All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
I. Vertebral Anatomy
As
Two short extensions/protrusions of bone, the pedicles 16, extend backward from each side of the vertebral body 14 to form a vertebral arch 18. At the posterior end of each pedicle 16 the vertebral arch 18 flares out into broad plates of bone known as the laminae 20. The laminae 20 join to form a spinous process 22. The spinous process 22 serves for muscle and ligamentous attachment. A smooth transition from the pedicles 16 into the laminae 20 is interrupted by the formation of a series of processes.
Two transverse processes 24 thrust out laterally on each side from the junction of the pedicle 16 with the lamina 20. The transverse processes 24 serve as levers for the attachment of muscles to the vertebrae 12. Four articular processes, two superior 26 and two inferior 28, also rise from the junctions of the pedicles 16 and the laminae 20. The superior articular processes 26 are sharp oval plates of bone rising upward on each side from the union of the pedicle 16 with the lamina 20. The inferior processes 28 are oval plates of bone that extend in an inferior direction on each side.
The superior and inferior articular processes 26 and 28 each have a natural bony structure known as a facet. The superior articular facet 30 faces upward or superiorly, while the inferior articular facet 31 faces downward. As
The facet joint 32 is composed of a superior facet and an inferior facet. The superior facet is formed by the vertebral level below the joint 32, and the inferior facet is formed by the vertebral level above the joint 32. For example, in the L4-L5 facet joint, the superior facet of the joint is formed by bony structure on the L-5 vertebra (e.g., a superior articular surface and supporting bone on the L-5 vertebra), and the inferior facet of the joint is formed by bony structure on the L-4 vertebra (e.g., an inferior articular surface and supporting bone on the L-4 vertebra).
As also shown in
II. Facet Joint Dysfunction
Back pain, particularly in the “small of the back”, or lumbosacral (L4-S1) region, is a common ailment. In many cases, the pain severely limits a person's functional ability and quality of life. Such pain can result from a variety of spinal pathologies.
Through disease or injury, the laminae, spinous process, articular processes, or facets of one or more vertebrae can become damaged, such that the vertebrae no longer articulate or properly align with each other. This can result in an undesired anatomy, pain or discomfort, and loss of mobility.
For example, the vertebral facet joints can be damaged by either traumatic injury or by various disease processes. These disease processes include osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylolysis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. The damage to the facet joints often results in pressure on nerves, also called a “pinched” nerve, or nerve compression or impingement. The result is pain, neuropathy, misaligned anatomy, and a corresponding loss of mobility. Pressure on nerves can also occur without facet joint pathology, e.g., a herniated disc, due to unwanted bone growth, or as a result of thickening of the soft tissues of the spinal canal, e.g., Arachnoiditis.
One type of conventional treatment of facet joint pathology is spinal stabilization, also known as intervertebral stabilization. Intervertebral stabilization prevents relative motion between the vertebrae. By preventing movement, pain is desirably reduced. Stabilization can be accomplished by various methods.
One method of stabilization is posterior spinal fusion. Another method of stabilization is anterior spinal fusion, fixation of any number of vertebrae to stabilize and prevent movement of the vertebrae.
Another type of conventional treatment is decompressive laminectomy. This procedure involves excision of the laminae to relieve compression of nerves.
These traditional treatments are subject to a variety of limitations and varying success rates. Furthermore, none of the described treatments puts the spine in proper alignment or return the spine to a desired anatomy. In addition, stabilization techniques, by holding the vertebrae in a fixed position, permanently limit the relative motion of the vertebrae, altering spine biomechanics.
This invention relates to prostheses for treating various types of spinal pathologies, as well as to methods of treating spinal pathologies.
There is a need for prostheses, installation tools, and methods that overcome the problems and disadvantages associated with current strategies and designs in various treatments for spine pathologies.
The invention provides prostheses, installation tools, and methods designed to replace natural facet joints at virtually all spinal levels including L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1, T11-T12, and T12-L1. The prostheses, installation tools, and methods can restore a desired anatomy to a spine and give back to an individual a desired range of relative vertebral motion. The prostheses, installation tools, and methods also can lessen or alleviate spinal pain by relieving the source of nerve compression or impingement, restoring spinal alignment and/or allowing for partial and/or total immobilization and/or fusion of treated levels.
For the sake of description, the prostheses that embody features of the invention will be called either “cephalad” or “caudal” with relation to the portion of a given natural facet joint they replace. As previously described, a given natural facet joint has a superior facet and an inferior facet. In anatomical terms, the superior facet of the joint is formed by the vertebral level below the joint (which can thus be called the caudal portion of the facet joint, i.e., because it is nearer the feet). The inferior facet of the joint is formed by the vertebral level above the joint (which can thus be called the cephalad portion of the facet joint, i.e., because it is nearer the head). Thus, a prosthesis that, in use, replaces the caudal portion of a facet joint (i.e., the superior facet of the caudal vertebral body) will be called a “caudal” prosthesis. Likewise, a prosthesis that, in use, replaces the cephalad portion of a facet joint (i.e., the inferior facet of the cephalad vertebral body) will be called a “cephalad” prosthesis.
One aspect of the invention provides a cephalad facet joint prosthesis to replace a cephalad portion of a natural facet joint (e.g., an inferior articular surface and its supporting bone structure on the posterior elements of the vertebra) in the posterior elements of a vertebra. According to this aspect of the invention, the prosthesis includes an artificial facet joint element adapted and configured to replace a cephalad portion of the natural facet joint and a fixation element extending from the artificial facet joint element, the fixation element being adapted and configured to be inserted through a lamina portion of a vertebra to affix the artificial facet joint element to the vertebra, preferably without blocking access to a pedicle portion of the vertebra. The fixation element may also extend into and/or through a second lamina portion of the vertebra, such as by traversing the midline of the vertebra through or adjacent to the spinous process. In one embodiment, after installation the cephalad bearing element is disposed between a caudal facet joint bearing surface and a portion of the vertebra, such as a lamina portion.
This aspect of the invention also provides a method of implanting an artificial cephalad facet joint prosthesis on a vertebra and/or the posterior elements of a vertebra. According to this method, a fixation element is inserted through a lamina portion of the vertebra, and a cephalad facet joint bearing surface is placed in a position to form a cephalad portion of a facet joint. An artificial facet joint element is attached to a distal end of the fixation element either after or prior to insertion of the fixation element. The fixation element preferably does not block anterior, posterior and/or lateral access to a pedicle portion of the vertebra. The fixation element may also extend through a second lamina portion of the vertebra, such as by traversing the midline of the vertebra through or adjacent to the spinous process. In one embodiment, the placing step includes disposing the artificial facet joint bearing surface between a caudal facet joint bearing surface and a portion of the vertebra, such as a lamina portion. The method may also include the steps of using a guide to define an insertion path for the fixation element, forming a passage through the lamina corresponding to the insertion path, and/or prepping the surface of the treated vertebral levels to accept the cephalad and/or caudal components.
Another aspect of the invention provides a prosthesis to replace a cephalad portion of a natural facet joint on a vertebra. In this aspect of the invention the prosthesis includes an artificial facet joint element adapted and configured to replace a cephalad portion of the natural facet joint; and a fixation element adapted and configured to affix the artificial facet joint element to the vertebra without blocking access to a pedicle portion of the vertebra. In one embodiment, after installation the cephalad bearing element is disposed between a caudal facet joint bearing surface (either the natural caudal joint surface or an artificial caudal joint surface) and a portion of the vertebra, such as a lamina portion.
This aspect of the invention also provides a method for implanting a cephalad facet joint prosthesis to replace a removed cephalad portion of a natural facet joint on a vertebra. The method includes the steps of aligning the cephalad facet joint prosthesis with a caudal facet joint bearing surface; and attaching the cephalad facet joint prosthesis to the vertebra without blocking a pedicle portion of the vertebra. The attaching step of the method may also include disposing the cephalad facet joint prosthesis between the caudal facet joint bearing surface and a portion of the vertebra. The attaching step may also include the step of inserting a fixation element through a portion of the vertebra, such as the lamina. In this case, the method may include the steps of defining an insertion path in the vertebra prior to the inserting step and forming a passage in the vertebra corresponding to the insertion path. A guide may be used to direct the location and orientation of the insertion path.
Another aspect of the invention provides a facet joint prosthesis to replace, on a vertebra, a caudal portion of a natural facet joint (e.g., a superior articular surface and supporting bone structure on the vertebra). The prosthesis includes an artificial facet joint element with a vertebra contacting surface and a caudal bearing surface, the caudal bearing surface being adapted and configured to replace a caudal portion of a natural facet joint and, in various embodiments, to be substantially entirely posterior of a contact portion of the vertebra when the vertebra contacting surface contacts the contact portion. The prosthesis also includes a fixation element extending from the artificial facet joint element, the fixation element being adapted and configured to be inserted into the vertebra to affix the prosthesis to the vertebra.
Another aspect of the invention provides a prosthesis for replacing a cephalad portion and a caudal portion of a natural facet joint of cephalad and caudal vertebrae of a spine motion segment. The prosthesis includes an artificial cephalad facet joint element adapted and configured to replace a cephalad portion of the natural facet joint, the artificial cephalad facet joint element having a cephalad bearing surface; a cephalad fixation element, the cephalad fixation element being adapted and configured to be inserted through a lamina portion of a vertebra to affix the artificial cephalad facet joint element to the cephalad vertebra; and an artificial caudal facet joint element adapted and configured to replace a caudal portion of the natural facet joint, the artificial caudal facet joint element including a caudal bearing surface adapted and configured to mate with the cephalad bearing surface.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides a method for implanting a facet joint prosthesis to replace removed cephalad and caudal portions of a natural facet joint of cephalad and caudal vertebrae. The method includes the steps of: affixing an artificial caudal facet joint element to the caudal vertebra; inserting a cephalad fixation element through a lamina portion of the cephalad vertebra; and placing an artificial cephalad facet joint bearing surface in a position to form a cephalad portion of a facet joint. The method may also include attaching an artificial cephalad facet joint element comprising the cephalad facet joint bearing surface to an end of the fixation element either prior to or after the inserting step. The method may also include removal of various bone structures (such as one or more facet structures and/or laminar material) and/or prepping of the bone surfaces. In at least one embodiment, the fixation element does not block access to a pedicle portion of the cephalad vertebra. The cephalad fixation element may also extend through a second lamina portion of the cephalad vertebra, such as by traversing the midline of the cephalad vertebra through or adjacent to the spinous process. The placing step may also include the step of disposing the artificial cephalad facet joint bearing surface between the artificial caudal facet joint element and a portion of the cephalad vertebra. An installation fixture may be used to align the caudal and cephalad elements, although the prosthesis may also be installed without using an installation fixture. The method may also include the step of using a guide to define an insertion path for the cephalad fixation element, although the prosthesis may also be installed without using a guide.
Another aspect of the invention provides a prosthesis to replace cephalad and caudal portions of a natural facet joint of cephalad and caudal vertebrae. The prosthesis may include an artificial cephalad facet joint element adapted and configured to replace a cephalad portion of the natural facet joint, with the artificial cephalad facet joint element including a cephalad bearing surface; a cephalad fixation element adapted and configured to affix the artificial cephalad facet joint element to the cephalad vertebra without blocking access to a pedicle portion of the cephalad vertebra; and an artificial caudal facet joint element adapted and configured to replace a caudal portion of the natural facet joint, the artificial caudal facet joint element including a caudal bearing surface adapted and configured to mate with the cephalad bearing surface. In one embodiment, after installation the cephalad facet joint bearing surface is disposed between a caudal facet joint bearing surface and a portion of the vertebra, such as a lamina portion. In one embodiment, the cephalad bearing surface and the caudal bearing surface each has a width along its respective transverse axis, with the cephalad bearing surface width being shorter than the caudal bearing surface width. The artificial caudal facet joint element may also include a vertebra contacting surface, with the entire caudal bearing surface being adapted and configured to be posterior of a contact portion of the caudal vertebra when the vertebra contacting surface contacts the contact portion.
This aspect of the invention also includes a method for implanting a facet joint prosthesis to replace removed cephalad and caudal portions of a natural facet joint of cephalad and caudal vertebrae. The method includes the steps of affixing an artificial caudal facet joint element to the caudal vertebra; and affixing an artificial cephalad facet joint element to the cephalad vertebra in alignment with the artificial caudal facet joint element and without blocking access to a pedicle portion of the cephalad vertebra. The second affixing step may also include the step of disposing the artificial cephalad facet joint element between the artificial caudal facet joint element and a portion of the cephalad vertebra. An installation fixture may be used to align the caudal and cephalad element, although the prosthesis may also be installed without using an installation fixture. The method may also include the step of using a guide to define an insertion path for the cephalad fixation element, although the prosthesis may also be installed without using a guide.
Another aspect of the invention includes devices and methods that minimize the size and extent of the surgical incision(s) required during the repair and/or replacement of facet joints. For example, one disclosed embodiment of a prosthesis for replacing a cephalad facet joint can potentially be implanted into a targeted vertebral body through a minimally-invasive cannula. This embodiment can be utilized in conjunction with a surgical incision with exposes only the posterior portion of the targeted facet joint to be replaced. (Alternatively, this embodiment can be utilized in conjunction with an endoscopic expanding cannula, such as the Atavi Flexposure® Retractor, commercially available from Endius Incorporated of Plainville, Mass.) Desirably, the surgical site is prepared—including removal of cephalad/caudal facet material and/or decompression of affected nerve fibers—and the cephalad and caudal prosthesis attached and positioned with little or no disruption to surrounding tissues, including the supra-spinous and/or inter-spinous ligaments.
In another disclosed embodiment of the present invention, the caudal component of a facet prosthesis can be secured to the lamina of the inferior vertebral body, while the cephalad component is secured to one or more pedicles of the superior vertebral body. This configuration facilitates the secure placement of a facet prosthesis where some or all of the lamina and/or posterior structures of the superior vertebral body have been removed and/or damaged as a result of injury, disease and/or surgical intervention.
In another disclosed embodiment of the present invention, both the cephalad and caudal components of a facet prosthesis can be secured to the lamina of their respective vertebral bodies.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for implanting a spinal prosthesis by forming a passage from a first side of a lamina or a spinous process completely through to a second side of the lamina or the spinous process; advancing a distal end of a fastening element from the first side to the second side until a proximal stop of the fastening element rests against the first side; and securing a bearing prosthesis to the distal end of the fastening element. In additional embodiments, the forming step and the advancing step are performed percutaneously and/or the securing step is performed percutaneously. In another alternative, the securing step is performed by placing an element between the bearing and the fastening element. In yet another alternative, the securing step is performed by expanding the fastening element into an opening in the bearing prosthesis. In another alternative, a reinforcing structure or material is provided to distribute forces applied to the first side and/or the second side.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a spinal prosthesis having an elongate body having a distal end and a flared proximal end; a proximal collar adapted to pass over the distal end and to fit against the flared proximal end; and a prosthetic bearing element forming a part of an articulating process of the spine, the bearing element having an outer surface and an internal opening adapted to fit over the elongate body distal end. In another alternative embodiment, the elongate body is long enough to pass completely through a lamina or a spinous process. In another embodiment, the elongate body and the proximal collar are adapted to be percutaneously implanted into a portion of the spine. In yet another embodiment, the prosthetic bearing element is adapted to be percutaneously implanted into a portion of the spine. In another embodiment there is also provided a distal collar adapted to fit over the elongate body distal end proximal to the prosthetic bearing element. In an alternative embodiment, the elongate body has a non-circular cross section. In yet another embodiment, a portion of the outer surface of the elongate body is covered with a bone in-growth compound.
In another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a spinal prosthesis having an elongate body having a distal end and proximal end; a prosthetic bearing element adapted to form a part of an articulating process in the spine, the bearing element having an outer surface and an internal opening adapted to fit over the elongate body distal end; and a shaft having a proximal end and a flared distal end is disposed within the elongate body such that when the shaft advances within the elongate body an outer surface of the elongate body is pressed against a portion of the prosthetic bearing internal opening. In another alternative embodiment, the shaft is threaded to engage with a threaded internal portion of the elongate body. In another embodiment, the distal ends of the shaft and the elongate body are adapted to engage with a drive instrument, fixing the elongate body while allowing rotation of the shaft. In another embodiment, the shaft proximal end further comprises a shearable drive section proximal to a drive section. In yet another embodiment, the elongate body further comprising a feature formed on the elongate body outer surface adapted to engage a proximal collar.
Other features and advantages of the inventions are set forth in the following Description and Drawings, as well as in the appended Claims.
The invention may be embodied in several forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The scope of the invention is defined in the appended claims, rather than in the specific description preceding them. All embodiments that fall within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced by the claims.
Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention that may be embodied in other specific structure. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
Depending on the patient's disease state, the condition of the patient's natural facet joint—including the facet joint's strength, location and orientation—may not be acceptable and/or may need to be removed to access other spinal structures (such as the lamina and/or an intervertebral disc). As shown in
In one embodiment of the invention, fixation element 42 attaches cephalad prosthesis 36 to a vertebra 60 in an orientation and position that places bearing surface 40 in approximately the same location as the natural facet joint surface the prosthesis replaces. The prosthesis may also be placed in a location other than the natural facet joint location without departing from the invention, such as by orienting the fixation element along a different angle, by moving the joint cephalad/caudad, anteriorly/posteriorly, by moving the joint medially or laterally, or any combination thereof.
In the embodiment shown in
In this embodiment of the invention, the cephalad facet joint prosthesis attaches to a posterior element of the vertebra, such as one or more portions of the lamina and/or the spinous process. For example, as shown in
Unlike other facet joint prostheses that attach to the pedicle, this embodiment's use of one or more posterior elements of the vertebra to attach the cephalad facet joint prosthesis of this invention does not block access to the pedicle area, leaving this area free to be used to attach other prostheses or devices. Other embodiments of the invention may occupy, block or impede access to the pedicle area, of course, without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. In addition, because of the inherent strength of the lamina (and the surrounding cortical bone), the cephalad facet joint prosthesis may be affixed without the use of bone cement, especially when using a bone ingrowth surface, trabecular/coated metal or bioactive ceramics.
In the orientation shown in
Prosthesis 36 may be used to form the cephalad portion of a facet joint with either a natural caudal facet joint portion or an artificial caudal facet joint prosthesis.
In one embodiment, the natural caudal facet surface has been removed, and fixation element 56 attaches prosthesis 50 to a vertebra 70 via a pedicle in an orientation and position that places bearing surface 54 in approximately the same location as the natural facet joint surface the prosthesis replaces. In an alternative embodiment, the bearing surface 54 may be placed in a location different than the natural facet joint surface, either more medial or more lateral, more cephalad or more caudad, more anterior or more posterior, and/or rotated or displaced from the natural anatomical orientation and orientation. For example, the geometry and function of the artificial joints could be designed to allow for greater-than-natural flexibility and/or movement, to account for motion missing and/or lost due to disease, injury, aging and/or fusion of the treated and/or other vertebral levels. In addition, in other embodiments the caudal component can be attached to other locations in or on the vertebral body in addition to the pedicle or to the vertebral body alone.
As shown in the embodiment of
In this embodiment, bearing element 52 has a serrated fixation surface 57 adapted to contact a contact portion 74 of vertebra 70. This optional fixation surface 57 helps prevent rotation of the bearing element 52. In various embodiments, the fixation surface 57 may be coated with bone ingrowth material, and any optional serrations can increase the surface area for bony ingrowth (as well as prevent unwanted rotation of the implant). As shown in
Prosthesis 50 may be used to form the caudal portion of a facet joint with either a natural cephalad facet joint portion or an artificial cephalad facet joint prosthesis. Similarly, an artificial cephalad facet joint portion may be use in conjunction with either an natural or artificial caudal facet joint component.
The prostheses of
As shown in
When attached to installation fixture 80, cephalad and caudal bearing surfaces 40 and 54 are in contact and in proper alignment with respect to each other, as shown in
In use, after preparing the implant site by removal of all or a portion (if desired and/or necessary) of existing natural cephalad and caudal facet joint portions of the cephalad and caudal vertebrae 60 and 70, respectively, of the spine motion segment, bearing elements 38 and 52 are attached to installation fixture 80 as described above. The spacing between the bearing element pairs is then adjusted using thumbwheel 96 to align the fixation holes 58 of caudal bearing elements 52 with the proper fixation screw insertion sites in the pedicle portions of the caudal vertebra (or other suitable location), thus placing the artificial facet joints in positions corresponding to the position of natural facet joints or in any other position desired by the physician, including positions that do not correspond to the position of natural facet joints. Passages aligning with holes 58 are formed in the pedicle—or into another part of the caudal vertebra near or adjacent to the pedicle—using a drill, awl, pedicle probe, or other tool known in the surgical arts. Fixation screws 56 are then inserted through holes 58 into the pedicle or other portion of the caudal vertebra to attach the caudal bearing elements as well as the entire prosthesis and installation fixture to the caudal vertebra 70, as shown in
Thereafter, the cephalad bearing elements are attached to the cephalad vertebra 60. In one embodiment, an insertion path is first determined for each fixation element, then a passage is formed along the insertion path corresponding to cephalad bearing element holes 46 (e.g., in the lamina at the base of the spinous process and through the lamina on the other side, through only one lamina portion, through the spinous process, etc.). Fixation screws 42 can then be inserted through the holes 46 into the passages. Alternatively, self-tapping screws or other caudal fixation elements may be used, thereby eliminating the need to pre-form the passages.
After all four bearing elements have been affixed, the installation fixture 80 may be detached and removed. Installation fixture 80 may be used to implant fewer than four bearing elements, of course.
As shown, tool 100 has a handle 102 and an alignment interface (such as dowels 104 in tool 100 and holes 106 in fixture 80) to align the tool in the proper orientation with respect to installation fixture 80 and a cephalad facet joint bearing element. With the caudal and cephalad bearing elements still attached to installation fixture 80 and preferably with caudal bearing elements already affixed to the caudal vertebra 70, the tool 100 engages installation fixture through the alignment interface as shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In order to determine the length of the passage (especially during a minimally invasive procedure), as well as to prevent over-drilling of the passage, the proximal shaft of the drill can include a drill-stop (not shown) to prevent advancement of the drill into the cannula beyond a desired depth. Similarly, the proximal shaft of the drill can include depth markings which, when the drill exits the passage, can be used to determine the length of the passage created in the lamina. Desirably, subtracting the length of the cannula (which is known) from the depth markings can provide an accurate estimate of the passage length, and thus assists the physician in the choice of the proper size cephalad implant to fill the passage.
A mirror image tool may then be used to define an insertion path or to form a hole for the right cephalad bearing element, which is then affixed to the vertebral body in the same way. The installation fixture is then removed, such as by unscrewing screws 86.
As mentioned above, in alternative embodiments the guide tool may be used to define a path for a self-tapping screw or other fixation element that does not require the use of a drill. In those embodiments, element 108 may be used to define a path for the self-tapping screw or other fixation element. The fixation element path may be through only a single lamina portion, through the spinous process alone, or any other suitable path.
In some embodiments, the entire prosthesis other than the bearing surface may be coated with bone ingrowth material.
In additional alternative embodiments, features, compounds, or surface treatments may be utilized to enhance attachment between the various components of the prosthesis 200 or between the prosthesis 200 and vertebral bone. For example, portions of the collars 225, 220 that interact with the body 205 may be textured or have teeth to promote a stronger attachment when joined to the body 205. Similarly, portions of the collars 225, 220 that come into contact with the lamina/spinous process may also include features or surface textures to promote joining as well as compounds, for example, bone growth compounds or cements, to promote adhesion between the bone and the collars 220, 225. Similarly, the surfaces of the shims 245, 240 may also include features or surface treatments to improve contact and grip between the distal collar 225 and the ball 230, respectively, as well as the body 205. In much the same way, the exterior surface of the body 205 may also be adapted to include features, compounds, or surface treatments to improve contact with the shims 245, 240, collars 225, 220, ball 230 and the exposed bone in the passage 290 (see
In one specific embodiment, the prosthesis 200 has an elongated cylindrical body with a length of 40 mm, a minimum diameter of 4 mm, a distal end that expands to approximately 5 mm, and a ball 230 having a metal sphere with a diameter of approximately 10 mm. The size, length and dimensions of the components of prosthesis 200 may vary and be selected based on a number of criteria. Examples of selection criteria include the age and sex of the patient, the specific pathology and anatomy of the patient and the specific spinal level where implantation will occur. The measurement techniques and tools described herein may be used to determine the size, dimensions and placement of a specific prosthesis 200.
A method for implanting the prosthesis 200 will now be described with reference to
As shown in
Next, as shown in
As best shown in
In one embodiment of a surgical procedure for implanting the prosthesis 200, the targeted facet capsule is initially exposed (the open portion) using standard open surgical techniques. The facet capsule is then opened and/or removed, and the superior and/or inferior facets are resected and/or removed as necessary (using a surgical cutter or rongeur) during the surgical procedure. If replacement of the caudal facet section is deemed necessary, a caudal stem and associated caudal bearing can be implanted into the exposed pedicle through the open incision.
Advantageously and in contrast to conventional techniques where both the cephalad and caudal prosthesis are implanted via an open procedure, a majority of the components of the prosthesis 200 can be surgically implanted using minimally-invasive techniques alone or in combination with conventional open techniques. For example, all or most of the prosthesis 200 may be delivered through a cannula inserted through a small incision in the skin. To implant the cephalad implant, the physician can first create an access path through the skin and soft tissue (with a spinal needle and/or K-wire) to the lamina of the targeted vertebral body. Desirably, non-invasive visualization, such as fluoroscopic or real-time MRI, is used to monitor the advancement of the needle and avoid damage to tissue structures such as muscles, tendons, ligaments, nerves, veins and/or the spinal cord itself. Once the access path has been created, a suitable cannula can be advanced through the tissues to the targeted bone. If necessary, progressively larger dilation catheters (such as the Access™ Dilation Port commercially available from Spinal Concepts of Austin, Tex.) can be used to introduce a cannula having a lumen large enough to accommodate passage of the cephalad implant (i.e., the body 205 and proximal collar 220). In alternative embodiments, one cannula is positioned and adapted to deliver the body 205 and the proximal collar 220 and another cannula is positioned and adapted to deliver the remaining prosthesis components.
Once the cannula is in position against the lamina, a drill is advanced through the central opening in the cannula and drills into and through the targeted portion of the lamina and/or spinous process, creating a passage through the lamina. Desirably, a positioning tool (such as the tool 100 shown in
After creation of the passage 290, the drill (and any alignment frame, if desired) is removed (with the cannula desirably remaining in place in the patient), and the cylindrical body 205 and associated proximal collar 220 are advanced through the cannula and into the passage 290 in the lamina. The proximal collar 220 is desirably seated against the near surface of the lamina (i.e., the first outer surface of the lamina or spinous process 285), with the distal end 215 extending out of the far surface of the lamina into the open incision (i.e., beyond the second outer surface of the lamina or spinous process 287.) The distal collar 225 and shim 245 are then placed on the distal end 215 and tightened into position as described above. Desirably, the distal and proximal collars 225, 220 will compress and bear directly against the far and near outer surfaces of the lamina and/or spinous process 285, 287, with the lamina and/or spinous process in between. Once the cephalad implant is secured in its desired position, the cannula can be removed, if desired.
Next, using the access provided by the open incision, the ball 230 is positioned over the distal end 215 into the desired position and secured using the shim 240 as previously described. Once the prosthesis 200 is implanted and secured into position, the open surgical site can be closed in a known manner, and the surgical procedure completed.
If desired, various embodiment of the caudal and/or cephalad components disclosed herein could incorporate non-circular posts or stems for anchoring the devices. Passages to accommodate such constructs could be created using broachers, reamers, awls, punches or the like. Such non-circular stems would desirably reduce and/or prevent unwanted rotation of these components along their longitudinal axis.
Returning to
To install the cephalad prosthesis 200a in a targeted vertebral body 300a, a passage 305a is drilled completely through the lamina and/or spinous process from a first outer surface 385 to a second outer surface 387 of a lamina and/or spinous process as previously described (the passage 305a is illustrated in
Next, after creating the passage 305a completely through the lamina, the physician will slide a proximal collar 220a over the distal end 215a up to engagement with the exterior surface of the ridge 217a. The body 205a is then advanced distal end 215a first until the proximal collar 220a seats against the first outer surface of the lamina and/or spinous process 385 and the distal end 215a desirably extends out of the other end of the passage 305a (i.e., beyond the second outer surface of the lamina and/or spinous process 387) (
Next as shown in
Returning now to
Once the bearing 230a is secured to the body 205a with a pre-determined amount of force, further tightening of the counter-torque wrench will desirably shear the shaft 250a at the notched section 280a, preventing further rotation and/or over-torqueing of the shaft 250a (
If desired, implantation of a similar cephalad prosthesis corresponding to the complimentary facet joint can be accomplished in a like manner.
In the event that revision and/or removal of the cephalad prosthesis is desired or required, the present embodiment also facilitates revision/removal of the cephalad prosthesis. To remove the prosthesis, the counter-torque wrench 400 can be used to rotate the shaft 250a (relative to the body 205a) in a direction opposite to the “tightening direction”, thereby advancing the shaft 250a distally and eventually “pushing” the bearing 230a off of the distal end 215a of the body 205a (
The previously-described procedure could similarly be used to replace a worn and/or damaged bearing surface of a previously-implanted cephalad construct, without requiring removal and/or revision of the entire cephalad implant. Simply removing and replacing the worn or damaged bearing with a new/undamaged bearing, and retightening of the cephalad implant, could be accomplished with little or no disruption to the surrounding tissues. Moreover, such a repair procedure could be accomplished using a first cannula to access the proximal drive section 270a and associated components, and a second cannula to access the bearing 230a (to remove the old bearing and introduce a new replacement).
In alternate embodiments, the bearing surfaces 235, 235a of the bearings 230, 230a could be non-spherical (including oval, square, triangular, flattened and/or disk shaped), and could include one or more bearing surfaces 235 (i.e., more than one bearing surface 235 as illustrated in
Depending upon the patient's condition and the desired surgical outcome, as well as the surgeon's preference, the present embodiment can facilitate the repair and replacement/augmentation of the facet joints in a minimally-invasive, limited-open (or modified-open) and/or fully-open surgical procedure. For example, where facet joint replacement is deemed necessary, but removal of soft and/or hard tissues in and/or adjacent the spinal canal is not warranted or desired (such as where spinal stenosis and nerve impingement is not a significant concern), the repair and/or replacement of one or more facet joints can be accomplished in a least-invasive fashion, using one or more cannulae to implant the prosthesis and associated distal hardware. Alternatively, where removal of the facet joints and/or lamina is necessitated, such a procedure can be accomplished through a combination of open, semi-open and/or minimally invasive procedures (which will be referred to herein as a modified-open or mini-open procedure) to minimize damage and/or disruption to surrounding soft-tissue structures. In such a procedure, one or more of the facet joint capsules can be exposed through an open incision (to allow easy resection and removal of the facet joint and/or surrounding anatomical structures), and the cephalad component of the facet replacement can be delivered through the lamina through a cannula or other minimally-invasive delivery method.
Another significant advantage attendant with the present embodiment is that the majority of the cephalad prosthesis is positioned within the lamina, with only limited portions of the implant extending outwards from the vertebral body. This arrangement presents a low-profile to the surrounding soft tissue structures, desirably resulting in less interaction between the prosthesis and the surrounding soft tissues, as well as less displacement of natural tissues due to the presence of the implant. Moreover, anchoring the cephalad portion of the prosthesis within the lamina and/or spinous process reduces and/or eliminates to opportunity for unwanted contact between the dura and the prosthesis.
Another significant advantage attendant to various disclosed embodiments results from the location and attachment method of the cephalad portion of the prosthesis. Because the location, length and orientation of the laminar passage created by the surgeon is variable (depending upon the patient's anatomical constraints), a limited variety of implant sizes and/or shapes can accommodate almost any anatomical variation possible in the patient. For example, a kit including the cephalad implant can include cephalad implants having various lengths, including 30, 40, 50 and 60 millimeters, to accommodate passages/lamina having differing lengths/thicknesses. Similarly, the depth of the hole 233 in the bearing 235a (to accommodate the distal end of the cephalad component) can vary (by 1 or ½ mm increments, for example) to accommodate anatomical variations in the patient. Thus, the present embodiment and implantation methods reduces the need for a highly-modular and/or configurable cephalad prosthesis. Moreover, the present implant design can accommodate bones of varying dimensions and/or configurations. Moreover, the solid nature of the component retains its strength and durability.
Another significant advantage of various embodiments described herein is the use of the lamina and spinous process as the anchor points for the cephalad portion(s) of the prosthesis. By avoiding use of the pedicles of the cephalad vertebral body to anchor the cephalad prosthesis, the present embodiment (1) reduces the opportunity for unintended damage to and/or intrusion into the facet joint capsule and facet joint structures of the cephalad vertebral level being treated, (2) allows for subsequent or concurrent implantation of additional prosthesis into the pedicles of the cephalad vertebral body, (3) allows unrestricted access to the intervertebral disk and disk structures in event of the need for concurrent or subsequent disk treatment, and (4) utilizes the lamina (and thus the pedicles) to support the prosthesis in a more natural anatomical manner. Desirably, the present embodiment will permit a physician to “daisy-chain” multiple prosthesis along multiple vertebral levels, during either a single surgical procedure or during subsequent surgeries as additional facet joints degrade and/or degenerate.
By anchoring the cephalad prosthesis within the lamina and/or spinous process, rather than within the pedicle, the present embodiment more closely mimics the natural anatomical position and loading of the cephalad facet joint surface and vertebral bodies. Loads which would have originally been transmitted from the inferior facet joint through the lamina and pedicles and into the vertebral body (which would be directly conducted through the pedicle and into the vertebral body by a pedicle-based cephalad implant anchoring system) are now simply transferred through the cephalad prosthesis and into the lamina in a more natural anatomical loading manner. Moreover, the use of the lamina as an anchoring point for the implant significantly reduces the forces experienced by the bone at the anchor (desirably reducing the tendency for the implant to break or loosen over time).
Desirably, the proximal and distal collars can move and/or rotate to a limited degree relative to the cylindrical body of the cephalad implant, such that, when the implant is in position and tightened, the collars will lie relatively flat against the cortical bone walls of the lamina at either or both the proximal and distal ends of the cephalad implant. If desired, the physician can alter one or both sides of the lamina to more readily accommodate the proximal and/or distal collars.
Desirably, the cephalad stems will be secured directly to the lamina and will incorporate a bony-ingrowth surface. Alternatively, the stems can be secured to the lamina using bone-cement or osteo-conductive or osteo-inductive material. Desirably, any such securing material will resist progressive loosening and fracture propagation typically associated with long-term implantation of orthopedic joint replacements.
In another alternate embodiment, the lamina passages could cross through each other, with the bodies of the individual cephalad prosthesis connecting or “linking in one or more manner (either inside the lamina or externally to the lamina, or some combination thereof) to more securely “solidify” the fixation and rigidity of the construct. For example, one cephalad implant could incorporate a through-hole of varying size to accommodate a corresponding distal end of a corresponding implant. Alternatively, the implants could be bridged by a locking collar extending over, under and/or through the spinous process.
In another embodiment, the cephalad implant or portions thereof (i.e., the body 205, 205a) can be non-cylindrical, and the correspondingly shaped passage through the lamina can be created using a chisel, rongeur, broach or “box punch”. Such a non-cylindrical implant would desirably resist rotation to a significant degree.
In another alternate embodiments, the cephalad and caudal components of the prosthesis can be linked together to reduce and/or eliminate relative motion between the cephalad and caudal components, and thus between the cephalad and caudal vertebral bodies. For example, where progressive degeneration of the intervertebral disk and/or vertebral bodies renders the spinal motion segment significantly unstable, or where reduction of the relative motion between the vertebral bodies is desired, the cephalad components can be “capped” or locked to the caudal components. Such linking mechanism could include clamps or wraps (such as wire ties) which secure the bearing surface within the caudal cup, as well as adhesives which could secure the components to each other or “fill” a clamp or cup used to “fuse” the articulating surfaces of the implant.
Many of the features of the present embodiment are designed to accommodate significant variability in the anatomy of vertebral bodies. For example, the bearing 235a need not be positioned flush against the distal end 215a, but can rather be secured to the body 205a at various locations, thereby incorporating some length variability into the system (
In the event of weakened posterior portions, embodiments of the present invention may be adapted to attach to different portions of the vertebral body that remain structurally sound. For example, in the illustrated embodiment of
In another alternate embodiment, both the cephalad and caudal portions of the prosthesis could be secured to the lamina and/or spinous process of their respective vertebral bodies using embodiments of the present invention described above with regard to
In one embodiment, the reinforcing material is a strip 3500 desirably having sufficient length to extend from the proximal collar 220, along the bone to the distal collar 225. In another alternative embodiment, the reinforcing material is one or more pads having a larger area than the adjacent collar. In this case, the reinforcing material 3505 is shown adjacent a distal collar 225 (a similar reinforcing material may be placed adjacent the opposite proximal collar, if desired, which is hidden by the lamina in this figure. In additional alternative embodiments, the reinforcing material could be used in conjunction with or in lieu of one or both collars 225, 220.
The various disclosed embodiments can facilitate the implantation of one or more portions of a facet joint prosthesis into a vertebral level that, for a myriad of reasons, cannot accommodate a pedicle-fixation based anchor. Such reasons can include where the pedicular space is already occupied (i.e., where pedicle screws are being used in fusion systems and/or dynamic stabilization), is blocked (i.e. where existing hooks and/or rods block clear access to the pedicle), or where the vertebral body is partially or fully occupied to preclude introduction of pedicle anchors (i.e. where fixation screws for thoraco-lumbar plates pass in front of the pedicle space, or the vertebral body incorporates interbody spacers such as in the K-Centrum Anterior Spinal System™).
It should be understood that the caudal and cephalad bearing surfaces in other embodiments could be reversed, such that the bearing surface of the caudal component could ride inside and/or against a bearing surface of the cephalad component. For example, one or more balls (incorporating convex bearing surfaces) carried by the caudal components could ride inside one or more corresponding cups (incorporating concave bearing surfaces) carried by the cephalad components. In a similar manner, the arms of the caudal components could be longer than the arms of the corresponding cephalad components.
In various alternate embodiments, the disclosed pairs of caudal and cephalad portions of the facet replacement prosthesis described herein could comprise a single caudal and cephalad pair, or more than two caudal and cephalad pairs. Alternatively, the disclosed caudal pair could comprise a single caudal portion, with one or a plurality of cephalad portions, and vice versa. In such an arrangement, the plurality of portions could interact with a single bearing surface on the corresponding single portion, or multiple bearing surfaces on the corresponding single portion of the prosthesis.
While the disclosed bearing surface 235a is spherical in shape, the bearing surface 235a could be a myriad of shapes, including other geometric configurations as well as flat, convex or concave surfaces. In one embodiment, the bearing surface could comprise a relatively flat surface having a convex face, similar to the surface of the facet joint it replaces.
The above described embodiments of this invention are merely descriptive of its principles and are not to be limited. The scope of this invention instead shall be determined from the scope of the following claims, including their equivalents.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/973,834, filed Oct. 25, 2004, and entitled “Prosthesis, Tools and Methods for Replacement of Natural Facet Joints with Artificial Facet Joint Surfaces,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,608,104 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/438,294, filed May 14, 2003, and entitled “Prosthesis, Tools and Methods for Replacement of Natural Facet Joints with Artificial Facet Joint Surfaces,” now abandoned and further claims the benefit of Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/567,933, filed May 3, 2004, and entitled “Spinal Prosthesis for Facet Joint Replacement,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1308451 | Schachat | Jul 1919 | A |
2502902 | Tofflemire | Apr 1950 | A |
2930133 | Thompson | Mar 1960 | A |
2959861 | Stromquist | Nov 1960 | A |
3596656 | Kaute | Aug 1971 | A |
3710789 | Ersek | Jan 1973 | A |
3726279 | Barefoot et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3867728 | Stubstad et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3875595 | Froning | Apr 1975 | A |
3941127 | Froning | Mar 1976 | A |
4040130 | Laure | Aug 1977 | A |
4123848 | Emmerich et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4156296 | Johnson et al. | May 1979 | A |
4210317 | Spann et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4231121 | Lewis | Nov 1980 | A |
4271836 | Bacal et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4349921 | Kuntz | Sep 1982 | A |
4394370 | Jefferies | Jul 1983 | A |
4472840 | Jefferies | Sep 1984 | A |
4502161 | Wall | Mar 1985 | A |
4554914 | Kapp et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4611581 | Steffee | Sep 1986 | A |
4633722 | Beardmore et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4693722 | Wall | Sep 1987 | A |
4697582 | William | Oct 1987 | A |
4710075 | Davison | Dec 1987 | A |
4759769 | Hedman et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4772287 | Ray et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4778472 | Homsy et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4795469 | Oh | Jan 1989 | A |
4805602 | Puno et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4863477 | Monson | Sep 1989 | A |
4904260 | Ray et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4911718 | Lee et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4917701 | Morgan | Apr 1990 | A |
4932975 | Main et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4950270 | Bowman et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955916 | Carignan et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4957495 | Kluger | Sep 1990 | A |
4987904 | Wilson | Jan 1991 | A |
5000165 | Watanabe | Mar 1991 | A |
5015255 | Kuslich | May 1991 | A |
5019081 | Watanabe | May 1991 | A |
5047055 | Bao et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5062845 | Kuslich et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5070623 | Barnes | Dec 1991 | A |
5071437 | Steffee | Dec 1991 | A |
5092866 | Breard et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098434 | Serbousek | Mar 1992 | A |
5108399 | Eitenmuller et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5129900 | Asher et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5147404 | Downey | Sep 1992 | A |
5171280 | Baumgartner | Dec 1992 | A |
5192326 | Bao et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5258031 | Salib et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5261910 | Warden et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5284655 | Bogdansky et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5300073 | Ray et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303480 | Chek | Apr 1994 | A |
5306308 | Gross et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306309 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312409 | McLaughlin et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314429 | Goble | May 1994 | A |
5314476 | Prewett et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314486 | Zang et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314489 | Hoffman et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314492 | Hamilton et al. | May 1994 | A |
5329933 | Graf | Jul 1994 | A |
5334203 | Wagner | Aug 1994 | A |
5348026 | Davidson | Sep 1994 | A |
5350380 | Goble et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5360448 | Thramann | Nov 1994 | A |
5370697 | Baumgartner | Dec 1994 | A |
5401269 | Buttner-Janz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5405390 | O'Leary et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413576 | Rivard | May 1995 | A |
5415659 | Lee et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415661 | Holmes | May 1995 | A |
5425773 | Boyd et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437669 | Yuan et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5437672 | Alleyne | Aug 1995 | A |
5443483 | Kirsch | Aug 1995 | A |
5445639 | Kuslich et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5458641 | Ramirez Jimenez | Oct 1995 | A |
5458642 | Beer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458643 | Oka et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5470333 | Ray | Nov 1995 | A |
5474551 | Finn et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474555 | Puno et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484437 | Michelson | Jan 1996 | A |
5491882 | Walston et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496318 | Howland et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501684 | Schlapfer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5507823 | Walston et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510396 | Prewett et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514180 | Heggeness et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527312 | Ray | Jun 1996 | A |
5534028 | Bao et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534030 | Navarro et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545229 | Parsons et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5556431 | Buttner-Janz | Sep 1996 | A |
5562738 | Boyd et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569247 | Morrison | Oct 1996 | A |
5571189 | Kuslich | Nov 1996 | A |
5571191 | Fitz | Nov 1996 | A |
5575792 | Errico et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577995 | Walker et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5587695 | Warmerdam | Dec 1996 | A |
5599311 | Raulerson | Feb 1997 | A |
5603713 | Aust et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609641 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5643263 | Simonson | Jul 1997 | A |
5645597 | Krapiva | Jul 1997 | A |
5645599 | Samani | Jul 1997 | A |
5649930 | Kertzner | Jul 1997 | A |
5653762 | Pisharodi | Aug 1997 | A |
5658338 | Tullos et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662651 | Tornier et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672175 | Martin | Sep 1997 | A |
5674295 | Ray et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674296 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676701 | Yuan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678317 | Stefanakos | Oct 1997 | A |
5683391 | Boyd | Nov 1997 | A |
5683392 | Richelsoph et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683464 | Wagner et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683466 | Vitale | Nov 1997 | A |
5688274 | Errico et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690630 | Errico et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700268 | Bertin | Dec 1997 | A |
5702450 | Bisserie | Dec 1997 | A |
5704941 | Jacober et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716415 | Steffee | Feb 1998 | A |
5725527 | Biedermann et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733284 | Martin | Mar 1998 | A |
5738585 | Hoyt, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741253 | Michelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5741255 | Krag et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741261 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766253 | Brosnahan, III | Jun 1998 | A |
5776135 | Errico et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782833 | Haider | Jul 1998 | A |
5797911 | Sherman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800433 | Benzel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824093 | Ray et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824094 | Serhan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827289 | Reiley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836948 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860977 | Zucherman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5863293 | Richelsoph | Jan 1999 | A |
5865846 | Bryan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5866113 | Hendriks et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868745 | Alleyne | Feb 1999 | A |
5879350 | Sherman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879396 | Walston et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885285 | Simonson | Mar 1999 | A |
5885286 | Sherman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891145 | Morrison et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893889 | Harrington | Apr 1999 | A |
RE36221 | Breard et al. | Jun 1999 | E |
5947893 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5947965 | Bryan | Sep 1999 | A |
5964760 | Richelsoph | Oct 1999 | A |
5984926 | Jones | Nov 1999 | A |
6001130 | Bryan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004353 | Masini | Dec 1999 | A |
6010503 | Richelsoph et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014588 | Fitz | Jan 2000 | A |
6019759 | Rogozinski | Feb 2000 | A |
6019792 | Cauthen | Feb 2000 | A |
6022350 | Ganem | Feb 2000 | A |
6039763 | Shelokov | Mar 2000 | A |
6048342 | Zucherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050997 | Mullane | Apr 2000 | A |
6053917 | Sherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6063121 | Xavier et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066325 | Wallace et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068630 | Zucherman et al. | May 2000 | A |
RE36758 | Fitz | Jun 2000 | E |
6074391 | Metz-Stavenhagen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077262 | Schläpfer et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080157 | Cathro et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086590 | Margulies et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090111 | Nichols | Jul 2000 | A |
6113600 | Drummond et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6113637 | Gill et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120510 | Albrektsson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132430 | Wagner | Oct 2000 | A |
6132462 | Li | Oct 2000 | A |
6132464 | Martin | Oct 2000 | A |
6132465 | Ray et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6165177 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6190388 | Michelson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193724 | Chan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193758 | Huebner | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200322 | Branch et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214012 | Karpman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224602 | Hayes | May 2001 | B1 |
6231575 | Krag | May 2001 | B1 |
6248105 | Schläpfer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6280443 | Gu et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290703 | Ganem | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293949 | Justis et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302890 | Leone, Jr. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309391 | Crandall et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312431 | Asfora | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6340361 | Kraus et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340477 | Anderson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6342054 | Mata | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6361506 | Saenger et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368320 | Le Couedic et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6419703 | Fallin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6440169 | Elberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443954 | Bramlet et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451021 | Ralph et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471705 | Biedermann et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6514253 | Yao | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520963 | McKinley | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524315 | Selvitelli et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540749 | Schäfer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547790 | Harkey, III et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554843 | Ou | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565565 | Yuan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565572 | Chappius | May 2003 | B2 |
6565605 | Goble et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6572617 | Senegas | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579319 | Goble et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585740 | Schlapfer et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6585769 | Muhanna et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6607530 | Carl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610091 | Reiley | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6619091 | Heffe | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623485 | Doubler et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626909 | Chin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632226 | Chan | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638281 | Gorek | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645214 | Brown et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648891 | Kim | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6669698 | Tromanhauser et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669729 | Chin | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679915 | Cauthen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6712818 | Michelson | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712849 | Re et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6736815 | Ginn | May 2004 | B2 |
6749361 | Hermann et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6761698 | Shibata et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6761720 | Senegas | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6770095 | Grinberg et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783527 | Drewry et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790233 | Brodke et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793678 | Hawkins | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802844 | Ferree | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811567 | Reiley | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6902567 | Del Medico | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6902580 | Fallin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908465 | von Hoffmann et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6949123 | Reiley | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6974478 | Reiley et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6979299 | Peabody et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7011658 | Young | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7044969 | Errico et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051451 | Augostino et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7220262 | Hynes | May 2007 | B1 |
7294127 | Leung et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302288 | Schellenberg | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7309338 | Cragg | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7377942 | Berry | May 2008 | B2 |
7445635 | Fallin et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455685 | Justis | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7547324 | Cragg et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20010012938 | Zucherman et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010020170 | Zucherman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020013585 | Gournay et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013588 | Landry et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029039 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042613 | Mata | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049446 | Harkey, III et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052603 | Nickols et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065557 | Goble et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068975 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082601 | Toyama et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020120272 | Yuan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123752 | Schultheiss et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123806 | Reiley | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151895 | Soboleski et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004572 | Goble et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028250 | Reiley et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040797 | Fallin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055427 | Graf | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069603 | Little et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030125740 | Khanna | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181914 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191532 | Goble et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195631 | Ferree | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204259 | Goble et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204261 | Eisermann et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030233148 | Ferree | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006391 | Reiley | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040049205 | Lee et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049272 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049273 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049274 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049275 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049276 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049277 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049278 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049281 | Reiley | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059429 | Amin et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093083 | Branch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111154 | Reiley | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116927 | Graf | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127989 | Dooris et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143264 | McAfee | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040204710 | Patel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204718 | Hoffman | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230201 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230304 | Yuan et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260305 | Gorensek et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267279 | Casutt et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010291 | Stinson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015146 | Louis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027359 | Mashburn | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027361 | Reiley | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033431 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033432 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033434 | Berry | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033439 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043799 | Reiley | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049705 | Hale et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055096 | Serhan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059972 | Biscup | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080428 | White | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080486 | Fallin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085912 | Arnin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101956 | Simonson | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102028 | Arnin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119748 | Reiley et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131406 | Reiley et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131409 | Chervitz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131537 | Hoy et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131538 | Chervitz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131545 | Chervitz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137705 | Reiley | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137706 | Reiley | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143818 | Yuan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149190 | Reiley | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159746 | Grob et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165484 | Ferree | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177240 | Blain | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187560 | Dietzel et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192589 | Raymond et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203533 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222683 | Berry | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228500 | Kim et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234552 | Reiley | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240264 | Tokish et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240265 | Kuiper et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240266 | Kuiper et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251256 | Reiley | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261770 | Kuiper et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267579 | Reiley et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273167 | Triplett et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277922 | Trieu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283238 | Reiley | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009847 | Reiley | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009848 | Reiley | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009849 | Reiley | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025769 | Dick et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029186 | De Villiers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036246 | Carl et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041311 | McLeer | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041314 | Millard | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052785 | Augostino et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058790 | Carl et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058791 | Broman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079895 | McLeer | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085010 | Lieberman | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085072 | Funk et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085075 | McLeer | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100707 | Stinson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100709 | Reiley et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122703 | Aebi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149375 | Yuan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184180 | Augostino et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060241532 | Murakami et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265070 | Stinson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070079517 | Augostino et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088358 | Yuan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093833 | Kuiper et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070168029 | Yuan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070233256 | Ohrt et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255411 | Reiley | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265706 | Reiley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276370 | Altarac et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276374 | Broman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282445 | Reiley | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015583 | Reiley | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015696 | Reiley | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20140052248 | Kuiper et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10135771 | Jul 2001 | DE |
10312755 | Oct 2003 | DE |
1103226 | May 2001 | EP |
1205152 | May 2002 | EP |
1254639 | Nov 2002 | EP |
2726459 | May 1996 | FR |
2749155 | Dec 1997 | FR |
2844180 | Mar 2004 | FR |
S970323 | Jun 1998 | IE |
59010807 | Jan 1984 | JP |
10082605 | Mar 1998 | JP |
10179622 | Jul 1998 | JP |
WO 9505783 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9600049 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO 9848717 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-9848717 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9856301 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9905995 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9923963 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9960957 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9965412 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0038582 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0062684 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0106939 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0115638 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0128442 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0130248 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0139678 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0167972 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0197721 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0200270 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0200275 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0202024 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0202158 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0234150 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 0243603 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02071960 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02089712 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03020143 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03041618 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03075805 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03101350 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004071358 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004103227 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2004103228 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005009301 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005079711 | Sep 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ochoa et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/377,546 entitled “Spinal implant,” filed Feb. 13, 2009. |
Hewko, Brian; U.S. Appl. No. 12/377,552 entitled “Spinal implant,” filed Feb. 13, 2009. |
Berg, et al; U.S. Appl. No. 11/800,895 entitled “Minimally Invasive Spine Restoration Systems, Devices, Methods, and Kits,” filed May 7, 2007. |
Reiley et al; U.S. Appl. No. 11/577,872 entitled “Facet Joint Prosthesis” which entered the U.S. from the National Phase Apr. 24, 2007. |
Reiley et al; U.S. Appl. No. 11/577,923 entitled “Facet Joint Prostheses” filed Apr. 25, 2007. |
Kuiper et al; U.S. Appl. No. 11/577,964 entitled “Crossbar Spinal Prosthesis Having a Modular Design and Systems for Treating Spinal Pathologies,” filed Apr. 25, 2007. |
Kuiper et al; U.S. Appl. No. 11/577,967 entitled “Crossbar Spinal Prosthesis having a Modular Design and Systems for Treating Spinal Pathologies,” filed Apr. 25, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark; U.S. Appl. No. 11/831,870 entitled “Prostheses systems and methods for replacement of natural facet joints with artificial facet joint surfaces,” filed Jul. 31, 2007. |
Ralph et al; U.S. Appl. No. 11/837,335 entitled “Angled Washer Polyaxial Connection for Dynamic Spine Prosthesis,” filed Aug. 10, 2007. |
Stone et al; U.S. Appl. No. 11/861,239 entitled “Facet Replacement Device Removal and Revision Systems and Methods” filed Sep. 25, 2007. |
McLeer, Thomas, U.S. Appl. No. 11/934,724 entitled “Polymeric Joint Complex and Methods of Use” filed Nov. 2, 2007. |
McLeer, Thomas, U.S. Appl. No. 11/934,720 entitled “Polymeric Joint Complex and Methods of Use” filed Nov. 2, 2007. |
McLeer, Thomas, U.S. Appl. No. 11/934,719 entitled “Polymeric Joint Complex and Methods of Use” filed Nov. 2, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark, U.S. Appl. No. 11/934,713 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Nov. 2, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark, U.S. Appl. No. 11/939,540 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Nov. 13, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark, U.S. Appl. No. 11/943,458 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Nov. 20, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark, U.S. Appl. No. 11/949,007 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Nov. 30, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark, U.S. Appl. No. 11/949,000 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Nov. 30, 2007. |
Reiley et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 11/948,963 entitled “Prostheses, systems and methods for replacement of natural facet joints with artificial facet joint surfaces” filed Nov. 30, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark, U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,208 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Dec. 14, 2007. |
Reiley et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,315 entitled “Prostheses, systems and methods for replacement of natural facet joints with artificial facet joint surfaces” filed Dec. 14, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark; U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,175 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Dec. 14, 2007. |
Reiley et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,290 entitled “Prostheses, systems and methods for replacement of natural facet joints with artificial facet joint surfaces” filed Dec. 14, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark; U.S. Appl. No. 11/956,961 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Dec. 14, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark; U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,149 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Dec. 14, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark; U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,061 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Dec. 14, 2007. |
Reiley et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,259 entitled “Prostheses, systems and methods for replacement of natural facet joints with artificial facet joint surfaces” filed Dec. 14, 2007. |
Reiley, Mark; U.S. Appl. No. 12/016,177 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods” filed Jan. 17, 2008. |
Kuiper et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 11/948,994 entitled “Crossbar spinal prosthesis having a modular design and related implantation methods” filed Nov. 30, 2007. |
Kuiper et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 11/948,973 entitled “Crossbar spinal prosthesis having a modular design and related implantation methods” filed Nov. 30, 2007. |
Kuiper et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 11/957,303 entitled “Crossbar spinal prosthesis having a modular design and related implantation methods” filed Nov. 30, 2007. |
McLeer, Thomas; U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,988 entitled “Polymeric joint complex and methods of use” filed Dec. 7, 2007. |
Abraham, D.J. et al. “Indications and Trends in Use in Cervical Spinal Fusions.” Orthop Clin North Am. Oct. 1998; 29(4):731-44. |
Farfan, H.F. Effects of Torsion on the Intervertebral Joints. The Canadian Journal of Surgery, Jul. 1969; 12(3):336-41. |
Farfan, H.F. et al. “The Relation of Facet Orientation to Intervertebral Disc Failure.” The Canadian Journal of Surgery, Apr. 1967; 10(2):179-85. |
Farfan, H.F. The Pathological Anatomy of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. A Cadaver Study. Spine. Sep.-Oct. 1980; 5(5):412-8. |
Fosbinder, R.A. et al. Essentials of Radiologic Science. The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2002. |
Goh, J.C. et al. “Influence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability.” Spine. Jan. 2000, 25(1) Medline abstract (one page). |
Head, W.C.“Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip.” Analysis of fourteen failures in forty-one hips. J Bone Joint Surg. Am; Mar. 1981, 63(3), Medline abstract (one page). |
Khoo, L.T. et al. “A biomechanical analysis of the effects of lumbar fusion on the adjacent vetebral motion segment.” Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society, New Orleans, pp. 127-128. |
Kirkaldy-Willis, W.H. et al. “Pathology and Pathogenesis of Lumbar Spondylosis and Stenosis.” Spine. Dec. 1978; 3(4):319-28. |
Kotani, Y. et al. The effects of spinal fixation and destabilization on the biomechanical and histologic properties of spinal ligaments. An in vivo study. Spine, Mar. 15, 1998, 23(6), Medline abstract (2 pages). |
Lam, K. N., et al. X-ray “Diagnosis: A Physician's Approach.” Springer-Verlag; 1998. |
Lemaire, J.P. et al. “Intervertebral disc prosthesis: results and prospects for the year 2000.” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1997; No. 337, pp. 64-76. |
Lombardi, J.S. et al. “Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.” Spine. 1985; 10(9): 821-7. |
McMillin, C. R. et al. Artificial Spinal Discs with up to Five Years Follow-up. 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials (Abstract) 1994; p. 89. |
Nagata, H. et al. “The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbrosacral motion”. Spine, Dec. 1993; 18(16):2471-2479, (9 pages). |
Nibu, K. et al. “Multidirectional stabilizing potential of BAK interbody spinal fusion system for anterior surgery.” J Spinal Discord, Aug. 1997; 10(4), Medline abstract (one page). |
Posner, I. et al. A “Biomechanical Analysis of the Clinical Stability of the Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spine.” Spine. 1982; 7(4): 374-389. |
Rosenberg, N.J. “Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Predisposing Factors.” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1975; 57-A(4): 467-74. |
Slone, R. M. et al. Body CT: A Practical Approach. The McGraw-Hill Companies; 1999. |
Stout, G. H. et al. X-Ray Structure Determination: A Practical Guide. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons; 1989. |
Szpalski, M., et al. Spine Arthroplasty: A Historical Review. Eur Spine J. 2002; 11(Suppl. 2): S65-S84. |
Tsantrizos, A. et al. “Segmental stability and compressive strength of posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants.” Spine, Aug. 1, 2000; 25(15), Medline abstract (one page). |
UCR Pedicle Screw System from SeaSpine (information available at http://www.seaspine.com/UCR—Pedicle—Screw—System.html). Accessed Dec. 5, 2005. |
Victrex of Lancashire, Great Britain. (information on Victrex available at http://www.matweb.com). Accessed Dec. 5, 2005. |
Reiley et al; U.S. Appl. No. 12/058,403 entitled “Polyaxial adjustment of facet joint prostheses,” filed Mar. 28, 2008. |
Quest et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/099,068 entitled “Measurement and trialing system and methods for orthopedic device component selection,” filed Apr. 7, 2008. |
Reiley, Mark; U.S. Appl. No. 12/176,280 entitled “Facet arthroplasty devices and methods,” filed Jul. 18, 2008. |
Yuan et al; U.S. Appl. No. 12/163,738 entitled “Prostheses, tools and methods for replacement of natural joints with artificial facet joint surfaces,” filed Jun. 27, 2008. |
Funk et al; U.S. Appl. No. 12/186,461 entitled “Implantable orthopedic device component selection instrument and methods,” filed Aug. 5, 2008. |
Eichholz, K.M. et al. “Complications of Revision Spinal Surgery”, Neurosurg Focus; (Sep. 15, 2003), 15 (3): pp. 1-4. |
Guyer R. et al. “Impliant: Motion Preservation through Total Posterior-Element Replacement.” May 7, 2004 Presentation held at Hofburg Center, Vienna, Austria, (2 pages). |
Kulkarni, et al. “Accelerated Spondylotic Changes Adjacent to the Fused Segment Following Central Cervical Corpectomy: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Evidence.” J. Neurosurg (Spine 1). 2004; 100: 2-6. |
Sacher, R., Impliant Brochure for presentation at MedTech Insight Conference (Oct. 31, 2003) Boston, MA. pp. 93-94. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080125814 A1 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60567933 | May 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10973834 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 12027899 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10438294 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10973834 | US |