This application is a national stage application of international application no. PCT/EP2017/071259 filed Aug. 23, 2017, entitled “Protective Helmet with an Antenna,” claiming priority to German application no. DE 10 2016 115 889.8 filed Aug. 26, 2016, which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference as part of the present disclosure.
The disclosure generally relates to a protective helmet having an antenna.
Wearing a protective helmet is required for many activities, inter alia, as a rule, when riding on a motorcycle. It is not only such a protective helmet with its safety-related and extensive coverage of the head of the driver, but also the noise produced by the engine of the motorcycle and the travel-related noise, which, in practice, make non-amplified oral communication between motorcyclists difficult or impossible during travel.
In the course of recent technical developments, wireless radio connections between the motorcyclists and corresponding assemblies of microphones and headsets enable communication of motorcyclists amongst each other, even in a larger group and during travel. The Bluetooth protocol especially has proved to be a suitable basis for forming communication networks within a respective group of motorcyclists. In this case, the maximum possible distance between the communication participants constitutes a potential disadvantage. The distance between the individual motorcyclists within a group may vary greatly during travel. In addition, the antenna in many Bluetooth modules for arrangement on a motorcycle helmet is dimensioned or positioned in such a way that the obtainable range stays below the values that are actually possible.
In this connection, the prior art WO 2012/148519 A1 proposes a protective helmet with an integrated antenna. Specifically, the integrated antenna is in this case to be accommodated in the inner layer, which inner layer is surrounded by the outer shell and is supposed to dampen any occurring impact forces. This assembly is supposed to enable the use of an antenna without any narrow constraints with regard to its length with a protective helmet.
However, the arrangement of the antenna in the inner layer, and thus inside the outer shell, is disadvantageous, on the one hand, with regard to the emission from the antenna towards the wearer of the helmet. In the same context, an attenuation of the antenna radiation on the way to the other communication participants is produced by the outer shell as well, which may, inter alia, limit the possible range of the antenna.
It is an object to develop and improve the protective helmet with an antenna so as to result in more favorable emission properties both with regard to the wearer of the protective helmet as well as with regard to the communication partners of the antenna.
Placement of the antenna in such a way that at least a part of the outer shell is disposed between the antenna and the inner layer is advantageous for the emission of the antenna. The outer shell, which as such interferes with the transmission from the antenna, in this way tends to shield the wearer of the protective helmet, or his head, from the emission. Conversely, the outer shell does not interfere, or only to a small extent, with the actually intended transmission to the other communication participants. Additionally, even though the modern antennas are configured to be rather small and light, the arrangement of such a component outside the outer shell, based on fundamental considerations, is nevertheless advantageous also with respect to the aspect of mechanical safety.
The protective helmet according to at least some embodiments, which may be, in particular, a protective motorcycle helmet, comprises an antenna for radio transmission, an outer shell for distributing impact forces, and an inner layer, which is accommodated by the outer shell, for damping impact forces. Consequently, the inner layer is disposed within the outer shell and, as a rule, consists of a softer material than the outer shell. Both the outer shell and the inner layer may consist of several layers or plies, wherein it is essential for the respective association with the outer shell or with the inner layer, whether the respective layer or ply serves for distributing or damping impact forces.
The protective helmet according to at least some embodiments further comprises a socket, which is firmly connected to the outer shell, for contacting a digital device, which digital device is configured for wireless communication. In at least some embodiments, the digital device has electronic logic components for implementing a wireless communication protocol. The connection of the socket to the outer shell may in this case be direct, however, it may also be carried out indirectly via interposed components. In the protective helmet according to the invention, the socket, when contacting the digital device, electrically connects the latter—i.e. the digital device—to the antenna for wireless communication. In this way, the digital device is able to employ the antenna for wireless communication. The protective helmet may also have further antennas. The latter may then be electrically connected with the digital device, which can separately, when the digital device is contacted. It is also conceivable that, in that case, further sockets are provided for these additional antennas.
The protective helmet according to at least some embodiments is characterized in that at least a partial layer of the outer shell is disposed between the antenna and the inner layer. This means that at least a part of the outer shell is disposed between every portion of the antenna along the substantially entire length of the antenna and the inner layer. In other words, there is no portion of the antenna which—without a part of the outer shell being interposed—is directly adjacent to the inner layer. In this way, the outer shell is used at least partially for attenuating the radiation emitted towards the wearer of the protective helmet, wherein the attenuation with respect to a transmission to the other communication participants is avoided to the same extent. An antenna in the present sense is understood to be the structure which, when used as intended, is configured for emitting and receiving corresponding signals. Consequently, electrical lines, which may possibly have a substantially smaller and parasitic emitting and receiving output in comparison, do not count among antennas in this sense.
According to some embodiments of the protective helmet, it is provided that the antenna is disposed outside the outer shell. In that case, it would not only be a partial layer of the outer shell that is disposed between the antenna and the inner layer, but rather, all layers of the outer shell, and thus the outer layer as a whole, would be disposed between the antenna and the inner layer. Furthermore, according to at least some embodiments, the antenna is substantially configured for emitting in a horizontal transmission direction. In this case, the relative transmission direction of the antenna is generally determined by its type and geometry. In this case, the directional indication “horizontal” refers to the protective helmet in the state of it being worn by a person.
However, the antenna may also be surrounded by the outer shell. In particular, this may be the case if the outer shell has a plurality of outer shell layers and the antenna is disposed between the outer shell layers.
In at least some embodiments the antenna contacts the outer shell along an entire length of the antenna.
In principle, the antenna and digital device may be used for any type of digital wireless communication. However, at least some embodiments of the protective helmet are characterized in that the digital device is a radio module for a Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN). In this case, the digital device may be, for example, a radio module for Bluetooth.
Another embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the socket has a frame for accommodating the digital device and a transmission device for signal transmission, which is electrically connected to the antenna, and that, when the digital device is accommodated in the frame, the transmission device is electrically coupled to an antenna pole of the digital device. In principle, this transmission device is also capable of establishing a contactless electrical coupling, e.g. an inductive electrical coupling, with the antenna pole. In at least some embodiments, the transmission device is a contact device, and that, when the digital device is accommodated in the frame, the contact device electrically contacts the antenna pole, which may be an antenna contact. Accordingly, the result is the contact device and the antenna contact touching each other.
Thus, the digital device is also accommodated mechanically by the socket or its frame. In at least some embodiments, the frame is configured for attaching the digital device to the outer shell when accommodating the digital device. In this case, the socket may also comprise a locking means for retaining the digital device in the socket. Not only can a secure attachment of the digital device to the protective helmet be ensured in this manner, but also a reliable electrical contact of the digital device with the antenna.
According to at least some embodiments of the protective helmet, it is provided that the antenna is a dipole antenna. Accordingly, the transmission device, and the contact device, may be a coaxial plug-in device with at least two contact poles. Thus, the digital device may have an antenna contact, which is a coaxial contact and has at least two coaxial contacts.
At least some embodiments of the protective helmet are characterized in that the antenna, with respect to a transverse direction of the protective helmet, is disposed substantially at an outer transverse end of the protective helmet. Here and hereinafter, the term “transverse direction” is to be understood in relation to a longitudinal direction of the protective helmet, which longitudinal direction corresponds to the—straight—viewing direction of a person wearing the helmet. Thus, the transverse direction is a horizontal direction in the above sense, which, furthermore, extends substantially perpendicularly to the longitudinal direction. Such a placement of the antenna has proved to be suitable with respect to the emission of the antenna.
Another embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the protective helmet has a transmission line for electrically connecting the digital device to the antenna. Since this transmission line does not play an essential role for emitting or receiving signals, it does not itself belong to the antenna in the sense of the present subject matter. In principle, such a transmission line may be arranged in any way. However, the transmission line may be routed at least partially inside the outer shell. The transmission line may also be routed completely inside the outer shell. The transmission line therefore could also be—completely or partially—routed between the outer shell as a whole and the inner layer. In other words, the transmission line could be routed at least in some sections between the outer shell and the inner layer.
If the transmission line is routed inside the outer shell, it is still to be contacted with the antenna, wherein in that case, at least the partial layer of the outer shell would have to be traversed in a basically arbitrary manner. In this case, at least some embodiments of the protective helmet provide that the outer shell has an opening, and that the transmission line for the electrical connection is routed through the opening.
According to at least some embodiments of the protective helmet, it is provided that the opening is disposed in a lower half of the outer shell. Also in this case, the directional indication “lower” relates to an orientation of the protective helmet when worn by a person. In this manner, the transmission line can be configured to be comparatively short, given a favorable positioning of the antenna.
This applies particularly if the socket is disposed at a lower edge of the protective helmet. Moreover, the socket may be disposed laterally offset with respect to a vertical center plane in the longitudinal direction of the protective helmet. Here and hereinafter, the directional indication “vertical” also relates to the orientation of the protective helmet when worn by a person. In other words, the socket is not disposed centrally in the transverse direction, but rather offset. This facilitates the operation of the digital device by operating members, such as pushbuttons, disposed on the digital device. In this context, the above opening may be disposed on the same side-half of the outer shell as the socket.
At least some embodiments of the protective helmet are characterized in that the protective helmet has a cover disposed on the outer shell, and that the antenna is at least partially disposed between the outer shell and the cover. The antenna may also be completely disposed between the outer shell and the cover. In this manner, the antenna is better protected against damage by external mechanical influence. The cover may comprise plastic or consist of plastic. Since the cover, as a rule, does not have a protective effect with requirements as demanding as in the case of the outer shell, the influence on the emission of the antenna is also much smaller, as a rule.
Another embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the protective helmet has a visor for eye protection and a visor attachment means, which is firmly connected to the outer shell, for pivotably mounting the visor. Such a visor and such a visor attaching means are known per se from the prior art. In this case, it may be provided that the cover is disposed adjacent to the visor attaching means. This allows for various advantageous synergies between the cover and the visor attaching means, which are explained in more detail below. These advantageous synergies arise when the cover is disposed substantially offset from the visor attaching means in an opposite direction to the viewing direction of the protective helmet. In this case, the viewing direction is oriented along the longitudinal direction and aligned with the direction of sight of a person wearing the protective helmet.
According to at least some embodiments of the protective helmet, it is provided that the cover is attached to the visor attaching means. Since the visor attaching means has to ensure a secure attachment of the visor to the outer shell anyway, this attaching effect of the visor attaching means can also be used by the cover without any separate engagement with the outer shell being required, which engagement generally necessitates weakening the outer shell by drill holes or the like. Furthermore, the opening may be disposed underneath the visor attaching means, wherein, the visor attaching means in that case may have a through-hole aligned with the opening for routing the transmission line through the opening. In this way, the work on the outer shell required for passing the transmission line through can be limited to the region of the visor attaching means, which has to be configured separately, anyway.
According to another embodiment of the protective helmet, it is provided that the cover has an aerodynamics device (which may be integrally configured) for influencing the air flow about the protective helmet during travel. Thus, the cover has not only the function of protecting the antenna against external mechanical influence, but it also influences the aerodynamic behavior of the protective helmet advantageously. In this case, the cover may have turbulators for generating air vortices during travel. These turbulators may be bulges in the cover, which are configured to be elongate and substantially extend in the longitudinal direction. In a manner known per se from the prior art, such turbulators are configured for converting a laminar air flow, which is produced in the present case by the traveling air, into a turbulent air flow. In the case of a protective helmet, they serve for minimizing the noise produced by the traveling air.
In at least some embodiments, the protective helmet has a structure disposed on the outer shell, which structure, compared to the outer shell, results in a contoured surface profile of the protective helmet, and that the aerodynamics device is disposed adjacent to the structure in such a manner that the surface profile resulting because of the aerodynamics device is smoothed compared to the contoured surface profile. Consequently, the structure is not a part of the outer shell. For reasons of aerodynamics, especially contours or the like protruding abruptly from the surface of the protective helmet are to be avoided in a protective helmet as a matter of principle. In certain regions, e.g. in the region of the visor attaching means, such structures cannot be entirely avoided. In principle, the outer shell could also be shaped such that it compensates the irregularities arising from such a structure. Generally, however, it is easier, as regards production, if this is done by the aerodynamics device. In at least some embodiments, this structure is the visor or the visor attaching means.
At least some embodiments of the protective helmet are characterized in that the outer shell has ventilation openings—which may be disposed in a ceiling region of the protective helmet—for feeding traveling air for cooling into the protective helmet, and that the cover is a feeding device, which covers the ventilation openings, for diverting the traveling air. In this case, the ceiling region corresponds to the upper half of the protective helmet—again relative to an orientation when the protective helmet is worn by a person—and to the region of the protective helmet or the outer shell located above a head of a person wearing the protective helmet. It is known per se from the prior art to provide ventilation openings in protective helmets in this region. Here, the feeding device, which is also generally provided and which is configured for diverting traveling air specifically through the ventilation openings, can also be used for covering the antenna. In at least some embodiments, the feeding device is adjustable for a variable feed of traveling air, so that thus, the amount of traveling air fed to the ventilation openings is variable.
This summary is not exhaustive of the scope of the present aspects and embodiments. Thus, while certain aspects and embodiments have been presented and/or outlined in this summary, it should be understood that the present aspects and embodiments are not limited to the aspects and embodiments in this summary. Indeed, other aspects and embodiments, which may be similar to and/or different from, the aspects and embodiments presented in this summary, will be apparent from the description, illustrations, and/or claims, which follow.
It should also be understood that any aspects and embodiments that are described in this summary and do not appear in the claims that follow are preserved for later presentation in this application or in one or more continuation patent applications.
Other advantages will become apparent from the following description and with reference to the Figures, which are understood not to be limiting.
The, altogether, three exemplary embodiments of protective helmets shown in
Also, the protective helmets shown each include a socket 4 for contacting a digital device 5, which is a Bluetooth module, i.e. a device for communication with a Bluetooth WPAN.
In the first—
The socket 4 has a plastic frame 6, which is schematically illustrated in
Also, the socket 4 includes a coaxial plug-in device—which is illustrated here only in a schematic manner—as a contact device and transmission device 8. This transmission device 8 serves for contacting an antenna contact of the accommodated digital device 5 and is electrically connected to a transmission line 10 via which the digital device 5 is connected to the antenna 1. In this way, the digital device 5 is able to employ the antenna 1 for its Bluetooth transmission.
A synopsis of
The transmission line 10 is disposed between the inner layer 3 and the outer shell 2 and routed from the transmission device 8 to an opening 11 in the outer shell 2, through which it exits from the outer shell 2 and then contacts the antenna 1. The corresponding course of the transmission line 10 and the placement of the opening 11, in the present case, are shown only for the first exemplary embodiment in
The protective helmets shown each have one visor 13—which is not shown only in the view of
In the exemplary embodiments of
The—single—cover 15 of the exemplary embodiment of
In contrast, the cover 15 of the third exemplary embodiment of
While the above describes certain embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the foregoing description is not intended to limit the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. It should also be understood that the embodiments of the present disclosure described herein are merely exemplary and that a person skilled in the art may make any variations and modification without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. All such variations and modifications, including those discussed above, are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2016 115 889.5 | Aug 2016 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/071259 | 8/23/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/037055 | 3/1/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3422224 | Curran | Jan 1969 | A |
3470558 | Raschke | Sep 1969 | A |
3582951 | Altmayer | Jun 1971 | A |
3885246 | Tung | May 1975 | A |
3963917 | Romano | Jun 1976 | A |
3977003 | Kershaw | Aug 1976 | A |
4077007 | McKinney | Feb 1978 | A |
4109105 | Von Statten, Jr. | Aug 1978 | A |
4130803 | Thompson | Dec 1978 | A |
4152553 | White | May 1979 | A |
4178411 | Cole et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4239106 | Aileo | Dec 1980 | A |
4321433 | King | Mar 1982 | A |
4357711 | Drefko | Nov 1982 | A |
4400591 | Jennings et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4466138 | Gessalin | Aug 1984 | A |
4519099 | Kamiya et al. | May 1985 | A |
4563392 | Harpell et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4719462 | Hawkins | Jan 1988 | A |
4729132 | Fierro | Mar 1988 | A |
4833726 | Shinoda | May 1989 | A |
4903350 | Gentes | Feb 1990 | A |
4950439 | Smith et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5119505 | Tisseront | Jun 1992 | A |
5136567 | Nagahara et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5136657 | Hattori | Aug 1992 | A |
5142700 | Reed | Aug 1992 | A |
5183701 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5291203 | Schneck | Mar 1994 | A |
5327588 | Garneau | Jul 1994 | A |
5329637 | Walker | Jul 1994 | A |
5357409 | Glatt | Oct 1994 | A |
5438702 | Jackson | Aug 1995 | A |
5448780 | Gath | Sep 1995 | A |
5508900 | Norman | Apr 1996 | A |
5615410 | DeMars | Mar 1997 | A |
5683831 | Baril et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5718004 | Broersma et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5743621 | Mantha et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749096 | Fergason et al. | May 1998 | A |
5862528 | Saijo et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5886667 | Bondyopadhayay | Mar 1999 | A |
5931559 | Pfaeffle | Aug 1999 | A |
5996128 | Yanagihara | Dec 1999 | A |
6009563 | Swanson | Jan 2000 | A |
6081929 | Rothrock et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6336220 | Sacks et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6464369 | Vega et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6691325 | Pelletier et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701537 | Stamp | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7377666 | Tyler | May 2008 | B1 |
7532163 | Chang et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7555312 | Kim et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555788 | Schimpf | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7901104 | McLean et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8001623 | Gertsch et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009229 | Peterson | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8245326 | Tolve | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8544399 | Miloslavsky | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8545959 | McGuire, Jr. et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8667617 | Glezerman | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8853105 | Bhatnagar et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8908389 | Teetzel et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9070978 | Boni et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9247779 | Aloumanis et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9445639 | Aloumanis et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9456649 | Basson | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9486027 | Dey et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9585433 | Heimer et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9686136 | Dey et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9711146 | Cronin | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9833933 | Cadens Ballarin | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9968153 | Thompson et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10051908 | Redpath et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10160156 | Pourboghrat et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10219571 | Aloumanis et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10383384 | Zhavoronkov et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10779604 | Lebel et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10806204 | Pritz | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10814524 | Prins et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10856599 | Cuenca | Dec 2020 | B1 |
11278076 | Suddaby | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11633303 | Persson et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11660846 | Drzal et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
20050017911 | Lee | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060232955 | Labine | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060277664 | Akhtar et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070220662 | Pierce | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070289044 | Ellis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080068825 | Harris | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080130271 | Harris | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090064386 | Rogers | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090158508 | Quaranta | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090199317 | Schwiers et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100175172 | Dempsey et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100287687 | Ho | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110302701 | Kuo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120011631 | Crossman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120077438 | Jung | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120189153 | Kushnirov et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120272435 | Glezerman et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130007949 | Kurs et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130081199 | Nimura | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130176183 | Boni et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130190052 | Lundell | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130305437 | Weller et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140000013 | Redpath et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140000014 | Redpath et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140020159 | Teetzel et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140109297 | Lanez | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140189938 | Redpath et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140362244 | Martin | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150038199 | Shirashi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150223547 | Wibby | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150282549 | Lebel et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160100649 | Glezerman et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160106174 | Chung et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160249700 | Zhavoronkov et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170006955 | Dow, II et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170052000 | White et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170367433 | Frett | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180221915 | Simor et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180272928 | Boksteyn | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180289095 | Catterson | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190104797 | Teetzel et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190191808 | Becker et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190269193 | Benyola | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190320753 | Le et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190380417 | Zhavoronkov et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200015537 | Becker et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200037693 | Klimek et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200305532 | Lange et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2540799 | Mar 2003 | CN |
1627651 | Jun 2005 | CN |
1715734 | Jan 2006 | CN |
201319192 | Sep 2009 | CN |
102791157 | Nov 2012 | CN |
202919121 | May 2013 | CN |
104871384 | Aug 2015 | CN |
204949670 | Jan 2016 | CN |
205106513 | Mar 2016 | CN |
206043574 | Mar 2017 | CN |
106659261 | May 2017 | CN |
206312966 | Jul 2017 | CN |
206560075 | Oct 2017 | CN |
3042159 | Jun 1982 | DE |
8226935 | Feb 1983 | DE |
29519601 | Feb 1996 | DE |
29906107 | Jul 1999 | DE |
29914563 | Jan 2000 | DE |
102005038893 | Mar 2006 | DE |
202011051831 | Nov 2011 | DE |
102015216835 | Mar 2017 | DE |
102016115889 | Mar 2018 | DE |
0412205 | Feb 1991 | EP |
1393643 | Mar 2004 | EP |
2183989 | May 2010 | EP |
2335169 | Jul 1977 | FR |
2668901 | May 1992 | FR |
826012 | Dec 1959 | GB |
974901 | Nov 1964 | GB |
2059206 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2254528 | Oct 1992 | GB |
S6468507 | Mar 1989 | JP |
2000328342 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2005060889 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2011-002958 | Jan 2011 | JP |
20010011095 | Feb 2001 | KR |
101530061 | Jun 2015 | KR |
2004032658 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2011129576 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012006653 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012017836 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012148519 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2016001915 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016022984 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2018043025 | Mar 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wikipedia, Wireless Personal Area Network, https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wireless_Personal_Area_Network, printed Mar. 27, 2018, 4 pages. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/EP2017/071259, issued Oct. 27, 2017, 3 pages. |
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2017/071259, issued Oct. 27, 2017, 5 pages. |
Rajpurohit, A. “Fiber Reinforced Composites: Advances in Manufacturing Techniques.”, Researchgate; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279885386. (Year: 2014). |
D'Hooghe et al., Thermoplastic Composite Technology; Tougher Than You Think. Adv Mat. 2000;12(23):1865-1868. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190387829 A1 | Dec 2019 | US | |
20200383418 A9 | Dec 2020 | US |