This invention relates generally to medical implants, and more particularly to prosthetic joints having conformal geometries and wear resistant properties.
Medical implants, such as knee, hip, and spine orthopedic replacement joints and other joints and implants have previously consisted primarily of a hard metal motion element that engages a polymer contact pad. This has usually been a high density high wear resistant polymer, for example Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE), or other resilient material. The problem with this type of configuration is the polymer eventually begins to degrade due to the caustic nature of blood, the high impact load, and high number of load cycles. As the resilient member degrades, pieces of polymer may be liberated into the joint area, often causing accelerated wear, implant damage, and tissue inflammation and harm.
It is desirable to employ a design using a hard member on a hard member (e.g. metals or ceramics), thus eliminating the polymer. Such a design is expected to have a longer service life. Extended implant life is important as it is now often required to revise or replace implants. Implant replacement is undesirable from a cost, inconvenience, patient health, and resource consumption standpoint.
Implants using two hard elements of conventional design will be, however, subject to rapid wear. First, a joint having one hard, rigid element on another will not be perfectly shaped to a nominal geometry. Such imperfections will result in points of high stress, thus causing localized wear. Furthermore, two hard elements would lack the resilient nature of a natural joint. Natural cartilage has a definite resilient property, absorbing shock and distributing periodic elevated loads. This in turn extends the life of a natural joint and reduces stress on neighboring support bone and tissue. If two rigid members are used, this ability to absorb the shock of an active lifestyle could be diminished. The rigid members would transmit the excessive shock to the implant to bone interface. Some cyclical load in these areas stimulates bone growth and strength; however, excessive loads or shock stress or impulse loading the bone-to-implant interface will result in localized bone mass loss, inflammation, and reduced support.
These and other shortcomings of the prior art are addressed by the present invention, which provides a prosthetic joint having wear-resistant contacting surfaces with conformal properties.
According to one aspect of the invention, a prosthetic joint includes: (a) first member having a balanced centroidal axis, the first member comprising a rigid material and including a concave interior defining a cup surface, the cup surface including: (i) a cantilevered first flange defining a wear-resistant first contact rim which protrudes relative a nominal profile of the cup surface, the first flange being asymmetric relative to the balanced centroidal axis; and (ii) a cantilevered second flange defining a wear-resistant second contact rim which protrudes relative to the nominal profile of the cup surface; (c) where the first and second contact rims bear directly against the contact surface of the second member, so as to transfer axial and lateral loads between the first and second members, while allowing pivoting motion between the first and second members; and (d) wherein the flanges are shaped and sized so as to deform elastically and permit the first and second contact rims to conform in an irregular shape to the contact surface, when the joint is placed under a predetermined load.
The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:
The present invention provides a specialized implant contact interface (implant geometry). In this geometry, an implanted joint includes two typically hard (i.e. metal or ceramic) members; however, at least one of the members is formed such that it has the characteristics of a resilient member, such as: the ability to absorb an impact load; the ability to absorb high cycle loading; the ability to be self-cleaning; and the ability to function as a hydrodynamic and/or hydrostatic bearing.
Generally, the contact resilient member is flexible enough to allow elastic deformation and avoid localized load increases, but not so flexible as to risk plastic deformation, cracking and failure. In particular, the resilient member is designed such that the stress levels therein will be below the high-cycle fatigue endurance limit. As an example, the resilient member might be only about 10% to about 20% as stiff as a comparable solid member. It is also possible to construct the resilient member geometry with a variable stiffness, i.e. having a low effective spring rate for small deflections and a higher rate as the deflections increase, to avoid failure under sudden heavy loads.
The Z7 region may be local to the contact member 34 or may be one of several. In any case, it may contain a means of providing fluid pressure to the internal contact cavity to produce a hydrostatic interface. A passive (powered by the regular motion of the patient) or active (powered by micro components and a dedicated subsystem) pumping means and optional filtration may be employed to provide the desired fluid interaction.
A hydrodynamic interface is desirable as, by definition, it means the contact member 34 is not actually touching the mating joint member. The lead-in and lead-out shapes Z1, Z2, Z5, Z6 are configured to generate a shear stress in the working fluid so as to create the fluid “wedge” of a hydrodynamic support.
The contact member 34 includes an osseointegration surface “S”, which is a surface designed to be infiltrated by bone growth to improve the connection between the implant and the bone. Osseointegration surfaces may be made from materials such as TRABECULAR METAL, textured metal, or sintered or extruded implant integration textures. TRABECULAR METAL is an open metal structure with a high porosity (e.g. about 80%) and is available from Zimmer, Inc., Warsaw, Ind. 46580 USA.
It may be desirable to create a return passage 62 from the seal void region 60 back into the internal zone 64 in order to stabilize the pressure between the two and to allow for retention of the internal zone fluid if desired. This is especially relevant when the hydrostatic configuration is considered.
The first member 102 includes a body 106 with a perimeter flange 116 extending in a generally radially outward direction at one end. Optionally, a disk-like base 108 may be disposed at the end of the body 106 opposite the flange 116, in which case a circumferential gap 111 will be defined between the base 106 and the flange 116. The first member 102 is constructed from a rigid material. As used here, the term “rigid” refers to a material which has a high stiffness or modulus of elasticity. Nonlimiting examples of rigid materials having appropriate stiffness for the purpose of the present invention include stainless steels, cobalt-chrome alloys, titanium, aluminum, and ceramics. By way of further example, materials such as polymers would generally not be considered “rigid” for the purposes of the present invention. Generally, a rigid material should have a modulus of elasticity of about 0.5×106 psi or greater. Collectively, one end of the body 106 and the flange 116 define a wear-resistant, concave first contact surface 118. As used herein, the term “wear-resistant” refers to a material which is resistant to surface material loss when placed under load. Generally the wear rate should be no more than about 0.5 μm (0.000020 in.) to about 1.0 μm (0.000040 in.) per million cycles when tested in accordance with ASTM Guide F2423. As a point of reference, it is noted that any of the natural joints in a human body can easily experience one million operating cycles per year. Nonlimiting examples of wear-resistant materials include solid metals and ceramics. Known coatings such as titanium nitride, chrome plating, carbon thin films, and/or diamond-like carbon coatings may be used as a face layer to impart wear resistance to the first contact surface 118. Optionally, the first contact surface 118 could comprise a substantially thicker face layer (not shown) of a wear-resistant material such as ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene.
The first contact surface 118 includes a protruding peripheral rim 120 (see
The annular configuration of first contact surface 118 with the protruding rim 120 results in a configuration which permits only pivoting and rotational motion, and is statically and dynamically determinate for the life of the joint 100. In contrast, prior art designs employing mating spherical shapes, even very accurate shapes, quickly reach a statically and dynamically indeterminate condition after use and wear. This condition accelerates wear, contributes to the fretting corrosion wear mechanism, and permits undesired lateral translation between the joint members.
The second member 104 is also made from a rigid material and has a wear-resistant, convex second contact surface 124. The first and second contact surfaces 118 and 124 bear directly against each other so as to transfer axial and lateral loads from one member to the other while allowing pivoting motion between the two members 102 and 104.
Nominally the first and second members 102 and 104 define a “ring” or “band” contact interface therebetween. In practice it is impossible to achieve surface profiles completely free of minor imperfections and variations. If the first and second members 102 and 104 were both completely rigid, this would cause high Hertzian contact stresses and rapid wear. Accordingly, an important feature of the illustrated joint 100 is that the flange 116 (and thus the first contact surface 118) of the first member 102 is conformable to the second contact surface 124 when the joint is placed under load.
The conformable nature of the flange 116 is explained in more detail with reference to
For comparative purposes,
To achieve this controlled deflection, the flange 116 is thin enough to permit bending under working loads, but not so thin as to allow material yield or fatigue cracking The deflection is opposed by the elasticity of the flange 116 in bending, as well as the hoop stresses in the flange 116. To achieve long life, the first member 102 is sized so that stresses in the flange 116 will be less than the endurance limit of the material, when a selected external load is applied. In this particular example, the joint 100 is intended for use between two spinal vertebrae, and the design average axial working load is in the range of about 0 N (0 lbs.) to about 1300 N (300 lbs.). These design working loads are derived from FDA-referenced ASTM and ISO standards for spinal disc prostheses. In this example, the thickness of the flange 116, at a root 126 where it joins the body 106 (see
The joint members may include multiple rims. For example,
If present, the circumferential gap between the flange and the base of the joint member may be filled with resilient nonmetallic material to provide damping and/or additional spring restoring force to the flange.
As discussed above, the joint may incorporate a wiper seal. For example,
The joint construction described above can be extended into a three-part configuration. For example,
The first member 602 is hollow and includes a disk-like base 606 and a cup 608, interconnected by a peripheral wall 610. An interior cavity 612 is defined between the base 606 and the cup 608. The cup 608 is constructed from a rigid material and defines a wear-resistant, concave first contact surface 614. The first contact surface 614 includes a protruding peripheral rim 616, and a recessed central portion 618, which may also be considered a “pocket” or a “relief”. The rim 616 may have a conical or curved cross-sectional shape. The interior cavity 612 may be filled with resilient nonmetallic material to provide damping and/or additional spring restoring force to the flange. Examples of suitable resilient materials include polymers, natural or synthetic rubbers, and the like.
The second member 604 is constructed from a rigid material and has a wear-resistant, convex second contact surface 620. The first and second contact surfaces 614 and 616 bear directly against each other so as to transfer axial and lateral loads from one member to the other while allowing pivoting motion between the two members 602 and 604.
As described above with reference to the prosthetic joint 100, the cup 606 of the first member 602 is thin enough to permit bending under working loads, but not so thin as to allow material yield or fatigue cracking. The first contact surface 614 is thus conformable to the second contact surface 620 when the prosthetic joint 600 is placed under external load.
An inverted configuration of hollow members is also possible. For example,
The second member 704 is hollow and includes a dome 714 connected to a peripheral wall 716. An interior cavity 718 is defined behind the dome 714. The dome 714 defines a wear-resistant, convex second contact surface 720, which is shaped and sized enough to permit bending under working loads, but not so as to allow material yield or fatigue cracking The second contact surface 720 is thus conformable to the first contact surface 708 when the prosthetic joint 700 is placed under external load.
The first and second contact surfaces 708 and 720 bear directly against each other so as to transfer axial and lateral loads from one member to the other while allowing pivoting motion between the two members 702 and 704.
Any of the contact surfaces described above may be provided with one or more grooves formed therein to facilitate flow of fluid or debris. For example,
The first member 1002 is constructed from a rigid material as described above. The first member 1002 is concave and may generally be thought of as a “cup”, although it need not have any particular degree of curvature. Its interior defines a cup surface 1006 with a nominal profile shown by the dashed line in
The interior also includes an annular second flange 1018 which is located at or near an outer peripheral edge 1020 of the first member 1002 and which extends in a generally axial direction relative to the axis A. The second flange 1018 is defined in part by an undercut groove 1022 formed in the first member 1002. The second flange 1018 includes a protruding second contact rim 1024. As used herein, the term “protruding” as applied to the second contact rim 1024 means that the second contact rim 1024 lies inside of the nominal cup surface 1006 when the joint 1000 is assembled. The second contact rim 1024 may have a curved or toroidal cross-sectional shape. Depending on the particular application, joint 1000 may include more than two flanges defining more than two contact rims.
In the illustrated example, the first member 1002 includes a face layer 1026 of a known coating such as titanium nitride, chrome plating, carbon thin films, and/or diamond-like carbon coatings, and/or a another substantially thicker wear-resistant material such as ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene. This face layer 1026 is used to impart wear resistance, as described above. The face layer 1026 may be extraordinarily thin. In this particular example, its as-applied thickness is about 0.0041 mm (0.00016 in.), or 160 millionths of an inch thick. The face layer 1026 is applied at a substantially uniform thickness over the surface profile which is defined by machined or formed features of the substrate. Alternatively, and especially if a much thicker face layer were used, the face layer could be profiled so as to define both the nominal cup surface 1006 and the first and second contact rims 1016 and 1024.
The second member 1004 is also made from a rigid material and has a wear-resistant, convex contact surface 1028. In the specific example illustrated, the second member 1004 includes a face layer 1030 of a known coating such as titanium nitride, chrome plating, carbon thin films, and/or diamond-like carbon coatings, and/or a another substantially thicker wear-resistant material such as ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene. This face layer 1030 is used to impart wear resistance, and may be quite thin, as described above. The first and second contact rims 1016 and 1024 bear directly against the contact surface 1028 so as to transfer axial and lateral loads from one member to the other while allowing pivoting motion between the two members 1002 and 1004.
The annular configuration of contact rims 1016 and 1024 results in a joint configuration which permits only pivoting and rotational motion, and is statically and dynamically determinate for the life of the joint 1000. In particular, the presence of the relatively widely-spaced contact rims 1016 and 1024, and the peripheral positioning of the second contact rim 1024 is highly effective in resisting any translation of the first and second members 1002 and 1004 lateral to the axis A.
Nominally the first and second contact rims 1016 and 1024 define two separate “ring” or “band” contact interfaces with the contact surface 1028 of the second member 1004. In practice it is impossible to achieve surface profiles completely free of minor imperfections and variations. If the first and second members 1002 and 1004 were both completely rigid, this would cause high Hertzian contact stresses (i.e. non-uniform contact) and rapid wear. Accordingly, an important feature of the illustrated joint 1000 is that the flanges 1008 and 1018 (and thus the contact rims 1016 and 1024) of the first member 1002 are conformable to the contact surface 1028 when the joint 1000 is placed under load. The flanges 1008 and 1018 can conform to the imperfect contact surface 1028 and deflect in an irregular shape. In other words, in addition to any uniform deflection which may be present, the deflected shape of the flanges 1008 and 1018 can include one or more specific locations or portions that are deflected towards or away from the nominal free shape to a greater or lesser degree than the remainder of the flanges 1008 and 1018. To achieve this controlled deflection, the flanges 1008 and 1018 are thin enough to permit bending under working loads, but not so thin as to allow material yield or fatigue cracking, or to exceed the endurance limit of the material. The deflection is opposed by the elasticity of the flanges 1008 and 1018 in bending, as well as the hoop stresses in the flanges 1008 and 1018.
The contact rims 1016 and 1024 are designed in conjunction with the contact surface 1028 to create a wear characteristic that is constantly diminishing (similar to an asymptotic characteristic). With reference to
The configuration of the flanges 1008 and 1018 are important in developing the constantly diminishing wear characteristics described above. In particular, the flanges 1008 and 1018 are sized and shaped so that deflections of the contact rims 1016 and 1024 under varying load are always essentially normal to their respective tangent points on the opposing contact surface 1028, as the joint 1000 is loaded and unloaded. This ensures that the position of each of the contact bands remains constant and that the contact bands remain substantially uniform around the entire periphery of the joint 1000.
An inverted configuration of the joint described above may be used. For example,
For purposes of explanation and illustration the first member 1202 will be described relative to a “balanced centroidal axis”, labeled “N1” in
The first member 1202 is constructed from a rigid material and may generally be thought of as a “cup”, as described above. Its interior defines a wear-resistant cup surface 1206 including a nominal profile. The interior includes a cantilevered first flange 1208, defined in part by an undercut groove 1212 formed in the first member 1202. Without regard to the exact direction that the flange 1208 extends, it may be considered to be cantilevered relative to the remainder of the first member 1202. In other words, when viewed in cross-section, it is a projecting structure, that is supported at one end and carries a load at the other end or along its length. A ramped surface 1214 forms a transition from the groove 1212 to the cup surface 1206. The first flange 1208 includes a protruding first contact rim 1216. “protruding” has the meaning described above, i.e. the contact rim 1216 extends away from the nominal profile of the cup surface 1206 and towards the second member 1204. The first contact rim 1216 may have a straight, curved, or toroidal cross-sectional shape.
The first flange 1208 has an angular offset relative to the balanced centroidal axis N1. In other words, the first flange 1208 is asymmetric to the balanced centroidal axis N1. This is also referred to as a “non-axisymmetric” condition. In the particular example and view shown in
The interior also includes a cantilevered second flange 1218 which is defined in part by an undercut groove 1222 formed in the first member 1202. The second flange 1218 includes a protruding second contact rim 1224. The second contact rim 1224 may have a straight, curved, or toroidal cross-sectional shape.
The second member 1204 is also made from a rigid material and has a wear-resistant, convex contact surface 1228. The first and second contact rims 1216 and 1224 bear directly against the contact surface 1228 so as to transfer axial and lateral loads from one member to the other while allowing pivoting motion between the two members 1202 and 1204. The annular configuration of contact rims 1216 and 1224 results in a joint configuration which permits only pivoting and rotational motion, and is statically and dynamically determinate for the life of the joint 1200.
Nominally the first and second contact rims 1216 and 1224 define two separate “ring” or “band” contact interfaces with the contact surface 1228 of the second member 1204. The flanges 1208 and 1218 (and thus the contact rims 1216 and 1224) of the first member 1202 are conformable to the contact surface 1228 when the joint 1200 is placed under load. The flanges 1208 and 1218 can conform to the imperfect contact surface 1228 and deflect in an irregular shape, in the manner described above for the joint 1200. Any of the flanges described herein may have free shape defining a first contact area with the contact surface, and a loaded (i.e. deflected) shape defining a second contact area with the contact surface which is substantially larger than the first contact area, substantially reducing the contact stress between the two members. The contact rims 1216 and 1224 and the contact surface 1228 may be configured with curvatures to have an asymmetric wear characteristic as described above in detail.
The facing surfaces of either or both of the first and second members 1202 and 1204 may include a face layer of a known coating such as titanium nitride, chrome plating, carbon thin films, and/or diamond-like carbon coatings, and/or a another substantially thicker wear-resistant material such as ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene. This face layer is used to impart wear resistance, as described above.
Depending on the specific application, the second flange 1218 may have an angular offset like the first flange 1208. For example,
The flange of the joint members described above need not be circular, elliptical, or another symmetrical shape in plan view, and need not lie in a single plane. For example,
The first flange 1308 (and therefore the first contact rim 1316) have a “saddle” shape. In this particular example it has a racetrack shape in plan view, and the portions at the ends of the major axis of the racetrack shape are elevated (in the z-direction) relative to the remainder of the shape. The first contact rim 1316 is shaped so as to define a contact band in which some or all points on its surface lie on a sphere (or otherwise match the shape of the mating convex joint member described above). The second flange 1318 could have a similar saddle shape as well.
The prosthetic joints described herein may include one or more flanges with an open perimeter. For example,
A balanced centroidal axis “N2”, may be considered to pass through the first member 1402. This axis N2 is defined in the same manner as the balanced centroidal axis “N1” described above. The first member 1402 is constructed from a rigid material and may generally be thought of as a “cup”, as described above. Its interior defines a cup surface 1406 having a nominal profile. The interior includes a cantilevered first flange 1408, defined in part by an undercut groove 1412 formed in the first member 1402. A ramped surface 1414 forms a transition from the groove 1412 to the nominal cup surface 1406. The first flange 1408 includes a protruding first contact rim 1416. The first contact rim 1416 may have a straight, curved, or toroidal cross-sectional shape.
The first flange 1408 has an angular offset relative to the balanced centroidal axis N2, in other words it is asymmetric relative to the balanced centroidal axis N2. The interior also includes a cantilevered second flange 1418 which is defined in part by an undercut groove 1422 formed in the first member 1402. The second flange 1418 includes a protruding second contact rim 1424. The second contact rim 1424 may have a straight, curved, or toroidal cross-sectional shape.
In the example shown in
The interior also includes a cantilevered third flange 1429 which is defined in part by an undercut groove 1430 formed in the first member 1402. The third flange 1418 includes a protruding third contact rim 1432. The third contact rim 1432 may have a straight, curved, or toroidal cross-sectional shape. As best seen in
The third flange 1429 could be symmetric or asymmetric relative to the balanced centroidal axis N2.
The second member 1402 is also made from a rigid material and has a wear-resistant, convex contact surface 1428. The first, second, and third contact rims 1416, 1424, and 1432, bear directly against the contact surface 1428 so as to transfer axial and lateral loads from one member to the other while allowing pivoting motion between the two members 1402 and 1404.
Nominally the first, second, and third contact rims 1416, 1424, and 1432 define three separate “ring” or “band” contact interfaces with the contact surface 1428 of the second member 1404. The flanges 1408, 1418, and 1429 (and thus the contact rims 1216, 1224, and 1432) of the first member 1402 are conformable to the contact surface 1428 when the joint 1400 is placed under load. The flanges 1408, 1418, and 1429 can conform to the imperfect contact surface 1428 and deflect in an irregular shape, in the manner described above for the joint 1000.
The facing surfaces of either or both of the first and second members 1402 and 1404 may include a face layer of a known coating such as titanium nitride, chrome plating, carbon thin films, and/or diamond-like carbon coatings, and/or a another substantially thicker wear-resistant material such as ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene. This face layer is used to impart wear resistance, as described above.
Any of the flanges may have an open perimeter. For example,
The member 1502 is constructed from a rigid material and generally has a concave “cup” shape as described above. It may also be bone-implantable as described above. Its interior defines a cup surface 1506 having a nominal profile. The interior includes a cantilevered flange 1508, defined in part by an undercut groove 1512 formed in the first member 1502. A ramped surface 1514 forms a transition from the groove 1512 to the nominal cup surface 1506. The flange 1508 includes a protruding first contact rim 1516. The first contact rim 1516 may have a straight, curved, or toroidal cross-sectional shape. The flange 1508 may include an angular offset relative to a balanced centroidal of the joint member 1502, as described above.
A peripheral groove 1520 is formed in the cup surface 1506. In the example shown in
The contact ring 1522 is made of a rigid material and has a wear-resistant surface, as those terms are described above. It is sized and shaped to achieve controlled elastic deflection, and to be conformable in the manner of the flanges described above. Its construction is thin enough to permit bending under working loads, but not so thin as to allow material yield or fatigue cracking. Deflection of the contact ring 1522 is opposed by the elasticity of the contact ring 1522 in bending, as well as the hoop stresses therein. To achieve long life, the contact ring 1522 is sized so that stresses therein will be less than the endurance limit of the material.
Various cross-sectional shapes may be used for the contact ring. For example,
Nominally the first and second contact rims 1516 and 1524 define two separate “ring” or “band” contact interfaces with the contact surface of the opposed convex member (not shown). The contact rims 1516 and 1524 are conformable to an opposed contact surface when the joint is placed under load.
Any of the joint members described above may include holes or apertures formed therein to reduce their weight, or to facilitate manufacture or installation. For example,
While the joint members have been illustrated above with monolithic construction, any of the joint members may be made from one or more components built up to form the whole. For example,
The member 1802 is constructed from a rigid material and generally has a concave “cup” shape as described above. It may also be bone-implantable as described above. It is made up from a shell 1804 with an interior surface 1806, and a liner 1808 which fits conformally against the interior surface 1806. The liner 1808 may be fixed or moveable relative to the shell 1804. An interior of the liner 1808 defines a nominal cup surface 1810. The liner 1808 includes a first peripheral ring 1812, defined as a generally “U”-shape formed in the liner 1808. The first peripheral ring 1812 includes a protruding first contact rim 1816. The first contact rim 1816 may have a straight, curved, or toroidal cross-sectional shape. The first peripheral ring 1812 may include an angular offset or asymmetric positioning relative to a balanced centroidal axis “N4” of the joint member 1802, as that concept is described above.
The liner 1808 also includes a second peripheral ring 1818, defined as a generally “U”-shape formed in the liner 1808. The second peripheral ring 1818 includes a protruding second contact rim 1820. The second contact rim 1820 may have a straight, curved, or toroidal cross-sectional shape. The second peripheral ring 1818 may include an angular offset relative to a balanced centroidal “N4” of the joint member 1802, as that concept is described above.
The liner 1808 is made of a rigid material and has a wear-resistant surface, as those terms are described above. The first and second peripheral rings 1812 and 1818 are sized and shaped to achieve controlled elastic deflection, and to be conformable in the manner of the flanges described above. Their construction is thin enough to permit bending under working loads, but not so thin as to allow material yield or fatigue cracking Deflection of the contact rings 1812 and 1818 are opposed by the elasticity of the rings in bending, as well as the hoop stresses therein. To achieve long life, the contact rings 1812 and 1818 are sized so that stresses therein will be less than the endurance limit of the material.
Nominally the first and second contact rims 1816 and 1820 define two separate “ring” or “band” contact interfaces with the contact surface of the opposed convex member (not shown). The contact rims 1816 and 1820 are conformable to the opposed contact surface when the joint is placed under load.
As noted above, known coatings such as titanium nitride, chrome plating, carbon thin films, and/or diamond-like carbon coatings may be used to impart wear resistance or augment the wear resistance of any of the contact surfaces and/or contact rims described above. To the same end, it may be desirable to surface treat either or both interfaces of any of the above-described implants or joints with a laser, shot peen, burnishing, or water shock process, to impart residual compressive stresses and reduce wear. The benefit could be as much from surface annealing and microstructure and microfracture elimination as smoothing itself.
The foregoing has described prosthetic joints with wear-resistant properties and conformal geometries. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications thereto can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the best mode for practicing the invention are provided for the purpose of illustration only and not for the purpose of limitation.
This application is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 13/073,963, filed Mar. 28, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,070,823, which is a Continuation-in-Part of application Ser. No. 12/826,620, filed Jun. 29, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,914,580, which is a Continuation-in-Part of application Ser. No. 12/714,288, filed Feb. 26, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,905,919, which is a Continuation-in-Part of application Ser. No. 11/936,601, filed Nov. 7, 2007, currently pending, which claims the benefit of Provisional Patent Application 60/864,667, filed Nov. 7, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3521302 | Muller | Jul 1970 | A |
3723995 | Baumann | Apr 1973 | A |
3744061 | Frost | Jul 1973 | A |
3842442 | Kolbel | Oct 1974 | A |
3916451 | Buechel et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3945739 | Abe | Mar 1976 | A |
4031570 | Frey | Jun 1977 | A |
4044403 | D'Errico | Aug 1977 | A |
4123806 | Amstutz et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4126924 | Akins et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4159544 | Termanini | Jul 1979 | A |
4224696 | Murray et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4309778 | Buechel et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4437193 | Oh | Mar 1984 | A |
4550450 | Kinnett | Nov 1985 | A |
4568348 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4662891 | Noiles | May 1987 | A |
4673408 | Grobbelaar | Jun 1987 | A |
4676798 | Noiles | Jun 1987 | A |
4718911 | Kenna | Jan 1988 | A |
4759766 | Buettner-Janz et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4795469 | Oh | Jan 1989 | A |
4813961 | Sostegni | Mar 1989 | A |
4878918 | Tari et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4904106 | Love | Feb 1990 | A |
4919674 | Schelhas | Apr 1990 | A |
4955919 | Pappas et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4964865 | Burkhead et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4997432 | Keller | Mar 1991 | A |
5019105 | Wiley | May 1991 | A |
5061288 | Berggren et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062853 | Forte | Nov 1991 | A |
5080675 | Lawes et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5080678 | Spotorno et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5092898 | Bekki et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5095898 | Don Michael | Mar 1992 | A |
5116375 | Hofmann | May 1992 | A |
5116376 | May | May 1992 | A |
5133769 | Wagner et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5181926 | Koch et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197987 | Koch et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5314477 | Marnay | May 1994 | A |
5358530 | Hodorek | Oct 1994 | A |
5389107 | Nassar et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5405394 | Davidson | Apr 1995 | A |
5413604 | Hodge | May 1995 | A |
5458650 | Carret et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462362 | Yuhta et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5480442 | Bertagnoli | Jan 1996 | A |
5480446 | Goodfellow et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5480448 | Mikhail | Jan 1996 | A |
5507816 | Bullivant | Apr 1996 | A |
5549693 | Roux et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549695 | Spotorno et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549697 | Caldarise | Aug 1996 | A |
5549699 | MacMahon et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549700 | Graham et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5593445 | Waits | Jan 1997 | A |
5609645 | Vinciguerra | Mar 1997 | A |
5641323 | Caldarise | Jun 1997 | A |
5674296 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676701 | Yuan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676704 | Ries et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5702456 | Pienkowski | Dec 1997 | A |
5702470 | Menon | Dec 1997 | A |
5702478 | Tornier | Dec 1997 | A |
5725584 | Walker et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5766260 | Whiteside | Jun 1998 | A |
5782927 | Klawitter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800555 | Gray et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824101 | Pappas | Oct 1998 | A |
5824107 | Tschirren | Oct 1998 | A |
5871542 | Goodfellow et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871546 | Colleran et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879404 | Bateman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879406 | Lilley | Mar 1999 | A |
5879407 | Waggener | Mar 1999 | A |
5893889 | Harrington | Apr 1999 | A |
5916269 | Serbousek et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5935174 | Dye | Aug 1999 | A |
5935175 | Ostiguy, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938702 | Lopez et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957979 | Beckman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5989293 | Cook et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989294 | Marlow | Nov 1999 | A |
5997579 | Albrektsson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013103 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6042293 | Maughan | Mar 2000 | A |
6059830 | Lippincott, III et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080195 | Colleran et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096083 | Keller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6126695 | Semlitsch | Oct 2000 | A |
6129765 | Lopez et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146421 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152961 | Ostiguy, Jr. et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162252 | Kuras et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162256 | Ostiguy, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179874 | Cauthen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190415 | Cooke et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203576 | Afriat et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206929 | Ochoa et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217249 | Merlo | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231264 | McLaughlin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6299646 | Chambat et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6364910 | Shultz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368350 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375682 | Fleischmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6416553 | White et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425921 | Grundei et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6475243 | Sheldon et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494916 | Babalola et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537321 | Horber | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6558427 | Leclercq et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6626947 | Lester et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6660040 | Chan et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
RE38409 | Noiles | Jan 2004 | E |
6719800 | Meyers et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740117 | Ralph et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740118 | Eisermann et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743258 | Keller | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6770095 | Grinberg et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6866685 | Chan et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875235 | Ferree | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893465 | Huang | May 2005 | B2 |
6896703 | Barbieri et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6916342 | Frederick et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6942701 | Taylor | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949105 | Bryan et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964686 | Gordon | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972039 | Metzger et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981989 | Fleischmann et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6981991 | Ferree | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986791 | Metzger | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7001433 | Songer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7022142 | Johnson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025787 | Bryan et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037341 | Nowakowski | May 2006 | B2 |
7060099 | Carli et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060101 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066963 | Naegerl | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7083650 | Moskowitz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083651 | Diaz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083652 | McCue et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7108719 | Horber | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7108720 | Hanes | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115145 | Richards | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121755 | Schlapfer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128761 | Kuras et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7153325 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153328 | Kim | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160332 | Frederick et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179294 | Eisermann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7214243 | Taylor | May 2007 | B2 |
7214244 | Zubok et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7250060 | Trieu | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7267693 | Mandell et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7270679 | Istephanous et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276082 | Zdeblick et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297164 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309363 | Dietz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326250 | Beaurain et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7326252 | Otto et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7326253 | Synder et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338529 | Higgins | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7393362 | Cruchet et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407513 | Alleyne et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7442211 | de Villiers et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7465320 | Kito et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7468076 | Zubok et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468079 | Collier | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470287 | Tomier et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485145 | Purcell | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494507 | Dixon et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7531002 | Sutton et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7537615 | Lemaire | May 2009 | B2 |
7550009 | Arnin et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7550010 | Humphreys et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7572295 | Steinberg | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7572296 | Scott et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578848 | Albert et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7582115 | Weber | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7588384 | Yokohara | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601174 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611653 | Elsner et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7618439 | Zubok et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618459 | Justin et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621956 | Paul et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7655041 | Clifford et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7658767 | Wyss | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7682398 | Croxton et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7740659 | Zarda et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758645 | Studer | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758653 | Steinberg | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7776085 | Bernero et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7879095 | Pisharodi | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7905919 | Kellar et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914580 | Kellar et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7955395 | Shea et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8007539 | Slone | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8029574 | Kellar et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8070823 | Kellar et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8308812 | Kellar et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20020035400 | Bryan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020111682 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143402 | Steinberg | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147499 | Shea et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030055500 | Fell et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030081989 | Kondoh | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114935 | Chan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030191534 | Viart et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220691 | Songer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040010316 | William et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024460 | Ferree | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034433 | Chan et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073311 | Ferree | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088052 | Dearnaley | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093087 | Ferree et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117021 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143332 | Krueger et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143334 | Ferree | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167626 | Geremakis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167629 | Geremakis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172021 | Khalili | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215345 | Perrone, Jr. et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220674 | Pria et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260396 | Ferree et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267374 | Friedrichs | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267375 | Friedrichs | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004572 | Biedermann et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015152 | Sweeney | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021145 | de Villiers et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038516 | Spoonamore | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055101 | Sifneos | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071007 | Malek | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080488 | Schultz | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113926 | Zucherman et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113931 | Horber | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125065 | Zucherman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143827 | Globerman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165485 | Trieu | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171604 | Michalow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171614 | Bacon | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192674 | Ferree | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197706 | Hovorka et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203626 | Sears et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216081 | Taylor | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251261 | Peterman | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050251262 | de Villiers et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261776 | Taylor | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288793 | Dong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020342 | Ferree et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025862 | Villiers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041314 | Millard | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064169 | Ferree | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085076 | Krishna et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095135 | Kovacevic | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129240 | Lessar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136062 | DiNello et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060178744 | de Villiers et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190079 | Istephanous et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200247 | Charrois | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217809 | Albert et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217815 | Gibbs et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235527 | Buettner-Janz et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241765 | Burn et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241766 | Felton et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259147 | Krishna et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259148 | Bar-Ziv | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271200 | Greenlee | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293752 | Moumene et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021837 | Ashman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032875 | Blacklock et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032877 | Whiteside | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050032 | Gittings et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073405 | Verhulst et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073410 | Raugel | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083267 | Miz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100447 | Steinberg | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100454 | Burgess et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100456 | Dooris et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106391 | Ronk | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118223 | Allard et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123990 | Sharifi-Mehr | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156246 | Meswania et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168037 | Posnick | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173936 | Hester et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185578 | O'Neil et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208427 | Davidson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070213821 | Kwak et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219638 | Jones et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225806 | Squires et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225810 | Colleran et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225818 | Reubelt et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233244 | Lopez et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239276 | Squires et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080065211 | Albert et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065216 | Hurlbert et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071381 | Buscher et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077137 | Balderston | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080133017 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133022 | Caylor | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154263 | Janowski et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154369 | Barr et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161924 | Viker | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161930 | Carls et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195212 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215156 | Duggal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221689 | Chaput et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221690 | Chaput et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228276 | Mathews et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228282 | Brodowski | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243253 | Levieux | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243262 | Lee | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243263 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300685 | Carls et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005872 | Moumene et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012619 | Cordaro et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030521 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036992 | Tsakonas | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043391 | de Villiers et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054986 | Cordaro et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062920 | Tauber | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076614 | Arramon | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082867 | Sebastian Bueno et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082873 | Hazebrouck et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088865 | Brehm | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105758 | Gimbel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125111 | Copf, Jr. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138090 | Hurlbert et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090157185 | Kim | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090192616 | Zielinski | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192617 | Arramon et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090215111 | Veenstra et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222089 | Hauri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234458 | de Villiers et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248161 | Theofilos et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265009 | Ward et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270986 | Christensen | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276051 | Arramon et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090281629 | Roebling et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090306784 | Blum | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306785 | Farrar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326656 | De Villiers et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326663 | Dun | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326664 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326665 | Wyss et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326666 | Wyss et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326668 | Dun | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004746 | Arramon | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030335 | Arramon | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063589 | Tepic | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063597 | Gradel | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100189 | Metzger | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100191 | May et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131073 | Meridew et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100161064 | Kellar et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161072 | Drescher | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100191342 | Byrd et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100262250 | Kellar et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268340 | Capote et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292794 | Metz-Stavenhagen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100331993 | Gradl | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009975 | Allen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110015752 | Meridew | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110087333 | Kellar et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110166671 | Kellar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110190901 | Weissberg et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110276146 | Segal et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120083896 | Kellar et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120265318 | Forsell | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4102509 | Jul 1992 | DE |
4102510 | Jul 1992 | DE |
4423020 | Jan 1996 | DE |
10164328 | Jul 2003 | DE |
202008004709 | Jul 2008 | DE |
46926 | Mar 1982 | EP |
636353 | Feb 1995 | EP |
648478 | Apr 1995 | EP |
974316 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1114624 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1508315 | Feb 2005 | EP |
2158879 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2750036 | Dec 1997 | FR |
2805456 | Aug 2001 | FR |
2883723 | Oct 2006 | FR |
2897528 | Aug 2007 | FR |
2936145 | Mar 2010 | FR |
1322680 | Jul 1973 | GB |
1417407 | Dec 1975 | GB |
1527498 | Oct 1978 | GB |
1528906 | Oct 1978 | GB |
2191402 | Dec 1987 | GB |
2004011782 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004169820 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2121319 | Nov 1998 | RU |
9523566 | Sep 1995 | WO |
9604867 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9716138 | May 1997 | WO |
9738650 | Oct 1997 | WO |
0023015 | Apr 2000 | WO |
03049649 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2004066882 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2005039455 | May 2005 | WO |
2006069465 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007087730 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008088777 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008094260 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2009094477 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009105884 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009121450 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2009126908 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2010095125 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2011011340 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alvarado et al. “Biomechanics of Hip and Knee Prostheses”. University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez (2003): 1-20. |
Wang, W., Wang, F., Jin, Z., Dowson, D., Hu, Y., “Numerical Lubrication Simulation of Metal-on-Metal Artificial 1 Hip Joint Replacements: Ball-in-Socket Model and Ball-on-Plane Model”, vol. 223 Part J, 2009, pp. 1073-1082, Journal Engineering Tribology, [online] [retrieved Mar. 28, 2011]. |
Wang, F., Jin, Z., “Effect of Non-Spherical Bearing Geometry on Transient Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication in Metal-on-Metal Hip Joint Replacements”, vol. 221, Part J, 2007, pp. 379-389, “Journal of Engineering Tribology”, [online] D [retrieved Mar. 28, 2011]. |
Wang, F., Brockett, C., Williams, S., Udofia, I., Fisher, J., Jin, Z., “Lubrication and Friction Prediction in Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants”, vol. 53, Jan. 2008, pp. 1277-1293, “Phys. Med. Biol.” , United Kingdom. D. |
Clarke, I., “Role of Ceramic Implants: Design and Clinical Success with Total Hip Prosthetic Ceramic-to-Ceramic Bearings”, No. 282, Sep. 1992, pp. 19-30, “Clinical Orthopeadics and Related Research”, Kinamed, Inc., Newbury Park, California. |
Gardelin, P., Seminario, J., Corradini, C., Fenollosa Gomez, J., “Total Hip Prostheses with Cup and Ball in Ceramic and Metal Sockets”, vols. 192-195, 2001, pp. 983-988, “Key Engineering Materials”, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland. |
Bruckmann, H., Keuscher, G., Huttinger, K., “Carbon, A Promising Material in Endoprosthetics. Part 2: Tribological Properties”, vol. 1, Apr. 1980, pp. 73-81, “Biomaterials”, IPC Business Press, West Germany. D. |
Jalali-Vahid, D., Jagatia, M., Jin, Z., Dowson, D., “Prediction of Lubricating Film Thickness in UHMWPE Hip Joint Replacements”, vol. 34, 2001, pp. 261-266, “Journal of Biomechanics”, Elsevier Science Ltd., United Kingdom. |
Minns, R.J., Campbell, J., “The 'Sliding Meniscus' Knee Prosthesis: Design Concepts”, vol. 8, no. 4, Oct. 1979, pp. 201-205, “Engineering in Medicine”, London, England. |
Swanson, S., “The State of the Art in Joint Replacement, Part 2: Present Practice and Results”, pp. 335-339, Nov. 1977, “Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology”, London, United Kingdom. |
Faizan, Ahmad, Goei, Vijay K., Garfin, Steven R., Bono, Christopher M., Serhan, Hassan, Biyani, Ashok, Eigafy, Hossein, Krishna, Manoj, Friesem, Tai, “Do Design Variations in the Artificial Disc Influence Cervical Spine Biomechanics? A Finite Element Investigation”, Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Exellence (E-O CORE), Departments of Bioengineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, 5046 NI, MS 303, Colleges of Engineering and Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606, USA, Published online: 2009-11-21. |
Post, Zachary D., Matar, Wadih Y., Van de Leur, Tim, Grossman, Eric L., Austin, Matthew S.,.“Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty”, vol. 25, No. 6, 2010, pp. 998-1003, “Journal of Arthroplasty”, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. |
Fregly, Benjamin, J., Bei, Yanhong, Sylvester, Mark E., “Experimental Evaluation of an Elastic Foundation 3 Model to Predict Contact Pressures in Knee Replacements”, vol. 36, No. 11, Nov. 2003, pp. 1659-1668, “Journal D of Biomechanics”, Gainesville, Florida. |
Strickland, M.A., Taylor, M., “In-Silico Wear Prediction for Knee Replacements—Methodology and Corroboration”, vol. 42, No. 10, Jul. 2009, “Journal of Biomechanics”, Southampton, United Kingdom. |
Halloran, Jason P., Easley, Sarah K., Patrella, Anthony J., Rullkoetier, Paul J., “Comparison of Deformable and Elastic Foundation Finite Element Simulations for Predicting Knee Replacement Mechanics”, vol. 127, No. 5, Oct. 2005, pp. 813-818, “Journal of Biomechanical Engineering”, Denver, Colorado. |
Guerinot, Alexandre, E., Magleby, Spencer, P. Howell, Larry L., “Preliminary Design Concepts for Compliant Mechanism Prosthetic Knee Joints”, vol. 2B, pp. 1103-1111, 2004, “Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference”, Provo, Utah. |
Walker, Peter, S., Sathasivam, Shivani, “The Design of Guide Surfaces for Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing Knee Replacements”, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 27-34, Jan. 1999, “Journal of Biomechanics”, Middlesex, United Kingdom. |
Wenzel, Sa and Shepherd, D.Et, “Contact Stresses in lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty”, vol. 17, No. 3, 2007, pp. 169-173, “Bio-medical Materials and Engineering”, Edgbaston, UK. |
Clewiow, J.P., Pylios, T. and Shepherd, D.Et, “Soft layer Bearing Joins for Spine Arthroplasty”, vol. 29, No. 10, Dec. 2008, pp. 1981-1985, “Materials and Design”, Edgabaston, UK. |
Parea, Philippe E., Chana, Frank W., Bhatiacharyab, Sanghita and Goeib, Vijay K., “Surface Slide Track Mapping of Implants for Total Disc Arthroplasty”, vol. 42, No. 2, Jan. 19, 2009, pp. 131-139, “Journal of Biomechanics”, [online] [retrieved Feb. 19, 2010]. |
Dooris, Andrew P., Goei, Vijay K., Todd, Dwight T., Grosland, Nicole M., Wilder, David G., “Load Sharing in a Lumbar Motion Segment Implanted with an Artificial Disc Under Combined Sagittal Plane Loading”, BED—vol. 42, 1999, pp. 277-278, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Iowa City, Iowa. |
Walter, A., Plitz, W., “Wear Characteristics of Ceramic-to-Ceramic Hip Joint Endoprostheses”, Transactions of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials in Conjunction with the Interna, vol. 8, p. 178, Apr. 19S5, Conference: Transactions of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, in Conjunction with the Seventeenth International Biomaterials Symposium, Published by Society for Biomaterials, San Antonio, Texas. |
Huttinger, K.J., Bruckmann, H., Redig, H., Weber, U., “Development and Clinical Testing of Carbon 1 Implants for Orthopedic Surgery”, Schunk and Ebe G.m.b.H., Giessen (Germany, F.R.), Bundesministerium fuer Forschung and Technologie, Bonn-Bad Godesberg (Germany, F. R.), p. 112, Jan. 1981. |
St. John, K.R., Zardiackas, L.D., Poggie, RA, “Wear Evaluation of Cobalt-Chromium Alloy for Use in a Metal-on-Metal Hip Prosthesis”, vol. 68, pp. 1-14, Jan. 15, 2004, “Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B, Applied Biomaterials”, Wiley Periodicals, United States. |
Scholes, S.C., Burgess, I.C., Marsden, H.R., Unsworth, A., Jones, E., Smith, N., “Compliant Layer Acetabular Cups: Friction Testing of a Range of Materials and Designs for a New Generation of Prosthesis that Mimics the Natural Joint”, vol. 220, pp. 583-96, Jul. 2006, “Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H”, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, United Kingdom. |
Gao, L., Wang, F., Yang, R. Jin, Z., “Effect of 3D Physiological Loading and Motion on Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacements”, vol. 31, pp. 720-729, 2009, “Medical Engineering and Physics”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120083896 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60864667 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13073963 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13311119 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12826620 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13073963 | US | |
Parent | 12714288 | Feb 2010 | US |
Child | 12826620 | US | |
Parent | 11936601 | Nov 2007 | US |
Child | 12714288 | US |