This invention relates to apparatus for converting energy present in surface waves on bodies of water to useful energy, and particularly to means for protecting such apparatus from storm induced surface turbulence by either raising the apparatus above or sinking it below the water surface.
Wave energy converters, referred to hereinafter as WECs, are known and described, for example, in co-pending application Ser. No. 10/762,800, filed Jan. 22, 2004, the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference. In the co-pending application, there are described two floats, one having an annular or tire-like configuration and floating in generally horizontal orientation. The other float is elongated (referred to hereinafter as a spar) and floats in vertical orientation inside the central opening of the annular float. Both floats bob up-and-down in response to passing surface waves, but generally in an out-of-phase relationship. When the annular float, for example, is rising, the spar generally tends to be sinking. The relative movements between the two floats are used for driving an energy converter, such as a linear electrical generator, for generating useful energy.
A problem associated with the use of a WEC disposed near or on the surface of a body of water is the danger that excessively large waves can cause damage to the WEC. A known practice for protecting a WEC in storm conditions is to sink it to a depth below the surface zone of turbulence. While such deliberate sinking of the WEC can be done by flooding a ballast tank, as in a submarine, this requires elaborate and expensive apparatus including a source of pressurized air for blowing the flooded tanks.
Another technique for sinking a WEC comprises winding an anchoring cable of the WEC around a motor driven drum on the floor of the water body and forcibly dragging the WEC to a safe depth. A problem here, however, is that for highest energy generating efficiency, the WEC preferably has substantial reserve buoyancy (i.e., is subject to a substantial buoyant force when the instantaneous water surface is elevated relative to the calm condition waterline of the WEC). But the greater the reserve buoyancy of the WEC, the greater is the force required not only to sink the WEC but for controlling its rate of ascent when the WEC is resurfaced. The greater the sinking and elevating forces, the larger must be the overall system including an anchor of sufficient strength for withstanding the applied forces, and the more complex must be the mechanisms to hold the WEC in and release the WEC from a submerged state.
An alternative practice for protecting a WEC, usable in situations where the WEC is suspended from a support structure, for example, an ocean platform, is to pull the WEC upwardly out of the zone of influence of the waves. There is a problem in this approach which is analogous to the problem of submerging the WEC: for the WEC to be efficient, it has to displace a substantial weight of water, because this displaced weight is approximately equal to the maximum force experienced by the WEC when the instantaneous water surface drops below the calm condition waterline. The substantial weight required for efficient wave energy conversion however, poses onerous requirements on the mechanisms required to pull the WEC upwardly out of the water and to eventually release the WEC in a controlled manner.
The present invention is directed to means for reducing the amount of force required for moving a WEC from its normal surface floating position to a position of safety.
A normally highly buoyant float for use in a WEC comprises two vertically stacked components. A first of the components is of fixed buoyancy and the second component comprises a hollow vessel having an outer wall including a number of holes there through admitting flow of water into and out of the vessel.
In the instance where the WEC is to be pulled beneath the water surface for storm protection, the apertured component is the upper of the stacked components. As the apertured component is pulled beneath the water surface, it begins to fill with water thereby increasing its weight and reducing the amount of force required to sink it. However, even when the upper vessel is completely filled with water, the buoyancy of the lower vessel is sufficiently high that the WEC remains slightly buoyant. This allows the WEC to automatically resurface when the submerging force is removed. When resurfaced, and under safe operating conditions, the water in the upper vessel gradually drains through the wall openings for returning the WEC to high buoyancy.
In the instance where the WEC is to be lifted out of the water for storm protection, the apertured compartment is the lower of the two stacked components and, during normal energy producing usage, is fully submerged and completely full of water. Buoyancy for the WEC is provided by the upper component. As the WEC is pulled upwardly out of the water, the water within the apertured component drains outwardly through the wall openings thus decreasing the weight of the WEC and reducing the amount of force required to raise it.
The drawings are schematic and not to scale.
As previously described, WECs are typically protected against storm damage either by being lifted above the water surface or by being sunk below the surface. The WEC 10 shown in
The WEC is anchored in place by an anchor cable 46 which extends, first, to an auxiliary buoy 47 for supporting the weight of the cable 46, and then to an anchor assembly 48 on the floor of the water body. (Although not shown herein, the anchor cable 46 preferably extends, along the water surface, from the WEC 10 to an auxiliary buoy which supports the weight of the cable between the water surface and the anchor assembly.) As shown schematically, the cable 46 is wrapped around a drum 50 rotatable in either direction by a motor 52. The anchor assembly 48 can be embedded in the water body floor or, more simply, is of sufficient weight for remaining stationary against the lifting forces from the WEC.
To the extent described, and ignoring the holes 40 in the wall of the vessel 20, the vessel 20 is simply a part of the float 12 contributing to the buoyancy of the WEC. The buoyancy of the float 12 is such that, when the float is floating on a perfectly flat surface of a body of water, the intercept of the water surface with the float is along a line 44 slightly below the interface 46 between the upper 20 and lower 18 members of the float 12. As cresting waves pass the float 12, the rising water level increases the volume of water displaced by the float for increasing the buoyancy of the float for lifting it against the load provided by the energy converter (not shown) connected between the two floats 12 and 14.
The holes 40 through the vessel 20 walls allow entry of water into the vessel. The purpose of the holes 40 is now described.
As shown in
However, under storm conditions when it is desired to submerge the WEC for safety purposes, the motor 52 (
Specifically, if the vessel 26 contained no through holes 40, the force required to completely submerge the WEC is equal to the weight of water corresponding to the volume of the WEC between the flat surface intercept line 44 (
As noted, the buoyancy of the WEC is such that even with the vessel 20 completely filled with water, positive buoyancy remains. Thus, when the storm conditions have abated and it is safe to resurface the WEC, the cable 46 is unwound from the drum 50 to allow the buoyant WEC to float to the surface. The WEC positive buoyancy is sufficiently high that an upper portion of the water filled vessel 20, including some through holes 40, extends above the water surface. Draining of the vessel through the holes then begins and continues until normal buoyancy of the WEC is reached.
Another advantage of filling the submerged vessel 20 with water is that, during the re-surfacing of the WEC, its buoyancy remains reduced thereby reducing the risk of the WEC escaping from its anchoring restraint and racing at an uncontrolled and dangerous speed to the surface.
As shown in
A disadvantage of an open top end is that complete filling of the vessel 20 can occur even under safe operating conditions in response to the passage of a random wave crest of extra high amplitude. While the WEC would not sink, decreased efficiency operation results until the water drains from the vessel.
A compromise arrangement is to close the upper end 30 of the vessel 20, but to provide larger diameter holes 40 through the vessel wall 26 towards the upper end 30. Thus, as the wave amplitudes begin to build in response to an approaching storm, the rate of water flow into and out of the vessel 20 increases in proportion to the increased wave amplitudes. But, if only an occasional large amplitude wave completely enveloping the vessel 20 arrives during otherwise normal conditions, the closed upper end 30 of the vessel 20 prevents complete filling of the vessel 20, and less time is required for draining the extra water from the vessel.
In this embodiment, the WEC 100 is similar to the WEC 10 shown in
In normal, energy producing usage, the lower, apertured member 80 is completely submerged and full of water. Buoyancy for the WEC is provided by the upper, closed member 82.
Under approaching storm conditions, the WEC 70 is lifted upwardly out of the water by known means, such as above-described. As the apertured member 80 is lifted out of the water (whereby its weight would normally increase) the water contained in the lower member 80 drains there from the member 200 through the wall openings 40, thereby decreasing the weight of the WEC and reducing the amount of force required to lift it.
As described, a feature of the invention is that the WEC's include hollow vessels intended, under certain circumstances, to be partially or completely filled with water. A problem, however, is that when water is introduced into a compartment in any non-fixed maritime structure, tilting motions of the structure in response to wave action can induce rapid motions of the water, or “sloshing”. This sloshing can have a detrimental effect on stability and can impede desired dynamic behavior. Additionally, the water, if unrestrained, flows to the lower side of the compartment in response to the tilting motions of the structure. This tends to enhance the tilting movements and further jeopardize structural stability.
A known solution in similar situations is the use of impervious vertical walls or barriers within liquid containing compartments to stop internal water flows. However, this solution is inadequate in conjunction with WECs used in accordance with the present invention because wave conditions may exist which cause water to flow preferentially into one of the compartments, accumulate therein in excess of the mass of water in other compartments, and thus accentuate tilting of the structure.
In accordance with this invention, porous baffles are disposed within a WEC float sub-dividing the float interior into multiple compartments. The compartments are individually small enough to minimize sloshing effects, but are interconnected such that uniform distribution of the water among the compartments occurs regardless of any particular direction of arrival of surface waves.
In
In an alternative arrangement, the compartment forming plates are impervious to water, but each compartment is connected to a spaced apart compartment via a tube through which water can flow in moderate volume for obtaining uniform distribution of the water. In
This concept can be applied to any symmetrical disposition of compartments. If there are eight compartments, such as shown in
In the embodiment of the invention shown in
Other, suitable valves are known.
Now described is a method of determining the amount of water in the apertured upper vessel 20 of the float 12 shown in
When the wave elevation n is sufficiently high that n>y+h+d, then water flows into the upper chamber. Otherwise, water flows out of the upper chamber.
When the inflow condition occurs, the rate of inflow is proportional to the square root of the differential pressure across the valves, multiplied by some constant relating to the orifices.
For simplicity, the following assumptions are made:
A: The wave elevation is right at the mean free surface. There is outflow, and the rate of outflow is governed by some orifice-specific constants multiplied by the square root of the pressure, which is given by pg(d).
B: The wave elevation is at the interface between upper and lower chambers. There is outflow, and constants multiplied by the square root of the pressure, which is given by pg(d).
C: The wave elevation is less than h above the interface between upper and lower chambers. There is outflow, and the rate of outflow is governed by some orifice specific constants multiplied by the square root of the pressure, which is given by pg(n-h).
D: The wave elevation is at the same height as the surface of the water inside the upper chamber. There is no net flow into or out of the upper chamber.
E: The wave elevation is at a greater height than the surface of the water inside the upper chamber. There is a net flow into the chamber. The rate of inflow is governed by some orifice specific constants multiplied by the square root of the pressure, which is given by pg(n-h-d).
Analysis of this simplified case shows the following: