Patent Grant
11696610
This application is a national stage application of international application no. PCT/EP2018/084594 filed Dec. 12, 2018, entitled “Protective Helmet,” claiming priority to German application nos. DE 10 2017 130 109.7, filed Dec. 15, 2017 and DE 10 2017 130 373.1, filed Dec. 18, 2017, which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference as part of the present disclosure.
The present disclosure generally relates to a protective helmet as well as a method for producing a protective helmet.
Wearing a protective helmet is required for many activities, including regularly when driving a motorcycle. Not only a protective helmet of this type with its safety-related and extensive coverage of the driver's head, but also the noise resulting from the motorcycle's engine and the road noises makes the unaided oral communication of motorcyclists difficult or impossible from a practical point of view during the journey.
In the course of more recent technological developments, wireless radio connections and corresponding arrangements of microphones and earphones enable motorcyclists to communicate with one another, even in a relatively large group and during the journey. An important aspect in this respect is the maximum possible distance between the communication participants. It is obvious that, on the one hand, even relatively large distances can exist or arise between the individual motorcyclists—e.g., if the group is separated from one another by a traffic light or the like or disperses on a relatively long stretch—and that, on the other hand, the transmission power should not be arbitrarily increased. This is mainly because the corresponding devices on a motorcycle are regularly operated by batteries, which are not easy to charge on the go, and also the exposure of the driver to radio waves should not be excessively increased.
As well as the special type of radio communication used, the antenna and its positioning also play an important role in terms of the range. The antenna is regularly arranged on the protective helmet itself for this communication. Since the microphone and the loudspeaker are regularly mounted on the protective helmet anyway, the need to provide a separate component that would have to be held or mounted in a different way, is in this way negated. The arrangement on the protective helmet also enables the antenna to be effectively protected from damage.
In this context, WO 2012/148519 A1 proposes a protective helmet having an integrated antenna, which antenna is arranged inside the outer shell.
It may be the case, however, that a material that for mechanical reasons and, possibly, for manufacturing reasons is particularly suitable for the outer shell, has unfavorable properties for positioning the antenna regarding a damping effect on the radio signals. This is the case in particular for fiber composites with carbon fibers. Although these have an encouragingly low weight, which is an important consideration in particular for a helmet, they cause a relatively strong damping of electromagnetic waves. This reduces the range of an antenna, the radio signals of which should pass through the outer shell.
It is therefore an objective to further develop and improve the protective helmet having an antenna as well as a corresponding production method such that an improved range can be achieved whilst maintaining the desired mechanical properties as far as possible.
In at least some embodiments a partial region can be provided in the outer shell of the protective helmet, which partial region has a lower damping for radio signals because it is made of another and in this regard more suitable material. An improved range for the communication with the antenna can be achieved as a result of a suitable positioning of the antenna also on the inside of the outer shell, without significant compromises having to be made in terms of mechanics or otherwise. As such, an increased weight of this other material is then negligible, if the partial region is small compared to the rest of the outer shell.
The protective helmet in at least some embodiments, which can be a motorcycle protective helmet, has an outer shell for distributing impact forces and an antenna, arranged at least partially inside the outer shell, for transmitting a radio signal, wherein the outer shell consists of a main material in a main region. The radio signal can be any analogue or digital signal possibly in accordance with, in principle, any communication protocol. The antenna can be set up to transmit and, alternatively or additionally, to emit the radio signal. The arrangement of the antenna at least partially inside the outer shell means that at least one part of the outer shell is arranged between the antenna and an outside of the outer shell. For example, it is possible that the antenna is surrounded by the outer shell both on the inside and on the outside. The inside of the outer shell is concave and corresponds to the direction towards the head of a wearer of the protective helmet. The outside of the outer shell is correspondingly convex. The main region is a part of the outer shell. The main material is, in principle, any material.
In at least some embodiments, the outer shell consists of a cut-out material in a cut-out region, which has a lower damping effect on the radio signal compared to the main material. The cut-out region is a part of the outer shell that does not overlap with the main region and can be smaller than the main region. The outer shell may consist of the main region and the cut-out region. The damping effect in the present sense is damping by means of dielectric adsorption.
The main material can, in principle, be any material. In at least some embodiments the main material is a main fiber composite having a main fiber material. The main fiber material can be fibers from any material or fibers of any different materials. The main fiber composite is correspondingly, in principle, any fiber composite.
In at least some embodiments, the cut-out material consists of a secondary fiber composite. The secondary fiber composite can also be, in principle, any fiber composite. In at least some embodiments, the secondary fiber composite has a secondary fiber material that is different from the main fiber material. The secondary fiber composite can also have a plurality of different secondary fiber material, which is possibly also distributed unevenly in regions. In these cases, the lower damping of the cut-out material can be due to the correspondingly different properties of the secondary fiber material. The secondary fiber material can have a lower in particular specific damping effect on the radio signal than the main fiber material. The specific damping effect in this case is the damping effect related to a volume unit of the secondary fiber material. In other words, the secondary fiber material has a lower dielectric adsorption than the main fiber material. The secondary fiber material may include glass fibers, aramid fibers and/or polyethylene fibers or consists of them. The secondary fiber material and, alternatively or in addition, the main fiber material can take the form of a scrim, woven fabric, knitted fabric or other textile structure.
In at least some embodiments, the protective helmet is characterised in that the main fiber composite has a main matrix material for embedding the main fiber material. The main matrix material can, when cured, form the main fiber composite with the main fiber material. It can also be the case that the secondary fiber composite has a secondary matrix material for embedding the secondary fiber material. The secondary matrix material can correspondingly, when cured, form the secondary fiber composite with the secondary fiber material. The main matrix material and/or the secondary matrix material can comprise vinyl ester resin or consist of it.
In at least some embodiments, the main fiber material has carbon fibers. The main fiber material can also substantially consist of carbon fibers. In principle, the secondary matrix material can also be different from the main matrix material. In at least some embodiments, the main matrix material substantially corresponds to the secondary matrix material in its composition. In this case, the same matrix material can be used for the outer shell as a whole.
In at least some embodiments, the main region and the cut-out region are integrally bonded together. In this way, mechanically disadvantageous irregularities can be effectively avoided. In at least some embodiments, the main region and the cut-out region are integrally bonded together by the main matrix material and the secondary matrix material. In at least some embodiments, the main region and the cut-out region are integrally bonded by means of curing the main matrix material and the secondary matrix material. As already described, these two materials can be substantially the same material. In at least some embodiments, the main region and the cut-out region are substantially exclusively integrally bonded together along their border. This border is the border between the main region and cut-out region. In at least some embodiments, there is an even transition between the main region and the cut-out region along the border. In other words, the above transition is continuous in particular on the outside of the outer shell. Finally, in at least some embodiments, the outer shell is molded in one piece.
In at least some embodiments, the cut-out region adjoins the main region in at least three directions on the outer shell. These three directions are among the four directions respectively perpendicular to or opposite each other on the two-dimensional plane formed by the outside or inside of the outer shell. Adjoining in exactly three directions is then, for example, the case if the cut-out region adjoins an edge of the outer shell and is otherwise completely surrounded by the main region. Even without adjoining the edge of the outer shell like this, in at least some embodiments the cut-out region is completely surrounded by the main region, in that it adjoins the main region in four directions in the above sense.
In principle, the antenna can be arranged anywhere in relation to the outer shell. In at least some embodiments, the antenna touches the outer shell. This means that the antenna is in contact with the outer shell. For example, the antenna may touch the cut-out region. In this way, the low damping effect of the cut-out region comes into effect effectively. Alternatively or in addition, it may be the case that the antenna is arranged in a bag-like pocket of the outer shell. Finally, it may be the case that the antenna is attached to an inside of the outer shell.
In principle, the antenna cannot touch the outer shell at all, in a partial section or even only at certain points. In at least some embodiments, the antenna extends substantially completely along one extension region/portion of the outer shell. In other words, the antenna as a whole is in contact with the outer shell. The region of the outer shell in contact with the antenna is the extension region. In this context, in at least some embodiments the extension region is substantially completely surrounded by the cut-out region. Moreover, a safety distance from the main region/portion can be provided. In at least some embodiments, the extension region maintains a minimum distance from the main region, which is in at least some embodiments at least 10 mm.
It is, however, not just the part of the outer shell that is situated closest to the antenna that is relevant regarding the damping. An antenna regularly has a mirror-symmetrical radiation pattern, such that two opposite radiation directions emanating from the antenna are regularly particularly relevant in terms of damping. If the antenna is positioned accordingly on the outer shell, it is not just the region of the outer shell directly adjoining the antenna, but also the opposite region, relative to a center of the protective helmet, that is relevant. In at least some embodiments, therefore, the outer shell is designed concave for partially enclosing the head of a wearer of the protective helmet, such that said shell defines a center point in accordance with a center of the head, in that a point reflection of at least one part of the cut-out region defines a mirror region about the center point and in that a mirror region radio path, starting from the antenna and leading through the mirror region, of the radio signal has a lower damping than a main region radio path, leading through the main region, of the radio signal. In other words, the region opposite the antenna also has a reduced damping. There regularly exists a theoretically unlimited number of radio paths from the antenna through the mirror region, i.e., of mirror region radio paths. It suffices here for there to be reduced damping for at least one such mirror region radio path. There does not therefore have to be reduced damping for all conceivable mirror region radio paths. Furthermore, the above statement that the mirror region radio path originates from the antenna merely defines the course of the mirror region radio path and does not restrict the direction of the radio signals—corresponding to a transmission from the antenna or reception by the antenna—to this path.
The reduced damping described in this way can, in principle, be achieved in various ways. In at least some embodiments, the mirror region overlaps an opening region of the outer shell. In other words, there is a mirror region radio path that does not pass through the outer shell. The opening region can, for example, be the visor opening or the head opening for putting on the helmet.
In at least some embodiments, the cut-out region overlaps with the mirror region. In other words, at least one part of the mirror region also consists of the cut-out region. It may further be the case here that the cut-out region has several parts, that a first contiguous cut-out partial region comprises the extension region, that a second contiguous cut-out partial region overlaps with the mirror region and that the main region separates the first and the second contiguous cut-out regions from one another. In other words, there are two non-contiguous partial regions of the cut-out region.
In at least some embodiments, the protective helmet has an inner layer accommodated by the outer shell for damping impact forces. In at least some embodiments, at least one part of the outer shell is arranged between the antenna and the inner layer.
In principle, the antenna can have any shape or design. However, in at least some embodiments the antenna has a larger expansion along a longitudinal direction than along a transverse direction running transverse to the longitudinal direction. In other words, the antenna is elongated. In at least some embodiments, the antenna is arranged such that the longitudinal direction is oriented substantially vertically.
In at least some embodiments, the antenna is arranged on the outer shell substantially centrally relative to an outer shell transverse direction, which outer shell transverse direction is defined by a left and a right lateral direction of a wearer of the protective helmet.
In at least some embodiments, the protective helmet has a transmission line for coupling the antenna to a communication device. According to a first variant, the protective helmet has a slot for the in particular interchangeable accommodation of the communication device and this slot has a contact arrangement for connecting the communication device with the transmission line. A second variant envisages that the protective helmet has a connection arrangement for connecting an external contact to the transmission line. In such a case, the communication arrangement is not arranged on the protective helmet, but rather an electrical connection, e.g., by means of a cable, is merely established with the transmission line. In at least some embodiments, the communication device is a digital communication device such as a Bluetooth communication device. Accordingly, in at least some embodiments, the antenna is set up to transmit digital radio signals, wherein these can be Bluetooth radio signals.
In the method for producing a protective helmet having an outer shell for distributing impact forces, a main fiber material for forming a main fiber composite in a main region of the outer shell is arranged in a molding device for molding the outer shell. In other words, the main fiber material is arranged in the molding device for molding the outer shell such that it forms a main fiber composite in the main region of the outer shell. A main matrix material surrounding the main fiber material is further cured for embedding the main fiber material, wherein a cut-out region of the outer shell is formed from a cut-out material, wherein an antenna for transmitting a radio signal is arranged at least partially inside the outer shell and wherein the cut-out material has a lower damping effect on the radio signal compared to the main fiber composite.
In at least some embodiments, the cut-out material has a secondary fiber material, wherein the secondary fiber material is arranged in the molding device together with the main fiber material. In at least some embodiments, a secondary matrix material surrounding the secondary fiber material is cured for embedding the secondary fiber material, wherein this may occur substantially at the same time as the main fiber material is cured. By curing the secondary matrix material surrounding the secondary fiber material, the secondary matrix material together with the secondary fiber material forms a secondary fiber composite. In at least some embodiments, the secondary matrix material has substantially the same composition as the main matrix material.
This summary is not exhaustive of the scope of the present aspects and embodiments. Thus, while certain aspects and embodiments have been presented and/or outlined in this summary, it should be understood that the present aspects and embodiments are not limited to the aspects and embodiments in this summary. Indeed, other aspects and embodiments, which may be similar to and/or different from, the aspects and embodiments presented in this summary, will be apparent from the description, illustrations, and/or claims, which follow.
It should also be understood that any aspects and embodiments that are described in this summary and do not appear in the claims that follow are preserved for later presentation in this application or in one or more continuation patent applications.
Other details, features, objectives and advantages are explained in the following description with reference to the Figures, which are understood not to be limiting, in which:
The protective helmet shown in
In a main region 5, the outer shell 1 consists of a main material, which is a fiber composite having carbon fibers as fiber material and vinyl ester resin as matrix material. This main material can also be designated a main fiber composite. In a cut-out region 6 that is different from the main region 5, the outer shell 1 consists of a cut-out material which here consists of a further fiber composite, which comprises glass fibers as fiber material and likewise vinyl ester resin as matrix material. This further fiber composite can also be designated a secondary fiber composite. The use of glass fibers leads to the damping effect of the secondary fiber composite on the radio signals being lower than the damping effect of the main fiber composite. The damping effect of the cut-out region 6 is therefore lower than that of the main region 5. The vinyl ester resin is the same for the main region 5 and the cut-out region 6.
When producing the outer shell 1, the carbon fibers and the glass fibers were respectively inserted into the corresponding molding device as scrim in accordance with the desired arrangement of the cut-out region 6. A collective impregnation with the vinyl ester resin and then curing of the vinyl ester resin subsequently took place. In this way, an exclusively bonded connection was created between the cut-out region 6 and the main region 5 by means of the vinyl ester resin along the border 7 between the cut-out region 6 and the main region 5. As can be seen in
The antenna 2 is elongated and extends longitudinally along the cut-out region 6. A corresponding longitudinal direction 16 as well as a transverse direction 17 running transverse to the longitudinal direction 16 are illustrated in
The radiation pattern of the antenna 2 is such that a first main direction passes through the cut-out region 6 substantially perpendicular to the outer shell 1. The second main direction of the antenna 2 extends exactly opposite. This fact is illustrated in more detail in
It can be seen from the schematic illustration in
Alongside the outer shell 1, the protective helmet shown in
While the above describes certain embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the foregoing description is not intended to limit the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. It should also be understood that the embodiments of the present disclosure described herein are merely exemplary and that a person skilled in the art may make any variations and modification without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. All such variations and modifications, including those discussed above, are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2017 130 109.7 | Dec 2017 | DE | national |
| 10 2017 130 373.1 | Dec 2017 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2018/084594 | 12/12/2018 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2019/115629 | 6/20/2019 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3422224 | Curran | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3470558 | Raschke | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3582951 | Altmayer | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3885246 | Tung | May 1975 | A |
| 3963917 | Romano | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3977003 | Kershaw | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4077007 | McKinney | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4109105 | Von Statten, Jr. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4130803 | Thompson | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4152553 | White | May 1979 | A |
| 4178411 | Cole et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4239106 | Aileo | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4321433 | King | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4357711 | Drefko et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4400591 | Jennings et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4466138 | Gessalin | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4519099 | Kamiya et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4563392 | Harpell et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4719462 | Hawkins | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4729132 | Fierro | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4833726 | Shinoda et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4903350 | Gentes et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4950439 | Smith et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5119505 | Tisseront et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5136567 | Nagahara et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5136657 | Hattori | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5142700 | Reed | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5183701 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5291203 | Schneck | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5327588 | Garneau | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5329637 | Walker | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5357409 | Glatt | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5438702 | Jackson | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5448780 | Gath | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5508900 | Norman | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5615410 | DeMars | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5683831 | Baril et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5718004 | Broersma et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5743621 | Mantha et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749096 | Fergason et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5862528 | Saijo et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5886667 | Bondyopadhayay | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5931559 | Pfaeffle | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5996128 | Yanagihara | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009563 | Swanson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6081929 | Rothrock et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6336220 | Sacks et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6464369 | Vega et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6691325 | Pelletier et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6701537 | Stamp | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 7377666 | Tyler | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7532163 | Chang et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7555312 | Kim et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7555788 | Schimpf | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7901104 | McLean et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8001623 | Gertsch et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8009229 | Peterson | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8245326 | Tolve | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8544399 | Miloslavsky | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8545959 | McGuire, Jr. et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8667617 | Glezerman et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8853105 | Bhatnagar et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8908389 | Teetzel et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9070978 | Boni et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9247779 | Aloumanis et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
| 9445639 | Aloumanis et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
| 9456649 | Basson | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9486027 | Dey et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9585433 | Heimer | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9686136 | Dey et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
| 9711146 | Cronin | Jul 2017 | B1 |
| 9833933 | Cadens Ballarin | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9968153 | Thompson et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10051908 | Redpath et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10160156 | Pourboghrat et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10219571 | Aloumanis et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
| 10383384 | Zhavoronkov et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10779604 | Lebel et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10806204 | Pritz | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10814524 | Prins et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10856599 | Cuenca | Dec 2020 | B1 |
| 11278076 | Suddaby | Mar 2022 | B2 |
| 20050017911 | Lee | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20060232955 | Labine | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060277664 | Akhtar et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070220662 | Pierce | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070289044 | Ellis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080068825 | Harris | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080130271 | Harris | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20090064386 | Rogers | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158508 | Quaranta et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090199317 | Schwiers et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100175172 | Dempsey et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100287687 | Ho | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110302701 | Kuo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120011631 | Crossman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120077438 | Jung | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120189153 | Kushnirov et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120272435 | Glezerman et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130007949 | Kurs et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130081199 | Nimura | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130176183 | Boni et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130190052 | Lundell | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130305437 | Weller et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140000013 | Redpath et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140000014 | Redpath et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140020159 | Teetzel et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140109297 | Lanez | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140189938 | Redpath et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140362244 | Martin | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150038199 | Shiraishi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150223547 | Wibby | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150282549 | Lebel et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160100649 | Glezerman et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160106174 | Chung et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160249700 | Zhavoronkov et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20170006955 | Dow, II et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170052000 | White et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170367433 | Frett | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180221915 | Simor et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180272928 | Boksteyn | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180289095 | Catterson et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20190104797 | Teetzel et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190191808 | Becker et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190269193 | Benyola | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190320753 | Le et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190380417 | Zhavoronkov et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190387829 | Becker et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200015537 | Becker et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200037693 | Klimek et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1627651 | Jun 2005 | CN |
| 1715734 | Jan 2006 | CN |
| 201319192 | Sep 2009 | CN |
| 102791157 | Nov 2012 | CN |
| 104871384 | Aug 2015 | CN |
| 204949670 | Jan 2016 | CN |
| 205106513 | Mar 2016 | CN |
| 206043574 | Mar 2017 | CN |
| 106659261 | May 2017 | CN |
| 206312966 | Jul 2017 | CN |
| 3042159 | Jun 1982 | DE |
| 8226935 | Feb 1983 | DE |
| 29519601 | Feb 1996 | DE |
| 29906107 | Jul 1999 | DE |
| 29914563 | Jan 2000 | DE |
| 102005038893 | Mar 2006 | DE |
| 202011051831 | Nov 2011 | DE |
| 102015216835 | Mar 2017 | DE |
| 102016115889 | Mar 2018 | DE |
| 0412205 | Feb 1991 | EP |
| 1393643 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 2183989 | May 2010 | EP |
| 2335169 | Jul 1977 | FR |
| 2668901 | May 1992 | FR |
| 826012 | Dec 1959 | GB |
| 974901 | Nov 1964 | GB |
| 2059206 | Apr 1981 | GB |
| 2254528 | Oct 1992 | GB |
| S6468507 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| 2000328342 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2005060889 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2011-002958 | Jan 2011 | JP |
| 20010011095 | Feb 2001 | KR |
| 101530061 | Jun 2015 | KR |
| 2004032658 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2011129576 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 2012006653 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2012017836 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| 2012148519 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2016001915 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| 2016022984 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| 2018043025 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| A. Rajpurohit, “Fiber Reinforced Composites: Advances in Manufacturing Techniques.”, Researchgate; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279885386. (Year: 2014). |
| Wikipedia, Wireless Personal Area Network, https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wireless_Personal_Area_Network, printed Mar. 27, 2018, 4 pages. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/EP2018/084594, dated Mar. 8, 2019, 4 pages. |
| Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/EP2018/084594, dated Mar. 8, 2019, 6 pages. |
| D'Hooghe et al., Thermoplastic Composite Technology; Tougher Than You Think. Adv Mat. 2000;12(23):1865-1868. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200305532 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |
