The present invention is directed generally to embodiments in the field of image forming devices, and more particularly to embodiments of toner supply member properties and architectures for controlling toner layer thickness supply to the developer member in image forming devices.
One step in the electrophotographic printing process typically involves a toner supply member of a toner cartridge providing a relatively uniform layer of toner to a developer member. The developer member in turn supplies that toner to a photoconductive element to develop a latent image thereon. The toner layer supplied by the toner supply member to the developer member is often much greater than what is required for quality image formation. A doctor blade “doctors” this layer into an acceptable thickness prior to supply to the photoconductive element.
In an image forming device the toner supply member is typically considered to have two primary functions. The first is to remove undeveloped toner from the developer member. The second is to supply a sufficient and consistent quantity of uniformly charged toner to the developer member surface prior to the doctor blade.
While the surface properties of the developer member and the doctor blade have long been known to be factors in the control of the toner layer on the developer member, it has been discovered that the properties and architecture of the toner supply member are also a factor in controlling the thickness of the toner layer supplied to the developer member.
The present invention relates to embodiments for toner supply members, particularly toner supply member properties and architectures for controlling toner layer thickness supply to the developer member in image forming devices. In one embodiment the toner supply members have a foamed elastic body.
The present invention relates to embodiments for toner supply members, particularly toner supply member properties and architectures for controlling toner layer thickness supplied to the developer member in image forming devices.
Five primary properties of the toner supply member foam body and the developer member nip architecture influence the toner layer thickness supplied to the developer member 20. These five primary properties are: (1) the cell size of the toner supply member foam body 12; (2) the porosity of the toner supply member foam body 12; (3) the electrical resistance of the toner supply member foam body 12; (4) the nip width between the toner supply member 10 and the developer member 20; and (5) the surface velocity ratio between the toner supply member 10 and the developer member 20.
These properties directly affect the number of contacts the toner supply member foam body 12 has with toner at the developer member nip 30. The greater the number of contacts between the toner supply member 10 and toner at the developer member nip 30, the greater the control of the toner layer thickness supplied to the developer member 20.
Porosity is defined as the density of the foamed material divided by the density of the material that constitutes the solid portion of the foam. As such, it is a measure of the percentage of void volume in a unit volume of foam. In one embodiment the toner supply member foam body 12 is comprised of cells that are defined by the bubble diameter during the foam formation process. Within these cells may be many pores that are defined by the cell structure. There may, or may not, be wall material in the pores. Porosity is a function of cell size (often referred to as cell diameter) and cell spacing (often referred to in terms of pores per inch (ppi)).
A commonly cited foam property is compression force deflection (CFD). CFD is one test method to determine the load bearing capacity (firmness or stiffness) of a foam body, and may be expressed in pounds force per square inch (psi) at a given percent deflection of the foam body. Most resilient foams exhibit CFD properties that follow Hooke's Law. That is, the further they are compressed, the harder they push back against whatever is compressing them.
CFD may be measured by driving a circular indenter plate into a foam sample, stopping when the plate reaches a deflection of twenty-five percent (25%) of the foam sample thickness. The force in pounds required to hold this foam indented after one minute is recorded. The higher the force reading, the higher the load bearing capacity of the foam. The CFD value may also be reported in metric units and the foam sample size may be varied.
Foam bodies having high CFD values are often thought to improve the cleaning of toner from the developer member at the expense of developer member torque. This may be evidenced by an increase in developer member torque with the higher CFD foam body.
In
The electrical resistance of the toner supply member foam body 12 needs to be sufficiently low (in combination with the voltage differential between the toner supply member and the developer member) to supply enough current to the developer member nip 30 to fully supply and charge the toner to the developer member 20. In one embodiment the toner supply member foam body 12 may have a resistance less than or equal to about 1E9 ohms.
A nip is a relatively uniform pressure zone created between two roll surfaces forced together by pressure. In one embodiment, a nip is formed between two parallel roll surfaces. Nip width is the width of mating surfaces between the two rolls. In one embodiment nip width between the toner supply member 10 and the developer member 20 may be controlled by the diameter of the toner supply member 20, the diameter of the developer member 20, and the nominal center to center distance between the two.
Foam body density may be defined as mass per unit volume and may be expressed as pounds per cubic foot (lbs/ft3). Thus, the foam body density may be expressed as a measure of the weight of a cubic foot of the foam. Foam body density is directly proportional to the porosity of the foam. Foam body density may not be a measure of the firmness, stiffness, or load bearing capacity of the foam body 12. The firmness, stiffness or load bearing capacity of the foam body 12 may be measured by compression force deflection (CFD) as described above.
In one embodiment the toner supply member foam body 12 has a density in a range of about 2 pounds per cubic foot to about 8 pounds per cubic foot.
Two toner supply member foam bodies 12 were examined. In one embodiment the toner supply member foam body 12 had a density of about 2 lbs./ft3 and about a 800 μm cell size. In one other embodiment the toner supply member foam body 12 had a density of about 7 lbs./ft3 and about a 500 μm cell size.
As illustrated in
In one embodiment the nip width between the toner supply member 10 and the developer member 20 may be in a range from about 0.5 mm to about 1.5 mm. In another embodiment the nip width may be in a range of about 0.7 mm to about 1.3 mm.
The surface velocity ratio refers to the ratio between the relative surface speeds of the toner supply member 10 versus the developer member 20 at the developer member nip 30. In one embodiment, the toner supply member 10 and the developer member 20 rotate in the same direction within an image forming apparatus as illustrated in
The opposing surface velocities at the developer member nip 30 may improve the ability of the toner supply member 10 to scrub toner from the surface of the developer member 20. The opposing surface velocities may also increase the number of contacts between the toner supply member 10 and toner in the nip 30. This effect of the opposing surface velocities may be less significant as the foam density of the toner supply member foam increases and cell size decreases.
In one embodiment the surface velocity ratio between the toner supply member 10 and the developer member 20 ranges from about 0.5 to about 1.0. In another embodiment the surface velocity ratio is about 0.875.
A mathematical model may illustrate the relationship between the previously described foam properties and architecture with the performance of a toner supply member foam body 12 in an image forming device. With reference to
The differential velocity between the velocity of the developer member (DM) 22 and the toner supply member (TSM) 18 is:
ΔV=VDM−VTSM Eqn 1
This can also be expressed in terms of the surface velocity ratio (R) between the developer member 20 and the toner supply member 10:
ΔV=(1+R)*VDM Eqn 2
In Equation 2, the surface velocities of the developer member 22 and the toner supply member 18 are assumed to be in opposite directions, and the value of (R) will have a positive value. Therefore, (ΔV) may be greater than (VDM).
If (Wnip) 32 is the width of the nip, then the time that any locus on the developer member 20 spends in the developer member nip 30 against the toner supply member 10 is:
The amount of circumferential length of the toner supply member 10 that contacts this locus on the developer member 20 while it is in the developer member nip 30 is:
XTSM=ΔV*tnip Eqn 4
Within this length of the toner supply member 10, it is desired to know the number of contacts that touch any locus on the developer member 20 surface as it passes through the developer member nip 30. This can be approximated knowing the average cell size or cell size diameter (Dcell) 17, and the porosity of the foam (P). Here we assume that the porosity (P) can be used to estimate the ratio of the amount of toner supply member 10 material that actually touches the developer member 20 to the amount of air space “in contact” with the developer member 20:
where (K) is a foam-dependent constant of proportionality, compensating for such things as geometry differences of the foam pore structures. Constant (K) may also be used for units compensation.
Substituting (XTSM) from Equation 4 into Equation 5 gives:
Substituting (ΔV) from Equation 2 into Equation 6 gives:
Substituting (tnip) from Equation 3 into Equation 7, and cancelling (VDM) gives:
Finally, the unknown constant (K) can be brought to the left side of the equation, leaving all knowns on the right side of the equation, and defining a new foam property (N/K), hereinafter referred to as the contact value:
Equation 9 demonstrates that number of foam contacts against a locus on the developer member 20 within the developer member nip 30 is directly proportional to foam porosity and nip width, increases with increasing surface velocity ratio, and is inversely proportional to cell size.
Currently, the constant (K) is undefined and the actual number of contacts made in the developer member nip is undetermined. The model, however, can be used to determine an (N/K) value for each toner supply member foam body type.
Where a toner supply member foam body 12 has an (N/K)>2, the toner mass control and image formation performance may be adequate if the toner supply member foam body is relatively stiff.
Where a toner supply member foam body 12 has an (N/K)>3, the toner mass control and image formation performance may be independent of the toner supply member foam body's stiffness.
There may be an upper limit to (N), where the toner supply member foam body porosity available to accumulate toner and apply it to the developer member becomes too small for adequate toner mass control and image formation performance.
The present invention may be carried out in other specific ways than those herein set forth without departing from the scope and essential characteristics of the invention. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, and all changes coming within the meaning and equivalency range of the appended claims are intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5339141 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5557060 | Okada et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5655197 | Okada et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5768668 | Shiraki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6813470 | Elbert et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
20010009618 | Ohgoshi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20040259966 | Lovette | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070003327 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |