This Invention relates to a projection display system, and more particularly to a projection display system of quasi-axial optical imagery.
Recently, the traditional cathode-ray-tube (CRT) rear-projection TV sets are losing favor in the consumer market to large screen TV sets built with alternative technologies because for a similarly sized display the later are lighter in weight, have slimmer profile, and are more power efficient.
The non-traditional large-screen display systems generally may be categorized into two groups. The first group includes LCD panel TVs and plasma panel TVs, the second group includes rear-projection TVs (RPTVs).
Today's RPTV uses a microdisplay as imager and a projection system to provide high density content of 800 by 1000 lines per inch or higher and a magnification system that enlarges the image from a tiny light source. Three microdisplay technologies are available commercially today—LCDs, Texas Instruments' digital light processing (DLP), and liquid crystal on silicon (LCoS).
The RPTV directs the light from the light source via the imager to the display screen by way of an optical imaging set, which may include lenses, reflective mirrors. In today's RPTV, the display screen is perpendicular or close to perpendicular to the light impinging on it—a fact that makes the large screen RPTVs relatively thicker compared to a LCD panel or a plasma panel TV of comparable screen size.
Applicants recognize that one way to reduce the thickness of the profile of a RPTV is tilt the display screen away from being perpendicular to the impinging light. The invention-embodying examples described in this paper disclose methods and structures of such slim display systems of excellent, distortion free imagery.
One embodiment of this invention is an optical system for projection display with a large screen based on the quasi-axial imagery, where the screen and the impinging light form an acute angle.
Another embodiment discloses an optical display system that includes two optical imaging sets, where the screen and the impinging light form an acute angle. The sets may comprise lenses or reflective mirrors or a combination of lenses and mirrors.
In one embodiment, the first optical imaging set has a first optical center and a first focal length; the second optical imaging set has a second optical center and a second focal length, which is longer than the first focal length. The system also includes a light source, an imager and a display screen. The light source and the imager are near the first optical imaging set while the display screen is near the second optical imaging set. In this embodiment, the imager has a planar surface, which forms a first acute angle, preferably about 50 degrees or smaller with respect to an optical axis that passes the first focal center. The optical axis is defined in this paper as an geometrical line connecting the light source to a point on the display screen, preferably at the center of the display screen. The display screen in this embodiment forms a second acute angle, preferably about 10 degrees or smaller, with respect to the optical axis that passes the second focal center.
In a simple optical system, the optical axis may be a straight line; in a more complex system, the optical axis may be folded by optical devices such as prisms, mirrors, or the imagers; or it may be split by optical devices such as dichroic filters or mirrors, and therefore does not remain on a straight line.
The first and the second imaging sets in this embodiment are displaced by an optical distance approximately equal the sum of the focal lengths of the two optical imaging sets. When so spaced apart, the system—a co-focal system—magnifies the image of the imager by a magnification factor that is independent of the displacement of the imager relative to the optical imaging sets.
In a quasi-axial optical imagery system where the imager and the display screen each forms an acute angle with respect to the optical axis, the magnification factor of the displayed image comprises two components—a transverse component perpendicularly to the optical axis and a longitudinal component parallel to the optical axis. In this embodiment, the longitudinal component is approximate the square of the transverse component; i.e. it is approximately equal to the product of the transverse component multiplied by the transverse component, as will be explained in more detail later in this paper.
In another embodiment, the light source has a red component, a green component, and a blue component.
In another embodiment, the optical axis is folded by planar reflective mirrors.
In another embodiment, the display system includes dichroic mirrors and cholesterol liquid crystal plates.
In another embodiment, the display system includes Fresnel lenses and light compensators.
In another embodiment, the display system includes spherical mirrors and non-spherical mirror.
The projection system described in this paper may be adapted for either a front-projection system or a rear-projection system.
In
From equations (3) and (4), one can see that the longitudinal magnification factor equals the square of the transverse magnification factor, or
M=m2. (5)
In equations (3) and (4), m and M are functions of u. In other words, the magnifications of the image depend on the position of the object with respect to the optical set L.
A more desirable system, especially one for consumer products, would be a one in which the magnification of the image is or is close to being independent of the precise location of the imager with respect to the optical set. Such a system may be realized with a co-focal system of two optical imaging sets as depicted in
In
In such an axial-projection imagery system, the transverse magnification factor, m, and the longitudinal magnification factor, M, are independent of u.
In
The magnification factor is defined as
M′=du′/du. (7)
The element du has a longitudinal component dz and a transverse component dx such that du=√{square root over (dx2+dz2)}; the element du′ has a longitudinal component dz′ and a transverse component dx′ such that du′=√{square root over (dx′2+dz′2)}, dx=dz tan θ, dx′=dz′ tan θ′, dx′=mdx and dz′=Mdz.
Substituting these equations into Eq. (7) one gets
Substituting mdx=Mdz tan θ′ and m tan θ=M tan θ′, Eq. (8) becomes
From Eq. (9) one can see that the magnification factor of this quasi-axial imagery system is related to that of the axial imagery by a factor C, which is
In a system having two optical imaging sets of focal length f1 and f2, one can achieve a desired magnification factor M′ and the desired system profile by setting the display angle imager angle θ and the display screen angle θ″ with respect to the optical axis according to the following relationship:
In contrast, the current projection display technologies, in which the imager and the display screen or both are or are close to being perpendicular to the optical axis, put sever limitation on both the distortion of the displayed image and the bulkiness of the display system so compromise in system performance is often unavoidable.
The quasi-axial optical imagery projection display system disclosed in this paper, on the other hand, with both the imager and the display screen tilt so each makes an acute angle with respect to the optical axis, substantially removes this problem. In this system, the tilting of the display screen allows the thickness of the projection system to slim down and it is only limited by the intensity of the light source. The image distortion is also easily controlled by controlling the tilting angles of the imager and the display screen according to the desired system magnification factor M′.
The quasi-axial optical imagery projection display system has at least three advantages over the current projection display systems. First, because both the imager and especially the display screen are tilted with respect to the optical axis, it enables significant reduction in the system thickness compared to a current system in which the screen are or are close to being perpendicular to the optical axis. Second, because the quasi-axial optical imagery projection display system has longitudinal magnification in addition to transverse magnification, while current systems only has transverse magnification, the quasi-axial system offers system flexibility in choosing an imager that is most suitable for a specific application. For example, in certain applications, one can use an imager such as a thin-film-transistor (TFT) panel with relatively large area-per-pixel, which can be made with matured and cost effective manufacturing method in order to reduce the demand for high light-source intensity. Consequently, the system can be made with a light source of lesser intensity and with the associated benefits of being more radiation proof, and the temperature resistance. Third, the axial-imagery system of this Invention is simple to construct, easy to manufacture more cost effectively.
Imager 3 in this embodiment is a planar chromium glass mask with a checker-board pattern, with a dimension of 166 mm by 13.375 mm. The imager is set at an angle of 29.21 degrees with respect to the optical axis 7. In order to project square pixels on the display screen, the longitudinal to transverse ratio of pixels on the imager is about 8:1. In this embodiment the size of a pixel in the imager is 0.8 mm by 0.1 mm.
Imager 3 is placed at the outer side of the front focus of the first imaging set 4, which consists of seven individual lenses. The parameters of the lenses are listed below. The first plane mirror 5 and the second plane mirror 6 are set at 45° with respect to the optical axis. The mirrors fold the optical axis and the light path to reduce further the thickness of the system.
The second imaging set 8 is a spherical mirror with a radius about 2468 mm. It is set at 5 degrees offset from perpendicular to the optical axis. The center of curvature of mirror 8 coincides with the back focus of imaging set 4. The image reflected from the second imaging set 8 is displayed on screen 9. The distance between the center point of the surface of the last lens of the first imaging set 4 and the central point of the second imaging set 8 is about 1296 mm.
Pertinent data of the optical imaging system of this embodiment as produced by the optical system software ZEMAX are listed below. Person skilled in the art of projection display should be familiar with this software and the significance of the parameter list.
In this embodiment, the imager 13 is a color film. The longitudinal to transverse ratio of the imager is 3.61:1.05 and the resulting image displayed on the screen is square. Imager 13 is set at an angle of 18 degrees with respect to the optical axis.
The first imaging set is a non-spherical mirror 14 with a radius of about 1928.825 mm to 1300.001 mm. Its focal plane is perpendicular to the optical axis Z.
Element 15 in this embodiment is a planar mirror set comprises 3 pieces of cholesterol liquid crystal, of which the central wavelengths match the central wavelengths of the three colored LED's. The planar mirror set folds the light path to reduce the system thickness. The surface of the planar mirror is set at 86 degrees with respect to the optical axis; and at a distance 660 mm from the non-spherical Mirror 14.
Mirror 16 is another planar mirror of high reflective power with a reflectivity higher than 75%. Mirror 16 is set at a distance about 650 mm from the planar mirror 15.
The second imaging set 17 is also a non-spherical mirror of radius between 4696.264 mm and 4698.281 mm. The second focus of first imaging set 14 coincides with the first focus of the second imaging set 17.
Element 18 is a display screen. It is set at 4.6 degrees with respect to the optical axis.
Pertinent data of the optical imaging system of this embodiment as produced by the software ZEMAX are listed below. Person skilled in the art of projection display should be familiar with this software and the significance of the parameter list.
Applicants have given a detailed description on the implementations of preferred embodiments of this invention. Persons skilled in the art of projection display may make changes and modifications based on this description. For example, ultra high performance (UHP) high intensity discharge lamp, or a semiconductor laser may be used as alternative light source; LCD, LCoS, or other digital light processor may be used as alternative imager. But these changes and modifications do not separate themselves from the core spirit of this invention, and therefore are within the range of protection, which is only limited by the appending claims.