Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Providing a provisional restoration or interim prosthesis at the time of dental implant surgery aids in the healing process and provides the patient with a functioning temporary restoration while the permanent long-term restoration is being fabricated and implants are healing. Currently, during the process of a full mouth restoration, doctors are utilizing a traditional denture that is altered to seat on the implants placed in the patient's mouth as the provisional restoration. The use of this traditional denture typically leads to breakage and repair scenarios for the patient and the doctor. These breakage and repair scenarios typically occur due to the acrylic and denture teeth materials breaking in the areas modified by the doctor to retrofit the traditional denture to the implants. A need exists for an improved process and product that alleviates these costly breakage and repair scenarios for the doctor and patient which is the purpose of this disclosure. The doctor would also benefit from a process for the creation of a provisional restoration and the associated provisional restoration that can aid in the surgical process and selection of potential abutments at the time of surgery.
In addition to an improved restoration, there is a need for an improved impression and diagnostic process that alleviates the number of visits for the patient and doctor. The traditional procedure of impressing, fabricating a verification jig, wax bite rim and diagnostic wax up can be tedious, lengthy, frustrating, time consuming, and costly to both the doctor and the patient. Utilizing a new digitally designed impression prosthesis, the doctor is able to capture the occlusal record, an impression of the soft tissue, and critical aspects of the tooth position and orientation in a single procedure. A new process that can aid both the patient and the doctor in expediting the delivery of the final prosthesis and provide improved accuracy over the current process is crucial.
Doctors will often provide a temporary restoration at the time of surgery to aid in the healing and osseointegration of the patient's dental implants. The patient also benefits with having a temporary restorative solution while the long-term prosthesis is being created and implants are healing. Typically, these temporary restorations will remain in the patient's mouth for a period of 3 to 6 months or until appropriate healing and osseointegration has been achieved.
The current state of the art in the making of the temporary restoration is utilizing a traditional denture that is retrofitted to seat on the implants and/or abutments in the patient's mouth. The traditional denture that is retrofitted utilizes a pink acrylic base plate and denture teeth common in the market and can be fabricated from a number of methods (heat cured acrylic, cold cure, light cure, etc. . . . ). The doctor will cut holes into the traditional denture where temporary copings that are attached to the implants can be luted to the denture. These holes will typically extend through both the pink base plate acrylic and the denture tooth. Additional acrylic material may be used to fill any gaps or voids between the traditional denture and the patient's soft tissue. Once the modifications to the traditional denture have been completed (cutting holes, attaching temporary copings, and adding acrylic), the traditional denture will be referred to as the temporary restoration.
During the 6-month healing period, the patient places occlusal loads and forces onto the temporary restoration. Due to the design and modifications performed by the doctor in retrofitting the traditional denture to the implants, the patient can experience a breakage scenario of the temporary restoration. Typically, the breakage occurs in the area of the access hole the doctor cut though the pink base plate acrylic and denture tooth. The bond between the denture tooth and the pink acrylic base plate material relies upon the bottom acrylic portion of the denture tooth bonding to the pink base plate acrylic. When this hole is cut through the denture tooth and the pink base plate material, the amount of surface area where this bonding occurs is reduced dramatically. As the patient applies occlusal loads in these areas, the bond between the denture tooth and the pink base plate acrylic will break and the denture tooth will dislodge from the temporary restoration. Also, in some extreme instances the structural integrity of the temporary restoration or denture tooth can be impacted and a breakage of the temporary restoration or the denture tooth can occur.
The resulting breakage and repair scenarios are inconvenient for both the patient and the doctor. Each time the temporary restoration breaks the patient has to return to the doctor's office where the temporary restoration can be repaired properly. The doctor is also compelled to see the patient the same day as the breakage and will typically see the patient regardless of the number of patients already on the schedule. The doctor will typically not charge for any of the costs associated with this breakage and in addition to the use of materials will typically result in 1-2 hours of chair time depending upon the severity of the break. Over time these breakages can result in a loss of profitability in performing these types of repair procedures.
A need exists for an improved product and method to advance the current state of the art for the temporary restoration. The product needs to address the breakage issues associated with the current technique and provide a time saving method in delivering a provisional restoration at the time of surgery. In addition to the improved performance, if additional features can be incorporated into the provisional restoration to aid with the surgical process (such as bone reduction and potential abutment selection), these features could improve the overall quality of the implant placement and outcome for the final restoration.
In addition to providing a provisional restoration at the time of surgery, there is a need for improving the current impression and diagnostic wax up process which results in an impression prosthesis. Typically after osseosintegration has been completed, the restorative doctor will impress the implants/abutments in the patient's mouth and begin fabricating a mockup of the final restoration, commonly called a diagnostic wax up. The impression process is fraught with issues of accuracy and typically a verification jig is required that confirms the accuracy of the analog positions in the stone cast. Creating the mockup of the final restoration or diagnostic wax up is also a time consuming process. Typically, a wax bite rim is created to identify the vertical and centric relationship of the opposing arches. The dentist will mark or identify the midline, canine position, and smile line on the wax bite rim. On the basis of these markings, the technician will select denture teeth of the appropriate height and width for use in the diagnostic wax up. The diagnostic wax up will be sent for a try in with the patient. On the basis of patient's feedback and review of the tooth position and occlusal scheme, the diagnostic wax up will be sent for adjustments or for different denture teeth to be utilized in the diagnostic wax up. Depending upon the type and number of adjustments, it may take multiple visits with the doctor and patient to ensure the appropriate function and esthetics are obtained for the final prosthesis.
A similar process of duplicating the temporary restoration was found in application Ser. No. 14/174,985, where the inventor duplicated the traditional denture that was used as the temporary restoration in a clear or white acrylic. This process involved delivering the temporary restoration and then returning it to the stone cast in the laboratory, where an impression of the temporary restoration on the stone cast would be made. The impression would then be used to create a duplicate using a white acrylic. Some of the problems or limitations associated with this process is the increased time during the surgical visit for both the doctor and the patient. The anesthesia given to the patient may wear off and the patient may become uncomfortable while waiting for the duplication process to occur. Also, due to the patient being under anesthesia, the patient may not be able to provide critical feedback during the delivery of the provisional restoration regarding comfort or occlusion. During the follow up visits the doctor may need to make adjustments to the provisional restoration, which obviously would not be captured in the duplicate made at the time of surgery. Also utilizing a clear or white acrylic, the patient is not able to provide feedback with regards to the esthetics of the planned completed provisional restoration. Having the patient agree to the desired shade and the contours of the teeth and gingiva are a critical aspect in determining the design for the final restoration. Also, performing the impression at the time of surgery is not ideal as the soft tissue and bone around the implants are healing and soft issue will resorb during the healing process. Any impression taken at the day of surgery will provide an inaccurate representation of the soft tissue contours the final dental prosthesis will need to interface. There are obvious limitations and need for improvements over this process or the traditional methodology discussed earlier in the application.
In application Ser. No. 12/236,325, the inventor discloses the use of a clear surgical guide for impressing and capturing the vertical dimension for the case. Again, we are faced with the similar problems as outlined above. Utilizing a clear acrylic will not provide a proper representation of shade of the teeth or gingiva for the final restoration. Also taking the impression at the time of surgery, the dentist will not capture an accurate impression of the soft tissue contours. The surgical guide will also include flanges to help in orienting the surgical guide on the edentulous ridge, meaning the dentist and the patient will not have an accurate representation of the gingiva contours of the final dental prosthesis. Additionally, the surgical guide may be too bulky or provide a level of lip support that may not be duplicated in the final dental prosthesis. This process has obvious limitations as well.
A need exists for an improved product and method to advance the current state of the art for the impression and diagnostic wax up process. The product needs to reduce the number of visits between the doctor and patient and provide improved accuracies over the traditional process.
In accordance with the first embodiment of the invention, a provisional dental restoration is disclosed where the design of the provisional dental restoration includes the teeth and base plate portion designed into a single structure. The provisional dental restoration consists of a series of recesses to receive copings that allow for attachment to the implants and abutments in the patient's mouth. The design of the provisional dental restoration is determined from digital data defining the appropriate tooth and gingiva contours for the provisional dental restoration. The position of the series of recesses is determined from digital data defining the patient's current or planned clinical condition. The series of recesses is also designed with the use of a unique subtract body. Finally the provisional dental restoration is manufactured from an appropriate dental material to provide the required shade and esthetics for the patient.
In accordance with the second embodiment of the invention, an impression prosthesis is disclosed where the design of the impression prosthesis includes the contours of the teeth for a provisional dental restoration or final dental prosthesis. The impression prosthesis consists of a series of recesses to receive copings that allow for attachment to the implants and abutments in the patient's mouth. The design of the impression prosthesis is determined from digital data defining the appropriate tooth and gingiva contours for the provisional dental restoration or final dental prosthesis. The position of the series of recesses is determined from digital data defining the patient's current or planned clinical condition. The series of recesses is also designed with the use of a unique subtract body. Finally the impression prosthesis is manufactured from an appropriate dental material to provide the required shade and esthetics for the patient.
The present disclosure reveals the process of creating a provisional dental restoration.
A dental prosthesis is supported by a series of dental implants or anchors placed in the patient's jaw bone. The number of dental implants or anchors can vary greatly in number, orientation, and position dependent upon the available bone and requirements for the dental prosthesis. While the final dental prosthesis is being fabricated, the dentist will typically deliver a provisional restoration that will stabilize the implants and provide chewing function for the patient during the healing phase. In
To attach anchors 104, the dentist first makes an incision in the mucosal tissue 102 where a missing tooth or teeth would normally extend from the mandible where it is embedded, through the gum, and into the oral cavity. Once the incision is made, the dentist makes a hole (which may include such processes as drilling, broaching or reaming) in the mandible 100 in the same general direction and location as the missing tooth. The dentist then fixes an anchor 104 into the hole thus created and sutures the incision, typically leaving mating surface 108 of anchor 104 exposed so that a provisional restoration may be placed and temporarily restore the patient's chewing function during the healing process. The provisional restoration can consist of a crown, bridge or full mouth denture.
Upon completion of the surgical placement of all anchors 104 into the patient's jaw bone, the dentist will begin the process of delivering the provisional restoration. Traditionally, the temporary restoration consists of a prefabricated denture 200 as shown in
Some dentists may choose to take an impression of the anchors by utilizing impression copings and creating a stone cast, where the dentist can more easily and accurately modify the prefabricated denture 200 in comparison to performing the process chair side in the patient's mouth.
The anchor 104 has a central longitudinal aperture 107 in the top, which is configured to receive an impression coping 110, as shown in
Mating surface 108 is typically the surface on which the provisional restoration or final prosthesis will be mounted or an abutment surface having a predetermined position with respect to that surface 108 on which the provisional restoration or final prosthesis will ultimately be mounted. The coping 110 is configured to engage surface 108 and surrounding structures of anchor 104 (if any) such as holes that extend into (or protrusions that extend above) the surface 108.
These inter engaging surfaces of coping 110 and anchor 104 serve to align the coping and the anchor in predetermined positions with respect to each other when fixed together, such that, if one knows the position and orientation of surfaces on the coping, one can know the position and orientation of corresponding structures on the anchor 104 and more preferably when a scanner (see below) determines the position and orientation of structures on copings 110 the scanner can mathematically determine the position and orientation of corresponding structures on anchors 104. Anchor 104 is preferably cylindrical and has a longitudinal axis 111, as does coping 110. In a typical arrangement, when the coping 110 is fixed in its predetermined position with respect to anchor 104, a longitudinal axis 111 of the coping is coaxial with the longitudinal axis of the anchor 104. The coping 110 and the anchor 104 are preferably threadedly engaged to permit surfaces on the coping to be drawn down tightly against mating surface 108 for precise alignment of the inter engaging surfaces. Alternatively, the coping 110 and anchor 104, to which it is coupled, may be equipped with inter engaging snap fastening connecting surfaces that hold the coping in the proper orientation with respect to the anchor 104.
In
The copings 110 previously attached by the dentist to the anchors 104 are completely submerged by the dentist in impression material 122 such that the entire outer surfaces of the copings 110 extending above the surface of the mucosal tissue on the patient's mandible 100 are completely covered. The impression material 122 is left in this position to set. Once set, the individual copings 110 are fixed with respect to each other in the same position and orientation that the anchors 104 are fixed with respect to each other. The curing process fixes the copings in this position and thereby permits the copings to be collectively removed together with the impression material while preserving their orientation.
In the next step of the process, the dentist flexes the tray 120 and the now set impression material 122 and removes them from the patient's mouth. Enough impression material 122 is placed in the tray 120 and disposed around the patient's mandible 100 to cover any still-existing teeth of the mandible and the mucosal tissue 102 of the mandible as well as the copings 110.
When the tray 120 and impression material 122 are removed, the copings are removed with them, embedded in the now-cured impression material 122. The process of removal disconnects the copings 110 from the anchors 104, permitting the copings to be removed while still embedded in the impression material 122. If the copings include a threaded portion that holds them to the anchors, this threaded portion is unthreaded from the anchors. If the copings are fastened to the anchors with a snap fastening portion, the snap fastening portions are unsnapped from each other. The now-cured impression material 122 that couples the copings 110 to each other preserves the relative positions and orientations of the mating surfaces of all the copings 110 and hence relative positions and orientations of the mating surfaces 108 of all the anchors 104 with respect to each other. This relationship is preserved in the relative positions and orientations of the surfaces of copings 110 that were connected to the mating surfaces 108 of anchors 104. To even further ensure the preservation of this relationship, some dentists will attach the copings 110 to one another by applying a light cured or self-curing acrylic or resin material prior to submerging them in the impression material 122. The impression material 122 in which copings 110 are embedded also preserves the surface contours of the mucosal tissue and the remaining teeth (if any) in the mandible and their relative positions with respect to the mating surfaces of copings 110 and anchors 104. The surface of the impression material 122, once removed from the patient's mouth, is a negative replica of the soft tissue and teeth. The surfaces of copings 110, now separated from anchors 104 and exposed on the inside surface of the impression material 122, are a negative replica of surfaces 108 of anchors 104 to which they were coupled. The now-cured impression material 122 is therefore a negative replica of all the free surfaces, including teeth, mucosal tissue, and the surfaces of the copings embedded in the impression material are a negative replica of the mating surfaces 108 of anchors 104. The cured impression material with embedded copings is commonly called an “impression” and identified in the figures herein as item 123. After completing the impression for the arch is being restored, the dentist will typically impress the opposing arch to capture the surfaces of the teeth, mucosal tissue or any dental prosthesis. The dentist will also take a series of inter occlusal records utilizing a face bow, bite, wax bite rim or combination of the previously mentioned. This process allows the dentist and technicians to accommodate these surface contours into the design of the provisional restoration or final prosthesis as it will need to properly occlude these surfaces.
In
The end surfaces of analogs 124 are configured to abut and mate with the free surfaces of the copings 110 that were previously coupled to anchors 104 and normally attach in the same manner as copings 110 to anchors 104. The surfaces of analogs 124 replicate the position and orientation of mating surfaces 108 of anchors 104. In effect, the spacing and orientation of anchors 104 was transferred to the copings 110, and transferred back again to analogs 124, which have the same spacing and orientation as the anchors 104. Thus, each analog 124 is coaxial with and is disposed in the same position as anchor 104.
In the next step of the process, illustrated in
The impression molding and stone casting processes described above provide accurate replicas of the position and orientation of the mating surfaces 108 of anchors 104, the mucosal tissues, and the teeth.
In the preferred embodiment, the mating surfaces 108 of anchors 104 are exactly duplicated by the mating surfaces 128 of the analogs 124: they are in exactly the same position and at exactly the same orientation. In an alternative embodiment, the mating surfaces 128 on the analogs may be offset slightly or configured slightly differently than the mating surfaces 108 of anchors 104. In some cases, manufacturers choose to make analogs or other connecting components that have mating surfaces slightly different from the mating surfaces 108 of the anchors 104; for example, to permit the copings 110 to be more easily attached to anchors 104 or to permit analogs 124 to be more easily attached to copings 110. Any slight differences in position such as this is intentional, however, and is eliminated later in the process when the denture is created so that the mating surfaces of the denture are precisely oriented to mate properly with surfaces 108 of anchors 104 in the patient's mouth.
Further, the anchors 104 in the patient's mouth may not be connected directly to the provisional restoration or final prosthesis. Abutments may be mounted on the anchors 104 (i.e. the anchors have surmounted abutments). The may be mounted to these abutments, and thus indirectly mounted to anchors 104. When the provisional restoration or final prosthesis being designed is intended to be mounted on abutments mounted on anchors 104, the analogs 124 may be provided with surmounted abutments, i.e. the analogs may include the abutment design incorporated into it, to replicate the mating structure of the abutment to the framework.
While the mating surfaces 128 of the analogs 124 and the mating surfaces 108 of anchors 104 may be slightly different, the longitudinal axis of each of the anchors 104 and the analogs 124 are preferably identically oriented and spaced apart, each pair of corresponding analog and anchor sharing a common longitudinal axis (i.e. they are coaxial). Considered differently, if the surface of the stone cast representing the soft tissues and teeth of the patient's mouth could be superimposed on top of the patient's mucosal tissues 108 that formed the stone cast 125, all the longitudinal axis defined by the analogs would be superimposed on (i.e. simultaneously coaxial with) all the corresponding axis defined by the anchors. The longitudinal axis 127 of the analogs 124 and the surfaces of the stone cast 125 defined by the mucosal tissues 108 the patient are positive replicas of the longitudinal axis 111 of anchors 104 and the surfaces of mucosal tissues 108.
In order to confirm the position and orientation of analogs 124 in stone cast 125 correlates with the position and orientation of anchors 104, the dentist or dental technician will create a verification jig on the stone cast 125 as depicted in
The replica of any teeth formed in the surface of the stone cast are formed with respect to one another and with respect to the analogs such that they duplicate the position of any existing real teeth in the patient's mouth with respect to one another and with respect to mating surfaces 108 and longitudinal axis of the anchors 104 in the patient's mandible. The replica of the mucosal tissues formed in the surface of the stone cast are in generally the same position on the stone cast as they are in the patient's mouth including the replication in the stone cast 125 of the junction between the mucosal tissue and any existing teeth and anchors 104, as well as a replication in the stone cast of all the mucosal tissue that will be covered by the denture. The dentist will mount stone cast 125 into an articulator along with an opposing cast by creating inter occlusal records through means of a face bow, bite or the use of a wax bite rim. Mounting the stone cast 125 along with the opposing cast allows the dentist to review and confirm occlusion of the provisional restoration before delivering it to the patient's mouth.
The dentist will next cut the necessary holes 212 in the prefabricated denture 200 to receive the temporary copings 206. In order to do so the dentist will position the prefabricated denture 200 over the position of the analogs 124 in stone cast 125 and by eye determine where the holes 212 need to be cut in correlation with the prefabricated denture 200. The holes 212 are typically oversized to ensure the prefabricated denture 200 can be positioned over all temporary copings 206. The dentist will attach temporary copings 206 to analogs 124 as shown in
It can be appreciated that the aforementioned processes of modifying the prefabricated denture 200 in fabricating the temporary restoration 208 could be performed with a patient's existing denture if available.
One of the major issues that the dentist encounters in creating temporary restoration 208 with a prefabricated denture 200 is frequent breakage of the denture teeth 132 from the temporary restoration 208. This issue is a result of the inaccurate cutting of holes into the prefabricated denture and the reduction of the bonding surface between the denture tooth and the base plate acrylic.
These breakages can be inconvenient for the dentist and the patient. The patient is inconvenienced with enduring a broken, non-functional, and poorly esthetic restoration until it can be repaired. The dentist is compelled to see the patient in the timeliest fashion possible and will typically accommodate the unscheduled visit. This repair scenario is also an unforeseen cost that the dentist will have to cover and which will result in a loss of production and profitability for the case and the practice. In some instances, the denture tooth 132 can be reattached to the temporary restoration 208, but in the worst scenarios, a new temporary restoration will need to be fabricated for the patient.
The dentist can also benefit from a new process for the creation of the temporary restoration that aids in the placement of the temporary copings. With the current prefabricated denture method, the dentist is making a judgment call on the basis of where he or she perceives the holes to be cut into the prefabricated denture 200. There are times where they will mistakenly cut the hole in the wrong position and the current hole has to be enlarged or a new hole has to be cut, which further weakens the temporary restoration. The dentist could also benefit from a new process for the creation of the temporary restoration that can aid them in better identifying the position of the implants/abutments and identify where the holes need to be cut in the temporary restoration.
It can be appreciated that a new process for the creation of a temporary restoration that reduces occurrences of such breakages and improves the quality of the outcome of the provisional dental restoration would be beneficial. The term “provisional dental restoration” will be used in describing the disclosed invention.
In the first embodiment of the present disclosure, a new process for the creation of a provisional dental restoration is presented. The process allows for denture teeth and acrylic base plate portion to be designed into a single structure and removing the bonding surface to provide a stronger provisional dental restoration over the traditional temporary restoration. In a similar fashion as the temporary restoration 208, the new provisional dental restoration can be created on the basis of the diagnostic wax up 130 contours with denture teeth 132. Diagnostic wax up 130 and stone cast 125 are then scanned utilizing a scanning unit 182 represented in
Once the stone cast surface model has been finalized, the diagnostic wax up surface model 230 is generated and will provide the basis for the design of provisional dental restoration 300. The scan data of the denture teeth 132 and wax 134 are modeled into a single body. This design aspect ensures the digital representation of the denture teeth portion and acrylic base plate portion are fabricated into a single unit. This design aspect alleviates the common breakage issues associated with prefabricated denture 200 by removing the bonding surface 210 from the design of the provisional dental restoration.
A Boolean operation will be performed to generate the stone cast mating surface 232 into the intaglio surface of diagnostic wax up surface model 230. This process ensures the diagnostic wax up has an ideal surface for seating on the patient's edentulous ridge. Flanges and palatal portions can also be extended or included in the design of the diagnostic wax up surface model 230. These flanges and palatal portions can aid in orienting and positioning the provisional dental restoration 300 over the anchors 104 that have been placed in the patient's jaw bone. For the maxilla, the provisional dental restoration 300 can include a palatal portion for this purpose. For the mandible, flanges can extend back to the retro molar pads or extend into the vestibules similar to a denture. The scanning operator will utilize a unique CAD body 234 to create a trough 236 or series of recesses 238 into the intaglio surface of diagnostic wax up surface model 230. The trough and recesses are intended to receive the temporary copings 206. For the trough, the scan operator will position CAD body 234 along the crest of the ridge of stone cast surface model 225. Once appropriately positioned, a Boolean subtraction will be performed to create the trough in the diagnostic wax up surface model 230. It can be appreciated trough 236 can have any size or shape based upon the doctor's or operator's preference. Trough 236 can have various heights and widths on the basis of the size, shape and contours of the stone cast surface model 225 and diagnostic wax up surface model 230. The trough 236 can extend along the entire arch or can be positioned only in areas where the dentist is planning on placing anchors 104. The trough 236 can also be broken up into sections.
The trough 236 can also be designed to receive a bar, framework or other support structures designed for the case. As noted in application Ser. No. 15/068,423, a framework can be digitally designed on the basis of scan data captured of the diagnostic wax up 130 and stone cast 125. The design of the framework or bar can also include a unique subtract body that can be used for creating the appropriate mating surface for the overlay or in the case of this application the provisional dental restoration 300 that will rest upon the framework or bar. The mating surface can possess the appropriate spacing to allow for the addition of acrylic, resin or cement to allow for the provisional dental restoration to be attached to the bar or framework. The mating surface can also be configured to rest on portions of the framework or bar, such as the top surface, or mate on the framework or bar on only selected areas. In addition to making an intimate mating surface, the trough 236 can be designed more of a recess that has no mating with the bar but purely provides the space for the acrylic, resin or cement to attach the provisional dental restoration to the framework or bar. The trough can also include through holes or recesses 238 where the dentist will have access to any screws used in attaching framework 242 or bar 243 to the anchors 104 in the patient's mouth. As noted in application Ser. No. 15/068,423, the framework 242 or bar 243 can be fabricated out of any dental material (metal, cobalt chrome, titanium, palladium, ceramic, zirconia, lithium disilicate, emax, ceramic composite such as Lava, PMMA, PEEK, plastic, wax, or any other desirable materials) and designed on the basis of scan data derived from multiple digital sources (table-top scanning units, intra-oral scanners, CT's, touch probe, etc.). The design of the trough 236 can also be used in generating or dictating the design of the framework 242 or bar 243. On the basis of the preplanned surgical data, the implant locations are known and the trough 236 is placed in the ideal position on the basis of the contours of the diagnostic wax up and stone cast or contours of the patient's jaw bone. On the basis of this data, the framework or bar can be reverse engineered and the implant locations can be altered to best suit the clinical demands for the case.
A pre-surgical cast with analogs 124 can be generated on the basis of a surgical guide. The dentist or technician can design and fabricate the framework utilizing this pre-surgical cast, in place of stone cast 125, along with a diagnostic wax up 130 or a virtual set up, the dentist or technician can design the framework 242 or bar 243 as noted in U.S. Pat. No. 8,100,692 and application Ser. No. 15/068,423. Framework 242 and bar 243 can also be fabricated in a more traditional manner such as laser welding or casting utilizing the same pre-surgical cast.
In addition to a trough design, the dentist may prefer a series of recesses 238 to be incorporated the diagnostic wax up surface model 230 as shown in
In addition to accommodating the temporary cylinder 206, the recesses 238 may be designed with an additional purpose. Recesses 238 may be intended to seat or mate with a surgical guide that was produced for placing the implants. The recess may seat over the sleeves or access holes placed into the surgical guide and aid in properly positioning the provisional dental restoration 300 relative to anchors 104. Obviously, instead of a series of recesses, a series of protrusions could also be used for this similar purpose. Where the protrusions would extend from the underside of provisional dental restoration and mate with recesses that were designed in the surgical guide.
The operator is also able to modify the gingiva contours of the diagnostic wax up surface model 230. The operator can perform a digital cutback 240 to the gingiva surfaces to allow for space where acrylic, composite or porcelains can be applied to these areas in generating the appropriate look for the gingiva contours of the provisional dental restoration 300. This digital cutback can be performed on both the buccal and lingual aspect of the diagnostic wax up surface model 230. Typically, the digital cutback 240 will reduce the original gingiva contours by 1-4 mm.
Upon finalizing the diagnostic wax up surface model 230, this file can now be used for fabricating provisional dental restoration 300. The file can be used in a number of CNC fabrication methods, including but not limited to milling, 3D printing, laser sintering, or EDM. Also the provisional dental restoration 300 can be fabricated from a number of dental materials (metal, cobalt chrome, titanium, palladium, ceramic, zirconia, lithium disilicate, emax, ceramic composite such as Lava, PMMA, PEEK, pekton (PEKK), plastic, wax, or any other biocompatible materials commonly used in dentistry). For the preferred fabrication method and material, provisional dental restoration 300 will be milled from a PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) puck. This method and material provides a balance in strength, esthetics and an ability for the dentist to modify the provisional dental restoration 300 as he/she sees fit at the time of surgery. Preferably, the PMMA will consist of the appropriate tooth shade (A1, B1, etc.). Currently available PMMA pucks have multi layers of colors and translucency, which allows for the milled provisional dental restoration 300 to have a similar shade as the denture teeth, which have a similar number of layers of colors and translucency. The technician will be able to apply pink acrylic (another form of PMMA) or resin for the look of the gingiva for the provisional dental restoration 300 after being milled. As the acrylic and resin being used for this purpose are similar forms of polymethyl methacrylate, the bond of the pink gingiva to the milled PMMA will be quite strong and provide the appropriate esthetics for the patient.
The above disclosed invented process utilizes a traditional diagnostic wax-up 130, which provided the contours of denture teeth 132 and wax 134, which provide the contours of the gingiva portion of the provisional dental restoration 300. In the first alternate embodiment of the invented process, the use of a virtual set up is used in place of the diagnostic wax-up 130. There are currently multiple dental systems and software (such as 3Shape, Dental Wings, Avadent and Procera) which have the ability to lay in CAD models of stock denture teeth or crown CAD models relative to scans of a stone cast and an opposing dentition. For this first alternate process, the stone cast and opposing cast would be scanned separately and then scanned in their proper orientation relative to one another. Utilizing the scan capturing the orientation of the stone cast and opposing cast, the scan data of the stone cast and opposing cast will be properly aligned to one another. Once properly aligned, the Operator will position the CAD models of the stock denture teeth or crown CAD models relative to the occlusion of the opposing cast. Once the position of the CAD models of the stock denture teeth or crown CAD models have been finalized, this information can be used in creating the diagnostic wax up model 230. The technician can also add the gingiva contours or a reduction of the gingiva contours digitally to allow for the appropriate application of the acrylic or resin material as previously discussed. This process may be advantageous over the previous described process as it alleviates the dentist and/or technician from having to create the diagnostic wax up. Also, if the CAD models of stock denture teeth or crown CAD models are truly parametric, the operator can modify the design of the occlusal contours and buccal contours of the desired crown to meet any unique design requirements for the dentist.
In the second alternate process, the scanning process for capturing the implant and abutment positions is altered by the use of an intra-oral scanner that would directly capture the implant and/or abutment locations in the patient's mouth along with the gingiva contours. The intra-oral scanner can also capture the contours of a diagnostic wax up, denture or denture tooth set up that has been placed in the patient's mouth or the position and orientation of the edentulous arch relative to the opposing arch during the scanning process. From this digital data, the dentist or technician can identify the appropriate location of the implants and or abutments, CAD models of stock denture teeth or crown CAD models and trough 236 or recesses 238. This process would alleviate the dentist or technician from being required to create an impression or stone cast.
In a third alternate embodiment, the dentist or technician can utilize a CT scan or series of CT scans for the basis of determining the stone cast surface model 225 and diagnostic wax up surface model 230. The dentist or technician can use the CT scan data for determining or planning the position of the implant locations and ultimately the position of trough 236 or recesses 238. The use of a radiographic stent or guide demonstrating the ideal tooth position or gingiva contours for the provisional dental restoration or final restoration can also be included in this process and provide the dentist and technician with an ability to align CAD models of stock denture teeth or crown CAD models to the contours of the radiographic stent or relative to the position of the opposing arch. The dentist or technician could also utilize a CT scan of the patient's previous existing dentition, which could be aligned utilizing anatomical markers, in order to determine the ideal position of the CAD models of stock denture teeth or crown CAD models.
The dentist is now ready to modify provisional dental restoration 300 to receive temporary copings 206 as outlined in the flow charts provided in
If the dentist is performing the modifications to provisional dental restoration 300 at the laboratory bench as outlined in the flow chart in
It can also be appreciated that the provisional dental restoration 300 can be used in place of the traditional impression tray 120 for the impression process and used to create stone cast 125. This process would combine the two previously described processes. After placing anchors 104, the dentist will impress the locations using the bite registration material applied to trough 236. The dentist will make the appropriate holes 212 on the basis of the impressed locations of anchors 104. The dentist will attach temporary copings 206 to provisional dental restoration 300 by applying acrylic or resin into holes 212 and allowing to harden/cure. Once the temporary copings 206 have been attached to provisional dental restoration 300, the dentist can take a bite and apply impression material to the underside of the provisional dental restoration 300 to accurately capture the soft tissue contours of the patient's mouth after the surgical process. Analogs 124 can be attached to the temporary copings 206 in the provisional dental restoration 300 and stone cast 125 can be generated. An impression of the opposing cast will also be created by the dentist and utilizing the bite taken of the provisional dental restoration 300 in the patient's mouth, stone cast 125 and opposing cast can be mounted appropriately in an articulator. Once mounted, the dentist can remove the provisional dental restoration 300 from stone cast 125, remove any residual impression material and fill any voids around temporary copings 206 and add any additional acrylic to create the appropriate level of soft tissue contact for the case. The dentist will check occlusion, refine the contours and polish the provisional dental restoration 300 before seating it on the anchors 104 in the patient's mouth. The dentist will confirm the occlusion and soft tissue contact one more time before allowing the patient to leave. This process is obviously advantageous as it prevents the requirement of using an impression tray and allows for the provisional dental restoration 300 to also double as a verification jig as discussed previously in this application and assist in mounting the case in the lab. This process also allows for the greatest speed and allows the patient to rest while additional refinement of the provisional dental restoration 300 is completed in the lab. This process has been outlined in the flow chart included in
In addition to the trough design just discussed in the application, the provisional dental restoration 300 can also include a series of recesses 238 for receiving the temporary copings 206. As discussed previously, these recesses 238 can be cylindrical in nature or have any geometry deemed appropriate by the dentist or operator who designed the provisional dental restoration 300. The recesses can include flats for the purposes of positioning the temporary cylinders 206 into the recess appropriately or in positioning the provisional dental restoration 300 relative to the anchors in the patient's mouth. The recesses can be made from a parametric CAD body that is a duplicate of the temporary coping 206 or a slightly oversized version to accommodate the space for the acrylic or resin that will be sued to fixate the temporary coping 206 to the provisional dental restoration 300. The parametric CAD body can also include additional features into the design, such as a body for creating an injection port for the acrylic or resin to be injected into the recess 238 to retain a temporary coping 206. Typically, the position of these recesses is determined from digital planning for the surgical placement of the anchors 104 using a surgical guide. Alternately, this information can be derived from taking scan data of analogs 124 in the stone cast 125 or the dentist utilizing an intraoral scanner to capture the position of the anchors directly in the patient's mouth. As discussed already, this data can be incorporated into the diagnostic wax up surface model 230 and allow for an even faster process of attaching the temporary copings 206 to the provisional dental restoration 300 as these positions will have already been determined prior to surgery.
The previous descriptions reflect a more generally used concept where temporary copings 206 have been attached to provisional dental restoration 300. The inventor has also discussed the process for the trough 236 to be designed to mate or receive a bar or framework. The process will be similar to the above mentioned process. Once the implant anchors 104 have been surgically placed, the dentist will attach framework 242 to anchors 104. The dentist will assess the fit of framework 242 on anchors 104 and the fit of provisional dental restoration 300 over framework 242 in the patient's mouth. If necessary the dentist will adjust trough 236 to provide a more appropriate fit over framework 242. The dentist will impress the position of framework 242 and identify the position of any screw access holes associated with framework 242. The dentist will make the appropriate holes 212 on the basis of the impressed locations of the screw access holes. Alternatively if recesses 238 have been included in the design of the trough 236, the dentist will review the ability to access the screws in the screw access holes to ensure no adjustments are required. The dentist will attach framework 242 to the provisional dental restoration 300 by means of a self-curing or light cured acrylic or resin. The dentist will fill any voids, refine any contours, polish and confirm occlusion before allowing the patient to leave. If preferred, the dentist may also choose to impress the soft tissue and create a bite once framework 242 has been attached to provisional dental restoration 300 in order to create stone cast 125 with analogs 124. This process would enable the dentist to complete any of the finishing work in the lab and allow for the case to be mounted in preparation for completing the final prosthesis.
The benefits of abutment selection have been covered already with the use of the trough 236 in the provisional dental restoration 300, but there is a second surgical benefit that can be included in the design of the provisional dental restoration 300. Determining or confirming the appropriate level of bone reduction can be challenging. Many times, dentists review and take measurements from their CT and Panoramic radiographs. However, at the time of surgery, dentists can lose their point of reference in performing the required bone reduction or in the worst cases not reduce enough bone for the required prosthesis. In these instances, the dentist has to make accommodations in the final restoration to overcome this lack of bone reduction. It may require a different type of restoration being provided to the customer or potentially schedule a second surgery to further reduce the bone to obtain the necessary space for the restoration. In order to confirm or guide the dentist in ensuring the appropriate level of reduction has been performed, the provisional dental restoration 300 can exhibit a properly sized buccal flange 310 designed on the basis of measurements, radiographic stents or CT data incorporated into the design of the diagnostic wax up surface model 230 and ultimately the provisional dental restoration 300. The height of the flange can be reviewed against the reduced bone to confirm the reduction has been performed appropriately. Also, the flange can be used in performing the bone reduction itself. Once the soft tissue has been reflected, the provisional dental restoration 300 can be placed in the patient's mouth and properly positioned using the flanges and or palatal portions. The dentist can use a surgical instrument to mark the bone around the buccal aspect of the arch using the height of the flange as a guide. Once the markings have been made, the provisional dental restoration 300 can be removed and the bone reduction can be performed by the dentist. Alternatively marking the bone can be done prior to flapping the tissue by perforating the bone through the tissue utilizing the height of the flange. If so desired, the buccal flange 310 can also be designed with markings that denote different heights relative to the occlusal plane of the provisional dental restoration 300, which can allow the dentist to quickly assess the bone height and potential reduction that can be performed for a patient.
In addition to confirming abutment selection and bone reduction, the provisional dental restoration 300 allows for the dentist to confirm a number of attributes or features that may need to be maintained or altered for the final prosthesis. During the healing phase, the dentist and the patient have the ability to review the vertical dimension, tooth and gingiva shade, occlusion, midline position, lip support, canine position, canine guidance, overall esthetics, plane of occlusion, tooth shape and contours, gingiva contours and soft tissue contact. This process can be especially important for patients who want to achieve a particular look or level of function for the final prosthesis. The dentist can note any requested modifications and photo document the provisional dental restoration 300 in the patient's mouth to provide insight to the laboratory who will be fabricating the final prosthesis.
The provisional dental restoration 300 described in this application has some unique design features that provide improved performance characteristics and additional tools that can be helpful to the dentist at the time of surgery and in preparation for the final prosthesis. The second embodiment of the invention is using a duplicate or slightly altered version of the provisional dental restoration 300 in the impression process for the final prosthesis.
The provisional dental restoration 300 was designed to provide an appropriate interim prosthesis during the healing process for the patient. A tremendous amount of time and effort was spent to create the appropriate vertical dimension, tooth and gingiva shade, occlusion, midline position, lip support, canine position, canine guidance, overall esthetics, plane of occlusion, tooth shape and contours, gingiva contours and soft tissue contact. The dentist also spent a tremendous amount of time in delivering the provisional dental restoration 300 to the anchors placed in the patient's mouth. In the traditional fashion, the entire process of impressing, creating inter occlusal records, creating a stone cast, fabricating a verification jig, creating a diagnostic wax up as discussed earlier in the application is started over again once healing is complete. The provisional dental restoration is removed and the anchor positions are impressed with traditional impression copings. A verification jig is fabricated on the resulting stone cast and the stone cast with analogs and opposing cast are mounted on the basis of the inter occlusal records taken at the time of impression. A new diagnostic wax up 130 is created and again tried in the patient's mouth and the position and design of the teeth and gingiva are reviewed with the patient. This process takes multiple visits and delays the time in which the patient can receive the final restoration. In the flow chart shown in
As noted previously in the application, the dentist has the ability to create an impression 123 of the anchors 104 either using an impression tray 120 or provisional dental restoration 300. The impression tray 120 is usually a stock plastic tray with no attributes that would aid in determining an appropriate shade, vertical dimension or occlusal scheme for the case. With the traditional process, the dentist still has to create diagnostic wax up 130 with denture teeth 132 to ensure the mock up for the provisional dental restoration or final restoration is acceptable for the patient. By utilizing the impression prosthesis 320 (which is a duplicate or revised version of provisional dental restoration 300), the dentist can capture all of the necessary soft tissue contours, anchor positions, occlusal scheme, position of midline, review overjet and overbite, centric relation to the opposing arch and vertical dimension or restorative space for the case.
The impression prosthesis 320 as disclosed here will be manufactured in a similar fashion (milling, 3D printing, laser sintering, or EDM) and dental material (metal, cobalt chrome, titanium, palladium, ceramic, zirconia, lithium disilicate, emax, ceramic composite such as Lava, PMMA, PEEK, pekton (PEKK), plastic, wax, or any other biocompatible desirable materials) as the previously described provisional dental restoration (preferably milled from a tooth colored PMMA). The impression prosthesis 320 can consist of the same design, size, and position of the teeth incorporated into the design of the provisional dental restoration 300, but also the impression prosthesis 320 can be refined on the basis of patient feedback or clinical observations from the dentist. One example of refining the design would be changing the size or contours of the teeth. The dentist can modify the original diagnostic wax up 130 by replacing the original teeth with ones that the patient finds more suiting for their appearance. This process is even faster if a virtual diagnostic wax up or denture tooth set up was used, where the operator can refine any of the tooth position, contours, etc. The dentist has the ability to modify any of the following from the design of the provisional dental restoration 300 to the impression prosthesis; vertical dimension, tooth and gingiva shade, occlusion, midline position, lip support, canine position, canine guidance, overall esthetics, plane of occlusion, tooth shape and contours, gingiva contours and soft tissue contact. The impression prosthesis will be used in the same fashion as described in the flow chart for
By improving the process for delivering the provisional dental restoration 300 and generating the impression and occlusal records for the final restoration, the dentist will be able to deliver the final prosthesis in a shorter amount of time and with improved confidence. The overall experience for the patient will be improved as well. They will be able to receive the final restoration in a shorter time frame and alleviate unnecessary or unplanned visits.
Ser. No. 15/068,423 March 2016 Schulter, et al.