This application is a national stage application of international application no. PCT/EP2017/071260 filed Aug. 23, 2017, entitled “Protective Helmet,” claiming priority to German application no. DE 10 2016 115 905.0 filed Aug. 26, 2016, which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference as part of the present disclosure.
The present disclosure generally relates to a protective helmet, for example, a protective motorcycle helmet.
Modern protective helmets not only have mechanical devices and features such as a visor, a ventilation device and turbulators, but increasingly also additional electric devices—here and hereinafter referred to as accessories—that can be affixed to the protective helmet.
The manner of attaching of such an accessory generally constitutes a challenge. A first option is to push such an accessory into the protective helmet, e.g. using a fastening strap, which is inserted between a layer of expanded polystyrene and padding for fastening purposes. This approach is advantageous in that no special fastening means need be provided on the protective helmet itself, and that therefore, an attachment to virtually any protective helmet is possible. A drawback is that the accessory is protected only to a small degree from being inadvertently detached from the protective helmet by this type of attachment.
In contrast, another option is to provide a pre-configured socket on an external surface of the outer shell of the protective helmet, into which socket the accessory can then be inserted. By providing respective devices for attachment to the socket and to the accessory, a reliable attachment of the accessory can thus be achieved. A drawback, however, is that, in order to provide such a socket, the outer shell must be adapted with respect to, on the one hand, its outer shape and, on the other hand, to a substantial extent in such a manner that the socket can be incorporated. However, with respect to the function of the outer shell as a hard layer for distributing impact forces, this is problematic.
Therefore, it is an object to develop and improve a protective helmet in such a way that such an accessory can be reliably placed on the protective helmet and that the function of the outer shell is affected as little as possible in the process.
The socket may be designed and disposed in such a way that the accommodated accessory can be placed underneath the outer shell, namely in such a manner that the accessory effectively rests against the outer shell. In this way, a specially adapted attaching device for the accessory may be provided so that the attachment is secure and reliable. On the other hand, neither a substantial adaptation of the outer shell itself nor any substantial enlargement of the protective helmet as a whole is necessary. As a result, the respective advantages of the above-described approaches are combined with each other.
The protective helmet according to at least some embodiments, which may be a protective motorcycle helmet, comprises an outer shell for distributing impact forces and a socket, which is firmly connected to the outer shell, for accommodating an electrical accessory, wherein the socket is disposed on an edge of the outer shell and the socket is configured, when accommodating the accessory, for guiding the latter substantially along an inner face of the outer shell, so that the accommodated accessory extends substantially along the inner face of the outer shell. In the process, only a part of the accessory may be accommodated by the socket and, correspondingly, only a part of the accommodated accessory may extend along the inner face of the outer shell. However, this may be the major part of the accessory. Due to the fact that a remaining part of the accessory thus does not extend along the inner face of the outer shell, this remaining part stays accessible and may therefore be used for operating the accessory, for example.
This accessory may be any electrical or electronic device. The inner face of the outer shell is the concave side of the outer shell, and thus the side by which the head of the wearer of the protective helmet is accommodated. The above extent of the accommodated accessory substantially along the inner face of the outer shell means that the accommodated accessory is substantially coplanar, i.e. parallel, to an imaginary tangential plane of the outer shell at the location of the outer shell closest to the accommodated accessory. In this case, the accessory may have a substantially flat extent and the above coplanar orientation may relate to the plane defined by this substantially flat extent.
At least some embodiments of the protective helmet are characterized in that the protective helmet has an inner layer accommodated by the outer shell for damping impact forces, and that the accommodated accessory is disposed between the outer shell and the inner layer. This arrangement ensures that the shape of the outer shell need not be altered and that the protective effect both of the outer shell and the inner layer can be largely maintained.
Another embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the socket has a frame, which may consist substantially of plastic and is disposed inside the outer shell, for positively accommodating the accessory with a frame opening for inserting the accessory. As was already indicated above, a part of the accommodated accessory may protrude from the frame, and especially from the frame opening.
In at least some embodiments having a frame, the frame can house at least a first portion of an electrical accessory within the outer shell and at least a portion of the at least a first portion within the frame and with the entirety of the at least a first portion and an entirety of the at least a portion of the first portion between the inner layer and the outer shell. In such embodiments, when the helmet includes an electrical accessory therein, at least a first portion of the electrical accessory is located within the outer shell and at least a portion of the at least a first portion is located within the frame, and an entirety of the at least a first portion and an entirety of the at least a portion of the first portion is located between the inner layer and the outer shell.
In this case it is provided, according to at least some embodiments of the protective helmet, that the frame is in positive engagement for lateral retention with the accommodated accessory in at least one retaining direction, which at least one retaining direction is substantially orientated parallel to the outer shell at the location of engagement for lateral retention. Such an engagement for lateral retention prevents the accommodated accessory from slipping along the outer shell. The parallel orientation relative to the outer shell may—in analogy to the above coplanar orientation—be assessed by means of an imaginary tangential plane of the outer shell at the location of engagement for lateral retention, or the place of the outer shell closest to the location of engagement for lateral retention. The frame may be in positive engagement for lateral retention with the accommodated accessory on both sides in the at least one retaining direction. Thus, the accessory is effectively prevented from slipping in both orientations of the retaining direction.
In at least some embodiments having a frame, the frame extends along a front end and an opposing rear end of the electrical accessory and/or the frame extends adjacent an upper end of the electrical accessory. In some such embodiment, the frame extends adjacent at least four ends of the electrical accessory.
At least some embodiments of the protective helmet are characterized in that the retaining direction is orientated substantially parallel to a circumferential direction of the outer shell at the location of engagement for lateral retention. Here and hereinafter, this circumferential direction is to be understood to be a direction which is both horizontal—i.e. relative to a person wearing the protective helmet—as well as tangential to the outer shell at the location of engagement for lateral retention—i.e. of the above positive engagement.
Another embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the frame is adjacent to a lower edge of the outer shell and that the frame opening is substantially disposed at the lower edge of the outer shell. Here and hereinafter, the directional indication “lower” refers to a person wearing the protective helmet. This arrangement of the frame and the frame opening enables a convenient access both for accommodation and for removing the accessory from the socket. In at least some embodiments, the frame, starting at the frame opening, substantially extends along the outer shell. This extent may be such that the accessory is inserted into the frame substantially in a vertically upward direction. Here and hereinafter, the directional indication “upward” also refers to a person wearing the protective helmet.
According to at least some embodiments of the protective helmet, it is provided that the protective helmet comprises a helmet trim which is firmly connected to the outer shell and which may substantially consist of plastic, for at least partially covering the edge of the outer shell. Such a helmet trim protects the vulnerable edge of the outer shell, for example, when the protective helmet is dropped. The helmet trim also serves in at least some embodiments, for delimiting the protective helmet in a downward direction. In at least some embodiments, the frame is firmly and positively connected to the helmet trim.
At least some embodiments of the protective helmet are characterized in that the frame opening is disposed laterally offset from a vertical central longitudinal plane of the protective helmet. The central longitudinal plane is described by a vector in the longitudinal direction of the protective helmet, which longitudinal direction is defined, here and hereinafter, as the viewing direction of a person wearing the protective helmet, and a vector in a vertical direction, which vertical direction is defined, in particular, in accordance with the above-mentioned “upward” direction.
Therefore, a lateral offset from this vertical central longitudinal plane is an offset perpendicular to the central longitudinal plane, and thus, in a horizontal transverse direction, with respect to the above viewing direction of a person wearing the protective helmet. Here, the frame opening may also be disposed substantially centrally between a maximally rearward and a maximally lateral position and along the lower, edge of the outer shell. This arrangement corresponds to a region of the lower edge situated diagonally offset in a rearward direction from an imaginary center of the protective helmet. The region is particularly suitable for the person wearing the protective helmet to conveniently grip the protective helmet without limiting the visual field of the protective helmet.
Another embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the socket has a snap-in device for a positive engagement for holding the accessory. The positive engagement may serve for holding the accessory in the frame. In at least some embodiments, the snap-in device is disposed spaced apart from the frame opening. This may cause the snap-in device to be covered by an accessory accommodated by the frame. In other words, the snap-in device is in that case no longer exposed, so that an inadvertent release of the positive engagement for holding the accessory by accidentally touching the snap-in device is prevented.
According to a at least some embodiments of the protective helmet, it is provided that the socket has a wall against which the accommodated accessory rests in a flat manner, and that the snap-in device has at least one hook, which at least one hook protrudes in an adjustable manner from the wall for positive engagement in order to hold the accessory. In at least some embodiments, it may be that the frame of the socket includes the wall. The above adjustability of the hook may be provided by the bendability of an arm of the frame, on which arm the hook is disposed. It may also be that the at least one the hook is disposed in such a way that, by inserting a release device between the wall and the accommodated accessory, it can be pressed into the wall so that the positive engagement for holding the accessory is released. Such a release device may be configured to be flat or card-like. Consequently, the snap-in device is configured to release the positive engagement for holding the accessory in response to the release device being used. This enables a reliable removal of the accessory if, and only if, removal is desired.
At least some embodiments of the protective helmet are characterized in that the protective helmet comprises an electric and electrically operated module device which is coupled to the outer shell and electrically connected to the socket, and that the socket has a pole assembly for the detachable electric coupling of the accommodated accessory. On the one hand, this electric coupling may be contact-free, e.g. by means of magnetic induction. This electric coupling may also contain a mechanical contacting portion. Accordingly, the pole assembly may be a pole contact assembly for detachable electrical contacting. In this way, an accessory accommodated by the socket is reliably electrically connected to the module device. This is advantageous if the module device and the accessory are two components of a combined overall device that becomes functional only due to this connection. The accessory is then a replaceable constituent of this overall device, whereas the module device is firmly integrated with the outer shell and thus, the protective helmet as a whole. Here, the pole contact assembly may also have a plurality of single contacts for respectively contacting the accessory. The module device may be an electronic device, or also a digital electronic device.
Another embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the pole assembly, such as the above pole contact assembly, has at least one plug contact for positive connection with the accessory. Then, the pole assembly also contributes to the mechanical connection of the accessory to the socket. The pole contact assembly may also comprise at least one sliding contact for the connection without positive fit to the accessory. Alternatively or additionally, the pole contact assembly may have further types of contacts.
In principle, this accessory may be any electrical device. For example, the accessory may also be an electrical energy storage unit and, correspondingly, an electrical battery. The accessory may also be a radio device for receiving a radio transmission, wherein it is possible to receive analog radio—frequency-modulated or amplitude-modulated—and/or digital radio. In addition to this option, the accessory may be an electronic device, such as a digital electronic device. According to a at least some embodiments of the protective helmet, it is provided that the accessory is a digital device for wireless communication. The digital device may be a radio module for a Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN), wherein the digital device may be, for example, a radio module for Bluetooth. In this context, the module device may moreover be an antenna for high-frequency transmission. In this manner, the protective helmet can provide such replaceable radio modules with an already pre-installed antenna on the protective helmet.
At least some embodiments of the protective helmet are characterized in that the protective helmet comprises an accessory accommodated by the socket, that the accessory has pushbuttons for operation, and that the pushbuttons protrude from the socket. In at least some embodiments, the pushbuttons serve for operating the accessory. In this case, the pushbuttons may protrude from the frame. In this manner, both a largely covered arrangement of the accessory and an accessibility of the operating means of the accessory are obtained.
Another embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the pushbuttons are disposed on the accessory in such a way that an operation of the pushbuttons pushes the accessory in an insertion direction of the socket, and in some embodiments, of the frame. The operation of the pushbuttons—which, due to the fact that the operator will generally wear motorcycle gloves, may be carried out in a comparatively crude manner—thus pushes the accessory into the socket, so that the risk of an inadvertent release of the accessory is minimized even in the case of imprecise operation.
This summary is not exhaustive of the scope of the present aspects and embodiments. Thus, while certain aspects and embodiments have been presented and/or outlined in this summary, it should be understood that the present aspects and embodiments are not limited to the aspects and embodiments in this summary. Indeed, other aspects and embodiments, which may be similar to and/or different from, the aspects and embodiments presented in this summary, will be apparent from the description, illustrations, and/or claims, which follow.
It should also be understood that any aspects and embodiments that are described in this summary and do not appear in the claims that follow are preserved for later presentation in this application or in one or more continuation patent applications.
Other advantages will become apparent from the following description with reference to the Figures, which are understood not to be limiting.
The protective helmet illustrated in
The socket 3 has a frame 9 of plastic which is shown only in
For inserting the accessory 3, the latter is inserted substantially in the vertically upward direction 13 into the frame 9, through the frame opening 10. A helmet trim 14 made of plastic covers the lower edge 6 of the outer shell 1. The helmet 14 is firmly connected to the outer shell 1, and the frame 9, in turn, to the helmet trim 14 in a manner not shown here in detail. As can be seen, the frame opening 11 is disposed laterally offset from a vertical central longitudinal plane 15 indicated in
With respect to the details of the socket 2,
A pole assembly 20 for electrically coupling and, in this case, contacting the accessory 3, which is, in in some embodiments, a pole contact assembly, is apparent from
While the above describes certain embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the foregoing description is not intended to limit the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. It should also be understood that the embodiments of the present disclosure described herein are merely exemplary and that a person skilled in the art may make any variations and modification without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. All such variations and modifications, including those discussed above, are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure.
The invention relates to a protective helmet, and in particular to a protective motorcycle helmet.
Modern protective helmets not only have mechanical devices and features such as a visor, a ventilation device and turbulators, but increasingly also additional electric devices—here and hereinafter referred to as accessories—that can be affixed to the protective helmet.
The manner of attaching of such an accessory generally constitutes a challenge. A first option is to push such an accessory into the protective helmet, e.g. using a fastening strap, which is inserted between a layer of expanded polystyrene and padding for fastening purposes. This approach is advantageous in that no special fastening means need be provided on the protective helmet itself, and that therefore, an attachment to virtually any protective helmet is possible. A drawback is that the accessory is protected only to a small degree from being inadvertently detached from the protective helmet by this type of attachment.
In contrast, another option is to provide a pre-configured socket on an external surface of the outer shell of the protective helmet, into which socket the accessory can then be inserted. By providing respective devices for attachment to the socket and to the accessory, a reliable attachment of the accessory can thus be achieved. A drawback, however, is that, in order to provide such a socket, the outer shell must be adapted with respect to, on the one hand, its outer shape and, on the other hand, to a substantial extent in such a manner that the socket can be incorporated. However, with respect to the function of the outer shell as a hard layer for distributing impact forces, this is problematic.
Therefore, the object of the invention is to develop and improve a protective helmet in such a way that such an accessory can be reliably placed on the protective helmet and that the function of the outer shell is affected as little as possible in the process.
This object is achieved by a protective helmet with the features of claim 1.
The insight that the socket may be designed and disposed in such a way that the accommodated accessory can be placed underneath the outer shell, namely in such a manner that the accessory effectively rests against the outer shell, is essential to the invention. In this way, a specially adapted attaching device for the accessory may be provided so that the attachment is secure and reliable. On the other hand, neither a substantial adaptation of the outer shell itself nor any substantial enlargement of the protective helmet as a whole is necessary. As a result, the respective advantages of the above-described approaches are combined with each other.
The protective helmet according to the invention, which may be, in particular, a protective motorcycle helmet, comprises an outer shell for distributing impact forces and a socket, which is firmly connected to the outer shell, for accommodating an electrical accessory, wherein the socket is disposed on an edge of the outer shell and the socket is configured, when accommodating the accessory, for guiding the latter substantially along an inner face of the outer shell, so that the accommodated accessory extends substantially along the inner face of the outer shell. In the process, only a part of the accessory may be accommodated by the socket and, correspondingly, only a part of the accommodated accessory may extend along the inner face of the outer shell. Preferably, however, this is the major part of the accessory. Due to the fact that a remaining part of the accessory thus does not extend along the inner face of the outer shell, this remaining part stays accessible and may therefore be used for operating the accessory, for example.
This accessory may be any electrical and, in particular, electronic device. The inner face of the outer shell is the concave side of the outer shell, and thus the side by which the head of the wearer of the protective helmet is accommodated. The above extent of the accommodated accessory substantially along the inner face of the outer shell means that the accommodated accessory is substantially coplanar, i.e. parallel, to an imaginary tangential plane of the outer shell at the location of the outer shell closest to the accommodated accessory. In this case, the accessory may have a substantially flat extent and the above coplanar orientation may relate to the plane defined by this substantially flat extent.
A preferred embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the protective helmet has an inner layer accommodated by the outer shell for damping impact forces, and that the accommodated accessory is disposed between the outer shell and the inner layer. This arrangement ensures that the shape of the outer shell need not be altered and that the protective effect both of the outer shell and the inner layer can be largely maintained.
Another preferred embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the socket has a frame, which preferably consists substantially of plastic and is disposed inside the outer shell, for positively accommodating the accessory with a frame opening for inserting the accessory. As was already indicated above, a part of the accommodated accessory may protrude from the frame, and especially from the frame opening.
In this case it is provided, according to a preferred embodiment of the protective helmet, that the frame is in positive engagement for lateral retention with the accommodated accessory in at least one retaining direction, which at least one retaining direction is substantially orientated parallel to the outer shell at the location of engagement for lateral retention. Such an engagement for lateral retention prevents the accommodated accessory from slipping along the outer shell. The parallel orientation relative to the outer shell may—in analogy to the above coplanar orientation—be assessed by means of an imaginary tangential plane of the outer shell at the location of engagement for lateral retention, or the place of the outer shell closest to the location of engagement for lateral retention. Preferably, the frame is in positive engagement for lateral retention with the accommodated accessory on both sides in the at least one retaining direction. Thus, the accessory is effectively prevented from slipping in both orientations of the retaining direction.
A preferred embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the retaining direction is orientated substantially parallel to a circumferential direction of the outer shell at the location of engagement for lateral retention. Here and hereinafter, this circumferential direction is to be understood to be a direction which is both horizontal—i.e. relative to a person wearing the protective helmet—as well as tangential to the outer shell at the location of engagement for lateral retention—i.e. of the above positive engagement.
Another preferred embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the frame is adjacent to a lower edge of the outer shell and that the frame opening is substantially disposed at the lower edge of the outer shell. Here and hereinafter, the directional indication “lower” refers to a person wearing the protective helmet. This arrangement of the frame and the frame opening enables a convenient access both for accommodation and for removing the accessory from the socket. It is also preferred that the frame, starting at the frame opening, substantially extends along the outer shell. In particular, this extent may be such that the accessory is inserted into the frame substantially in a vertically upward direction. Here and hereinafter, the directional indication “upward” also refers to a person wearing the protective helmet.
According to a preferred embodiment of the protective helmet, it is provided that the protective helmet comprises a helmet trim which is firmly connected to the outer shell and which, preferably, substantially consists of plastic, for at least partially covering the, in particular lower, edge of the outer shell. Such a helmet trim protects the vulnerable edge of the outer shell, for example, when the protective helmet is dropped. Preferably, the helmet trim also serves, in particular, for delimiting the protective helmet in a downward direction. It is also preferred that the frame is firmly and preferably positively connected to the helmet trim.
A preferred embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the frame opening is disposed laterally offset from a vertical central longitudinal plane of the protective helmet. The central longitudinal plane is described by a vector in the longitudinal direction of the protective helmet, which longitudinal direction is defined, here and hereinafter, as the viewing direction of a person wearing the protective helmet, and a vector in a vertical direction, which vertical direction is defined, in particular, in accordance with the above-mentioned “upward” direction. Therefore, a lateral offset from this vertical central longitudinal plane is an offset perpendicular to the central longitudinal plane, and thus, in a horizontal transverse direction, with respect to the above viewing direction of a person wearing the protective helmet. Here, it is also preferred that the frame opening is disposed substantially centrally between a maximally rearward and a maximally lateral position along the, in particular lower, edge of the outer shell. This arrangement corresponds to a region of the lower edge situated diagonally offset in a rearward direction from an imaginary center of the protective helmet. The region is particularly suitable for the person wearing the protective helmet to conveniently grip the protective helmet without limiting the visual field of the protective helmet.
Another preferred embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the socket has a snap-in device for a positive engagement for holding the accessory. In particular, the positive engagement may serve for holding the accessory in the frame. Preferably, the snap-in device is disposed spaced apart from the frame opening. In particular, this may cause the snap-in device to be covered by an accessory accommodated by the frame. In other words, the snap-in device is in that case no longer exposed, so that an inadvertent release of the positive engagement for holding the accessory by accidentally touching the snap-in device is prevented.
According to a preferred embodiment of the protective helmet, it is provided that the socket has a wall against which the accommodated accessory rests in a flat manner, and that the snap-in device has at least one hook, which at least one hook protrudes in an adjustable manner from the wall for positive engagement in order to hold the accessory. In particular, it may be that the frame of the socket, in particular, includes the wall. The above adjustability of the hook may be provided, in particular, by the bendability of an arm of the frame, on which arm the hook is disposed. It may also be that the at least one the hook is disposed in such a way that, by inserting a release device between the wall and the accommodated accessory, it can be pressed into the wall so that the positive engagement for holding the accessory is released. Such a release device may be configured to be flat or card-like. Consequently, the snap-in device is configured to release the positive engagement for holding the accessory in response to the release device being used. This enables a reliable removal of the accessory if, and only if, removal is desired.
A preferred embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the protective helmet comprises an electric and, in particular, electrically operated module device which is, preferably firmly, coupled to the outer shell and electrically connected to the socket, and that the socket has a pole assembly for the detachable electric coupling of the accommodated accessory. On the one hand, this electric coupling may be contact-free, e.g. by means of magnetic induction. This electric coupling may also contain a mechanical contacting portion. Accordingly, the pole assembly may be a pole contact assembly for detachable electrical contacting. In this way, an accessory accommodated by the socket is reliably electrically connected to the module device. This is advantageous particularly if the module device and the accessory are two components of a combined overall device that becomes functional only due to this connection. The accessory is then a replaceable constituent of this overall device, whereas the module device is firmly integrated with the outer shell and thus, the protective helmet as a whole. Here, it is also preferred that the pole contact assembly has a plurality of single contacts for respectively contacting the accessory. The module device may be, in particular, an electronic device, or also a digital electronic device.
Another preferred embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the pole assembly, preferably the above pole contact assembly, has at least one plug contact for positive connection with the accessory. Then, the pole assembly also contributes to the mechanical connection of the accessory to the socket. The pole contact assembly may also comprise at least one sliding contact for the connection without positive fit to the accessory. Alternatively or additionally, the pole contact assembly may have further types of contacts.
In principle, this accessory may be any electrical device. For example, the accessory may also be an electrical energy storage unit and, correspondingly, an electrical battery. The accessory may also be a radio device for receiving a radio transmission, wherein it is possible to receive analog radio—frequency-modulated or amplitude-modulated—and/or digital radio. In addition to this option, the accessory may be an electronic device, and especially a digital electronic device. According to a preferred embodiment of the protective helmet, it is provided that the accessory is a digital device for wireless communication. In particular, the digital device may be a radio module for a Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN), wherein the digital device may be, in particular, a radio module for Bluetooth. In this context, the module device may moreover be an antenna for high-frequency transmission. In this manner, the protective helmet can provide such replaceable radio modules with an already pre-installed antenna on the protective helmet.
A preferred embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the protective helmet comprises an accessory accommodated by the socket, that the accessory has pushbuttons for operation, and that the pushbuttons protrude from the socket. Preferably, the pushbuttons serve for operating the accessory. In this case, the pushbuttons may, in particular, protrude from the frame. In this manner, both a largely covered arrangement of the accessory and an accessibility of the operating means of the accessory are obtained.
Another preferred embodiment of the protective helmet is characterized in that the pushbuttons are disposed on the accessory in such a way that an operation of the pushbuttons pushes the accessory in an insertion direction of the socket, in particular of the frame. The operation of the pushbuttons—which, due to the fact that the operator will generally wear motorcycle gloves, may be carried out in a comparatively crude manner—thus pushes the accessory into the socket, so that the risk of an inadvertent release of the accessory is minimized even in the case of imprecise operation.
Other advantageous and preferred embodiments become apparent from the following description with reference to the Figures. In the drawing, which only illustrates a single embodiment:
The proposed protective helmet illustrated in
The socket 3 has a frame 9 of plastic which is shown only in
For inserting the accessory 3, the latter is inserted substantially in the vertically upward direction 13 into the frame 9, through the frame opening 10. A helmet trim 14 made of plastic covers the lower edge 6 of the outer shell 1. The helmet 14 is firmly connected to the outer shell 1, and the frame 9, in turn, to the helmet trim 14 in a manner not shown here in detail. As can be seen, the frame opening 11 is disposed laterally offset from a vertical central longitudinal plane 15 indicated in
With respect to the details of the socket 2,
A pole assembly 20 for electrically coupling and, in this case, contacting the accessory 3, which is, in particular, a pole contact assembly, is apparent from
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2016 115 905.0 | Aug 2016 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/071260 | 8/23/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/037056 | 3/1/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3422224 | Curran | Jan 1969 | A |
3470558 | Raschke | Sep 1969 | A |
3582951 | Altmayer | Jun 1971 | A |
3885246 | Tung | May 1975 | A |
3963917 | Romano | Jun 1976 | A |
3977003 | Kershaw | Aug 1976 | A |
4077007 | McKinney | Feb 1978 | A |
4109105 | Von Statten, Jr. | Aug 1978 | A |
4130803 | Thompson | Dec 1978 | A |
4152553 | White | May 1979 | A |
4178411 | Cole et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4239106 | Aileo | Dec 1980 | A |
4321433 | King | Mar 1982 | A |
4357711 | Drefko et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4400591 | Jennings | Aug 1983 | A |
4466138 | Gessalin | Aug 1984 | A |
4519099 | Kamiya et al. | May 1985 | A |
4563392 | Harpell et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4719462 | Hawkins | Jan 1988 | A |
4729132 | Fierro | Mar 1988 | A |
4833726 | Shinoda | May 1989 | A |
4903350 | Gentes et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4950439 | Smith et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5119505 | Tisseront et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5136567 | Nagahara et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5136657 | Hattori | Aug 1992 | A |
5142700 | Reed | Aug 1992 | A |
5183701 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5291203 | Schneck | Mar 1994 | A |
5327588 | Garneau | Jul 1994 | A |
5329637 | Walker | Jul 1994 | A |
5357409 | Glatt | Oct 1994 | A |
5438702 | Jackson | Aug 1995 | A |
5448780 | Gath | Sep 1995 | A |
5508900 | Norman | Apr 1996 | A |
5615410 | DeMars | Mar 1997 | A |
5683831 | Baril | Nov 1997 | A |
5718004 | Broersma et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5743621 | Mantha | Apr 1998 | A |
5749096 | Fergason et al. | May 1998 | A |
5862528 | Saijo et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5886667 | Bondyopadhayay | Mar 1999 | A |
5931559 | Pfaeffle | Aug 1999 | A |
5996128 | Yanagihara | Dec 1999 | A |
6009563 | Swanson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6081929 | Rothrock et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6336220 | Sacks et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6464369 | Vega | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6691325 | Pelletier | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701537 | Stamp | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7377666 | Tyler | May 2008 | B1 |
7532163 | Chang et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7555312 | Kim | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555788 | Schimpf | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7901104 | McLean et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8001623 | Gertsch | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009229 | Peterson | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8245326 | Tolve | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8544399 | Miloslavsky | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8545959 | McGuire, Jr. et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8667617 | Glezerman et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8853105 | Bhatnagar et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8908389 | Teetzel | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9070978 | Boni | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9247779 | Aloumanis et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9445639 | Aloumanis et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9456649 | Basson | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9486027 | Dey | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9585433 | Heimer et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9686136 | Dey | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9711146 | Cronin | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9833933 | Cadens Ballarin | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9968153 | Thompson | May 2018 | B2 |
10051908 | Redpath | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10160156 | Pourboghrat et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10219571 | Aloumanis et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10383384 | Zhavoronkov et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10779604 | Lebel | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10806204 | Pritz | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10814524 | Prins et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10856599 | Cuenca | Dec 2020 | B1 |
11278076 | Suddaby | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11633303 | Persson et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11660846 | Drzal et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
20050017911 | Lee | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060232955 | Labine | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060277664 | Akhtar et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070220662 | Pierce | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070289044 | Ellis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080068825 | Harris | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080130271 | Harris | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090064386 | Rogers | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090158508 | Quaranta et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090199317 | Schwiers et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100175172 | Dempsey | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100287687 | Ho | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110302701 | Kuo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120011631 | Crossman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120077438 | Jung | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120189153 | Kushnirov | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120272435 | Glezerman et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130007949 | Kurs | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130081199 | Nimura | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130176183 | Boni et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130190052 | Lundell | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130305437 | Weller et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140000013 | Redpath et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140000014 | Redpath | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140020159 | Teetzel | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140109297 | Lanez | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140189938 | Redpath | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140362244 | Martin | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150038199 | Shirashi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150223547 | Wibby | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150282549 | Lebel | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160100649 | Glezerman | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160106174 | Chung et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160213088 | Dey | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160249700 | Zhavoronkov | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170006955 | Dow, II | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170052000 | White | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170367433 | Frett | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180221915 | Simor et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180272928 | Boksteyn | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180289095 | Catterson | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190104797 | Teetzel et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190191808 | Becker et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190269193 | Benyola | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190320753 | Le et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190380417 | Zhavoronkov et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190387829 | Becker et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200015537 | Becker et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200037693 | Klimek et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200305532 | Lange et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2540799 | Mar 2003 | CN |
1627651 | Jun 2005 | CN |
1715734 | Jan 2006 | CN |
102791157 | Nov 2012 | CN |
202919121 | May 2013 | CN |
104871384 | Aug 2015 | CN |
204949670 | Jan 2016 | CN |
205106513 | Mar 2016 | CN |
206043574 | Mar 2017 | CN |
106659261 | May 2017 | CN |
206560075 | Oct 2017 | CN |
3042159 | Jun 1982 | DE |
8226935 | Feb 1983 | DE |
29519601 | Feb 1996 | DE |
29906107 | Jul 1999 | DE |
29914563 | Jan 2000 | DE |
102005038893 | Mar 2006 | DE |
202011051831 | Nov 2011 | DE |
102015216835 | Mar 2017 | DE |
102016115889 | Mar 2018 | DE |
0412205 | Feb 1991 | EP |
1393643 | Mar 2004 | EP |
2183989 | May 2010 | EP |
2335169 | Jul 1977 | FR |
2668901 | May 1992 | FR |
826012 | Dec 1959 | GB |
974901 | Nov 1964 | GB |
2059206 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2254528 | Oct 1992 | GB |
S6468507 | Mar 1989 | JP |
2000328342 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2005060889 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2011-002958 | Jan 2011 | JP |
20010011095 | Feb 2001 | KR |
101530061 | Jun 2015 | KR |
2004032658 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2011129576 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012006653 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012017836 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012148519 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2016001915 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO-2016001915 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016022984 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2018043025 | Mar 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/EP2017/071259, issued Dec. 14, 2017, 4 pages. |
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2017/071259, issued Dec. 14, 2017, 8 pages. |
Wikipedia, Wireless Personal Area Network, https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wireless_Personal_Area_Network, printed Mar. 27, 2018, 4 pages. |
Rajpurohit, A. “Fiber Reinforced Composites: Advances in Manufacturing Techniques.”, Researchgate; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279885386. (Year: 2014). |
D'Hooghe et al., Thermoplastic Composite Technology; Tougher Than You Think. Adv Mat. 2000;12(23):1865-1868. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200015537 A1 | Jan 2020 | US | |
20210052029 A2 | Feb 2021 | US |