Claims
- 1. A process for providing a surface with a catalytically-active glass ceramic coating comprising the steps of
- i. producing a glass ceramic frit having a formulation lying within the ranges SiO.sub.2 30- 70% by weight: Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 0-25% by weight: LiO.sub.2 and/or Na.sub.2 O and/or K.sub.2 O (in total) 0-30% by weight: CaO and/or SrO and/or BaO and/or MgO (in total) 10-40% by weight: ZnO 0-10% by weight: and B.sub.2 O.sub.3 0-20% by weight,
- ii. milling the frit to a fineness of from 2-20 grams on a 200 mesh sieve (50 ml. sample),
- iii. preparing a slurry from the frit,
- iv. incorporating a catalyst in the slurry,
- v. coating the surface with the slurry and drying the same, and,
- vi. firing the surface with the dried slurry at a temperature within the range of from 650.degree.-950.degree.C to produce a fully-fired glass ceramic coating with a porosity in excess of about 20%.
- 2. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the formulation further includes, in a proportion not exceeding 15% by weight, at least one of the constituents selected from the group consisting of TiO.sub.2, ZrO.sub.2 and Sb.sub.2 O.sub.3.
- 3. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the catalyst is suitable for bringing about the oxidation of contamination produced by cooking food.
- 4. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the catalyst comprises an oxide of at least one of the metals selected from the group consisting of iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese and copper.
- 5. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the catalyst is added in a proportion by weight of from 10-40% of the weight of the frit.
- 6. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the catalyst is added in a proportion by weight of from 5-30% of the weight of the frit.
- 7. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the frit is of the formulation SiO.sub.2 49.5% by weight: Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 3.6% by weight: B.sub.2 O.sub.3 8.4% by weight: K.sub.2 O 8.3% by weight: Na.sub.2 O 4.4% by weight: CaO 9.4% by weight: MgO 7.0% by weight: BaO 9.4% by weight.
- 8. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the frit is of the formulation SiO.sub.2 42.0% by weight: Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 6.1% by weight: B.sub.2 O.sub.3 8.4% by weight: K.sub.2 O 8.3% by weight: Na.sub.2 O 4.4% by weight: CaO 9.4% by weight: MgO 7.0% by weight: BaO 9.4% by weight: ZrO.sub.2 5.0% by weight.
- 9. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the frit is of the formulation SiO.sub.2 43.9% by weight: Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 2.8% by weight: B.sub.2 O.sub.3 1.4% by weight: K.sub.2 O 1.1% by weight: CaO 26.0% by weight: Na.sub.2 O 14.9% by weight: ZnO 9.9% by weight.
- 10. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the frit is of the formulation SiO.sub.2 47.8% by weight: Al.sub.2 O.sub.3 8.3% by weight: B.sub.2 O.sub.3 12.7% by weight: K.sub.2 O 7.6% by weight: MgO 6.4% by weight: SrO 17.2% by weight.
- 11. A cooker part having a surface produced by the process as claimed in claim 1.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
23039/70 |
May 1970 |
UK |
|
Parent Case Info
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 140,566, filed May 5, 1971, now abandoned.
US Referenced Citations (5)
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
1,197,067 |
Jul 1967 |
UK |
Continuation in Parts (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
140566 |
May 1971 |
|