The field of technology is data processing, or, more specifically, methods, apparatus, and products for providing cloud storage array services for a storage array of a data center when the storage array is not connected to a remote cloud-based storage array services provider.
Data centers may include many computing components including servers, network devices, and storage arrays. As the need for storage of large amounts of data and efficient access to that data increases, storage array technology is advancing. Such storage arrays may provide persistent storage for any number of computing devices in a data center. Given that many data centers provide services to many different users, various considerations must be taken into account to provide efficient, useful, and secure access to and administration of storage arrays. Various management tools, reporting services, and the like may be implemented for storage array through cloud-based service providers. In some implementations, however, such cloud-based service providers may be unavailable, either by design or through a loss of connection.
Methods, apparatus, and products for locally providing cloud storage array services for a storage array of a data center when the storage array is not connected to a remote cloud-based storage array services provider are disclosed in this specification. Providing such cloud storage array services in accordance with embodiments of the present invention includes: initiating, by a primary storage array, one or more cloud storage array services; and locally providing the cloud storage array services including: generating, by the cloud storage array services, metadata describing one or more real-time storage array characteristics; and presenting the metadata to a user through a local area network.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular descriptions of exemplary embodiments of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numbers generally represent like parts of exemplary embodiments of the invention.
Exemplary methods, apparatus, and products for providing cloud storage array services for a storage array of a data center when the storage array is not connected to a remote cloud-based storage array services provider in accordance with the present invention are described with reference to the accompanying drawings, beginning with
The computing devices (164-170) in the example of
The local area network (160) of
The example storage arrays (102, 104) of
Each storage controller (106, 112) may be implemented in a variety of ways, including as an FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array), a PLC (Programmable Logic Chip), an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit), or computing device that includes discrete components such as a central processing unit, computer memory, and various adapters. Each storage controller (106, 112) may, for example, include a data communications adapter configured to support communications via the SAN (158) and the LAN (160). For clarity, only one of the storage controllers (112) in the example of
Each write buffer device (148, 152) may be configured to receive, from the storage controller (106, 112), data to be stored in the storage devices (146). Such data may originate from any one of the computing devices (164-170). In the example of
A ‘storage device’ as the term is used in this specification refers to any device configured to record data persistently. The term ‘persistently’ as used here refers to a device's ability to maintain recorded data after loss of a power source. Examples of storage devices may include mechanical, spinning hard disk drives, Solid-state drives (“Flash drives”), and the like.
In addition to being coupled to the computing devices through the SAN (158), the storage arrays may also be coupled to the computing devices through the LAN (160) and to one or more cloud service providers through the Internet (172). One example cloud service in
In some instances, the storage arrays (102, 104) may be disconnected from the storage array services provider (176). Various reasons may exist for such a disconnect. For example, a loss of data communications connection between the storage array and the storage array services provider (176) may occur. In high-security data centers, as another example, the storage arrays (102, 104) may never be connected to the storage array services provider at all. In such situations, users may still desire the services provided by the storage array services provider. To that end, the system of
Prior to presentation, the metadata may be processed and analyzed. Such analysis processing and analysis may also be included in the presentation of the metadata to the user through the LAN (160). That is, ‘presenting the metadata’ is not limited to presenting the metadata in its original form. The metadata may be formatted, processed, analyzed, and otherwise altered for purposes of presentation.
As mentioned above, one example in which cloud storage array services are provided locally in accordance with embodiments of the present invention includes when a loss of data communications occurs. To that end, the primary storage array (180), through the storage array services module (182) may be configured to detect a data communications connection between the primary storage array (180) and a remote cloud-based storage array services provider (176). Here, a ‘heartbeat’ signal may be used to ensure that the data communications connection between the primary storage array (180) and the cloud-based storage array services provider (176) is maintained. Such a ‘heartbeat’ may be a periodic ping of the storage array services provider. As long as the ping is returned, the storage array services module (182) may infer that the data communications connection between the storage array services provider (176) and the primary storage array (180) has not been lost. In such an embodiment, the cloud-based storage array services provider (176) may provide the cloud storage array services remotely, rather than the storage array services module (182).
Further, while the data communications connection between the primary storage array (180) and the storage array services provider (176) is active, the storage array services module (182) may periodically retrieve, from the remote cloud-based storage array services provider (176), a current configuration of the cloud storage array services and the current configuration of the plurality of storage arrays (102, 104) in the data center. The term ‘current configuration of the cloud storage array services’ may include any data related to the execution of the services including, for example, a list of the types of services to be executed, the executable computer program instructions of the services themselves, updates to the executable computer program instructions of the services, data used to seed the services, data describing the format of presenting the results of the services, and so on. The term ‘current configuration of the plurality of storage arrays’ refers to any data describing each of the storage arrays of the data center including: storage capabilities of each storage array; data communications capabilities, endpoints, and present connectivity of each storage array; one or more identifiers of the storage array or the array's components; a listing of components of the storage array; an identification of logical volumes maintained by the storage array; and the like. By periodically updating these current configurations, the storage array services module (182) may be primed to locally provide the cloud storage array services upon a loss of data communications between the primary storage array (180) and the storage array services provider (176).
The storage array services module (182) may later detect loss of the data communications connection between the primary storage array and the remote cloud-based storage array services provider. The storage array services module (182) may detect such a loss of communications when a predefined number of pings of the heartbeat signal are not returned. Responsive to detecting the loss of communications between the primary storage array (180) and the storage array services provider (176), the storage array services provider may then initiate the cloud storage array services (184).
In embodiments in which multiple storage arrays are included in the data center, each storage array may be independently coupled for data communications to the cloud-based storage array services provider (176). In such embodiments, each storage array is generally unaware of the other storage arrays at least for purposes of participating in storage array services offered by the cloud-based storage array services provider (176). In such an embodiment, the cloud-based storage array services provider may expose a REST (Representational State Transition) API (Application Programming Interface), or the like, to the storage arrays to carry out data communications between a storage array service and a storage array. REST APIs generally utilize HTTP commands and a domain as the basis for data communications to between two endpoints. To that end, upon a loss of communications with the cloud-based storage array services provider (176), the primary storage array (180) may initiate the one or more cloud storage array services (184) by altering a local DNS (Domain Name Service) record such that the domain originally utilized by the cloud-based storage array services provider (176) redirects to an IP address of the primary storage array. In this way, any communications that would normally be addressed to the cloud-based storage array services provider from any storage array in the data center are now redirected to the primary storage array (180).
In such an embodiment in which multiple storage arrays are located within a single data center, generating metadata describing one or more real-time storage array characteristics may also include generating metadata describing one or more real-time storage array characteristics of each of the plurality of the storage arrays; and aggregating, for presentation to the user, the metadata of each of the plurality of storage arrays.
Although the example of
In embodiments in which workload characteristics are utilized to select a host for the cloud-based storage array services, the primary storage array (180) may also be configured to detect a change in workload characteristics of each of the plurality of storage arrays. Such a change may be detected in a variety of ways including, for example, by detecting a failure of a storage array, by periodically retrieving workload characteristics, and so on. Upon detecting the change, the primary storage array (180) may then re-select one of the storage arrays to host the one or more cloud storage array services in dependence upon the changed workload characteristics. In this way, hosting of the services may be dynamically reassigned when workload changes amongst the storage arrays.
In embodiments in which a storage array other than the primary storage array (180) is selected to host the cloud-based storage array services, the primary storage array may operate as a proxy for the selected storage array. In such an embodiment, presenting the metadata to a user through a local area network may include presenting the metadata through the proxy of the primary storage array. The primary storage array (180) may operate as a proxy in different ways. In one way, the primary storage array receives only the final aggregated results for presentation to the user through the local area network (160). That is, the selected storage array actually hosting the cloud-based storage array services (184) may perform the services, collecting metadata from all storage arrays, aggregate the metadata into a single result and pass that result on to the primary storage array for presentation to a user. In another example, the selected storage array may execute the cloud-based storage array services and each storage array may pass its metadata directly to the primary storage array. In such an embodiment, the primary storage array may aggregate and process the metadata of each storage array prior to presenting the aggregated and processed metadata to a user through the LAN (160).
The arrangement of computing devices, storage arrays, cloud-based service providers, networks and other devices making up the exemplary system illustrated in
Locally providing cloud storage array services in accordance with embodiments of the present invention is generally implemented with computers. In the system of
The primary storage array (202) of
Here, the user may receive or view the metadata (226) through a client-side array services module (228) stored in RAM (238) of a client-side user computer (204). In the example of
In some embodiments, prior to the storage array services module (182) initiating cloud storage array services (184) locally, such cloud storage array services may be provided remotely via the storage array services provider (176). In such an embodiment, the cloud storage array services (184) may be stored in RAM (24) of the storage array services provider (176) and be accessible via an API exposed by the storage array services provider via data communications over the Internet (172) or some other wide-area network.
Turning back to the components of the primary storage array (202), also stored in RAM (214) is an operating system (234). Examples of operating systems useful in primary storage arrays configured for locally providing cloud storage array services according to embodiments of the present invention include UNIX™, Linux, Microsoft Windows™, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. The operating system (234), the storage array services module (182), the cloud storage array services (184) and the metadata (226) in the example of
The primary storage array (202) of
The example primary storage array (202) of
The exemplary primary storage array (202) of
The example of
The processor (314) is also coupled for data communications through PCIe (Peripheral Component Interface express) links (308, 310, 312, 322) to several Fibre Channel host bus adapters (302, 304), an Ethernet adapter (306), and a PCIe switch (324). The Fibre Channel host bus adapters (308, 310) may couple the storage controller to a storage area network, such the SAN (158) depicted in the example of
Readers of skill in the art will recognize that these components, protocols, adapters, and architectures are for illustration only, not limitation. Such a storage controller may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Each such way is well within the scope of the present invention.
For further explanation,
The method of
Presenting (408) metadata (226) locally to a user may be carried out by sending the data through the local area network (160) to a client-side array services module for presentation in a GUI (Graphical User Interface) (410). A client-side array services module (228) is a module of automated computing machinery comprising computer hardware, computer software, or a combination of computer hardware and software that is configured to receive and present in a GUI metadata from cloud storage array services. One example of a client-side array services module (228) may be a web browser and the GUI (410) may be a webpage hosted by the primary storage array (202). In another example, the client-side array services module (228) may be implemented as an application for a mobile device. These are but a few of many possible implementations of a client-side array services module (228) that may be configured to receive and present metadata to a user.
For further explanation,
The method of
While the data communications connection is active, the method of
Also while the data communications connection between the primary storage array (202) and the remote cloud based storage array services provider (176) is active, the method of
The method of
For further explanation,
The method of
For further explanation,
The method of
The method of
The method of
For further explanation,
In this example, a “storage system” may be considered to be a “storage array” as described above with reference to
In some implementations, the locally provides cloud storage services are provided in response to unavailability of remote cloud storage services, such as remote storage array services providers (176). However, in other examples, the locally provided cloud storage services (184) are provided whether or not the local plurality of storage systems are connected to a remote services provider.
As depicted within
In some cases, the cloud storage array services (184) may be implemented within a storage array services module (182) that is a computing device (not depicted) other than the storage systems (802A-802N), where the computing device is on the same local network as the client computing device(s) (802) and the storage systems (802A-802N). In some implementations, as described above, any of the storage systems (802A-802N) may serve as the primary storage array (202).
Further, the cloud storage array services (184) may include virtualization services and/or operating system level virtualization services such as a containerization service (808), a hybrid cloud container orchestration (814), and/or a container orchestration system (820).
In some implementations, an integrated storage manager (800) may be in communication, across one or more networks (not depicted), with the storage systems (800A-800N) and with multiple different virtualization services, including services that provide operating system level virtualization, or containers—including containerization service (808), such as Docker™, hybrid cloud container orchestration (814), such as Mesosphere™, and Container Orchestration Service (820), such as Kubernetes™. In other examples, the integrated storage manager (800) may be in communication with other container service providers. Further, in this example, containerization service (808) may include multiple implementations of containers, including container(s) (810), which includes a plugin (812) for interfacing with the integrated storage manager (800), for example, via an API; hybrid cloud container orchestration (814) may include multiple implementations of containers, including container(s) (816), which includes a plugin (818) for interfacing with the integrated storage manager (800); and container orchestration system (820) may include a provisioner (822) and a plugin (824).
In some implementations, each of the storage systems (802A-802N) may include respective API interfaces (804), where the API interface (804) may be used for communicating with the integrated storage manager (800).
For further explanation,
For further explanation,
In this example, the cloud storage array services (184) may locally provide the cloud storage services (404)—where the local cloud storage services (404) may include an integrated storage manager (800) configured to: receive (902), from one or more storage systems from among a plurality of storage systems (802A-802N), one or more performance analyses (954); receive (904) a management request (952) from an operating system level virtualization service (808); and determine (906), among the plurality of storage systems (802A-802N), an implementation of the request (952) from the operating system level virtualization service (808).
Receiving (902), from one or more storage systems from among a plurality of storage systems (802A-802N), one or more performance analyses (954) may be implemented by a storage system (802A-802N) sending metrics, such as performance metrics for the storage system, or an analysis of workload performance, across a network using API interface (804) to communicate with the API interface on the integrated storage manager (800).
Receiving (904) a request (952) from an operating system level virtualization service (808) may be implemented by the integrated storage manager (800) receiving one or more messages across a local network, local mesh fabric, or via a direct connection using one or more network communication protocols.
Determining (906), among the plurality of storage systems, an implementation of the request from the operating system level virtualization service (808) may be implemented by applying a selection policy to select one or more storage systems to provide storage and/or computing resources for implementing the request (952). In some examples, the selection policy may be configured to satisfy one or more of: balancing workload distributions across the plurality of storage systems (802A-802N), balancing data storage consumption across the plurality of storage systems (802A-802N), or satisfying one or more quality of service terms for a given client.
Further, in some implementations, determining (906) an implementation for the request (952) may include determining (908), based at least upon the one or more performance analyses (554) for the one or more storage systems, an implementation of the management request that is modified to improve one or more metrics corresponding to the one or more storage systems may be implemented by the integrated storage manager (800) determining multiple versions of a performance impact among the one or more storage systems based on implementing the management request in multiple ways, where the multiple ways include an implementation, such as provisioning, based on a performance analysis indicating a particular balance of workloads—where the determination, in this example, may be made to improve a performance balance of workloads among the one or more storage systems given a provisioning of data storage for a new workload among the one or more storage systems. For example, if the integrated storage manager (800) determines a particular one or more storage systems will be less lightly used, then those particular one or more storage systems may be selected for implementing the management request.
In other examples, the integrated storage manager (800) may be implemented to service bare metal applications as well as virtualized applications. In other examples, the integrated storage manager (800) may communicate with a management application for one or more storage services, such as a management application that runs in a cloud environment that manages the one or more storage systems (802A-802N). In other examples, the integrated storage manager (800) may receive analytics data from one or more containers, or Kubernetes pods or clusters at different granularities.
Further, in some examples, the integrated storage manager (800) may implement an agent (not depicted) within a host computer or some other computing device that is in communication with the one or more storage systems or containers, where the agent may provide an interface to one or more of the services provided by the integrated storage manager (800), including provisioning volumes or data, and mounting or unmounting volumes, and more generally for providing a host-side interface for each of the modules depicted in
Generating (910) metadata (926) describing one or more results from the implementation of the request (954) may be implemented similarly to generating (406) metadata describing one or more real-time storage array characteristics, as discussed above with reference to
Providing (912) the metadata (926) through a local area network (160) may be implemented similarly to presenting (408) the metadata (226) to a user through a local area network, as discussed above with reference to
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described largely in the context of a fully functional computer system. Readers of skill in the art will recognize, however, that the present invention also may be embodied in a computer program product disposed upon computer readable media for use with any suitable data processing system. Such computer readable storage media may be any transitory or non-transitory media. Examples of such media include storage media for machine-readable information, including magnetic media, optical media, or other suitable media. Examples of such media also include magnetic disks in hard drives or diskettes, compact disks for optical drives, magnetic tape, and others as will occur to those of skill in the art. Persons skilled in the art will immediately recognize that any computer system having suitable programming means will be capable of executing the steps of the method of the invention as embodied in a computer program product. Persons skilled in the art will recognize also that, although some of the exemplary embodiments described in this specification are oriented to software installed and executing on computer hardware, nevertheless, alternative embodiments implemented as firmware, as hardware, or as an aggregation of hardware and software are well within the scope of embodiments of the present invention.
It will be understood from the foregoing description that modifications and changes may be made in various embodiments of the present invention without departing from its true spirit. The descriptions in this specification are for purposes of illustration only and are not to be construed in a limiting sense. The scope of the present invention is limited only by the language of the following claims.
This is a continuation application for patent entitled to a filing date and claiming the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/254,859, filed Jan. 23, 2019, which is a continuation in part of and claims priority from U.S. Pat. No. 10,652,331, issued May 12, 2020, which is a continuation application of and claims priority from U.S. Pat. No. 10,027,757, issued Jul. 17, 2018, which is a continuation application of and claims priority from U.S. Pat. No. 9,716,755, issued Jul. 25, 2017.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5706210 | Kumano et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5799200 | Brant et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5933598 | Scales et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6012032 | Donovan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6085333 | DeKoning et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6643641 | Snyder | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647514 | Umberger et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6789162 | Talagala et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7089272 | Garthwaite et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7107389 | Inagaki et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7146521 | Nguyen | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7334124 | Pham et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7420466 | Shafer | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437530 | Rajan | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7493424 | Bali et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7593972 | Silva-Craig et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7669029 | Mishra et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7689609 | Lango et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7739447 | Rodrigues | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7743191 | Liao | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7899780 | Shmuylovich et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8042163 | Karr et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8086585 | Brashers et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8200887 | Bennett | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8271700 | Annem et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8387136 | Lee et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8437189 | Montierth et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8465332 | Hogan et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8527544 | Colgrove et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8566546 | Marshak et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8578442 | Banerjee | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8583887 | Patel et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8613066 | Brezinski et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8620970 | English et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8751463 | Chamness | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8762642 | Bates et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8769622 | Chang et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8800009 | Beda et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8812860 | Bray | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8850546 | Field et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8862728 | Jayachandran | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8898346 | Simmons | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8909854 | Yamagishi et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8931041 | Banerjee | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8949863 | Coatney et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8984602 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8990905 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9081713 | Bennett | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9112936 | Poletto et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9124569 | Hussain et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9134922 | Rajagopal et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9152578 | Saad et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9189334 | Bennett | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9197696 | Jakatdar et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9209973 | Aikas et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9250823 | Kamat et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9300660 | Borowiec et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9311182 | Bennett | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9330106 | Piasecki et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9444822 | Borowiec et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9507532 | Colgrove et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9521200 | Borowiec et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9563517 | Natanzon et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9600429 | Pope | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9626127 | Glickman et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9632870 | Bennett | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9716746 | Garg et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9716755 | Borowiec | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9755986 | Brown et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9830091 | Venkatesan et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10027757 | Borowiec | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10154112 | Anthony et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10652331 | Borowiec | May 2020 | B1 |
11102298 | Borowiec | Aug 2021 | B1 |
20020013802 | Mori et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030145172 | Galbraith et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030191783 | Wolczko et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225961 | Chow et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040080985 | Chang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111573 | Garthwaite | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040153844 | Ghose et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040193814 | Erickson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040260967 | Guha et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021923 | Von Bergen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021924 | Bergen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050160416 | Jamison et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050188246 | Emberty et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188251 | Benhase et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216800 | Bicknell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060015771 | Van Gundy et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060129817 | Borneman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161726 | Lasser | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206603 | Rajan | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230245 | Gounares et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239075 | Williams et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070022227 | Miki | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028068 | Golding et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055702 | Fridella et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070109856 | Pellicone et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070150689 | Pandit et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168321 | Saito et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070220227 | Long | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070294563 | Bose | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294564 | Reddin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005587 | Ahlquist | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077825 | Bello et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080162674 | Dahiya | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195833 | Park | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080270678 | Cornwell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282045 | Biswas et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090077340 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100115 | Park et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090198889 | Ito et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100036931 | Certain et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052625 | Cagno et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100199042 | Bates et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211723 | Mukaida | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235422 | Perret | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246266 | Park et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257142 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262764 | Liu et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100325345 | Ohno et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332754 | Lai et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110072290 | Davis et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110125955 | Chen | May 2011 | A1 |
20110131231 | Haas et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167221 | Pangal et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110258461 | Bates | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110296526 | Kim | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017156 | Broda | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023144 | Rub | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120054264 | Haugh et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066371 | Patel | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079318 | Colgrove et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084261 | Parab | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120131253 | McKnight et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131573 | Dasari et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120173822 | Testardi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120303919 | Hu et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311000 | Post et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007845 | Chang et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031414 | Dhuse et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036272 | Nelson | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130071087 | Motiwala et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130117506 | Glickman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124400 | Hawkett | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145447 | Maron | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130191555 | Liu | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198459 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130205173 | Yoneda | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212262 | Imes et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219164 | Hamid | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227201 | Talagala et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130262638 | Kumarasamy et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262801 | Sancheti et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290607 | Chang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130311434 | Jones | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318297 | Jibbe et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332614 | Brunk et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140020083 | Fetik | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140074850 | Noel et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140082715 | Grajek et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086146 | Kim et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140090009 | Li et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140096220 | Pinto et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140101434 | Senthurpandi et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140164774 | Nord et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173232 | Reohr et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140195636 | Karve et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201512 | Seethaler et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201541 | Paul et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140208155 | Pan | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215590 | Brand | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229654 | Goss et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140230017 | Saib | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140249850 | Woodson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258526 | Le Sant et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282983 | Ju et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140285917 | Cudak et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140308098 | Lert et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140325262 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140351627 | Best et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140373104 | Gaddam et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140373126 | Hussain et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150012639 | Mclean | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026387 | Sheredy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150032817 | Garg et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150052392 | Mickens et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150063366 | Melander | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150074463 | Jacoby et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089569 | Sondhi et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150095515 | Krithivas et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150113203 | Dancho et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150121137 | McKnight et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150134920 | Anderson et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150149822 | Coronado et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150193169 | Sundaram et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150244801 | Guo et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150281011 | Gates | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150287318 | Nair et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150365291 | Burton et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150378888 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160098323 | Mutha et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160170823 | Miller et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160170833 | Segura et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160350009 | Cerreta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160352720 | Hu et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160352830 | Borowiec et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160352834 | Borowiec et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180081562 | Vasudevan | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190361626 | East | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0725324 | Aug 1996 | EP |
2012087648 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2013071087 | May 2013 | WO |
2014110137 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2016015008 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016190938 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2016195759 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2016195958 | Dec 2016 | WO |
2016195961 | Dec 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bellamy-Mcintyre et al., “OpenID and the Enterprise: A Model-based Analysis of Single Sign-On Authentication”, 15th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), Aug. 29, 2011, pp. 129-138, IEEE Computer Society, USA, DOI: 10.1109/EDOC.2011.26, ISBN: 978-1-4577-0362-1. |
ETSI, “Network Function Virtualisation (NFV); Resiliency Requirements”, ETSI GS NFCV-REL 001, V1.1.1, Jan. 2015, 82 pages, etsi.org (online), URL: www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-REL/001_099/001/01.01.01_60/gs_NFV-REL001v010101p.pdf. |
Faith, “dictzip file format”, GitHub.com (online), accessed Jul. 28, 2015,1 page, URL: github.com/fidlej/idzip. |
Google Search of “storage array define” performed by the Examiner on Nov. 4, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/725,278, Results limited to entries dated before 2012, 1 page. |
Hota et al., “Capability-based Cryptographic Data Access Control in Cloud Computing”, International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications, col. 1, Issue 1, Aug. 2011, 10 pages, Eswar Publications, India. |
Hu et al., “Container Marking: Combining Data Placement, Garbage Collection and Wear Levelling for Flash”, 19th Annual IEEE International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems, Jul. 25-27, 2011, 11 pages, ISBN: 978-0-7695-4430-4, DOI: 10.1109/MASCOTS.2011.50. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/015006, dated Apr. 29, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/015008, dated May 4, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/016333, dated Jun. 8, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/020410, dated Jul. 8, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/032052, dated Aug. 30, 2016, 17 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/032084, dated Jul. 18, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/035492, dated Aug. 17, 2016, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/036693, dated Aug. 29, 2016, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/038758, dated Oct. 7, 2016, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/040393, dated Sep. 22, 2016, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/044020, dated Sep. 30, 2016, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/044874, dated Oct. 7, 2016, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/044875, dated Oct. 5, 2016, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/044876, dated Oct. 21, 2016, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2016/044877, dated Sep. 29, 2016, 13 pages. |
Kong, “Using PCI Express as the Primary System Interconnect in Multiroot Compute, Storage, Communications and Embedded Systems”, White Paper, IDT.com (online), Aug. 28, 2008, 12 pages, URL: www.idt.com/document/whp/idt-pcie-multi-root-white-paper. |
Li et al., “Access Control for the Services Oriented Architecture”, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Workshop on Secure Web Services (SWS '07), Nov. 2007, pp. 9-17, ACM New York, NY. |
Microsoft, “Hybrid for SharePoint Server 2013—Security Reference Architecture”, Microsoft (online), Oct. 2014, 53 pages, URL: hybrid.office.com/img/Security_Reference_Architecture.pdf. |
Microsoft, “Hybrid Identity Management”, Microsoft (online), Apr. 2014, 2 pages, URL: download.microsoft.com/download/E/A/E/EAE57CD1-A80B-423C-96BB-142FAAC630B9/Hybrid_Identity_Datasheet.pdf. |
Microsoft, “Hybrid Identity”, Microsoft (online), Apr. 2014, 36 pages, URL: www.aka.ms/HybridIdentityWp. |
PCMag, “Storage Array Definition”, Published May 10, 2013, URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20130510121646/http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/52091/storage-array, 2 pages. |
Storer et al., “Secure Data Deduplication”, Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Workshop on Storage Security and Survivability (StorageSS'08), Oct. 2008, 10 pages, ACM New York, NY. USA, DOI: 10.1145/1456469.1456471. |
Sweere, “Creating Storage Class Persistent Memory with NVDIMM”, Published in Aug. 2013, Flash Memory Summit 2013, URL: http://ww.flashmemorysummit.com/English/Collaterals/Proceedings/2013/20130814_T2_Sweere.pdf, 22 pages. |
Techopedia, “What is a disk array”, techopedia.com (online), Jan. 13, 2012, 1 page, URL: web.archive.org/web/20120113053358/http://www.techopedia.com/definition/1009/disk-array. |
Webopedia, “What is a disk array”, webopedia.com (online), May 26, 2011, 2 pages, URL: web/archive.org/web/20110526081214/http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/D/disk_array.html. |
Wikipedia, “Convergent Encryption”, Wikipedia.org (online), accessed Sep. 8, 2015, 2 pages, URL: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_encryption. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210360068 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16254859 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 17389457 | US | |
Parent | 15419551 | Jan 2017 | US |
Child | 15967189 | US | |
Parent | 14721571 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 15419551 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15967189 | Apr 2018 | US |
Child | 16254859 | US |