1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a protective circuit for a rechargeable battery. In particular, the present invention relates to a low-power, low “rush current” protective circuit suitable for use with a lithium ion battery or lithium ion polymer battery.
2. Discussion of the Related Art
Lithium ion batteries and lithium polymer batteries are widely use in portable electronic devices because of their high energy density per unit weight or per unit volume. However, if not properly used, they can be hazardous. In some instances, inadvertent large discharge currents or large charging currents have been known to cause fire or even explosion. Therefore, as a safety measure, each lithium ion battery or lithium polymer battery is always provided a protective circuit that limits the current drawn from the battery in the event of an unusual or abnormal operating condition occur. Because the protective circuit is always operating, regardless of whether or not a load is connected across the battery, a practical protective circuit cannot be allowed to draw more than a few microamperes of current.
A protective circuit for a battery typically has the following states: (a). the on state, in which the switch is closed to allow normal discharging or charging currents to flow, and the total on-resistance Rtotal is no more than a few tens of milli-ohms; (b) a charging-only state, in which current flows in the charging direction is allowed and current flows in the discharging direction is blocked; and (c) A discharging-only state, in which current flows in the discharging direction is allowed but current flows in the charging direction is blocked.
In a typical implementation, protective circuit 100 is mounted on a printed circuit board, with MOSFETs 102 and 103 provided in a single package, and control circuit 101 provided in a separate integrated circuit. Because the bulk (or substrate) terminals of MOSFET 102 and 103 are common with their respective source terminals, parasitic diodes 104a and 104b of MOSFETs 102 and 103 each allow current flow from its respective source terminal to its drain terminal, even when the voltage applied to its gate terminal is below its threshold voltage.
In protective circuit 100, MOSFETs 102 and 103 are sized to achieve a low total resistance Rtotal, which is equal to the sum of the MOSFETs' individual on-resistance (Rds(on)). Hence, each Rds(on) equals ½ Rtotal. As the on-resistance of a MOSFET is inversely proportional to the device area on the semiconductor substrate (“die area”), the total die area for MOSFETs 102 and 103 is roughly four times the size of an alternative “single-MOSFET” protective circuit, which is discussed next.
The bulk terminal of MOSFET 78 in protective circuit 200 is difficult to control because of the bulk-to-source junction and the bulk-to-drain junction. If either of these junctions become forward biased, the parasitic lateral and vertical bipolar transistors may become conducting and the resulting current may be detrimental. To prevent these junctions to become forward biased, switches 82 and 86 are controlled such that the bulk terminal of MOSFET 78 is connected to the source terminal or the drain terminal of MOSFET 78, whichever has the lower potential.
One disadvantage of protective circuit 200 is its requirement that control circuit 74 monitors the current direction during both charging and discharging operations, so as to determine which one of the source and drain terminals of MOSFET 78 has the lower potential. This determination may be difficult sometimes. Because the on-resistance Rds(on) of MOSFET 78 is in the range of tens of milliohms, and the current drawn from the battery is typically between a few microamps (μA) to about 1 ampere (A), the voltage drop across the source and drain terminals of MOSFET 78 is less than a few tens of millivolts (mV). Consequently, protective circuit 200 must include a high-precision comparator. Such a comparator requires precious die area and draws a significant operating current.
Another disadvantage of protective circuit 200 occurs when battery 70 switches from discharging to charging, or vice versa. During the switch over, switches 82 and 86 must operate in a coordinated fashion to switch the bulk terminal of MOSFET 78 from its source terminal to its drain terminal, or vice versa. This condition is illustrated by
Thus, a safe, low power protective circuit which requires a small die area is desired.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a protective circuit for a battery includes: (1) an MOS transistor having a first drain/source terminal coupled to one terminal of the battery; (2) a switch selectable to couple the bulk terminal of the MOS transistor to (a) the first drain/source terminal, (b) a second drain/source terminal, or (c) float; and (3) a control circuit which provides control signals for the gate terminal of the MOS transistor and the switch. By allowing the bulk terminal to float during normal operation (i.e., charging or discharging operation), a precision, low-power comparator used in the prior art is eliminated, thereby allowing the protective circuit to have a small foot-print.
In one embodiment, the protective circuit further includes a resistor. The switch connects the bulk terminal of the MOS transistor to the first drain/source terminal through this first resistor, thereby limiting any “rush” current which occurs when the battery circuit switches from discharging to charging, or vice versa, over a very short time period. Consequently, safe operation of the battery circuit is achieved.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a protective circuit for a battery includes: (1) an MOS transistor having a first drain/source terminal coupled to one terminal of the battery; (2) a switch selectable to couple the bulk terminal of the MOS transistor to (a) the first drain/source terminal, or (b) a second drain/source terminal; and (3) a control circuit which provides control signals for the gate terminal of the MOS transistor and the switch. In this embodiment, while a low-power comparator is required in the control circuit, the protective circuit may further include a resistor, which operates to limit any “rush” current that occurs when the battery circuit switches from discharging to charging, or vice versa, over a very short time period. Consequently, safe operation of the battery circuit is also achieved.
The present invention is better understood upon consideration of the detailed description below and the accompanying drawings.
To facilitate cross-referencing and to simplify the detailed description, like elements in the figures are provided like reference numerals.
During a change from a discharging operation to a charging operation, or vice versa, switch 405 is switched to connect the bulk terminal of MOSFET 402 to the drain terminal or the source terminal of MOSFET 402 thorough resistor 404a or resistor 404b, so as to limit the current in parasitic diode 403b or parasitic diode 404a, respectively. The appropriate resistance values should limit the current in each of the parasitic diodes to no more than a few milliamps (mA). Such a current normally does not cause catastrophic destruction in the integrated circuit. In one embodiment, resistors 404a and 404b are integrated into switch 405 by properly sizing the MOS switches.
The detailed description above is provided to illustrate the specific embodiments of the present invention and is not intended to be limiting. Numerous modifications and variations within the scope of the present invention are possible. The present invention is set forth in the claims below.