The present application relates to prosthetic feet and other prosthetic devices including a spring, and more particularly to prosthetic feet and other prosthetic devices having one or more flexible members between two or more joints (e.g., pivots) and allowing for variable stiffness during use.
In the field of prosthetics, particularly prosthetic feet, it is desirable to provide a high level of functionality with reliable performance. Further, as each user is different, it is desirable to provide a prosthesis that can be adapted to the particular needs of each individual user.
Particularly in the area of prosthetic feet, it is desirable to provide a prosthesis that provides stability throughout the gait cycle and in other activities such as stance. Further, during movement it is often desirable for a prosthetic foot to absorb and return elastic energy, while having enhanced energy conservation during ambulation. Even further, it is desirable for a prosthetic foot to be adjustable to an individual who may have various weights, heights, stride lengths, etc., as well as for prosthetic foot designs to allow for a variable stiffness, depending on the activity level of the amputee.
In accordance with one embodiment, a prosthetic foot is provided having one or more flexible members between two or more joints (e.g., pivots) to provide improved control and stability during a stance phase of gait cycle (e.g., provide more movement during stance). In one embodiment, the prosthetic foot is purely a mechanical foot. In another embodiment the prosthetic foot can include an actuator. In some embodiments, the actuator can be an active actuator (e.g., an electric motor, such as a motor with a power between approximately 60 W and 100 W) that can be selectively actuated (e.g., via an electric controller) to impart mechanical motion to the prosthetic foot (e.g., to change the orientation of the prosthetic ankle during a swing phase of gait cycle to dorsiflexion and then to plantarflexion). In another embodiment, the actuator can be a passive actuator (e.g., resilient member, spring or stiff beam).
In another embodiment, a prosthetic foot is provided with a variable stiffness control which allows the stiffness of the prosthetic foot to be adjusted for different types of gait. In some embodiments, the variable stiffness control is mechanically actuatable (e.g., actuated manually by a user) to vary the stiffness of one or more flexible elements of the prosthetic foot (e.g., by changing the length of a lever arm of a flexible element, or by varying a gap between adjacent flexible elements). In another embodiment, the variable stiffness control can be automatically or actively adjusted during ambulation by the user (e.g., automatic adjustment of a lever arm of a flexible element, or active varying of a gap between adjacent flexible elements), e.g., based on the activity level of the user or the phase of gait cycle. In some embodiments the variable stiffness control can be automatically adjusted based on a sensed parameter of gait (e.g., sensed with one or more sensors on the prosthetic device).
In still another embodiment, the prosthetic foot or device can include a housing or adapter (e.g., for coupling the prosthetic foot or device to another prosthetic component) with a mechanism that provides for flexible motion in one or more planes (e.g., sagittal, coronal, transverse) so as to allow motion of the housing or adapter in a medial-lateral, anterior-posterior, or torsional direction. In one embodiment, where the prosthetic device is a prosthetic foot, the housing or adapter can be located generally at a location associated with a natural human ankle, and provide for motion similar to that of a natural human ankle. In some embodiments, the mechanism can include one or more slots or openings in one or more surfaces of the housing or adapter (e.g., slots on medial and lateral surfaces of the housing or adapter), that movably receive one or more pins, axles or joint members that connect the housing or adapter with other components (e.g., flexible elements or foot plates) of the prosthetic foot.
In another embodiment, a prosthetic foot is provided that allows a medial-lateral movement and or twist movement in an ankle portion of the prosthetic foot during stance, thereby providing improved stability during stance.
In one embodiment, the prosthetic foot can comprise an adapter member comprising a connector configured to connect the adapter member to a user or another prosthetic device. The prosthetic foot can also comprise a bottom plate extending between a heel end and a toe end and an intermediate plate disposed above the bottom plate and extending between a proximal end and a distal end. The prosthetic foot can also comprise a support member extending between and interconnecting the proximal end of the intermediate member and a proximal portion of the adapter member, the support member pivotally coupled to the proximal end of the intermediate member. The prosthetic foot can also comprise a top plate assembly extending between a proximal end and a distal end, the top plate assembly including a split that extends from the proximal end to the distal end to divide the top plate assembly into a medial blade and a lateral blade. A distal end of the adapter member is disposed between and pivotally coupled to the medial and lateral blades at the proximal end of the top plate assembly to thereby facilitate a medial-lateral and/or a twist movement of the prosthetic foot during stance when the bottom plate is in contact with a support surface.
In one embodiment, a prosthetic foot comprises an attachment member and two or more flexible members. The attachment member can include a connector configured to connect the attachment member to a user or another prosthetic device. The two or more flexible members can be rotatably attached to the attachment member by rotatable joints such that the flexible members can both rotate and flex relative to the attachment member when the prosthetic foot contacts the ground.
In another embodiment, a prosthetic foot can include an attachment member, two or more flexible members, and an adjustable fastening member. The attachment member can include a connector configured to connect the attachment member to a user or another prosthetic device. The two or more flexible members can attach to the attachment member. Further, the two or more flexible members can extend from the attachment member to a foot portion of the prosthetic foot and be substantially movable relative to each other along their lengths. The adjustable fastening member can be configured to fasten the two or more flexible members along the foot portion of the prosthetic foot. Further, fastening can be provided at a plurality of positions along the length of the two or more flexible members to change the flexibility and resistance of the two or more flexible members.
In further embodiments, a prosthetic foot can include an attachment member, two or more flexible members, and a variable stiffness control member. The attachment member can include a connector configured to connect the attachment member to a user or another prosthetic device. The two or more flexible members can attach to the attachment member and can extend from the attachment member to a foot portion of the prosthetic foot. The flexible members can be substantially movable relative to each other along their lengths. However, the variable stiffness control member can be configured to adjust a length of a lever arm of the two or more flexible members along the foot portion of the prosthetic foot. For example, the variable stiffness control member can limit the relative motion between the flexible members.
In further embodiments, a prosthetic foot can include one or more flexible foot plates, an attachment member, and a means for modifying the stiffness of the prosthetic foot. The one or more flexible foot plates can be configured to bend along their lengths. The attachment member can include a connector configured to connect the attachment member to a user or another prosthetic device. The means for modifying the stiffness of the prosthetic foot can change the bending length of one or more of the flexible foot plates either prior to or during use.
In further embodiments, a prosthetic foot can include one or more flexible elements and an attachment member. The one or more flexible elements can be configured to bend along their lengths. The attachment member can include a connector configured to connect the attachment member to a user or another prosthetic device. Further, the attachment adapter can be connected to the one or more flexible elements via at least two pivotable joints. At least one of the flexible elements can extend between the at least two pivotable joints.
In further embodiments, a prosthetic foot can include an attachment member, at least one first brace, at least one first flexible member, an unpowered actuator, at least one second brace, and at least one second flexible member. The attachment member can include a connector configured to connect the attachment member to a user or another prosthetic device. The at least one first brace can mount to the attachment member and the at least one first flexible member can connect to the attachment member by the at least one first brace such that a force between the ground and the attachment member can be supported by the at least one first flexible member. The unpowered actuator can mount to the attachment member and the at least one second brace can be mounted to the actuator. The at least one second flexible member can connect to the attachment member by the at least one second brace such that a force between the ground and the attachment member can be supported by the at least one second flexible member.
In further embodiments, a prosthetic foot system can include a prosthetic foot and a plurality of replacement flexible members. The prosthetic foot can include an attachment member, at least one first brace, and at least one first flexible member. The attachment member can include a connector configured to connect the attachment member to a user or another prosthetic device. The at least one first brace can mount to the attachment member and the at least one first flexible member can releasably connect to the attachment member by the at least one first brace such that a force between the ground and the attachment member can be supported by the at least one first flexible member. The plurality of replacement flexible members can have different flexibility characteristics and be configured to replace the at least one flexible member to provide a different flexibility characteristic to a user.
In further embodiments, a method of adjusting a prosthetic foot can be provided. A prosthetic foot including at least one actuator and at least one first flexible member can be mounted to a user, and be used to support the user during ambulation. The at least one first flexible member can then be replaced with at least one second flexible member having different flexibility characteristics than the at least one first flexible member. The prosthetic foot can then be used to support the user during ambulation with the at least one second flexible member.
In further embodiments, a prosthetic foot includes an attachment member, at least one flexible member, at least one electric actuator, and at least one foot member. The attachment member can include a connector configured to connect the attachment member to a user or another prosthetic device. The at least one flexible member can be connected to the attachment member such that a force between the ground and the attachment member can be supported by the at least one first flexible member. At least one electric actuator can be connected to the attachment member such that a force between the ground and the actuator can be supported by the at least one actuator. The at least one foot member can be connected to the at least one flexible member and the at least one electric actuator, the at least one foot member being configured to contact the ground. Movement of the at least one actuator can cause a joint angle of the prosthetic foot to change. Further, the actuator can be configured to lock during substantially all of a stance phase of a gait cycle.
In a further embodiment, a method of operating a prosthetic foot can be provided. The prosthetic foot can include at least one electric actuator and at least one flexible member. The at least one electric actuator can be locked during a first portion of a stance phase of a gait cycle such that energy is stored in the at least one flexible member. The actuator can be released from locking and powered during a second portion of the stance phase such that the actuator provides power for toe-off and the flexible member releases stored energy for toe-off.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the invention disclosed herein are described below with reference to the drawings of preferred embodiments, which are intended to illustrate and not to limit the invention. Additionally, from figure to figure, the same reference numerals have been used to designate the same components of an illustrated embodiment. The following is a brief description of each of the drawings.
The attachment member 10 can additionally include second and third connection portions 14, 16 (see
Further, in some embodiments the attachment member 10 can include other features of a prosthetic foot such as sensors configured to measure, for example, the position and movement of the prosthetic foot, the position and movement of various joints and components on the prosthetic foot (such as the rotational position and movement at the connection portions 14, 16 and an actuator 20, as further discussed below), pressures and forces on various components of the prosthetic foot 1 (such as on the attachment member 10, the actuator 20, or the flexible members 30, 40, 50, further discussed below), and other measurable characteristics of the prosthetic foot. The sensors can additionally be configured to measure the prosthetic foot's environment, such as a terrain on which the prosthetic foot 1 moves. It will be understood that these sensors can be positioned on other elements of the prosthetic foot 1, such as the actuator 20, the flexible members 30, 40, 50, and other elements, further described below. In some embodiments, one or more of the flexible members 30, 40, 50 can be foot plates (e.g., generally planar or flat, or have a generally rectangular transverse cross-section).
In some embodiments, sensors positioned in the connection portions 14, 16, 22 can provide load measurement during stance phase (for example when a user is resting on the foot 1) when flexible members 30, 40 bend due to loading on the foot. For example, the sensors can measure a bending of the flexible members 30, 40 at the connection portions 16, 22, the bending then being used to estimate a load on the flexible members. In stance phase, these measurements can therefore be used to determine if the user is loading the heel or toe by comparing it to the sensed angle (and optionally an estimated load) just before heelstrike.
In some embodiments, the sensors can include rotational sensors such as rotational hall effect sensors (for example, sensor type AS5048 manufactured by Austria Micro Systems). Such sensors can measure a rotation at the connection portions 14, 16, 22 that can be indicative of loads placed on the flexible members 30, 40, 50. Other sensors can also be used such as gap measurement sensors. The gap measurement sensors can generally include two components spaced from each other to create a gap. As the distance between the two sensors is increased or decreased, a signal can be produced indicative of this distance. For example, the gap measurement sensor can be a linear hall effect sensor (for example, sensor type SS49E-L manufactured by Honeywell International Inc.). The gap measurement sensors can be placed in or on the flexible members 30, 40, 50 to directly measure a bending of the flexible members along their length.
In some embodiments, the rotational sensors can be provided at rotational joints of a prosthetic foot 1. For example, a gap measurement sensor can be provided at any one or more of the connection portions 14, 16, and 22. The gap measurement sensor can then measure a rotational position between the elements at the connection portions 14, 16, 22, such as the attachment member 10 and the first flexible member 30, the attachment member 10 and the actuator 20, and the actuator 20 and the second flexible member 40, as depicted in the prosthetic foot 1 in
In other embodiments, the gap measurement sensors can be provided along one or more of the flexible members 30, 40, 50. Some embodiment sensors are depicted in
The prosthetic foot 1 can include other sensors such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, load sensor, or other sensors. These sensors can detect various aspects including the angular position of the prosthetic foot's joints and the angular position of the prosthetic foot relative to the earth, axial or torsional loads on the prosthetic foot, or other variables. For example, as shown in
The attachment member 10 can also include electronics (e.g., computer processor). For example, the attachment member 10 can include electronics configured to receive information from the sensors, discussed above. Further, in some embodiments, the attachment member 10 can include electronics configured to communicate information (e.g., information from the sensors) to other electronic devices, such as to other prosthetic devices or to an external computer (e.g., via wired or wireless communication, such as RF communication). Such electronics may also be configured to receive information from other prosthetic devices or an external computer, such information potentially including information from other sensors and/or operational commands for the prosthetic foot 1.
The information from the sensors can optionally be processed by the electronics (e.g., using one or more algorithms stored in a memory) to determine certain gait patterns, terrains, and appropriate alignment settings for the prosthetic feet described herein. For example, the foot can have a particular translational motion, rotational bending, load patterns, and other characteristics during particular types of ambulation.
Another line indicates a gyroscopic angular measurement, measured on an axis perpendicular to the sagittal plane, indicating a rotational position of the housing or cover 18 of the prosthetic foot. Thus, the gyroscopic angular measurement can indicate a rotational position of the first connection portion 12 (such as a pyramid connector), and a lower leg member or amputated stump to which the prosthetic foot connects, relative to the environment (as opposed to a bending of the joint, as measured by the load sensors discussed above).
Another line indicates the determined transitions between different portions of a gait cycle, such as pre-mid-stance, post-mid-stance, pre-mid-swing, and post-mid-swing (depicted as a step-function on the graph). These portions of the gait cycle can be determined based on the data measured. However, other data could also be used, such as data from accelerometers (which can measure rotational angle relative to gravity, and thus the environment), rotational encoders, or other sensors described herein.
Finally, the graphs also show acceleration data on the prosthetic foot in both a forward direction (perpendicular to the coronal plane) and in an upward, vertical direction (perpendicular to the transverse plane). It can be seen that acceleration is substantially zero during the stance phase. Further, it should be noted that the vertical direction is offset to below-zero due to the acceleration of gravity.
As shown in
As shown in
Detection of these characteristics can indicate to modules within the electronics on the prosthetic foot what type of gait (and thus, for example, what type of terrain) with which a user is walking. For example, a strong heel-load (plantarflexion) at pre-mid-stance, a strong toe-load (dorsiflexion) at post-mid-stance, and a relatively steady transition from heel-load to toe-load (or joint angle) can indicate level-ground walking. A two-peak pattern and/or a consistently dominant toe-load (dorsiflexion) can indicate stair ascent. A one-peak toe-load pattern with a very slight heel-load (plantarflexion) at pre-mid-stance can indicate stair descent. A one-peak toe-load (dorsiflexion) pattern with a very slight heel load (plantarflexion) at pre-mid-stance and a slowing in the weight-shift (angle change) toward toe-load during mid-stance can indicate ramp ascent. Finally, a strong heel-load (plantarflexion) at pre-mid-stance, a strong toe-load (dorsiflexion) at post-mid-stance, and a quickening transition during mid-stance can indicate ramp-descent. Further, acceleration data can be used to determine if vertical velocity is generally upward, downward, or level. These are just a few examples. Additional gait patterns can also be detected, and additional sensors can also be used. The actuator can then be operated according to the detected gait pattern.
Even further, as shown in
For example, velocity components in the forward direction and the upward direction can be compared to determine a general direction of motion (for example, using a two-input arctangent function). When walking on level ground, the foot typically is moving downward at mid swing. However, if the foot is moving in an upward direction at mid-swing, the foot is likely moving upwards (on stairs, or a slope). Thus, a transition from level ground to stair or ramp-ascent can be indicated when the foot moves in an upward direction at mid-swing, and the foot's behavior can be adjusted accordingly (e.g., by adjusting the ankle angle to a desired stair ascent position). Such a change in acceleration can be seen in
Sensors can also indicate when the prosthetic foot is going to exit a relaxed state such as a sitting or “chair” position. A gyroscope measuring rotations within the sagittal plane can indicate when the prosthetic foot is being moved backwards by a user in preparation to exit a seated position, by measuring a change in angle of the prosthetic foot relative to the environment. In other embodiments, this backward motion can be measured by an accelerometer or other sensor. The device can then exit a relaxed mode and facilitate or power movement into a dorsiflexed position in preparation to exit the seated position. This movement can potentially happen during a swinging of the prosthetic foot backwards, such that the adjustment toward dorsiflexion can occur prior to the foot touching the ground. Even further, in some embodiments the prosthetic foot can prepare for active use to assist the user out of a seated position.
Sensors can also indicate when the user is changing direction, as shown in
The sensors can also be used to facilitate alignment of the prosthetic foot for a particular user and associated cosmesis, shoe, or other auxiliary device associated with the foot. For example, a range of motion of the prosthetic foot (such as a maximum dorsiflexion position and a maximum plantarflexion position) can be compared to idealized ranges of motion. Further, a heel and toe-load ratio during level ground walking can be measured and compared with idealized ratios (e.g., for every foot category and size). If the alignment is off, the heel height can be raised or lowered (either by a powered actuator, or by a static device such as a screw or other un-powered device as discussed further herein) to adjust the alignment (e.g., to change the range of motion or the neutral angle).
Additionally, the activity measured by these sensors, and other sensors described herein can be recorded for review at a later time. Additionally, the data can be time-stamped. The data can be retrieved at a later time by wired or wireless connections, and transferred to an auxiliary device. Alternatively, the data can be transferred in real-time, such as with a wireless connection to a user's mobile device.
The attachment member 10 can additionally include or define a cover 18. The cover 18 can protect various components of the prosthetic foot 1 such as electronics (as described above), the actuator 20 (describe below), or other components. In some embodiments the cover 18 can include open portions in the coronal plane, allowing flexibility of motion in the medial-lateral directions. In further embodiments the cover 18 can include open portions in the sagittal plane, allowing flexibility of motion in the anterior-posterior directions. In some embodiments, the open portions can be vertical or horizontal slots formed in the cover 18, to allow movement of pivot axles associated with any one of the connection portions 12, 14, 16.
As shown in
Additionally, it will be understood that the flexible members 30, 40, 50 can include various films or coatings at least on their outer surfaces. The films can provide a variety of functions, such as reducing wear on the flexible members as they move against each other or other objects, reducing frictional forces, increasing traction with the ground or an intermediate structure between the flexible member and the ground, reducing noise from rubbing of the flexible members, and other functions. For example, in some embodiments a bottom surface of a flexible member intended to contact the ground or an intermediate structure between the member and the ground might have a toughening film and/or coating. Similarly, the bottom surface can include a film and/or coating that improves traction with the ground or an intermediate structure such as a shoe, sock, or cosmesis. Examples of films that can be used include, but are not limited to, films containing dry lubricants such as graphite and molybdenum disulfide (particularly, Dupont's DryFilm and Dow Corning's Molykote), soft metals, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), vinyl, polyester, nylon, and epoxies.
Further, the first flexible member 30 can be formed into a shape configured to provide a desired flexibility or rigidity. As shown in
In the embodiment of
As further shown in
The actuator 20 can be in a variety of forms and can be operated in a variety of ways, as described by way of example in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/367,049, issued Mar. 1, 2011 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,896,927, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/816,968, published as U.S. 2010/0324698 on Dec. 23, 2010, each of which being incorporated by reference in their entirety herein and should be considered a part of this specification. For example, the actuator 20 can be a powered actuator such as a screw motor, or a passive member such as a flexible member (e.g., a spring) or a chamber with a magnetorheologic fluid, or can be a hydraulic or pneumatic system. In some embodiments, the actuator 20 can have an electric motor. The electric motor can have a power between approximately 60 W and 100 W). Further, the actuator 20 can be configured to operate in a variety of ways, as also discussed in Appendices A and B. For example, the actuator 20 can be configured to extend or contract to assist a user during a gait cycle. For example, the actuator 20 can change the orientation of the prosthetic foot 1 to dorsiflexion and then to plantarflexion during a swing phase of gait cycle so that the toe portion of the prosthetic foot 1 is raised during the initial portion of swing phase. In another embodiment, the actuator 20 can change the orientation of the prosthetic foot 1 to plantarflexion when the user is in a relaxed (e.g., sitting) position. Further, such motion of the actuator 20 can change the flexibility or resistance of the flexible members 30, 40, 50, as further described below. In some embodiments, the actuator 20 can also enter a low power mode (e.g., hibernation mode), such as a relaxed mode or an inactive mode. For example, the actuator 20 may enter a low power mode during stance, as the embodiments described herein can provide greater stability during stance, as further described below. Advantageously, the low power mode allows for the conservation of battery power used to power the actuator 20, allowing the actuator 20 to be operated for longer periods of time between battery charging.
Power can also be conserved, for example, by storing energy generated during ambulation. In some embodiments, the user's body weight can be used to load a spring during stance. The spring can then be held in the loaded position by a lock, ratchet, brake, or similar mechanism. The energy in the spring can then be used during toe-off by the prosthetic foot (e.g., to power a plantarflexion motion during toe-off). In other embodiments, a spring can be loaded by an actuator during a swing phase of the ambulation, held in
The actuator 20 is depicted as connecting to a second flexible member 40 at a fourth connection portion 22. Like the second and third connection portions 14, 16, the fourth connection portion 22 can be rotatable or non-rotatable. In one embodiment, the second flexible member 40 can include or define a bushing or opening through which an axle extends to provide a rotatable connection or pivot axis between the second flexible member 40 and the actuator 20. The second flexible member 40 can extend into a foot portion in a manner similar to the foot portion 34 of the first flexible member 30. In one embodiment, the second flexible member 40 can extend to a distal end of the prosthetic foot 1, so that the first and second flexible members 30, 40 extend to generally the same location at the distal end of the prosthetic foot 1. Further, the second flexible member 40 can include a slit similar to the slit 36 of the first flexible member 30. Even further, the second flexible member 40 can be composed of materials similar to those for the first flexible member, such as carbon fiber. As shown, the second flexible member 40 is disposed below the first flexible member 30, and extends tangentially forward and toward the first flexible member to abut the first flexible member 30 along the foot portion 34 of the first flexible member 30. Although the first and second flexible members 30, 40 are depicted as ending at approximately the same point at a toe portion of the prosthetic foot, in some embodiments the first flexible member 30 may extend further, or the second flexible member 40 may extend further. For example, as depicted in
The prosthetic foot 1 can further include a third flexible member 50. As shown, the third flexible member 50 can extend from a heel portion 56 (e.g., a cantilevered or free end) at a bottom and rear portion of the prosthetic foot 1. This heel portion 56, as shown, can be spaced from the actuator 20 and the second flexible member 40, curving downward toward and away from the actuator 20. From the heel portion 56, the third flexible member 50 can extend to a toe portion of the prosthetic foot 1, and can generally abut the foot portion second flexible member 40, as that member abuts the first flexible member 30. Further, the third flexible member 50 can have a slit along this foot portion that generally matches the slits in the first and second flexible members 30, 40. Additionally, as shown, the third flexible member 50 can include a heel slit 54 in the heel portion 56 of the flexible member.
As shown in the figures, the slit 36 in the first flexible member 30 can align with the slit in the second flexible member 40 and a slit 52 in the third flexible member 50 in the foot portion 34. In one embodiment, the prosthetic foot 1 can have a stiffness control member 60 that can be actuated to vary the stiffness of the prosthetic foot. In some embodiments, the stiffness control member 60 can be a fastening member 60 (e.g., bolt and nut, clamp, staple, rivet, etc.) that couples two or more of the flexible members 30, 40, 50 to each other, where the fastening member 60 can travel along the slit 36 or a slot defined at least partially by the slit, best shown in
In some embodiments, the stiffness control member 60 can be mechanically actuated, either manually by the user or automatically (e.g., actively adjusted) during ambulation by the user (e.g., based on the activity level of the user or the phase of gait cycle).
Notably, as discussed above, in some embodiments, the flexibility and resistance of the flexible members 30, 40, 50 can also be altered by the actuator 20 (independently of, or in combination with, the stiffness control member 60). Thus, it will be understood that the flexibility and resistance of the flexible members 30, 40, 50 can be altered manually and/or by an actuator. In further examples, the stiffness control member 60 can be moved (e.g., automatically moved) by an actuator to adjust the resistance and flexibility of the flexible members 30, 40, 50.
In some embodiments, it may be preferable to adjust the flexibility and resistance of the flexible members 30, 40, 50 to reduce resistance and increase flexibility while moving on level ground. Thus, for example, the stiffness control member 60 can be moved forward while ambulating on level ground to provide faster plantarflexion after heel strike. During other gait patterns, such as walking downstairs, one can reduce flexibility and increase resistance by moving the stiffness control member 60 backward. In some embodiments, these gait patterns can be detected by sensors and processors provided on or in communication with the prosthetic foot 1. An actuator can then be controlled to adjust the flexibility and resistance of the flexible members 30, 40, 50 according to the detected gait pattern.
Variations to the embodiment in
In further embodiments this resistance can be varied by other methods. For example, in some embodiments the stiffness control member can be a wedge or insert that can be inserted where two or more of the flexible members 30, 40, 50 meet. For example, a wedge can be inserted between the first and second flexible members 30, 40 (e.g., above the second and below the first). Similarly, a wedge can be inserted between the second and third flexible members 40, 50, such as at a wedging location 64, depicted in
The depicted embodiment also combines three separate flexible elements 30, 40, 50 that each provide a separate function. For example, the first flexible element 30 acts as a spring in parallel with the actuator 20. Further, the second flexible element 40 acts as a spring in series with the actuator 20. Both flexible elements 30, 40 can thus be configured to work with or against the actuator 20 at different phases of the gait cycle. Further, the flexible elements 30, 40 can be loaded or unloaded by the actuator 20. Providing one spring in parallel and the other in series allows each spring to have a different effect on the dynamics of the prosthetic foot 1 during movement. For example, during heel strike, the actuator 20 and second flexible member 40 can act in series to provide the prosthetic foot 1 with a certain level of flexibility in addition to the energy stored by the third flexible member (e.g., be relatively less stiff at heel-strike), while during toe-off, the actuator 20 and first flexible element 30 can act in parallel to provide the prosthetic foot with a different level of flexibility (e.g., be relatively more stiff at toe-off). Thus, the independent flexibility and resistance of the flexible elements 30, 40 can be chosen separately to optimize the behavior of the prosthetic foot 1.
Notably, in the depicted embodiment the first and second flexible members 30, 40 both extend toward the toe along the foot portion 34. However, they do not extend toward the heel of the prosthetic foot 1. The third flexible member 50 includes a heel portion 56. The heel portion 56 thus provides flexibility and resistance to the prosthetic foot 1 during heel strike. This response during heel strike can be determined independently of a flexibility and resistance during toe-strike or toe-off during a gait cycle, as the third flexible element 50 is a separate piece from the first and second flexible elements 30, 40. Thus, for example, a system of separate flexible members 30, 40, 50 can include versions of each flexible member with varying flexibilities and resistances. One can then choose each flexible member 30, 40, 50 to provide a desired flexibility and resistance at different times during a gait cycle, depending on the needs of a particular user.
In further embodiments, the actuator 20 can be removed or replaced with a rigid member. For example, in some embodiments the second flexible member 40 can connect directly to the second connection portion 14. In such embodiments, the first and second flexible members 30, 40 can both be rotatably connected to the attachment member 10. Further, in embodiments where the second flexible member 40 does not connect directly to the second connection portion 14, it can still rotatably connect to an intermediary member (such as a rigid member replacing the actuator 20) at a fourth connection portion 22 (as described above). In such embodiments, the three rotatable connections 14, 16, 22 can form a triangle with at least one flexible portion, the flexible portion being both the first and second flexible members 30, 40, between the fourth connection portion 22 and the third connection portion 16.
The rotatable connections 14, 16, 22 with the flexible members 30, 40 can provide a flexible resistance to rotation of the attachment member 10. Advantageously, the use of both first and second flexible members 30, 40 can provide for a natural rocking motion during stance that can provide improved stability with the prosthetic foot 1. This stability can also be provided in embodiments that include an actuator 20, e.g., when the actuator 20 is locked in a particular position or is substantially inactive.
Notably, the features in the embodiment in
Further, in some embodiments the C-shaped portion 32A can be substantially similar to that shown in
Additionally, the depicted prosthetic foot 1A depicts an alternative method for attaching the second and third flexible members 40A, 50A. As shown, these members can be attached by two bolts 62A, on opposite sides of the slit 36A. However, it will be understood that other attachment methods can be used, such as those described above. Further, an adjustable fastening member can be provided in the slit 36A, as discussed above, to vary the flexibility and resistance of the prosthetic foot 1A.
Connection of the third flexible member 50B is depicted as being substantially similar to the third flexible member 50A depicted in
Notably, as shown in this embodiment, the first and third flexible members 30B, 50B can end substantially at the location of the bolts 62B. This can aid flexing of the second flexible member 40B in a toe region of the prosthetic foot 1B. Thus, the toe region can be made more flexible than the middle and heel regions of the prosthetic foot 1B.
In further embodiments, the bolts 62B can be angled into the coronal plane (i.e., the bolts 62B can be aligned on a plane that extends at an angle to a longitudinal axis of the prosthetic foot 1B). This angling can follow the angle of a natural metatarsal joint, facilitating the guiding of roll-over of the prosthetic foot 1B (e.g., toward the medial side) during use. This arrangement of the bolts (e.g., aligned along a plane at an angle to the longitudinal axis of the prosthetic foot and generally corresponding to the angle of a natural metatarsal joint) can be provided in other prosthetic foot embodiments disclosed herein.
Notably, the features in the embodiment in
Further, as best shown in
Additionally, the second flexible member 40D can include a flexible member brace depicted as a wedge piece 70D. The wedge piece 70D can be disposed at a rear portion of the second flexible member 40D and form a part of the fourth connection portion 22D to the actuator 20D. In some embodiments, the wedge piece 70D can be of a material different from the remainder of the second flexible member 40D. For example, the wedge piece can be a more rigid and resilient material such as aluminum, titanium, steel, or other metals, while the flexible member can be a more flexible material such as carbon fiber, glass fiber, nylon, or the like. Thus, the wedge piece 70D can provide a strong connection with the actuator 20D while the rest of the flexible member 40D is flexible (e.g., can flex, bend). As shown, the wedge piece 70D includes a hole that can receive an axle connecting it to the actuator 20D to allow a rotatable connection. Additionally, as shown the wedge piece 70D can be substantially surrounded (e.g., completely circumscribed) by the other materials of the flexible member 40D, such that it is mounted within the flexible member. In some embodiments, the flexible member 40D can be molded, layered, or otherwise constructed around the wedge piece 70D. In another embodiment, the wedge piece 70D can be inserted into an opening formed in the flexible member 40D.
These additional or distinguishing features can optionally be included in the other embodiments described herein, and need not be used in combination with the additional features described.
The flexible member brace 70E can have a C-shape with an opening that receives the flexible member 40E, as best shown in
Notably, the first flexible member 30E can attach at the third connection portion 16E to the cover 18E with a similar flexible member brace 70E. The flexible member braces 70E can be substantially similar in their attachment to the flexible members 30E, 40E.
These additional or distinguishing features can optionally be included in the other embodiments described herein, and need not be used in combination with the additional features described.
Advantageously, the prosthetic foot 1H can provide significant load bearing in the toe region when the foot is set to high heel heights. For example, the prosthetic foot 1H can provide significant load bearing in the toe region when used with a high-heel shoe. The second flexible member 40H can bend at the flexible region 92H such that the toe region is substantially flat when in a high-heel shoe. The fourth flexible member 90H can then transmit loads between the toe region and the rest of the prosthetic foot 1H, such as a first connection portion. Absent the fourth flexible member 90H, forces from the toe portion would be transmitted through the other flexible members 30H, 40H, 50H, which might be at extreme bending which could cause the material of the flexible members to fail.
The prosthetic foot 1J can have a top plate assembly 30J, an intermediate plate 40J and a bottom plate 50J. The bottom plate 50J can extend from a heel end 50J1 to a toe end 50J2, which substantially correspond to heel and toe ends of the prosthetic foot 1J. In the illustrated embodiment, the bottom plate 50J can have a split 50J3 at least in the heel end 50J1. Though not shown, in some embodiments, the bottom plate 50J can have a split at least in a portion of the toe end 50J2.
With continued reference to
In one embodiment, the support member 20J can be pin connector of a set length that interconnects the intermediate plate 40J and the adapter 10J, where a proximal portion 20J2 of the support member 20J connects to the adapter 10J via a pivot connection 14J. In another embodiment, the support member 20J can be a mechanical actuator (e.g., a set screw) that can be mechanically actuated (e.g., with a key, via a lever, via a ratchet, etc.) to change the length of the support member 20J. In still another embodiment, the support member 20J can be a powered actuator and can have an electric motor that can be automatically actuated (or remotely actuated) to change the length of the support member 20J.
With continued reference to
In the illustrated embodiment, the top plate assembly 30J has a split 36J that extends from the proximal end 32J to the distal end 34J (e.g., extends from the connection with the distal portion of the adapter 10J, through the C-shaped curved section and the generally planar section) of the top plate assembly 30J. As noted the top plate assembly 30J includes first and second plates 30J1, 30J2, and the split 36J extends through both plates 30J1, 30J2 from the proximal end 32J to the distal end 34J so that the first plate 30J1 is divided into medial and lateral members 30J1a, 30J1b and so that the second plate 30J2 is divided into medial and lateral members 30J2a, 30J2b. The top plate assembly 30J can couple to the intermediate plate 40J and/or bottom plate 50J via one or more fasteners 62 (e.g., bolts).
As best shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the top plate assembly 30J has two plates (the first and second plates 30J1, 30J2) that extend from the proximal end 32J to the distal end 34J. The first and second plates 30J1, 30J2 can be spaced from each other at least a long a portion of the length of the top plate assembly 30J to define a gap G between them, as shown in
Though the top plate assembly 30J in the illustrated embodiment has first and second plates 30J1, 30J2, in other embodiments the top plate assembly 30J can have only the first plate 30J1. In such an embodiment, the proximal end 32J of the first plate 30J1 can define the opening that receives the axle pin, or a connector (e.g., brace) can be connected to the proximal end 32J of the medial and lateral members of the first plate 30J1 to allow the coupling of the proximal end 32J to the distal end 10J1 of the adapter 10J.
As further depicted in
The elastic connections 20L, 21L can provide a degree of rotational freedom, such that the connection portions 14, 22 in the prosthetic foot 1 depicted in
In the illustrated embodiment, the third flexible member 50K can extend along an entire length of the prosthetic foot 1K (e.g., extend from heel-to-toe). The third flexible member 50K can additionally include a slit 36K similar to the slit 36 depicted in
Further variations to the design of the prosthetic feet are also possible. For example, the flexible members described above can be custom made for individual users. The thickness of each flexible member can then vary across the length of each flexible member to provide a desired amount of flexibility and resistance against bending at each portion of the members. The thickness of the flexible members can be determined by any combination of factors such as a user's weight, leg length, walking style, desired activities, residual limb strength, point of amputation, and the like.
Similarly, in some embodiments the flexibility of the flexible members can be varied by altering features in the flexible members such as the slits (described above). For example, in the depicted embodiments the slits extend over only a portion of any flexible element. However, in some embodiments the slit can extend across an entire flexible element, splitting it into two lateral pieces. The two lateral pieces can then be held together, for example, through their attachment to the other flexible elements. Additionally or alternatively, the slits in some embodiments can be asymmetric near a toe region of the flexible members. For example, the slit could curve inward (e.g., toward the medial side) near the toe region to promote a more natural roll-over during ambulation. The extent and direction of the slit can alter the flexibility in medial-lateral directions, thus potentially improving the medial-lateral stability of the prosthesis. Even further, in some embodiments there may be a distinct big-toe cutout in the flexible members to provide this and also allow fitting with a sandal.
As another variation, in some embodiments both of the first and second flexible members can be substantially straight (e.g., planar, flat) along their lengths. For example, the prosthetic foot 1E in
Advantageously, the prosthetic foot embodiments disclosed can provide for a natural rocking motion during a stance phase of gait that can provide improved stability to the prosthetic foot (e.g., the attachment member can move relative to one or more of the flexible members during stance). This improved stability can also be provided in embodiments that include an actuator, e.g., when the actuator is locked in a particular position or is substantially inactive. For example, in some embodiments the actuator (e.g., electric actuator including an electric motor) can lock during at least a portion of the stance phase, or alternatively during all or substantially all of the stance phase. Locking the actuator during the stance phase can allow the flexible members to flex and thus provide damping and energy absorption for storage during the stance phase. Thus, as discussed further herein, the spring can be loaded during stance by the force placed on the flexible members by the user, storing energy. The stored energy can then be released at toe-off. Further, in some embodiments the actuator can be unlocked and actuated (e.g., via the electric motor of the actuator) to plantarflex the foot plate during toe-off to push the foot forward at this point in the gait cycle. Notably, if the actuator is not locked during the stance phase, force between the prosthetic foot and the ground may be transmitted into a motion of the actuator, instead of a desirable bending of the flexible members. However, if reducing bending in the flexible members is desirable, the actuator can be allowed to provide some marginal movement. Similarly, bending in the flexible members can be increased by activating the actuator to bend the members (e.g., at toe off, during stance phase).
The prosthetic foot can detect a time to unlock the actuator and optionally actuate the actuator (e.g., via an electric motor) to provide powered plantarflexion (such as at toe-off) with various sensors. For example, a load sensor can detect a change in forces on the prosthetic foot consistent with the on-set of toe-off. Additionally or alternatively, a gyroscope can indicate an angle of the prosthetic foot relative to the ground or a path of motion of the angle of the foot relative to the ground, again being consistent with the on-set of toe-off. In further embodiments, the prosthetic foot can be adjustable, such that the timing of the unlocking of the actuator and optional powered plantarflexion can be adjusted. Further, the actuator (e.g., electric actuator with an electric motor) can stop providing powered plantarflexion before the end of toe-off, such that only the spring or flexible members provide push-off at the end of the toe-off to push the foot forward and into swing.
Similarly, the strength of the plantarflexion could also be adjustable. These adjustments can be made in a variety of ways, such as with various controls on the device, or a computer, mobile device, or other device wired or wirelessly communicating (e.g., via Rf or IR communication) with the prosthetic foot and having associated software such as an app. Further, the strength of the plantarflexion can be adjusted (e.g., automatically adjusted via an electronic controller) according to a speed of ambulation by the user.
Further, in some embodiments, locking of the actuator can depend on the terrain a user is walking-on. For example, if the prosthetic foot detects movement on a decline, the actuator can be configured to not lock, such that the actuator can provide power during stance phase to ease the descent. In another example, the actuator can be configured not to lock while moving on stairs such that a sufficient range of motion is available.
Additionally, in some embodiments, the prosthetic foot can include a stiffness control member that can be mechanically actuated (e.g., manually or automatically) to vary a stiffness of one or more flexible members of the prosthetic foot to provided different levels of stiffness (e.g., during different types of gait).
Testing has shown that the designs described herein can reduce the impact transmitted through a first connection portion 12 to approximately one-third that created in conventional prosthetic feet. This reduced impact can relieve stress on an amputee's stump or additional prosthetic devices connected to the prosthetic foot, such as a prosthetic knee.
In some embodiments, various feet and/or ankle modules shown and described herein can be configured to be compatible with vacuum suspension systems. Such a system generates negative pressure within a prosthetic socket to improve the fit and stability of the socket relative to the residual limb. The distal end of the residual limb typically has more soft tissue compared to the area closer to the knee. The distal end is therefore more susceptible to volume fluctuations throughout the day, which can impede stabilization and suspension of the socket. A vacuum suspension system that can be used with the feet described herein can therefore apply a vacuum to the distal end of the residual limb to improve stability and suspension. The system can include a frame coupled to the foot and a membrane disposed on or between parts of the frame. When the user places weight on the heel of the foot, the membrane expands, which causes air to be drawn out of the socket to create and maintain the vacuum. Additional details regarding such systems are shown and described in U.S. Publications 2013/0289742, 2013/0289741, and 2013/0221544 and U.S. Design Patent Nos. D711,510 and D718,861, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety and should be considered a part of this specification.
Conditional language used herein, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” “may,” “e.g.,” and from the like, unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or states. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or states are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without author input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or states are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features as applied to various embodiments, it may be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the ground contact sensing system, including the sensor components, logical blocks, modules, and processes illustrated may be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. As may be recognized, certain embodiments of the systems described herein may be embodied within a form that does not provide all of the features and benefits set forth herein, as some features may be used or practiced separately from others. Additionally, features described in connection with one embodiment can be incorporated into another of the disclosed embodiments, even if not expressly discussed herein, and the prosthetic device having the combination of features still fall within the scope of the invention. For example, features described above in connection with one embodiment can be used with a different embodiment described herein and the combination still fall within the scope of the disclosure. It should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with, or substituted for, one another in order to form varying modes of the embodiments of the disclosure. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the disclosure herein should not be limited by the particular embodiments described above. Accordingly, unless otherwise stated, or unless clearly incompatible, each embodiment of this invention may comprise, additional to its essential features described herein, one or more features as described herein from each other embodiment of the invention disclosed herein.
Features, materials, characteristics, or groups described in conjunction with a particular aspect, embodiment, or example are to be understood to be applicable to any other aspect, embodiment or example described in this section or elsewhere in this specification unless incompatible therewith. All of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), and/or all of the steps of any method or process so disclosed, may be combined in any combination, except combinations where at least some of such features and/or steps are mutually exclusive. The protection is not restricted to the details of any foregoing embodiments. The protection extends to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the features disclosed in this specification (including any accompanying claims, abstract and drawings), or to any novel one, or any novel combination, of the steps of any method or process so disclosed.
Furthermore, certain features that are described in this disclosure in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the combination may be claimed as a subcombination or variation of a sub combination.
Moreover, while operations may be depicted in the drawings or described in the specification in a particular order, such operations need not be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Other operations that are not depicted or described can be incorporated in the example methods and processes. For example, one or more additional operations can be performed before, after, simultaneously, or between any of the described operations. Further, the operations may be rearranged or reordered in other implementations. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that in some embodiments, the actual steps taken in the processes illustrated and/or disclosed may differ from those shown in the figures. Depending on the embodiment, certain of the steps described above may be removed, others may be added. Furthermore, the features and attributes of the specific embodiments disclosed above may be combined in different ways to form additional embodiments, all of which fall within the scope of the present disclosure. Also, the separation of various system components in the implementations described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single product or packaged into multiple products.
For purposes of this disclosure, certain aspects, advantages, and novel features are described herein. Not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosure may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves one advantage or a group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
Conditional language, such as “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements, and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements, and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements, and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Conjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, and Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is otherwise understood with the context as used in general to convey that an item, term, etc. may be either X, Y, or Z. Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain embodiments require the presence of at least one of X, at least one of Y, and at least one of Z.
Language of degree used herein, such as the terms “approximately,” “about,” “generally,” and “substantially” as used herein represent a value, amount, or characteristic close to the stated value, amount, or characteristic that still performs a desired function or achieves a desired result. For example, the terms “approximately”, “about”, “generally,” and “substantially” may refer to an amount that is within less than 10% of, within less than 5% of, within less than 1% of, within less than 0.1% of, and within less than 0.01% of the stated amount. As another example, in certain embodiments, the terms “generally parallel” and “substantially parallel” refer to a value, amount, or characteristic that departs from exactly parallel by less than or equal to 15 degrees, 10 degrees, 5 degrees, 3 degrees, 1 degree, 0.1 degree, or otherwise.
The scope of the present disclosure is not intended to be limited by the specific disclosures of preferred embodiments in this section or elsewhere in this specification, and may be defined by claims as presented in this section or elsewhere in this specification or as presented in the future. The language of the claims is to be interpreted roadly based on the language employed in the claims and not limited to the examples described in the present specification or during the prosecution of the application, which examples are to be construed as non-exclusive.
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/704,117, filed on May 5, 2015, and entitled, “PROSTHETIC FOOT WITH REMOVABLE FLEXIBLE MEMBERS,” now U.S. Pat. No. 10,390,974, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/683,563, filed on Apr. 10, 2015, and entitled, “PROSTHETIC FOOT WITH REMOVABLE FLEXIBLE MEMBERS,” now abandoned, which claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/978,721 filed Apr. 11, 2014 and entitled PROSTHETIC FOOT WITH REMOVABLE FLEXIBLE MEMBERS; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/042,687, filed Aug. 27, 2014 and entitled PROSTHETIC FOOT WITH REMOVABLE FLEXIBLE MEMBERS; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/106,085, filed Jan. 21, 2015 and entitled PROSTHETIC FOOT, the entirety of each hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
909859 | Apgar | Jan 1909 | A |
2475373 | Catranis | Jul 1949 | A |
2568051 | Catranis | Sep 1951 | A |
3557387 | Ohlenbusch et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3589134 | Hackmann | Jun 1971 | A |
3871032 | Karas | Mar 1975 | A |
3953900 | Thompson | May 1976 | A |
3995324 | Burch | Dec 1976 | A |
4030141 | Graupe | Jun 1977 | A |
4179759 | Smith | Dec 1979 | A |
4209860 | Graupe | Jul 1980 | A |
4387472 | Wilson | Jun 1983 | A |
4488320 | Wilson | Dec 1984 | A |
4518307 | Bloch | May 1985 | A |
4521924 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4558704 | Petrofsky | Dec 1985 | A |
4579558 | Ramer | Apr 1986 | A |
4600357 | Coules | Jul 1986 | A |
4617920 | Carsalade | Oct 1986 | A |
4652266 | Truesdell | Mar 1987 | A |
4657470 | Clarke et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4776852 | Ruble | Oct 1988 | A |
4805455 | DelGiorno et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4843921 | Kremer | Jul 1989 | A |
4865024 | Hensley et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872803 | Asakawa | Oct 1989 | A |
4989161 | Oaki | Jan 1991 | A |
4994086 | Edwards | Feb 1991 | A |
5012591 | Asakawa | May 1991 | A |
5020790 | Beard et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5062673 | Mimura | Nov 1991 | A |
5062856 | Sawamura et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5062857 | Berringer | Nov 1991 | A |
5101472 | Repperger | Mar 1992 | A |
5116384 | Wilson | May 1992 | A |
5156630 | Rappoport et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5174168 | Takagi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5201772 | Maxwell | Apr 1993 | A |
5246465 | Rincoe et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5252102 | Singer et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5252901 | Ozawa et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5282460 | Boldt | May 1994 | A |
5327790 | Levin et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5376133 | Gramnaes | Dec 1994 | A |
5376138 | Bouchard et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376141 | Phillips | Dec 1994 | A |
5383939 | James | Jan 1995 | A |
5394132 | Poil | Feb 1995 | A |
5413611 | Haslam, II et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425780 | Flatt et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430643 | Seraji | Jul 1995 | A |
5443528 | Allen | Aug 1995 | A |
5455497 | Hirose et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5476441 | Durfee et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5484389 | Stark et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5571205 | James | Nov 1996 | A |
5571213 | Allen | Nov 1996 | A |
5650704 | Pratt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662693 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5695527 | Allen | Dec 1997 | A |
5704946 | Greene | Jan 1998 | A |
5746774 | Kramer | May 1998 | A |
5779735 | Molino | Jul 1998 | A |
5800561 | Rodriquez | Sep 1998 | A |
5800570 | Collier | Sep 1998 | A |
5888212 | Petrofsky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888213 | Sears et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888246 | Gow | Mar 1999 | A |
5893891 | Zahedi | Apr 1999 | A |
5895430 | O'Connor | Apr 1999 | A |
5929332 | Brown | Jul 1999 | A |
5948021 | Radcliffe | Sep 1999 | A |
5954621 | Joutras et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957981 | Gramnaes | Sep 1999 | A |
5984972 | Huston et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007582 | May | Dec 1999 | A |
6029374 | Herr et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6061577 | Andrieu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071313 | Phillips | Jun 2000 | A |
6086616 | Okuda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091977 | Tarjan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113642 | Petrofsky et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117177 | Chen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122960 | Hutchings et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129766 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6187052 | Molino et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206932 | Johnson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206933 | Shorter et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6361570 | Gow | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378190 | Akeel | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6379393 | Mavroidis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6423098 | Biedermann | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425925 | Grundei | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436149 | Rincoe | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443993 | Koniuk | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6482236 | Habecker | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6494039 | Pratt et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500210 | Sabolich et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513381 | Fyfe et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517585 | Zahedi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517858 | Le Moel et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522266 | Soehren et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6543987 | Ehrat | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6587728 | Fang et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610101 | Herr et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613097 | Cooper | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645252 | Asai et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679920 | Biedermann et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695885 | Schulman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704024 | Robotham et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6704582 | Le-Faucheur et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708103 | Herr et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719807 | Harris | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6755870 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761743 | Johnson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6764520 | Deffenbaugh et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764521 | Molino et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767370 | Mosler et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6813582 | Levi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824569 | Okediji | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6863695 | Doddroe et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875241 | Christensen | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908488 | Paasivaara et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910331 | Asai et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6955692 | Grundei | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6966882 | Horst | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969408 | Lecomte et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7029500 | Martin | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7066896 | Kiselik | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7066964 | Wild | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7112938 | Takenaka et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7118601 | Yasui | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131998 | Pasolini | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137998 | Bédard | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147667 | Bédard | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7150762 | Caspers | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7164967 | Etienne-Cummings et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182738 | Bonutti et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7209788 | Nicolelis et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7279009 | Herr et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295892 | Herr et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7300240 | Brogardh | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308333 | Kern et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313463 | Herr et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314490 | Bédard et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7347877 | Clausen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7381192 | Brodard et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7396337 | McBean et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410471 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7410472 | Yakimovich et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7455696 | Bisbee, III et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462201 | Christensen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485152 | Haynes et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7520904 | Christensen | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7531006 | Clausen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7552664 | Bulatowicz | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7575602 | Amirouche et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578799 | Thorsteinsson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7588604 | Okuda | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7618464 | Christensen | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637957 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637959 | Clausen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641700 | Yasui | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655050 | Palmer et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7691154 | Asgeirsson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704283 | Ninomiya | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7731759 | Pusch et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7736394 | Bédard et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7799091 | Herr et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811333 | Jónsson et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811334 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815689 | Bédard et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7846213 | Lecomte et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7867284 | Bédard | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7918808 | Simmons | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942935 | Iversen et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955398 | Bédard et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7985265 | Moser et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992849 | Sugar et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8011229 | Lieberman et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8048007 | Roy | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8048172 | Jonsson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8057550 | Clausen | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075633 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083807 | Auberger et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8087498 | Dupuis et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8109890 | Kamiar et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8142370 | Weinberg et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8231687 | Bédard et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8323354 | Bédard et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8366788 | Moser et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8403997 | Sykes et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8419804 | Herr et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435309 | Gilbert et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8480760 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8500823 | Herr et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8512415 | Herr et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8551184 | Herr | Oct 2013 | B1 |
7431737 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Dec 2013 | C1 |
8601897 | Lauzier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8617254 | Bisbee, III et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8652218 | Goldfarb et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657886 | Clausen et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8702811 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
7896927 | Clausen et al. | May 2014 | C1 |
8764850 | Hanset et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790282 | Jung et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801802 | Oddsson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814949 | Gramnaes | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8852292 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8864846 | Herr et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870967 | Herr et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8888864 | Iversen et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8915968 | Langlois et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8986397 | Bédard et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9032635 | Herr et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9044346 | Langlois et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060883 | Herr et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9060884 | Langlois | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9066819 | Gramnaes | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9078774 | Jónsson et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9114029 | Ásgeirsson et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9221177 | Herr et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9271851 | Claussen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9289316 | Ward et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9345591 | Bisbee, III et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9345592 | Herr et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9351856 | Herr et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9358137 | Bédard et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9459698 | Lee | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9462966 | Clausen et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9498401 | Herr et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9526635 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9526636 | Bédard et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9532877 | Holgate | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9554922 | Casler et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9561118 | Clausen et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9604368 | Holgate | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9622884 | Holgate et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9649206 | Bédard | May 2017 | B2 |
9682005 | Herr et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9687377 | Han et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9707104 | Clausen | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9717606 | Gramnaes | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737419 | Herr et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9808357 | Langlois | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9839552 | Han et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9895240 | Langlois et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10195057 | Clausen | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10251762 | Langlois | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10299943 | Clausen et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10307271 | Holgate et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10369019 | Clausen et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10390974 | Clausen et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10405996 | Langlois | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10543109 | Holgate | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10575970 | Holgate | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10695197 | Clausen | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10940027 | Langlois et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11007072 | Gilbert et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
20010002772 | Kim et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020007690 | Song et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020079857 | Ishii et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030005786 | Stuart et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030120354 | Doddroe et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040064195 | Herr | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073149 | Okediji | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078299 | Down-Logan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040153484 | Unno | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169112 | Grossart | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217324 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050049719 | Wilson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049721 | Sulprizio | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070834 | Herr et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107889 | Bédard et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113973 | Endo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137717 | Gramnaes | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050166685 | Boiten | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216097 | Rifkin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251079 | Carvey et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283257 | Bisbee et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025959 | Gomez et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060069336 | Krebs et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060122710 | Bédard et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060184280 | Oddsson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189899 | Flaherty et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206043 | Yakimovich et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224246 | Clausen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249315 | Herr et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259153 | Harn et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260620 | Kazerooni et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070043449 | Herr et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061016 | Kuo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083272 | Van De Veen | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123997 | Herr et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129653 | Sugar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162152 | Herr et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080004718 | Mosler | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046096 | Bédard et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058668 | Seyed Momen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080141813 | Rat | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080262635 | Moser et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080306612 | Mosler | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030530 | Martin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082869 | Slemker et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088912 | Rajaraman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090192625 | Boiten | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204229 | Mosley et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204230 | Kattenborn et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100023133 | Fairbanks et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030343 | Hansen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042228 | Doddroe et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100094431 | Albrecht-Laatsch | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113980 | Herr et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114329 | Casler et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131101 | Engeberg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100161077 | Boone et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174384 | Herr et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185301 | Hansen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241242 | Herr et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262260 | Bédard et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100275718 | Stuart et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100305716 | Pusch et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324456 | Jónsson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324699 | Herr et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015761 | Celebi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110082566 | Herr et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087339 | Pusch et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106274 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125290 | Langlois | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130847 | Bédard et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110132131 | Worz | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137429 | Bédard et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166674 | Montmartin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196509 | Jansen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202144 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208322 | Rifkin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110224804 | Clausen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110295384 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295385 | Herr et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016492 | Clausen | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120078415 | Kubo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120130508 | Harris et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120203359 | Schimmels et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209405 | Herr et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226364 | Kampas et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120259430 | Han et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283845 | Herr et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330439 | Goldfarb et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130035769 | Bédard et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130142608 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144402 | Clausen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173022 | Arabian et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130197408 | Goldfarb et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204395 | Gramnaes | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218295 | Holgate et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218298 | Mosler | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130268093 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282141 | Herr et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130297041 | Bédard | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310949 | Goldfarb et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140039642 | Nijiman | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140081424 | Herr et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140114437 | Herr et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140121782 | Herr et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156025 | Bisbee, III et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140191522 | Birglen | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140243997 | Clausen et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140277586 | Clausen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150032225 | Oddsson et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150073566 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150127118 | Herr et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150164661 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150209214 | Herr et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150223952 | Langlois | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150265429 | Jónsson et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150297368 | Langlois | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160158031 | Ward et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160158032 | Ward et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160302956 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170049659 | Farris et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170112640 | Clausen et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170241497 | Mooney et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170304083 | Clausen | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170340504 | Sanz Merodio et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180125678 | Langlois | May 2018 | A1 |
20180177618 | Langlois | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190175369 | Langlois | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190224026 | Clausen | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190365545 | Langlois | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200214856 | Holgate | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200383804 | Clausen | Dec 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 546 858 | Jun 2005 | CA |
543 277 | Dec 1973 | CH |
2043873 | Sep 1989 | CN |
1215614 | May 1999 | CN |
2400072 | Oct 2000 | CN |
1088988 | Aug 2002 | CN |
2776340 | May 2006 | CN |
1929797 | Mar 2007 | CN |
39 23 057 | Jan 1991 | DE |
43 05 213 | Aug 1993 | DE |
42 29 330 | Mar 1994 | DE |
692 26 268 | Apr 1999 | DE |
0 358 056 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0 380 060 | Aug 1990 | EP |
1 166 726 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 169 982 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1 410 780 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 442 704 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 547 567 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1 718 252 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1 792 597 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2 564 817 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2 702 963 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2293 185 | Jul 1976 | FR |
2 623 086 | May 1989 | FR |
2 816 463 | May 2002 | FR |
2 201 260 | Aug 1988 | GB |
2 228 201 | Aug 1990 | GB |
2 260 495 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2 301 776 | Dec 1996 | GB |
2 302 949 | Feb 1997 | GB |
2 367 753 | Apr 2002 | GB |
59-032453 | Feb 1984 | JP |
59-071747 | Apr 1984 | JP |
59-088147 | May 1984 | JP |
59-189843 | Oct 1984 | JP |
60-177102 | Sep 1985 | JP |
01-244748 | Sep 1989 | JP |
05-123348 | May 1993 | JP |
05-161668 | Jun 1993 | JP |
07-024766 | Jan 1995 | JP |
11-056885 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-215793 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2002-191654 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2005-500 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005-536317 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2009-153660 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2002-0041137 | Jun 2002 | KR |
10-2006-105026 | Oct 2006 | KR |
1447366 | Dec 1988 | SU |
1731210 | May 1992 | SU |
WO 94009727 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 96041599 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 97027822 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 00027318 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 03003953 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03088373 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004017873 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004017890 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2005079712 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006076164 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006088966 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007025116 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007095933 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2008080231 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2010027968 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2011005482 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011096965 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2012091555 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO 2013006585 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 20130148726 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2015157723 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Au et al., “An EMG-Position Controlled System for an Active Ankle-Foot Prosthesis: An Initial Experimental Study,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, IL, Jun. 28-Jul. 1, 2005, pp. 375-379. |
Aminian et al., “Estimation of Speed and Incline of Walking Using Neural Network,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 44, No. 3, Jun. 1995, pp. 743-746. |
Andrews et al., “Hybrid FES Orthosis Incorporating Closed Loop Control and Sensory Feedback,” Journal of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 10, Apr. 1988, pp. 189-195. |
Bar et al., “Adaptive Microcomputer Control of an Artificial Knee in Level Walking,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 5, Apr. 1983, pp. 145-150. |
Blaya, “Force-Controllable Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) to Assist Drop Foot Gait,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Thesis, Feb. 2003 (believed to be catalogued on or after Jul. 8, 2003) in 97 pages. |
Bonivento et al., “Automatic Tuning of Myoelectric Prostheses”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Jul. 1998, vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 294-304. |
Dai et al., “Application of Tilt Sensors in Functional Electrical Stimulation,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 4, No. 2, Jun. 1996, pp. 63-72. |
Dietl et al., “Der Einsatz von Elektronik bei Prothesen zur Versorgung der unteren Extremität,” Med. Orth. Tech., vol. 117, 1997, pp. 31-35. |
DIGINFO TV, “Powered Prosthetic Thigh and Leg”, uploaded Nov. 7, 2008 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqitTzNEd54&feature=youtu.be%3E [Sc14704117reenshots retrieved Oct. 23, 2014 in 9 pages]. |
“Extension Spring Design Theory, Spring Rate of Extension Springs,” http://web.archive.org/web/20131209120508/http://springipedia.com/extension-design-theory.asp as archived Dec. 9, 2013 in 1 page. |
Flowers et al., “An Electrohydraulic Knee-Torque Controller for a Prosthesis Simulator,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering: Transactions of the ASME; vol. 99, Series K, No. 1; Feb. 1977, pp. 3-8. |
Foerster et al., “Detection of Posture and Motion by Accelerometry: A Validation Study in Ambulatory Monitoring,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 15, 1999, pp. 571-583. |
Frank et al., “Reliable Real-Time Recognition of Motion Related Human Activities Using MEMS Inertial Sensors,” 2010, http://www.xsens.com/images/stories/PDF/Activity_Recognition_Final_ION_2010_Paper.pdf. |
Hayes et al., “Leg Motion Analysis During Gait by Multiaxial Accelerometry: Theoretical Foundations and Preliminary Validations,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 105, Aug. 1983, pp. 283-289. |
Herr et al., “Patient-Adaptive Prosthetic and Orthotic Leg Systems,” In Proceedings of the 12th Nordic Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Jun. 2002, pp. 4. |
Heyn et al., “The Kinematics of the Swing Phase Obtained From Accelerometer and Gyroscope Measurements,” 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam 1996, pp. 463-464. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/025461, dated Oct. 12, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/025461, dated Sep. 2, 2015. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/025461, dated Jun. 29, 2015. |
Jonic et al., “Three Machine Learning Techniques for Automatic Determination of Rules to Control Locomotion,” IEEE, Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 46, No. 3, Mar. 1999, pp. 300-310. |
Kirkwood et al., “Automatic Detection of Gait Events: A Case Study Using Inductive Learning Techniques,” Journal of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 11, Nov. 1989, pp. 511-516. |
Kostov et al., “Machine Learning in Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation Systems for Locomotion,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 42, No. 6, Jun. 1995, pp. 541-551. |
Lee et al., “Activity and Location Recognition Using Wearable Sensors,” Pervasive Computing, Jul.-Sep. 2002, pp. 24-32. |
Martens, W.L.J.; “Exploring Information Content and Some Application of Body Mounted Piezo-Resistive Accelerometers,” In P.H. Veltink, & R.C. van Lummel (Eds.), Dynamic analysis using body fixed sensors, Second World Congress of Biomechanics, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 9-12. Asserted by iWalk in Civil Action No. 12-CV-11061 FDS to constitute prior art to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,431,737 and 7,896,927. Applicant requests that the Examiner consider this reference as qualifying as prior art to the present application, but reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date. |
Martin, C.W., Otto Bock C-leg: A Review of Its Effectiveness, WCB Evidence Based Group, Nov. 27, 2003. |
Martinez-Villalpando et al., “Agonist-Antagonist Active Knee Prosthesis: A Preliminary Study in Level-Ground Walking”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 2009, vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 361-373. |
Mayagoitia et al., “Accelerometer and Rate Gyroscope Measurement of Kinematics: An Inexpensive Alternative to Optical Motion Analysis Systems,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 35, 2002, pp. 537-542. |
Michael, John W., M.Ed., “Upper Limb Powered Components and Controls: Current Concepts”, Clinical Prosthetics and Orthotics, 1986, vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 66-77. |
Moe-Nilssen, R.; “A New Method for Evaluating Motor Control in Gait Under Real-Life Environmental Conditions. Part 1: The Instrument” Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 13, 1998, pp. 320-327. |
Moe-Nilssen, R.; “A New Method for Evaluating Motor Control in Gait Under Real-Life Environmental Conditions. Part 2: Gait Analysis” Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 13, 1998, pp. 328-335. |
Nakagawa, Akio; “Intelligent Knee Mechanism and the Possibility to Apply the Principle to the Other Joints,” Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 20, No. 5, Dec. 1998, pp. 2282-2287. |
Petrofsky et al., “Feedback Control System for Walking in Man,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 135-149, 1984. |
Popovic et al., “Control Aspects of Active Above-Knee Prosthesis,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 35, No. 6, Dec. 1991, pp. 751-767. |
Reitman et al., “Gait Analysis in Prosthetics: Opinions, Ideas, and Conclusions,” Prosthetics and Orthotics International, vol. 26, 2002, 50-57. |
Robinson et al., “Series Elastic Actuator Development for a Biomimetic Walking Robot,” MIT Leg Laboratory, 1999, pp. 1-8. |
Sekine et al., “Classification of Waist-Acceleration Signals in a Continuous Walking Record,” Medical Engineering & Physics, 2000, pp. 285-291. |
Sigurdsson et al., “12th Nordic Baltic Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics,” Proceeding of the International Federation for Medical & Biological Engineering, Jun. 18-22, 2002, Reykjavik, Iceland, pp. 6. |
Smidt et al., “An Automated Accelerometry System for Gait Analysis,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 10, 1977, pp. 367-375. |
“The Electronic C-Leg® Knee Joint System,” Instructions for Use, Otto Bock®, 2002, pp. 30. http://www.ottobockus.com/products/lower_limb_prosthetics/c-leg_instructions.pdf (printed Jul. 20, 2006) Asserted by iWalk in Civil Action No. 12-CV-11061 FDS to constitute prior art to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,431,737 and 7,896,927. Applicant requests that the Examiner to consider this reference as qualifying as prior art to the present application, but reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date. |
Tomović et al., “A Finite State Approach to the Synthesis of Bioengineering Control Systems,” IEEE Transactions of Human Factors in Electronics, vol. HFE-7, No. 2, Jun. 1966, pp. 65-69. |
Tong et al., “A Practical Gait Analysis System Using Gyroscopes,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 21, 1999, pp. 87-94. |
Tong et al., “Virtual Artificial Sensor Technique for Functional Electrical Stimulation,” Medical Engineering & Physics, vol. 20, 1998, pp. 458-468. |
Townsend et al., “Biomechanics and Modeling of Bipedal Climbing and Descending,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 9, No. 4, 1976, pp. 227-239. |
Van Der Kooij et al., “A Multisensory Integration Model of Human Stance Control,” Biological Cybernetics, vol. 80, pp. 299-308, 1998. |
Veltink et al., “Detection of Static and Dynamic Activities using Uniaxial Accelerometers,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 4, No. 4, Dec. 1996, pp. 375-385. |
Veltink et al., “The Feasibility of Posture and Movement Detection by Accelerometry,” 15th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Oct. 28-31, 1993, San Diego, California, pp. 1230-1231. |
Willemsen et al., “Real-Time Gait Assessment Utilizing a New Way of Accelerometry,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 23, No. 8, 1990. pp. 859-863. |
Woodward et al., “Skeletal Accelerations Measured During Different Exercises,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 207, No. 2, Jun. 1993, pp. 79-85. |
Official Communication in European Application No. 15776980.3, dated Oct. 27, 2017. |
Hanafusa et al., “A Robot Hand with Elastic Fingers and Its Application to Assembly Process,” Robot Motion, Brady et al., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982, pp. 337-359. |
Hashimoto et al., “An Instrumented Compliant Wrist Using a Parallel Mechanism,” Japan/USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, vol. 1, ASME, 1992, pp. 741-744. |
Howard, Russell Duane; “Joint and Actuator Design for Enhanced Stability in Robotic Force Control,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Thesis, Sep. 1990 (believed to be catalogued on or after Sep. 19, 1990) in 219 pages. |
Pfeffer et al., “Experiments with a Dual-Armed, Cooperative, Flexible-Drivetrain Robot System,” Proceedings of 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, May 5, 1993, pp. 601-608. |
Rapport De Recherche Europeenne EP 01169982, dated Nov. 6, 2001. |
Robinson, David William; “Design and Analysis of Series Elasticity in Closed-Loop Actuator Force Control,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Thesis, Jun. 2000 in 123 pages. |
Sugano et al., “Force Control of the Robot Finger Joint Equipped with Mechanical Compliance Adjuster,” Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, Jul. 7-10, 1992, pp. 2005-2013. |
Williamson, Matthew M.; “Series Elastic Actuators,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, A.I. Technical Report No. 1524, Jan. 1995, pp. 1-83. |
Official Communication in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580026745.8, dated Mar. 6, 2019. |
Official Communication in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580026745.8, dated Jul. 23, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200000611 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61978721 | Apr 2014 | US | |
62042687 | Aug 2014 | US | |
62106085 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14704117 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 16506306 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14683563 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 14704117 | US |