The technical scope of the invention is that of ballistic shield devices against projectiles and in particular rockets.
The protection of military vehicles against rocket attacks, in particular shaped charges, is at present ensured in full or in part by flat grids or grills, commonly termed “slats”.
The common functioning principle of these devices is to damage the nose cone of a rocket so as to produce a short circuit in the firing system of the projectile's warhead. To do this, more often than not, such protection incorporates parallel metallic blades of a width of between 30 and 40 mm for a thickness of between 2 and 5 mm.
As disclosed in patent FR-1103549, these blades damage the nose cone impacting on them. The worst case in which the rocket is ignited only occurs when the rocket's piezoelectric fuse directly strikes a blade or portion of the structure of the protection device. To overcome this, the opposing edge of the blades is as narrow as possible to as to statistically limit the probability of the fuse hitting this edge.
This solution works for a frontal attack or one which is substantially perpendicular to the plane of the protection device. However, the smaller the elevation angle between the plane of the device and the projectile's trajectory, the wider the opposing edge of a blade device, thereby increasing the probability of the rocket fuse striking a blade.
A protection device is also known by patent US2009266227 in which hard steel or tungsten inserts are positioned in an array over a net of thin cables. The purpose of the inserts is to deteriorate the nose cone of the projectile in order to neutralize it.
Such a solution, light but complicated in structure, requires the cables to be flexible enough for the projectile to be brought into contact with the hard inserts.
Furthermore, the presence of a peripheral frame to hold the net in place strongly reduces the protection efficiency when the angle between the plane of the screen and the impact trajectory is small.
Patent GB2448477 discloses a light grill acting as a ballistic shield against rockets. This grill incorporates flat bars made of carbon fiber and fixed to uprights of light alloy. This grill also neutralizes rockets by deteriorating their nose cone or fuse.
Such a solution, despite its lightness, is complicated in structure, and only provides protection against rockets fired substantially perpendicularly to the grill.
Perforated amour plates are also known by patents WO2010/036411 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,007,326 that provide protection against small caliber projectiles. These plates are equipped with holes of a reduced diameter (of around 12.5 mm) and are thus not able to deteriorate rocket nose cone to neutralize them. Rockets are systematically ignited after impacting such amour plates.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,191,694 proposes a shield device for the edges of the window openings of armored vehicles. Once again, such shielding incorporates oblong drill holes of reduced dimensions (5 mm wide, approximately) and is not able to neutralize a rocket.
Lastly, patent EP1574810 discloses multi-layered shielding whose external plate incorporates drill holes to provide protection against small caliber (less than 20 mm) projectiles. This plate is not able to neutralize an incident rocket.
The invention proposes to overcome such drawbacks by implementing a grid, rigid but of reduced thickness, that incorporates bars made of a hard material, for example a metal, and having sharp angles. The bars are joined by uprights.
The invention thereby ensures protection against rockets fired at different angles of incidence with respect to the plane of the grid.
The grid according to the invention has the advantage of opposing a small surface to low elevation angles of attack whilst being aggressive enough to damage the nose cone of a rocket.
A second advantage lies in its small size which makes it light, easy to handle and store.
A third advantage lies in the fact that the grid can be made contiguously, as a single piece, by laser cutting or by die-stamping in a steel plate. The manufacture of the grid is thus made simpler.
A fourth advantage linked to this single-piece manufacture is that the grid is less subject to fractures between uprights and bars since there is no material discontinuity at this level.
A fifth advantage lies in the alternate spacing of the uprights thereby reducing their number and reducing the probability of the fuse hitting an upright and making the grid self-supporting (no need for a frame as for the cable-based device).
Thus, the invention relates to a protection grid against a projectile, for example of the rocket type that incorporates a body extended by a fuse, such grid incorporating bars linked together by uprights, the width between the bars being between the maximal diameter of the fuse and the maximal diameter of the projectile body, protection grid wherein the grid is formed in a single piece and the grid has a thickness that is less than three times the thickness of a bar, the section of the bar and uprights being polygonal with square edges.
According to one characteristic of the invention, the thickness of the grid is less than 15 mm.
Advantageously, the hardness of the material composing the grid is greater than 350 HRB.
Advantageously, the uprights are arranged alternately, from one row of bars to another, over the full grid.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the grid is plane.
Advantageously, the grid is constant in thickness.
According to another characteristic of the invention, the grid may incorporate at least one plane attachment zone provided with at least one drill hole.
The invention will become more apparent from the following description, description illustrated by the appended drawings, in which:
According to
The width L between the bars is of between the maximal diameter of a fuse of a projectile (not shown, for example a rocket) and the maximal diameter of the body of this projectile. These dimensions are well known to one skilled in the art and namely by U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0266227 (quoted as prior art) which specifies that the dimensions of the meshing of a net able to stop a rocket are of between 110 and 180 mm and that the protection must be positioned at a distance of around 60 cm from the structure to be shielded.
Such a grid arrangement is well known and is intended to ensure the passage of the fuses of these projectiles between the bars whereas the body of the projectile itself is stopped by the grid. This results in a substantial shock at the nose of the projectile linking the fuse and the body, thereby leading to the destruction of the priming means. The projectile is thus not ignited and is neutralized.
The uprights are spaced alternately from one row of bars to another over the surface of the grid 1. In this way, it is possible for less uprights 3 to be used than if they were aligned from one row to another.
The grid 1 is in a single piece, which means it is made contiguously, for example by laser cutting or by stamping from a steel plate of a constant thickness. The grid can also be made by welding or mechanical assembly of the uprights 3 and the bars 2. Manufacture by laser cutting is the simplest since it limits the number of manufacturing operations and above all procures improved solidity of the grid 1 which thereby finds the number of its weaknesses, located at the intersections between the bars 2 and uprights 3, reduced.
According to
The grid 1 incorporates plane attachment zones 10 (
The grid 1 is made of a material with a superficial hardness of over 350 HRB (by which is conventionally designated Rockwell Hardness B defined by standard ISO 6508-1).
The bars thus obtained have sharp edges able to penetrate the body of a projectile level with its nose whatever the firing angles.
For an elevation angle of attack a with respect to the plane of the grid 1, when the width M exposed by a bar 2 of the grid 1 according to the invention is compared with the width K exposed by a bar of classical design 100 (second bar 100 drawn in dotted lines), it can be observed that the width M exposed is much less than the second width K exposed by a bar 100 of classical design.
The uprights 3 can be observed to have the same sectional characteristics as the bars 3 and because of this they have the same properties and also contribute to the aggression of the nose cone in addition to enabling the grid to be self-supporting and avoiding the necessity of having supporting frames or structures.
According to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11 00191 | Jan 2011 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2012/000032 | 1/25/2012 | WO | 00 | 8/15/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/098317 | 7/26/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5007326 | Gooch, Jr. et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
7191694 | Gonzalez | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7882776 | Medwell et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7975594 | Wartmann | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8402878 | Schreiner et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20080257141 | Medwell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090266227 | Farinella et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100206158 | Neethling | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100288114 | Soukos | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110113952 | Rosenwasser et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110120294 | Beach et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110232472 | Kellner et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120011993 | Malone et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120180640 | Farinella et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140123842 | Kahmann et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140123843 | Leeming | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 574 810 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1103549 | Nov 1955 | FR |
2 448 477 | Oct 2008 | GB |
WO 2010036411 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Apr. 18, 2012 Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/FR2012/000032. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130312596 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |