Patent Grant
10617519
This invention relates to various improvements for prosthetic valves, including but not limited to transcatheter mitral valve replacement prosthetics and delivery devices therefor.
The current state of knowledge is as follows.
Valvular heart disease and specifically aortic and mitral valve disease is a significant health issue in the US. Annually approximately 90,000 valve replacements are conducted in the US. Traditional valve replacement surgery, the orthotopic replacement of a heart valve, is an “open heart” surgical procedure. Briefly, the procedure necessitates surgical opening of the thorax, the initiation of extra-corporeal circulation with a heart-lung machine, stopping and opening the heart, excision and replacement of the diseased valve, and re-starting of the heart. While valve replacement surgery typically carries a 1-4% mortality risk in otherwise healthy persons, a significantly higher morbidity is associated to the procedure largely due to the necessity for extra-corporeal circulation. Further, open heart surgery is often poorly tolerated in elderly patients.
Thus, if the extra-corporeal component of the procedure could be eliminated, morbidities and the costs of valve replacement therapies would be significantly reduced.
While replacement of the aortic valve in a transcatheter manner has been the subject of intense investigation, lesser attention has been focused on the mitral valve. This is in part reflective of the greater level of complexity associated to the native mitral valve apparatus and thus a greater level of difficulty with regards to inserting and anchoring the replacement prosthesis.
Several designs for catheter-deployed (transcatheter) aortic valve replacement are under various stages of development. The Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve is currently undergoing clinical trial in patients with calcific aortic valve disease who are considered high-risk for conventional open-heart valve surgery. This valve is deployable via a retrograde transarterial (transfemoral) approach or an antegrade transapical (transventricular) approach. A key aspect of the Edwards SAPIEN and other transcatheter aortic valve replacement designs is their dependence on lateral fixation (e.g. tines) that engages the valve tissues as the primary anchoring mechanism. Such a design basically relies on circumferential friction around the valve housing or stent to prevent dislodgement during the cardiac cycle. This anchoring mechanism is facilitated by, and may somewhat depend on, a calcified aortic valve annulus. This design also requires that the valve housing or stent have a certain degree of rigidity.
At least one transcatheter mitral valve design is currently in development. The Endovalve uses a folding tripod-like design that delivers a tri-leaflet bioprosthetic valve. It is designed to be deployed from a minimally invasive transatrial approach, and could eventually be adapted to a transvenous atrial septotomy delivery. This design uses “proprietary gripping features” designed to engage the valve annulus and leaflets tissues. Thus the anchoring mechanism of this device is essentially equivalent to that used by transcatheter aortic valve replacement designs.
One problem involves the repetitive deformation of the nitinol wire material commonly used in the manufacture of stented valves. Fatigue fractures of the metal wire material can result in a catastrophic structural failure whereby the valve support structure weakens and breaks. Although failure of a single wire may not necessarily cause a structural collapse of the entire valve, over time, this possibility becomes a practical reality. When the consequence of valve failure means the death of the patient, the importance cannot be overstated.
Various problems continue to exist in this field, including problems with perivalvular leaking around installed prosthetic valve, lack of a good fit and stability for the prosthetic valve within the native mitral annulus, atrial tissue erosion, excess wear on the metallic structures, interference with the aorta at the posterior side of the mitral annulus, difficulties in deployment and retrieval, and lack of customization, to name a few. Accordingly, there exists a need for the improvement inventions disclosed herein.
The present invention relates to improvements for prosthetic valves intended to be deployed into a closed beating heart using a transcatheter delivery system. The invention provides improved stability, in-growth of the prosthetic, maintains structural integrity over large cycles, addresses biocompatibility issues, addresses commissural regurgitation, and addresses hemocompatibility issues. Additionally, the invention addresses problems related to unwanted buckling of the material, lack of sealing of the prosthetic valve within the valvular annulus, unwanted twisting of fabrics, and difficulties arising from elasticity during attachment of the cover to the stent.
Improved Surfaces
In a preferred embodiment, there is provided a multi-layer cover for a prosthetic heart valve having an expandable tubular stent and an expandable internal leaflet assembly, wherein said stent is a tubular wire-form having an interior wall and an exterior wall, and wherein said leaflet assembly is disposed within the stent to form a valve and is comprised of stabilized tissue or synthetic material, wherein the multi-layer cover comprises at least two layers of stabilized tissue or synthetic material, a first layer comprised of a polyester material and a second layer comprised of a polyester material or stabilized tissue, wherein the first layer is attached to the interior wall of the stent and the second layer is attached to the exterior wall of the stent.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the stabilized tissue is derived from 30 day old bovine, ovine, equine or porcine pericardium, or from animal small intestine submucosa.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the synthetic material is selected from the group consisting of polyester, polyurethane, and polytetrafluoroethylene.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the first layer and the second layer range in thickness from about 0.001″ (0.0254 mm) to about 0.015″ (0.3809 mm), or more alternatively from about 0.002″ (0.0508 mm) to about 0.010″ (0.254 mm), or alternatively wherein the first layer and the second layer are about 0.005″ (0.127 mm) in thickness.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the stabilized tissue or synthetic material is treated with anticoagulant.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the stabilized tissue or synthetic material is heparinized.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the first layer and the second layer are both synthetic material.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the synthetic material is selected from the group consisting of polyester, polyurethane, and polytetrafluoroethylene.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the synthetic material is electrospun.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the stent tubular wire-form is formed as a unitary shape comprising a tubular body portion having an open gasket-like sealing cuff at one end, and wherein the tubular body portion and the sealing cuff are formed from the same piece of superelastic metal, and wherein the first layer and the second layer extend to cover substantially all of the stent.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the superelastic metal is a nickel-titanium alloy.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic valve having the multi-layer cover described and/or claimed herein.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method of treating mitral regurgitation in a patient, which comprises the step of surgically deploying the prosthetic heart valve provided herein into the mitral annulus of the patient.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method of treating tricuspid regurgitation in a patient, which comprises the step of surgically deploying the prosthetic heart valve provided herein into the tricuspid annulus of the patient.
Shuttlecock Annular Valve
In another embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve supported by a self expanding nitinol body that uses tethers for anchoring to the ventricular myocardium.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve which comprises an expandable tubular stent having an annular collar and an internal leaflet assembly, wherein the stent is covered on an exterior surface with stabilized tissue, synthetic fabric material, or a combination of both, and the internal leaflet assembly is disposed with the lumen of the stent and is comprised of stabilized tissue, synthetic fabric material, or a combination of both, wherein the annular collar is a web of polyester or polyeester-like fabric or metal mesh spanning from a distal end of the stent body to a collar support structure made from superelastic metal, the collar forming a flat circular band connected on one edge to the stent and extending circumferentially around the exterior of the stent at or near a distal end of the stent.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve, wherein the internal leaflet assembly is saddle-shaped.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the stent covering is stabilized tissue.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the leaflet assembly is comprised of stabilized tissue.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is elastic and is compressed into a delivery catheter for deployment within a patient, and whereby upon expelling the prosthetic pericardial valve from the delivery catheter, the valve expands to its functional shape.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the stent and collar support structure are formed from the same piece of superelastic metal.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the superelastic metal is a nickel-titanium alloy.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the stent and collar are laser cut with pre-determined shapes to facilitate collapsing into a catheter delivery system.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the stent is constructed from ductile metal that requires a balloon for expansion once the valve is positioned at the valve annulus.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the stabilized tissue is derived from 30 day old bovine, ovine, equine or porcine pericardium, or from animal small intestine submucosa.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the synthetic material is selected from the group consisting of polyester, polyurethane, and polytetrafluoroethylene.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the stabilized tissue or synthetic material is treated with anticoagulant.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the stabilized tissue or synthetic material is heparinized.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the angle of the collar to the stent comprises a range of between about 5 and about 45 degrees.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the collar support structure extends laterally beyond the wall of the expanded tubular stent between about 2 and about 10 millimeters.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the tubular stent has a plurality of tether attachment structures.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve further comprising a plurality of tethers attached to the prosthetic pericardial valve for anchoring the prosthetic pericardial valve to tissue.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein at least one of the plurality of tethers is an elastic tether.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein at least one of the plurality of tethers is a bioresorbable tether.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein at least one of the plurality of tethers is a positioning tether and at least one of the plurality of tethers is an anchoring tether.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve further comprising at least one tether attached to the collar support structure and at least one tether attached to the stent body.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve further comprising a plurality of tethers attached to the prosthetic pericardial valve wherein one of the plurality of tethers is attached to an epicardial tether securing device.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic pericardial valve wherein the leaflet assembly is constructed solely of stabilized tissue or synthetic material without a separate wire support structure, wherein the leaflet assembly comprises a plurality of valve leaflets attached to a leaflet housing, wherein the leaflet assembly is disposed within the lumen of the stent and is attached to the stent to provide a sealed joint between the leaflet assembly and the inner wall of the stent.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the valve has a three-dimensional structure that is a D-shape in lateral cross-section.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided wherein the valve has a three-dimensional structure that is a kidney-shape in lateral cross-section.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method of treating mitral regurgitation in a patient, which comprises the step of surgically deploying the prosthetic pericardial valve disclosed and claimed herein into the mitral annulus of the patient.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is deployed by directly accessing the pericardial through the intercostal space, using an apical approach to enter the left ventricle, and deploying the prosthetic pericardial valve into the mitral annulus.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is deployed by directly accessing the pericardial through a thoracotomy, sternotomy, or minimally-invasive thoracic, thorascopic, or trans-diaphragmatic approach to enter the left ventricle.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is deployed by directly accessing the pericardial through the intercostal space, using an approach through the lateral ventricular wall to enter the left ventricle.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is deployed by accessing the left atrium of the pericardial using a transvenous atrial septostomy approach.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is deployed by accessing the left ventricle of the pericardial using a transarterial retrograde aortic valve approach.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is deployed by accessing the left ventricle of the pericardial using a transvenous ventricular septostomy approach.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method further comprising tethering the prosthetic pericardial valve to tissue within the left ventricle.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is tethered to the apex of the left ventricle using an epicardial tether securing device.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the tissue is selected from papillary muscle tissue, septal tissue, or ventricular wall tissue.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is tethered to the apex of the ventricular septum.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method of treating tricuspid regurgitation in a patient, which comprises the step of surgically deploying the prosthetic pericardial valve as disclosed and claimed herein into the tricuspid annulus of the patient.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is deployed by directly accessing the pericardial through the intercostal space, using an apical approach to enter the right ventricle, or wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is deployed by directly accessing the pericardial through a thoracotomy, sternotomy, or minimally-invasive thoracic, thorascopic, or trans-diaphragmatic approach to enter the right ventricle, or wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is deployed by directly accessing the pericardial through the intercostal space, using an approach through the lateral ventricular wall to enter the right ventricle, or wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is deployed by accessing the right atrium of the pericardial using a transvenous approach.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method further comprising tethering the prosthetic pericardial valve to tissue within the right ventricle.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is tethered to the apex of the right ventricle using an epicardial tether securing device.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method wherein the tissue is selected from papillary muscle tissue, septal tissue, or ventricular wall tissue.
Spring Anchor
In one embodiment, spring-shaped anchor comprising at least two coils, with shape-memory characteristics fashioned for attachment to a prosthetic pericardial valve stent and circumnavigation of the chordae tendineae.
In a preferred embodiment, wherein the anchor is fabricated from one or more of a group of shape-memory, surgical-grade alloys, including, without limitation, nickel-titanium, copper-zinc-nickel, or copper-aluminium-nickel.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the anchor is fabricated from one or more of a group of shape-memory polymers or ceramics, including, without limitation, polyurethanes with ionic or mesogenic components made by a prepolymer method, a block copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyethyleneoxide (PEO), block copolymers containing polystyrene and poly(1,4-butadiene), an ABA triblock copolymer made from poly (2-methyl-2-oxazoline) and polytetrahydrofuran, and the ceramic Mn-doped (Pb, Sr)TiO3.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the shape-memory material forming the anchor has been drawn or formed into a wire or band.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the wire is 0.012″ nickel-titanium wire.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the wire or band, upon deployment, is formed to open into spring-like shape with an open tip.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the proximal loop of the spring anchor is fused to the base of the stent component of the associated prosthetic pericardial valve via welding, soldering or by use of an adhesive.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the adhesive used to bond the proximal loop of the spring anchor to the base of the stent is chosen from one or more of the following group, without limitation: synthetic polymer glues including, without limitation, epoxy resins, epoxy putty, ethylene-vinyl acetate, phenol formaldehyde resins, polyamides, polyester resins, polypropylene, polysulfides, polyurethane, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylpyrrolidone, silicones and styrene acrylic copolymer; synthetic monomer glues such as acrylnitrile, cyanoacrylate, acrylic and resorcinol glue; and solvent-type glues such as polystyrene cement/butanone and dichloromethane.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the loops of the coil equal or exceed the circumference of the base of the stent.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein all loops of the spring anchor are of equal circumference.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the proximal loop of the spring anchor is equal in circumference to the base of the prosthetic valve stent, further wherein each successive loop gradually increases in circumference.
In another preferred embodiment, further comprising wherein the fused proximal loop of the spring anchor and base of the prosthetic valve stent are attached to a plurality of tethers for anchoring the prosthetic pericardial valve to tissue.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the anchor is laser cut with pre-determined shapes to facilitate collapsing into a catheter delivery system.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the anchor is covered with biocompatible stabilized tissue or synthetic material.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the stabilized covering tissue is derived from 30 day old bovine, ovine, equine or porcine pericardium, or from animal small intestine submucosa.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the synthetic covering material is selected from the group consisting of polyester, polyurethane, and polytetrafluoroethylene.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the stabilized tissue or synthetic covering material is treated with anticoagulant.
In another preferred embodiment, wherein the stabilized tissue or synthetic covering material is heparinized.
A method of treating mitral regurgitation in a patient, which comprises the step of surgically deploying a prosthetic pericardial valve into the mitral annulus of the patient while simultaneously deploying the spring anchor of claim 1 around the corresponding chordae tendineae.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve and attached spring anchor are deployed by directly accessing the heart through the intercostal space, using an apical approach to enter the left ventricle, and deploying the prosthetic pericardial valve into the mitral annulus and the spring anchor around the chordae tendineae.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve and attached spring anchor are deployed by directly accessing the heart through a thoracotomy, sternotomy, or minimally-invasive thoracic, thorascopic, or trans-diaphragmatic approach to enter the left ventricle.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve and attached spring anchor are deployed by directly accessing the heart through the intercostal space, using an approach through the lateral ventricular wall to enter the left ventricle.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve and attached spring anchor are deployed by accessing the left atrium of the pericardial using a transvenous atrial septostomy approach.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve and attached spring anchor are deployed by accessing the left ventricle of the pericardial using a transarterial retrograde aortic valve approach.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve and attached spring anchor are deployed by accessing the left ventricle of the pericardial using a transvenous ventricular septostomy approach.
In another preferred embodiment, the method further comprising wherein the spring anchor is secured around the chordae tendineae by guiding the anchor in a rotating motion using known transcatheter surgical tools.
In another preferred embodiment, the method further comprising wherein the spring anchor is secured around the chordae tendineae by pulling the chordae tendineae within the circumference of one or more coil loops using known transcatheter surgical tools.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is tethered to one or more of the pericardial tissue areas, including without limitation, the apex of the left ventricle, the papillary muscle tissue, the septal tissue, ventricular wall tissue, apex of the ventricular septum, using an epicardial tether securing device.
A method of treating tricuspid regurgitation in a patient, which comprises the step of surgically deploying a prosthetic pericardial valve into the tricuspid annulus of the patient while simultaneously deploying the spring anchor of claim 1 around the corresponding chordae tendineae.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve and attached spring anchor are deployed by directly accessing the pericardial through the intercostal space, using an apical approach to enter the right ventricle.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve and attached spring anchor are deployed by directly accessing the pericardial through a thoracotomy, sternotomy, or minimally-invasive thoracic, thorascopic, or trans-diaphragmatic approach to enter the right ventricle.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve and attached spring anchor are deployed by directly accessing the pericardial through the intercostal space, using an approach through the lateral ventricular wall to enter the right ventricle.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve and attached spring anchor are deployed by accessing the right atrium of the pericardial using a transvenous approach.
In another preferred embodiment, the method further comprising wherein the spring anchor is secured around the chordae tendineae by guiding the anchor in a rotating motion using known transcatheter surgical tools.
In another preferred embodiment, the method further comprising wherein the spring anchor is secured around the chordae tendineae by pulling the chordae tendineae within the circumference of one or more coil loops using known transcatheter surgical tools.
In another preferred embodiment, the method further comprising tethering the prosthetic pericardial valve to tissue within the right ventricle.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the prosthetic pericardial valve is tethered to the apex of the right ventricle using an epicardial tether securing device.
In another preferred embodiment, the method wherein the tissue is selected from papillary muscle tissue, septal tissue, or ventricular wall tissue.
Annular Clamps
In one embodiment, a prosthetic valve clamp, comprising: (a) a hinge made of a pin, optionally surrounded by a spring, said pin extending through holes in two interdigitated middle members, which hinge can be manipulated into a closed or open position; (b) wherein each middle member comprises (i) a footer section with a proximal side and a distal side, (ii) two flat plates wherein the distal end of each plate is attached to the narrow edges of the proximal side of the footer section and extend therefrom, in parallel, at adjustable angles, (iii) wherein the proximal end of each such plate contains a centered circular hole of a diameter to accommodate the insertion of the pin, and (iv) wherein a flat flange protrudes from the center of the inner end of the footer section, such flange containing a centered hole to allow a pressure-bearing member to attach to open and close the hinge; (c) two or more semicircular fingers, with an equal number of such fingers attached to the distal end of each middle member such that, upon closing of the hinge, the open side of the semicircle faces inward and the closed side faces outward, wherein the fingers or dual sets of fingers move towards one another as the hinge closes and away from one another as the hinge opens; (d) wherein the semicircular fingers are attached to the middle member in a staggered fashion such that the semicircular members interdigitate upon closing; and (e) wherein the tip of each semicircular finger tapers to form a point capable of piercing valve annulus tissue.
In another preferred embodiment, a prosthetic valve clamp, comprising: (a) a hinge made of a pin, optionally surrounded by a spring, said pin extending through holes in the proximal ends of each of two or more closing members, which hinge can be manipulated into a closed or open position; (b) two or more closing members, each with a straight base branching outward into a semicircular shape such that, upon closing of the hinge, the open side of the semicircle faces inward and the closed side faces outward, wherein each closing member, or set of two or more closing members, move parallel to one another in opposite directions, towards one another as the hinge closes and away from one another as the hinge opens; (c) further comprising wherein the closing members are attached to the pin in a staggered fashion such that the semicircular members interdigitate upon closing; and (d) further comprising wherein the tip of each closing member tapers to form a point capable of piercing valve annulus tissue.
In another preferred embodiment, a system for anchoring a prosthetic mitral valve stent comprising: (a) a braided or laser-cut stent; (b) an assembly for a suction fin further comprising a tube located within the artificial stent annulus and circumnavigating said annulus, emanating from the inner surface of the artificial stent annulus; (c) an assembly for a glue fin further comprising a tube located within the artificial stent annulus and circumnavigating said annulus, emanating from the inner surface of the artificial stent annulus; (d) a connection between each of the glue fin assembly and the suction fin assembly and the transapical delivery catheter; (e) a series of clamping devices dispersed at intervals around the exterior surface of the artificial stent annulus, each clamping onto a security belt and opening upon the removal of such belt; (f) a plurality of wires, with each attached to the posterior side of a clamping device such that a pull on the wire will close the clamping device; and (g) a guidance catheter wherein the wires of step (f) are contained within the catheter lumen that comprises a plurality of holes circumnavigating the catheter, with one or more wires emanating from each such hole.
In another preferred embodiment, one of the above prosthetic valve anchoring devices, further comprising wherein the device is comprised of one or more types of medically acceptable metallic alloys, natural or synthetic polymers or ceramics, including but not limited to shape-memory alloys.
In another preferred embodiment, one of the above prosthetic valve anchoring devices, further comprising wherein the tapered tips of the elements comprise further anchoring features, including but not limited to fishhook or arrowhead designs, with or without retraction capabilities for ease in withdrawing the anchors from tissue.
Improved Cuff/Collar Variations
In one embodiment, an improved design and function of a compressible prosthetic heart valve replacement having an improved contoured atrial cuff/collar which can be deployed into a closed beating heart using a transcatheter delivery system. The design as discussed focuses on the deployment of a device via a minimally invasive fashion and by way of example considers a minimally invasive surgical procedure utilizing the intercostal or subxyphoid space for valve introduction. In order to accomplish this, the valve is formed in such a manner that it can be compressed to fit within a delivery system and secondarily ejected from the delivery system into the target location, for example the mitral or tricuspid valve annulus.
In a preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic mitral valve containing a atrial cuff/collar which locally contours to the mitral annulus.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a method of sealing a deployed prosthetic mitral valve against hemodynamic leaking, comprising fitting a prosthetic mitral valve with an atrial cuff/collar prior to deployment wherein the atrial cuff/collar is constructed to contour to the commissures of a pathologically defective mitral valve and constructed to contour to the zone of coaptation of the pathologically defective mitral valve, wherein the atrial cuff/collar is formed from wire originating from one end of an expandable tubular braided wire stent and the atrial cuff/collar is covered with stabilized tissue or synthetic material, the commissural contour components of the atrial cuff/collar and the zone of coaptation contour components of the atrial cuff/collar forming a complete or partial saddle-shape wherein the commissural contour components are in direct communication with the mitral valve commissures, and the zone of coaptation contour components are in direct communication with the mitral valve zone of coaptation.
In a preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is agaricoid.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is onychoid.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is reniform.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is an oval.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is a truncated-oval having a squared end.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is propeller-shaped having two or three blades.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is cruciform.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is petal-shaped having flat radial covered loops.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is irregular or amoeboid.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is cotyloid shaped.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is a partial half-round fan-shape.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is a rectangular U-shape.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar is constructed from ductile metal.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is constructed with a cover of stabilized tissue that is derived from adult, or 90-day old, or 30 day old bovine, ovine, equine or porcine pericardium, or from animal small intestine submucosa.
In another preferred embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar shape is constructed with a cover of synthetic material is selected from the group consisting of polyester, polyurethane, and polytetrafluoroethylene.
In another preferred embodiment, the stabilized tissue or synthetic material is treated with anticoagulant.
In another preferred embodiment, the method further comprises the step of anchoring the prosthetic heart valve to tissue uses a plurality of tethers to the atrial cuff/collar.
In another preferred embodiment, at least one of the plurality of tethers is an elastic tether.
In another preferred embodiment, at least one of the plurality of tethers is a bioresorbable tether.
Improved Stent Designs
An embodiment relating to the design and function of a pre-configured compressible transcatheter prosthetic heart valve replacement having improved stent structure-function profiles which can be deployed into a closed beating heart using a transcatheter delivery system. The design as discussed focuses on the deployment of a device via a minimally invasive fashion and by way of example considers a minimally invasive surgical procedure utilizing the intercostal or subxyphoid space for valve introduction. In order to accomplish this, the valve is formed in such a manner that it can be compressed to fit within a delivery system and secondarily ejected from the delivery system into the target location, for example the mitral or tricuspid valve annulus.
In a preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic mitral valve containing an improved stent which locally contours to the mitral structures and/or annulus.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic heart valve with a stent body that has a low height to width profile.
In a preferred embodiment, the prosthetic mitral valve contains an improved stent body that is a half-round D-shape in cross-section.
In a preferred embodiment, the prosthetic mitral valve contains an improved stent body that is a bent tubular stent structure wherein the bend is directed away from the anterior leaflet, away from interfering with coaptation of adjacent, e.g. aortic, valvular leaflets.
In a preferred embodiment, the prosthetic mitral valve contains an improved stent body that has a low height to width profile and the leaflet structure disposed within the stent is positioned at or near the atrial end of the stent body.
In another preferred embodiment, the a prosthetic mitral valve has a stent body made from both braided wire (atrial end) and laser-cut metal (annular or ventricular end), or vice versa.
In a preferred embodiment, the prosthetic heart valve has a cuff that has articulating wire loops of various lengths.
In another preferred embodiment, the prosthetic heart valve has at least one elastic tether to provide compliance during the physiologic movement or conformational changes associated with heart contraction.
In another preferred embodiment, the prosthetic heart valve has a stent body and cuff that are made from a superelastic metal.
In another preferred embodiment, the prosthetic heart valve has a tether which is used to position the valve cuff into the mitral annulus to prevent perivalvular leak.
In another preferred embodiment, the tethers are bioabsorbable and provide temporary anchoring until biological fixation of the prosthesis occurs. Biological fixation consisting of fibrous adhesions between the leaflet tissues and prosthesis or compression on the prosthesis by reversal of heart dilation, or both.
In another preferred embodiment, the prosthetic heart valve has a cuff for a prosthetic heart valve, said cuff being covered with tissue.
In another preferred embodiment, the cuff is covered with a synthetic polymer selected from expandable polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) or polyester.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic heart valve that has leaflet material constructed from a material selected from the group consisting of polyurethane, polytetrafluoroethylene, pericardium, and small intestine submucosa.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic heart valve having surfaces that are treated with anticoagulant.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic heart valve having a cuff and containing anchoring tethers which are attached to the cuff.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic heart valve having a cuff and containing anchoring tethers which are attached to the cuff and at both commissural tips.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic heart valve having a cuff where the cuff attachment relative to the body is within the angles of about 60 degrees to about 150 degrees.
In another preferred embodiment, there is provided a prosthetic heart valve containing a combination of tethers and barbs useful for anchoring the device into the mitral annulus.
In another embodiment, the wire of the cuff is formed as a series of radially extending loops of equal or variable length.
In another embodiment, the cuff extends laterally beyond the expanded tubular stent according to a ratio of the relationship between the height of the expanded deployed stent (h) and the lateral distance that the cuff extends onto the tissue (l). Preferably, the h/l ratio can range from 1:10 to 10:1, and more preferably includes without limitation 1:3, 1:2, 1:1, 2:1, and fractional ranges there between such as 1.25:2.0, 1.5:2.0, and so forth. It is contemplated in one non-limiting example that the cuff can extend laterally (l) between about 3 and about 30 millimeters.
In another embodiment, there is provided a feature wherein the tubular stent has a first end and a second end, wherein the cuff is formed from the stent itself, or in the alternative is formed separately and wherein the cuff is located at the first end of the stent, and the second end of the tubular stent has a plurality of tether attachment structures.
In another embodiment, there is provided a feature further comprising a plurality of tethers for anchoring the prosthetic heart valve to tissue and/or for positioning the prosthetic heart valve.
In another embodiment, there is provided a feature further comprising an epicardial tether securing device, wherein the tethers extend from about 2 cm to about 20 cm in length, and are fastened to an epicardial tether securing device. Some pathological conditions within a ventricle may require a atrial-apical tether from about 8 to about 15 cm, or more as described within the range above.
In another embodiment, there is provided a catheter delivery system for delivery of a prosthetic heart valve which comprises a delivery catheter having the prosthetic heart valve disposed therein, and an obturator for expelling the prosthetic heart valve.
In another embodiment, there is provided an assembly kit for preparing the catheter delivery system which comprises a compression funnel, an introducer, a wire snare, an obturator, a delivery catheter, and a prosthetic heart valve, wherein the compression funnel has an aperture for attaching to the introducer, wherein said introducer is comprised of a tube having a diameter that fits within the diameter of the delivery catheter, wherein said obturator is comprised of a tube fitted with a handle at one end and a cap at the other end, wherein said cap has an opening to allow the wire snare to travel therethrough, and said obturator has a diameter that fits within the diameter of the introducer, and wherein said prosthetic heart valve is compressible and fits within the delivery catheter.
In another embodiment, there is provided a method of treating mitral regurgitation and/or tricuspid regurgitation in a patient, which comprises the step of surgically deploying the prosthetic heart valve described herein into the annulus of the target valve structure, e.g. mitral valve annulus and tricuspid valve annulus of the patient.
In another embodiment, there is provided a feature wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed by directly accessing the heart through an intercostal space, using an apical approach to enter the left (or right) ventricle, and deploying the prosthetic heart valve into the valvular annulus using the catheter delivery system.
In another embodiment, there is provided a feature wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed by directly accessing the heart through a thoracotomy, sternotomy, or minimally-invasive thoracic, thorascopic, or transdiaphragmatic approach to enter the left (or right) ventricle, and deploying the prosthetic heart valve into the valvular annulus using the catheter delivery system.
In another embodiment, there is provided a feature wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed by directly accessing the heart through the intercostal space, using a lateral approach to enter the left or right ventricle, and deploying the prosthetic heart valve into the valvular annulus using the catheter delivery system.
In another embodiment, there is provided a feature wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed by accessing the left heart using either an antegrade-trans(atrial)septal (transvenous-trans(atrial)septal) approach or a retrograde (transarterial-transaortic) catheter approach to enter the left heart, and deploying the prosthetic heart valve into the mitral annulus using the catheter delivery system.
In another embodiment, there is provided a feature wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed into the mitral annulus from a retrograde approach by accessing the left ventricle through the apex of the ventricular septum (transvenous-trans(ventricular)septal approach).
In another embodiment, there is a feature wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed into the mitral position using a retrograde transventricular septal approach and the tethers are anchored into or on the right ventricular side of the ventricular septum.
In another embodiment, there is provided a feature further comprising tethering the prosthetic heart valve to tissue within the left ventricle.
In another embodiment, there is provided a feature wherein the prosthetic heart valve is tethered to the apex of the left ventricle using an epicardial tether securing device.
In another embodiment, there is provided a retrieval method for quickly removing a prosthetic heart valve having one or more tethers from a patient using minimally invasive cardiac catheter techniques, which comprises the steps of, capturing the one or more tethers with a catheter having a snare attachment, guiding the captured tethers into a collapsible funnel attachment connected to the removal catheter, pulling the tethers to conform the prosthetic heart valve into a collapsed, compressed conformation, and pulling the now compressed prosthetic heart valve into the removal catheter for subsequent extraction. The retrieval method is contemplated for use for capturing the prosthetic heart valve as described herein or any suitable tethered, collapsible medical device. In a preferred embodiment, the method is used to extract a prosthetic heart valve from either the left or right ventricle. The method may be particularly useful to extract the prosthetic appliance during an aborted surgical deployment.
Narrow Gauge Stent
An embodiment relating to the design and function of a compressible prosthetic heart valve replacement having a narrow-diameter stent body, which can be deployed into a closed beating heart using a transcatheter delivery system. The design as discussed focuses on a prosthetic mitral valve that fits within the native mitral valve annulus, but does not compress or substantially interfere with the opening and closing of the native commissural leaflets located at the terminus of the native mitral valve leaflets.
As with previous devices, the deployment of this device is preferably via a minimally invasive surgical procedure utilizing percutaneous valve introduction through the intercostal or subxyphoid space, but can also be an endoscopic catheter-based antegrade, retrograde, or trans-septal deployment, as is know ion the arts. In order to accomplish this, the valve is formed in such a manner that it can be compressed to fit within a delivery system and secondarily ejected from the delivery system into the target location, for example the mitral or tricuspid valve annulus.
Accordingly, there is provided a method of deploying a prosthetic heart valve for the treatment of commissural regurgitation and/or secondary mitral regurgitation in a patient in need thereof, which comprises the step of using a cardiac imaging device to measure the diameter of the native mitral annulus for selection and delivery of a prosthetic mitral valve, the improvement consisting of using the same or different cardiac imaging device and measuring the distance from the posterior edge of the posterior leaflet to the anterior edge of the anterior leaflet and the posterior leaflet to define a cross-sectional leaflet diameter, wherein said cross-sectional leaflet diameter is substantially less than the maximum diameter of the mitral annulus, said maximum diameter defined as the distance from the mitral annulus adjacent the anterolateral commissure to the mitral annulus adjacent the posteromedial commissure.
In a preferred embodiment, there is provided for use herein a prosthetic transcatheter valve comprising an expandable tubular stent having a cuff and an expandable internal leaflet assembly, wherein the diameter of said stent is less than the distance between the internal tips of the commissural cusps, and wherein said leaflet assembly is disposed within the stent and is comprised of stabilized tissue or synthetic material.
In one preferred embodiment, there is also provided a prosthetic heart valve as described herein wherein the diameter of the stent is approximate to the distance between the interior tips of the commissural cusps.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a prosthetic heart valve as described herein wherein the diameter of the stent is between 18 mm and 32 mm.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a prosthetic heart valve as described herein wherein the diameter of the stent is between 20 mm and 30 mm.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a prosthetic heart valve as described herein wherein the diameter of the stent is between 23 mm and 28 mm.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a prosthetic heart valve as described herein wherein the stent is sized to cover between 75% and 99% of the mitral valve area.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a prosthetic heart valve as described herein wherein the stent is sized to cover between 85% and 98% of the mitral valve area.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a prosthetic heart valve as described herein wherein the stent is sized to cover between 92% and 97% of the mitral valve area.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a prosthetic heart valve as described herein wherein the stent is sized to allow for a degree of mitral regurgitation of 20% or less.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a prosthetic heart valve as described herein wherein the stent is sized to allow for a degree of mitral regurgitation of 10% or less.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a prosthetic heart valve as described herein wherein the stent is sized to allow for a degree of mitral regurgitation of 5% or less.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a cuff for a narrow gauge prosthetic heart valve for treatment of commissural regurgitation and/or secondary mitral regurgitation, wherein the cuff has an articulating structure made of a superelastic metal that is covered with stabilized tissue or synthetic material, with only the portion of the cuff overlaying the commissures left uncovered.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a method of treating mitral secondary regurgitation in a patient, which comprises the step of surgically deploying the narrow gauge prosthetic heart valve described herein into the mitral annulus of the patient.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed by directly accessing the heart through the intercostal space, using an apical approach to enter the left ventricle, and deploying the prosthetic heart valve into the mitral annulus, or wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed by directly accessing the heart through a thoracotomy, sternotomy, or minimally-invasive thoracic, thorascopic, or trans-diaphragmatic approach to enter the left ventricle, or wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed by directly accessing the heart through the intercostal space, using an approach through the lateral ventricular wall to enter the left ventricle, or wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed by accessing the left atrium of the heart using a transvenous atrial septostomy approach, or wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed by accessing the left ventricle of the heart using a transarterial retrograde aortic valve approach, or wherein the prosthetic heart valve is deployed by accessing the left ventricle of the heart using a transvenous ventricular septostomy approach.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a method wherein the prosthetic heart valve is tethered to the apex of the left ventricle using an epicardial tether securing device.
In another preferred embodiment, there is also provided a method of treating commissural regurgitation and/or secondary mitral regurgitation by (1) measuring the area of the native valve and the regurgitant fraction using known imaging techniques; (2) sizing a prosthetic valve of claim 1 to allow between a 1% and 20% regurgitant fraction through the native commissures, based on the measures of step (1); and (3) implanting such prosthetic valve within the native mitral annulus.
Improved Surfaces
Shuttlecock Annular Valve
Spring Anchor
Annular Clamps
Improved Cuff/Collar Variations
Improved Stent Designs
Narrow Gauge Stent
The present invention provides various improvements in the design and components of prosthetic valves, especially for use in cardiac surgeries. Specifically, the invention relates to improved designs and features providing better stability, fit, durability and ease of delivery and retrieval for such prosthetic valves. For the purposes of this application, the terms “collar” and “sealing cuff” are used interchangeably.
Improved Surface Components
In one embodiment, the invention provides improvement in the surface components and structures for prosthetic valves intended to be deployed into a closed beating heart using a transcatheter delivery system. The combination of unique features herein addresses many of the issues and points of failure in current valve technology and provides a highly developed approach to the extraordinary number of problems that arise when attempting to provide a medical device of this type. The invention provides improved in-growth of the prosthetic, maintains structural integrity over large cycles, addresses biocompatibility issues, and addresses hemocompatibility issues. Additionally, the invention addresses problems related to unwanted buckling of the surface material, lack of sealing of the prosthetic valve within the valvular annulus, unwanted twisting of fabrics, and difficulties arising from elasticity during attachment of the cover to the stent.
In a preferred embodiment, there is provided a multi-layer cover for a prosthetic heart valve having an expandable tubular stent and an expandable internal leaflet assembly, wherein said stent is a tubular wire-form having an interior wall and an exterior wall, and wherein said leaflet assembly is disposed within the stent to form a valve and is comprised of stabilized tissue or synthetic material, wherein the multi-layer cover comprises at least two layers of stabilized tissue or synthetic material, a first layer comprised of a polyester material and a second layer comprised of a polyester material or stabilized tissue, wherein the first layer is attached to the interior wall of the stent and the second layer is attached to the exterior wall of the stent.
Stabilized Tissue or Biocompatible Synthetic Material
In one embodiment, it is contemplated that multiple types of tissue and biocompatible material may be used to line or cover both the inner “interior” and/or outer “exterior” lateral walls of the stent, and to line or cover embodiments utilizing the integral sealing cuff. As stated previously, the leaflet component may be constructed solely from stabilized tissue or synthetic material, with or without using an additional wire support, to create a leaflet assembly and valve leaflets. In this aspect, the leaflet component may be attached to the stent with or without the use of the wire form.
It is contemplated that the tissue may be used to cover the inside of the stent body, but that the outside of the stent body is lined or covered with either tissue or synthetic material. Where the stent is heat formed to created a sealing cuff structure, the top “side” of the cuff wire form (formerly the interior until the stent was heat formed) will be lined with tissue, whereas the underside of the sealing cuff will be lined, similar to the exterior, with tissue or more preferably synthetic material
In one preferred embodiment, the tissue used herein is optionally a biological tissue and may be a chemically stabilized valve of an animal, such as a pig. In another preferred embodiment, the biological tissue is used to make leaflets that are sewn or attached to a metal frame. This tissue is chemically stabilized pericardial tissue of an animal, such as a cow (bovine pericardium) or sheep (ovine pericardium) or pig (porcine pericardium) or horse (equine pericardium).
Preferably, the tissue is bovine pericardial tissue. Examples of suitable tissue include that used in the products Duraguard®, Peri-Guard®, and Vascu-Guard®, all products currently used in surgical procedures, and which are marketed as being harvested generally from cattle less than 30 months old. Other patents and publications disclose the surgical use of harvested, biocompatible animal thin tissues suitable herein as biocompatible “jackets” or sleeves for implantable stents, including for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,554,185 to Block, U.S. Pat. No. 7,108,717 to Design & Performance-Cyprus Limited disclosing a covered stent assembly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,440,164 to Scimed Life Systems, Inc. disclosing a bioprosthetic valve for implantation, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,336,616 to LifeCell Corporation discloses acellular collagen-based tissue matrix for transplantation.
In one preferred embodiment, the synthetic material is a polyurethane or polytetrafluoroethylene. The synthetic polymer materials include expanded polytetrafluoroethylene or polyester may optionally be used. Other suitable materials may optionally include thermoplastic polycarbonate urethane, polyether urethane, segmented polyether urethane, silicone polyether urethane, silicone-polycarbonate urethane, and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Additional biocompatible polymers may optionally include polyolefins, elastomers, polyethylene-glycols, polyethersulphones, polysulphones, polyvinylpyrrolidones, polyvinylchlorides, other fluoropolymers, silicone polyesters, siloxane polymers and/or oligomers, and/or polylactones, and block co-polymers using the same.
In another embodiment, the tissue and/or synthetic material liner/cover may optionally have a surface that has been treated with (or reacted with) an anti-coagulant, such as, without limitation, immobilized heparin. Such currently available heparinized polymers are known and available to a person of ordinary skill in the art.
Layers
In one preferred embodiment, the layering of the stent and the synthetic material and tissue may be provided in various options. For example, in one preferred embodiment, it is contemplated that the interior layer (within the lumen of the stent) is Dacron® (aka PET), and the outer exterior of the stent is lined or covered with stabilized tissue as described herein. In another embodiment, there is Dacron® both on the interior and the exterior of the stent, where one or both may be electrospun PET to provide the microscopic ‘hairs’ necessary for in-growth. In another embodiment, the prosthetic valve may have a synthetic layer on top of a tissue layer for an exterior, and have a tissue layer on the interior.
Electrospun Fibers
Electrospinning is a technology that produces polymer fibers with diameters ranging from the nano- to the microscale. Fabrics with complex shapes can be electrospun from solutions, producing a broad range of fiber and fabric properties. Electrospinning produces materials with high surface to weight and volume ratios, which makes these materials excellent candidates for controlled biological interactions, especially construction of fibrous extra-cellular matrix scaffolds. The porous nature of the fabric coupled with the ability to spin many types of polymers allows for the formation of implantable structures. Here, the prosthetic valve cover material can use the electrospun fabric as a scaffolding to allow integration into the body, also known as in-growth or cell attachment (both endothelialization and smooth muscle cell attachment). Additives, ranging from therapeutic agents to property modifiers, can be introduced into the solutions and become incorporated into the fibers and fabrics.
In preferred embodiments, the synthetic material will range in thickness from about 0.001″ (0.0254 mm) to about 0.015″ (0.3809 mm), or from about 0.002″ (0.0508 mm) to about 0.010″ (0.254 mm), or alternatively wherein both the first layer and the second layer are about 0.005″ (0.127 mm) in thickness. Preferred materials may be obtained from Zeus Co., Orangeburg, S.C.
By creating a sandwiched prosthetic valve made using a nitinol (or similar) stent that has extremely thin tissue on the inside and extremely thin synthetic, e.g. Dacron®, on the outside, very small but very durable prosthetic valves can be created and, importantly, delivered via the less-invasive, safer transcatheter delivery techniques.
Synthetics and polymers contemplated as within the scope of the present invention support long-term cell growth, without cytotoxic or mutagenic effects, and have a degradation profile consistant with its usage. For example, the material should promote in-growth but not degrade prior to effective in-growth, where the rate of degradation matches the rate of tissue attachment. Also, degradation by-products must be similarly non-toxic and biocompatible.
Biodegradable materials contemplated as within the scope of the present invention include without limitation polyesters such as polylactide (PLA), polyglycolide (PGA), polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactide-co-polyglycolide (PLGA), co-polymers of poly-L-lactide and polycaprolactone (PLLA-CL), and poly-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate (PHBV). Also contemplated as within the scope of the invention are polyanhydrides, polyamides, modified polysaccharides, polyalkene glycols (e.g. PEG), polyalkene oxides (e.g. PEO, PEO-co-PBT), and polyalkene terephthalates (e.g. PBT), and ethylene-vinyl acetate co-polymers.
However, non-degradable polymers may also be used but with biocompatible coatings in order to reduce problems known in the art that arise with the use of certain polymers such as immune responses, thrombotic responses, and cell toxicity. include non-degradable materials such as polytetrafluoroehtylene (PTFE), polyethylene-co-vinyl acetate, poly n-butyl methacrylate, poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene,
The co-polymers may vary in the range of the ratio of one polymer to the copolymer from a ratio of about 5:95 to a ratio of about 95:5. In certain embodiments, the ratio range may be about 10:90 to about 90:10, or range from about 20:80 to 80:20, or from about 25:75 to 75:25, or from about 30:70 to 70:30, or 40:60 to 60:40, or 50:50, or subranges in between.
In a preferred non-limiting embodiment, the material is spun into nanofibers, fibers having a cross-sectional size of less than 1000 nm. Preferred diameters may range from about 100 to about 1000 nm. Alternative preferred embodiments include nanofibers having a diameter ranging from about 200-800, or alternatively about 300-800 nm.
Additional therapeutic agents, e.g. sirolimus, paclitaxel, may be used incorporated into the polymer in certain embodiments for local, timed release.
Fabrication of Electrospun Nanofibers
To fabricate polymeric nanofibers by electrospinning, the polymer was dissolved in an appropriate solvent. The resultant solution was then filled in a syringe. With the aid of a syringe pump, the solution was ejected out through a needle tip with an inner diameter of 0.21 mm at a constant feed-rate. A high DC voltage ranging from 10-15 kV (Gamma High Voltage Research, Ormond Beach, Fla., USA) was applied between the needle and a grounded aluminum plate which was 15 cm below the needle.
The electric field generated by the surface charge causes the solution drop at the tip of the needle to distort into the Taylor cone. Once the electric potential at the surface charge exceeded a critical value, the electrostatic forces overcome the solution surface tension and a thin jet of solution erupts from the surface of the cone. The parameters for fabrication of nano-fibers include voltages from about 10-12.5 kV, solvents selected from hexafluoro-isopropanol, dimethyl-formamide, chloroform, methanol, dichloromethane, other solvents known to person of skill in the polymer arts, and mixtures and combination thereof.
Manufacture of Ultra-Thin Stabilized Tissue
In a preferred embodiment, ultra-thin vapor-cross linked stabilized bioprosthetic or implant tissue material is contemplated. Tissue having a 0.003′ (0.0762 mm) to about 0.010″ (0.254 mm) may be made using a process comprising the steps of: (a) vapor cross-linking a pre-digested compressed tissue specimen by exposing the tissue specimen to a vapor of a cross-linking agent selected from the group consisting of aldehydes, epoxides, isocyanates, carbodiimides, isothiocyanates, glycidalethers, and acyl azides; and (b) chemically cross-linking the vapor-cross-linked tissue specimen by exposing the vapor-crosslinked tissue specimen to an aqueous crosslinking bath for a predetermined time, such crosslinking bath containing a liquid phase of a crosslinking agent selected from the group consisting of aldehydes, epoxides, isocyanates, carbodiimides, isothiocyanates, glycidalethers, and acyl azides. [para 15] Such tissue may be porcine, ovine, equine or bovine in origin and preferably the initial material is taken from a bovine animal 30 days old or less, although tissue from older animals is contemplated as within the scope of the invention. In one preferred embodiment, the tissue specimen is subjected to chemical dehydration/compression and mechanical compression before cross-linking.
Pre-digestion is provided by digesting a harvested, cleaned pericardial tissue in a solution containing a surfactant, such as 1% sodium laurel sulfate. The chemical dehydration/compression step comprises subjecting the tissue specimen to hyperosmotic salt solution. And, the mechanical compression may be performed by subjecting the tissue specimen to a roller apparatus capable of compressing the tissue specimen to a thickness ranging from about 0.003′ (0.0762 mm) to about 0.010″ (0.254 mm).
The animal collagen tissue specimen is then chemically cross-linked first by exposing the tissue to formaldehyde vapor for approximately 10 minutes, and second by immersing the tissue in a glutaraldehyde solution for two consecutive sessions of approximately 24 hours each.
Functions of the Annular Cuff/Collar
The valve collar functions in a variety of ways. The first function of the prosthetic valve is to be a substitute for the native valve, but with improved functions, such as inhibiting perivalvular leak/regurgitation of blood by flexing and sealing across the irregular contours of the annulus and atrium.
The second function of the valve collar is to provide adjustability and compliance once the prosthetic is seated.
The heart and its structures undergo complex conformational changes during the cardiac cycle. For example, the mitral valve annulus has a complex geometric shape known as a hyperbolic parabloid much like a saddle, with the horn being anterior, the seat back being posterior, and the left and right valleys located medially and laterally. Beyond this complexity, the area of the mitral annulus changes over the course of the cardiac cycle. Further, the geometry of the tricuspid valve and tricuspid annulus continues to be a topic of research, posing its own particular problems. Accordingly, compliance is a very important but unfortunately often overlooked requirement of cardiac devices. Compliance here refers to the ability of the valve to maintain structural position and integrity during the cardiac cycle. Compliance with the motion of the heart is a particularly important feature, especially the ability to provide localized compliance where the underlying surfaces are acting differently from the adjacent surfaces. This ability to vary throughout the cardiac cycle allows the valve to remain seated and properly deployed in a manner not heretofore provided.
Additionally, compliance may be achieved through the use of the tethers where the tethers are preferably made from an elastic material. Tether-based compliance may be used alone, or in combination with the collar-based compliance.
The third function of the valve/collar is to provide a valve that, during surgery, is able to be seated and be able to contour to the irregular surfaces of the atrium. The use of independent tethers allows for side to side fitting of the valve within the annulus. For example, where three tethers are used, they are located circumferentially about 120 degrees relative to each other which allows the surgeon to observe whether or where perivalvular leaking might be occurring and to pull on one side or the other to create localized pressure and reduce or eliminate the leaking.
The forth function of the collar is to counter the forces that act to displace the prosthesis toward/into the ventricle (i.e. atrial pressure and flow-generated shear stress) during ventricular filling.
Additional features of the collar include that it functions to strengthen the leaflet as sembly/stent combination by providing additional structure. Further, during deployment, the collar functions to guide the entire structure, the prosthetic valve, into place at the mitral annulus during deployment and to keep the valve in place once it is deployed.
Another very important feature in one embodiment of the present invention is that the design of the valve allows the leaflets to be located high within the stent body, in the top half (atrial) of the lumen of the stent, or even at or near the atrial top end of the stent portion of the prosthetic valve. By allowing the leaflets to be located high within the stent body, the reduces the occurrence of LVOT obstruction (Left Ventricular Outflow Tract obstruction), a situation where the blood leaving the left ventricle to the aortic valve is obstructed and/or has it's laminar flow disrupted. In some circumstances this pathological condition is caused by having a stent or other medical device at or near the mitral valve area that extends too far into the left ventricle itself.
Annular Cuff/Collar Structure
The collar is a substantially flat, circular, band-shaped collar structure that is attached to and encircles the tubular stent forming a V-shape, when viewed in cross-section, between the exterior wall of the tubular stent and the flat, circular band-shaped annular expansion gasket. The stiff-yet-flexible nature of the attached (or integrated) gasket in a V-shape collar establishes a “cork” or “shuttlecock” type of structure that when the prosthetic valve is deployed into the annulus of the valve, e.g. mitral valve, the wedge-ring shape of the device, with its spring-like pusher band to provide a lateral annular compressive pressure or force against the native valve annulus to immobilize the valve and provide a seal between the cardiac chambers, e.g. the atrium and the ventricular, to re-establish valve function via the prosthetic valve. As viewed from a side perspective, the collar diameter matches the diameter of the tubular stent where the collar is attached to the stent nearest the ventricle, but as the collar and stent wall form a V-shape, the diameter of the collar gets larger and larger, until it reaches it's maximum diameter at the atrial terminus of the collar panel. As used herein, the term collar, inverted flange, gasket, spring panel, are considered to be functionally equivalent. When the tubular stent is pulled through the mitral valve aperture, the mitral annulus, by the tether loops in the direction of the left ventricle, the flexible collar acts as to stop the tubular stent from traveling any further through the mitral valve aperture. At this point, the entire prosthetic valve is held by lateral pressure caused by the forcible compression of the advancing spring-like collar through the mitral annulus, and the longitudinal forces ventricular tethers attached to the left ventricle.
The collar is preferably formed from a web of polyester fabric spanning from the distal end of the stent body to a support structure made from superelastic metal. Alternatively, the web made be made from a stiff, flexible shape-memory material such as the nickel-titanium alloy material Nitinol® wire that is covered by stabilized tissue or other suitable biocompatible or synthetic material.
In one embodiment, the collar wire form is constructed from independent loops of wire creating lobes or segments extending axially around the circumference of the bend or seam where the collar transitions to the tubular stent (in an integral collar) or where the collar is attached to the stent (where they are separate, but joined components). The collar forms an acute angle in relation to the exterior wall of the tubular stent body.
In another embodiment, the collar is constructed from an attached panel. In this embodiment, the panel may be a solid metal band, or may be perforated, woven, or laser cut to provide a mesh-like surface, or may be a polyester fabric material.
Because of the material's flexibility, the collar has the ability to articulate back and forth, along the lateral axis compared to the longitudinal axis that runs length-wise through the center of the tubular stent. In other words, where the metal has loops or is woven, the individual spindles or loops can independently move back and forth, and can spring back to their original position due to the relative stiffness of the wire. The collar has a certain modulus of elasticity such that, when attached to the wire of the stent, is able to allow the collar to move. This flexibility gives the collar, upon being deployed within a patient's heart, the ability to conform to the anatomical shape necessary for a particular application. In the example of a prosthetic mitral valve, the collar is able to conform to the irregularities of the left atrium and shape of the mitral annulus, and to provide a tight seal against the atrial tissue adjacent the mitral annulus and the tissue within the mitral annulus. As stated previously, this feature importantly provides a degree of flexibility in sizing the a mitral valve and prevents blood from leaking around the implanted prosthetic heart valve.
In one preferred wire collar embodiment, the wire spindles of the collar are substantially uniform in shape and size. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, each loop or spindle may be of varying shapes and sizes. In this example, it is contemplated that the loops may form a pattern of alternating large and small loops, depending on where the valve is being deployed. In the case of a prosthetic mitral valve, pre-operative imaging may allow for customizing the structure of the sealing cuff depending on a particular patient's anatomical geometry in the vicinity of the mitral annulus.
The sealing cuff wire form is constructed so as to provide sufficient structural integrity to withstand the intracardiac forces without collapsing. The sealing cuff wire form is preferably constructed of a web of polyester fabric spanning from the distal end of the stent body to a support structure made from a superelastic metal, such as Nitinol™® and is capable of maintaining its function as a sealing collar for the tubular stent while under longitudinal forces that might cause a structural deformation or valve displacement. It is contemplated as within the scope of the invention to optionally use other shape memory alloys such as Cu—Zn—Al—Ni alloys, and Cu—Al—Ni alloys. The heart is known to generate an average left atrial pressure between about 8 and 30 mm Hg (about 0.15 to 0.6 psi). This left atrial filling pressure is the expected approximate pressure that would be exerted in the direction of the left ventricle when the prosthesis is open against the outer face of the collar as an anchoring force holding the collar against the mitral valve annulus. The collar counteracts this downward longitudinal pressure against the prosthesis in the direction of the left ventricle to keep the valve from being displaced or slipping into the ventricle. In contrast, left ventricular systolic pressure, normally about 120 mm Hg, exerts a force on the closed prosthesis in the direction of the left atrium. The tethers counteract this force and are used to maintain the valve position and withstand the ventricular force during ventricular contraction or systole. Accordingly, the collar has sufficient structural integrity to provide the necessary tension against the tethers without being dislodged and pulled into the left ventricle. Tethers and anchors may also be used to secure position against any other directional forces as necessary. After a period of time, changes in the geometry of the heart and/or fibrous adhesion between prosthesis and surrounding cardiac tissues may assist or replace the function of the ventricular tethers in resisting longitudinal forces on the valve prosthesis during ventricular contraction.
Annular Clamp Structure and Function
It is possible for a prosthetic valve stent to be stabilized within the valvular annulus through the use of integrated clamps located at intervals around the circumference of the stent. This clamp system may use clamps made of metal or similarly rigid and durable material, either as an integrated component of the stent during manufacture, by soldering, by threading stent wire through anchoring apertures in the clamp structure, or a similar attachment process.
In one embodiment of a clamp-based anchoring system, each clamp comprises a hinge made of a pin, optionally surrounded by a spring, said pin extending through holes in two interdigitated middle members, which hinge could be manipulated into a closed or open position. Further, each middle member of a clamp could comprise (a) a footer section with a proximal side and a distal side, (b) two flat plates with the distal end of each plate attached to the narrow edges of the proximal side of the footer section and extending out, parallel to each other, at a diagonal angle, (c) the proximal end of each plate containing a centered circular hole of a diameter to accommodate the insertion of the pin, and (d) a flat flange protruding from the center of the inner end of the footer section, with the flange containing a centered hole to allow connection by a tool to open and close the hinge. Attached to the distal end of each of the two middle members, two or more semicircular fingers, with an equal number of such fingers attached to each middle member such that, upon closing of the hinge, the open side of the semicircle faces inward and the closed side faces outward.
In this embodiment, the dual sets of semicircular fingers would move towards one another as the hinge closes and away from one another as the hinge opens. The semicircular fingers are attached to the middle members in a staggered fashion such that the semicircular members interdigitate upon closing. Finally, the tip of each semicircular finger tapers to form a point capable of piercing valve annulus tissue, allowing for a firm stabilizing anchor for both the stent and the valve it contains.
In a more preferred embodiment, the clamp assembly described above shall be manufactured similar to the dimensions indicated in
The clamp of the immediately preceding embodiment may be comprised within a clamp-based valve anchoring system in which two flexible members, each with a preformed bend and protruding from a delivery housing, wherein each such flexible member is attached to the flange of each middle member, such that the flexible member is straightened upon retraction into the delivery housing, and the action of straightening the flexible member applies pressure to the two flanges, closing the hinge.
In another preferred embodiment, the clamp body would comprise a hinge made of a pin, optionally surrounded by a spring, said pin extending through holes in the proximal ends of each of two or more closing members, which hinge can be manipulated into a closed or open position. The closing members each have a straight base branching outward into a semicircular shape so that, upon closing the hinge, the open side of the semicircle faces inward and the closed side faces outward.
Each closing member, or set of two or more closing members, will move parallel to one another in opposite directions, towards one another as the hinge closes and away from one another as the hinge opens. Thus, an open clamp can be positioned so that one or more closing members are located on either side of the native valve annulus tissue, and the tips will contact the annulus tissue upon the clamp being moved to a closed position.
Further, the closing members are attached to the pin in a staggered fashion such that the semicircular members interdigitate upon closing; and the tip of each closing member tapers to form a point capable of piercing the valve annulus tissue, again allowing for a firm stabilizing anchor for both the stent and the valve it contains.
In a more preferred embodiment, the clamp assembly described above shall be manufactured similar to the dimensions indicated in
Any of the clamps or other anchoring elements, or pressure-bearing members, described herein may be comprised of any surgically acceptable metal, natural or synthetic polymer or ceramic material, including but not limited to shape-memory alloys. The tapered tips of anchoring elements may also include further anchoring features, including but not limited to fishhook or arrowhead designs, with or without retraction capabilities for ease in withdrawing the anchors from tissue.
Functions of the Improved Annular Cuff/Collar
The atrial cuff or collar functions in a variety of ways. The first function of the atrial cuff/collar is to inhibit perivalvular leak/regurgitation of blood around the prosthesis. By flexing and sealing across the irregular contours of the annulus and atrium, leaking is minimized and/or prevented.
The second function of the atrial cuff/collar is to provide an adjustable and/or compliant bioprosthetic valve. The heart and its structures undergo complex conformational changes during the cardiac cycle. For example, the mitral valve annulus has a complex geometric shape known as a hyperbolic parabloid much like a saddle, with the horn being anterior, the seat back being posterior, and the left and right valleys located medially and laterally. Beyond this complexity, the area of the mitral annulus changes over the course of the cardiac cycle. Further, the geometry of the tricuspid valve and tricuspid annulus continues to be a topic of research, posing its own particular problems. Accordingly, compliance is a very important but unfortunately often overlooked requirement of cardiac devices. Compliance here refers to the ability of the valve to maintain structural position and integrity during the cardiac cycle. Compliance with the motion of the heart is a particularly important feature, especially the ability to provide localized compliance where the underlying surfaces are acting differently from the adjacent surfaces. This ability to vary throughout the cardiac cycle allows the valve to remain seated and properly deployed in a manner not heretofore provided.
Additionally, compliance may be achieved through the use of the tethers where the tethers are preferably made from an elastic material. Tether-based compliance may be used alone, or in combination with the atrial cuff/collar-based compliance.
The third function of the atrial cuff/collar and valve is to provide a valve that, during surgery, is able to be seated and be able to contour to the irregular surfaces of the atrium. The use of independent tethers allows for side to side fitting of the valve within the annulus. For example, where three tethers are used, they are located circumferentially about 120 degrees relative to each other which allows the surgeon to observe whether or where perivalvular leaking might be occurring and to pull on one side or the other to create localized pressure and reduce or eliminate the leaking.
The fourth function of the atrial cuff/collar is to counter the forces that act to displace the prosthesis toward/into the ventricle (i.e. atrial pressure and flow-generated shear stress) during ventricular filling.
Additional features of the atrial cuff/collar include that it functions to strengthen the leaflet assembly/stent combination by providing additional structure. Further, during deployment, the atrial cuff/collar functions to guide the entire structure, the prosthetic valve, into place at the mitral annulus during deployment and to keep the valve in place once it is deployed. Another important function is to reduce pulmonary edema by improving atrial drainage.
Structure of the Improved Cuff/Collar
The atrial cuff/collar is a substantially flat plate that projects beyond the diameter of the tubular stent to form a rim or border. As used herein, the term atrial cuff/collar, cuff, flange, collar, bonnet, apron, or skirting are considered to be functionally equivalent. When the tubular stent is pulled through the mitral valve aperture, the mitral annulus, by the tether loops in the direction of the left ventricle, the atrial cuff/collar acts as a collar to stop the tubular stent from traveling any further through the mitral valve aperture. The entire prosthetic valve is held by longitudinal forces between the atrial cuff/collar which is seated in the left atrium and mitral annulus, and the ventricular tethers attached to the left ventricle.
The atrial cuff/collar is formed from a stiff, flexible shape-memory material such as the nickel-titanium alloy material Nitinol™ wire that is covered by stabilized tissue or other suitable biocompatible or synthetic material. In one embodiment, the atrial cuff/collar wire form is constructed from independent loops of wire that create lobes or segments extending axially around the circumference of the bend or seam where the atrial cuff/collar transitions to the tubular stent (in an integral atrial cuff/collar) or where the atrial cuff/collar is attached to the stent (where they are separate, but joined components).
Once covered by stabilized tissue or material, the loops provide the atrial cuff/collar the ability to travel up and down, to articulate, along the longitudinal axis that runs through the center of the tubular stent. In other words, the individual spindles or loops can independently move up and down, and can spring back to their original position due to the relative stiffness of the wire. The tissue or material that covers the atrial cuff/collar wire has a certain modulus of elasticity such that, when attached to the wire of the atrial cuff/collar, is able to allow the wire spindles to move. This flexibility gives the atrial cuff/collar, upon being deployed within a patient's heart, the ability to conform to the anatomical shape necessary for a particular application. In the example of a prosthetic mitral valve, the atrial cuff/collar is able to conform to the irregularities of the left atrium and shape of the mitral annulus, and to provide a tight seal against the atrial tissue adjacent the mitral annulus and the tissue within the mitral annulus. As stated previously, this feature importantly provides a degree of flexibility in sizing the a mitral valve and prevents blood from leaking around the implanted prosthetic heart valve.
An additional important aspect of the atrial cuff/collar dimension and shape is that, when fully seated and secured, the edge of the atrial cuff/collar preferably should not be oriented laterally into the atrial wall such that it can produce a penetrating or cutting action on the atrial wall.
In one preferred embodiment, the wire spindles of the atrial cuff/collar are substantially uniform in shape and size. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, each loop or spindle may be of varying shapes and sizes. In this example, it is contemplated that the loops may form a pattern of alternating large and small loops, depending on where the valve is being deployed. In the case of a prosthetic mitral valve, pre-operative imaging may allow for customizing the structure of the atrial cuff/collar depending on a particular patient's anatomical geometry in the vicinity of the mitral annulus.
The atrial cuff/collar wire form is constructed so as to provide sufficient structural integrity to withstand the intracardiac forces without collapsing. The atrial cuff/collar wire form is preferably constructed of a superelastic metal, such as Nitinol™® and is capable of maintaining its function as a sealing collar for the tubular stent while under longitudinal forces that might cause a structural deformation or valve displacement. It is contemplated as within the scope of the invention to optionally use other shape memory alloys such as Cu—Zn—Al—Ni alloys, and Cu—Al—Ni alloys. The heart is known to generate an average left atrial pressure between about 8 and 30 mm Hg (about 0.15 to 0.6 psi). This left atrial filling pressure is the expected approximate pressure that would be exerted in the direction of the left ventricle when the prosthesis is open against the outer face of the atrial cuff/collar as an anchoring force holding the atrial cuff/collar against the atrial tissue that is adjacent the mitral valve. The atrial cuff/collar counteracts this longitudinal pressure against the prosthesis in the direction of the left ventricle to keep the valve from being displaced or slipping into the ventricle. In contrast, left ventricular systolic pressure, normally about 120 mm Hg, exerts a force on the closed prosthesis in the direction of the left atrium. The tethers counteract this force and are used to maintain the valve position and withstand the ventricular force during ventricular contraction or systole. Accordingly, the atrial cuff/collar has sufficient structural integrity to provide the necessary tension against the tethers without being dislodged and pulled into the left ventricle. After a period of time, changes in the geometry of the heart and/or fibrous adhesion between prosthesis and surrounding cardiac tissues may assist or replace the function of the ventricular tethers in resisting longitudinal forces on the valve prosthesis during ventricular contraction.
Stent Structure
Preferably, superelastic metal wire, such as Nitinol® wire, is used for the stent, for the inner wire-based leaflet assembly that is disposed within the stent, and for the sealing cuff wire form. As stated, it is contemplated as within the scope of the invention to optionally use other shape memory alloys such as Cu—Zn—Al—Ni alloys, and Cu—Al—Ni alloys. It is contemplated that the stent may be constructed as a braided stent or as a laser cut stent. Such stents are available from any number of commercial manufacturers, such as Pulse Systems. Laser cut stents are preferably made from Nickel-Titanium (Nitinol®), but also without limitation made from stainless steel, cobalt chromium, titanium, and other functionally equivalent metals and alloys, or Pulse Systems braided stent that is shape-set by heat treating on a fixture or mandrel.
One key aspect of the stent design is that it be compressible and when released have the stated property that it return to its original (uncompressed) shape. This requirement limits the potential material selections to metals and plastics that have shape memory properties. With regards to metals, Nitinol has been found to be especially useful since it can be processed to be austhenitic, martensitic or super elastic. Martensitic and super elastic alloys can be processed to demonstrate the required compression features.
In one preferred embodiment, the valve, in lateral cross-section, is “D-shaped”. Having one side that is relatively flat allows the valve to seat against the native anterior leaflet, tracking the shape of the anterior annulus, without putting excessive pressure on the aortic valve which is located immediately adjacent the anterior leaflet. The D-shape also provides the rounded posterior valve/stent wall to track the shape of the posterior annulus and seat securely against the posterior leaflet.
In this regard, in one preferred aspect the deployment of the D-shaped valve may be offset such that the flat wall, or straight line of the “D”, is positioned along the axis between the mitral annulus and the aortic valve.
In another preferred embodiment, the valve, in lateral cross-section, is “kidney shaped” or “kidney bean shaped”. This three-dimensional shape, like the D-shape, allows the valve to seat against the native anterior leaflet, tracking the shape of the anterior annulus, without putting excessive pressure on the aortic valve which is located immediately adjacent the anterior leaflet.
Laser Cut Stent
One possible construction of the stent envisions the laser cutting of a thin, isodiametric Nitinol tube. The laser cuts form regular cutouts in the thin Nitinol® tube. Secondarily the tube is placed on a mold of the desired shape, heated to the Martensitic temperature and quenched. The treatment of the stent in this manner will form a stent or stent/sealing cuff that has shape memory properties and will readily revert to the memory shape at the calibrated temperature.
Braided Wire Stent
A stent can be constructed utilizing simple braiding techniques. Using a Nitinol wire—for example a 0.012″ wire—and a simple braiding fixture, the wire is wound on the braiding fixture in a simple over/under braiding pattern until an isodiametric tube is formed from a single wire. The two loose ends of the wire are coupled using a stainless steel or Nitinol coupling tube into which the loose ends are placed and crimped. Angular braids of approximately 60 degrees have been found to be particularly useful. Secondarily, the braided stent is placed on a shaping fixture and placed in a muffle furnace at a specified temperature to set the stent to the desired shape and to develop the martensitic or super elastic properties desired.
The stent as envisioned in one preferred embodiment is designed such that the ventricular aspect of the stent comes to 1-5 points onto which one or more anchoring sutures are affixed. The anchoring sutures (tethers) will traverse the ventricle and ultimately be anchored to the epicardial surface of the heart approximately at the level of the apex. The tethers when installed under slight tension will serve to hold the valve in place, i.e. inhibit paravalvular leakage during systole.
Narrow Gauge Stent to Treat Commissural Regurgitation and/or Secondary Mitral Regurgitation
“Primary MR” is a term describing mitral regurgitation caused by an anatomic defect in the valve or associated tissue, such as the chordae. The defect can either be congenital or degenerative, with causal factors ranging from marfan syndrome to drug- or radiation-inducement.
“Secondary MR” (also known as “Functional MR”), unlike Primary MR, is classified as a defect in valvular function or mechanics, as opposed to an anatomical defect. In such cases, an anatomically normal mitral valve has become regurgitant, usually as a result of impaired left ventricle from dilated cardiomyopathy or a myocardial infarction. Causality can be either ischemic or nonischemic. Specifically, chordae tendinae and papillary muscles can be stretched from increased tension, and the valve annulus itself may become distended due to the altered position of surrounding myocardium. Frequently, dilation of the left ventricle results in “volume overload” of blood during periods of systole, inhibiting full coaptation of the leaflets.
Secondary MR involves a defect in valvular function or mechanics, as opposed to an anatomical defect. In these cases, an anatomically normal mitral valve has become regurgitant, usually as a result of impaired left ventricle from dilated cardiomyopathy or a myocardial infarction. Specifically, chordae tendinae and papillary muscles can be stretched from increased tension, and the valve annulus itself may become distended due to the altered position of surrounding myocardium. Frequently, dilation of the left ventricle results in volume overload during periods of systole, inhibiting full coaptation of the leaflets.
Types of treatment currently in use for Secondary MR include treatments to decrease the circumference of the valvular orifice; decreasing the size of the mitral orifice, either by cinching the leaflets or restricting the movement of the leaflets; or remodeling the left ventricle to decrease the dimensions there. Examples of procedures to limit the size of the mitral orifice and/or enhance leaflet coaptation include the anchoring of one or more balloon devices across the mitral valve orifice to provide a backstop for leaflet coaptation and the use of sutures or clips to attach the leaflets at the point of coaptation. These methods are known to involve thrombotic and stenotic complications.
Secondary MR can be subclassified by leaflet movement (Carpentier's classification): type I (normal valve movement, such as annular dilatation or leaflet perforation); type II (excessive movement); and type III (restrictive movement: Ma-diastolic restriction such as rheumatic disease; IIIb-systolic restriction as in functional disease).
One particular aspect of secondary or “functional” mitral regurgitation is the presence of a “central jet” of regurgitant blood flowing through and near the center of the point of coaptation during regurgitation.
In one non-limiting preferred embodiment, the prosthetic valve is used to close the valve to this central jet flow, while leaving the commissures free to seal. This embodiment has yielded unexpected benefits in ameliorating the effects of commissural regurgitation and/or secondary mitral regurgitation, such as LV hypertrophy. It is thought that this unexpected benefit is likely due benefit is potentially due to the overall reduction in regurgitation and increased pumping efficiency, combined with the lessened deformity of the native commissures, this eliminating most or all of the mitral commissural regurgitation.
In another non-limiting preferred embodiment, the diameter of the stent body should be less than the diameter of the native mitral annulus. In one preferred embodiment, the stent diameter is between 50% and 95% of the diameter of the native mitral annulus. In another preferred embodiment, the stent diameter is between 75% and 90% of the diameter of the native mitral annulus. Preferably, the valve is positioned within the point of coaptation so as not to impair the opening of either the posterior or anterior commissions, thereby allowing the prosthetic valve to stop central jet regurgitation, while avoiding structural deformation or interaction with the mitral commissures.
In another non-limiting preferred embodiment, the diameter of the stent body should be less than the distance between the inward-facing tips of the two commissural cusps.
In another non-limiting preferred embodiment, the diameter of the stent body should approximately match the distance between the inward-facing tips of the two commissural cusps. In another non-limiting preferred embodiment, the diameter of the stent body should be approximately 18-32 mm. In a more preferred embodiment, the diameter of the stent body should be 20-30 mm. In a more preferred embodiment, the diameter of the stent body should be 23-28 mm.
The average area of an open mitral valve is between 4 cm2 and 6 cm2. In another non-limiting preferred embodiment, the diameter of the stent body may be between 75% and 99% of the mitral valve cross-sectional leaflet diameter. In another preferred embodiment, the diameter of the stent body may be between 85% and 98% of the mitral valve cross-sectional leaflet diameter. In another preferred embodiment, the diameter of the stent body may be between 92% and 97% of the mitral valve cross-sectional leaflet diameter.
The degree of severity of mitral regurgitation can be quantified by the regurgitant fraction, which is the percentage of the left ventricular stroke volume that regurgitates into the left atrium.
where Vmitral and Vaortic are respectively the volumes of blood that flow forward through the mitral valve and aortic valve during a cardiac cycle. Methods that have been used to assess the regurgitant fraction in mitral regurgitation include echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, fast CT scan, and cardiac MRI.
The degree of mitral regurgitation is often gauged according to the regurgitant fraction.
Determination of the Degree of Mitral Regurgitation
In another non-limiting preferred embodiment, the stent body shall be shaped to allow for continued commissural regurgitation of 20% or less. In a more preferred embodiment, the stent body shall be shaped to avoid commissural deformation and/or commissural regurgitation of 10% or less. In another preferred embodiment, the stent body shall be shaped to avoid commissural deformation and/or commissural regurgitation of 5% or less.
Leaflet and Assembly Structure
The valve leaflets are held by, or within, a leaflet assembly. In one preferred embodiment of the invention, the leaflet assembly comprises a leaflet wire support structure to which the leaflets are attached and the entire leaflet assembly is housed within the stent body. In this embodiment, the assembly is constructed of wire and stabilized tissue to form a suitable platform for attaching the leaflets. In this aspect, the wire and stabilized tissue allow for the leaflet structure to be compressed when the prosthetic valve is compressed within the deployment catheter, and to spring open into the proper functional shape when the prosthetic valve is opened during deployment. In this embodiment, the leaflet assembly may optionally be attached to and housed within a separate cylindrical liner made of stabilized tissue or material, and the liner is then attached to line the interior of the stent body.
In this embodiment, the leaflet wire support structure is constructed to have a collapsible/expandable geometry. In a preferred embodiment, the structure is a single piece of wire. The wireform is, in one embodiment, constructed from a shape memory alloy such as Nitinol. The structure may optionally be made of a plurality of wires, including between 2 to 10 wires. Further, the geometry of the wire form is without limitation, and may optionally be a series of parabolic inverted collapsible arches to mimic the saddle-like shape of the native annulus when the leaflets are attached. Alternatively, it may optionally be constructed as collapsible concentric rings, or other similar geometric forms that are able to collapse/compress which is followed by an expansion to its functional shape. In certain preferred embodiments, there may be 2, 3 or 4 arches. In another embodiment, closed circular or ellipsoid structure designs are contemplated. In another embodiment, the wire form may be an umbrella-type structure, or other similar unfold-and-lock-open designs. A preferred embodiment utilizes super elastic Nitinol wire approximately 0.015″ in diameter. In one preferred embodiment, the diameter is 0.012″. In this embodiment, the wire is wound around a shaping fixture in such a manner that 2-3 commissural posts are formed. The fixture containing the wrapped wire is placed in a muffle furnace at a pre-determined temperature to set the shape of the wire form and to impart it's super elastic properties. Secondarily, the loose ends of the wireform are joined with a stainless steel or Nitinol tube and crimped to form a continuous shape. In another preferred embodiment, the commissural posts of the wireform are adjoined at their tips by a circular connecting ring, or halo, whose purpose is to minimize inward deflection of the post(s).
In another preferred embodiment, the leaflet assembly is constructed solely of stabilized tissue or other suitable material without a separate wire support structure. The leaflet assembly in this embodiment is also disposed within the lumen of the stent and is attached to the stent to provide a sealed joint between the leaflet assembly and the inner wall of the stent. By definition, it is contemplated within the scope of the invention that any structure made from stabilized tissue and/or wire(s) related to supporting the leaflets within the stent constitute a leaflet assembly.
In this embodiment, stabilized tissue or suitable material may also optionally be used as a liner for the inner wall of the stent and is considered part of the leaflet assembly.
Liner tissue or biocompatible material may be processed to have the same or different mechanical qualities, e.g. thickness, durability, etc. from the leaflet tissue.
Deployment within the Valvular Annulus
The prosthetic heart valve is, in one embodiment, apically delivered through the apex of the left ventricle of the heart using a catheter system. In one aspect of the apical delivery, the catheter system accesses the heart and pericardial space by intercostal delivery. In another delivery approach, the catheter system delivers the prosthetic heart valve using either an antegrade or retrograde delivery approach using a flexible catheter system, and without requiring the rigid tube system commonly used. In another embodiment, the catheter system accesses the heart via a trans-septal approach.
In one non-limiting preferred embodiment, the stent body extends into the ventricle about to the edge of the open mitral valve leaflets (approximately 25% of the distance between the annulus and the ventricular apex). The open native leaflets lay against the outside stent wall and parallel to the long axis of the stent (i.e. the stent holds the native mitral valve open).
In one non-limiting preferred embodiment, the diameter should approximately match the diameter of the mitral annulus. Optionally, the valve may be positioned to sit in the mitral annulus at a slight angle directed away from the aortic valve such that it is not obstructing flow through the aortic valve. Optionally, the outflow portion (bottom) of the stent should not be too close to the lateral wall of the ventricle or papillary muscle as this position may interfere with flow through the prosthesis. As these options relate to the tricuspid, the position of the tricuspid valve may be very similar to that of the mitral valve.
In another embodiment, the prosthetic valve is sized and configured for use in areas other than the mitral annulus, including, without limitation, the tricuspid valve between the right atrium and right ventricle. Alternative embodiments may optionally include variations to the sealing cuff structure to accommodate deployment to the pulmonary valve between the right ventricle and pulmonary artery, and the aortic valve between the left ventricle and the aorta. In one embodiment, the prosthetic valve is optionally used as a venous backflow valve for the venous system, including without limitation the vena cava, femoral, subclavian, pulmonary, hepatic, renal and cardiac. In this aspect, the sealing cuff feature is utilized to provide additional protection against leaking.
Tethers
In one preferred embodiment, there are tethers attached to the prosthetic heart valve that extend to one or more tissue anchor locations within the heart. In one preferred embodiment, the tethers extend downward through the left ventricle, exiting the left ventricle at the apex of the heart to be fastened on the epicardial surface outside of the heart. Similar anchoring is contemplated herein as it regards the tricuspid, or other valve structure requiring a prosthetic. There may be from 1 to 8 tethers which are preferably attached to the stent.
In another preferred embodiment, the tethers may optionally be attached to the sealing cuff to provide additional control over position, adjustment, and compliance. In this preferred embodiment, one or more tethers are optionally attached to the sealing cuff, in addition to, or optionally, in place of, the tethers attached to the stent. By attaching to the sealing cuff and/or the stent, an even higher degree of control over positioning, adjustment, and compliance is provided to the operator during deployment.
During deployment, the operator is able to adjust or customize the tethers to the correct length for a particular patient's anatomy. The tethers also allow the operator to tighten the sealing cuff onto the tissue around the valvular annulus by pulling the tethers, which creates a leak-free seal.
In another preferred embodiment, the tethers are optionally anchored to other tissue locations depending on the particular application of the prosthetic heart valve. In the case of a mitral valve, or the tricuspid valve, there are optionally one or more tethers anchored to one or both papillary muscles, septum, and/or ventricular wall.
The tethers, in conjunction with the sealing cuff or collar, provide for a compliant valve which has heretofore not been available. The tethers are made from surgical-grade materials such as biocompatible polymer suture material. Examples of such material include 2-0 exPFTE (polytetrafluoroethylene) or 2-0 polypropylene. In one embodiment the tethers are inelastic. It is also contemplated that one or more of the tethers may optionally be elastic to provide an even further degree of compliance of the valve during the cardiac cycle. Upon being drawn to and through the apex of the heart, the tethers may be fastened by a suitable mechanism such as tying off to a pledget or similar adjustable button-type anchoring device to inhibit retraction of the tether back into the ventricle. It is also contemplated that the tethers might be bioresorbable/bioabsorbable and thereby provide temporary fixation until other types of fixation take hold such a biological fibrous adhesion between the tissues and prosthesis and/or radial compression from a reduction in the degree of heart chamber dilation.
Further, it is contemplated that the prosthetic heart valve may optionally be deployed with a combination of installation tethers and permanent tethers, attached to either the stent or sealing cuff, or both, the installation tethers being removed after the valve is successfully deployed. It is also contemplated that combinations of inelastic and elastic tethers may optionally be used for deployment and to provide structural and positional compliance of the valve during the cardiac cycle.
Pledget
In one embodiment, to control the potential tearing of tissue at the apical entry point of the delivery system, a circular, semi-circular, or multi-part pledget is employed. The pledget may be constructed from a semi-rigid material such as PFTE felt. Prior to puncturing of the apex by the delivery system, the felt is firmly attached to the heart such that the apex is centrally located. Secondarily, the delivery system is introduced through the central area, or orifice as it may be, of the pledget. Positioned and attached in this manner, the pledget acts to control any potential tearing at the apex.
Tines/Barbs
In another embodiment the valve can be seated within the valvular annulus through the use of tines or barbs. These may be used in conjunction with, or in place of one or more tethers. The tines or barbs are located to provide attachment to adjacent tissue. In one preferred embodiment, the tines are optionally circumferentially located around the bend/transition area between the stent and the sealing cuff. Such tines are forced into the annular tissue by mechanical means such as using a balloon catheter. In one non-limiting embodiment, the tines may optionally be semi-circular hooks that upon expansion of the stent body, pierce, rotate into, and hold annular tissue securely.
Functions of the Spring Anchor
The spring anchor will form a spring-shaped wire or banded extending from the base of the self-expanding stent. The anchor will provide support to hold the stent within the natural valve annulus by being coiled around the chordae tendineae extending from the natural valve annulus. The spring mechanism of the anchor will allow consistent support to the prosthetic valve stent, despite repetitive deformation as the chordae tendineae, valve annulus and surrounding tissue contract and release. The shape memory characteristics of the coil will allow each loop deform and move independently in response to each heart contraction, and then return to the original coil dimensions as the heart relaxes. The placement of the coil around the chordae tendineae will anchor the stent to counteract the natural tendency of the stent to move laterally with the cardiac tissue contractions and releases, and longitundinally with the blood flow between the ventricle and the atrium.
Deployment of the Spring Anchor
The spring anchor will be fused to the prosthetic valve stent via either welding, soldering or adhesion prior to insertion of the entire valve and anchor assembly into a delivery catheter.
The delivery catheter will approach the heart via either transvenous, transarterial or percutaneous delivery. Delivery may be made through into the left or right ventricle, or the left or right atrium.
Delivery into the right ventricle may be made through the intercostal space and thereby through the lateral ventricular wall. Delivery into the right atrium may be made using a transvenous approach.
Delivery into the left ventricle may be made through the intercostal space, using an apical approach or through the lateral ventricular wall. A transarterial retrograde aortic valve approach and a transvenous septostomy approach may also be used.
Upon deployment of the self-expanding prosthetic valve within the native valvular annulus, whether in the tricuspid valve annulus, mitral valve annulus, or otherwise, the catheter sheath will be withdrawn, allowing the spring anchor to deploy. Such anchor deployment will result in the expanding of the coiled loops into a spring-like shape of sufficient diameter to allow circumnavigation of the chordae tendineae.
After release of the spring anchor, control of the anchor will be maintained via surgical tools contained within the catheter and known in the art to guide the anchor around the chordae tendineae in a rotating, screw-like motion. The number of rotations performed will be determined by the number of loops contained within the spring anchor.
Alternatively, the surgeon may use a surgical tool contained within the catheter and known in the art to secure and pull the chordae tendineae within the circumference of one or more loops of the anchor.
Upon securing the anchor around the chordae tendineae, surgical tools may or may not be used to secure one or more anchoring tethers to surrounding pericardial tissue for additional support.
Upon the securing of the valve stent within the native annulus, the spring anchor around the chordae tendineae and the tethers, if any, to the pericardial tissue, all surgical tools manipulating said components will be disengaged, pulled into the catheter and the catheter withdrawn.
Spring Anchor Structure
The spring anchor is a single wire or band of shape-memory material, for example a 0.012″ Nitinol wire, formed into a series of two or more circular loops, in which the proximal loop is attached to the base of the prosthetic valve stent.
Once the proximal loop has been attached to the base of the self-expanding stent, the additional loop(s) will radiate outward axially from the stent in the shape of a spring. The distal loop will be open, allowing for the tip to be placed outside a chordae tendineae during deployment, then rotated about a plurality of chordae tendineae in either a clockwise or counterclockwise direction until each non-proximal loop is deployed about and anchored against the outer tissue of the chordae tendineae.
In a preferred embodiment, the spring anchor is made of material identical to the material used to construct the base of the stent. In another preferred embodiment, the material of the anchor differs from the material of the stent base.
In a preferred embodiment, the proximal loop of the spring anchor is welded to the base of the stent, forming a continuous joint around the full diameter of the base. In another embodiment, the proximal loop of the anchor is soldered to the stent base, or adhered to the stent base using an adhesive substance known in the art.
Because of the shape-memory material's flexibility, the anchor has the ability to articulate back and forth both laterally and longitudinally, while returning to its original shape formation after each deformation. The loops can independently move back and forth, and can spring back to their original position due to the relative stiffness of the wire or band. The coil has a certain modulus of elasticity such that, when attached to the wire of the stent, is able to allow the collar to move. This flexibility gives the anchor, upon being deployed within a patient's heart, the ability to conform to the anatomical shape necessary for a particular application. In the example of a prosthetic mitral valve, the anchor is able to conform to the irregularities in the shape and disposition of the chordae tendineae, and to provide a tight grip against the chordae tendineae tissue to provide support to the prosthetic valve. As stated previously, this feature importantly provides a degree of flexibility in sizing the anchor and prevents dislocation of the anchor and/or prosthetic valve due to wear.
In one preferred anchor embodiment, each loop in the coil is substantially uniform in shape and diameter. In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the loops may be of varying shapes and sizes. In this example, it is contemplated that the loops may gradually increase in diameter as they extend away from the stent base. The size and pattern of the loops may vary based on whether the valve replacement is being performed on the mitral valve or the tricuspid valve.
The anchor form is constructed so as to provide sufficient structural integrity to withstand the intracardiac forces without dislocating, permanently deforming or fracturing. The anchor assembly is preferably constructed of a wire or band constructed of a shape memory alloy, polymer or ceramic, such as Nitinol®, that is capable of maintaining its function as an anchor for the tubular stent while under lateral and longitudinal forces that might cause a structural deformation or valve displacement. It is contemplated as within the scope of the invention to optionally use other shape memory alloys or materials such as listed herein.
For example, assuming a mitral valve replacement prosthesis, the heart is known to generate an average left atrial pressure between about 8 and 30 mm Hg (about 0.15 to 0.6 psi). This left atrial filling pressure is the expected approximate pressure that would be exerted in the direction of the left ventricle when the prosthesis is open against the prosthesis within the mitral valve annulus. The anchor counteracts this downward longitudinal pressure against the prosthesis in the direction of the left ventricle to keep the valve from being displaced or slipping into the ventricle. In contrast, left ventricular systolic pressure, normally about 120 mm Hg, exerts a force on the closed prosthesis in the direction of the left atrium. The anchor would also counteract this force and be used to maintain the valve position and withstand the ventricular force during ventricular contraction or systole. Tethers may also be used to secure position against any other directional forces as necessary. After a period of time, changes in the geometry of the heart and/or fibrous adhesion between prosthesis and surrounding cardiac tissues, or between the anchor and surrounding cardiac tissues, may assist or replace the function of anchor and/or the ventricular tethers in resisting longitudinal forces on the valve prosthesis during ventricular contraction.
Description of Surface Improvements Figures
Referring now to the FIGURES,
Tubular stent 112 may be an expandable laser cut stent or an expandable braided stent. Tubular stent 112 may be constructed of Martensitic or super elastic metal alloys. Tubular stent 112 may be compressed along its longitudinal axis and will fit into a catheter-based stent delivery system. When the tubular stent 112 is delivered to the location where it is to be installed, it is expelled from the catheter by an obturator and deposited at the site where it is to be deployed.
Tubular stent 112 includes a plurality of optional tether attachments 114 upon which a tether (not shown) may be connected.
Leaflet assembly 118 is a separate but integrated structure that is disposed within the stent 112. Leaflet assembly 118 functions to provide the structure upon which the valve leaflets or cusps 120 are located. Leaflet assembly 118 may be made entirely of stabilized tissue or it may be a combination wire and tissue structure. Where leaflet assembly 118 is composed entirely of tissue, it is contemplated that the leaflet assembly, leaflet support structure, and leaflets or cusps 120 are made from tissue.
The prosthetic valve is covered with multiple layers of either synthetic material, or tissue, or both. This feature is described in greater detail herein. Different qualities of stabilized tissue, i.e. thin or thick, structurally rigid or flexible as it may be, may be used for the different components of the sealing cuff top covering 124, the stent interior liner/covering 124, the leaflet assembly 118 and the leaflets 120. Where leaflet assembly 118 is composed of wire and tissue, it contemplated that assembly or support(s), or both, may be made from wire, and the leaflet cusps 120 would necessarily be made from tissue.
Prosthetic heart valve 110 also includes sealing cuff 116.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Description of Shuttlecock Annular Valve Figures
Referring now to the FIGURES,
As stated, tubular stent 112 may be an expandable laser cut stent or an expandable braided stent. Tubular stent 112 may be constructed of Martensitic or super elastic metal alloys. Tubular stent 112 may be compressed in diameter along its longitudinal axis and will fit into a catheter-based stent delivery system. When the tubular stent 112 is delivered to the location where it is to be installed, it is expelled from the catheter by an obturator and deposited at the site where it is to be deployed.
Tubular stent 112 may include a plurality of tether attachments (not pictured) to which a plurality of tethers 138 may be connected.
Leaflet assembly 118 is a separate but integrated structure that is disposed within the stent 112. Leaflet assembly 118 functions to provide the structure upon which the valve leaflets or cusps 120 are located. Leaflet assembly 118 may be made entirely of stabilized tissue or it may be a combination wire and tissue structure. Where leaflet assembly 118 is composed entirely of tissue, it is contemplated that the leaflet assembly, leaflet support structure, and leaflets or cusps 120 are made from tissue. It is contemplated as within the scope of the invention that different qualities of stabilized tissue, i.e. thin or thick, structurally rigid or flexible as it may be, may be used for the different components of the collar covering 124, the stent covering, the leaflet assembly 118 and the leaflets 120. Where leaflet assembly 118 is composed of wire and tissue, it contemplated that assembly or support(s), or both, may be made from wire, and the cusps 120 would necessarily be made from tissue.
Prosthetic heart valve 110 also includes collar 116.
As stated, collar 116 may be a band of metal tape, a wire structure, made from flexible synthetic material, or made from tissue material, and may be a separate attached structure, or may be constructed as an integral part of the stent body when the stent body is manufactured. Annular tissue is seen exerting lateral pressure onto collar 116. In one embodiment, the collar is an extension of the stent itself, where the stent has been heated and manipulated upon a form to create the extended flat, inverted plate of the collar. In another embodiment, the collar is made separate from the stent 112 and attached as a flat plate constructed to include an inner rim 146 and an outer rim 148, with joint 142 where the collar 116 meets the tubular stent 112.
Referring now to
Referring to the stent body, it is contemplated as within the scope of the invention to include both laser cut stent technology and/or the braided stent technology. Where the collar is an extension of a braided stent and forms a unitary stent-collar construction, the collar is formed by heating a Nitinol™ stent on a mold to create the proper extension and angle necessary to establish the collar or collar portion.
Where the stent is laser cut, the collar may be manufactured as a unitary laser-cut stent-collar construction. In this embodiment, the collar wire form and the stent are laser cut within the same overall manufacturing process. Where the collar wire form is made separate from the stent and attached as a flat collar plate, the collar and stent may be manufactured/laser cut separately and attached using laser weld or other similar technique to create a non-fatiguing elastic stent-collar joint capable of maintaining elastic compliance while it is deployed.
As noted, the rim or joint may consist of an artificial transition point between the stent and the collar where the stent has been heated to change the shape and angle of the stent or has been laser cut to create it's overall form, or the rim may consist of a constructed transition point such as a laser welded joint for attaching two component parts.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The prosthetic valve may be sized according to the patient's cardiovascular needs. Smaller patients may need smaller devices. Varying heart anatomies may call for specific sizes also, depending on the pathology presented. In a preferred embodiment, the pericardial stent body is about 28 mm in diameter with support structure 150 extending to about 45 mm in diameter. It is contemplated as within the scope of the invention that the stent body diameter may range from about 2 mm in diameter to about 30 mm in diameter. It is contemplated that the support structure 150 may extend beyond the diameter of the stent body from 0.1 mm to about 20.0 mm, depending on use.
The height may be in one preferred embodiment about 5 mm-15 mm in total body length. It is contemplated as within the scope of the invention that the height range of the prosthetic valve length may range from about 2 mm to about 30 mm in total body length. The tethers may comprise from 1 to about 96 tethers securing the prosthetic valve in place. In one embodiment, there may be a plurality of tethers 138 integrated with the stent body.
Stent 112 may include a liner contemplated as being made of tissue or biocompatible material as disclosed herein. The stent liner may be an inner stent liner and/or an outer (surface) stent liner.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Description of Spring Anchor Figures
Referring now to the FIGURES,
As stated, tubular stent 112 may be an expandable laser cut stent or an expandable braided stent. Tubular stent 112 may be constructed of Martensitic or super elastic metal alloys. Tubular stent 112 may be compressed in diameter along its longitudinal axis and will fit into a catheter-based stent delivery system. When the tubular stent 112 is delivered to the location where it is to be installed, it is expelled from the catheter by an obturator and deposited at the site where it is to be deployed.
Tubular stent 112 includes spring anchor attachment 156.
Referring now to
As noted, the stent base 154 may comprise an artificial transition point between the stent and the spring anchor proximal loop 158, which transition point may consist of a welded attachment, a soldered attachment, or an adhesive attachment.
As previously discussed, spring anchor 156 has the ability to travel or flex both in and out, and up and down, as required by the movements in the cardiac tissue associated with heart contraction, while moving back into its natural spring-like shape with each heart muscle relaxation. As stated, the pliability of anchor 156 provides the prosthetic heart valve, upon deployment within a patient's heart, with added stability within the native annulus, enhancing the ability of stent 112 to both maintain a conforming shape during the cardiac cycle, and provide a tight seal against the atrial tissue adjacent the mitral valve aperture. By providing an anchor with characteristics to stent 112, the potential for blood leakage around the implanted prosthetic heart valve is minimized, as is the potential for the stent to dislodge into either the ventricle or atrium, resulting in catastrophic failure.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Description of Annular Clamps Figures
Description of Improved Cuff/Collar Figures
Referring now to the FIGURES,
Description of Improved Stent Figures
Referring now to the FIGURES,
As stated, the stent may be an expandable laser cut stent or an expandable braided stent and may be constructed of Martensitic or super elastic metal alloys. The stent/valve assembly may be compressed along its longitudinal axis and will fit into a catheter-based stent delivery system. When the stent/valve is delivered to the location where it is to be installed, it is expelled from the catheter by an obturator and deposited at the site where it is to be deployed.
The stent may include a plurality of tether attachments upon which a tether may be connected. The leaflet assembly is a separate but integrated structure that is disposed within the stent body. Leaflet assembly functions to provide the structure upon which the valve leaflets or cusps are located. Leaflet assembly may be made entirely of stabilized tissue or it may be a combination wire and tissue structure. It is contemplated as within the scope of the invention that different qualities of stabilized tissue, i.e. thin or thick, structurally rigid or flexible as it may be, may be used for the different components of the cuff covering, the stent covering, the leaflet assembly and the leaflets.
Prosthetic heart valve may also include a cuff. In one embodiment, the cuff “wire form” is an extension of the stent itself, where the stent has been heated and manipulated upon a form to create the extended spindles of the flat, collar plate of the cuff. In another embodiment, the cuff “wire form” is made separate from the stent and attached as a flat collar plate with independent loops of wire that create lobes or segments extending radially/axially around the circumference of the inner rim, the joint where the cuff meets the tubular stent.
As contemplated, the deployment of one embodiment of a prosthetic valve according to the present invention includes an embodiment of a delivery catheter according to the present invention containing a pre-loaded prosthetic valve which is being pushed out of the delivery catheter, i.e. by an obturator, starting with (A) the valve completely within the catheter, (B) the cuff portion being in view, (C) the stent body following, and (D) the prosthetic valve with attached tethers for positioning and/or adjustment and/or securing the valve to tissue.
Description of Narrow Gauge Stent Figures
Referring now to the FIGURES,
In this embodiment of a prosthetic heart valve according to the present invention, there is a tubular stent having tether attachment structures at one end and tubular stent is attached to cuff at the other end. Leaflet assembly (not shown) is disposed within stent and supports leaflets (also not shown). Cuff has independent articulating loops of wire and a covering.
As stated, tubular stent 112 may be an expandable laser cut stent or an expandable braided stent. Tubular stent 112 may be constructed of Martensitic or super elastic metal alloys. Tubular stent 112 may be compressed along its longitudinal axis and will fit into a catheter-based stent delivery system. When the tubular stent 112 is delivered to the location where it is to be installed, it is expelled from the catheter by an obturator and deposited at the site where it is to be deployed.
Tubular stent 112 includes a plurality of tether attachments 138 upon which a tether, shown, may be connected.
Leaflet assembly 118 is a separate but integrated structure that is disposed within the stent. Leaflet assembly 118 functions to provide the structure upon which the valve leaflets or cusps are located. Leaflet assembly 118 may be made entirely of stabilized tissue and/or polymeric fabric, or it may be a combination wire and tissue/fabric structure. Where leaflet assembly is composed entirely of tissue, it is contemplated that the leaflet assembly, leaflet support structure, and leaflets or cusps are made from tissue. It is contemplated as within the scope of the invention that different qualities of stabilized tissue, i.e. thin or thick, structurally rigid or flexible as it may be, may be used for the different components of the cuff covering, the stent covering, the leaflet assembly and the leaflets. Where leaflet assembly 118 is composed of wire and tissue, it contemplated that assembly or support(s), or both, may be made from wire, and the cusps would necessarily be made from tissue.
In one embodiment, the cuff wire form 116 is an extension of the stent 112, where the stent has been heated and manipulated upon a form to create the extended spindles of the flat, collar plate of the cuff. In another embodiment, the cuff wire form 116 is made separate from the stent 112 and attached as a flat collar plate constructed to include an inner rim and an outer rim, with independent loops of wire that create lobes or segments extending axially around the circumference of the inner rim, the joint where the cuff meets the tubular stent.
The references recited herein are incorporated herein in their entirety, particularly as they relate to teaching the level of ordinary skill in this art and for any disclosure necessary for the commoner understanding of the subject matter of the claimed invention. It will be clear to a person of ordinary skill in the art that the above embodiments may be altered or that insubstantial changes may be made without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is determined by the scope of the following claims and their equitable Equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/829,091, filed Dec. 1, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/183,943, filed Jun. 16, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,833,315, issued Dec. 5, 2017, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/237,023, filed Feb. 4, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,480,559, issued Nov. 1, 2016, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 371 to, and is a U.S. national phase application of, International Application No. PCT/US2012/050579, filed Aug. 13, 2012, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/522,542, filed Aug. 11, 2011; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/522,468, filed Aug. 11, 2011; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/522,450, filed Aug. 11, 2011; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/522,476, filed Aug. 11, 2011; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/523,134, filed Aug. 12, 2011; U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/564,462, filed Nov. 29, 2011; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/615,264, filed Mar. 24, 2012, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2697008 | Ross | Dec 1954 | A |
| 3409013 | Berry | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3472230 | Fogarty et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
| 3476101 | Ross | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3548417 | Kischer | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3587115 | Shiley | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3657744 | Ersek | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3671979 | Moulopoulos | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3714671 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3755823 | Hancock | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3976079 | Samuels et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4003382 | Dyke | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4035849 | Angell et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4056854 | Boretos et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4073438 | Meyer | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4106129 | Carpentier et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4222126 | Boretos et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4265694 | Boretos et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4297749 | Davis et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4339831 | Johnson | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4343048 | Ross et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4345340 | Rosen | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4373216 | Klawitter | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4406022 | Roy | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4470157 | Love | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4490859 | Black et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4535483 | Klawitter et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4574803 | Storz | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4585705 | Broderick et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4592340 | Boyles | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4605407 | Black et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4612011 | Kautzky | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4626255 | Reichart et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4638886 | Marietta | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4643732 | Pietsch et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4692164 | Dzemeshkevich et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4759758 | Gabbay | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4762128 | Rosenbluth | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4777951 | Cribier et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4787899 | Lazarus | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4787901 | Baykut | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4796629 | Grayzel | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4824180 | Levrai | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4829990 | Thuroff et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4830117 | Capasso | May 1989 | A |
| 4851001 | Taheri | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4856516 | Hillstead | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4878495 | Grayzel | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4883458 | Shiber | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4922905 | Strecker | May 1990 | A |
| 4923013 | De Gennaro | May 1990 | A |
| 4960424 | Grooters | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4966604 | Reiss | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4979939 | Shiber | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4986830 | Owens et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4996873 | Takeuchi | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5007896 | Shiber | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5026366 | Leckrone | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5032128 | Alonso | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5035706 | Giantureo et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5037434 | Lane | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5047041 | Samuels | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5059177 | Towne et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5064435 | Porter | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5080668 | Bolz et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085635 | Cragg | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5089015 | Ross | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5152771 | Sabbaghian et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5163953 | Vince | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5167628 | Boyles | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5192297 | Hull | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5201880 | Wright et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5266073 | Wall | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5282847 | Trescony et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5295958 | Shturman | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5306296 | Wright et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5332402 | Teitelbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5336616 | Livesey et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5344442 | Deac | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5360444 | Kusuhara | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5364407 | Poll | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5370685 | Stevens | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5397351 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5411055 | Kane | May 1995 | A |
| 5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5415667 | Frater | May 1995 | A |
| 5443446 | Shturman | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5480424 | Cox | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5500014 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5545209 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5545214 | Stevens | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549665 | Vesely et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5554184 | Machiraju | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5554185 | Block et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5571175 | Vanney et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5591185 | Kilmer et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5607462 | Imran | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5607464 | Trescony et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5609626 | Quijano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5639274 | Fischell et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5662704 | Gross | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5665115 | Cragg | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5674279 | Wright et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5697905 | d'Ambrosio | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702368 | Stevens et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5716417 | Girard et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5728068 | Leone et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5728151 | Garrison et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735842 | Krueger et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5741333 | Frid | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749890 | Shaknovich | May 1998 | A |
| 5756476 | Epstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5769812 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5792179 | Sideris | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5800508 | Goicoechea et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5833673 | Ockuly et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840081 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5855597 | Jayaraman | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5855601 | Bessler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5855602 | Angell | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5904697 | Gifford, III et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5925063 | Khosravi | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5968052 | Sullivan, III et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968068 | Dehdashtian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972030 | Garrison et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5993481 | Marcade et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6027525 | Suh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6042607 | Williamson, IV et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045497 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6063112 | Sgro | May 2000 | A |
| 6077214 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6099508 | Bousquet | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6132473 | Williams et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6168614 | Andersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171335 | Wheatley et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174327 | Mertens et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183411 | Mortier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6210408 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217585 | Houser et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221091 | Khosravi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6231602 | Carpentier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6245102 | Jayaraman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6260552 | Mortier et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6261222 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264602 | Mortier et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6287339 | Vazquez et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6299637 | Shaolian et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6302906 | Goicoechea et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6312465 | Griffin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6332893 | Mortier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6350277 | Kocur | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6358277 | Duran | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6379372 | Dehdashtian et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6402679 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402680 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6402781 | Langberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6406420 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6425916 | Garrison et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6440164 | DiMatteo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6454799 | Schreck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6461382 | Cao | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468660 | Ogle et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6482228 | Norred | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6488704 | Connelly et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6537198 | Vidlund et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6540782 | Snyders | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6569196 | Vesely | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6575252 | Reed | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6582462 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6605112 | Moll et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6616684 | Vidlund et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622730 | Ekvall et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6629534 | St. Goar et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6629921 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6648077 | Hoffman | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6648921 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6652578 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6669724 | Park et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6706065 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6709456 | Langberg et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6723038 | Schroeder et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6726715 | Sutherland | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6733525 | Yang et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6740105 | Yodfat et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6746401 | Panescu | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6746471 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6752813 | Goldfarb et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6764510 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6797002 | Spence et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6810882 | Langberg et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6830584 | Seguin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6854668 | Wancho et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6855144 | Lesh | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6858001 | Aboul-Hosn | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6890353 | Cohn et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6893460 | Spenser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6896690 | Lambrecht et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6908424 | Mortier et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6908481 | Cribier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6936067 | Buchanan | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6945996 | Sedransk | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6955175 | Stevens et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6974476 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6976543 | Fischer | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6997950 | Chawla | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7018406 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7018408 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7044905 | Vidlund et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7060021 | Wilk | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7077862 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7087064 | Hyde | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7100614 | Stevens et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7101395 | Tremulis et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7108717 | Freidberg | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7112219 | Vidlund et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7115141 | Menz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7141064 | Scott et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7175656 | Khairkhahan | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7198646 | Figulla et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7201772 | Schwammenthal et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7247134 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7252682 | Seguin | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7267686 | DiMatteo et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7275604 | Wall | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7276078 | Spenser et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7276084 | Yang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7316706 | Bloom et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7318278 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7326236 | Andreas et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7329278 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7331991 | Kheradvar et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7335213 | Hyde et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7374571 | Pease et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7377941 | Rhee et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7381210 | Zarbatany et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7381218 | Schreck | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7393360 | Spenser et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7404824 | Webler et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7416554 | Lam et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7422072 | Dade | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7429269 | Schwammenthal et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7442204 | Schwammenthal et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7445631 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7462191 | Spenser et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7470285 | Nugent et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7500989 | Solem et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7503931 | Kowalsky et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7510572 | Gabbay | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7510575 | Spenser et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7513908 | Lattouf | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7524330 | Berreklouw | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7527647 | Spence | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7534260 | Lattouf | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7556646 | Yang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7579381 | Dove | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7585321 | Cribier | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7591847 | Navia et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7618446 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7618447 | Case et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7621948 | Herrmann et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7632304 | Park | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632308 | Loulmet | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7635386 | Gammie | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7674222 | Nikolic et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7674286 | Alfieri et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7695510 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7708775 | Rowe et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7748389 | Salahieh et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7766961 | Patel et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7789909 | Andersen et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7803168 | Gifford et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7803184 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7803185 | Gabbay | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7806928 | Rowe et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7837727 | Goetz et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7854762 | Speziali et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7892281 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7896915 | Guyenot et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7901454 | Kapadia et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7927370 | Webler et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7931630 | Nishtala et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7942928 | Webler et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7955247 | Levine et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7955385 | Crittenden | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7972378 | Tabor et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7988727 | Santamore et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7993394 | Hariton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8007992 | Tian et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8029556 | Rowe | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8043368 | Crabtree | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8052749 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8052750 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8052751 | Aklog et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8062355 | Figulla et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8062359 | Marquez et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8070802 | Lamphere et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8109996 | Stacchino et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8142495 | Hasenkam et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8152821 | Gambale et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8157810 | Case et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8167932 | Bourang et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8167934 | Styrc et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8187299 | Goldfarb et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8206439 | Gomez Duran | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8216301 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8226711 | Mortier et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8236045 | Benichou et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8241274 | Keogh et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8252051 | Chau et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8303653 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8308796 | Lashinski et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8323334 | Deem et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8353955 | Styrc et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| RE44075 | Williamson et al. | Mar 2013 | E |
| 8449599 | Chau et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8454656 | Tuval | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8470028 | Thornton et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8480730 | Maurer et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8486138 | Vesely | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8506623 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8506624 | Vidlund et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8578705 | Sindano et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8579913 | Nielsen | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8591573 | Barone | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8591576 | Hasenkam et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8597347 | Maurer et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8685086 | Navia et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8790394 | Miller et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8845717 | Khairkhahan et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8888843 | Khairkhahan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8900214 | Nance et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8900295 | Migliazza et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8926696 | Cabiri et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8932342 | McHugo et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8932348 | Solem et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8945208 | Jimenez et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8956407 | Macoviak et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8979922 | Jayasinghe et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8986376 | Solem | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9011522 | Annest | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9023099 | Duffy et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9034032 | McLean et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9034033 | McLean et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9039757 | McLean et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9039759 | Alkhatib et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9078645 | Conklin et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9078749 | Lutter et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9084676 | Chau et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9095433 | Lutter et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9125742 | Yoganathan et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9149357 | Seguin | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9161837 | Kapadia | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9168137 | Subramanian et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9232995 | Kovalsky et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9232998 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9232999 | Maurer et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9241702 | Maisano et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9254192 | Lutter et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9265608 | Miller et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9289295 | Aklog et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9289297 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9345573 | Nyuli et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9480557 | Pellegrini et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9480559 | Vidlund | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9526611 | Tegels et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9597181 | Christianson et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9610159 | Christianson et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9675454 | Vidlund et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9730792 | Lutter et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9827092 | Vidlund et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9833315 | Vidlund et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9867700 | Bakis et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9895221 | Vidlund | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9986993 | Vidlund et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10376361 | Gross et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 20010018611 | Solem et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010021872 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010025171 | Mortier et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020010427 | Scarfone et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116054 | Lundell et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020139056 | Finnell | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151961 | Lashinski et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161377 | Rabkin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020173842 | Buchanan | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183827 | Derus et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030010509 | Hoffman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036698 | Kohler et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050694 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078652 | Sutherland | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100939 | Yodfat et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105519 | Fasol et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105520 | Alferness et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120340 | Liska et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030130731 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149476 | Damm et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212454 | Scott et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040039436 | Spenser et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049266 | Anduiza et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064014 | Melvin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092858 | Wilson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093075 | Kuehne | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097865 | Anderson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127983 | Mortier et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133263 | Dusbabek et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147958 | Lam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040152947 | Schroeder et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162610 | Liska et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040163828 | Silverstein et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181239 | Dorn et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186565 | Schreck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186566 | Hindrichs et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260317 | Bloom et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040260389 | Case et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004652 | van der Burg et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050004666 | Alfieri et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075727 | Wheatley | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080402 | Santamore et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085900 | Case et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096498 | Houser et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107661 | Lau et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113798 | Slater et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113810 | Houser et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113811 | Houser et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119519 | Girard et al. | Jun 2005 | A9 |
| 20050121206 | Dolan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125012 | Houser et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137686 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137688 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137695 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137698 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148815 | Mortier et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177180 | Kaganov et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197695 | Stacchino et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203614 | Forster et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203615 | Forster et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203617 | Forster et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234546 | Nugent et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240200 | Bergheim | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251209 | Saadat et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256567 | Lim et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283231 | Haug et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288766 | Plain et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004442 | Spenser et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025784 | Starksen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025857 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030885 | Hyde | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060042803 | Gallaher | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047338 | Jenson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052868 | Mortier et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058872 | Salahieh et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060094983 | Burbank et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129025 | Levine et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060142784 | Kontos | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161040 | McCarthy et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161249 | Realyvasquez et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060167541 | Lattouf | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195134 | Crittenden | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195183 | Navia et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229708 | Powell et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229719 | Marquez et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241745 | Solem | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247491 | Vidlund et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259135 | Navia et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259136 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259137 | Artof et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276874 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282161 | Huynh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287716 | Banbury et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287717 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070005131 | Taylor | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005231 | Seguchi | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070010877 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016286 | Herrmann et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016288 | Gurskis et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070027535 | Purdy et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038291 | Case et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050020 | Spence | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061010 | Hauser et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066863 | Rafiee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073387 | Forster et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078297 | Rafiee et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083076 | Lichtenstein | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083259 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093890 | Eliasen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100439 | Cangialosi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112422 | Dehdashtian | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112425 | Schaller et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118151 | Davidson | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118154 | Crabtree | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118210 | Pinchuk | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118213 | Loulmet | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142906 | Figulla et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161846 | Nikolic et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162048 | Quinn et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162103 | Case et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168024 | Khairkhahan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185565 | Schwammenthal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185571 | Kapadia et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203575 | Forster et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213813 | Von Segesser et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070215362 | Rodgers | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070221388 | Johnson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233239 | Navia et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070239265 | Birdsall | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070256843 | Pahila | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265658 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070267202 | Mariller | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070270932 | Headley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070270943 | Solem et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070293944 | Spenser et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080009940 | Cribier | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033543 | Gurskis et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065011 | Marchand et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071361 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071362 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071363 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071366 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071368 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071369 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077235 | Kirson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082163 | Woo | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082166 | Styrc et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091264 | Machold et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080114442 | Mitchell et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080125861 | Webler et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147179 | Cai et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154355 | Benichou et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154356 | Obermiller et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161911 | Revuelta et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172035 | Starksen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177381 | Navia et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183203 | Fitzgerald et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183273 | Mesana et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080188928 | Salahieh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208328 | Antocci et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208332 | Lamphere et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221672 | Lamphere et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243150 | Starksen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243245 | Thambar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255660 | Guyenot et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255661 | Straubinger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281411 | Berreklouw | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080288060 | Kaye et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080293996 | Evans et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090005863 | Goetz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090048668 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054968 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054974 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090062908 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076598 | Salahieh et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090082619 | De Marchena | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088836 | Bishop et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090099410 | De Marchena | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112309 | Jaramillo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090131849 | Maurer et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132035 | Roth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090137861 | Goldberg et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090138079 | Tuval et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157175 | Benichou | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090164005 | Dove et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171432 | Von Segesser et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171447 | Von Segesser et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171456 | Kveen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090177266 | Powell | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090192601 | Rafiee et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210052 | Forster et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216322 | Le et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222076 | Figulla et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090224529 | Gill | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234318 | Loulmet et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234435 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234443 | Ottma et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240320 | Tuval et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090248149 | Gabbay | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090276040 | Rowe et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090281619 | Le et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287299 | Tabor et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292262 | Adams et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319037 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090326575 | Galdonik et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100016958 | St. Goar et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100021382 | Dorshow et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100023117 | Yoganathan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100036479 | Hill et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049313 | Alon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100082094 | Quadri et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100161041 | Maisano et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100168839 | Braido et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100179641 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185277 | Braido et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185278 | Schankereli | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100191326 | Alkhatib | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100192402 | Yamaguchi et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100204781 | Alkhatib | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210899 | Schankereli | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217382 | Chau et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249489 | Jarvik | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249923 | Alkhatib et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280604 | Zipory et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280606 | Naor | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100286768 | Alkhatib | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100298755 | McNamara et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100298931 | Quadri et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004296 | Lutter et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110015616 | Straubinger et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110015728 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110015729 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029072 | Gabbay | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066231 | Cartledge et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066233 | Thornton et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110112632 | Chau et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137397 | Chau et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137408 | Bergheim | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224655 | Asirvatham et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224678 | Gabbay | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224728 | Martin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224784 | Quinn | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110245911 | Quill et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251682 | Murray, III et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264191 | Rothstein | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264206 | Tabor | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110288637 | De Marchena | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110319988 | Schankereli et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110319989 | Lane et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120010694 | Lutter et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120016468 | Robin et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120022640 | Gross et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120035703 | Lutter et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120035713 | Lutter et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120035722 | Tuval | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120053686 | McNamara et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120059487 | Cunanan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120089171 | Hastings et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101571 | Thambar et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101572 | Kovalsky et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120116351 | Chomas et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120123529 | Levi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120165930 | Gifford, III et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179244 | Schankereli | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203336 | Annest | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120215303 | Quadri et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226348 | Lane et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120283824 | Lutter et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120289945 | Segermark | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130030522 | Rowe et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130053950 | Rowe et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130066341 | Ketai et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130079873 | Migliazza et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131788 | Quadri et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130172978 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130184811 | Rowe et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130190860 | Sundt, III | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130190861 | Chau et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130197622 | Mitra et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130226288 | Goldwasser et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130231735 | Deem et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130274874 | Hammer | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130282101 | Eidenschink et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130310928 | Morriss | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130317603 | McLean et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325041 | Annest et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325110 | Khalil et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130338752 | Geusen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140046433 | Kovalsky | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140081323 | Hawkins | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094918 | Vishnubholta et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142691 | Pouletty | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140163668 | Rafiee | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194981 | Menk et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194983 | Kovalsky et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140214159 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140222142 | Kovalsky et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140243966 | Garde et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277419 | Garde et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296969 | Tegels | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296970 | Ekvall et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296971 | Tegels et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296972 | Tegels et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296975 | Tegels | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140303718 | Tegels et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140309732 | Solem | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140316516 | Vidlund et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140324160 | Benichou et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140324161 | Tegels et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140324164 | Gross et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140331475 | Duffy et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140358224 | Tegels et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140364942 | Straubinger et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140364944 | Lutter et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140379076 | Vidlund et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150005874 | Vidlund | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150011821 | Gorman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150025553 | Del Nido et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150057705 | Vidlund | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150073542 | Heldman | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150073545 | Braido | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150094802 | Buchbinder et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150105856 | Rowe et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150119936 | Gilmore et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150119978 | Tegels et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150127093 | Hosmer et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150127096 | Rowe et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150134050 | Solem et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150142100 | Morriss et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150142101 | Coleman et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150142103 | Vidlund | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150142104 | Braido | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150173897 | Raanani et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150196393 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150196688 | James | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150202044 | Chau et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216653 | Freudenthal | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216660 | Pintor | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223820 | Olson | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223934 | Vidlund | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150230921 | Chau et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150238312 | Lashinski | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150238729 | Jenson et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150272731 | Racchini et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150305860 | Wang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150305864 | Quadri et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150305868 | Lutter et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150327995 | Morin et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150328001 | McLean | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150335424 | McLean | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150335429 | Morriss et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150342717 | O'Donnell et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150351903 | Morriss et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150351906 | Hammer et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160000562 | Siegel | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160008131 | Christianson | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160067042 | Murad et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160074160 | Christianson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160106537 | Christianson | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160113764 | Sheahan | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160143736 | Vidlund | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160151155 | Lutter et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206280 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160242902 | Morriss | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160262879 | Meiri et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160262881 | Schankereli et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160278955 | Liu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160317290 | Chau | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160324635 | Vidlund et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160331527 | Vidlund et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160346086 | Solem | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160367365 | Conklin | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160367367 | Maisano et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160367368 | Vidlund et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170079790 | Vidlund et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170100248 | Tegels et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128208 | Christianson et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170181854 | Christianson et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170196688 | Christianson et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170252153 | Chau et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170266001 | Vidlund et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281343 | Christianson et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170312076 | Lutter et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170312077 | Vidlund et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170319333 | Tegels et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180028314 | Ekvall et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180078368 | Vidlund et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180078370 | Kovalsky et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1486161 | Mar 2004 | CN |
| 1961845 | May 2007 | CN |
| 2902226 | May 2007 | CN |
| 101146484 | Mar 2008 | CN |
| 101180010 | May 2008 | CN |
| 101984938 | Mar 2011 | CN |
| 102639179 | Aug 2012 | CN |
| 102869317 | Jan 2013 | CN |
| 102869318 | Jan 2013 | CN |
| 102869321 | Jan 2013 | CN |
| 103220993 | Jul 2013 | CN |
| 2246526 | Mar 1973 | DE |
| 19532846 | Mar 1997 | DE |
| 19546692 | Jun 1997 | DE |
| 19857887 | Jul 2000 | DE |
| 19907646 | Aug 2000 | DE |
| 10049812 | Apr 2002 | DE |
| 10049813 | Apr 2002 | DE |
| 10049815 | Apr 2002 | DE |
| 102006052564 | Dec 2007 | DE |
| 102006052710 | May 2008 | DE |
| 102007043830 | Apr 2009 | DE |
| 102007043831 | Apr 2009 | DE |
| 0103546 | Mar 1984 | EP |
| 1057460 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 1088529 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 1469797 | Nov 2005 | EP |
| 1849440 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 2072027 | Jun 2009 | EP |
| 2111800 | Oct 2009 | EP |
| 2193762 | Jun 2010 | EP |
| 2278944 | Feb 2011 | EP |
| 2747707 | Jul 2014 | EP |
| 2918248 | Sep 2015 | EP |
| 2788217 | Jul 2000 | FR |
| 2815844 | May 2002 | FR |
| 2003505146 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2005515836 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2009514628 | Apr 2009 | JP |
| 2013512765 | Apr 2013 | JP |
| 1017275 | Aug 2002 | NL |
| 1271508 | Nov 1986 | SU |
| 9217118 | Oct 1992 | WO |
| 9301768 | Feb 1993 | WO |
| 9829057 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| 9940964 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| 9947075 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 2000018333 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| 2000030550 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 200041652 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| 200047139 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| 0135878 | May 2001 | WO |
| 2001049213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 2001054624 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 2001056512 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 2001061289 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 200176510 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| 2001082840 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 0203892 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 2002004757 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 2002022054 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| 2002028321 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| 0236048 | May 2002 | WO |
| 2002041789 | May 2002 | WO |
| 2002043620 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 2002049540 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 2002076348 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 2003003943 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| 2003030776 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| 03047468 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 2003049619 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| 2004019825 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| 2005102181 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2006014233 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006034008 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2006064490 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2006070372 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| 2006113906 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2006127756 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| 2007081412 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| 2008005405 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| 2008035337 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| 2008091515 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2008125906 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| 2008147964 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009024859 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009026563 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2009045338 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009080801 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2009132187 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2010037141 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| 2010057262 | May 2010 | WO |
| 2010090878 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2010098857 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2010121076 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| 2011017440 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| 2011022658 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| 2011069048 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2011072084 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2011106735 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011109813 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011111047 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011159342 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2011163275 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2012011108 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2012027487 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2012036742 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| 2012095116 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| 2012177942 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2013028387 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013045262 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013059747 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013096411 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| 2013175468 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2014121280 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| 2014144937 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014162306 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| 2014189974 | Nov 2014 | WO |
| 2015023862 | Feb 2015 | WO |
| 2015051430 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| 2015058039 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| 2015063580 | May 2015 | WO |
| 2015120122 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| 2015138306 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2015173609 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| 2016112085 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| 2016126942 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| 2016168609 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| 2016196933 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| 2017096157 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| 2017132008 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| 2017218375 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| 2018005779 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| 2018013515 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| US 9,155,620 B2, 10/2015, Gross et al. (withdrawn) |
| Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2019246822, dated Nov. 27, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Yoganathan, A. P. et al., “The Current Status of Prosthetic Heart Valves,” In Polymetric Materials and Artificial Organs, Mar. 20, 1983, pp. 111-150, American Chemical Society. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-525197, dated Jul. 5, 2016, 8 pages. |
| Rosch, J. et al., “The Birth, Early Years and Future of Interventional Radiology,” J Vasc Interv Radiol., Jul. 2003, 4:841-853. |
| Office Action for European Application No. 12825480.2, dated Nov. 16, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,844,746, dated Aug. 10, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,844,746, dated May 1, 2017, 3 pages. |
| “Shape Memory Alloys,” Retrieved from the Internet: <http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/˜database/MEMS/sma.html>, Feb. 5, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/237,023, dated Nov. 30, 2015, 7 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/237,023, dated May 9, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/183,943, dated Sep. 1, 2016, 6 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/183,943, dated Feb. 1, 2017, 8 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2016203451, dated Jul. 13, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,957,442, dated Feb. 27, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2017-085324, dated Mar. 20, 2018, 3 pages. |
| Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2019200617 dated Dec. 4, 2019. |
| Extended Search Report for EP18167606 dated Aug. 29, 2018, pp. 1-3. |
| Office Action for Australian Patent Application No. 2012299311, dated Mar. 2, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,844,746, dated Apr. 28, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 12825480.2, dated Jul. 15, 2015, 8 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2012/050579, dated Feb. 28, 2013, 9 pages. |
| Al Zaibag, Muayed, et al., “Percutaneous Balloon Valvotomy in Tricuspid Stenos's,” British Heart Journal, Jan. 1987, vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 51-53. |
| Al-Khaja, N. et al., “Eleven Years' Experience with Carpentier-Edwards Biological Valves in Relation to Survival and Complications,” European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jun. 30, 1989, 3:305-311. |
| Almagor, Y. et al., “Balloon Expandable Stent Implantation in Stenotic Right Heart Valved Conduits,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Nov. 1, 1990, 16(6):1310-1314. |
| H. R. Andersen et al., “Transluminal Implantation of Artificial Heart Valves: Description of a New Expandable Aortic Valve and Initial Results with Implantation by Catheter Technique in Closed Chest Pigs,” European Heart Journal, 1992, Issue 5, vol. 13, pp. 704-708. |
| Andersen, H. R., “History of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Prosthesis,” Herz, Aug. 2009, 34(5):343-346. |
| Andersen, H. R., “Transluminal catheter implanted prosthetic heart valves,” International Journal of Angiology, 1998, 7(2):102-106. |
| Robert C. Ashton Jr., “Development of an Intraluminal Device for the Treatment of Aortic Regurgitation: Prototype and in Vitro Testing System,” Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1996, Issue/vol. 112, pp. 979-983. |
| Benchimol, A. et al., “Simultaneous Left Ventricular Echocardiography and Aortic Blood Velocity During Rapid Right Ventricular Pacing in Man,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Jan.-Feb. 1977, 273(1):55-62. |
| G. M. Bernacca, et al., “Polyurethane Heart Valves: Fatigue Failure, Calcification, and Polyurethane Structure,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Mar. 5, 1997, Issue 3, vol. 34, pp. 371-379. |
| Boudjemline, Y. et al., “Steps Toward the Percutaneous Replacement of Atrioventricular Valves: An Experimental Study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Jul. 2005, 46(2):360-365. |
| Buckberg, G. et al., “Restoring Papillary Muscle Dimensions During Restoration in Dilated Hearts,” Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 2005, 4:475-477. |
| Chamberlain, G., “Ceramics Replace Body Parts,” Design News, Jun. 9, 1997, Issue 11, vol. 52, 5 pages. |
| Choo, S. J. et al., “Aortic Root Geometry: Pattern of Differences Between Leaflets and Sinuses of Valsava,” The Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Jul. 1999, 8:407-415. |
| Declaration of Malcolm J. R. Dalrymple-Hay, Nov. 9, 2012, pp. 1-11; with Curriculum Vitae, Oct. 4, 2012. |
| Dotter, C. T. et al., “Transluminal Treatment of Arteriosclerotic Obstruction. Description of a New Technic and a Preliminary Report of its Application,” Circulation, Nov. 1964, 30:654-670. |
| Drawbaugh, K., “Feature—Heart Surgeons Explore Minimally Invasive Methods,” Reuters Limited, Jul. 16, 1996, 3 pages. |
| Gray, H., The Aorta, Anatomy of the Human Body, 1918, Retrieved from the Internet <http://www.bartleby.com/107/142.html>, Dec. 10, 2012, 5 pages. |
| Gray, H., The Heart, Anatomy of the Human Body, 1918, Retrieved from the Internet <http://education.yahoo.com/reference/gray/subjects/subject/138>, Aug. 10, 2012, 9 pages. |
| Greenhalgh, E. S., “Design and characterization of a biomimetic prosthetic aortic heart valve,” 1994, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Department of Fiber and Polymer Science, North Carolina State University at Raleigh, 159 pages. |
| Inoue, K. et al., “Clinical Application of Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy by a New Balloon Catheter,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1984, 87:394-402. |
| Jin, X. Y. et al., “Aortic Root Geometry and Stentless Porcine Valve Competence,” Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Oct. 1999, 11(4):145-150. |
| Knudsen, L. L. et al., “Catheter-implanted prosthetic heart valves. Transluminal catheter implantation of a new expandable artificial heart valve in the descending thoracic aorta in isolated vessels and closed chest pigs,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1993, 16(5):253-262. |
| Kolata, G., “Device That Opens Clogged Arteries Gets a Failing Grade in a New Study,” New York Times [online], (http://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/03/health/device-that-opens-clogged-ar-teries-gets-a-faili . . . ,>, published Jan. 3, 1991,retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 5, 2016, 3 pages. |
| Lawrence, D. D., “Percutaneous Endovascular Graft: Experimental Evaluation,” Radiology, 1987, 163:357-360. |
| Lozonschi, L., et al. “Transapical mitral valved stent implantation: A survival series in swine,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 140(2):422-426 (Aug. 2010) published online Mar. 12, 2010, 1 page. |
| Lutter, Georg, et al., Mitral valved stent implantation, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2010, vol. 38, pp. 350-355. |
| Ma, L. et al., “Double-crowned valved stents for off-pump mitral valve replacement,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Aug. 2005, 28(2): 194-198. |
| Moazami, N. et al., “Transluminal aortic valve placement: A feasibility study with a newly designed collapsible aortic valve,” ASAIO Journal, Sep./ Oct. 1996, 42(5):M381-M385. |
| Orton, C., “Mitralseal: Hybrid Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement,” Symposium: Small Animal Proceedings, 2011, pp. 311-312. |
| Pavcnik, D. et al. “Development and Initial Experimental Evaluation of a Prosthetic Aortic Valve for Transcatheter Placement,” Radiology, 1992; 183:151-154. |
| Porstmann, W. et al., “Der Verschluß des Ductus Arteriosus Persistens ohne Thorakotomie,” Thoraxchirurgie Vaskuläre Chirurgie, Band 15, Heft 2, Stuttgart, Apr. 1967, pp. 199-203. |
| Rashkind, W. J., “Creation of an Atrial Septal Defect Without Thoracotomy,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, Jun. 13, 1966, 196( 11 ): 173-174. |
| Rashkind, W. J., “Historical Aspects of Interventional Cardiology: Past, Present, Future,” Texas Heart Institute Journal, Dec. 1986, 13(4):363-367. |
| Reul, H. et al., “The Geomety of the Aortic Root in Health, at Valve Disease and After Valve Replacement,” J. Biomechanics, 1990, 23(2):181-191. |
| Ross, D. N., “Aortic Valve Surgery,” Guy's Hospital, London, 1968, pp. 192-197. |
| Rousseau, E. P. M. et al., “A Mechanical Analysis of the Closed Hancock Heart Valve Prosthesis,” Journal of Biomechanics, 1998, 21(7):545-562. |
| Sabbah, A. N. et al., “Mechanical Factors in the Degeneration of Porcine Bioprosthetic Valves: An Overview,” Dec. 1989, Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 4(4):302-309. |
| Selby, M.D., J. Bayne, “Experience with New Retrieval Forceps for Foreign Body Removal in the Vascular, Urinary, and Biliary Systems,” Radiology 1990; 176:535-538. |
| Serruys, P.W., et al., “Stenting of Coronary Arteries. Are we the Sorcerer's Apprentice?,” European Heart Journal (1989) 10, 774-782, pp. 37-45, Jun. 13, 1989. |
| Sigwart, U., “An Overview of Intravascular Stents: Old and New,” Chapter 48, Interventional Cardiology, 2nd Edition, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, © 1994, 1990, pp. 803-815. |
| Tofeig, M. et al., “Transcatheter Closure of a Mid-Muscular Ventricular Septal Defect with an Amplatzer VSD Occluder Device,” Heart, 1999, 81:438-440. |
| Uchida, Barry T., et al., “Modifications of Gianturco Expandable Wire Stents,” AJR:150, May 1988, Dec. 3, 1987, pp. 1185-1187. |
| Watt, A.H., et al. “Intravenous Adenosine in the Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia; a Dose-Ranging Study and Interaction with Dipyridamole,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (1986), 21, pp. 227-230. |
| Webb, J. G. et al., “Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation Retrograde from the Femoral Artery,” Circulation, 2006, 113:842-850. |
| Wheatley, M.D., David J., “Valve Prostheses,” Rob & Smith's Operative Surgery, Fourth Edition, pp. 415-424, ButtenNorths 1986. |
| Preliminary Opinion of Opposition Decision for Application No. EP 12825480.2 dated Jan. 8, 2020, 9 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200038179 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61615264 | Mar 2012 | US | |
| 61564462 | Nov 2011 | US | |
| 61523134 | Aug 2011 | US | |
| 61522468 | Aug 2011 | US | |
| 61522542 | Aug 2011 | US | |
| 61522450 | Aug 2011 | US | |
| 61522476 | Aug 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14237023 | US | |
| Child | 15183943 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15829091 | Dec 2017 | US |
| Child | 16594504 | US | |
| Parent | 15183943 | Jun 2016 | US |
| Child | 15829091 | US |
