1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to healthy nutrition, and more specifically to proteinaceous health food, preferably based on hempseed, that keeps the seed's nutritional value and does not use dangerous ingredients, such as for example preservatives or coloring.
2. Background
The use of vegetable proteins in Proteinaceous foods both for humans and for pets, and especially carnivores, like dogs and cats, has become very popular for many years, in order to save production costs, reduce cholesterol (compared to consuming beef for example), for the convenience of using pre-prepared food, and for ecological reasons, since feeding animals and humans with plant protein is much more efficient than feeding animals and then consuming their meat.
Unfortunately, according to the claims in the publications listed below, in the recent years it has been discovered that Soy, which is the most commonly used vegetable protein today, may be in fact much more damaging than meat or milk, because Soy is a nasty plant that contains anti-nutrients and especially isoflavones, which are designed to damage animals that feed on it. It can reduce the growth of animals that eat it and can damage the brain by reducing tyrosine enzymes activity, which can disturb the activity of the hippocampus (a brain region involved with learning and memory) and of the thyroid gland and disturb the utilization rate of dopamine, and by Phytates that reduce the ability to absorb important minerals, such as for example zinc, which is important for the brain. The Isoflavones are also Phytoestrogens, which means that they can mimic human Estrogens, and they can interfere with the mammalian hormones involved in reproduction and growth—a strategy to reduce the number and size of animals that eat the plant, and might also decrease brain calcium-binding proteins. This can be especially damaging for example to babies that are fed a soy-based formula instead of mother's milk. Also, there are other proteins found in soybeans which can act as enzyme inhibitors and thus block the action of Trypsin and other enzymes needed for protein digestion. (See for example: “The Trouble With Tofu: Soy and the Brain” by John D. MacArthur (http:www.mercola.com/2000/sept/17/soy_brain.htm), Soy Online Service (http://www.soyonlineservice.co.nz), and “Tragedy and Hype: The Third International Soy Symposium” in Nexus Magazine, Vol. 7, Number 3 (April-May 2000) (http://www.nexusmagazine.com/soydangers.html). In order to reduce these toxins, Soy beans have to be fermented in water for a long time (preferably at least for 10 hours) before further processing and need to be cooked for preferably at least 1 hour (but this also denatures the proteins, thus making them more difficult to digest), and even this does not get rid of these toxins completely but only reduces their quantities. Unfortunately, there is no standard or supervision that forces producers of various soy products to fully or even partially implement these toxin reduction procedures, nor to report on the label what and how much effort has been done for reducing the amount of these toxins or what percent of the toxins remains in the products. Therefore, there is a large variance in the levels of toxins found in various soy products on shelves, and in Israel for example some dealers even sell dry roasted soybeans, which may be without any toxin reduction at all. What makes matters even worse is the fact that manufacturers are not even required to label the fact that soy ingredients are included at all, so many times the label just states “vegetable oil”, and many times this “vegetable oil” is actually soy oil, since it is the cheapest oil. So even people buying for example just some types of chocolate spreads that contain for example about 30% “vegetable oil” might actually be buying inadvertently a product that contains 30% soy oil, with unknown amounts of these toxins. In addition to this, soy has a problem of having a taste that most people dislike, so various additional processing or additions of other ingredients are required in order to make the taste more acceptable to humans and to animals. Also, there is a controversy about genetically modified Soy. In new Zealand there is now an attempt to file a large class action suit against the soy industry, and similar lawsuits will probably follow in other places, such as the USA and Europe.
In the pet food industry the state-of-the-art situation might be even worse, since in order to save production costs to minimum, some producers might try to shorten the processing time to minimum, thus leaving higher quantities of the toxins in the soy. In addition to this, in order to make these products palatable to animals, industrial soy-based pet foods may contain also some meat or meat by-products (which may be of low quality, in order to save costs) and may contain various chemicals, such as for example preservatives, colors, and artificial flavors. Also, it is very hard to find really healthy alternatives other than giving pets (and especially dogs and cats) human foods (such as for example preferably raw meat and bones of chickens), since pet foods that are more meat-based typically contain low level meat and various unhealthy chemicals. Also, they are typically thoroughly cooked at levels that can destroy most of the nutritional value. The result is that many pets that are fed industrial junk food may develop human-like diseases such as cancer, heart disease or diabetes, whereas pets that are fed foods suitable for human consumption and especially raw meat and bones (for example dogs) are typically healthier and happier and need less visits to the veterinarian, and live longer.
Clearly a better vegetable protein alternative is needed for humans that wish to consume less animal meat, and clearly a healthy alternative is needed for commercial pet food. Also, the state of the art is selling pet foods in either relatively dry form typically in nylon bags, or moist pet food in cans, but there is no inherent reason why not to add also the option of more fresh, refrigerated pet food.
The present invention tries to solve the above problems by providing a much healthier alternative both for humans and for animals and with less problems. This solution is based on using hempseed (and/or other proteinaceous plants that don't have the problems of soy, such as for example flax seed or sesame) instead of soybeans. Hempseeds contain almost as much protein as Soy, but have a much higher nutritional value because:
The hemp seeds don't contain the mind-altering THC that can be found in the female flowers or leaves, so there is no drug problem. Also, unlike in the USA, industrial hemp (that has a very low THC content even in the flowers and leaves) can be and is now legally grown in most of the civilized world, such as for example in Canada, England, Germany, France, Eastern Europe (and especially Russia and Romania), China, India, and South America. Therefore, almost every food item that contains Soy can be replaced with hemp. However, since, unlike Soy, hemp does not contain damaging toxins that need to be reduced and in fact contains many important nutrients, and especially the Essential Fatty Acids, it is preferable not to use the same processes that are used with soy, and also preferably not to remove the oil or remove only part of it. There have been some recent attempts to create a relatively pure protein isolate from hemp seed, however for the above reasons it seems like an unnecessary and undesirable procedure. Birds and fish for example love to eat the seed as is, so no processing is needed for them. However, in food for carnivorous pets, such as for example dogs and cats, it might still be desirable to remove at least some of the fats in order to make the seeds taste more protein-like or meat-like. On the other hand, hempseed has some problems that Soy does not have, and especially the fact that since its oil is so good for bio-organisms, it can easily become rancid if not kept in an oxygen-free and light-free environment or if heated. Another problem is that hempseeds have a strong shell with lower nutritional value, which is harder to remove than in other grains, and can for example cause inconvenience by getting stuck in the teeth. Therefore the shell is preferably removed as much as possible, preferably by better or more efficient methods than those used with normal seeds. However, another possible variation is to leave the shell in the food (for example for its value as fiber-rich food), but preferably crash it and mix it together with the seed to ensure digestion of all the components.
There are a number of related patents by Udo Erasmus (mainly U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,165,539, 5,656,312, 6,007,860, and 6,001,401), however, these patents relate mainly to Flax seeds, they do not deal with dehydration or oil extraction, they do not mention shell removal, and they are typically limited to a process of less than 20 minutes duration and temperatures of lees than 100 degrees F. Also, these patents do not include for example the option of keeping away oxygen during the production process itself, which can be used for example for making temperature requirements and/or time requirements more flexible, especially if temperature is raised for example for only very short times. Nor do these patents include the option of preparing relatively dry, relatively solid, healthy snacks in various shapes, so that they can compete directly with the state of the art soy or meat dry-food snacks. And these patents deal with oily seed food supplements, not with balanced independent foods.
Therefore, the invention preferably contains at least some of the following main elements:
Another possible variation is to use preferably short microwave exposure before or during or after preferably short cooking or without cooking (for example in a separate microwave oven or in some combined heat-microwave oven, which preferably can activate the microwave radiation also at least partially concurrently with the normal heating) in order to further help the dehydration and/or to aid the cooking and/or improve the heat penetration or dissipation.
If the microwave is used also for heating the food, another possible variation is that the Microwave heating is preferably automatically controlled so as also not to exceed the desired limited heat. This controlling is preferably done by at least one of the following options:
However, another problem with microwave ovens is that they create uneven heating with various cold spots and hot spots, so that the hot spots can typically become for example 30 degrees (Celsius) or more hotter, which means that even if the heat is measured, it does not necessarily show the heat at these hot spots, so for example if some hot spots reach temperatures significantly beyond for example 100 degrees or for example beyond 120 degrees, then the oil and/or proteins and/or starches can be damaged and/or other dangerous elements may be formed there even if the average heat is for example 100 or 120 Celsius. This is caused by the fact that the microwave beam itself is irregular and by the fact that the reflections from the internal walls of the microwave oven are irregular. This is typically solved in the prior art by some rotation of the beam itself and by rotating the food on a typically slowly rotating plate. However, this solution is only partial since even with it hot spots and cold spot still exist, probably because the rotation of the beam cannot solve the problem of the reflections and because the rotating plate is not rotated fast enough. A much better solution suggested in the present invention is to change the design of the microwave oven so that instead of a rectangular enclosure it has at least internally the shape of for example a ball or for example a preferably vertical cylinder, for example around the area of the rotating plate, as shown below in
Therefore the whole practice of using microwave ovens might turn out to be too dangerous. Another possible variation is to use for example ultrasound for heating instead of microwaves and preferably similarly using internal walls that are ball-shaped or in the shape of a preferably vertical cylinder. However, ultrasound also has a problem of being able to rip cells apart, and also the problems of hot spots can be even more severe.
Another possible variation is to use microwave ovens with preferably constant DC energy instead of the prior art in which the Microwave engine is based on short AC bursts of high energy. If for example in a normal microwave oven the microwave energy is emitted for example 10% of the time (or other small percent) with bursts of high energy, the use of a preferably stabilized DC emission could enable for example a constant emission of energy that is for example 10 times weaker. So that although the total energy for the same amount of time (for example 30 seconds or a few minutes) is the same, this way the food is exposed to less fluctuation and the constant energy can be much lower than in each short burst of higher energy. This might thus considerably reduce the damages that the microwave radiation can do to the food. Another possible variation is the increase the capacity so that for example the microwave oven consumes for example twice as much wattage (or other convenient factor) and thus the cooking time is for example cut in half in this example, but since in our example the energy level at any time is still for example 20% of the level in each burst of high energy in the prior art, the food is still exposed at any time during the cooking period to less destructive energy and still can even cook faster. The DC drive can be implemented for example by increasing the frequency from the 50/60 Hz wall power source to for example 20 KHz or more (or for example even 1 or a few MHz), and then using preferably small capacitors to stabilize the current into DC. However, this is preferably done with a constant current stabilizer, which might be needed but can make the power supply considerably more expensive. Another possible variation is to use instead for example two or more ferrite rings with coils with a certain preferably varying distance between them, so that the maximum current is limited, like is done for example in welding devices. Another possible variation is to use for example one or more Microwave emitting diodes, so that preferably DC can be supplied to them and be preferably converted directly into the desired form of energy. Another possible variation is to use for example multiple frequencies of the microwave radiation instead of only one frequency of for example 2.5 Gigahertz. Of course, like other features of this invention, these solutions can be used also independently of any other features of this invention.
All the illustrations are just examples and should not be interpreted as limiting, and should not be interpreted as literal positioning, shapes, angles, or sizes of the various elements. Throughout the patent whenever variations or various solutions are mentioned, it is also possible to use combinations of these variations or of elements in them, and when combinations are used, it is also possible to use at least some elements in them separately. These variations are preferably in different embodiments. In other words: certain features of the invention, which are described in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention, which are described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Eventhough most animal examples have been used regarding pets, this food processing can be similarly applied also to other animals. Eventhough the patent has been described mainly with reference to hemp seed, since hempseed is the best example, the present invention may be used also with other proteinaceous plants that don't have the problems of soy, such as for example flax seed or sesame.
All of the descriptions in this and other sections are intended to be illustrative examples and not limiting.
Since this patent deals with a method of preparing food and the composition of such food, as is customary in this area, instead of drawings, examples of the method and of the possible compositions will be given for illustration.
In more detail, the invention preferably contains at least some of the following main elements:
The whole process from start to end preferably takes place in an oxygen-free (or Oxygen-reduced) and light-free (or light-reduced) environment (for example by using an automated process in an atmosphere that contains for example CO2 or Nitrogen instead of Oxygen) and preferably in room temperatures except for the short exposure to the microwave in the variations where a microwave is used. These principles can be used also for example for improving the process described in PCT application no. WO0150873 by Meir Eini for creating thickened oil compositions of edible oil without destroying the oil. Although that patent tries to solve the problem that solidified oils typically become toxic and carcinogenic by the processes that solidifies them, the alternatives shown in that patent, of adding a solid edible substances to the oils instead of hardening the oils themselves, might also not be completely safe, since in the examples given there the temperatures used for mixing the ingredients are also sometimes dangerous, such as for example 180-200 degrees Celsius for even 30 minutes due to the need to reach the melting point of at least some of the ingredients. Using that process in an automated environment of no oxygen and preferably no light can solve the problem of oxidation during the process. However, since such heating of oils can create dangerous compounds even without oxygen, another possible variation is to use very fast mixing so that the process can be much shorter, and/or mix the oils only with solid oils that have naturally a convenient melting point, such as for example Cocoa butter, which has a melting point of about 34 degrees.
a-b show illustrations of two preferable variations of using ball-shaped or cylinder-shaped internal walls in a microwave oven. As can be seen, instead of a rectangular enclosure, the microwave oven (21) has at least internally for example the shape of a ball (22b) or of a preferably vertical cylinder (22a), for example around the area of the rotating plate. Since such a shape has the same reflections from all angles, there is no longer a need for using a rotating plate, and so the oven can be also more silent. In addition, preferably the microwave beam is rotated much faster, so that the spreading of the microwave beam becomes much more even. Since there is no longer a problem of uneven reflections, a fast rotation of the microwave lens is sufficient to create a much better dispersion. However, the cylinder shape is more preferable than the ball shape and makes more efficient use of the space. In addition, this can have the further advantage that much less leakage than the standard can be achieved because the cylinder can be for example closed by a rotation of part of it, for example in addition to closing the front door of the oven. Another possible variation is that the cylinder or ball for example has one half coupled to the back wall and one half coupled to the front door, so that simply opening and closing the door opens and closes also the inner cylinder or ball. Preferably the ball or cylinder has small preferably millimetric metal mesh like in the front door, so that the food can still be viewed while cooking. Another possible variation is that in that case for example the front door (or for example the front part of the cylinder or ball) has a mesh with bigger holes, since the radiation is contained anyway within the inner ball or inner cylinder, however, having the protecting mesh also on the front door increases even further protection from radiation leakage. Another possible variation is that for example the microwave generator and engines are on the bottom part and the viewing mesh is for example from the top—from above the cylinder. Another possible variation is to increase even further the safety of the microwave oven against external leakage by adding for example a microwave radiation sensor on the door handle, since the handle is exactly near the notch where the biggest risk of leakage is located and also at some distance from it, so that preferably if the leakage exceeds a certain threshold the sensor at the handle preferably starts for example to beep and/or automatically turns off the microwave oven. Another possible variation is to add to the handle a preferably additional sensor for opening the door so that for example when the user touches the handle or pulls it preferably the microwave automatically turns off the energy. This has the advantage that the handle sensor (which can be for example a mechanical or electronic or electromagnetic or optic or electrostatic sensor) can preferably respond even before the door has a chance to move at all, whereas in the prior art the sensors are activated only after the door begins to move a little. Of course, like other features of this invention, these solutions can be used also independently of any other features of this invention.
The above described methods and compositions according to the present invention are further illustrated by the following examples. The examples are intended to be illustrative and should not be interpreted as limiting or otherwise restricting in scope of the invention in any way. For example, some steps can change or be done in a different order, and quantities and times can change.
The hemp seed shells are mechanically removed and the remaining parts are further separated by air flow and/or screening and/or centrifuge. The shelled seeds are partially cold-pressed for oil, so that for example two thirds of the oil are extracted. The extracted oil is then immediately packaged in opaque and oxygen-free small packages which are then packaged together within a larger and mechanically stronger external envelope. The remaining cake is then pressed into a thin sheet of preferably less than 1 mm in thickness and dried for example for about 10 minutes by room temperature dry air flow (preferably with little or no oxygen) or vacuum suction. The thin partially dehydrated sheet is then mechanically pulverized and preferably thoroughly mixed for example with the following ingredients, so that the final product contains for example (in weight percentages): 50-80% shelled hemp seed, 0-2% salt, 0-2% preferably raw brown sugar, 5-15% preferably dry high-grade poultry meat and bone powder, 5-15% preferably dry high grade fish meal (such as for example Nile fish), 0-15% percent dry cereals or dried cooked whole-wheat, and 1-5% divided between various spices and Vitamins, and preferably especially antioxidant vitamins (such as for example Vitamin C, Vitamin E and Vitamin A), and/or other natural anti-oxidants. The resulting mix is then for example pressure-extruded in the shape of small squares, and covered for example by fresh egg mixed with wheat gluten and warmed for 1 minute in a preferably oxygen-free microwave oven in order to help keep the shape. The resulting product is then immediately packaged in opaque and oxygen-free small packages which are then packaged together in a larger and mechanically stronger external envelope. The whole process from start to end preferably takes place in an oxygen-free and light-free environment (for example by using an automated process in an atmosphere that contains for example CO2 or Nitrogen instead of Oxygen) and preferably in room temperatures except for the short exposure to the microwave. When served some water may be added and some of the extracted oil may be also added back and preferably slightly mixed before consumption.
Same as example 1, except that only 3% animal meat or bone extracts are added, and 75% of the oil is separated.
Same as example 1, except that no animal meat or bone extracts are added at all, and most of the oil is separated, in order to increase the protein-like taste. Some preferably enzymatically hydrolyzed hemp proteins are added in order to improve the taste and various natural flavors and aromas are added.
Same as example 1, except that the drying is done after the adding and mixing of the additional ingredients.
Same as example 1, except that the cake is heated for a very short time in the microwave oven also immediately before sheet-drying it.
Same as example number 1, except that for example more than 50% is based on meat, and only for example 15-20% is hemp seed, and preferably its oil is not extracted at all.
Same as example number 6, except that the meat is for example normal non-processed raw or cooked meat (for example chicken), preferably including also whole meaty bones (preferably uncooked, in case of pet food), and the mixture is also kept in mild or strong refrigeration, preferably in addition to packaging in opaque and oxygen free packages.
Like example 1 but without the microwave.
Like example 1 but without dehydration.
Various variations and combinations are created, for example according to some of the above examples, so that for example 5 types of preferably single-serving sub-packages are created. So for example one type of sub-packages contains high seed content (preferably hemp) and low meat content, type 2 for example contains mixed amount of meat and hempseed, type 3 contains for example just refrigerated raw meaty bones, type 4 contains for example more starches, and type 5 contains for example more vegetables and fruits, preferably ripe or over-ripe and preferably thoroughly grinded.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, it will be appreciated that many variations, modifications, expansions and other applications of the invention may be made which are included within the scope of the present invention, as would be obvious to those skilled in the art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
143738 | Jun 2001 | IL | national |
150534 | Jul 2002 | IL | national |
2,451,136 | Dec 2003 | CA | national |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10172889 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 11927284 | US |