When a user downloads an app, the user may be provided with options of the types of notifications the app can receive. For instance, the user may indicate that the app can receive notifications, such as alerts, badges, sounds, or any combination thereof. In order to receive these notifications, the app must register with a third-party notification system, such as Apple Push Notification (APN) service or Google Cloud Messaging (GCM) service. In response to receiving a registration request from an app, the third-party notification system will generate a unique device token, which is provided to the app on the client device.
After receiving the unique device token, the app transmits the unique device token to the app provider (e.g., the app developer). Accordingly, the app provider will use the unique device token to provide information, such as communications, data, content, updates, or notifications, to the app. For instance, the app may be a messaging tool and the information may be a message intended for another user of an app. Alternatively, the information may be a notification generated by the app provider. The app provider obtains the receiver app's unique device token and prepares the information for delivery to the receiver's app. Once the information has been prepared, it is transmitted to the third-party notification service, along with the receiver app's unique device token. The third-party notification service receives the information and unique device token from the app provider and uses the unique device token to route the information to the correct device. Upon receiving the information, the client device uses the received unique device token to associate the information with the appropriate app and provides the information to the correct app.
Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process; an apparatus; a system; a composition of matter; a computer program product embodied on a computer readable storage medium; and/or a processor, such as a processor configured to execute instructions stored on and/or provided by a memory coupled to the processor. In this specification, these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques. In general, the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention. Unless stated otherwise, a component such as a processor or a memory described as being configured to perform a task may be implemented as a general component that is temporarily configured to perform the task at a given time or a specific component that is manufactured to perform the task. As used herein, the term ‘processor’ refers to one or more devices, circuits, and/or processing cores configured to process data, such as computer program instructions.
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate the principles of the invention. The invention is described in connection with such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.
The present disclosure describes a system and method that allows an app provider to facilitate the delivery of communications—such as alerts, messages, content, gaming data, and other data—between the app provider system and client devices, as well as among client devices, without the use of a third-party push token.
The app provider's system includes a load balancer and a cluster of nodes to provide users with the functionality offered by the app. For example, the cluster of nodes may allow users of the app to interact with each other. Alternatively, the cluster of nodes may provide a gaming interface to users of the app. In this regard, the cluster of node may include physical servers, virtual machines, or any combination thereof to render the services offered by the app provider.
Each node in the cluster of nodes includes at least a reactor module, a processor module, a plurality of queues, and an incoming message queue. In operation, client devices connect to the node and register with the app provider's system via the reactor module. The processor module includes a distributed routing table that contains entries for each connected client device and to which node they are connected. Each of the plurality of queues is assigned to a client device connected to a node in the cluster and stores communications for delivery to the client node. The incoming message queue is a distributed storage for all information received by the app provider. Entries in the receiver's queue include a pointer to the communication stored in the incoming message queue.
Additionally, each node includes replication data for at least one other node in the app provider system. The replication data includes the reactor module, the processor module, a plurality of queues, and the incoming message queue. The plurality of replicated queues may maintain the same state information as the plurality of queues on the node hosting the receiver's queue.
As noted above, a client device will connect to a node in the cluster of nodes. Specifically, the load balancer will distribute client devices amongst the nodes in the cluster. Once connected to the node, the client device will provide authentication information to the node. The node will verify the authentication information provided by the client device. If the verification fails, the node will deny the connection request.
However, when the verification is successful, the reactor module will register the client device with the cluster of nodes. Registration includes creating an ephemeral identifier for the client device, to which the device is bound. Next, the reactor module creates an entry in the distributed routing table for the client device that includes a client identifier, the ephemeral identifier, and information about which node the client device is connected to. Finally, the entry is propagated to the other nodes to update the distributed routing table maintained on those nodes.
Once registration is complete, a secure, persistent connection between the client device and the node is created. This persistent connection allows the client device to send and receive communications, such as messages, notifications, and other data, more efficiently and securely than through the use of a third-party notification system.
For example, when a first user, Alice, wants to communicate with a second user, Bob, she will connect to the app provider system and compose her message. After sending her communication, Alice's app will transmit it to the node her device is connected to. The reactor module receives the communication and provides the communication to the incoming message queue. While storing the communication in the incoming message queue, the reactor module will process the communication to determine how to handle the communication. For example, if the communication is a secure message, the reactor module may determine one or more receivers of the secure message. This may include determining an ephemeral identifier for each of the receivers of the secure message. If the reactor module recognizes the ephemeral identifier, it determines that the receiver's device is connected to the same node as Alice. Accordingly, the reactor module will route the communication directly to the receiver, Bob, without any further processing required by the node.
However, if the reactor module does not recognize the receiver's ephemeral identifier, it passes Alice's communication to the node's processor module. The processor module accesses the distributing routing table to determine if Bob's device is connected to the app provider system, and if so which node in the app provider system. If Bob's device is connected to a different node in the app provider system, the first node packages Alice's communication and transmits it to the reactor module of the node that Bob's device is connected to. The reactor module on the second node adds a notification to Bob's queue. Further, the second reactor module provides notification to Bob's device that a communication has been received. Accordingly, Bob's device will receive the notification in due course from his queue.
If the processor module determines that the receiver's devices are not connected, the app provider system may employ one of several fallback mechanisms to deliver Alice's communication. For instance, as communications are continually received for Bob, notifications would accumulate in Bob's assigned queue, with each entry in the queue having a pointer to the location of the communication in the incoming message queue. The pointer may track the accumulated notifications received by the app provider system since the last time Bob's device connected. The next time Bob's device connects to the app provider system, the newly received notifications are delivered in the order that they were received. For instance, Bob's queue may be flushed from the location of the pointer onward. Additionally, the pointer may be used to retrieve communications in Bob's queues that were indicated as previously delivered. In this regard, the app provider system may store communications in accordance with end-user service level agreements. Alternatively, the failback mechanism may include sending the communication, such as a message and notification, to a third-party notification service. The third-party notification service may then provide the notification to Bob's device using standard techniques. Accordingly, Bob may log into the app provider to retrieve his communications after receiving notification from the third-party notification server.
Periodically, one of the nodes in the app provider system may fail. In these situations, the client devices connected to that node will attempt to reconnect to the app provider system. Accordingly, the load balancer will redistribute the client devices across available nodes using load balancing techniques. In the event of a node failure, information that has not yet been delivered to client devices will not be lost. In this regard, user queues are not necessarily located on the node that the client device is connected to. Further, each queue is replicated on at least one other node. Accordingly, notifications from the replicated queue will be provided to the client device when the app provider system detects a connection event.
Further, in times of high volume, the app provider system may add additional nodes to deal with the additional volume. In this regard, the app provider system may provision a new node for the cluster. The new node may send a broadcast to the other nodes in the app provider system. Based on the other nodes' responses, the app provider system may realign to accommodate the new node. After realignment, the new node may be configured as a participant in the app provider system. This includes installing the reactor module, the processor module, a plurality of queues, and the incoming message queue. Further, the new node will be provided with replication information for at least one other node in the app provider system. Once the new node is configured, it will be allowed to receive connection requests from client devices and perform the processing described above.
Accordingly, the above-described system and processes allow app providers to provide information to client devices more securely and efficiently without the use of a push token provided by a third-party notification service. While the examples describe providing notifications and messages without the use of a third-party push token, the systems and processes may be applicable to other techniques, such as receiving notifications, messaging, file transfers, news, and other communications from the app provider and other third parties. For example, the app provider may want to provide a communication regarding an update to the app to all client devices. The app provider transmits the notification to every client device using the techniques described above. In particular, the reactor modules on each node determine whether the client device is connected thereto. If it is, the notification is added to the client device's queue and delivered in due course. If not, the notification passes to the processor module, which determines the node that the client device is connected to. The notification is forwarded to that node's reactor module, where it is subsequently added to the client device's queue to be delivered in the order in which it was received.
In order to provide the functionality provided by the app, each node in the app provider system needs to be configured to provide the services offered by the app.
Processor 210 may be any processor capable of interacting with the components of node 120-n. For example, processor 210 may include a processor, multiprocessors, a multicore processor, a dedicated controller, such as an ASIC or an FPGA, or any combination thereof. Memory 220 may store information accessible by processor 210, including instructions and data that may be executed or otherwise used by the processor 210 for providing functionality to the app. For example, memory 220 may include a plurality of modules that, when executed by processor 210, perform functionality that enables the app to interact with the app provider system and other users of the app. In particular, memory 220 includes an incoming message queue 2250; a plurality of user queues 2260-0, 2260-1, 2260-n; a processor module 2270; and a reactor module 2280. The incoming message queue 2250 may be configured to store communications until they are delivered. For example, if the app is a secure messaging app, incoming message queue 2250 may store communications, such as messages, pictures, video, animated gifs, content, etc., until they are delivered to a recipient. Alternatively, if the app is a game, the incoming message queue 2250 may store an opponent's move or countermove until it is delivered to the intended user. Each of the plurality of user queues 2260-0, 2260-1, and 2260-n may be assigned to app users and configured to enqueue notifications and other communications for delivery to the assigned user. In various embodiments, the plurality of user queues 2260-0, 2260-1, and 2260-n may be distributed commit logs; however, the plurality of user queues may be any suitable queue including, for example, first-in first out (FIFO) queues, circular queues, priority queue, etc. Furthermore, the plurality of user queues may not be located on the same node that the user's app is connected to. Instead, the nodes may communicate with each other to add events to each user's assigned queue. The processor module 2270 may be configured to route information to users connected to different nodes. In this regard, processor module 2270 may include a distributed routing table 2272. Distributed routing table 2272 maintains routing information that reflects which nodes that users are connected to. The reactor module 2280 may be configured to accept users' connection requests, generate ephemeral identifiers for each of the users connected to the node, and route information between users connected to the same node. In order to accommodate the queues and modules, memory 220 may be any type of media capable of storing the information above, including a non-transitory computer-readable medium or any other suitable medium that stores data that may be read with the aid of an electronic device, such as a hard-drive, solid state drive, memory card, flash drive, ROM, RAM, DVD, or other optical disks, as well as other write-capable and read-only memories. Memory 220 may include short term or temporary storage as well as long term or persistent storage. According to some embodiments, memory 220 may be a storage area network (SAN) that is accessible by processor 210.
Interface(s) 240 may be dedicated hardware, software, or a combination thereof that is capable of connecting node 120-n to a network. In particular, interface(s) 240 may be capable of connecting and communicating with client devices that have an instantiation of the app installed thereon. Further, interface(s) 240 may be configured to communicate and interact with other nodes in the app provider system 100. In this regard, interface(s) 240 may include various configurations and use various communication protocols including Ethernet, TCP/IP, ATM, Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), Representational State Transfer (REST), cellular and wireless communication protocols (e.g. 802.11, LTE), instant messaging, HTTP and SMTP, and various combinations of the foregoing.
In order to access the full functionality of the app, user devices will need to connect to the app provider system.
Process 300 begins in block 310 when a connection request is received from one of the client's apps. According to various embodiments, the load balancer will receive a connection request from the client app that includes an application identifier. The load balancer then determines whether the client app has previously connected to a node in the app provider system. In some embodiments, the load balancer hashes the received application identifier to generate an ephemeral identifier. The load balancer uses the generated ephemeral identifier to determine if the client app has previously connected to the system, and, if so, routes the client app to the node with which it previously connected. If the load balancer determines that the client app has not previously connected to the app provider system, the process proceeds to route the client app to an available node in the app provider system. In block 320, the connection request may be authenticated. In some embodiments, the reactor module located on the node will perform the authentication. In some embodiments, the authentication information may be a blob of data based on the user's password that is received from the client device and used to decrypt information stored on the app provider system. If the app provider system successfully decrypts the information using the received blob of data, then the user's identity is validated. Alternatively, the authentication information may include a username and password, which the reactor module compares to a database of authentication information. In still yet other examples, the authentication information may include multifactor authentication. For instance, the user may have to enter a password and a one-time code or biometric information and a one-time password. Accordingly, the reactor module may compare the multifactor authentication information to information stored by the app provider system to determine whether to authenticate the user and allow the app to connect to the app provider system.
If the authentication request fails, the process proceeds to block 340 where the app's connection request is denied. However, if the authentication is successful, the process proceeds to block 330 in which a secure, persistent connection is established between the client device and the app provider system and an ephemeral identifier is generated for the client device. According to various embodiments, the ephemeral identifier is generated by the reactor module. In particular, the reactor module may generate the ephemeral identifier by concatenating a node identifier and a hash of information related to the client device. The information related to the client device may include a username, device information—such as hardware identifiers, or any combination thereof. In block 332, the ephemeral identifier is bound to the client's device. In block 334, an entry is created in the distributed routing table that includes a client identifier, the ephemeral identifier, and information about which node the client device is connected to. As noted above, the entries in the routing table may be used to route information to clients' apps, and specifically, the nodes that those clients are connected to. Finally, in block 336, the newly created entry is distributed to other nodes in the app provider system. In this regard, the other nodes may update their distributed routing tables to reflect the new connection and enable information to be routed to the new device.
After a user app has connected to the app provider system, the user app may begin to interact with the app provider system. According to some examples, this may include communicating with other users of the app.
The process begins in block 410 with the app provider system receiving a communication from a sender's app. In various embodiments, a node in the app provider system receives the communication from the sender's app. In particular, the reactor module receives the incoming communication via a secure, persistent channel, such as Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) or Transport Layer Security (TLS). In various embodiments, incoming communications may also be encrypted via the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) using at least one 256-bit encryption key that is shared between the app and the provider system. Upon receiving the communication, the reactor module parses the incoming communication in block 420. According to various embodiments, the communication is an encrypted message intended for one or more receivers. In this regard, the communication includes a header and a payload. The header includes sender information, receiver information, and decryption information. In various embodiments, the decryption information includes information necessary to decrypt the sender's message that only the intended receiver can decrypt and access. The payload of the communication includes the encrypted message and metadata identifying the one or more receivers of the sender's encrypted message.
In block 430, the node determines the one or more receivers' ephemeral identifiers. In various embodiments, the reactor module uses the metadata included in the payload of the communication to determine the one or more receivers of the communication. In this regard, the reactor module calculates the ephemeral identifier for each of the one or more receivers by performing a hash function on the receiver information contained in the metadata. Alternatively, the reactor module may refer to the distributed routing table to look up the one or more receivers' ephemeral identifier. For example, the reactor module may use the one or more receivers' information contained in the metadata, or a hash thereof, to obtain the one or more receivers' ephemeral identifier from the distributed routing table. In block 440, the communication is transmitted to the incoming message queue. That is, the reactor module stores the communication to the incoming message queue. According to some embodiments, writing the communication to the incoming message queue includes storing the communication on a node in a data center that is in geographic proximity to the receiver. In various embodiments, the communication is stored in the incoming message queue of the node that the receiver is connected to.
In block 450, the node determines whether one or more receivers' devices are connected to the same node as the sender device. In particular, the reactor module may perform the determination. In block 460, the node provides notification to the one or more receivers' apps when one or more of the receivers' devices are connected to the same node as the sender's device. In this regard, the reactor module may publish the notification to each of the one or more receivers' user queues. Alternatively, the reactor module may bypass the one or more receivers' user queues and provide the one or more receivers' apps with a push notification that they have a new communication. In yet another alternative, the reactor module may push the communication directly to the one or more receivers.
If, however, the reactor module determines that the one or more receiver devices are not connected to the same node as the sender device, the reactor module passes the communication to the processor module, which will determine whether the one or more receiver devices are connected to the app provider system in block 470. In various embodiments, the processor module uses the distributed routing table to determine whether one or more receiver devices are connected to the app provider system. When one or more receivers are connected to the app provider system, the processor module determines which node(s) the one or more receivers are connected to in block 480. For example, the processor module uses information contained in the distributed routing table to determine which node(s) the one or more receivers are connected to. In block 482, the newly received communication is added to the one or more receivers' user queues. In due course, the one or more receivers' apps will receive a notification of the new communication from their respective user queue. For instance, the notifications may be provided to the receivers' apps as soon as they arrive in the user queue, thereby providing near real-time notification of received communications. Alternatively, notifications may be provided from user queues using a throttling technique. That is, if the one or more receivers are active on the app provider system, alerts may be pushed every minute. However, if the one or more receivers are inactive, the time between alerts being pushed may gradually be increased. This technique can be repeated when the one or more users becomes active again.
When the node determines that one or more receivers are not connected to the app provider system, the app provider system relies on a fallback mechanism to deliver the communication to one or more receiver devices in block 490. In various embodiments, the fall back mechanism includes publishing received communications in the user queues. The next time the user's app connects to the app provider system, the app provider system detects a connection event and delivers the communications, or at least notifications of the communications, to the user's app. That is, the user's queue would be flushed of all communications received since the last time the user device connected to the app provider system. Alternatively, the fallback mechanism may provide the communication to a third-party notification system for notification and delivery using a push token via the techniques described above.
Turning to
In 510, Alice's user device 130 transmits a communication to the node 120-1 via the first secure, persistent connection. As noted above, the communication may be an encrypted message. In 520, the node 120-1 receives the communication from Alice's user device 130. Specifically, the reactor module 2280 receives the communication from Alice's user device 130 and begins processing the communication. This may include, for example, determining one or more receivers of the communication and transmitting the communication to the incoming message queue (not shown). According to various embodiments, the reactor module may generate an ephemeral identifier for each of the one or more receivers in order to determine the one or more receivers. In alternative embodiments, the reactor module may access the distributed routing table to determine the one or more receivers' ephemeral identifiers and which node the receiver device is connected.
After determining the one or more receivers' ephemeral identifiers, the reactor module 2280 determines whether any of the one or more receivers are connected to node 120-1. In this regard, the reactor module 2280 may maintain a table or database of user devices connected to node 120-1. Accordingly, the reactor module 2280 may refer to its own table or database to determine whether one or more receivers are connected to the node 120-1. Alternatively, the reactor module 2280 may access the distributed routing table maintained by the processor module 2270 to determine whether one or more receivers are connected to the same node as the sender device. If one or more receiver devices are not connected to the same node as the sender, the reactor module passes the communication to the processor module for further processing as discussed in greater detail below. However, if the one or more receiver devices are connected to the same node as the sender device, the reactor module routes the communication directly to the one or more receiver devices without any further processing required by the app developer system. In 530, the reactor module transmits Alice's communication directly to Bob's user device 132. By allowing the app provider system to handle the received communication and forward it to the intended recipient, the app provider system provides quicker and more efficient notification of the communication in a more secure manner than using a third-party notification system since third-party notification systems may be imitated by a malicious user, thereby exposing users of the app to receiving malicious communications.
More often than not, user devices will be connected to different nodes in the app provider system.
Returning to
While the communication is being stored in the incoming message queue, the reactor module 2280 processes the communication. As noted above, the reactor module 2280 determines whether one or more receiver devices are connected to the first node 120-1. Returning to the example illustrated in
The first processor module 2270 obtains receiver information from the communication. After obtaining the receiver information, the first processor module 2270 may access the distributed routing table to determine if Bob's device 132 is connected to the app provider system. If the first processor module 2270 determines that Bob's device 132 is connected to the app provider system, the first processor module 2270 determines which node Bob's device 132 is connected to. In 650, the first processor module 2270 forwards Alice's communication to the second reactor module 2380 located on the second node 120-2.
Upon receiving the communication, the second reactor module 2380 may deliver the communication to the Bob's device 132 in 660. Delivery of the communication may include publishing the communication to Bob's queue 2360-0. In this regard, Bob's device may receive notification of Alice's communication in due course. According to this example, the notification received by Bob's device 132 would include information such that the app could retrieve the communication from the incoming message queue. Alternatively, reactor module 2380 may push a notification and the communication directly to Bob's device.
From time to time, a user device may disconnect from the app provider system. For instance, the user device may be powered down or the user may sever the secure, persistent connection between the user app and the app provider system.
Turning to
When Alice wants to communicate with Bob, her user device 130 transmits a communication to the first node 120-1 as illustrated in 710. As discussed above, the first reactor module 2280 receives the communication from Alice's user device 130 and begins processing it. Additionally, the communication is stored in the first incoming message queue 2250 in 720 and may distributed to other incoming message queues 2350 in 730. While the message is being stored in the incoming message queues, the reactor module 2280 may further process the communication; specifically, it determines whether one or more receiver devices are connected to the first node 120-1. As illustrated in
As noted above, the first processor module 2270 determines receiver information and uses information contained in the distributed routing table to determine if Bob's device 132 is connected to the app provider system. Accordingly, the first processor module will determine that Bob's device 132 is not connected to the app provider system. Instead, the first processor module 2270 may determine which node Bob's user queue is located on from the information contained in the distributed routing table. According to some embodiments, a user's user queue does not have to be located on the same node that the user's device connects to when accessing the app provider system. In 750, the first processor module 2270 will forward the communication to the reactor module on the node in which the user's user queue is located. As illustrated in
Turning to
As with previous examples, when Alice wants to communicate with Bob, she composes a communication and her user device 130 transmits it the first node 120-1 for delivery to Bob's device 132 as illustrated in 710. In 720, the communication is stored in the incoming message queue. Further, the communication may be distributed to the incoming message queue located on other nodes in the app provider system in 730. The reactor module 2280 determines whether Bob is connected to the first node 120-1 while the communication is being stored. Since Bob is not connected to the app provider system in
According to the embodiment illustrated in
As communications increase, nodes in the app provider system may fail. Such failures may be catastrophic for the app provider system. In addition to being a disruption of service, users may lose communications. Those two factors may deter users from downloading the app provider's app. In this regard, there is a need for nodes in the app provider system to fail that minimizes disruption of service and ensures that communications are not lost.
In block 910, the app provider system detects a node failure. In this regard, the other nodes in a system may detect that one or more nodes have failed. For example, nodes may transmit a heartbeat signal to indicate their presence. When the heartbeat signal is not detected, the other nodes may determine that the node has been lost. Alternatively, one or more nodes may be designated to periodically poll other nodes to determine their state. According to some embodiments, the load balancer may be responsible for determining node availability, including when one or more nodes fail.
When a node fails, the users that were connected to that node will attempt to reconnect to the app provider system. In block 920, the load balancer distributes reconnection requests to other nodes in the app provider system. As noted above, each node in the app provider system may include replication information of at least one other node. In block 930, the failed node's replication data is distributed to other nodes. This distribution may be equitable with each remaining node in the app provider system receiving a portion of the failed node's replication data. Alternatively, the app provider system may transfer the failed node's replication data to a single node, or several nodes, that assume the failed node's workload.
In block 940, the app provider system provides communications received for users that were disconnected from the app provider system when the node failed. In various embodiments, communications received after the node failed but before the user reconnected would accumulate in the user's user queue as discussed above with respect to
Turning to
Returning to
The app provider system may need to occasionally provision a new node, for example, in response to a failed node or due to an increase in network traffic.
In block 1110, the app provider system provisions a new node. According to some embodiments, provisioning a new node may include requesting additional resources from a cloud service provider. These additional resources may include, for example, an additional virtual machine, more processing power, more memory, additional bandwidth, etc. In other embodiments, provisioning a new node may mean adding an additional server to the app provider system.
In block 1120, the new node broadcasts to the other nodes in the cluster. That is, the new node broadcasts a communication to the other nodes in the system to determine the overall configuration of the app provider system. In block 1130, the other nodes respond to the new node's broadcast. The response may include configuration information, geographic location, workload, and any other pertinent information for the new node. The new node receives the responses from the other nodes in the system. In block 1140, the nodes in the app provider system realign to accommodate the new node. Realignment may include redistributing user queues and the incoming message queue. Once the other nodes have realigned to accommodate the new node, the new node is configured as a participant in the cluster in block 1150. Configuring the new node may be done by at least one other node. In this regard, the new node receives copies of the reactor module, the processor module, the plurality of user queues, and the incoming message queue. Additionally, the new node's configuration may include receiving replication information for at least one other node in the app provider system. Once the new node is configured, the app provider system will allow the new node to accept connection requests from client devices in block 1160.
Turning to
The above-described embodiments disclose a system and method that provide an app provider the ability to deliver information without the use of a push token provided by a third-party notification service. Further, various embodiments describe the flexibility of the app provider system to handle node failures and the provisioning of additional nodes. While the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, the present disclosure is not limited to the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementing the present disclosure. The disclosed embodiments should be construed as being illustrative and not restrictive.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/290,301, entitled, “Providing Real-Time Events to Applications,” filed Feb. 2, 2016 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/318,657, entitled, “Providing Real-Time Events to Applications,” filed Apr. 5, 2016, both of which are incorporated herein in their entireties by reference. This application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/224,314, entitled, “Providing Real-Time Events to Applications,” filed concurrently herewith, the entirety of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5850443 | Van | Dec 1998 | A |
5953419 | Lohstroh | Sep 1999 | A |
6009173 | Sumner | Dec 1999 | A |
6091820 | Aziz | Jul 2000 | A |
6112227 | Heiner | Aug 2000 | A |
6145079 | Mitty | Nov 2000 | A |
6263435 | Dondeti | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266420 | Langford | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6314190 | Zimmermann | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324569 | Ogilvie | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6393464 | Dieterman | May 2002 | B1 |
6405315 | Burns | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6457134 | Lemke | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463155 | Akiyama | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463460 | Simonoff | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463463 | Godfrey | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6711608 | Ogilvie | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721784 | Leonard | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6742116 | Matsui | May 2004 | B1 |
6801998 | Hanna | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804257 | Benayoun | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6851049 | Price, III | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6904521 | Jivsov | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912656 | Perlman | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6947556 | Matyas | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6978284 | McBrearty | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7024456 | Simonoff | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7043529 | Simonoff | May 2006 | B1 |
7139399 | Zimmermann | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149893 | Leonard | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7178021 | Hanna | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7197537 | Koch | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7243231 | Ellison | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263619 | Kim | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7308477 | Gress | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7356564 | Hartselle | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366894 | Kalimuthu | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7383439 | Price, III | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7526620 | McGovern | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7584505 | Mondri | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7640427 | Callas | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7657037 | Callas | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7711120 | Kimmel | May 2010 | B2 |
7715565 | Kimmel | May 2010 | B2 |
7730309 | Zimmermann | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739501 | Kimmel | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7802099 | Mitchell | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8036221 | Fluhrer | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8156536 | Polk | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175277 | Bell | May 2012 | B2 |
8291031 | Kirkham | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8347083 | Scudder | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8356177 | McGrew | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364764 | Hartselle | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364984 | Jeffries | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8379857 | Zheng | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8380868 | Hiie | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8407471 | Sobel | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8412934 | De Atley | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8429420 | Melvin | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8433901 | De Atley | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8392699 | Jones | May 2013 | B2 |
8447970 | Klein | May 2013 | B2 |
8478893 | Hiie | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8489889 | Moscaritolo | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8503621 | Patel | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8503681 | McGrew | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8510552 | De Atley | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527769 | Kotla | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8560843 | Moscaritolo | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8566350 | Chow | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572757 | Stamos | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8588425 | Harwood | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8589673 | Ackerly | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8589680 | De Atley | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8601114 | Blair | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8601263 | Shankar | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8625805 | Statica | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8631227 | Olechowski | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8667271 | Shkolnikov | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8677136 | Brokenshire | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8682893 | Summerlin | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8689015 | Jeffries | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8705565 | Kutt | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713311 | Roskind | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8782409 | Murphy | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719233 | Gandhi | May 2014 | B2 |
8726009 | Cook | May 2014 | B1 |
8726369 | Emigh | May 2014 | B1 |
8732452 | Byrum | May 2014 | B2 |
8756419 | De Atley | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762712 | Kwan | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8788842 | Brouwer | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8788899 | Hiie | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8798614 | Bellovin | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8824664 | Ristock | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8837739 | Sexton | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8862129 | Moshir | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8863226 | Bailey, Jr. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8874902 | Ackerly | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8913994 | Edwards | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918896 | Murphy | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8925109 | Agrawal | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8938810 | Richardson | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8948382 | Hassan | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8948391 | Kritt | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8954740 | Moscaritolo | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8958559 | Medina | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8996861 | Cummings | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9027114 | Akhter | May 2015 | B2 |
9037796 | Nagpal | May 2015 | B2 |
9059840 | Connelly | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9071597 | Lord | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9075638 | Barnett | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9077525 | Chandran | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9078127 | Kritt | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9094405 | Buck | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9100373 | Deluca | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9124559 | Deluca | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9130822 | Cooper | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9137191 | Firstenberg | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9154612 | Moshir | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9197616 | Sinha | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9210143 | Ozzie | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224014 | Rios | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9225709 | Ackerly | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9237016 | De Atley | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9264406 | Kipnis | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9282192 | Laasik | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9288047 | Brouwer | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9326135 | Rodrigues | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9380044 | Zhang | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20010044901 | Grawrock | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002468 | Spagna | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026487 | Ogilvie | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020037736 | Kawaguchi | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038296 | Margolus | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038421 | Hamada | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049671 | Trende | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020078380 | Lin | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094085 | Roberts | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095465 | Banks | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020154776 | Sowa | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166053 | Wilson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186703 | West et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030021416 | Brown | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028597 | Salmi | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037114 | Nishio | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046533 | Olkin | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084050 | Hall | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084347 | Luzzatto | May 2003 | A1 |
20030126215 | Udell | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131060 | Hartselle | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030191937 | Balissat | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204720 | Schoen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208686 | Thummalapally | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217266 | Epp | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229668 | Malik | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040013113 | Singh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054891 | Hengeveld | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064512 | Arora et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078568 | Pham | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107349 | Sasselli | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111612 | Choi | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133520 | Callas | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133775 | Callas | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168055 | Lord | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040205248 | Little | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210772 | Hooker | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050005106 | Chen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050044059 | Samar | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053232 | Bace | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076061 | Cox | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086527 | Jackson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102528 | Tan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125659 | Sarfati | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149732 | Freeman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160292 | Batthish | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187966 | Iino | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193199 | Asokan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198170 | LeMay | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229257 | Kim | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050262338 | Irwin | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273592 | Pryor | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020796 | Aura | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031670 | Price | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036739 | Hagale | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060075234 | You | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060090073 | Steinberg | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094402 | Kim | May 2006 | A1 |
20060133346 | Cheeda | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147000 | Novi | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149822 | Henry | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060212928 | Maino | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060288209 | Vogler | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003065 | Schwartz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070003066 | Schwartz | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005713 | Levasseur | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011469 | Allison | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016771 | Allison | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022469 | Cooper | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050624 | Lord | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073823 | Cohen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070116269 | Nochta | May 2007 | A1 |
20070199071 | Callas | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233832 | Narayanan | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070276836 | Chatterjee | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277240 | Durfee | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080019530 | Eldridge | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022061 | Ito | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080091780 | Balan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049941 | Kim | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065878 | Hutson | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077686 | Subhraveti | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080095371 | Vataja | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098038 | Motoyama | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080162647 | Liang | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165952 | Smith | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178004 | Wei | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080235336 | Stern | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080281930 | Hartselle | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090052660 | Chen | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069033 | Karstens | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070466 | Elbring | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083112 | Bhogal | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097662 | Olechowski | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090100268 | Garcia | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132822 | Chen | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154705 | Price | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090198997 | Yeap | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222668 | Zaccone | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090265552 | Moshir | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281829 | Hansen | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299200 | Eggenberger | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002882 | Rieger | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017602 | Bussard | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100031038 | Kruegel | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100100967 | Douglas | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100138619 | Benavid | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100138934 | Minoshima | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161817 | Xiao | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174911 | Isshiki | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199340 | Jonas | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211541 | Deetz | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217984 | Hill | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223470 | Lord | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100239087 | Chaisson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250939 | Adams | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250946 | Korte | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262714 | Hiie | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100275007 | Kutt | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100296655 | Solow | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100304766 | Goyal | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110035591 | Dudziak | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110131406 | Jones | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145564 | Moshir | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145571 | Schmidt-Karaca | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151903 | Moshir | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173272 | Carvalho Neto | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202598 | Evans | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110246942 | Misawa | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110307707 | Fielder | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120030183 | Deetz | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120030743 | Semba | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045064 | Rembarz | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120096035 | Spector | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120098639 | Ijas | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102326 | Palekar | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120117568 | Plotkin | May 2012 | A1 |
20120159164 | Brown | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173353 | Rausch | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173880 | Swaminathan | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179905 | Ackerly | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120184309 | Cohen | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209924 | Evans | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120231770 | Clarke | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240037 | Migos | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120030331 | Deetz | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297451 | Ozzie | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300331 | Deetz | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311329 | Medina | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331073 | Williams | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130034229 | Sauerwald | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130036302 | Lord | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046828 | Grewal | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070045 | Meek | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073850 | Zaverucha | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077774 | Lynch, III | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130091298 | Ozzie | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097688 | Charles | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130136255 | Brown | May 2013 | A1 |
20130159436 | Hartselle | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130194301 | Robbins | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198522 | Kohno | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130208725 | Wakumoto et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219035 | Detienne | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227066 | Sato | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130232209 | Fernandez | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130252585 | Moshir | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254537 | Bogorad | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130275842 | Peach | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290416 | Nelson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304833 | St. Clair | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130305049 | Krakowski | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130305057 | Greco | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308628 | Marueli | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326220 | Connelly | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332724 | Walters | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339465 | Zhang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140033286 | Zhang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140052982 | Ackerly | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140053150 | Barnett | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068254 | Scharf | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140090042 | Short | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140129785 | Deetz | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129838 | Kim | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136842 | Kitze | May 2014 | A1 |
20140157435 | Stamos | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140162601 | Kim | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164776 | Hook | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169554 | Scarisbrick | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181221 | Kushtagi | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140196140 | Gong | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140206285 | Jance | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140207887 | Hartselle | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140207900 | Liu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140233736 | Zhang | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140258719 | Cidon | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140304508 | Murphy | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140304515 | Feuerman | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140307543 | Marueli | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140325622 | Luk | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140325667 | Sun | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140351586 | Hook | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150006884 | Ackerly | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039882 | Watanabe | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150082391 | Lerman | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150121549 | Baessler | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150143546 | Charles | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154206 | Kumar | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150156177 | Murphy | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169615 | Batchu | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150169893 | Desai | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150195239 | Firstenberg | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215291 | Abdunabi | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150227761 | Cohen | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150229612 | Hassan | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244658 | Speyer | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244684 | Ng | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150264005 | Brooks | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150264042 | Lord | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150264540 | Brooks | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271653 | Brooks | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150281185 | Cooley | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150282117 | Pozuelo et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304849 | Moom | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312260 | Kim | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150326731 | Laasik | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150332332 | Darmaki | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150347770 | Whalley | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150350036 | Cooper | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150350119 | Thirumalai | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150350247 | Adler | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150350895 | Brander | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150365395 | Enriquez | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370918 | Patterson | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373021 | Tussy | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160013939 | Jun | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160034692 | Singler | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160036791 | Sauerwald | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160055325 | Ozzie | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057156 | Lin | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160063258 | Ackerly | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160065530 | Prado | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160072781 | Zhang | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160191513 | Tomlinson | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160265005 | Zelle et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2018015 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2011101784 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2014140736 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Author Unknown, ‘myENIGMA: Whitepaper’, Qnective AG, 2013. |
Author Unknown, ‘Perfect Forward Secrecy’, IBM Security SiteProtector System, http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocented/sprotect/v2r8m0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.siteprotector.doc%2Freferences%2Fsp_agenthelp_perfect_forward_secrecy.htm, Aug. 27, 2013. |
Author Unknown, ‘Threema Cyrptography Whitepaper’ Threema., Mar. 9, 2015. |
B Kaliski, ‘PKCS #7: Cryptographic Message Syntax’, Version 1.5, Mar. 1998, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2315. |
Callas et al., ‘OpenPGP Message Format’, RFC 4880, Nov. 2007. |
Cremers et al., ‘One-round strongly secure key exchange with perfect forward secrecy and deniability’, IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, version 3, 2011. |
Diffie et al., “Authentication and authenticated key exchanges”, Designs, Codes and Cryptography, vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 107-125, Jun. 1992. |
Green et al., Dancing on the Lip of the Volcano—Chosen Ciphertext Attacks on Apple iMessage' Mar. 21, 2016. |
Leach et al.‘A Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) URN Namespace’, Standards Track, Jul. 2005. |
Lin et al., “An Improvement on Secure E-mail Protocols Providing Perfect Forward Secrecy”, JCIS, 2006. |
Moscaritolo et al., ‘Silent Circle Instant Messaging Protocol Protocol Specification’, Silent Circle Engineering, Dec. 5, 2012, Version 1.0. |
Ms. Smith, ‘How to easily encrypt email with Virtru for free: Gmail, Hotmail, Outlook, Yahoo’, Network World, Jan. 28, 2014. |
Pomian & Corella, LLC, ‘Submission of Prior Art under 37 CFR 1.501 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,625,805’Apr. 18, 2014. |
S. Kent, ‘Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: Part 2: Certificate-Based Key Managment’, Feb. 1993, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1422. |
Stedman et al., ‘A User Study of Off-the-Record Messaging’, Symposium on Unstable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), Jul. 2008. |
Sui et al., ‘An Improved Authenticated Key Agreement Protocol with Perfect Forward Secrecy for Wireless Mobile Communication’, WCNC, pp. 2088-2093, 2005. |
Sun et al., Password-based authentication and key distribution protocols with perfect forward secrecy, Journal of computer and System Sciences 72, pp. 1002-1011,2006. |
Toorani et al.,‘SSMS—A Secure SMS Messaging Protocol for the M-Payment Systems’, Proceedings of the 13th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, IEEE, Jul. 2008. |
Wong et al., “Email Protocols with Perfect Forward Secrecy”, Int. J. Security and Networks, vol. 7, No. 1, 2012. |
Nishant Garg. Apache Kafka. Packt Publishing. Oct. 2013. |
Redis Cluster Specification. Jul. 19, 2015. |
Oikonomidis et al. “Identity Based Protocols for Secure Electronic Content Distribution and Licensing Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Delivering of Music”, WEDELMUSIC 2004. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber= 1358105. |
Pei et al. “An Intelligent Digital Content Protection Framework between Home Network Receiver Devices”, 2006 Interational Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4076116. |
Yampolskiy, Roman V. “Mimicry Attack on Strategy-Based Behavioral Biometric”, Fifth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, 2008. ITNG 2008. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4492601. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62290301 | Feb 2016 | US | |
62318657 | Apr 2016 | US |