Providing contextually sensitive tools and help content in computer-generated documents

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8706708
  • Patent Number
    8,706,708
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 26, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 22, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A method and system are provided for creation, implementation, and use of computer-generated “smart” documents to which functionality is attached for providing contextually sensitive tools, controls and help content to users of those documents. Portions of documents are annotated with Extensible Markup Language (XML) tags and structure so that when a user enters those portions, such as by placing a computer cursor in those portions, the user is provided contextually sensitive tools, controls and/or help content. A document tools pane may open on the user's computer screen adjacent to the document being edited for providing the document tools, controls or help content related to the context of the text or data in which the cursor is located. If the user moves the cursor to another portion of the document, the user may obtain information associated with the context of the new portion of the document in which the cursor is located.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to the provision of contextually sensitive tools and help content in computer-generated documents.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Computer software applications allow users to create a variety of documents to assist them in work, education, and leisure. For example, popular word processing applications allow users to create letters, articles, books, memoranda, and the like. Spreadsheet programs allow users to store, manipulate, print, and display a variety of alpha-numeric data. Such applications have a number of well-known strengths, including rich editing, formatting and calculation.


However, documents created by such software applications do not provide users with contextually sensitive tools, help content, or support. That is, as the user is entering text or data into such software applications, these applications do not provide the user with helpful tools or assistance based on the context of the text or data being entered by the user. Internet web-based applications attempt to solve some business problems through the creation and deployment of web-based templates with which users may enter information that may be transmitted to a back-end web server for the purpose of registering the user for some type of service. Such web-based applications often may include links with which the user may navigate to a separate web site for helpful information or assistance with the current web-based application or document in use by the user. However, such web-based applications suffer compared to the aforementioned software application documents in that modern web-based applications seldom offer rich editing, formatting, printing, and calculation.


By way of example, in a typical setting, a user may decide to prepare a resume using a word processing application loaded on her home computer. As the user prepares the resume, she likely will fill in such sections such as “personal information,” “education,” “experience,” and “extra-curricular activities.” As the user is completing each of those sections, she may require assistance, including information on the preferred ordering of the sections, information on the preferred number of past jobs to place in the “experience” section, and the like. In order to receive such assistance, the user likely must read a book on resumes, or go online to an internet-based resume help site for the information.


In contrast, the user may enter an internet-based resume site to complete a resume using a web-based resume template. The user may be allowed to enter specific information in given data fields, and the user may be provided with internet web site links for navigating to sites where she may obtain assistance with various sections of the document. When the user has completed preparation of the web-based resume, the user may be allowed to submit the resume to some web-based job service, or the user may be able to print the template. However, the functionality of the user's word processing application, such as rich editing and formatting of the resume, is likely not available to the user given the limitations of the web-based application in contrast to the user's computer-based word processor.


It is with respect to these and other considerations that the present invention has been made.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method and system for creating, implementing and using computer-generated documents that provide contextually sensitive tools, controls and help content to the user(s) of those documents. Generally described, a schema is attached to a document defining permissible data content, data type and data structure for the document. The document is structured to associate the document with the schema, and a solution is associated with the document structure. A plurality of software components is assembled for providing the solution to the document, and the document is enabled to call the plurality of software components for providing the solution to the document based on an editing position in the document.


After the document is created, a software application for opening the document may be booted to initiate opening the document. A determination is made as to whether the document refers to the solution. A determination is made as to whether the plurality of software components for providing the solution is present in a library of software components. If so, the plurality of software components is called for providing the solution to the document.


Once the document is opened for use, focusing document editing in a particular portion of the document, such as by placing the cursor in a particular portion of the document, causes the generation of a list of Extensible Markup Language (XML) elements enclosing a position of the editing focus. A determination is made as to whether any available solutions are associated with the list of XML elements. If any available solutions are associated with the list of XML elements, each associated solution is called and is obtained for use by the document. Preferably, the solutions comprise help content and document tools associated with the context of the editing position in the document. A graphical user interface is launched for displaying each solution obtained for use by the document.


These and other features, advantages, and aspects of the present invention may be more clearly understood and appreciated from a review of the following detailed description of the disclosed embodiments and by references to the appended drawings and claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a computer screen display of a software application graphical user interface through which is displayed a document and associated contextually sensitive tools and help content according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating client-side software architecture for use in conjunction with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a computer and associated peripheral and networked devices that provide an exemplary operating environment for the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a method for creating a document that provides contextually sensitive tools and help content according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method for opening a document created in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 illustrates a computer-generated dialog box for offering multiple document solutions to a user.



FIG. 7 illustrates a computer-generated dialog box for assisting a user with downloading components to an application created in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating a method of determining what content to display in a document tools pane according to an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention is directed toward creation, implementation and use of computer-generated “smart” documents to which functionality is attached for providing contextually sensitive tools, help content and controls to users of those documents. According to an embodiment of the invention, portions of documents are structured so that when a user enters those portions, such as by placing a computer cursor in those portions, the document points to a solution that may provide the user contextually sensitive tools and/or help content. For example, if a user is preparing a resume to assist her in obtaining a job, the user may place her computer cursor in the “education” section the resume. According to the present invention, the placement of computer cursor in the “education” section may provide the user with contextually sensitive information. The document may point to an overall solution, e.g., a resume document solution, or individual portions of the document may point to contextual subsets of the solution, e.g., and “experience” section solution of a resume document solution. A document tools pane may open on the user's computer screen adjacent to the document being edited and may provide a narrative on suggested approaches for the completion of the “education” section. If the user moves the cursor to another portion of the document, for example to the “objectives” section of the resume, the user may obtain information associated with that context, such as examples of proper employment objectives statements.


It should be understood that the contextually sensitive tools and help content provided to a user in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention may be provided for a variety of software application programs, including word processors, spreadsheets, web browsers, text editors, and the like. Moreover, the types and content of helpful information and tools provided to a user according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a variety of tools and actions and help information as desired by the creator of the software applications in use by the user.


Referring to FIG. 1, a computer screen display is illustrated showing an exemplary software application 100 with which a document and associated document tools pane providing document tools and help content is illustrated. The document 110 depicted in FIG. 1 shows an employee annual performance review template with which an employ may complete her annual performance review or with which she may complete a performance review of one of her employees. The application 100 depicted in FIG. 1 is a word processing application used for displaying and editing the document 110, but as should be understood by those skilled in the art, the application 100 could include other software applications, including spreadsheet applications, text editing applications, and the like. Moreover, the document 110 illustrated in FIG. 1 depicts an annual performance review document, but the document 110 could include a variety of other documents and templates edited by the user, including resume templates, will templates, desktop publishing documents, letters, financial spreadsheets, and the like.


Referring to the exemplary document shown in FIG. 1, the word processing application 100 provides typical functionality associated with a word processor, accessible via drop down menus such as, File, Edit, View, Insert, Format, etc. The document 110 is displayed in the work area of the application 100, and a document tools pane 135 is illustrated to the right of the document 110. As should be understood, the display illustrated in FIG. 1 is by way of example only, and the components illustrated in FIG. 1 may be organized in a variety of different ways pleasing to the user. That is, the document tools pane may be located on the bottom of the screen display, to the left of the document 110, or according to other orientations allowed by the application 100.


A detailed discussion of the creation and implementation of the “smart” document 110 illustrated in FIG. 1 follows below, but generally described according to an embodiment of the present invention, once the user places her computer cursor within a particular section of the document 110, for example the “objectives” section 125 illustrated in FIG. 1, the user is provided with tools and help content in the document tools pane 135. For example, if the user places her computer cursor in the “objectives” section 125, the user may be provided with “Objective Writing Tips” 155 shown in the document tools pane 135. Selection of the “Objective Writing Tips” 155, as illustrated in FIG. 1, causes a display of “Objective Writing Tips” text 160 that provide the user with helpful information as to how to complete the “objectives” section the performance review document 110, illustrated in FIG. 1. If the user moves the cursor to a different section of the document, for example the personal information section 120, information provided in the document tools pane 135 will be provided to give the user assistance with the completion of the personal information section 120.


In addition to helpful information to assist the user, a variety of document tools and actions 145 are provided. For example, the “Submit Review” action may allow the user to submit the completed document 110 to her supervisor or to her employee after completion of the document. The “Open Last Review” action may allow the user to open the last performance review so that she may determine whether she completed her objectives as set forth in the last review. If the document in use by the user is some other type of document, for example a resume document, helpful information in the document tools pane might include information on preparing the “education” section, the “experience” section, and/or the “personal information” section. A will document 110 might be associated with helpful information regarding legal rules for preparation of wills, rules regarding estate beneficiaries, and the like.


In addition to the document actions and help content illustrated in the pane 135, a variety of document controls may be provided, including radio buttons, text boxes, check boxes, ActiveX controls, XML tree controls, and the like. For example, a text box may be provided to allow a user to select from a list of pre-written text items. Or, the user may be allowed to enter text in a list box provided in the pane 135 that will then be inserted into the document or used by the application with respect to some other functionality of the application. A radio button or check box may be provided to allow the user to select from different choices of document actions or help content. For example, if the document is a will, check boxes may be provided with which the user may select “married,” “single,” etc., to obtain help information based on the user's personal will and estate profile.


Referring to FIG. 2, a general system architecture for creating and utilizing a “smart” document 110 in accordance with the present invention is illustrated. A software application 100, as described above, is opened on the user's computer 20 to create or edit a document 110 according to the present invention. A schema library 105 is provided for containing all of the executable files required for providing the contextually sensitive functionality to the document 110. For example, the schema library may include a variety of components, including individual modular software routines that have been compiled and dynamically linked and that are ready to use by the application 100 for providing contextually sensitive functionality to the document 110.


Such components may include a number of dynamically-linked libraries (dll), which include executable files or routines stored separately from the software application 110. The dlls are loaded by the software application 100 only when they are needed to provide functionality to the document 110. Additionally, as described in detail below, the schema library 105 may include a number of Extensible Markup Language (XML) files for providing contextually sensitive functionality in association with XML structure that has been applied to the document 110.


A solution property 115 is included in the document 110 for pointing the document to a particular solution contained in the schema library 105. The solution location property 118 provides the document 110 and the application 100 with information as to the location of the solution property in the schema library or to a remote location provided via a distributed computing environment, such as is provided from a web-based server via the Internet.


According to the present invention, and as described in detail below, when a user focuses on a particular portion of the document 110, such as the “objectives” section of the performance review 110 illustrated in FIG. 1, a solution property 115 points the document to the “objectives” section help solution illustrated in the document tools pane 135. The solution location 118 provides the document 110 and the application 100 with the location of the components, dlls, or XML files necessary for implementing that solution. As should be understood, exemplary components may include components for drawing the document tools pane 135, components for displaying the information associated with the particular context, in this case the “objectives” section, and components for executing document actions such as “Submit Review” action 145.



FIG. 3 and the following discussion are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment in which the invention may be implemented. While the invention will be described in the general context of an application program that runs on an operating system in conjunction with a personal computer, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention also may be implemented in combination with other program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, cell phones, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.


With reference to FIG. 3, an exemplary system for implementing the invention includes a conventional personal computer 20, including a processing unit 21, a system memory 22, and a system bus 23 that couples the system memory to the processing unit 21. The system memory 22 includes read-only memory (ROM) 24 and random access memory (RAM) 25. A basic input/output system 26 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the personal computer 20, such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 24. The personal computer 20 further includes a hard disk drive 27, a magnetic disk drive 28, e.g., to read from or write to a removable disk 29, and an optical disk drive 30, e.g., for reading a CD-ROM disk 31 or to read from or write to other optical media. The hard disk drive 27, magnetic disk drive 28, and optical disk drive 30 are connected to the system bus 23 by a hard disk drive interface 32, a magnetic disk drive interface 33, and an optical drive interface 34, respectively. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide non-volatile storage for the personal computer 20. Although the description of computer-readable media above refers to a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk and a CD-ROM disk, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of media which are readable by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, Bernoulli cartridges, and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment.


A number of program modules may be stored in the drives and RAM 25, including an operating system 35, one or more application programs 100, a word processor program module 37 (or other type of program module), program data, such as the manifest 38, and other program modules (not shown).


A user may enter commands and information into the personal computer 20 through a keyboard 40 and pointing device, such as a mouse 42. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 21 through a serial port interface 46 that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a game port or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 47 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 23 via an interface, such as a video adapter 48. In addition to the monitor, personal computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers or printers.


The personal computer 20 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 49. The remote computer 49 may be a server, a router, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the personal computer 20, although only a memory storage device 50 has been illustrated in FIG. 3. The logical connections depicted in FIG. 3 include a local area network (LAN) 51 and a wide area network (WAN) 52. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the Internet.


When used in a LAN networking environment, the personal computer 20 is connected to the LAN 51 through a network interface 53. When used in a WAN networking environment, the personal computer 20 typically includes a modem 54 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 52, such as the Internet. The modem 54, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 23 via the serial port interface 46. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the personal computer 20, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a method of creating a “smart” document 110 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The method 300 begins at start step 305 and proceeds to step 310 where an XML schema is attached to the document. As is understood by those skilled in the art, a schema sets up the grammar and rules associated with Extensible Markup Language (XML) tags applied to the document 110 to provide XML structure to the document 110. The schema attached to the document 110 illustrated in FIG. 1 may set out all of the grammatical, data type and data content rules allowed for tags associated with the document 110. For example, the “personal information” section 120, which includes the name, e-mail name, title, and employee identification for the employee, may have schema that requires that data entered into the “name” block must be in the form of “first name,” followed by “middle name,” followed by “last name.”


As understood by those skilled in the art of Extensible Markup Language usage, once that portion of the document 110 is annotated with XML structure corresponding to the “name” element, for example, manipulation of data entered into that section of the document may be performed by software components without regard to the actual content of the data so long as the content was entered according to the schema prescribed for that portion of the document.


At step 315, the document 110 is annotated with XML structure that will be associated with tools and help functionality for providing contextually sensitive functionality to the document as described above. A simplified XML structure annotation for the employee review document 110 illustrated in FIG. 1 is as follows.












Sample XML Structure

















<Employee Review>



  <Personal Information>



  <Name>



    <first_name>Joe</first_name>



    <last_name>Smith</last_name>



  </Name>



  <email Name>



    <email>Joe@Address.com</email>



  </email Name>



    *



    *



    *



</Employee Review>










The schema attached to the document 110 prescribes the data type and data structure rules entered within the XML document structure. As should be understood, the XML structure illustrated above is simplified in nature, and is provided for purposes of illustration only. A sample XML schema associated with the example XML structure above is as follows.












Sample Schema















  <xsd:schema   xmlns:xsd=“http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema”


xmlns=“urn:reviewForm”


    targetNamespace=“urn:reviewForm”


    elementFormDefault=“qualified”>


   <xsd:annotation>


   <xsd:documentation xml:lang=“en”>


    The schema for the August 2001 Microsoft employee review


    form.


   </xsd:documentation>


   </xsd:annotation>


  <xsd:element name=“Review” type=“ReviewType” />


  <xsd:complexType name=“EmployeeManagerResponsesType”>


    <xsd:all>


      <xsd:element name=“EmployeeResponse”


      type=“xsd:string” />


      <xsd:element name=“ManagerResponse”


      type=“xsd:string” />


    </xsd:all>


  </xsd:complexType>


  <xsd:simpleType name=“RatingScore”>


   <xsd:restriction base=“xsd:decimal”>


      <xsd:enumeration value=“2.5” />


      <xsd:enumeration value=“3.0” />


      <xsd:enumeration value=“3.5” />


      <xsd:enumeration value=“4.0” />


      <xsd:enumeration value=“4.5” />


      <xsd:enumeration value=“5.0” />


   </xsd:restriction>


  </xsd:simpleType>


  <xsd:complexType name=“RatingType”>


    <xsd:all>


      <xsd:element name=“EmployeeRating”


      type=“RatingScore” />


      <xsd:element name=“EmployeeComments”


      type=“xsd:string” />


      <xsd:element name=“ManagerRating”


      type=“RatingScore” />


      <xsd:element name=“ManagerComments”


      type=“xsd:string” />


    </xsd:all>


  </xsd:complexType>


  <xsd:complexType name=“IdentityType”>


    <xsd:all>


      <xsd:element name=“Name” type=“xsd:string” />


      <xsd:element name=“Alias” type=“xsd:string” />


      <xsd:element name=“Title” type=“xsd:string” />


      <xsd:element name=“EmployeeID”


type=“xsd:positiveInteger” />


      <xsd:element name=“Reviewer” type=“xsd:string” />


      <xsd:element name=“Department” type=“xsd:string” />


      <xsd:element name=“Date” type=“xsd:date” />


    </xsd:all>


  </xsd:complexType>


  <xsd:complexType name=“ReviewType” mixed=“true”>


    <xsd:all>


    <xsd:element name=“ReviewPeriod” type=“xsd:string” />


    <xsd:element name=“Identity” type=“IdentityType” />


    <xsd:element         name=“CurrentObjectives”


type=“EmployeeManagerResponsesType” />


    <xsd:element         name=“FutureObjectives”


type=“EmployeeManagerResponsesType” />


    <xsd:element       name=“StrengthsAndWeaknesses”


type=“EmployeeManagerResponsesType” />


    <xsd:element name=“Ratings” type=“RatingType” />


    </xsd:all>


  </xsd:complexType>


  </xsd:schema>










At step 320, the document 110 is saved along with the associated document schema and XML structure.


At step 325, software programming code is written that is necessary to display and handle tools, controls and actions in the document tools pane 135 according to the position of the user's cursor within the document 110. The code written at step 325 includes all required XML files, including Extensible Style Sheet Language (XSL) files, including XSL transformations and XSL formatting objects. As understood by those skilled in the art, XSL transformations include files containing specific rules by which one XML document is transformed into another XML document. As should be understood by those skilled in the art, all XML files, including XML documents and XML transformation documents, are written for processing the document 110 as an XML-structured document.


According to one embodiment, an XML schema may be written to define a list of document actions, controls and help content that are associated with a solution or contextual subset of a solution that are correspondingly associated with XML structure (elements) in the document. The XML schema may be written using any editing tool or XML schema editing tool to create an instance of the schema. The XML schema may be written to include directly in the XML schema all of the properties of the schema and a list of the document actions, controls and help content to be displayed. An exemplary XML schema is set out above.


Other code written for the document 110 at step 325 includes all of the components, such as dynamic-link libraries (dll), needed by the application 100 and the document 110 for providing the contextually sensitive functionality to the document 110, as described with reference to FIG. 1. For example, a dll in the form of an application programming interface (API) may be written to call on a particular solution contained in the schema library 105 when the computer cursor is located by the user within a particular context of the document 110. That is, when the computer cursor is placed within a particular section or portion of the document 110, such as the “name” portion, an application program interface is included for finding the solution property 115 associated with the “name” portion of the document 110 and for calling that solution to provide document tools, actions and help content associated with the “name” portion of the document.


Other exemplary components that are written at step 325 include components for drawing the document tools pane 135 and for displaying textual information associated with the XML elements in the document 110 within which the computer cursor is presently located. Other components may include modular software routines for displaying an action, such as a “submit review” button, for allowing the user to submit the review to a third party, such as the user's employee or the user's supervisor. Still other components may be included for drawing and for providing functionality to controls, such as radio buttons, text boxes and check boxes, as described above with reference to FIG. 1. Any component object model add-ins that may be needed to provide functionality according to the present invention are also written at step 325. In addition to software components necessary providing the document tools and help functionality described herein, the actual text of help content that is drawn into the pane 135 is assembled for deployment when a corresponding help topic is called.


Controls, such as radio buttons, text boxes and check boxes, may be provided in the pane 135 without an associated schema being attached to the document. By declaring that a control is associated with a particular XML element, that control may be provided at the top of the pane 135 above other actions, controls and help topics prescribed by the schema. Similarly, a control may be provided immediately above all other items, including those described above, in the pane 135 by declaring that the control is associated with the entire schema for the document rather than to individual XML elements prescribed by the schema.


All of the aforementioned files, components, component add-ins, dlls, schema files, and XML files are assembled and stored for use by the application 100 in providing the contextually sensitive functionality of the document 110. The schema library 105 may be in the form of a database containing pointers to the aforementioned stored components that may be stored in the memory of the computer 20 in various locations, including the computer's registry.


According to embodiment of the present invention, an application programming interface (API) is provided for implementing the functionality of the present invention to provide a “smart” document solution to the document 110. The API includes properties and methods or instructions that are called upon when a particular action is initiated, for example, opening the document 110 that in turn points to a solution, as described above. Listed below is sample computer programming code for implementing the “smart” document API. The sample code listed below is not limiting of variations that may be made in computer programming code that may be written for implementing the API according to the present invention.


Sample Smart Document API


Implements ISmartDocument


Private Sub ISmartDocument SmartDocInitialize(ByVal document As Object, ByVal bstrSolutionPath As String)


Private Property Get ISmartDocument_SmartDocXMLTypeCount( ) As Long


Private Property Get ISmartDocument_SmartDocXMLTypeName(ByVal smartDocID As Long) As String


Private Property Get ISmartDocument_SmartDocXMLTypeCaption(ByVal smartDocID As Long, ByVal LocaleID As Long) As String


Private Property Get ISmartDocument_ControlCount(ByVal SmartDocXMLTypeName As String) As Long


Private Property Get ISmartDocument_ControlID(ByVal SmartDocXMLTypeName As String, ByVal ControlIndex As Long) As Long


Private Property Get ISmartDocument_ControlTypeFromID(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long) As C_TYPE


Private Property Get ISmartDocument_ControlNameFromID(ByVal ControlID As Long) As String


Private Property Get ISmartDocument_IsControlDynamic(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long) As Boolean


Private Property Get ISmartDocument_ControlCaptionFromID(ByVal ControlIDAs Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object) As String


Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateRadioGroup(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, List( ) As String, count As Long, InitialSelected As Long)


Private Sub ISmartDocument OnRadioGroupSelectChange(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Selected As Long, ByVal Value As String)


Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateImage(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, ImageSrc As String)


Private Sub ISmartDocument_ImageClick(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal


ApplicationName As String, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Text As String, ByVal Xml As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal XCoordinate As Long, ByVal YCoordinate As Long)


Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateDocumentFragment(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, DocumentFragment As String)


Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateActiveXProps(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, PropBag As SmartTagLib.IActiveXProperties)


Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateCheckbox(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, Checked As Boolean)


Private Sub ISmartDocument OnCheckboxChange(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Checked As Boolean)


Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateListOrComboContent(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, List( ) As String, count As Long, InitialSelected As Long, IsEditable As Boolean, ControlOnSameLine As Boolean)


Private Sub ISmartDocument OnListOrComboSelectChange(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Selected As Long, ByVal Value As String)


Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateTextboxContent(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, Value As String, ControlOnSameLine As Boolean)


Private Sub ISmartDocument_OnTextboxContentChange(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Value As String)


Private Sub ISmartDocument_PopulateHelpContent(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, Content As String)


Private Sub ISmartDocument_InvokeControl(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Text As String, ByVal Xml As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long)


A number of properties and methods are included in the API listed above. The SmartDoclnitialize method includes routines and instructions executed when the API is called upon to provide “smart” document functionality to the docket 110. The SmartDocXMLTypeCount property includes the number of XML element types associated with the solution. The SmartDocXMLTypeName property includes unique identifiers for the XML element types associated with the “smart” document solution. The SmartDocXMLTypeCaption property includes captions associated with XML elements that may be included in a menu or pane such as the help pane 135.


The ControlCount property includes the number of controls associated with the “smart” document solution for a particular XML element type. The ControlID property includes unique identifiers for the controls. The ControlTypeFromID property includes the types of controls available for use with an associated solution, for example, radio buttons, textboxes, and check boxes. The ControlNameFromID property returns a name associated with each control for use internally by a given application program 100.


The PopulateRadioGroup method includes routines and instructions that are executed for populating radio control buttons within a menu or pane such as the help pane 135. The OnRadioGroupSelectChange method includes routines and instructions that are executed when a radio group (radio button) is selected or deselected.


The PopulateImage method includes routines and instructions that are executed for populating an image associated with a solution, such as an image populated within the help pane 135. The ImageClick method includes routines and instructions that are executed when an image is selected by a user.


The PopulateDocumentFragment method includes routines and instructions that are executed for populating the user interface with text or data. The PopulateActiveXProps method includes routines and instructions that are executed for obtaining ActiveX functionality associated with a document solution.


The PopulateCheckbox method includes routines and instructions for providing a checkbox control in a user interface such as the help pane 135. The OnCheckboxChange method includes routines and instructions that are executed when a checkbox control is selected or deselected by a user.


The PopulateListOrComboContent method includes routines and instructions that are executed to populate a list box control in a user interface such as the pane 135. The OnListOrComboSelectChange method includes routines and instructions that are executed upon the selection of an item in a list box control.


The PopulateTextboxContent method includes routines and instructions for populating a textbox in a user interface such as the pane 135. The OnTextboxContentChange method includes routines and instructions that are executed for handling an event associated with the change of content in a textbox control within a user interface such as the pane 135.


The PopulateHelpContent method includes routines and instructions for populating a help content field within the pane 135 with required text or data. The InvokeControl method includes routines and instructions that are executed when a control such as a radio button, textbox, or checkbox is selected or deselected.


Referring still to FIG. 4, at step 330, a determination is made as to whether the document 110 may work in a client-server operation. That is, components providing contextually sensitive functionality to the application 110, or updates or changes to those components, may be stored at a remote server location separate from the computer 20. If the document is to be enabled to obtain necessary components for operation of the application and document from a remote server location, the method proceeds to step 335, and server code is written to a server location for responding to client-side actions performed by the user at the computer 20. That is, application programming interfaces for corresponding between the computer 20 and a remote server 49 are written for obtaining server-based data and application components necessary for providing the contextually sensitive functionality of the present invention. If it is desired that the application point to a remote server for data and application components, a solution location identifier, such as a solution URL, is added to point the application to a location on the remote server to obtain the necessary data and application components.


At step 340, a manifest of all of the programming components described above is created for identifying the list of components, dlls, schema files, and XML files that will be used to provide various solutions and functionality to the document 110. A pointer is added to the document 110 for pointing the document to the manifest of components for obtaining functionality provided by individual and various components. For a detailed description of the manifest, see U.S. Patent Application entitled “Mechanism for Downloading Software Components From A Remote Source For Use By A Local Software Application,” Ser. No. 10/164,260, filed Jun. 5, 2002, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set out herein. At step 350, all files, code, and changes to the document 110 are saved, and the document creation method ends at step 390. Accordingly, the document 110 is now in a condition to be opened and utilized by a user.



FIG. 5 refers to the steps involved in opening and utilizing the document 110. For purposes of example only, the employee performance review document 110 is described with reference to the steps involved in opening a “smart” document created and implemented in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The method 400 begins at start step 405, and proceeds to step 410 where the application 100 is booted by the user. As is understood by those skilled in the art, the application 100 may be booted by selecting the application or by selecting a document 110 created with the application 100.


At step 415, the user selects the document 110 for opening in a manner consistent with the application 100. At step 420, a determination is made as to whether the document 110 refers to a solution. That is, at step 420, a determination is made as to whether the document 110 is annotated with pointers to a solution or to multiple solutions for providing contextually sensitive tools and help information to the document, as described above. As a part of the check to determine whether the document 110 points to a solution or to multiple solutions, a determination is also made as to whether a schema has been attached to the document as described above. If the document does refer to a solution, for example a solution for providing the user with assistance in preparation of the user's employee review document 110, the method proceeds to step 425 and the application 100 calls the schema library 105 to determine whether the solution referred to by the document 110 is stored in the schema library 105. At the schema library, the determination includes a determination as to what components in the schema library are necessary; that is, what components are associated with the solution I.D. For example, the document 110 may have a schema attached to define the rules governing the XML structure of the document 110, but that was created without reference to a particular solution.


At step 430, a determination is made as to whether the solution is stored in the schema library. As should be understood, multiple solutions may be attached to the document 110. For example, a first solution might include helpful information and actions to provide contextually sensitive information regarding completion of the document 110 by a particular user. A second solution may be attached to the document 110 for providing information to a supervisor of the user so that the contextually sensitive information provided to the supervisor will give the supervisor information as to how to evaluate each section of the employee's review document.


If multiple solutions are referred to by the document 110, a prompt may be provided to the user, such as the dialog box 500, illustrated in FIG. 6, to notify the user that multiple solutions are available for this document. The user may then select one solution from the list of solutions for providing the desired functionality to the user after the document opens.


At step 435, a determination is made as to whether the user actually wants the solution to be provided to the user after the document 110 is opened. As should be understood, a dialog box similar to the dialog box 500 may be presented to the user to query the user as to whether she desires the help content and tools functionality. The user may have completed the document 110 on numerous occasions and may not now desire additional help functionality or action functionality. If desired, the user may elect to always receive the solution upon opening the document 110. Similarly, the user may elect to have the document 110 via the application 100 check for updates to the solution each time the document 110 is opened.


If the user declines the solution, the method proceeds to step 455, and the document is opened without “smart” document solutions according to the normal procedures required and implemented by the application 100. If the user does desire the functionality of the solution referred to by the document 110, the method proceeds to step 440, and the solution is loaded for use by the application 100 and document 110. As should be understood by those skilled in the art, loading the solution includes calls from the document 110 via the application 100 to all necessary files, dlls, component add-ins, and XML files associated with the solution and stored in the schema library 105.


Upon being called by the document 110, each called file is registered with the application 100 via the computer's operating system, and a path is established between each called file and the application 100 and document 110 for provision of the functionality associated with each file. For example, if a particular dll that is used for drawing the document tools pane 135 must be assigned a registry key for proper communication with the application 100 and document 110, this registration process is performed during the load solution step 440. At step 445, the “smart” document 110 is opened and is displayed on the user's computer screen, as illustrated in FIG. 1.


Referring back to step 420, if the document does not refer to a solution, the method proceeds to step 450, and a determination is made as to whether a schema has been attached to the document. If the document has an attached schema, but no reference to a particular solution, the method proceeds to step 430 and a “check” is made of the schema library as to whether a solution does exist that may be associated with the schema that is attached to the document 110. That is, even where no solution is referred to in the document 110, the schema library may have solutions that have been obtained by the user of the computer 20 subsequent to the creation of the document 110 that may be utilized by the document 110 even though the document 110 was not originally created to refer to the solution.


If a solution does exist in the schema library for the document 110, the method proceeds to step 435, and the steps thereafter, as described above. If a schema is not attached to the document 110, the method proceeds to step 455, and the document is opened without “smart” document solutions.


Referring back to step 430, if no solution(s) are found in the schema library associated with the solution referred to by the document 110 or associated with the attached schema, the method proceeds to step 460, and a determination is made as to whether the user would like to download a solution. At step 460, the user may be “prompted” by the application 100 and informed that the document 110 will work more efficiently, or will be more useful, if the user downloads certain help and action functionality to the user's document 110. The user may be provided with a “prompt” in the form of a dialog box, such as the dialog box 600 illustrated in FIG. 7. A number of queries may be made to the user to ask the user whether the user would like components comprising the desired solution to be downloaded according to a number of methods. If the user declines to download solution functionality and components, the method proceeds back to step 455, and the document is opened without “smart” document solutions as described above.


If the user desires to download the solution(s) offered to the user, the method proceeds to step 465. At step 465, components necessary for providing the desired solution(s) to the document 110 are downloaded to the user's computer 20 from some remote source, such as a remote web-based server. In order to locate the remote source, the application 100 uses the solution location pointer 118 from the document 110 to locate and obtain the necessary solution components. For a detailed description of a mechanism for downloading data and application components and other software modules from a remote location to the application 110, see U.S. Patent Application entitled “Mechanism for Downloading Software Components From A Remote Source For Use By A Local Software Application,” Ser. No. 10/164,260, filed Jun. 5, 2002, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set out herein. At step 470, the downloaded solutions are loaded into the client-side schema library 105, and the solution is loaded as described above so that the document 110 will include the functionality of the solution.



FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating a method for determining what to display in the document tools pane 135 after a document 110 is opened with a “smart” document solution. For purposes of the description of the steps illustrated with reference to FIG. 8, the document 110 has been opened with a “smart” document solution which has been loaded and is running. By way of example, consider that the user has placed the computer cursor in a particular location with the document 110, such as the “objectives” section 125.


The method 700 begins at start step 705, and proceeds to step 710, where a list of XML elements that surround the cursor is generated. The position of the cursor within the XML hierarchy is located, and the X-path expression to get to the position where the cursor is located is determined. For example, referring to the simplified XML code set forth above, the cursor may be located within the “e-mail” tag and inside the larger XML tree within the “employee review” tag.


At step 715, a determination is made as to which tools and help content should appear in the document tools pane 135. To make this determination, the application 100 enters a look-up table stored on the client computer 20 that contains information about which XML elements have which particular tools, help content, controls, etc., associated with those XML elements. For example, if the cursor is located in the “e-mail name” element within the “personal information” section 120, the application 100 will enter the look-up table to determine which particular tools or help content are associated with the e-mail name element.


Each document action, help item, and control associated with each element is populated with a unique identification (ID) associated with each XML element to which it is applied so that the application 100 may readily locate the actions, help items, or tools associated with the XML element. At step 720, a determination is made as to whether any of the actions, help items, or controls are dynamic. A control may appear differently based on the context or background information for the context. The “objectives” section of the review document 110 may be associated with a “Submit Review” button when the section is completed. On the other hand, if the section is not completed, the “Submit Review” button may not appear in the pane 135 because the document should not be submitted without the completed “objections” section. Accordingly, the “Submit Review” button in this case may be identified as dynamic at step 720, and the method then proceeds to step 725. At step 725, the document 110 via the application 100 calls the component representing the “Submit Review” button and provides that component with the context of the cursor position, for example, whether the “objectives” element has been completed or not.


At step 730, after a determination has been made that the actions, help content, or controls are static or dynamic, the contents of the document tools pane 135 are drawn on the user's computer screen adjacent to the document 110, as illustrated in FIG. 1. At step 735, a determination is made as to whether the cursor is moved to a new context. For example, after the user completes an entry in the “objectives” section 125, the user may move the cursor to the “personal information” section 120 to complete that section. If the cursor does not move, the method proceeds to step 790 and ends. That is, as long as the cursor stays in the current context, no additional changes are made to the content of the document tools pane 135. If the cursor is moved to a new context within the document, the method proceeds back to step 710 where a new list of XML elements containing the cursor is generated, and the method proceeds on as described above to provide new content in the document tools pane 135 associated with the new position and context of the cursor.


Referring back to FIG. 1, the following is a description of the tools and help content drawn in the document tools pane 135. The particular text and controls illustrated in FIG. 1 are by way of example only, and vary with the context of the cursor position as described above. The name 140 is a name for the document XML element associated with the actions and tools shown in the document tools pane 135. The name may refer to the schema that is attached to the document, for example, employee performance review form, or the name 140 may refer to the XML element in which the cursor is currently located. For example, if the cursor is located in the “objectives” section, the name 140 may be re-drawn as “objectives section.” The document actions 145 are displayed based on the cursor context and based on whether the actions are static or dynamic. As set forth above, the “Submit Review” action, for example, may be a dynamic action that is not displayed in the document actions pane 135 if all required sections of the document 110 have not been completed. The “Last Years Objectives” help topic 155 is shown in a collapsed display. Selecting the “+” expands the help topic to display additional sub-topics contained therein. The “Objective Writing Tips” help topic is shown in an expanded view, showing the full content 160 available under that help topic. If an XML element within the document 110 has no “smart” document actions or tools associated with it, that XML element is not shown or identified in the document tools pane 135.


Help topics and tools may be nested, meaning that sub-help topics and sub-actions may be included in help topics and document tools. If the cursor is in multiple elements because of nesting, then the number of sections in the document tools pane 135 can be greater than two. In this case, the nested elements are shown in order of nesting where the outermost element is at the top of the document tools pane 135 and innermost element is at the bottom of the document tools pane 135. If the elements, actions, tools, and help content do not fit on one page, a scroll bar may be provided, as illustrated in FIG. 1, that will extend over the entire document tools pane 135. Action and help content are listed in the order in which the dlls, or components that provide them to the document 110 return their names in response to a call from the application 100. According to one embodiment, XML elements that are not associated with actions, controls or help topics are not shown to the user. If desired, however, all XML elements may be shown in the pane 135 to make the user aware of the complete XML structure of the document 110.


Accordingly, after the document 110 is opened, and the “smart” document solution is loaded and implemented as described above, the user of the document 110 may now enter the document and complete the document with the help of the “smart” document functionality provided in the document tools pane 135. As the user moves the computer cursor through various sections of the document that are tagged with XML structure, the user may be provided with helpful information and tools associated with that portion of the document.


It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications or variations may be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein.

Claims
  • 1. A method for providing contextually sensitive functionality to a computer-generated document, the method comprising: attaching an Extensible Markup Language (XML) schema to the document defining at least one of the following: permissible data content, data type and data structure for the document;annotating particular portions of the document with XML elements;associating a solution with a portion of the document, wherein the solution comprises at least one of the following: a document control and a document action associated with content of the document;assembling a plurality of software components for providing the solution to the document; andproviding a contextually sensitive user interface upon a user selecting the portion of the document for editing document content within the portion of the document, the contextually sensitive user interface providing at least one of the following: the document control and the document action configured to be employed in editing the document content, wherein providing the contextually sensitive user interface comprises providing a contextual sensitive user interface having editable elements, the editable elements enabling a user to edit textual content within the document.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein providing the contextually sensitive user interface comprises: providing the contextually sensitive user interface for displaying the solution, anddisplaying the solution in the contextually sensitive user interface.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein assembling the plurality of software components comprises retrieving a software component from a remote location in a distributed computing environment.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein annotating portions of the document with the XML elements comprises annotating the XML elements so as to be with one of a plurality of text strings and a plurality of data elements within the document.
  • 5. A method for providing contextually sensitive functionality to a computer-generated document, the method comprising: attaching an Extensible Markup Language (XML) schema to the document defining data structure for the document;structuring the document to associate the document with the XML schema;associating a solution with the document structure, wherein the solution comprises at least one of the following: a document control and a document action associated with editing document content;assembling a plurality of software components for providing the solution to the document;receiving a request for the solution; andproviding the solution in a contextually sensitive user interface for the document, the contextually sensitive user interface providing the solution to assist a user in editing the document content, wherein providing the contextually sensitive user interface comprises providing a contextual sensitive user interface having editable elements, the editable elements enabling a user to edit textual content within the document.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein receiving the request for the solution comprises receiving a selection of a portion of the document.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, wherein assembling the plurality of software components comprises retrieving a software component from a remote location in a distributed computing environment.
  • 8. The method of claim 5, wherein attaching the XML schema to the document comprises attaching the XML schema to the document wherein the XML elements are associated with one of a plurality of text strings and a plurality of data elements within the document.
  • 9. A computer-readable storage device that stores a set of instructions which when executed perform a method for providing contextually sensitive functionality to a computer-generated document, the method executed by the set of instructions comprising: attaching an Extensible Markup Language (XML) schema to the document defining permissible data content to be edited within the document;structuring the document to associate the document with the XML schema by annotating particular portions of the document with XML elements;associating a solution with the document structure, wherein the solution comprises at least one of the following: at least one document control and at least one document action associated with editing the data content of the document within the permissible data content definition;assembling a plurality of software components for providing the solution to the document; andproviding a contextually sensitive user interface upon a user selecting a portion of the document, the contextually sensitive user interface being configured to provide the solution to assist a user in editing the data content of the document with the solution, wherein providing the contextually sensitive user interface comprises providing a contextual sensitive user interface having editable elements, the editable elements enabling a user to edit textual content within the document.
  • 10. The computer-readable storage device of claim 9, further comprising: launching the contextually sensitive user interface for displaying each document action obtained for use by the document; anddisplaying each document action in the contextually sensitive user interface.
  • 11. The computer-readable storage device of claim 9, wherein assembling the plurality of software components comprises retrieving a software component from a remote location in a distributed computing environment.
  • 12. The computer-readable storage device of claim 9, wherein attaching the XML schema to the document comprises attaching the XML schema to the document wherein the XML elements are associated with one of a plurality of text strings and a plurality of data elements within the document.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/164,960, filed Jun. 6, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,356,537 which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (377)
Number Name Date Kind
4674065 Lange et al. Jun 1987 A
4868750 Kucera et al. Sep 1989 A
5020019 Ogawa May 1991 A
5128865 Sadler Jul 1992 A
5159552 van Gasteren et al. Oct 1992 A
5267155 Buchanan et al. Nov 1993 A
5287448 Nicol et al. Feb 1994 A
5297039 Kanaegami et al. Mar 1994 A
5317546 Balch et al. May 1994 A
5337233 Hofert et al. Aug 1994 A
5341293 Vertelney et al. Aug 1994 A
5351190 Kondo Sep 1994 A
5386564 Shearer et al. Jan 1995 A
5392386 Chalas Feb 1995 A
5418902 West et al. May 1995 A
5446891 Kaplan et al. Aug 1995 A
5522089 Kikinis et al. May 1996 A
5535323 Miller et al. Jul 1996 A
5541836 Church et al. Jul 1996 A
5546521 Martinez Aug 1996 A
5581684 Dudzik et al. Dec 1996 A
5596700 Darnell et al. Jan 1997 A
5617565 Augenbraun et al. Apr 1997 A
5625783 Ezekiel et al. Apr 1997 A
5627567 Davidson May 1997 A
5627958 Potts et al. May 1997 A
5634019 Koppolu et al. May 1997 A
5640560 Smith Jun 1997 A
5657259 Davis et al. Aug 1997 A
5685000 Cox, Jr. Nov 1997 A
5708825 Sotomayor Jan 1998 A
5715415 Dazey et al. Feb 1998 A
5717923 Dedrick Feb 1998 A
5752022 Chiu et al. May 1998 A
5761689 Rayson et al. Jun 1998 A
5764794 Perlin Jun 1998 A
5765156 Guzak et al. Jun 1998 A
5781189 Holleran et al. Jul 1998 A
5781904 Oren et al. Jul 1998 A
5794257 Liu et al. Aug 1998 A
5799068 Kikinis et al. Aug 1998 A
5802253 Gross et al. Sep 1998 A
5802262 Van De Vanter Sep 1998 A
5802299 Logan et al. Sep 1998 A
5802530 van Hoff Sep 1998 A
5805911 Miller Sep 1998 A
5809318 Rivette et al. Sep 1998 A
5815830 Anthony Sep 1998 A
5818447 Wolf et al. Oct 1998 A
5821931 Berquist et al. Oct 1998 A
5822539 van Hoff Oct 1998 A
5822720 Bookman et al. Oct 1998 A
5826025 Gramlich Oct 1998 A
5832100 Lawton et al. Nov 1998 A
5845077 Fawcett Dec 1998 A
5855007 Jovicic et al. Dec 1998 A
5859636 Pandit Jan 1999 A
5872973 Mitchell et al. Feb 1999 A
5875443 Nielsen Feb 1999 A
5877757 Baldwin et al. Mar 1999 A
5884266 Dvorak Mar 1999 A
5892919 Nielsen Apr 1999 A
5893073 Kasso et al. Apr 1999 A
5893132 Huffman et al. Apr 1999 A
5895461 De La Huerga et al. Apr 1999 A
5896321 Miller et al. Apr 1999 A
5900004 Gipson May 1999 A
5907704 Gudmundson et al. May 1999 A
5907852 Yamada May 1999 A
5913214 Madnick et al. Jun 1999 A
5920859 Li Jul 1999 A
5924099 Guzak et al. Jul 1999 A
5933139 Feigner et al. Aug 1999 A
5933140 Strahom et al. Aug 1999 A
5933498 Schneck et al. Aug 1999 A
5940614 Allen et al. Aug 1999 A
5944787 Zoken Aug 1999 A
5946647 Miller et al. Aug 1999 A
5948061 Merriman et al. Sep 1999 A
5956681 Yamakita Sep 1999 A
5974413 Beauregard et al. Oct 1999 A
5987480 Donohue et al. Nov 1999 A
5991719 Yazaki et al. Nov 1999 A
5995756 Herrmann Nov 1999 A
6006265 Rangan et al. Dec 1999 A
6006279 Hayes Dec 1999 A
6014616 Kim Jan 2000 A
6018761 Uomini Jan 2000 A
6028605 Conrad et al. Feb 2000 A
6029135 Krasle Feb 2000 A
6029171 Smiga et al. Feb 2000 A
6031525 Perlin Feb 2000 A
6052531 Waldin et al. Apr 2000 A
6061516 Yoshikawa et al. May 2000 A
6067087 Krauss et al. May 2000 A
6072475 Van Ketwich Jun 2000 A
6073090 Fortune et al. Jun 2000 A
6085201 Tso Jul 2000 A
6088711 Fein et al. Jul 2000 A
6092074 Rodkin et al. Jul 2000 A
6108640 Slotznick Aug 2000 A
6108674 Murakami et al. Aug 2000 A
6112209 Gusack Aug 2000 A
6121968 Arcuri et al. Sep 2000 A
6122647 Horowitz et al. Sep 2000 A
6126306 Ando Oct 2000 A
6137911 Zhilyaev Oct 2000 A
6141005 Hetherington et al. Oct 2000 A
6151643 Cheng et al. Nov 2000 A
6154738 Call Nov 2000 A
6167469 Safai et al. Dec 2000 A
6167523 Strong Dec 2000 A
6167568 Gandel et al. Dec 2000 A
6173316 De Boor et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182029 Friedman Jan 2001 B1
6185550 Snow et al. Feb 2001 B1
6185576 McIntosh Feb 2001 B1
6199046 Heinzle et al. Mar 2001 B1
6199081 Meyerzon et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208338 Fischer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6219698 Iannucci et al. Apr 2001 B1
6246404 Feigner et al. Jun 2001 B1
6262728 Alexander Jul 2001 B1
6272074 Winner Aug 2001 B1
6272505 De La Huerga Aug 2001 B1
6282489 Bellesfield et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289513 Bentwich Sep 2001 B1
6291785 Koga et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292768 Chan Sep 2001 B1
6295061 Park et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297822 Feldman Oct 2001 B1
6300950 Clark et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308171 De La Huerga Oct 2001 B1
6311152 Bai et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311177 Dauerer et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311194 Sheth et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320496 Sokoler et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323853 Hedloy Nov 2001 B1
6336125 Noda et al. Jan 2002 B2
6336131 Wolfe Jan 2002 B1
6338059 Fields et al. Jan 2002 B1
6339436 Amro et al. Jan 2002 B1
6339755 Hetherington et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347398 Parthasarathy et al. Feb 2002 B1
6349295 Tedesco et al. Feb 2002 B1
6353926 Parthesarathy et al. Mar 2002 B1
6381742 Forbes et al. Apr 2002 B2
6382350 Jezewski et al. May 2002 B1
6392668 Murray May 2002 B1
6396515 Hetherington et al. May 2002 B1
6401067 Lewis et al. Jun 2002 B2
6408323 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413100 Dickmeyer et al. Jul 2002 B1
6415304 Horvitz Jul 2002 B1
6421678 Smiga et al. Jul 2002 B2
6424979 Livingston et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434567 De La Huerga Aug 2002 B1
6438545 Beauregard et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441753 Montgomery Aug 2002 B1
6442545 Feldman et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442591 Haynes et al. Aug 2002 B1
6456304 Angiulo et al. Sep 2002 B1
6470091 Koga et al. Oct 2002 B2
6473069 Gerpheide Oct 2002 B1
6477510 Johnson Nov 2002 B1
6480860 Monday Nov 2002 B1
6493006 Gourdol et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498982 Bellesfield et al. Dec 2002 B2
6510504 Satyanarayanan Jan 2003 B2
6516321 De La Huerga Feb 2003 B1
6519557 Emens et al. Feb 2003 B1
6519603 Bays et al. Feb 2003 B1
6546433 Matheson Apr 2003 B1
6553385 Johnson et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556972 Bakis et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556984 Zien Apr 2003 B1
6564264 Creswell et al. May 2003 B1
6571241 Nosohara May 2003 B1
6571253 Thompson et al. May 2003 B1
6578022 Foulger et al. Jun 2003 B1
6591260 Schwarzhoff et al. Jul 2003 B1
6595342 Maritzen et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601075 Huang et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604099 Chung et al. Aug 2003 B1
6615131 Rennard et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618733 White et al. Sep 2003 B1
6622140 Kantrowitz Sep 2003 B1
6623527 Hamzy Sep 2003 B1
6625581 Perkowski Sep 2003 B1
6629079 Spiegel et al. Sep 2003 B1
6631519 Nicholson et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636880 Bera Oct 2003 B1
6643650 Slaughter et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654734 Mani et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654932 Bahrs et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658623 Schilit et al. Dec 2003 B1
6687485 Hopkins et al. Feb 2004 B2
6694307 Julien Feb 2004 B2
6697824 Bowman-Amuah Feb 2004 B1
6697837 Rodov Feb 2004 B1
6708189 Fitzsimons et al. Mar 2004 B1
6715144 Daynes et al. Mar 2004 B2
6717593 Jennings Apr 2004 B1
6718516 Claussen et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728679 Strubbe et al. Apr 2004 B1
6732090 Shanahan et al. May 2004 B2
6732361 Andreoli et al. May 2004 B1
6741994 Kang et al. May 2004 B1
6742054 Upton, IV May 2004 B1
6745208 Berg et al. Jun 2004 B2
6766326 Cena Jul 2004 B1
6795808 Strubbe et al. Sep 2004 B1
6802061 Partovi et al. Oct 2004 B1
6826726 Hsing et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829631 Forman et al. Dec 2004 B1
6845499 Srivastava et al. Jan 2005 B2
6857103 Wason Feb 2005 B1
6859908 Clapper Feb 2005 B1
6868625 Jacobsen et al. Mar 2005 B2
6874125 Carroll et al. Mar 2005 B1
6874143 Murray et al. Mar 2005 B1
6880129 Lee et al. Apr 2005 B1
6883137 Girardot et al. Apr 2005 B1
6898604 Ballinger et al. May 2005 B1
6901402 Corston-Oliver et al. May 2005 B1
6904560 Panda Jun 2005 B1
6925457 Britton et al. Aug 2005 B2
6925470 Sangudi et al. Aug 2005 B1
6944857 Glaser et al. Sep 2005 B1
6948133 Haley Sep 2005 B2
6950831 Haley Sep 2005 B2
6950982 Dourish Sep 2005 B1
6957385 Chan et al. Oct 2005 B2
6963867 Ford et al. Nov 2005 B2
6964010 Sharp Nov 2005 B1
6975983 Fortescue et al. Dec 2005 B1
6976090 Ben-Shaul et al. Dec 2005 B2
6976209 Storisteanu et al. Dec 2005 B1
6981212 Claussen et al. Dec 2005 B1
6986104 Green et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990654 Carroll, Jr. Jan 2006 B2
7003522 Reynar et al. Feb 2006 B1
7013289 Horn et al. Mar 2006 B2
7024658 Cohen et al. Apr 2006 B1
7028312 Merrick et al. Apr 2006 B1
7032174 Montero et al. Apr 2006 B2
7039859 Sundaresan May 2006 B1
7051076 Tsuchiya May 2006 B2
7082392 Butler et al. Jul 2006 B1
7100115 Yennaco Aug 2006 B1
7113976 Watanabe Sep 2006 B2
7146564 Kim et al. Dec 2006 B2
7216351 Maes May 2007 B1
7237190 Rollins et al. Jun 2007 B2
7281245 Reynar et al. Oct 2007 B2
7302634 Lucovsky et al. Nov 2007 B2
7305354 Rodriguez et al. Dec 2007 B2
7325194 Moore et al. Jan 2008 B2
7346840 Ravishankar et al. Mar 2008 B1
7356537 Reynar et al. Apr 2008 B2
7392479 Jones et al. Jun 2008 B2
7421645 Reynar Sep 2008 B2
7454459 Kapoor et al. Nov 2008 B1
7707024 Arayasantiparb et al. Apr 2010 B2
7707496 Moore et al. Apr 2010 B1
7712024 Reynar et al. May 2010 B2
7716163 Reynar et al. May 2010 B2
7716676 Sawicki et al. May 2010 B2
7739588 Reynar et al. Jun 2010 B2
7742048 Moore et al. Jun 2010 B1
7770102 Wolff et al. Aug 2010 B1
7778816 Reynar Aug 2010 B2
7783614 Jones et al. Aug 2010 B2
7788602 Reynar et al. Aug 2010 B2
7827546 Jones et al. Nov 2010 B1
20010029605 Forbes et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010041328 Fisher Nov 2001 A1
20010042098 Gupta et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049702 Najmi Dec 2001 A1
20010056461 Kampe et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002590 King et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020003469 Gupta Jan 2002 A1
20020003898 Wu Jan 2002 A1
20020004803 Serebrennikov Jan 2002 A1
20020007309 Reynar Jan 2002 A1
20020023113 Hsing et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020023136 Silver et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026450 Kuramochi Feb 2002 A1
20020029304 Reynar et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020035581 Reynar et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038180 Bellesfield et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020065110 Enns et al. May 2002 A1
20020065891 Malik May 2002 A1
20020066073 Lienhard et al. May 2002 A1
20020078222 Compas et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020085020 Carroll, Jr. Jul 2002 A1
20020087591 Reynar et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091803 Imamura et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020099687 Krishnaprasad et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020100036 Moshir et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103829 Manning et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020104080 Woodard et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020110225 Cullis Aug 2002 A1
20020111928 Haddad Aug 2002 A1
20020120685 Srivastava et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020129060 Rollins et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129107 Loughran et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133523 Ambler et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020149601 Rajarajan et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156774 Beauregard et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156792 Gombocz et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169802 Brewer et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020175955 Gourdol et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178008 Reynar Nov 2002 A1
20020178182 Wang et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184247 Jokela et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020188941 Cicciarelli et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020196281 Audleman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198909 Huynh et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030002391 Biggs Jan 2003 A1
20030005411 Gerken Jan 2003 A1
20030009489 Griffin Jan 2003 A1
20030014745 Mah et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025728 Ebbo et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046316 Gergic et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050911 Lucovsky et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030051236 Pace et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030056207 Fischer et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030081791 Erickson et al. May 2003 A1
20030083910 Sayal et al. May 2003 A1
20030084138 Tavis et al. May 2003 A1
20030097318 Yu et al. May 2003 A1
20030101190 Horvitz et al. May 2003 A1
20030101204 Watson May 2003 A1
20030101416 McInnes et al. May 2003 A1
20030106040 Rubin et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030115039 Wang Jun 2003 A1
20030121033 Peev et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030126136 Omoigui Jul 2003 A1
20030140308 Murthy et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030154144 Pokorny et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030158841 Britton et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030158851 Britton et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030167445 Su et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030172343 Leymaster et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177341 Devillers Sep 2003 A1
20030182391 Leber et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030192040 Vaughan Oct 2003 A1
20030195937 Kircher, Jr. et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212527 Moore et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220795 Arayasantiparb et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229593 Raley et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233330 Raley et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040002939 Arora et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003389 Reynar et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040006564 Lucovsky et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040006741 Radja et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024875 Horvitz et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039990 Bakar et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044959 Shanmugasundaram et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040068694 Kaler et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083218 Feng Apr 2004 A1
20040133846 Khoshatefeh et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143581 Bohannon et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040165007 Shafron Aug 2004 A1
20040181756 Berringer et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199861 Lucovsky Oct 2004 A1
20040201867 Katano Oct 2004 A1
20040236717 Demartini et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050050164 Burd et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055330 Britton et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050094850 Nakao May 2005 A1
20050108195 Yalovsky et al. May 2005 A1
20050120313 Rudd et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050187926 Britton et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060173674 Nakajima et al. Aug 2006 A1
20100268793 Wolff et al. Oct 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (54)
Number Date Country
2 246 920 Mar 2000 CA
200410005390.8 Oct 2008 CN
0 364 180 Apr 1990 EP
0481784 Apr 1992 EP
0598511 May 1994 EP
0872827 Oct 1998 EP
0810520 Dec 1998 EP
1093058 Apr 2001 EP
1280068 Jan 2003 EP
1361523 Nov 2003 EP
1376392 Jan 2004 EP
1 447 754 Aug 2004 EP
1 452 966 Sep 2004 EP
64-88771 Apr 1989 JP
03-152663 Jun 1991 JP
05-174013 Jul 1993 JP
06-035962 Feb 1994 JP
06-096064 Apr 1994 JP
07-036917 Feb 1995 JP
08-272662 Oct 1996 JP
09-138636 May 1997 JP
10-171827 Jun 1998 JP
10-240737 Sep 1998 JP
2000-067056 Mar 2000 JP
2000-222394 Aug 2000 JP
2000-231566 Aug 2000 JP
2001-014303 Jan 2001 JP
2001-125994 May 2001 JP
2001-522112 Nov 2001 JP
2001-0350464 Dec 2001 JP
2002-041353 Feb 2002 JP
2002163250 Jun 2002 JP
2002-222181 Aug 2002 JP
2003-141174 May 2003 JP
4567952 Oct 2010 JP
4809577 Aug 2011 JP
272521 Dec 2009 MX
317624 Oct 1997 TW
338136 Aug 1998 TW
515963 Jan 2003 TW
2004-133892 Apr 2004 TW
I364674 May 2012 TW
WO 9507510 Mar 1995 WO
WO 9917240 Apr 1999 WO
WO 0054174 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0067117 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0073949 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0118687 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0137170 May 2001 WO
WO 0186390 Nov 2001 WO
WO 02099627 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0215518 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0242928 May 2002 WO
WO 2004012099 Feb 2004 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (395)
Entry
Australian First Official Action dated Oct. 21, 2008 cited in 2003204800.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265.
Sharon Oviatt et al., “Integration and Synchronization of Input Modes during Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction,” CHI 97, Atlanta, Georgia, Mar. 22-27, 1997, pp. 415-422.
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
European Statement regarding Grounds of Appeal dated Jan. 13, 2009 cited in Application No. 04 002 224.6.
Malaysian Examination Report dated Nov. 30, 2009 cited in Application No. PI 20040559.
Australian Third Official Action dated Dec. 23, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003204478.
Australian First Official Action Report dated Jan. 18, 2009 cited in Application No. 2004200459.
Hara, T. et al., “Inside Microsoft.NET-Complete Explanation, ‘What Microsoft Aims for’”, msdn magazine, No. 6, pp. 20-35, ASCII, Japan, Sep. 18, 2000, 19 pp.
Shiroiwa, K., “iMac&iBook, Must-see for User, Full of Recommended Setting Methods and Specially Selected Tips, Mastering Mac OS9”, MacPeople, ASCII Corporation, Japan, Dec. 3, 1999, vol. 5, No. 24, p. 50 (in Japanese—no translation yet).
(Previously cited) Koyaku, H., “What is Brought to SQL Server 2000 by XML, Part 1: Function of XML Provided by SQL Server 2000”, Enterprise Servers World, vol. 3, No. 12, IDG Japan, Inc., Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 42-53 (with English language translation).
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/780,376.
European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Feb. 26, 2009 cited in European Application No. 03012830.0-2211.
European Communication dated Mar. 18, 2009 cited in European Application No. 04003683.2-2211.
European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Mar. 20, 2009 cited in European Application No. 03012830.0.
Australian First Examiner's Report dated Sep. 15, 2008 cited in Australian Application No. 2003204379.
Japanese Final Official Action dated Nov. 25, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2002-207514.
Japanese Official Action dated Feb. 6, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-180218.
Japanese Official Action dated Feb. 13, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-162911.
Japanese Official Action dated Feb. 24, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-161338.
Japanese Official Action dated Mar. 6, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2004-042140.
Malaysian Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2010 cited in Application No. PI 20040265.
Korean Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2010 cited in Application No. 10-2003-36252.
Chinese Second Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2010 cited in Application No. 03143003.1.
Japanese Final Notice of Rejection dated Apr. 9, 2010 cited in Application No. 2003-162911.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190, filed Jun. 27, 2002, entitled “System and Method for Providing Namespace Related Information”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,260, filed Jun. 5, 2002, entitled “Mechanism for Downloading Software Components from a Remote Source for Use by a Local Software Application”.
Fernandex M. et al., “SilkRoute: Trading Between Relations and XML”, Computer Networks, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam NL, vol. 33, No. 1-6, Jun. 2000, pp. 723-745.
Braganholo VDP; “Updating Relationship Databases Through XML Views”, Technical Report RP-328, Online (http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/{vanessa/disc/iplinas/PropostaTese.pdf), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, Sep. 2002, XP-002279067, pp. 1-61.
Falquet G et al., “Design and Analysis of Active Hypertext Views on Databases”, CUI—Technical Report, Online (http://cui.unige.ch/isi/reports/design-anls-ahtv.pdf), Jan. 2002, XP-002279068, pp. 1-24.
Ceri S et al., “Deriving Production Rules for Incremental View Maintenance”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 1994, XP-00914159, pp. 577-589.
Bonifati A., “Active Behaviors Within XML Document Management”, EDBT Ph.D. Workshop, (EDBT Ph.D. WS 2000), Online (http://www.edbt2000.uni-konstanz.de/phd-workshop/papers/Bonifati.ps), Mar. 2000, Konstanz, Germany, XP-002279069, pp. 1-4.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899, filed Dec. 9, 2003, entitled “Mechanism for Downloading Software Components from a Remote Source for Use by a Local Software Application”.
“Integrating with External Systems: iPlanet™ Unified Development Server”, Sun Microsystems, Inc., Ver. 5.0, Aug. 2001, pp. 127-156.
Sperberg-McQueen, C.M. and Thompson, Henry, “XML Schema”, W3C Architecture Domain, http://web.archive.org/web/20020802155904/http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema, 2000-2002, pp. 1-10.
Quin, Liam, “Extensible Markup Language (XML)”, W3C Architecture Domain, http://web.archive.org/web/2002121962057/http://www.w3.org/XML/, 1996-2002, pp. 1-3.
Clark, James, and DeRose, Steve, “XML Path Language (XPath), Version 1.0”, W3C, http://web.archive.org/web/2021010034434/http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath, 1999-2000, pp. 1-31.
“Microsoft BizTalk Server 2002—Using BizTalk Mapper”, http://msdn.Microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—intro—zkqb.asp . . . , Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1-2.
“BizTalk Server 2002 Mapper User Interface”, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—concept—codw . . . , Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1.
“BizTalk Server 2002 Compiling Data”, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—concept—drgl.a . . . , Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1.
“BizTalk Server 2002 Testing Maps”, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—concept—fhhy.a . . . , Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1-2.
“BizTalk Server 2002 View Links and Functoids by Using Grid Preview”, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—check—fuwn.as . . . , Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1.
“The StarOffice™ 6.0 Suite: New Features Guide”, Sun Microsystems, V. 1.1, Jul. 2002, pp. 1-31.
“New Microsoft Office Family Application Taps Power of Industry-Standard XML”, http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/oct02/10-09officefamilypr.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Oct. 2002-Feb. 2003, pp. 1-2.
“Q&A: How ‘XDocs’ Alters the Paradigm for Gathering Business-Critical Information”, http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/oct02/10-09officefamily.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Oct. 2002-Feb. 2003, pp. 1-4.
“InfoPath: Microsoft Names New Product from Office Group”, http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2003/feb03/02-10infopath.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Oct. 2002-Feb. 2003, pp. 1-4.
“Microsoft Unveils Visual Studio.NET Enterprise Tools”, Microsoft Corporation, http://microsoft.com/presspass/press/2001/may01/05-21vseepr.mspx, May 2001, pp. 1-4.
“Microsoft Extends XML Web Services Support in .NET Enterprise Servers Through Visual Studio .NET”, http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/feb02/02-13servervspr.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Feb. 2002, pp. 1-3.
“Integrated Development Environment (IDE)”, http://web.archive.org/web/20020602032242/http://altova.com/products—ide.html, Jun. 2002, pp. 1-2.
“How to Use XSL to Transform Excel XML Spreadsheet for Server-Side Use”, http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;278976, Microsoft Corporation, Aug. 2004, pp. 1-7.
“Altova markup your mind!”, http://web.archive.org/web/20021204211721/http://altova.com/products—ide.html, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-3.
“Arbortext and Accessibility”, http://web.archive.org/web/20021219133536/www.arbortext.com/html/accessibility.html, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-5.
“XML Compliance, 100% Pure XML”, http:web.archive.org/web/20021209185855/www.arbortext.com/html/xml—compliance, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-3.
“Schemas”, http://web.archive.org/web/20021221023148/www.arbortext.com/html/schemas.html, Dec. 2002, pp. 13.
“Arbortext's Support for XSL-FO”, http://web.archive.org/web/20021221021632/www.arbortext.com/html/xsl-fo.html. Dec. 2002, pp. 1-4.
“Corel XMetal4, Making XML Content Creation Easy”, http://web.archive.org/web/20031118215158/www.corel.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename, Nov. 2003, pp. 1-2.
“Corel XMetal 4 and Interwoven TeamXML”, http ://web.archive.org/web/20030807211225/www.corel.com/futuretense—cs/ccurl/corel+xml+4+and+interwoven+teamxml.pdf, Aug. 2003, pp. 1-2.
“The Corel-XyEnterprise XML Solution”, http://web.archive.org/web/20030807154355/www.corel.com/futuretense—cs/ccurl/corel+and+XY+enterprise+XML+solution.pdf, Aug. 2003, pp. 1-2.
Alex Homer, et al.: “Professional Active Server pp.”, 1997, WROS Press Ltd.
David Flanagan: “JavaScript—The Definitive Guide, Fourth Edition”, Jan. 2002, O'Reilly.
Santos, C.A.S., L.F.G Soares, G.L. de Souza and J.P. Courtiat: Design methodology and formal validation of hypermedia documents; Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on multimedia, (1998) p. 39-48.
Terveen, Loren, Will Hill and Brian Amento; Constructing, organizating, and visualizing collections of tropically related Web resources; ACM Trans, Comput-um. Interact. 6, (Mar. 1, 1999) p. 67-94.
Barrett, Rob, Paul P. Maglio and Daniel C. Kellem; How to personalize the Web; Conference proceedings on human factors in computing systems (1997) p. 75-82.
Marx, Matthew and Chris Schmandt; CLUES: dynamic personalized message filtering; Proceedings of the ACM 1996 conference on computer supported cooperative work (1996) p. 113-121.
Goschka, Karl M. and Jurgen Falb; Dynamic hyperlink generation for navigation in relational databases; Proceedings of the tenth ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia: returning to our diverse roots (1999) p. 23-24.
Pentland, Alex; Perceptual user interfaces: perceptual intelligence; Commun. ACM 43, 3 (Mar. 2000) p. 35-44.
Stairmand, Mark A.; Texual context analysis for information retrieval; Proceedings of the 20th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (1997) p. 140-147.
Glushko, Robert J., Jay M. Tenenbaum and Bart Meltzer; An XML framework for agent-based E-commerce; Commun. ACM 42, 3 (Mar. 1999) p. 106.
Kukich, Karen; Technique for Automatically Correcting Words in Text; ACM Comput. Surv., 24, 4 (Dec. 1992); pp. 377-439.
Marx, Matt and Chris Schmandt; Putting People First: Specifying Proper Names in Speech Interfaces; Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology; 1994; pp. 29-37.
Ford, Bryan, Mike Hibler, Jay Lepreau, Roland McGrath and Patrick Tullman; Interface and execution models in the fluke kernal; Proceedings of the third symposium on operating systems design and implementation, (1999) p. 101-115.
Desmarais, Michel C. and Jiming Liu; Exploring the applications user-expertise assessment for intelligent interfaces; Proceedings of the conference on human factors in corrupting systems, (1993) p. 308-313.
Foley, James D.; Future directions in user-computer interface software; Conference proceedings on organizational computer systems, (1991) p. 289-297.
Hartson, H. Rex and Deborah Hix; Human-computer interface development: concepts and systems for its management; ACM Comput. Surv. 1 (Mar. 1989) p. 5-92.
Foley, Jim; Intergrating computer technology, people technology; strategies and case studies from Georgia Tech's Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center; Proceedings of the workshop on advanced visual interfaces, (1994) p. 34-43.
Tsai, M., P. Reiher and G.J. Popek; Command management system for next-generation user input; Proceedings of the seventh workshop on hottopics in operating systems, (1999) p. 179-84.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft, Microsoft Press, Fifth Edition, p. 409.
Kuenning, Geoff, “Using ISPELL from Emacs”, http://theochem.ki.ku.dk/on—line—docs/ispell/ispell—1.html, 4 pp., publication date unknown.
“Spellout Command”, Commands Reference, vol. 5, http://www.rz.uni-hohenheim.de/betriebssysteme/unix/aix/ aix—4.3.3—doc/base—doc/usr/share/man/inf . . . , 1 page, publication date unknown.
“Chapter 8—Standard Input and Output”, http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/users/eiamjw/unix/chap8.html, 3 pp., publication date unknown.
Panagiotis, Christias, Man-cgi 1.15, http://www.physics.umn.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?spell, 1994, 5 pp.
Bischof, Hans-Peter, “Spell, Spellin, Spellout—Finding Spelling Errors”, http://www.vorlesungen.uni-osnabrueck.de/informatik/shellscript/Html/Man/—Man—NeXT—html/html . . . , Apr. 21, 1997, 2 pp.
“Module 123—Spell”, http://duplex.hypermart.net/books/bsd/501-504.html, 4 pp., publication date unknown.
Panagiotis, Christias, Man-cgi 1.15, http://www.calpoly.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?spell+1, 1994, 3 pp.
Martensson, Bengt, “Thread-Enhanced Spell Front End for GNU Emacs + Detex + Delatex”, http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/337/1987/8/0/1871981/, Aug. 20, 1987, 1 p.
Willisson, Pace, Ispell (1), http://www.rt.com/man/findaffix.1.html, 1983, 15 pp.
Willisson, Pace, Ispell (1), “User Commands”, http://www.csee.usf.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?ispell, 1983, 18 pp.
“Handout 38: Spell Checking, Word Counting, and Textual Analysis”, http://courses.cs.emporia.edu/pheattch/courses/2002/cs501s02/hand38/, 3 pp., publication date unknown.
Keunning, Geoff, “International Spell”, http://fmg-www.cs.ucla.edu/geoff.ispell.html, 3 pp., publication date unknown.
Ispell 4, “Ispell—Format of Ispell Dictionaries and Affix Files”, http://www.bigbiz.com/cgi-bin/manpage?4+ispell, 11 pp., publication date unknown.
McMahon, Lee. E., “SED—A Non-Interactive Text Editor,” Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974, Aug. 15, 1978, pp. 16.
Beitner, N. D.; Hall, W.; Goble, C.A., “Multimedia Support and Authoring in Microcosm: An Extended Model,” Dept. of Electronics and Computer Science, Univ. of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK; Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester MI3 9PL, UK, pp. 1-12, publication date unknown.
IBM Corporation, “IBM Research Disclosure #368; Multimedia Hyperlinks Automatically Created for Reference Documents,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jun. 1993, pp. 1-5.
The Complete LINUX™ Operating System 5.2 Deluxe, Red Hat,® Macmillian Digital Publishing USA, A Viacom Company, Red Hat Software, Inc., ISBN 1-57595-199-1B, 1995-1998, pp. 1-385.
User Manual For AddressMate and AddressMate Plus, CoStar Corporation, AddressMate Software, 1994-1995, pp. 1-210.
Getting Results With Microsoft® Office 97, Real World Solutions For The Work You Do, Microsoft Corporation, 1995-1997, pp. 1-703.
InfoCentral™ 7, User's Manual, Corel Corporation, vol. 1, Version 7.0, 1996, pp. 1-86.
Corel® Office Professional 7 Quick Results User's Manual, vol. 1, Version 7.0 (first printing), Corel Corporation, Limited, pp. 1-531, publication date unknown.
Novell GroupWise User's Guide for Windows 16-Bit Version 5.2, Novell, Inc., 1993-1997, pp. 1-231.
Novell GroupWise User's Guide for Windows 32-Bit Version 5.2, Novell, Inc., 1998, pp. 1-318.
Claris Em@iler Getting Started User's Guide, for Macintosh, Claris Corporation, 1995-1997, 61 pp.
Developer's Guide to Apple Data Detectors, for Version 1.0.2., Apple Computer, Inc., 1997, pp. 1-33.
Apple Data Detectors User's Manual, Apple Computer, Inc., 1997, pp. 1-15.
Nardi, Bonnie A.; Miller, James R.; Wright, David J., “Collaborative, Programmable Intelligent Agents,” Jim Miller/Miramontes Computing, Apple Computer Advanced Technology Group, http://www.miramontes.com/writing/add-cacm/add-cacm/html, Mar. 1998, pp. 1-11.
Hewkin, “Smart Tags—the Distributed-Memory Resolution”, IEE Review, Jun. 22, 1989, pp. 203-206.
Measuring Units Conversion Table—http://web.archie.org—1997 Internet French Property, pp. 1-4.
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “National Language Support Enhancement for Culture-Specific Operations”, Nov. 1, 1993, vol. 36, Issue 11, pp. 629-638.
Towers, J. Tarin, Visual Quickstart Guide: Dreamweaver 2 for Windows and Macintosh, 1999, Peachpit Press, pp. 150-151.
Driza, Scott, “Learn Word 2000 VBA Document Automation”, Wordware Publishing Inc., 2001, 6 pp.
Cornell, Paul, “Developing Smart Tag DLLs”, MSDN Library, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnsmarttag/html/odc—smarttags.asp, Apr. 2001, pp. 8.
Menu Customizing, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 34, No. 1, Jun. 1991, pp. 91-92 (4 pp. total).
Perry, Brad, et al., “Discovering Similar Resources by Content Park-Linking”, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, published by ACM Press 1997, pp. 317-324.
Schulz, Charles, “Writing Applications for Uniform Operation on a Mainframe or PC: A Metric Conversion Program”, Lockheed Missles & Space Company, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, May 1990, pp. 348-361.
Devanbue, P. et al., “Chime: customizable hyperlink insertion and maintenance engine for software engineering environments”, Software Engineering, Publication date: 1999, ISBN: 1-58113-07400.
“Using Flyswat”, http://www.flywsat.com/using.html, download date: Sep. 28, 1999, 1 pp.
“What is Flyswat”, http://www.flyswat.com, download date: Sep. 28, 1999, 5 pp.
“Intelligent Text Processing: About”, http://www.syntalex.co.uk/about/about.html, download date: Aug. 7, 1999, 1 pp.
“Intelligent Text Processing: Automatic Cross-Referencing”, http://www.syntalex.co.uk/services/acrl.html, download date Aug. 7, 1999, 3 pp.
“Intelligent Text Processing: Case Study: Context”, http://www.syntalex.co.uk/casestudies/context.html, download date: Aug. 7, 1999, 3 pp.
Mueller, Jennifer M., “Work Smarter with Smart Tags”, Journal of Accounting—Online, vol. 194, No. 5, Nov. 2002, http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/nov2002/Mueller.htm>, retrieved on Apr. 22, 2005.
Brooks-Bilson, “Programming ColdFusion” [electronic resource] 2001, Safari Tech Books Online, 1st Edition, 25 pp.
Wilker, John, “ColdFusion MX Adds J2EE, XML, and Web Services Compatibility”, Aug. 9, 2002, http://builder.com.com/5102-6387-104585.html, 3 pp.
Brockschmidt, K., “Inside OLE, Second Edition”, 1995, Microsoft Press, p. 169.
Toth, V., “Visual C++ 4 Unleashed”, 1996, Sams Publishing, p. 174.
Sriram, V., “ComponentXchange: An E-Exchange for Software Components”, Master Thesis, CitSeer, May 2001, pp. i-v, 1-77.
Bosak, “XML: The Universal Publishing Format”, SGML/XML Europe '98, May 1998, pp. A1-C17.
Kristensen, “Template Resolution in XML/HTML”, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, vol. 30, 1998, pp. 239-249.
Fan et al., “FormPlus: A Form Authoring Toolkit”, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference, Oct. 31, 1990-Nov. 2, 1990, pp. 255-260.
Boone, “Concept Features in Re: Agent, An Intelligent Email Agent”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents, May 9-13, 1998, pp. 141-148.
Takkinen et al., “CAFÉ: A Conceptual Model for Managing Information in Electronic Mail”, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1998, pp. 44-53.
“Smart Tags: Dumb Technology?”, webreference.com, Online, Aug. 29, 2001, http://www.webreference.com/xml/column30/3.html, 3 pp.
“Being ‘Smart’ with Smart Tags in Office XP”, Create for Mississippi, Aug. 2001, http://www.create.cett.msstate.edu/create/howto/smart—tags.pdf, 7 pp.
Harold, E.R., “XML: Extensible Markup Language”, IDG Books Worldwide, Books 24×7.com printout, 1998, pp. 1-11.
Marais, Hannes, “Supporting Cooperative and Personal Surfmg With a Desktop Assistant”, 1997, ACM Press, pp. 129-138.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157, filed Mar. 27, 2001, entitled “Automatically Adding Proper Names to a Database”.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265, filed Apr. 24, 2001, entitled “Method and System for Applying Input Mode Bias”.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266, filed Apr. 24, 2001, entitled “Method and System for Providing Electronic Commerce Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Strings”.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552, filed Jul. 16, 2001, entitled “Method and System for Providing Restricted Actions for Recognized Semantic Categories”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141, filed Feb. 13, 2003, entitled “Linking Elements of a Document to Corresponding Fields, Queries and/or Procedures in a Database”.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467, filed Jul. 16, 2001, entitled “Application Program Interfaces for Semantically Labeling Strings and Providing Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Strings”.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418, filed Jul. 17, 2001, entitled “Method and System for Defining Semantic Categories and Actions”.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411, filed Jun. 6, 2000, entitled “Method and System for Semantically Labeling Strings and Providing Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Strings”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712, filed May 9, 2002, entitled “Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Dates Between Calendars and Languages Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630, filed May 23, 2002, entitled “Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Numbers Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544, filed May 7, 2002, entitled “Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Numbers Between Measurement Systems Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680, filed May 23, 2002, entitled “Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Currency Values Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810, filed Jun. 25, 2002, entitled “Method, System, and Apparatus for Performing Custom Actions on Digital Content”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/178,680, filed Jun. 24, 2002, entitled “System and Method for Incorporating Smart Tags in Online Content”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438, filed Jun. 25, 2002, entitled “Method and System for Dynamically Providing Actions Associated with Semantically Labeled Strings”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298, filed Jun. 27, 2002, entitled “Method and System for Associating Actions with Semantic Labels in Electronic Documents”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258, filed Feb. 28, 2003, entitled “Method and System for Enhancing Paste Functionality of a Computer Software Application”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446, filed Apr. 29, 2003, entitled “Methods and System for Recognizing Names in a Computer-Generated Document and for Providing Helpful Actions Associated with Recognized Names”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267, filed Jun. 27, 2003, entitled “Leveraging Markup Language Data for Semantically Labeling Text Strings and Data and for Providing Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Text Strings and Data”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/780,376, filed Feb. 17, 2004, entitled “Methods and Systems for Providing Automatic Actions on Recognized Text Strings in a Computer-Generated Document”.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317, filed Jun. 25, 2002, entitled “System and Method for Issuing a Message to a Program”.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 29, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 12, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 29, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 14, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 18, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157.
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 15, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 20, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266.
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 29, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 6, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 2, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/178,680.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 8, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 26, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 1, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 17, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 24, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 19, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266.
U.S. Official Action dated May 5, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
U.S. Official Action dated May 6, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
U.S. Official Action dated May 20, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 3, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 6, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,260.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 24, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544.
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 2, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 4, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 5, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 20, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 2, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 10, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,260.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 15, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 22, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 5, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 14, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 15, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 11, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 2, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 16, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 24, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,937, filed Apr. 3, 2006, entitled “Automatically Adding Proper Names to a Database”.
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 5, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258.
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 10, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190.
U.S. Official Action dated May 26, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
U.S. Official Action dated May 31, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 1, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
U.S. Final Official Action dated Jul. 19, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 2, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899.
U.S. Final Official Action dated Aug. 18, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 7, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680.
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 28, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267.
U.S. Final Official Action dated Oct. 5, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 6, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 10, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265.
European Communication dated Apr. 19, 2006 in EP 05 000 506.5-1527.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
European Communication dated Sep. 25, 2006 in EP 03 01 4181.
World Wide Web Consortium, “Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Events Specification, Version 1.0”, http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Events-20001113/DOM2-Events.pdf, Nov. 2000, 50 pp.
World Wide Web Consortium, “Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Core Specification, Version 1.0”, http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Core-20001113/DOM2-Core.pdf, Nov. 2000, 107 pp.
European Communication dated Nov. 9, 2006 in EP 03010292.5.
“Word 2002 Add in: measurement Converter Smart Tag”, http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=f67fc42c-5f41-4c3f-9d5a-71354471dc32&DisplayLang=en, retrieved on Nov. 9, 2006, 2 pgs.
“Microsoft Measurement Converter Smart Tag—Chinese Version”, http://www.jiyang.gov/cn/laiying/My%20Pictures/%E8%B4%E5%BA%86%E8%BE%89/office2003/FILES/PFILES/COMMON/MSSHARED/SMARTTAG/CMEASURE/1033/CHMCABT.HTM, retrieved on Nov. 7, 2006, 2 pgs.
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298.
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 20, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
U.S. Final Official Action dated Dec. 26, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 5, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,717.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 11, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 25, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267.
European Communication dated Nov. 17, 2006 in EP 03 011 851.7-2211.
European Communication dated Dec. 11, 2006 in EP 03 012 830.0-2211.
Singapore Search Report/Written Opinion dated Jan. 26, 2007 in SG 200500214-2.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 6, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 7, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 21, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
European Communication dated Feb. 16, 2007 cited in European Application No. 04 003 683.2-2211.
Anonymous, “Adding Data from Other Sources in PowerPoint 2002,” Jul. 2002, Internet article, XP-002420700, A Professional Approach Series the E-Zine Approach, http://www.glencoe.com/ps/computered/pas/article.php4?articleld-437, 8 pgs.
Rice, F.C., “Transform XML Files with XSLT When Importing into Microsoft Excel 2002,” Jul. 2001, Internet article, XP-002420701, http://msdn2.microsoftcom/en-us/library/aa140055(office.10.d=printer).aspx, 9 pgs.
Johnson, L., “What's So Special About Paste Special?”, Jun. 2002, Internet article, XP-002420702, http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/Pub0009/LPMArticle.asp?ID=40, 5 pgs.
Anonymous, “Moving and Copying Text Tutorial,” Aug. 17, 2001, Internet Article, XP-002307566, http://tutorials.findtutorials.com/read/category/102/id/342/p/3, 4 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 9, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 12, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 10, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
U.S. Official Action dated May 14, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
U.S. Final Official Action dated May 18, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680.
U.S. Official Action dated May 30, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
U.S. Final Official Action dated Jun. 15, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899.
Blaheta et al., “Assigning Function Tags to Parsed Text,” Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2000, pp. 234-240.
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298.
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265.
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267.
Malaysian Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2007 cited in Malaysian Application No. PI 20040265.
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
European Communication dated Sep. 25, 2007 cited in European Application No. 03 014 181.6-1243.
Japanese Official Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-128417.
Rubin, Charles, “Microsoft Word 2000 Official Manual,” First Edition, Nikkei BP Soft Press, Inc., Aug. 2, 1999, pp. 215-217.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446.
Russian Official Action dated Oct. 11, 2008 cited in Russian Application No. 2003118722.
Pershikov, V.I., “Explanatory Dictionary in Informatics,” Finances and Statistics, Moscow, 1991 (in Russian with translated sections) 5 pgs.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265.
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467.
David D. Lewis et al., “A Sequential Algorithm for Training Text Classifiers,” Spring-Verlag New York, Inc., 1994, pp. 1-10.
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267.
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
Singapore Examination Report (conducted by Austrian Patent Office) dated Jan. 25, 2008 in SG Application No. 200500214-2.
Chinese Official Action dated Jan. 4, 2008 cited in Chinese Application No. 200510009487.0.
Chinese Official Action dated Dec. 28, 2007 cited in Application No. 200410005390.8.
Wei Ying-bin et al., “A New Technology ColdFusion of Realizing Dynamic Webpage,” 2000, 6 pgs. (English language translation, pp. 1-6).
European Examination Report dated Mar. 4, 2006 cited in EP Application No. 02 014 717.9-1527.
European Examination Report dated Mar. 4, 2006 cited in EP Application No. 03 012 432.5-1527.
Russian Official Action dated Jan. 11, 2008 cited in Russian Application No. 2004105880/09(006292).
V. Doroth et al., “Modern Computer Vocabulary,” St. Petersburg, BHV-Peterburg, 2001, p. 465 (with English language translation).
Mexican Official Action dated Feb. 11, 2009 cited in Application No. Pa/a/2003/005451.
Chinese Final Rejection dated Mar. 13, 2009 cited in Application No. 03145242.6.
Japanese Final Rejection dated Mar. 17, 2090 cited in Application No. 2004-037158.
Japanese Final Rejection dated Apr. 3, 2009 cited in Application No. 2002-207514.
C. Goldfarb, XML Handbook, 1st Ed., Pearson Education, Japan, May 10, 1999, pp. 246-254 (no English translation).
S. Tanaka, “Verifying the XML Schema Definition,” XML Magazine, Shoeisha Co., Ltd., vol. 10, No. 3, Jul. 1, 2000, pp. 135-155 (no English translation).
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446.
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
U.S. Official Action mailed Apr. 1, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418.
U.S. Official Action mailed Apr. 4, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680.
U.S. Official Action mailed Apr. 29, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411.
U.S. Final Official Action mailed Apr. 29, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
U.S. Official Action mailed May 1, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317.
European Communication Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Mar. 4, 2008 in EP 05 000 506.5-1527.
European Communication Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Mar. 10, 2008 in EP 03 01 0292.5-1527.
Japanese Notice of Final Rejection dated May 28, 2010 cited in Application No. 2003-161338.
Australian Examiner's First Report dated Aug. 16, 2010 cited in Application No. 2009202563.
Polish Official Notice dated Aug. 25, 2009 cited in Application No. P.365553/DP.
Australian Official Action dated Sep. 11, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003204478.
Norwegian Official Action dated Aug. 24, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003 2550.
Polish Official Notice dated Sep. 22, 2009 cited in Application No. P. 364854/DP.
Polish Official Notice dated Sep. 23, 2009 cited in Application No. P. 360520/DP.
Korean Official Action dated Sep. 30, 2009 cited in Application No. 10-2003-40988.
Japanese Official Notice of Final Rejection dated Oct. 2, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003-162911.
“The Spatial Smart Tag”, Geomatic Technologies, Mar. 10, 2005, 2 pp.
Harmon, D., “Microsoft MapPoint 2002”, Geoworld Quick-Take Reviews, Aug. 2001, 3 pp.
Irie R. et al., “Resources for Place Name Analysis”, May 28, 2004, 4 pp.
Rajabifard, A. et al., “Creating an Enabling Platform for the Delivery of Spatial Information”, Spatial Sciences Institute Biennial Conference, Sep. 12, 2005, 10 pp.
Camarda, B., Special Editing Using® Microsoft® Office Word 2003, Que, Dec. 12, 2003, pp. 1-5.
Ivens, K., Office XP Smart Tags, Microsoft, Mar. 6, 2002, pp. 1-4.
Frye, C., Microsoft Office Systems: Step by Step, Microsoft Press, 2003 Edition, Sep. 3, 2003, pp. 1-6.
U.S. Official Action mailed Sep. 8, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948.
U.S. Official Action mailed Feb. 15, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948.
U.S. Official Action mailed Oct. 18, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948.
U.S. Official Action mailed Mar. 20, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948.
U.S. Official Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948.
U.S. Official Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630.
European Search Report dated Dec. 12, 2006 in European Application No. 05 105 000.3-1527.
European Examination Report dated Oct. 9, 2007 in European Application No. 05 105 000.3-1527.
European Preliminary Opinion dated Aug. 27, 2008 cited in European Application No. 04002224.6-1527 / 1447754.
Chinese Official Action dated Dec. 7, 2007 in Chinese Application No. 200510088529.4.
Chinese Second Official Action dated Aug. 15, 2008 in Chinese Application No. 200510088529.4.
Chilean Second Office Action cited in Chilean Application No. 67/2005 (date unknown).
Malaysian Official Action dated Aug. 29, 2008 cited in Malaysian Application No. PI 20031902.
Polish Official Action dated Aug. 27, 2008 in Polish Application No. P360520.
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Aug. 23, 2010 cited in Application No. 10-2004-0013354.
Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 30, 2010 cited in Application No. 2,433,472.
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Aug. 31, 2010 cited in Application No. 10-2004-9346.
Polish Official Letter dated Jun. 24, 2008 cited Polish Application No. P 365553.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712.
“XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes,” W3C, May 2, 2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/, pp. 1-146 (separated into 2 documents—A & B).
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141.
Ghamrawi et al., “Collective Multi-Label Classification,” ACM, 2005, pp. 195-200.
Polish Official Action dated Jul. 21, 2008 cited in Polish Application No. P 364854.
Japanese Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2002-207514.
Chinese Decision on Rejection dated Jul. 3, 2009 cited in Application No. 03143003.1.
European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Aug. 5, 2009 cited in Application No. 03003931.7.
Japanese Official Action dated May 26, 2009 cited in Application No. 2005-039754.
Rubin, C., “Microsoft Word 2000 Official Manual”, First Edition, Nikkei BP Soft Press, Inc., Aug. 2, 1999, pp. 215-217.
U.S. Office Action dated May 27, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552.
U.S. Examiner's Answer BPAI dated Jun. 5, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298.
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265.
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446.
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/780,376.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258.
M. Stowe, “XML in Excel and the Spreadsheet Component”, Microsoft Corporation, Aug. 2001, 6 pgs.
C. Heinemann, “Cross-Reference your XML Data”, Microsoft Corporation, Dec. 7, 1998, 6 pgs.
D. Obasanjo, “XML—Namespaces and How They Affect Xpath and XSLT”, Microsoft Corporation, May 20, 2002, 19 pgs.
European Communication Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated May 7, 2008 cited in European Application No. 04002224.6.
Russian Official Action dated Mar. 13, 2008 cited in Russian Application No. 2004104096/09(004398).
Japanese Official Action dated Mar. 28, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-178497.
Pixley, “Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Events Specification Version 1.0”, World Wide Web Consortium, Nov. 13, 2000, www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Events-20001113/DOM2-Events.pdf.
European Communication dated Jun. 3, 2008 cited in European Application No. 03 011 851.7-2211.
Japanese Official Action dated Apr. 18, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-128417.
European Communication Minutes of Oral Proceedings and Decision dated Sep. 15, 2008 in European Application No. 05 000 506.5-1527.
Polish Second Official Action dated Oct. 28, 2008 in Polish Application No. P36553.
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258.
Japanese Official Notice of Final Rejection dated Oct. 27, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003-161338.
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated Nov. 12, 2010 cited in Application No. 2003-161338.
Russian Official Action dated Jun. 21, 2009 cited in Application No. 2005104223/09(005505).
D. Richter, “Windows for professionals” (Win32 API programming for Windows NT 3.5 and Windows 95, translation from English, Moscow: Russian Edition, 1995, ISBN 5-7502-0010-8, pp. 26, 31, 215.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810.
Glover et al., “Inferring hierarchical Descriptions,” ACM, 2002, pp. 507-514.
Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2008 cited in Application No. 2004-037158.
Koyaku, H., “What is Brought to SQL Server 2000 by XML, Part 1: Function of XML Provided by SQL Server 2000”, Enterprise Servers World, vol. 3, No. 12, IDG Japan, Inc., Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 42-53.
Chinese Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2008 cited in Application No. 03145242.6.
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317.
Canadian Official Action dated Dec. 15, 2010 cited in Application No. 2,431,667.
Canadian Official Action dated Dec. 16, 2010 cited in Application No. 2,431,104.
Japanese Final Official Action dated Dec. 14, 2010 cited in Application No. 2005-175170.
Chinese Final Rejection dated Dec. 21, 2010 cited in Application No. 03143003.1.
Japanese Interrogation dated Jan. 7, 2011 cited in Application No. 2003-178497.
Indian Official Action dated Dec. 13, 2010 cited in Application No. 557/MUM/2003.
Japanese Notice of Rejection mailed Jul. 8, 2011 cited in Application No. 2003-178497.
Japanese Appeal Decision mailed Aug. 12, 2011 cited in Application No. 2008-31101.
Canadian Official Action mailed Aug. 26, 2011 cited in Application No. 2,431,104.
Taiwan Official Action mailed Jul. 28, 2011 cited in Application No. 93103386.
Japanese Official Action dated Apr. 28, 2011 cited in Appl. No. 2003-128417.
Japanese Appeal Decision of Rejection dated Sep. 16, 2011 cited in Appl. No. 2003-128417.
European Examination Report dated Oct. 18, 2011 cited in Appl. No. 03 011 851.7-2211.
European Examination Report dated Oct. 25, 2011 cited in Appl. No. 03 014 181.6.
Canadian Examiner's Report mailed Mar. 2, 2012 cited in Application No. 2,456,771.
Malaysian Substantive Examination Clear Report dated Jun. 19, 2012 in PI 20040265.
Canadian Examiner's Report dated Jul. 26, 2012 in 2,456,711.
Chinese Third Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2012 cited in Application No. 03143003.1.
U.S. Office Action dated May 24, 2012 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 12/777,322, 65 pgs.
Peng et al., “Accessing existing business data from the World Wide Web,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 37, No. 1, 1998, pp. 115-132.
Indian Official Action dated Apr. 11, 2013 in 170/DEL/2004.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080046812 A1 Feb 2008 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10164960 Jun 2002 US
Child 11924856 US