Patent Application
20210330018
This application claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 119(a) of India Patent Application No. 202011017952, filed Apr. 27, 2020, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Various embodiments described herein relate generally to protective helmets. In particular, various embodiments are directed to wearable helmets configured for protecting the head of a user from harmful physical contact with an object in a user's environment.
Consumers in industrial and commercial applications may use protective helmets to protect the consumer's head from harmful physical contact with an object. In particular, a protective helmet may be used to provide protection from one or more objects falling within the consumer's environment by acting as a physical barrier between the consumer's head and the one or more falling objects. Through applied effort, ingenuity, and innovation, Applicant has solved problems relating to protective helmets by developing solutions embodied in the present disclosure, which are described in detail below.
Various embodiments are directed to a protective helmet and method of using the same. In various embodiments, a protective helmet comprises: A protective helmet comprising: a protective shell having a substantially dome-shaped configuration, the protective shell comprising: an outer shell surface; an inner shell surface comprising a lower perimeter and defining, at least in part, an internal shell portion configured to receive at least a portion of a head of a user extending through the lower perimeter of the inner shell surface; and at least one groove extending along at least a portion of the inner shell surface, wherein the at least one groove is defined at least in part by a groove depth; wherein the protective shell is defined at least in part by a shell thickness defined at least in part by a perpendicular distance between the outer shell surface and the inner shell surface; wherein the at least one groove is embodied as a material recess within the cap thickness extending from the inner shell surface to a maximum recession point, wherein the groove depth of the at least one groove is defined at least in part by a distance between the inner shell surface and the maximum recession point of the at least one groove; and wherein a ratio of the shell thickness at a first shell location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove is at least a predetermined threshold value.
In various embodiments, the predetermined threshold value of the ratio of the shell thickness at the first shell location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove may be between 1.5:1 and 3:1. In various embodiments, the groove configuration may be configured to reduce a shell weight of the protective shell by at least 10%. In various embodiments, the ratio of the shell thickness at the first shell location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove may be different than a second ratio of the shell thickness at a second shell location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove.
Various embodiments are directed to a protective helmet comprising: a protective shell; and an inner ring; wherein each of the protective shell and the inner ring are defined by a respective wall thickness; wherein one or more of the protective shell and the inner ring comprises a groove configuration defined by at least one groove, wherein the at least one groove is embodied as a material recess extending into the respective wall thickness from a respective surface thereof; and wherein the groove configuration is configured to reduce an amount of material within the protective helmet.
In various embodiments, the at least one groove may be defined in part by a respective groove depth, and wherein the groove configuration is defined by a ratio of the respective wall thickness at a first location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove is at least a predetermined threshold value. Further, in various embodiments, the predetermined threshold value of the ratio of the respective wall thickness at the first location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove may be between 1.5:1 and 3:1. In various embodiments, each of the protective shell and the inner ring comprises a respective groove configuration. In certain embodiments, the groove configuration may be configured to reduce a helmet weight of the protective helmet by at least 15%. In various embodiments, the ratio of the respective wall thickness at the first location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove may be different than a second ratio of the respective wall thickness at a second location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove.
In various embodiments, the protective helmet may further comprise an impact cap, wherein the protective helmet is configured such that the impact cap is positioned at least partially between the protective shell and the inner ring such that the impact cap defines an intermediate buffer between the shell and the inner ring. In certain embodiments, the impact cap may comprise at least one impact cap groove configuration defined by one or more impact cap grooves, wherein the one or more impact cap groove are embodied as a material recess extending into an impact cap wall thickness from an external surface thereof.
Various embodiments are directed to protective helmet comprising: a protective shell; an impact cap; and an inner ring; wherein each of the protective shell, the impact cap, and the inner ring are defined by a respective wall thickness; wherein one or more of the protective shell, the impact cap, and the inner ring comprises a groove configuration defined by one or more grooves, wherein the one or more grooves are embodied as a material recess extending into the respective wall thickness from a respective surface thereof and wherein the groove configuration is configured to reduce an amount of material within the protective helmet.
In various embodiments, the at least one groove may be defined in part by a respective groove depth, and wherein the groove configuration is defined by a ratio of the respective wall thickness at a first location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove is at least a predetermined threshold value. In various embodiments, the predetermined threshold value of the ratio of the respective wall thickness at the first location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove may be between 1.5:1 and 3:1. In various embodiments, each of the protective shell, the impact cap, and the inner ring may comprise a respective groove configuration. In various embodiments, the groove configuration may be configured to reduce a helmet weight of the protective helmet by at least 15%. In various embodiments, the ratio of the respective wall thickness at the first location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove may be different than a second ratio of the respective wall thickness at a second location adjacent the at least one groove to the groove depth of the at least one groove.
Reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
The present disclosure more fully describes various embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that some, but not all embodiments are shown and described herein. Indeed, the embodiments may take many different forms, and accordingly this disclosure should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
The words “example,” or “exemplary,” when used herein, are intended to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any implementation described herein as an “example” or “exemplary embodiment” is not necessarily preferred or advantageous over other implementations.
Various types of personal protective equipment (PPE) can be worn by a user to protect the user from various types of dangerous conditions within the user's environment. Protective helmets, for example, to protect a user's head from harmful forces resulting in physical contact with an object in the user's ambient environment. Conventionally, in order to provide PPE capable of providing a higher level of user protection, the equipment may be designed to be heavier or comprise an increased amount of material, so as to, for example, increase a coverage area or produce a stronger, more robust product. However, a weight increase in of a piece of PPE may generate increased physiological stress on a user's body and may decrease a user's mobility. With respect to protective helmets, the stress applied atop a user's neck (e.g., by the protective helmet) is particularly critical, as the distance between the user's head and the user's center of gravity results in the force of the applied stress being assigned a force multiplier approximately 6:1. That is, for every pound added to the weight of a protective helmet, a user wearing the helmet experiences an additional 5 to 6 pounds of physiological stress. Further, various occupational and recreational activities are conducted in environments requiring PPE performance to remain consistent while being exposed to extreme temperatures. For example, conventional firefighting helmet certifications include a required preconditioned temperature range from between −32° C. (−25° F.) and 260° C. (500° F.), requiring a helmet to maintain its structural integrity through various strength tests (e.g., testing crush resistance, tensile strength, impact resistance, penetration resistance, and/or the like) conducted at such extreme temperatures.
Described herein is a protective helmet configured to be worn by a user so as to protect the user's head from harmful forces that may be transmitted through physical engagement with an object within the user's environment. The protective helmet comprises a plurality of features that provide desirable strength characteristics while minimizing the weight of the helmet by minimizing the required amount of material necessary to construct the protective helmet having the desired strength characteristics. For example, various features may comprise one or more grooves, ribs, raised features, and/or the like, that may extend across planar surfaces, curved surfaces, and/or complex curved surfaces in order to provide crush resistance, tensile strength, impact resistance, penetration resistance, and/or the like for the protective helmet. Further, a protective helmet as described herein may be configured such that the various features may increase the heat dissipation capacity of the protective helmet so as to facilitate the operability of the helmet at extreme temperature conditions. For example, the various features of a protective helmet described herein may include, for example, a groove configuration configured to increase the surface area of the helmet, thereby facilitating a more effective heat transfer between the helmet and an ambient environment.
As described herein, the disclosed protective helmet comprise various protective components, such as, for example, a shell, an impact cap, and/or an inner ring. At least one of the protective components may include one or more groove configurations, which may be embodied as one or more grooves recessed into a surface of the protective component. A shell, an impact cap, and/or an inner ring of protective helmet described herein may comprise one or more grooves within a respective outer surface, a respective inner surface, or both. A groove within a protective component of the protective helmet described herein may comprise a material recess within the thickness of the protective component, such that an exemplary protective component having one or more grooves may comprise a lesser amount of material than a similarly sized protective component having the same thickness and zero grooves. As described herein, such a reduction in material required to manufacture one or more of a protective helmet's protective components corresponds to a protective helmet that weighs less than a similarly configured helmet without a groove configuration. In particular, the grooves of the one or more protective components of the protective helmet may be configured such that the protective helmet may maintain desirable strength characteristics while reducing the amount of physiological stress placed upon the neck of a user wearing the helmet. For example, as described herein, one or both of the groove configuration and the wall thickness of various portions of the one or more protective components may be selectively varied in order to strategically modify the distribution of strength characteristics throughout the one or more components as needed, based at least in part on the application and/or environment in which the protective helmet may be used. As a non-limiting example, a protective helmet as described herein may comprise various groove configurations such that the helmet weighs about 3.50 lbs., which may represent an approximately 20% weight reduction compared to conventional protective helmets.
In various embodiments, an exemplary protective helmet may comprise a shell. In various embodiments, the protective helmet may further comprise an impact cap and/or an inner ring.
In various embodiments, the shell 100 may comprise a substantially hard material that is capable of withstanding high-impact forces without being penetrated or otherwise compromised, in particular in conditions of extreme temperatures (e.g., between −32° C. (−25° F.) and 260° C. (500° F.)). For example, in various embodiments, the shell 100 may be made of various leather, metal, and/or plastic materials, such as glass-filled thermoset and/or thermoplastics. For example, the shell 100 may be manufactured using various compression molding, injection molding, CNC machining, additive manufacturing (e.g., 3D printing) processes, and/or the like.
As illustrated, in various embodiments, shell 100 may comprise a cap portion 110 and a brim portion 120. In various embodiments, the cap portion 110 may comprise a substantially rounded dome configuration defined in part by an outer shell surface 111. The outer shell surface 111 of the cap portion 110 may comprise a curved profile extending between an at least substantially circular (e.g., oval-shaped) lower perimeter 112 and a central outer peak 113 located at the uppermost point of the dome-shaped outer shell surface 111 of the cap portion 110. In various embodiments, the brim portion 120 of the shell 100 may extend in an outward direction from the outer shell surface 111 of the cap portion along at least a portion of the lower perimeter 112 of the cap portion 110. For example, as illustrated, the brim portion 120 may extend around the entirety of the lower perimeter 112 of the cap portion 110. In various embodiments, the cap portion 110 may further comprise one or more outer shell ribs extending along at least a portion of the outer shell surface 111. For example, the outer shell ribs 114A, 114B, 114C, 114D, 114E may protrude from the outer shell surface 111 and extend between the lower perimeter 112 and the central outer peak 113. As described herein, a rib (e.g., outer shell rib) may be defined at least in part by a rib height, a rib length, a rib width, and a rib shape. For example, the rib height may be defined as the distance between the surface from which the rib protrudes (e.g., an outer shell surface 111) and an outermost point of protrusion of the rib (e.g., measured perpendicularly). Further, the rib width may be defined as the distance along the surface from which the rib protrudes (e.g., an outer shell surface 111) between the two rib sidewalls extending from the surface from which the rib protrudes (e.g., measured perpendicularly to the length of the rib). Further, the rib length may be defined as the distance that the rib extends along the surface from which the rib protrudes. For example, each rib may comprise a first end and a second end, wherein the rib length is the distance measured along the rib between the first end and the second end of the rib. Further, the rib shape may be defined as the cross-sectional configuration of the rib. For example, in various embodiments, a rib may comprise a squared cross-section, a rounded cross-section, a triangular cross-section, and/or the like. In various embodiments, the rib height, rib width, and/or rib shape may vary along the length of the rib.
In various embodiments, the one or more outer shell ribs may comprise a plurality of outer shell ribs. In such an exemplary circumstance, the plurality of outer shell ribs may be arranged about the outer shell surface 111 of the cap portion. For example, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
As described herein, a groove (e.g., inner shell groove) may be defined at least in part by a groove depth, a groove width, a groove length, and a groove shape. For example, the groove depth may be defined as the distance between the surface into which the groove extends (e.g., an inner shell surface 131) and an innermost point of recession of the groove (e.g., measured perpendicularly). Further, the groove width may be defined as the distance along the surface into which the groove recesses (e.g., an inner shell surface 131) between the two groove sidewalls extending from the surface into which the groove recesses (e.g., measured perpendicularly to the length of the groove). In various embodiments, the width of one or more of the squared primary grooves may vary along the depth of the groove such that the groove width is different than, for example, the width of the groove at the deepest portion of the groove. Further, the groove length may be defined as the distance that the groove extends along the surface from which the groove recesses. For example, each groove may comprise a first end and a second end, wherein the groove length is the distance measured along the groove between the first end and the second end of the groove. Further, the groove shape may be defined as the cross-sectional configuration of the groove. For example, in various embodiments, a groove may comprise a squared cross-section, a rounded cross-section, a triangular cross-section, and/or the like. In various embodiments, the groove depth, groove width, and/or groove shape may vary along the length of the groove.
In various embodiments, the one or more inner shell grooves may comprise a plurality of inner shell grooves. In such an exemplary circumstance, the plurality of inner shell grooves may be arranged about the inner shell surface 131 of the cap portion 110. For example, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
In various embodiments, the cap portion 110 may be configured such that the groove depth, groove length, groove length, and/or groove shape of one or more primary groove may at least partially correspond to a rib height, rib width, rib length, and/or rib shape of an outer shell rib arranged along the outer shell surface in a position adjacent to the position of the primary groove along the inner shell surface 131. For example, in such an exemplary circumstance, the configuration of the inner shell groove and the corresponding outer shell rib may be such that the distance between the inner shell groove and the corresponding outer shell rib may be at least substantially equal to the shell cap thickness, as described herein.
In various embodiments, the one or more intermediate grooves may comprise linear grooves extending in a vertical direction from lower perimeter 112 towards the central inner peak 133 and may have a groove width that is at least substantially smaller than the groove width of the one or more primary grooves, as described herein. In various embodiments, at least a portion of the plurality of primary grooves may be distributed about the inner shell surface 131 in between proximate primary grooves. In various embodiments, the one or more intermediate grooves may comprise a plurality of intermediate grooves, and at least a portion of the plurality of intermediate grooves may be distributed about the inner shell surface 131 in a substantially varied distribution such that the distance between various proximate intermediate grooves of the plurality of intermediate grooves may vary. In various embodiments, as illustrated in
In various embodiments wherein the one or more intermediate grooves comprises a plurality of intermediate grooves, the intermediate grooves of the plurality may have either the same or different groove shapes. For example, a plurality of intermediate grooves may comprise one or more intermediate grooves having a rounded cross-sectional configuration, such as, for example, intermediate grooves 143A, 143B, 143C, 143D, while one or more intermediate grooves may have, for example, a squared cross-sectional configuration.
In various embodiments, the shell 100 may define a symmetry plane 101 extending through the center of the shell. In various embodiments, the shell 100 may be symmetrical about the symmetry plane 101, such that grooves and/or ribs on a first side of the symmetry plane 101 are equal and opposite to grooves and/or ribs on a second side of the symmetry plane 101. In various embodiments, the plurality of inner shell grooves may correspond to a material reduction of at least substantially between 300 grams and 1000 grams (e.g., between 350 grams and 850 grams) of material, which, based at least in part on the material of a shell 100, may result in a weight reduction of at least substantially between 10% and 25% (e.g., approximately 15%) to a shell 100.
As illustrated in
As illustrated, the plurality of intermediate grooves may comprise 24 rounded primary grooves, including intermediate grooves 143A, 143B, 143C, 143D, 143E, 143F. The plurality of intermediate grooves may comprise linear grooves distributed intermittently in sets of three intermediate grooves between the various primary grooves. For example, at least a portion of the plurality of intermediate grooves (e.g., intermediate grooves 143A, 143B, 143C, 143D, 143E, 143F) have a groove depth of 0.055 inches, a groove width of 0.055 inches, and a groove length of between 4.0 inches and 7.0 inches based at least in part on the orientation of the groove relative to the symmetry plane 101. Each of the intermediate grooves may comprise an inner groove surface having a radius of curvature of 0.055 inches and may define an angled groove transition relative to the inner shell surface 131 of approximately 90 degrees.
As illustrated in
In various embodiments, the impact cap 200 may comprise a substantially lightweight and/or compressible material that is capable of withstanding high-impact forces without being penetrated or otherwise compromised, in particular in conditions of extreme temperatures (e.g., between −32° C. (−25° F.) and 260° C. (500° F.)). For example, in various embodiments, the impact cap 200 may be made of various plastic, composite, and/or foam materials, such as Polyurethane foam. The impact cap 200 may be manufactured using various compression molding, injection molding, CNC machining, additive manufacturing (e.g., 3D printing) processes, and/or the like.
As described herein, the impact cap 200 may comprise an outer impact cap surface 210 and an inner impact cap surface 220. In various embodiments, an outer impact cap surface 210 may be configured to at least partially engage an inner shell surface of a shell such that a force may be received from the shell by the impact cap 200, as described herein. For example, the configuration of the outer impact cap surface 210 may correspond at least in part to a profile of the inner shell surface of the shell. The impact cap 200 may further comprise an internal impact cap portion 230 embodied as an interior of the impact cap 200 that is defined at least in part by an inner impact cap surface 220 of the impact cap 200. The internal impact cap portion 230 may be configured to receive at least a portion of the head of a user such that a protective helmet may be worn by the user on the user's head, as described herein. For example, in various embodiments, at least a portion of the inner impact cap surface 220 may be configured to at least partially engage a user's head and/or an outer liner surface of an inner ring, as described herein. For example, in various embodiments, the inner impact cap surface 220 may be configured at least substantially similarly to the outer impact cap surface 210. In various embodiments, the impact cap 200 may be configured such that the inner impact cap surface 220 is positioned a distance away from the outer impact cap surface 210. The distance between the inner impact cap surface 220 and the outer impact cap surface 210 may define the thickness of the impact cap 200 (e.g., the impact cap thickness). In various embodiments, the impact cap thickness may be either uniform or variable at one or more points throughout the impact cap 200. For example, the impact cap thickness may be at least substantially between 0.197 inches and 0.787 inches (e.g., between 0.394 inches and 0.591 inches).
In various embodiments, impact cap 200 may be embodied as either a full impact cap or a partial impact cap. For example, in various embodiments wherein an impact cap 200 is embodied as a full impact cap, the impact cap 200 may comprise a substantially rounded dome configuration defined in part by an outer impact cap surface 210. The outer impact cap surface 210 may comprise a curved profile extending between an at least substantially circular (e.g., oval-shaped) outer lower perimeter 212 and a central outer cap peak located at an uppermost point of the dome-shaped outer impact cap surface 210 of the impact cap 200. In such an exemplary circumstance, the inner impact cap surface 220 may comprise a substantially similar curved profile extending between an at least substantially circular (e.g., oval-shaped) inner lower perimeter 222 and a central inner peak located at the uppermost point of the dome-shaped inner impact cap surface 220.
Alternatively, as illustrated in
In various embodiments, the impact cap 200 may comprise one or more grooves (e.g., impact cap grooves) extending along at least a portion of the outer impact cap surface 210 and/or the inner impact cap surface 220. As described herein, a groove may embody a material recess within the impact cap thickness of the impact cap 200, such that an exemplary impact cap 200 having one or more grooves may comprise a lesser amount of material than a similarly sized impact cap having the same impact cap thickness and zero grooves. Accordingly, as described herein, the exemplary impact cap 200 having one or more grooves may weigh less than a similarly sized impact cap having the same impact cap thickness and zero grooves. Moreover, in various embodiments, a groove positioned within an impact cap 200 may increase the surface area of the impact cap 200, thereby increasing the heat dissipation capacity of the impact cap 200 by facilitating a more effective heat transfer between an impact cap surface (e.g., the outer impact cap surface 210 and/or the inner impact cap surface 220) and an ambient environment. Furthermore, in various embodiments, the one or more grooves may be configured such that an exemplary impact cap 200 with one or more grooves may exhibit similar strength characteristics and piercing resistance as a similarly configured, heavier impact cap that has no grooves.
In various embodiments, for example, as illustrated in
Further,
As described herein in further detail, a groove (e.g., impact cap groove) may be defined at least in part by a groove depth, a groove width, a groove length, and a groove shape. In various embodiments wherein the impact cap 200 comprises a plurality of impact cap grooves, one or more of the impact cap grooves may comprise either the same or different groove depth, groove width, groove length, and/or groove shape. For example, as illustrated in
In various embodiments, a groove width 441A of a groove 410 may be defined as the distance between the two groove sidewalls 412A, 412B as measured at the external surface 411 perpendicularly to a length of the groove 410. For example, in various embodiments, the groove width of one or more impact cap grooves may be at least substantially between 0.039 inches and 0.197 inches (e.g., between 0.098 inches and 0.138 inches). In various embodiments, the groove configuration 400 may comprise a plurality of impact cap grooves having either the same or different groove widths. For example, in an exemplary embodiment wherein the groove configuration 400 comprises a plurality of impact cap grooves, the groove widths 441A, 441B of grooves 410, 420, respectively, may be either the same or different. Further, in various embodiments, the groove width of an impact cap groove may be either uniform or variable along the length of the groove. In various embodiments, the groove width of the various grooves of an exemplary plurality of impact cap grooves may be configured such that the penetration resistance characteristics of the impact cap are not substantially compromised.
In various embodiments, a groove depth 442A of a groove 410 may be defined as the distance between the external surface 411 into which the groove 410 extends and an innermost point of recession of the groove 413. For example, in various embodiments, the groove depth of one or more impact cap grooves may be at least substantially between 0.02 inches and 0.118 inches (e.g., between 0.059 inches and 0.079 inches). In various embodiments, the groove configuration 400 may comprise a plurality of impact cap grooves having either the same or different groove depths. For example, in an exemplary embodiment wherein the groove configuration 400 comprises a plurality of impact cap grooves, the groove depths 442A, 442B of grooves 410, 420, respectively, may be either the same or different. Further, in various embodiments, the groove depth of an impact cap groove may be either uniform or variable along the length of the groove. In various embodiments, an exemplary impact cap may be configured such that a ratio of the impact cap thickness to a groove depth of a proximate groove is at least substantially between 1.167:1 and 3.5:1 (e.g., between 1.5:1 and 3:1). For example, an exemplary impact cap may comprise a groove configuration 400 configured such that the ratio of the wall thickness 443 (e.g., impact cap thickness) to groove depth 442B of groove 420 is approximately 2.25:1).
In various embodiments, a groove shape of a groove 410 may be defined as the cross-sectional configuration of the groove 410. As non-limiting examples, in various embodiments, an impact cap groove may comprise a squared cross-section, a rounded cross-section, a triangular cross-section, and/or the like. In various embodiments, the groove configuration 400 may comprise a plurality of impact cap grooves having either the same or different groove shapes. For example, in an exemplary embodiment wherein the groove configuration 400 comprises a plurality of impact cap grooves, the groove shapes of grooves 410, 420 may be either the same or different. As illustrated in
In various embodiments, an impact cap may comprise a groove configuration that is defined at least in part by one or more groove separation distances. As described herein, a groove separation distance may be defined by a distance between various proximate grooves of a plurality of grooves as measured at an external surface into which the grooves protrude. For example, in various embodiments wherein an impact cap comprises a plurality of impact cap grooves, the plurality of impact cap grooves may be distributed about the impact cap such that a first groove is positioned proximate to a second groove, wherein the first groove and the second groove are separated by a groove separation distance. For example, the groove separation distance may be measured between adjacent sidewalls of the two proximate grooves. As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Further, as described herein, a groove (e.g., an impact cap groove) may comprise a groove transition, defined at least in part by the configuration of the transition between external surface into which the groove extends and a sidewall of the groove. As non-limiting examples, an impact cap groove may comprise a groove transition that is either an angled groove transition or a curved groove transition. As illustrated in
Further, As illustrated in
In various embodiments, the plurality of impact cap grooves may correspond to a material reduction of at least substantially between 60 grams and 100 grams (e.g., between 75 grams and 85 grams) of material, which, based at least in part on the material of an impact cap, may result in a weight reduction of at least substantially between 15% and 25% (e.g., approximately 20%) to the impact cap.
In various embodiments, the inner ring 300 may comprise a substantially hard material that is capable of withstanding high-impact forces without being penetrated or otherwise compromised, in particular in conditions of extreme temperatures (e.g., between −32° C. (−25° F.) and 260° C. (500° F.)). For example, in various embodiments, the inner ring 300 may be made of various plastic and/or metal materials, such as thermoplastics. The inner ring 300 may be manufactured using various compression molding, injection molding, CNC machining, additive manufacturing (e.g., 3D printing) processes, and/or the like.
As described herein, the inner ring 300 may comprise an outer inner ring surface 310 and an internal inner ring surface 320. In various embodiments, an outer inner ring surface 310 may be configured to at least partially engage an inner impact cap surface of an impact cap such that a force may be received from the impact cap by the inner ring 300, as described herein. For example, the configuration of the outer inner ring surface 310 may correspond at least in part to a profile of the internal inner ring surface of the impact cap. The inner ring 300 may further comprise an internal inner ring portion 330 embodied as an interior of the inner ring 300 that is defined at least in part by an internal inner ring surface 320. The internal inner ring portion 330 may be configured to receive at least a portion of the head of a user such that a protective helmet may be worn by the user on the user's head, as described herein. For example, in various embodiments, at least a portion of the internal inner ring surface 320 may be configured to at least partially engage a user's head. For example, in various embodiments, the internal inner ring surface 320 may be configured at least substantially similarly to the outer inner ring surface 310. In various embodiments, the inner ring 300 may be configured such that the internal inner ring surface 320 is positioned a distance away from the outer inner ring surface 310. The distance between the internal inner ring surface 320 and the outer inner ring surface 310 may define the thickness of the impact cap liner 300 (e.g., the inner ring thickness). In various embodiments, the inner ring thickness may be either uniform or variable at one or more points throughout the inner ring 300. For example, the inner ring thickness may be at least substantially between 0.06 inch and 0.16 inches (e.g., between 0.08 inches and 0.12 inches).
In various embodiments, an inner ring 300 may comprise one or more support protrusions
In various embodiments, an inner ring 300 may be embodied as either a full inner ring or a partial inner ring. For example, in various embodiments wherein an inner ring 300 is embodied as a full inner ring, the inner ring 300 may comprise a substantially rounded dome configuration defined in part by an outer inner ring surface 310. The outer inner ring surface 310 may comprise an at least partially curved profile extending between an at least substantially circular (e.g., oval-shaped) outer lower perimeter 312 and a central outer cap peak located at an uppermost point of the dome-shaped outer inner ring surface 310 of the inner ring 300. In such an exemplary circumstance, the internal inner ring surface 320 may comprise an at least partially similar curved profile extending between an at least substantially circular (e.g., oval-shaped) inner lower perimeter 322 and a central inner peak located at the uppermost point of the dome-shaped internal inner ring surface 320.
Alternatively, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
In various embodiments, the lower portion 333 may comprise an inner ring brim portion 340 extending in an outward perpendicular direction from the outer inner ring surface 310 along at least a portion of the outer lower perimeter 312 of the inner ring 300. For example, as illustrated, the inner ring brim portion 340 may extend around the entirety of the lower perimeter of the inner ring 300. In various embodiments, the inner ring brim portion 340 may further comprise a vertical ridge that extends in a substantially vertical direction upward from an outer edge of the inner ring brim portion 340. In various embodiments, the vertical ridge of the inner ring brim portion 340 may comprise a substantially uniform protrusion of material extending around the entirety of the inner ring brim portion 340. Alternatively and/or additionally, the vertical ridge of the inner ring brim portion 340 may comprise one or more grooves, distributed around the ridge, as described herein, so as to reduce the amount of material required to make inner ring 300. In various embodiments, the inner ring brim portion 340 may be configured to facilitate an integrated and secured configuration between the inner ring 300 and one or more other components of a protective helmet, as described herein. Further, in various embodiments, the inner ring brim portion 340 may comprise one or more inner ring interface elements 343 configured to engage one or more other components of an exemplary protective helmet so as to at least partially secure (e.g., fasten) the inner ring to the one or more other helmet components. As a non-limiting example, an exemplary inner ring may comprise four interface elements 343 arranged at substantially 90 degree intervals around the perimeter of the inner ring brim portion 340.
In various embodiments, the lower portion 333 of an inner ring 300 may further comprise one or more outer protrusions 341A, 341B, 341C extending in an outward direction from the outer inner ring surface 310 along at least a portion of the lower 333 of the inner ring 300. The outer protrusions 341A, 341B, 341C may comprise a generally convex feature extending radially away from the outer inner ring surface 310. For example, an inner ring 300 may comprise a plurality of outer protrusions distributed intermittently about the lower portion 333 of the inner ring 300. In various embodiments, the outer protrusions 341A, 341B, 341C of the inner ring may be configured so as to increase one or more strength characteristics (e.g., crushing resistance, penetration resistance, and/or the like) of an inner ring 300. Alternatively and/or additionally, each of the one or more outer protrusions (e.g., outer protrusions 341A, 341B, 341C) may respectively correspond to one or more inner recesses of the inner ring 300 (e.g., inner recess 342A, 342B). In various embodiments, the inner ring 300 may comprise one or more inner recesses 342A, 342B extending the internal inner ring surface 320 into the impact cap thickness along at least a portion of the lower 333 of the inner ring 300. For example, the inner recess 342A, 342B may be configured to receive interface elements of one or more other components of an exemplary protective helmet, as described herein. In such a circumstance, the one or more outer protrusions 341A, 341B, of the inner ring 300 may be configured to protrude from the outer inner ring surface 310 so as to prevent the respective interface elements received within the corresponding inner recesses 342A, 342B from being exposed through the outer inner ring surface 310. Further, in various embodiments, the outer protrusions 341A, 341B, 341C may be configured to define a spatial configuration of the inner ring 300 relative to one or more other components of a protective helmet, as described herein. As a non-limiting example, the outer protrusions 341A, 341B, 341C may be configured to maintain a gap between at least a portion of the outer inner ring surface 310 and at least a portion of the inner shell surface, wherein the gap is at least substantially between 0.394 inches and 0.984 inches (e.g., between 0.591 inches and 0.787 inches). In various embodiments, an exemplary inner ring 300 having a plurality of outer protrusions, as described herein, may comprise between six and twelve outer protrusions (e.g., between eight and ten outer protrusions).
In various embodiments, an intermediate portion 334 of an inner ring 300 may comprise a substantially curved profile extending upwards from the lower portion 333 of the inner ring 300 to an upper portion 335. Similarly, an upper portion 335 of an inner ring 300 may comprise a substantially curved profile extending upwards from the intermediate portion 334 of the inner ring 300 to either a central peak at the uppermost point of a dome-shaped full inner ring or an upper impact cap surface 331 defining the uppermost surface of a partial inner ring 300. As described herein, the intermediate portion 334 and the upper portion 335 of an exemplary inner ring 300 may each comprise a radius of curvature and an inner ring thickness profile defined by the distribution of impact cap thickness throughout the respective portion. In various embodiments, the radius of curvature and the inner ring thickness profile of the intermediate portion 334 may be either the same or different than radius of curvature and/or the inner ring thickness profile, respectively, of the upper portion 335 of the inner ring 300. For example, in various embodiments, the impact cap thickness of at least a portion of the upper portion 335 may be smaller than that of the intermediate portion 334. As a further non-limiting example, in various embodiments, the radius of curvature of the upper portion 335 may be larger than that of the intermediate portion 334. In various embodiments, the boundary between the intermediate portion 334 and the upper portion 335 may be defined in part by a distinct change in radius of curvature and/or inner ring thickness. For example, the inner ring thickness of the intermediate portion 334 may be approximately 0.11 inches, while the inner ring thickness of the upper portion 335 may be approximately 0.09 inches.
In various embodiments, the inner ring 300 may comprise one or more grooves (e.g., inner ring grooves) extending along at least a portion of the outer inner ring surface 310 and/or the internal inner ring surface 320. As described herein, a groove may embody a material recess within the inner ring thickness of the inner ring 300, such that an exemplary inner ring 300 having one or more grooves may comprise a lesser amount of material than a similarly sized inner ring having the same inner ring thickness and zero grooves. Accordingly, as described herein, the exemplary inner ring 300 having one or more grooves may weigh less than a similarly sized inner ring having the same inner ring thickness and zero grooves. Moreover, in various embodiments, a groove positioned within an inner ring 300 may increase the surface area of the inner ring 300, thereby increasing the heat dissipation capacity of the inner ring 300 by facilitating a more effective heat transfer between an inner ring surface (e.g., the outer inner ring surface 310 and/or the internal inner ring surface 320) and an ambient environment. Furthermore, in various embodiments, the one or more inner ring grooves may be configured such that an exemplary inner ring 300 with one or more grooves may exhibit similar strength characteristics and piercing resistance as a similarly configured, heavier impact cap that has no grooves.
In various embodiments, for example, as illustrated in
Further,
As described herein in further detail, a groove (e.g., inner ring groove) may be defined at least in part by a groove depth, a groove width, a groove length, and a groove shape. In various embodiments wherein the inner ring 300 comprises a plurality of inner ring grooves, one or more of the inner ring grooves may comprise either the same or different groove depth, groove width, groove length, and/or groove shape. For example, as illustrated in
As described above with respect to various exemplary inner ring groove configurations,
For example, as illustrated in
As described herein, a groove width 441A of a groove 410 may be defined as the distance between the two groove sidewalls 412A, 412B as measured at the external surface 411 perpendicularly to a length of the groove 410. For example, in various embodiments, the groove width of one or more inner ring grooves may be at least substantially between 0.039 inches and 0.197 inches (e.g., between 0.098 inches and 0.138 inches). In various embodiments, the groove configuration 400 may comprise a plurality of inner ring grooves having either the same or different groove widths. For example, in an exemplary embodiment wherein the groove configuration 400 comprises a plurality of inner ring grooves, the groove widths 441A, 441B of grooves 410, 420, respectively, may be either the same or different. Further, in various embodiments, the groove width of an inner ring groove may be either uniform or variable along the length of the groove. In various embodiments, the groove width of the various grooves of an exemplary plurality of inner ring grooves may be configured such that the penetration resistance characteristics of the inner ring are not substantially compromised.
Further, as described herein, a groove depth 442A of a groove 410 may be defined as the distance between the external surface 411 into which the groove 410 extends and an innermost point of recession of the groove 413. For example, in various embodiments, the groove depth of one or more inner ring grooves may be at least substantially between 0.02 inches and 0.118 inches (e.g., between 0.059 inches and 0.079 inches). In various embodiments, the groove configuration 400 may comprise a plurality of inner ring grooves having either the same or different groove depths. For example, in an exemplary embodiment wherein the groove configuration 400 comprises a plurality of inner ring grooves, the groove depths 442A, 442B of grooves 410, 420, respectively, may be either the same or different. Further, in various embodiments, the groove depth of an inner ring groove may be either uniform or variable along the length of the groove. In various embodiments, an exemplary inner ring may be configured such that a ratio of the inner ring thickness to a groove depth of a proximate groove is at least substantially between 1.167:1 and 3.5:1 (e.g., between 1.5:1 and 3:1). For example, an exemplary inner ring may comprise a groove configuration 400 configured such that the ratio of the wall thickness 443 (e.g., inner ring thickness) to groove depth 442B of groove 420 is approximately 2.25:1).
As described herein, a groove shape of a groove 410 may be defined as the cross-sectional configuration of the groove 410 (e.g., at the deepest portion of the groove). As non-limiting examples, in various embodiments, an inner ring groove may comprise a squared cross-section, a rounded cross-section, a triangular cross-section, and/or the like. In various embodiments, the groove configuration 400 may comprise a plurality of inner ring grooves having either the same or different groove shapes. For example, in an exemplary embodiment wherein the groove configuration 400 comprises a plurality of inner ring grooves, the groove shapes of grooves 410, 420 may be either the same or different. As illustrated in
In various embodiments, an inner ring may comprise a groove configuration that is defined at least in part by one or more groove separation distances, as described herein. For example, in various embodiments wherein an inner ring comprises a plurality of inner ring grooves, the plurality of inner ring grooves may be distributed about the inner ring such that a first groove is positioned proximate to a second groove, wherein the first groove and the second groove are separated by a groove separation distance. For example, the groove separation distance may be measured between adjacent sidewalls of the two proximate grooves. As illustrated in
As illustrated in
Further, as described herein, a groove (e.g., an inner ring groove) may comprise a groove transition, defined at least in part by the configuration of the transition between external surface into which the groove extends and a sidewall of the groove. As non-limiting examples, an inner ring groove may comprise a groove transition that is either an angled groove transition or a curved groove transition. As illustrated in
Further, As illustrated in
As described herein, in various embodiments, an exemplary inner ring may comprise a lower portion, an intermediate portion, and/or an upper portion. In various embodiments, one or more of the lower portion, the intermediate portion, and/or the upper portion may comprise one or more inner ring grooves having a groove depth, groove width, groove length, and/or groove shape that is different than the groove depth, the groove width, the groove length, and/or the groove shape, respectively, of another one of one of the lower portion, the intermediate portion, and/or the upper portion of the inner ring. For example, as a non-limiting example, an inner ring may comprise an inner ring groove having a groove depth of an approximately 0.075 inches within the lower portion, approximately 0.068 inches within the intermediate portion, and approximately 0.062 inches within the upper portion of an inner ring. Further, as a non-limiting example, an exemplary inner ring may be configured such that a ratio of the inner ring thickness to a groove depth of a proximate inner ring groove is approximately 1.95:1 within the lower portion, approximately 2.35:1 within the intermediate portion, and approximately 2.75:1 within the upper portion of an inner ring.
In various embodiments, the plurality of inner ring grooves may correspond to a material reduction of at least substantially between 50 grams and 400 grams (e.g., between 200 grams and 350 grams) of material, which, based at least in part on the material of an inner ring, may result in a weight reduction of at least substantially between 15% and 25% (e.g., approximately 20%) to the inner ring.
Various computer-aided simulations were conducted wherein various inner rings comprising a baseline inner ring configuration, a first exemplary inner ring configuration, a second exemplary inner ring configuration, a third exemplary inner ring configuration, and a fourth exemplary inner ring configuration were each subjected to a 700N point force applied perpendicularly to the respective upper portions of the various inner rings. As described in further detail below, each of the each of the various exemplary inner ring configurations were defined at least in part by inner ring thickness and a groove configuration, the groove configuration being defined in part by a plurality of outer inner ring grooves having uniform groove depth, groove width, groove shape, and groove separation distance. In the computer-aided simulations, each of the various exemplary inner rings were subjected to fully fixed conditions at each of the four interface elements arranged at substantially 90 degree intervals around the perimeter of the inner ring brim portion, as well as a perpendicularly fixed condition in a radially outward direction at the vertical ridge of the inner ring brim portion, as described herein. Each of the tested inner rings was made of Lexan 241 R, a material having a density of 1.19 g/cc, a Young's modulus of 2340 MPa, a yield stress of 62 MPa, and a tensile stress of 68 MPa. The computer aided simulations were conducted to assess the weight savings, maximum deflection, and maximum stress realized by each of the exemplary inner rings.
A baseline experimental simulation was conducted on a baseline inner ring configuration having a wall thickness of 0.118 inches and no inner ring grooves. When loaded with the experimental 700N point force described above, the baseline inner ring configuration experienced a maximum deflection of 8.34 mm and a maximum stress of 55 MPa.
An experimental simulation was conducted on a first exemplary inner ring configuration having an inner ring thickness of 0.118 inches and a groove configuration defined by a plurality of uniform inner ring grooves, each having a squared groove shape and an angled groove transition of at least substantially 90 degrees, as described herein. Further, the plurality of uniform inner ring grooves of the first exemplary inner ring configuration each have a groove depth of 0.063 inches and a groove width of 0.046 inches, with the plurality of grooves defining a uniform groove separation distance of 0.046 inches between each of the plurality of grooves. When loaded with the experimental 700N point force described above, the first exemplary inner ring configuration experienced a maximum deflection of 14.8 mm (a 77% increase compared to the baseline inner ring configuration) and a maximum stress of 134 MPa (a 143% increase compared to the baseline inner ring configuration). The first exemplary inner ring configuration related to a weight reduction of 47.2 g relative to the baseline inner ring configuration.
An experimental simulation was conducted on a second exemplary inner ring configuration having an inner ring thickness of 0.118 inches and a groove configuration defined by a plurality of uniform inner ring grooves, each having a squared groove shape and an angled groove transition of at least substantially 90 degrees, as described herein. Further, the plurality of uniform inner ring grooves of the second exemplary inner ring configuration each have a groove depth of 0.049 inches and a groove width of 0.046 inches, with the plurality of grooves defining a uniform groove separation distance of 0.046 inches between each of the plurality of grooves. When loaded with the experimental 700N point force described above, the second exemplary inner ring configuration experienced a maximum deflection of 12.27 mm (a 47% increase compared to the baseline inner ring configuration) and a maximum stress of 105 MPa (a 90% increase compared to the baseline inner ring configuration). The second exemplary inner ring configuration related to a weight reduction of 30 g relative to the baseline inner ring configuration.
An experimental simulation was conducted on a third exemplary inner ring configuration having an inner ring thickness of 0.118 inches and a groove configuration defined by a plurality of uniform inner ring grooves, each having a squared groove shape and an angled groove transition of at least substantially 90 degrees, as described herein. Further, the plurality of uniform inner ring grooves of the third exemplary inner ring configuration each have a groove depth of 0.063 inches and a groove width of 0.16 inches, with the plurality of grooves defining a uniform groove separation distance of 0.08 inches between each of the plurality of grooves. When loaded with the experimental 700N point force described above, the third exemplary inner ring configuration experienced a maximum deflection of 13.8 mm (a 65% increase compared to the baseline inner ring configuration) and a maximum stress of 126 MPa (a 129% increase compared to the baseline inner ring configuration). The third exemplary inner ring configuration related to a weight reduction of 45.49 g relative to the baseline inner ring configuration.
An experimental simulation was conducted on a fourth exemplary inner ring configuration having an impact cap thickness of 0.118 inches and a groove configuration defined by a plurality of uniform inner ring grooves, each having a squared groove shape and an angled groove transition of at least substantially 90 degrees, as described herein. Further, the plurality of uniform inner ring grooves of the fourth exemplary inner ring configuration each have a groove depth of 0.049 inches and a groove width of 0.16 inches, with the plurality of grooves defining a uniform groove separation distance of 0.08 inches between each of the plurality of grooves. When loaded with the experimental 700N point force described above, the fourth exemplary inner ring configuration experienced a maximum deflection of 11.5 mm (a 37% increase compared to the baseline inner ring configuration) and a maximum stress of 106 MPa (a 92% increase compared to the baseline inner ring configuration). The fourth exemplary inner ring configuration related to a weight reduction of 36 g relative to the baseline inner ring configuration.
Many modifications and other embodiments will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which this disclosure pertains having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 202011017952 | Apr 2020 | IN | national |
