This is the United States National Stage of Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/ES2020/070203, filed Mar. 25, 2020, which claims priority to Spanish Patent Application No. ES201930271A, filed on Mar. 26, 2019, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The present invention concerns a propulsion system for vessels, in particular, a propulsion system for vessels comprising one or more suction sails.
The use of propulsion systems for vessels called wind propulsion systems (WAPS) is known, and their performance is related to the aerodynamic forces (lift) they can produce.
These forces are directly related to the aerodynamic characteristics of the system, such as its aerodynamic coefficients, to the surface of the system and to the wind speed present.
The lift coefficient depends on two main variables: the geometry of the aerodynamic profile (asymmetric vs. symmetric) and the attack angle (defined as the angle between the profile chord and the direction of the airflow).
The first variable is the shape of the aerodynamic profile. A symmetrical profile has its axis of colinear symmetry with the chord of the profile itself. This type of profile has a zero lift coefficient when the attack angle is zero, since it does not produce any asymmetry in the airflow around it and, therefore, no pressure differential.
Adding asymmetries in the aerodynamic profile can generate pressure differences in the airflow around the profile, thus producing higher lift coefficients. However, these asymmetries are hardly applicable in WAPS, as they must be able to operate for any wind direction.
The main limitation when implementing asymmetric profiles to increase the lift coefficient lies in the high complexity of the mechanical systems of the WAPS, which results in high costs and greater weight.
The second variable is the attack angle, which behaves as follows: for an attack angle equal to zero, the airflow flows around the aerodynamic profile with virtually no turbulence, and consequently the lift is almost zero.
As the attack angle increases, the lift coefficient increases in a linear fashion. At the same time, turbulence appears starting from the trailing edge.
There is a maximum lift attack angle, for which turbulence and its effects are relevant.
Finally, above the attack angle of maximum sustenance occurs the effect known as stall. This phenomenon is a sudden detachment of the airflow attached to the profile, which causes an abrupt reduction in lift.
In this case, the limitation of the maximum lift coefficient is related to the sudden detachment of the flow boundary layer, the loss.
Within wind propulsion systems (WAPS) the use of rigid suction sails is known. The objective of the rigid suction sail is to maximize the lift coefficient by controlling the effects induced by the two variables described above.
Starting with the attack angle, if the detachment of the boundary layer around the profile can be delayed with respect to the attack angle, higher lift coefficients can be obtained. This could be achieved by suctioning the airflow from the top of the profile, ensuring that it remains attached to the sail surface for high angles of attack. This process is described in detail below:
When the original attack angle of maximum lift is reached (without suction), part of the airflow of the extrados is sucked in.
The suction adheres the boundary layer to the profile, delaying the stall, although it increases the attack angle, which implies an increase in the lift coefficient.
Due to the suction of the flow, the detachment point remains approximately constant as the attack angle (and therefore the attack angle) increases. As a consequence, behind that point of flow release, the structure and shape of the profile is not necessary and can be eliminated, reducing the size of the profile.
Finally, as the detachment is controlled by suction, the shape of the profile can be modified by introducing significant asymmetry. The best solution to achieve this effect is through a “moving trailing edge”, called flap. This flap can be positioned in two different positions (one on each side of the aerodynamic profile chord) generating the asymmetry towards one side or the other, to adapt to any wind direction.
The rigid suction sail has a substantial improvement over the rigid passive sail: it increases the lift coefficient of the sail, which improves the efficiency of the rigid sail in terms of thrust per unit area of the sail. These improvements have a number of advantages:
The higher the lift coefficient, the smaller the size of the rigid sails needed to provide the same thrust and therefore the same fuel economy.
Size reduction means less expenditure on materials for the structure, shorter production times per unit, which translates into lower production costs.
The reduction in size and material used also reduces the weight of each unit, with a positive effect on the stability and storage capacity of the boat. It can be reduced by up to 50% in weight.
Smaller systems allow more units to be installed for the same available deck space, increasing the maximum potential reduction in fuel consumption for a single vessel.
Smaller systems also mean less impact on visibility requirements.
On the other hand, the rigid suction sail also offers certain limitations, most of them related to the suction system itself. The major limitations are:
Suction requires an active pump or a fan that constantly sucks in air. This results in constant power consumption to keep the system in operation. It is important to note that this power consumption is a very small fraction of the thrust power provided by the sail.
The region of the rigid sail surface where the boundary layer suction should be performed has a certain critical position, and it is very important to ensure that the rest of the rigid sail surface is sealed.
The performance of the rigid suction sail for headwinds is lower, as in this operating scenario the aerodynamic resistance gains a lot of relevance against the thrust.
Consequently, the rigid suction sail is suitable for vessels with the following characteristics:
Vessels with limited deck space.
Vessels with reduced stability.
Vessels with limited visibility.
Vessels with no prop limit, because it does not require a folding system.
Fishing vessels fit perfectly with these characteristics.
Therefore, an objective of the present invention is to provide a propulsion system for vessels that allows them to optimize their performance using suction sails.
With the propulsion system of the invention, the above-mentioned disadvantages are solved, presenting other advantages that will be described below.
The propulsion system for vessels according to the present invention comprises at least one suction sail, comprising said suction sail a suction system and a driving unit for driving the rotation of said at least one suction sail, wherein the at least one suction sail also comprises a plurality of sensors connected to a control unit, whose control unit determines the operation of the suction system and the driving unit.
Such an operation can be autonomous or semi-autonomous, i.e. with very little interaction with the crew.
Advantageously, such a plurality of sensors includes at least one wind sensor, at least one sensor for the rotation of the suction sail, at least one sensor for the position of a flap of the suction sail, and/or at least one suction sensor.
In addition, the control unit preferably includes a user interface for the user to interact with the control unit.
If desired, the propulsion system may also comprise a manual control unit connected to the suction system and to the driving unit for manual control of the propulsion system.
Advantageously, said suction sail comprises a rigid or flexible outer coating and a suction area provided with a plurality of holes.
Preferably, said driving unit is located at the lower end of the suction sail and is an electric or hydraulic driving unit, driven by a power unit.
This suction sail also includes a support structure at its lower end to support its weight and restrict lateral movement of the suction sail.
According to a possible embodiment, the lower part of the suction sail comprises a tilting support, which allows the suction sail to be tilted with respect to the vertical, i.e. it is tilted with respect to a substantially horizontal axis.
With the propulsion system for vessels according to the present invention, the operation of the suction sail can be optimized automatically, based on the data collected by said sensors.
When the suction system is a single fan or multiple fans, the suction can be adjusted along a suction zone to suit each zone.
A multiple suction zone can also be made, which causes a pressure gradient (and thus suction) to control the absorbed flow.
It allows the movement/positioning of the flap to be active (by means of a motor and gears, by cables) or passive (to be mechanically positioned on one side or the other depending on the (vertical) rotation of the suction sail.
For a better understanding of what has been disclosed, some drawings are included in which, schematically and only as a non-limitative example, a practical case of embodiment is shown.
The propulsion system comprises at least one suction sail 3 including an outer coating 4, which may be either rigid or flexible, and said suction sail 3 may be rotated about its longitudinal axis 5.
The suction sail 3 also comprises at least one flap 6 capable of rotating between different positions and at least two suction zones 7 provided with multiple holes.
The suction sail 3 also comprises a suction system 10, which may be of the fan type or equivalent to suck part of the airflow from the extrados of the profile, and at least one driving unit 8, which may be electric or hydraulic to rotate the suction sail 3 provided with an electric or hydraulic power unit 18, which drives the driving unit 8.
In addition, the suction sail 3 is connected to the deck of the vessel 2 using a support structure 17, which may comprise a gear mechanism or a structure with bearings, where the support structure 17 is capable of supporting the total weight and restricting the lateral movement of the suction sail 3.
In
As can be seen from the block diagram in
For this purpose, the control unit 9 is accessible to users to adjust the autonomous or manual modes of the effective propulsion provided by the suction sail 3.
As indicated, the propulsion system according to the present invention comprises a plurality of sensors, which are chosen from the following:
The control unit also comprises:
a data collection system;
a processor;
an autonomous control logic;
a driving system that sends a driving signal to the power unit and the suction system;
a control/supervision man-machine interface, i.e. a control communication system for introduction to the autonomous control and monitoring of the results obtained;
a man-machine interface for manual piloting.
The data collection system, formed by these sensors 12, 13, 14, 15, allows the monitoring of environmental variables, such as wind, air pressure, temperature and humidity), operating variables (rotation speed, internal pressure, flow direction).
The control unit also allows the monitoring of variables of a reference system (the vessel), such as speed, position, inertial unit and characterization of the propulsion unit (revolutions, flow, torque and propulsion force).
The control unit 9, where all the data are received and processed to obtain the optimal control solution, is also in charge of generating a system health indicator for predictive maintenance.
Examples of the use of the propulsion system disclosed in this document are described below.
A suction sail is able to generate high lift coefficients (aerodynamic forces) by sucking a certain amount of air from the boundary layer (the area of air near the surface of the sail) of the extrados (top/front side of the sail) which prevents the airflow from being detached and the profile from stall (a situation in which it no longer produces lift). This suction is done through one or more suction zones, generating a depression inside the sail that absorbs the air from the outside.
The size of the boundary layer, and therefore the amount of air to be drawn in, is a function of the Reynolds number (Re):
Reynolds' number depends on:
If less of the required boundary layer is sucked in, this will result in the detachment of the boundary layer. If more boundary layer is sucked in, the excess is sucked in and thus consumes unnecessary suction power.
In order to be able to operate the suction sail efficiently and optimally, avoiding unwanted detachment and excessive power consumption, there must be precise control of the amount of air in the boundary layer to be suctioned, which is variable, as we have seen, with the speed, temperature and air pressure of each moment.
The control variable for this is the so-called Suction Pressure Coefficient (SPC), which is defined as
Where:
P∞—is the outside ambient pressure
Pa—is the suction pressure, or internal pressure of the sail
The principle of the control logic is to control the vacuum motor to achieve the necessary Pa to obtain the desired Cpa (design) for all operating conditions.
Control Option 1:
This first autonomous control option, shown in
To control the rotation of the sail and the position of the flap, the control system follows the following steps:
For suction control, the control system follows the following steps:
This second autonomous control option, shown in
To control the rotation of the sail and the position of the wing, the control system follows the following steps:
For suction control, the control system follows the following steps:
This third autonomous control option, shown in
To control the rotation of the sail and the position of the flap, the control system follows the following steps:
For suction control, the control system follows the following steps:
There is a simplification option of the control methodology, shown in
This simplifies the system architecture and data collection and processing. In return, an error is introduced in the determination of the desired/target suction coefficient (Cpa), desired/target pressure increase (ΔP) and/or in the actual suction coefficient (Cpa) (depending on the control option applied), which introduces error in the suction precision, leading to a sub-optimal operation.
An intermediate option could also be the use of the ISA (International Standard Atmosphere) equations that allow relating the environmental variables of Temperature, Pressure and Density. Thus, by measuring only one of the three variables with a sensor, the other two can be calculated.
As an example, the steps followed by the control system, according to option 1, for the suction control are detailed:
For this alternative method of control, shown in
Any aerodynamic profile exposed to an airflow generates a pressure distribution (Pskin), along its surface. The difference between that pressure distribution on both sides of the profile is what generates the profile aerodynamic forces, i.e. lift and drag.
If that surface pressure (Pskin) is dimensioned, it is converted to the pressure coefficient (CP), where the pressure coefficient is defined as:
The distribution (its shape and values) becomes dependent only on the attack angle (AoA). At the same time, the lift coefficient (CL) also depends only on the attack angle (AoA), so the surface pressure coefficient of a point (CP) can be linked unequivocally to the lift coefficient (CL) that is giving the profile.
By extrapolating this to a suction sail, given a known AoA, we know what the surface pressure coefficient (CP) should be at a given point if the suction is adequate. If it is lower, it is an indication that the profile is stall due to inadequate suction. This difference in CP occurs at any point along the profile chord, although it is preferable to choose a point where the pressure variations are more marked, to simplify detection, this point being in proximity to the profile leading edge. This variation of surface pressure coefficient (CP) for various angles of attack (AoA) can be seen in
The principle of the control logic is to control the vacuum motor to achieve a measured CP equal to the desired (design) CP for all operating conditions.
This autonomous control option, shown in
To control the rotation of the sail and the position of the flap, the control system follows the following steps:
For suction control, the control system follows the following steps:
Despite the fact that reference has been made to specific embodiments of the invention, it is clear to a person skilled in the art that the described propulsion system is susceptible to numerous variations and modifications, and that all the details mentioned can be replaced by other technically equivalent ones, without deviating from the scope of protection defined by the attached claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
ES201930271 | Mar 2019 | ES | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/ES2020/070203 | 3/25/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/193835 | 10/1/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4602584 | North | Jul 1986 | A |
9540087 | Winkler | Jan 2017 | B2 |
11142294 | Malpede | Oct 2021 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3235719 | Oct 2017 | EP |
2847009 | May 2004 | FR |
2006560 | Oct 2012 | NL |
2018211260 | Nov 2018 | WO |
2020193835 | Oct 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/ES2020/070203 mailed on Jul. 14, 2020. |
Designers in Action Tube Sail Drives Costeau's Experimental Boat a Cleaner Calypso; 903 Machine Design; vol. 55 p. 102-103, Oct. 1983; Cleveland, Ohio, USA. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220177097 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |