The present invention generally relates to small-scale unmanned aerial vehicles, and more particularly relates to propulsion prognostics apparatus and systems for unmanned aerial vehicles.
Ducted fan propulsion systems for unmanned aerial vehicles are propulsion systems that include a fan surrounded by a duct. The fan is driven by a motor or engine and the configuration of the duct increases the efficiency/power of the fan. A ducted fan vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) UAV is an aircraft that uses a ducted fan propulsion system to provide vertical take-off and landing capabilities to the UAV. Control of a ducted fan VTOL UAV can be provided via modulation, or vectoring, of the thrust provided by the ducted fan propulsion system through the use of flight control vanes that are mounted in the exit air stream of the ducted fan propulsion system.
Ducted fan propulsion systems for contemporary small-scale (e.g., VTOL) UAVs do not have established problem detection apparatus or systems. As such, it is left up to the instincts and/or experience of users to determine if unmanned aerial vehicles are airworthy for both pre-flight operations and in-flight operations. In other words, it is left up to a user to determine if the engine is producing enough power for an unmanned aerial vehicle to begin flying and/or to continue flying.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide propulsion prognostics apparatus and systems for unmanned aerial vehicles. Furthermore, other desirable features and characteristics of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent detailed description of the invention and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and this background of the invention.
Various embodiments provide propulsion prognostics apparatus for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) having an engine system. One propulsion prognostics apparatus comprises a prognostics module configured to generate prognostics data and a power output sensor configured to be coupled to the engine system and configured to generate power output data representing an actual power output of the engine system. The propulsion prognostics apparatus further comprises a processor coupled to the prognostics module and the power output sensor. The processor is configured to receive the prognostics data and the power output data, compare the prognostics data and the power output data, and determine the airworthiness of the UAV based on the comparison.
Various other embodiments provide systems comprising a UAV including an engine system and a propulsion prognostics apparatus coupled to the UAV. The propulsion prognostics apparatus comprises a prognostics module configured to generate prognostics data, a power output sensor coupled to the engine system and configured to generate power output data representing an actual power output of the engine system, and a processor coupled to the prognostics module and the power output sensor. The processor is configured to receive the prognostics data and the power output data, compare the prognostics data and the power output data, and determine the airworthiness of the UAV based on the comparison.
The present invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the following drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and
The following detailed description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the invention or the application and uses of the invention. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any theory presented in the preceding background of the invention or the following detailed description of the invention.
Various embodiments of the invention provide propulsion prognostics apparatus for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Also provided are UAVs comprising the propulsion prognostics apparatus.
Turning now to the figures,
Prognostics module 110 is configured to monitor the pre-flight and/or in-flight health of a UAV. In one embodiment (see
In the embodiment illustrated in
In-flight module 114, at least in the embodiment illustrated in
In various embodiments, pre-flight module 112 and in-flight module 114 share at least one common sensor. In the embodiment illustrated in
Limits module 116, at least in the embodiment illustrated in
Flight control vane servo limit counter 1164 is configured to be coupled to the flight control vanes (e.g., the front flight control vane, the back flight control vane, the left flight control vane, and the right flight control vane) on the UAV. Flight control vane servo limit counter 1164 is further configured to count the number of times the user (or flight controller) attempts to apply the maximum amount of deflection on each flight control vane. That is, flight control vane servo limit counter 1164 is configured to count the number of times the user (or flight controller) attempts to apply the maximum amount of roll to the front and back flight control vanes and to apply the maximum amount of pitch to the left and right flight control vanes.
With reference again to
Memory 130 may be any system, device, hardware, software, and combinations thereof capable of storing data. In one embodiment, memory 130 is configured to store one or more look-up tables 135.
In one embodiment, look-up table 135 is a table including data related to the ideal or expected amount of power the engine of the UAV should be producing for a given set of inputs during pre-flight and/or in-flight operations. For pre-flight operations, the data included in look-up table 135 relates to the ideal or expected amount of power the engine should be producing based on a rotational speed (in RPM) input for the engine, a throttle position input, and a barometric pressure input. For in-flight operations, the data included in look-up table 135 relates to the ideal or expected amount of power the engine should be producing based on a rotational speed input for the engine, a throttle position input, a barometric pressure input, and a vertical rate of climb input.
Look-up table 135, in another embodiment, further comprises data related to the number of times the user (or flight controller) attempts to apply the maximum amount of throttle and/or attempts to apply the maximum amount of deflection to one or more flight control vanes in relation to the in-flight operation inputs. That is, when the actual power output of the engine during flight is questionable as to the ability of the engine to keep the UAV aloft, the number of times the user (or flight controller) attempts to apply the maximum amount of throttle and/or the maximum amount of deflection for one or more flight control vanes may be further indicative of the airworthiness of the UAV.
Processor 140 may be any system, device, hardware, software, and combinations thereof capable of determining the airworthiness of a UAV during pre-flight operations and/or during in-flight operations. For pre-flight operations, processor 140 is configured to receive sensor data (e.g., rotational speed data, throttle position data, and/or barometric pressure data) from prognostics module 110 and use look-up table 135 to determine the amount of power the engine of the UAV should be producing (i.e., the ideal power or expected power) for pre-flight operations based on the conditions sensed by tachometer 1122 (or tachometer 1142), throttle position sensor 1124 (or throttle position sensor 1144), and/or barometric pressure sensor 1126 (or barometric pressure sensor 1146). Processor 140 is further configured to receive the actual amount of power the engine is producing from power output sensor 120 and compare the actual amount of power to the expected amount of power for pre-flight operations.
Processor 140 is also configured to determine a “no go” or “go” status based on the comparison of the actual power to the pre-flight expected power. That is, if the actual power is less than a pre-determined threshold of the pre-flight expected power, the UAV is deemed unworthy for flight. Alternatively, if the actual power is greater than the pre-determined threshold of the flight-flight expected power, the UAV is deemed worthy for flight.
For in-flight operations, processor 140 is configured to receive sensor data (e.g., rotational speed data, throttle position data, barometric pressure data, and/or VROC data) from prognostics module 110 and use look-up table 135 to determine the amount of power the engine of the UAV should be producing (i.e., the ideal power or expected power) for in-flight operations based on the conditions sensed by tachometer 1142 (or tachometer 1122), throttle position sensor 1144 (or throttle position sensor 1124), barometric pressure sensor 1146 (or barometric pressure sensor 1126), and VROC sensor 1148. Processor 140 is further configured to receive the actual amount of power the engine is producing from power output sensor 120 and compare the actual amount of power to the expected amount of power for in-flight operations.
Processor 140 is also configured to determine a “land” or “continue” status based on the comparison of the actual power to the in-flight expected power. That is, if the actual power is less than a pre-determined threshold of the expected power for flight, the UAV is deemed unworthy to continue flying. Alternatively, if the actual power is greater than the pre-determined threshold of the expected power for flight, the UAV is deemed worthy to continue flying.
In addition, processor 140 is configured to determine the airworthiness of the UAV during in-flight operations when the actual power is close to the pre-determined threshold of the expected power for flight. Specifically, processor 140 is configured to receive sensor data (e.g., counter data from throttle servo limit counter 1162 and/or flight control vane servo limit counter 1164) and use look-up table 135 to determine if the user (or flight controller) has exceeded a pre-determined threshold number of times of attempting to apply the maximum amount of throttle and/or maximum amount of deflection for one or more flight control vanes for the given conditions sensed by in-flight module 114. That is, if the number of maximum throttle and/or maximum deflection counts is greater than a pre-determined threshold number of counts for a particular set of in-flight conditions, the UAV is deemed unworthy to continue flying. Alternatively, if the number of maximum throttle and/or maximum deflection counts is less than the pre-determined threshold number of counts for the particular set of in-flight conditions, the UAV is deemed worthy to continue flying.
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description of the invention, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing an exemplary embodiment of the invention, it being understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements described in an exemplary embodiment without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
The United States Government has a paid-up license in this invention and the right in limited circumstances to require the patent owner to license others on reasonable terms as provided by the terms of Contract No. W56HZV-05-C-0724 awarded by the United States Army.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5408412 | Hogg et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5938401 | Modeen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6216066 | Goebel et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6389335 | Vos | May 2002 | B1 |
6526356 | DiMaggio et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6556902 | Ing et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6567729 | Betters et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6622972 | Urnes et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6664945 | Gyde et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684349 | Gullo et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6751536 | Kipersztok et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6843060 | Gallant et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6907416 | Tasooji et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7031812 | Pettigrew et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7308614 | Kojori | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7343232 | Duggan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7449858 | Chang et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7656637 | McAvoy et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20020010532 | Sinex | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030195718 | Crowder, Jr. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040088991 | Gallant et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040139735 | Zhu | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040254747 | Vollum | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018369 | Bax et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050096873 | Klein | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114090 | Black et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050209767 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212523 | Chang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060047403 | Volponi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060259217 | Gorinevsky et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070113670 | Etchason | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142980 | Ausman et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080004768 | Chang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039993 | Cleary et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080177515 | Saintis | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090152391 | McWhirk | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090259350 | Morris et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100168952 | Falkmann et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
EP Search Report, EP 09 169 099.0 dated Jan. 12, 2012. |
Motter, M. A. et al., “A Turbine-powered UAV Controls Testbed”, AIAA Paper 2007-2751, AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2007 Conference and Exhibit, Rohnert Park, California, May 2007, May 7, 2007, pp. 1-8, URL: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070021748—2007020307.pdf. |
Filippone et al: “Comprehensive analysis of transport aircraft flight performance”, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Oxford, GB, vol. 44, No. 3, Dec. 31, 2007, pp. 192-236. |
Wigley G. et al: “A Low Cost, High Performance Reconfigurable Computing Based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle” , 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, Mar. 4-11, 2006, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Pasadena, CA, USA, Mar. 4, 2006, pp. 1-13. |
Sheppard, J. W.; IEEE Standards for Prognostics and Health Management, Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, IEEE, Sep. 2009. |
EP Communication, EP 09169099.0-1225 dated Nov. 7, 2012. |
EP examination report, EP 09169099.0-1951 dated Jan. 20, 2014. |
EP Communication, EP 09 169 099.0 dated Jan. 8, 2013. |
EP Communication, for application No. EP 09 169 099.0 dated Jun. 10, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100286860 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |