The present disclosure is directed to connecting service providers with other service providers.
In general, in one aspect, a computer-implemented method comprises receiving, by one or more computers, data indicating that a first service provider is authorized to engage in a consultation with a second service provider; and receiving, by one or more computers, a request from the first service provider to consult with the second service provider having a second service provider profile that satisfies at least some attributes in a set of attributes that define a suitable service provider. In one aspect, the data indicating that the first service provider is authorized to engage in the consultation with the second service provider is received from a device being operated by a consumer of services, while the first service provider is engaged with the consumer of services. In another aspect, the data indicating that the first service provider is authorized to engage in the consultation with the second service provider is received from a device operated by the first service provider.
In general, in one aspect, the method further comprises accessing a data repository that stores information pertaining to service providers, including present availability of the service providers for participating in a consultation; determining, by one or more computers, which of the service providers are presently available; identifying, by one or more computers, second service providers satisfying at least some of the attributes in the set of attributes that define suitable service providers; producing, by one or more computers, a set of presently available, second service providers that satisfy at least some of the attributes in the set of attributes; receiving a selection from the first service provider of one of the second service providers from the set of presently available, second service providers; and establishing a communication channel between the first service provider and the selected second service provider.
In yet another aspect, the method further comprises sending, to the first service provider, data indicating that the consumer of services has authorized the first service provider to consult with the second service provider. The method also comprises determining, by one or more computers, a cost associated with the first service provider consulting with the second service provider; and generating, by one or more computers, a graphical user interface that when rendered on a display, displays for a consumer of services, the cost associated with the first service provider consulting with the second service provider.
In general, in one aspect, the method further comprises generating, by one or more computers, a graphical user interface that when rendered on a display, displays for the first service provider a visual representation of the set of presently available, second service providers that satisfy at least some of the attributes in the set of attributes.
In yet another aspect, the method further comprises receiving, from the second service provider, data indicating that the second service provider is available to engage in a consultation with one or more other service providers. The method also comprises receiving, from the first service provider, at least one of first medical data and first service provider notes associated with the consultation between the first service provider and the second service provider; receiving, from the second service provider, at least one of second medical data and second service provider notes associated with the consultation between the first service provider and the second service provider; generating, by one or more computers, a consultation report from the first and second medical data and first and second service provider notes received from the first service provider and the second service provider; and sending, to a consumer of services, the consultation report.
In general, in one aspect, the method further comprises receiving a request from a consumer of services to consult with a service provider having a service provider profile that satisfies at least some attributes in a set of attributes that define a suitable service provider; accessing a data repository that stores information pertaining to service providers, including present availability of the service providers for participating in a consultation; determining, in one or more computers, which of the service providers are presently available; identifying, in one or more computers, service providers satisfying at least some of the attributes in the set of attributes that define suitable service providers; producing a set of available service providers that satisfy at least some of the attributes in the set of attributes to send to the consumer of services; receiving a selection from the consumer of one of the service providers from the set of available service providers, wherein the selected service provider is the first service provider; and establishing a realtime communication channel between the consumer of services and the first service provider.
Through a brokerage system, a consumer of services engages in a consultation with a service provider, as described in my issued Patent as published in US-2008-0065726 on Mar. 13, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference. Additionally, through the brokerage system, a service provider (hereinafter “primary service provider”) engages in a consultation (hereinafter “provider-to-provider consultation”) with another service provider (hereinafter “consulting service provider”). In some examples, a primary service provider, such as a physician, engages in a consultation with a consulting service provider, such as a cardiologist, about a consumer's health, while the primary service provider is delivering care to the consumer, such as during an office visit. In other examples, the primary service provider engages in a consultation with the consulting service provider before or after the primary service provider engages in a consultation with the consumer of services. In yet another example, a service provider engages in a consultation, which is not on behalf of a consumer, with another service provider. In this example, a service provider chooses to engage in a provider-to-provider consultation for various reasons, including needing to learn more about a particular medical procedure or technique.
Provider-to-provider consultations allow primary service providers, such as primary care and other physicians, to obtain advice from consulting service providers, such as specialists, at the point of care, thereby increasing the value of an office visit to consumers. Since federal regulations permit provider consultations across states, provider-to-provider consultations allow primary service providers to talk to consulting service providers in any physical location across the country or the word, granting the primary service provider access to a wide network of other service providers and extending the primary service provider's base of knowledge
Service providers are presented with the option of enabling and supporting provider-to-provider consultations. For example, if a service provider chooses to engage in consultations with other service providers, then when the service provider logs into the brokerage system, the brokerage system makes the service provider available for consultations with other service providers. Referring to
When a primary service provider engages in a consultation with a consulting service provider, the consumer of services authorizes the consultation. In some examples, the consumer of services selects a service provider from a list of service providers. The consumer specifies, for example through a link or button on a graphical user interface, that the selected service provider is authorized to engage in consultations with other service providers. When the selected service provider has enabled the option of engaging in consultations with other service providers, the consumer receives a message indicating that the consumer has successfully enabled provider-to-provider consultations for the selected service provider. When the selected service provider has disabled the option of engaging in consultations with other service providers, the consumer receives a message indicating that the selected service provider does not support provider-to-provider consultations. The consumer of services is also presented with the option of removing a service provider's authorization to engage in consultations with other service providers, which removes the service provider's ability to conduct provider-to-provider consultations on the consumer's behalf. In some examples, the consumer authorizes the primary service provider to engage in provider-to-provider consultations. In other examples, the consumer authorizes the consulting service provider to engage in provider-to-provider consultation. In still other examples, the consumer authorizes both the primary service provider and the consulting service provider to engage in provider-to-provider consultations.
Referring to
The brokerage system also enables the primary service provider to certify the primary service provider's authorization to discuss medical issues on the consumer's behalf. In some examples, the consumer is not enrolled with the brokerage system. In this example, the primary service provider certifies that the primary service provider is authorized to discuss medical issues on the consumer's behalf by electronically signing a digital statement certifying that the primary service provider has an established relationship with the consumer and is authorized by the consumer to view the consumer's medical information and conduct consultations on the consumer's behalf. Referring to
Referring to
In some examples, the brokerage system confirms (206) the relationship between the consumer and the primary service provider depending on the primary service provider's provider status, such as a treating service provider, in the brokerage system. When the primary service provider is the consumer's treating service provider, such as a primary care provider or treating physician 156 (
The primary service provider searches (208) for a consulting service provider by specifying various attributes of a consulting service provider. Referring to
Referring to
From the list of service providers with matching attributes, the brokerage system determines (504) which of those service providers are presently available to engage to a consultation with the primary service provider. The brokerage system tracks the availability of service providers in real-time, for example, by monitoring whether a service provider is currently engaged in a consultation with a consumer or another service provider or by monitoring whether the service provider is logged into the brokerage system.
From the set of service providers with matching attributes and who are presently available for a consultation, the brokerage system determines (506) the service providers who have enabled provider-to-provider consultations. Based on this determination, the brokerage system generates (508) a list of consulting service providers (i.e., service providers with matching attributes, who are presently available for a consultation and who have enabled provider-to-provider consultations).
Referring to
Referring to
The primary service provider shares with the consulting service provider a consumer's relevant information, such as health information and other medical data, prior to the provider-to-provider consultation. The primary service provider accesses the consumer's electronic medical record (“EMR”) and selects files to be shared with the consulting service provider. These files are then shared with the consulting service provider by being emailed to the consulting service provider or by the primary service provider specifying that the consulting service provider has access to view the selected files through the brokerage system. When the primary service provider wants to share a file with a consulting service provider that has not already been loaded or read into the brokerage system, the primary service provider uploads the file into the brokerage system. Referring to
Referring to
Additionally, during the consumer's review (214) of the connection details, the consumer reviews his health summary and health information. The consumer electronically authorizes (either through entering his initials or full name into an authorization text box) the viewing and sharing of health information with the consulting service provider or the primary service provide. When the consumer selects health information for viewing and sharing with either the primary service provider or the consulting service provider, a disclaimer is displayed for the consumer of services. The disclaimer indicates that the consumer's health information is accessible to the primary service provider and/or the consulting service provider during the provider-to-provider consultation.
In some examples, the disclaimer states that the consumer's health information and history are shareable with the consulting service provider during the provider-to-provider consultation, at the primary service provider's discretion. The consumer electronically signs (either through entering his initials or full name into an authorization text box) a disclaimer to authorize the primary service provider to act on behalf of the consumer during the provider-to-provider consultation and to authorize the primary service provider to share the consumer's health information with the consulting service provider.
Referring to
The graphical user interface 800 also displays other information associated with the provider-to-provider consultation, including a payment summary 810, profile information for the primary service provider including a photograph (not shown), provider rating information and provider location information (not shown), topics 812, 814, 816 for the provider-to-provider consultation, a history of the consulting service provider's prior interactions with the consumer of services (not shown), and a health summary 818 associated with the consumer of services. In some examples, the health summary 818 is displayed when the primary service provider has chosen to share the health summary with the consulting service provider. Referring to
The graphical user interface 800 also displays a link or button 820 through which the consulting service provider declines the request for the provider-to-provider consultation. The graphical user interface 800 also displays a link or button 822 through which the consulting service provider accepts the request for the provider-to-provider consultation. When the consulting service provider declines a request for a provider-to-provider consultation, the consulting service provider is prompted to provide a reason for declining the request. The reason for the consulting service provider declining the provider-to-provider consultation is sent to the primary service provider, for example by email, secure message, or through a dialogue box that is displayed when rendered on a web browser of a computer. Referring to
When the consulting service provider accepts the request, the primary service provider and the consulting service provider engage (222, 224) in a consultation. In some examples, the consultation is a real-time communication established over a real time communication channel, including voice, chat, text and/or video. Referring to
A phone control 918, 920 allows the primary service provider or the consulting service provider to initiate a phone call with the other service provider. The telephone number of the primary service provider or the consulting service provider is displayed in a text box 922, 924.
Because the primary service provider and the consulting service provider have access to the other functionalities of the brokerage system, as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. US-2008-0065726, if the primary service provider or the consulting service provider adds notes, documents follow-up recommendations, assigns diagnoses or procedures, and/or recommends medications, this information and data are automatically stored and associated with the consumer of services in the brokerage system. Additionally, the primary service provider and/or the consulting service provider have access to online medical reference materials, which are provided through the brokerage system.
In some examples, the service providers need additional time to complete the provider-to-provider consultation. Referring to
Referring to
A consulting service provider wrap-up graphical user interface is displayed for the consulting service provider. Through the consulting service provider wrap-up graphical user interface, the consulting service provider wrap-ups the consultation after the consultation has ended by performing various actions, including waiving payments associated with the consultation and entering in any additional notes from the consultation. The consulting service provider wrap-up graphical user interface also displays various information, including conversation topics discussed during the provider-to-provider consultation, payment information, health history that was shared between the consumer and/or the primary service provider, a transcript of the consultation between the primary service provider and the consulting service provider notes, diagnoses and procedures, prescriptions, and follow-up suggestions. The consulting service provider wrap-up graphical user interface also includes information about the primary service provider, including the name of the primary service provider, the rating of the primary service provider, and a picture of the primary service provider. The consulting service provider wrap-up graphical user interface also provides the consulting service provider the option to rate his overall experience with the provider-to-provider consultation.
Referring to
Embodiments can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer hardware, firmware, software, or in combinations thereof. Apparatus of the invention can be implemented in a computer program product tangibly embodied or stored in a machine-readable storage device for execution by a programmable processor; and method actions can be performed by a programmable processor executing a program of instructions to perform functions of the invention by operating on input data and generating output. The invention can be implemented advantageously in one or more computer programs that are executable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a data storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device. Each computer program can be implemented in a high-level procedural or object oriented programming language, or in assembly or machine language if desired; and in any case, the language can be a compiled or interpreted language.
Suitable processors include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory and/or a random access memory. Generally, a computer will include one or more mass storage devices for storing data files; such devices include magnetic disks, such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and optical disks. Storage devices suitable for tangibly embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD_ROM disks. Any of the foregoing can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits).
Other embodiments are within the scope and spirit of the description claims. For example, due to the nature of software, functions described above can be implemented using software, hardware, firmware, hardwiring, or combinations of any of these. Features implementing functions may also be physically located at various positions, including being distributed such that portions of functions are implemented at different physical locations.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to provisional U.S. Patent Application 61/179,328, filed on May 18, 2009, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5801755 | Echerer | Sep 1998 | A |
5911687 | Sato et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6223165 | Lauffer | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6519570 | Faber et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523010 | Lauffer | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6546372 | Lauffer | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549889 | Lauffer | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6801899 | Lauffer | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7249045 | Lauffer | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7308422 | Faber et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7412396 | Haq | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7590550 | Schoenberg | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7729938 | Lauffer | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7818183 | Schoenberg | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7912733 | Clements et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912737 | Schoenberg | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8396735 | Lauffer | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20010051765 | Walker et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010608 | Faber et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020165732 | Ezzeddine et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194131 | Dick | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023459 | Shipon | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023508 | Deep | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028399 | Davis et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030069752 | LeDain et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093294 | Passantino | May 2003 | A1 |
20030126205 | Lurie | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144580 | Iliff | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195838 | Henley | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040019579 | Herz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059603 | Brown et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040111297 | Schoenberg | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111298 | Schoenberg | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111622 | Schoenberg | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040152952 | Gotlib et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153343 | Gotlib et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181430 | Fotsch et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050065813 | Mishelevich et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050108052 | Omaboe | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125252 | Schoenberg | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125254 | Schoenberg | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125435 | Schoenberg | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125446 | Schoenberg | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125487 | O'Connor et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182743 | Koenig | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050234739 | Schoenberg | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234745 | Schoenberg | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050288965 | Van Eaton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060106644 | Koo et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116900 | Jensen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060122850 | Ward et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136264 | Easton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161457 | Rapaport et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060236247 | Morita et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247968 | Kadry | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070088580 | Richards, Jr. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070150372 | Schoenberg | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070299316 | Haslehurst et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080065414 | Schoenberg | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065726 | Schoenberg | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080133511 | Schoenberg | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146277 | Anglin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080288293 | Brown, Jr. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090063188 | Schoenberg | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089074 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089084 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089085 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089086 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089088 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089090 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089096 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089097 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089098 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089147 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112623 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113312 | Schoenberg | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090150252 | Schoenberg | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171695 | Cobbinah et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090254361 | Schoenberg | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262919 | Schoenberg | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110004487 | Schoenberg | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110010197 | Schoenberg | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110106557 | Gazula | May 2011 | A1 |
20110196699 | Schoenberg | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110288888 | Gazula | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120179490 | Fuhrmann et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130182834 | Lauffer | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0057326 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0122718 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 2008141283 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/140,760, filed Jun. 17, 2008, Schoenberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,406, filed Mar. 2, 2009, Schoenberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,637, filed Jun. 17, 2009, Schoenberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/633,115, filed Dec. 8, 2009, Schoenberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/348,642, filed Jan. 5, 2009, Schoenberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/270,224, filed Nov. 13, 2008, Schoenberg. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100293487 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61179328 | May 2009 | US |