Proppant discharge system and a container for use in such a proppant discharge system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • RE46334
  • Patent Number
    RE46,334
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 25, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 7, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A proppant discharge system has a container with an outlet formed at a bottom thereof and a gate slidably affixed at the outlet so as to be movable between a first position covering the outlet to second position opening the outlet, and a support structure having an actuator thereon. The container is removably positioned on the top surface of the support structure. The actuator is engageable with gate so as to move the gate from the first position to the second position. A conveyor underlies the container so as to receive proppant as discharged from the container through the outlet. The container is a ten foot ISO container.
Description
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.


NAMES OF THE PARTIES TO A JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT

Not applicable.


INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF MATERIALS SUBMITTED ON COMPACT DISC

Not applicable.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to storage containers. More particularly, the present invention the relates to proppant discharge systems wherein proppant can be discharged from the storage container. Additionally, the present invention relates to a process for providing proppant to a well site by the transport and delivery of the proppant containers.


2. Description of Related Art Including Information Disclosed Under 37 CFR 1.97 and 37 CFR 1.98


Hydraulic fracturing is the propagation of fractions in a rock layer caused by the presence of pressurized fluid. Hydraulic fractures may form naturally, in the case of veins or dikes, or may be man-made in order to release petroleum, natural gas, coal seam gas, or other substances for extraction. Fracturing is done from a wellbore drilled into reservoir rock formations. The energy from the injection of a highly-pressurized fracking fluid creates new channels in the rock which can increase the extraction rates and ultimate recovery of fossil fuels. The fracture width is typically maintained after the injection by introducing a proppant into the injected fluid. Proppant is a material, such as grains of san d, ceramic, or other particulates, that prevent the fractures from closing when the injection is stopped.


With the rise of hydraulic fracturing over the past decade, there is a steep climb in proppant demand Global supplies are currently tight. The number of proppant suppliers worldwide has increased since 2000 from a handful to well over fifty sand, ceramic proppant and resin-coat producers.


By the far the dominant proppant is silica sand, made up of ancient weathered quartz, the most common mineral in the Earth's continental crust. Unlike common sand, which often feels gritty when rubbed between the fingers, sand used as a proppant tends to roll to the touch as a result of its round, spherical shape and tightly-graded particle distribution. Sand quality is a function of both deposit and processing. Grain size is critical, as any given proppant must reliably fall within certain mesh ranges, subject to downhole conditions and completion design. Generally, coarser proppant allows the higher now capacity due to the larger pore spaces between grains. However, it may break down or crush more readily under stress due to the relatively fewer grain-to-grain contact points to bear the stress often incurred in deep oil- and gas-bearing formations.


Typically, in any hydraulic fracturing operation, a large amount of such proppant is required. Typically, it has been difficult to effectively store the proppant at the fracturing sites. Additionally, it has been found to be rather difficult to effectively transport the proppant to the desired location. Often, proppant is hauled to the desired locations on the back of trucks and is clumped onsite. Under such circumstances, the proppant is often exposed to adverse weather conditions. This will effectively degrade the quality of the proppant during its storage. Additionally, the maintenance of proppant in containers at the hydraulic fracturing site requires a large capital investment in storage facilities. Typically, the unloading of such storage facilities is carried out on a facility-by-facility basis. As such, there is a need to be able to effectively transport the proppant to and store the proppant in a desired location adjacent to the hydraulic fracturing location.


With the development and acceptance of the well stimulation methodology known as “hydraulic fracturing”, a unique logistics challenge has been created in delivering the massive quantities of proppant from domestic sand mines to the wellhead. This logistics challenge affects every stakeholder up-and-down the logistics chain. In particular, this includes sand mine owners, railroads, trans-loading facilities, oil-field service companies, trucking companies and exploration and production companies. The existing method of delivering sand to the consumer requires the use of expensive specialized equipment and a high level of coordination. This makes the process subject to a myriad of problems that disrupt the efficient flow of proppant to the wellhead. The result of utilizing the current method is the expenditure of hundreds of millions of dollars in largely unnecessary logistics costs.


Sand mines are being rapidly developed all over the United States to satisfy the demand that the “Shale Boom” has created for proppant. Most of the recent mines that have come on-line, or are in varying stages of development, have limited transportation infrastructure to support the export of sand from the sand-pit. As a result, many mines are building rail-spurs that will accommodate up to 100 rail cars or more that can be loaded and stand for transportation to the designated destination. Along with rail-track, these companies are also investing in expensive vertical silo storage facilities to store thousands of tons of proppant. The sand mines are unable to effectively ship proppant to the shale regions without equal fluid trans-loading and storage facilities on the receiving end of the logistics chain. This results in lost revenue and productivity for the mine owner and higher prices for proppant buyers in the destination region.


Railroads are a critical part of the logistics chain required to move proppant from mine to the various shale regions. Due to the lack of rail track and trans-loading facilities in some of these remote regions, the railroad companies must be selective of their customers' delivery locations, and make sure that their customers have the ability to efficiently off-load rail cars. Recently, the railroads have seen the allocated fleet of hopper cars being stranded at those destination where there is no cost-effective storage option to efficiently off-load those cars. Consequently, there has been a significant opportunity cost that the railroads have been forced to pay. As such, a need has developed for facilitating the ability to quickly and inexpensively off-load proppant from rail cars so as to enable the railroads to improve the velocity, turn-around and revenue-generating capacity of the rail-car fleet.


Limited storage at trans-loading facilities has severely limited many of the current facilities' ability to operate efficiently. Most trans-load facilities are forced to off-load rail hopper cars by bringing in trucks (i.e. pneumatics) along the rail siding, and conveying sand directly from rail to truck. This requires an intense coordination effort on the part of the trans-loader as well as the trucking community. Long truck lines are commonplace, and demurrage fees (i.e. waiting time charged by trucking companies) amount to hundreds of millions of dollars nationwide. As such, the trans-loader is not able to fully realize the utilization of conveying and other material handling equipment. The throughput of these transloading terminals severely reduces costing of the terminal meaningful revenue.


Additionally, optimal trans-load terminal locations are immobile and not able to move from one area of the shale pay to another. Investors in immobile silo and flat storage facilities can see the utilization and value of those investments tumble. A potential loss of the investment in such immobile silos can often scare investment capital away from these types of future projects so as to further exacerbate the logistics chain problem. As such, a need has developed for a portable, inexpensive storage and delivery solution for proppant that would help revive the capital needed to improve the facilities and maximize the revenue-generating potential of existing and new trans-load and storage facilities.


The lack of efficient trans-load and storage facilities in shale regions have taken a heavy toll on the efficiencies of trucking fleets. While trucking companies have typically charged demurrage fees to compensate for the waiting time and lost productivity, those types of charges are under significant resistance from the customer base. When trucking companies are required to wait in line to be loaded, or wait at a well-site to be unloaded, the number of turns that the equipment can make in a day is severely limited. Rather than turning two or three loads in a single day, the trucks more typically make one trip per day, and very commonly may make one delivery every two or three days, This lack of efficient fleet utilization results in the trucking company having to buy more equipment and hire more drivers to move the same amount of material than would be necessary. As such, it would be desirable to eliminate demurrage charges and to present the opportunity for trucking companies to become more profitable while making smaller investments in equipment.


Service companies (such as fracturing companies) are held captive by the current proppant delivery process. This is the result of inefficient trans-load facilities and pneumatic (bulk) truck deliveries. The service company cannot frac a well if it does not have a supply of proppant. It is widely known that the problems surrounding the efficient delivery of proppant to the well-site is one of the primary challenges to the service companies in successfully completing a frac job. Pressure pumps, coiled tubing and other well stimulation equipment, often site idle due to the lack of required proppant at the well-site, “Screening-Out” or running out of proppant is very common at well locations due to the lack of control over what is happening up-stream in the proppant logistics chain. This results in lower profit margins to the service company. Many small to medium-sized hydraulic fracturing companies have little or no logistics infrastructure. Some have entered the marketplace without much thought to the logistics problems associated with taking delivery of the necessary supplies to complete a well. In doing so, many of these companies have been forced to source material and employ very expensive logistics options in order to survive. This has resulted in above-market pricing in order to complete wells. There is also as risk of losing out on otherwise viable hydraulic fracturing contracts. As such, there is a need to lower costs across the board in order to properly compete.


Exploration and production companies, along with the entire U.S. population, pay the ultimate bill for all of the inefficiencies and waste that plagues the proppant supply chain. Service companies are forced to price hydraulic fracturing services by taking into account the historical costs of supply chain problems. Exploration and production companies need to pass on the overall increased cost of production. As such, there is a need to provide a cost-effective solution to improve the profitability of stake holders in the proppant logistics chain, while lowering the overall cost to the consumer.


U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/427,140, filed on Mar. 22, 2012 by the present inventor, describes a system for the delivery of proppant between a loading station and the well site. This application describes the steps of placing the storage container in a location adjacent to a train site such that the proppant, as delivered by the train, can be discharged into the container. The container can then be transported for storage in stacks at the loading area or can be delivered to a tilting mechanism at the loading station. The tilting station will tilt the container so as to allow the proppant to flow outwardly therefrom. This proppant will flow, by a conveyor, to a pneumatic truck. The truck can then transport the proppant over the highways to the well site. At the well site, the proppant from the pneumatic truck can then be discharged into a twenty foot container at the well site. These twenty foot containers can be stored at the well site in a stacked configuration. Ultimately, each of the containers can be transported to another tilting mechanism at the well site so that the proppant within each of the storage containers can be discharged onto a conveyor and ultimately for use during the fracturing operation.


In this U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/427,140, the twenty-foot ISO container that is utilized is one of the most inexpensive and readily-available pieces of transportation equipment in the world. It was determined that the use of the twenty-foot container allows for the transportation of proppant through various minor modifications to the internal walls and reinforcements of the twenty-foot ISO container. The available capacity is more than acceptable. It was determined that this modified twenty-foot container could hold in excess of forty-five tons of proppant. The cost of an unmodified twenty-foot ISO container is less than four thousand dollars. This makes it very affordable compared to the cost of building, vertical silos or flat storage buildings.


The twenty-foot ISO container was modified by cutting a hole in the top of the container and constructing a water-tight, hinged hatch through which the proppant could be poured by any number of readily-available conveying units. There was also a lower hatch in the twenty-foot ISO container. This lower hatch could be opened to drain the proppant out of the twenty-foot ISO container. Alternatively, a square flow-gate was fabricated and welded to the vertical rear lower side of the twenty-foot container. This gate hatch allowed the container to be tilted in the manner of a dump truck bed. As a result, sand could flow out of the flow gate while moderating the flow of the sand.


This patent application provided the ability to trans-load sand via containers from a standard rail hopper car to the twenty-foot ISO container. It was determined that the container could be loaded in less than twenty minutes with at least fort-five tons of proppant. By pre-positioning the container along, the rail track, movable conveyors could work the train from one end to the other and unload the train in a very efficient and timely manner. This part of the process eliminated the coordination efforts of calling in pneumatic trucks that could be systematically loaded by conveying units. This reduced the time necessary to unload a train's hopper cars by many hours. It also eliminated truck traffic and demurrage charges at the rail-spur and trans-load facility.


Once the proppant is loaded into the container, another piece of specialized equipment would be used to lift the full container and to stack the container upon other containers. The stackable arrangement of containers allows the ability to operate and store proppant within a very small footprint. The specialized equipment that was required to lift the full containers was so heavy and large that it would have to be disassembled into several pieces before moving from one location to another. This created some limitations on the flexibility that such equipment lent to the containerized process.


By “containerizing” proppant, it was found that an inventory management system could be added in order to provide real-time, accurate information pertaining to the volume/inventory of proppant that the customers own in a particular region. Currently, many proppant buyers are subject to inaccurate volume reporting from trans-loading facilities. As such, they May not be certain that the proppant being delivered to the well-site is, in fact, of the quality and grade that they have purchased. By applying an inventory management system, bar coding, and scanning the containers into and out of inventory, the customers would be assured that they have received, their proppant and would be able streamline the procurement process when ordering more material.


In this prior process, since the twenty-foot ISO container needed to be emptied and trans-loaded into pneumatic trailers for delivery to the wellhead, a tilting unit was incorporated into the process. This tilting unit accepted the twenty-foot ISO containers. The tilting unit is able to lift one end of the container and create the required angle to wholly empty the container through the flow gate. Once tilted, the sand would spill onto the belt of the conveyor and rise vertically into a hopper. The hopper rested on a steel fabrication stand. This stand is high enough such that a truck that pulls a pneumatic trailer could drive under the stand and be gravity fed by the hopper so as to fill up the sand trailer. These “loading stations” could be replicated along a path so as to alleviate the bottleneck of trucks at a trans-load facility that has a limited number of conveyors available to load the trucks. Once again, trucking demurrage at this trans-load facility could be dramatically reduced through the process. The railcars can be off-loaded rapidly and released back to the railroads. This also reduced or eliminated demurrage fees charged by the railroads for rail hopper cars that stood waiting to be off-loaded.


This prior process created an inexpensive storage solution, improved the efficiencies of the trans-loading process, added inventory visibility and controls, and reduced both truck and rail demurrage charges. However, it did have several limitations. For example, the twenty-foot ISO container, while capable of handling ninety thousand pounds of proppant, could not be transported legally over a public road. In most states, the maximum allowable total weight of a vehicle and its payload is eighty thousand pounds of gross vehicle weight in order to be considered a legal load. By law, any load that can be broken down by two units or more, in order to achieve a legal weight limit, must be divided into multiple loads. Since proppant is divisible, the law does not allow for heavy or over-weight loads.


The angle of repose of a granular material is the steepest angle of descent or dip of the slope relative to the horizontal plane when material on the slope face is on the verge of sliding. When bulk granular materials are poured onto a horizontal surface, a conical pile will form. The internal angle between the surface of the pile and the horizontal surface is known as the angle of repose and is related to the density, surface area and shape of the particles, and the coefficient of friction of the material. The angle of repose is also gravity-dependent.


When analyzing the angle of repose of proppant poured into a twenty-foot ISO container, it was evident that much of the volume of such a container was void. Specifically, the upper ends of twenty-foot ISO container could not be utilized without somehow manipulating or tilting the container as it was filled by a conveyor. Moreover, when emptying the container, by way of the original bottom hatch, the proppant would pour directly out of the bottom and leave a significant amount of material sitting on the floor of the container.


U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/555,635, filed on Jul. 23, 2012 by the present inventor, is the parent of the present application. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/555,635 described a new generation of the container by taking the original twenty-foot ISO container and splitting it in half. As such, a ten foot ISO container was provided. By breaking the container into a ten foot configuration, it was determined that such a container could hold approximately 45,000-48,000 pounds of proppant. More importantly, the total gross vehicle weight of such a fully-loaded container could be legally transported over a public road. This was a major breakthrough. The container could be delivered to the wellhead in advance of a frac crew and eliminate sand deliveries during the fracturing process. Because all of the required proppant for any frac job could be delivered and stored on-site, such a ten-foot ISO container effectively eliminated the occurrence of trucking demurrage charges at the well-site. Also, the use of such a ten-foot container effectively eliminated the problems caused by the angle of repose of the proppant and allowed the volumetric capacity of such a ten-foot ISO container to be more fully utilized. It was found to be the optimal configuration, size, and cost for the process.


This prior application utilized, an insert that is fabricated, and welded within the interior of the ten-foot ISO container. The insert allowed, the proppant, loaded through the top hatch, to fully flow out of a newly designed bottom flow-gate. The need to manipulate or tilt the container was eliminated. This ten-foot container could now be filled and emptied by using only gravity to do so.


In the past, various patents have issued relating to storage and transport facilities. For example, U.S. Patent Publication No, 2008/0179054, published on Jul. 31, 2008 to McGough et al., shows a bulk material storage and transportation system. In particular, the storage system is mounted on the trailer of a truck. The storage system includes walls that define an interior volume suitable for receiving the aggregate material therein. There are hoppers provided at the bottom of the container. These hoppers have inclined walls. The hoppers can extend so as to allow the material from the inside of the container to be properly conveyed to a location exterior of the container. Actuators are used so as to expand and collapse the container.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,240,681, issued on Jul. 10, 2007 to L. Saik, describes a trailer-mounted mobile apparatus for dewatering and recovering formation sand. The trailer is mounted to a truck-towable trailer so as to receive sand therein. The container has a pair of sloping end walls. The back end of the container is suitably openable so as to allow the sand to be removed therefrom. A pneumatic or hydraulic ram is provided on the forward part of the container so as to allow the container to be lifted angularly upwardly so as to allow sand to be discharged through the gate at the rear of the container.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,228, issued on Jan. 27, 1981 to Gray et al., describes a dump truck or trailer with a pneumatic conveyor. The container is mounted to a frame on wheels. A hydraulic ram tilts the container for dumping through a rear outlet. A pneumatic conveyor is carried by the frame with an intake at the rear of the container. A gate allows the solids to be dumped conventionally by gravity or to be blown to a storage facility by the pneumatic container. The container has a top hatch formed therein so as to allow the solids to be introduced into the interior of the container.


U.S. Pat. No. 2,865,521, issued on Dec. 23, 1958 to Fisher et al., shows a bulk material truck that has an interior volume suitable for the receipt of bulk material therein. A pneumatic conveyer is utilized so as to allow the removal of such material from the bottom of the container. A pair of sloping walls are provided on opposite sides of the container so as to allow the bulk material within the container to be passed toward the bottom of the container. A top hatch is provided on the top of the conveyer. The pneumatic conveyer is connected to the bottom of the container.


It is an object of the present invention to provide a proppant storage container that allows proppant to be easily transported and stored.


It is another object of the present invention to provide a proppant storage container that allows the proppant to be easily and efficiently discharged to the bottom of the container.


It is another object of the present invention to provide a proppant storage container which allows for the effective storage of proppant at the fracturing site.


It is another object of the present invention to provide a process for delivering proppants that eliminates the use of pneumatic trailers.


It is further object of the present invention to provide a proppant storage container and a process for delivering proppant in which of the containers can be moved by a simple forklift.


It is another object of the present invention to provide a process for delivering proppants which effectively eliminates demurrage associated with the loading station and at the well site.


It is a further object of the present invention to provide a process of the deliver proppant which avoids the degradation of the proppant as a result of repeated handling.


It is a further object of the present invention to provide a proppant discharge system which provides a premeasured amount of proppant to the drill site.


it is still another object of the present invention to provide a proppant container which satisfies highway regulation and which has less void space within the interior of the container.


These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from a reading of the attached specification and appended claims.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a container for the transport and storage of proppant. The container comprises a box having a bottom, a pair of side walls a pair of end walls and a top. The box has an inlet formed at or adjacent to the top. The box has a outlet at the bottom. A gate is positioned at the outlet. The gate is slidably movable between a first position covering the outlet and a second position opening the outlet.


A first ramp extends from one of the pair of sidewalls to the outlet. A second ramp extends from the other of the pair of sidewalls to the outlet. A third ramp extends from one pair of end walls to the outlet. A fourth ramp extends from the other of the pair of end walls to the outlet. The box has a track formed on the bottom thereof. The gate is positioned in the track. The gate has a pin extending outwardly therefrom. The box has a frame formed on an exterior thereof. The frame extends across the pair of sidewalls and the pair of end walls. The ramps have exterior surfaces exposed through the frame. The box has a capacity of up to 48,000 pounds of the proppant. The box is a ten-foot ISO container.


present invention is also a proppant discharge system that has a container with a pair of sidewalls, a pair of end walls, a bottom and a top. The container has an inlet formed at or adjacent to the top. The container has an outlet formed at the bottom thereof. A gate is slidably affixed at the outlet of the container so to be movable between a first position covering the outlet and a second position opening the outlet. A support structure has a top surface and at least one actuator. The container is removably positioned on the top surface of the support structure. The actuator is engageable with the gate so as to move the gate from the first position to the second position.


In particular, the gate has a pin extending therefrom. The actuator has a receptacle. The pin is receivable within the receptacle.


A conveyor underlies the top surface of the support structure so as to receive proppant as discharged from the container through the outlet of the container. A hopper is positioned on the support structure below the top surface thereof. The hopper is positioned directly below the gate of the container. The hopper has an opening at a bottom thereof. The bottom of the hopper is positioned above the conveyor. A metering gate is positioned adjacent to the opening at the bottom of the hopper metering gate. The metering gate is movable between a closed position and an open position. The opening at the bottom of the hopper has a plurality of slots formed therein. The metering gate also has a plurality of slots formed therethrough. The plurality of slots of the metering gate are at least partially aligned with the plurality of slots of the hopper when the metering gate is in the open position. The opening, at the bottom of the hopper has an inverted V-shape configuration. The metering rate has an inverted V-shaped configuration matching with the opening at the bottom of the hopper. The metering gate is slidable relative to the opening at the bottom of the hopper. An actuator affixed to the metering gate so as to move the metering gate between the closed position and the open position.


A frame is affixed to the conveyor and extends therealong. A discharge chute is connected to the frame and is cooperative with the end of the conveyor so as to discharge the proppant from the conveyor to a desired location. A plurality of wheels can be rotatably mounted to the frame so as to allow the conveyor to be transported to the desired location.


The present invention is also as process for delivering proppant to a fracturing site. This process includes the steps of (1) forming a container having, an interior suitable for receiving the proppant therein and having an outlet at a bottom thereof; (2) filling the container with the proppant; (3) moving the filled container along, a roadway to the fracturing site; (4) placing the filled container upon a conveyor structure; (5) discharging the proppant from the outlet of the container onto the conveyor, and (6) conveying the discharged proppant to a desired location at the fracturing site.


In this process of present invention, the step of forming includes forming the container so as to have a length of approximately ten feet. A gate is placed over the outlet of the container. The gate is movable between a first position closing the outlet and a second position opening the outlet. The conveyor structure has an actuator thereon. This actuator is connected to a receptacle. The gate has a pin extending outwardly therefrom. The pin is positioned into the receptacle of the actuator and the actuator is actuated so as to move the gate from the first position to the second position. The conveyor structure has a hopper is positioned below a top surface thereof. The hopper has a metering gate at a bottom thereof. The metering gate is positioned above the conveyor of the conveyor structure. The filled container is positioned directly above the hopper of the conveyor structure. The proppant is discharged from the outlet of the container into the hopper of the conveyor structure. The proppant is metered through the metering gate at a control flow rate so as to be discharged therefrom onto the conveyor.


The process of the present invention further includes the steps of placing the filled container upon a train, transporting the filled container on the train to a location, removing the filled container from the train, and placing the removed filled container onto a vehicle.


This foregoing section is intended to describe, with particularity, the preferred embodiments of the present invention. It is understood that modifications to these preferred embodiments can be made within the scope of the present invention. As such, this section should not be construed, in any way; as limiting of the true scope of the present invention. The present invention should only be limited by the following claims and their legal equivalents.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the container in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of the container in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view showing the container of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a plan view showing the interior of the container of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is an isolated end view showing the support structure of the system of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is a plan view of the support structure of the system of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is an end view showing the placement of the container upon the support structure in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the system of the present invention.



FIG. 8 is a side view of the container as place on the support structure in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the system of the present invention.



FIG. 9 is a side devotional view showing a plurality of containers as placed upon the support structure in accordance with the system of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 10 is a plan view showing a plurality of containers as placed upon the support structure in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the system of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown the container 10 in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention. The container 10 is in the nature of a box 12 having an exterior frame 14. The box 12 includes a top 16, a bottom 18, an end wall 20 and a side wall 22. The side wall 24 is opposite to the side wall 22. There also an end wall 26 that is opposite to that of end will 20. An inlet 28 is formed through the top 16 of the box 12. A hatch 30 is removably or hingedly affixed over the inlet 28 so as to allow proppant to be introduced into the interior volume of the container 10.


In FIG. 1, it can be seen that the frame 14 extends generally around the exterior of the end walls 20 and 26 and over the side walls 22 and 24. As such as will be described hereinafter, there is a funnel-shaped bottom of the container that has exterior surfaces exposed through the frame 14. During the course of international shipment, it is important to avoid closed spaces within such a container. As such, the exposure of the surfaces through the openings 32 at the bottom of the frame 14 will allow inspectors to have visual access to the areas adjacent to this funnel-shaped area.


As can be seen in FIG. 2, the container 10 is illustrated, as having the top 16 and the bottom 18. The frame 14 provides structural support for the container 10 and generally surrounds the exterior of the container. The frame is formed of a plurality o'vertical bars that extend so as to form a cage-like configuration around the walls 20, 22, 24 and 26. The bottom 18 is generally of a planar shape so that the bottom 18 can be placed upon the support structure (to be described hereinafter). Importantly, the area 32 shows that the funnel-shaped portion 34 is exposed through the openings of the frame 14. As such, there will be no closed or sealed areas within the interior of the container 10. The hatch 30 is positioned over the inlet 28 at the top 16 of the container 10. As a result, the proppant can be introduced through the inlet 28 when the hatch 30 is opened so as to fill the interior volume of the container 10. The funnel-shaped, area 34 defines an outlet 36 located at the bottom 18 of the container 10.


As can be seen in FIGS. 1 and 2, the container 10 is a ten-foot ISO container. In accordance with standard ISO terminology, this means that the container has a length of ten feet, a width of eight feet and a height of 8.5 feet. The height can also be 9.5 feet. This configuration allows between 43,000 and 48,000 pounds of proppant to be introduced into the interior volume or the container.



FIG. 3 shows a partial cross-sectional view of the container 10. It can be seen that the container 10 has an interior volume 38. The outlet 36 is formed adjacent to the bottom 18 of the container 10. A first ramp 40 will extend from the end wall 20 to the outlet 36. A second ramp 42 will extend from the end wall 22 to the outlet 36. The ramps 40 and 42 will serve to funnel, the proppant that is retained within the interior volume 38 of the container 10 toward the outlet 36. Importantly, a gate 44 is positioned within a track 46 located at the bottom 18 of the container 10. The gate 44 is in the nature of flat plate which, as shown in FIG. 3, covers the outlet 36. The gate 44 includes a pin 48 (in the nature of king bolt) that extends outwardly from the gate 44. When an actuator is connected to the pin 48, it can move the gate 44 from the position closing the outlet 36 to a position opening the outlet 36. Allow 50 shows the movement of the gate 44 between these positions. Since the gate 44 has a width that generally corresponds to the size of the outlet 36, the gate 44 will only need to move for a small amount of travel so as to move the gate 44 to the open position.



FIG. 4 is an interior view of the container 10. As can be seen, the first ramp 40 will extend from the end wall 20 to the outlet 36. The second ramp 42 extends from the end wall 26 to the outlet 36. A third ramp 52 will extend from the side wall 22 to the outlet 36. Another ramp 54 will extend horn the side wall 24 to the outlet 36. As such, the ramps 40, 42, 52 and 54 form the funnel-like shape so that the proppant that is received within the interior volume 38 of the container 10 can flow free downwardly toward the outlet 36.


In FIG. 4, it can be seen that the gate 44 is positioned within the track 46. FIG. 4 shows the gate 44 in its closed position. An actuator can be used so as to move the gate 44 from the position shown in FIG. 4 in a direct on toward either the side wall 22 or the side wall 24. Pins 48 and 58 are illustrated as extending outwardly of the sides of the gate 44. As such, a suitable actuator, such as a hydraulic piston-and-cylinder arrangement, can be connected to these pins 4S and/or 50 so as to achieve the requisite movement of the gate 44 from the closed position to the open position.



FIG. 5 is an end view showing the support structure 60 as used in the proppant discharge system of the present invention. The support structure 60 has a frame 62 which forms a top surface 64, a bottom surface 66, and sides 68 and 70. The top 64 of the frame 62 has a surface upon which the container 10 can be placed. Suitable pin connections 72 and 74 extend upwardly from the top surface 64 so as to engage corresponding receptacles on the container 10. These pins 72 and 74 can be utilized so as to assure that the container 10 is properly positioned upon the support structure 60.


A receptacle 76 is positioned at or adjacent to the top surface 64. The actuator 78 is affixed to the frame 62 and extends to the receptacle 76. As can be seen, the receptacle 76 has a slot formed in the top end thereof. The slot of the receptacle 76 is suitable for receiving one of the pins 48 and 58 of the gate 44 of the container 10. Once the receptacle 76 receives the pin 48 therein, the actuator 78 can be actuated so as to move the receptacle (and its received pin) from the first position 80 to a second position 82. When the receptacle 82 (along with the pin received therein) is moved to the second position 82, the gate 44 will be opened so that the proppant can be discharged through the outlet 36 of the container 10. Since pins 48 and 58 are symmetrically placed, and since the container 10 is rather symmetrical, the support, structure 60 is particularly adapted to the variety of orientations with the container 10 can be placed upon the top surface 64.


In FIG. 5, it can be seen that there is a hopper 84 that is positioned below the top surface 64. Hopper 84 serves to receive a portion of the proppant as discharged through the outlet 36 of the container 10 when the gate 44 is in the open position. As such, the hopper 84 can be utilized so as to properly meter the proppant onto the conveyor 86. Conveyor 86 is located below the opening 88 of the hopper 84.


As can be seen in FIG. 5, hopper 84 has an opening 88 of a generally inverted V-shaped configuration. There is a metering gate 90 that is mated with the opening 88 and also has a V-shaped configuration. The metering gate 90 can be moved a small distance so as to allow for the selected and controlled discharge of proppant from the hopper 84 onto the conveyor 86.



FIG. 6 shows the interior of the hopper 84. Hopper 84 includes side walls 92 and 94 and end walls 96 and 98. The walls 92, 94, 96 and 98 are formed into a funnel-like shape so as to move the proppant downwardly toward the metering gate 90. In FIG. 6, it can be seen that the opening 88 of the hopper 84 has a plurality of slots formed therein. Similarly, the metering gate 90 has a plurality of slots formed therethrough. The structures between the slots is solid. As such, when the slots of the metering gate 90 are aligned with the slots of the opening 88, then proppant can be discharged onto the underlying conveyor 86. A small movement of the metering gate 90 in one direction or another, will block the flow of the proppant through the slots of the opening 88 of hopper 84. As such, very small actuators 100 and 102 can be used so as to achieve the proper metering of the proppant onto the conveyor. If a small flow rate of proppant is desired, then the actuators 100 and 102 will move the metering gate 90 only a small distance. If a greater flow rate is required, then the actuators 100 and 102 will move the metering gate 90 so that the slots of the metering, gate 90 fully correspond with the slots of the opening 88 so as to achieve a maximum flow of proppant from the hopper 84 down to the conveyor.



FIG. 7 shows the container 10 as placed upon the top surface 64 of the support structure 60. In normal use, a forklift can be utilized so as to properly position the container 10 in a proper position upon the pins 72 and 74 of the support structure 60. Initially, the gate 44 of the container 10 will be closed. Additionally, the metering gate 90 can also be closed. When the container 10 is properly positioned, the gate 44 can be moved to an open position so that the proppant is discharged into the hopper 84. The hopper 84 can then be filled with proppant. When it is desired to move the proppant from the hopper 84, along the conveyor, to the desired destination, then the metering gate 90 can be opened so as to achieve the desired flow rate of proppant through the opening 88 of the hopper 84.



FIG. 8 shows a side view in which the container 10 is placed upon the top surface 64 of the support structure 60. The conveyor 86 is illustrated as extending longitudinally. As such when the proppant passes through the metering gate 90 associated with the hopper 84, any proppant within the interior volume 38 of the container 10 can be delivered, in a controlled manner, onto the conveyor.



FIG. 9 is an illustration of containers 110, 112, 114 and 116 as placed upon the support structure 118. The support structure 118 has a sufficient length so as to accommodate the containers 110, 112, 114 and 116. It can be seen that the conveyor 120 is arranged beneath the top surface of the support structure 118 and below the respective hoppers 122, 124, 126 and 128 below the respective containers 110, 112, 114 and 116. The conveyor 120 is an endless conveyor that is suitably wound around sheaves and idlers so as to travel a desired path. The proppant that is discharged from the containers 110, 112, 114 and 116 is discharged onto the conveyor 120 so as to travel therealong and along upwardly extending section 130. The end 132 of the Conveyor 120 will open to a chute 134. The chute 134 can be directed toward the desired purposes at the fracturing site. As such, the array of containers 110, 112, 114 and 116 can be configured so as to replace existing storage facilities at the fracturing site. The support structure 118, along, with the conveyor 120, can be easily transportable by a truck upon a roadway because of the use of the wheels 136. The forward end 138 can be suitably connected to a truck so as to allow for the easy transport of the system of the present invention.



FIG. 10 illustrates the placement of the containers 110, 112, 114 and 116 upon the support structure 118. The end 138 includes a suitable hitch connection for attachment to a truck. The conveyor 120 extends below the containers 110, 112, 114 and 116 so as to deliver the proppant to the chute 134. FIG. 10 illustrates that the chute 134 is suitably pivotable in cooperation with the end 132 of the conveyor 120 so as to allow for the controlled and directed discharge of the proppant to the desired location.


The container 10 of the present invention is manufactured as a single unit. The gate 44 of the container 10 is specifically engineered to align with the actuator 70 located on the conveying system. The actuator is hydraulically controlled and accepts the pin 48 which is attached to the gate 44. When the actuator 70 is activated, the gate 44 moves horizontally so as to allow for the discharge of proppant therefrom.


The container of the present invention can be specifically applied for transport via rail. In particular, the railcar can be designed so as to accommodate up to four containers 10. As such, the railcar can carry approximately 180,000 pounds of proppant when the four containers are placed on the railcar. The railcar can be similar to current inter-modal railcars that carry twenty foot, forty foot and fifty-three foot inter-modal containers. The railcar would include typical inter-modal load-locks which are evenly spaced down to chassis of the railcar. The container should be constructed of materials wide enough to keep the overall loaded weight of the container under currently regulated railroad weight guidelines. Additionally, it must be strong enough to bear the load of the loaded container. This development allows sand mines to load proppant directly into a container 10 in order to speed up the loading process. It also eliminates the need to build a silo storage at the mine site. Once the container arrives at its designated location or region, trans-load processes to pneumatic trailers, silos or flat storage, are thus eliminated.


The present invention is an improved delivery system that can be used at the well-site. The support structure 60 includes a fabricated steel frame upon which multiple containers can be positioned. The containers lock into receptacles that secure the containers to the frame. The container will then sit above a conveying system that delivers the proppant from the container as the gate is opened to a master-conveying belt. The cradle is outfitted with a hydraulic system which can control the opening and closing of the gates. The containers of the present invention can be combined as an attachment or cartridge compatible with existing devices known as SAND KINGS™, SAND CHIEFS™ and SAND DRAGONS™. By replacing existing hoppers on these devices with the removable containers of the present invention, even greater efficiencies can be attained in the proppant delivery process.


The conveying system of the present invention is an alternative method of delivering proppant from the container to the blender belt for the mixing unit once delivered to the well-site. The conveying system of the present invention provides all of the functionality commonly seen in the SAND MASTER™, SAND KING™, SAND DRAGON™. SAND MOVE™, etc. As such, the present invention allows the flow of sand to be metered onto the conveyor belt through a hydraulic system of flow gates. The container is first lifted into position onto the support structure. The bottom flow gate is received by the receptacle of the hydraulic actuator so as to create a lock between the in of the gate and the hydraulic system. The hydraulic system then opens the flow gate and the proppant so as to gravity-feed into a hopper located on the support structure. Another set of flow gates associated with the hopper system are then opened by way of another hydraulic system. This allows the proppant to be metered and to flow onto a conveyor belt. The conveyor belt can then deliver the proppant to the blender or the T-Belt. The proppant can then be mixed with other materials in the blender.


Currently, expensive pneumatic bulk trucks are utilized in the delivery of proppant to a well-site. Once on-site, the trucker employs a power take-off unit to “blow” the sand into the sand storage devices. This delivery often takes over one (1) hour to complete. By delivering sand to the well in the ten-foot containers of the present invention, the use of expensive pieces of specialized equipment are eliminated. The container can ride on a standard flatbed, step-deck, low-boy, or other more commonly-used trailer. As such, the process of the present invention is able to tap into a much larger universe of available trucking capacity. This can reduce the transportation costs to the well. While pneumatic trailer deliveries are priced in “round trip” miles, the delivery of the container of the present invention by a more common piece of equipment (capable of getting a “back-haul”) significantly reduces the overall transportation cost. As an example, there is a great need for parts, tools and other wellhead equipment to be taken off the well-site for repair or return to a manufacturer or rental company. The flatbed trailer, now empty, has the ability to accept that load while it is on-site rather than calling in another trucking company to provide that service. The reduced need for “hot-shot” service is another significant value to the service company and ultimately the exploration and production company.


In terms of returning empty containers to the sand distribution facilities, a total of four (4) empty containers can be returned by a single flatbed trailer. This provides a 4:1 level of efficiency in removing the containers from the well-site. Additionally, at forty foot container chassis will be used in the movement of both empty and full containers. The support structure, just like the containers, can be delivered to the well-site by a typical flatbed truck. The support structure could be towed via, truck to the site in manner similar to any other trailer.


Another important advantage to the present invention is the small footprint that the ten-foot ISO containers of the present invention occupy relative to the capacity of sand that they can store. When the containers are stacked three high, the containers can store approximately 135,000 pounds in a footprint of eighty square feet. The available space at the wellhead, and in potential proppant minimizes the footprint that is required for a given amount of proppant at such a location.


Since environmental and safety concerns surrounding well-site operations is becoming an increasing concern, the present invention minimizes the amount of particulate matter that is released into the air. Proppant is currently delivered to the frac site via pneumatic trailers. Pneumatic pressure is used to pressurize the trailer and then “blow” the material into a sand storage unit. This process creates an immense amount of particulate matter than can then be inhaled by personnel at the frac-site. Additionally, while blowing the sand into the sand storage facility, the sand storage facility must vent the pressurized air to the atmosphere. This creates an even greater exposure to particulate matter. The constant need to take delivery of proppant on-site creates a constant environment of dust and small particles in the air. Since the present invention eliminates pneumatic deliveries, the process of the present invention significantly reduces the amount of particulate matter on the frac-site. The gravity-feed delivery method front the container to the blender greatly improves the safety of well-site personnel.


The present invention also serves to reduce trucking emissions by reducing the amount of trucks that are being used or waiting. The safety at the wellhead is improved by reducing such truck traffic.


The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention is illustrative and explanatory thereof. Various changes in the details of the illustrated construction, or in the steps of the described method, can be made within the scope of the present invention without departing from the true spirit of the invention. The present invention should only be limited by the following claims and their legal equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A process for delivery of proppant to a fracturing site, the process comprising: formingproviding a container having an interior suitable for receiving the proppant therein, the container having an outlet at a bottom thereof, said container havingand a gate slidably positioned over saidthe outlet, saidthe gate being slidable along a horizontal plane, said gateand having at least one pin affixed thereto and extending outwardly thereof;filling at least a portion of saidthe container with the proppant;positioning the container upon a trailer of a vehicle;moving the vehicle and, the trailer, and the container along a roadway to the fracturing site;lifting the container from saidthe trailer;placing the lifted container upon a conveyor structure having a conveyor such that saidthe outlet of saidthe container is positioned directly above saidthe conveyor, said conveyor structure havingthe container being aligned with a cradle of the conveyor structure, and a receptacle translatably positioned adjacent a top surface thereofof the conveyor structure when the container is positioned on the conveyor structure, the step of placing comprising: inserting a portion of the pin of saidthe gate into saidthe receptacle;translating saidthe receptacle such that the pin causes saidthe gate to slide in a horizontal placeplane so as to open saidthe outlet of said conveyorthe container such that the proppant in saidthe interior of container is discharged through saidthe outlet directly downwardlydownward toward saidthe conveyor through the opening in the conveyor structure; andconveying the discharged proppant to a desired location at the fracturing site.
  • 2. A process for delivering proppant to a fracturing site, the process comprising: formingproviding a container having an interior suitable for receiving the proppant therein, the container having an outlet, the container having a gate slidably movable in a horizontal plane over saidthe outlet;filling at least a portion of saidthe interior of saidthe container with the proppant;positioning saidthe filled container upon a trailer of a vehicle after filling at least a portion of the interior of the container with the proppant;moving saidthe vehicle and said, the trailer, and saidthe container along a roadway to the fracturing site;lifting saidthe container from saidthe trailer;formingproviding a conveyor structure having a conveyor, saidthe conveyor structure havingbeing arranged to position an actuator adjacent a top surface thereof when the container is positioned on the conveyor structure, saidthe conveyor structure having a hopper positioned below saidthe top surface of saidthe conveyor structure, saidthe hopper having a metering gate at a bottom thereof, saidthe metering gate positioned directly over saidthe conveyor;placing the lifted conveyorcontainer upon saidthe top surface of saidthe conveyor structure such that saidthe actuator is cooperative with saidthe gate when the container is positioned on the conveyor structure such that the proppant filling at least a portion of the interior of the container will flow into the hopper when the gate slides along the horizontal plane;actuating saidthe actuator so as to slide saidthe gate in saidthe horizontal plane so as to open saidthe outlet of saidthe container such that proppant is discharged from saidthe container directly downwardlydownward into saidthe hopper;metering the proppant from saidthe hopper at a controlled flow rate onto saidthe conveyor; andconveying the metered proppant to a desired location at the fracturing site.
  • 3. The process of claim 2, further comprising: placing the filled container upon a train;transporting the filled container on saidthe train to a location; andremoving the filled container from saidthe train.
  • 4. A process for delivery of proppant to a fracturing site, the process comprising: filling at least a portion of a container with proppant, a container having an interior suitable for receiving the proppant therein, an outlet at a bottom thereof, and a gate slidably positioned over the outlet;positioning the container upon a trailer of a vehicle;moving the vehicle, the trailer and the container along a roadway to the fracturing site when at least a portion of the container is filled with proppant;lifting the container from the trailer;placing the lifted container upon a conveyor structure having a conveyor such that the outlet of the container overlies the conveyor, the step of placing comprising:connecting the container to a receptacle when the container is on a top surface of the container mounting structure;actuating the receptacle such that the gate slides to open the outlet of the container such that the proppant in the interior of container is discharged through the outlet downwardly toward the conveyor through an opening in the conveyor structure aligned with the outlet and extending through the conveyor structure; anddirecting the discharged proppant to a desired location at the fracturing site.
  • 5. A process for delivering proppant to a fracturing site, the process comprising: positioning the container filled with proppant upon a trailer of a vehicle, the container having an interior suitable for receiving the proppant therein, an outlet, and a gate slidably movable in a substantially horizontal plane over the outlet;moving the vehicle, the trailer, and the container along a roadway to the fracturing site;lifting the container from the trailer;providing a conveyor structure having a conveyor to direct proppant toward a desired location at the fracturing site, the conveyor structure supporting an actuator adjacent a top surface thereof when the container is positioned on the conveyor structure, the conveyor structure having a hopper positioned below the top surface of the conveyor structure, the hopper having a metering gate positioned at an outlet thereof over the conveyor;placing the lifted container upon the top surface of the conveyor structure such that the actuator is cooperative with the gate when the container is positioned on the conveyor structure and the outlet of the container is aligned with the hopper;actuating the actuator so as to open the gate in the substantially horizontal plane so as to open the outlet of the container such that proppant is discharged from the container directly downward into the hopper;metering the proppant from the hopper at a controlled flow rate onto the conveyor; anddirecting the metered proppant to a desired location at the fracturing site.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present invention is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/628,702, filed on Sep. 27, 2012, and entitled “Proppant Discharge System and a Container for Use in Such a Proppant Discharge System”, presently pending, U.S. application Ser. No. 13/628,702 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/555,635, filed on Jul. 23, 2012, and entitled “Proppant Discharge System Having a Container and the Process for Providing Proppant to a Well Site”, presently pending.

US Referenced Citations (426)
Number Name Date Kind
137871 Worsley Apr 1873 A
150894 Safely May 1874 A
384443 Hoover Jun 1888 A
448238 Johnson Mar 1891 A
711632 Johnson Oct 1902 A
917649 Otto Apr 1909 A
1143641 McGregor Jun 1915 A
1331883 Stuart Feb 1920 A
1344768 Messiter Jun 1920 A
1434488 Forsythe et al. Nov 1922 A
1520560 Burno Dec 1923 A
1506936 Lea Sep 1924 A
1526527 Butler Feb 1925 A
1573664 Wetherill Feb 1926 A
1807447 Smith May 1931 A
1850000 Fernand Mar 1932 A
1932320 Steward Oct 1933 A
1973312 Hardinge Sep 1934 A
2233005 Garlinghouse Feb 1941 A
2293160 Miller et al. Aug 1942 A
2368672 McNamara Feb 1945 A
2381103 Frank Aug 1945 A
2423879 De Frees Jul 1947 A
2564020 Mengel Aug 1951 A
2603342 Martinson Jul 1952 A
2616758 Meyers Nov 1952 A
2622771 Tulou Dec 1952 A
2652174 Shea et al. Sep 1953 A
2678145 Ejuzwiak et al. May 1954 A
2693282 Sensibar Nov 1954 A
2700574 Tourneau Jan 1955 A
2792262 Hathom Apr 1955 A
2774515 Johansson et al. Dec 1956 A
2791973 Dorey May 1957 A
2801125 Page et al. Jul 1957 A
2808164 Glendinning Oct 1957 A
2812970 Martinson Nov 1957 A
2837369 Stopps Jun 1958 A
2865521 Fisher et al. Dec 1958 A
2873036 Noble Feb 1959 A
2894666 Campbell, Jr. Jul 1959 A
2988235 Ronyak Jun 1961 A
3049248 Heltzel et al. Aug 1962 A
3064832 Heltzel Nov 1962 A
3083879 Coleman Apr 1963 A
3090527 Rensch May 1963 A
3109389 Karlsson Nov 1963 A
3122258 Raymond Feb 1964 A
3135432 McKinney Jun 1964 A
3163127 Gutridge et al. Dec 1964 A
3187684 Ortner Jun 1965 A
3198494 Curran et al. Aug 1965 A
3199585 Cronberger Aug 1965 A
3248026 Kemp Apr 1966 A
3255927 Ruppert et al. Jun 1966 A
3265443 Simas Aug 1966 A
3270921 Nadolske et al. Sep 1966 A
3281006 Wei Oct 1966 A
3294306 Areddy Dec 1966 A
3318473 Jones et al. May 1967 A
3353599 Swift Nov 1967 A
3354918 Coleman Nov 1967 A
3378152 Warner Apr 1968 A
3387570 Pulcrano et al. Jun 1968 A
3396675 Stevens Aug 1968 A
3397654 Snyder Aug 1968 A
3407971 Oehler Oct 1968 A
3425599 Sammarco et al. Feb 1969 A
3455474 Truncali Jul 1969 A
3524567 Coleman Aug 1970 A
3528570 Pase Sep 1970 A
3561633 Morrison et al. Feb 1971 A
3587834 Dugge Jun 1971 A
3596609 Ortner Aug 1971 A
3601244 Ort et al. Aug 1971 A
3602400 Cooke Aug 1971 A
3650567 Danielson Mar 1972 A
3653521 Bridge Apr 1972 A
3661293 Gerhard et al. May 1972 A
3692363 Tenebaum et al. Sep 1972 A
3704797 Suykens Dec 1972 A
3721199 Hassenauer Mar 1973 A
3729121 Cannon Apr 1973 A
3734215 Smith May 1973 A
3738511 Lemon et al. Jun 1973 A
3777909 Rheinfrank Dec 1973 A
3785534 Smith Jan 1974 A
3800712 Krug, Jr. Apr 1974 A
3802584 Sackett Apr 1974 A
3817261 Rogge Jun 1974 A
3820762 Bostrom et al. Jun 1974 A
3840141 Allom et al. Oct 1974 A
3854612 Snape Dec 1974 A
3861716 Baxter et al. Jan 1975 A
3883005 Stevens May 1975 A
3933100 Dugge Jan 1976 A
3970123 Poulton et al. Jul 1976 A
3986708 Hellzel et al. Oct 1976 A
3997089 Clarke et al. Dec 1976 A
4003301 Norton Jan 1977 A
4004700 Empey Jan 1977 A
4057153 Weaver Nov 1977 A
4058239 Van Mill Nov 1977 A
4063656 Lambert Dec 1977 A
4073410 Melcher Feb 1978 A
4138163 Calvert et al. Feb 1979 A
4178117 Brugler Dec 1979 A
4204773 Bates May 1980 A
4210273 Hegele Jul 1980 A
4210963 Ricciardi et al. Jul 1980 A
RE30358 Sensibar Aug 1980 E
4222498 Brock Sep 1980 A
4227732 Kish Oct 1980 A
4232884 DeWitt Nov 1980 A
4239424 Pavolka Dec 1980 A
4247228 Gray et al. Jan 1981 A
4258953 Johnson Mar 1981 A
4265266 Kierbow et al. May 1981 A
4278190 Oory et al. Jul 1981 A
4282988 Hulbert, Jr. Aug 1981 A
4287921 Sanford Sep 1981 A
4287997 Rolfe et al. Sep 1981 A
4289353 Merritt Sep 1981 A
4329106 Adler May 1982 A
4350241 Wenzel Sep 1982 A
4359176 Johnson Nov 1982 A
4363396 Wolf et al. Dec 1982 A
4397406 Croley Aug 1983 A
4398653 Daloisio Aug 1983 A
4402392 Fabian et al. Sep 1983 A
4407202 McCormick Oct 1983 A
4408886 Sampson et al. Oct 1983 A
4410106 Kierbow et al. Oct 1983 A
4427133 Kierbow et al. Jan 1984 A
4428504 Bassett et al. Jan 1984 A
4449861 Saito et al. May 1984 A
4453645 Usui et al. Jun 1984 A
4474204 West Oct 1984 A
4475672 Whitehead Oct 1984 A
4478155 Cena et al. Oct 1984 A
4483462 Heintz Nov 1984 A
4525071 Horowitz Jun 1985 A
4532098 Campbell Jul 1985 A
4569394 Sweatman et al. Feb 1986 A
4571143 Hellerich Feb 1986 A
4608931 Ruhmann et al. Sep 1986 A
4619531 Dunstan Oct 1986 A
4626155 Hlinsky et al. Dec 1986 A
4628825 Taylor et al. Dec 1986 A
4660733 Snyder et al. Apr 1987 A
4701095 Berryman et al. Oct 1987 A
4715754 Scully Dec 1987 A
4738774 Patrick Apr 1988 A
4741273 Sherwood May 1988 A
4801389 Brannon et al. Jan 1989 A
4819830 Schultz Apr 1989 A
4848605 Wise Jul 1989 A
4882784 Tump Nov 1989 A
4889219 Key Dec 1989 A
4901649 Fehrenbach et al. Feb 1990 A
4909378 Webb Mar 1990 A
4909556 Koskinen Mar 1990 A
4917019 Hesch et al. Apr 1990 A
4919583 Speakman, Jr. Apr 1990 A
4923358 Van Mill May 1990 A
4946068 Erickson et al. Aug 1990 A
4947760 Dawson et al. Aug 1990 A
4954975 Kalata Sep 1990 A
4956821 Fenelon Sep 1990 A
4975205 Sloan Dec 1990 A
4995522 Barr Feb 1991 A
5004400 Handke Apr 1991 A
5042538 Wiese Aug 1991 A
5069352 Harbolt et al. Dec 1991 A
5080259 Hadley Jan 1992 A
5102281 Handke Apr 1992 A
5102286 Fenton Apr 1992 A
5105858 Levinson Apr 1992 A
5131524 Uehara Jul 1992 A
5190182 Copas et al. Mar 1993 A
5195861 Handke Mar 1993 A
5199826 Lawrence Apr 1993 A
5201546 Lindsay Apr 1993 A
5224635 Wise Jul 1993 A
5253746 Friesen et al. Oct 1993 A
5253776 Decroix et al. Oct 1993 A
5265763 Heinrici et al. Nov 1993 A
5286158 Zimmerman Feb 1994 A
5290139 Hedrick Mar 1994 A
5320046 Hesch Jun 1994 A
5324097 DeCap Jun 1994 A
5339996 Dubbert Aug 1994 A
5358137 Shuert et al. Oct 1994 A
5373792 Pileggi et al. Dec 1994 A
5402915 Hogan Apr 1995 A
5413154 Hurst et al. May 1995 A
5429259 Robin Jul 1995 A
5441321 Karpisek Aug 1995 A
5445289 Owen Aug 1995 A
5465829 Kruse Nov 1995 A
5470175 Jensen et al. Nov 1995 A
5493852 Stewart Feb 1996 A
5538286 Hoff Jul 1996 A
5549278 Sidler Aug 1996 A
5564599 Barber et al. Oct 1996 A
5570743 Padgett et al. Nov 1996 A
5590976 Kilheffer et al. Jan 1997 A
5601181 Lindhorst Feb 1997 A
5602761 Spoerre et al. Feb 1997 A
5613446 DiLuigi et al. Mar 1997 A
5617974 Sawyer Apr 1997 A
5647514 Toth et al. Jul 1997 A
RE35580 Heider et al. Aug 1997 E
5667298 Musil Sep 1997 A
5687881 Rouse et al. Nov 1997 A
5690466 Gaddis et al. Nov 1997 A
5697535 Coleman Dec 1997 A
5706614 Wiley et al. Jan 1998 A
5718555 Swalheim Feb 1998 A
5722552 Olson Mar 1998 A
5761854 Johnson et al. Jun 1998 A
5762222 Liu Jun 1998 A
5772390 Walker Jun 1998 A
5782524 Heider et al. Jul 1998 A
5785421 Milek Jul 1998 A
5803296 Olson Sep 1998 A
5806863 Heger et al. Sep 1998 A
5836480 Epp et al. Nov 1998 A
5845799 Deaton Dec 1998 A
5876172 Di Rosa Mar 1999 A
5906471 Schwoerer May 1999 A
5911337 Bedeker Jun 1999 A
5927558 Bruce Jul 1999 A
5971219 Karpisek Oct 1999 A
6002063 Bilak et al. Dec 1999 A
6006918 Hart Dec 1999 A
6069118 Hinkel et al. May 2000 A
6077068 Okumura Jun 2000 A
6109486 Lee Aug 2000 A
6120233 Adam Sep 2000 A
6155175 Rude et al. Dec 2000 A
6186654 Gunteret et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190107 Lanigan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192985 Hinkel et al. Feb 2001 B1
6196590 Kim Mar 2001 B1
6205938 Foley et al. Mar 2001 B1
6247594 Garton Jun 2001 B1
6263803 Dohr et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269849 Fields Aug 2001 B1
6283212 Hinkel et al. Sep 2001 B1
6286986 Grimland Sep 2001 B2
6296109 Nohl Oct 2001 B1
6306800 Samuel et al. Oct 2001 B1
6328156 Ostman Dec 2001 B1
6328183 Coleman Dec 2001 B1
6364584 Taylor Apr 2002 B1
6374915 Andrews Apr 2002 B1
6382446 Hinkle et al. May 2002 B1
6401983 McDonald et al. Jun 2002 B1
6412422 Dohr et al. Jul 2002 B2
6415909 Mitchell et al. Jul 2002 B1
6416271 Pigott et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425725 Ehlers Jul 2002 B1
6457291 Wick Oct 2002 B2
6505760 Werner Jan 2003 B1
6508387 Simon et al. Jan 2003 B1
6508615 Taylor Jan 2003 B2
6523482 Wingate Feb 2003 B2
6537002 Gloystein Mar 2003 B2
6575614 Tosco et al. Jun 2003 B2
6660693 Miller et al. Dec 2003 B2
6666573 Grassi Dec 2003 B2
6675073 Kieman et al. Jan 2004 B2
6705449 Wagstaffe Mar 2004 B2
6720290 England et al. Apr 2004 B2
6772912 Schall et al. Aug 2004 B1
6774318 Beal et al. Aug 2004 B2
6776235 England Aug 2004 B1
6783032 Fons Aug 2004 B2
6811048 Lau Nov 2004 B2
6828280 England et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835041 Albert Dec 2004 B1
6882960 Miller Apr 2005 B2
6902061 Elstone Jun 2005 B1
6915854 England et al. Jul 2005 B2
6953119 Wening Oct 2005 B1
6955127 Taylor Oct 2005 B2
6964551 Friesen Nov 2005 B1
6968946 Shuert Nov 2005 B2
6974021 Boevers Dec 2005 B1
7008163 Russell Mar 2006 B2
7051661 Herzog et al. May 2006 B2
7084095 Lee et al. Aug 2006 B2
7104425 Le Roy Sep 2006 B2
7140516 Bothor Nov 2006 B2
7146914 Morton et al. Dec 2006 B2
7201290 Mehus et al. Apr 2007 B2
7214028 Boasso May 2007 B2
7240681 Saik Jul 2007 B2
7252309 Eng Soon et al. Aug 2007 B2
7284579 Elgan et al. Oct 2007 B2
7316333 Wegner Jan 2008 B2
7367271 Early May 2008 B2
7377219 Brandt May 2008 B2
7410623 Mehus et al. Aug 2008 B2
7475796 Garton Jan 2009 B2
7500817 Furrer et al. Mar 2009 B2
7513280 Brashears et al. Apr 2009 B2
7591386 Hooper Sep 2009 B2
7640075 Wietgrefe Dec 2009 B2
7753637 Benedict et al. Jul 2010 B2
7798558 Messier Sep 2010 B2
7802958 Garcia et al. Sep 2010 B2
7803321 Lark et al. Sep 2010 B2
7837427 Beckel et al. Nov 2010 B2
7841394 McNeel et al. Nov 2010 B2
7845516 Pessin et al. Dec 2010 B2
7858888 Lucas et al. Dec 2010 B2
7891304 Herzog et al. Feb 2011 B2
7891523 Mehus et al. Feb 2011 B2
7896198 Mehus et al. Mar 2011 B2
7921783 Forbes et al. Apr 2011 B2
7967161 Townsend Jun 2011 B2
7980803 Brandstätter et al. Jul 2011 B2
7997623 Williams Aug 2011 B2
8083083 Mohns Dec 2011 B1
8201520 Meritt Jun 2012 B2
8313278 Simmons et al. Nov 2012 B2
8366349 Beachner Feb 2013 B2
8379927 Taylor Feb 2013 B2
8387824 Wietgrefe Mar 2013 B2
8393502 Renyer et al. Mar 2013 B2
8424666 Berning et al. Apr 2013 B2
D688351 Oren Aug 2013 S
8505780 Oren Aug 2013 B2
8545148 Wanek-Pusset et al. Oct 2013 B2
8562022 Nadeau et al. Oct 2013 B2
8573387 Trimble Nov 2013 B2
8573917 Renyer Nov 2013 B2
8585341 Oren Nov 2013 B1
D694670 Oren Dec 2013 S
8616370 Allegretti Dec 2013 B2
8622251 Oren Jan 2014 B2
8668430 Oren Mar 2014 B2
D703582 Oren Apr 2014 S
8820559 Beitler et al. Sep 2014 B2
8827118 Oren Sep 2014 B2
8887914 Allegretti Nov 2014 B2
8905266 De Brabanter Dec 2014 B2
8915691 Mintz Dec 2014 B2
9051801 Mintz Jun 2015 B1
9052034 Wegner et al. Jun 2015 B1
20010022308 Epp et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010045338 Ransil et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020134550 Leeson et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020139643 Peltier et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030111470 Fouillet et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030156929 Russell Aug 2003 A1
20040065699 Schoer et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040074922 Bothor et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040084874 McDougall et al. May 2004 A1
20040206646 Goh Oct 2004 A1
20040245284 Mehus et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050158158 Porta Jul 2005 A1
20050201851 Jonkka Sep 2005 A1
20060012183 Marchiori et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060027582 Beach Feb 2006 A1
20060151058 Salaoras et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060180062 Furrer et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060180232 Glewwe et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060239806 Yelton Oct 2006 A1
20060267377 Lusk et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060277783 Garton Dec 2006 A1
20060289166 Stromquist et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070096537 Hicks May 2007 A1
20070125543 McNeel et al. Jun 2007 A1
20080008562 Beckel et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080029546 Shuld Feb 2008 A1
20080029553 Culleton Feb 2008 A1
20080179054 McGough et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080179324 McGough et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080213073 Benedict et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080226434 Smith et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080264641 Slabaugh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080277423 Garton Nov 2008 A1
20090038242 Cope Feb 2009 A1
20090078410 Krenek Mar 2009 A1
20090278326 Rowland et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100021258 Kim Jan 2010 A1
20100038143 Burnett et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100040446 Renyer Feb 2010 A1
20100065466 Perkins Mar 2010 A1
20100108711 Wietgrefe May 2010 A1
20100278621 Redekop Nov 2010 A1
20110011893 Cerny Jan 2011 A1
20110017693 Thomas Jan 2011 A1
20110101040 Weissbrod May 2011 A1
20110109073 Williams May 2011 A1
20110127178 Claussen Jun 2011 A1
20110160104 Wu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110162838 Mackenzie et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110168593 Neufeld et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110222983 Dugic et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110297702 Hildebrandt et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120103848 Allegretti et al. May 2012 A1
20120219391 Teichrob et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130004272 Mintz Jan 2013 A1
20130022441 Uhryn et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130206415 Sheesley Aug 2013 A1
20130209204 Sheesley Aug 2013 A1
20130233545 Mahoney Sep 2013 A1
20130284729 Cook et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130309052 Luharuka Nov 2013 A1
20130323005 Rexius et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140020765 Oren Jan 2014 A1
20140020892 Oren Jan 2014 A1
20140023465 Oren et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140083554 Harris Mar 2014 A1
20140097182 Sheesley Apr 2014 A1
20140166647 Sheesley Jun 2014 A1
20140203046 Allegretti Jul 2014 A1
20140234059 Thomeer Aug 2014 A1
20140305769 Eiden et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140321950 Krenek et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150069052 Allegretti et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150086307 Stefan Mar 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
2023138 Feb 1992 CA
2791088 Mar 2013 CA
201390486 Jan 2010 CN
201881469 Jun 2011 CN
3108121 Sep 1982 DE
3342281 Jun 1985 DE
4217329 May 1993 DE
0019967 Dec 1980 EP
322283 Jun 1989 EP
0564969 Oct 1993 EP
0997607 May 2000 EP
1052194 Nov 2000 EP
1167236 Jan 2002 EP
1775190 Apr 2007 EP
2062832 May 2009 EP
2311757 Apr 2011 EP
1296736 Nov 1972 GB
2374864 Oct 2002 GB
S4871029 Sep 1973 JP
S4876041 Sep 1973 JP
S58161888 Oct 1983 JP
410087046 Apr 1998 JP
10264882 Oct 1998 JP
2012011046 May 2013 MX
9008082 Jul 1990 WO
9202437 Feb 1992 WO
9301997 Feb 1993 WO
9306031 Apr 1993 WO
2006039757 Apr 2006 WO
2007005054 Jan 2007 WO
2007061310 May 2007 WO
2010026235 Mar 2010 WO
2011099358 Aug 2011 WO
2012021447 Feb 2012 WO
2012058059 May 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (92)
Entry
International Search Report for PCT/US15/35635, Oct. 30, 2015. (12 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. 15167039.5, Sep. 8, 2015. (7 pages).
International Search Report for related International Application No. PCT/US2012/066639, Feb. 25, 2013.
International Search Report for related International Application No. PCT/US2013/035442, Jun. 23, 2013.
International Search Report for related International Application No. PCT/US2013/032819, May 23, 2013.
International Search Report for related International Application No. PCT/US2013/049028, Mar. 4, 2014.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/066639, Feb. 26, 2013.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/032819, Sep. 23, 2014.
International Search Report for PCT/US2015/012990, dated May 6, 2015. (15 pages).
FS-35 Desert Frac-Sanders. NOV (National Oilwell Varco). Mar. 19, 2012. (https://web.archive.org/web/20120319070423/http://www.nov.com/Well—Service—and—Completion/Frac—Sand—Handling—Equipment/Frac—Sanders/FS-35.aspx).
File History for Provisonal U.S. Appl. No. 61/538,616, Robert A. Harris, Sep. 23, 2011. (21 pages).
International Search Report for PCT/US2015/024810, Jul. 8, 2015. (13 pages).
SandBox Logistics, “Mine to Wellhead Logistics,” Houston, TX, May 2013.
SandBox Logistics, screenshots from video made in Apr., 2013 and publicly shown in May 2013, Arnegard, North Dakota.
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US15/57601, May 6, 2016. (11 pages).
Non-Final Office Action Mailed May 13, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/986,826.
Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 15, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,836.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Feb. 4, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,836.
Final Office Action Mailed Aug. 25, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/927,614.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Mar. 1, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/927,614.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Apr. 29, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/943,182.
Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 15, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/882,973.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Feb. 11,2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/882,973.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Aug. 11, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/625,675.
Final Office Action Mailed Nov. 11, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/625,675.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Mar. 11, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/625,675.
Arrows Up, Inc., Jumbo BTS—Bulk Transport System, Aug. 1, 2014.
Anrows Up, Inc., Reusable Packaging Association, Member Spotlight: John Allegretti, President & CEO, Arrows Up, Inc., Jun. 23, 2016.
Seed Today, Arrows Up, Inc. Bulk Transport System (BTS), Country Journal Publishing Co., Decatur, IL, Mar. 2, 2011.
SeedQuest, Arrows Up, Inc. launches innovative bulk transport system for see, Barrington, IL, Mar. 2, 2011.
Monster Tanks, Inc., Sand Monster Website, http://monstertanksinc.com/sandmonster.html, 2012.
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure, Mobile Sand Silo System, 2016.
Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 27, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/555,635.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Mar. 23, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/555,635.
Final Office Action Mailed Jul. 30, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/555,635.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Oct. 22, 2014 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/555,635.
Final Office Action Mailed Jun. 21,2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/628,702.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Feb. 23,2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/628,702.
Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 22, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/628,702.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Jul. 28, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/628,702.
Final Office Action Mailed Mar. 24, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/628,702.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 18,2014 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/628,702.
Final Office Action Mailed Jun. 27, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/831,924.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Feb. 16,2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/831,924.
Final Office Action Mailed Jun. 27,2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/923,920.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Feb. 9,2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/923,920.
Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 15, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/943,111.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Apr. 5, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/943,111.
Final Office Action Mailed Jul. 18, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,494.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Apr. 8,2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,494.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 6, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,296.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Jul. 25, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,855.
Final Office Action Mailed Apr. 28, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,855.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Oct. 6, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,855.
Final Office Action Mailed Aug. 6, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,855.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Apr. 29, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,855.
Final Office Action Mailed Dec. 17, 2014 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,855.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 4, 2014 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,855.
Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 24, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,855.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed May 14, 2013 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/660,855.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Jul. 5, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/996,362.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Jul. 6, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,450.
Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 29, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,962.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Apr. 5,2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,962.
Final Office Action Mailed Oct. 9, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,962.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed May 1, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/768,962.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Jul. 18, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/152,744.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Apr. 13, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/738,485.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 7, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,942.
Final Office Action Mailed May 12, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,942.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Nov. 30, 2015 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/841,942.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Jul. 21,2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/083,596.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Aug. 19, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,613.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 6, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/143,942.
Final Office Action Mailed Sep. 1, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,447.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Apr. 8, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,447.
Frac Sand Primer by Brian D. Olmen, Kelrick, LLC, from Hydraulic Fracturing by Michael Berry Smith and Carl Montgomery (CRC Press, Dec. 16, 2015), p. 384.
Premier Silica LLC, Sands Application in the Energy Market, Irving, TX, Copyright 2016.
Getty, John, Montana Tech; ASTM International, Overview of Proppants and Existing Standards and Practices, Jacksonville, FL, Jan. 29, 2013.
SandBox Logistics, LLC, screenshots from video dated Sep. 19, 2013.
SandBox Logistics, LLC, screenshots from video dated Aug. 22, 2014.
SandBox Logistics, LLC, screenshots from video dated Oct. 11, 2013.
SandBox Logistics, LLC, screenshots from video dated Apr. 10, 2013.
Grit Energy Solutions, LLC, Fidelity, Screenshots from video dated May 16, 2014.
Grit Energy Solutions, LLC, Gate, Screenshots from video dated Dec. 6, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/user/gritstack.
Grit Energy Solutions, LLC, Screen, Screenshots from video dated Dec. 6, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/user/gritstack.
Grit Energy Solutions, LLC, The Grit Stack System—Live Frac, Screenshots from video dated Jun. 15, 2015, https://www.youtube.com/user/gritstack.
Grit Energy Solutions, LLC, The Grit Stack System, Screenshots from video dated Feb. 7, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/user/gritstack.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Oct. 27, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/219,676.
Non-Final Office Action Mailed Nov. 9, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/948,494.
Final Office Action Mailed Nov. 4, 2016 for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/738,485.
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US15/49074, Dec. 17,2015. (11 pages).
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13628702 Sep 2012 US
Child 13660870 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13555635 Jul 2012 US
Child 13628702 US
Reissues (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13660870 Oct 2012 US
Child 14834520 US