Communication devices often utilize proximity detection to determine when to consider specific absorption rate (SAR) radiofrequency (RF) power limits. When proximity of an object is detected, such devices determine whether to perform RF transmission power adjustments (e.g., reductions). However, proximity detection can involve sensors that occupy valuable device real estate (e.g., in a display bezel) in a communications device.
Implementations described and claimed herein address the foregoing problems by providing a radiofrequency (RF) power regulator. The RF power regulator includes a forward RF power detection circuit operable to detect forward RF power supplied by an RF transmitter circuit to an RF transmitting antenna. An RF power sampler is coupled to the forward RF power detector circuit and provides RF power samples of the supplied forward RF power. Multiple filters are coupled to receive the RF power samples. Each filter differently filters the received forward power samples to apply a different average power period. Each filter activates an RF power adjustment trigger signal while a time-averaged forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna satisfies a forward RF power adjustment condition for the average power period of the filter. Forward RF power adjustment logic is coupled to filters and operable to adjust the forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna based on the RF power adjustment trigger signal.
Other implementations are also described and recited herein.
Consumer electronic devices may be equipped with wireless communication circuitry emitting radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields that can be absorbed by human tissue positioned in close proximity to the wireless communication circuitry. For example, the wireless communications circuitry may transmit and receive RF signals in mobile telephone RF bands, LTE RF bands, Wi-Fi network RF bands, and GPS RF bands. To protect humans from harmful levels of RF radiation when using such devices, government agencies have imposed regulations limiting RF transmission power from some wireless electronic devices, such as tablet computers and mobile phones.
In some jurisdictions, specific absorption rate (SAR) standards set maximum time-averaged energy absorption limits on electronic device manufacturers. These standards impose restrictions on the time-averaged amount of electromagnetic radiation that may be emitted during a rolling time window within a given distance of a transmitting radio frequency (RF) antenna. Particular attention is given to radiation limits at distances within a few centimeters from the device (e.g., 0-3 centimeters), where users are likely to place a human body part near the transmitting antenna. For example, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) imposes a regulation under which phones sold in the United States have an average SAR level at or below 1.6 watts per kilogram (W/kg) taken over the volume containing a mass of 1 gram of tissue that is absorbing the most signal. Different regulations may be imposed for different types of devices (e.g., phone, tablet computer) and for different body parts (e.g., torso, hands, legs) in the proximity of an RF transmitting antenna. Such restrictions may be satisfied by reducing the transmitted RF signal strength when a dielectric body (e.g., a human body part) is detected in the proximity of the transmitting antenna. Such proximity detection can be performed in a variety of ways, such as capacitive sensing or other means of measuring signal interference.
While reducing transmitted RF signal strength may enhance user safety and/or compliance with local safety regulations, significant reductions in the transmitted carrier signal strength can result in decreased device communication performance, including without limitation dropped connections (e.g., a dropped call) and/or delays in the transmission of information. Furthermore, proximity detection typically involves a sensor that occupies scarce space within a computing device.
The disclosed technology manages transmission RF signal strength to maintain device communication performance while controlling transmission energy of an electronic device to remain, on average within a rolling time window, below a predetermined safety threshold, independent of a proximity detection. The application of transmission RF power detection and intelligent attenuation triggering allows the technology to provide effective proximity-independent SAR mitigation in a communications device. Accordingly, the communications device provides improved SAR mitigation without allocating valuable space to proximity sensing structures and while maintaining effective RF signal strength for communications during various signaling conditions and use cases.
The communications device 100 also includes a radio-frequency (RF) transmitting antenna 104, which emits a transmitted RF signal 106. Certain SAR regulations limit the time-averaged amount of transmitted RF signal energy that can be absorbed within a rolling time window by human body tissue 108 in proximity to the RF transmitting antenna 104. In the described technology, SAR regulations can be satisfied by applying fine control over the time-averaged transmission RF signal power, regardless of any proximity conditions. In other words, the communications device 100 satisfies the SAR requirements whether human body tissue is in proximity or not, thereby allowing omission of a proximity detection component in the communications device 100.
Satisfaction of the SAR requirements is managed by a forward RF power regulator 110 coupled to the RF transmitting antenna 104. The forward RF power regulator 110 monitors and manages the time-averaged amount of forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna 104 within the rolling time window specified by SAR regulations. The forward RF power regulator 110 intelligently allocates the forward RF power available within the SAR limit (or some other related threshold) and the rolling time window to maintain SAR standard compliance and device performance during operation in the time following the rolling time window.
When the forward RF power regulator 110 determines that the forward RF power should be attenuated to comply with SAR limits, the forward RF power regulator 110 triggers a forward RF power adjustment event and signals a modem 112 (e.g., including an RF transmitter circuit) that is coupled to supply forward RF power to the RF transmitting antenna 104 to reduce the supplied power. Likewise, when the forward RF power regulator 110 determines that the forward RF power should be increased when additional forward RF power is available within the rolling time window, the forward RF power regulator 110 triggers a forward RF power adjustment event and signals a modem 112 that supplies forward RF power to the RF transmitting antenna 104 to increase the supplied power.
A modem 204 (e.g., including an RF transmitter circuit) supplies forward RF power to the RF transmitting antenna 202 to produce an RF carrier wave from the communications device 200. The modem 204 can transmit at a variety of different power levels and can vary the forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna 202, responsive to receipt of a power adjustment instruction from a base station (not shown). For example, a base station may instruct the communications device 200 to transmit at different power levels based on the location of the communications device 200 relative to the base station or based on a signal condition, such as an impending handoff to another base station. Under various conditions, for example, lower power levels may be suitable for communications when the communications device 200 is in close proximity to the base station, while a higher or maximum power level may be requested by the base station when the communications device 200 is further away from the base station.
A forward RF power regulator 206 also monitors the forward RF power being supplied to the RF transmitting antenna 202 and can vary the forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna 202, responsive to detection of satisfaction of a forward RF power adjustment condition. High-directivity power monitoring circuitry results in detection of power that is substantially the forward RF power supplied by the modem 204 to the RF transmitting antenna 202. In this manner, the detected power is not substantially polluted by reflected power directed back toward the modem 204 due to imperfect antenna terminating impedance. Various example high-directivity monitoring circuits are described herein, although others may be employed.
In general, the forward RF power regulator 206 monitors the forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna 202 and adjusts the forward RF power (whether up or down) when the forward RF power adjustment condition is satisfied. In one implementation, the adjustment can be made by instructing the modem 204 to adjust its output RF power to the RF transmitting antenna 202. In another implementation, the output RF power from the modem 204 can be attenuated at varying levels based on power adjustment instructions from the forward RF power regulator 206 to a power attenuator placed in the coupling between the modem 204 and the RF transmitting antenna 202. Other adjustment controls may be employed.
A “forward RF power adjustment condition” refers to a condition relating to the average transmit RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna 202 and its relationship to the SAR limit. The forward RF power adjustment condition, in one implementation, presents an average forward RF power limit for a given rolling time window, such as a time period set by SAR regulations. An average transmission RF power limit for the condition may be set at or below the SAR limit. Setting the average transmit RF power limit below the SAR limit provide an amount of tolerance to reduce SAR mitigation failures, although there are other approaches to avoid SAR mitigation failures (e.g., a worst-case adjustment condition that terminates transmission for a period of time if the average transmit RF power approaches or meets the SAR limit).
One implementation of the described technology employs multiple filter banks to monitor the forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna 202. Each filter bank filters at a different cut-off frequency than another filter bank and therefore applies a different average power period to the samples. If the average forward RF power is within the average power period of a filter bank (referred to as a “filter”), then the filter activates an RF power adjustment trigger signal. If the control logic selects the triggering filter, based on inputs such as network conditions and/or transmission requirements, then the trigger point control logic initiates a transmit RF power adjustment event.
As described, the forward RF power regulator 206 monitors the forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna 202 and varies the supplied power in order to maintain an average transmission power below the SAR limit within a rolling time window. The forward RF power regulator 206 can evaluate a variety of signaling condition inputs to determine when and how to adjust the supplied power, including without limitation transmitting frequency, transmitting band, modulation scheme, GPS location of the communications device 200, channel conditions (e.g., conditions relating to quality and interference in signal communications with a base station), scheduled channel activities, current channel activities, movement characteristics of the communications device 200 (such as with respect to a base station, shielding, etc.), current transmission power, distance from a base station or cell tower, etc. Accordingly, the evaluation is predictive of signaling conditions expected to be experienced by the communications device 200.
Furthermore, the forward RF power regulator 206 can evaluate a variety of transmission requirement inputs to determine when and how to adjust the supplied power, including without limitation the level of transmission activity being experienced and expected to be experienced by the communications device 200 (e.g., uploading a large data file represents a high level of transmission activity whereas downloading a large data file or handling a VOIP call represents a low level of transmission activity), the importance of successful transmission for critical transmissions (e.g., an imminent handoff to a new base station or cell tower or an Emergency 911 call), etc. Accordingly, the evaluation is predictive of recently experienced transmission activity and expected transmission requirements of the communications device 200.
Example operational characteristics of the forward RF power regulator 206 are shown in an exploded view 212. A SAR limit represents a regulatory limit for a time-averaged transmission power within a rolling time window. In various implementations, satisfaction of a forward RF power adjustment condition is achieved when a time-averaged forward RF power exceeds an average power threshold that is less than or equal to the SAR limit. It should be understood that the average power threshold of the example forward RF power adjustment condition may vary depending on network conditions, transmission requirements a selected filter bank, etc.
Actual transmission power 214 is shown in view 212, as adjusted by the RF power regulator 206. Average power monitoring results of three filter banks (fast filter 216, medium filter 218, and slow filter 220) are also shown, with the fast filter 216 detecting satisfaction of a forward RF power adjustment condition at multiple points in time (reflected by the fast filter 216 plot satisfying the forward RF power adjustment condition (e.g., average power exceeds a threshold within an average power period of the filter)). Each detected satisfaction of a forward RF power adjustment condition within the average power period of a filter results in issuance of an RF power adjustment trigger signal. If the trigger point control logic selects the triggering filter, based on inputs such as network conditions and/or transmission requirements, then the control logic initiates a transmit RF power adjustment event, represented in view 212 as an attenuation of the actual transmission power 214.
The forward RF power regulator 320 may be implemented in the form of a system-on-a-chip (SOC), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), discrete circuitry, etc. that may be implemented with existing/future modems/antennas or integrated into such components. The direction coupler 307 may be positioned or insertable next to an antenna RF transmission line coupling (e.g., an RF transmission line coupling 314). In one implementation, the directional coupler 307 demonstrates the simultaneous properties of low insertion loss on the RF transmission line coupling 314 (antenna-to-modem) and high directivity. High directivity provides that the detected power is substantially the forward RF power transmitted from the modem 302 to the RF transmitting antenna 304 and is not substantially polluted by reflected power directed back towards the modem 302 due to imperfect antenna terminating impedance.
The output of the directional coupler 307 (e.g., a lower amplitude copy of the transmit RF power output of the modem 302) is fed to a detector circuit (e.g., the detector 308), which may be a type of root-mean-square (RMS) detector circuit. The detector circuit produces an output signal that is both:
The low-frequency output signal from the detector circuit (e.g., the detector 308) can be moved into the digital domain, for signal processing, via the ADC 310, which may be a low-cost ADC. The SAR controller 312 monitors the digitized low-frequency output signal and instructs the modem 302 to perform power adjustments for SAR compliance, when appropriate (e.g., when a forward RF power adjustment condition is satisfied). Logarithmic computation can be applied to satisfy applicable regulatory SAR paradigms. The SAR controller 312 may include hardware and/or software stored in a processor-readable medium storing processor-executable instructions for reading RF power inputs from the ADC 310 and determining whether transmit RF power adjustments are needed. The SAR controller 312 may include one or more processors, processing cores, microprocessors, etc.
In particular, SAR is a time-averaged measurement. Even though some periods of signal transmission will be at transmission power levels that exceed the allowed regulatory limit for body SAR (0 mm space, or small space e.g. 5 mm or 10 mm for some device form factors), the circuit configuration in
The output of the capacitive tap 407 (e.g., a lower amplitude copy of the transmit RF power output of the modem 402) is fed to a detector circuit (e.g., the detector 408), which may be a type of root-mean-square (RMS) detector circuit. The detector circuit produces an output signal that is both:
The position of the capacitive tap 407 (e.g., protected by the circulator 409, which directs reflected RF power through the inductor 411 to ground) substantially eliminates measurement inaccuracy risk associated with reflected power and imperfect antenna terminating impedance. The capacitive tap 407, the detector 408, an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 410, a SAR controller 412, the circulator 409 and/or the inductor 411 may be part of a system-on-a-chip (SOC), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), discrete circuitry, etc. that may be positioned on the RF transmission line coupling 414 (antenna-to-modem) to detect forward RF power supplied by the modem 402 to the RF transmitting antenna 404 and to direct the modem 402 to perform forward RF power adjustments upon satisfaction of a forward RF power adjustment condition (e.g., average power during a rolling window reaching the SAR legal limit or some related limit).
The position of the directional coupler 507 (e.g., protected by the circulator 509, which directs reflected RF power through the inductor 511 to ground) substantially eliminates measurement inaccuracy risk associated with reflected power and imperfect antenna terminating impedance. The forward RF power regulator 520 may be implemented in the form of a system-on-a-chip (SOC), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), discrete circuitry, etc. that may be implemented with existing/future modems/antennas or integrated into such components. The direction coupler 507 may be positioned or insertable next to an antenna RF transmission line coupling (e.g., an RF transmission line coupling 514). In one implementation, the directional coupler 507 demonstrates the simultaneous properties of low insertion loss on the RF transmission line coupling 514 (antenna-to-modem) and high directivity. High directivity provides that the detected power is substantially the forward RF power transmitted from the modem 502 to the RF transmitting antenna 504 and is not substantially polluted by reflected power directed back towards the modem 502 due to imperfect antenna terminating impedance.
The output of the directional coupler 507 (e.g., a lower amplitude copy of the transmit RF power output of the modem 502) is fed to a detector circuit (e.g., the detector 508), which may be a type of root-mean-square (RMS) detector circuit. The detector circuit produces an output signal that is both:
The low-frequency output signal from the detector circuit (e.g., the detector 508) can be moved into the digital domain, for signal processing, via the ADC 510, which may be a low-cost ADC. The SAR controller 512 monitors the digitized low-frequency output signal and instructs the modem 502 to perform power adjustments for SAR compliance, when appropriate (e.g., when a forward RF power adjustment condition is satisfied). Logarithmic computation can be applied to satisfy applicable regulatory SAR paradigms. The SAR controller 512 may include hardware and/or software stored in a processor-readable medium storing processor-executable instructions for reading RF power inputs from the ADC 510 and determining whether transmit RF power adjustments are needed. The SAR controller 512 may include one or more processors, processing cores, microprocessors, etc.
In particular, SAR is a time-averaged measurement. Even though some periods of signal transmission will be at transmission power levels that exceed the allowed regulatory limit for body SAR (0 mm space, or small space e.g. 5 mm or 10 mm for some device form factors), the circuit configuration in
The output of the capacitive tap 607 (e.g., a lower amplitude copy of the transmit RF power output of the modem 602) is fed to a detector circuit (e.g., the detector 608), which may be a type of root-mean-square (RMS) detector circuit. The detector circuit produces an output signal that is both:
The position of the capacitive tap 607 (e.g., protected by the isolator 609) substantially eliminates measurement inaccuracy risk associated with reflected power and imperfect antenna terminating impedance. The capacitive tap 607, the detector 608, an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 610, a SAR controller 612, and/or the isolator 609 may be part of a system-on-a-chip (SOC), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), discrete circuitry, etc. that may be positioned on the RF transmission line coupling 614 to detect forward RF power supplied by the modem 602 to the RF transmitting antenna 604 and to direct the modem 602 to perform forward RF power adjustments upon satisfaction of a forward RF power adjustment condition (e.g., average power during a rolling window reaching the SAR legal limit or some related limit).
The position of the directional coupler 707 (e.g., protected by the isolator 709) substantially eliminates measurement inaccuracy risk associated with reflected power and imperfect antenna terminating impedance. The forward RF power regulator 720 may be implemented in the form of a system-on-a-chip (SOC), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), discrete circuitry, etc. that may be implemented with existing/future modems/antennas or integrated into such components. The direction coupler 707 may be positioned or insertable next to an antenna RF transmission line coupling (e.g., an RF transmission line coupling 714). In one implementation, the directional coupler 707 demonstrates the simultaneous properties of low insertion loss on the RF transmission line coupling 714 and high directivity. High directivity provides that the detected power is substantially the forward RF power transmitted from the modem 702 to the RF transmitting antenna 704 and is not substantially polluted by reflected power directed back towards the modem 702 due to imperfect antenna terminating impedance.
The output of the directional coupler 707 (e.g., a lower amplitude copy of the transmit RF power output of the modem 702) is fed to a detector circuit (e.g., the detector 708), which may be a type of root-mean-square (RMS) detector circuit. The detector circuit produces an output signal that is both:
The low-frequency output signal from the detector circuit (e.g., the detector 708) can be moved into the digital domain, for signal processing, via the ADC 710, which may be a low-cost ADC. The SAR controller 712 monitors the digitized low-frequency output signal and instructs the modem 702 to perform power adjustments for SAR compliance, when appropriate (e.g., when a forward RF power adjustment condition is satisfied). Logarithmic computation can be applied to satisfy applicable regulatory SAR paradigms. The SAR controller 712 may include hardware and/or software stored in a processor-readable medium storing processor-executable instructions for reading RF power inputs from the ADC 710 and determining whether transmit RF power adjustments are needed. The SAR controller 712 may include one or more processors, processing cores, microprocessors, etc.
In particular, SAR is a time-averaged measurement. Even though some periods of signal transmission will be at transmissions power levels that exceed the allowed regulatory limit for body SAR (0 mm space, or small space e.g. 5 mm or 10 mm for some device form factors), the circuit configuration in
In the implementation illustrated in
The middle/high band circuit 842 includes a modem middle/high band transmission (Tx) port 820, which outputs an RF signal through an RF test connector 822 to a low band antenna 826. A directional coupler 824 (or a capacitive tap) receives some of the RF transmission power from the RF signal output from the middle/high band Tx port 820. The RF signal received at the directional coupler is output to a 10 dB pad 828 (or other dB pad). The RMS detector 830 receives the signal from the 10 dB pad 828 and outputs a low-frequency signal to an analog to digital converter (ADC) 832. The ADC 832 outputs a digital signal to a SAR controller 834. The SAR controller 834 compares the detected RF power (in digital signal form) to stored patterns to determine the transmission context. Based on the determined transmission context, the SAR controller 834 determines an averaging scheme to determine average RF power over time. Based on the determined average RF power, the SAR controller 834 may recommend RF power adjustment to a modem that includes the modem middle/high band Tx port 820.
In implementations, the 10 dB pad (e.g., the 10 dB pad 810 and 828) are optional and depend on the type/characteristics of connected RMS detector. In some implementations, no pad is included, and in other implementations, the characteristics of the pad are different. In some implementations, the SAR controllers 816 and 834 may be a single processing unit where determining/averaging algorithms are running and monitoring signals and making SAR adjustment recommendations. The circuits (e.g., low band circuit 840 and the middle/high band circuit 842) may include isolators and/or circulators as described above.
The discontinuous transmission of
In a situation (e.g., transmission context) where the mobile device is uploading very large files for a protracted period of time while far from a cell tower (hence high transmission power),
Averaging techniques (e.g., fast averaging) with a more advanced algorithmic method may invoke a smaller, less dramatic power adjustment before approaching a ‘brick wall’ back-off needed to observe safe limits. This more gradual application of power adjustment combines the benefits of observing safe transmission levels and providing a superior customer user experience.
The detector output waveform (e.g.,
The FCC discusses SAR limits as an average over an allowed period of time. Implementations described herein remove the need for instantaneous application of SAR back-off while in object proximity (e.g., using proximity detection techniques). Guaranteeing safety can then be accomplished without a proximity detection and relying more on smart averaging that can be adaptively and dynamically adjusted to satisfy FCC while eliminating the need for a proximity sensor.
A monitoring operation 1208 monitors the converted digital signal. A determining operation 1210 determines transmission signals conditions (e.g., context) of the mobile device. The determining operation 1210 may be performed by comparing the detected (converted) RF signal power to stored transmission power contexts. Such transmission power contexts may include high transmission power contexts (e.g., file transmission), medium transmission power contexts (e.g., VOIP call), and low transmission power contexts (e.g., passive transmission). An averaging operation 1212 time averages the monitored digital signal using the selected averaging scheme.
A selecting operation 1214 selects a time averaging filter based on the determined transmission signal conditions. The time averaging scheme corresponds to the determined context. For example, a fast averaging scheme may be utilized to time average a high transmission power context to take advantage of the many dips in transmission power. A slow averaging scheme may be utilized in a low transmission power context to take advantage of periods of low (e.g., almost zero) transmission power. The selection of the averaging scheme may include selecting filters/filter coefficients. An initiating operation 1216 initiates an adjustment of the RF transmission power of the mobile device based on the time averaged signal (according to the selected filter) and the RF transmission power limit. The initiating operation 1216 may utilize the current time averaged transmission power to determine if/when the transmission power may exceed the set RF transmission power limit. Furthermore, an amount of buffer in the RF transmission power may be considered. The operations 1200 may be performed in real-time and as such, the time average and RF transmission power may be determined on a moving time-window basis.
The transmission contexts may include different transmission patterns which can be constructed by a set of signal transmission characteristics that are combined based on pre-stored knowledge of a transmission technology (e.g. LTE) to determine how best to produce an attenuation profile that is optimal for OTA wireless operations while keeping the FCC average satisfied. The outcome (e.g., determined context) is then used to determine which type of filter averaging will be used for the next set of attenuation decisions, the type of filter used and its associated filter coefficients. In addition to producing an adjustment value, the combined logic of such an overall operation takes into account setting aside certain transmission budgets that can be set aside intelligently for anticipating future needs where a high-power period might be required.
It should be understood that the described operations 1204, 1206, 1208, 1210, 1212, and 1214 may be performed continuously or periodically, repeating as transmission power monitoring continues. Further, the operation 1216 may be performed whenever the time-averaged signal and the RF transmission power trigger an RF transmission power adjustment instruction.
The filters 1306 issue a trigger for each filter that satisfies the forward RF power adjustment condition. Trigger point logic 1308 receives the triggers, selecting one or more triggers based on inputs including without limitation network conditions 1310 and/or transmission requirements 1312. Control logic 1314 of the trigger point logic 1308 processes the inputs and passes the processed inputs to a filter selector 1316, which selects the filter from which to accept a trigger at any specific point in time, based on the processed inputs. Additionally, override logic 1309 may override a filtered trigger (e.g., if unfiltered samples of the monitored forward RF power risks breaching the SAR limit within the regulatory rolling time window, the override logic 1309 may simply trigger an immediate adjustment, irrespective of any filter-based average power period).
Attenuation profile logic 1320 receives triggers from the selected filters and, based on inputs including without limitation network conditions 1310 and transmission requirements 1312, applies an attenuation profile, which specifies an attenuation duration and potentially incremental attenuation events and magnitudes during the attenuation duration. See, e.g.,
Additionally, override logic 1326 may override an input-dependent attenuation profile (e.g., if the monitored forward RF power risks breaching the SAR limit within the regulatory rolling time window, the override logic 1326 may simply terminate transmission power for a period of time).
In some implementations, recursive averaging techniques are used. In such implementations, a slow averaging filter (e.g., passing lower frequency samples) is used in low transmission modes (e.g., a VOIP call) while a faster averaging filter (e.g., also passing higher frequency samples) is used in high transmission modes (e.g., uploading a large data file). Filter buffers may be flushed at selected periods (e.g., when maximum averaging periods are reached or other system conditions mandate it). In both slow averaging and fast averaging, SAR headroom may be reserved by forcing transmission power adjustment periodically if conditions allow it (e.g. more likely in a fast running average). Many other averaging filters may be employed within the range set by the “fast” and “slow” averaging filters.
A decision counter, which may comprise a part of the SAR controller described above, determines a transmission context (e.g., based on one or more signal conditions) based on the pre-determined and dynamically-determined patterns. For example, pre-determined patterns for file uploads, VOIP calls, web browsing, passive data transmission, and other types of data transmission contexts may be stored in memory. Dynamically-determined patterns may include without limitation patterns learned based on feedback about signal conditions from a base station, etc. These patterns may vary based on the distance between a device and a tower, which may be known by the device/system disclosed herein. The decision counter may compare detected power on the modem-to-antenna transmission line coupling to the pre-determined powers to determine the transmission context. Based on the determined context, an averaging scheme (e.g., filters) is selected to determine the average transmission power.
A slow averaging scheme is selected for a low transmission context (e.g., a “good” signal condition, a low transmission activity). A “medium” averaging scheme is selected for a determined moderate transmission context. A fast averaging scheme is selected for a high transmission context (e.g., a “bad” signal condition, a high transmission activity). It should be understood that more than the three illustrated transmission contexts may be determined and that different averaging schemes may correspond to such contexts. Furthermore, it should be understood that the system may, in real-time, determine a change in context, and thus the averaging scheme (e.g., applied filters) may change.
As discussed, different attenuation profiles at any particular time may be applied to forward RF power adjustment event, depending on the inputs such as network conditions and/or transmission requirements. The plot 1400 depicts actual RF transmission power over time (subject to differing levels of attenuation).
The attenuation profile 1402 depicts the incremental levels of attenuation applied to the actual RF transmission power over time, responsive to triggering of a forward RF power adjustment event and selection of the attenuation profile. The edge 1404 generally depicts an incremental increase in attenuation magnitude over time, contributing to a decrease in the magnitude of actual RF transmission power spikes over time. The edge 1406 generally depicts an incremental decrease in attenuation magnitude over time, contributing to an increase in the magnitude of actual RF transmission power spikes over time.
The attenuation profile 1504 depicts the incremental levels of attenuation applied to the actual RF transmission power over time, responsive to triggering of a forward RF power adjustment event by the medium averaging filter and selection of the attenuation profile. In the illustrated scenario, when the average power monitored during an average power period by the medium average filter exceeds a threshold (e.g., −35 dbm in this scenario), an RF power adjustment trigger signal is activated to adjust the RF power supplied to the antenna. The edge 1506 generally depicts an incremental increase in attenuation magnitude over time, contributing to a decrease in the magnitude of actual RF transmission power spikes over time. The edge 1508 generally depicts an incremental decrease in attenuation magnitude over time, contributing an increase in the magnitude of actual RF transmission power spikes over time.
In some implementations, a hysteresis is introduced when the average power exceeds a threshold. The hysteresis delays the RF power adjustment trigger signal to allow confirmation that the threshold-exceeding activity is not an anomalous event. For example, if the average power monitored during an average power period by the medium average filter still exceeds the threshold at the end of the hysteresis delay, then the trigger condition is confirmed, and the RF power adjustment trigger is activated to adjust the RF power supplied to the antenna. A hysteresis may also be applied to the decrease in attenuations, such that the start of attenuation is delayed until the transmitted average power during the average time period is confirmed to be decreasing below a threshold.
The attenuation profile 1604 depicts the incremental levels of attenuation applied to the actual RF transmission power over time, responsive to triggering of a forward RF power adjustment event by the fast averaging filter and selection of the attenuation profile. In the illustrated scenario, when the average power monitored during an average power period by the fast average filter exceeds a threshold (e.g., −35 dbm in this scenario), an RF power adjustment trigger signal is activated to adjust the RF power supplied to the antenna. The edge 1606 generally depicts an incremental increase in attenuation magnitude over time, contributing to a decrease in the magnitude of actual RF transmission power spikes over time. The edge 1608 generally depicts an incremental decrease in attenuation magnitude over time, contributing an increase in the magnitude of actual RF transmission power spikes over time.
In some implementations, a hysteresis is introduced when the average power exceeds a threshold. The hysteresis delays the RF power adjustment trigger signal to allow confirmation that the threshold-exceeding activity is not an anomalous event. For example, if the average power monitored during an average power period by the medium average filter still exceeds the threshold at the end of the hysteresis delay, then the trigger condition is confirmed, and the RF power adjustment trigger is activated to adjust the RF power supplied to the antenna. A hysteresis may also be applied to the decrease in attenuations, such that the start of attenuation is delayed until the transmitted average power during the average time period is confirmed to be decreasing below a threshold.
The attenuation profile 1704 depicts the incremental levels of attenuation applied to the actual RF transmission power over time, responsive to triggering of a forward RF power adjustment event by the slow averaging filter and selection of the attenuation profile. In the illustrated scenario, when the average power monitored during an average power period by the fast average filter exceeds a threshold (e.g., −35 dbm in this scenario), an RF power adjustment trigger signal is activated to adjust the RF power supplied to the antenna. The edge 1706 generally depicts an incremental increase in attenuation magnitude over time, contributing to a decrease in the magnitude of actual RF transmission power spikes over time. The edge 1708 generally depicts an incremental decrease in attenuation magnitude over time, contributing an increase in the magnitude of actual RF transmission power spikes over time.
In some implementations, a hysteresis is introduced when the average power exceeds a threshold. The hysteresis delays the RF power adjustment trigger signal to allow confirmation that the threshold-exceeding activity is not an anomalous event. For example, if the average power monitored during an average power period by the medium average filter still exceeds the threshold at the end of the hysteresis delay, then the trigger condition is confirmed, and the RF power adjustment trigger is activated to adjust the RF power supplied to the antenna. A hysteresis may also be applied to the decrease in attenuations, such that the start of attenuation is delayed until the transmitted average power during the average time period is confirmed to be decreasing below a threshold.
It should be understood that RF transmission power limits or thresholds, attenuation profiles, hysteresis values, average power periods, rolling time windows, etc. may be programmable or otherwise adjustable before or during operation of the SAR mitigation process.
One or more application programs 1812 modules or segments, such as an antenna module(s) 1848, a SAR controller(s) 1850, and/or a detector(s) 1852 are loaded in the memory 1804 and/or storage 1820 and executed by the processor(s) 1802. Data such as signal context patterns, SAR RF power thresholds, conditions, etc. may be stored in the memory 1804 or storage 1820 and may be retrievable by the processor(s) 1802 for use in the by the antenna modules 1848, the SAR controllers 1850, the detectors 1852, etc. The storage 1820 may be local to the communications device 1800 or may be remote and communicatively connected to the communications device 1800 and may include another server. The storage 1820 may store resources that are requestable by client devices (not shown).
The communications device 1800 includes a power supply 1816, which is powered by one or more batteries or other power sources and which provides power to other components of the communications device 1800. The power supply 1816 may also be connected to an external power source that overrides or recharges the built-in batteries or other power sources.
The communications device 1800 may include one or more communication transceivers 1830 which may be connected to one or more antenna assemblies 1832 to provide network connectivity (e.g., mobile phone network, Wi-Fi®, Bluetooth®, etc.) to one or more other servers and/or client devices (e.g., mobile devices, desktop computers, or laptop computers). The communications device 1800 may further include a network adapter 1836, which is a type of communication device. The communications device 1800 may use the adapter and any other types of communication devices for establishing connections over a wide-area network (WAN) or local-area network (LAN). It should be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and that other communications devices and means for establishing a communications link between the communications device 1800 and other devices may be used. The one or more antenna assemblies 1832 may include isolators, circulators, capacitive taps, detectors, pads, analog to digital converters, etc.
The communications device 1800 may include one or more input devices 1834 such that a user may enter commands and information (e.g., a keyboard or mouse). These and other input devices may be coupled to the server by one or more interfaces 1838 such as a serial port interface, parallel port, universal serial bus (USB), etc. The communications device 1800 may further include a display 1822 such as a touch screen display.
The communications device 1800 may include a variety of tangible processor-readable storage media and intangible processor-readable communication signals. Tangible processor-readable storage can be embodied by any available media that can be accessed by the communications device 1800 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile storage media, removable and non-removable storage media. Tangible processor-readable storage media excludes intangible communications signals and includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable storage media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as processor-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Tangible processor-readable storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CDROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other tangible medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the processing system 1800. In contrast to tangible processor-readable storage media, intangible processor-readable communication signals may embody processor-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data resident in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other signal transport mechanism. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, intangible communication signals include signals traveling through wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared, and other wireless media.
Some implementations may comprise an article of manufacture. An article of manufacture may comprise a tangible storage medium to store logic. Examples of a storage medium may include one or more types of processor-readable storage media capable of storing electronic data, including volatile memory or non-volatile memory, removable or non-removable memory, erasable or non-erasable memory, writeable or re-writeable memory, and so forth. Examples of the logic may include various software elements, such as software components, programs, applications, computer programs, application programs, system programs, machine programs, operating system software, middleware, firmware, software modules, routines, subroutines, operation segments, methods, procedures, software interfaces, application program interfaces (API), instruction sets, computing code, computer code, code segments, computer code segments, words, values, symbols, or any combination thereof. In one implementation, for example, an article of manufacture may store executable computer program instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform methods and/or operations in accordance with the described implementations. The executable computer program instructions may include any suitable type of code, such as source code, compiled code, interpreted code, executable code, static code, dynamic code, and the like. The executable computer program instructions may be implemented according to a predefined computer language, manner or syntax, for instructing a computer to perform a certain operation segment. The instructions may be implemented using any suitable high-level, low-level, object-oriented, visual, compiled and/or interpreted programming language.
An example method regulates forward radiofrequency (RF) power supplied by an RF transmitter circuit to an RF transmitting antenna and includes detecting forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna and receiving at multiple filters RF power samples of the supplied forward RF power. Each filter differently filters the received forward power samples to apply a different average power period. Each filter further activates an RF power adjustment trigger signal while a time-averaged forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna satisfies a forward RF power adjustment condition for the average power period of the filter. The example method also adjusts the forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna based on the RF power adjustment trigger signal.
Another example method of any preceding method further includes selecting one of the multiple filters from which to output the RF power adjustment trigger signal.
Another example method of any preceding method is provided wherein the selecting operation selects one of the multiple filters based on at least one of network conditions and transmission requirements.
Another example method of any preceding method further includes applying an attenuation profile while the RF power adjustment trigger signal is active and the adjusting operation adjusts the forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna according to the attenuation profile.
Another example method of any preceding method is provided wherein the attenuation profile specifies magnitudes of incremental adjustments in forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example method of any preceding method is provided wherein the attenuation profile specifies durations of incremental adjustments in forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example method of any preceding method is provided wherein the detecting operation includes isolating the forward RF power from reflected RF power in a supply coupling between the RF transmitter circuit and the RF transmitting antenna.
An example radiofrequency (RF) power regulator includes a forward RF power detection circuit operable to detect forward RF power supplied by an RF transmitter circuit to an RF transmitting antenna. An RF power sampler is coupled to the forward RF power detection circuit and provides RF power samples of the supplied forward RF power. Multiple filters are coupled to receive the RF power samples. Each filter differently filters the received forward power samples to apply a different average power period. Each filter further activates an RF power adjustment trigger signal while a time-averaged forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna satisfies a forward RF power adjustment condition for the average power period of the filter. Forward RF power adjustment logic is coupled to the filters and is operable to adjust the forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna based on the RF power adjustment trigger signal.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator further includes a filter selector coupled to the multiple filters and operable to select one of the multiple filters from which to output the RF power adjustment trigger signal.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator is provided wherein the filter selector is operable to select one of the multiple filters based on at least one of network conditions and transmission requirements.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator further includes an attenuation profile controller operable to apply an attenuation profile while the RF power adjustment trigger signal is active and to adjust the forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna according to the attenuation profile.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator is provided wherein the attenuation profile specifies magnitudes of incremental adjustments in forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator is provided wherein the attenuation profile specifies durations of incremental adjustments in forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator is provided wherein the forward RF power detection circuit includes forward RF power isolation circuitry coupled between the RF transmitter circuit and the RF transmitting antenna and operable to isolate the forward RF power from reflected RF power in a supply coupling between the RF transmitter circuit and the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator is provided wherein the forward RF power isolator circuitry includes a directional coupler operable to detect the forward RF power from the supply coupling between the RF transmitter circuit and the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator is provided wherein the forward RF power isolator circuitry includes a directional coupler operable to detect the forward RF power from the supply coupling between the RF transmitter circuit and the RF transmitting antenna and a circulator coupled between the directional coupler and the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator is provided wherein the forward RF power isolator circuitry includes a capacitive tap operable to detect the forward RF power from the supply coupling between the RF transmitter circuit and the RF transmitting antenna and a circulator coupled between the capacitive tap and the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator is provided wherein the forward RF power isolator circuitry includes a directional coupler operable to detect the forward RF power from the supply coupling between the RF transmitter circuit and the RF transmitting antenna and an isolator coupled between the directional coupler and the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example RF power regulator of any preceding regulator is provided wherein the forward RF power isolator circuitry includes a capacitive tap operable to detect the forward RF power from the supply coupling between the RF transmitter circuit and the RF transmitting antenna and an isolator coupled between the capacitive tap and the RF transmitting antenna.
An example communications device includes a radiofrequency (RF) transmitting antenna, an RF transmitter circuit coupled to supply forward RF power to the RF transmitting antenna, a forward RF power detection circuit operable to detect the forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna, an RF power sampler coupled to the forward RF power detection circuit and to provide RF power samples of the supplied forward RF power, and multiple filters coupled to receive the RF power samples. Each filter differently filters the received forward power samples to apply a different average power period. Each filter further activates an RF power adjustment trigger signal while a time-averaged forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna satisfies a forward RF power adjustment condition for the average power period of the filter. A filter selector is coupled to the multiple filters and is operable to select one of the multiple filters from which to output the RF power adjustment trigger signal based on at least one of network conditions and transmission requirements. Forward RF power adjustment logic is coupled to the filter selector and is operable to adjust the forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna based on the RF power adjustment trigger signal output from the selected filter.
An example system regulates forward radiofrequency (RF) power supplied by an RF transmitter circuit to an RF transmitting antenna and includes means for detecting forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna and means for receiving at multiple filters RF power samples of the supplied forward RF power. Each filter differently filters the received forward power samples to apply a different average power period. Each filter further activates an RF power adjustment trigger signal while a time-averaged forward RF power supplied to the RF transmitting antenna satisfies a forward RF power adjustment condition for the average power period of the filter. The example system also includes means for adjusting the forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna based on the RF power adjustment trigger signal.
Another example system of any preceding system further includes means for selecting one of the multiple filters from which to output the RF power adjustment trigger signal.
Another example system of any preceding system is provided wherein the means for selecting selects one of the multiple filters based on at least one of network conditions and transmission requirements.
Another example system of any preceding system further includes means for applying an attenuation profile while the RF power adjustment trigger signal is active. The means for adjusting adjusts the forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna according to the attenuation profile.
Another example system of any preceding system is provided wherein the attenuation profile specifies magnitudes of incremental adjustments in forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example system of any preceding system is provided wherein the attenuation profile specifies durations of incremental adjustments in forward RF power supplied by the RF transmitter circuit to the RF transmitting antenna.
Another example system of any preceding system further includes is provided wherein the means for detecting includes means for isolating the forward RF power from reflected RF power in a supply coupling between the RF transmitter circuit and the RF transmitting antenna.
The implementations described herein are implemented as logical steps in one or more computer systems. The logical operations may be implemented (1) as a sequence of processor-implemented steps executing in one or more computer systems and (2) as interconnected machine or circuit modules within one or more computer systems. The implementation is a matter of choice, dependent on the performance requirements of the computer system being utilized. Accordingly, the logical operations making up the implementations described herein are referred to variously as operations, steps, objects, or modules. Furthermore, it should be understood that logical operations may be performed in any order, unless explicitly claimed otherwise or a specific order is inherently necessitated by the claim language.
The present application claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/480,114, entitled “SAR Mitigation Techniques Using Integrated Hardware and Algorithmic Approaches” and filed on Mar. 31, 2017, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/511,741, entitled “SAR Mitigation Techniques Using Integrated Hardware” and filed on May 26, 2017, both of which are specifically incorporated by reference herein for all that they disclose or teach.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4016490 | Weckenmann et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4729129 | Koerner | Mar 1988 | A |
4806944 | Jacomb-Hood | Feb 1989 | A |
5166679 | Vranish et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5212621 | Panter | May 1993 | A |
5408690 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5564086 | Cygan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
6178310 | Jeong, II | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6657595 | Phillips et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6989745 | Milinusic et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7009944 | Hulbert | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7053629 | Nevermann | May 2006 | B2 |
7062288 | Raaf et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7071776 | Forrester et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7124193 | Raaf et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7146139 | Nevermann | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7151382 | Kean et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7162264 | Vance | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167093 | Fergusson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7541874 | Maeda et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7729715 | Love et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7917175 | Song et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8063375 | Cobbinah et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8134461 | Van Doorn | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8208423 | Liu et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8213982 | Marlett et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8269511 | Jordan | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8324549 | Romero et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8326385 | Brogle et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8401851 | Bushey | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8417296 | Caballero et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8432322 | Amm et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8442572 | Borran et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8466839 | Schlub et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8483632 | Arsani et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8515496 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520586 | Husted et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8547952 | Liu et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548388 | Chiu et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559999 | Hu et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565205 | Ho et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577289 | Schlub et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8630596 | Harel et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8723531 | Harrison | May 2014 | B2 |
8723749 | Lin et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8775103 | Jayaraj et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8775193 | Schnell et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8781437 | Ngai et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8792930 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8798695 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8860526 | Manssen et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8922443 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8975903 | Salter et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9325355 | Pecen et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9337833 | Siska | May 2016 | B2 |
9466872 | Sanchez et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9531420 | Prendergast et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9785174 | Khawand et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9871544 | Mercer et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10044095 | Mercer et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
20020009976 | Rashidi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020039028 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020175814 | Wadlow et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030064732 | McDowell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030064761 | Nevermann | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030203720 | Oosawa | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210203 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214310 | McIntosh | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030228846 | Berliner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040021608 | Kojima et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040075613 | Jarmuszewski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040108957 | Umehara et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113847 | Qi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040160378 | Abrams et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040219893 | Takano | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040222925 | Fabrega-Sanchez et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050017906 | Man et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050093624 | Forrester et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050184914 | Ollikainen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060244663 | Fleck et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070037619 | Matsunaga et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070111681 | Alberth, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120745 | Qi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122307 | Da Costa et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080051165 | Burgan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055160 | Kim et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080158065 | Wee | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080218493 | Patten et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080254836 | Qi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090033562 | Takeuchi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090047998 | Alberth, Jr. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090230884 | Van Doorn | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253459 | Naganuma et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090295648 | Dorsey et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090305742 | Caballero | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325511 | Kim | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100026664 | Geaghan | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052997 | Kan et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100056210 | Bychkov et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100067419 | Liu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100113111 | Wong et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100234058 | Hu et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234081 | Wong et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279751 | Pourseyed et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100283671 | Levin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100283691 | Su et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100317302 | Greenwood et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321325 | Springer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001675 | Lee | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012793 | Amm et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012794 | Schlub et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110043408 | Shi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110063042 | Mendolia et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110117973 | Asrani et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124363 | Calvarese et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110157077 | Martin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110199267 | Hayashi | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110222469 | Ali et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110250928 | Schlub et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110298669 | Rao | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120021707 | Forrester et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120021800 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120023225 | Imes et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120032951 | Lee et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044115 | McCaughey et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120071195 | Chakraborty et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120074961 | Herrmann | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120077538 | Yun | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120108188 | Matsumoto | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133561 | Konanur et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147801 | Ho et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120164962 | Lin et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172079 | Baldemair et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120178494 | Haim et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190398 | Leukkunen | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120214422 | Shi et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223865 | Li et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120231784 | Kazmi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120270519 | Ngai et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120270592 | Ngai et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120276861 | Isobe et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120295554 | Greene et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120298497 | Maeda et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299772 | Shtrom et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120315847 | Li et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329517 | Elin | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329524 | Kent et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130005413 | Brogle et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016621 | Kil et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130026846 | Gianesello et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033400 | Chiang | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130045700 | Stallman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050046 | Jarvis et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051261 | Kazmi et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060517 | Sanchez | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130120257 | Park et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130122827 | Ali et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127677 | Lin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133827 | Cho | May 2013 | A1 |
20130137487 | Sato | May 2013 | A1 |
20130149957 | Desclos et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130157564 | Curtis et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169348 | Shi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178167 | Lockerbie et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178174 | Geris et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130203363 | Gratt et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210477 | Peter | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130217342 | Abdul-gaffoor et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130241670 | Mikhemar et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130278474 | Lenormand et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293244 | Leek | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300618 | Yarga et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310105 | Sagae et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310106 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130314365 | Woolley et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130335291 | Judson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140015547 | Bottomley et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140015595 | Van Ausdall et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140021801 | Kao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140071008 | Desclos et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078094 | Yang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140087663 | Burchill et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140280450 | Luna | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098491 | Wang | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098693 | Tabet et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140066124 | Novet | May 2014 | A1 |
20140128032 | Muthukumar | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139380 | Ouyang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140141733 | Wong et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140152121 | Ku | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140155000 | Erkens | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140159980 | Finegold | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173269 | Varoglu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176938 | Yang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177371 | Abbasi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140206297 | Schlub et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140274188 | Thorson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274189 | Moller et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292587 | Yarga et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140307570 | Hong | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140315592 | Schlub et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140357207 | Ma | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140357313 | Mercer et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140370929 | Khawand et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150022206 | Adolf et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150031408 | Kalla et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150053575 | Bridges et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150141080 | Standing | May 2015 | A1 |
20150169093 | Nakao | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150177371 | Abbasi et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150199042 | Standing et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150200444 | Mercer et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150201385 | Mercer et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150201387 | Khawand et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150288074 | Harper et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150382307 | Harper et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160028234 | Watanabe | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160049978 | Mercer et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160098053 | Khawand et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160164563 | Khawand et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160064801 | Lee et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160204836 | Lee et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170093504 | Sutskover et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180209817 | Harper et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212313 | Harper | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1123476 | May 1996 | CN |
1179864 | Apr 1998 | CN |
100504407 | Sep 2006 | CN |
102064812 | May 2011 | CN |
102077234 | May 2011 | CN |
202276339 | Jun 2012 | CN |
102714346 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102835036 | Dec 2012 | CN |
103248747 | Aug 2013 | CN |
103270799 | Aug 2013 | CN |
103688575 | Mar 2014 | CN |
103703840 | Apr 2014 | CN |
0843421 | May 1998 | EP |
1298809 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1469550 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1732167 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2015548 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2276108 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2381527 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2383364 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2405534 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2410661 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2509229 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2568605 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2787780 | Oct 2014 | EP |
2293277 | Mar 1996 | GB |
2380359 | Apr 2003 | GB |
2409345 | Jun 2005 | GB |
2002043957 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2007194995 | Aug 2007 | JP |
200042797 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0148848 | Jul 2001 | WO |
200148858 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2004015813 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004091046 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005018046 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2007043150 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2009149023 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011051554 | May 2011 | WO |
2011058128 | May 2011 | WO |
2012152103 | Feb 2012 | WO |
2012061582 | May 2012 | WO |
2012091651 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012109952 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012113754 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012122113 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012122116 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2012143936 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012176217 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013011352 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013101106 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013103948 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013141791 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013165419 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013169527 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014036532 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2015134117 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016111897 | Jul 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/072414; dated Mar. 23, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/072413, dated Mar. 24, 2016, 7 pages. |
Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/052769, dated Jul. 7, 2016, 5 Pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2015/037563, dated Sep. 13, 2016, 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2015/052769, dated Sep. 29, 2016, 16 pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/062851”, dated Oct. 28, 2016, 8 Pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2015/062851, dated Feb. 22, 2017, 19 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/069056, dated Mar. 31, 2017, 17 pages. |
Mercer, et al., “Dynamic Antenna Power Control for Multi-Context Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,964, filed Jan. 5, 2016, 52 pages. |
Standing, et al., “Radiofrequency-Wave-Transparent Capacitive Sensor Pad”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/384,742, filed Dec. 20, 2016, 26 pages. |
Harper et al., “Active Proximity Sensor With Adaptive Electric Field Control”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/413,196, filed Jan. 23, 2016, 35 pages. Harper et al., “Active Proximity Sensor With Adaptive Electric Field Control”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/413,196, filed Jan. 23, 2017, 35 pages. |
Harper, “Loop Antenna With Integrated Proximity Sensing”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/412,997, filed Jan. 23, 2017, 32 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,351, dated Feb. 20, 2015, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,088, dated Mar. 23, 2015, 37 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,652, dated Jul. 16, 2015, 9 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,086, dated Jul. 22, 2015, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,529, dated Sep. 22, 2015, 18 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, dated Sep. 23, 2015, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,086, dated Nov. 30, 2015, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/562,212, dated Dec. 18, 2015, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/927,287, dated Dec. 21, 2015, 28 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,652, dated Dec. 23, 2015, 9 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,320, dated Jan. 21, 2016, 9 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,529, dated Jan. 22, 2016, 18 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, dated Mar. 2, 2016, 20 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/152,652, dated Apr. 18, 2016 9 pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/927,287”, dated May 11, 2016, 34 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,866, dated May 19, 2016, 7 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, dated Jun. 14, 2016, 21 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/562,212, dated Jun. 17, 2016, 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,478, dated Jul. 1, 2016, 10 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,320, dated Jul. 29, 2016, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/086,866, dated Oct. 17, 2016, 7 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846, dated Oct. 26, 2016, 25 pages. |
Ban, et al., “A Dual-Loop Antenna Design for Hepta-Band WWAN/LTE Metal-Rimmed Smartphone Applications”, In Journal of IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, Issue 1, Jan. 2015, 8 pages. |
Curto, et al., “Circular Loop Antenna Operating at 434 MHz for Medical Applications: Loop-Tissue Interaction”, In Proceeding of: Irish Signals and Systems Conference, Jul. 2006, 6 pages. |
Chung, et al., “A dual-mode antenna for wireless charging and Near Field Communication”, In Proceedings of EEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Jul. 24, 2015, 5 pages. |
Design of Printed Trace Differential Loop Antennas, http://www.silabs.com/Support%20Documents/TechnicalDocs/AN639.pdf, Retrieved on: Nov. 17, 2016, 28 pages. |
“Digital, Silicon Microphone has 2.6 X 1.6mm2 Footprint”, Published on: Dec. 28, 2005, Available at: http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/Digital-Silicon-Microphone-has-2-6-x-1-6-mm-footprint-471386. |
Hochwald, et al “Minimizing Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation in Portable Devices”, In Proceedings of Information Theory and Applications Workshop, Feb. 5, 2012, pp. 7. |
Holopainen, et al., “Broadband Equivalent Circuit Model for Capacitive Coupling Element-Based Mobile Terminal Antenna”, In IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 9, Jul. 8, 2010, 4 pages. |
I.B. Bonev et al, “Parametric Study of Antenna with Parasitic Element for Improving the Hearing Aids Compatibility of Mobile Phones and the Specific Absorption Rate in the Head”, Proceedings in Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Marrakesh, Morocco, Mar. 20-23, 2011, 5 pages. |
“Low SAR Solution for Tablet PC”, Published on: Sep. 27, 2011, Available at: http://www.auden.com.tw/TRC/webspace/disk/AudenSARSolutiondatasheet_110927.pdf. |
Monebhurrun, et al., “A Novel Measurement Procedure for the Specific Absorption Rate Conformity Assessment of WiFi Devices”, In Proceedings of Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, Dec. 1, 2009, pp. 401-404. |
Mrazovac, “Reaching the Next Level of Indoor Human Presence Detection: An RF Based Solution”, 11th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, Oct. 16, 2013, 4 pages. |
Mumcu, et al., “Small Wideband Double-Loop Antennas Using Lumped Inductors and Coupling Capacitors”, In Journal of IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 10, Feb. 4, 2011, 5 pages. |
Myllymaki, “Capacitive Antenna Sensor for User Proximity Recognition”; Academic dissertation to be presented with the assent of the Doctoral Training Committee of Technology and Natural Sciences of the University of Oulu for public defence in Arina-sali (Auditorium TA105), Linnanmaa, dated Nov. 30, 2012, 59 pages. |
Osoinach, Bryce, “Proximity Capacitive Sensor Technology for Touch Sensing Applications”, In White Paper of Proximity Sensing, 2007, 7 pages. |
Ozyalcin, et al., “SAR Simulations in Wireless Communication and Safety Discussions in the Society”, In Proceedings of Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, vol. 10, Issue 2, Dec. 31, 2013, 16 pages. |
Pal, et al., “A low-profile switched-beam dual-band capacitively coupled Square Loop Antenna”, In Proceedings of Antennas and Propagation Conference, Nov. 11, 2013, 5 Pages. |
Pal, et al., “Dual-Band Low-Profile Capacitively Coupled Beam-Steerable Square-Loop Antenna”, In Journal of IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, Issue 3, Mar. 2014, pp. 1204-1211. |
Poutanen, “Interaction Between Mobile Terminal Antenna and User” Helsinki University of Technology Master's Thesis, Oct. 9, 2007, 100 pages. |
Poutanen, et al., “Behavior of Mobile Terminal Antennas near Human Tissue at a Wide Frequency Range”, In International Workshop on Antenna Technology: Small Antennas and Novel Metamaterials, Mar. 4, 2008, 4 pages. |
Quddious, et al., “An inkjet printed meandered dipole antenna for RF passive sensing applications”, In Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Apr. 2016, 4 Pages. |
Rogerson, James, “Samsung reveals a folding phone-to-tablet prototype”, http://www.techradar.com/us/news/phone-and-communications/mobile..nes/samsung-reveals-a-folding-phone-to-tablet-prototype-1197384,7 pages. |
“SAR Evaluation Considerations for Laptop, Notebook, Netbook and Tablet Computers,” Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division, May 28, 2013, 14 pages. |
“Semtech Launches Smart Proximity Sensor for Short-Range Human Presence Detection & SAR Regulations in Mobile & Tablet PC Applications”, Published on: Jul. 24, 2012, Available at: http://www.semtech.com/Press-Releases/2012/Semtech-Launches-Smart-Proximity-Sensor-for-Short-Range-Human-Presence-Detection-SAR-Regulations-in-Mobile-Tablet-PC-Applications.html. |
Sterner, et al., “Development of an Antenna Sensor for Occupant Detection in Passenger Transportation”, In Proceedings of Procedia Engineering, vol. 47, Sep. 9, 2012, 6 pages. |
Toit, Riaan Du, “Using Proximity Sensing to Meet Mobile Device FCC SAR Reulations”, Published on: Apr. 17, 2012, Available at: http://www.eetimes.com/General/PrintView/431201. |
Office Action Issued in United Kingdom Patent Application No. 1219096.3, dated Jan. 28, 2016, 4 Pages. |
Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201380055749.X, dated Jun. 6, 2016, 12 Pages. |
Office Action Issued in Columbian Patent Application No. NC2016/0000122, dated Aug. 19, 2016, 2 Pages. |
First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480031132.9, dated Nov. 2, 2016, 10 Pages. |
Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480033869.4, dated Dec. 19, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201380055749.X”, dated Jan. 25, 2017, 10 Pages. |
Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480063903.02, dated Apr. 19, 2017, 11 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/066441, dated Dec. 12, 2013, 12 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/042023, dated Aug. 29, 2014, 11 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/039479, dated Sep. 19, 2014, 11 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/065856, dated Feb. 4, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Second Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2014/042023, dated Mar. 2, 2015, 6 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report for PCT/US2014/072411, dated Mar. 27, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/072412, dated Mar. 30, 2015, 12 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/072414, dated Apr. 14, 2015, 9 Pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US2013/066441, dated May 7, 2015, 9 pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US2014/039479, dated Jun. 15, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/072413, dated Jul. 16, 2015, 16 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/037563, dated Aug. 31, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Searching Authority, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Second International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/072412; dated Oct. 5, 2015, 11 pages. |
Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/072411, dated Nov. 26, 2015, 7 Pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/US2014/072412, dated Dec. 4, 2015, 5 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/US2014/072414 dated Dec. 9, 2015, 29 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Second Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority for PCT/US2014/072413 dated Dec. 17, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Seraching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/062851, dated Feb. 5, 2016, 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/065856, dated Feb. 10, 2016, 14 pages. |
International Searching Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/052769, dated Feb. 17, 2016, 27 pages. |
International Preliminary Report of Patentability issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/072412; dated Mar. 22, 2016, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2014/072411; dated Mar. 23, 2016, 8 pages. |
“Restriction Requirement Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/905,088”, dated Jan. 9, 2015, 9 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846”, dated Jul. 7, 2017, 27 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846”, dated Sep. 26, 2017, 28 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/918,846”, dated Jan. 9, 2017, 24 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/024232”, dated Jun. 15, 2018, 11 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,478”, dated Dec. 2, 2016, 9 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,478”, dated Feb. 10, 2017, 11 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,964”, dated Nov. 15, 2017, 8 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201380055749.X”, dated Jun. 12, 2017, 8 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480031132.9”, dated Jul. 26, 2017, 11 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480033869.4”, dated Aug. 21, 2017, 4 Pages. |
“First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580054069.5”, dated Oct. 18, 2017, 17 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580054069.5”, dated Jun. 4, 2018, 7 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/042023”, dated May 22, 2015, 7 Pages. |
“Invitation to Pay Additional Fee Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/052769”, dated Dec. 4, 2015, 8 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 14742612.6”, dated Nov. 20, 2018, 5 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180287650 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62511741 | May 2017 | US | |
62480114 | Mar 2017 | US |