Promoter system inducing expression by 3-hydroxypropionic acid and method for biological production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid using same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10961539
  • Patent Number
    10,961,539
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 11, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 30, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to a promoter system inducing expression of 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) and a method of biologically producing 3-HP using the same. To improve production of 3-HP in a biological manner, continuous synthesis of new enzymes having enzyme activity is necessary. As a result of screening 3-HP reactive transcription regulators and 3-HP reactive promoters from several microorganisms including Pseudomonas denitrificans, it was confirmed that the transcriptions regulations and promoters are composed of LysR proteins and particular gene nucleotide sequences binding to the LysR proteins. Therefore, the 3-HP inducible system is expected to be effectively used to regulate 3-HP metabolic pathways.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to a promoter system inducing expression of 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) and a method for biological production of 3-HP.


3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) is an important synthetic immediate used in various chemical processes, and is used as a raw material for producing acrylic acid, acrylamide, 1,3-propanediol, malonic acid, and the like. 3-HP is also used for synthesis of a biodegradable polymer. Biological production of 3-HP using glycerol has been successfully accomplished through genetic engineering of key enzymes required for 3-HP production pathways in various bacteria. In detail, production of 3-HP has been confirmed in bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas denitrificans, and the like, by (over)expression of glycerol dehydratase which is a coenzyme B12-dependent enzyme, DhaB reactivase which is a glycerol dehydratase reactivase, and aldehyde dehydrogenase which is a NAD+-dependent enzyme, and the like through genetic engineering. Some recombinant strains including E. coli W DUBGK were able to produce more than 40 g/L of 3-HP for 48 hours, but had a difficulty in increasing 3-HP production beyond that. It was particularly observed that, as fermentation time for the production of 3-HP continues, problems that enzymes, such as glycerol dehydratase and aldehyde dehydrogenase, become unstable or lose activity occur. In this regard, one important reason why the activity of glycerol dehydratase disappears is due to a mechanism called suicidal inactivation. In such a mechanism, coenzyme B12 which is a coenzyme of glycerol dehydratase is irreversible damaged during a dehydration reaction from glycerol to 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde (3-HPA), and such a deactivation reaction is promoted in the presence of oxygen. In recent years, to ease deactivation-based on such a mechanism above, mutant glycerol dehydratase has been developed according to site-directed mutagenesis. Several mutant enzymes have been found to have improved enzyme stability, but enzyme activity thereof has been observed to be significantly reduced when compared to conventional enzymes.


Another reason for the problems above is due to toxicity of 3-HPA which is a highly reactive intermediate. When glycerol dehydratase or aldehyde dehydrogenase is present with 3-HPA, activity of glycerol dehydratase or aldehyde dehydrogenase decreases depending on a concentration of 3-HPA. Aldehydes are known to react with amino acid residues, such as ε-amino acid (NH3+), a sulfhydryl group (—C—SH), and an imidazole group that are present in lysine, cysteine, and histidine, respectively. Efforts have been made to improve the stability of many enzymes in the presence of aldehydes using site-directed mutagenesis and random mutagenesis, but have been limitedly succeeded.


An interesting alternative to solving the problems that the enzymes become unstable is continuous synthesis of new enzymes having activity during the whole period of cell culture. Theoretically, if new enzymes can be supplied as much as the enzymes that become unstable, the enzyme activity of the enzymes in cells can be kept constant. In particular, it is necessary to continuously express enzymes at the time when the growth of cells in the latter half of fermentation slows down and the total metabolic activity of the cells is decreased due to high concentrations of 3-HP.


SUMMARY

The present invention provides an inducible promoter for 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) or a derivative thereof, the inducible promoter including a binding site to a LysR protein that is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof.


The present invention also provides a recombinant gene expression cassette reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, the recombinant gene expression cassette including a lysR gene encoding a LysR protein that is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, a promoter comprising a binding site to a LysR protein, and a gene encoding a target expression protein.


To achieve the technical problems above, the present invention provides an inducible promoter for 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) or a derivative thereof, the inducible promoter including a binding site to a LysR protein that is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof.


In addition, the present invention relates to a recombinant expression vector including the inducible promoter for 3-HP or a derivative thereof, a recombinant microorganism transformed by the recombinant expression vector, and a method of producing 3-HP, the method including culturing the recombinant microorganism.


In addition, the present invention provides a recombinant gene expression cassette reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, the recombinant gene expression cassette including a lysR gene encoding a LysR protein that is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, a promoter including a binding site to a LysR protein, and a gene encoding a target expression protein.


In addition, the present invention provides a recombinant expression vector including the recombinant gene expression cassette that is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, a recombinant microorganism transformed with the recombinant expression vector, a recombinant microorganism including the recombinant gene expression cassette, which is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, inserted in a chromosome of a host cell, and a method of producing a target expression protein, the method including culturing the recombinant microorganism.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is shows production (A) of 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) in proliferating cells and degradation (B) of 3-HP. A strain for a 3-HP production test of Pseudomonas denitrificans was cultured in an M9 medium supplemented with 25±2 mmol/L of 3-HP as a single carbon energy source and an energy source. Meanwhile, resting cells for a 3-HP degradation test of P. denitrificans were prepared by culturing on an M9 medium supplemented with 25±2 mmol/L of 3-HP. Here, the standard deviation for 3-HP concentration measurements was calculated to be 10% or less. Symbols: closed circle, 3-HP; semi-circle left, cell mass; cross, pH.



FIG. 2 shows two metabolic pathways of 3-HP (oxidation and reduction pathways). Abbreviations: 3-HPDH, 3-hydroxypropionate dehydrogenase; 3-HIBDH, 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase; MMSADH, methylmalonate semialdehyde dehydrogenase; HPCS, 3-hydroxypropionyl-CoA synthetase.



FIG. 3 shows a relative mRNA expression level (A) and a fold increase in P. denitrificans ATCC13867 with respect to a 3-hydroxypropionate catabolite gene. FIG. 3(A) shows a result (shown in a grey bar) obtained by culturing P. denitrificans in an M9 medium supplemented with 25 mmol/L of 3-HP and a result (shown in a black bar) obtained by culturing P. denitrificans in an M9 medium not supplemented with 3-HP. FIG. 3(B) shows a result (shown in a grey bar) of a difference in mRNA expression levels depending on the 3-HP supply, wherein the result is indicated as a fold increase. Here, the standard deviation for mRNA level measurements was calculated to be 10% or less. Here, the mRNA expression levels are compared using a rpoD gene as a reference gene.



FIG. 4 shows expression of genes, i.e., mmsadh (shown in black) and 3hibdhIV (shown in grey). In addition to 3-HP, 3-hydroxyisobutyrate (3HIB), 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-HB), L-valine, or the like also acts as an inducer.



FIG. 5 shows expression of a gene, 3hpdH. In addition to 3-HP, 3HIB, 3-HB, L-valine, or the like also acts as an inducer.



FIGS. 6A and 6B show a promoter system gene sequence and a structure thereof, the promoter system being induced by 3-HP. FIG. 6A shows positions of genes, mmsadh and 3hibdh, and a gene of a LysR protein (C4-LysR) that regulates gene transcription of mmsadh and 3hibdh.



FIG. 6B shows positions of a 3hpdh gene and a gene of a LysR protein (C3-LysR) that regulates gene transcription of 3hpdh.



FIG. 7 shows results of analysis for an inducible promoter for a C4-LysR gene. O1 and O2 operators between the genes, such as C4-LysR (represented by mmsR) and mmsadh (represented by mmsA), are each present at position −58 and position −9 at positions relative to, as a standard, a transcription start site of mmsadh, and each include an inverted repeat sequence. As a result of the analysis of the inverted repeat sequence constituting each of O1 and O2, a TACGTGT{right arrow over (A)}A sequence was conserved.



FIG. 8 shows a regulatory mechanism of a LysR family transcriptional regulator.



FIG. 9 shows an amino acid sequence that is highly conserved in a LysR protein. Positions of the amino acid was centered on the C4-LysR protein. However, the amino acid sequence conserved in a DNA binding domain or a substrate binding domain was the same for all LysR proteins derived from a strain used in the present invention.



FIG. 10 shows SDS-PAGE results for analyzing solubility of C-his tag C4-LysR by using a chaperon plasmid: pG-KJE8 (A), pGro7 (B), pKJE7 (C), pG-Tf2 (D), and pTf16 (E). A genetically engineered strain of E. coli BL21 was cultured in an LB medium at a temperature of 25° C., induced with 0.1 mM IPTG, and harvested within 4 or 12 hours. Here, the blue arrow shows the size of 34.4 kDa for the C4-LysR protein.



FIG. 11 shows SDS- and native-PAGE analysis results of the purified C4-LysR protein. FIG. 11(A) shows purification results by denaturing SDS-PAGE, wherein lane 1 shows a wild-type (crude) result; lane 2 shows a (−)IPTG result; lanes 3, 4, 5, and 7 each show cell-free, soluble, insoluble, and purified fraction results; and lane 6 shows a protein marker result. FIG. 11(B) shows native PAGE analysis results, wherein lanes 8, 10, and 12 show protein marker results, and lanes 9, 11, and 13 show purified C4-LysR protein results when loaded at a concentration of 65 nM, 220 nM, and 550 nM, respectively.



FIGS. 12A-12C show the effect of C4-LysR concentrations and 3-HP on binding of DNA fragments between the C4-LysR protein and a promoter region thereof. FIG. 12A shows a DNA fragment sequence of a promoter used in the experiment, wherein F12 indicates a fragment including both O1 and O2, F12M indicates a fragment including only an O1 operator, F1M2 indicates a fragment including only an O2 operator, and F1M2M indicates a fragment from which both O1 and O2 are removed, and the DNA fragments used in the experiment had the same length of 135 bp. FIG. 12B shows results of electromobility shift assay (EMSA) obtained by analyzing in vitro binding of DNA fragments between the C4-LysR protein and a promoter region thereof, wherein the upper panel shows the results of electrophoresis performed in the absence of 3-HP, and the lower panel shows the results of electrophoresis performed in the presence of 25 mM of 3-HP, and in lanes 1 to 9, the concentration of the C4-LysR protein was gradually increased from 0 nM to 0.36 nM, 0.73 nM, 1.45 nM, 2.9 nM, 5.8 nM, 11.6 nM, 14.5 nM and 24.2 nM, in lanes 10 to 15, the concentration of the C4-LysR protein was gradually increased from 0 nM to 2.9 nM, 5.8 nM, 11.6, nM 14.5 nM, and 24.2 nM, and in lanes 16 to 21, the concentration of the C4-LysR protein was gradually increased from 0 nM to 2.9 nM, 11.6 nM, 24.2 nM, and 72.7 nM. FIG. 12C shows quantitative results of binding affinity of DNA fragments between the C4-LysR protein and a promoter region thereof, wherein affinity refers to a dissociation constant (KD), and that is, half of the DNA fragments was represented by the concentration of a protein required to bind the C4-LysR protein.



FIGS. 13A and 13B show the structural comparison of genetic populations involved in the 3-HP degradation pathway between P. denitrificans ATCC13861 and various microorganisms.



FIGS. 14A-14C and FIGS. 15A-15B show the multiple sequence arrangement of the N-terminal HTH included in a LysR region: C4-LysR (FIGS. 14A-14C) and C3-LysR (FIGS. 15A-15B).



FIG. 16 shows a pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH plasmid developed for the expression of glycerol dehydratase and KGSADH in P. denitrificans.



FIG. 17 shows results (O1 & S1) of comparing consumption of glucose and glycerol, cell growth, 3-HP production, and pH changes by a strain of Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-dhaB-gdrAB, PC4-KGSADH) (O1, O2 & O3) and a strain of Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH) (S1, S2 & S3): no glycerol; (O2 & S2), 25 mg/L of CoCl2.6H2O added to a culture medium; (03 & S3), 12 μmol/L of coenzyme B12 added to a culture medium, and 100 mM of glycerol added at 3 hours.



FIG. 18 shows results of comparing time-dependent inactivation of glycerol dehydratase and KGSADH by using cell lysates of Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhT (pUCPK′/PC3-dhaB-gdrAB, PC4-KGSADH) and Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH).



FIG. 19 shows time-dependent changes in consumption of glycerol and glucose, biomass, and 3-HP production upon a fed-batch bioreactor operation: (A) recombinant Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-dhaB-gdrAB, PC4-KGSADH) and (B) Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Accordingly, in terms of efficiently maintaining expression of a 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) production enzyme, the inventors of the present invention have discovered a specific gene transcription promoter system, which induces the expression of 3-HP, in various microorganisms, and then, examined genetic and biochemical characteristics of the promoter system. The promoter system is an unusual system that has never been reported in documents yet, and consists of a transcription activating protein of 3-HP and a DNA sequence specifically binding to the transcription activating protein. The inventors of the present invention developed a recombinant strain capable of producing 3-HP at a high concentration from glycerol by overexpressing DhaB, GdrAB, and KGSADH by using the promoter system, thereby completing the present invention.


The present invention provides an inducible promoter for 3-HP or a derivative thereof, the inducible promoter including a binding site to a LysR protein which is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof.


In addition, the present invention provides a recombinant expression vector including the inducible promoter for 3-HP or a derivative thereof. Preferably, the recombinant expression vector may further include a gene encoding a foreign protein linked to the inducible promoter for 3-HP or a derivative thereof. More preferably, the foreign protein may be glycerol dehydratase (DhaB), DhaB reactivase (GdrAB), or α-ketoglutaric semialdehyde dehydrogenase (KGSADH), but embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto.


In addition, the present invention provides a recombinant microorganism transformed with the recombinant expression vector. Preferably, the recombinant microorganism may have producibility of 3-HP. More preferably, the recombinant microorganism may be Pseudomonas denitrificans, and more preferably, may be a stain of Pseudomonas denitrificans Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI from which 3hpdh, 3hibdh, and mmsadh genes relating to degradation of 3-HP are deleted in a strain of P. denitrificans, but embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto.


In addition, the present invention provides a method of producing 3-HP, the method including culturing the recombinant microorganism.


In addition, the present invention provides a recombinant gene expression cassette reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, the recombinant gene expression cassette including a lysR gene encoding a LysR protein that is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, a promoter comprising a binding site to a LysR protein, and a gene encoding a target expression protein.


In addition, the present invention provides a recombinant expression vector including the recombinant gene expression cassette that is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, and a recombinant microorganism transformed with the recombinant expression vector.


In addition, the present invention provides a recombinant microorganism including the recombinant gene expression cassette that is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof inserted in a chromosome of a host cell. It will be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that, even if the recombinant gene expression cassette is inserted into the genome of the host cell, the same effect as the case where the recombinant vector is introduced into a host cell is made.


In the present invention, as a method of inserting the recombinant gene expression cassette to a chromosome of a host cell, any gene engineering method known in the art may be used. In one embodiment, a method using a retrovirus vector, an adenovirus vector, an adeno-associated virus vector, a herpes simplex virus vector, a poxvirus vector, a lentivirus vector, or a non-viral vector may be used.


In addition, the present invention provides a method of producing a target expression protein, the method including culturing the recombinant microorganism. Preferably, the culturing of the recombinant microorganism may further include adding for 3-HP.


Preferably, the LysR protein or the promoter may be derived from a microorganism with 3-HP degradability. More preferably, the LysR protein or the promoter may be Achromobacter denitrificans, Acidovorax avenae subsp., Acidovorax sp., Acinetobacter baumannii, Aeromonas hydrophilia, Agrobacterium sp., Alcaligenes faecalis, Alcanivorax hongdengensis, Alicycliphilus denitrificans, Alteromonas marina, Amycolatopsis sp., Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans, Azospirillum brasilense, Azotobacter vinelandii, Beijerinckia indica, Bordetella avium, Bradyrhizobium japonicum, Burkholderia ambifaria, Catenulispora acidiphilia, Caulobacter sp., Castellaniella defragrans, Chromobacterium violaceum, Collimonas arenae, Comamonas testosteroni, Corynebacterium vitaeruminis, Cupriavidus necator, Curvibacter gracilus, Delftia acidovorans, Ferrimonas balearica, Glaciecola nitratireducens, Gordonia bronchialis, Hahella chijuensis, Halomonas elongata, Hirschia litorea, Idiomarina sp., Janthinobacterium lividum, Kitasatospora setae, Kutzneria albida, Methylobacterium sp., Methylocystis sp., Novosphingobium sp., Oceanimonas smirnovii, Paracoccus sp., Parvibaculum lavamentivorans, Phenylobacterium kunshanensis, Photobacterium gaetbuleda, Polynucleobacter necessarius asymbioticus, Pseudoalteromonas carrageenovora, Pseudogulbenkiania sp., Pseudomonas denitrifcans ATCC13867, P. knackmussii, P. protegens, P. fluorescens, Pseudoxanthomonas spadix, Psychrobacter phenylpyruvicus, Ralstonia oxalatica, Rhodomicrobium vannielli, Segniliparus rotundus, Shewanella oneidensis, Simiduia agarovorans, Sinorhizobium meliloti, Sphingobium chlorophenolicum, Sphingomonas wittichii, Sphingopyxis alaskensis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Streptomyces nodosus, Tatlockia micdadei, Thalassospira xiamenensis, Variovorax paradoxus, Verminephrobacter eiseniae, Vibrio furnissii, Xanthobacter autotrophicus, Xanthomonas campestri, and Xanthomonas oryzae, but embodiments of the present disclosure.


Preferably, the LysR protein may have an N-terminal domain having a helix-turn-helix structure and binding to DNA, a C-terminal domain binding to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, and a C-terminal domain contributing to stabilization of a LysR protein dimer, but embodiments of the disclosure are not limited thereto.


More preferably, the N-terminal domain having a helix-turn-helix structure and binding to DNA may include an amino acid sequence represented by SEQ ID NO: 1 or 2, the C-terminal domain binding to 3-HP or a derivative thereof may include an amino acid sequence represented by SEQ ID NO: 3, and the C-terminal domain contributing to stabilization of a LysR protein dimer may include an amino acid sequence represented by SEQ ID NO: 4, but embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto.


“X” or “Xaa” described in SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 4 does not refer to particular amino acid, meaning that any amino acid may be used. More preferably, the LysR protein may be a LysR protein having Genebank ID represented by Table 4 and 5, but embodiments of the disclosure are not limited thereto.


Preferably, the binding site to the LysR may include two LysR protein dimers that are bonded to each other, and may include a base sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 5 to 43, wherein an inverted repeat sequence and another inverted repeat sequence paired with therewith may be repeated twice in the binding site to a LysR protein, wherein the inverted repeat sequence may consist of a base sequence represented by one selected from SEQ ID NOs: 5 to 43, but embodiments of the disclosure are not limited thereto.


More preferably, the binding site to a LysR protein may consist of a base sequence represented by SEQ ID NO: 44 or 45.


“n” described in the SEQ ID NOs: 5 to 43 does not refer to a particular base, meaning the any base may be used.


The SEQ ID NO: 44 or 45 may be a promoter base sequence derived from Pseudomonas denitrificans ATCC13867.


Preferably, the derivative may be 3-hydroxyisobutyrate (3HIB) or 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-HB), but embodiments of the disclosure are not limited thereto.


The term “vector” as used herein refers to a self-replicating DNA molecule that is used to carry the clone gene (or other fragments of the clone DNA).


The term “expression vector” as used herein refers to a recombinant DNA molecule including a desired coding sequence and a suitable nucleic acid sequence necessary for expressing a coding sequence operably linked to a particular host organism. The expression vector may include at least one selective marker. The marker may be a nucleic acid sequence having characteristics that can be generally selected by a chemical method, and may include all genes capable of distinguishing a transformed cell from a non-transformed cell. Examples of the marker include antibiotic resistance genes, such as ampicillin, kanamycin, G418, Bleomycin, hygromycin, and chloramphenicol, but embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto. Such a marker can be appropriately selected from one of ordinary skill in the art.


Hereinafter, the present inventive concept will be described below in further detail through Examples and Comparative Examples. However, such Examples are for illustrative purposes only and do not limit the scope of the present inventive concept.


<Example 1> Identification of Gene Expression System by 3-HP

1. Materials


A number of strains including Achromobacter denitrificans and Acinetobacter baumannii were obtained from the Korean Culture Center of Microorganisms (KCCM). A number of strains including Acidovorax avenae subsp. and Agrobacterium sp. were purchased from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC). A number of strains including Alicycliphilus denitrificans and Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans were obtained from DSM in Germany. A number of strains including Aeromonas hydrophilia and Pseudomonas denitrificans ATCC13867 purchased from ATCC in the United States. A primer was synthesized by COSMO GENETECH (Seoul, Korea). 3-HP was purchased from Tokyo Kasei Kogyo (TCI America, Portland, Oreg.) in Japan. An enzyme extract (Cat. 212750) and tripton (Cat. 211705) were purchased from Difco (Becton Dickinson; Franklin Lakes, N.J.). All chemicals and enzymes not mentioned were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.).


2. 3-HP Production of Proliferating Cells and 3-HP Degradation in Dormant Cells


Shake flask experiments were carried out in a 250 mL non-baffled Erlenmeyer flask in a volume of 30 mL in shaking incubator at a temperature of 37° C. and a stirring speed of 200 rpm. Experiments on 3-HP production by P. denitrificans were performed under conditions where an M9 medium having a modified volume of 30 mL was added to a 250 mL non-baffled Erlenmeyer flask for culturing in a shaking incubator at a temperature of 37° C. at a stirring speed of 200 rpm. Here, compositions of the modified M9 medium for culturing a strain included 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.25 g/L of MgSO4 7H2O, 1.0 g/L of NaCl, 1.0 g/L of NH4Cl, and 3-HP 25 mM.


Experiments on the dormant cells were carried out to investigate 3-HP degradation in a total of 69 microorganisms including P. denitrificans, and bacteria used in the experiments are shown in Table 1. To prepare active cells, 3-HP was added to a nutrient-enriched medium specified for each strain, and then, cultured in a for 250 mL non-baffled erlenmeyer flask at a volume of 50 mL. Strain culture was performed at a temperature of 37° C., and when OD600 of cells reached about 1 to 1.5, cells were harvested by centrifugation at a speed of 5,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The precipitated cells were washed with 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and resuspended with 25±2 mmol/L of 3-HP in the same buffer. The above-mentioned cell harvesting, washing and resuspending procedures were performed prior to the 3-HP degradation experiments. Samples were taken periodically to investigate the concentration of 3-HP.









TABLE 1







Strains used in the present invention















Culture

Pur-


Genus


temper-
Aerobic
chase


No.
Strain
Medium
ature
condition
site















1

Achromobacter

Nutrient medium
26° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




denitrificans







2

Acidovorax

Nutrient medium
25° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




avenaesubsp.









Acidovorax sp

Tryptone
28° C.
Aerobic
DSM




soya broth





3

Acinetobacter

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




baumannii







4

Aeromonas

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
ATCC




hydrophilia







5

Agrobacterium sp.

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC


6

Alcaligenes

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




faecalis







7

Alcanivorax

Nutrient medium
26° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




hongdengensis







8

Alicychphilus

Nutrient medium
26° C.
Aerobic
DSM




denitrificans







9

Alteromonas

Marine broth
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




marina

2216







(DIFCO 0791)





10

Amycolatopsis sp.

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC


11

Anaeromyxo-

R2A medium
28° C.
Micro-
DSM




bacter



aerobic





dehalogenans







12

Azospirillum

Azospirillum
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




brasilense

medium





13

Azotobacter

Azotobacter
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




vinelandii

medium





14

Beijerinckia

Beijerinckia
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




indica

medium





15

Bordetella
avium

Trypticase
37° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




soy broth





16

Bradyrhizobium

Rhizobium
26° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




japonicum

medium





17

Burkholderia

Trypti case
28° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




ambifaria

soy broth





18

Catenulispora

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




acidiphilia







19

Caulobacter sp.

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC


20

Castellaniella

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




defragrans







21

Chromobacterium

Nutrient medium
26° C.
Aerobic
ATCC




violaceum







22

Collimonas

Nutrient medium
28° C.
Aerobic
DSM




arenae

with 5 g/L NaCl





23

Comamonas

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




testosteroni







24

Corynebacterium

Corynebacterium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




vitaeruminis

broth





25

Cupriavidus

Nutrient medium
26° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




necator







26

Curvibacter

Peptone, yeast
30° C.
Aerobic
ATCC




gracilus

extract with







magnesium







sulfate





27

Delftia

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




acidovorans







28

Ferrimonas

Triple-sugar-iron
28° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




balearica

medium







(Difco)





29

Glaciecola

Broth Medium
25° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




nitratireducens

Marine Broth







2216







(BD 279110)





30

Gordonia

Trypticase
28° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




bronchialis

soy broth





31

Hahella

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




chijuensis







32

Halomonas

Halomonas
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




elongata

medium





33

Hirschia
litorea

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC


34

Idiomarina sp.

Bactomarine broth
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




(Difco 2216)





35

Janthino-

Nutrient medium
25° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




bacterium









lividum







36

Kitasatospora

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




setae







37

Kutzneria
albida

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC


38

Methylo-

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




bacterium sp.







39

Methylocystis sp.

NMS medium for
28° C.
Aerobic
ATCC




Methanotrophs







with 20%







methane







(v/v) in the air







head space





40

Novo-

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




sphingobium sp.







41

Oceanimonas

Marine Broth
23° C.
Aerobic
ATCC




smirnovii

2216







(BD 279110)





42

Paracoccus sp.

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC


43

Parvibaculum

Peptone 10.0
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




lavamentivorans

g/L; NaCl 5.0







g/L; CaCl2H2O







0.1 ng/L;







Tween







80 10.0 g/L





44

Phenylo-

R2A medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




bacterium









kunshanensis







45

Photobacterium

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




gaetbuleda







46

Polynucleo-

R2A medium
28° C.
Aerobic
DSM




bacter









necessarius









asymbioticus







47

Pseudo-

Sea water yeast
20° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




alteromonas

peptone broth







carrageenovora







48

Pseudo-

Nutrient medium
37° C.
Aerobic
DSM




gulbenkiania








sp.






49

Pseudomonas

Minimal medium
37° C.
Aerobic
ATCC




denitrificans








ATCC13867








Pseudomonas

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
DSM




knackmussii









Pseudomonas

Nutrient medium
28° C.
Aerobic
DSM




protegens









Pseudomonas

1213 King
28° C.
Aerobic
ATCC




fluorescens

medium B





50

Pseudo-

R2A medium
35° C.
Micro-
KCTC




xanthomonas



aerobic





spadix







51

Psychrobacter

Trypti case
30° C.
Aerobic
ATCC




phenylpyruvicus

soy broth





52

Ralstonia

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




oxalatica







53

Rhodomicrobium

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




vannielli







54

Segniliparus

Bacto Middle
28° C.
Aerobic
DSM




rotundus

brook7H10







medium







(Difco 262710)





55

Shewanella

Trypticase
30° C.
Aerobic
ATCC




oneidensis

soy broth





56

Simiduia

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




agarovorans







57

Sinorhizobium

Rhizobium
26° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




meliloti

medium





58

Sphingobium

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




chloro-









phenolicum







59

Sphingomonas

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




wittichii







60

Sphingopyxis

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




alaskensis







61

Stenotro-

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




phomonas









maltophilia







62

Streptomyces

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




nodosus







63

Tatlockia

BCYE (Buffered
37° C.
Micro-
DSM




micdadei

Charcoal

aero-





Yeast Extract)

philic





medium





64

Thalassospira

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




xiamenensis







65

Variovorax

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCTC




paradoxus







66

Vermine-

R2A medium
28° C.
Aerobic
DSM




phrobacter









eiseniae







67

Vibrio
furnissii

Bactomarine
28° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




broth







(Difco 2216)





68

Xanthobacter

Nutrient medium
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




autotrophicus







69

Xanthomonas

Nutrient medium
26° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




campestri









Xanthomonas

IFO medium 802
30° C.
Aerobic
KCCM




oryzae










3. RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction


An M9 medium was used for culture of a P. denitrificans strain (ATCC 13567), and a nutrient medium specified for each strain was used for culture of other microorganisms shown in Table 1. Then, when examining the effect of 3-HP, 25 mM of 3-HP was added to the media provided herein. all the strains were cultured in a shaking incubator at a temperature of 37° C. at a stirring speed of 200 rpm under an aerobic condition, and cells were harvested when the cultured cells reached an exponential growth phase. After the cells were harvested in an amount of about 5×108, centrifugation was performed thereon at 5,000 g for 10 minutes. Then, 500 μl of RNA later solution (Ambion, UK) was immediately added to the precipitated cells, and then, the mixed solution was resuspended. RNA was extracted by using a total RNA isolation kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). 1 μg of total RNA was used for synthesis of 20 μl first-strand cDNA, and a SuperScript III first-strand synthesis system provided by Invitrogen was used for synthesis of cDNA.


A reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed by using a SYBR green step with a One Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA). In a reaction solution (20 μL) for the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, 300 ng of cDNA, 10 μL 2× Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, UK), 5 pmol of forward and reverse primers, and DEPC treated water were contained. Conditions for the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were determined as follows: denaturation, 1 cycle of 95° C. for 30 seconds; amplification, 40 cycles of 95° C. for 15 seconds, 62° C. for 30 sections, and 72° C. for 30 seconds. Prior to performing the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, PCR was performed to confirm the effect of the primers used in the experiments for measurement of mRNA levels, and relative quantification for mRNA levels was calculated according to the ΔΔCT method.


4. Gene Cloning of LysR Protein, Protein Production, and Separation-Purification


In the case of P. denitrificans, two operons, i.e., 3HPDH (hereinafter, referred to as C3 system) and 3HIBDH-IV (hereinafter, referred to as C4 system), that are involved in the 3-HP degradation were present, as well as LysR proteins, such as C3-LysR and C4-LysR, that regulate transcription of the operons. Among the proteins, protein production was attempted for C4-LysR. E. coli BL21 (DE3) was used as a host and E. coli strain Top10 was used for cloning and maintaining of plasmids. C4 LysR genes were amplified in the P. denitrificans genome by PCR, cloned into a pET30b(+) plasmid, and E. coli strain Top10 was added thereto to confirm sequences, and then, E. coli BL21 (DE3) was added thereto. For protein purification, a His tag was labeled at a C-terminus site. To express the LysR protein in an active soluble form, the LysR protein was co-expressed along with several chaperone plasmids, such as pG-KJE8, pGRO7, pG-TF2, and pTF-16. For use as a medium, an LB medium appropriately supplemented with kanamycin, chloramphenicol, L-arabinose, or the like was used and cultured under aerobic conditions. When the cell concentration reached OD of 0.6, 0.1 mM of IPTG was added to induce production of the LysR protein. For water-soluble expression of the LysR protein, various culture conditions were examined, and eventually, the LysR protein was cultured at a temperature of 25° C. at a speed of 150 rpm for 10 hours. The cultured cells were obtained by centrifugation, washed with 100 mM (pH 7) phosphate buffer, resuspended in binding buffer, and then, disrupted by French Press. Afterwards, the resulting cells were subjected to centrifugation again, and solid and undisrupted cells were removed while the solution was purified by using a Ni-affinity column. followed by being stored in a 20% glycerol solution at a temperature of 80° C.


5. Measurement of Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) for Analyzing Protein-DNA Binding Under In Vitro Conditions


To study binding between the separated C4-LysR gene and a promoter region thereof under in vitro conditions, a DNA fragment of the promoter region was synthesized (see FIG. 7). Three types of fragments were synthesized: first, a fragment (designated as F12) including both O1 and O2 operators, expecting that a transcription regulatory protein binds to the entire DNA fragments between genes, C4-LysR and mmsadh; second, a fragment (designated as F12M) including a part of the O1 operator; third, a fragment (designated as F1M2) including a part of the O2 operator. The EMSA experiments were performed by using a molecular probes fluorescence-based mobility shift assay kit (fluorescence-EMSA) manufactured by Invitrogen Company. First, a DNA fragment of the promoter region was purified by a glass fiber column, mixed with a LysR protein purified with binding buffer, and a reaction was allowed at room temperature for 30 minutes. Afterwards, the mixture was loaded onto a 6% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel, and developed in TBE buffer (pH 8) at 220 V for 30 minutes. Then, to confirm DNA bands after fixing the gel, SYBR Green EMSA staining was performed thereon, followed by quantification of band intensity by a gel documentation system (Bio-Rad). For observation of the proteins, the DNA-protein band was stained with SYPRO Ruby EMSA.


6. Analysis Method


The cell concentration was measured by using a double beam spectrophotometer (Lambda 20, Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Conn.) with a cuvette having a length of 10 mm. The 3-HP concentration was measured by using a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Raj et al, 2008). For preparation of a sample, a sample taken for HPLC analysis was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 10 minutes to remove cell precipitates, and a tuffryn membrane filter (Acrodisc; Pall Life Sciences, Port Washington, N.Y.). A column used for HPLC analysis had a size of 300 mm×7.8 mm Aminex HPX-87H (Bio-Rad, USA) and 2.5 mmol/L of H2SO4 was used as a mobile phase at a temperature of 65° C.


7. Results


(1) Screening of 3-HP Inducible Promoter in P. denitrificans


3-HP is a carbon compound rarely present in natural environments, and there are few reports on its use as a carbon substrate or its biological degradation. However, recently, the inventors of the present invention found that P. denitrificans degraded 3-HP rapidly in both a growth phase and a non-growth phase. During the growth phase of the cells, P. denitrificans was able to be use 3-HP as a sole carbon source and an energy source (FIG. 1A). During non-growth phase of the cells, P. denitrificans showed characteristics of degrading 3-HP in the presence of oxygen (FIG. 1B). Biological degradation of 3-HP is known to use a reducing or oxidative pathway (FIG. 2). Through genome analysis and metabolite analysis using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, it was estimated that the 3-HP degradation in P. denitrificans utilized an oxidation pathway. According to this pathway, two enzymes, presumably 3-hydroxypropionated dehydrogenase (3HPDH) and (methyl)malonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (MMSADH), sequentially converted 3-HP to methylmalonate semialdehyde and methylmalonate semialdehyde to acetyl-CoA (FIG. 2). In addition to 3HPDH, many 3-hydroxybutylate dehydrogenases assumed to be capable of degrading 3-HP and 3-hydroxy acid similar to 3-HP were confirmed in P. denitrificans. In this regard, the expression of various enzymes having activity against 3-HP may be possible induced by 3-HP. The mRNA levels of three genes (3hpdh, 3hibdhIV, and mmsadh) assumed to be 3-HP catabolic genes were compared by RT-PCR (FIG. 3). Here, rpoD, which is known to encode sigma factor 70 and is known as a housekeeping gene, was used as a reference gene. As a result, it was interesting to observe that the expression of genes, assumed to be related to the 3-HP degradation, was significantly increased by 3-HP. When the cells were exposed to 3-HP, 3hpdh showed a 46-fold increase, 3hibdhIV showed a 146-fold increase, and mmsadh showed a 137-fold increase. As such, up-regulation of the genes can be explained by the nature of the promoters of genes induced by 3-HP.


The expression of the genes, i.e., 3hpdh, 3hibdhIV, and mmsadh, was similar with 3-HP in size, but the possibility of being amplified by other compounds having different structures from the genes above was also examined (FIGS. 4 and 5). The genes were all amplified by 3-HP, 3-hydroxyisobutyrate (3HIB), and 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-HB). However, the amplification of the genes was not induced by lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, 1,3-propanediol, and 2,3-butandiol. In particular, the amplification of the genes was induced by L-valine, and it is assumed that the induction is due to conversion from L-valine to 3-HIB in a process of metabolism. In this regard, it is determined that the transcriptional regulatory proteins were specifically reactive to 3-HP, 3-HIB, 3-HB, or the like.


(2) Analysis of 3-HP Inducible Gene Expression System


LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) are known as transcriptional activators that regulate the same catabolic pathway as the aromatic compounds. In general, genes encoding the LTTRs are located in front of a population of genes involved in degradation of aromatic compounds and regulate the compound degradation. To identify the 3-HP degradation pathway, the gene structure analysis of operons related to 3HPDH and 3HIBDH-IV of P. denitrificans was performed. As a result, it was confirmed that the LTTRs were located in a similar gene sequence in the front part of the 3-HP degrading genes (FIG. 6). That is, it showed possibility that the expression of the 3-HP degrading genes may be related to the LysR protein in P. denitrificans. In particular, the genes (i.e., mmsadh, 3hibdh4, and 3hpdh) whose transcription was regulated by a lysR gene and a gene binding to the LysR protein (hereinafter, LysR binding to a gene of 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase which is a C4 compound is designated as C4-LysR, and LysR binding to a gene of 3-HP dehydrogenase which is a C3 compound is designated as C3-LysR) were located in an opposite orientation, two specific binding sites, i.e., a regulatory binding site (RS) having a conservative T-N11-A motif and an activation binding site (AS) adjacent to a 35 RNA polymerase binding site, were confirmed (FIG. 6). In addition, it was confirmed that the RS and AS overlap over positions 10 and −35 of the genes encoding the LysR protein. In this regard, it is assumed that the expression of the lysR gene is suppressed by an expression product, LysR.


More detailed analysis of the C4 LysR inducible promoter present in P. denitrificans was performed. O1 and O2 operators between a LysR gene and a mmsadh gene were each located at positions −58 and −9 relative to a transcription start site of the mmsadh gene, and each had an inverted repeat (FIG. 7). The inverted repeat sequence or the palindromic structure was often found in an operator site of prokaryotes, and is known to be a binding site for the transcriptional regulatory proteins. A distance between O1 and O2 sites was about 50 bp, which corresponds to 5 turns of helical DNA, and thus, it is assumed that the LysR protein can bind in the same direction when binding to O1 and O2 sites. The O1 site dyad consists of 9 bases at an interval of 15 bp, but since there was only one mismatch, it was found that the O1 site dyad was highly symmetrical. Meanwhile, the inverted repeat sequence of the O2 site also consists of 9 bases at a relatively short interval of 11 bp. 6 out of 9 was mismatched, and that is, the symmetry of the O2 site was weak. As a result of examining homology of four palindromic fragments present in the O1 and O2 operators, TACGTGTAA was found. The bases at positions 3, 4, and 5 (bold letters) were conserved in all fragments, and the bases at positions 2 and 8 (underlined) were conserved in three fragments, suggesting that these bases play an important role in binding to the C4 LysR protein.


The effect of the O1 and O2 operators on biosynthesis of the C4-LysR protein and the mmsadh expression was examined by using a green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter (Table 2). In Table 2, the effect of the C4-LysR protein and the O1 and O2 operators on the expression of the C4-LysR and the mmsadh. The relative size of the GFP was shown relative to the wild type in the absence of 3-HP. the C4-LysR protein was either not present or was produced by a constitutive promoter, and a plasmid was prepared to control the expression of the GFP upon the existing promoter having the O1 and O2 operators. Then, the experiment was carried out by inserting the prepared plasmid into a host of P. denitrificans from which genes between the C4-LysR and the mmsadh was deleted. Accordingly, the expression of the GFP was suppressed by the C4-LysR protein itself. That is, when the C4-LysR is expressed, the GFP expression was reduced by more than 10-fold. In addition, the expression regulation was also constant regardless of the presence of 3-HP. In this regard, it was confirmed that the transcription of C4-LysR mRNA was negatively regulated by the C4-LysR protein. This experiment was repeated by using a promoter that randomized the O1 and O2 operators to eliminate the symmetrical dyad. As a result, in the case where the O1 or O2 operator site was randomized, the GFP expression was not regulated by the C4-LysR protein, referring that the C4-LysR protein in the P. denitrificans strain was negatively regulated by the strain itself.


Meanwhile, the effect of the O1 and O2 operators on the mmsadh gene expression was examined in a similar manner. That is, the C4-LysR protein was constitutively expressed, and a plasmid was prepared so that GFP can be located after a promoter having O1 and O2 promoters. Here, an O1 or O2 operator was mutated so that the symmetrical dyad of an O1 or O2 site was randomized. As a result, when the O1 or O2 site was mutated, the phenomenon of up-regulation of transcription by 3-HP disappeared. That is, it means that the O1 and O2 operators are all essential sites for up-regulation of the expression by 3-HP. Thus, it has been found that the promoter of the present invention is a promoter requiring the presence of the O1 and O2 operators.















TABLE 2






3-HP




O1 & O2


Genes tested1
addition2
wildtype
ΔC4-LysR
O1 mutation3
O2 mutation3
mutation3







C4-LysR
w/o 3-HP
1
10
10
1
10


C4-LysR
w 3-HP
1
10
10
1
10


mmsadh
w/o 3-HP
1
 3
 3
3
 3


mmsadh
w 3-HP
55 
 3
 3
3
 3






1GFP was used as a reporter protein, and that is, a plasmid to which a GFP gene was inserted at a C4-LysR position or a mmsadh position was used.




23-HP was added in a concentration of 25 mM.




3When O1 and O2 were randomized, C4-LysR used a promoter expressed weakly but constitutively.







Meanwhile, the LTTRs protein was known to consist of an N-terminal which is a DNA binding domain (helix-turn-helix motif), a C-terminal which is a substrate binding domain, and a linker connecting the N-terminal and the C-terminal. The LysR protein forms a homodimer to bind RS and AS, and when an effector molecule (3-HP in the case of the present invention) binds each of the LysR proteins, due to protein-protein interaction between two LTTR dimmers the LTTR forms a tetramer, which in turn causes a structural change in DAN associated with the LysR protein. A derivative specifically binding to the LTTR tetramer is known to cause a structural changes of the LysR protein, and subsequently alter the structure of the promoter region DNA, thereby ultimately helping binding of a RNA polymerase to the promoter (FIG. 8).


When examining the structure of the C4-LysR protein which has been emphasized in the present invention, it was also resulted that the C4-LysR protein consists of an N-terminal which is a DNA binding domain (helix-turn-helix motif), a C-terminal which is a substrate binding domain, and a linker connecting the N-terminal and the C-terminal (FIG. 9). It was found that four amino acids, i.e., Thr-31, Arg-34, Glu-40, and Leu-47, played a key role in the DNA binding domain, and in the substrate binding domain, amino acids that are important for binding 3-HP and amino acids that play an important role in the dimer formation have been identified. Among these amino acids, amino acids that play an important role in the binding to 3-HP were Asp-159, Thr-160, Pro-237, and Phe-239, and amino acids that play an important role in the dimer formation were Ala-60, Gly-91, Arg-94, Pro-118, and Glu-137. In particular, amino acids that play an important role in the dimer formation were all located on the protein surface, except for Pro-118.


To confirm that the LysR protein is a transcriptional regulator, genes encoding the C3 and C4 LysR proteins were removed from P. denitrificans chromosomes, and then, transcription induction of transcriptionally regulated genes (mmsadh, 3hibdhIV, and 3hpdh) was examined. First, when the C4 LysR gene was removed, regardless of the presence of 3-HP, the expression of the mmsadh and 3hibdhIV genes was low, and addition of 3-HP did not increase the expression. When the C3 LysR gene was removed, the expression of the 3hpdh gene was not amplified by addition of 3-HP. However, when C3 LysR or C4 LysR gene was expressed again by using a plasmid in strains from which the C3 LysR or C4 LysR gene was removed (complementation experiment), the gene expression was amplified and restored to the same level as that of the wild type strain upon 3-HP. In this regard, it was confirmed that the C3 LysR protein and the C4 LysR protein were each a transcriptional regulatory protein that regulates the expression of the mmsadh, 3hibdhIV, and 3hpdh in cells.


(3) In Vitro Examination of Binding Characteristics of C4-LysR Protein and O1 and O2 Operator Sites


To examine in vitro characteristics of the C4-LysR protein, the C4-LysR protein having a histidine tag at the C-terminal was produced in E. coli and purified therefrom. First, the His tag was labeled at the C-terminal and the N-terminal, and then, the above-mentioned complementation experiment was carried out. As a result, both cases showed the same performance as the wild type LysR having no His tag. Accordingly, among two recombinant LysR proteins, only the C-His tagged LysR was subjected to biochemical experiment. The recombinant LysR was mostly expressed in an insoluble form in E. coli. Here, detailed optimization experiment for the expression conditions (temperature, pH, medium composition, IPTG concentration, etc) was also carried out. In addition, the influence of the various chaperon proteins also carried out. As a result, a sufficient amount of water-soluble C4-LysR was able to be produced from E. coli at a comparatively low temperature of 25° C. under common conditions with 0.1 M IPTG, an LB medium, and GroEL-ES chaperon (FIG. 10). The purely separated proteins were identified by SDS-PAGE. Here, the size of the C4-LysR was estimated to be about 33 kDa, which was in good match with the predicted size of the gene. However, the result of native gel electrophoresis showed that a dimer was formed in a buffer solution when the protein concentration was high (FIG. 11).


The binding between the genetically recombinant C4-LysR and the promoter DNA through EMSA experiments (FIG. 12). For the EMSA experiments, three DNA fragments were synthesized. F12 (135 bp) is a DNA fragment serving as an entire promoter region between C4-Lys and mmsadh genes and including both O1 and O2 operators; F12M (135 bp) is a DNA fragment including only the O1 operator region; and F1M2 (135 bp) is a DNA fragment including only the O2 operator region. For use as a control group, one fragment was synthesized, wherein the one fragment had the same size as F12, but was designed not to have a palindrome structure by randomizing both O1 and O2 regions. The C4-LysR protein was reacted with the DNA fragments (F12, F12M, and F1M2) and electrophoresis was carried out thereon. As a result, it was observed that the mobility of the DNA fragments decreased (FIG. 12), meaning that the C4-LysR protein binds to the DNA fragments under in vitro conditions. Such a decrease in the mobility was not observed in the control fragment. That is, the binding between C4-LysR and the DNA fragment can be achieved in the presence of base sequences of the DNA fragments, and more particularly, sequences of the O1 and O2 operators. Among the three fragments, F12 showed the highest affinity to the LysR protein, followed by F12M and F1M2. The EMASA experiments were repeated in the presence of 3-HP, and the presence of 3-HP changed affinity. That is, F12 had increased affinity, F1 had barely changed affinity, and F2 had slightly decreased affinity.


When F12 had higher affinity than F12M or F1M2, it means that the binding of O1 and O2 of the LsyR is cooperative. That is, when the LysR protein binds to the O1 site having high affinity, the binding to the O2 site is promoted. The results of the EMSA experiments showed that F12 always had low mobility, compared to F12M or F1M2. In addition, at a low concentration of the LysR, the bane having only one shift was shown, meaning that there is always more LysR proteins bound to F12. That is, when the LysR binds to F12, it means that the LysR binds to both O1 and O2 sites. F12 having higher affinity than F12M or F1M2 and having lower mobility than F12M or F1M2 shows the fact that the binding of the LysR protein to the O1 and O2 sites in F12 was cooperative. From these results of the EMSA experiments, the important properties of the 3-HP inducible promoter can be summarized as follows: (i) the promoter is characterized by having two or more inverted repeat sequence pairs, each consisting of 9 bases, and providing a binding site of the LysR protein; (ii) the LysR protein is able to bind to the promoter regardless of the binding with an inducer molecule, but the improvement in transcription efficiency is only shown by the LysR protein associated with an inducer molecule, wherein the inducer molecule may be 3-HP or 3-HIB and 3-HB that are structurally similar with 3-HP; (iii) the promoter provides a site where two LysR protein dimmers are bound, wherein the binding is cooperative each other; (iv) the promoter provides a structure that can interact with the LysR protein when the RNA polymerase binds thereto; and (v) the promoter includes the O1 and O2 operators, wherein each operator consists of 9 bases and has well conserved inverted repeat sequences.


(4) Virtual Search of 3-HP Inducible Gene Expression System and Analysis of Characteristics of the Expression System


To find out a new 3-HP inducible gene expression system, putative LysR regulatory genes and mmsadh, 3hipdh, 3hpdh, and the like were screened from various microorganisms, based on the gene homology of P. denitrificans. The BlastP similarity search results show that similar 3-HP inducible gene expression systems are present in various microorganisms, and among well-known microorganisms, the presence of a population of genes assumed to be 3HIBDH (C4 system) and 3HPDH(C3 system) was discovered (FIG. 13 and Tables 4 and 5). As a result of structure analysis and comparison of the genes, it was confirmed that each microorganism had various genetic structures.


In a total more than 150 microorganisms, the 3-HP inducible gene expression systems were discovered, and depending on the presence of the C3-LysR and the C4-LysR and the gene arrangement characteristics, the gene expression systems were divided into a total of 16 groups. Among the groups, 9 groups had both C4 the C3 systems, and 7 groups had only the C4 system. A group having only the C3 system was not discovered. In addition, the case of the C3 system, a gene encoding the LysR protein and a gene regulating the expression thereof by the LysR protein were all characterized in that the direction of transcription was opposite. In the case of the C4 system, a gene encoding the LysR protein and a gene regulating the expression thereby of the LysR were mostly characterized in that the direction of transcription was opposite. However, in the microorganisms belonging to Groups 15 and Group 16, the direction of transcription was the same.


The characteristics of the promoter sequences that are reactive to the C3 and C4 LysR proteins were analyzed. In the same manner as in P. denitrificans, two tandem operator sites (designated as O1 and O2) were present. Two operators had a dyad symmetry, wherein each of the inverted repeats consists of 9 bases. Here, the distance between the centers of the dyad symmetry was 50 bases, so that when the LysR protein binds to the O1 and O2 operator sites, the LysR protein was spaced to bind in the same direction. In addition, the 9 bases within the inverted repeat sequence was well conserved in many microorganisms.


The palindromic binding site to the LysR that is reactive to 3-HP was conserved in various microorganisms. However, depending on species, only the O1 operator, i.e., a primary/repression binding site (PBS/RBS), was conserved (Table 3). In addition, in all species, PBS including the conserved T-N11/12-A motif and having high affinity was present adjacent to positions −65 and −75 relative to a transcription start site (TSS). That is, the O2 operator, i.e., a secondary/activation binding site (SBS/ABS) motif, had low sequence conservation, so that in silico prediction of the ABS motif is complex and difficult. The RBS and ABS sites were each reported to play a key role in autogenic inhibition and activation. Despite having a common function as proteins that are reactive to 3-HP, the 3-HP-LysR protein had low sequence similarity among other genus and had high sequence similarity within the same genus. Therefore, it is not logically wrong that the DNA sequence of the operator region to which the LysR protein binds is different among different genus. Here, transcription factors (promoters; −10 and −35 regions) were predicted by using BPROM and BDGP tools.


The 9 base sequences shown in Table 3 refer to the conserved regions corresponding to the binding sites to the LysR that is reactive to 3-HP in each genus, wherein the capital letters are bases that appear to be conserved in all target subjects.











TABLE 3






Repressive




Binding Site




(T-N11/12-A



Genus
motif)
# Representatives


















Achromobacter

CAcAcATct
4






Acidovorax

TcGCAcAcC
3






Acinetobacter

GTcaAaGAT
7






Advenella

TTGCAaATT
4






Aeromonas

GGGcAaaCA
2






Alcaligenes

CAcAcATct
5






Alcanivorax

AgCAGCATG
2






Alicycliphilus

TGCaAAGcc
2






Anaeromyxobacter

GGGaCGacG
3






Azospirillum

gTGCCcGCG
4






Azotobacter

gTatcGAGC
4






Beijerinckia

ATTgcCgTG
3






Bordetella

gTTtCGTtG
6






Bradyrhizobium

AtATATcaG
3






Brucella

AaaAAtGCa
3






Burkholderia

GCCtACacT
16






Corynebacterium

CACCTtTgC
6






Cupriavidus

AGTtCAgcG
3






Delftia

GCAAAAAcg
3






Ferrimonas

GCGGTTTTa
2






Glaciecola

TgAaTtGAC
3






Gordonia

GAaaCCGGC
2






Halomonas

tACACacAA
3






Janthinobacterium

TtCGcATTa
3






Marinobacter

CAgaAgGcT
2






Methylocystis

CGAtCgACC
2






Phenylobaculum

GTcCCGCtC
2






Pseudomonas

TTGCAcatC
24






Ralstonia

GCCtACacT
5






Shewanella

gTTcGcgTA
6






Sinorhizobium

TcGgAAaTT
2






Sphingobium

CgcACaAcC
2






Stenotrophomonas

GgcCaGATT
2






Tistrella

CCGGcgGcG
3






Variovorax

gTcTATTgT
2






Verminephrobacter

CgTGgcCGA
2






Vibrio

TGcaCcgTT
6






Xanthobacter

CTgtGCACa
2






Xanthomonas

GcgGTGGgC
6





# Representitives: The number of species identified as having the same repressive binding site (RBS) within the genus.













TABLE 4







Comparison of enzyme protein sequence homology for C4-LysR, MMSADH, and


3HIBDH















Genbank ID



C4-LysR
MMSADH
3HIBDH
C4-LysR














Enzyme Source
Size
Identity
Size
Identity
Size
Identity
MMSADH


Enzyme Source
(AA)
(%)
(AA)
(%)
(AA)
(%)
3HIBDH






Achromobacter sp.

306
47
497
67
296
56
WP_013392250.1









WP_020924676.1









WP_046807163.1



Acidovorax

295
59
507
82
299
54
WP_019701544.1



avenae subsp.







WP_019701545.1









WP_019701549.1



Acidovorax sp.

301
60
507
82
296
55
WP_005799303.1









WP_008905850.1









WP_026437393.1



Acinetobacter

293
49
505
70
296
59
WP_005014261.1



baumannii







WP_039237888.1









WP_005025914.1



Aeromonas

304
36
503
58
306
55
WP_029302009.1



hydrophilia







WP_042863805.1









WP_017784754.1



Agrobacterium sp.

293
37
518
47
294
45
NA



Alcaligenes faecalis

297
45
497
60
298
55
WP_026483089.1









WP_045930222.1









WP_026483274.1



Alcanivorax

302
39
498
56
287
48
WP_008927645.1



hongdengensis







WP_008929937.1









WP_040297229.1



Alicycliphilus

304
58
505
81
298
53
WP_013519376.1



denitrificans







WP_013519377.1









WP_013519381.1



Alteromonas

294
35
496
48
291
62
WP_039223538.1



marina







WP_039216373.1









WP_039223543.1



Anaeromyxobacter

313
31
491
53
293
29
WP_012631783.1



dehalogenans







ABC82015.1









WP_011419642.1



Azospirillum

291
33
499
51
296
53
EZQ04117.1



brasilensse







WP_014241748.1









WP_035679372.1



Azotobacter

296
72
501
92
297
79
WP_012699721.1



vinelandii







WP_012699726.1









WP_012699724.1



Beijerinckia

301
43
509
50
295
52
WP_012383627.1



indica







WP_012383190.1









WP_012383623.1



Bordetella avium

307
48
497
66
294
58
WP_012416822.1









WP_012416824.1









WP_012417430.1



Bradyrhizobium

302
42
498
49
296
50
WP_024338218.1



japonicum







WP_024338217.1









WP_028153398.1



Burkholderia

319
47
509
74
300
65
WP_012365776.1



ambifaria







WP_012366631.1









WP_006761413.1



Catenulispora

296
35
504
42
301
41
NA



acidiphila











Caulobacter sp.

295
31
498
45
295
43
NA



Castellaniella

303
46
497
64
297
59
WP_043685951.1



defragrans







WP_043680927.1









WP_043682533.1



Chromobacterium

305
41
500
79
296
58
WP_043617011.1



violaceum







WP_045051895.1









WP_043613761.1



Collimonas arenae

319
47
502
67
297
54
AIY40998. 1









WP_038487725.1









WP_038487728.1



Comamonas

300
54
507
83
298
52
WP_034389635.1



testosteroni







WP_003075837.1









WP_043003783.1



Corynebacterium

304
28
504
51
291
42
WP_025251982.1



vitaeruminis







WP_025251535.1









WP_025251536.1



Cupriavidus

308
40
507
73
296
66
WP_042881289.1



necator







WP_042878263.1









WP_042878261.1



Carvibacter gracilus

296
60
505
82
294
54
WP_027474562.1









WP_027474565.1









WP_027474567.1



Delftia

300
54
507
82
298
53
WP_034393435.1



acidovorans







WP_012205523.1









WP_016453478.1



Ferrimonas

284
25
497
55
296
51
ADN76259.1



balearica







WP_013344534.1









WP_013344538.1



Glaciecola

281
28
496
56
295
47
WP_014109619.1



nitratireducens







WP_014108982.1









WP_014108979.1



Gordonia

298
32
513
48
289
46
WP_041920477.1



bronchialis







WP_012835581.1









WP_012835579.1



Hahella chejuensis

302
28
498
51
296
51
NA



Halomonas elongata

315
44
499
67
300
53
WP_013331269.1









WP_013331270.1









WP_013332181.1



Hirschia sp.

294
37
498
43
293
45
NA



Idiomarina sp.

312
28
499
57
297
52
WP_007420015.1









WP_034729012.1









WP_007419652.1



Janthinobacterium

305
46
502
75
297
53
WP_034757572.1



lividum







WP_034778805.1









WP_034757584.1



Kitasatospora setae

304
31
508
43
298
40
NA



Kutzneria albida

300
35
501
45
284
44
NA



Methylobacterium

302
41
499
47
297
47
NA


sp.










Methylocystis sp.

294
30
498
48
295
46
WP_036241816.1









WP_036286001.1









WP_036289118.1



Novosphingobium

316
39
499
45
289
45
NA


sp.










Oceanimonas

288
28
497
58
297
47
WP_019933245.1



smirnovii







WP_019933168.1









WP_019933171.1



Paracoccus sp.

297
38
533
46
302
45
NA



Parvibaculum

304
30
500
52
296
57
WP_041536697.1



lavamentivorans







WP_041536463.1









WP_012111823.1



Phenylobacterium

282
32
498
52
298
49
WP_041374440.1



koreense







WP_012520768.1









WP_012522231.1



Photobacterium

303
26
502
53
303
44
NA



gaetbuleda











Polynucleobacter

291
49
500
79
298
66
ABP34774.1



necessarius







ABP34773.1



asymbioticus







ABP34771.1



Pseudoalteromonas

299
29
496
55
299
52
WP_009840151.1



carrageenovora







WP_010381506.1









WP_033103466.1



Pseudogulbenkiania

320
46
500
79
298
59
WP_008953966.1


sp.






WP_008954515.1









WP_014086932.1



Pseudomonas

298
100 
501
100 
291
100 
WP_015477414.1



denitrificans







WP_015477415.1


ATCC13867






WP_015477416.1



Pseudomonas

298
 95%
504
93
291
92
WP_043252263.1



knackmussii







WP_043252261.1









WP_043252259.1



Pseudomonas

316
45
508
73
295
62
WP_041751937.1



protegens







WP_011059111.1









WP_015634046.1



Pseudomonas

315
45
505
73
295
60
WP_034128788.1



fluorescens







WP_046055588.1









WP_034128786.1



Pseudoxanthomonas

297
27
501
79
297
57
WP_014159583.1



spadix







WP_014159749.1









WP_014159753.1



Psychrobacter

302
27
495
71
314
52
WP_028859590.1



phenylpyruvicus







WP_028859166.1









WP_028859170.1



Ralstonia oxalatica

298
30
515
73
301
65
NA



Rhodomicrobium

296
30
496
48
296
48
NA



vannielli











Segniliparus

300
25
509
51
300
46
WP_013137524.1



rotundus







WP_013137611.1









WP_013137610.1



Shewanella

291
24
499
55
300
51
WP_011072126.1



oneidensis







WP_011071828.1









WP_011071832.1



Simiduia

297
29
505
55
296
47
NA



agarivorans











Sinorhizobium

315
40
498
50
298
52
WP_018099720.1



meliloti







WP_027990465.1









WP_027991426.1



Sphingobium

292
43
499
49
294
48
WP_037446180.1



chlorophenolicum







WP_037456635.1









WP_037446174.1



Sphingomonas

325
43
503
44
296
46
NA



wittichi











Sphingopyxis

310
36
497
45
291
44
NA



alaskensis











Stenotrophomonas

289
32
501
80
296
57
WP_044569661.1



maltophilia







WP_019185504.1









WP_005407687.1



Tatlockia micdadei

293
22
499
45
295
47
WP_045099921.1









WP_045098082.1









WP_045098081.1



Thalassospira

295
38
499
45
296
48
NA



xiamenensis











Variovorax

298
60
507
82
300
55
WP_018905631.1



paradoxus







WP_012748355.1









WP_012748351.1



Verminephrobacter

298
26
507
78
299
51
WP_011807819.1



eiseniae







WP_011811243.1









WP_011811250.1



Vibrio furnissii

304
25
520
57
300
49
WP_014257826.1









WP_041943477.1









WP_004727845.1



Xanthobacter

307
44
498
50
299
51
WP_012114222.1



autotrophicus







WP_012114221.1









WP_041575420.1



Xanthomonas

301
29
501
77
295
58
WP_044099340.1



campestri







WP_003488244.1









WP_003488236.1



Xanthomonas oryzae

304
27
501
77
300
57
WP_024711534.1









WP_044750113.1









WP_024744051.1
















TABLE 5







Comparison of enzyme protein


sequence homology for C3-LysR and 3HPDH

















Genbank











C3-LysR
3HPDH
accession














Iden-

Iden-
no



Size
tity
Size
tity
C3-LysR


Enzyme Source
(AA)
(%)
(AA)
(%)
3HPDH
















Achromobacter sp.

306
45
547
65
WP_006223849.1







WP_006225226.1



Acidovorax
avenae

295
45
564
59
WP_013595009.1







WP_013592873.1



Acidovorax sp.

301
44
556
61
WP_020229646.1







WP_020229941.1



Acinetobacter

293
40
534
39
WP_000861803.1



baumannii





WP_032868291.1



Alcaligenes

297
42
555
64
WP_026483089.1



faecalis





ADT64694.1



Alcanivorax

290
27
531
42
WP_008929468.1



hongdengensis





WP_008927596.1



Alicychphilus

304
44
560
60
WP_013519376.1



denitrificans





WP_013721241.1



Alteromonas

294
36
550
43
WP_039223538.1



marina





WP_039222748.1



Azospirillum

391
35
537
36
WP_040137273.1



brasilense





WP_035676856.1



Bordetella
avium

307
45
540
66
WP_012416822.1







WP_012415815.1



Bradyrhizobium

302
41
539
57
WP_024338218.1



japonicum





WP_028143201.1



Burkholderia

323
38
567
60
WP_006754369.1



ambifaria





WP_011659279.1



Castellaniella

303
42
537
63
WP_043685951.1



defragrans





WP_043679553.1



Chromobacterium

305
54
556
68
WP_043617011.1



violaceum





WP_043617013.1



Collimonas
arenae

319
44
541
61
AIY40998.1







WP_038494339.1



Comamonas

300
39
555
69
WP_043003771.1



testosteroni





WP_012836757.1



Cupriavidus

308
38
554
61
WP_042881289.1



necator





WP_042883575.1



Carvibacter

296
45
575
57
WP_027474562.1



gracilus





WP_027477384.1



Delftia

300
41
575
59
WP_034393435.1



acidovorans





WP_043780341.1



Glaciecola

310
23
533
41
WP_014110217.1



nitratireducens





WP_014110368.1



Gordonia

298
24
443
42
WP_041920477.1



bronchialis





WP_012835455.1



Halomonas

315
42
551
61
WP_013331269.1



elongata





WP_013332997.1



Idiomarina sp.

303
25
564
37
WP_008487425.1







WP_034821838.1



Janthinobacterium

305
44
541
62
WP_034788899.1



lividum





WP_010393822.1



Parvibaculum

304
28
548
40
WP_041536697.1



lavamentivorans





WP_041536013.1



Polynucleobacter

291
41
539
58
ABP34774.1



necessarius





ABP33573.1



asymbioticus









Pseudogulbenkiania

320
42
547
42
WP_014086927.1


sp.




WP_014087291.1



Pseudomonas

304
100
554
100
WP_015478424.1



denitrificans





WP_015478425.1


ATCC13867








Pseudomonas

301
89
552
85
WP_043249755.1



knackmussii





WP_043249752.1



Pseudomonas

297
71
548
75
WP_041117574.1



protegens





WP_011060785.1



Pseudomonas

294
72
548
76
WP_046048946.1



fluorescens





WP_038984218.1



Pseudoxanthomonas

307
28
545
43
WP_043290476.1



spadix





WP_014160845.1



Psychrobacter

302
25
565
40
WP_028859810.1



phenylpyruvicus





WP_028859590.1



Segnihparus

300
26
516
37
WP_013139368.1


rotundus




WP_013137524.1



Sinorhizobium

315
37
531
77
WP_018094277.1



meliloti





WP_010970328.1



Sphingobium

292
38
544
40
WP_037446180.1



chlorophenolicum





WP_037446228.1



Stenotrophomonas

289
29
534
44
WP_037590748.1



maltophilia





WP_044569661.1



Variovorax

298
44
544
61
WP_018905631.1



paradoxus





WP_042580440.1



Verminephrobacter

306
28
556
59
WP_011812258.1



eiseniae





WP_011808703.1



Vibrio
furnissii

295
27
573
39
WP_004729245.1







WP_004724290.1



Xanthobacter

307
43
556
56
ABS68474.1



autotrophicus





WP_012114222.1



Xanthomonas

304
30
556
53
WP_033484874.1



campestris





WP_011038502.1









The analysis of the LysR protein was performed in the same manner. As a result BLAST search for the C4 LysR and C3 LysR sequences from the non-redundant NCBI database, it was confirmed that there were 126 and 132 sequences that were homologous to the DNA-binding helix-turn-helix region. FIGS. 14 and 15 show the multiple sequence alignments of these sequences. As a result of the sequence alignments, it was confirmed that a significant portion of the LysR sequences was found to be highly conserved, and that the LysR sequences were also found to be conserved at a high level in other microorganisms. That is, it is suggested that most microorganisms use LysR in cells. In addition, the helix-turn-helix region assumed to bind strongly to the inverted repeat sequences of the operator region in the 3-HP expression promoter in all C4 LysR and C3 LysR sequences was found. In this helix-turn-helix region, four residues, such as Thr-31, Arg-34, Glu-40, and Leu-47, are well conserved. The conserved amino acid residues are considered as important parts in strong interaction upon binding between the LysR protein and DNA (FIG. 9).


To further examine protein-ligand interaction between LysR and 3-HP, homology modeling and docking experiments were carried out. First, a structure available from the PDB database was used, and as a result of comparing sequence similarity of C4-LysR and C3-LysR in P. denitrificans using the structure, the sequence similarity of 35% or less was shown (PDB ID: 3SZP, 24% identical). Therefore, the modeling of the C4-LysR and the C3-LysR was carried out according to a threading method using MUSTER and LOMET server. As a result, the predicted C4-LysR and C3-LysR models were purified and verified using RAMPAGE, and it was confirmed by Ramachandran plot that 98% of the amino acid residues were in the appropriate region. Then, the active sites to which 3-HP binds in C4-LysR and C3-LysR were predicted by using COACH. Here, the valid models and the residues at the predicted active sites were used to perform docking experiments in the Maestro program on SCHRODINGER™. Target proteins (C4-LysR and C3-LysR) and a ligand (3-HP) were each examined by using Protein Preparation Wizard and LigPrep Wizard. To produce a grid box, a receptor grid generation tool was used, and ligand docking was performed in the produced grid box by using standard precision (SP) and eXtra precision (XP) docking settings. Consequently, the excellent docking pose was shown when having a docking score of 5.01 for C4-LysR and a docking score of 3.74 for C3-LysR. It was also confirmed that C4-LysR and C3-LysR had interaction with 3-HP and several molecules. Among amino acid residues of C4-LysR, it was examined that Asp-159, Thr-160, Pro-237, and Phe-239 had hydrogen bonding with 3-HP, and ARG24 had hydrophobic interaction with 3-HP (FIG. 9). Among amino acid residues of C3-LysR, it was examined that LEU74, THR190, and THR28 had hydrogen bonding, and THR73, VAL150, PRO167, PHE127, and PHE169 had hydrophobic interaction. Unlike the prediction that there is no interaction between 3-HP and LysR, the docking results interestingly show that 3-HP had strong interaction with a substrate binding domain (ARG94, LYS96, and GLU137) and a helix-turn-helix domain (ARG24) in C4-LysR. In a similar manner, THR28 (helix-turn-helix domain) of C3-LysR was found to have strong interaction with 3-HP. In particular, in a substrate binding domain, in addition to the 3-HP bonding, amino acids that play an important role in the dimer formation have been identified, and the identified amino acids are Ala-60, Gly-91, Arg-94, Pro-118, and Glu-137. In particular, amino acids that play an important role in the dimer formation were all located on the protein surface, except for Pro-118. In this regard, when 3-HP directly affects LysR and causes dimerization of LysR, LysR undergoing dimerization binds to DNA and highly regulates transcription of the 3-HP degrading genes located below the LysR gene.


(5) 3-HP Degradation and Expression of 3-HP Inducible Genes by Microorganisms Having 3-HP Inducible Genes


According to the gene structure analysis, the 3-HP degradation pathway was found to be present in various microorganisms. To evaluate the 3-HP degradation ability of various microorganisms, cells were suspended in a 100 mM phosphate solution containing 25 mmol/L of 3-HP and allowed to degrade 3-HP for 24 hours (Table 6). As a result, there was a difference in 3-HP degrading rates depending on the microorganisms, but all of the microorganisms were found to effectively degrade 3-HP. The transcription levels of the 3-HP degrading genes (3hpdh, 3hibdh, and mmsadh) were evaluated depending on the presence of 3-HP (Table 7). As shown in Table 7, 3-HP increased the expression of the 3hpdh, 3hibdh, and mmsadh genes by 6-fold, 14-fold, and 16-fold, respectively in the microorganisms. Such results refer that the 3-HP inducible systems are common in various microorganisms. Meanwhile, in comparison with P. denitrificans, the rate of transcription increase in other microorganisms was about 10 times lower than that of P. denitrificans, probably due to differences in culture conditions. That is, except for P. denitrificans, to improve the growth of other microorganisms, the microorganisms were cultured in a medium supplemented with a large amount of complex nitrogen source, but in this case, in addition to 3-HP, amino acids included in the complex nitrogen source or degradation products of the amino acids activated the transcription of 3hpdh, 3hibdh, and mmsadh at a certain point under conditions where 3-HP was not present so that the amount of the transcription was able to be highly maintained even in the absence of 3-HP.









TABLE 6







3-HP degradation of dormant cells













3-HP



Genus

degraded



No.
Strains
(mM)a















1

Achromobacter
denitrificans

18.40



2

Acidovorax
avenae subsp.

20.43





Acidovorax sp.

16.60



3

Acinetobacter
baumannii

18.76



4

Aeromonas
hydrophilia

17.88



5

Agrobacterium sp.

20.54



6

Alcaligenes
faecalis

19.32



7

Alcanivorax
hongdengensis

24.51



8

Alicychphilus
denitrificans

20.62



9

Alteromonas
marina

20.42



10

Amycolatopsis sp.

21.13



11

Anaeromyxobacter
dehalogenans

23.14



12

Azospirillum
brasilensse

17.96



13

Azotobacter
vinelandii

19.44



14

Beijerinckia
indica

23.13



15

Bordetella
avium

23.87



16

Bradyrhizobium
japonicum

21.67



17

Burkholderia
ambifaria

18.33



18

Catenulispora
acidiphilia

19.45



19

Caulobacter sp.

22.34



20

Castellaniella
defragrans

13.97



21

Chromobacterium
violaceum

14.56



22

Collimonas
arenae

16.11



23

Comamonas
testosteroni

15.96



24

Corynebacterium
vitaeruminis

17.35



25

Cupriavidus
necator

18.46



26

Curvibacter
gracilus

19.12



27

Delftia
acidovorans

15.89



28

Ferrimonas
balearica

17.32



29

Glaciecola
nitratireducens

16.57



30

Gordonia
bronchialis

18.41



31

Hahella
chijuensis

17.59



32

Halomonas
elongata

19.14



33

Hirschia
litorea

18.47



34

Idiomarina sp.

17.86



35

Janthinobacterium
lividum

18.02



36

Kitasatospora
setae

19.05



37

Kutzneria
albida

21.14



38

Methylobacterium sp.

23.04



39

Methylocystis sp.

16.97



40

Novosphingobium sp.

15.87



41

Oceanimonas
smirnovii

15.91



42

Paracoccus sp.

17.96



43

Parvibaculum
lavamentivorans

18.02



44

Phenylobacterium
kunshanensis

17.56



45

Photobacterium
gaetbuleda

19.04



46

Polynucleobacter
necessarius
asymbioticus

16.97



47

Pseudoalteromonas
carrageenovora

19.03



48

Pseudogulbenkiania sp.

7.36



49

Pseudomonas
denitrificans ATCC13867

20.53





Pseudomonas
knackmussii

7.42





Pseudomonas
protegens

25.24





Pseudomonas
fluorescens

24.41



50

Pseudoxanthomonas
spadix

23.01



51

Psychrobacter
phenylpyruvicus

20.17



52

Ralstonia
oxalatica

18.09



53

Rhodomicrobium
vannielli

19.42



54

Segnihparus
rotundus

8.96



55

Shewanella
oneidensis

10.14



56

Simiduia
agarovorans

23.78



57

Sinorhizobium
meliloti

13.87



58

Sphingobium
chlorophenolicum

14.76



59

Sphingomonas
wittichii

21.04



60

Sphingopyxis
alaskensis

23.56



61

Stenotrophomonas
maltophilia

15.34



62

Streptomyces
nodosus

21.13



63

Tatlockia
micdadei

17.81



64

Thalassospira
xiamenensis

18.88



65

Variovorax
paradoxus

19.34



66

Verminephrobacter
eiseniae

17.04



67

Vibrio
furnissii

16.98



68

Xanthobacter
autotrophicus

15.92



69

Xanthomonas
campestri

14.37





Xanthomonas
oryzae

13.88








aThe amount of 3-HP degraded was calculated between 0 and 24 h.














TABLE 7







Relative mRNA levels of 3-HP degrading genes













3hpdh
3hibdh
mmsadh














Genus No.
Strains

+

+

+


Genus No.
Strains
3-HP
3-HP
3-HP
3-HP
3-HP
3-HP

















1

Achromobacter denitrificans

0.04
0.24
0.31
6.40
0.24
6.34


2

Acidovorax avenae subsp.

0.05
0.28
0.34
5.97
0.21
5.98




Acidovorax sp.

0.02
0.31
0.33
6.76
0.36
6.04


3

Acinetobacter baumannii

0.01
0.19
0.35
6.02
0.27
5.76


4

Aeromonas hydrophilia



0.37
6.17
0.32
6.14


5

Agrobacterium sp.

0.01
0.27
0.36
6.27
0.41
6.56


6

Alcaligenes faecalis

0.04
0.26
0.39
5.87
0.28
5.73


7

Alcanivorax hongdengensis

0.03
0.27
0.33
6.74
0.37
6.58


8

Alicychphilus denitrificans

0.07
0.30
0.31
7.01
0.25
6.01


9

Alteromonas marina

0.06
0.34
0.34
6.09
0.22
5.73


10

Amycolatopsis sp.



0.32
5.96
0.24
6.05


11

Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans



0.37
6.43
0.28
5.44


12

Azospirillum brasilensse

0.05
0.41
0.36
6.54
0.33
6.05


13

Azotobacter vinelandii



0.38
6.73
0.31
5.87


14

Beijerinckia indica



0.34
6.59
0.29
5.01


15

Bordetella avium

0.08
0.45
0.31
6.04
0.24
4.98


16

Bradyrhizobium japonicum

0.07
0.52
0.41
7.21
0.34
5.49


17

Burkholderia ambifaria

0.03
0.31
0.29
5.94
0.21
5.13


18

Catenulispora acidiphilia

0.05
0.41
0.32
5.84
0.25
5.24


19

Caulobacter sp.

0.04
0.45
0.35
5.96
0.24
5.96


20

Castellaniella defragrans



0.45
7.43
0.37
5.98


21

Chromobacterium violaceum

0.02
0.25
0.38
7.02
0.32
6.31


22

Collimonas arenae



0.37
7.20
0.30
5.87


23

Comamonas testosteroni

0.04
0.24
0.28
5.88
0.21
4.96


24

Corynebacterium vitaeruminis

0.03
0.28
0.47
6.99
0.34
5.89


25

Cupriavidus necator

0.02
0.21
0.42
6.84
0.33
6.05


26

Curvibacter gracilus



0.29
5.76
0.19
3.99


27

Delftia acidovorans



0.33
6.34
0.26
4.03


28

Ferrimonas balearica



0.41
7.04
0.34
5.17


29

Glaciecola nitratireducens

0.05
0.30
0.36
7.11
0.29
4.81


30

Gordonia bronchialis

0.04
0.29
0.45
6.99
0.33
5.21


31

Hahella chijuensis

0.03
0.28
0.42
6.81
0.34
5.97


32

Halomonas elongata

0.06
0.32
0.27
5.41
0.19
4.34


33

Hirschia litorea

0.05
0.34
0.29
6.19
0.18
4.56


34

Idiomarina sp.

0.08
0.42
0.47
7.21
0.32
5.43


35

Janthinobacterium lividum

0.03
0.33
0.41
6.98
0.29
5.01


36

Kitasatospora setae

0.04
0.36
0.39
6.46
0.25
5.25


37

Kutzneria albida

0.03
0.41
0.35
5.96
0.24
5.61


38

Methylobacterium sp.

0.05
0.45
0.33
6.02
0.23
598


39

Methylocystis sp.



0.32
6.51
0.21
4.91


40

Novosphingobium sp.

0.04
0.39
0.29
5.98
0.25
6.04


41

Oceanimonas smirnovii

0.02
0.24
0.36
6.44
0.28
4.88


42

Paracoccus sp.

0.03
0.25
0.34
6.32
0.27
4.96


43

Parvibaculum lavamentivorans

0.04
0.28
0.46
7.31
0.32
4.99


44

Phenylobacterium kunshanensis

0.06
0.33
0.41
7.43
0.33
5.02


45

Photobacterium gaetbuleda



0.36
7.02
0.29
5.06


46

Polynucleobacter necessarius

0.09
0.45
0.39
6.99
0.27
5.37




asymbioticus









47

Pseudoalteromonas carrgeenovora



0.29
5.76
0.21
5.03


48

Pseudogulbenkiania sp.

0.04
0.26
0.32
5.98
0.23
5.36


49

Pseudomonas denitrificans

0.03
0.23
0.39
6.20
0.26
5.43



ATCC13867










Pseudomonas knackmussii

0.03
0.25
0.41
6.81
0.35
5.96




Pseudomonas protegens

0.02
0.19
0.28
5.62
0.21
5.01




Pseudomonas fluorescens

0.04
0.27
0.26
5.81
0.18
4.70


50

Pseudoxanthomonas spadix



0.31
5.99
0.27
4.96


51

Psychrobacter phenylpyruvicus

0.08
0.37
0.43
7.04
0.31
5.03


52

Ralstonia oxalatica



0.40
7.21
0.34
5.21


53

Rhodomicrobium vannielli

0.05
0.41
0.39
7.01
0.32
6.02


54

Segniliparus rotundus

0.07
0.27
0.25
5.81
0.19
4.32


55

Shewanella oneidensis

0.05
0.28
0.25
5.81
0.19
4.07


56

Simiduia agarovorans

0.03
0.29
0.23
5.76
0.21
4.87


57

Sinorhizobium meliloti



0.24
5.79
0.16
4.07


58

Sphingobium chlorophenolicum

0.06
0.33
0.33
5.99
0.23
4.86


59

Sphingomonas wittichii

0.03
0.45
0.31
7.02
0.32
6.42


60

Sphingopyxis alaskensis



0.35
7.00
0.35
6.94


61

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

0.04
0.31
0.29
6.02
0.24
5.21


62

Streptomyces nodosus

0.07
0.39
0.43
6.72
0.34
5.14


63

Tatlockia micdadei



0.47
6.61
0.36
5.65


64

Thalassospira xiamenensis



0.32
7.02
0.33
6.10


65

Variovorax paradoxus



0.38
6.59
0.28
4.97


66

Verminephrobacter eiseniae

0.08
0.43
0.42
6.43
0.30
5.14


67

Vibrio furnissii

0.05
0.39
0.39
6.03
0.27
4.91


68

Xanthobacter autotrophicus

0.04
0.27
0.27
6.23
0.21
5.41


69

Xanthomonas campestri

0.03
0.25
0.24
5.81
0.18
5.09




Xanthomonas oryzae

0.02
0.19
0.45
6.43
0.34
5.19









Analysis of 3-HP inducible promoters was performed on the microorganism above. In the same manner as in P. denitrificans of the previous case, all of the promoters had O1 and O2 operator sequences, and it was confirmed that these sequences had a palindromic structure consisting of 9 bases. Although no further studies on these sequences have been made yet, binding to the LysR protein was expected in the same manner as in P. denitrificans.


In conclusion, to improve the 3-HP production in a biological manner, it is necessary to continuously produce new enzymes with enzyme activity. In the present invention, transcriptional regulators that are reactive to 3-HP and promoters have been screened from microorganisms including P. denitrificans, wherein the transcriptional regulators and promoters consist of LysR proteins and specific gene sequences binding to the LysR proteins. In addition, in the presence of 3-HP, it was found that the LysR family transcriptional regulator up-regulated the expression of the corresponding genes. The molecular modeling and docking experiments showed the presence of important residues for C4-LysR (ARG94, LYS96, GLU137, and ARG24) and C3-LysR (LEU74, THR190, THR28, THR73, VAL150, PRO167, PHE127, and PHE169). Therefore, the 3-HP inducible system is expected to be effectively used to regulate the 3-HP metabolic pathway.


<Example 2> Optimization of 3-HP Production Pathway in P. denitrificans

1. Strains, Plasmids, and Experimental Materials


Bacterial species and plasmids used in the present study were shown in Table 8. An E. coli strain was provided from KCTC and a P. denitrificans strain was provided from ATCC. E. coli XL1-Blue was used for plasmid cloning and maintenance. A genome DNA separation kit and a pGEM-T vector were purchased from Promega (Madison, Wis., USA), a high-performance pfx polymerase was purchased from Invitrogen (Seoul, Korea), a DNA modification enzyme was purchased from New England Bio-Labs (Beverly, Mass., USA), and a Miniprep and DNA gel extraction kit was purchased from Qiagen (Mannheim, Germany). In addition, primers were purchased from Cosmogenetech Co. Ltd. (Seoul, Korea), bacto tryptone and yeast extract were purchased from Difco (Becton Dickinson; Franklin Lakes, N.J., USA), and other chemicals and enzymes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo., USA).









TABLE 8







Bacterial species and plasmids used in the present study










Analysis contents
Source





Strains





E.
coli

Cloning host
KCTC,


DH5α

Korea



P.
denitrificans


P.
denitrificans ATCC13867;

ATCC,


wt
Source for 3hibdhIV and
America



3hpdh promoters and terminators



Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIV

P.
dentirificans ATCC13867

Zhou et



Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIV double
al. 2014



mutant strain



Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIV

P.
dentirificans ATCC13867

This


Δ3hibdhI
Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI
study



triple mutant strain



Plasmids




pGEM-T
lacZa; cloning vector; pGEM 5zf(+)
Promega



derivative; 3T-overhang; Ampr



pUCP19
ColE1-ori; pRO1614-ori; broad-host-range
West et



cloning vector; Ampr
al. 1994


pUCPK/
KGSADH gene amplified from pQKS1
This


PC3-dhaB-gdrAB,
were overlapped with 3hibdhIV
study


PC4-KGSADH
promoter and terminator and cloned in




pUCPK/Pc3-dhaB-gdrAB; Kmr



pUCPK/
gdrAB and dhaB gene order were switched and
This


PC3-gdrAB-dhaB,
cloned in pUCPK/Pc4-KGSADH,; Kmr
study


PC4-KGSADH









2. Development of Δ3HpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI Deletion Mutant Strain of P. denitrificans


To understand the role of the 3-HP degrading genes, 3hibdhI was removed from the chromosome of P. denitrificans Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIV. A target gene was deleted therefrom based on a sacB negative counter-selection system. A sacB-Km cassette was introduced to NdeI and XbaI restriction sites of pQE-80L to prepare a pQSAK plasmid which is to be used for removal of the target gene. The genome DNA of P. denitrificans was used to obtain a DNA fragment including ˜700 bp upstream and downstream of the target gene by PCR. After DNA sequencing thereon, the DNA fragment was cloned into a pGEM-T vector. Afterwards, sub-cloning into the pQSAK plasmid was made again, and then, a mutant strain of P. denitrificans was developed through two rounds of recombination. The mutant strain was re-identified by PCR and sequencing performed thereon. The mutant strains thus obtained was designated as P. denitrificans Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI.


3. Plasmid Construction


A gene encoding glycerol dehydratase and reactivation enzyme was amplified by using a pUCPK′/PC3-dhaB-gdrAB, PC4-KGSADH plasmid, and an expression cassette was constructed by cloning a C3 promoter and a C3 terminator onto promoters at the 5′-end and 3′-end of gdrAB and dhab123 genes, respectively. The expression cassette was replicated at XbaI and SacI restriction sites of the pUCPK′/PC3-dhaB-gdrAB, PC4-KGSADH plasmid, and a resulting plasmid was designated as pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH. The pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH plasmid thus obtained was transformed with P. denitrificans Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI, and finally, a Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH) plasmid was constructed (FIG. 16).


4. Determination of Enzyme Activity


The DhaB activity can be measured by measuring the KGSADH enzyme activity. 1 unit of the DhaB activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to reduce 1 μmol of NAD+ to NADH for 1 minute. Briefly, first, 20 ul of 26 U/mg NAD+-dependent KGSADH was cultured at a temperature of 37° C. for 5 minutes in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) (total volume of 1 mL) containing 1 mM DTT, 15 uM coenzyme B12, 3 mM MgCl2, and 1.5 mM ATP. Here, KGSADH contained 25% glycerol. A reaction was started by the addition of an appropriate amount of a cell extract containing 1.5 mM NAD+ and DhaB preheated at a temperature of 37° C., and was observed through changes in absorbance of NADH. The KGSADH activity was determined according to the method reported by Dr. Raj by measuring the reduction from NAD+ to NADH at 340. A reaction mixture including 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0), 1 mM DTT, and an appropriate amount of an enzyme extract was cultured at a temperature of 37° C. for 5 minutes, and a reaction was initiated by the addition of 2.0 mM 3-HPA and 2.0 mM NAD+. The amount of NADH was determined by using 6.22×103 M−1 cm−1 of molar extinction coefficient (Δε340). 1 unit activity of KGSADH is defined as the amount of enzyme required to reduce 1 μmol of NAD+ to NADH for 1 minute. All enzyme activities were measured by using a crude cell extract.


5. Culture Medium and Culture Conditions


Unless otherwise stated, shaking culture was performed by using a 250 mL non-baffled Erlenmeyer flask containing 20 mL of a culture broth at a speed of 200 rpm at a temperature of 30° C. Here, an M9 culture medium supplemented with, per liter, MgSO4, 0.25 g; NaCl, 1.0 g; NH4Cl, 1.0 g; yeast extract, 1 g; glycerol, 100 mmol; L-glutamate, 5 g; tryptone, 2 g; and glucose 2.5 g was used, and the medium contained 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). If necessary, 12 μmol/L of coenzyme B12 was additionally injected, and then, the flask was sealed with an oxygen-permeable sponge plug. For the measure of cell mass, residual substrates, and metabolites, sampling was periodically done, and all shaking culture experiments were repeated three times, wherein a standard deviation of biomass and metabolites was less than 10%. The bioreactor experiments were carried out in a 1-L working volume in a 1.5-L capacity Biotron-LiFlus GM bioreactor (Biotron, Seoul, Korea).


An M9 culture medium for the bioreactor experiments was supplemented with, per liter, MgSO4.H2O, 0.25 g; NaCl, 1.0 g; NH4Cl, 1.0 g; yeast extract, 1 g; L-glutamate, 5 g; tryptone, 2 g; casamino acids, 2 g; glucose 2.5 g, and trace element solution, 10 mL/L, and the medium contained 100 mM of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The culturing was performed in a fed-type culturing mode at a temperature of 30° C. while concentrated glycerol (10 M) and 7 mM glucose were periodically injected thereto. Here, pH was maintained to 7.0±0.1 by using 5 N NaOH and 2.5 N HCl. Air was continuously supplied at an agitation speed of 650 rpm at 1 vvm. During the culturing, a medium supplemented with tryptone, 2 g/L; casamino acids, 2 g/L; L-glutamate, 5.0 g/L; and yeast extract, 1 g/L was added every 6 hours to the bioreactor. Samples thereof were regularly analyzed to measure cell mass, residual substrates, and metabolites.


6. Analysis Method


The cell concentration was measured by using a spectrophotometer (Lambda 20, Perkin Elmer; Norwalk, Conn., USA) with a cuvette having a length of 10 mm. 1 unit of absorbance at 600 nm (OD600) was consistent with a dry cell volume of 0.3 g per liter. The protein concentration was analyzed according to a Bradford method with a microtiter plate reader based on bovine serum albumin (1420, Wallac Victor 2; Perkin Elmer). The concentrations of glycerol, 3-HP, and other metabolites were measured by HPLC, wherein the supernatant obtained by centrifugation performed on a culturing sample for 10 minutes at 10,000×g was filtered through a tuffryn-membrane (Acrodisc, Pall Life Sciences), and then, was eluted with by 300 mm×7.8 mm Aminex HPX-87H (Bio-Rad, USA) column using 2.5 mM H2SO4 as a mobile phase at a temperature of 65° C.


7. Results


(1) Shaking Flask Culture of Recombinant Pd Δ3HpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH)


The inventors of the present invention had observed in the previous study that the DhaB activity was significantly reduced due to self-destructive catalytic reaction by DhaB when glycerol conversion occurred. Such reduction may be caused by low expression of GdrAb that reactivates DhaB. In addition, it was also expected that the expression of GdrAB would be improved by sequentially arranging GdrAB and DhaB right below the PC3 promoter. Based on this hypothesis, a pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH plasmid was developed and introduced to a P. denitrificans (hereinafter, referred to as Pd) Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI strain for the production of 3-HP. The effect of changing the arrangement order of GdrAB and DhaB regarding the 3-HP production from glycerol was measured in Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH). The supplying effect of coenzyme B12 was examined by supplying 12 μM of coenzyme B12 at 0 h. Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-dhaB-gdrAB, PC4-KGSADH) was used as a control group. S1˜S3 in FIG. 17 shows the production of 3-HP from glycerol by recombinant Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH), and O1˜O3 in FIG. 17 shows the production of 3-HP from glycerol by recombinant Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-dhaB-gdrAB, PC4-KGSADH). S and O1 in FIG. 17 show the results in the case where there was no supply of glycerol, and S2 and O2 of FIG. 17 show the results in the case where there was no supply of coenzyme B12. Meanwhile, S3 and O3 of FIG. 17 show the results obtained in associated with supply of coenzyme B12. It was confirmed that there was no significant difference in cell growth between the two strains. However, the production of 3-HP by the Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH) strain supplied with cobalt and coenzyme B12 increased to 41% and 29% after 12 hours. These results indicate that the rate of DhaB reaction was affected by the amount of coenzyme or the amount of cobalt.


It was observed that the addition of cobalt led to the production of 3-HPA and 1,3-PDO at 12 h, but in a control strain, it was observed that 3-HPA (with cobalt) was not accumulated (Table 9). The yield of 3-HP from glycerol was about ˜1, meaning that glycerol supplied thereto was completed used for the production of 3-HP, and the produced 3-HP was not degraded again.









TABLE 9







Carbon distribution in 12-h culture of recombinant



P.
denitrificans Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI













S2
S3
O2
O3














substrates






Glucose (mM)
0.58
0.91
0.67
0.88


Glycerol (mM)
64.13
52.15
44.92
37.45


Biomass (g/L)
1.51
1.36
1.66
1.17


Metabolites






3-HP (mM)
64.83
49.51
45.93
38.24


3-HPA (mM)
0.78
0.52
0
0.39


1,3-PDO (mM)
3.55
4.95
1.37
1.42


Growth rate (μmax, h−1)
0.56
0.54
0.54
0.53


3-HP yield on glycerol
1.01
0.95
1.02
1.02


(mol/mol)






Glycerol carbon
1.08
1.05
1.05
1.07


recovery (%)









(2) Enzyme Activity


Time-dependent in vitro enzyme activity of DhaB and KGSADH was measured (FIG. 18). The DhaB enzyme activity was examined by using the KGSADH enzyme activity, and the KGSADH enzyme activity was measured by using propionaldehyde as a substrate. When the order of DhaB and GdrAB genes was changed, it was observed that the DhaB activity was reduced. Meanwhile, the addition of glycerol, cobalt, or coenzyme B12 was observed to rather cause significant reduction in the DhaB enzyme activity. In this regard, additional experiments are needed to determine whether such effects are caused by the accumulation of 3-HPA or other factors. However, one thing that is clear is that changing of the order of gdrAB and DhaB was not enough to sufficiently improve the DhaB enzyme activity. Thus, it is unclear whether the expression of gdrB is improved in the recombinant strain used herein. For the gdrB translation, RBS of Klebsiella pneumonia was used, but further verification thereof is required.


(3) Bioreactor Culture of DhaB, KGSADH Overexpression Recombinant Pd Δ3HpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH)


A fed-type glycerol-glucose bioreactor operation was performed by using Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-gdrAB-dhaB, PC4-KGSADH) and Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-dhaB-gdrAB, PC4-KGSADH) strains. In the bioreactor experiments, the concentrations of glucose and glycerol were maintained at low levels of 10 mM and 150 mM, respectively. For every 6 hours, glutamate was supplied for cell growth. As a result of the culture, similar cell growth was observed in the two bioreactors. The cell growth decreased in both cultures after 9 hours, but the cell growth continued until the end of the reaction. In bioreactor A, a Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI (pUCPK′/PC3-dhaB-gdrAB, PC4-KGSADH) strain was used (FIG. 19). Here, the production of 3-HP mostly increased up to 36 hours, resulting in an amount of more than 58±2 g/L at a production rate of 1.2 g/L/h or more, and a 3-HP yield of more than 0.9 mol/mol from glycerol. The 3-HP production rate decreased after 36 hours. Between 36 hours to 48 hours, only 2±0.5 g/L of the 3-HP production was maintained. Overall, for 48 hours, based on a production rate of 1.0 g/L/h and a 3-HP yield of 0.93 mol/mol from glycerol, 60±2 g/L of 3-HP was produced. In comparison with previous experiments, i.e., the fermentation experiment of the strain in which 3hibdhI was not deleted, the yield of 3-HP was significantly increased, confirming that 3hibdhI had an important role in the 3-HP degradation. The influence of 3hibdhI was not observed at all in the flask experiments with short fermentation times.


In bioreactor B, the strain in which the gene order (dhaB and gdrAB) was changed was used, and as a result, the production of 3-HP was improved in the latter half of fermentation. Based on a production rate of 1.3 g/L/h and a yield of 0.95 mol/mol from glycerol, about 63±2 g/L of 3-HP was produced. In comparison with bioreactor A, the 3-HP production was increased by 5%. Although the results were not seen in the enzyme activity assays or flask experiments, the degree of GdrAB expression was significantly important in terms of the 3-HP production.


In conclusion, when the 3-HP production enzymes, i.e., DhaB, GdrAB, and KGSADH, were expressed, P. denitrificans was able to produce 3-HP from glycerol. The recombinant plasmids were developed by using two strong inducible promoters, PC3 and PC4, and Pd Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI from which three genes were deleted was used as a host. To alleviate the degree of inactivation of DhaB, gdrAB was located in front of dhaB, so as to enhance the expression of gdrAB. The enzyme activity analysis and protein expression analysis by SDS-PAGE showed that the activity of DhaB was reduced by such a positional change. However, regardless of the reduced activity of DhaB, the production of 3-HP was improved. As a result of operating the fed-type bioreactor using new recombinant strains, 3-HP was obtained in high concentrations, high production rates, and high yields.

Claims
  • 1. A recombinant expression vector comprising an inducible promoter for 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) or a derivative thereof, wherein the derivative is 3-hydroxyisobutyrate (3HIB) or 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-HB), wherein the inducible promoter comprises a binding site to a LysR protein which is reactive to 3-HP or a derivative thereof,wherein the binding site to a LysR protein comprises a base sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 5 to 43, oran inverted repeat sequence having a base sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 5 to 43 and an inverted repeat sequence paired with therewith are repeated twice.
  • 2. The recombinant expression vector of claim 1, wherein the LysR protein or the promoter is derived from a microorganism having degradability of 3-HP.
  • 3. The recombinant expression vector of claim 2, wherein the microorganism having degradability of 3-HP is one selected from the group consisting of Achromobacter denitrificans, Acidovorax avenae subsp., Acidovorax sp., Acinetobacter baumannii, Aeromonas hydrophilia, Agrobacterium sp., Alcaligenes faecalis, Alcanivorax hongdengensis, Alicycliphilus denitrificans, Alteromonas marina, Amycolatopsis sp., Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans, Azospirillum brasilense, Azotobacter vinelandii, Beijerinckia indica, Bordetella avium, Bradyrhizobium japonicum, Burkholderia ambifaria, Catenulispora acidiphilia, Caulobacter sp., Castellaniella defragrans, Chromobacterium violaceum, Collimonas arenae, Comamonas testosteroni, Corynebacterium vitaeruminis, Cupriavidus necator, Curvibacter gracilus, Delftia acidovorans, Ferrimonas balearica, Glaciecola nitratireducens, Gordonia bronchialis, Hahella chijuensis, Halomonas elongata, Hirschia litorea, Idiomarina sp., Janthinobacterium lividum, Kitasatospora setae, Kutzneria albida, Methylobacterium sp., Methylocystis sp., Novosphingobium sp., Oceanimonas smirnovii, Paracoccus sp., Parvibaculum lavamentivorans, Phenylobacterium kunshanensis, Photobacterium gaetbuleda, Polynucleobacter necessarius asymbioticus, Pseudoalteromonas carrageenovora, Pseudogulbenkiania sp., Pseudomonas denitrifcans ATCC13867, P. knackmussii, P. protegens, P. fluorescens, Pseudoxanthomonas spadix, Psychrobacter phenylpyruvicus, Ralstonia oxalatica, Rhodomicrobium vannielli, Segniliparus rotundus, Shewanella oneidensis, Simiduia agarovorans, Sinorhizobium meliloti, Sphingobium chlorophenolicum, Sphingomonas wittichii, Sphingopyxis alaskensis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Streptomyces nodosus, Tatlockia micdadei, Thalassospira xiamenensis, Variovorax paradoxus, Verminephrobacter eiseniae, Vibrio furnissii, Xanthobacter autotrophicus, Xanthomonas campestri, and Xanthomonas oryzae.
  • 4. The recombinant expression vector of claim 1, wherein the LysR protein comprises an N-terminal domain having a helix-turn-helix structure and binding to DNA, a C-terminal domain binding to 3-HP or a derivative thereof, and a C-terminal domain contributing to stabilization of a LysR protein dimer.
  • 5. The recombinant expression vector of claim 4, wherein the N-terminal domain having a helix-turn-helix structure and binding to DNA comprises an amino acid sequence represented by SEQ ID NO: 1 or 2.
  • 6. The recombinant expression vector of claim 4, wherein the C-terminal domain binding to 3-HP or a derivative thereof comprises an amino acid sequence represented by SEQ ID NO: 3.
  • 7. The recombinant expression vector of claim 4, wherein the C-terminal domain contributing to stabilization of a LysR protein dimer comprises an amino acid sequence represented by SEQ ID NO: 4.
  • 8. The recombinant expression vector of claim 1, wherein the binding site to a LysR protein comprises two LysR protein dimers that are bonded to each other.
  • 9. The recombinant expression vector of claim 1, wherein the binding site to a LysR protein comprises a base sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs: 44 or 45.
  • 10. The recombinant expression vector of claim 1, wherein the recombinant expression vector further comprises a gene encoding a foreign protein linked to the inducible promoter for 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) or a derivative thereof.
  • 11. The recombinant expression vector of claim 10, the foreign protein is glycerol dehydratase (DhaB), DhaB reactivase (GdrAB), or α-ketoglutaric semialdehyde dehydrogenase (KGSADH).
  • 12. A recombinant microorganism transformed with the recombinant expression vector of claim 1.
  • 13. The recombinant microorganism of claim 12, wherein the recombinant microorganism has producibility of 3-HP.
  • 14. The recombinant microorganism of claim 13, wherein the recombinant microorganism is Pseudomonas denitrificans.
  • 15. The recombinant microorganism of claim 13, wherein the recombinant microorganism is a stain of Pseudomonas denitrificans Δ3hpdhΔ3hibdhIVΔ3hibdhI from which 3hpdh, 3hibdh, and mmsadh genes relating to degradation of 3-HP are deleted in a strain of P. denitrificans.
  • 16. A method of producing 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP), the method comprising: culturing the recombinant microorganism of claim 12.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
10-2015-0082593 Jun 2015 KR national
10-2016-0073091 Jun 2016 KR national
CROSS REFERENCE TO PRIOR APPLICATION

This application is a Division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/735,585 filed on May 24, 2018, which is a National Stage Patent Application of PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/KR2016/006261 filed on Jun. 13, 2016, which claims priority to Korean Patent Application Nos. 10-2016-0073091 filed on Jun. 13, 2012 and 10-2015-0082593 filed on Jun. 11, 2015 which are all hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
8883464 Lynch et al. Nov 2014 B2
9428778 Lynch et al. Aug 2016 B2
20120135481 Jessen et al. May 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
2013-542747 Nov 2013 JP
10-1437042 Sep 2014 KR
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
International Search Report for PCT/KR2016/006261 dated Oct. 6, 2016 from Korean Intellectual Property Office.
Zhou, Shengfang et al., “Development of a deletion mutant of Pseudomonas denitrificans that does not degrade 3-hydroxypropionic acid”, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, vol. 98, No. 10, pp. 4389-4398.
Zhou, Shengfang et al., “Cloning, Expression and Characterization of 3-Hydroxyisobutyrate Dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas denitrificans ATCC 13867”, PloS One, 2013, vol. 8, No. 5, e62666 (inner pp. 1-11).
Zhou, Shengfang et al., “Inducible gene expression system by 3-hydroxypropionic acid”, Biotechnology for Biofuels, (2015) 8:169.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200407730 A1 Dec 2020 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15735585 US
Child 17017717 US