For many years, print media provided the only way to transmit information and ideas in a fixed form. With the advent of photography and audio recording, additional media have become available for transmitting information and ideas. Moreover, with the widespread use of the Internet, it has become possible to distribute large, coherent units of media, such as books, using electronic technologies. The information in such media, however, is static. That is, updated information is provided only by preparing and distributing additional media. However, widespread distribution of updated information, including comments, supplements, features, thoughts, insights, etc., becomes difficult when the information is authored by multiple parties. Media consumers having additional information or insight typically do not have a way to effectively share that information with other consumers. What is needed is a method and system that allows users of media to easily annotate the media and afterward distribute such annotations to others in an economical and efficient manner.
Another problem that arises with electronic media is that display conditions (e.g., screen size, font type or size, screen resolution, margins, line spacing, etc.) affect the amount of content that can be displayed on a given display screen. Electronic media is typically structured as virtual frames presented on a display device, and a user may turn or change from one virtual frame or “page” of electronic content to another. The term “page” as used herein refers to a collection of content that is presented at one time on a display. Thus, “pages” as described herein are not fixed permanently, and may be redefined or repaginated based on variances in display conditions, such as screen size, font type or size, margins, line spacing, resolution, or the like. Accordingly, it may be difficult or impossible for a user reading electronic media on one display device to meaningfully communicate a page cite or annotation to a reader of the same electronic media on another display device, because one or more of the foregoing display conditions may be different.
In view of the above, this disclosure describes exemplary ways of annotating a digital work, conveying locations of annotations within a digital work, providing access to annotations, as well as other exemplary aspects. In one aspect, a digital work may be annotated at least partially using an eBook reader device. The eBook reader device receives an annotation. If the annotation relates to a specific portion of the digital work, an invariant location reference identifier corresponding to the specified portion of the digital work may be appended to the annotation. The annotation may then be stored in association with the digital work.
In another aspect, an annotation of a digital work may be presented on an eBook reader device. The annotation is received at the eBook reader device. The received annotation may then be stored in association with the digital work. The eBook reader device may also receive an authorization credential granting access to the annotation and, if the authorization credential is valid, may present the annotation of the digital work on the eBook reader device in context with regard to the digital work.
In yet another aspect, an eBook reader device includes a processor and memory in communication with the processor. One or more digital works are stored in the memory, along with one or more annotations associated with the digital works. The annotations are separate from the digital works, such that the digital works are unaltered by the provision of the annotations.
The detailed description is set forth with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
Overview
This disclosure describes annotation of digital works and presenting annotations of digital works. In particular, in some implementations, annotations may be created and/or presented on an eBook reader device or other suitable display device. The amount of content that can be displayed on a given display of the eBook reader or other display device may be affected by various display conditions, such as screen size, font type or size, screen resolution, margins, line spacing, etc. This problem arises because the virtual frames or “pages” displayed on the display device are not fixed permanently, and may be redefined or repaginated based on variances in the display conditions. Accordingly, it may be difficult or impossible for a user reading a digital work on one display device to meaningfully communicate a page cite to a reader of the same digital work on another display device, because one or more of the foregoing display conditions may be different. Consequently, annotations of a digital work that are based on a “page” citation to the digital work may not accurately communicate the portion of the digital work to which the annotation applies. Moreover, the annotation may not be displayed in the intended location if the display conditions are different than when the annotation was authored.
Invariant referencing of locations within a digital work allows a user to accurately reference a location within a digital work, regardless of screen size, font type, font size, or other variations in display conditions of the digital work. Briefly, invariant referencing of locations is accomplished by assigning unique reference identifiers at locations throughout the content of a digital work, or to individual segments of the digital work. These reference identifiers are not dependent on display conditions of a display device on which the digital work is displayed. In that sense, the reference characters are invariant. The invariant location reference identifiers provide a reliable means by which a user can determine a location of content in the digital work and approximately where the content is relative to the beginning and end of the digital work. Invariant location reference identifiers may also be used as a means of identifying a location, or section of content, within a digital work with which an annotation is associated.
Also, once an annotation of a digital work has been authored, it may be desirable to share the annotation with other users. The annotation may be shared with other users in a variety of ways, including transmission to another display device directly (e.g., peer-to-peer) or via one or more remote servers and/or databases. The annotations may be transmitted via wired and/or wireless connection, and may be transmitted together with, or separately from, the digital work to which the annotation applies. Depending on the circumstances, it may be desirable to limit distribution of the annotation. Accordingly, in some implementations, an authorization credential may be required in order to access the annotation.
Exemplary Computing Environment
In
The terms “user”, “author” and “source” are generally used herein. A “user” typically refers to a person, entity or device that seeks to receive an annotation previously stored in association with a digital work. An “author” typically refers to a person, entity or device that prepares an annotation for storage and distribution to users. A “source” typically refers to a person, entity, or device that originates a digital work that may be annotated by an “author”. As should be readily appreciated, a person, entity or device can be a source, an author and/or a user, depending on the distribution of a digital work and whether an annotation is being prepared or requested. Accordingly, at different times, the users 120, 122 can be “authors” and the authors 134, 136 can be “users”, and any of them (or some other third party) may be the source of a digital work.
As will be described with regard to the particular implementations shown herein, the server system 102 is configured to exchange data and information, including digital works and annotations thereof, with the users 120, 122 who are operating the client systems 104, 106 and the authors 134, 136 who are operating the client systems 130, 132. In some circumstances, the server system 102 may be associated with a merchant, such as an online retailer authorized to provide a marketplace for selling and distributing digital works to consumers. Exemplary implementations are described herein in the context of electronic books (“eBooks”) or “digital works.” The terms “eBook” and “digital work” are used synonymously and, as used herein, may include any type of content that can be stored and distributed in digital form. By way of illustration, without limitation, digital works and eBooks can include all forms of textual information such as books, magazines, newspapers, newsletters, periodicals, journals, reference materials, telephone books, textbooks, anthologies, proceedings of meetings, forms, directories, maps, manuals, guides, references, photographs, articles, reports, documents, etc., and all forms of audio and audiovisual works such as music, multimedia presentations, audio books, movies, etc.
Digital works may be stored as media files in a digital works database 124 that resides in or is otherwise communicatively connected to the server system 102. An annotations database 126 and a transaction information database 128 are also shown in
The network 108 shown in
When software formed in accordance with the invention is implemented in one or more computer systems, for example, of the type illustrated in
Exemplary Server System
The server system 102 shown in
The server system 102 shown in
The memory 204 additionally stores program code and data for providing network services that allow client systems to exchange information and data files with the server system 102. Accordingly, the memory 204 may store a Web server application 218, which may be provided by any one of a number of commercially available software packages. The Web server application 218 comprises computer executable instructions, that, when executed by the processor 202, generate or otherwise obtain configurable markup documents such as the sample Web pages shown in
The video display adapter 206 provides display signals to a local display (not shown in
Further included in the server system 102 is a mass storage 224 comprising facilities such as one or more CD-RW/DVD-RW drives, hard disk drives, tape drives, etc., or combinations thereof, that are utilized to store digital content and information, such as annotations. In the implementation shown in
Turning back to
Exemplary Client System
As shown in
The first display 306 in the dual display system presents content in a human-readable format to the user. The content presented in the first display 306 may be digital works, such as electronic books, newspapers, or other readable or viewable materials. For example, the display 306 provides the text of the electronic books and also depicts any illustrations, tables, or graphic elements that might be contained in the electronic books.
The second display 308 of the dual display system is a narrow screen located adjacent to the content display 306. The narrow display 308 is illustrated as being positioned to the right of the content display 306, although it may be located elsewhere in the housing 302 in other implementations. The narrow display screen 308 may be responsive to user input registered via, for example, a finger, a stylus, or other similar pointing device. Additionally, the narrow display screen 308 may enable presentation of graphic elements that correspond to content displayed in the content display 306.
The eBook reader device 300 may also include a variety of user inputs 310 to navigate through and among eBooks and digital works. Examples of user inputs that may be present include buttons, scroll wheels, thumb wheels, thumb sticks, sensors that detect and register movement of a user's thumb or finger, tactile sensors, or any other conventional user input mechanism.
The eBook reader device 300 also has various internal components, which are referred to generally as eBook reader subsystems 312. In one implementation, the subsystems 312 include system storage 314 and a processing unit 316. The processing unit 316 interacts with the system storage 314 to facilitate operation of the eBook reader device 300. The system storage 314 may be used to store one or more eBooks 318, annotations 320, authentication certificates 322, and other content, as well as software programs or other executable modules 324 that may be executed by the processing unit 316. Examples of such programs or modules might include indexing modules indexing eBooks with invariant location reference identifiers, reader programs, control modules (e.g., power management), network connection software, operating models, display drivers, sensor algorithms, page turn detectors, and the like.
The system storage 314 may include volatile memory (such as RAM), nonvolatile memory, removable memory, and/or non-removable memory, implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Also, the processing unit 316 may include onboard memory in addition to or instead of the system storage 314. Some examples of storage media that may be included in the system storage 314 and/or processing unit 316 include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the eBook reader device 300. Any such computer storage media may be part of the eBook reader device 300.
Various instructions, methods and techniques described herein may be considered in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. for performing particular tasks or implementing particular abstract data types. These program modules and the like may be executed as native code or may be downloaded and executed, such as in a virtual machine or other just-in-time compilation execution environment. Typically, the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various implementations. An implementation of these modules and techniques may be stored on or transmitted across some form of computer-readable media.
The above-described server systems and client computer systems may store software instructions that, when executed, implement aspects and features of the present invention. For example, such software can be stored on a computer-accessible medium (e.g., magnetic or optical disk or other device), or downloaded from a remote source, for loading into memory 204 of the server system 102 to be executed by the processor 202, and/or for loading into system storage 314 of the client 300 to be executed by the processing unit 316. For illustrative purposes, described herein are implementations that allow authors and users to access digital works, to annotate digital works, to receive annotations of those digital works from authors, and to provide annotations of digital works to users, possibly in exchange for some form of compensation or completed action by the user. Although the illustrative examples described herein depict a Web-based implementation, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other implementations of the invention may use other implementations for communication and display of information to authors and users.
Overview of Invariant Location Referencing
As mentioned above, a problem arises when attempting to identify and communicate a page or position within a digital work, due to the variable screen size, font type or size, margins, line spacing, resolution, and other variable display conditions of the display devices. This problem applies equally to the communication of annotations between display devices having varying display conditions.
Invariant location referencing makes it possible to meaningfully identify and communicate a specific location or segment of content in an eBook, regardless of screen size, font type or size, resolution, or other display conditions of the display device. Generally, this is accomplished by assigning unique reference identifiers at locations throughout the content of a digital work, or to individual segments of the digital work. These reference identifiers are not dependent on display conditions of a display device on which the digital work is displayed. In that sense, the reference characters are invariant.
The invariant location reference identifiers may be provided in addition to any dividing indicia in the digital work itself (e.g., page numbers, chapter numbers, book numbers, section numbers, etc.) and any virtual (variable) page numbering, or may be provided instead of such dividing indicia and/or virtual page numbering. Generally, the invariant location reference identifiers are separate from the digital work, such that the digital work is unaltered by the location reference identifiers, though not necessarily. The invariant location reference identifiers provide a reliable means by which a user can determine a location of content in the digital work and approximately where the content is relative to the beginning and end of the digital work. Invariant location reference identifiers may also be used as a means of identifying a source of an annotation, quotation, or excerpt from an eBook, or when one eBook references a passage from another eBook (e.g., See Shakespeare, “Romeo and Juliet”, location 201).
There are numerous ways of providing invariant location reference identifiers in, or in association with, content of a digital work. In addition, there are a variety of ways in which digital works may be partitioned and assigned invariant location reference identifiers. For example, each invariant location reference identifier may be assigned to an individual character or word, a group of words, a sentence, a paragraph, a band of text of predetermined size, a unit of data, or some other division of the digital work. Additional details of partitioning digital works, generating, assigning, and/or storing invariant location reference identifiers are described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/882,870, filed Dec. 29, 2006, and entitled “Invariant Referencing in Digital Works,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
Exemplary Annotation Methods
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/669,088, filed Sep. 23, 2003, which is commonly owned by the assignee of the present invention and incorporated by reference herein, discloses other exemplary systems that may be used in connection with the implementations described herein. Such systems may include one or more databases that include digital works in multiple representations. One representation of a digital work may include images of pages of content, while another representation of the digital work may include text searchable forms of the content. The content in the page images correlates with the text searchable form of the content. The page images may be stored in a page image database, while the searchable text may be stored in a text searchable database. Images of pages of content may be acquired using methods known in the art, such as scanning printed pages, converting electronic text to document images, retrieving page images from memory, receiving page images from others, etc.
For each image of a page of content, a recognition routine, such as an optical character recognition (OCR), may be performed on the page image to identify the text, position, and size of each word on the page and provide a text searchable representation of the page. A “word,” in this context, may encompass any grouping of one or more characters, numbers, or symbols. Moreover, a word may stand alone or be associated with a non-text object, such as a picture or graphic. OCR routines are well known in the art of electronic document processing and do not require further discussion herein. The resulting text, position, and size information obtained from processing text on page images may be stored in the text searchable database.
The text searchable database may be organized as desired, which may include using data structures optimized for full text searching. In one suitable implementation, each word in the text searchable database has associated therewith content identification numbers for digital works (e.g., SKU numbers) and page numbers corresponding to the digital work and the images in the page image database where the particular word is found. Furthermore, the text searchable database typically includes information that identifies the position and size of the text (and possibly non-text objects associated with the text) as found on each respective page image. In one implementation, the position and size information is recorded as “quads,” which include four numbers representing the X and Y position and the width and height of the text as it appears on a particular page image. All of this information may be encoded in the text searchable database to reduce the storage space required.
As will be described in more detail below, in some implementations an annotation may be received in regard to particular content of a digital work. A text searchable database as discussed above can be used to enable an author of an annotation (or other person, entity or device) to indicate particular content in a digital work and associate an annotation with the particular content. As noted, the text searchable database may be constructed to include information that helps identify the image(s) in the page image database corresponding to the particular content. Thus, when an author of an annotation indicates particular content in a digital work by selecting text in the text searchable database, the selected text not only identifies the particular content that the author is annotating, but also identifies the corresponding page image(s) in the page image database where the particular content is represented. Word position and size information as discussed above may be helpful in this regard in that it correlates text in the text searchable database with the location of text as represented in a corresponding page image.
Supposing, for example, the author 136 (
As indicated at block 606 in
Implementations of the present invention have a wide applicability of which the following examples are only a small part. The following examples give selected contexts for appreciating several advantages of the invention. An annotation, for example, may be a critique or alternatively a summary of the digital work. An annotation may be a separate essay on the same topic presented in the digital work. Annotations may be words, graphs, formulae, files, images, enhancements, etc., provided by the user. For example, a user may wish to annotate a travel book by providing recent images of locations described in the travel book. For digital works that are audio, such as music files, authors can annotate the music files with additional content commenting on the songs, providing background information on the singer or the recording process, alternative lyrics, technical information as to the composition, related musical compositions, etc. In a circumstance where the digital work is a cookbook, for example, authors may submit alternative ingredients that enhance a recipe, ingredients that make a spicier dish, ingredient substitutions considered to be lower in fat or carbohydrates, etc. In another circumstance, a student or teacher as an author may provide a markup of an academic textbook. As can be appreciated from the foregoing, there is virtually no limitation to the type, form and content of annotations that can be added to a digital work. By way of illustration, an annotation can also be in the form of a link or address to another page, file, or document available to the server system or the client system(s).
A user, such as the user 120 shown in
As indicated at block 610 in
Authorization credentials presented by users may take any form appropriate for processing in the server system 102. For example, an authorization credential may be a token comprised of symbols or an alphanumeric code that is recognized in the server system 102. Users may obtain authorization credentials for accessing annotations in various ways. For example, a user purchasing a digital work may automatically receive an authorization credential to receive present and/or future annotations of the digital work without charge. Alternatively, a user may provide some form of compensation to the server system 102, such as a monetary payment or other item or representation of value. A user may also receive an authorization credential as an incentive for performing an action specified by the server system 102. For example, a user may receive an authorization credential for electronically previewing a digital work or purchasing one or more related digital works or annotations. Users may also receive authorization credentials for performing actions such as filling out surveys, participating in games, or providing annotations to digital works. In some circumstances, free access to annotations may be provided by simply giving the user an authorized credential when the user requests access to the annotation.
The server system 102 is configured to receive an authorization credential from a user requesting an annotation and to determine whether the credential is valid, thus enabling the user to access the annotation. A user's authorization credential can be determined valid in any suitable manner, including comparing a user-submitted credential to a list of known credentials that have been authorized and distributed to users. Use of a credential may cause the credential to be removed from the list in this example, in cases where the credential is intended for a single use. Validation of an authorization credential may be separately communicated to the user or simply followed by delivery of the requested annotation to the user.
In other implementations, an authorization credential may be generated and distributed for use with a specific annotation or group of annotations and as such, may be used only to authorize access to the specific annotation or group of annotations. Moreover, depending on the format of the authorization credential, the authorization credential may itself identify the annotation to which it pertains. In that case (where the authorization credential identifies the annotation), implementations of the invention may be configured to receive the authorization credential and automatically consider it as a request for the annotation. A user may thus request an annotation and present the authorization credential in a single step.
Authorization credentials can be advantageously used to create a market for distribution of annotations to others. For example, where a user intends to submit monetary compensation for annotations, the user may be given a price list for annotations to a digital work. The user can then select which annotations the user desires to receive and pay for the annotations. In other implementations, a subscription model may be used where the user pays a monthly or annual fee to have access to certain groups or all available annotations. Commercially-available payment processing systems may be used by an online marketplace 138 (
At block 706, an annotation of the digital work is received at the eBook reader device 300. The annotation may be received in a variety of ways, including, for example, being input by a user/author via a user interface of the eBook reader device 300, being downloaded or otherwise obtained along with the digital work to which the annotation corresponds, and/or being received directly from another peer client system. Annotations received from input by a user/author may be entered using the keyboard 304, one or more of user inputs 310 (e.g., by highlighting text, etc.), and/or using a stylus or other pointing device if one or both of the screens 306, 308 are touch sensitive.
A determination is made at block 708 if the annotation is specific to a portion of the digital work or a location within the digital work. If the annotation is not specific to a portion of the digital work, the method proceeds to block 712. However, if the annotation is specific to a portion of the digital work (e.g., a passage of the digital work), at block 710, one or more invariant location reference identifiers corresponding to the specific portion of the digital work may be appended to the annotation. In this way, the annotation can be consistently associated with the same content of the digital work on different display devices, regardless of display characteristics. Once the invariant location reference identifiers are appended, the method proceeds to block 712.
At block 712, the annotation is stored. The annotations may be stored locally in system storage 314 of the eBook reader device 300 and/or remotely in a remote data store, such as annotations database 126. In some instances, the annotation may be stored in local memory of the eBook reader device, and subsequently transmitted to a remote data store. The annotation may be stored in an annotation file separate from the digital work, embedded in a data file of the digital work, or otherwise associated with the digital work. As mentioned above, if the annotation corresponds to a specific portion of the digital work or a location within the digital work, the annotation may include one or more invariant location reference identifiers, which may be stored together with the annotation or separately. Annotations received by the server system 102 may be stored in the annotations database 126 in association with the digital work, as indicated at block 712. Storing an annotation in association with a digital work may be accomplished in any suitable manner, including simply storing the annotation in the annotations database 126 with an indication of the digital work to which the annotation pertains, and if apt, invariant location reference identifiers corresponding to the particular content within the work to which the annotation pertains.
In some implementations, at block 714, the annotation may be made available to one or more other computing devices. Annotations may be made available in a number of ways, including being placed on a remote data store, such as annotations database 126, being shared directly from memory of the eBook reader 300 or other client system, or the like. The annotations may be made freely available, or access may require a valid authorization credential as in method 600 above.
Also in some implementations, at block 716, annotations, digital works, authorization credentials, and other content stored locally on the eBook reader device or other client system may be syncronized with a remote computing device, and vice versa. Remote computing devices with which client systems may be synchronized include remote servers, such as server system 102, personal computers, other eBook reader devices or client systems, and the like. By way of example and not limitation, this synchronization may be schedueld to occur periodically (e.g., every week, every other day, every five mintues, etc.), may occure in response to a change in content on one or more client devices, and/or may occure upon request of the user. One specific advantage of this synchronization operation is to allow a user to have access to his or her entire library of digital content at each of several client devices. For example, if a user has a PC at home, a laptop at work, and an eBook reader device at his vacation home, each of these client devices may by synchronized with each other, so that the user has access to all of his or her digital works regardless of the location. The synchronization may occur directly between client devices (on a peer-to-peer basis) and/or over a network via a remote data store. Also, if one of the user's client systems becomes lost or stolen, the content will be stored in one or more other locations and will, therefore, be retreiveable by the user.
Exemplary Compensation Method
Another aspect of creating a market for annotations of digital works is to provide incentive for users to submit annotations.
It should be noted that “authors” and “users” can be, and typically are, distinct from the persons, entities, or devices that are the creators, originators, producers, publishers, distributors, or other “sources” of digital works to be annotated. To further illustrate distinctions between “authors”, “users”, and “sources”, consider a person A who writes a book that publisher P publishes in hardbound, paperback, audio (e.g., “books on tape”), and/or digital forms (e.g., electronic books that can be viewed using a suitable device incorporating a visual display), these forms of the book being distributed to the public, for example, through retail outlets such as book stores, book clubs, and online marketplaces accessible via computer networks. As to the last, publisher P may authorize the limited reproduction of all or selected portions of the book by such online marketplaces for promotional purposes.
Now consider a person B who wishes to write a review of the book, as for a newspaper, magazine, online journal, or even for one of the online marketplaces that offers the book for sale. In accordance with suitable implementations of the invention, person B's review can be (or can become) an annotation to A's book, given proper authorization(s) by A, P, and/or B for this to occur, and can be bought, sold, traded, rented, etc., at the same online marketplace as A's book and/or at other online marketplaces or retail establishments. B's review need not be limited to a conventional self-contained review essay that is written to be read separately from A's book. Instead (or additionally), in accordance with implementations of the invention, B may write some or all of the book review as a set of annotations that pertain to, and are fully understandable when read in context with, specific sections or passages of the book.
For example, B's review may focus on textual passages or pictures or diagrams in A's book that, to B's sensibilities, seem particularly noteworthy, and link or associate these with corresponding portions of the review. In other words, B annotates the passages or images, and the annotations, taken together, make up some or all of B's book review.
With A's original work and B's review now available, it becomes possible for another person C to annotate both A's book and B's review thereof, as digital works. A and/or B may, if they choose, respond to C's comments and to one another, with all these comments and responses being added as yet further annotations to A's book, suitably limited to or associated with pertinent passages and/or prior annotations, as appropriate, that are read in context with the pertinent sections or passages of the book.
The entire set of annotations or subsets thereof (e.g., only C's annotations, or only A's responses, or only annotations made at the behest of publisher P) can be made available with appropriate authorizations from A, B, C, and P, as may be necessary (or, in some instances, under the doctrine of fair use or other legal rubric without prior authorization) for purchase, rental, exchange, or other use by a consumer D. Thus, A and P may be considered “sources” in this example; B, C and A (in the role of responding to B's and C's annotations) may be considered “authors”; and D may be considered a “user”. Further, a particular online marketplace M (or other forum in which annotations and annotated digital works according to the invention are made available to “users”) may be considered none of these, although it will be appreciated that in some situations where publisher P owns marketplace M or vice versa, or where A self-publishes a book through M without the assistance of a conventional publisher P, M may be viewed as a “source”.
Specifics of exemplary annotation, presentation, and compensation methods 600, 700, and 800 are described above. However, it should be understood that certain acts in the methods 600, 700, 800 need not be performed in the order described, may be modified, combined, and/or may be omitted entirely, depending on the circumstances. For example, in method 700, the acts of making annotations available to other computing devices (714) and synchronizing content with a remote device (716) may be omitted. Moreover, acts from one method may be combined with acts from another method in a variety of combinations.
Also, any of the acts described above with respect to the methods 600, 700, and 800 may be implemented by a processor or other computing device based on instructions stored on one or more computer-readable media associated with a preference-based media alert system and/or media system.
Exemplary Presentation of Annotations
As will be described below in reference to
Furthermore, indicators may be included in the digital work to identify particular content having annotations. In a textual digital work for example, the indicators may appear as footnotes, graphical icons, symbols, characters, or other indicia that are located with the text. Where the digital work is an audio work or an audiovisual work, an annotation associated with particular content in the digital work may be identified by an indicator in a playback control provided for playback of the digital work. In yet another alternative, a digital work having annotations pertaining to particular content in the digital work may provide a listing of contents for the digital work with indicators in the listing of contents identifying the location of the annotations.
Turning now to the example given in
Displayed with the digital work 902 are indicators 904, 906 indicating the presence of annotations to the digital work. The indicators 904, 906 may be graphical icons, characters, or symbols that are simply displayed with the digital work. Alternatively, the indicators 904, 906 may provide active links that initiate the display of corresponding annotations when a user activates (e.g., checks or clicks on or hovers over) the indicators 904, 906.
The Web page illustrated in
In yet another implementation of the invention, a Web browser 1100, as shown in
Digital works and/or annotations may also be received from authors and presented to users in an audio or audiovisual form, as illustrated in
Annotations to the audio or audiovisual work may be indicated by indicators 1208 and 1210, for example, associated with the playback control 1202. In the implementation shown in
Alternatively, a digital work may be presented in textual form with annotations in an audio or audiovisual format. Activating an indicator in the display of the digital work may cause a playback control 1202 and controls 1204 to appear for operating the playback of the annotation to the digital work. If the annotation of a digital work is an image, activating the annotation indicator in the digital work may cause a window, such as window 1206, to appear with the image annotation. As should be appreciated from the foregoing, the presentation and format of annotations of digital works is not limited.
Another criterion for ordering a list of annotations is the price assigned to each of the annotations. A user may choose to have the lowest priced annotations or the highest priced annotations listed first. Yet another criterion for determining the order of annotations is the date of receipt of each of the annotations. For example, annotations that are more recent may be presented above annotations that are older. Other suitable criteria can be readily recognized by persons having ordinary skill in the art.
In some circumstances, user receipt of annotations may be conditioned on prior purchase of the digital work to which the annotations pertain. Conditioning the receipt of annotations on the purchase of the underlying digital work provides incentive to users to purchase the work. Moreover, authors of underlying digital works are more likely to grant permission to users to add annotations to the digital work, where such permissions are necessary. A user's purchase of the underlying digital work may be recorded by the transaction manager 222 in the transaction information database 128 and later referenced when the user requests the annotations to the digital work.
Also as noted earlier, authors submitting annotations may indicate particular content in the digital work to which the annotations pertain. Where the digital work is, for example, a book, annotations may pertain to the whole work or particular portions of the work, for example, a chapter, certain pages, or certain text on a page.
Further implementations of the invention may allow users to receive authorization credentials to access annotations from one or more authorized distributors of credentials. For example, an entity providing only annotations to digital works may have a relationship with an online retailer that permits the online retailer to give authorization credentials to purchasers of digital works, which authorization credentials are valid for use in accessing annotations of the purchased works from the entity. In another circumstance, the author of an annotation may become an authorized distributor and distribute authorization credentials to others, allowing them to access the particular author's annotations. Distribution of access credentials in this manner may be advantageous where an author wishes to provide access to his or her annotations to selected family, friends, etc. For example, a group of students in a class or book club may each annotate a digital work and share their annotations with the others in their group by appropriate distribution of authorization credentials among the group. In yet another environment, a publisher may be an authorized distributor that distributes valid credentials for accessing annotations to works published by the publisher.
In still further implementations of the invention, a computer-implemented method may be provided which includes obtaining a first representation of a digital work, the first representation comprising one or more images. A second representation of the digital work is obtained, the second representation comprising content of the digital work in a form that allows particular content of the digital work to be indicated. The particular content is correlatable with one or more locations in the one or more images at which the content is represented. The method further includes receiving an annotation of the digital work in regard to indicated particular content of the digital work, and providing to a user the annotation in context with regard to the digital work. In regard to the latter, one or more images of the digital work may be provided to the user such that the annotation is perceptibly associated by the user with the particular content in the digital work. For example, the annotation may be configured to appear to the user superposed on one or more of the images of the digital work. Alternatively, the annotation may be configured to appear adjacent to one or more of the images of the digital work. The one or more images may further include an indication of the particular content to which the annotation pertains. The indication of particular content to which the annotation pertains is typically received from the author of the annotation, though it may be received from others.
As previously noted, the annotation may be received from an author that is different than the source of the digital work. Likewise, the user to whom the annotation is provided may be different than the source of the digital work. It should be recognized that an annotation of a digital work may be further subject to annotation by another author.
In some implementations, the annotation may be provided to the user via an online marketplace. If desired, the annotation may be provided to the user together with the digital work via the online marketplace.
While several exemplary implementations of the invention have been illustrated and described above, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The scope of the invention, therefore, should be determined from the following claims and equivalents thereto.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/693,682, filed Mar. 29, 2007, entitled “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/039,645, filed Jan. 19, 2005, and entitled “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work” and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/882,870, filed Dec. 29, 2006, and entitled “Invariant Referencing in Digital Works,” both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2684955 | Knowles | Sep 1954 | A |
4622627 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4985697 | Boulton | Jan 1991 | A |
5146552 | Cassorla | Sep 1992 | A |
5418549 | Anderson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5495268 | Pearson et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499359 | Vijaykumar | Mar 1996 | A |
5517407 | Weiner | May 1996 | A |
5544305 | Ohmaye et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566098 | Lucente et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5600775 | King et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5623260 | Jones | Apr 1997 | A |
5630159 | Zancho | May 1997 | A |
5640553 | Schultz | Jun 1997 | A |
5659742 | Beattie et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661635 | Huffman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663748 | Huffman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5696982 | Tanigawa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710922 | Alley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711922 | O'Brien et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5742905 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761485 | Munyan | Jun 1998 | A |
5765168 | Burrows | Jun 1998 | A |
5774109 | Winksy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5813017 | Morris | Sep 1998 | A |
5845278 | Kirsch et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845301 | Rivette et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847698 | Reavey et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5923861 | Bertram et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930026 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940846 | Akiyama | Aug 1999 | A |
5956048 | Gaston | Sep 1999 | A |
5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5973681 | Tanigawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991439 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018575 | Gross et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034839 | Hamming | Mar 2000 | A |
6037954 | McMahon | Mar 2000 | A |
6041335 | Merritt | Mar 2000 | A |
6047189 | Yun et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049334 | Bates et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049796 | Siitonen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064980 | Jacobi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073148 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6105042 | Aganovic et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113394 | Edgar | Sep 2000 | A |
6148340 | Bittinger et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154757 | Krause | Nov 2000 | A |
6160553 | Robertson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164974 | Carlile et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6195698 | Lillibridge et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201771 | Otsuka et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209007 | Kelley et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226642 | Beranek et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233318 | Picard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6272461 | Meredith et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279014 | Schilit | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289513 | Bentwich | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300947 | Kanevsky | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308320 | Burch | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313828 | Chombo | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331866 | Eisenberg | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331867 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335678 | Heutschi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351750 | Duga et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6385596 | Wiser et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401086 | Bruckner | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401239 | Miron | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407757 | Ho | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6442651 | Crow et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6449627 | Baer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457030 | Adams et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466951 | Birkler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484212 | Markowitz et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487669 | Waring | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493734 | Sachs et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496803 | Seet et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6529920 | Arons et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535857 | Clarke, III et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542874 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559882 | Kerchner | May 2003 | B1 |
6560699 | Konkle | May 2003 | B1 |
6574658 | Gabber et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629138 | Lambert et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631495 | Kato et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642947 | Feierbach | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658623 | Schilit et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685482 | Hopp et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687878 | Eintracht | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704733 | Clark et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721869 | Senthil | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724403 | Santoro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725227 | Li | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6726487 | Dalstrom | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735583 | Bjarnestam et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744891 | Allen | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6744967 | Kaminski et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6801751 | Wood et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6803930 | Simonson | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804489 | Stuppy et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829594 | Kitamura | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847966 | Sommer et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6904449 | Quinones | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912398 | Domnitz | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6933928 | Lilienthal | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938076 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6947922 | Glance | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6948135 | Ruthfield et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6953343 | Townshend | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6957233 | Beezer | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6966029 | Ahern | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6980652 | Braitberg | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985932 | Glaser et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6992687 | Baird et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6999449 | Barna et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999565 | Delaney et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7007015 | Nayak | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7009596 | Seet et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010500 | Aarnio | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010751 | Shneiderman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020654 | Najmi | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020663 | Hay et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7028267 | Beezer | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7054914 | Suzuki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7057591 | Hautanen et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062707 | Knauft et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7071930 | Kondo et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080076 | Williamson et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7089292 | Roderick et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7092116 | Calaway | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103848 | Barsness et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107533 | Duncan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111250 | Hayward et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7130841 | Goel et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7133506 | Smith | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7135932 | Quadir et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7149776 | Roy et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7165217 | Kondo | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171202 | Chen et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181502 | Incertis | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188085 | Pelletier | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191346 | Abe et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7209888 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216116 | Nilsson et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7234108 | Madan | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7237123 | LeVine et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7246118 | Chastain et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249046 | Katsurabayashi et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249060 | Ling | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7249324 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257577 | Fagin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7287068 | Eriksson et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7290285 | McCurdy et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298851 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7304635 | Seet et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310629 | Mendelson et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7313759 | Sinisi | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7343552 | Denoue | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349901 | Ramarathnam et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350704 | Barsness et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7355591 | Sugimoto | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375649 | Gueziec | May 2008 | B2 |
7383505 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386480 | Sarig | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386804 | Ho et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398244 | Keith | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7401286 | Hendricks et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7454238 | Vinayak et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461406 | Pelly et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7496767 | Evans | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506246 | Hollander et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506356 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509270 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7519278 | Ikeda et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533152 | Stark et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539478 | Herley et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7546618 | Bacon | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558884 | Fuller et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7562032 | Abbosh et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7562038 | Brumfield et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7574653 | Croney et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574658 | Kisanuki | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7631013 | Parsons et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634429 | Narin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656127 | Shutt et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657459 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7657831 | Donahue | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7680849 | Heller et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7716224 | Reztlaff, II et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720892 | Healey, Jr. et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7747949 | Incertis Carro | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760986 | Beuque | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7783979 | Leblang et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7788369 | McAllen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792756 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7835989 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7849393 | Hendricks et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7865405 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7865567 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7865817 | Ryan et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870022 | Bous et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7890848 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7900133 | Cragun | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908628 | Swart et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920112 | Kurihara et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7920320 | Watson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7921309 | Isbister et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8018431 | Zehr et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8117128 | Ishibashi | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131647 | Siegel et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8161198 | Kikuchi | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165998 | Semerdzhiev | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175925 | Rouaix | May 2012 | B1 |
8209623 | Barletta et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8234282 | Retzlaff, II et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8244468 | Scalisi et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260915 | Ashear | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8312096 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8341210 | Lattyak et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8341513 | Lattyak et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8370196 | Choi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8370341 | Cromwell et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8417772 | Lin et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429028 | Hendricks et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8452797 | Paleja et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8510247 | Kane, Jr. et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8577965 | Hymel et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8601084 | Carlander | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8631451 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8675518 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8706649 | Epis et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8725565 | Ryan | May 2014 | B1 |
8793575 | Lattyak et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8935265 | Tang | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9137322 | Hamada et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9268367 | Aguera y Arcas et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20010007980 | Ishibashi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010025302 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010026287 | Watanabe | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010027450 | Shinoda et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010027478 | Meier et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036822 | Mead et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037323 | Moulton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010037328 | Pustejovsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039493 | Pustejovsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042078 | Anwar | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042098 | Gupta | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049623 | Aggarwal et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010050658 | Adams | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052855 | Ogilvie | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053975 | Kurihara | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002540 | DeMello et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010707 | Chang et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010759 | Hitson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012134 | Calaway | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023010 | Rittmaster et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026443 | Chang et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035697 | McCurdy et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046261 | Iwata et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049717 | Routtenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049787 | Keely | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054059 | Schneiderman | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057286 | Markel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059415 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069222 | McNeely | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069312 | Jones | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087532 | Barritz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090934 | Mitchelmore | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091584 | Clark et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092031 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095468 | Sakata | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101447 | Carro | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103809 | Starzl et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111907 | Ling | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116420 | Allam | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120635 | Joao | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120650 | d'Aquin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123336 | Kamada | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126140 | Gorbet et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129012 | Green | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138291 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138649 | Cartmell et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143822 | Brid et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147724 | Fries et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152473 | Unger | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154157 | Sherr et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165707 | Call | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169615 | Kruger et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184319 | Willner et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194474 | Natsuno et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005002 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009459 | Chastain et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012216 | Novaes | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018543 | Alger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018720 | Chang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025731 | Chastain et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028395 | Rodgers et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040970 | Miller | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046233 | Ara et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030052928 | Williams | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056139 | Murray et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058265 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065642 | Zee | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069812 | Yuen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076513 | Sugimoto et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078986 | Ayres et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030085916 | Thiry et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030090572 | Belz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093312 | Ukita et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093382 | Himeno et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097354 | Finlay et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097361 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105679 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110503 | Perkes | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120593 | Bansal et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126123 | Kodama | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030129963 | Nurcahya | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135495 | Vagnozzi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147099 | Heimendinger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152894 | Townshend | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163399 | Harper et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164844 | Kravitz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177112 | Gardner | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182551 | Frantz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030190145 | Copperman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191737 | Steele et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204496 | Ray et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212613 | Sarig | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229626 | Nayak | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002943 | Merrill et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003344 | Lai et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003398 | Donian et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015467 | Fano | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019564 | Goldthwaite et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023191 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030686 | Cardno et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044723 | Bell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049734 | Simske | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049743 | Bogward | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054499 | Starzyk et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068471 | Kato | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078273 | Loeb et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078757 | Golovchinsky et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088328 | Cook et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098350 | Labrou et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117189 | Bennett | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120280 | Western | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122912 | Kim et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128359 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128539 | Shureih | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139400 | Allam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140975 | Saito et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167822 | Chasen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181467 | Raiyani et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193697 | Grosvenor et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201633 | Barsness et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205457 | Bent et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205514 | Sommerer | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210561 | Shen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212635 | Mussini | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212941 | Haas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229194 | Yang | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237033 | Woolf et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040239703 | Angelica | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243613 | Pourheidari | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252692 | Shim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254013 | Quraishi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254917 | Brill et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267552 | Gilliam et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268232 | Tunning | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268253 | DeMello et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021464 | Lindauer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022113 | Hanlon | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050044148 | Son et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044224 | Jun et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055635 | Bargeron et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066219 | Hoffman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069225 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069849 | McKinney et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076012 | Manber et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086514 | Han et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088410 | Chaudhri | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091027 | Zaher | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091604 | Davis | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097007 | Alger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102618 | Naito | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108189 | Samsonov | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125222 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132281 | Pan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134606 | Hong | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138007 | Amitay | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138428 | McAllen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138551 | Elazar et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144221 | Shin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144895 | Grimes et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149985 | Okamoto | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154601 | Halpern et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050176438 | Li | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177562 | Raciborski | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177567 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193330 | Peters | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195975 | Kawakita | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198070 | Lowry | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198169 | Holten et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222977 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223315 | Shimizu | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228836 | Bacastow et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246374 | Blinn et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250439 | Leslie | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256822 | Hollingsworth | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257261 | Shraim et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262258 | Kohno et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289394 | Arrouye et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004840 | Senda | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020469 | Rast | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031316 | Forstadius | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045470 | Poslinski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047830 | Nair et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047844 | Deng | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060048047 | Tao | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060048184 | Poslinski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053045 | Danielson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060053364 | Hollander et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056628 | Todd | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057960 | Tran | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060061595 | Goede et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069697 | Shraim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071754 | Tofts et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075205 | Martin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075444 | Dillen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077897 | Kotzin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080261 | Christal | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095404 | Adelman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095459 | Adelman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098900 | King | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101328 | Albornoz | May 2006 | A1 |
20060107220 | Letkeman | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109242 | Simpkins | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123053 | Scannell, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129618 | Maier | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129924 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143558 | Albornoz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145950 | Tanaka | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156222 | Chi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161578 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161635 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060175983 | Crouse et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179137 | Jennings, III et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190489 | Vohariwatt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190568 | Patterson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195431 | Holzgrafe et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209175 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230340 | Parsons et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235803 | Romney | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236240 | Lebow | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240799 | Kim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060250994 | Sasaki et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253441 | Nelson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253458 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253461 | de Bonet | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256083 | Rosenberg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265518 | Owens et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271629 | MacDowell | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281058 | Mangoaela | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282797 | Barsness et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005570 | Hurst-Hiller et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005616 | Hay et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005757 | Finger et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014404 | Cha | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016555 | Ito et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025704 | Tsukazaki et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070039023 | Kataoka | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050346 | Goel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050360 | Hull et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055926 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061335 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061337 | Saito et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061803 | Barrett | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073596 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078273 | Hirota | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070079236 | Schrier et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070079383 | Gopalakrishnan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088711 | Craggs | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089053 | Uhlig et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094285 | Agichtein et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094351 | Kalish et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097073 | Takashima et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105536 | Tingo, Jr. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112817 | Danninger | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118533 | Ramer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130109 | King et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136660 | Gurcan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136679 | Yang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142934 | Boercsoek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150456 | Lian et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162961 | Tarrance et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168420 | Morris | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174545 | Okada et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185865 | Budzik et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189719 | Furumachi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201702 | Hendricks et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208751 | Cowan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219983 | Fish | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220419 | Stibel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233562 | Lidwell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233692 | Lisa et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234209 | Williams | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238077 | Strachar | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238524 | Harris et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070240187 | Beach et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242225 | Bragg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250573 | Rothschild | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250901 | McIntire et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256020 | Haga | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282809 | Hoeber et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283158 | Danseglio | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283173 | Webb et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288853 | Neil | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288986 | Candelore et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070300260 | Holm et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005097 | Kleewein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005203 | Bots et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005664 | Chandra | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016064 | Sareday et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016164 | Chandra | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027933 | Hussam | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031595 | Cho | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040233 | Wildman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059702 | Lu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066155 | Abraham | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082518 | Loftesness | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082903 | McCurdy et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082911 | Sorotokin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089665 | Thambiratnam et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098085 | Krane et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100568 | Koch et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103854 | Adam et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111788 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080113614 | Rosenblatt | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115224 | Jogand-Coulomb et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120101 | Johnson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120280 | Iijima et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126919 | Uskali et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133479 | Zelevinsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154908 | Datar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080163039 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164304 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165141 | Christie | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168073 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198139 | Lacroix et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208833 | Basmov | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222552 | Batarseh et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235351 | Banga et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243788 | Reztlaff et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243814 | Gurcan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080243828 | Gurcan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259057 | Brons | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270930 | Slosar | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281058 | Araki | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080293450 | Ryan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294674 | Reztkaff, II et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295039 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298083 | Watson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301820 | Stevens | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320396 | Mizrachi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090094528 | Gray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094540 | Gray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090164429 | Svendsen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090181649 | Bull et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090228774 | Matheny et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090231233 | Liberatore | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241054 | Hendricks | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090263777 | Kohn | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267909 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296331 | Choy | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319482 | Norlander et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023259 | Krumm et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100081120 | Nanjiani et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095340 | Ei et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125876 | Craner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131385 | Harrang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100156913 | Ortega et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164888 | Okumura et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188327 | Frid et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100284036 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100328223 | Mockarram-Dorri et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110050591 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110050594 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110057884 | Gormish et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069073 | Unger | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110112671 | Weinstein | May 2011 | A1 |
20110119165 | Zee | May 2011 | A1 |
20110191710 | Jang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110225048 | Nair | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110261030 | Bullock | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267333 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295926 | Battiston et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001923 | Weinzimmer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016774 | Dicke et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036431 | Ito et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041941 | King et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120079372 | Kandekar et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120096373 | Aguera et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120143918 | Hao et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120197998 | Kessel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120227001 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240081 | Sim et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120311438 | Cranfill et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130100139 | Schliesser et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130138531 | Baughman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130219320 | Seet et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130246157 | Puppin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130326253 | Lam et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140218286 | Kim | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150269488 | Galai et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1236450 | Nov 1999 | CN |
1362682 | Aug 2002 | CN |
1445780 | Oct 2003 | CN |
1648901 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1841373 | Oct 2006 | CN |
1889111 | Jan 2007 | CN |
101120358 | Feb 2008 | CN |
101120358 | Feb 2008 | CN |
1197902 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1544720 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1842150 | Oct 2007 | EP |
6274493 | Sep 1994 | JP |
07078139 | Mar 1995 | JP |
09179870 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10091640 | Apr 1998 | JP |
11074882 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000501214 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001052016 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001052025 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001100702 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001195412 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2001236358 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001344524 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002099739 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002197079 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002203156 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002259718 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002536736 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003016104 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003122969 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003513384 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003516585 | May 2003 | JP |
2003517158 | May 2003 | JP |
2003186910 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2005056041 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005100146 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2006011694 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006107496 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006129323 | May 2006 | JP |
2006129327 | May 2006 | JP |
2006190114 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2008071334 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008516297 | May 2008 | JP |
2008527580 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008197634 | Aug 2008 | JP |
1020020020262 | Mar 2002 | KR |
1020050038645 | Apr 2005 | KR |
WO9720274 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO9720274 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO9722107 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO0045588 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0045588 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO0056055 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO0075840 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0142978 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0239206 | May 2002 | WO |
WO2002039206 | May 2002 | WO |
WO2004055647 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2006078728 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO2008042745 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
The European Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2016 for European patent application No. 08827356.0, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,282, 9 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2016 for European patent application No. 08756060.3, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 4 pages. |
Office Action far U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,476, dated Oct. 11, 2016, John Lattyak, “Delivery of items for Consumption by a User Device”, 11 pages |
“Amazon Home Page”, Amazon.com, retreived from Internet Archive Wayback Machine, www.archive.org, Sep. 2005, 3 pages. |
The Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 27, 2017 for European Patent Application No. 07870076.2, 8 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2016 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 16 pages. |
The Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2016 for Canadian patent application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 3 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, dated Apr. 4, 2016, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 15 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, dated May 12, 2016, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 34 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, dated May 27, 2016, Retzlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, dated May 31, 2016, Griffin et al., “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 61 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, dated Jul. 7, 2016, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 34 pages. |
The Indian Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2018 for Indian Patent Application No. 6591/CHENP/2009, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,234,282, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. 14/880,821, dated Mar. 13, 2018, Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 10 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211 dated Mar. 29, 2018, Retzlaff II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 22 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2018 for European Patent Application No. 08756060.3, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 12 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2018 for the European Application No. 08744189.5, a counter part foreign application of the U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/880,821, dated Aug. 13, 2018, Linsey R. Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/629,284, dated Aug. 9, 2018, Michael V. Rykov, “Selecting and Providing Items in a Media Consumption System ”, 17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, dated Apr. 6, 2017, Rykov et al., “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 14 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/884,476, dated May 8, 2017, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 12 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. 11/693,685, dated Aug. 15, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/277,894, filed Mar. 29, 2006, Jateen P. Parekh, Gregg E. Zehr, and Subram Narasimhan,“Reader Device Content Indexing”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, filed Sep. 29, 2006, Thomas Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, filed Sep. 29, 2006, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item based on a Catalog Presentation of Items.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, filed Mar. 29, 2007, John Lattyak; John Kim; Steven Moy; Laurent An Minh Nguyen, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Craig Griffin; Steven Weiss, “Display Dependent Markup Language.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,339, filed Jun. 14, 2007, David Isbister; Marshall Willilams; Nicholas Vaccaro, “Power Management Techniques for a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; John Lattyak, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; Thomas Ryan, “Search Results Generation and Sorting.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak, Girish Bansil Bajaj, Kevin R. Cheung, Thomas Fruchterman, Robert L. Goodwin, Kenneth P. Kiraly, Richard Moore, Subram Narasimhan, Thomas A. Ryan, Michael V. Rykov, Jon Saxton, James C. Slezak, Beryl Tomay, Aviram Zagorie, Gregg Elliott Zehr, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Kenneth Kiraly; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; Xiaotian Guo, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,381, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Selecting and Providing Items in a Media Consumption System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Girish Bansilal Bajaj; Michael Rykov; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin,, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Subram Narasimhan; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System .” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin,, “Incremental Updates of Items .” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; James Reztlaff II, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, filed Dec. 21, 2007, Michael Rykov; Laurent An Minh Nguyen; Steven Moy, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, filed Dec. 11, 2008, Aviram Zagorie; Craig Griffin; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov, “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,629, filed Jan. 9, 2009, John Johnston; Weiping Dou; Steven Chase, “Antenna Placement on Portable Device.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,663, filed Jan. 9, 2009, Chris Li; Steven Chase, “Surface Mount Clip for Routing and Grounding Cables.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, filed Jan. 26, 2009, Thomas Dimson, Janna Hamaker, Eugene Kalenkovich, Tom Killalea, “Aggregation of Highlights.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Rajiv Kotesh Ghanta; Marcos Frid; Joseph J. Hebenstreit; John T. Kim, “Electronic Device With Haptic Feedback.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, filed Feb. 6, 2009, Scott Dixon; Eriel Thomas, “Bundled Digital Content.” |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, filed Mar. 31, 2009, Amit Agarwal; Zaur Kambarov; Tom Killalea, “Questions on Highlighted Passages.” |
U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2004081300 dated Apr. 29, 2004, corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2002-259718, 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/331,528, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Chris Green, “User Interface Cluster.” |
U.S. Pat. No. 7,340,436 dated Mar. 4, 2008, corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2003-513384, 7 pages. |
“A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf. |
“Annotation Engine,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <http://cyber.law .harvard. edulproj ectsl annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
“Annotator Instructions,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/annotate/instructions.html>>, also found at <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cite/instructions.html>>, [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
“Annotator Wishlist,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School r <http://cyber.law.harvard.edulcite/annotate.cgi ?action=print&markup ;center=; view=http%3A%2F%2Fcy . . . > [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
Barnes & Noble, “Nook User Guide”, retrieved from the internet Feb. 5, 2013, 120 pgs. |
BarnesandNoble.com, “Barnes and Noble Homepage”, retrieved on Aug. 2, 2011 http://web.archive.org/web/19981202183957/http://www.barnesandnoble.com/, Dec. 2, 1998. |
Beigbeder et al., “An Information Retrieval Model Using the Fuzzy Proximity Degree of Term Occurences”, 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1018-pp. 1022. |
Bellwood, et al., “UDDI Version 2.04 API Specification UDDI Committee Specification, Jul. 19, 2002”, Oasis, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/20050314033213/www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/tcspecs.htm. |
Roscheisen, M., et al., “Beyond Browsing: Shared Comments, SOAPs, Trails, and On-Line Communities,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 27:739-749, 1995. |
Biskup, J., et al, “Towards a Credential-Based Implementation of Compound Access Control Policies” SACMAT '04, Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, Jun. 4, 2004, NY, retrieved from the internet: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=990036.990042 (retrieved Nov. 9, 2010. |
Bradley, “Plastic Shape Shifter”, retreived on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.reactivereports.com/61/61_3.html>>, Chemistry WebMagazine, Issue No. 61, Dec. 2006, 2 pgs. |
Breu, M. et al., “The Medoc Distrubuted Electronic Library: Accounting and Security Aspects”, Electronic Publishing, New Models and Opportunities, Proceedings of an ICCC/IFIP Conference, Apr. 14, 1997, pp. 237-249. |
The Canadian Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2681755, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,349, 4 pages. |
The Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2688002, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 5 pages. |
The Canadian Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2105 for Canadian patent application No. 2681754, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 4 pages. |
The Canadian Office Action dated Dec. 15, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2681754, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages. |
Canadian Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2009 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
The Canadian Office Action dated May 29, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 3 pages. |
The Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 3 pages. |
The Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2684955, a counterpat foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 4 pages. |
Canadian Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2012 for Canadian patent application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 5 pages. |
The Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684955, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 3 pages. |
The Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 4, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2750759, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 4 pages. |
Cafesoft.com, “Security Glossary”, dated Oct. 13, 2003, retrieved from the Wayback Machine on Jul. 2, 2009 at <<http://web.archive.org/web/20031013022218/http://cafesoft.com/support/security-glossary.html>>. |
Card et al., “3Book: A 3D Electronic Smart Book”, AVI'04 May 25-28, 2004, Hallipoli, Italy, ACM 2004, pp. 303-pp. 307. |
Cavanaugh “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Expectional Children vol. 35 No. 2 p. 56-61 Copyright 2002 CEC. |
Cavanaugh, “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Exceptional Children, vol. 35, No. 2, Copyright 2002 CEC, 6 pages. |
Chi et al. “eBooks with Indexes that Reorganize Conceptually”, CHI2004, Apr. 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria ACM 1-58113-703-6/04/0004. |
Cleveland, Jr. et al., “Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 56, Fourth Edition, Aug. 1999, 38 pages. |
Cleveland, Jr., et al, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, Aug. 1997, 84 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated May 9, 2008 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645 |
The Chinese Second Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
The Chinese Third Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5 , a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 13 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 12 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2015 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 10 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 15 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 8 pages. |
The Chinese Office Aciton dated Feb. 1, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 19 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2015 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 10 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated May 17, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 5 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated May 21, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 16, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 18 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 9 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 13 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 8 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 6 pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880024964.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 6 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 17 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 5 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 9 pages. |
Davison et al. “The Use of eBooks and Interactive Multimedia, as Alternative Forms of Technical Documentation” SIGDOC'05, Sep. 21-23, 2005, Conventry, United Kingdom, Copyright 2005 ACM 1-59593-175-9/5/0009. |
Desmoulins et al., “Pattern-Based Annotations on E-books: From Personal to Shared Didactic Content”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless adn Mobile Techniques in Education, 2002, 4 pages. |
Carter, S., et al., “Digital Graffiti: Public Annotation of Multimedia Content,” Proceedings o/the CHI2004, Vienna, Austria, Apr. 24-29, 2004, pp. 1207-1210. |
Elspass, et al., “Portable Haptic Interface with Active Functional Design”, In Proceedings SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, Newport Beach, California, vol. 3668, Mar. 1999, 926-932. |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 22, 2009, issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. EP 06 71 8773.2, filed Jan. 18, 2006. |
The Mintues of the Oral Proceedings dated Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 13 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 9 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2014 for European patent application No. 08732668.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 31 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645 |
The European Office Action dated Mar. 26, 20010 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
The European Office Action dated Apr. 7, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 7 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2013 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages. |
The European Search report dated Dec. 22, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
The Extended European Search Report dated Feb. 10, 2016 for European Patent Application No. 10736293.1, 15 pages. |
ePaperBoard.de, “Hanlin V3 Review”, retrieved on Jan. 22, 2016 at <<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=li4K5LCjV54>>, Jun. 15, 2008 *the whole video*, *segment 4:50-5:10*. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, dated Feb. 23, 2010, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, dated Mar. 16, 2010, 16 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, dated Apr. 5, 2011, James R. Retzlaff II, “Managing Status of Search Index Generation”. |
Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, dated Jan. 4, 2012, 16 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, dated Jan. 28, 2014, Tom Killalea, “Aggregation of Highlights”, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, dated Oct. 30, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, dated Feb. 10, 2014, Amit D. Agarwal, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 40 pages. |
Gladney, H. M.: “Access Control for Large Collections”, NY, vol. 15, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1997, pp. 154-194. |
Goodreads.com, “About goodreads”, 2006, 2 pages. |
Malloy, et al. “Google Search”, retrieved on Sep. 17, 2014 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Google_Search&oldid=118323867>>, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Mar. 27, 2007, 6 pages. |
“Haptic History—Machine Haptics (Expansion)” retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://hapticshistory.chc61.uci.cu/haptic/site/pages/Machine-Haptics-Became_5.php.>> from Google's cache, text-only version as webpage appeared on Apr. 16, 2009, 8 pgs. |
Henke, H. “Survey on Electronic Book Features”, Open eBook Forum, online, Mar. 20, 2002, pp. 1-14, retrieved from the internet: <http://www.openebook.org/doc_library/surveys/IDPF_eBook_Features_2002.pdf> retrieved Nov. 8, 2010. |
Homer, et al., “Instant HTML”, Wrox Press, 1997, pp. 76-79. |
Jones, et al., “Development of a Tactile Vest”, IEEE Computer Society, In the Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Mar. 27-28, 2004, pp. 82-89. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, 4 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Jan. 14, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 4 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
The Japanese Office dated Oct. 12, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 6 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 3 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2015 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-245401, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,677, 2 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 7 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2015 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 19 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated May 24, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated May 31, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 5 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 pages. |
The Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 4 pages. |
Kindle Community, Discussions—Screen Saver, retrieved from the internet on Nov. 6, 2009 at <<http://www.amazon.com/tag/kindle/forum?cdForum=Fx1D7SY3BVSESG&cdThread=Tx28QGUBE29L22J>>, 4 pages. |
“Kobo Wireless eReader & Desktop Application User Guide”, Feb. 2011, 170 pgs. |
The Korean Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024279, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 6 pages. |
The Korean Office Action dated Oct. 14, 2015 for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2011-7017613, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 6 pages. |
The Korean Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024280, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 10 pages. |
The Korean Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2015 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024280, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 7 pages. |
Leach et al, “A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf, 32 pgs. |
Leutwyler, “Shape-shifting Polymer Gels”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=shape-shifting-polymer-ge&print=true>>, Scientific American, Nov. 9, 2000, 1 pg. |
“Mastering to Become a True Manager, Well-selected commands for an efficient event log management, Part 1,” Windows Server World, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 86-96, IDG Japan, Japan, Feb. 1, 2004. |
Means, et al., “ Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields”, OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01, Jun. 2001, 57 pages. |
Mercier et al., “Sphere of influence Model in Information retrieval”, IEEE 2005 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 120-pp. 125. |
Nakatani, et al., “3D Form Display with Shape Memory Alloy”, In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Teleexistence (ICAT), 2003, pp. 179-184. |
Navarro, et al., “Modern Information Retrieval, Chapter 8: Indexing and Searching”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York, pp. 191-228. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, dated Jan. 19, 2010, 31 pgs. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, dated Oct. 15, 2009, 31 pgs. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, dated Aug. 6, 2010, 17 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, dated Jan. 6, 2015, Scott Dixon, “Bundled Digital Content”, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, dated Jan. 9, 2015, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 13 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, dated Jan. 15, 2015, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 45 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, dated Feb. 5, 2015, John Lattyak, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device”, 21 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, dated Feb. 26, 2015, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 45 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, dated Feb. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, dated Jan. 24, 2012, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, dated Jan. 4, 2012, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 41 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, dated Jan. 5, 2016, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 32 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, dated Jan. 6, 2016, Rykov et al., “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 16 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, dated Oct. 5, 2011, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 75 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, dated Oct. 10, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, dated Oct. 14, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System ”, 38 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374 dated Oct. 16, 2012, Ryan et al, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, dated Oct. 16, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”,18 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211 dated Oct. 16, 2015, Retzlaff II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, dated Oct. 24, 2011, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, dated Oct. 31, 2014, Linsey R. Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, dated Oct. 5, 2012, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 29 pages. |
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, dated Oct. 6, 2014, Lattyak et al., “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device”, 16 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, dated Oct. 7, 2014, Siegelet al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, dated Oct. 8, 2013, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314 dated Oct. 8, 2015, Griffin et al., “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 56 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, dated Nov. 10, 2011, James R. Retzalff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 16 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518 dated Nov. 10, 2015, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, dated Nov. 23, 2012, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, dated Nov. 25, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items,” 8 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,380 dated Nov. 5, 2015, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, dated Nov. 6, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 29 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, dated Nov. 8, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, Thomas Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System ”, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, dated Dec. 17, 2013, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 25 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,380, dated Dec. 19, 2014, Girish Bansilal Bajaj, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 11 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357 , dated Dec. 21, 2011, Reztlaff et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, dated Dec. 23, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II et al., “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, dated Dec. 24, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, dated Dec. 29, 2011, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 21 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, dated Dec. 8, 2011, John Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, dated Feb. 13, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 14 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, dated Feb. 14, 2013, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, dated Feb. 14, 2014, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, dated Feb. 16, 2012, John Lattyak et al., “Incremental Updates of Items”, 24 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, dated Feb. 21, 2013, Inventor #1, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 76 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, dated Feb. 21, 2014, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 36 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, dated Feb. 25, 2014, Sailesh Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, dated Feb. 28, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 17 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, dated Mar. 10, 2014, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 42 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, dated Mar. 14, 2014, Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, dated Mar. 15, 2013, Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readern”, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, dated Mar. 24, 2014, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 26 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, dated Mar. 27, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages. |
Final; Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, dated Mar. 28, 2012, Tom Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, dated Mar. 30, 2012, Scott Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 12 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, dated Mar. 5, 2013, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, dated Apr. 22, 2013, Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, dated Apr. 23, 2012, Siegel et al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, dated Apr. 24, 2015, James R. Retzlaff II, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, dated Apr. 25, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 4 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, dated Apr. 26, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, dated Apr. 28, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, dated Apr. 8, 2013, Bajaj et al, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, dated May 14, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 24 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, dated May 14, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 21 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, dated May 2, 2013,Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, dated May 2, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, dated May 26, 2011, Reztlaff, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, dated May 27, 2015, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, dated May 4, 2012, Hilliard B. Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 20 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, dated May 9, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, dated Jun. 13, 2011, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, dated Jun. 2, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 24 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, dated Jun. 24, 2014, Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 19 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/216,596, dated Jun. 26, 2015, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 22 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, dated Jun. 27, 2012, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, dated Jun. 27, 2012, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378 dated Jun. 3, 2015, John Lattyak, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device”, 25 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, dated Jun. 30, 2015, Hilliard B. Siegel, “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, dated Jun. 4, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 26 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,115, dated Jun. 4, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Invariant Referencing in Digital Works”, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, dated Jun. 6, 2012, James. R. Retzlaff II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 10 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, dated Jun. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369 dated Jun. 7, 2012, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 20 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, dated Jun. 9, 2011, Hilliard B. Siegel, “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, dated Jul. 16, 2015, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, dated Jul. 18, 2011, Zagorie et al., “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices”, 22 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, dated Jul. 2, 2014, Retzlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, dated Jul. 25, 2013, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, dated Jul. 3, 2013, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 14 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, dated Jul. 31, 2015, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, dated Aug. 4, 2011, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 39 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, dated Aug. 12, 2014, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 6 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, dated Aug. 13, 2014, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 40 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, dated Aug. 15, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 24 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, dated Aug. 19, 2013, Kiraly et al., “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action”, 16 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, dated Aug. 19, 2011, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, dated Aug. 26, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II, “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, dated Aug. 27, 2013, Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, dated Aug. 28, 2014, Griffin et al., “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 52 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,380, dated Aug. 3, 2015, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, dated Sep. 11, 2013, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 31 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, dated Sep. 12, 2011, James R. Retzlaff II, “Managing Status of Search Index Generation”, 11 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, dated Sep. 13, 2013, Agarwal et al, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 35 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941 dated Sep. 15, 2015, Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, dated Sep. 16, 2013, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 23 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, dated Sep. 24, 2013, John Lattyak, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 27 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, dated Sep. 24, 2014, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 31 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, dated Sep. 26, 2011, Michael Rykov, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, dated Sep. 27,2011, Thomas Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, dated Sep. 27, 2012, John T. Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Reader”, 9 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618 dated Sep. 3, 2015, Rykov et al., “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 16 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, dated Sep. 4, 2014, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 10 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, dated Sep. 5, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 6 pages |
Oki et al., “The Infomation Bus—An Architecture for Extensive Distributed Systems”, ACM, 1993, 11 pages. |
Oqo “A Full PC That Fits in Your Pocket” Retrieved on Sep. 22, 2008 at <<http://www.oqo.com/support/documentation.html>>. |
Palm Reader Handbook, Palm Inc., 2000, 56 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US 08/64389, dated Jan. 28, 2009, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US/08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 15, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US07/89105, filed Dec. 28, 2007, 2 pages. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 15, 2008, in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/57829, filed Mar. 21, 2008, 1 page. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 7, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/57848, filed Mar. 31, 2008, 2 pages. |
PCT Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US10/22060, dated Mar. 8, 2010 (7 pages). |
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2006/001752, dated Jul. 27, 2006, 8 pgs. |
“Say No to Third Voice,” Worldzone.net, 1999-2004, <http://worldzone.netiinternetipixelsnttv/index.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
“Shape Memory Polymer”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_Memory_Polymer>>, Wikipedia, 8 pgs. |
Sohn et al. “Development of a Standard Format for eBooks”, SAC2002, Madrid, Spain, 2002 ACM 1-58113-445-2/02/0. |
“The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School: Annotation Engine,” Harvard.Edu, 1999-2004, <http://cyber.iaw.harvard.eduJprojects/annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
Marshall, C.C., “The Future of Annotation in a Digital (Paper) World,” Proceedings o/the 35th Annual GSLIS Clinic, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, 11, Mar. 22-24, 1998, pp. 1-19. |
Kumar, A., “Third Voice Trails off . . . ,” Wired News, 2004, <http://www.wired.comlnews/printIO. 1294,42803 ,00.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
“Trilogy Definition”, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1999, 2 pages. |
“Universal Unique Identifier”, dated Dec. 16, 2002. The Open Group, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/20021216070918/http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9629399/apdxa.htm. |
“Web Services Architecture: W3C Working Group Note Feb. 11, 2004”, Feb. 11, 2004, W3C, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/2004040205185/http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/. |
Wellman, et al., “Mechanical Design and Control of a High-Bandwidth Shape Memory Alloy Tactile Display”, Springer-Verlag, In the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 1997, pp. 56-66, 12 pgs. |
International Publication WO 01/42978 published Jun. 14, 2001, for International Application PCT/US00/33081, which corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2003-516585. |
Yoshikawa, et al., “Vertical Drive Micro Actuator for Haptic Display Using Shape Memory Alloy Thin Film”, IEE Japan, Papers of Technical Meeting on Micromachine and Sensor System, Journal Code L2898B, vol. MSS-05, No. 21-44, 2005, pp. 103-108. |
Ziviani, N ED, Baeza—Yates R. et at: “Modern Information Retrieval, Text Operations”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, NY, pp. 163-190. |
Zobel, J. et al., “Inverted Files for Text Search Engines” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, No. 2, Jul. 1, 2006, pp. 1-56, NY, NY. |
The European Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2016 for European Patent Application No. 10736293.1, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, 9 pages. |
The Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 9, 2016 for European patent application No. 08744189.5, 7 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, dated Dec. 22, 2016, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 20 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2018 for European Patent Application No. 08756060.3, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 10 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2018 for European patent application No. 07870076.2, a counterpart foreign application fo U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,817, 5 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2018 for European patent application No. 08744189.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 9,275,052. |
The Indian Office Action dated Dec. 29. 2017 for Indian patent application No. 5756/DELNP/2011, a countepart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8/378,979, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,518, dated Jan. 26, 2018, Retzlaff II , “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 24 pages. |
Shiratuddin, et al., “eInfoC Mobile Payment Model and Wap Site Prototype for Sales of eBooks”, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mobile Technologies, Applications & Systems, Mobility '06, Oct. 25-27, 2006, pp. 1-9. |
Byteflight, “iRex iLiad eBook reader”, retrieved on May 8, 2017 at <<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxUnY9eD4xM>>, Jun. 19, 2007, 1 page. |
The Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2017 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 4 pages. |
The European Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2017 for European Patent Application No. 10736293.1, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,979, 13 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, dated Jun. 20, 2017, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”,17 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/629,284, dated Jun. 30, 2017, Rykov, “Selecting and Providing Items in a Media Consumption System”, 16 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, dated Jul. 5, 2017, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 21 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211 dated Aug. 9, 2017, Retzlaff II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 15 pages. |
The Indian Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2017 for Indian patent application No. 6593/CHENP/2009, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, dated Oct. 26, 2017, Siegel, “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 17 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, dated Nov. 2, 2017, Rykov, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 18 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/629,284, dated Nov. 29, 2017, Rykov, “Selecting and Providing Items in a Media Consumption System”, 18 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,518, dated Aug. 29, 2017, James R. Retzlaff, II , “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 22 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2018 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201610284070.3, a counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 20 pages. |
The Chinese Office Action dated May 15, 2019 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201610284070.3, a counter part of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/629,284 “Selecting and Providing Items in a Media Consumption System” Rykov, 17 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180307664 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60882870 | Dec 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11693682 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 15050199 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11039645 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 11693682 | US |