firing.
Advantageously, the seal includes at least one axial stack of resilient rings.
Advantageously, each resilient ring is made up of an assembly of a plurality of contiguous sectors, the junctions of which are distributed angularly evenly and such that, for a first ring, the junction zones are angularly offset relative to the junction zones of a second adjacent ring.
Advantageously, the collar is made up of the assembly of a plurality of contiguous sectors, the junctions of which are distributed angularly evenly, the annular part of the collar is located across from the inside of the collar, thus forming a chute capable of matching the edge of the cup, and is located partially between the edge of the cup and the projectile body, which prevents the radial separation from the collar.
The invention will be better understood upon reading the following description, done with reference to the appended drawings, in which drawings:
As outlined in the preamble,
According to
According to
According to the prior art, the projectile thus includes a circular bulge 6 including a groove 7 that receives an O-ring 8. The edge 5c of the wall 5b of the cup 5 passes below the collar 4 and is pinched between the O-ring 8 and the inner face of the collar 4.
Thus, when the projectile is in the gun, the gases cannot infiltrate the inside of the cup 5 by crossing the edge 5c.
After firing, once the projectile has left the gun as illustrated on
The rotating band 3 is also no longer held by the tube of the weapon and is separated by the rotation of the projectile 1. The collar 4 remains in place as shown in
The rear of the projectile 1 is then freed and the fins 200 serving to increase the range of the projectile 1 can deploy (here the fins are formed by metal sheets wound around the rear of the projectile and which deploy resiliently).
It nevertheless remains the bulge 6 covered by the collar 4 that forms a protruding obstacle frontally opposing the penetration in the air of the projectile by disrupting the flow 300 of air along the profile of the projectile 1, which is detrimental to its range.
According to
The first diameter D1 is smaller than the second diameter D2 so as to form a shoulder 10 whereof the annular face is oriented toward the rear AR of the projectile 1.
A pair of resilient rings 11 and 12 stacked axially forms the seal 8, guaranteeing that the propulsion gases do not pass between the collar 4 and the edge 5c of the cup 5.
The resilient rings 11 and 12 are crushed against the annular part 4a of the collar 4 by a gripping means 13 including a nut screwed on a thread 14 formed on the first diameter D1 of the projectile body, the gripping means including a nut 13.
Pressure exerted by the gripping means 13 causes the radial expansion of the resilient rings 11 and 12, which are compressed against the edge 5c of the shell 5, which in turn is pressed against the inside of the collar 4.
The person skilled in the art will understand that the resilient rings 11 and 12 can be replaced by an O-ring.
The sealing thus done prevents the propulsion gases from crossing the edge 5c of the cup.
For reasons mentioned later, the collar 4 and its annular part 4a are made up of several sectors contiguous in pairs, the junctions of which are angularly evenly distributed. In order to keep these sectors joined, the annular part 4a of the collar 4 is located across from the inside of the collar 4, thus forming a chute 4c able to correspond to the edge 5c of the cup 5. This annular part 4a according to the invention is therefore located partially between the edge 5c of the shell 5 and the projectile body 2, which prevents the radial separation of the collar 4 owing to the edge 5c of the shell 5, which opposes any radial movement of the inner part 4b of the collar 4. Likewise, the resilient rings 11 and 12 include sectors contiguous in pairs, the junctions of which are angularly evenly distributed. Owing to the edge 5c of the cup, any radial movement of the ring sectors 11 and 12 is blocked, which maintains the integrity of the resilient rings.
According to
The same is true for the resilient ring sectors 11 and 12 forming the seal 8.
One can see in this view that the junctions of each ring sector of a first ring 11 are axially offset relative to the junctions of the sectors of the second adjacent ring 12 such that each junction is across from an adjacent ring sector to improve the sealing provided by the ring sectors 11 and 12.
The gripping means 13 includes fragmentation lines that allow it to burst under the centrifugal force once the collar 4 is released.
According to
The fins 200 are deployed. It will be noted that the projectile body 2 exposes, in the order of travel P of air along its profile, the second seat having a second diameter D2 greater than the first diameter D1 of the first seat and that all of the following changes in diameter D moving toward the rear AR of the projectile 1 have decreasing dimensions, which makes it possible not to oppose frontal resistance to the flow P of air, and therefore to the penetration of the projectile 1 in the air.
The invention therefore makes it possible not to reduce the range, unlike the solution according to the prior art, and the rear part of the projectile nevertheless remains protected from the gases during the gun firing phase.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
17 01228 | Nov 2017 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3738279 | Eyre | Jun 1973 | A |
3927618 | Engel | Dec 1975 | A |
20100000439 | Baumann | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20130284045 | Lee | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150330755 | Citro et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2407220 | Sep 1980 | DE |
1 297 292 | Apr 2010 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Jul. 9, 2018 Search Report issued in French Patent Application FR1701228. |
Jul. 9, 2018 Written Opinion issued in French Patent Application FR 1701228. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190162512 A1 | May 2019 | US |