This invention relates to the provision of contextually sensitive tools and help content in computer-generated documents.
Computer software applications allow users to create a variety of documents to assist them in work, education, and leisure. For example, popular word processing applications allow users to create letters, articles, books, memoranda, and the like. Spreadsheet programs allow users to store, manipulate, print, and display a variety of alpha-numeric data. Such applications have a number of well-known strengths, including rich editing, formatting and calculation.
However, documents created by such software applications do not provide users with contextually sensitive tools, help content, or support. That is, as the user is entering text or data into such software applications, these applications do not provide the user with helpful tools or assistance based on the context of the text or data being entered by the user. Internet web-based applications attempt to solve some business problems through the creation and deployment of web-based templates with which users may enter information that may be transmitted to a back-end web server for the purpose of registering the user for some type of service. Such web-based applications often may include links with which the user may navigate to a separate web site for helpful information or assistance with the current web-based application or document in use by the user. However, such web-based applications suffer compared to the aforementioned software application documents in that modern web-based applications seldom offer rich editing, formatting, printing, and calculation.
By way of example, in a typical setting, a user may decide to prepare a resume using a word processing application loaded on her home computer. As the user prepares the resume, she likely will fill in such sections such as “personal information,” “education,” “experience,” and “extra-curricular activities.” As the user is completing each of those sections, she may require assistance, including information on the preferred ordering of the sections, information on the preferred number of past jobs to place in the “experience” section, and the like. In order to receive such assistance, the user likely must read a book on resumes, or go online to an internet-based resume help site for the information.
In contrast, the user may enter an internet-based resume site to complete a resume using a web-based resume template. The user may be allowed to enter specific information in given data fields, and the user may be provided with internet web site links for navigating to sites where she may obtain assistance with various sections of the document. When the user has completed preparation of the web-based resume, the user may be allowed to submit the resume to some web-based job service, or the user may be able to print the template. However, the functionality of the user's word processing application, such as rich editing and formatting of the resume, is likely not available to the user given the limitations of the web-based application in contrast to the user's computer-based word processor.
It is with respect to these and other considerations that the present invention has been made.
The present invention provides a method and system for creating, implementing and using computer-generated documents that provide contextually sensitive tools, controls and help content to the user(s) of those documents. Generally described, a schema is attached to a document defining permissible data content, data type and data structure for the document. The document is structured to associate the document with the schema, and a solution is associated with the document structure. A plurality of software components is assembled for providing the solution to the document, and the document is enabled to call the plurality of software components for providing the solution to the document based on an editing position in the document.
After the document is created, a software application for opening the document may be booted to initiate opening the document. A determination is made as to whether the document refers to the solution. A determination is made as to whether the plurality of software components for providing the solution is present in a library of software components. If so, the plurality of software components is called for providing the solution to the document.
Once the document is opened for use, focusing document editing in a particular portion of the document, such as by placing the cursor in a particular portion of the document, causes the generation of a list of Extensible Markup Language (XML) elements enclosing a position of the editing focus. A determination is made as to whether any available solutions are associated with the list of XML elements. If any available solutions are associated with the list of XML elements, each associated solution is called and is obtained for use by the document. Preferably, the solutions comprise help content and document tools associated with the context of the editing position in the document. A graphical user interface is launched for displaying each solution obtained for use by the document.
These and other features, advantages, and aspects of the present invention may be more clearly understood and appreciated from a review of the following detailed description of the disclosed embodiments and by references to the appended drawings and claims.
The present invention is directed toward creation, implementation and use of computer-generated “smart” documents to which functionality is attached for providing contextually sensitive tools, help content and controls to users of those documents. According to an embodiment of the invention, portions of documents are structured so that when a user enters those portions, such as by placing a computer cursor in those portions, the document points to a solution that may provide the user contextually sensitive tools and/or help content. For example, if a user is preparing a resume to assist her in obtaining a job, the user may place her computer cursor in the “education” section the resume. According to the present invention, the placement of computer cursor in the “education” section may provide the user with contextually sensitive information. The document may point to an overall solution, e.g., a resume document solution, or individual portions of the document may point to contextual subsets of the solution, e.g., and “experience” section solution of a resume document solution. A document tools pane may open on the user's computer screen adjacent to the document being edited and may provide a narrative on suggested approaches for the completion of the “education” section. If the user moves the cursor to another portion of the document, for example to the “objectives” section of the resume, the user may obtain information associated with that context, such as examples of proper employment objectives statements.
It should be understood that the contextually sensitive tools and help content provided to a user in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention may be provided for a variety of software application programs, including word processors, spreadsheets, web browsers, text editors, and the like. Moreover, the types and content of helpful information and tools provided to a user according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a variety of tools and actions and help information as desired by the creator of the software applications in use by the user.
Referring to
Referring to the exemplary document shown in
A detailed discussion of the creation and implementation of the “smart” document 110 illustrated in
In addition to helpful information to assist the user, a variety of document tools and actions 145 are provided. For example, the “Submit Review” action may allow the user to submit the completed document 110 to her supervisor or to her employee after completion of the document. The “Open Last Review” action may allow the user to open the last performance review so that she may determine whether she completed her objectives as set forth in the last review. If the document in use by the user is some other type of document, for example a resume document, helpful information in the document tools pane might include information on preparing the “education” section, the “experience” section, and/or the “personal information” section. A will document 110 might be associated with helpful information regarding legal rules for preparation of wills, rules regarding estate beneficiaries, and the like.
In addition to the document actions and help content illustrated in the pane 135, a variety of document controls may be provided, including radio buttons, text boxes, check boxes, ActiveX controls, XML tree controls, and the like. For example, a text box may be provided to allow a user to select from a list of pre-written text items. Or, the user may be allowed to enter text in a list box provided in the pane 135 that will then be inserted into the document or used by the application with respect to some other functionality of the application. A radio button or check box may be provided to allow the user to select from different choices of document actions or help content. For example, if the document is a will, check boxes may be provided with which the user may select “married,” “single,” etc., to obtain help information based on the user's personal will and estate profile.
Referring to
Such components may include a number of dynamically-linked libraries (dll), which include executable files or routines stored separately from the software application 110. The dlls are loaded by the software application 100 only when they are needed to provide functionality to the document 110. Additionally, as described in detail below, the schema library 105 may include a number of Extensible Markup Language (XML) files for providing contextually sensitive functionality in association with XML structure that has been applied to the document 110.
A solution property 115 is included in the document 110 for pointing the document to a particular solution contained in the schema library 105. The solution location property 118 provides the document 110 and the application 100 with information as to the location of the solution property in the schema library or to a remote location provided via a distributed computing environment, such as is provided from a web-based server via the Internet.
According to the present invention, and as described in detail below, when a user focuses on a particular portion of the document 110, such as the “objectives” section of the performance review 110 illustrated in
With reference to
A number of program modules may be stored in the drives and RAM 25, including an operating system 35, one or more application programs 100, a word processor program module 37 (or other type of program module), program data, such as the manifest 38, and other program modules (not shown).
A user may enter commands and information into the personal computer 20 through a keyboard 40 and pointing device, such as a mouse 42. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 21 through a serial port interface 46 that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a game port or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 47 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 23 via an interface, such as a video adapter 48. In addition to the monitor, personal computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers or printers.
The personal computer 20 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 49. The remote computer 49 may be a server, a router, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the personal computer 20, although only a memory storage device 50 has been illustrated in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the personal computer 20 is connected to the LAN 51 through a network interface 53. When used in a WAN networking environment, the personal computer 20 typically includes a modem 54 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 52, such as the Internet. The modem 54, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 23 via the serial port interface 46. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the personal computer 20, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
As understood by those skilled in the art of Extensible Markup Language usage, once that portion of the document 110 is annotated with XML structure corresponding to the “name” element, for example, manipulation of data entered into that section of the document may be performed by software components without regard to the actual content of the data so long as the content was entered according to the schema prescribed for that portion of the document.
At step 315, the document 110 is annotated with XML structure that will be associated with tools and help functionality for providing contextually sensitive functionality to the document as described above. A simplified XML structure annotation for the employee review document 110 illustrated in
The schema attached to the document 110 prescribes the data type and data structure rules entered within the XML document structure. As should be understood, the XML structure illustrated above is simplified in nature, and is provided for purposes of illustration only. A sample XML schema associated with the example XML structure above is as follows.
At step 320, the document 110 is saved along with the associated document schema and XML structure.
At step 325, software programming code is written that is necessary to display and handle tools, controls and actions in the document tools pane 135 according to the position of the user's cursor within the document 110. The code written at step 325 includes all required XML files, including Extensible Style Sheet Language (XSL) files, including XSL transformations and XSL formatting objects. As understood by those skilled in the art, XSL transformations include files containing specific rules by which one XML document is transformed into another XML document. As should be understood by those skilled in the art, all XML files, including XML documents and XML transformation documents, are written for processing the document 110 as an XML-structured document.
According to one embodiment, an XML schema may be written to define a list of document actions, controls and help content that are associated with a solution or contextual subset of a solution that are correspondingly associated with XML structure (elements) in the document. The XML schema may be written using any editing tool or XML schema editing tool to create an instance of the schema. The XML schema may be written to include directly in the XML schema all of the properties of the schema and a list of the document actions, controls and help content to be displayed. An exemplary XML schema is set out above.
Other code written for the document 110 at step 325 includes all of the components, such as dynamic-link libraries (dll), needed by the application 100 and the document 110 for providing the contextually sensitive functionality to the document 110, as described with reference to
Other exemplary components that are written at step 325 include components for drawing the document tools pane 135 and for displaying textual information associated with the XML elements in the document 110 within which the computer cursor is presently located. Other components may include modular software routines for displaying an action, such as a “submit review” button, for allowing the user to submit the review to a third party, such as the user's employee or the user's supervisor. Still other components may be included for drawing and for providing functionality to controls, such as radio buttons, text boxes and check boxes, as described above with reference to
Controls, such as radio buttons, text boxes and check boxes, may be provided in the pane 135 without an associated schema being attached to the document. By declaring that a control is associated with a particular XML element, that control may be provided at the top of the pane 135 above other actions, controls and help topics prescribed by the schema. Similarly, a control may be provided immediately above all other items, including those described above, in the pane 135 by declaring that the control is associated with the entire schema for the document rather than to individual XML elements prescribed by the schema.
All of the aforementioned files, components, component add-ins, dlls, schema files, and XML files are assembled and stored for use by the application 100 in providing the contextually sensitive functionality of the document 110. The schema library 105 may be in the form of a database containing pointers to the aforementioned stored components that may be stored in the memory of the computer 20 in various locations, including the computer's registry.
According to embodiment of the present invention, an application programming interface (API) is provided for implementing the functionality of the present invention to provide a “smart” document solution to the document 110. The API includes properties and methods or instructions that are called upon when a particular action is initiated, for example, opening the document 110 that in turn points to a solution, as described above. Listed below is sample computer programming code for implementing the “smart” document API. The sample code listed below is not limiting of variations that may be made in computer programming code that may be written for implementing the API according to the present invention.
Sample Smart Document API
Implements ISmartDocument
Private Sub ISmartDocument SmartDocInitialize(ByVal document As Object, ByVal bstrSolutionPath As String)
Private Property Get ISmartDocument_SmartDocXMLTypeCount( ) As Long
Private Property Get ISmartDocument_SmartDocXMLTypeName(ByVal smartDocID As Long) As String
Private Property Get ISmartDocument_SmartDocXMLTypeCaption(ByVal smartDocID As Long, ByVal LocaleID As Long) As String
Private Property Get ISmartDocument_ControlCount(ByVal SmartDocXMLTypeName As String) As Long
Private Property Get ISmartDocument_ControlID(ByVal SmartDocXMLTypeName As String, ByVal ControlIndex As Long) As Long
Private Property Get ISmartDocument_ControlTypeFromID(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long) As C_TYPE
Private Property Get ISmartDocument_ControlNameFromID(ByVal ControlID As Long) As String
Private Property Get ISmartDocument_IsControlDynamic(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long) As Boolean
Private Property Get ISmartDocument_ControlCaptionFromID(ByVal ControlIDAs Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object) As String
Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateRadioGroup(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, List( ) As String, count As Long, InitialSelected As Long)
Private Sub ISmartDocument OnRadioGroupSelectChange(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Selected As Long, ByVal Value As String)
Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateImage(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, ImageSrc As String)
Private Sub ISmartDocument_ImageClick(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal
ApplicationName As String, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Text As String, ByVal Xml As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal XCoordinate As Long, ByVal YCoordinate As Long)
Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateDocumentFragment(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, DocumentFragment As String)
Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateActiveXProps(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, PropBag As SmartTagLib.IActiveXProperties)
Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateCheckbox(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, Checked As Boolean)
Private Sub ISmartDocument OnCheckboxChange(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Checked As Boolean)
Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateListOrComboContent(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, List( ) As String, count As Long, InitialSelected As Long, IsEditable As Boolean, ControlOnSameLine As Boolean)
Private Sub ISmartDocument OnListOrComboSelectChange(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Selected As Long, ByVal Value As String)
Private Sub ISmartDocument PopulateTextboxContent(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, Value As String, ControlOnSameLine As Boolean)
Private Sub ISmartDocument_OnTextboxContentChange(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Value As String)
Private Sub ISmartDocument_PopulateHelpContent(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long, ByVal bstrText As String, ByVal bstrXML As String, ByVal Target As Object, Content As String)
Private Sub ISmartDocument_InvokeControl(ByVal ControlID As Long, ByVal ApplicationName As String, ByVal Target As Object, ByVal Text As String, ByVal Xml As String, ByVal LocaleID As Long)
A number of properties and methods are included in the API listed above. The SmartDoclnitialize method includes routines and instructions executed when the API is called upon to provide “smart” document functionality to the docket 110. The SmartDocXMLTypeCount property includes the number of XML element types associated with the solution. The SmartDocXMLTypeName property includes unique identifiers for the XML element types associated with the “smart” document solution. The SmartDocXMLTypeCaption property includes captions associated with XML elements that may be included in a menu or pane such as the help pane 135.
The ControlCount property includes the number of controls associated with the “smart” document solution for a particular XML element type. The ControlID property includes unique identifiers for the controls. The ControlTypeFromID property includes the types of controls available for use with an associated solution, for example, radio buttons, textboxes, and check boxes. The ControlNameFromID property returns a name associated with each control for use internally by a given application program 100.
The PopulateRadioGroup method includes routines and instructions that are executed for populating radio control buttons within a menu or pane such as the help pane 135. The OnRadioGroupSelectChange method includes routines and instructions that are executed when a radio group (radio button) is selected or deselected.
The PopulateImage method includes routines and instructions that are executed for populating an image associated with a solution, such as an image populated within the help pane 135. The ImageClick method includes routines and instructions that are executed when an image is selected by a user.
The PopulateDocumentFragment method includes routines and instructions that are executed for populating the user interface with text or data. The PopulateActiveXProps method includes routines and instructions that are executed for obtaining ActiveX functionality associated with a document solution.
The PopulateCheckbox method includes routines and instructions for providing a checkbox control in a user interface such as the help pane 135. The OnCheckboxChange method includes routines and instructions that are executed when a checkbox control is selected or deselected by a user.
The PopulateListOrComboContent method includes routines and instructions that are executed to populate a list box control in a user interface such as the pane 135. The OnListOrComboSelectChange method includes routines and instructions that are executed upon the selection of an item in a list box control.
The PopulateTextboxContent method includes routines and instructions for populating a textbox in a user interface such as the pane 135. The OnTextboxContentChange method includes routines and instructions that are executed for handling an event associated with the change of content in a textbox control within a user interface such as the pane 135.
The PopulateHelpContent method includes routines and instructions for populating a help content field within the pane 135 with required text or data. The InvokeControl method includes routines and instructions that are executed when a control such as a radio button, textbox, or checkbox is selected or deselected.
Referring still to
At step 340, a manifest of all of the programming components described above is created for identifying the list of components, dlls, schema files, and XML files that will be used to provide various solutions and functionality to the document 110. A pointer is added to the document 110 for pointing the document to the manifest of components for obtaining functionality provided by individual and various components. For a detailed description of the manifest, see U.S. Patent Application entitled “Mechanism for Downloading Software Components From A Remote Source For Use By A Local Software Application,” Ser. No. 10/164,260, filed Jun. 5, 2002, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set out herein. At step 350, all files, code, and changes to the document 110 are saved, and the document creation method ends at step 390. Accordingly, the document 110 is now in a condition to be opened and utilized by a user.
At step 415, the user selects the document 110 for opening in a manner consistent with the application 100. At step 420, a determination is made as to whether the document 110 refers to a solution. That is, at step 420, a determination is made as to whether the document 110 is annotated with pointers to a solution or to multiple solutions for providing contextually sensitive tools and help information to the document, as described above. As a part of the check to determine whether the document 110 points to a solution or to multiple solutions, a determination is also made as to whether a schema has been attached to the document as described above. If the document does refer to a solution, for example a solution for providing the user with assistance in preparation of the user's employee review document 110, the method proceeds to step 425 and the application 100 calls the schema library 105 to determine whether the solution referred to by the document 110 is stored in the schema library 105. At the schema library, the determination includes a determination as to what components in the schema library are necessary; that is, what components are associated with the solution I.D. For example, the document 110 may have a schema attached to define the rules governing the XML structure of the document 110, but that was created without reference to a particular solution.
At step 430, a determination is made as to whether the solution is stored in the schema library. As should be understood, multiple solutions may be attached to the document 110. For example, a first solution might include helpful information and actions to provide contextually sensitive information regarding completion of the document 110 by a particular user. A second solution may be attached to the document 110 for providing information to a supervisor of the user so that the contextually sensitive information provided to the supervisor will give the supervisor information as to how to evaluate each section of the employee's review document.
If multiple solutions are referred to by the document 110, a prompt may be provided to the user, such as the dialog box 500, illustrated in
At step 435, a determination is made as to whether the user actually wants the solution to be provided to the user after the document 110 is opened. As should be understood, a dialog box similar to the dialog box 500 may be presented to the user to query the user as to whether she desires the help content and tools functionality. The user may have completed the document 110 on numerous occasions and may not now desire additional help functionality or action functionality. If desired, the user may elect to always receive the solution upon opening the document 110. Similarly, the user may elect to have the document 110 via the application 100 check for updates to the solution each time the document 110 is opened.
If the user declines the solution, the method proceeds to step 455, and the document is opened without “smart” document solutions according to the normal procedures required and implemented by the application 100. If the user does desire the functionality of the solution referred to by the document 110, the method proceeds to step 440, and the solution is loaded for use by the application 100 and document 110. As should be understood by those skilled in the art, loading the solution includes calls from the document 110 via the application 100 to all necessary files, dlls, component add-ins, and XML files associated with the solution and stored in the schema library 105.
Upon being called by the document 110, each called file is registered with the application 100 via the computer's operating system, and a path is established between each called file and the application 100 and document 110 for provision of the functionality associated with each file. For example, if a particular dll that is used for drawing the document tools pane 135 must be assigned a registry key for proper communication with the application 100 and document 110, this registration process is performed during the load solution step 440. At step 445, the “smart” document 110 is opened and is displayed on the user's computer screen, as illustrated in
Referring back to step 420, if the document does not refer to a solution, the method proceeds to step 450, and a determination is made as to whether a schema has been attached to the document. If the document has an attached schema, but no reference to a particular solution, the method proceeds to step 430 and a “check” is made of the schema library as to whether a solution does exist that may be associated with the schema that is attached to the document 110. That is, even where no solution is referred to in the document 110, the schema library may have solutions that have been obtained by the user of the computer 20 subsequent to the creation of the document 110 that may be utilized by the document 110 even though the document 110 was not originally created to refer to the solution.
If a solution does exist in the schema library for the document 110, the method proceeds to step 435, and the steps thereafter, as described above. If a schema is not attached to the document 110, the method proceeds to step 455, and the document is opened without “smart” document solutions.
Referring back to step 430, if no solution(s) are found in the schema library associated with the solution referred to by the document 110 or associated with the attached schema, the method proceeds to step 460, and a determination is made as to whether the user would like to download a solution. At step 460, the user may be “prompted” by the application 100 and informed that the document 110 will work more efficiently, or will be more useful, if the user downloads certain help and action functionality to the user's document 110. The user may be provided with a “prompt” in the form of a dialog box, such as the dialog box 600 illustrated in
If the user desires to download the solution(s) offered to the user, the method proceeds to step 465. At step 465, components necessary for providing the desired solution(s) to the document 110 are downloaded to the user's computer 20 from some remote source, such as a remote web-based server. In order to locate the remote source, the application 100 uses the solution location pointer 118 from the document 110 to locate and obtain the necessary solution components. For a detailed description of a mechanism for downloading data and application components and other software modules from a remote location to the application 110, see U.S. Patent Application entitled “Mechanism for Downloading Software Components From A Remote Source For Use By A Local Software Application,” Ser. No. 10/164,260, filed Jun. 5, 2002, which is incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set out herein. At step 470, the downloaded solutions are loaded into the client-side schema library 105, and the solution is loaded as described above so that the document 110 will include the functionality of the solution.
The method 700 begins at start step 705, and proceeds to step 710, where a list of XML elements that surround the cursor is generated. The position of the cursor within the XML hierarchy is located, and the X-path expression to get to the position where the cursor is located is determined. For example, referring to the simplified XML code set forth above, the cursor may be located within the “e-mail” tag and inside the larger XML tree within the “employee review” tag.
At step 715, a determination is made as to which tools and help content should appear in the document tools pane 135. To make this determination, the application 100 enters a look-up table stored on the client computer 20 that contains information about which XML elements have which particular tools, help content, controls, etc., associated with those XML elements. For example, if the cursor is located in the “e-mail name” element within the “personal information” section 120, the application 100 will enter the look-up table to determine which particular tools or help content are associated with the e-mail name element.
Each document action, help item, and control associated with each element is populated with a unique identification (ID) associated with each XML element to which it is applied so that the application 100 may readily locate the actions, help items, or tools associated with the XML element. At step 720, a determination is made as to whether any of the actions, help items, or controls are dynamic. A control may appear differently based on the context or background information for the context. The “objectives” section of the review document 110 may be associated with a “Submit Review” button when the section is completed. On the other hand, if the section is not completed, the “Submit Review” button may not appear in the pane 135 because the document should not be submitted without the completed “objections” section. Accordingly, the “Submit Review” button in this case may be identified as dynamic at step 720, and the method then proceeds to step 725. At step 725, the document 110 via the application 100 calls the component representing the “Submit Review” button and provides that component with the context of the cursor position, for example, whether the “objectives” element has been completed or not.
At step 730, after a determination has been made that the actions, help content, or controls are static or dynamic, the contents of the document tools pane 135 are drawn on the user's computer screen adjacent to the document 110, as illustrated in
Referring back to
Help topics and tools may be nested, meaning that sub-help topics and sub-actions may be included in help topics and document tools. If the cursor is in multiple elements because of nesting, then the number of sections in the document tools pane 135 can be greater than two. In this case, the nested elements are shown in order of nesting where the outermost element is at the top of the document tools pane 135 and innermost element is at the bottom of the document tools pane 135. If the elements, actions, tools, and help content do not fit on one page, a scroll bar may be provided, as illustrated in
Accordingly, after the document 110 is opened, and the “smart” document solution is loaded and implemented as described above, the user of the document 110 may now enter the document and complete the document with the help of the “smart” document functionality provided in the document tools pane 135. As the user moves the computer cursor through various sections of the document that are tagged with XML structure, the user may be provided with helpful information and tools associated with that portion of the document.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications or variations may be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/164,960, filed Jun. 6, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,356,537 which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4674065 | Lange et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4868750 | Kucera et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5020019 | Ogawa | May 1991 | A |
5128865 | Sadler | Jul 1992 | A |
5159552 | van Gasteren et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5267155 | Buchanan et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5287448 | Nicol et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297039 | Kanaegami et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5317546 | Balch et al. | May 1994 | A |
5337233 | Hofert et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341293 | Vertelney et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351190 | Kondo | Sep 1994 | A |
5386564 | Shearer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5392386 | Chalas | Feb 1995 | A |
5418902 | West et al. | May 1995 | A |
5446891 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5522089 | Kikinis et al. | May 1996 | A |
5535323 | Miller et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541836 | Church et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546521 | Martinez | Aug 1996 | A |
5581684 | Dudzik et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596700 | Darnell et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5617565 | Augenbraun et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625783 | Ezekiel et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627567 | Davidson | May 1997 | A |
5627958 | Potts et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634019 | Koppolu et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640560 | Smith | Jun 1997 | A |
5657259 | Davis et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5685000 | Cox, Jr. | Nov 1997 | A |
5708825 | Sotomayor | Jan 1998 | A |
5715415 | Dazey et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717923 | Dedrick | Feb 1998 | A |
5752022 | Chiu et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761689 | Rayson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764794 | Perlin | Jun 1998 | A |
5765156 | Guzak et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781189 | Holleran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781904 | Oren et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794257 | Liu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799068 | Kikinis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802253 | Gross et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802262 | Van De Vanter | Sep 1998 | A |
5802299 | Logan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802530 | van Hoff | Sep 1998 | A |
5805911 | Miller | Sep 1998 | A |
5809318 | Rivette et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815830 | Anthony | Sep 1998 | A |
5818447 | Wolf et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821931 | Berquist et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822539 | van Hoff | Oct 1998 | A |
5822720 | Bookman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826025 | Gramlich | Oct 1998 | A |
5832100 | Lawton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845077 | Fawcett | Dec 1998 | A |
5855007 | Jovicic et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859636 | Pandit | Jan 1999 | A |
5872973 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875443 | Nielsen | Feb 1999 | A |
5877757 | Baldwin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884266 | Dvorak | Mar 1999 | A |
5892919 | Nielsen | Apr 1999 | A |
5893073 | Kasso et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893132 | Huffman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895461 | De La Huerga et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896321 | Miller et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900004 | Gipson | May 1999 | A |
5907704 | Gudmundson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907852 | Yamada | May 1999 | A |
5913214 | Madnick et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920859 | Li | Jul 1999 | A |
5924099 | Guzak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933139 | Feigner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933140 | Strahom et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933498 | Schneck et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940614 | Allen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944787 | Zoken | Aug 1999 | A |
5946647 | Miller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956681 | Yamakita | Sep 1999 | A |
5974413 | Beauregard et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987480 | Donohue et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991719 | Yazaki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995756 | Herrmann | Nov 1999 | A |
6006265 | Rangan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006279 | Hayes | Dec 1999 | A |
6014616 | Kim | Jan 2000 | A |
6018761 | Uomini | Jan 2000 | A |
6028605 | Conrad et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029135 | Krasle | Feb 2000 | A |
6029171 | Smiga et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031525 | Perlin | Feb 2000 | A |
6052531 | Waldin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061516 | Yoshikawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067087 | Krauss et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072475 | Van Ketwich | Jun 2000 | A |
6073090 | Fortune et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085201 | Tso | Jul 2000 | A |
6088711 | Fein et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092074 | Rodkin et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108640 | Slotznick | Aug 2000 | A |
6108674 | Murakami et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112209 | Gusack | Aug 2000 | A |
6121968 | Arcuri et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122647 | Horowitz et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126306 | Ando | Oct 2000 | A |
6137911 | Zhilyaev | Oct 2000 | A |
6141005 | Hetherington et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151643 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
6167469 | Safai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167523 | Strong | Dec 2000 | A |
6167568 | Gandel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173316 | De Boor et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182029 | Friedman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185550 | Snow et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185576 | McIntosh | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199046 | Heinzle et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199081 | Meyerzon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208338 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219698 | Iannucci et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246404 | Feigner et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262728 | Alexander | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272074 | Winner | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272505 | De La Huerga | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282489 | Bellesfield et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289513 | Bentwich | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291785 | Koga et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292768 | Chan | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295061 | Park et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297822 | Feldman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300950 | Clark et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308171 | De La Huerga | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311152 | Bai et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311177 | Dauerer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311194 | Sheth et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320496 | Sokoler et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323853 | Hedloy | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336125 | Noda et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6336131 | Wolfe | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338059 | Fields et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339436 | Amro et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339755 | Hetherington et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347398 | Parthasarathy et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349295 | Tedesco et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353926 | Parthesarathy et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381742 | Forbes et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6382350 | Jezewski et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6392668 | Murray | May 2002 | B1 |
6396515 | Hetherington et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401067 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6408323 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413100 | Dickmeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415304 | Horvitz | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421678 | Smiga et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6424979 | Livingston et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434567 | De La Huerga | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438545 | Beauregard et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441753 | Montgomery | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442545 | Feldman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442591 | Haynes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456304 | Angiulo et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470091 | Koga et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473069 | Gerpheide | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477510 | Johnson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480860 | Monday | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493006 | Gourdol et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498982 | Bellesfield et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6510504 | Satyanarayanan | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516321 | De La Huerga | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519557 | Emens et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519603 | Bays et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6546433 | Matheson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553385 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556972 | Bakis et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556984 | Zien | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564264 | Creswell et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571241 | Nosohara | May 2003 | B1 |
6571253 | Thompson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578022 | Foulger et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591260 | Schwarzhoff et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595342 | Maritzen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601075 | Huang et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604099 | Chung et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615131 | Rennard et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618733 | White et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622140 | Kantrowitz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623527 | Hamzy | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625581 | Perkowski | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629079 | Spiegel et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631519 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636880 | Bera | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643650 | Slaughter et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654734 | Mani et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654932 | Bahrs et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658623 | Schilit et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687485 | Hopkins et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694307 | Julien | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697824 | Bowman-Amuah | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697837 | Rodov | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6708189 | Fitzsimons et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715144 | Daynes et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717593 | Jennings | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6718516 | Claussen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728679 | Strubbe et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732090 | Shanahan et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6732361 | Andreoli et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741994 | Kang et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742054 | Upton, IV | May 2004 | B1 |
6745208 | Berg et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766326 | Cena | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6795808 | Strubbe et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6802061 | Partovi et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826726 | Hsing et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829631 | Forman et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6845499 | Srivastava et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6857103 | Wason | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859908 | Clapper | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868625 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6874125 | Carroll et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874143 | Murray et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6880129 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6883137 | Girardot et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6898604 | Ballinger et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901402 | Corston-Oliver et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904560 | Panda | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6925457 | Britton et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6925470 | Sangudi et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6944857 | Glaser et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6948133 | Haley | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950831 | Haley | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950982 | Dourish | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6957385 | Chan et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963867 | Ford et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964010 | Sharp | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975983 | Fortescue et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976090 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976209 | Storisteanu et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981212 | Claussen et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6986104 | Green et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990654 | Carroll, Jr. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7003522 | Reynar et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013289 | Horn et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024658 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7028312 | Merrick et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7032174 | Montero et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039859 | Sundaresan | May 2006 | B1 |
7051076 | Tsuchiya | May 2006 | B2 |
7082392 | Butler et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7100115 | Yennaco | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7113976 | Watanabe | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7146564 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7216351 | Maes | May 2007 | B1 |
7237190 | Rollins et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7281245 | Reynar et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302634 | Lucovsky et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305354 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7325194 | Moore et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7346840 | Ravishankar et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7356537 | Reynar et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7392479 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7421645 | Reynar | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7454459 | Kapoor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7707024 | Arayasantiparb et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707496 | Moore et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7712024 | Reynar et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716163 | Reynar et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716676 | Sawicki et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7739588 | Reynar et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742048 | Moore et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7770102 | Wolff et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7778816 | Reynar | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783614 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788602 | Reynar et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7827546 | Jones et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
20010029605 | Forbes et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041328 | Fisher | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042098 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049702 | Najmi | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056461 | Kampe et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002590 | King et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020003469 | Gupta | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020003898 | Wu | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004803 | Serebrennikov | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007309 | Reynar | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023113 | Hsing et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023136 | Silver et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026450 | Kuramochi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029304 | Reynar et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035581 | Reynar et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038180 | Bellesfield et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065110 | Enns et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065891 | Malik | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066073 | Lienhard et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078222 | Compas et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085020 | Carroll, Jr. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087591 | Reynar et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091803 | Imamura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099687 | Krishnaprasad et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020100036 | Moshir et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103829 | Manning et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020104080 | Woodard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110225 | Cullis | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111928 | Haddad | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120685 | Srivastava et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129060 | Rollins et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129107 | Loughran et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133523 | Ambler et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020149601 | Rajarajan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156774 | Beauregard et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156792 | Gombocz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169802 | Brewer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175955 | Gourdol et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178008 | Reynar | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178182 | Wang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184247 | Jokela et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188941 | Cicciarelli et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196281 | Audleman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198909 | Huynh et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002391 | Biggs | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005411 | Gerken | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009489 | Griffin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014745 | Mah et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025728 | Ebbo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046316 | Gergic et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050911 | Lucovsky et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051236 | Pace et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056207 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030081791 | Erickson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083910 | Sayal et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084138 | Tavis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097318 | Yu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101190 | Horvitz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101204 | Watson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101416 | McInnes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030106040 | Rubin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115039 | Wang | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121033 | Peev et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126136 | Omoigui | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140308 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154144 | Pokorny et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158841 | Britton et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158851 | Britton et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167445 | Su et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172343 | Leymaster et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177341 | Devillers | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182391 | Leber et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030192040 | Vaughan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195937 | Kircher, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212527 | Moore et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220795 | Arayasantiparb et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229593 | Raley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233330 | Raley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002939 | Arora et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003389 | Reynar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006564 | Lucovsky et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006741 | Radja et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024875 | Horvitz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039990 | Bakar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044959 | Shanmugasundaram et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068694 | Kaler et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083218 | Feng | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133846 | Khoshatefeh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143581 | Bohannon et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040165007 | Shafron | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181756 | Berringer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199861 | Lucovsky | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040201867 | Katano | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236717 | Demartini et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050050164 | Burd et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055330 | Britton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050094850 | Nakao | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108195 | Yalovsky et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120313 | Rudd et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050187926 | Britton et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060173674 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20100268793 | Wolff et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 246 920 | Mar 2000 | CA |
200410005390.8 | Oct 2008 | CN |
0 364 180 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0481784 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0598511 | May 1994 | EP |
0872827 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0810520 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1093058 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1280068 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1361523 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1376392 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 447 754 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 452 966 | Sep 2004 | EP |
64-88771 | Apr 1989 | JP |
03-152663 | Jun 1991 | JP |
05-174013 | Jul 1993 | JP |
06-035962 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06-096064 | Apr 1994 | JP |
07-036917 | Feb 1995 | JP |
08-272662 | Oct 1996 | JP |
09-138636 | May 1997 | JP |
10-171827 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-240737 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2000-067056 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-222394 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-231566 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-014303 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-125994 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-522112 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001-0350464 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-041353 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002163250 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-222181 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003-141174 | May 2003 | JP |
4567952 | Oct 2010 | JP |
4809577 | Aug 2011 | JP |
272521 | Dec 2009 | MX |
317624 | Oct 1997 | TW |
338136 | Aug 1998 | TW |
515963 | Jan 2003 | TW |
2004-133892 | Apr 2004 | TW |
I364674 | May 2012 | TW |
WO 9507510 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9917240 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0054174 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0067117 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0073949 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0118687 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0137170 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0186390 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 02099627 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0215518 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0242928 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2004012099 | Feb 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Australian First Official Action dated Oct. 21, 2008 cited in 2003204800. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265. |
Sharon Oviatt et al., “Integration and Synchronization of Input Modes during Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction,” CHI 97, Atlanta, Georgia, Mar. 22-27, 1997, pp. 415-422. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712. |
European Statement regarding Grounds of Appeal dated Jan. 13, 2009 cited in Application No. 04 002 224.6. |
Malaysian Examination Report dated Nov. 30, 2009 cited in Application No. PI 20040559. |
Australian Third Official Action dated Dec. 23, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003204478. |
Australian First Official Action Report dated Jan. 18, 2009 cited in Application No. 2004200459. |
Hara, T. et al., “Inside Microsoft.NET-Complete Explanation, ‘What Microsoft Aims for’”, msdn magazine, No. 6, pp. 20-35, ASCII, Japan, Sep. 18, 2000, 19 pp. |
Shiroiwa, K., “iMac&iBook, Must-see for User, Full of Recommended Setting Methods and Specially Selected Tips, Mastering Mac OS9”, MacPeople, ASCII Corporation, Japan, Dec. 3, 1999, vol. 5, No. 24, p. 50 (in Japanese—no translation yet). |
(Previously cited) Koyaku, H., “What is Brought to SQL Server 2000 by XML, Part 1: Function of XML Provided by SQL Server 2000”, Enterprise Servers World, vol. 3, No. 12, IDG Japan, Inc., Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 42-53 (with English language translation). |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 4, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/780,376. |
European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Feb. 26, 2009 cited in European Application No. 03012830.0-2211. |
European Communication dated Mar. 18, 2009 cited in European Application No. 04003683.2-2211. |
European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Mar. 20, 2009 cited in European Application No. 03012830.0. |
Australian First Examiner's Report dated Sep. 15, 2008 cited in Australian Application No. 2003204379. |
Japanese Final Official Action dated Nov. 25, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2002-207514. |
Japanese Official Action dated Feb. 6, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-180218. |
Japanese Official Action dated Feb. 13, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-162911. |
Japanese Official Action dated Feb. 24, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-161338. |
Japanese Official Action dated Mar. 6, 2009 cited in Japanese Application No. 2004-042140. |
Malaysian Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2010 cited in Application No. PI 20040265. |
Korean Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2010 cited in Application No. 10-2003-36252. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2010 cited in Application No. 03143003.1. |
Japanese Final Notice of Rejection dated Apr. 9, 2010 cited in Application No. 2003-162911. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190, filed Jun. 27, 2002, entitled “System and Method for Providing Namespace Related Information”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,260, filed Jun. 5, 2002, entitled “Mechanism for Downloading Software Components from a Remote Source for Use by a Local Software Application”. |
Fernandex M. et al., “SilkRoute: Trading Between Relations and XML”, Computer Networks, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam NL, vol. 33, No. 1-6, Jun. 2000, pp. 723-745. |
Braganholo VDP; “Updating Relationship Databases Through XML Views”, Technical Report RP-328, Online (http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/{vanessa/disc/iplinas/PropostaTese.pdf), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil, Sep. 2002, XP-002279067, pp. 1-61. |
Falquet G et al., “Design and Analysis of Active Hypertext Views on Databases”, CUI—Technical Report, Online (http://cui.unige.ch/isi/reports/design-anls-ahtv.pdf), Jan. 2002, XP-002279068, pp. 1-24. |
Ceri S et al., “Deriving Production Rules for Incremental View Maintenance”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 1994, XP-00914159, pp. 577-589. |
Bonifati A., “Active Behaviors Within XML Document Management”, EDBT Ph.D. Workshop, (EDBT Ph.D. WS 2000), Online (http://www.edbt2000.uni-konstanz.de/phd-workshop/papers/Bonifati.ps), Mar. 2000, Konstanz, Germany, XP-002279069, pp. 1-4. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899, filed Dec. 9, 2003, entitled “Mechanism for Downloading Software Components from a Remote Source for Use by a Local Software Application”. |
“Integrating with External Systems: iPlanet™ Unified Development Server”, Sun Microsystems, Inc., Ver. 5.0, Aug. 2001, pp. 127-156. |
Sperberg-McQueen, C.M. and Thompson, Henry, “XML Schema”, W3C Architecture Domain, http://web.archive.org/web/20020802155904/http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema, 2000-2002, pp. 1-10. |
Quin, Liam, “Extensible Markup Language (XML)”, W3C Architecture Domain, http://web.archive.org/web/2002121962057/http://www.w3.org/XML/, 1996-2002, pp. 1-3. |
Clark, James, and DeRose, Steve, “XML Path Language (XPath), Version 1.0”, W3C, http://web.archive.org/web/2021010034434/http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath, 1999-2000, pp. 1-31. |
“Microsoft BizTalk Server 2002—Using BizTalk Mapper”, http://msdn.Microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—intro—zkqb.asp . . . , Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1-2. |
“BizTalk Server 2002 Mapper User Interface”, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—concept—codw . . . , Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1. |
“BizTalk Server 2002 Compiling Data”, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—concept—drgl.a . . . , Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1. |
“BizTalk Server 2002 Testing Maps”, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—concept—fhhy.a . . . , Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1-2. |
“BizTalk Server 2002 View Links and Functoids by Using Grid Preview”, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/bts—2002/htm/lat—xmltools—map—check—fuwn.as . . . , Microsoft Corporation, 1999-2001, pp. 1. |
“The StarOffice™ 6.0 Suite: New Features Guide”, Sun Microsystems, V. 1.1, Jul. 2002, pp. 1-31. |
“New Microsoft Office Family Application Taps Power of Industry-Standard XML”, http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/oct02/10-09officefamilypr.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Oct. 2002-Feb. 2003, pp. 1-2. |
“Q&A: How ‘XDocs’ Alters the Paradigm for Gathering Business-Critical Information”, http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/oct02/10-09officefamily.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Oct. 2002-Feb. 2003, pp. 1-4. |
“InfoPath: Microsoft Names New Product from Office Group”, http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2003/feb03/02-10infopath.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Oct. 2002-Feb. 2003, pp. 1-4. |
“Microsoft Unveils Visual Studio.NET Enterprise Tools”, Microsoft Corporation, http://microsoft.com/presspass/press/2001/may01/05-21vseepr.mspx, May 2001, pp. 1-4. |
“Microsoft Extends XML Web Services Support in .NET Enterprise Servers Through Visual Studio .NET”, http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2002/feb02/02-13servervspr.mspx, Microsoft Corporation, Feb. 2002, pp. 1-3. |
“Integrated Development Environment (IDE)”, http://web.archive.org/web/20020602032242/http://altova.com/products—ide.html, Jun. 2002, pp. 1-2. |
“How to Use XSL to Transform Excel XML Spreadsheet for Server-Side Use”, http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;278976, Microsoft Corporation, Aug. 2004, pp. 1-7. |
“Altova markup your mind!”, http://web.archive.org/web/20021204211721/http://altova.com/products—ide.html, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-3. |
“Arbortext and Accessibility”, http://web.archive.org/web/20021219133536/www.arbortext.com/html/accessibility.html, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-5. |
“XML Compliance, 100% Pure XML”, http:web.archive.org/web/20021209185855/www.arbortext.com/html/xml—compliance, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-3. |
“Schemas”, http://web.archive.org/web/20021221023148/www.arbortext.com/html/schemas.html, Dec. 2002, pp. 13. |
“Arbortext's Support for XSL-FO”, http://web.archive.org/web/20021221021632/www.arbortext.com/html/xsl-fo.html. Dec. 2002, pp. 1-4. |
“Corel XMetal4, Making XML Content Creation Easy”, http://web.archive.org/web/20031118215158/www.corel.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename, Nov. 2003, pp. 1-2. |
“Corel XMetal 4 and Interwoven TeamXML”, http ://web.archive.org/web/20030807211225/www.corel.com/futuretense—cs/ccurl/corel+xml+4+and+interwoven+teamxml.pdf, Aug. 2003, pp. 1-2. |
“The Corel-XyEnterprise XML Solution”, http://web.archive.org/web/20030807154355/www.corel.com/futuretense—cs/ccurl/corel+and+XY+enterprise+XML+solution.pdf, Aug. 2003, pp. 1-2. |
Alex Homer, et al.: “Professional Active Server pp.”, 1997, WROS Press Ltd. |
David Flanagan: “JavaScript—The Definitive Guide, Fourth Edition”, Jan. 2002, O'Reilly. |
Santos, C.A.S., L.F.G Soares, G.L. de Souza and J.P. Courtiat: Design methodology and formal validation of hypermedia documents; Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on multimedia, (1998) p. 39-48. |
Terveen, Loren, Will Hill and Brian Amento; Constructing, organizating, and visualizing collections of tropically related Web resources; ACM Trans, Comput-um. Interact. 6, (Mar. 1, 1999) p. 67-94. |
Barrett, Rob, Paul P. Maglio and Daniel C. Kellem; How to personalize the Web; Conference proceedings on human factors in computing systems (1997) p. 75-82. |
Marx, Matthew and Chris Schmandt; CLUES: dynamic personalized message filtering; Proceedings of the ACM 1996 conference on computer supported cooperative work (1996) p. 113-121. |
Goschka, Karl M. and Jurgen Falb; Dynamic hyperlink generation for navigation in relational databases; Proceedings of the tenth ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia: returning to our diverse roots (1999) p. 23-24. |
Pentland, Alex; Perceptual user interfaces: perceptual intelligence; Commun. ACM 43, 3 (Mar. 2000) p. 35-44. |
Stairmand, Mark A.; Texual context analysis for information retrieval; Proceedings of the 20th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (1997) p. 140-147. |
Glushko, Robert J., Jay M. Tenenbaum and Bart Meltzer; An XML framework for agent-based E-commerce; Commun. ACM 42, 3 (Mar. 1999) p. 106. |
Kukich, Karen; Technique for Automatically Correcting Words in Text; ACM Comput. Surv., 24, 4 (Dec. 1992); pp. 377-439. |
Marx, Matt and Chris Schmandt; Putting People First: Specifying Proper Names in Speech Interfaces; Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology; 1994; pp. 29-37. |
Ford, Bryan, Mike Hibler, Jay Lepreau, Roland McGrath and Patrick Tullman; Interface and execution models in the fluke kernal; Proceedings of the third symposium on operating systems design and implementation, (1999) p. 101-115. |
Desmarais, Michel C. and Jiming Liu; Exploring the applications user-expertise assessment for intelligent interfaces; Proceedings of the conference on human factors in corrupting systems, (1993) p. 308-313. |
Foley, James D.; Future directions in user-computer interface software; Conference proceedings on organizational computer systems, (1991) p. 289-297. |
Hartson, H. Rex and Deborah Hix; Human-computer interface development: concepts and systems for its management; ACM Comput. Surv. 1 (Mar. 1989) p. 5-92. |
Foley, Jim; Intergrating computer technology, people technology; strategies and case studies from Georgia Tech's Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center; Proceedings of the workshop on advanced visual interfaces, (1994) p. 34-43. |
Tsai, M., P. Reiher and G.J. Popek; Command management system for next-generation user input; Proceedings of the seventh workshop on hottopics in operating systems, (1999) p. 179-84. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft, Microsoft Press, Fifth Edition, p. 409. |
Kuenning, Geoff, “Using ISPELL from Emacs”, http://theochem.ki.ku.dk/on—line—docs/ispell/ispell—1.html, 4 pp., publication date unknown. |
“Spellout Command”, Commands Reference, vol. 5, http://www.rz.uni-hohenheim.de/betriebssysteme/unix/aix/ aix—4.3.3—doc/base—doc/usr/share/man/inf . . . , 1 page, publication date unknown. |
“Chapter 8—Standard Input and Output”, http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/users/eiamjw/unix/chap8.html, 3 pp., publication date unknown. |
Panagiotis, Christias, Man-cgi 1.15, http://www.physics.umn.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?spell, 1994, 5 pp. |
Bischof, Hans-Peter, “Spell, Spellin, Spellout—Finding Spelling Errors”, http://www.vorlesungen.uni-osnabrueck.de/informatik/shellscript/Html/Man/—Man—NeXT—html/html . . . , Apr. 21, 1997, 2 pp. |
“Module 123—Spell”, http://duplex.hypermart.net/books/bsd/501-504.html, 4 pp., publication date unknown. |
Panagiotis, Christias, Man-cgi 1.15, http://www.calpoly.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?spell+1, 1994, 3 pp. |
Martensson, Bengt, “Thread-Enhanced Spell Front End for GNU Emacs + Detex + Delatex”, http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/337/1987/8/0/1871981/, Aug. 20, 1987, 1 p. |
Willisson, Pace, Ispell (1), http://www.rt.com/man/findaffix.1.html, 1983, 15 pp. |
Willisson, Pace, Ispell (1), “User Commands”, http://www.csee.usf.edu/cgi-bin/man-cgi?ispell, 1983, 18 pp. |
“Handout 38: Spell Checking, Word Counting, and Textual Analysis”, http://courses.cs.emporia.edu/pheattch/courses/2002/cs501s02/hand38/, 3 pp., publication date unknown. |
Keunning, Geoff, “International Spell”, http://fmg-www.cs.ucla.edu/geoff.ispell.html, 3 pp., publication date unknown. |
Ispell 4, “Ispell—Format of Ispell Dictionaries and Affix Files”, http://www.bigbiz.com/cgi-bin/manpage?4+ispell, 11 pp., publication date unknown. |
McMahon, Lee. E., “SED—A Non-Interactive Text Editor,” Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974, Aug. 15, 1978, pp. 16. |
Beitner, N. D.; Hall, W.; Goble, C.A., “Multimedia Support and Authoring in Microcosm: An Extended Model,” Dept. of Electronics and Computer Science, Univ. of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK; Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester MI3 9PL, UK, pp. 1-12, publication date unknown. |
IBM Corporation, “IBM Research Disclosure #368; Multimedia Hyperlinks Automatically Created for Reference Documents,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jun. 1993, pp. 1-5. |
The Complete LINUX™ Operating System 5.2 Deluxe, Red Hat,® Macmillian Digital Publishing USA, A Viacom Company, Red Hat Software, Inc., ISBN 1-57595-199-1B, 1995-1998, pp. 1-385. |
User Manual For AddressMate and AddressMate Plus, CoStar Corporation, AddressMate Software, 1994-1995, pp. 1-210. |
Getting Results With Microsoft® Office 97, Real World Solutions For The Work You Do, Microsoft Corporation, 1995-1997, pp. 1-703. |
InfoCentral™ 7, User's Manual, Corel Corporation, vol. 1, Version 7.0, 1996, pp. 1-86. |
Corel® Office Professional 7 Quick Results User's Manual, vol. 1, Version 7.0 (first printing), Corel Corporation, Limited, pp. 1-531, publication date unknown. |
Novell GroupWise User's Guide for Windows 16-Bit Version 5.2, Novell, Inc., 1993-1997, pp. 1-231. |
Novell GroupWise User's Guide for Windows 32-Bit Version 5.2, Novell, Inc., 1998, pp. 1-318. |
Claris Em@iler Getting Started User's Guide, for Macintosh, Claris Corporation, 1995-1997, 61 pp. |
Developer's Guide to Apple Data Detectors, for Version 1.0.2., Apple Computer, Inc., 1997, pp. 1-33. |
Apple Data Detectors User's Manual, Apple Computer, Inc., 1997, pp. 1-15. |
Nardi, Bonnie A.; Miller, James R.; Wright, David J., “Collaborative, Programmable Intelligent Agents,” Jim Miller/Miramontes Computing, Apple Computer Advanced Technology Group, http://www.miramontes.com/writing/add-cacm/add-cacm/html, Mar. 1998, pp. 1-11. |
Hewkin, “Smart Tags—the Distributed-Memory Resolution”, IEE Review, Jun. 22, 1989, pp. 203-206. |
Measuring Units Conversion Table—http://web.archie.org—1997 Internet French Property, pp. 1-4. |
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “National Language Support Enhancement for Culture-Specific Operations”, Nov. 1, 1993, vol. 36, Issue 11, pp. 629-638. |
Towers, J. Tarin, Visual Quickstart Guide: Dreamweaver 2 for Windows and Macintosh, 1999, Peachpit Press, pp. 150-151. |
Driza, Scott, “Learn Word 2000 VBA Document Automation”, Wordware Publishing Inc., 2001, 6 pp. |
Cornell, Paul, “Developing Smart Tag DLLs”, MSDN Library, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnsmarttag/html/odc—smarttags.asp, Apr. 2001, pp. 8. |
Menu Customizing, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 34, No. 1, Jun. 1991, pp. 91-92 (4 pp. total). |
Perry, Brad, et al., “Discovering Similar Resources by Content Park-Linking”, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, published by ACM Press 1997, pp. 317-324. |
Schulz, Charles, “Writing Applications for Uniform Operation on a Mainframe or PC: A Metric Conversion Program”, Lockheed Missles & Space Company, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, May 1990, pp. 348-361. |
Devanbue, P. et al., “Chime: customizable hyperlink insertion and maintenance engine for software engineering environments”, Software Engineering, Publication date: 1999, ISBN: 1-58113-07400. |
“Using Flyswat”, http://www.flywsat.com/using.html, download date: Sep. 28, 1999, 1 pp. |
“What is Flyswat”, http://www.flyswat.com, download date: Sep. 28, 1999, 5 pp. |
“Intelligent Text Processing: About”, http://www.syntalex.co.uk/about/about.html, download date: Aug. 7, 1999, 1 pp. |
“Intelligent Text Processing: Automatic Cross-Referencing”, http://www.syntalex.co.uk/services/acrl.html, download date Aug. 7, 1999, 3 pp. |
“Intelligent Text Processing: Case Study: Context”, http://www.syntalex.co.uk/casestudies/context.html, download date: Aug. 7, 1999, 3 pp. |
Mueller, Jennifer M., “Work Smarter with Smart Tags”, Journal of Accounting—Online, vol. 194, No. 5, Nov. 2002, http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/nov2002/Mueller.htm>, retrieved on Apr. 22, 2005. |
Brooks-Bilson, “Programming ColdFusion” [electronic resource] 2001, Safari Tech Books Online, 1st Edition, 25 pp. |
Wilker, John, “ColdFusion MX Adds J2EE, XML, and Web Services Compatibility”, Aug. 9, 2002, http://builder.com.com/5102-6387-104585.html, 3 pp. |
Brockschmidt, K., “Inside OLE, Second Edition”, 1995, Microsoft Press, p. 169. |
Toth, V., “Visual C++ 4 Unleashed”, 1996, Sams Publishing, p. 174. |
Sriram, V., “ComponentXchange: An E-Exchange for Software Components”, Master Thesis, CitSeer, May 2001, pp. i-v, 1-77. |
Bosak, “XML: The Universal Publishing Format”, SGML/XML Europe '98, May 1998, pp. A1-C17. |
Kristensen, “Template Resolution in XML/HTML”, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, vol. 30, 1998, pp. 239-249. |
Fan et al., “FormPlus: A Form Authoring Toolkit”, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference, Oct. 31, 1990-Nov. 2, 1990, pp. 255-260. |
Boone, “Concept Features in Re: Agent, An Intelligent Email Agent”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents, May 9-13, 1998, pp. 141-148. |
Takkinen et al., “CAFÉ: A Conceptual Model for Managing Information in Electronic Mail”, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1998, pp. 44-53. |
“Smart Tags: Dumb Technology?”, webreference.com, Online, Aug. 29, 2001, http://www.webreference.com/xml/column30/3.html, 3 pp. |
“Being ‘Smart’ with Smart Tags in Office XP”, Create for Mississippi, Aug. 2001, http://www.create.cett.msstate.edu/create/howto/smart—tags.pdf, 7 pp. |
Harold, E.R., “XML: Extensible Markup Language”, IDG Books Worldwide, Books 24×7.com printout, 1998, pp. 1-11. |
Marais, Hannes, “Supporting Cooperative and Personal Surfmg With a Desktop Assistant”, 1997, ACM Press, pp. 129-138. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157, filed Mar. 27, 2001, entitled “Automatically Adding Proper Names to a Database”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265, filed Apr. 24, 2001, entitled “Method and System for Applying Input Mode Bias”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266, filed Apr. 24, 2001, entitled “Method and System for Providing Electronic Commerce Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Strings”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552, filed Jul. 16, 2001, entitled “Method and System for Providing Restricted Actions for Recognized Semantic Categories”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141, filed Feb. 13, 2003, entitled “Linking Elements of a Document to Corresponding Fields, Queries and/or Procedures in a Database”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467, filed Jul. 16, 2001, entitled “Application Program Interfaces for Semantically Labeling Strings and Providing Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Strings”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418, filed Jul. 17, 2001, entitled “Method and System for Defining Semantic Categories and Actions”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411, filed Jun. 6, 2000, entitled “Method and System for Semantically Labeling Strings and Providing Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Strings”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712, filed May 9, 2002, entitled “Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Dates Between Calendars and Languages Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630, filed May 23, 2002, entitled “Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Numbers Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544, filed May 7, 2002, entitled “Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Numbers Between Measurement Systems Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680, filed May 23, 2002, entitled “Method, System, and Apparatus for Converting Currency Values Based Upon Semantically Labeled Strings”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810, filed Jun. 25, 2002, entitled “Method, System, and Apparatus for Performing Custom Actions on Digital Content”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/178,680, filed Jun. 24, 2002, entitled “System and Method for Incorporating Smart Tags in Online Content”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438, filed Jun. 25, 2002, entitled “Method and System for Dynamically Providing Actions Associated with Semantically Labeled Strings”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298, filed Jun. 27, 2002, entitled “Method and System for Associating Actions with Semantic Labels in Electronic Documents”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258, filed Feb. 28, 2003, entitled “Method and System for Enhancing Paste Functionality of a Computer Software Application”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446, filed Apr. 29, 2003, entitled “Methods and System for Recognizing Names in a Computer-Generated Document and for Providing Helpful Actions Associated with Recognized Names”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267, filed Jun. 27, 2003, entitled “Leveraging Markup Language Data for Semantically Labeling Text Strings and Data and for Providing Actions Based on Semantically Labeled Text Strings and Data”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/780,376, filed Feb. 17, 2004, entitled “Methods and Systems for Providing Automatic Actions on Recognized Text Strings in a Computer-Generated Document”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317, filed Jun. 25, 2002, entitled “System and Method for Issuing a Message to a Program”. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 29, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 12, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 29, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 14, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 18, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 15, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 20, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 29, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 6, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 2, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/178,680. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 8, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 26, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 1, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/818,157. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 17, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 24, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 19, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 5, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 6, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 20, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 3, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 6, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,260. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 24, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 2, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 4, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 5, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 20, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 2, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 10, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,260. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 15, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265. |
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 22, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 5, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 14, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 15, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 11, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 2, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 16, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 24, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,937, filed Apr. 3, 2006, entitled “Automatically Adding Proper Names to a Database”. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 5, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 10, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 26, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 31, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 1, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141. |
U.S. Final Official Action dated Jul. 19, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552. |
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 2, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899. |
U.S. Final Official Action dated Aug. 18, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 7, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680. |
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 28, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267. |
U.S. Final Official Action dated Oct. 5, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 6, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/140,544. |
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 10, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265. |
European Communication dated Apr. 19, 2006 in EP 05 000 506.5-1527. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467. |
European Communication dated Sep. 25, 2006 in EP 03 01 4181. |
World Wide Web Consortium, “Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Events Specification, Version 1.0”, http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Events-20001113/DOM2-Events.pdf, Nov. 2000, 50 pp. |
World Wide Web Consortium, “Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Core Specification, Version 1.0”, http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Core-20001113/DOM2-Core.pdf, Nov. 2000, 107 pp. |
European Communication dated Nov. 9, 2006 in EP 03010292.5. |
“Word 2002 Add in: measurement Converter Smart Tag”, http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=f67fc42c-5f41-4c3f-9d5a-71354471dc32&DisplayLang=en, retrieved on Nov. 9, 2006, 2 pgs. |
“Microsoft Measurement Converter Smart Tag—Chinese Version”, http://www.jiyang.gov/cn/laiying/My%20Pictures/%E8%B4%E5%BA%86%E8%BE%89/office2003/FILES/PFILES/COMMON/MSSHARED/SMARTTAG/CMEASURE/1033/CHMCABT.HTM, retrieved on Nov. 7, 2006, 2 pgs. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298. |
U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2006 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 20, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630. |
U.S. Final Official Action dated Dec. 26, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 5, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,717. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 11, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190. |
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 25, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267. |
European Communication dated Nov. 17, 2006 in EP 03 011 851.7-2211. |
European Communication dated Dec. 11, 2006 in EP 03 012 830.0-2211. |
Singapore Search Report/Written Opinion dated Jan. 26, 2007 in SG 200500214-2. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 6, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 7, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438. |
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 21, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141. |
European Communication dated Feb. 16, 2007 cited in European Application No. 04 003 683.2-2211. |
Anonymous, “Adding Data from Other Sources in PowerPoint 2002,” Jul. 2002, Internet article, XP-002420700, A Professional Approach Series the E-Zine Approach, http://www.glencoe.com/ps/computered/pas/article.php4?articleld-437, 8 pgs. |
Rice, F.C., “Transform XML Files with XSLT When Importing into Microsoft Excel 2002,” Jul. 2001, Internet article, XP-002420701, http://msdn2.microsoftcom/en-us/library/aa140055(office.10.d=printer).aspx, 9 pgs. |
Johnson, L., “What's So Special About Paste Special?”, Jun. 2002, Internet article, XP-002420702, http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/Pub0009/LPMArticle.asp?ID=40, 5 pgs. |
Anonymous, “Moving and Copying Text Tutorial,” Aug. 17, 2001, Internet Article, XP-002307566, http://tutorials.findtutorials.com/read/category/102/id/342/p/3, 4 pgs. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 9, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 12, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712. |
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 10, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 14, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552. |
U.S. Final Official Action dated May 18, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680. |
U.S. Official Action dated May 30, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467. |
U.S. Final Official Action dated Jun. 15, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899. |
Blaheta et al., “Assigning Function Tags to Parsed Text,” Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2000, pp. 234-240. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,266. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810. |
U.S. Office Action dated Sep. 10, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267. |
Malaysian Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2007 cited in Malaysian Application No. PI 20040265. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,190. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552. |
European Communication dated Sep. 25, 2007 cited in European Application No. 03 014 181.6-1243. |
Japanese Official Action dated Oct. 19, 2007 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-128417. |
Rubin, Charles, “Microsoft Word 2000 Official Manual,” First Edition, Nikkei BP Soft Press, Inc., Aug. 2, 1999, pp. 215-217. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446. |
Russian Official Action dated Oct. 11, 2008 cited in Russian Application No. 2003118722. |
Pershikov, V.I., “Explanatory Dictionary in Informatics,” Finances and Statistics, Moscow, 1991 (in Russian with translated sections) 5 pgs. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265. |
U.S. Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2007 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,438. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,467. |
David D. Lewis et al., “A Sequential Algorithm for Training Text Classifiers,” Spring-Verlag New York, Inc., 1994, pp. 1-10. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/608,267. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/731,899. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630. |
Singapore Examination Report (conducted by Austrian Patent Office) dated Jan. 25, 2008 in SG Application No. 200500214-2. |
Chinese Official Action dated Jan. 4, 2008 cited in Chinese Application No. 200510009487.0. |
Chinese Official Action dated Dec. 28, 2007 cited in Application No. 200410005390.8. |
Wei Ying-bin et al., “A New Technology ColdFusion of Realizing Dynamic Webpage,” 2000, 6 pgs. (English language translation, pp. 1-6). |
European Examination Report dated Mar. 4, 2006 cited in EP Application No. 02 014 717.9-1527. |
European Examination Report dated Mar. 4, 2006 cited in EP Application No. 03 012 432.5-1527. |
Russian Official Action dated Jan. 11, 2008 cited in Russian Application No. 2004105880/09(006292). |
V. Doroth et al., “Modern Computer Vocabulary,” St. Petersburg, BHV-Peterburg, 2001, p. 465 (with English language translation). |
Mexican Official Action dated Feb. 11, 2009 cited in Application No. Pa/a/2003/005451. |
Chinese Final Rejection dated Mar. 13, 2009 cited in Application No. 03145242.6. |
Japanese Final Rejection dated Mar. 17, 2090 cited in Application No. 2004-037158. |
Japanese Final Rejection dated Apr. 3, 2009 cited in Application No. 2002-207514. |
C. Goldfarb, XML Handbook, 1st Ed., Pearson Education, Japan, May 10, 1999, pp. 246-254 (no English translation). |
S. Tanaka, “Verifying the XML Schema Definition,” XML Magazine, Shoeisha Co., Ltd., vol. 10, No. 3, Jul. 1, 2000, pp. 135-155 (no English translation). |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630. |
U.S. Official Action mailed Apr. 1, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/907,418. |
U.S. Official Action mailed Apr. 4, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,680. |
U.S. Official Action mailed Apr. 29, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/588,411. |
U.S. Final Official Action mailed Apr. 29, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810. |
U.S. Official Action mailed May 1, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317. |
European Communication Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Mar. 4, 2008 in EP 05 000 506.5-1527. |
European Communication Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Mar. 10, 2008 in EP 03 01 0292.5-1527. |
Japanese Notice of Final Rejection dated May 28, 2010 cited in Application No. 2003-161338. |
Australian Examiner's First Report dated Aug. 16, 2010 cited in Application No. 2009202563. |
Polish Official Notice dated Aug. 25, 2009 cited in Application No. P.365553/DP. |
Australian Official Action dated Sep. 11, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003204478. |
Norwegian Official Action dated Aug. 24, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003 2550. |
Polish Official Notice dated Sep. 22, 2009 cited in Application No. P. 364854/DP. |
Polish Official Notice dated Sep. 23, 2009 cited in Application No. P. 360520/DP. |
Korean Official Action dated Sep. 30, 2009 cited in Application No. 10-2003-40988. |
Japanese Official Notice of Final Rejection dated Oct. 2, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003-162911. |
“The Spatial Smart Tag”, Geomatic Technologies, Mar. 10, 2005, 2 pp. |
Harmon, D., “Microsoft MapPoint 2002”, Geoworld Quick-Take Reviews, Aug. 2001, 3 pp. |
Irie R. et al., “Resources for Place Name Analysis”, May 28, 2004, 4 pp. |
Rajabifard, A. et al., “Creating an Enabling Platform for the Delivery of Spatial Information”, Spatial Sciences Institute Biennial Conference, Sep. 12, 2005, 10 pp. |
Camarda, B., Special Editing Using® Microsoft® Office Word 2003, Que, Dec. 12, 2003, pp. 1-5. |
Ivens, K., Office XP Smart Tags, Microsoft, Mar. 6, 2002, pp. 1-4. |
Frye, C., Microsoft Office Systems: Step by Step, Microsoft Press, 2003 Edition, Sep. 3, 2003, pp. 1-6. |
U.S. Official Action mailed Sep. 8, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948. |
U.S. Official Action mailed Feb. 15, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948. |
U.S. Official Action mailed Oct. 18, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948. |
U.S. Official Action mailed Mar. 20, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948. |
U.S. Official Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,948. |
U.S. Official Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/154,630. |
European Search Report dated Dec. 12, 2006 in European Application No. 05 105 000.3-1527. |
European Examination Report dated Oct. 9, 2007 in European Application No. 05 105 000.3-1527. |
European Preliminary Opinion dated Aug. 27, 2008 cited in European Application No. 04002224.6-1527 / 1447754. |
Chinese Official Action dated Dec. 7, 2007 in Chinese Application No. 200510088529.4. |
Chinese Second Official Action dated Aug. 15, 2008 in Chinese Application No. 200510088529.4. |
Chilean Second Office Action cited in Chilean Application No. 67/2005 (date unknown). |
Malaysian Official Action dated Aug. 29, 2008 cited in Malaysian Application No. PI 20031902. |
Polish Official Action dated Aug. 27, 2008 in Polish Application No. P360520. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Aug. 23, 2010 cited in Application No. 10-2004-0013354. |
Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 30, 2010 cited in Application No. 2,433,472. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection dated Aug. 31, 2010 cited in Application No. 10-2004-9346. |
Polish Official Letter dated Jun. 24, 2008 cited Polish Application No. P 365553. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/141,712. |
“XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes,” W3C, May 2, 2001, http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/, pp. 1-146 (separated into 2 documents—A & B). |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/366,141. |
Ghamrawi et al., “Collective Multi-Label Classification,” ACM, 2005, pp. 195-200. |
Polish Official Action dated Jul. 21, 2008 cited in Polish Application No. P 364854. |
Japanese Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2002-207514. |
Chinese Decision on Rejection dated Jul. 3, 2009 cited in Application No. 03143003.1. |
European Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated Aug. 5, 2009 cited in Application No. 03003931.7. |
Japanese Official Action dated May 26, 2009 cited in Application No. 2005-039754. |
Rubin, C., “Microsoft Word 2000 Official Manual”, First Edition, Nikkei BP Soft Press, Inc., Aug. 2, 1999, pp. 215-217. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 27, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/906,552. |
U.S. Examiner's Answer BPAI dated Jun. 5, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/184,298. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 09/841,265. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 12, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/426,446. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/780,376. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258. |
M. Stowe, “XML in Excel and the Spreadsheet Component”, Microsoft Corporation, Aug. 2001, 6 pgs. |
C. Heinemann, “Cross-Reference your XML Data”, Microsoft Corporation, Dec. 7, 1998, 6 pgs. |
D. Obasanjo, “XML—Namespaces and How They Affect Xpath and XSLT”, Microsoft Corporation, May 20, 2002, 19 pgs. |
European Communication Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings dated May 7, 2008 cited in European Application No. 04002224.6. |
Russian Official Action dated Mar. 13, 2008 cited in Russian Application No. 2004104096/09(004398). |
Japanese Official Action dated Mar. 28, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-178497. |
Pixley, “Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Events Specification Version 1.0”, World Wide Web Consortium, Nov. 13, 2000, www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Events-20001113/DOM2-Events.pdf. |
European Communication dated Jun. 3, 2008 cited in European Application No. 03 011 851.7-2211. |
Japanese Official Action dated Apr. 18, 2008 cited in Japanese Application No. 2003-128417. |
European Communication Minutes of Oral Proceedings and Decision dated Sep. 15, 2008 in European Application No. 05 000 506.5-1527. |
Polish Second Official Action dated Oct. 28, 2008 in Polish Application No. P36553. |
U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 22, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/377,258. |
Japanese Official Notice of Final Rejection dated Oct. 27, 2009 cited in Application No. 2003-161338. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection dated Nov. 12, 2010 cited in Application No. 2003-161338. |
Russian Official Action dated Jun. 21, 2009 cited in Application No. 2005104223/09(005505). |
D. Richter, “Windows for professionals” (Win32 API programming for Windows NT 3.5 and Windows 95, translation from English, Moscow: Russian Edition, 1995, ISBN 5-7502-0010-8, pp. 26, 31, 215. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2009 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/179,810. |
Glover et al., “Inferring hierarchical Descriptions,” ACM, 2002, pp. 507-514. |
Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2008 cited in Application No. 2004-037158. |
Koyaku, H., “What is Brought to SQL Server 2000 by XML, Part 1: Function of XML Provided by SQL Server 2000”, Enterprise Servers World, vol. 3, No. 12, IDG Japan, Inc., Dec. 1, 2000, pp. 42-53. |
Chinese Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2008 cited in Application No. 03145242.6. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Dec. 8, 2008 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,317. |
Canadian Official Action dated Dec. 15, 2010 cited in Application No. 2,431,667. |
Canadian Official Action dated Dec. 16, 2010 cited in Application No. 2,431,104. |
Japanese Final Official Action dated Dec. 14, 2010 cited in Application No. 2005-175170. |
Chinese Final Rejection dated Dec. 21, 2010 cited in Application No. 03143003.1. |
Japanese Interrogation dated Jan. 7, 2011 cited in Application No. 2003-178497. |
Indian Official Action dated Dec. 13, 2010 cited in Application No. 557/MUM/2003. |
Japanese Notice of Rejection mailed Jul. 8, 2011 cited in Application No. 2003-178497. |
Japanese Appeal Decision mailed Aug. 12, 2011 cited in Application No. 2008-31101. |
Canadian Official Action mailed Aug. 26, 2011 cited in Application No. 2,431,104. |
Taiwan Official Action mailed Jul. 28, 2011 cited in Application No. 93103386. |
Japanese Official Action dated Apr. 28, 2011 cited in Appl. No. 2003-128417. |
Japanese Appeal Decision of Rejection dated Sep. 16, 2011 cited in Appl. No. 2003-128417. |
European Examination Report dated Oct. 18, 2011 cited in Appl. No. 03 011 851.7-2211. |
European Examination Report dated Oct. 25, 2011 cited in Appl. No. 03 014 181.6. |
Canadian Examiner's Report mailed Mar. 2, 2012 cited in Application No. 2,456,771. |
Malaysian Substantive Examination Clear Report dated Jun. 19, 2012 in PI 20040265. |
Canadian Examiner's Report dated Jul. 26, 2012 in 2,456,711. |
Chinese Third Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2012 cited in Application No. 03143003.1. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 24, 2012 cited in U.S. Appl. No. 12/777,322, 65 pgs. |
Peng et al., “Accessing existing business data from the World Wide Web,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 37, No. 1, 1998, pp. 115-132. |
Indian Official Action dated Apr. 11, 2013 in 170/DEL/2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080046812 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10164960 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 11924856 | US |