The invention relates to protection equipment for protecting a target against attacking missiles, with a number of protection elements, which can be triggered individually to combat a missile. A further subject of the invention is a vehicle, in particular a military vehicle, with protection equipment against attacking missiles, and also a method for protecting a target against attacking missiles with protection equipment, in which a protection element is triggered to combat the missile.
To protect various targets, such as for example vehicles, ships, bunkers or similar targets, against attacking missiles, use is often made of versions of protection equipment that have a number of protection elements which can be used optionally for combating the incoming missile.
DE 26 12 673 C1 discloses protection elements that can be triggered as and when required to combat an incoming missile, such as for example a hollow-charge projectile. The protection element has for this purpose a multiplicity of interceptor explosive charges, which can be triggered individually or in groups.
It has been found to be disadvantageous in the case of protection equipment with such protection elements that, although it offers good protection against a first incoming missile, under some circumstances a second missile approaching from the same direction is no longer intercepted, since the corresponding interceptor explosive charges have already been triggered to combat the first missile.
Against this background, the object of the present invention is to provide protection equipment that offers improved protection when it is fired on more than once.
In the case of protection equipment of the type mentioned at the beginning, this object is achieved by the protection elements being arranged in such a way that a triggered protection element is replaced by a replacement protection element arranged redundantly in relation to it.
Such an arrangement of the protection elements and of the corresponding replacement protection elements achieves reliable protection of the target even when it is fired on more than once from the same direction. This is so because the protective function of the triggered protection element is taken over by the replacement protection element arranged redundantly in relation to it. The replacement of the triggered protection element by the replacement protection element is performed automatically, so that it is not required to carry out any manual actions for the replacement.
An advantageous design of the invention provides that the direction of effect of the protection elements is directed downwardly, preferably vertically downwardly. On account of the downwardly directed direction of effect, the risk of collateral damage when triggering of the protection element takes place is minimized. The protection elements may be arranged in the upper end region of the target to be protected, for example in the roof region of a vehicle, and act downwardly against the attacking missile. To this extent, the protection elements are primarily suitable for combating missiles approaching the target from the side that can be combated transversely in relation to their direction of flight.
A further design provides that a number of protection elements are arranged in the form of a ring, in particular in the manner of a closed or open ring. The arrangement of the protection elements in the form of a ring provides protection of the target to be protected that is effective on all sides. The arrangement of the protection elements in the form of a ring can bring about seamless protection of the target to be protected.
A further design provides that the protection elements have a number of explosive charges that can be triggered together, in particular in the form of hollow charges, plane charges, cutting charges or projectile-forming charges. All of the explosive charges of a protection element can be triggered together. Arranging the explosive charges next to one another achieves combating of the attacking missile over a broad range, so that there is a high probability of it being rendered harmless.
A further design provides that the replacement protection element is arranged in such a way that various protection elements can be replaced by it or that it is permanently assigned to one protection element as a replacement. In the case of an embodiment in which various protection elements can be replaced by means of a single replacement protection element, there is the advantage that even a relatively small number of replacement protection elements is sufficient to obtain redundant protection in each case for the protection elements triggered, which allows an altogether low-cost construction. In the case of a design in which the replacement protection elements are permanently assigned to the triggered protection element as a replacement, a simple construction is obtained. However, in this case it is necessary that the number of replacement protection elements coincides with the number of protection elements.
A design that is structurally advantageous, by virtue of being simple, provides that the replacement protection element is arranged behind the triggered protection element. When considered in the direction of the threat, a kind of series arrangement of the protection elements is obtained. Firstly, the outer protection element is triggered, then the replacement protection element that is arranged behind the triggered protection element is transformed from an inactive state to an active state and can take over the function of the triggered protection element. A missile approaching the target once again from the same direction after the corresponding protection element has already been triggered can therefore be combated by the replacement protection element.
In this connection, it has also proven to be advantageous if the protection elements are fixedly arranged and the replacement protection element is movably arranged. The movable arrangement of one or more replacement protection elements makes it possible that various protection elements can be replaced by a replacement protection element after they have been triggered. The gaps produced by triggering the outer protection elements can be closed by the replacement protection elements arranged behind them, as it were in the second row.
In certain structural situations, a design that has proven to be advantageous is one in which a number of replacement protection elements are provided, at least one of which is fixedly arranged and one of which is movably arranged. In regions of the protection arrangement into which the replacement protection element cannot be readily moved, the replacement protection elements may be fixedly arranged. In regions with easier accessability, they may be movably arranged.
In addition, it is proposed that means for moving the replacement protection elements are provided. The moving means may be activated by way of a motive drive, for example an electromotive drive. The means for moving the replacement protection elements may for example have a cantilever arm, at the free end of which at least one protection element is arranged, it being possible for the cantilever arm to be articulated rotatably on the target to be protected, for example about a substantially vertically extending axis.
A further design of the protection arrangement provides that, when providing a replacement, the replacement protection element assumes the position of the triggered protection element. An arrangement in which the replacement protection element assumes the position of the triggered protection element when providing a replacement offers the advantage over such a design in which the replacement protection element is arranged behind the triggered protection element that the distance between the protection element or replacement protection element and the target to be protected does not change when the replacement is provided.
It has proven to be advantageous in this connection if the protection element and a replacement protection element, preferably three replacement protection elements, are arranged in a rotary drum that is preferably rotatable about a horizontal axis of rotation. With such an arrangement, a replacement of the triggered protection element can be achieved in a way that is structurally comparatively simple. In the case of three replacement protection elements, incremental turning of the rotary drum allows the achievement of a triply redundant arrangement, in which, after triggering of the protection element, altogether three replacement protection elements can be moved one after the other into the position of the triggered protection element by rotational movements of the rotary drum by 90 degrees in each case.
To avoid unwanted instances of external triggering, for example by being fired on or similar effects, it is also proposed in this connection that the rotary drum has a covering with an active opening. The covering may enclose the rotary drum in the manner of a cylindrical shell and consist of a ballistically resistant material, for example armor steel. In the direction of effect of the protection element, the covering may have an active opening, through which the respectively triggered protection element acts outwardly against the attacking missile.
A further design provides that the protection element and at least one replacement protection element are arranged one behind the other in a magazine. The arrangement one behind the other in a magazine allows a triggered protection element to be replaced with a replacement element by a reloading operation. A number of replacement protection elements, for example two, three, four, five or more, may be arranged in the magazine.
Finally, it is proposed that, for replacing the protection element, the replacement protection element can be transferred from a rearward magazine position into a forward magazine position, preferably by an axial or folding movement.
In the case of a vehicle of the type mentioned at the beginning, it is proposed for achieving the aforementioned object that the protection equipment is formed as claimed in one of the preceding claims.
Such protection equipment with the corresponding arrangement of the protection elements and the replacement protection elements achieves reliable protection of the vehicle even when it is fired on more than once from the same direction. This is so because the protective function of the triggered protection element is taken over by the replacement protection element arranged redundantly in relation to it.
In a design of the vehicle it is also proposed that the protection equipment is arranged on the roof of the vehicle. In this way, reliable combating of missiles approaching from the side can be achieved by the protection elements acting downwardly. The protection equipment is preferably at a certain distance from the roof of the vehicle in the vertical direction, so that even missiles hitting comparatively high up in the side region of the vehicle can be reliably combated.
The protection equipment is preferably at a distance of at least 30 cm, with preference at least 50 cm and with greater preference at least 70 cm, from the roof area of the vehicle.
In the case of a method of the type mentioned at the beginning, it is proposed for achieving the aforementioned object that the triggered protection element is replaced by a protection element arranged redundantly in relation to it.
The replacing of a protection element by a replacement protection element arranged redundantly in relation to it achieves reliable protection of the target even when it is fired on more than once from the same direction. This is so because the protective function of the triggered protection element is taken over by the replacement protection element arranged redundantly in relation to it. The replacement may take place in an automated manner, without any manual actions having to be carried out for this.
All of the embodiments of the protection equipment that are described above may be used individually or in combination, both with regard to the method and with regard to the vehicle.
Further details and advantages of protection equipment according to the invention and of a vehicle equipped with such protection equipment and of a method for protecting a target against attacking missiles are explained below with the aid of the accompanying drawings of exemplary embodiments, in each case in highly schematized views, in which:
The vehicle 1 shown in
Therefore, to provide protection against such missiles, protection equipment 10 is provided, the specific details of which are discussed below.
As the representation in
As the representation in
For combating a missile, the individual protection elements 11, 12 respectively have a number of explosive charges that can be triggered together, for example a number of explosive charges in the form of miniature hollow charges. Alternatively, plane charges, cutting charges or projectile-forming charges could also be provided, depending on which type of missile is to be combated. The number of explosive charges provided per protection element 11, 12 may be in the range of four to twenty charges, particularly solutions with eight to twelve explosive charges in the form of hollow charges having proven to be advantageous.
It may be possible for the explosive charges to be ignited at the same time by way of a common ignition distributor. Igniting the explosive charges or triggering the protection element 11 produces an effect acting in the direction of effect W that is directed downwardly, substantially parallel to the side surface of the vehicle 1. Since the protection elements 11 are arranged on the roof 2 of the vehicle in the manner of a ring (cf. also the representation in
By triggering the protection elements 11, the missile is destroyed and the fragments of the missile created are intercepted by the basic armor plating of the vehicle 1, whereby reliable protection of the vehicle crew is obtained.
As explained in detail below on the basis of the representations in
In the case of the embodiment according to the representation in
In normal operation, the replacement protection elements 12 are inactive, so that they cannot be triggered. Immediately after triggering of the protection element 11 lying in front of it has taken place, a replacement protection element 12 is transformed from an inactive state into an active state by way of corresponding electronics, and can then be used for combating a further missile.
On account of the redundant arrangement, the all-round protection for the vehicle 1 is retained even when it is fired on more than once. Gaps occurring due to the triggering of a protection element 11 are immediately closed by the redundantly arranged replacement protection element 12.
As the representation in
The means 15 for moving the protection element 12 comprise a rotatably mounted cantilever arm 16, which is articulated in the roof region of the vehicle 1 about a substantially vertically extending axis of rotation DV. On the cantilever arm 16 there may also be arranged more than one replacement protection element 12. For example, two or four replacement protection elements 12 may be arranged on the cantilever arm 16. It is also conceivable to form a complete protective ring on the cantilever arm 16, in this case the number of replacement protection elements 12 corresponding to the number of outer protection elements 11. In this way, quadruple redundancy would then be obtained, on account of the possibility of movement of the inner ring of replacement protection elements 12.
While the designs described above have respectively showed versions of protection equipment 10 in which the replacement protection elements 12 are arranged in a position behind the triggered protection element 11, the representations in
In
As soon as the protection element 11 has been triggered, the replacement protection elements 12 arranged redundantly in relation to it can be transferred into its position. For this purpose, the drum magazine is turned by 90 degrees by way of the moving means 15, so that then a replacement protection element 12 takes the place of the triggered protection element 11. Incremental turning provides a triply redundant arrangement.
With the versions of protective equipment 10 described above it is possible to obtain reliable protection of a target 1 even against it being fired on more than once from the same direction, since a triggered protection element 11 is replaced immediately by a replacement protection element 12 provided for it. No gaps in the protection occur, whereby the overall protection of the target 1 is improved.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 106 746.5 | Jul 2012 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2013/100268 | 7/19/2013 | WO | 00 |