Patent Grant
8620765
Buying and selling of goods and services (collectively referred to as “products”) has resulted in a vast array of costing schemes, which are used to select the price at which such products are sold. One of the most common costing schemes that consumers encounter everyday is known as fixed pricing. According to this costing scheme, sellers set a fixed price for their products based on a past demand for the product and/or anticipated future demand. Buyers who desire to purchase products from seller are each required to pay the same fixed price regardless of the number of products purchased. If a seller finds that the demand for a given product is greater or less than expected, the seller may later adjust the fixed price of the product to account for such findings. Although fixed pricing provides a simple way for a seller to conduct business with multiple buyers, one drawback of this costing scheme is that it fails to reward buyers willing to purchase greater quantities of products. Accordingly, the discount quantity-pricing scheme evolved.
The discount quantity-pricing scheme approach to costing involves pricing a product at different levels depending on the quantity of products a customer is willing to purchase. The more products a customer is willing to purchase, the lower the price per product. Sellers have an incentive to lower prices for large quantity buyers since the fixed costs associated with producing the product is spread over more items. Thus, sellers are able to make equal or greater profits despite the lowered price of the product. While volume pricing offers a benefit to larger buyers who are able to purchase large quantities of goods at one time smaller buyers are often unable to obtain the lowered prices and therefore are more likely to “shop around” for the best available deal. This, in turn, hurts both the buyer and seller. For instance, the smaller buyer is burdened with needing to search for alternative deals and still often ends up paying a higher price than larger buyers pay. The sellers, on the other hand, are faced with lost business since they are unable to reduce their price for the smaller buyers and still make sufficient profit.
Another common costing scheme for pricing a product is an auction. In an auction, a seller sets an initial price for an item and then multiple buyers are given an opportunity to bid against one another for the product. The buyer who agrees to pay the highest price for the product purchases the product at the end of the auction at the final price bid. In order to provide a larger forum for buyers and sellers, a recent trend has been to auction goods electronically over the Internet. For example, one company known to operate an auction site over the Internet is eBay, Inc. Although auctions provide advantages when selling unique products for which customers are willing to competitively bid, the auction forum is not well suited for sellers desiring to sell large quantities of goods to multiple buyers given the inherent inefficiencies involved with selling one product at a time in a bidding environment.
Yet another costing scheme that has been advanced is buyer-driven bidding. According to this costing scheme, a single buyer desiring to obtain a product communicates a price at which the buyer is willing to purchase the product to multiple sellers. Each of the sellers is provided an opportunity to review the buyer's price. A sale is complete when one of the sellers agrees to sell the product to the buyer at the price suggested by the buyer, or at a price included in a counteroffer. While the buyer-driven bidding scheme provides advantages for certain types of transactions when, for example, sellers may be willing to sell products at lower than normal prices, the uncertainties involved with whether a buyer's offer will be accepted is often problematic.
While the costing schemes described above have various advantages and disadvantages in different situations, a commonality among all of the costing schemes is that each buyer operates independently with one or more sellers to set a purchase price of a product. For example, in the fixed pricing scheme and discount quantity purchasing scheme, buyers individually determine whether the sellers preset price schedule is acceptable regardless of whether other buyers have decided to purchase the product or not. In an auction, not only do buyers operate independently of other buyers, but, in fact, each buyer's decision to place a bid has a negative effect on all other buyers desiring to purchase the same good since the price of the good increases for all potential buyers. Similarly, in a buyer-driven bidding scheme, each buyer is completely unaware of the amount other buyers are bidding for a given product.
The following presents a simplified summary of the disclosed subject matter in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the disclosed subject matter. This summary is not an extensive overview of the disclosed subject matter. It is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of the disclosed subject matter nor delineate the scope of the disclosed subject matter. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the disclosed subject matter in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
Briefly described, the subject disclosure pertains to social pricing and mechanisms in support thereof. In particular, systems and methods are provided to broker group-buying transactions between buyers and sellers, as well to utilizing social networks and other online technologies for promoting purchases by others. Sellers can initiate a sale of a product with volume discounts for a limited time. Buyers have a real incentive to become “prosumers” who not only purchase a product but also promote purchase by others to obtain a lower price all buyers. Consequently, sellers can increase sales, profit, market share, and/or brand awareness while buyers realize true costs savings for participating in a deal and can recognize additional cost savings by promoting the service to others, or by engaging in other behavior mutually beneficial behavior.
The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of the disclosed subject matter. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the disclosed subject matter may be employed and the disclosed subject matter is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents. Other advantages and distinguishing features of the disclosed subject matter will become apparent from the following detailed description of the disclosed subject matter when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The disclosed subject matter is now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed subject matter. It may be evident, however, that the disclosed subject matter may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate describing the disclosed subject matter.
As used in this application, the terms “system,” “component,” “interface,” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity or an entity related to an operational machine with one or more specific functionalities. The entities disclosed herein can be either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a server and the server can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers. These components also can execute from various computer readable media having various data structures stored thereon. The components may communicate via local and/or remote processes such as in accordance with a signal having one or more data packets (e.g., data from one component interacting with another component in a local system, distributed system, and/or across a network such as the Internet with other systems via the signal). As another example, a component can be an apparatus with specific functionality provided by mechanical parts operated by electric or electronic circuitry that is operated by software or firmware application(s) executed by a processor, wherein the processor can be internal or external to the apparatus and executes at least a part of the software or firmware application. As yet another example, a component can be an apparatus that provides specific functionality through electronic components without mechanical parts, the electronic components can include a processor therein to execute software or firmware that confers at least in part the functionality of the electronic components. An interface can include input/output (I/O) components as well as associated processor, application, and/or API components.
Furthermore, the disclosed subject matter may be implemented as a method, apparatus, or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof to control a computer to implement the disclosed subject matter. The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device, carrier, or media. For example, computer readable media can include but are not limited to magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips . . . ), optical disks (e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD) . . . ), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., card, stick, key drive . . . ). Additionally it should be appreciated that a carrier wave can be employed to carry computer-readable electronic data such as those used in transmitting and receiving electronic mail or in accessing a network such as the Internet or a local area network (LAN). Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize many modifications may be made to this configuration without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosed subject matter.
As used herein, the terms “infer” or “inference” generally refer to the process of reasoning about or inferring states of the system, environment, and/or user from a set of observations as captured via events and/or data. Inference can be employed to identify a specific context or action, or can generate a probability distribution over states, for example. The inference can be probabilistic-that is, the computation of a probability distribution over states of interest based on a consideration of data and events. Inference can also refer to techniques employed for composing higher-level events from a set of events and/or data. Such inference results in the construction of new events or actions from a set of observed events and/or stored event data, whether or not the events are correlated in close temporal proximity, and whether the events and data come from one or several event and data sources.
Moreover, the word “exemplary” is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs. Rather, use of the word exemplary is intended to present concepts in a concrete fashion. As used in this application, the term “or” is intended to mean an inclusive “or” rather than an exclusive “or”. That is, unless specified otherwise, or clear from context, “X employs A or B” is intended to mean any of the natural inclusive permutations. That is, if X employs A; X employs B; or X employs both A and B, then “X employs A or B” is satisfied under any of the foregoing instances. In addition, the articles “a” and “an” as used in this application and the appended claims should generally be construed to mean “one or more” unless specified otherwise or clear from context to be directed to a singular form.
Referring now to the drawings, with reference initially to
As used herein, a deal room can be an electronic forum in which a product is offered for sale. For example, deal room 110 can be embodied as a particular web page, website, banner ad, pop-up, dialog box, web-based application, or the like. Furthermore, deal room 110 can include a price curve or price schedule that affords discounts based on aggregate purchases. In other words, the price per unit can lower for all participants as quantity purchased increases. The seller of a product and/or the creator of deal room 110 can control the specific slope, number of tiers, break points, tipping points, or other price schedule characteristics. Furthermore, while all products offered in deal room 110 will generally be associated with a price curve that breaks to lower price tiers with increasing aggregate volume (or tips upon reaching a particular critical mass), deal room 110, in one or more aspect, need not display the entire price curve or even be configured with more than one price break/tipping point.
In fact, research suggests that buyers often disfavor or are confused by price curves, especially those with multiple price breaks. Such can be so in spite of the fact that multiple price breaks affords the buyer multiple opportunities to save additional amounts on their purchases. Thus, at any given point in time, access to deal room 110 can present, inter alia, a current price, time remaining for the offer, a current discount received thus far (e.g., versus retail and/or the starting price), and the amount of additional purchases necessary to meet the next break point. In addition, the amount of additional savings that can be obtained upon reaching that next break point can also be presented, while additional break points can be suppressed from presentation until a prior price break is reached. Moreover, the number of deal rooms 110 and particular type (e.g., public/private) can also vary as will be discussed further hereinafter.
Since the final price of a product unit can be dependent upon the total quantity purchased, buyers or consumers have a natural incentive to promote purchase of the product. Stated differently, consumers can become prosumers—those that not only purchase a product, but also act in desired ways, typically intended to promote, inform, or evaluate with respect to the deal or product offered in deal room 110, and thus can contribute to what can be referred to herein as “social pricing.” One manner in which such promotion can be accomplished is via one or more social networks 120 (e.g., Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn . . . ). Prosumers can advertise a particular product to friends, family, and/or coworkers, or other contacts, e.g., by utilizing social network 120 and can optionally provide a link to a particular deal room 110 to purchase a product.
It should be appreciated that by encouraging prosumers, value can be created for all participants. For example, all buyers (e.g., consumers) can benefit from the activities of the prosumer, as does the prosumer by virtue of a lower price for the product. To offset this lower price afforded to buyers, the seller has increased sales, providing an economic benefit due to fixed-cost production and has potentially increased market share or brand awareness as well. Moreover, the seller can save a significant amount of money up front by reducing an advertising budget, all or a portion of which can be redirected to discounts for actual buyers instead, which can lead to higher customer loyalty and satisfaction with less risk than traditional methods of advertising or marketing. It should be understood that while the notion of offering incentives and/or rewards for marketing one's product exists in conventional systems, the above can be distinguished in that all or a portion of the incentives/rewards obtained by the prosumer can be allocated to other buyers in addition to the individual prosumer.
It is therefore to be noted that prosumers need not be seen as merely self-interested profiteers relying on the purchases of others, which is a particularly undesirable viewpoint when those others are friends, family, or colleagues. In accordance with one embodiment, a prosumer can be required to make a purchase or become an active buyer prior to receiving any type of incentive for promoting a purchase to others. In this way, the prosumers has “put his money where his mouth is” which, ostensibly, he or she would not have done unless the deal is perceived as a bargain. Furthermore, sharing bargains with others (or advocating products genuinely esteemed) is more readily identified with a generous enterprise, and certainly the type of behavior friends or family would expect to be made aware of. That such behavior can also be beneficial to the prosumer, makes such a symbiotic win-win, and that much better. In addition, such viral advertising from prosumers typically carry much more weight than, say, spam, ads, reviews, or the like from an unknown party or entity.
On the other hand, by leveraging existing social networks 120, it can be presumed a trust relationship of some type already exists between the promotee (e.g., a friend of the prosumers) and the promoter (e.g., the prosumers), and further that the promoter may have personal knowledge of the needs, tastes, desires, or interests of the promotee. Moreover, if the promotee is aware that the promoter has “put his money where his mouth is”, then any such advertisements from the promoter will typically carry even more weight. For instance, the promotee can be further assured that the promoter truly believes the offer exhibited by deal room 110 is both bona fide and a bargain, as evidenced by his or her own willingness to purchase. Moreover, the prosumer can also receive additional value out of his or her social network 120 by, e.g., receiving discounts or other economic benefits with very little additional effort; all while keeping in touch with friends, family, colleagues, or other contacts. In addition, the prosumer can also share similar benefits with those contacts, which can be a source of gratitude or esteem within his or her social circle.
One means of accomplishing the foregoing is to provide a buyer promote page upon the conclusion of a product order. Hence, the buyer promote page can be displayed after the buyer has made an order (even though the offer may still be live for several more hours or days, and the ultimate price paid can be lower than the current price). The buyer promote page can congratulate the buyer for successfully ordering a product that is likely to represent a deep discount over retail even at the current or initial price, as well as displaying and updating in real time various data associated with the offer. For example, the buyer promote page can indicate, e.g., that 15 more buyers have agreed to purchase the product, so the final price paid is now an additional 11% lower.
Furthermore, the buyer promote page can also entice the buyer to become a prosumer. Any such enticement can be configured according to the seller's desires. For example, the buyer promote page can further indicate, e.g., that if X more buyers purchase the product, then everyone in the buying group will get an additional Y % off.
Accordingly, to aid the buyer in reaching the next price break, and thereby facilitating a transition from mere consumer to prosumer, the buyer promote page can include icons representative of and including embedded links to popular (potentially third party) social network 120. Some example existing social networks can be, e.g., Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Wordpress or the like, as well as an icon to send targeted emails to indicated individuals. Upon clicking one of these links, the buyer can be redirected to the selected social network 120, whereupon he or she can login and be given an option to download a social pricing app.
Additional detail with respect to features consistent with a social pricing app can be found with reference to
It should be appreciated that access to various suitable social pricing apps is merely one example of elements that can be included on the buyer promote page. Ultimately, the seller can be free to suggest or require any type of prosumer activity that is deemed to have value to the seller, any of which can be indicated on the buyer promote page. For example, from the seller's perspective, many different activities of the prosumer can be valuable (e.g., telling friends about the deal, writing reviews, ranking . . . ), while from the prosumer's perspective some activities can be more difficult than others to accomplish. Therefore, the buyer promote page can include, e.g., a drop-down list of activities the seller desires the prosumer to engage in. Accordingly, the prosumer can select among the list, choosing which behavior to pursue, and thereby satisfying the desires of the seller as well. Appreciably, certain activities can be deemed to have more value to the seller than others. Therefore, the buyer promote page can indicate, e.g., that if the prosumer engages in at least one activity listed from box A (e.g., encourage at least 3 new buyers, download and activate a social pricing app to a preferred social network . . . ), and two activities from box B (e.g., email at least 5 friends about the deal, write a review of the product or offer, give a ranking of the product or offer . . . ), then the prosumer can be eligible for additional rewards.
As another example, it may be that the price has already reached its lowest possible price (according to a price curve set by, e.g., the seller), in which case such can be indicated on the buyer promote page. However, that does not mean additional value to the seller cannot be created by prosumers, for which the seller can reciprocate in some way. In this case, as well as some others, various incentives can be offered specifically to the prosumer, rather than to the entire buying group, however, such need not necessarily be the case as these incentives can also be group-wide. Regardless, it should be appreciated that the rewards need not be confined to a lower price for the product. Rather, rewards can relate to discounts on other items or future deals, an upgrade to the product or related accessory, a free gift, redeemable points, personal recognition (e.g., displaying the prosumer's name or username or possibly a profile photo, and with accolades distributed to various interface dashboards, banner ads, social pricing apps or the like), and so forth. It should be appreciated that personal recognition can also be employed in connection with buyers as well as prosumers, e.g., when a particular buyer tips the offer or breaks the price to the next tier, such recognition can be showered upon that buyer, potentially creating a more exciting and/or rewarding environment.
Continuing the discussion, it should be noted that market studies suggest ratings of the product (or the seller or manufacturer) from other buyers can operate as the most powerful influence on another buyer's decision to purchase. Due to certain ratings and feedback mechanisms available on many ecommerce platforms, an entire generation of buyers has been trained to check star ratings on a vendor, read the experiences of others, do other research, and compare price options prior to ordering. Vendors, as well as their products, are being vetted by the wisdom of the crowd. Therefore, social pricing can improve upon the above by, e.g., ensuring such vetting originates from an actual buyer (rather than say, from an anonymous representative of the vendor, which is a common fear of the product researcher). Moreover, social pricing can, in some cases, further bolster the veracity of a review or ranking by virtue of the social relationships that previously exist when utilizing social network 120 platform. For example, if a friend or contact on a particular social network 120 writes a review of, or gives a high rating for, or provides a link to an offer in deal room 110, then the motives of that friend or contact can be known with greater reliability due to the established relationship.
However, it should be noted that social pricing does not work for all products equally. For example, there are certain known conditions for increasing the likelihood of sustainable success when using social pricing. These are, e.g., (1) Standard product with standard options; (2) Highly fragmented, price sensitive buyers; (3) Product that has a repeat purchase cycle—an item that is consumed or resold to others; (4) Product that can be stored easily so that a buyer could be enticed to purchase more; (5) A Favorable Product life cycle—can be anywhere in the life cycle, but clearly, benefits have been dramatic when it is an early life cycle product in search of a expanding customer acceptance and conversely, the product late in the life cycle when slower moving items can be liquidated effectively to a fragment set of buyers; and (6) A leader within the seller organization who can experiment with what works for their particular situation. Regardless, merely because a product does not meet all six criteria does not necessarily mean the product will not be successful in connection with social pricing. Rather, the criteria above are meant to illustrate where the low hanging fruit exists for vendors, and is not intended to be exclusive of other opportunities in which social pricing makes sense and/or can function successfully.
As one example of a potentially successful viral marketing and/or social pricing of the type indicated supra, if is a prosumer provides a link to a deal on social networking site(s) for which the prosumer is a member at least a portion of the prosumer's friends are likely become prosumers themselves. Should those new prosumers post information on their own networking sites or pages, a large number of people can be notified and potentially grouped quite rapidly. However, aggregation need not be confined to friends and friends of friends, or members of a particular contact list, or the like. Rather, purchases by others of no relation or connection who also become aware of the deal in some manner (e.g., electronically, verbally, by way of search . . . ) can also become prosumers and can have their purchases aggregated to lower the price for everyone. In this manner, the power of computer networks can be leveraged to group purchases amongst large numbers of people who may not know each other, may not be geographically related, or related any other way except for a shared desire to purchase or promote a particular product during a given period. Still further yet, such grouping can be performed in real-time in accordance with one or more aspect.
It should be appreciated that products ordered via deal room 110 are not necessarily limited only to conventional online order-and-ship models. For example, when purchasing, say, a book, it is common to do so online, whereby the vendor charges the buyer and ships the book to an address on file. On the other hand, the vendor may operate widespread brick-and-mortar stores, whereby shipping can be an option, but the vendor might prefer if the buyer physically visits a local store. In the latter case, rather than shipping the book, the vendor can authorize a voucher or certificate for the buyer, which can be printed or mailed to the buyer. In either case, the vendor can capture payment information (e.g., credit or debit card information, bank account information . . . ) upon completing an order, but process the actual debit of funds after the deal closes and the final price (potentially with additional discounts) is determined.
Accordingly, the exclusively online vendor can have the option to mail the book immediately upon order or wait until funds are actually received. Likewise, the brick-and-mortar vendor can have similar options with respect to the voucher. It should be appreciated that there can be an incentive for the vendor in either case to immediately remit the product (e.g., either the book or the voucher) because should the buyer obtain the product prior to the close of the offer in deal room 110, the buyer can provide additional feedback that can be desired by the vendor. For example, rather than merely ranking or reviewing the offer, the buyer can now rank or review the product itself as well as the quality of the transaction with the vendor, which expands the options in which a prosumer can contribute to the social pricing ecosystem.
Moreover, for certain products, especially services such as restaurant dining, salon visits, or the like, vouchers can be much more suitable. In one or more aspects, the voucher can be printed at the time of order, e.g., with the buyer's attached printer, and thereafter redeemed at a vendor's place of business. In other cases, the vendor can mail the voucher or certificate, which unlike with immediate printing can be implemented as, e.g., a gift card with a magnetic stripe on the card. Another approach can be to allow the download of a barcode, which can be stored to a mobile device to be redeemed at the store. Appreciably, numerous other options can exist.
It should be understood that in certain cases, the voucher can include one or more fraud prevention mechanisms. For example, the voucher can include a unique coupon code, which upon redemption can be scanned or otherwise input to a database to ascertain the identity of the valid recipient. Similarly, the voucher or certificate can include the buyer's name, and in either case, then compared with ID of the redeemer at the point-of-sale. As yet another example, notifications can be delivered to the authorized owner of record of the voucher upon redemption (e.g., via email). Thus, if the owner of record did not redeem the voucher, various resolution procedures can be initiated. Of course, numerous other fraud-prevention mechanisms can be employed such as holographic marks, certificates of authentication (COA), secret pin numbers, and so forth.
On the other hand, various mechanisms can be provided to enable transferability to these vouchers, even while maintaining a degree of fraud-prevention. For example, suppose the product offered in deal room 110 is a $50 gift card good at a participating restaurant. Suppose at the time of order, the buyer intends the gift card to be used by her parents for their upcoming anniversary. Deal room 110 can provide a mechanism for this information to be entered (e.g., a check box or radio button) and collect all necessary information at the time of order. As another example, if the buyer decides to transfer the voucher at a later time, the buyer can be provided with a mechanism to do so (e.g., by following a URL on the voucher or included in an email associated with the purchase), where the recipient's information can be entered. The above examples are intended to be merely exemplary, and in some embodiments, such as those that allow completely free transfer, or those that include a secret pin number that can be shared with the recipient, can be unnecessary in any event.
Regardless of the means for fraud detection or prevention, it can be appreciated that these vouchers can represent stored value, and can even trade and function as a market until themselves. Accordingly, when dealing with such stored value, the disclosed subject matter can provide numerous additional features, either to facilitate transfer or to mitigate fraud attempts. For example, print limits can be implemented for a given voucher such that the recipient can only print the voucher a predetermined number of times or for a predetermined period of time. Another example can be viewless printing, where the voucher is not reproduced on a monitor, but merely capable of being printed by a suitable device. Still another example can be single-use printing, wherein the voucher can only be printed once. Additionally or alternatively, watermarking can be employed such that watermarks can be printed on the background of the voucher in order to mitigate fraud (e.g., thwart photocopying or similar reproduction means). It should be understood that mechanisms can be distributed to provide any of the above-mentioned functionality to a buyer's personal computer. In other cases, a link to the voucher can be delivered to an email address of the buyer, whereupon clicking the link directs a browser to a particular URL that can facilitate any of the above features, and can track and regulate the printing without any control of personal devices of the buyer.
In other aspects, group offers can be tied to a particular IP address or to the location of a device, for example determined by way of global positioning satellites (GPS) or other means. In particular, approximate location can be determined by signal triangulation (or trilateration). For example, signal strength measures at various stationary transceivers can be measured by well-known means in order to pinpoint the location of the transmitting device. One such example is Wireless Application Protocol (W AP), wherein radio location, triangulation, and/or trilateration can be employed in connection with radio waves or other electromagnetic radiation. Another example can be radio frequency identification (RFID). Regardless, group offers can be based upon the exact or approximate location of the recipient (e.g., within 20 miles of the vendor's place of business). Should the offer be received by one beyond the predetermined boundaries, then an opt-in email page can be provided upon a click-through rather than the offer.
In other words, location of one or more buyer or one or more seller can be monitored or tracked, potentially in real time and typically based upon express permission and/or based on an opt-in program expressly consented to. Thus, for example, consumers can search based upon location and vendors can, as noted above, broadcast ads or incentives to consumers within a particular radius of the vendor's place of business. In either case, results can be presented automatically on a cell phone or other mobile device, via email, etc.
Moreover, such location information can be integrated with or further leveraged in connection with other features disclosed herein. For instance, general or custom ad space can be provided to an interface, such as a banner ad or small pop-up or dialog box presented at an allocated portion of the interface on the mobile device or other interface component. The ad can change or be selected based upon location, category, preferences, profile, friends/contacts, location or logistics of friends/contacts. Additionally or alternatively, the ad can present special group or individual deals directly to particular consumers based upon the selected criteria. Furthermore, various maps or graphs or charts can be presented relating to information about those in a particular buying group (e.g., purchased a common product, etc.) or in a related group, or based upon some other relationship. For example, a map of a geographic region of interest to a buyer or a seller can be presented. The map can include visual indicia relating to the location or identity of who, e.g., purchased, rated, ranked, provided feedback, influenced others, responded to the influence of another, shared feedback and so forth. Hence, sellers can be apprised of the proximity of potential buyers or mavens in proximity of his or her place of business, while potential buyers can use these features to locate friends or contact (or anyone who grants access). Moreover, various information relating to particular points of interest included in the map can presented within the map. For instance, if a particular restaurant is selected or is in the visible map region, a ranking, rating, or recommendation (e.g., pulled from a social network 120) given by a member of one's contact list can be displayed or accessed. Likewise, local deals (e.g., pulled from or pushed by deal room 110) can be presented as well. It should be appreciated that each classification (e.g., selected from among various map controls) listed above on the map or chart, as well as others, can potentially be distinguished with unique visual indicial such as color coding or the like, and such can be presented to buyers or sellers alike. As another example, ad space included in the banner ad or other ad real estate can be bid upon by sellers. For instance, a seller can bid on certain product classes, keywords, groups or group deals, as well as location or combinations thereof.
Furthermore, a “rifle shoot” deal can be directed to a primary contact (e.g., a maven or influential individual, potentially based upon past activity or an inference thereof such as similarity to known mavens). Typically, this maven will have a large network of contacts that can be influenced, which can be even more beneficial if it is known the maven (or members of the maven's social network) is in close proximity to the vendor's place of business. As another example, the rifle shoot can be targeted to or be activated by a location of the target (e.g., deal goes live when it is detected an individual is local).
In one or more aspects, searches of one individual or potential buyer (e.g., a maven) can be saved or copied and delivered to others such as contacts of the maven. Such a feature can also be dependent upon an opt-in program, or can be utilized to help disparate buyers formulate more effective searches. Moreover, common searches can provided as a set of defaults, which can be selected from among various databases and/or indexed in specific ways, such as, e.g., “see all local deals”, “see all bargains that I might be interested in that are being offered right now in my present area”, “view what my friends have bought/provided feedback recently at this location” or other permutations.
In view of the above features described with respect to location data, consider the following example. Suppose a restaurant owner (e.g., seller) displays a map of her restaurant, which indicates that 100 (potentially random) people are currently within 500 feet of her restaurant. Ads or other enticements or requests can be delivered immediately to all or a portion of those 100 people. Moreover, the time of day can be logged (e.g., meal time), which can be compared to other data points at other times to, e.g., determine the highest volume time of day, date of week, or the like. Regardless, the restaurant owner can configure a deal to be broadcast at a specific time and repeat at specific intervals (e.g., daily, weekly . . . ). Ratings of those who gave feedback can be tracked and shared with friends or in the aggregate with all. Moreover, distinctions between different ads and their resultant effects (e.g., increased/decreased clicks or conversions, feedback, etc.) can be stored for future analysis.
Leaving now examples specifically directed to location-based criteria, in one or more aspects, a notion of game theory can be applied to the demand aggregation mechanisms utilized in deal room 110, specifically when conditional orders-orders in which the buyer is not obligated to purchase unless the deal reaches a certain price-are employed. In particular, the concept of a buyer voluntarily giving a portion of her discount (due to a tipping point/price break) to other buyers if they will agree to order. For instance, consider an item currently priced at $10, with a price curve that indicates the price will drop to $8 per unit if at least 200 units are order, and drop again to $7 per unit if 500 units are ordered. Assume in this case that 100 units have been ordered at the starting price of $10, and another 50 have been conditionally ordered if the price reaches $8, and still another 50 units have been conditionally ordered if the price reaches the minimum illustrated on the price curve of $7.
It is readily apparent that if 100 units were conditionally ordered at $8 dollars, then the server could immediately note this and fill all 200 units at the middle price point of $8. Specifically, both the first 100 units ordered at $10 as well as the second set of 100 ordered at $8 can all be filled at $8 since, the seller's first break point was reached. However, in this case, there are only 150 units ordered in which the buyer is willing to pay $8 or more (e.g., 100 ordered at $10, and 50 conditionally ordered at $8), which does not satisfy the seller's minimum to lower the price to $8. However, in this situation, there are also 50 conditional buyers at $7 per unit that remain to be considered. If each of these 50 conditional buyers at $7 per unit could be allocated an extra dollar, then the total number of units ordered would reach 200, thereby obligating the seller to drop the price from $10 to $8.
Naturally, this $1 subsidy is not especially likely to be allocated by the seller or the buyers at $7 or $8 per unit, however, for those 100 already willing the buy the product at $10 (even if desiring an eventual lower price), there is an incentive. In this case, (and assuming 1 buyer per unit) 50 of the 100 buyers willing to pay $10 per unit can offer a portion of their volume-based discount (which would be a discount of $2 if the volume reaches 200) to entice further buying. In particular, those 50 buyers at $10 can each give $1 to the 50 buyers at $7 (or all 100 can give $0.50 to each buyer at $7). As a result, the 50 buyers at $7 can be treated as though their order is at $8 per unit, thereby satisfying the first break point of 200 units ordered necessary to drop the price from $10 to $8. As a further result, all or a portion of the buyers willing to pay $10 will not get the lowest price at the conclusion of the offer. However, those buyers will still receive the product at a price lower than they would have if they had not voluntarily agreed to reduce their eventual discount (e.g., $9 per unit as opposed to $10, even though others will receive a price of $8 per unit, and still others only at $7). Such can be accomplished by, e.g., a check box or radio button on an order form, indicating something to the effect of “Are you willing to apply some portion of further discounts to entice additional buyers, which will not operate to raise you final price, just lower it, albeit not as low as what some others might receive.”
In the above example, if more than 50 buyers at $10 check this box, then the 50 ultimately selected can be based upon a first-in, first-out (FIFO) queuing method, based upon customer preference, server preference, or some other criteria. Likewise, if more than 50 buyers exist at $7, then the 50 who receive the $1 windfall can be based upon first-come, first-served basis, or some other criteria. Moreover, the features described above can be configured to activate only at the expiration of the offer. Thus, if more orders are received at either $10 or $8, fewer enticements from $10 buyers need be distributed to those willing to buy at $7 in order to meet the volume requirement of 200 units.
Turning now to
In one embodiment, one or more wizards can be provided to assist buyers or sellers with the input or collection of such information. In one particular instance, seller interface 210 can include one or more mechanisms to help the seller offer products for sale. For example, the interface 210 can aid specification of a sales unit (e.g., piece, box, barrel . . . ), minimum/maximum orders, product options, deliver choices, offer length (e.g., hours, days . . . ), discount offers (e.g., coupon! discount codes), commissions, public/private offers, price schedule, buy-it-now price, marker placement (start at a particular price tier), first buyer discounts, and/or rules or preference to facilitate automatic store front generation, among other things. Further yet, seller interface 210 can similarly be employed to later adjust the terms of the offer, if so desired.
It is also to be noted that the interface components 210 and 212 can provide customizable dashboards for buyers or sellers, which, among other things, can present valuable information thereto in an intuitive manner. For example, and not limitation, a buyer dashboard can include historical information about purchases, automated purchase criteria, and active offers of interest. In one or more aspects, the buyer dashboard can be formatted as, e.g., a banner ad or popup or widget. Accordingly, the buyer dashboard need only occupy a small amount of screen real estate, but can still deliver (potentially in a configurable manner) all the relevant information of the offer. For example, current discount, link to place an order, use a card or coupon code, share with others, get a final price, download the stored value of the transaction (potentially along with additional details), and so on. Appreciably, this banner ad (or other mechanism) can be embedded into a social network 120 in a manner similar to social pricing apps. Hence, potential buyers who are, e.g., still on the fence about whether or not to commit to a purchase can monitor the action and excitement of the offer by visiting page of a prosumer (and likely friend) who has embedded the banner ad.
Similarly, a seller dashboard can include information about visitors (e.g., top visitor locations), prosumers, orders, current inventory, production capacity, production schedule, and/or other key performance indicators. In one instance, a number of graphical elements can be utilized to render such valuable information including various graphs and charts, among other things. These and other mechanisms can also be employed to filter or sort a variety of information in various manners to allow users to acquire significant information from such mechanisms. Appreciable, with the potential wealth of information available, the host can be afforded a powerful opportunity to present advertising opportunities to both buyers and sellers. For example, the host can offer targeted advertising or ads to either buyers or sellers based on history statistics, search, location, and so forth. For instance, sellers can be informed automatically primed on potential deals based upon a number of prospective buyers in certain locations, while buyers can be proactively served deals based upon their own geographic location. Moreover, by utilizing product interest data or inferences to drive ads, more effective display or ad selection can be effectuated.
For example, in one or more aspects, a seller dashboard (or seller social pricing app) can be provided to support various information and levels of detail about prosumers with respect to products offered by the seller. For instance, a means for contacting the prosumer can be provided (e.g., to indicate appreciation, provide special recognition or other information) as well as a means of providing the prosumers with other additional incentives, such as coupon codes. Another purpose of this feature included on the seller dashboard can be to give sellers the ability to filter or sort those prosumers who have generated the most views, the most orders, the most prosumers, and to visually indicate how each prosumer is connected to others.
For example, any number or variety of representations can be employed such as tables, charts, graphs, trees, maps and so forth. Any suitable representation can thus display metrics indicative of how well offers are performing. In particular, such metrics can relate to, e.g., a total number of orders, total revenue for the day, total number of views, which offers have closed, which offers are still live, a total number of prosumers, various click-through rates, bounce rates, and the like. These and other additional metrics that can be displayed in some manner by the seller dashboard are summarized below in various tables, which are not intended to represent a comprehensive list, as other metrics can be suitable as well. Moreover, certain displayed metrics can relate to multiple or individual products as well as for multiple or individual buyers, and can typically be further filtered by date.
For example, upon selecting a particular offer from the seller dashboard, the seller can be presented with various reports regarding seller and buyer social pricing apps. These reports for the seller social pricing app can appear if the seller shared the seller social pricing app. The reports for the buyer social pricing app can appear if at least one of the seller's buyers shared the buyer social pricing app. The seller can be able to access reports on offers that are currently live as well as those that have closed. These reports include but are not limited to the following:
Table 1, below relates to offers that are live, wherein an associated seller social pricing app will typically display graphical representations the following to the seller:
Likewise, Table 11 below relates to offers that have closed and therefore generally removed from the seller social pricing app:
It should be appreciated that buyer social pricing app can display similar items as those noted above with respect to seller social pricing apps.
Furthermore, still referring to a seller dashboard in connection with seller interface component 210, various other metrics can be provided to sellers. For example, the seller dashboard can indicate the seller's top 5 most active prosumers, which can be defined however the seller chooses, such as the top 5 quantity buyers, the top 5 in total activity, the top 5 who lead to the most sales or orders, and so forth in connection with their active offers. A prosumer can be considered active when the offers those prosumers have included in their social pricing applications have not yet expired. The seller dashboard can provide a drop down menu that will allow selection dates for the information in that is to be ultimately displayed. Moreover, the seller dashboard can also provide the ability to sort this table as well as provide the ability to select all or individual prosumers. A Reward button located on the seller dashboard can then allow the seller to send an email or coupon to all selected prosumers. Appreciably, displaying information relating to prosumers need not be with respect to active or current or recent offers, but can also relate to, say, the seller's top 5 prosumers of all time, or with respect to certain product categories, and so forth.
Hence, the seller dashboard can display items such as, e.g., a username of prosumers, activity to date for offers submitted by the seller, a total amount each prosumer has personally spent on the seller's products, a total amount spent on the seller's products that were initiated by activities of the prosumer, or any of the above with respect to a particular category or class of product, as well as a reward link to allow transmission of a message or coupon code or the like. In addition, the seller dashboard can also provide an option of adding prosumers to a future watch list, which can be employed to track various prosumers, typically to later engage or reward them.
Although not necessarily limited to a particular form, often, such rewards will take the form of coupon codes. Moreover, coupon codes can apply to all (or some subset) buyers or merely to selected buyers or selected prosumers. Coupon codes can operate to reduce the final price after the offer closes by a predetermined percentage, by a predetermined notational value (e.g., dollar amount), or operated to provide other economic advantages such as free shipping, extended warranty, and so forth. In some cases, an alert can be delivered to the seller illustrating the effects the coupon code will likely have on the initial price curve.
In one or more aspect, the seller dashboard can allow the seller to limit the number of uses or iterations of a particular coupon code, which can further encourage immediate buying. It should be appreciated that a coupon code can be applied to substantially any offer that is live as well as substantially any offer that is scheduled for an upcoming date. System 200 can also include, deal room constructor component 214, which can utilize information specified by the seller to generate and subsequently activate a deal room (e.g., deal room 110 of
A price schedule 340 is graphically depicted close to the middle of the page. Here, two price tiers are shown, one for purchase of 10-20 product units and another for purchase of over 21 product units. Although depicted here as a three-dimensional graph, it should be noted that the price schedule 340 can take any number of different forms including, amongst others, a price curve and a table. Further additional information can be provided such as the amount (or percentage) saved at each tier, for example as shown in
Further, graphical element 350 is provided to allow specification of particular product options. For example, where a picture is for sale, various sizes, and/or frames can be made available as options. The price with options can be displayed therein. Beneath element 350, at 352, the time remaining and ship date can be specified. Button 360 can also be provided, e.g., as depicted next to the price schedule to initiate purchase of a product. Further still, various icons/links can be provided to initiate, e.g., help 370, send email 371, and return to a home page 372. Of course, screenshot 300 is only exemplary. It is to be appreciated that many different combinations of interface elements and functionality can be provided within the scope and spirit of the described subject matter.
Returning to
The recommender component 216 can provide recommendation to sellers as well. For example, smart recommendations can be provided on pricing, and/or durations of offers among other things. Although not limited thereto, in one embodiment, such recommendations can be inferred and/or otherwise determined utilizing various analytics based at least on historical market data and optionally on contextual data/information. Further, recommender component 216 can operate in connection with deal room constructor component 214 to, e.g., facilitate automated construction thereof as a function of one or more recommendations.
System 200 can also include analysis component 217, which can analyze all or a portion of potential buyers and/or product markets, among other things, to assist a seller in offering a product for sale. Moreover, analysis component 217 can receive, retrieve, or compute various metrics. For instance, analysis component 217 can facilitate identification, collection, or storage of the following metrics for sellers: total number of orders, total revenue for the day, total number of views, which offers have closed, which offers are still live, total number of prosumers, percentage of people who became prosumers, which prosumers brought in the most revenue, which consumers had the most impressions, click through rate (CTR), or bounce rate.
Further, the analysis component 217 can facilitate provisioning of a default pricing option for automated pricing or recommendation based on the current market, recent market, or forecasted market for a particular product. Additionally or alternatively, sensitivity analysis can be performed and potentially return computed-based inferences on a proposed offer. Still further yet, it should be noted that various simple or advanced analytics can be performed by analysis component 217. For example, trend analysis can be utilized to determine how particular social networks and/or prosumers are performing with respect to promotion and purchase of one or more seller products.
To provide a concrete example of the functionality of analysis component 217, consider following. Analysis component 217 examines and/or parses comments made about an offer from different groups of buyers, possibly based upon demographics or other known characteristics. Based upon such analysis component 217 can infer how a target demographic might respond to a similar (or disparate offer). Hence, analysis component 217 can substantially infer various probabilities of success for any given offer set forth by a seller. Additionally or alternatively, analysis component 217 comments (e.g., positive or negative on the offer/product, particular words used, responses thereto) with respect to a particular offer or product. Based upon such examination, the influence exerted by particular individuals who made comments can be tracked or measured.
Naturally, certain individuals (e.g., mavens) can be found who exert substantially more influence over others than the average case. Thus, how a maven reacts to a particular offer (or similar previous offers) can be employed to infer how well the particular offer will do. Therefore, upon constructing an offer, the seller can be informed of this information prior to posting the offer to a deal room, and therefore be able to employ the delivered information to intelligently modify the offer. For example, in one or more aspects, the seller can plug in a product database and/or business model. In response, analysis component 217 can examine all available relevant data to output, e.g., “if you offer a certificate/voucher of $20 face value for $10, have the offer expire in 3 days, then the odds of you getting 750 people to purchase, 20% of whom are new fans is 56%. If the offer is lowered from $10 to $9, analysis component 217 can indicate, e.g., that the probability rises to 82%, and so forth. Moreover, analysis component 217 can be employed to automatically optimize offers for a given criterion, such as, e.g., profitability, brand awareness, or another focus determined by the seller.
In one or more aspects, analysis component 217 can model a suitable profile for mavens with respect to the seller's product domain. Such modeling can relate to, e.g., types of words used, types of common activities, frequency of activity, number of contacts, tools or settings used for a deal room or an associated social network, character of replies to the maven, or the like. Based upon this model, analysis component can identify other potential mavens, e.g., those in the seller's geographic region. Hence, the seller can be apprised of a potentially very customer base, provided by the inferences of analysis component 217.
It should be appreciated that inferences can be employed to identify a specific context or action, or can generate a probability distribution over states, for example. The inference can be probabilistic—that is, the computation of a probability distribution over states of interest based on a consideration of data and events. Inferences can also refer to techniques employed for composing higher-level events from a set of events and/or data.
Such inferences can result in the construction of new events or actions from a set of observed events and/or stored event data, whether or not the events are correlated in close temporal proximity, and whether the events and data come from one or several event and data sources. Various classification (explicitly and/or implicitly trained) schemes and/or systems (e.g., support vector machines, neural networks, expert systems, Bayesian belief networks, fuzzy logic, data fusion engines . . . ) can be employed in connection with performing automatic and/or inferred action in connection with the claimed subject matter.
A classifier can be a function that maps an input attribute vector, x=(x1, x2, x3, x4, xn), to a confidence that the input belongs to a class, that is, f(x)=confidence(class). Such classification can employ a probabilistic and/or statistical-based analysis (e.g., factoring into the analysis utilities and costs) to prognose or infer an action that a user desires to be automatically performed. A support vector machine (SVM) is an example of a classifier that can be employed. The SVM operates by finding a hyper-surface in the space of possible inputs, where the hyper-surface attempts to split the triggering criteria from the non-triggering events. Intuitively, this makes the classification correct for testing data that is near, but not identical to training data. Other directed and undirected model classification approaches include, e.g., naive Bayes, Bayesian networks, decision trees, neural networks, fuzzy logic models, and probabilistic classification models providing different patterns of independence can be employed. Classification as used herein also is inclusive of statistical regression that is utilized to develop models of priority.
Automated order component 218 can automatically facilitate purchases of products and/or place orders for products as a function of buyer specified criteria. For example, a particular buyer can specify, utilizing buyer interface component 212 for instance, particular product quantities, price points, or delivery dates. In one instance, such information can be provided with respect to a subscription. The automated order component 218 can also monitor offers for products and if an offer matches buyer specified criteria, an order can be automatically executed and shipped.
Search component 220, which can provide search functionality over a plurality of products offered for sale with respect to the social pricing system 200. Accordingly, buyers can employ the search functionality (via interface component 212, for example) to locate products of interest. As well, sellers can search products to identify competing offers, hot products, among other things.
Data collection component 222 can collect a plurality of data surrounding the sale of a product. For example, product sales can be tracked by seller, product, category, or the like and demographic information recorded about particular buyers (e.g., gender, age, ethnicity, marital status, religion, education, income . . . ) and other contextual information (e.g., date, time, day of week, season, weather, events . . . ). Such data can subsequently or concurrently be employed by other components to improve shopping experience. In one instance, such information can be utilized to populate key performance indicators (KPIs) specified on a seller dashboard or interface and/or afforded to analysis component 217 for processing. As one example, demographic and other information relating to buyers or potential buyers can be obtained from social networking platforms such as social network 120 of
Import/Export component 224 can provide a mechanism to aid importing or exporting information with respect to the social pricing system 200. By way of example and not limitation, data can be exported to web services, RSS/XML feeds, particular applications (e.g., spreadsheet, inventory management system), or the like. Similarly, data can be imported from particular applications of sources (e.g., inventory management system, product catalog . . . ). Consider a company with many products, for example. Rather than inputting each product individually, import/export component 224 can enable an entire product catalog to be imported. Furthermore, import/export component 224 can operate in combination with other components to, e.g., aid automated deal room construction. In accordance with one aspect, a business can be easily import numerous products and a virtual storefront including a specific uniform resource locator (URL) and product offers can be generated automatically or semi-automatically (e.g., inferences, rules, manual input . . . ).
In more detail, import/export component 224 can, in one or more aspects, provide an ability to extract product database information from a client or vendor site (or other data repository) and import such data into a new database resident on a hosted server. Additionally, import/export component 224 can allow various defaults to be set. For instance, component 224 can pull volume price schedules for any item, such as 1-3 units=$20, 4-6 units=$19, and so on. Such can be accomplished by product, and can even distinguish based upon various classes or categories. Hence, import/export component 224 can pull a price list for “distributors” and a different price list for “resellers” and so on. Regardless, the pulled data can automatically feed a storefront with product, description, image, price curve or table, offer period, ship date, etc. Moreover, such can be performed rapidly, in an automated manner, and can even be allocated a unique URL associated with the managing entities, with items displayed according to the storefront selected. Furthermore, import/export component 224 can provide the ability to take the base volume prices for all items and add a predetermined (possibly product/category specific) markup to all (or a subset of) items before feeding into the selected price curves, for instance, by adding 5% to all products at all price curves.
Similarly, import/export component 224 can facilitate an application of certain incentives (e.g., coupons, discounts . . . ) to specific items, categories of items, subcategories of items, or the like, all or a portion of which can be on top of or in lieu of the determined price curves. Such features can imbed additional flexibility into the host platform by, e.g., enabling the seller to further customize the storefront, or multiple storefronts, accordingly. Moreover, import/export component 224 can feed, sort, and/or display imported data by substantially any pivot such as, e.g., product category, type, UPC number, and so forth. Moreover, specific offers or a group for a sub-criteria, can be subject to further analysis, to feed business intelligence, recommender systems, smart pricing, or the like.
The above-mentioned storefront can be equipped with a “Shopping cart” function (e.g., via cookies or related mechanisms) and tagged per user so that future visits can automatically pull earlier products and prices, coupons, etc., and can be utilized to incorporate a new distinct storefront with select items based on business intelligence and/or recommendation algorithms. Again, the items displayed, availability, price curves, coupons, can all change in unison based on the unique buyer on the site as can what is ultimately delivered as part of that shopping experience.
For example, if a buyer orders from the storefront and then proceeds to become a prosumer by, e.g., placing a social app on his/her social networking page, the seller can be notified of this event and can respond with unique offers directly to that person and/or to their social network. As more buyers click through this link, the group's activities can be recorded, as well as an identity or profile of the various individuals. This information can be further refined over subsequent visits to support proper profiling, which can then be used to generate smart storefronts, pricing, incentives, and recommendation systems to increase the value of the service for both buyer and seller.
Data store(s) 226 provide a mechanism to persist and retrieve data. For example, the data store(s) 226 can electronically house all product offers and make them available for retrieval utilizing the search component 220. Further, all or a portion of information collected by data collection component 222 can be housed by data store(s) 226. As well, component 224 can utilize the data store(s) to import and/or export data. In other words, data store 226 is intended to be a repository of all or portions of data, data sets, or information described herein or otherwise suitable for use with the described subject matter. Data store 226 can be centralized, either remotely or locally cached, or distributed, potentially across multiple devices and/or schemas. Furthermore, data store 226 can be embodied as substantially any type of memory, including but not limited to volatile or nonvolatile, sequential access, structured access, or random access and so on.
Access component 228 can control access to the social pricing system 200 or particular portions thereof. In other words, access component 228 can act as a authorization mechanism. In this manner, offers can be limited to registered users of social pricing system 200, or in accordance with terms or conditions set by an entity (e.g., buyer or seller) who constructs a particular deal room. Further, some offers can made public such that any member of the public can view the offer, while other offers can be private and potentially inaccessible to any but approved users, for example. In one instance, terms and conditions can be specified, satisfaction thereof allowing entrance into a private deal room. For example, a prosumer may be provided access to a private deal room with a more advantageous price schedule for a product after generating a set number of other prosumers.
Port component 230 can operate as a mechanism that allows at least a portion of the functionality provided by the social pricing system 200 to be ported to particular devices, applications, environments, or the like. In this manner, social pricing can be integrated with most any other context or suitable platform.
Turning attention to
Further yet, mobile interface component 530 can be downloaded and/or otherwise employed by a mobile device (e.g., phone, tablet, terminal . . . ) to facilitate interaction with the social pricing system. For example, a mobile interface or dashboard can be provided that is specifically constructed (e.g., in terms of form factor, processing, bandwidth . . . ) for use on a mobile phone or other mobile device. Additionally or alternatively, such functionality can be embodied as a mobile device application.
Stated differently, the widgets, applets or other small applications can act as a dynamic billboard where various information can be provided. Furthermore, the widget or the like can update information in real-time. For example, the most current unit price can be updated as it changes in accordance with a schedule and current volume purchased. Additionally, remaining time can be updated such as the number of days or minutes left before expiration of an offer. Sellers can also offer discounts in real time to encourage purchases. By way of example, special coupons and/or codes associated therewith can be provided for use on orders placed in the next five minutes (e.g., flash offers). Still further, yet, the widget can provide the ability to provide feedback to sellers in real-time. For instance, product description errors can be noted, questions asked regarding a product, suggestions made pertaining to a current or future price curve, and/or various other suitable elements. Furthermore, search functionality can be provisioned to enable identification of one or more similar or dissimilar group purchase opportunities.
Regardless, the product quantities ordered through all or a subset of each public deal room 112 and all or a subset of each private deal room 114 can be combined by aggregation component 720 (which can also be included in social pricing system 200). Hence, the final price per unit for the offered product can be based on the total quantity ordered with respect to both public and private deal rooms in accordance with a price schedule associated with each room. Appreciably, all other things being equal, buyers from public deal room 112 can end up paying a different price per unit than do buyers employing private deal room 114, even though both utilize the same aggregate volume of total units ordered (since the price curves for each can differ).
To facilitate clarity and understanding, the following non-limiting example is presented. An individual can identify or otherwise become of aware of a product offered for sale by a seller offering a volume discount. For example, he/she can become aware after searching for a product or be informed by a friend or family member via written or verbal communication and/or by way of a widget or applet on a networking site. The individual can then purchase a quantity of the product for at most the current price according to a price schedule. At this point, the individual becomes a consumer and can be obligated to buy the product at the initial price agreed upon, but with additional orders from others, may well end up paying a final price that is lower than the initial price (in accordance with a given price curve).
Thus, to obtain a lower price, the consumer can promote purchase of the same product to colleagues, friends, family, or others. For example, the consumer can acquire a widget, applet, or other application and place it on one or more of his/her social networking pages or other websites. The widget can be network agnostic and can provide a means for directing others to a location (e.g., deal room 110, 112, 114) where the product can be further examined and/or purchased. By promoting the purchase of the product, the consumer becomes what is deemed a prosumer. While a prosumer can be motivated by self-interest to obtain the lowest price possible on the product, the prosumer can also be subject to altruistic motives as well, such as to inform friends, family, or other contacts of the best deal. Regardless, the prosumers can be provided additional motivation beyond those listed above to continue to promote purchase of products, which can be initiated by sellers or other interested parties by way of offering, e.g., additional discounts, entry into private deal rooms, points, gift cards, and/or other incentives. At the expiration of an offer, consumers can be charged the lowest unit price reached by aggregating all consumer purchases. Some consumers may obtain additional price breaks as a function of one or more discounts acquired by that consumer, for example as a function of prosumer activity.
Further, it should be noted that social network providers themselves (or even prosumers, prosumer groups or organization, etc.) can offer discounts, host a sale, and/or provision widgets or the like to members, so it should be appreciated that incentives are not merely limited to sellers. This can be done to increase traffic and/or social network membership for a particular provider. Further, sellers can enter into agreements with one or more particular network providers. These agreements can be structured to afford additional discounts or other incentives to members of the network provider for its role in promoting purchase of a product, which can then be passed on to social network members. Additionally, buyers or prosumers can be incentivized to promote a purchase on a particular social network by offering a discount, for example.
Further yet, the disclosed social pricing system can be employed in conjunction with various resellers alone or in combination with other prosumers. For example, affiliate networks or the like can be provided with a commission as a function of sales completed through or with the aid of the network, click through rates, or other metrics.
Reward based incentive programs can be implemented by social network providers, affiliate network providers, among others in which individuals earn points or the like which can be utilized to purchase items, earn discounts, or acquire privileges, among other things. In this manner, a further incentive can be provided to increase traffic of deal rooms and social network platforms, and buyers of products.
Still further yet, it should be appreciated that a broker and/or other third party to a transaction can verify or certify proper operation. In other words, a transaction can be analyzed to ensure that a seller is providing buyers with a group discount in accordance with a provided price schedule, among other things. Such a certification, verification, seal of approval can be provided to particular sellers and/or deal rooms to assure consumers that they will receive a deal as promised.
The aforementioned systems, architectures, and the like have been described with respect to interaction between several components. It should be appreciated that such systems and components can include those components or subcomponents specified therein, some of the specified components or subcomponents, and/or additional components. Sub-components could also be implemented as components communicatively coupled to other components rather than included within parent components. Further yet, one or more components and/or sub-components may be combined into a single component to provide aggregate functionality. Communication between systems, components and/or sub-components can be accomplished in accordance with either a push and/or pull model. The components may also interact with one or more other components not specifically described herein for the sake of brevity, but known by those of skill in the art.
Furthermore, as will be appreciated, various portions of the disclosed systems above and methods below can include or consist of artificial intelligence, machine learning, or knowledge or rule based components, subcomponents, processes, means, methodologies, or mechanisms (e.g., support vector machines, neural networks, expert systems, Bayesian belief networks, fuzzy logic, data fusion engines, classifiers . . . ). Such components, inter alia, can automate certain mechanisms or processes performed thereby to make portions of the systems and methods more adaptive as well as efficient and intelligent.
In view of the exemplary systems described supra, methodologies that may be implemented in accordance with the disclosed subject matter will be better appreciated with reference to the flow charts of
Referring to
It is also to be noted that the social pricing system can interface/interact with inventory management, productions scheduling and/or other seller systems. As a result, sellers can construct profitable offers and increase efficiency. By way of example and not limitation, it if it can be determined that there is a open period between manufacturing runs, a seller an post an offer for products that can be produced during this time. Further, a minimum quantity can be specified to ensure profitability. If the minimum is met, production is run. Otherwise, it is not. Furthermore, a first buyer can be offered a discount or other benefit to get things going and/or a buyer who purchases the minimum quantity can be incentivized. Overall, the seller is able to leverage the social pricing system to make money when he would otherwise simply experience some downtime thereby increasing overall profitability and efficiency.
Discussion has focused primarily on utilizing social networks to provide others an ability to purchase a product such that a group can obtain a volume discount. In particular, widgets, applets or the like can be utilized to provide such functionality. However, other mechanism can also be utilized. For example, the some mechanisms can be utilized with respect to a blog or personal website. Further, different mechanism can be employed depending upon a communication medium. For instance, if widgets are not supported or desired, then links can be utilized to a deal room. Further, short messages can be utilized to promote purchases such as tweets, text messages or the like. In other words, any means can be employed to get the word out virally or otherwise to a particular group.
The term social pricing or the like as used herein refers to group purchases in which a volume discount or cost savings is provided. Social pricing also encompasses demand aggregation as specified herein and with respect to related applications.
As used herein, the terms “component,” “system” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an instance, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a computer and the computer can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers.
The word “exemplary” or various forms thereof are used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs. Furthermore, examples are provided solely for purposes of clarity and understanding and are not meant to limit or restrict the claimed subject matter or relevant portions of this disclosure in any manner. It is to be appreciated that a myriad of additional or alternate examples of varying scope could have been presented, but have been omitted for purposes of brevity.
As used herein, the term “inference” or “infer” refers generally to the process of reasoning about or inferring states of the system, environment, and/or user from a set of observations as captured via events and/or data. Inference can be employed to identify a specific context or action, or can generate a probability distribution over states, for example. The inference can be probabilistic—that is, the computation of a probability distribution over states of interest based on a consideration of data and events. Inference can also refer to techniques employed for composing higher-level events from a set of events and/or data. Such inference results in the construction of new events or actions from a set of observed events and/or stored event data, whether or not the events are correlated in close temporal proximity, and whether the events and data come from one or several event and data sources. Various classification schemes and/or systems (e.g., support vector machines, neural networks, expert systems, Bayesian belief networks, fuzzy logic, data fusion engines . . . ) can be employed in connection with performing automatic and/or inferred action in connection with the subject innovation.
Furthermore, all or portions of the subject innovation may be implemented as a method, apparatus or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof to control a computer to implement the disclosed innovation. The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device or media. For example, computer readable media can include but are not limited to magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips . . . ), optical disks (e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD) . . . ), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., card, stick, key drive . . . ). Additionally it should be appreciated that a carrier wave can be employed to carry computer-readable electronic data such as those used in transmitting and receiving electronic mail or in accessing a network such as the Internet or a local area network (LAN). Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize many modifications may be made to this configuration without departing from the scope or spirit of the claimed subject matter.
In order to provide additional context for the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter,
With reference to
The system memory 1216 includes volatile and nonvolatile memory. The basic input/output system (BIOS), containing the basic routines to transfer information between elements within the computer 1212, such as during start-up, is stored in nonvolatile memory. By way of illustration, and not limitation, nonvolatile memory can include read only memory (ROM). Volatile memory includes random access memory (RAM), which can act as external cache memory to facilitate processing.
Computer 1212 also includes removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media.
The computer 1212 also includes one or more interface components 1226 that are communicatively coupled to the bus 1218 and facilitate interaction with the computer 1212. By way of example, the interface component 1226 can be a port (e.g., serial, parallel, PCMCIA, USB, FireWire . . . ) or an interface card (e.g., sound, video, network . . . ) or the like. The interface component 1226 can receive input and provide output (wired or wirelessly). For instance, input can be received from devices including but not limited to, a pointing device such as a mouse, trackball, stylus, touch pad, keyboard, microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, camera, other computer, and the like. Output can also be supplied by the computer 1212 to output device(s) via interface component 1226. Output devices can include displays (e.g., CRT, LCD, plasma . . . ), speakers, printers, and other computers, among other things. In accordance with another aspect, it should be noted that one of the interface components 1212 can include one or more antennas for receiving and transmitting wireless communications between and/or amongst other computers, processor based devices, and/or peripherals, among other things.
The system 1300 includes a communication framework 1350 that can be employed to facilitate communications between the client(s) 1310 and the server(s) 1330. The client(s) 1310 are operatively connected to one or more client data store(s) 1360 that can be employed to store information local to the client(s) 1310. Similarly, the server(s) 1330 are operatively connected to one or more server data store(s) 1340 that can be employed to store information local to the servers 1330.
Client/server interactions can be utilized with respect with respect to various aspects of the claimed subject matter. By way of example and not limitation, a server 1330 can afford a social pricing system or service that is accessed by way of a client device 1310 directly or indirectly. Further, the server 1330 can provide or support a social networking application or technology also accessed by individuals via one or more clients 1310.
Referring to
Each of the buyers 1415 and sellers 1420 may access the central server 1425 in any of a variety of ways. For example, in the subject embodiment, each buyer 1415 and seller 1420 is shown to be part of separate establishments 1430, which include one or more respective computer systems 1435 and local servers 1440. The computer systems 1435 may, for example, be a desktop or laptop computer with a local area network (LAN) interface for communicating over a network backbone 1445 to the local server 140. The local servers 1440, in turn, interface with the central server 1425 via a network cable 1450 or the like. It will be appreciated that while the subject embodiment depicts the computer system 1435 communicating with the central server 1425 via hardwired network connections, in an alternative embodiment the computer system 1435 may interface with the central server 1425 using a modem, wireless local area and/or wide area networks, etc. Further, it will be appreciated, that while the buyers 1415 and sellers 1420 are shown to communicate with the central server 1425 via different computer systems 1435, it will be appreciated that the buyers 1415 and/or sellers 1420 may access the central server 1425 from the same computer system 1435.
It should be appreciated that central server 1425 (or managing entity thereof) can provide services to any of buyer 1415 or sellers 1420 in accordance with a contractual agreement. Moreover, central server 1425 can structure agreements in disparate ways for different classes of users or for particular users and so on. For example, central server 1425 can provide various packages such as a “standard” package and a “pro” package (or substantially any permutation thereof or substantially any number of disparate tiers of service), wherein various features can be available only for a particular level of service. One example of such can be found with respect to Table III below, which lists various product features along with an indication of whether or not a particular feature is included in various packages. In this case, only two packages are listed, yet it should be appreciated that others can be included as well, e.g., each reflecting a desired level of service.
Appreciably, solutions described herein can evolve into a working data warehouse to provide business intelligence specifically to individual sellers. One result can be to give sellers as much relevant information as possible about the performance of their offers. Such can include high-level metrics as well as the ability to do a deep dive into specific information, such as that associated with any particular metric. In one embodiment, a seller can purchase access to various functionality or features provided by the seller dashboard or another portion of seller interface component 210 of
Because such information can represent as substantial revenue opportunity for the seller, the seller will likely find value in purchasing such information. To meet expectations of such value, the seller dashboard can provide accurate, real time metrics in the most usable manner, as substantially described herein. For example, high level metrics can appear on the dashboard tab of the seller dashboard. The idea being that this information is the first thing the seller sees when logging into the system.
In addition, simple intuitive navigation can be provided that allows the seller to drill down into any of the metrics obtain additional information or detail. In particular, design and/or layout of the dashboard ideally will be such that the next likely question a seller would ask can be answered with a single additional click on the seller dashboard. Furthermore, the navigation scheme can be consistent with the remainder of the dashboard in order to add to the intuitive nature of navigation.
Thus, information at every level can be cleanly presented based upon previous experimentation with charts, graphs, tables, and other representations directed to discovering preferred and/or intuitive formats for each piece of data. Accordingly, it can be appreciated that a tool employed to display one particular data set may not be the most usable or likely tool to be selected to display another data set.
Moreover, the seller dashboard (or another suitable component described herein such as import/export component 224) can provide the ability to sellers to export data to another format outside of the host system provided by central server 1425. The most likely formats will be Microsoft Excel or Quicken, but other formats may make sense as well. Accordingly, algorithms for export to popular formats can be optimized and maintained for multiple versions to provide backward compatibility.
In one or more aspects, a trial period can be provided to the seller, for instance to give the seller access to various features prior to purchasing the service. However, upon provision of payment by the seller, which can be negotiated through a broker site, access to the sellers data can be provided immediately. Moreover, data prior to receipt of seller's payment can also be made available to the seller, for example, ten days prior. Furthermore, assuming the service is provided on a subscription basis or is otherwise recurring, then the seller can utilize all purchased tools or data sets for a specified period. At the end of the period, the seller can be charged again, potentially in an automatic fashion.
Among the features that can be provided and/or provisioned on a subscription basis can relate to prosumer activity; past, current, future offers; product mix; and order; and can include at least the following sub-features:
Analysis of Prosumers
Dimensions of Prosumers to be studied:
Dimensions of Offers to be studied:
Dimensions of Products to be studied:
Dimensions of Orders to be studied:
To provide additional detail with respect to prosumer marketing tools, it should be understood that such tools can be implemented as a web-based platform, which can be attached or accessed via the seller dashboard. Activation of these tools (e.g., through purchase) can enable another tab on the seller dashboard. One purpose of these tools in the platform can be to market specifically to prosumers, typically the most active and/or valuable buyers for any given seller.
As noted previously, these tools may not be available until the seller purchases access. In such cases, however, after payment processing these tools can be available in real time, which are described in more detail below:
The Seller can access an aggregate list of Prosumers segmented by offer.
The Seller can have access to an email engine through this platform.
The Seller can have access to a coupon engine through this platform.
Furthermore, in connection with other features discussed herein (e.g., seller interface component 210, prosumer interaction, etc.), prosumer tools can be segmented into at least four distinct categories, including by way of illustration: an email engine, coupon engine, aggregate prosumer database, and prosumer metrics, each of which is detailed herein.
What has been described above includes examples of the various embodiments. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the embodiments, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations are possible. Accordingly, the detailed description is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
In particular and in regard to the various functions performed by the above described components, devices, circuits, systems and the like, the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component which performs the specified function of the described component (e.g., a functional equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure, which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary aspects of the embodiments. In this regard, it will also be recognized that the embodiments includes a system as well as a computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions for performing the acts and/or events of the various methods.
In addition, while a particular feature may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “includes,” and “including” and variants thereof are used in either the detailed description or the claims, these terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising.”
The present application is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/424,226 filed Mar. 19, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,285,598, which is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/788,513, filed May 27, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,140,402, which: (1) is a continuation-in-part and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/922,884 filed Aug. 6, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,290,824, which: (a) is a continuation-in-part and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/324,391 filed Jun. 3, 1999, which claims the priority to U.S. provisional application 60/133,769, filed May 12, 1999;(b) is a continuation-in-part and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/426,063, filed Oct. 22, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,818,212;(c) is a continuation-in-part and claims the priority benefit of P.C.T. patent application PCT/US00/11989, filed May 3, 2000, which claims priority to: U.S. provisional application 60/137,583 filed Jun. 4, 1999; U.S. provisional application 60/138,209 filed Jun. 9, 1999; U.S. provisional application 60/139,338 filed Jun. 16, 1999; U.S. provisional application 60/139,518 filed Jun. 16, 1999; U.S. provisional application 60/139,519 filed Jun. 16, 1999; is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/342,345 filed Jun. 29, 1999; U.S. provisional application 60/142,371 filed Jul. 6, 1999; U.S. provisional application 60/160,510 filed Oct. 20, 1999; is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/426,063 filed Oct. 22, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,818,212; U.S. provisional application 60/162,182 filed Oct. 28, 1999; U.S. provisional application 60/173,409 filed Dec. 28, 1999; U.S. provisional application 60/133,769 filed May 12, 1999; U.S. provisional application 60/135,972 filed May 26, 1999; and is a continuation and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/324,391 filed Jun. 3, 1999, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. provisional application 60/133,769 filed May 12, 1999; and(d) claims priority benefit to U.S. provisional application 60/237,474 filed Oct. 2, 2000. (2) which claims the priority benefit of U.S. provisional application 61/183,390 filed Jun. 2, 2009; and (3) claims the priority benefit of U.S. provisional application 61/230,248 filed Jul. 31, 2009. The disclosures of the aforementioned applications are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4887207 | Natarajan | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4947028 | Gorog | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4992940 | Dworkin | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5053956 | Donald et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5053957 | Suzuki | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5063506 | Brockwell et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5402336 | Spiegelhoff et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5414838 | Kolton et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5444630 | Dlugos | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5564115 | Clarkson | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5592375 | Salmon et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5615109 | Eder | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5623660 | Josephson | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5710887 | Chelliah et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5732400 | Mandler et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734890 | Case et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797127 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5822736 | Hartman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5837071 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5842178 | Giovannoli | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878400 | Carter, III | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884271 | Pitroda | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5897620 | Walker et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5903830 | Joao et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5923741 | Wright et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933817 | Hucal | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940807 | Purcell | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5945653 | Walker et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950172 | Klingman | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5966697 | Fergerson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5970478 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974396 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974406 | Bisdikian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5987434 | Libman | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995943 | Bull et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5999915 | Nathan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6014638 | Burge et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016484 | Williams et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6026383 | Ausubel | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032136 | Brake et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6035289 | Chou et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6052670 | Johnson | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055519 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055573 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6064981 | Barni et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6078906 | Huberman | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6101484 | Halbert et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108632 | Reeder et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108639 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112185 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112189 | Richard et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6131087 | Luke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141653 | Conklin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151588 | Tozzoli et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6167383 | Henson | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6195646 | Grosh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6219653 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233566 | Levine et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236972 | Shkedy | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236977 | Verba et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6236978 | Tuzhilin | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6249772 | Walker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6260019 | Courts | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6260024 | Shkedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6266651 | Woolston | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269343 | Pallakof | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6289348 | Richard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6323894 | Katz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327574 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332127 | Bandera et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332135 | Conklin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6336105 | Conklin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6338050 | Conklin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6360205 | Iyengar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6397208 | Lee | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6415270 | Rackson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6418415 | Walker et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6418441 | Call | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6449601 | Friedland et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6450407 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6456986 | Boardman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466919 | Walker et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6496568 | Nelson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6507279 | Loof | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6510434 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6519571 | Guheen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6553346 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553350 | Carter | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6560501 | Walser et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6578014 | Murcko, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6584451 | Shoham et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6587835 | Treyz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6598026 | Ojha et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601043 | Purcell | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6604089 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6606603 | Joseph et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6606607 | Martin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6607136 | Atsmon et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6631356 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6647257 | Owensby | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6647373 | Carlton-Foss | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6658093 | Langseth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6662194 | Joao et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6705520 | Pitroda et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6716101 | Meadows et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6754636 | Walker et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6769607 | Pitroda et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6778968 | Gulati | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6782370 | Stack | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785661 | Mandler et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6847938 | Moore | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6847965 | Walker et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6850907 | Lutnick et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6868392 | Ogasawara | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6871140 | Florance et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6871190 | Seymour et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6876974 | Marsh et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6876977 | Marks | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6876982 | Lancaster | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6876983 | Goddard | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6877655 | Robertson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6877665 | Challa et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6915275 | Banerjee et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6925446 | Watanabe | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6928416 | Bertash | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6934690 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6954734 | Kuelbs et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6985879 | Walker et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6990467 | Kwan | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6992794 | Keane et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7013286 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7039603 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047206 | Schultze | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7062452 | Lotvin et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7065494 | Evans | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7069228 | Rose et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7072849 | Filepp et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7072853 | Shkedi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7076447 | Peyser et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7080030 | Eglen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082408 | Baumann et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7103565 | Vaid | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7107225 | McClung, III | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7107226 | Cassidy et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7120592 | Lewis | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7124099 | Mesaros | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7124107 | Pishevar et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7133835 | Fusz et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7143057 | Kuelbs et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7146330 | Alon et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7165045 | Kim-E | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7181419 | Mesaros | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7194427 | Van Horn et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7194442 | Flanagan et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7213754 | Eglen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7240021 | Walker et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7243082 | Forlai | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7254833 | Cornelius et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7263498 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7263505 | Forlai | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7296001 | Ephrati et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7330826 | Porat et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7343317 | Jokinen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7349890 | Pathak et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7363246 | Van Horn et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7364086 | Mesaros | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7376613 | Cofino et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7379899 | Junger | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7415428 | Garwood | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7415617 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7433832 | Bezos et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7464051 | Heggem | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7475024 | Phan | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7480627 | Van Horn et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
| 7496543 | Bamford et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7516089 | Walker et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7523045 | Walker et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7539742 | Spector | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542927 | Mukai | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7552069 | Kepecs | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7577582 | Ojha et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7584146 | Duhon | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7593871 | Mesaros | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7596509 | Bryson | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7599857 | Bishop et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7606731 | McClung, III | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7624044 | Wren | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7630919 | Obrecht | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7636672 | Angles et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7672870 | Haines et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7680696 | Murray | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7689463 | Mesaros | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7689468 | Walker et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689469 | Mesaros | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 7693748 | Mesaros | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7698173 | Burge et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7698208 | Hirani et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7698240 | Chatterjee et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7706838 | Atsmon et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7725350 | Schlee | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7729977 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7747473 | Mesaros | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7792699 | Kwei | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7801803 | Forlai | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7813955 | Ariff et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7814106 | Guido et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7814114 | Mi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7815114 | Mesaros | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7818212 | Mesaros | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7860776 | Chin et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 7890373 | Junger | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7899707 | Mesaros | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7912761 | Vaid | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917386 | Christensen | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917416 | Quinn et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7937288 | Blaser et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7942316 | Bennett et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7953730 | Bleckner et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
| 7958007 | Urbanski et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 8005747 | Forlai | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8015583 | Bates et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8024226 | Fusz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8032409 | Mikurak | Oct 2011 | B1 |
| 8032422 | Pickard et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8036941 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8073762 | Sheth et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8140402 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8140405 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8140442 | Heyer | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8140615 | Miller et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8150735 | Walker et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8160931 | Mesaros | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8196811 | Mesaros | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8219460 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8249942 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8271327 | Walker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8271332 | Mesaros | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8285598 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8311896 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8341035 | Mesaros | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8401918 | Mesaros | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8438075 | Mesaros | May 2013 | B2 |
| 20010011264 | Kawasaki | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010014868 | Herz et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010018660 | Sehr | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010039514 | Barenbaum | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010044751 | Pugliese, III et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047296 | Wyker | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010047311 | Singh | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020004765 | Han et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020007324 | Centner et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026351 | Coleman | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032573 | Williams et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035536 | Gellman | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020040352 | McCormick | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046105 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046147 | Livesay et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052782 | Landesmann | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065762 | Lee et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065769 | Irribarren et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069079 | Vega | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020080950 | Koko et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082881 | Price et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091580 | Wang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099643 | Abeshouse et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103741 | Boies et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107773 | Abdou | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116282 | Martin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143692 | Heimermann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147670 | Lange | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165771 | Walker et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165821 | Tree | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169703 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169759 | Kraft et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174051 | Wise | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188508 | Lee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004802 | Callegari | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030004808 | Eihaoussine et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030004823 | Sagy | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028473 | Eso et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041002 | Hao et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055774 | Ginsberg | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088494 | Lee | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093355 | Issa | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030109949 | Ikeda | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030111531 | Williams et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115100 | Teicher | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126040 | Mesaros | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126250 | Jhanji | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149619 | Stanley et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167222 | Mehrotra et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195832 | Cao et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200150 | Westcott et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208412 | Hillestad et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030216960 | Postrel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233276 | Pearlman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233557 | Zimmerman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015415 | Cofino et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039661 | Fuzell-Casey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039677 | Mura et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093276 | Nishio | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128197 | Bam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215467 | Coffman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215500 | Monahan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021400 | Postrel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021401 | Postrel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038713 | Pickard et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149458 | Eglen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171918 | Eden et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197857 | Avery | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050216337 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272442 | Miller et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273415 | Mathews et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060036491 | Leung et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060059062 | Wood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069619 | Walker et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095327 | Vaughn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095366 | Sheth et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106678 | Walker | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129454 | Moon et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143080 | Garg et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178918 | Mikurak | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070150349 | Handel et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220169 | Silver et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080015711 | Charland et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052189 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052750 | Grunnet-Jepsen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071634 | Rampell et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082418 | Fordyce et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080126201 | Ullah | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255886 | Unkefer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090055328 | Bamford et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090059856 | Kermoal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083136 | Blackwood | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090089177 | Dayton et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150218 | Brunner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187455 | Fernandes et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198622 | Temte et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276305 | Clopp | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090307073 | Mirroknibanadaki et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319359 | Soza et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327034 | Peterson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327038 | Peterson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327101 | Sayed | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327140 | Kuo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100088174 | Cohagan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125525 | Inamdar | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169161 | Sacco | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004515 | Mesaros | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016010 | Mesaros | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040624 | Jhanji | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125592 | Mesaros | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213648 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213649 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213650 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213653 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238476 | Carr et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246271 | Mesaros | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110246274 | Mesaros | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264499 | Abendroth et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110270699 | Mesaros | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110270700 | Mesaros | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120022970 | Mesaros | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120029993 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120029995 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120035999 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036000 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036031 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120041811 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120054012 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158475 | Mesaros | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158479 | Raisch | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179526 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179530 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197705 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197722 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203603 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203611 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203615 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209683 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209737 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209738 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209739 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209740 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209743 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226541 | Mesaros | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120245993 | Mesaros | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120253912 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120253977 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120265590 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120265600 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120278157 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284110 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120290395 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130006741 | Mesaros | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130013385 | Mesaros | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130013388 | Mesaros | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130080282 | Mesaros | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117086 | Mesaros | May 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 11-184910 | Jul 1999 | JP |
| WO 9821713 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 0050970 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 0070424 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 2008083371 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| tippr.com http://tippr.com/ Internet Archive (Nov. 27, 2012)—http://web.archive.org/web/20080229121727/http://tippr.com/. |
| eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Appeal Per Curiam Decision dated Oct. 9, 2012. |
| eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Reply Brief of Appellant dated Jun. 4, 2012. |
| eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Brief of Appellee dated May 17, 2012. |
| eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Brief of Appellant dated Apr. 2, 2012. |
| Order re Motion for Summary Judgment dated Nov. 23, 2011. |
| eWinWin, Inc.'s Opposition to Groupon, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Nov. 8, 2011. |
| Groupon, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringment dated Oct. 17, 2011. |
| Order re eWinWin, Inc. Motion for Reconsideration dated Oct. 3, 2011. |
| Order re Claim Construction dated Sep. 5, 2011. |
| eWinWin, Inc. Supplemental Brief in Support of Claim Construction dated Aug. 24, 2011. |
| Groupon, Inc.'s Supplemental Claim Construction Brief dated Aug. 24, 2011. |
| eWinWin, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Claim Construction dated Aug. 5, 2011. |
| Groupon, Inc.'s Responsive Claim Construction Brief dated Aug. 5, 2011. |
| Groupon, Inc.'s Opening Claim Constructin Brief dated Jul. 5, 2011. |
| Opening Claim Construction Brief of eWinWin, Inc.dated Jul. 5, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,054 Final Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Office Action mailed Dec. 4, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,275 Office Action mailed Oct. 4, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,276 Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,658 Office Action mailed Oct. 30, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/452,647 Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,512 Office Action mailed Dec. 10, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,820 Office Action mailed Nov. 8, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,040 Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,622 Office Action mailed Dec. 3, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,622 Office Action mailed Sep. 12, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923 Final Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,681 Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,158 Office Action mailed Dec. 5, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,213 Final Office Action mailed Aug. 1, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/538,302 Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,387 Final Office Action mailed Aug. 15, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,418 Final Office Action mailed Jul. 26, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,415 Office Action mailed Aug. 31, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/517/528 Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2012. |
| “Magna Cash Cybersource Partner to Expand Online Payment Options,” PR Newswire, New York, Jan. 15, 2001. |
| Abad, P.L. “Supplier pricing and lot sizing when demand is price sensitive”. Abad, P.L. Fac. of Bus., McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ont., Canada. European Journal of Operational Research , vol. 78, No. 3, p. 334-54. Date: Nov. 10, 1994 [recovered from Dialog on Oct. 20, 2009]. |
| Accompany: How it Works: “Anatomy of a Buy-Cycle”, Jun. 15, 1999, pp. 1-3. |
| Adam et al. “Strategic Directions in Electronic Commerce and Digital Libraries: Towards a Digital Agora”. ACM Computing Surveys [Online] 1996, vol. 28, Issue 4, pp. 818-835. |
| Amazon.com, “Earths Biggest Selection,” Jun. 30, 2001, archived by Archive.org: http://web.archive.org/web/20010630130618/http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/home/home.html. |
| Amazon.com, “Help/Shipping”, Archived on Feb. 2, 2003 by www.archive.org. Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 9 pages. |
| Anon, “Global Real Estate Markets Spell Opportunity, Experts Tell Realtors,” PR Newswire, Nov. 21, 1991. |
| Anon, “MobShop Selected by WHN(TM) (WhatsHotNow.com (R), Inc.) to Power Demand Aggregation Within Its Licensed Merchandise Marketplace; Demand Aggregation Technology Enables Marketplaces to Improve Liquidity by Generating Volume Transactions,” PR Newswire, San Francisco, Jan. 16, 2001. |
| Anon., “China—Welcome to the Machine: New Machinery, Electronics b-to-b Web,” China Online, Jul. 24, 2000. |
| Anon., “Domain TradeLIVE! Launched by solutionhome.com,” Business Wire, Oct. 20, 1999. |
| Anon., “ELCOM: Virgin Trains Cuts Procurement Costs with elcom.com; New Electronic Ordering System Offers Personalised Pricing,” M2 Presswire, Jul. 18, 2000. |
| Anon., “Excite@Home Standardizes on Siebel eBusiness; Leading Broadband Media Company Relies on Siebel Systems to Manage Customer Relationships Across Its Entire Family of Services,” Business Wire, Jan. 19, 2000. |
| Anon., “Lucent Launches On-Line Catalog,” M2 Presswire, Jan. 22, 1999. |
| Anon., “Open Market Introduces New Software for Dynamic Web-Based Commerce” PR Newswire, Oct. 1, 1996. |
| Anon., “Screen Savers,” Lawyer, Feb. 19, 2001. |
| Anon., “The Oil & Gas Asset Clearinghouse, a Petroleum Place Company, to Host Its Second Exclusively Online Auction of Oil & Gas Properties on Aug. 14-16, 2000,” PR Newswire, p. 5591, Aug. 3, 2000. |
| Ashton Technology Group, Inc. Announces NASDAQ National Market System Listing; Enters into Clearing Arrangements with 8 National Brokerage Firms, Business Wire, Jan. 3, 2000. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi.sub.--m0EIN/is.sub.--2000.sub.-- -Jan.sub.--3/ai.sub.--58429780/print. Last accessed Apr. 8, 2009, 3 pages. |
| Beaty. Mass Customisation. Manufacturing Engineer, vol. 75, issue 5, Oct. 1996, pp. 217-220. |
| Blyth, et al. Merchandising System Collecting Data. Derwent Information Ltd. Last accessed Jan. 20, 2009, 2 pages. |
| Boroshok, Jon, “Wireless, Location-Based, Shopping Portal being Tested in New York City and San Francisco by GeePS.com, Inc.,” published Apr. 3, 2000, New York, NY and San Francisco, CA; as downloaded from http://www.techmarcom.com/geeps.html on Jan. 6, 2012. |
| Breyer. “Bargains in Cyberspace,” National Home Center News, vol. 26, No. 21, p. 21, Nov. 20, 2000. |
| Business Editors and High Tech Writers, “eWinWin Announces the Release of DAS 3.0, the Next Generation of B2B Demand Aggregation Solutions” Dec. 28, 2000, Business wire, p. 1 (4 pages). |
| Business Editors. “Weatherchem Announces Major eCommerce Success with eWinWin”, Aug. 9, 2001, Business Wire, (p. 1) 2 pages. |
| Business/High Tech Editors “Mercata Launches Compelling Alternative to Online Auctions,” Business Wire, Nov. 15, 2000. |
| Chicago Board of Trade, “Knowledge Center,” as archived by Archive.org, on Feb. 13, 2003. |
| Computer Geeks Discount Outlet, “Order Status,” Mar. 1, 2002. |
| De Gheest, Computer Implemented Electronic Bidding for Electronic Sales Application. Derwent Acc No. 2001-006585, © Derwent Information Ltd. Last accessed Sep. 17, 2010, 2 pages. |
| Deierlein. “Smart Fuel Buying,” Fleet Equipment, vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 42-44, Aug. 1998. |
| Dibiase. The Inventory Simulator: A Micro Computer Based Inventory Model. Modeling and Simulation on Microcomputers, Paul F. Hogan, ed., Society for Computer Simulation (SCS), La Jolla, pp. 104-106, Jan. 1987. |
| Easley, et al. Time and the Process of Security Price Adjustment, Journal of Finance, vol. 47, No. 2, Jun. 1992. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfinan/v47y1992i2p576-605.html. Last accessed Sep. 10, 2009, 30 pages. |
| ebay.com “eBay Services: The Feedback Forum,” Aug. 1, 2001, archived by archive.org: “http://web.archive.org/web/20010801145144/http://pages.ebay.com/services/forum/feedback.html”. |
| Edwards, L.M., “Increase Your Bottom Line: Automated Customer Service and Marketing,” E-Business Advisor, vol. 17, No. 7, p. 30, Jul. 1999. |
| Enos. Vying to be the Top Dog. Upside vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 160-165, Mar. 2000. |
| eWinWin, “eCommerce Redefined : The Positive Impact of eWinWin's Demand Aggregation System on the Manufacturing Supply Chain”, Oct. 2000. Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 11 pages. |
| Gaonkar, et al. Strategic Sourcing and Collaborative Planning in Internet Enabled Supply Chain Networks Producing Multigeneration Products. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 2, issue 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 54-66. |
| Garner, K., “Culture Vulture: Up from Under—Germaine Greer,” Off our Backs, Jun. 24, 1971, vol. 1, Iss. 23, p. 14. |
| Gurley. Creating a Great E-Commerce Business. Fortune, Mar. 16, 1998. |
| Ha, Sung Ho et al., “Matching Buyers and Suppliers: An Intelligent Dynamic-Exchange Model,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2001. |
| Hinze, Annika et al., “Location- and Time-Based Information Delivery in Tourism,” as downloaded Apr. 20, 2012 from http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/voisard/Papers/sstd03.pdf. |
| IEEE Xplore Search Results, Aug. 12, 2007. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US07/89195, mailed May 12, 2008, 8 pages. |
| Jonsson et al., “Impact of Processing and Queueing Times on Order Quantities,” Material Flow, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 221-230, Aug. 1985. |
| Kantrow, American Express Sets a Three-Tier Pricing on Optima, Dialog: File 148 #05812190 (The Gale Group), American Banker, v157, n25, p. 1(2), Feb. 6, 1992. |
| Kauffman et al., “Bid Together Buy Together, on the Efficacy of Group-Buying Business models in Internet-based Selling,” May 16, 2001. |
| Koenig, et al. Quantitative Industrial Ecology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, Issue 1, Feb. 1998, pp. 16-28. |
| Lamparter, W.C., “Natural Selection,” American Printer, vol. 217, No. 3, pp. 54-64, Jun. 1996. |
| Mack, Going Local. Adweek, Jul. 10, 2000, pp. 38-.6, © 2006 ProQuest Info&Learning. Last accessed Sep. 17, 2010, 2 pages. |
| Market Engineering Research for Structural Impacts of e-Business in the European Chemicals Industry (Ch. 3), Structural Impact of e-Business on the Chemicals Industry, Frost & Sullivan, Market Research Report, Jun. 2001. |
| Maxwell, Pricing education in the United States of America: responding to the needs of business, the Journal of Product & Brand Management, Santa Barbara, Aug. 1998, vol. 7, Issue 4, p. 336-341. |
| Medrano, et al. Strategic Behaviour and Price Discovery, RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 32, No. 2, Jun. 21, 2001 https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/rje.sub.--online.cgi?action=view&year=2001&issue=sum&page=221&&tid=83197&sc=uogfbloa. Last accessed Sep. 3, 2009, 29 pages. |
| Mercata.com “How to Ship an Order” Oct. 22, 2000, archived by archive.org: http://web.archive.org/web/20001022035135/http://www.mercata.com/cgi-bin/mercata/mercata/v1/pages/editorial.jsp?name=Ship+an+Order. |
| Mercata.com, archived by archive.org on or before Jun. 19, 2000. |
| Meridex Introduces Advanced Features to its B2B Network, PR Newswire, May 25, 2000. http://www.canadait.com/cfm/index.cfm?It=106&Id=3421&Se=355&Sv=- Company&Lo=441. Last accessed Apr. 30, 2009, 3 pages. |
| Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1997, p. 732. |
| Mesaros. Innovation in Difficult Times : How US Manufacturers are Using Demand Aggregation to Increase Sales and Lower Costs. Jul. 26, 2001. Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 4 pages. |
| Millman, H., “Legacy Data Links Shrinks Costs,” InfoWorld, vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 51, 56, Jan. 5, 1998. |
| MobShop Launches New Rev of Selling App, Online Reporter, May 28, 2001. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi.sub.--hb5932/is.sub.--200105/ai.sub- .--n23884526/. Last accessed Apr. 30, 2009, 2 pages. |
| Moody. From E-Commerce to We-Commerce. Computer Weekly, 42, Jun. 3, 1999. Last accessed Apr. 9, 2009, 2 pages. |
| Mullich, J., “Altrade Serves as a Natural Resource—a Head Start and Big Trading Volume Give the Natural Gas Marketplace a Competitive Edge. Can It Last?” InformationWeek, p. 152, Jun. 12, 2000. |
| Munson, Donald “Trading in Futures Can Provide Considerable Financial Rewards”, CBOT, Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 41 pages. |
| Myers. “E-Solutions for Surplus Inventory,” Dsn Retailing Today, vol. 39, No. 21, p. 13, Nov. 6, 2000. |
| Nellore, et al. Factors Influencing Success in Integrated Product Development (IPD) Projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 48, issue 2, May 2001, pp. 164-174. |
| O'Gorman, et al. Considerations for Connecting Renewable Generation into Bulk Supply Networks. Sixth International Conference on Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management, ASDCOM 2003, vol. 2, Nov. 11-14, pp. 674-680. Last accessed Sep. 10, 2009, 7 pages. |
| Park, Sung Eun et al., “Efficient bid pricing based on costing methods for Internet bid systems,” Dept. of Comput. Eng., Dongguk Univ., South Korea. Book Title: Web Information Systems-WISE 2006. 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 42). |
| Rahim, M.A., et al., “Optimal Decision Rules for Determining the Length of the Production Run” (Abstract only), Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 195-202, 1985. |
| Rahim, M.A., et al., “Optimal Production Run for a Process Having Multilevel Tool Wear” (Abstract only), International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 139-149, 1988. |
| Rahim, M.A., et al., “Optimal Production Run for a Process with Random Linear Drift” (Abstract only), Omega, vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 347-351, 1988. |
| Rajaraman, Rajesh et al., “The Effect of Demand Elasticity on Security Prices for the Poolco and Multi-Lateral Contract Models,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 12, No. 3, Aug. 1997. |
| Rozic, Jeff “Who's Watching While You Surf?” Inside Business 3, 5, 64, May 2001. |
| Scott. Chains of Trust, Supply Chain Management, Manufacturing Engineer, vol. 75, issue 4, Aug. 1996, pp. 172-174. |
| Scott. Supply Partnerships and the Effective Management of Low Cost Components. Transforming Your Material Flow: A Practical Insight Into World Class Logistics and Supply Chain Management IEE Colloquium on, Mar. 19, 1996, pp. 2/1-2/4. |
| Scott. Supply Partnerships in the Aerospace Industry. Transforming Your Material Flow: A Practical Insight Into World Class Logistics and Supply Chain Management IEE Colloquium on, Oct. 24, 1996, pp. 3/1-3/3. |
| Sivakumar, et al. Price Match Guarantees: Rationale, Implementation, and Consumer Response. Pricing Strategy and Practice, Bradford, 1996, vol. 4, issue 4, 11 pgs. Recovered from ProQuest Database Aug. 25, 2006. |
| Sjostrom. Price Discrimination by Shipping Conferences. Logistics and Transportation Review, Jun. 1992, [from Dialog.RTM. File 15, Acc.No. 00727777 93-76998]. |
| Stacklin. “Bridgestone Printing Unit Teams with ewinwin”, Mar. 25, 2002, Crain's Cleveland Business, vol. 23, issue 12, 3 pages. |
| Swartz, Wireless Ads: Loved/Loathed. Wireless Review, Oct. 1, 2000, © 2006 The Gale Gropu. Last accessed Sep. 17, 2010. |
| Tanaka. “As Other Companies Crumble, Ecount Carves Out Niche in Online-Payment Services.” Knight Rider Tribune News Service, Washington, Feb. 27, 2002. (Recovered from ProQuest Database Dec. 4, 2006.). |
| Thomas, et al. JIT: Strategies for Distant Suppliers (Abstract). Business, vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 36-39, Dec. 1990. |
| Tippr http://www.tipper.com/ Internet Archive (Feb. 29, 2008)—http://web.archive.org/web/20080229121727/http://tippr.com/. |
| Watson. The Effects of Demand Forecast Fluctuations on Customer Service and Inventory Cost When Demand is Lumpy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 75-82, Jan. 1987. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v38/n1/abs/jors19879a.html. Last accessed Sep. 10, 2009, 8 pages. |
| Wayback Machine. “Searched for http://www.ewinwin.com/corp/ewinwinwhitepaper.pdf”, Oct. 2, 2008, Archive. org. |
| WHN Selects MobShop to Power Aggregated Buying for WHN Exchange. Jan. 23, 2001. http://www.allbusiness.com/retail-trade/4291613-1.html. Last accessed Sep. 11, 2009, 2 pages. |
| Yeh, R.H., et al., “Optimal Production Run Length for Products Sold with Warranty” (Abstract only), European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 575-582, Feb. 1, 2000. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/271,464 Office Action mailed May 10, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,884 Office Action mailed May 1, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,884 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,723 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,723 Office Action mailed Mar. 22, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,622 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,360 Final Office Action mailed Jul. 6, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/710,095 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/710,095 Office Action mailed Apr. 6, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/161,192 Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,144 Office Action mailed May 16, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923 Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Office Action mailed Feb. 9, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,681 Office Action mailed Jun. 20, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/160,128 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,412 Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,415 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,387 Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,147 Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2012. |
| Mercata.com, “Our Privacy Policy”, Archived by Archive.org on or before May 26, 2000. |
| Mercata.com, “Special Offers”, Archived by Archive.org on or before Jun. 19, 2000. |
| Mercata.com, “Terms of Use”, Published by Mercata.com, Nov. 6, 2000. |
| We-Commerce.com, “The We-Commerce™ Network Mission”, Archived by Archive.org on or before Oct. 23, 2000. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,723 Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,360 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,054 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 21, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2003. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,275 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,276 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/452,647 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,478 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 29, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,478 Office Action mailed Dec. 20, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,512 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,820 Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/491,449 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/491,449 Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,040 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,622 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,806 Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,806 Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Office Action mailed May 10, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Final Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,250 Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,158 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 27, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,213 Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,213 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 9, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,462 Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/160,128 Office Action mailed May 23, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/160,176 Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/538,302 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,147 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 9, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431 Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/517,528 Office Action mailed May 8, 2013. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120310738 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60133769 | May 1999 | US | |
| 60137583 | Jun 1999 | US | |
| 60138209 | Jun 1999 | US | |
| 60139519 | Jun 1999 | US | |
| 60142371 | Jul 1999 | US | |
| 60160510 | Oct 1999 | US | |
| 60162182 | Oct 1999 | US | |
| 60173409 | Dec 1999 | US | |
| 60237474 | Oct 2000 | US | |
| 60183390 | Jun 2009 | US | |
| 61230248 | Jul 2009 | US | |
| 60139518 | Jun 1999 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13424226 | Mar 2012 | US |
| Child | 13584809 | US | |
| Parent | 12788513 | May 2010 | US |
| Child | 13424226 | US | |
| Parent | 09342345 | Jun 1999 | US |
| Child | PCT/US00/11989 | US | |
| Parent | 09426063 | Oct 1999 | US |
| Child | 09342345 | US | |
| Parent | 09324391 | Jun 1999 | US |
| Child | 09426063 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09922884 | Aug 2001 | US |
| Child | 12788513 | US | |
| Parent | 09324391 | Jun 1999 | US |
| Child | 09922884 | US | |
| Parent | 09426063 | Oct 1999 | US |
| Child | 09324391 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US00/11989 | May 2000 | US |
| Child | 09426063 | US |
