Embodiments pertain to interceptors. Some embodiments relate to propulsion and maneuvering systems that may be suitable for interceptors. Some embodiments relate to propulsion and maneuvering systems that may be suitable for use during the terminal phase of flight of interceptors. Some embodiments relate to exo-atmospheric missile interception. Some embodiments relate to ballistic missile defense systems.
The spread of ballistic missile technology has accelerated in recent years. This proliferation has been difficult to control and more countries have developed sophisticated missile designs, including missiles capable of reaching great distances. Great danger also lies in the existence of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons that can be paired with ballistic missiles. Ballistic missile defense is one of the most challenging missions because a ballistic missile's altitude, speed, and range leave a defender little room for error. To meet this challenge, a system capable of destroying a ballistic missile requires accurate missile identification and tracking with advanced sensors, advanced interceptor missiles or directed energy weapons (e.g. lasers), and quick reaction time provided by reliable command and control, battle management, and communications.
In a ballistic missile defense scenario where closing velocities are immense, multiple stage interceptors may be used to engage threats. The operation of the final stage may determine the success of a mission. Missile systems, which employ boost-coast sustainer phases, use different control schemes for the various phases of trajectory. A control scheme with multiple sources of control effectiveness may be more beneficial during the operation of an interceptor in the homing phase where the precise control in a dynamic environment is needed.
Thus, what is needed are propulsion and maneuvering systems and methods suitable for use to control and guide the interceptor to interception/impact of the threat. What is needed are propulsion and maneuvering systems and methods suitable for use during the operation of said interceptor which allows the interceptor to respond to a maneuvering target. What is also needed are propulsion and maneuvering systems and methods that provides axial and divert thrust to allow an interceptor to respond to a maneuvering target.
The following description and the drawings sufficiently illustrate specific embodiments to enable those skilled in the art to practice them. Other embodiments may incorporate structural, logical, electrical, process, and other changes. Portions and features of some embodiments may be included in, or substituted for, those of other embodiments. Embodiments set forth in the claims encompass all available equivalents of those claims.
In these embodiments, the combined use of both the axial thrusters 102 and the divert thrusters 104 may provide for a significant increase in maneuverability of the interceptor 100 allowing it to respond to maneuvering of a target. The use of axial thrust, in combination of lateral thrust, may increase the interceptor's velocity at burn out (Vbo), increase range and or altitude of the interceptor, provide pursuit capability and provide for enhanced acceleration. As discussed in more detail below, the combination of the divert thrusters 104 and the axial thrusters 102 may allow the interceptor 100 to respond to a maneuvering target and may allow the interceptor to increase its velocity along a line-of-sight (LOS) to a target to change target impact/engagement time.
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, the propulsion and maneuvering system 108 includes two or more axial thrusters 102. In these embodiments, each of the axial thrusters 102 may be canted at an angle 111 with respect to the axial direction 107. In these embodiments with at least two axial thrusters 102, the thrust provided along the axial thrust lines 103 is at the angle 111 with respect to the axial direction 107 and provided through the CG 105. When there are two or more axial thrusters 102, the angle 111 may be a fixed angle that ranges from between ten and thirty degrees, although the scope of the embodiments is not limited in this respect. In some embodiments that include a single axial thruster 102, the angle 111 may be zero degrees with respect to the axial direction 107.
As illustrated in
In accordance with embodiments, the divert thrusters 104 are generally used for guidance correction (i.e., change the course, correct guidance error, maneuvering) of the interceptor 100, while the axial thrusters 102 can be used to increase velocity in the LOS direction as well as increase the burn-out velocity (Vbo) of the interceptor 100.
In embodiments in which the propulsion and maneuvering system 108 includes two axial thrusters 102 provided at an aft-end of the interceptor 100 and four of the divert thrusters 104 provided at ninety-degree radial positions on the interceptor, the net sum of the axial thrusters 102 may be configured to provide at least twice an amount of thrust of any of the lateral thrusters 104. In some embodiments, each of the axial thrusters 102 may provide thrust between 300 and 600 pounds of force, although the scope of the embodiments is not limited in this respect.
In accordance with some embodiments, the propulsion and maneuvering system 108 may also include a propulsion system controller 106 and a set of control valves 112 to control a release of the pressurized gas or fuel from the common propellant distribution manifold 114 in response to control signals from the propulsion system controller 106. The propulsion system controller 106 may configure the valves 112 regulate the release of the pressurized gas or fuel between the axial thrusters 102 and the divert thrusters 104 to allow varying amounts of thrust to be provided axially and laterally.
In these embodiments, the valves 112 may regulate the release of the pressurized gas or fuel between the axial thrusters 102 and the divert thrusters 104 allowing different amounts of thrust to be provided axially or laterally. In some embodiments, the valves 112 may be on/off valves that may be controlled with a pulse-width modulated (PWM) signal to regulate the release of the pressurized gas from the common propellant distribution manifold 114. In some embodiments, a control valve 112 may be provided for each of the axial thrusters 102 and each of the divert thrusters 104 allowing the propulsion system controller 106 to maneuver the interceptor 100 as described herein.
The embodiments disclosed herein are equally applicable to interceptors that use both liquid fuel propellants (e.g., gas) and solid fuel propellants. In liquid-fueled embodiments, the propulsion and maneuvering system 108 may comprise a liquid fuel tank 116, an oxidizer tank 118 and pressurization tanks 120. In some of these liquid-fueled embodiments, either the fuel tank 116 or the oxidizer tank 118 may have a toroidal shape when provided between the divert thrusters 104 and the axial thrusters 102 of the interceptor 100. In the example illustrated in
In solid-fueled embodiments, the propulsion and maneuvering system 108 may include solid fuel storage elements that allow a solid fuel to be provided to the axial thrusters 102 and the divert thrusters 104 to allow variable amounts of axial and radial thrust.
Embodiments disclosed herein provide for the integration of axial rocket motors to a divert attitude control system suitable for using both liquid and solid propellants. In some embodiments, the seeker 110 may be an infrared (IR) seeker. The interceptor 100 may also include an inertial-measurement unit (IMU) for navigation. In some embodiments, the interceptor 100 may be a kill vehicle (KV), a kinetic kill vehicle (KKV), or a kinetic warhead. The term interceptor may be referred to as the final stage, the terminal stage, the homing stage.
One advantage to the use of liquid propellant is that it may generate more energy that solid propellant for a given weight. The use of the common propellant distribution manifold 114 may utilize fewer components providing an increase in reliability, a reduction in costs, and a reduction in weight. In some embodiments, the interceptor 100 may be able to provide an increased burn-out velocity (up to a third or more increase) over many conventional interceptors. In some embodiments, range during the terminal stage may be increased, pursuit capability may be provided, and acceleration may be enhanced.
As illustrated in
The divert thrusters 104 may be used to change Vperp 217 without changing VLOS 213 which allows the interceptor 100 to change the intercept point 204 without changing the impact time. The impact time may be the range to go divided by VLOS 213. The axial thrusters 102 may be used to change the VLOS 213. The combination of the axial thrusters 102 and the divert thrusters 104 may allow the interceptor 100 to change VLOS 213 as well as Vperp 217 to add to the total velocity Vt 215, which may be the burn-out velocity (Vbo). Since both the axial thrusters 102 and the divert thrusters 104 use fuel from the same source, the addition of the axial thrusters 102 provides for advanced terminal phase guidance with little or no additional weight penalty.
In accordance with embodiments, the seeker 110 may be configured to track the target 202 and maintain the LOS 203 with the target 202 as the target 202 maneuvers. The seeker 110 may be further configured to generate command signals for the propulsion system controller 106. Based on control signals from the seeker 110, the propulsion system controller 106 may be configured to recalculate the intercept point 204 with the target 202 and may be configured to control the valves 112 to cause the interceptor 100 to follow a flight path 205 to the recalculated intercept point 204 by selectively deploying a combination of both the axial thrusters 102 and the divert thrusters 104. The Vt 215 may thus be increased without reorienting the interceptor 100.
Accordingly, the seeker 110 is able to track a target 202 while one or a combination of both the axial and lateral thrust is provided. In some embodiments, the propulsion system controller 106 may be responsive to commands from a guidance system 112 of the interceptor 100. In some embodiments, the propulsion system controller 106 may determine when the target 202 is maneuvering based on changes in the angle 207 between the LOS 203 and the flight path 205. The propulsion system controller 106 may be configured to maintain a constant bearing with the target 202 (i.e., by keeping the angle 207 the same) by changing, among other things, the Vbo as required, to change the point and/or the time-of-intercept.
In some embodiments, the control valves 112 may include at least one axial thrust control valve coupled to the common propellant distribution manifold 114 and configured for selectively releasing pressurized fuel into combustion chambers 122 of one or more of the axial thrusters 102 for mixing and combustion to provide the axial thrust. The control valves 112 may also include at least one maneuver control valve coupled to the common propellant distribution manifold 114 and configured for selectively releasing pressurized fuel into combustion chambers 122 of one or more of the divert thrusters 104 for mixing and combustion to provide lateral thrust for maneuvering the interceptor 100.
In some embodiments, the propulsion system controller 106 may be configured to control the at least one maneuver control valve and the at least one axial thrust control valve in response to a comparison of a commanded propellant mass flow discharge rate and a calculated actual propellant mass flow discharge rate from the pressure vessel. The propulsion system controller 106 may regulate a valve area of at least one of the at least one axial thrust valve and the at least one maneuver control valve in response to the comparison of a commanded propellant mass flow discharge rate and a calculated actual propellant mass flow discharge rate from the pressure vessel, although the scope of the embodiments is not limited in this respect. The controller 106 may be configured to compute at least one of the commanded propellant mass flow discharge rate and a total valve area to achieve target interception. In some embodiments, the computations may include non-linear computations. The controller 106 may include a burn-rate controller configured to calculate a burn rate from a measured pressure within pressurization tanks 120 and to control the valves 112 to adjust the burn rate in response to a comparison between the measured pressure and an estimated pressure based on the recalculated intercept point.
In some embodiments, differential geometry may be employed by the controller 106 to intercept both maneuvering and non-maneuvering targets. In these embodiments, the added thrust may be provided by both the divert thrusters 104 and the axial thrusters 102 if it is detected that a target is attempting to leave its trajectory path (i.e., maneuvering). The use differential geometry may be used to engage both non-maneuvering and maneuvering targets. The kinematics of the engagement for both maneuvering and non-maneuvering targets may be expressed in differential geometric terms. Two-dimensional geometry may be used to determine the intercept conditions for a straight line target as well as a constant maneuvering target. The intercept conditions for both target types may be developed for the case when the interceptor guides onto a straight line interception. These two cases are shown to have a common set of core conditions such that it enables a unified guidance law to be developed. The guidance law is shown to be globally stable using Lyapunov theory so that guidance capture may be assured for almost any initial condition. The analysis and guidance law design does not rely on local linearization and can be shown to produce guidance trajectories that mirror proportional navigation for the straight line interception of a non-maneuvering target for which proportional navigation was originally developed.
The propulsion system controller 106 may configure the valves 112 regulate the release of the pressurized fuel between the axial thrusters 102 and one or more of the divert thrusters 104 to allow varying amounts of thrust to be provided axially as well as laterally to effect a change in the VLOS 213 (
The propulsion system controller 106 may include several separate functional elements that may be implemented by combinations of software-configured elements, such as processing elements including digital signal processors (DSPs), and/or other hardware elements. For example, some elements may comprise one or more microprocessors, DSPs, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), radio-frequency integrated circuits (RFICs) and combinations of various hardware and logic circuitry for performing at least the functions described herein. In some embodiments, the operations performed by the propulsion system controller 106 may be implemented by one or more processes operating on one or more processing elements.
The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. Section 1.72(b) requiring an abstract that will allow the reader to ascertain the nature and gist of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to limit or interpret the scope or meaning of the claims. The following claims are hereby incorporated into the detailed description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
This invention was not made with United States Government support. The United States Government does not have certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3231223 | Upper | Jan 1966 | A |
3347494 | Wright | Oct 1967 | A |
3624367 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3732693 | Chu | May 1973 | A |
3862732 | Wyatt et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3977633 | Keigler et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4085909 | East et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4408735 | Metz | Oct 1983 | A |
4413795 | Ryan | Nov 1983 | A |
4463921 | Metz | Aug 1984 | A |
4482107 | Metz | Nov 1984 | A |
4542870 | Howell | Sep 1985 | A |
4550888 | Douglass et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4609169 | Schweickert et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4659036 | Pinson | Apr 1987 | A |
4684080 | Pinson | Aug 1987 | A |
4856734 | Davies | Aug 1989 | A |
4955558 | Machell et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4967982 | Bagley | Nov 1990 | A |
5026259 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5054712 | Bar et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5061930 | Nathanson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062593 | Goddard et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5140525 | Shankar et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5141181 | Leonard | Aug 1992 | A |
5238204 | Metz | Aug 1993 | A |
5417049 | Sackheim et al. | May 1995 | A |
5456425 | Morris et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5533331 | Campbell et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5850992 | Flament et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6135393 | Sackheim et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6231003 | Hibma et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6267326 | Smith et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
7026980 | Mavroudakis et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7281367 | Rohrbaugh et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7416154 | Bittle et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7580778 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7716912 | Cover et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7741588 | Gundel et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7891298 | Minick et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8084726 | Hanlon et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
Entry |
---|
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/064935, International Search Report mailed Apr. 17, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/064935, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 17, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/064935, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Aug. 29, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120211596 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |